From: eribsskog@gmail.com Erik Ribsskog
To: Michael.Rimer@legalservices.gov.uk Michael Rimer
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2007 11:20:51 +0000
Subject: Re: Your e-mail (complaint about a duty solicitor)
Hi,
thank you very much for your answer!
Well, in April, I called the Law Society about the problems, and they
adviced me
to bring the complaints through their complaint-procedure.
Now, about six months later, the Law Society tells me that it is the LSC,
who
should have dealt with these complaints.
The complaints are regarding poor service and unprofessional conduct, from
law-firms,
in conection with duty solicitor meetings, being set up by the CAB.
I’m going to enclose a copy of the two complaints that I sent the Law
Society.
One complaint regarding the Morecrofts Solicitors firm, and one complaint
regarding
the EAD solicitors firm.
So I’m looking forward to hearing more from you, regarding how I should go
forward
with these complaints.
Thanks in advance for the help!
Yours sincerely,
Erik Ribsskog
On 11/8/07, Michael Rimer
>
> Dear Mr Ribsskog
>
> Your email has been referred to me as you appear to have had some
> difficulties in finding out where to make a complaint about a duty
> solicitor who assisted you recently. I am a lawyer in the LSC’s head
> office legal department.
>
> I am not clear from your email what it is exactly that you were unhappy
> about the duty solicitor who assisted you. Did the duty solicitor see
> you at a police station? Or did the duty solicitor see you at the
> magistrates’ court? If you outlined very briefly the nature of your
> complaint about the solicitor, i.e., what he did that you thought was
> wrong, or what he didn’t do that you think he ought to have done, that
> would be helpful.
>
> I am mindful to suggest that you make a complaint to the firm directly.
> Usually, a complaint against a solicitor is best made to the senior or
> managing partner at the solicitor’s firm. Otherwise, the solicitor whom
> you are unhappy about wont know what it is he has done wrong, in your
> view. Depending on the firm’s response, the Customer Service Team
> (whom you originally emailed about this) will be in a better position to
> say whether your complaint should be referred to the firm’s account
> manager at the Legal Services Commission, or whether it should be dealt
> with by the Law Society’s Legal Complaint Service.
>
> Kind regards
>
> Michael
>
>
>
> Michael Rimer
> Legal Adviser
> Corporate Legal Team
> Legal Services Commission
> 85 Gray’s Inn Road,
> London WC1X 8TX
>
> DX 328 Chancery Lane
>
> Note: The email may contain confidential legal advice which is likely
> to be subject to legal professional privilege and which may be exempt
> from disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act. Please contact the
> author or the Commission’s Legal Director to seek authorisation before
> disclosing this email outside the Commission.”
>
>
>
>
> >>> “Erik Ribsskog”
> Hi,
>
> I can’t see that I have recieved an answer to this e-mail yet, thats
> why I’m
> trying to send it again.
>
> Yours sincerely,
>
> Erik Ribsskog
>
> ———- Forwarded message ———-
> From: Erik Ribsskog
> Date: Oct 19, 2007 4:36 PM
> Subject: Re: Your e-mail
> To: Legal LSC
>
>
> Hi,
>
> thank you very much for your answer.
>
> I will now try to summarise the corespondce I’ve been having with you
> and
> Simon Williams from the Legal Complaints Service.
>
> Simon Williams (The Legal Complaints Service) says that I should
> contact the
> LSC to complain about
> a duty solicitor.
>
> And you (The LSC) are saying that I should contact The Legal
> Complaints
> Service to complain about
> a duty solicitor.
>
> So I’m not sure how to conclude this summary.
>
> Could you please confirm again who I should contact if I want to
> formally
> complain about poor service
> and uprofessional conduct from a law-firm in connection with the duty
> solicitors scheme.
>
> Because Simon Williams from The Legal Complaints Service is writing
> this in
> a letter from 26/9:
>
> ‘Here, a meeting under the duty solicitors programme is unlikely to be
> something done under a retainer
> (that is, a relationship between solicitor and client), as duty
> solicitors
> are those who provide assistance
> to those who are without representation
>
> […]
>
> As you are not a client of EAD, this office is unable to consider your
> complaint. I will, therefore, take
> steps to close this file’.
>
> So it’s obvious that the Legal Complaints Service aren’t looking at
> complaints against law-firms in
> connection to the duty solicitors scheme.
>
> Williams, write in an e-mail from 2/10:
>
> ‘ *Q2: If not, then who is it one are supposed to complain to, about
> poor
> service/unprofessional* *conduct, by law-firms, in connection with the
> Dury
> Solicitors scheme?*
>
> I have looked into this matter and would suggest that you refer to
> this
> website:
>
> http://www.legalservices.gov.uk/aboutus/regions/liverpool_information.asp
>
>
> It contains information and contact details of the Merseyside Duty
> Solicitors scheme and I hope that you will find it useful.
>
> I should also note that the Legal Services Commission is an
> organisation
> wholly separate from the Law Society and, if you have any specific
> questions
> in relation to the procedures, you should direct them to the LSC,
> rather
> than our Office.’.
>
> So he’s saying that the LCS should deal with the complaint.
>
> Is this correct?
>
> Who could I ask for advice/help regarding this, since I’m being in a
> way
> ‘thrown around’ here, from one organisation to the
> other.
>
>
> Also, you are writing that:
>
> ‘In regards to our customer-helpline, it is more than likely that
> there
> was a miscommunication or misunderstanding between you and my
> colleague
> as a list of law firms can be accessed easily through a search on the
> CLS Legal Adviser Directory.’.
>
>
> So you are writing that since you have an online directory, then it
> can’t be
> something wrong
> in regards to your customer-helpline’s advice.
>
> I can’t see that it’s an excuse for giving wrong advice (giving me the
> phone-numbers to law-firms
> in Wales), I can’t see that this can be excused by you also having an
> online
> directory.
>
> What is the point of having a customer-helpline, if one can’t trust
> the
> advice?
>
> Since like you are writing, you also have an online directory, so this
> fact
> means that any mistakes
> the helpline makes, must be misunderstandings.
>
> I don’t see the logic in this.
>
> I think you must be mistaking.
>
> Even if you have an online directory, I don’t see how this explains
> mistakes
> from your helpline.
>
> It’s not a valid excuse I mean.
>
> If I go to Tesco and say I got the wrong change back.
>
> Then Tesco can’t say that, of it must be a misunderstanding because you
> have
> paid by debit-card.
>
> Thats the same reasoning to me.
>
> So it would be very fine, if you could please confirm that I’ve
> understood
> your excuse right.
>
> Because in that case, I don’t think it’s a valid excuse, and I would
> please
> like to complain about it.
>
> I hope that this is alright!
>
> Thank you very much for your answer again!
>
> Yours sincerely,
>
> Erik Ribsskog
>
>
>
>
> On 10/19/07, Legal LSC
> >
> > Our ref: KPL/MISC/07/07/70 (5)
> > Date: 19 October 2007
> >
> >
> > Dear Mr Ribbskog,
> >
> > Thank you for your e-mail on 16 October 2007.
> >
> > You are always welcome to put forward an informal complaint regarding
> a
> > duty solicitor’s poor service and/or misconduct, in connection with
> > the Local Duty Solicitors Scheme, to the Account Manager of our
> relevant
> > regional office. They will be happy to investigate your complaint
> and
> > will communicate with the duty solicitor involved to clarify the
> areas
> > of your complaint and endeavor to resolve the issue.
> >
> > However, it is not within our capacity or powers to enforce any
> actions
> > upon the relevant duty solicitor in regards to their poor service
> and/or
> > misconduct.
> >
> > For complaints on the poor service and/or misconduct of any
> solicitor
> > to be dealt with formally and with enforceable actions, you must
> direct
> > your complaints to the Law Society’s Legal Complaints Service (LCS),
> > who are an independent complaints handling body that deals with all
> > formal complaints against solicitors. Even though they are part of
> the
> > Law Society, they operate independently.
> >
> > Further details on the LCS are available at the following website:
> >
> > http://www.legalcomplaints.org.uk/home.page
> >
> > Both the above options are available to you and it is your decision
> on
> > where you want to direct your complaint and how it is resolved.
> >
> > In regards to our customer-helpline, it is more than likely that
> there
> > was a miscommunication or misunderstanding between you and my
> colleague
> > as a list of law firms can be accessed easily through a search on
> the
> > CLS Legal Adviser Directory.
> >
> > I hope the above is of assistance to you.
> >
> > Yours sincerely
> >
> >
> > Ka Poh Ling
> > Central Customer Services Unit
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> ***********************************************************************************
> > Disclaimer
> >
> > This email (and any attachment(s)) is private and intended solely for
> the
> > use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. Its
> > unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted.
> If you
> > are not the intended recipient please destroy all copies and inform
> the
> > sender by return e-mail.
> >
> > Internet e-mail is not a secure medium, as messages can be
> intercepted and
> > read by someone else. Please bear this in mind when deciding whether
> to
> > send information by e-mail. Postal addresses for the Legal Services
> > Commission are available from
> > http://www.legalservices.gov.uk/aboutus/regions/regions.asp
> >
> > The Legal Services Commission reserves the right to monitor, record
> and
> > retain any incoming and outgoing emails for security reasons and for
> > monitoring internal compliance with the Legal Services Commission
> policy on
> > staff use. Email monitoring and/or blocking software may be used and
> email
> > content may be read. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are
> not
> > broken when writing or forwarding emails and their contents. No
> contracts
> > can be entered into on our behalf by email.
> >
> > Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do
> not
> > necessarily represent those of the Legal Services Commission.
> >
> > The Legal Services Commission checks all mails and attachments for
> known
> > viruses; however, you are advised that you open any attachments at
> your own
> > risk.
> >
> >
>
> ***********************************************************************************
> >
>
>
> ************************************************************************************
> Disclaimer
>
> This e-mail (and any attachment(s)) is private and intended solely for the
> use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. Its unauthorised
> use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the
> intended recipient please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return
> e-mail.
>
> Internet e-mail is not a secure medium, as messages can be intercepted and
> read by someone else. Please bear this in mind when deciding whether to send
> information by e-mail. Postal addresses for the Legal Services Commission
> are available from http://www.legalservices.gov.uk/aboutus/regions.asp
>
> The Legal Services Commission reserves the right to monitor, record and
> retain any incoming and outgoing e-mails for security reasons and for
> monitoring internal compliance with the Legal Services Commission policy on
> staff use. E-mail monitoring and/or blocking software may be used and e-mail
> content may be read. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken
> when writing or forwarding e-mails and their contents. No contracts can be
> entered into on our behalf by e-mail.
>
> Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not
> necessarily represent those of the Legal Services Commission.
>
> The Legal Services Commission checks all e-mails and attachments for known
> viruses, however, you are advised that you open any attachments at your own
> risk.
>
> ************************************************************************************
>
>