johncons

Måned: mai 2008

  • Did Merseyside Police fail to help fireball murder victim Monika Szmecht?

    Did Merseyside Police fail to help fireball murder victim Monika Szmecht?

    Did police fail the fireball murder victim Monika Szmecht?
    May 10 2008 by Michelle Fiddler, Liverpool Echo

    AN INVESTIGATION was underway today to see if a Polish waitress stabbed and torched by her abusive boyfriend was given enough police protection.

    Monika Szmecht was imprisoned in a van and then driven to a remote country lane, where she was doused in petrol and set alight last June.

    Ex-soldier Anthony Clarke was jailed for life after being convicted of her murder last week.

    The Independent Police Complaints Commission is now investigating the way Merseyside Police dealt with domestic violence allegations prior to her horrific death.

    Officers from Merseyside police were in contact with Ms Szmecht and she expressed concern about Clarke’s behaviour in the days leading up to her murder.

    During Clarke’s trial, Liverpool crown court heard the 27-year-old lashed out at his ex-lover days before her death after discovering texts from another man.

    He also threatened to burn down her house – forcing her to secretly move.

    Weeks before she died, Ms Szmecht told police she had been assaulted by Clarke.

    She ended up with bruises and a fractured bone in her hand and was due to make a statement against him.

    Clarke claimed in his defence he met up with Miss Szmecht on the day she died in order to hand over £1,000 in return for her not making the statement.

    During the trial, his sister Shareen Clarke told the jury she, in fact, attacked the Polish waitress.

    On the day of her death, Clarke bundled Ms Szmecht, who at the time was living in Wellesbourne Place, Norris Green, into his van, where he kept her imprisoned for four hours.

    He then took her to an isolated country lane in Rainford and stabbed her six times.

    When she struggled to her feet Clarke, a divorced dad-of-three, doused her in petrol and set her alight.

    Merseyside police referred concerns regarding the way they dealt with Ms Szmecht and handled her allegations of domestic violence at the hands of Clarke to the IPCC on December 11 last year.

    IPCC Commissioner for the North West Mike Franklin decided an independent investigation was needed.

    The watchdog could not launch the investigation until criminal proceedings against Clarke were completed.

    Mr Franklin said: “This was a horrifically brutal murder and my condolences go out to Ms Szmecht’s family and friends.

    “It is known that Merseyside police had been in contact with Ms Szmecht and she had raised concerns about Mr Clarke’s behaviour towards her in the days leading up to her murder.

    “Our investigation will examine whether officers observed the correct policies and procedures and whether Ms Szmecht was afforded sufficient protection.”

    A Merseyside police spokesman said: “We can confirm the force has looked into the police response to issues of domestic violence in the case of Monika Szmecht.

    “The matter was voluntarily referred to the IPCC and we support their decision to carry out an independent enquiry.”

    michellefiddler@liverpoolecho.co.uk0151 472 2529

    http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/liverpool-news/local-news/2008/05/10/did-police-fail-the-fireball-murder-victim-monika-szmecht-100252-20889166/

  • E-mail to the LGO, 21/5/08.







    Google Mail – complaint against Liverpool City Council our ref 08 000 279







    Google Mail



    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>




    complaint against Liverpool City Council our ref 08 000 279





    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>





    Wed, May 21, 2008 at 8:03 AM





    To:

    st3 york <st3york@lgo.org.uk>



    Hi,

     

    I'm refering to our phone-call, on Monday, where I explained that I would have a closer look at the compaint, and

    call you back the next day. (Tuesday, yesterday).

     

    Unfortunaltly, I was a bit busy yesterday, but I have thought a bit more about this now, so I'm sending you this

    e-mail.

     

    Like I explained in the phone-call, my main complaint, against the gym, was that the (female) washing-staff,

    where washing the mens chaning-room, within the opening hours, on several (at least two) occations.

     

    I also explained, that I had been working-out in other council/university-run gyms, in Oslo and Sunderland,

    but that I hadn't seen this before, that the female washing-staff was washing the mens changing room,

    within the opening hours.

     

    I've been thinking a bit more about how to explain this, and I think one must probably say, that this, that

    the washing-women wash the mens changing-room within the opening hours of the gym, must be said

    to be indicent(?)

     

    And this gym is not like a private gym, but it's a council run gym, open to all members of the public, and

    run by the tax-payers money.

     

    The council, explained that they had changed the 'washing-regime', after recieving my complaint, but after

    I've been thinking more about this, I think it's a bit strange anyway.

    Since, I think that the staff at the gym should have stopped the washing-women, acting like this, I remember

    that there was plenty of staff there, the last time this happend, they were just standing in the reception-area,

    without doing any work-tasks, maybe 10 or 15 minutes before the gym closed, looking at me, more or less,

    smiling, when I left the gym, the last time this happend.

    So, I think that staff must have been aware of this.

     

    So, I think that there must have been something going on at the gym, since the staff didn't react, when the

    washing women did this.

    So I don't think it's enough by the Council, to say they've changed the washing regime, since I think there

    must be problems with the staff as well, since they didn't reflect or react at this procedure.

     

    I think both the washing-staff, and the gym-staff and management, should have understood, by themselves,

    that it's maybe a bit indecent, to let the washing-women wash the mens changing-room during the opening

    hours of the gym, while the changing-room is being used.

     

    So I think that there must be something going on there, since noone reflected on this.

     

    So, I think that maybe the situation at the gym, should be looked a more into, by the Ombudsman, since

    I think that there must have been something strange going on there.

    I haven't had the time to look at the complaint that much, and this was from last year, so I don't remember

    the details that well, but I remember that I was thinking, that there were a lot of strange things going on at

    the gym.

    So I'm forwarding you the complaint I sent the gym, so maybe you could have a look at this, and see what

    you think yourselves, of the other complaints than the main complaint mentioned in this e-mail, if you don't

    think the things going on at the gym, weren't a bit strange.

    So then I'll trust your judgement on the other complaints, since I am a bit after shedule with work etc. here.

    Hope this is alright!

     

    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog


     

     

    On 5/14/08, st3 york <st3york@lgo.org.uk> wrote:

    Dear Mr Ribskkog

     

    I refer to your complaint against Liverpool City Council. I tried calling you today and last Wednesday but have been unsuccessful.  I would like to have a chat with you about your complaint. Please would you telephone me today or on Monday, Tuesday or Wednesday next week (19-21 May) sometime between 9.15am and 4.30pm so that I can make progress on your complaint.  If I am not available when you call, please leave a message giving details of the best time to get back to you.

     

    Yours sincerely

     

    Julie Murray

    Investigator

    Commission for Local Administration in England

    Tel: 01904 380220

    Website: www.lgo.org.uk

    NOTICE – This message contains information intended only for the use of the addressee named above.  If you have received this message in error please advise us at once and do not make any use of the information.

     












    Google Mail – Complaint







    Google Mail



    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>




    Complaint





    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>





    Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 5:06 AM





    To:

    Richard.Little@liverpool.gov.uk


    Cc:

    "Lennon, Linda" <linda.lennon@liverpool.gov.uk>, "Southern, Lesley" <Lesley.Southern@liverpool.gov.uk>



    Hi,

     

    I'm refering to phone-call last week (4/7). I know I said I'd send this e-mail no

    later than Wednesday, but I didn't get to start on it untill late on Wednesday,

    so it's probably going to be Thursday untill I get to actually send the e-mail,

    so sorry about that!

     

     

    Problems with washing women/girls in the mens changing-room during opening hours:

     

    The first thing I wondered about, was regarding the problems described in

    the e-mail I sent to Linda Lennon on 8/6, about the washing girl/women in

    the mens changing-room.

     

    I'll copy the text from that e-mail into this e-mail, since I have some questions

    regarding that episode:

     

    to




    linda.lennon@liverpool.gov.uk

     

    date

    Jun 8, 2007 10:58 PM

     

    subject

    Fwd: Statement

     

    mailed-by

    gmail.com

     


    Hi,

     

    I just got back from the gym, it closed at 9 pm.

     

    I just had to eat a bit and relax a bit after the work-out, or else I would have sent the

    email at once.

     

    Because what I'm wondering about with the gym, is:

     

    Is it really right that there should be female washing-staf in the mens wardrobe

    at 8.45 pm, when the gym closes at 9pm?

     

    This happened again today, and it has also happened once before.

    I used to workout a bit when I lived in Oslo and Sunderland as well, but they never

    used to start washing the wardrobe until after the closing hours.

     

    So I think that since the gym is run by the Council, I think that they shouldn't

    have the washing-routines that includes female staff starting to wash in the

    mens wardrobe as early as 8.45 pm.

     

    I think they should wait until after closing-hours to wash the mens wardrobe,

    and that if they have to wash, then they could maybe instead wash the machines

    in the gym or something else before the gym is closed.

     

    When I went into the mens wardrobe at 8.45 pm then there was a female washing

    staff washing there, about 40 years maybe with dark hair.

     

    I think she was talking with a colleague in there, it was probably the other washing-

    woman.

    I was working out on the tread-mill by the reception untill a bit before 8.45 pm, and

    then I saw the washing-staff walking around in the reception-area at around 8.40 pm.

     

    And one of the washing-staff looked quite young, maybe 16-17 years.

    I think it must have been her that the washing-woman with dark hair spoke with in

    the mens wardrobe at 8.45.

     

    I don't think there should be that young female washing staff in the mens wardrobe

    at 8.45, when the gym closes at 9.00pm.

     

    It has happened once earlier as well that there were female washing staff in the

    mens wardrobe at around 8.45, and I just think that this isnt right.

     

    I think that both the staff in the gym and the washing staff should understand by

    themselves that the female washing staff shouldnt start to wash in the mens

    wardrobe untill after the closing hours at 9 pm, so thats why I havent complained

    about this to the staff in the gym or the washing staff.

    I think that it should be unecessary for me to tell this to them, I think they should

    have understood this by themselves.

     

    And Im not really sure whos in charge there in the evenings eighter.

     

    There has also been other incidents at the gym that I have thought to complain

    about, but I havent untill now.

    But with the washing-staff in the mens wardrobe again today at 8.45 pm, was

    a bit like the final drop, so since Im not really sure whos in charge there in the

    evening I thought that I could send you an email about this.

    And also since one of the washing women was so young, it makes me a bit

    worried about whats going on in the gym, when they put a washing woman/

    girl that looked like she was maybe 16 or 17 in the mens wardrobe at 8.45pm,

    so therefore I thought I should really just write the email now, because that this

    is a bit unacceptable for a gym thats run by the Council.

     

    I know its a bit late to send emails at this hour, but it thought that since I think

    that this way of organising the washing-routines in the gym is a bit unaceptable,

    I thought that if I sent the email about this right after I got back from the gym,

    then there would be less possibilites that eg. someone could say that I must have

    mistaken the time etc,  since now its just a quite short time since I left the gym,

    so I reckoned that its best to send it right away, while I still have the details at

    mind so to speak. 

     

    So I hope that this is alright!

     

    Sorry that I send the email this late.

     

    Regards,


     

    Erik Ribsskog


    – Show quoted text –


     

    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: Erik Ribsskog <

    eribsskog@gmail.com
    >
    Date: Jun 8, 2007 3:45 PM
    Subject: Statement
    To: linda.lennon@liverpool.gov.uk

     

    Hi,

     

    I refer to the phone-call earlier today, and send the statement from

    the bank about the duplicate payment with the direct-debit.

     

    Pleare just contact me if there is anything else I should have remembered.

     

    Hope that this is alright!

     

    Regards,


     

    Erik Ribsskog


     

    So my questions regarding this is:

     

    1. How come that there are washing women/girls in the mens changing-room at 8.45 pm,

    when the gym closes at 9 pm?

     

    2. Is the gym going to change its washing-routine, so that the washing women/girls dont

    start to wash the mens changing-room untill after the gym is closed. (Because like I explained

    in the e-mail to Linda Lennon, this with the washing women in the mens changing-room has

    also happened earlier at the Millenium gym, but I've never seen it in other gyms).

     

     

    Problems with direct-debit processing errors/duplicate payments:

     

    Also, I have been in contact with Lesley Southern, about some problems regarding processing

    errors/duplicate direct debits from the gym.

     

    I explained to him that I would also bring up some the issues regarding this with you, so I think

    its alright if I also copy the contents of that e-mail:

     

     

     

    from



    Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com> 

     

     hide details

     Jul 10 (2 days ago) 

     

    to



    "Southern, Lesley" <Lesley.Southern@liverpool.gov.uk>

     

     

    date

     

    Jul 10, 2007 6:18 PM

     

     

    subject

     

    Re: Earlier e-mails

     

     

    mailed-by

     

     


    Hi,

     

    thank you very much for your answer.

     

    I think it was very fine that you had the time to answer me, and I also think that it was very

    fine that you have taken off my arrears due to the amount of time/inconvinience I have had

    due to this.

     

    But since there were still some things I was wondering about, I thought I could try to send

    you an enquiery about this, to try to maybe found out about this.

     

    I've written an explanation below, as comments on your e-mail, since I thought it was easier

    to explain/answer this way.

     

    To summarize my questions:

     

    1. Shouldn't the gym have asked me first if they wanted to withdraw an extra payment (that they

    had no mandate for) from my account in June?

     

    2. How come that there were still two payment-requests from the gym waiting to be withdrawn

    from my account on 27/6, when firstly, the gym only have a mandate to withdraw one monthly

    payment from my account. Secondly, I had agreed with the staff at the gym, that I would pay the

    arrears when I recieved the swith-bonus from the bank. And thirdly, I had sent Linda Lennon,

    Administration Manager at the Council an e-mail about this problem on 8/6, with a copy of the

    statement from the bank, showing that there was a problem with the gym charging me duplicate

    payments from my account for the month of June?

     

    3. How come that the gym still wanted to withdraw a (duplicate) payment from my account for the

    month of July, when the gym was closed for refurbishment for six weeks from 25/6?

     

    I'm also going to contact the Duty Officer at the gym regarding why the gyms members weren't

    informed about the six weeks closure of the gym and more. So it might be that I'll also ask him

    about some of the same questions. (Like about why the gym still wanted to charge me even

    if they were going to be closed etc.)

     

    I hope you have the time to answer me about this questions, since I thought some of these things

    were a bit strange, so it would be nice to be informed about this.

    So I hope that you bear over with me if I'm asking many questions!

     

    Thank you very much in advance!

     

    Yours sincerely,

     

    Erik Ribsskog


     

     

     

     

     

    On 7/3/07, Southern, Lesley <Lesley.Southern@liverpool.gov.uk

    > wrote:

    Erik

     

    Your enquiry regarding your direct debit payments has been passed onto myself for further investigation.

     

    Unfortunately we cannot refund a payment to a member that has outstanding arrears, this is for audit purposes as we are required to provide details of all miscellaneous payments made to our members.

     

    The action we have taken to date is to take your 1 month overpayment as your cancellation fee (which is normally 2 months) and we have taken your arrears off your membership record for the inconvenience caused as a result of the error.


    – Regarding the overpayment, it wasn't actually an overpayment, because when the bank saw that it had been a

    process error/duplicate payment from the gym, then they transferred the duplicate payment back as a

    'interbranch payment' on 6/6.

     

    (Secondly, I think that I shouldn't recieve a cancellation fee, when the gym suddently closes for 6 weeks

    for refurbishment. I think that then the gym should have first sent its members a letter about this, put

    up a poster at the gym about this, and also not charged its members for the month that they are closed,

    but I have to contact the Duty Officer at the gym about something else, so I'll bring this up with him.)

     

     

    I have checked the Direct Debit report and it seems that the overpayment dates back to a missed January payment which has been allocated to your account on 30

    th May.  I will need to speak to our Direct Debit team to determine why a payment for January has been included in June's Direct Debit report.

    I've been speaking with the staff (including the Manager) at the gym several times about the arrears, and we agreed that I would

    pay the arrears later, when I recieved some money I was expecting (a switch-bonus from the bank).

     

    This was agreed with Craig at the gym, when we set up the direct-debit agreement in May.

     

    I spoke with Craig about this on 1/6 as well, since I hadn't recieved the switch-bonus yet, and then I was informed

    that the arrear was £70.50, and we agreed that I would pay this when I recieved the money from the bank.


     

    So my point is, that they should have told me first if they wanted to withdraw an extra payment from my account

    on 1/6, so that I could have planned this in advance.

     

    Also, this (RBS) bank account was set up in May, so I don't really understand how a missed direct-debit

    payment to my old (Barclays) account in Januray, could suddently appear on my RBS-account in June?

     

    It seems a bit strange to me that this could happen, when I also had agreed several times with the staff

    at the gym (in the month of March and then monthly), that I would pay the running bills, and that I'd pay the

    arrears when I recieved the switch-bonus from RBS.

     

    Also I had been told by the staff at the gym, that there was no hurry at all with the arrears, as long as I

    paid the running bills.

     

    – Also the bank told me when I called them in the beginning of June, that the gym wasn't allowed to

    withdraw more than one payment a month from my account, since they only had one mandate.

     

    – Also, when I called the gym on 26/6, to ask if they were open on 26/6, (since they were closed for

    no apparent reason on 25/6), then I was told that the gym was closed for refurbishment for six weeks.

     

    I then thought that it wasn't right that the gym should charge me for the month of July, when they were

    closed. (I also thought they should have informed the members about the six weeks closure). So due

    to this, I called my bank (the RBS customer-support line) on 27/6 to cancel the direct-debit.

    I was then told that there were still two direct-debits from the gym on my account, both with the same,

    reference-number (LIFE 800 1561).

     

    – So I was wondering, how come that there were still two payment-requests from the gym waiting to

    be withdrawn on my account on 27/6, when firstly, the gym only have a mandate to withdraw one

    monthly payment from my account. Secondly, I had agreed with the staff at the gym, that I would

    pay the arrears when I recieved the swith-bonus from the bank, and thirdly, I had sent Linda Lennon,

    Administration Manager at the Council an e-mail about this problem on 8/6, with a copy of the

    statement from the bank, showing that there was a problem with the gym charging me duplicate

    payments from my account?


     

     

     

    Your account has now been set to expired and no payment was requested in July.

     


    Well, there were actually two payments requested in July (see above

    So my questions regarding this is:

     

    3. Shouldn't the gym have asked me first if they wanted to withdraw an extra payment (that they

    had no mandate for) from my account in June?

     

    4. How come that there were still two payment-requests from the gym waiting to be withdrawn

    from my account on 27/6, when firstly, the gym only have a mandate to withdraw one monthly

    payment from my account. Secondly, I had agreed with the staff at the gym, that I would pay the

    arrears when I recieved the swith-bonus from the bank. And thirdly, I had sent Linda Lennon,

    Administration Manager at the Council an e-mail about this problem on 8/6, with a copy of the

    statement from the bank, showing that there was a problem with the gym charging me duplicate

    payments from my account for the month of June?

     

     

    Problems around the closure of the gym for six weeks from 25/6 due to refurbishment:

     

    5. How come that the gym still wanted to withdraw a (duplicate) payment from my account for the

    month of July, when the gym was closed for refurbishment for six weeks from 25/6?

     

    6. How come that there were no letters sent to the members of the gym regarding the closure

    of the gym for six weeks from 25/6 due to refurbishment?

     

    7. How come that there were no poster in the gym informing the users of the gym that the gym

    would be closed for six weeks from 25/6 due to refurbishment?

     

    8. How come that there was only a makeshift sign on the entrance-door to the millenium-

    building saying 'gym closed', and nothing more when I went there to work out on the

    evening on 25/6. (Shouldn't it have been a proper sign, with information about why the

    gym was closed, how long the gym was closed for, and not just some makeshift

    sign written with an ink-marker)?

     

    9. How come that there were no information about the fact that the gym was closed, when

    I went on the lifestyles website:

     

     

    on 26/6 (When the gym had been closed since 25/5)?

     

    (I can see that it says that the gym is closed there now, but on 26/6, there was no information

    about the gym being closed at all. I went there to see if it said anything on the website on 26/6,

    since the gym was closed for no obvious reason on 25/6, but it didn't say anything about the gym

    being closed on the website, so I noted down the phone-number to the gym, and called the gym,

    and they told me that the gym was closed for six weeks due to refurbishment.)

     

    10. How come that members of the gym were charged for the whole month of June, when the gym

    was closed for refurbishment from 25/6? (Shouldn't the six days from 25/6 to 30/6 have been

    deducted from the charge?).

     

     

    Other problems at the gym:

     

    Like I wrote in my e-mail to Linda Lennon on 8/6, there had also been other, earlier incidents at

    the gym which I had thought to complain about.

     

    But like I also wrote, it wasn't always easy to know who it was that was in charge there after the

    manager had gone home, and him I only spoke with once, since I most often worked out in the

    evening.

     

    And that the incident with the washing girls/women in the mens changing room again within the

    opening hours was the last drop, so to speak.

     

    And then it was easier for me to complain, because then I had her e-mail address from before,

    since I had sent her a copy of the statement from the bank, to document the problems with

    the duplicate direct debit/processing error from the gym.

     

    So then it was easier for me to complain.

     

    I'm going to try explain a bit more about the earlier incidents:

     

    Problems with locker:

     

    On 26/4, it says in my note-book, I was at the gym.

     

    I work with office-work, so I try to work out quite often, and I usually use different lockers at the

    gym, depending on which locker of the lockers that are free etc.

     

    And when one work out 3-5 days a week for some time, and you have a different locker each time,

    then it could be that one forgets exactly which locker one uses this particular time.

     

    And, since only about half of the key-rings with the keys for the lockers had tag-numbers on them,

    this could be a bit confusing.

     

    So when I was finished with the work-out, and I went to the area of the changing-room where my

    locker was, then the locker wouldn't open.

     

    Like I wrote, I use different lockers each time, depending on which lockers that are free, where in

    the changing-room it is less crowded etc.

     

    So it isn't that easy to be exactly sure if it is that particular locker, especially since the key-ring

    to the locker (like about half of the other key-rings, i noticed later), lacked a number-tag on it,

    to specify which locker it belonged to.

     

    I usually dont keep things like my wallet etc. in the locker, since its a big gym, always many

    people there, and I would get a lot of inconvienience if something happened to my wallet etc.,

    so I didn't keep the most 'valuble' things in the locker.

     

    I use to keep my note-book with my wallet, so I had my note-book still on me, and I thought it

    was a bit embarresing going to the reception explaining that I coultn't find my locker, so I decided

    to be 100% sure before I did that.

    So, I just wrote down the numbers of all the lockers in my note-book, and then I checked each

    and every locker, and crossed the number for that locker in my note-book.

    I made sure to check each lock thoroughly.

     

    So, when I had checked each lock in the changing-room, and the key didn't fit in any of them,

    then I went to the reception to explain.

     

    It was still quite embarresing, but at least now I had the note-book to show that I had tryed all

    of the locks.

     

    There were about 5 or 6 people sitting in the reception, and the woman in charge, told Neil to

    help me with this.

     

    I explained to Neil that maybe the smartest thing for me would be to return at closing-time,

    when all the other users of the gym had gone home, then it would only be one locker left

    to check.

     

    I was holding my note-book still, so I wrote down that Neil started acting a bit like a sergeant

    in the army, knocking his fist into the side of the enterance to the changing-room and screaming

    /comanding: 'come here'.

     

    I thought this behaviour was a bit peculiar, but I went after him into the changing-room, and then

    he starting to ask if I had been having a few beers. (Since I couldnt remember the number for

    the locker).

     

    I asked him what his name was, and wrote it down.

     

    Then I showed him that I had tryed all the lockers, and that noone worked, and that there wasnt

    any number-tag on the key-chain for the locker.

     

    He asked me which locker I thought it was, and I told him that I thought it was the number 156

    one. (It says in my note-book).

     

    So he asked me to give him the key, so that he could try the number 156 locker and the

    surrounding lockers.

     

    But he couldnt manage to open any of them, so he went to find the master-key.

     

    This took a bit of time, but he returned and then opened the locker with the new key.

     

    It was locker 156, and I showed him in my note-book that I had already tryed to open

    locker 156 with the key, because I had crossed out that number in the note-book.

     

    Neil said that 'the locks often get stuck.', I can see from my note-book.

     

    I found a new locker (since I didnt have the key any longer to the 156 one), and Neil

    reminded me to remember the key-number.

     

    I told him that I thought that there should be key-tags on the key-rings for the lockers.

     

    Also, the next time I went to the gym, the woman in charge reminded me that I should

    remember the key-number, and then I told the woman in charge that I thought that

    there should be key-tags on the key-rings. (But there still wasnt done anything

    with this problem, and about half of the key-rings were still missing a key-tag

    for the remainder of the time I was working out at the gym).

     

    So my questions regarding this is:

     

    11. How come there are so much problems with the locks getting stuck in the lockers?

    I mean, surely the gym bought new lockers when they opened? And its the Millennium

    building gym, so the building and the gym can't be that old? (Did someone buy used

    lockers for the gym when it opened)?

     

    12. How come the gym doesn't use oil in the locks for the lockers, if it, like Neil said,

    is a problem with the 'locks often get stuck'?

     

    13: And why didn't the gym put key-tags on the lockers, when about half of the key-

    tags were missing, and I had spoken about this problem with both Neil and the woman

    who was in charge there on the day this incident ocured, I think it was on 26/4?

     

     

    Problems with the washing of the machines:

     

    When I wrote the e-mail about the problem with the washing women/girls in the

    mens changing-room in the opening hours, then it came to mind that maybe

    the washing-should should rather wash the machines, and then wait untill

    the gym has closed, before they washed the changing-rooms.

     

    The reason I thought about this, is because I remembered an incident from when

    I was working out, I think it must have been in April or May.

    Then I was working out at the thread-mill, and this was I seem to remember hours

    before closing-time.

     

    There were a couple of washing-ladys there, even if it was still a few hours until

    closing-time.

     

    They were just walking around a bit, seemingly not certain on the routine.

     

    But then one of the washing ladies started to wash the stepping-machine in front

    of me. But what I thought was a bit strange, was that she only washed the tip of

    one of the handles of the stepping machine, and then nothing else. This she did

    twice with a few minuttes inbetween.

     

    Other than that, I couldn't see that eighter she or her collegue washed any of the

    other machines. (They looked a bit lost there, walking around with their buckets

    while the gym was still quite crowded, since it was hours till closing-time.)

     

    My question regarding this is:

    14: Shouldn't the washing-staff put up a sign near the machines when they wash

    them during the time of which the gym is open? Couldn't people get hurt if

    they work out on machines that are slippery from being washed? I seem to

    remember from other places I've been working etc., that yellow plastic signs

    are being put on the floor etc., saying that one have to be careful since its

    newly washed, so shouldn't the washing staff in the gym also do this when

    they clean the machines within the opening hours?

     

     

    Problems with staff:

     

    Like I've written, there have been some incedents before that I have wondered

    if I should complain about, but I'm not always sure whos in charge there, so

    this makes it a bit more tricky to complain, and I've also had the problem

    with the arrears on my membership, and the manager let me work out

    there and pay the arrears later, so there was a threshold before I would

    complain.

     

    But I wrote down in my note-book a couple of things I reacted on anyway.

     

    I was wondering a bit what was going on there, e.g. on 24/5 Craig and

    a blond girl sits in the reception.

     

    Only Craig logs in the members, even if there is a long queue. The girl

    is only watching. (I think maybe she is his girlfriend, since I noticed

    them sitting very close once when I wanted to log in).

     

    So I was wondering, if there is a long queue, surely both of them could

    log in the users of the gym, so that they wouldn't have to wait in a line,

    like if some of the customers are there to sign up for a membership,

    then still everyone have to wait in one line, even if there are more

    staff at work.

    So then I was wondering what is the girl doing there, if she cant log in

    the customers, and is only sitting watching.

     

    And I think she had been working there a while then, so I dont think

    she was on training.

     

    So this seemed a bit strange to me, so I thought I could mention it

    while Im writing this e-mail anyway.

     

    Also, I remember, that one Friday I was working out there, then they

    annonced the closing of the gym like this:

     

    'The gym will be closing in 60 minutes', 'The gym will be closing in

    45 minutes', 'The gym will be closing in 30 minutes', 'The gym will

    be closing in 15 minutes'.

    I think it was the same girl, but it seemed like it was Craig that told

    her to say it.

     

    Normally they only say 'The gym will be closing in 20 minuttes', or

    something like this, so I thought I could mention this as well, even

    if its maybe not so important what they say on the calling-system

    in the Friday evenings? Anyway, I thought I could mention it while

    I was writing the e-mail anyway.

     

    My question to this is:

     

    15. How come the staff only sits watching while the customers are

    standing in line?

     

    16. Shouldn't the staff have name-tags, where it said name and title,

    so that it would be easier for the users of the gym to know who to

    speak with regarding different problems. (So that they know who

    are in charge)?

     

    (For instance, on the day when there were washing girls/women in

    the mens changing room, and they must have been there from

    around 8.40 pm. or earlier, because I went in there on 8.45 pm,

    and then they were well into their routine it looked like, before I

    turned and went home.

     

    On that day (8/6), the staff that were working around closing-time,

    was Neil, a young girl that wears high-healed shoes and blouse,

    and a man around 40 years maybe that I think could maybe is the

    girls father, because I saw him standing very close to the girl once.

     

    I thought maybe the girl was in a kind of responsible position there,

    since she wear office-clothes, but the guy in his forthies I reckon

    also could be in charge there, since hes the oldest etc., and also

    Neil I reckoned could have been in charge, since he has access

    to the master-keys etc.

     

    So its a bit embarrasing asking about whos in charge, because

    you wouldn't want to offend anyone, with asking whos in charge,

    and then its actually that person who is in charge.

     

    I don't say that it is impossible for the customers of the gym to

    find out whose in charge, but I thought that it could maybe add

    to the general level of customer-service at the gym if the staff

    was wearing name-tags.

     

    I wrote down a note of who that was working that day, so that

    I would know later, since I wrote the e-mail that day with the

    complaint about the washing-staff in the chaning-room, so I

    thought I'd write it down, in case it became an issue.)

     

    17. Should they really anounce that the gym is closing in 60 minutes,

    and that the gym is closing in 45 minutes etc.?

     

     

     

    Problems with direct-debit agreement on 13/12/06:

     

    While I was looking for some notes before I started writing this

    e-mail now, I found a letter from the gym from 8/12/06.

     

    I'll just write what it says:

     

    'Dear Mr. Ribsskog,

     

    RE: Lifestyles Membership No: LDD121346

     

    As a valued Lifestyles member, I was surprised to find that your monthly

    Lifestyles subscription of £23.50 due earlier this month has not been paid.

     

    You may be aware of this already and have made payment at the

    Lifestyles centre, if so, please accept my apologies.

     

    If you have not paid these arrears, I would ask that you pay them at your

    earliest convienience by contacting your nearest Lifestyles Centre. Your

    membership account can be updated at any of the centres and you can

    pay either by cash, cheque, credit or debit card.

     

    Please contact Liverpool Direct on 0151 233 3007 for the number of your

    nearest Lifestye centre.

     

    I regret that until any arrears have been paid, standard admission

    charges will apply and you will lose the benefits of your membership.

     

    Yours feithfully

     

    Steve Kneale

     

    Business Development Manager'.

     

     

     

    (I write quite fast, so I thought I could just write it down, so that it would be

    easier to understand what I meant.)

     

    There were some problems regarding me switching from a Barclays Cashcard

    account to a Barclays Current-account at around the end of November/beginning

    of December 2006.

     

    The problem was that my pay from work was switched to the new current-account,

    whereas the direct-debits remained connected to the old account.

     

    I was in a busy period with work etc., so I didnt think about this problem before I

    got a letter from the bank about it.

    So I went to the bank, and transfered all my direct-debits from my old Barlays

    cashcard account, and to my new Barclays current/visa account.

    The clerk in the bank did this for me, it was a quite routine operation it seemed

    to me.

     

    Exept for the Lifestyles direct-debit for some reason.

    This direct-debit had been canceled right away, in a way so that the clerk in the

    bank couldnt transfer it to the new account.

     

    And when I went to the gym on 13/12, I had to pay the charge for Decemeber at

    the gym, and it wasn't possible for me to just switch the existing direct-debit

    agreement from my old Barlays Cashcard account to my new Barclays Current

    account, but I had to fill out a new form all over again to set up the new

    direct debit agreement on my new account.

     

    I accept that it was my fault with forgetting to transfer the direct-debit to the

    new account (It was some comunication-problem at work, with me informing

    work that I had got a new bank-account, but with work not giving me any

    feedback on that they had changed my account information in the payment

    system).

     

    But because of the later problem with the direct debits now in June, I thought

    I could ask a couple of questions regarding this as well, while I'm at it, so to

    speak.

     

    18: How come that the gym canceled my direct-debit between 1/12 and 8/12,

    and sent me a letter on 8/12, where it said that I had to go to the gym and

    pay in cash, when I had never had any payment problems with the gym before 

    this, and all the other direct-debits were possible to switch (for the clerk at

    the bank to my new account), except the gyms direct-debit? Shouldn't the

    gym have tryed to collect the payment from my account again 7-14 days

    later, like the clerk in the bank told me that the other companies did?

     

    19: Why did I have to write my signature on, and fill out a new form all over

    again on 13/12, for a new direct-debit. Didn't the gym have all my information

    from before, have one got to fill out and sign a new form just because one

    gets a new account-number, when one are still using the same bank?

     

    (The signature of the women I spoke with on the gym on 13/12/06, looks

    like it says Probert as a last name by the way, in case that makes it

    any easier to find out about this.

     

    I remember I thought it was strange that I had to fill out the form all over

    again, just because of the problem of the one payment due to the

    problems with changing the direct-debits and my pay from work to

    the new account, in a coordinated way.

     

    Because it didn't seem to be a similiar problem with the other companies

    that also had direct-debits on my account, so therefore I remember that

    I thought that this was a bit strange.

    And now, due to the other problems with the direct-debits again, now in

    June, I thought I'd just ask about the earlier problems, since they came

    to mind now.

     

    also this:

     

    How come I got a letter sent 8 days after the missed payment in December,

    where as later, in January, February and March (with the new direct-debit set

    up on 13/12), I didn't get a letter at all.

     

    It went on for two or three months, it must have been, before someone reminded

    me that there were arrears on my membership.

     

    I was quite busy in this time-periode, even if I was unemployed, so I didn't

    have so much money then, so I should maybe have spoken with the staff about

    this myself, but I much problems with paying my rent etc., and I was glad to

    have the oppertunity to work-out, since it was a bit stressing not having a

    job, and it helped to work-out to relax from the stress.

     

    And also, the staff gave different information to me regarding the arrears. The

    girl wearing office-wear, and who worked on 8/6, for instance, told me on

    one occation that it wasn't a hurry paying the arrears at all. (As long as I

    paid the running bills, which I did).

     

    And other members of staff, Craig for instance, told me that I had to pay the

    arrears before a certain date, (I spoke with the manager and got an extension,

    and later I agreed with Craig that I would pay the arrears when I got first the

    loan I was promised from the bank, and later the switch-bonus I was promised

    from the bank.)

     

    So the questions regarding this:

     

    20: How come in December I get a letter for not paying after 8 days, where as

    in the new year, it goes in the region of two or three months without recieving

    a letter or reminder from the staff, even if I worked out several times a week?

     

    21: How come one member of the staff (the girl with the office-wear who worked

    on 8/6), says that there is no hurry with the arrears, where as another member

    of staff (Craig), says that I have to pay before this and this date? How is this

    really supposed to be, according to the rules?

     

    (I appriciate very much that I was allowed to work out at the gym even if I had

    arrears, so it's not because I am ungrateful that I ask about these things. It's

    just that due to the other problems, with the washing-women/girls in the changing

    room, and the problems with the continuing processing errors and duplicate

    payments with the direct debits.

     

    And also due to the problems surrounding the unanounced closure of the gym

    for six weeks due to refurbishment.

     

    Due to these problems, I thought it would be best to mention all the other

    problems while I was at it. Even if some of these problems aren't maybe

    that serious in themselves, I anyway thought that they were worth bringing

    up, because, I think, thay add to a general picture of things at the gym

    being a bit out of hand, so due to this I'm a bit concerned about whats

    really going on at the gym, and then I thought it would be best to mentioned

    all the things that came to mind, because these things, even if it isn't clear

    to me here and now that there for certain is a problem conected with them,

    it could be a problem, so I thought it would be the most responsible thing

    to do, to also add the latter part of the problems, the ones that are mentioned

    under the title 'other problems'.

     

    So even if it was the first five or ten questions that made me go to the step

    of complaining. Even so, I hope you have the oppertunity to answer me about

    the last part of the questions as well.

     

    Sorry again that this e-mail got a bit delayed. I know I said I'd send it no latter

    than Wednesday, but I reckon that as long as I send it before the office hours

    on Thursday, then it hopefully should be ok.

     

    I'll also forward this e-mail to Linda Lennon and Lesley Southern, since I've been

    copying the e-mails I've sent to them earlier, in this e-mail now. 

     

    Hope that this is alright, and that you bear over with me if some of the last questions

    wasn't as well stated as they should have been, due to time problems etc.

     

    Hope that this is alright!

     

    Yours sincerely,

     

    Erik Ribsskog

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     







  • Webmail to the FBI, 20/5/08.

    HOME |PRIVACY NOTICE |LINKS |CONTACT US |SITE MAP |SEARCH

    Please use this website to report suspected terrorism or criminal activity. Your information will be reviewed promptly by an FBI special agent or a professional staff member. Due to the high volume of information that we receive, we are unable to reply to every submission; however, we appreciate the information that you have provided.

    FBI Tips and Public Leads

    Top of Form

    Your First Name

    Your Middle Name

    Your Last Name

    Your Phone

    Your Email

    Your Street 1

    Your Street 2

    Your Suite/Apt/Mail Stop

    Your City

    Your State

    Your Country

    Your Zip Code / Route


    Please describe your information:


    Bottom of Form

    Hi,

    I’ve been having some problems with Blogger.

    Someone, who I don’t know who are, have been posting a hate-blog, about me, writing sick lies about me.

    I’ve been contacting Blogger, but I haven’t received an answer from them.

    I was wondering how I should go forward if I wanted to stop the false and serious acusations on the Blogger-blog.

    Thanks in advance for the reply!

    Yours sincerley,

    Erik Ribsskog

  • Hvor ble Dagbladet-innlegget av? (In Norwegian).

    1

    anbefalinger

    Bra!

    Hvor ble innlegget av?

    Skrevet av Ratatoskr 20.05.2008 kl. 14:09

    Argh! Hvor ble Cons’ innlegg av?? Kom igjen Dagbladet, det var morsomt!

    Jeg som hadde så mange kommentarer klare….

    Nytt innlegg Svar på innlegg Varsle

    0

    anbefalinger

    Bra!

    RE: Hvor ble innlegget av?

    Skrevet av Ramsay 20.05.2008 kl. 14:13

    Helt enig,buuuuuh dagbladet, dette var jo strålende, godt å vitehvordan ståa egentlig er her på berget.:) heheh

    Nytt innlegg Svar på innlegg Varsle

    0

    anbefalinger

    Bra!

    RE: Hvor ble innlegget av?

    Skrevet av Ratatoskr 20.05.2008 kl. 14:19

    Endelig en som kunne avsløre hva Amnesty egentlig er! Hater det når de lurer i buskene utenfor huset mitt og følger etter meg med sine underskriftkampanjer. Men jeg vet hvem de er….

    Nytt innlegg Svar på innlegg Varsle

    0

    anbefalinger

    Bra!

    RE: Hvor ble innlegget av?

    Skrevet av cons 20.05.2008 kl. 14:20

    Dem fikk telefon fra Stoltenberg og Kolberg.

    Jeg har det på blogg da:

    https://johncons-blogg.net/2008/05/ser-norske-myndigheter-ogs-ubter-in.html

    Nytt innlegg Svar på innlegg Varsle

    http://www.dagbladet.no/nyheter/2008/05/20/535742.html?commentId=1973537#comment_1973537

  • Ser norske myndigheter også ‘ubåter’? (In Norwegian).

    Bra!

    Ser norske myndigheter også ‘ubåter”?

    Skrevet av cons 20.05.2008 kl. 13:28

    Jeg synes det kan virke som om norske og britiske myndigheter også ser ‘ubåter’, både her og der.

    Noe er det i hvertfall.

    Jeg ble jaget fra Norge i 2005, av folk som jeg hørte skulle skyte meg, om som jeg ikke aner hvem er.

    Og jeg har studert og jobbet hele livet, og aldri vært noe kriminell, eller lignende:

    http://www.linkedin.com/pub/6/86a/455

    Og her er hva jeg vet som foregår:

    https://johncons-blogg.net/2008/02/lack-of-openness-from-government.html

    Jeg har blant annet en e-post til Erna Solberg her, siden det virket som om Høyre hadde noen gode forslag i det nye prinsipp-programmet sitt, om å prøve å bekjempe maktmisbruk fra myndighetene osv., og i den e-posten, så ramser jeg opp alle etatene/direktoratene etc., som jeg har vært i kontakt med, i Norge og England:

    https://johncons-blogg.net/2008/05/e-post-sendt-leder-i-hyre-erna-solberg.html

    Så spørsmålet er om hvorfor myndighetene ikke vil hjelpe, om de driver å ser ubåter på høylys dag?

    Nytt innlegg Svar på innlegg Varsle

    http://www.dagbladet.no/nyheter/2008/05/20/535742.html

  • Problemer med menneskeofring og misbruk fra satanister/Bohemian Groove, reelt eller ikke? (In Norwegian).

    0

    anbefalinger

    Bra!

    Det er skrevet bøker om dette problemer i USA.

    Skrevet av cons 19.05.2008 kl. 16:33

    Det er skrevet bøker, om at det finnes en organisasjon, som heter Bohemian Groove, hvor president Bush og andre flere ledende politikere har deltatt.

    http://www.savethemales.ca/000683.html

    Jeg har også lest om at de bruker ‘Mind Control’, for å programere slaver osv., til å utvikle to personligheter, for å lettere skule misbruk, mener jeg grunnen var.

    De som er med i den klubben, Bohemian Groove, de har et sånt ugletegn, som Bush og Clinton og Prins William, m.fl., har blitt sett bruke.

    Skal jeg se om jeg finner noen linker:

    http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/False%20Religions/Wicca%20&%20Witchcraft/bohemian_grove_exposed.htm

    I den linken ovenfor, ser man både Clinton og Bush gjøre det ugle-tegnet, eller satan-tegnet.

    Jeg har også sett et bilde av Bush, når han gjør det tegnet, sammen med Dronning Elisabeth.

    Skal jeg se om jeg finner Prins William:

    http://www.laverdaduniversal.org/candidates.html

    I linken over, kan man se det.

    Jeg har også blitt trakasert selv, av personer som har brukt dette tegnet, og New World Ordet logoen, som avatarer, på nettet.

    Skal jeg se om jeg finner linker til det, for det kan jo være med å vise, at det er noe som foregår:

    http://nb.xiandos.info/The_New_World_Order#New_World_Order_aktive_p.C3.A5_Veggavisen.3F

    https://johncons-blogg.net/2008/04/blog-post_5320.html

    Og hvis man søker på ‘Bohemian Groove’, på Google, så får man 62.300 treff.

    Så om alt dette bare er tull?

    Eller om det er noe sannhet bak det?

    Det virker jo litt rart, at verdensledere skal fly rundt å vise et sånt ugle/satantegn, i hytt og pine da.

    Og en annen ting jeg tenkte på, fra 1998 vel.

    Er President Clinton, som han var da.

    Han hadde en så rar unnskyldning, for at ‘I did not have sex with that woman’.

    Så om det er noe lureri med disse folka?

    Det er vel noe som foregår, må man vel tro, når presidenter og prinser viser sånne tegn, og folk bruker sånne avatarer.

    Men nøyaktig hva som foregår, det skal jeg ikke uttale meg om.

    Men det er jo skrevet bøker om dette, og de ugle/satan-tegnene fra presidentene, og avatarene fra facebook og veggavisen-brukerne.

    (Jeg har blitt utsatt for mind-control operasjoner på både Facebook og veggavisen, se link til blogg fra website www.johncons.com.

    Mind-control operasjon, vil si street theater/group stalking, som er en slags mind control operasjon, søk på google f.eks., eller jeg kan finne link:

    http://xiandos.info/Surveillance,_Psychotronics_and_(Gang-)Stalking_Operations)

    Og bruken av New World Order, og Bohemian Groove avatarer, tolker jeg i forbindelse med disse organiserte trakasserings aksjonene, dvs. street theater/group stalking operasjoner.

    Så at det er noe som foregår, det synes jeg virker klart.

    Nøyaktig hva som foregår, det skal jeg ikke si for sikkert.

    Men det er vel på plass å rope et lite varsko.

    Så får folk heller lese linkene og dømme selv.

    Håper dette er i orden!

    Med vennlig hilsen

    Erik Ribsskog

    Nytt innlegg Svar på innlegg Varsle

    http://www.dagbladet.no/magasinet/2008/05/19/535612.html

  • E-post til Amnesty. 19. mai 2008. (In Norwegian).







    Google Mail – Problemer med mangel på hjelp fra myndighetene.







    Google Mail



    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>




    Problemer med mangel på hjelp fra myndighetene.





    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>





    Mon, May 19, 2008 at 1:58 PM





    To:

    jegenes@amnesty.no



    Hei,

     

    jeg ringte Amnesty Norge i dag, og fikk svar at det var du som var overordnede for organisasjonskonsulenten.

     

    For her har det vært snakk om en misforståelse.

    Jeg har hatt noen problemer, som gjorde at jeg bl.a. måtte flykte fra Norge, og som jeg har skrevet om på

    blogg, jeg skal skrive en link til den blogg-posten.

     

    Så jeg vet altså, at noe foregår, at noen i Norge, forfølger meg, må man vel si.

     

    Men jeg vet ikke nøyaktig hva som foregår.

    Og dette synes jeg er som tortur, må man vel kunne si, at ingen forteller hva som foregår.

     

    Jeg har forsøkt, å få hjelp fra norske myndigheter, men de vil ikke gi noe hjelp, med å svare på hva som

    foregår.

     

    Jeg mener, at man har rett til å få råd/hjelp/informasjon, fra myndighetene, i situasjoner som dette, hvor

    det er fare for liv og helse osv., hvis man ønsker å oppholde seg i landet.

     

    Så trodde organisasjonskonsulenten deres, at min henvendelse, gjaldt, at jeg ønsket at Amnesty skulle

    etterforske organisert kriminalitet.

     

    Men det var altså en misforståelse.

    Jeg prøver å finne ut hvem jeg kan kontakte, for å få hjelp, med problemene med myndighetene i Norge.

    Og _ikke_ problemene med organisert kriminalitet, det skjønner jeg at, er myndighetenes oppgave.

     

    Så ringte jeg dere i dag da, og da fikk jeg høre, at det var du, som var organisasjonskonsulentens

    overordnede, så det er derfor jeg sender denne e-posten nå da, om dere har mulighet til å hjelpe med

    problemene med myndighetene, fordi det virker som at dette er ganske alvorlig.

    Håper dere har mulighet til å hjelpe med dette!


     

    Med vennlig hilsen

    Erik Ribsskog

     

    PS.

     

    Her er den blogg-posten, hvor jeg har skrevet hva jeg vet, om hva som foregår:

     

    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
    Date: Oct 24, 2007 4:25 PM

    [Quoted text hidden]

    [Quoted text hidden]







  • E-mails to the Financial Ombudsman, 19/5/08.







    Google Mail – Complaint Barclays







    Google Mail



    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>




    Complaint Barclays





    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>





    Mon, May 19, 2008 at 1:02 PM





    To:

    katherine.crawshaw@financial-ombudsman.org.uk



    Hi,

     

    I spoke with you collegue Steven, at the Financial Ombudsman, on 0845 080 1800 today.

     

    He said that the e-mails I sent you on 3/4, had been 'lost', or 'lost in the post', or something like that.

    I explained, that I didn't mean to be inpolite, but that I thought this sounded a bit strange, that the e-mails

    would just end up being lost, in a way like that.

     

    But we agreed, that I would try to send the e-mails again today anyway.

    So I'm sending them again now.


     

    Hope this is alright!
     

    Yours sincerely,

     

    Erik Ribsskog
     

    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
    Date: Apr 3, 2008 3:07 PM

    Subject: Complaint Barclays
    To: "Crawshaw, Katherine" <katherine.crawshaw@financial-ombudsman.org.uk>

     

    Hi,

     

    I'm refering to my e-mail from 8/2, where I explained that I needed some time to send

    you the Barclays complaint.

     

    I've been having a lot to do, but I'm going to send you copy of the e-mails from my

    correspondence with Barclays regarding the complaints.

     

    Then I'll update you later with scanned copies of the notes.

     

    Hope this is alright!

     

    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog












    Google Mail – RE:Regarding complaint. [#953557]







    Google Mail



    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>




    RE:Regarding complaint. [#953557]





    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>





    Mon, May 19, 2008 at 1:03 PM





    To:

    katherine.crawshaw@financial-ombudsman.org.uk



    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
    Date: Apr 3, 2008 3:09 PM

    Subject: Fwd: Regarding complaint. [#953557]
    To: katherine.crawshaw@financial-ombudsman.org.uk


    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: customer.relations@barclays.co.uk <customer.relations@barclays.co.uk>

    Date: Dec 7, 2007 2:57 PM
    Subject: RE:Regarding complaint. [#953557]
    To: eribsskog@gmail.com

    Acknowledgement of your complaint of 07/12/07

    Dear Mr Ribsskog

    Thank you for taking the time and trouble to let us know of your disappointment on this subject.

    For us to be able to progress with your complaint could you please contact us again providing us with the following information:

    Your full postal address, as held on our records and your Barclays sorting code number.

    As soon as this information is received your complaint will be forwarded to the relevant area for investigation.

    For security reasons, we are obliged to respond to your complaint in writing.

    We value your feedback and are sorry that you have experienced dissatisfaction on this occasion.

    Please quote this unique tracking number when you contact us – [953557]

    Please see our website for further information on how we deal with complaints, http://www.barclays.co.uk/contact_us/leaflet.html

    Yours sincerely

    Internet Care Team
    For and on behalf of
    Barclays Bank plc

    This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and intended solely for the addressee and may also be privileged or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the addressee, or have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately, delete it from your system and do not copy, disclose or otherwise act upon any part of this e-mail or its attachments.

    Internet communications are not guaranteed to be secure or virus-free.
    The Barclays Group does not accept responsibility for any loss arising from unauthorised access to, or interference with, any Internet communications by any third party, or from the transmission of any viruses. Replies to this e-mail may be monitored by the Barclays Group for operational or business reasons.

    Any opinion or other information in this e-mail or its attachments that does not relate to the business of the Barclays Group is personal to the sender and is not given or endorsed by the Barclays Group.

    Barclays Bank PLC.Registered in England and Wales (registered no. 1026167).

    Registered Office: 1 Churchill Place, London, E14 5HP, United Kingdom.

    Barclays Bank PLC is authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority.












    Google Mail – RE:Regarding complaint. [#953557]







    Google Mail



    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>




    RE:Regarding complaint. [#953557]





    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>





    Mon, May 19, 2008 at 1:03 PM





    To:

    katherine.crawshaw@financial-ombudsman.org.uk



    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
    Date: Apr 3, 2008 3:09 PM

    Subject: Fwd: Regarding complaint. [#953557]
    To: katherine.crawshaw@financial-ombudsman.org.uk


    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

    Date: Dec 7, 2007 3:52 PM
    Subject: Re: Regarding complaint. [#953557]
    To: "customer.relations@barclays.co.uk" <customer.relations@barclays.co.uk>


    Hi,

     

    thanks for your reply!

     

    My address should be:

     

    PO Box 1250

    Flat 3

    5 Leather Lane

    Liverpool

    L2 2AE

     

    (You could just remover the line with the PO Box if you want, since it's not in use any longer).

     

    And my sort-code should be:

     

    20-51-01

     

    Thanks again!

     

    Yours sincerely,

     


    Erik Ribsskog



     

     

    On 12/7/07, customer.relations@barclays.co.uk <customer.relations@barclays.co.uk > wrote:

    Acknowledgement of your complaint of 07/12/07

    Dear Mr Ribsskog

    Thank you for taking the time and trouble to let us know of your disappointment on this subject.

    For us to be able to progress with your complaint could you please contact us again providing us with the following information:

    Your full postal address, as held on our records and your Barclays sorting code number.

    As soon as this information is received your complaint will be forwarded to the relevant area for investigation.

    For security reasons, we are obliged to respond to your complaint in writing.

    We value your feedback and are sorry that you have experienced dissatisfaction on this occasion.

    Please quote this unique tracking number when you contact us – [953557]

    Please see our website for further information on how we deal with complaints, http://www.barclays.co.uk/contact_us/leaflet.html

    Yours sincerely

    Internet Care Team
    For and on behalf of
    Barclays Bank plc

    This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and intended solely for the addressee and may also be privileged or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the addressee, or have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately, delete it from your system and do not copy, disclose or otherwise act upon any part of this e-mail or its attachments.

    Internet communications are not guaranteed to be secure or virus-free.
    The Barclays Group does not accept responsibility for any loss arising from unauthorised access to, or interference with, any Internet communications by any third party, or from the transmission of any viruses. Replies to this e-mail may be monitored by the Barclays Group for operational or business reasons.

    Any opinion or other information in this e-mail or its attachments that does not relate to the business of the Barclays Group is personal to the sender and is not given or endorsed by the Barclays Group.

    Barclays Bank PLC.Registered in England and Wales (registered no. 1026167).

    Registered Office: 1 Churchill Place, London, E14 5HP, United Kingdom.

    Barclays Bank PLC is authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority.












    Google Mail – RE:Regarding complaint. [#953557]







    Google Mail



    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>




    RE:Regarding complaint. [#953557]





    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>





    Mon, May 19, 2008 at 1:05 PM





    To:

    katherine.crawshaw@financial-ombudsman.org.uk



    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
    Date: Apr 3, 2008 3:09 PM


    Subject: Fwd: Re: Regarding complaint. [#953557]
    To: katherine.crawshaw@financial-ombudsman.org.uk

    ———- Forwarded message ———-

    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>


    Date: Dec 8, 2007 11:17 AM
    Subject: Re: Re: Regarding complaint. [#953557]
    To: "customer.relations@barclays.co.uk" <customer.relations@barclays.co.uk>



    Hi,

     

    In my e-mail to you, I was asking to escalate a complaints issue to Customer Relations Team Management-level.

     

    I'm not sure if it is this that you have acctually done.

    So I would think it would be very fine if you could please explain this do me.

     

    And also if you have the possibility to sign with a signature, just for the case of future referencing, then that would

    be very fine!

     

    Thank you very much for your help in advance!

     

    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

     


    On 12/8/07, customer.relations@barclays.co.uk <customer.relations@barclays.co.uk > wrote:

    Acknowledgement of your complaint of 7th December 07

    Dear Mr Ribsskog,
    Thank you for your email providing us with the further information we need to begin investigating your complaint.

    Your complaint has now been forwarded to a Customer Relations Manager who will respond to you within the next five bank working days. Please note that for security reasons they will respond to you in writing rather than email.

    We want to reassure you that we are dealing with your complaint as quickly as possible and will investigate all aspects fully.

    Please see our website for further information on how we deal with complaints, http://www.barclays.co.uk/contact_us/leaflet.html

    Yours sincerely

    Internet Care Team
    For and on behalf of
    Barclays Bank plc.

    —————–
    Tracking Number: [953557]
    Please quote this unique tracking number for your email in any future emails regarding this matter.  Thank you.

    This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and intended solely for the addressee and may also be privileged or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the addressee, or have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately, delete it from your system and do not copy, disclose or otherwise act upon any part of this e-mail or its attachments.

    Internet communications are not guaranteed to be secure or virus-free.
    The Barclays Group does not accept responsibility for any loss arising from unauthorised access to, or interference with, any Internet communications by any third party, or from the transmission of any viruses. Replies to this e-mail may be monitored by the Barclays Group for operational or business reasons.

    Any opinion or other information in this e-mail or its attachments that does not relate to the business of the Barclays Group is personal to the sender and is not given or endorsed by the Barclays Group.

    Barclays Bank PLC.Registered in England and Wales (registered no. 1026167).

    Registered Office: 1 Churchill Place, London, E14 5HP, United Kingdom.

    Barclays Bank PLC is authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority.












    Google Mail – RE:Regarding complaint. [#953557]







    Google Mail



    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>




    RE:Regarding complaint. [#953557]





    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>





    Mon, May 19, 2008 at 1:05 PM





    To:

    katherine.crawshaw@financial-ombudsman.org.uk



    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
    Date: Apr 3, 2008 3:10 PM

    Subject: Fwd: Re: Re: Regarding complaint. [#953557]
    To: katherine.crawshaw@financial-ombudsman.org.uk


    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: customer.relations@barclays.co.uk <customer.relations@barclays.co.uk>

    Date: Dec 8, 2007 1:40 PM
    Subject: RE:Re: Re: Regarding complaint. [#953557]
    To: eribsskog@gmail.com


    Thank you for your email.

    Your Complaint has been escalated to Customer Relations Complaints on the 7th December.

    Yours sincerely

    Internet Care Team
    For and on behalf of
    Barclays Bank plc

    —————–
    Tracking Number: [953557]
    Please quote this unique tracking number for your email in any future emails regarding this matter.  Thank you.

    This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and intended solely for the addressee and may also be privileged or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the addressee, or have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately, delete it from your system and do not copy, disclose or otherwise act upon any part of this e-mail or its attachments.

    Internet communications are not guaranteed to be secure or virus-free.
    The Barclays Group does not accept responsibility for any loss arising from unauthorised access to, or interference with, any Internet communications by any third party, or from the transmission of any viruses. Replies to this e-mail may be monitored by the Barclays Group for operational or business reasons.

    Any opinion or other information in this e-mail or its attachments that does not relate to the business of the Barclays Group is personal to the sender and is not given or endorsed by the Barclays Group.

    Barclays Bank PLC.Registered in England and Wales (registered no. 1026167).

    Registered Office: 1 Churchill Place, London, E14 5HP, United Kingdom.

    Barclays Bank PLC is authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority.












    Google Mail – RE:Regarding complaint. [#953557]







    Google Mail



    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>




    RE:Regarding complaint. [#953557]





    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>





    Mon, May 19, 2008 at 1:05 PM





    To:

    katherine.crawshaw@financial-ombudsman.org.uk



    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
    Date: Apr 3, 2008 3:10 PM

    Subject: Fwd: Re: Re: Regarding complaint. [#953557]
    To: katherine.crawshaw@financial-ombudsman.org.uk

    ———- Forwarded message ———-

    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>


    Date: Dec 8, 2007 4:00 PM
    Subject: Re: Re: Re: Regarding complaint. [#953557]
    To: "customer.relations@barclays.co.uk" <customer.relations@barclays.co.uk>



    Hi,

     

    thank you very much for you answer!

     

    I'm sorry I haven't lived that long in Britain yet.

    Does this mean that my enquiery is going to be sent directly to a Customer Relations Team Manager?

     

    Thank you very much for your answer in advance!

    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

     

    On 12/8/07, customer.relations@barclays.co.uk <customer.relations@barclays.co.uk > wrote:


    Thank you for your email.

    Your Complaint has been escalated to Customer Relations Complaints on the 7th December.

    Yours sincerely

    Internet Care Team
    For and on behalf of
    Barclays Bank plc

    —————–
    Tracking Number: [953557]
    Please quote this unique tracking number for your email in any future emails regarding this matter.  Thank you.

    This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and intended solely for the addressee and may also be privileged or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the addressee, or have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately, delete it from your system and do not copy, disclose or otherwise act upon any part of this e-mail or its attachments.

    Internet communications are not guaranteed to be secure or virus-free.
    The Barclays Group does not accept responsibility for any loss arising from unauthorised access to, or interference with, any Internet communications by any third party, or from the transmission of any viruses. Replies to this e-mail may be monitored by the Barclays Group for operational or business reasons.

    Any opinion or other information in this e-mail or its attachments that does not relate to the business of the Barclays Group is personal to the sender and is not given or endorsed by the Barclays Group.

    Barclays Bank PLC.Registered in England and Wales (registered no. 1026167).

    Registered Office: 1 Churchill Place, London, E14 5HP, United Kingdom.

    Barclays Bank PLC is authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority.












    Google Mail – RE:Regarding complaint. [#953557]







    Google Mail



    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>




    RE:Regarding complaint. [#953557]





    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>





    Mon, May 19, 2008 at 1:06 PM





    To:

    katherine.crawshaw@financial-ombudsman.org.uk



    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
    Date: Apr 3, 2008 3:10 PM


    Subject: Fwd: Re: Re: Re: Regarding complaint. [#953557]
    To: katherine.crawshaw@financial-ombudsman.org.uk


    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: customer.relations@barclays.co.uk <customer.relations@barclays.co.uk>

    Date: Dec 10, 2007 10:23 AM
    Subject: RE:Re: Re: Re: Regarding complaint. [#953557]
    To: eribsskog@gmail.com


    Thank you for your email.

    Your e mail has been sent to a Customer Relations Manager, who will contact you in due course.

    If you wish to ring them for an update the number to call is –
    Telephone: 0800 282 390 (UK-only free call) or 0113 389 8065 (+44 113 389 8065 from abroad).

    Yours sincerely

    Internet Care Team
    For and on behalf of
    Barclays Bank plc

    —————–
    Tracking Number: [953557]
    Please quote this unique tracking number for your email in any future emails regarding this matter.  Thank you.

    This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and intended solely for the addressee and may also be privileged or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the addressee, or have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately, delete it from your system and do not copy, disclose or otherwise act upon any part of this e-mail or its attachments.

    Internet communications are not guaranteed to be secure or virus-free.
    The Barclays Group does not accept responsibility for any loss arising from unauthorised access to, or interference with, any Internet communications by any third party, or from the transmission of any viruses. Replies to this e-mail may be monitored by the Barclays Group for operational or business reasons.

    Any opinion or other information in this e-mail or its attachments that does not relate to the business of the Barclays Group is personal to the sender and is not given or endorsed by the Barclays Group.

    Barclays Bank PLC.Registered in England and Wales (registered no. 1026167).

    Registered Office: 1 Churchill Place, London, E14 5HP, United Kingdom.

    Barclays Bank PLC is authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority.












    Google Mail – RE:Regarding complaint. [#953557]







    Google Mail



    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>




    RE:Regarding complaint. [#953557]





    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>





    Mon, May 19, 2008 at 1:06 PM





    To:

    katherine.crawshaw@financial-ombudsman.org.uk



    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
    Date: Apr 3, 2008 3:11 PM

    Subject: Fwd: Re: Re: Re: Regarding complaint. [#953557]
    To: katherine.crawshaw@financial-ombudsman.org.uk

    ———- Forwarded message ———-

    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>


    Date: Dec 10, 2007 11:18 AM
    Subject: Re: Re: Re: Re: Regarding complaint. [#953557]
    To: "customer.relations@barclays.co.uk" <customer.relations@barclays.co.uk>



    Hi,

     

    thank you very much much for your update!

     

    How should I go forward, if I was wondering why my email wasn't set directly to

    a Customer Relations Team Manager, like I was asking for?

     

    Thank you very much for your help in advance!

     

    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

     


    On 12/10/07, customer.relations@barclays.co.uk < customer.relations@barclays.co.uk> wrote:

    Thank you for your email.

    Your e mail has been sent to a Customer Relations Manager, who will contact you in due course.

    If you wish to ring them for an update the number to call is –
    Telephone: 0800 282 390 (UK-only free call) or 0113 389 8065 (+44 113 389 8065 from abroad).

    Yours sincerely

    Internet Care Team
    For and on behalf of

    Barclays Bank plc

    —————–
    Tracking Number: [953557]
    Please quote this unique tracking number for your email in any future emails regarding this matter.  Thank you.

    This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and intended solely for the addressee and may also be privileged or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the addressee, or have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately, delete it from your system and do not copy, disclose or otherwise act upon any part of this e-mail or its attachments.

    Internet communications are not guaranteed to be secure or virus-free.
    The Barclays Group does not accept responsibility for any loss arising from unauthorised access to, or interference with, any Internet communications by any third party, or from the transmission of any viruses. Replies to this e-mail may be monitored by the Barclays Group for operational or business reasons.

    Any opinion or other information in this e-mail or its attachments that does not relate to the business of the Barclays Group is personal to the sender and is not given or endorsed by the Barclays Group.

    Barclays Bank PLC.Registered in England and Wales (registered no. 1026167).

    Registered Office: 1 Churchill Place, London, E14 5HP, United Kingdom.

    Barclays Bank PLC is authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority.












    Google Mail – RE:Regarding complaint. [#953557]







    Google Mail



    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>




    RE:Regarding complaint. [#953557]





    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>





    Mon, May 19, 2008 at 1:07 PM





    To:

    katherine.crawshaw@financial-ombudsman.org.uk



    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
    Date: Apr 3, 2008 3:11 PM


    Subject: Fwd: Re: Re: Re: Re: Regarding complaint. [#953557]
    To: katherine.crawshaw@financial-ombudsman.org.uk


    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: customer.relations@barclays.co.uk <customer.relations@barclays.co.uk>

    Date: Dec 10, 2007 12:54 PM
    Subject: RE:Re: Re: Re: Re: Regarding complaint. [#953557]
    To: eribsskog@gmail.com


    Thank you for your email.

    All complaints are sent to the Head Office Customer Relations department, where a Customer Relations Manager is allocated to each complaint. This person will write to you, quoting their name and contact details.

    If you wish to ring them for an update the number to call is –
    Telephone: 0800 282 390 (UK-only free call) or 0113 389 8065 (+44 113 389 8065 from abroad).

    Yours sincerely

    Internet Care Team
    For and on behalf of

    Barclays Bank plc

    —————–
    Tracking Number: [953557]
    Please quote this unique tracking number for your email in any future emails regarding this matter.  Thank you.

    This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and intended solely for the addressee and may also be privileged or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the addressee, or have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately, delete it from your system and do not copy, disclose or otherwise act upon any part of this e-mail or its attachments.

    Internet communications are not guaranteed to be secure or virus-free.
    The Barclays Group does not accept responsibility for any loss arising from unauthorised access to, or interference with, any Internet communications by any third party, or from the transmission of any viruses. Replies to this e-mail may be monitored by the Barclays Group for operational or business reasons.

    Any opinion or other information in this e-mail or its attachments that does not relate to the business of the Barclays Group is personal to the sender and is not given or endorsed by the Barclays Group.

    Barclays Bank PLC.Registered in England and Wales (registered no. 1026167).

    Registered Office: 1 Churchill Place, London, E14 5HP, United Kingdom.

    Barclays Bank PLC is authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority.












    Google Mail – RE:Ref.: 1004 GHKT [#939869]







    Google Mail



    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>




    RE:Ref.: 1004 GHKT [#939869]





    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>





    Mon, May 19, 2008 at 1:07 PM





    To:

    katherine.crawshaw@financial-ombudsman.org.uk



    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
    Date: Apr 3, 2008 3:12 PM

    Subject: Fwd: Ref.: 1004 GHKT [#939869]
    To: katherine.crawshaw@financial-ombudsman.org.uk

    ———- Forwarded message ———-

    From: customer.relations@barclays.co.uk <customer.relations@barclays.co.uk>

    Date: Nov 6, 2007 9:48 AM
    Subject: RE:Ref.: 1004 GHKT [#939869]
    To: eribsskog@gmail.com


    Acknowledgement of your complaint of 6th Nov 2007

    Dear Erik Ribsskog

    Thank you for taking the time and trouble to let us know of your disappointment on this subject. We value your feedback and are sorry that you have experienced dissatisfaction on this occasion.

    Your complaint has been forwarded to a Customer Relations Manager who will respond to you within the next five bank working days. Please note that for security reasons they will respond to you in writing rather than email.

    We want to reassure you that we are dealing with your complaint as quickly as possible and will investigate all aspects fully.

    Please see our website for further information on how we deal with complaints, http://www.barclays.co.uk/contact_us/leaflet.html

    Yours sincerely

    Internet Care Team
    For and on behalf of
    Barclays Bank plc.

    —————-
    Tracking Number: [939869]

    Please quote this unique tracking number for your email in any future emails regarding this matter. Thank you.

    This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and intended solely for the addressee and may also be privileged or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the addressee, or have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately, delete it from your system and do not copy, disclose or otherwise act upon any part of this e-mail or its attachments.

    Internet communications are not guaranteed to be secure or virus-free.
    The Barclays Group does not accept responsibility for any loss arising from unauthorised access to, or interference with, any Internet communications by any third party, or from the transmission of any viruses. Replies to this e-mail may be monitored by the Barclays Group for operational or business reasons.

    Any opinion or other information in this e-mail or its attachments that does not relate to the business of the Barclays Group is personal to the sender and is not given or endorsed by the Barclays Group.

    Barclays Bank PLC.Registered in England and Wales (registered no. 1026167).

    Registered Office: 1 Churchill Place, London, E14 5HP, United Kingdom.

    Barclays Bank PLC is authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority.












    Google Mail – RE:Ref.: 1004 GHKT [#939869]







    Google Mail



    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>




    RE:Ref.: 1004 GHKT [#939869]





    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>





    Mon, May 19, 2008 at 1:07 PM





    To:

    katherine.crawshaw@financial-ombudsman.org.uk



    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
    Date: Apr 3, 2008 3:12 PM

    Subject: Fwd: Ref.: 1004 GHKT [#939869]
    To: katherine.crawshaw@financial-ombudsman.org.uk

    ———- Forwarded message ———-

    From: customer.relations@barclays.co.uk <customer.relations@barclays.co.uk>

    Date: Nov 6, 2007 9:48 AM
    Subject: RE:Ref.: 1004 GHKT [#939869]
    To: eribsskog@gmail.com


    Acknowledgement of your complaint of 6th Nov 2007

    Dear Erik Ribsskog

    Thank you for taking the time and trouble to let us know of your disappointment on this subject. We value your feedback and are sorry that you have experienced dissatisfaction on this occasion.

    Your complaint has been forwarded to a Customer Relations Manager who will respond to you within the next five bank working days. Please note that for security reasons they will respond to you in writing rather than email.

    We want to reassure you that we are dealing with your complaint as quickly as possible and will investigate all aspects fully.

    Please see our website for further information on how we deal with complaints, http://www.barclays.co.uk/contact_us/leaflet.html

    Yours sincerely

    Internet Care Team
    For and on behalf of
    Barclays Bank plc.

    —————-
    Tracking Number: [939869]

    Please quote this unique tracking number for your email in any future emails regarding this matter. Thank you.

    This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and intended solely for the addressee and may also be privileged or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the addressee, or have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately, delete it from your system and do not copy, disclose or otherwise act upon any part of this e-mail or its attachments.

    Internet communications are not guaranteed to be secure or virus-free.
    The Barclays Group does not accept responsibility for any loss arising from unauthorised access to, or interference with, any Internet communications by any third party, or from the transmission of any viruses. Replies to this e-mail may be monitored by the Barclays Group for operational or business reasons.

    Any opinion or other information in this e-mail or its attachments that does not relate to the business of the Barclays Group is personal to the sender and is not given or endorsed by the Barclays Group.

    Barclays Bank PLC.Registered in England and Wales (registered no. 1026167).

    Registered Office: 1 Churchill Place, London, E14 5HP, United Kingdom.

    Barclays Bank PLC is authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority.












    Google Mail – Regarding complaint.







    Google Mail



    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>




    Regarding complaint.





    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>





    Mon, May 19, 2008 at 1:07 PM





    To:

    katherine.crawshaw@financial-ombudsman.org.uk



    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
    Date: Apr 3, 2008 3:12 PM

    Subject: Fwd: Regarding complaint.
    To: katherine.crawshaw@financial-ombudsman.org.uk


    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

    Date: Dec 7, 2007 3:28 PM
    Subject: Regarding complaint.
    To: customer.relations@barclays.co.uk


    Hi,

     

    I was just wondering if it would please be possible for someone at Customer Relations Team Management-level,

    to contact me back regarding a complaint?

     

    Thanks in advance for the reply!

     

    Yours sincerely,

     


    Erik Ribsskog












    Google Mail – Complaint







    Google Mail



    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>




    Complaint





    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>





    Mon, May 19, 2008 at 1:09 PM





    To:

    katherine.crawshaw@financial-ombudsman.org.uk



    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
    Date: Apr 3, 2008 3:14 PM

    Subject: Fwd: Complaint
    To: katherine.crawshaw@financial-ombudsman.org.uk

    ———- Forwarded message ———-

    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

    Date: Oct 25, 2007 5:43 AM
    Subject: Complaint
    To: customer.relations@barclays.co.uk



    Hi,

     

    I would please like to complain about your representative Mr. Hall, acting inpolite

    against me, while I was in your branch in Lord St. in Liverpool, yesterday.

     

    It was at around 5.50 pm, yesterday.

     

    I've been busy with other work, so I havn't got to send the e-mail before now.

     

    I was in the bank to transfer some money to a Norwegian company.

     

    And I had brought with me an old copy of an 'Barclays International Payment' form.

     

    To use this to copy the company's IBAN-number and other details from.

     

    First I asked polite for a new form, and the representative, Mr. Hall, acted like he didn't want

    to give me the form.

     

    And just 'acted stupid' so to speak, I had to ask several times, to get the form.

     

    Then, when I had finished filling out the form, I returned to where the representative was placed.

     

    And then the representative, Mr. Hall, started mocking my signature.

     

    The representative also started whispering with one of his collegues or managers, a group of

    people appeared behind the representative.

     

    And then, while the representative was serving me, he started to whisper, it seemed to me

    it must have been something related to me, to a college or manager, a woman her fourties

    I think she must have been. I think she had blond hair, but I'm not 100% certain on that.

     

    And this seemed very impolite to me, because it seemed to me that it was me he was

    whispering about.

    And the representative also acted very akward, like he repeatedly said that I would be charged

    £20, ignoring what I said.

     

    I said the beneficary will be charged for the transfer right.

     

    Like I had crossed for, on the form.

     

    And the representative just continued repeating the same sentence several time, as though

    I hadn't said anything at all.

     

    Even if the representative seemed very focused, so not particulary tired or anything like that.

     

    So I thought this behavour was so strange that it seemed like it was due to me as a person,

    that the representative acted so awkward, and didn't take any regards to what I was saying,

    that the beneficary would be charged the £20 charge.

     

    (I really thoght that it was £25, but maybe I remember wrong, I have quite a few things on my

    mind).

    After the representative kept ignoring me, and just countinued saying that I would be charged

    £20.

     

    He said it like I would be charged £20 on top of the £60 that I was transfering.

     

    But I had crossed of on the form for the beneficary to pay for the charge, so that it would be

    deducted from the £60.

     

    Like I've always done, I used to transfer money to Norway quite often from your old Water St.

    branch, and there they where always acting very polite and correct.

     

    And it should be clear to the representative that I had transfered money abroad from before,

    since I showed the representative the copy of the old form, and asked the representative,

    if I could please get a new form.

     

    (This was when I had just entered into the bank).

     

    And the representative pretended to not understand, so I had to ask again and make it clear

    to the representative that I wanted to transfer some money abroad.

     

    So it was very strange experience, I think it should have been enough to show the representative

    the copy of the old form, and ask if I could please have a new form.

     

    But that was not enough.

     

    I had to refrase the question, and I had to point of the fact that I wanted to transfer some money

    abroad, before the representative was willing to give me a new form.

     

    And went I went back, after finishing filling out the new form, then the representative was mocking

    my signature, was whispering about me to one of his collegues or managers.

     

    He repeatedly said, at least three times, that I would be charged £20.

     

    Even if it said on the form that the beneficary would pay the charge.

     

    When the representative was ready repeat the sentence about me having to pay a £20 charge, for

    the forth time.

     

    Then I had to interupt the representative, and ask the representative, if they had changed their rules

    (for transfereing money abroad).

     

    The representative answered that you hadn't changed the rules.

     

    I think this kind of behaviour was totaly out of line, and I have to say very rediculus.

     

    Because why on earth would he bring up the issue of me having to pay a £20 charge, so many times.

     

    When he must have been aware of that I knew the process of transfering money abroad from before,

    since I brought with me a copy of the old form.

     

    And it also said on the form I gave the representative, that the beneficary would pay the charge.

     

    So that the representative, who seemed awake and aware, starts saying that I have to pay a

    £20 charge, three or four times, for no seemingly logical reason, seemed a bit sureal to me.

     

    And I also thought that it was very impolite of the representative to mock my signature.

     

    And also I though it was impolite that he didn't want to give me a new form when I asked for one,

    but for some reason, I had to ask twice for a form, before he was willing to give me one.

     

    So I thought this behaviour from the representative was harassing.

     

    So I wanted to report this, as soon as I left the bank I thought of this.

    But I've also been calling your credit-file department, not long ago, I'll try to call them back

    tomorrow, because I haven't heard from them yet.

     

    I called them regarding that the bank wouldn't give me a £30 overdraft for food and electricity,

    about two or three weeks ago.

     

    I thought that there must have been some wrong information registered on me on my Barclays

    credit-file.

    Because I have checked it with the Credit Expert company, and theres nothing wrong at all

    with my credit file with them, or with my credit history.

     

    And I haven't overdrawn my Barclays account, and I have had a regular cash-flow on my

    Barclays cashcard and current account for more than two years now.

     

    From regular full-time employement.

    And I've from students who get large overdrafts, but I was unable to get a £30 for food and

    electricity, so I've followed the advice I was given from the Credit Expert company, on

    getting and keeping a high credit-score, so I can't really understand what this is about.

     

    So due to this investigation, which I havn't got a reply from yet, I though that I maybe shouln't

    write a complaint about your representative Mr. Hall at first (I saw the name on the name-sign,

    and imeadeatly wrote it down on the copy of the international payment form).

     

    So I decided not to complain at first.

    But when I now, about an hour ago, thought about the episode again, I though the episode

    was so surreal and strange, that I decieded that I send a complaint anyway, and then

    explain in the complaint that there was an investigation going on regarding my Barclays

    credit-file, and that these two complaints are seperate incidents.

     

    I've also been having some problems with an organised crime case in Norway and Britain,

    and I haven't been given any help from the police regarding this.

     

    Since your representatives are acting so strange (I thought they acted strange the last time

    I was in the bank to transfer money abroad as well, even if I can't remember the details

    exactly, at least not at the moment).

     

    And also since it hasn't been possible for me, for no understandable reason, to get any

    overdraft or loan at all, even if I've been in economical hardship, and I've had a job, and

    a perfect credit-score.

     

    And no overdrafts or other problems.

     

    Due to these strange circomstances, and the lack of Goverment help, both in Norway

    and Britain, (which I've even contacted Amnesty International about, although they for

    some reason didn't want to help with the issues surrounding lack of respect from

    government in connection with peoples rights).

     

    So due to these strange cicomstances, I was wondering if you was instructed in any

    way, from the police or other government oragnisations, not to give me a loan or

    overdraft.

     

    And also to use my regular visits to the bank to transfer money, to spy on me, and

    ask strange questions for the police/other government institutions?

     

    Because it seem a bit to me like the police and government institutions, are using

    me as a living target or something like that, since I've been having some problems

    with being followed by mafia, (like I've overheard people saying about me in Norway).

     

    And I've also been having problems in connection with working in a company in

    Liverpool, in which there were organised crime going on, and abouth which,

    the Norwegian embassy in London, explained to me that they didn't want to

    help the Scandinavians working there, because, like they said, they didn't

    want to help people who where cooperating with criminals.

    Even if it seemed just like a normal company. Situated in the famous Cunard

    Building, and with strict office-wear dress-code. And with the work-task being

    activating Windows and other programs over the phone for Scandinavian

    customers on behalf of Microsoft.

     

    (Just to explain).

     

    So if it is the case, that the police or other government organisations, are instructing

    you, not to give me a loan or an overdraft, then I would like to remind you that

    this isn't legal.

     

    People have rights, and the Police have no more right to deny me a loan, than

    I have to deny the Police to get a loan.

     

    I will take these issues further, because I think I'm being harassed in regards

    to both these complaints.

     

    And I don't really think that the bank have the right to harass me, when it

    comes to not giving me a loan, even if the police tells the bank to do this.

    Because I can't see that the police have the right to do that.

     

    And I'd like to add now, when I'm writing this anyway, that I'm going to take

    these issues as far as find to be needed, if I find that this is like I suspect,

    and if I get the oppertunity.

     

    I just thought that I'd add that, while I was writing, so that there wouldn't be

    any misunderstandings surrouding this.

     

    I hope that this is alright!

     

    Yours sincerely,

     


    Erik Ribsskog

     

     

     

     

     






  • Hva er galt med media? (In Norwegian).

    Hva er galt med media? (In Norwegian).

    Hvis man søker på ‘illuminati’, på Google, så kommer det opp, 6,650,000 treff. Over 6 millioner treff.
    http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&q=illuminati&meta=

    Hvis man søker på ‘new world order’, på Google, så kommer det opp 70,100,000 treff. Over 70 millioner treff.

    http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&safe=off&q=new+world+order&meta=

    (Her fant jeg blant annet en link nå, som står på førstesida på Google over når man søker på ‘New world order’:

    New World Order Definition
    Introduction
    The following article is extracted from an excellent analysis of the New World Order by author Ken Adachi which can be found at educate-yourself.org.

    The term New World Order (NWO) has been used by numerous politicians through the ages, and is a generic term used to refer to a worldwide conspiracy being orchestrated by an extremely powerful and influential group of genetically-related individuals (at least at the highest echelons) which include many of the world’s wealthiest people, top political leaders, and corporate elite, as well as members of the so-called Black Nobility of Europe (dominated by the British Crown) whose goal is to create a One World (fascist) Government, stripped of nationalistic and regional boundaries, that is obedient to their agenda.

    Listen to the Zionist* banker, Paul Warburg:

    “We will have a world government whether you like it or not. The only question is whether that government will be achieved by conquest or consent.” (February 17, 1950, as he testified before the US Senate).

    Their intention is to effect complete and total control over every human being on the planet and to dramatically reduce the world’s population by two thirds. While the name New World Order is the term most frequently used today to loosely refer to anyone involved in this conspiracy, the study of exactly who makes up this group is a complex and intricate one. For further research sources, please see the side bar on the left.

    http://www.threeworldwars.com/new-world-order.htm

    Jeg har også lest, at disse New World Order folka, eller om det var Illuminati folka, om det er det samme.

    At disse kontrollerer stort sett hver eneste etterettningsorganisasjon, på jorden, og politi, og mafia osv.

    Jeg lurer på om det er disse folka jeg har etter meg, sånn at hvis man ikke blir tulla med av noe mafia, så blir man tulla med av politiet, og egentlig er det samme greia.

    Jeg kan ikke si det helt sikkert, men jeg mistenker at det er sånn.

    Men dette skulle egentlig være om media, så jeg får gå videre).

    Altså, man finner over 76 millioner treff på Google, på ‘New World Order’, og ‘Illuminati’.

    Er alt dette tull?

    Hvis man ser på TV, leser avisa, eller hører på radio, hvor mye får man høre om ‘New World Order’, og ‘Illuminati’, da?

    Ingenting!

    Er dette tilfeldig?

    Eller er det slik som det står over, at vi har en ‘One World Goverment’, og at disse samarbeider med storkapitalen, vi så en bankeier/finanseier/plutokrat (bankier, står det ovenfor), uttale seg, i 1950, til det amerikanske senatet, å si, at dere får en One World Government, enten frivillig, eller med tvang.

    Så storkapitalen, er med.

    Og hvem eier TV-selskaper, aviser, og radio-kanaler, det er vel ofte stor-kapitalen.

    Selskaper som NRK og BBC, er jo eiet av staten da.

    Men staten, har i hvertfall jeg vært nok borti, til å vite at det er en slags mafia også.

    Så myndighetene er vel også med da.

    For man kan jo ikke finne et kvekk om disse temaene, i vanlige aviser, på tv, eller på radio.

    Og det har jo skjedd oppkjøp av lokalaviser osv., de senere årene, i hvertfall i Norge.

    Og avisene har blitt samlet under tre paraplyer/eiere.

    – Schibsted, som eier Aftenposten og VG.

    – A-pressen, som eier alle de sosialdemokratiske avisene.

    – Orkla, som eide en stor gruppe aviser, men som har solgt disse til en britisk eier nå.

    (Orkla har jeg funnet en del rare ting med, når det gjelder deres veldig kjente Grandiosa-pizza, som det kanskje ikke er så populært å skrive om, siden Grandiosa er så populær.

    http://nb.xiandos.info/Pizza_Grandiosa).

    Og TV2, f.eks., er jo kontrollert av LO.

    Det er jo en del av arbeiderbevegelsen, på samme måte som at arbeiderparitet, er en del av arbeiderbevelgelsen.

    Og Arbeiderpartiet, har jo nettopp Erna Solberg i Høyre, kritisert, for å ha lite maktspredning, i det norske samfunnet, og lite respekt for enkeltpersoners universale rettigheter.

    De bygger opp til et elite-samfunn.

    Hvor de, i den nye eliten, ofte i Oslo, går på private sykehus, private skoler osv.

    Så hva skjer med de vanlige sykehusene, og de vanlige skolene?

    Jo de forfaller.

    Så her er det snakk om grisene i Orwells Animal Farm, at noen dyr er likere enn andre.

    Det er den nye eliten i Norge, de går for å være sosialdemokratiske, eller sosialistiske, men de er som grisene i Animal Farm, at de er likere enn de andre.

    Men tilbake til media.

    Vi har sett, at avisene, de har blitt kjøpt opp, og samlet i hos tre store eiere, i hovedsak.

    Det samme har foregått i andre land, som f.eks. Storbritannia.

    Her husker jeg fra 80-tallet, at det var to rike folk, som kjøpte opp nesten alle avisene, og det var Murdoch og Maxwell.

    Den ene av dem, døde på en veldig rar måte, på seilbåten sin.

    Denne New World Order agendaen, de må vel ha noe uoffisiellt maktapparat, og terrorstyrker, eller hva man skal kalle det.

    De bruker vel kanskje politiet, og de kontrollerte mafia osv, leste jeg, og dette Illuminati greiene, er kanskje noe mafia-greier og.

    Kan dette, at han Maxwell, plutselig dukket opp død, på seilbåten sin, ha vært noe New World Order attentat for eksempel?

    Det var bare noe jeg kom på nå.

    Skal jeg se om jeg finner en link til dette, at han dukket opp død på seilbåten, en gang på 90-tallet, var det vel.

    Maxwell mysteriously drowned in 1991 after apparently falling from his luxury yacht. The official verdict was accidental drowning but there was speculation that he may have committed suicide or even been murdered. After his death it was revealed that Maxwell had stolen millions of pounds from his employees’ pension funds to finance his business empire.

    http://uk.movies.yahoo.com/29062006/5/hollywood-takes-media-mogul-maxwell-s-story-0.html

    Ja, jeg skal ikke påstå, nøyaktig hva som har skjedd her.

    Men at noe rart kan ha foregått, det vil jeg ikke se bort fra.

    Siden, at den ene dagen, så var han en av de mest omtalte og mektigste personer, i Storbritannia, siden han alltid var i nyheten, pga. ‘krigen’ mot Murdoch, om a bli den som vant konkuransen om avis-markedet.

    Og den neste dagen, så står det plutselig i alle avisene at han er funnet død under uklare omstendigher.

    Så om dette kan ha noe med konkurransesituasjonen på avismarkedet å gjøre, at han ble funnet død, det er vel heller ikke umulig.

    De britiske avisene, virker i hvertfall gjennomkorrupte nå, når man ser på f.eks. Martine-saken, hvor alle de britiske avisene, vil ha det til at hun var en ‘socialite’, og lure de britiske avisleserene til å tro at hun var en sositet, i Norge, når hun var en vanlig norsk jente.

    Så om det er en New World Order agenda, ute å lurer, i forbindelse med denne saken.

    Når jeg jobba på Microsoft sin skandinaviske produktaktivering over telefon, i Liverpool.

    (Dette er ikke noen fancy bra betalt jobb, hvis noen tror det, siden man jobber indirekte for Microsoft, gjennom firmaet Arvato Services Ltd.

    Man tjener kun ca. £5 i timen i denne jobben, ca. 50 kroner timer, for å aktivere windows over telefon).

    Og her virket det som at nordiske damer, ble utnyttet av noe lokal mob osv.

    Det kunne i hvertfall virke sånn for meg, jeg har ikke klart å få noen klarhet i det.

    Så om nordiske damer blir utnyttet, ved at de blir oppmuntret til å studere og jobbe i utlandet, som del av en New World Order agenda?

    Og at det er dette britiske aviser prøver å dekke over i Martine-saken?

    Jeg skal ikke si det sikkert at det er sånn, men jeg vil ikke se helt bort fra det.

    Og da mener jeg at det riktigste er, å nevne muligheten.

    Man ser også reklamer på nettavisene, som ‘Ut å reise, bruk musa’.

    Så om det er en New World Order agenda, som gir nordiske jenter, jorden rundt biletter billige osv., for at de skal få bruke musa og komme seg ut å reise.

    Alle vet jo at nordiske jenter er kjent for å være veldig pene.

    Og staten setter de jo på prevansjons-program, det er gratis p-piller til alle unge norske jenter, de trenger bare snakke med helsesøster, og nå skal aldersgrensen økes, for hvor lenge de kan få p-piller gratis, nå er det vel fra de er rundt 14 til 18, eller noe, og det skal vel bli fra de er ca. 14 til en del år opp i 20-åra nå da.

    Slike tema er kanskje ikke så populært å ta opp, men det kan virke som at det er noe organisert lureri på gang.

    F.eks. da jeg var på språkreise i Weymouth, sommeren 85, da var jeg og en kamerat, Sevland fra Svelvik, og spilte fotball.

    Så dukker det opp to norske jenter i 16-17 års alderen, som går tur med en britisk mann, og ungen hans, var det kanskje. Og som er på språkreise da.

    Og de forklarte at de måtte ta oppvasken, og gjøre alt mulig husarbeid, og være nesten som konene hans da.

    Og det sa dem til vårs, som var nettopp ferdig med 9. klasse.

    Så vi var vel 15-16 år da.

    Men hvorfor sa dem ikke fra til lærerene på skolen osv.

    Ikke lett å svare på, men noe var det vel.

    Men nå skrev jeg meg litt bort her.

    Men, jeg lurer på om media, er under kontroll av noen, siden de ikke skriver et kvekk, om ‘New World Order’, og ‘Illuminati’, enda det finnes over 70 millioner nettsider, om disse temaene.

    Kan det være, at det er en mafia, eller noe, som media er redde for?

    Er alle redaktørene, under kontroll, av en New World Order agenda, med en verdensregjering, som vi finner referert til ovenfor?

    Ikke vet jeg, hva som foregår nøyaktig, men at noe foregår, det vil jeg nok si at jeg synes det virker som.

    Så får vi se om det vil dukke opp noe klarhet rundt disse temaene i fremtiden.

    Vi får se.

    Med vennlig hilsen

    Erik Ribsskog

  • E-mail to Blogger, 18/5/08.







    Google Mail – Hate-blogg.







    Google Mail



    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>




    Hate-blogg.





    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>





    Sun, May 18, 2008 at 7:48 PM





    To:

    support@blogger.com



    Hi,

     

    I'm a bit tired of that you aren't answering my e-mails.

     

    I'm going to contact the American police-autorothies, if you aren't answering me back on this e-mail now.

     

    Hope this is alright!

     

    Yours sincerely,

     

    Erik Ribsskog

    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
    Date: Apr 22, 2008 5:20 AM

    Subject: Re: Hate-blogg.
    To: Blogger Help <support@blogger.com>

     


    Hi,

     

    I can't see that I have recieved a reply to this e-mail.

    The blog contains very serious and sick personal-attacks on me as a person, and even the url, translates

    to 'insane Ribsskog'.

     

    So I don't understand how you can just ignore this.

     

    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

     


    On 4/21/08, Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com> wrote:

    Hi,

     

    now the person is insinuating that I am a pedophile.

     

    I want to know who this person is.

     

    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

     


    On 4/20/08, Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com> wrote:

    Hi,

     

    someone has startet a blogger-blog, which is dedicated to writing to writing abuse against me, as a privat-person.

     

    I was wondering if you could please have a look at this.

    The url is: http://galeribsskog.blogspot.com/ (It translates to: insane Ribsskog.blogspot.com).

     

    Thanks in advance for the help!

    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog