johncons

Måned: april 2008

  • Parabol-anlegg på Bergeråsen. (In Norwegian).

    Når jeg bodde på Bergeråsen, så var det avstemning på Bergeråsen Vel, i det gamle klasserommet vårt, når vi gikk i 6. klasse, om vi skulle ha Sky Channel og Super Channel på Bergeråsen.

    Og da skulle alle i klassen stemme.

    Det var vel da vi gikk i 9. klasse eller noe kanskje.

    Men det tok et eller to år etter dette, før vi fikk parabol på byggefeltet.

    Og da gadd ikke Odd Einar å dra.

    Men han sa at han sendte meg til å stemme istedet.

    Men jeg hadde jo allerede sagt at jeg skulle stemme.

    De som ville ha satelitttv, de vant med ca 2/3 flertall.

    Fattern betalte ikke vel-avgifta.

    Så det kom noen protester på at jeg hadde stemt seinere, siden fattern ikke betalte avgifta.

    Men forslaget for satelitt-tv, gikk gjennom.

    Det var blandt annet han Uglum fra Havnehagen vel, og søstra til Espen i klassen, som holdt tale for satelitt-tv.

    Og noen trøtte lærere og andre sosialister, eller noe, stemte mot.

    Så så mange folk tror jeg det aldri har vært i det klasserommet, ved siden av gymsalen, hvor fattern og Håkon bygde scenen, hvis den står der enda.

    En scene av tre man kunne montere fra hverandre, og montere inn langs veggen.

    Og så bygge opp, når det var 17. mai og sånn.

    Og da heiv vi ut Ole og Erland i klassen husker jeg.

    Når jeg og Tommy hjalp fattern og Håkon å holde noe greier.

    Jeg var litt irritert, for jeg skjønte at jeg kom til å høre det, at Ole og Erland ble hivi ut.

    Så jeg var ikke så flink til å holde scenen, så fattern fikk scenen i ryggen.

    Så det var ikke så bra.

    Men jeg fikk ikke forklart det her med at det var Erland, sønnen til rektoren osv., for da hadde dem sikkert fått lov å være.

    Men det var litt sånn stressa stemning der, og sikker en del av arbeidet som man måtte være konsentrert under da, så da var det ikke så populært om man prata for mye.

    Men sånn er det.

    Men Odd Einar har visst begynt med satelitt-greier nå da.

    Så han synes det var kult selv om han ikke var på møtet.

  • Odd’s Satelittservice. (In Norwegian).

    Odd’s Satelittservice Odd Einar Pettersen
    Kontaktinformasjon: Odd’s Satelittservice Odd Einar Pettersen
    Gateadresse: Sørjordet 35 Poststed: 3060 Svelvik
    Orgnr.: 977052939
    Etableringsdato: 20.02.1997
    Kommune: 0711 Svelvik Fylke: Vestfold
    Telefon: Telefax:
    Bransjer: Engroshandel med radio og fjernsyn

    Virksomhetsbeskrivelse: satelitt

    http://www.summa.no/index.php?cmd=show_company&kundenr=712869

  • Telefon forrige uke. (In Norwegian).

    Jeg husker fattern ringte i forrige uke.

    Så spurte han hvorfor jeg ikke flytta tilbake til Norge, siden jeg hadde så bra CV osv.

    Så sa jeg det, at jeg dreiv med en sånn Arvato, harassment at work case, osv.

    Og at jeg ikke visste hva som foregikk i forbindelse med det her mafia greiene osv.

    Så sa jeg også det, at det var noen damer på jobben, som hadde vært sykmeldt i to måneder osv., som jeg lurte på hva som hadde skjedd med.

    Så sa fattern, at det var mye misbruk i forbindelse med sånt.

    Med sykelønnsordninger osv.

    Så det bare kom jeg på nå.

    Han sa han hadde begynt med noe distribusjon osv.

    Så det er bra det at han har fått seg jobb osv.

    Selv om han prater litt rart noen ganger.

    Men man kan jo ikke skjønne alt.

  • E-mail to the Ministry of Justice, 7/8/08.

    From: eribsskog@gmail.com Erik Ribsskog
    To: Ryan.Holmes@justice.gsi.gov.uk Holmes, Ryan
    Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 16:28:40 +0100
    Subject: Re:

    Hi,

    thank you very much for your answer!

    You write that I should seek legal advice.

    But thats what these problems are about.

    That there has been problems, surrounding that I have been trying to get
    legal advice.

    I’m really a refugee, from Norway, I think I must say, so I haven’t got that
    much fonds.

    So I can’t finance a court-case myself, so I try to get help through the
    legal aid program
    etc., since I was sent by the Police to the CAB, to bring the harassment at
    work-case up
    for the Crowns Court, like they said.

    But then all the problems started, that led me to the Ministry of Justice,
    in the way explained
    in the earlier correspondence.

    So I’m not really sure how I should go forward, regarding bringing this up
    in the legal-system,
    since I haven’t really managed to get any help from this system.

    But maybe I should try once more, with this case.

    I was just wondering if you have any advice on how you think I should go
    forward with this, when
    I’m a refugee from Norway, and haven’t got that much fonds.

    Thank you very much in advance for any advice!

    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

    On 4/7/08, Holmes, Ryan wrote:
    >
    > Dear Mr Ribsskog
    >
    > Thank you for your email of 19 March, addressed to the Ministry of
    > Justice, regarding making a complaint against the Legal Services Ombudsman
    > (LSO). The letter has been forwarded to the Legal Services Regulation and
    > Redress Division as we are responsible for the policy relating to this
    > matter.
    >
    > While I am sorry to hear of the difficulties you have experienced, I
    > should explain from the outset that the legal profession is both independent
    > and self-regulating and therefore, neither Ministers nor their officials are
    > able to intervene in, or comment on individual cases.
    >
    > Similarly, the Legal Services Ombudsman (LSO) is independent of both the
    > legal profession and the Government and, in order to preserve that
    > independence, Ministers and officials are not able to comment on, intervene
    > in, or vary her conclusions. However, with regard to your query about the
    > complaints procedure of the LSO, if you do have a complaint about the
    > service that the Ombudsman provides – for example, they failed to reply to
    > your correspondence or did not answer your telephone calls – you should
    > write to their Corporate Services Manager. She will investigate your
    > complaint, and provide you with a response within ten working days.
    > However, the Corporate Services Manager has no authority to review decisions
    > taken by the Ombudsman. If you have a complaint about the Ombudsman’s
    > report, you should address your concerns to the Ombudsman.
    >
    > If you wish to complain about the service you have received from the LSO
    > (but not the decision – see below) you must contact your MP who will decide
    > whether to pass the complaint on to the Parliamentary and Health Services
    > Ombudsman (PHSP). The PHSO can look at the service you have received and,
    > if it finds any evidence of poor service, can take action to put the matter
    > right. There is usually a twelve month limit, from the time you were aware
    > that there was a reason to complain, upon this kind of complaint. The
    > Ombudsman’s powers and responsibilities are set out in an Act of Parliament
    > (the Parliamentary Commissioner Act 1967) which says that complaints must be
    > sent to them through Members of Parliament.
    >
    > There is no appeal against the LSO’s decision. However, the LSO’s
    > decisions, like the decisions of other public authorities, are open to
    > judicial review and you may consider taking your case to the High Court in
    > order to have a judicial review of the LSO’s decision. It is important to
    > bear in mind that judicial review is not an appeal procedure and is not
    > generally concerned with the merits of the decision. Instead, it examines
    > whether the decision reached by a public body was done in a lawful manner.
    > Therefore, I would recommend that you seek independent legal advice should
    > you wish to pursue this course of action.
    >
    > Additionally, you may be interested to know that the Government has
    > brought forward legislation to overhaul the regulatory structure of legal
    > services in England and Wales. The Legal Services Act 2007 provides for the
    > creation of the Legal Services Board (the Board), a single oversight body,
    > independent of both the Government and the legal professions. It will be a
    > publicly accountable body with the power to enforce high standards in the
    > legal sector, replacing the current maze of regulators with overlapping
    > responsibilities. Its Chair and the majority of its members will be lay
    > persons.
    >
    > The Act will also establish a single and fully independent Office for
    > Legal Complaints (OLC). Its Chair and the Majority of its members will also
    > be lay. The OLC will administer an ombudsman scheme providing a single
    > point of entry for consistent handling of all consumer complaints about
    > providers of regulated legal services. This will replace the current system
    > whereby complaints against the different types of legal professionals are
    > handled by their own representative bodies.
    >
    > I am sorry that I cannot be of more assistance, although I do hope that
    > this information is of some use to you.
    >
    > Yours sincerely,
    >
    > *Ryan Holmes*
    >
    > *Legal Services Regulation and Redress Division*
    >
    > This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of the
    > addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not
    > permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies
    > and inform the sender by return e-mail.
    >
    > Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be
    > intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding
    > whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail.
    >
    > This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be
    > monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail
    > monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read
    > at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when
    > composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.
    > The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government
    > Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless in
    > partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2007/11/0032.) On
    > leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.
    > Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
    > recorded for legal purposes.
    >
    >

  • E-mail from the Ministry of Justice, 7/4/08.

    From: Ryan.Holmes@justice.gsi.gov.uk Holmes, Ryan
    To: eribsskog@gmail.com
    Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 16:09:19 +0100
    Subject:

    Dear Mr Ribsskog

    Thank you for your email of 19 March, addressed to the Ministry of Justice, regarding making a complaint against the Legal Services Ombudsman (LSO). The letter has been forwarded to the Legal Services Regulation and Redress Division as we are responsible for the policy relating to this matter.

    While I am sorry to hear of the difficulties you have experienced, I should explain from the outset that the legal profession is both independent and self-regulating and therefore, neither Ministers nor their officials are able to intervene in, or comment on individual cases.

    Similarly, the Legal Services Ombudsman (LSO) is independent of both the legal profession and the Government and, in order to preserve that independence, Ministers and officials are not able to comment on, intervene in, or vary her conclusions. However, with regard to your query about the complaints procedure of the LSO, if you do have a complaint about the service that the Ombudsman provides – for example, they failed to reply to your correspondence or did not answer your telephone calls – you should write to their Corporate Services Manager. She will investigate your complaint, and provide you with a response within ten working days. However, the Corporate Services Manager has no authority to review decisions taken by the Ombudsman. If you have a complaint about the Ombudsman’s report, you should address your concerns to the Ombudsman.

    If you wish to complain about the service you have received from the LSO (but not the decision – see below) you must contact your MP who will decide whether to pass the complaint on to the Parliamentary and Health Services Ombudsman (PHSP). The PHSO can look at the service you have received and, if it finds any evidence of poor service, can take action to put the matter right. There is usually a twelve month limit, from the time you were aware that there was a reason to complain, upon this kind of complaint. The Ombudsman’s powers and responsibilities are set out in an Act of Parliament (the Parliamentary Commissioner Act 1967) which says that complaints must be sent to them through Members of Parliament.

    There is no appeal against the LSO’s decision. However, the LSO’s decisions, like the decisions of other public authorities, are open to judicial review and you may consider taking your case to the High Court in order to have a judicial review of the LSO’s decision. It is important to bear in mind that judicial review is not an appeal procedure and is not generally concerned with the merits of the decision. Instead, it examines whether the decision reached by a public body was done in a lawful manner. Therefore, I would recommend that you seek independent legal advice should you wish to pursue this course of action.

    Additionally, you may be interested to know that the Government has brought forward legislation to overhaul the regulatory structure of legal services in England and Wales. The Legal Services Act 2007 provides for the creation of the Legal Services Board (the Board), a single oversight body, independent of both the Government and the legal professions. It will be a publicly accountable body with the power to enforce high standards in the legal sector, replacing the current maze of regulators with overlapping responsibilities. Its Chair and the majority of its members will be lay persons.

    The Act will also establish a single and fully independent Office for Legal Complaints (OLC). Its Chair and the Majority of its members will also be lay. The OLC will administer an ombudsman scheme providing a single point of entry for consistent handling of all consumer complaints about providers of regulated legal services. This will replace the current system whereby complaints against the different types of legal professionals are handled by their own representative bodies.

    I am sorry that I cannot be of more assistance, although I do hope that this information is of some use to you.

    Yours sincerely,

    Ryan Holmes
    Legal Services Regulation and Redress Division

    This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.

    This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.

    This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.

    The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2007/11/0032.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.
    Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes.

  • Post fra trykker-blogg, om vannfirma. (In Norwegian).

    Vannfirma.
    Her i desember, så var det en kar som skulle sjekke vann-måleren i leiligheten her, mente’n.

    Så ringte’n på ganske tidlig, når jeg sov på sofaen da, fordi jeg hadde jobba seint dagen før da, så sovna jeg på sofaen osv.

    Så ringer jeg vann-firmaet nå da.

    Jeg prøvde å ringe før jul og, men da fikk jeg ikke tak i noen leder der.

    Men nå sier dem at dem ikke har sendt noen folk hit 5. desember.

    Og han her, som sa han var fra United Utilities, han skulle lete etter vannmåleren under vasken på kjøkkenet, ved varmtvannsberederen i et lite rom fra soverommet, og i strøm-skapet!

    Eller i ‘electricity-cabinet’, som jeg tror det heter.

    Og det er der man skal fylle på strøm-billetter, som man kan kjøpe for £5 i butikken osv.

    Og de på United Utilities, de sa at de sjekket aldri i strøm-skapet.

    Og det kommer opp på skjermen dems at leiligheten min ikke har noen vann-måler.

    Så den personen var tydeligvis ikke fra United Utilites.

    Fordi det eneste ærendet som ville vært aktuelt da, ettersom jeg forstod, var å installere vann-måler, men da skriver de alltid brev på forhånd sa dem.

    Og det var ikke det han karen skulle, han skulle sjekke vann-måleren, som ikke fantes.

    Og det er greit nok.

    Men når han skal kikke i strøm-skapet samtidig, eller ‘the electricity-cabinet’ da, da er det noe helt på jordet, for der finner man ikke vann-målere, det sa dem når jeg ringte United Utilities nå, at de sjekker aldri i de strøm-kabinettene, eller skapene da.

    Så hva som foregår, det er vanskelig å si.

    Men det er tydelig at noe foregår.

    Og jeg har prøvd å kontakte politi i Norge og England osv. om dette, men det virker nytteløst, de er ikke interessert i å gi råd eller noe.

    I forbindelse med det her mafia-greiene fra Norge, og den Arvato-saken her i England osv. da.

    Så folks rettigheter står nok ikke så høyt i kurs nei.

    Men myndighetene har vel sitt å stri med, så menneskerettigheter og slike ting, det kommer vel ikke så høyt opp på lista da antagelig.

    Men de kan jo ikke ha tid å drive med alt, de har sikkert andre ting å drive med.

    Folk som er i myndighetene, de er i en maktposisjon ovenfor vanlige folk, og hvis de tuller med vanlige folk, så det er det maktmisbruk.

    Da tror de vel at de er Gud, og at det er dommedag da.

    Så hva skal man med Gud i bibelen og himmelen, når vi har myndighetene på jorda?

    Det er ikke mye bruk for Gud da tror jeg, når myndighetene har tatt på seg den rollen.

    Kanskje de skulle bruke mindre tid på å leke Gud, så kanskje dem hadde fått tid til å drive med menneskerettigheter og sånne ting også?

    Men men, det er jo grenser for hvor mye man kan forlange og.

    Det er helt sikkert.

    https://johncons-blogg.net/2007/12/tidligere-i-dag-rundt-kl.html

    http://johncons.trykker.com/2008/01/02/vannfirma/