johncons

Måned: juli 2008

  • Dette tror jeg bare kan skje i Sverige. (In Norwegian).

    fick inte köpa cigg Karl-Erik Borg i Gällivare blev röksugen efter middagen – och tänkte köpa en ask cigaretter på Ica. Men eftersom han inte kunde bevisa att han är över 18 år gammal fick han nobben. ”Jag har aldrig varit med om något löjligare”, säger Karl-Erik – som faktiskt har fyllt 64.

    Foto: Anna-Lena Mattsson

    Gissa: Är Karl-Erik över 18 år?

    Bloggat om artikeln

    Visar inlägg från de 3 högst rankade bloggarna

    Från bloggen: LasseB
    07 jul 14:28

    Från bloggen: Twentysomething – Fighten mot övervikten
    07 jul 12:15

    Från bloggen: Salubrin Online
    07 jul 12:51

    Visa alla »

    Vill du blogga om artikeln?

    Top of Form

    Blogga om artikeln

    Länka till artikeln från ditt blogginlägg – kopiera den här adressen:

    För att komma med i listningen här behöver du också ha presenterat din blogg på Bloggportalen Läs mer här!

    Bottom of Form

    Aftonbladet.se ansvarar inte för det som står i bloggarna.

    Tillbaka

    GÄLLIVARE. Pensionären Karl-Erik Borg, 64, fick inte köpa cigaretter.

    Anledning: han hade glömt legitimationen hemma och kunde inte bevisa att han är över 18 år.

    Aldrig att jag sätter min fot på Ica igen, säger han.

    I förra veckan hade Karl-Erik och några vänner ätit middag på en restaurang i stan.

    Jag blev sugen på en cigarett efter maten.

    Jag blev ursinnig”

    I väg till Ica mitt i Gällivare. Ett paket Marlboro och fram med pengarna.

    Då tog det stopp.

    Legitimation, sa kassörskan.

    ??? sa Karl-Erik.

    Legitimation, förtydligade kassörskan.

    Det gäller ju att bevisa att man är över 18 år. Och på Ica i Gällivare är legitimationstvånget ingen lek.

    Jag blev ursinnig, jag har aldrig känt mig så förolämpad i hela mitt liv. Och jag har aldrig varit med om något löjligare heller.

    Karl-Erik gick, frustande av ilska tillbaka till sitt sällskap. Men han fick sina cigaretter i alla fall. Genom en bulvan.

    En kvinnlig bekant som turligt nog hade legitimation med sig.

    Marlboromannen i Gällivare har det inte lätt. Tre gånger har han fått visa legitimation på Ica Supermarket för att få köpa sina cigaretter.

    Och visst, handlarna ska vara noga med åldersgränsen för tobak som är 18 år.

    Men i ärlighetens namn: Karl-Erik ser inte riktigt ut som en 18-åring. Faktiskt.

    Ölsugna pensionärer

    Det gjorde inte heller 87-åriga Judith Lundkvist i Piteå som glömt legget hemma när hon skulle köpa folköl i november.

    Inte heller 77-årige Per-Eric Henricsson som dock hade legget med sig när han skulle köpa folköl till pensionärsmötet i Gällivare i höstas.

    Allvarligt talat, om kassapersonalen inte kan se skillnad på en 18-åring och en pensionär som gjort sex FN-bataljoner så funderar man ju på om de ens kan skilja på en femhundring och en 50-lapp, säger Karl-Erik.

    Aldrig mer Ica, i fortsättningen handlar jag på Coop. Icakortet har jag redan klippt.

    Aftonbladet har förgäves försökt nå butikschefen för en kommentar.

    Viss flexibilitet”

    Men Anders Lönnebring på Icas pressjour säger diplomatiskt:

    Icahandlarna är egna företagare och följer sin egen policy.

    Fast jag kan hålla med om att man kanske kan visa en viss flexibilitet när det gäller legitimationen i vissa fall.

    Men inget ont som inte för något gott med sig:

    Hela historien har gjort mig så förbannad att jag beslutat mig för att fimpa för gott, säger Karl-Erik.

    Och så tänder han sin sista cigg. För bildens skull.

    Men kolla, inga halsbloss!

    http://www.aftonbladet.se/nyheter/article2847100.ab

  • E-post til EFTA. (In Norwegian).







    Google Mail – Spørsmål om rettigheter innenfor EØS-området/Fwd: The European Economic Area.







    Google Mail



    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>




    Spørsmål om rettigheter innenfor EØS-området/Fwd: The European Economic Area.





    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>





    Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 2:22 PM





    To:

    Elin.BJERKEBO@efta.int



    Hei,

     

    jeg er ikke så vant til å drive med ting som har med EU eller EFTA å gjøre, men jeg hadde noen spørsmål,

    angående rettighetene til innbyggere fra EFTA land som er med i EØS, og som bor i EU.

     

    Og da sendte jeg det først til noe som heter EU Ombudsmannen, men det har jeg skjønt nå at var galt.

    Det er min feil, som ikke er vant til hvor man skal henvende seg, når det gjelder EU og EFTA-saker.

     

    Men jeg har jo lest nå, på nettet osv., at det er tre EFTA land, som er med i EØS-avtalen.

     

    Og siden jeg er fra et av de EFTA-landene, så er det vel riktig av meg, å ta opp spøsmål angående EØS-

    avtalen, med EFTA og ikke EU, hvis det er noe jeg lurer på, angående rettigheter osv.

    Har jeg ressonert riktig da?

     

    Jeg sender med en kopi av e-posten jeg først sendte EU-ombudsmannen, samt en kopi av svaret,

    for å forklare mer, om hva spørsmålene gjelder.

    Så håper jeg at jeg har klart å sende spøsmålene riktig nå, og jeg sier på forhånd tusen takk for svar!

     

    Med vennlig hilsen

    Erik Ribsskog

    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: Euro-Ombudsman <EO@ombudsman.europa.eu>
    Date: Jul 7, 2008 1:48 PM
    Subject: RE: The European Economic Area.

    To: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

     

    Dear Mr Ribsskog,

     

    Thank you for your e-mail of 30 June 2008, in which you ask if you, as a Norwegian citizen living in Britain, have the right to get help from the police and the British government.

     

    In replying to your e-mail, first, I would like to give a short presentation of the work of the European Ombudsman.

     

    The European Ombudsman investigates complaints about maladministration by the institutions and bodies of the European Union. This means that you can complain to the Ombudsman if you consider that, for instance, the European Commission, the European Parliament or the Council of the European Union has done something wrong.

     

    It is thus not part of the Ombudsman's function to provide you with the kind of information that you are asking for.

     

    However, you could consider turning to EuropeDirect, which provides practical information in the official EU language of your choice about the European Union and its policies or a reference to further sources of information. You can reach the service by calling the following toll-free number from anywhere in the EU during opening hours (9h00-18h30 CET on weekdays):

     

    00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11

     

    Or call the standard number + 32-2-299.96.96 from anywhere in the world (normal charges apply).

     

    You can also contact the service by sending an e-mail:

     

    http://europedirect-cc.cec.eu.int/websubmit/?lang=en

     

    For more information on Europe Direct, you can consult the following website:

     

    http://ec.europa.eu/europedirect/index_en.htm

     

    Yours sincerely,

     

    Angela Lindberg

    Office of the European Ombudsman

     

     

     


    From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
    Sent: 30 June 2008 21:58

    To: Euro-Ombudsman
    Subject: The European Economic Area.

     


    Hi,

     

    I'm a Norwegian citizen living in Britain.

     

    Here, there have been many problems, at work, and regarding a complaint against the Police etc., that

    I haven't got any help with.

    (I've also contacted the Norwegian Government, regarding these problems, but they don't answer my

    e-mails, and the Sivilombudsmannen, is part of a cover-up, from the Government, it seems, even

    if I wont explain this in detail now, but I can explain more detailed if it's needed).

     

    I was wondering, since Norway, are part of the European Economical Area.

    So Norwegian citizens, are allowed, to live and work, in Britain, like if they were EU-Citizens, as I've

    understood it.

    But, I was wondering if this means, that one, as a Norwegian citizen in Britain, also has the right,

    to get help/advice from the Police, and other Goverment in Britain, like if one was an EU-citizen?

     

    I think, that if one have the right to work and live in an EU-country, like the 'EFTA/EØS-agreement'

    says, then only has the right help from the Government, it that EU-country (the Police etc), like

    if one were an EU-citizen, right?

     

    I just wanted to try to get this clear, since I'm having some problems, both with the Norwegian and

    the British Goverment now, so I just wanted to know, if some this could be something to do, with

    that one aren't that well protected by rights, if one are a Norwegian citizen living in the EU?

    Hope that you have the chance to answer about this, and thanks in advance for the reply!

     

    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog







  • Telefonsamtale med Thor Gjermund Eriksen i A-Pressen. (In Norwegian).

    Nå ringte jeg å pratet med Thor Gjermund Eriksen, i A-Pressen.

    Han var på ferie, men han svarte likevel, jeg ble satt over fra A-Pressens sentralbord.

    Han mente, at dette var en sak, som han ikke kunne gjøre noe med.

    Det var en klage på Stavrum, i Nettavisen, at han ikke hadde svar på e-post osv.

    Han skulle ta det med Stavrum sa han, at jeg ikke fikk svar.

    Jeg forklarte, at det saken gikk på, var trakassering. (På Veggavisen).

    Dette svarte jo ikke Stavrum på, klagene på trakassering.

    Så han Eriksen, mente, at dette var redaksjonelt da.

    Det mener jeg er tøys. (Jeg mener at trakassering ikke har noe med journalistikk å gjøre).

    Men han kunne ikke gjøre noe med det her, mente han.

    Så spurte jeg hvem Stavrums overordnede var, og det var han Thor Gjermund Eriksen, mente han.

    Så jeg lurte på om det var Pressens Faglige Utvalg, som jeg måtte ta det med, denne trakasseringen.

    Og det sa han, at det fikk jeg gjøre, hvis jeg mente det var riktig.

    Jeg sa at jeg skulle tenke mer på det her, hvordan jeg skulle gå frem, om jeg skulle ta det med pressens faglige utvalg, eller ikke.

    Så beklagde jeg at jeg forstyrret i ferie osv.

    Det er jo ikke så kult, når man blir forstyrret i ferie, det skjønner man.

    Men jeg får tenke gjennom hva jeg skal gjøre da.

    Vi får se.

  • E-mail to the LSC, 7/7/08.







    Google Mail – Complaint







    Google Mail



    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>




    Complaint





    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>





    Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 11:11 AM





    To:

    Sarah Thompson <Sarah.Thompson@legalservices.gov.uk>



    Hi,

     

    that's right, I did not recieve legal aid, since Morecrofts, said that they didn't participate, in the legal aid

    programme.

    (They said this about a month after the initial meeting, like explained in the complaint).

     

    However, the Law Society, if I remember right, told me, that if I wanted to complain, about unprofessional

    conduct, from law-firms, in connection with the Duty Solicitor programme, then I should contact the LSC,

    I was told.

     

    So that was why I was contacting your offices, earlier this year, I think it was.

     

    So the complaint wasn't really in regards to the Legal Aid Programme, it was to do with law-firms, and 

    unproffesional conduct etc., from them (Morecrofts and EAD), in connection with the Duty Solicitor Programme.

    Yours sincerely,

     


    Erik Ribsskog

     


    On 7/7/08, Sarah Thompson <Sarah.Thompson@legalservices.gov.uk> wrote:

    Dear Mr Ribsskog

    Mrs Dillon forwarded your complaint to me as I am the Account Manager
    for Morecrofts. I have investigated your complaint and find that you did

    not received Legal Aid and did not become a client of Morecrofts.
    Therefore, I am unable to take your complaint any further.

    Kind regards

    Sarah Thompson

    Account Manager

    >>> "Erik Ribsskog" <eribsskog@gmail.com> 02/07/2008 20:04 >>>

    Hi,

    there has been a lot going on regarding this case.

    I was wondering, is this e-mail to do with the e-mail I sent to Fiona
    Dillon
    at the LSC,
    earlier this week?

    Thanks in advance for the reply!

    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

    On 7/2/08, Sarah Thompson <Sarah.Thompson@legalservices.gov.uk> wrote:
    >
    > Dear Mr Ribsskog

    >
    > I have investigated your complaint and found that you did not
    receive
    > advice funded by the Legal Services Commission. Therefore, I am
    unable
    > to to investigate the matter further as it is not a Legal Services

    > Commission matter. It also seems from the correspondence that this
    > matter is also outside the Law Society's jurisdiction. Therefore,  I
    > cannot see how you can progress this complaint further.
    >

    > Kind regards
    >
    > Sarah Thompson
    >
    > Account Manager
    >
    >
    >
    ************************************************************************************
    > Disclaimer
    >

    > This e-mail (and any attachment(s)) is private and intended solely
    for the
    > use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. Its
    unauthorised
    > use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not

    the
    > intended recipient please destroy all copies and inform the sender by
    return
    > e-mail.
    >
    > Internet e-mail is not a secure medium, as messages can be
    intercepted and
    > read by someone else. Please bear this in mind when deciding whether

    to send
    > information by e-mail. Postal addresses for the Legal Services
    Commission
    > are available from
    > http://www.legalservices.gov.uk/aboutus/our_regional_network.asp

    >
    > The Legal Services Commission reserves the right to monitor, record
    and
    > retain any incoming and outgoing e-mails for security reasons and
    for
    > monitoring internal compliance with the Legal Services Commission

    policy on
    > staff use. E-mail monitoring and/or blocking software may be used and
    e-mail
    > content may be read. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not
    broken
    > when writing or forwarding e-mails and their contents. No contracts

    can be
    > entered into on our behalf by e-mail.
    >
    > Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do
    not
    > necessarily represent those of the Legal Services Commission.
    >

    > The Legal Services Commission checks all e-mails and attachments for
    known
    > viruses, however, you are advised that you open any attachments at
    your own
    > risk.
    >
    >
    ************************************************************************************

    >
    >




  • Noen bruker navnet mitt, til å undertegne debattinnlegg, i the Mirror online. (In Norwegian).

    Charity conman Peter Lyon gets banned from running companies

    By Andrew Penman on Jul 3, 08 10:55 AM in Charity

    The charity conman we’ve branded repulsive has been banned from acting as a company director for 11 years.


    Peter Lyon ran Barrington House Publishing Corp, which persuaded businesses into advertising on wallplanners by claiming that money raised would help children’s charities.

    It raked in £3.5million but just £100,000 – less than three per cent – went to good causes.

    Lyon, 45, who recently tried to sell his huge detached house in Halsall, Lancs, repeated the scam at Hamilton Forbes Ltd and Price Chamberlain Ltd.

    All three were put into compulsory liquidation by the High Court.

    Besides personally pocketing £600,000 the worm also acted as a director while a bankrupt.

    The woman who sat on his right hand, 39-year-old Lorraine Wells, of Liverpool, has been banned from the boardroom for eight years.

    (2) comments so far add yours here

    Share:

    Older/Newer

    « Elaine Douglas gets company ban for Galaxy Lifestyles scam | We save money for Shopper Discounts victims »

    2 Comments

    Erik Ribbskog said:

    Mr Lyon is pictured there leaving the Halsall offices of CHESTNUT HOUSE PUBLISHING.

    Chestnut House is a publishing company that publish Charity Wall Planners and sell advertising upon said planners. Just like Barrington House and Hamilton Forbes did.

    Chestnut House is run by Lisa Colford (former employee of Mr Lyons at Barrington House and
    Hamilton Forbes).

    Several other former employees and ‘friends’ of My Lyon also work at CHESTNUT HOUSE

    Mr Lyon lived/lives in Halsall

    Im not making any assumption as I dont want to incur the wrath of ‘The Law’ (though as a lady once told me – ‘its not libel if its true’). But these coincidences are just piling up arent they?

    Hello Mr P and Mr S – a fine job you are being. Feel free to visit Ormskirk a little town in the middle of ‘Knowhere’ and say hi 🙂

    July 3, 2008 6:04 PM

    Her in Doors said:

    Peter Lyon does look like he’s got the weight of the world on his shoulders, doesn’t he? HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!!!

    July 3, 2008 6:30 PM

    Leave a comment

    Top of Form

    Name

    Email Address

    URL

    Remember personal info?

    Comments

    Captcha:


    Type the characters you see in the picture above.

    Bottom of Form

    When I was working, at Bertelsmann Arvato Services Ltd’s Microsoft Scandinavian Product Activation, in 2005 and 2006, they spellt my name, Erik Ribbskog.

    (There there were a lot of problems, with illigal managment methods, and organised harassment, and more, by the way).

    When I searchen on Google now, I found this article, and that someone had been using my name, the way Arvato spellt it.

    So I was just wondering what this is about, since I don’t really think anyone else living in Britain, or anywhere else, have the same name as me.

    So I thought this was a bit strange maybe.

    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

    PS.

    Here is a link where it is explained more about the problems at Arvato:

    https://johncons-blogg.net/search/label/Arvato-case

    http://blogs.mirror.co.uk/investigations/2008/07/charity-conman-peter-lyon-gets.html