johncons

Måned: september 2008

  • E-post til Justissekretariatene. (In Norwegian).







    Google Mail – Deres referanse 2008/02046 IV/Fwd: Til Fylkesmannen, Oppdatering.







    Google Mail


    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>



    Deres referanse 2008/02046 IV/Fwd: Til Fylkesmannen, Oppdatering.




    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>


    Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 9:04 AM





    To:

    post@justissekretariatene.no



    Hei,

     

    jeg viser til deres brev, av 16. september, hvor dere skriver, at min søknad om fri rettshjelp,

    avvises, blant annet på grunn av at:

     

    'Det anses derfor ikke nødvendig med bistand fra advokat for å kunne anmelde et forhold

    til politiet'.

     

    Men dette er en misforståelse.

    Min søknad gjaldt veldig mye problemer, som jeg har med offentlig forvaltning.

    Blant annet, en klage på Kripos, som har vært hos Spesialenheten og Riksadvokaten, og som

    jeg sendte til Fylkesmannen i Oslo og Akershus, i mai måned.

    Så denne burde ha endt opp hos dere også.

    Jeg sender nå, som en 'forward', i denne e-posten.

    Så jeg har altså kontaktet politiet (Kripos), men de bare 'tuller' med meg.

     

    Jeg har sendt klage på de til Spesialenheten, men den har vært hos Riksadvokaten, og ikke

    blitt tatt til følge.

    Jeg har også tatt kontakt med Kripos, om andre problemer, men Kripos har ikke svart på

    e-postene mine.

    Så dette har jeg tatt med politidirektoratet, justisdepartementet, SMK og Sivilombudsmannen.

     

    Men her har Sivilombudsmannen begynt å 'tulle' nå.

     

    Nå ser jeg jo at dere i Justissekretariatene, er underlagt Justisdepartementet, som jo er innblandet

    i klagen fra før.

    Så jeg ser jo at dere nok kan være i en dobbeltrolle her.

    Ala bukken som passer havresekken, bare for å ta et eksempel.

    Men jeg prøver i hvertfall å sende denne e-posten, for jeg tror ikke alle bilagene som jeg har sendt

    fylkesmannen, kan ha kommet fram til dere.

    Så om det er sånn, at jeg skal sende de samme bilagene til dere, som jeg har sendt Fylkesmannen.

     

    Angående problemene, med at jeg blir tullet med, av offentlig forvaltning mm. i Norge og England.

    Eller om det er sånn at dere har fått dette av Fylkesmannen, for det virket ikke sånn på brevet deres.

    Så håper jeg dere har mulighet til å svare på dette!

    Med vennlig hilsen

     

    Erik Ribsskog

    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
    Date: 2008/5/11

    Subject: Til Fylkesmannen, Oppdatering.
    To: postmottak@fmoa.no

    Hei,

     

    jeg viser til klage på medarlbeider hos dere, sendt 1. april, i år, med purring 17. april, (som jeg ikke har mottatt

    noe svar på fra dere), og sender med dette en oppdatering til søknaden min om fri rettshjelp.

    Det er snakk om en klage på Kripos, som ikke ble tatt til følge av Spesialenheten og Riksadvokaten.

     

    Men det ble informert, at jeg har anledning, til å ta dette opp i en rettsak.

     

    Og det ønsker jeg å gjøre, siden jeg synes avgjørelsen, om å henlegge klagen, var uforståelig/feilaktig, siden

    jeg synes at feilene fra Kripos sin side, var såpass alvorlige, at jeg synes det var uansvarlig av Spesialenheten

    og Riksadvokaten, å bare henlegge klagen uten videre.

    Jeg sender med kopi av brev fra Spesialenheten og Riksadvokaten, angående henleggelsen, og jeg kommer

    også til å videresende en e-post, som inneholder klagen på Kripos, som ble sendt Spesialenheten i april i fjor.

     

    Håper dette er i orden, og at jeg snart hører noe mer fra dere!

     

    Med vennlig hilsen

    Erik Ribsskog





    2 attachments

    scan0003.gif
    96K
    scan0004.gif
    243K




  • Brev fra Justissekretariatene. (In Norwegian).

    Brev fra Justissekretariatene. (In Norwegian).


  • Halvbroren til Christell, Jan, han maste på Christell, om at hun måtte begynne å barbere musa. (In Norwegian).

    Nå tenkte jeg litt på det her, med hu Linda Moen, som jeg skreiv om her om dagen, som pleide å hente sagflis til kanin, i silo’n, utafor versted til fattern.

    Christell, hadde jo dukka opp, i leiligheten min, på Bergeråsen, sånn rundt 1986 kanskje, mens jeg gikk i 8. eller 9. klassen, og hun gikk i 6. eller 7. klasse, og spurt om det var sant, at Linda Moen, i klassen min hadde barbert kjønnshårene, til form av et hjerte.

    Nå tenkte jeg på det her da, med Linda Moen og kanin osv.

    Om hun visste at jeg stod i huset til Ågot, og kikka, mens hun gravde i flisa, inni silo’n.

    Så da kom jeg på det her da, med at Christell lurte på om hu barberte musa.

    Og da fikk jeg flashback til en episode på 90-tallet.

    Christell har jo en ti år eldre bror, Jan Snoghøj.

    Dette her var kanskje julen jeg var i militæret, julen 92.

    For da var jeg invitert til Haldis og Christell og Jan, på Bergeråsen.

    Og da husker jeg at Jan sa, til Christell, sånn at jeg hørte det.

    At han hadde kikka på henne, mens hun dusja, og sett at hun hadde så mye hår på musa.

    Så nå syntes Jan, at nå burde halvsøstra hans, begynne å barbere musa.

    Sa han, så han måtte ha skjønt at jeg hørte det.

    Christell var kanksje 19 eller 20 da.

    Jeg var vel 22.

    Jan var vel 30.

    Jeg skjønner ikke helt hvorfor han dreiv å brydde seg om det, om søstra hans barberte musa.

    Og hvorfor han dreiv å kikka på henne i dusjen.

    Det syntes jeg var litt rart.

    Det bare fikk jeg flashback til nå.

    Christell sa at hun barberte seg på legga, og da vokste det ut så fort, så hun ville ikke det, for da måtte man barbere seg hele tida.

    Noe sånt.

    Men men, jeg havna liksom midt oppi den diskusjonen, som vel ikke var min business.

    Og det var vel kanskje ikke Jans business heller.

    Så det lurte jeg litt på nå, da jeg fikk sånn flashback, hvorfor Jan var så opptatt av om søstra hans barberte seg på sine intime steder, eller ikke.

    Det synes jeg kanskje var litt merkelig.

    Men Jan er en lur røver, må man vel kanskje si, så han blander seg kanskje opp i mer enn det som er hans business.

    Det er mulig.

    Med vennlig hilsen

    Erik Ribsskog

  • E-mail to the American Homeland Security.







    Google Mail – Re: 2040389







    Google Mail


    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>



    Re: 2040389




    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>


    Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 5:04 AM





    To:

    trip@dhs.gov



    Hi,

     

    I checked the tracking-function, for this complaint, on your website, today.

    But it still says that some documents are lacking still.

    I think I've sent you all the needed documents now, so I was wondering if you think you could maybe

    have a look at this.

     

    Thanks in advance for the help!

    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog


    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
    Date: Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 4:57 PM

    Subject: Re: 2040389
    To: trip@dhs.gov

    Hi,

     

    I'm refering to my call today, to the Problem Solving-department, of the Trip-department, of the Homeland Security.

     

    I was told, that there were still some pending paper-work, and we agreed that I would check up on the complaint.

    I had some problems with the printer, when I sent the complaint, so I just took a screenshot, of the

    acknowledging-page, and signed it in paint, since I was out of ink, on the printer.

    But since it could seem, from the call today, that there was a problem with the acknowledging-page.

    And since I now have ink on the printer again.

    Then I thought I could try to send a scanned copy of the Acknowledning-page, with a regular signature, written

    with a pen, and not written in paint, this time.

    So that the complaint, hopefully would be registered, in case this was the problem.

    Hope this is alright, and sorry about the problems with this page.

     

    Your sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog





    scan0003.jpg
    405K




  • E-post til Solvit. (In Norwegian).







    Google Mail – Problemer med at mine rettigheter ikke blir respektert, av myndighetene, i Norge og Storbritannia.







    Google Mail


    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>



    Problemer med at mine rettigheter ikke blir respektert, av myndighetene, i Norge og Storbritannia.




    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>


    Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 4:14 AM





    To:

    solvit-norway@nhd.dep.no



    Hei,

     

    jeg kan ikke se at jeg har mottatt noe svar på denne e-posten ennå, så jeg prøver å sende den på nytt.


    Med vennlig hilsen

    Erik Ribsskog

    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
    Date: 2008/9/10

    Subject: Problemer med at mine rettigheter ikke blir respektert, av myndighetene, i Norge og Storbritannia.
    To: solvit-norway@nhd.dep.no

    Hei,

     

    jeg kontaktet EFTA, for å forsikre meg, om at man har samme rettigheter, som norsk statsborger,

    som jobber i Storbritannia, etter at EØS-avtalen kom, som britiske statsborgere.

    Og EFTA, kunne bekrefte at det var riktig, at nordmenn hadde de samme rettighetene, som

    britiske statsborgere og EU-statsborgere, når man oppholdt seg, og jobber, som nordmann,

    i Storbritannia, og følger vilkårene, som er nevnt i EØS-avtalen.

     

    EFTA anbefalte meg, å kontake dere, i Solvit.

     

    Problemet er, at jeg blir 'tullet med' av mange myndigheter, i både Norge og Storbritannia.

     

    Jeg kontaktet EFTA, angående problemene med britiske myndigheter, først og fremst.

     

    Men jeg blir også 'tullet' mye med, av norske myndigheter.

    Så det kan kanskje også være et problem, at norske myndigheter, ikke forstår EØS-avtalen.

     

    Fordi, som jeg forstår det, så har man fortsatt rettigheter i Norge, siden man fortsatt er norsk

    statsborger, selv om man jobber noen år i Storbritannia, f.eks.

     

    Men det er mulig at dette også går andre veien, at norske myndigheter, tror det er fritt fram,

    for å tulle med en, siden man bor i utlandet.

    Nå er det så mange myndigheter som tuller med meg, så jeg må nesten ta dette ganske

    generellt.

     

    Jeg bruker så mye tid, på å stå opp mot, alle disse myndighetene, i Norge og Storbritannia,

    som tuller med meg, så jeg har nesten ikke tid til å gjøre jobben min.

    Jeg får ikke brukt så mye tid på jobben min, som jeg burde, så jeg er forsinket med alle regninger,

    og har knapt penger til å kjøpe basis matvarer.

    Så jeg sender ikke noe detaljert klage nå, for det har jeg rett og slett ikke tid til nå, fordi denne

    'tullingen', fra norske og britiske myndigheter, er så omfattende.

     

    I går, så sendte jeg et brev, til den europeiske menneskerettighetsdomstolen, i Strasbourg,

    og jeg sender med en kopi av det brevet, som vedlegg, for å forklare litt av hva som foregår.

    Så håper jeg dere har muligheten til å hjelpe meg med dette!

     

    Med vennlig hilsen

    Erik Ribsskog





    2 attachments

    scan0004.jpg
    419K
    scan0005.jpg
    307K




  • E-mail to Amnesty International Secretariat.







    Google Mail – To the leader of Amnesty International Secretariat/Fwd: Complaint about the Norwegian Amnesty.







    Google Mail


    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>



    To the leader of Amnesty International Secretariat/Fwd: Complaint about the Norwegian Amnesty.




    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>


    Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 4:09 AM





    To:

    amnestyis@amnesty.org



    Hi,

     

    I can't see that I've recieved an answer to this e-mail yet, so I'm sending it again.

    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
    Date: Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 6:09 PM

    Subject: To the leader of Amnesty International Secretariat/Fwd: Complaint about the Norwegian Amnesty.
    To: amnestyis@amnesty.org

    Hi,

     

    I would like to escalate a complaint please.

    It's regarding that the Norwegian Amnesty, refuse to help, people like me, who aren't getting help

    by the Government, after they have overheard that they are being followed by 'the mafia'.

     

    Mr. Egenes, the General Secretary, at Amnesty in Norway, is using the excuse,

    'that the mafia don't operate this way'.

     

    How can Amnesty know how the mafia operate, and use this as an excuse not to help, with

    the problem that the Government refuse to give help?

     

    Are Amnesty a branch of 'the mafia', since Amnesty know how the mafia operate?

     

    How can Amnesty know the mafia agenda?

     

    I don't think Amnesty should refere to mafia agenda, if they document what this agenda is about,

    unless you change your name to Mafia International, then I guess it would have been alright.

    Is it possible to please get an explanation, about how Amnesty can know this in detail, about

    how 'the mafia' operate?

     

    Where have Amnesty found this knowledge?

    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

    Date: Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 10:00 AM
    Subject: Re: Complaint about the Norwegian Amnesty.
    To: "MByler@amnesty.org" <MByler@amnesty.org>

    Hi,

     

    if I felt it was impolite, to legitimise mafia?

     

    I think your organisation is a joke!

     

    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

     

    On 7/7/08, MByler@amnesty.org <MByler@amnesty.org> wrote:

    Dear Mr. Ribsskog,

    I am sorry to hear that you have not had a positive experience with Amnesty International in relation to your concerns.  

    I need to affirm, however, that the response that was given to you  by the Director of AI Norway is correct, and that there is nothing that AI can do to support you in this instance.  I am sorry that you felt this was impolite.

    Best wishes,

    Marjory M. Byler
    Senior Director, International Mobilization
    Amnesty International

    ———- Forwarded message ———-

    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
    Date: Jun 18, 2008 1:38 PM
    Subject: Complaint about the Norwegian Amnesty.

    To: amnestyis@amnesty.org

    Hi,
     
    I called your offices today, and explained that I had been having some problems with the

    Norwegian Amnesty, and if it was possible for me to send an e-mail to you explaining about
    this, and then I was given your e-mail address.
     
    The problems, are regarding that I was in contact with the General Secretary, for the Norwegian

    Amnesty, Mr. Jegenes, earlier today.
     
    It was a bit of problem with the communiction in this phone-call.
     
    So I thought I'd try to write you an explanation, or complaint, about this.
     
    I found that Mr. Jegenes, was a bit impolite, I think I have to say, since he interupted me, when

    I started explaining why I had contacted him and Amnesty, and about the problems with the earlier
    contact, which I had escalated to the General Secretary.
     
    Then, after he had interupted me, and said quite a few things, then he didn't want to let me finish

    my explanation, that I had prepared, before the call.
     
    He just hang up.
     
    I thought this was a bit inpolite.
     
    Further, in the call, when he interupted me, he said that their representative, was right in declining

    to help me, since Amnesty couldn't investigate organised crime, like he said.
     
    But, I wanted them, to help me with the Government.

    The Government, aren't answering my correspondence, and also the Sivilombudsman in Norway,

    which Amnesty UK, adviced me to contact, is also, like the Goverment, playing games with me,
    I think one have to say.

    This is what I wanted Amnesty to help with, to get the Government to treat me, in accordance to

    my rights, and not play games with me.

    But the General Secretary, said that Amnesty would have had to investigate organised crime,
    to help me.

    This is not right, they could just have looked at the correspondance, between me and the

    Government, and then they could have seen that the Government are playing games with me.
     
    Since I think this is the real problem, that leads to what I'd say is torture and inhumane
    treatment from the Government, that they are playing games with me, and my life, and that

    they have no respect for my rights.
     
    And this leads to the torture, like I think I have to call it, and inhumanity, in my situation.

    I think I have to hold the Government in Norway, since I am a Norwegian citizen, responsible

    for this, since they haven't got the right, to keep things in soceity, like how the situation is
    with 'mafia', like I've heard I've been followed by, secret.
     
    And they are also not answering my corresponedence etc, with I'd say means that they are

    playing games with me.

    Further, Mr. Jegenes, also said, when he interupted me, that 'mafia/organised criminals
    wouldn't just single out and individual for following', when he asked me, why I was being

    followed, and I answered that I couldn't say exactly why.
     
    These things, like criminal organisations/mafias agenda, is not something that is open in
    society, and for him, to demand, that I needed to know this, I think is unreasonable.

     
    Mr. Jegenes, is infact, legitimising mafia, in society, by saying, that their agenda, is
    logical and reasonable.

    Mafia, is not a legitimate part of society, you can't find anything in eg. the Norwegian

    constitution, that says that mafia, is legit.

    I think it seems like Mr. Jegenes, is trying to legitimise mafia, and mafia/orginised criminal
    organisations agenda in society, by claiming, that they are acting reasonable and logical.

     
    I object strongly to this legitimisation of mafia/organised crime, by Mr. Jegenes.
     
    Further, Mr. Jegenes, also said, that he thought, that the Norwegian Government, thought
    that, what I had overheard, that I was followed by 'the mafia', and that I was being used as

    a 'target-guy', by the Government, must have been something I had imagined.
     
    So Mr. Jegenes, is saying what he thinks is more right, than what I think.
     
    He isn't taking what I'm saing in good faith, and neighter is the Government.

     
    There is no declared sivil war, in Norway, at the moment, so there is no reason, for why,
    Mr. Jegenes (and the Norwegian Goverment), shouldn't take what is being said from a
    fellow country-man, in good faith.

     
    So this I would like to complain about, I think it's inpolite of Mr. Jegenes, to treat a fellow
    country-man, in this way.
     
    This is what I wanted to contact you and explain about.

    I hope that you have the time to have a look at this!

     
    I'll also add a link, to my blog, where I've written a short summary, of the phone-call with
    the General Secretary today, and also posted the notes from the call, and the notes that
    I had written, to prepare myself, before I called, but which the General Secretay, wouldn't

    let me finish read/explain about.
     
    (Although this blog-post is in Norwegian, but I add the link anyway, just for to explain that
    I got a bit upset, and posted the notes etc. on my blog, at once after the call, since I though

    I was being treated a bit inpolite.).
     
    I hope this is alright!
     
    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog
     
    PS.
     
    Here is the link to mentioned post, on my blog:
     

    http://johncons-mirror.blogspot.com/2008/06/kort-referat-fra-telefonsamtale-med.html

     

    Working to protect human rights worldwide

    DISCLAIMER

    Internet communications are not secure and therefore Amnesty International Ltd does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this message. If you are not the intended recipient you must not disclose or rely on the information in this e-mail. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Amnesty International Ltd unless specifically stated. Electronic communications including email might be monitored by Amnesty International Ltd. for operational or business reasons.

    This message has been scanned for viruses by Postini.

    www.postini.com






  • E-post til Pressens Faglige Utvalg. (In Norwegian).







    Google Mail – Telefonsamtale, forrige måned.







    Google Mail


    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>



    Telefonsamtale, forrige måned.




    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>


    Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 4:03 AM





    To:

    Per Edgar Kokkvold <kokkvold@online.no>



    Hei,

     

    jeg prøver å sende denne klagen til deg, siden han kollegaen din ikke svarer.


    Med vennlig hilsen

    Erik Ribsskog

    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
    Date: 2008/9/8

    Subject: Telefonsamtale, forrige måned.
    To: Kjell Nyhuus <kjell.nyhuus@presse.no>

    Hei,

     

    jeg viser til telefonsamtale, i forrige måned, hvor jeg etterlyste svar på klagen min, på trakassering og sensur,

    fra VGD, Veggavisen, Debattcentralen og Dagbladet.

     

    Jeg viste til de aktuelle punktene, i Vær Varsom-plakaten, og etterlyste også en egen Vær Varsom-plakat,

    for debattforum.

    Siden det finnes en Vær Varsom-plakat, for vanlige avisartikler.

     

    Og også en Vær Varsom-plakat, for reklamer, mener jeg det var.

    Men nå er det jo år 2008, så jeg lurte på om det ikke var på tide med en egen Vær Varsom-plakat, for

    debattfoum, drevet av nettavisene også.

    Bare et forslag, siden jeg ikke tror at de plakatene som man har nå, passer helt å bruke for problemer,

    som med trakassering og sensur, på debattforum.

    I allefall ikke, etter at jeg hørte du sa, over telefon, da jeg ringte den nevnte telefonsamtalen, at min klage

    lå langt nede i bunken, og at du bare hadde tenkt å foreta en forenklet behandling.

    Og det kan man jo tenke seg hva betyr, at du bare ville hive det i søpla, f.eks.

    Men, da nevnte jo jeg det, at Solskjær, han hadde sagt, at PFU, bare var noe tull uansett, eller noe.

    At man kunne bare like gjerne droppe PFU, de hadde ingen troverdighet, og heller ta det i et sivilt

    søksmål.

     

    Noe sånn var det vel han sa.

    Men du sa at det var feil, det var agenten til Solskjær, en som Solbakken, som hadde sagt, at å klage

    til PFU, var som å pisse i motvind.

    Det er mulig.

    I hvertfall, så virker det ikke helt enkelt.

    Fordi, du sa, da jeg ringte, for 3-4 uker siden, at du skulle meg noe skriftlig, angående klagen på de

    nevnte avisene, som jeg sendte dere.

    Men jeg har ikke fått noe svar av deg.

    Så jeg tror Solskjær og Solbakken, har rett i det her, at PFU, det er like greit å droppe å kontakte,

    for de har ikke noen troverdighet uansett.

     

    Det kan i hvertfall virke som at de kan ha rett, hvis man sammenligner hva dere sier, med hva dere gjør.

     

    Med vennlig hilsen

    Erik Ribsskog






  • E-mail to the Minister of Justice.







    Google Mail – To the Minister of Justice/Fwd: Our ref: TO08/2153







    Google Mail


    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>



    To the Minister of Justice/Fwd: Our ref: TO08/2153




    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>


    Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 5:54 PM





    To:

    general.queries@justice.gsi.gov.uk



    Hi,

     

    I can't see that I've recieved an answer to this e-mail yet, so I'm sending it again.

     

    Yours sincerely,

     

    Erik Ribsskog

    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
    Date: Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 1:47 PM

    Subject: To the Minister of Justice/Fwd: Our ref: TO08/2153
    To: general.queries@justice.gsi.gov.uk

    Hi,

     

    I've tried to escalate a complaint, but it doesn't seem like your representative is answering, to his

    correspondence.

     

    And I also thought that the original complaint, wasn't answered that well, by another of your

    representatives.

    So it seems to me, that there are a lot of problems in the Ministry, so I thought it would be

    best, to send it to the top of the Ministry, so that you could have the chance to have a look

    at these problems, and to get these problems sorted, so that I maybe could get a second

    opinion, from the right person in your Ministry, to the original complaint.

    Hope this is alright!

     

    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

    Date: Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 2:42 PM
    Subject: Fwd: Our ref: TO08/2153
    To: jan.farenden@justice.gsi.gov.uk

    Hi,

     

    I can't see that I've recieved an answer to this e-mail yet, so I'm sending it again.

     

    Yours sincerely,

     


    Erik Ribsskog


    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

    Date: Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 9:31 AM
    Subject: Fwd: Our ref: TO08/2153
    To: jan.farenden@justice.gsi.gov.uk

    Hi,

     

    I called the Ministry of Justice today, and I got your e-mail address, from the clerk there.

     

    The reason that I'm sending you this e-mail, is that I was wondering, who it is, that one

    should contact, if one are having problems with the IPCC.

     

    Since they are not answering my e-mails, and I've already been in contact, with the

    complaints-manager there, so I think I've escalated it, as far as it's possible to

    escalate, at the IPCC.

    So I was wondering, if it isn't the Ministry of Justice, that one should contact, if the

    IPCC, are having problems in the way, that they aren't answering e-mails etc.

     

    Thanks in advance for any help regarding this!

     

    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

    ———- Forwarded message ———-

    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
    Date: Jun 30, 2008 7:23 PM

    Subject: Re: Our ref: TO08/2153

    To: "Holmes, Ryan" <Ryan.Holmes@justice.gsi.gov.uk>

     

    Hi,

     

    thank you very much for your answer!

     

    I think that the IPCC, probably recieves founding from the Government.

    And, I think, that if the IPCC, don't answer their e-mails etc, then this is a matter, for the Ministry,

    who are administratively in charge of the IPCC.

     

    Which I think must be the Ministry of Justice.

     

    I don't think the Ministry of Justice, can't pretend that they aren't in charge of the Police, like

    you are trying now.

    So, I write this, mostly, to put it on my blog, and then I'll think further, on how to go forward with this.

    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

     


    On 6/30/08, Holmes, Ryan <Ryan.Holmes@justice.gsi.gov.uk> wrote:

    Dear Mr Ribsskog

    Thank you for your email reply of 23 June.

    While I am sorry to read of your ongoing concerns, I am afraid there is little useful information I can add to the previous correspondence that you have received from this Department.

    As previously explained, if you choose to further your concerns regarding your complaint with the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC), you must address the matter to the IPCC directly. Similarly, the Ministry of Justice is unable to comment on or give advice on how to escalate your case with the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) or the American Embassy. I can only confirm that the points you have raised have been thoroughly considered and that the Department has been as helpful as possible in answering your concerns.

    I am sorry that I am unable to be of more help, but I hope you can appreciate for the reasons given above that the Department is unable to intervene in your case. Hence, any further correspondence sent that addresses the same points will be placed on file and not responded to.

    Yours sincerely,

    Ryan Holmes

    Legal Services Regulation and Redress Division

    —–Original Message—–
    From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
    Sent: 23 June 2008 14:20

    To: Holmes, Ryan
    Subject: Re: Our ref: TO08/2153

    Hi,

     

    I've already been in contact with the Complaints Manager at the IPCC, but this hasn't resovled the problems.

    I suspect could be some corruption involved there, because something is obviouslly wrong there in my opinion.

     

    Also I wondering a bit on how to escalate the case I've been in contact with the FBI, or the American Embassy,

    about.

     

    Also, I've been in contact with the Norwegian equivalent, of the IPCC, that's Spesialenheten, regarding another,

    but linked, matter.

     

    And they sort under the Norwegian Ministry of Justice.

    So, I think that the IPCC are sorting under the British Ministy of Justice(?)

     

    If not, who should they then be sorting under?

     

    Sorry if I'm asking stupid questions.

     

    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

     

    On 6/23/08, Holmes, Ryan <Ryan.Holmes@justice.gsi.gov.uk> wrote:


    Dear Mr Ribsskog

    Thank you for your email reply of 19 June.

    The Ministry of Justice is unable to submit a complaint on your behalf to the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC). Additionally, a complaint against the IPCC cannot be directed to the Ministry of Justice for review as this does not fall within the remit of this Department. If you wish to make a complaint against the IPCC you must do this by addressing your concerns to the IPCC directly. The information provided below outlines how to do this.

    If you have a complaint or query about a casework decision, the IPCC will do their best to clearly explain the reason for their decisions and answer any concerns you have. Please note however that IPCC casework decisions are final and they will not necessarily be able to change the outcome. For further information or advice on your rights you can contact a Citizens Advice Bureau, solicitor or your local MP.

    If you have a complaint about a member of staff at the IPCC, in the first instance you can contact the person concerned and the matter may be resolved there and then. As mentioned in my previous email, Casework Manager Sarah Brown is one of a number of IPCC staff that has conducted an investigation into your file and she can be contacted on 0207 166 3934 should you wish to discuss the details of your complaint further. However, since you mention that Miss Brown has not contacted you in the past, you may wish to raise any issues of concern through a line manager, or write to the Internal Complaints Manager. Alternatively, you can download a complaint form via the link

    http://www.ipcc.gov.uk/index/contact-us/complaints_ipcc.htm and make your complaint against the IPCC using the contact details below.

    Internal Complaints Manager

    Independent Police Complaints Commission

    90 High Holborn

    London

    WC1V 6BH

    Fax: 0207 404 0695

    Email:

    internal.complaints.unit@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk.

    I do hope that this information is of some use to you.

    Yours sincerely,

    Ryan Holmes

    Legal Services Regulation and Redress Division

     

    —–Original Message—–
    From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

    Sent: 19 June 2008 20:35
    To: Holmes, Ryan
    Subject: Re: Our ref: TO08/2153


    Hi,

     

    thank you very much for your e-mail, and the advice!

     

    I wanted to complain about the IPCC, since the whole case is a mess, and they don't reply to my e-mails,

    and they don't call me, you mention Brown, she has been supposed to call me, regarding the problems

    with the missing answers on the e-mails, but she haven't called.

    I think that the IPCC must have some serious problems, with handeling the complaints I sent them,

    which I view as one case really.

    So I was wondering, how I could submit this complaint, on the IPCC, to the Ministry of Justice.

    If you think that you could please submit this complaint for me.

     

    Also, I've contacted the FBI, in the American Embassy, in London.

     

    And I asked them, on how should go forward, regarding reporting a crime in the US, that someone,

    has set up a hate-blog against me there.

     

    The FBI/The American Embassy Legal Advice, tells me to contact my local police-station, about this.

    But I've lost a bit of confidence, with the Merseyside Police, due to the things mentioned in the

    complaints, sent to the IPCC, and more.

    And then I thought, that I could contact the IPCC about this then, since I didn't think I could contact

    the local Police about this.

     

    But now there has been so much problems, with the IPCC, so that I've lost a bit of confidence, in

    the IPCC, as well.

     

    So then I have to contact the Ministry of Justice about this, since I don't think that eighter the

    Merseyside Police or the IPCC, have showed themselves, to be worthy, of much confidence,

    unfortunatly.

    So I'm mentioning this now.

     

    Hope this is alright!

    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

     

    On 6/19/08, Holmes, Ryan <Ryan.Holmes@justice.gsi.gov.uk> wrote:


    Dear Mr Ribsskog

    Thank you for your email reply of 5 June. I am also in receipt of your email dated 13 June.

    As explained in my previous reply, the Law Society is the regulatory body for solicitors in England and Wales and will keep a comprehensive list of solicitors practising in your local area. Their website promotes a searchable database to help you find a solicitor which allows you to search by firm name, area of law and/or post code. To alleviate your concerns about contacting the Law Society due to previous personal experiences, I should point out that this list is a resource to assist the public locate suitable legal representation and promote solicitors across England and Wales. You can access the facility via the following link:

    http://www.lawsociety.org.uk/choosingandusing/findasolicitor.law.

    Alternatively, you could also look through a local directory, such as the Yellow Pages, which might help identify a suitable firm. As suggested in my previous reply, you may wish to contact the Law Centres Federation on 0207 428 4401 who can provide contact details for your local Law Centre. Also, you may find it helpful to access the Community Legal Services Direct website for information on providers of legal advice at

    www.clsdirect.org.uk. These are all alternative options available to you that do not involve the assistance of the Law Society.

    With regard to the complaint you have submitted to the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC), I have contacted the IPCC to investigate the status of your complaint. Senior lawyers at the IPCC inform me that without your expressed consent, I am unable to obtain any information that relates to your complaint. I was informed however that Casework Manager Sarah Brown is one of a number of IPCC staff that has conducted an investigation into your file and she can be contacted on 0207 166 3934 should you wish to discuss the details of your complaint further.

    I do hope that this information is of some use to you.


    Yours sincerely,

    Ryan Holmes

    Legal Services Regulation and Redress Division


    —–Original Message—–
    From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
    Sent: 05 June 2008 01:51

    To: Holmes, Ryan
    Subject: Re: Our ref: TO08/2153



    Hi,

     

    thank you very much for your e-mail!

     

    I have been thinking about contacting the Law Society, regarding getting a list, like you say,

    for law firms, who take on law-cases on a 'pro bono' service basis.

    But, like I might have forgotten to explain, the Law Society, are already involved in this,

    I have complained about them to the Legal Services Ombudsman, who I have been contacting

    you about.

    So I've maybe lost a bit of confidence, in the Law Society, since I think they gave a bit of wrong

    information, and some errors, that I thought were a bit strange, so they are really involved in this

    from before.

    So then I was wondering about, if it would be right to involve the Law Society again, since they

    are involved from before.

    Maybe there is someone else one could contact about getting the name of companies like this?

    Sorry if I'm asking a lot of questions.

    I've also sent a complaint, on the Merseyside Police, to the IPCC.

    But the IPCC, aren't dealing with the complaint at all, it seems, so I was wondering who I should

    contact then, if I wanted to compain about the IPCC not dealing with the complaint on the Police?

     

    Sorry again that I'm asking so many questions!

    Thanks in advance for the reply!

     

    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

     

    On 4/25/08, Holmes, Ryan <Ryan.Holmes@justice.gsi.gov.uk> wrote:

    Dear Mr Ribsskog

    Thank you for your email reply of 7 April, in which you request further advice on ways to proceed forward with your complaint against the Legal Services Ombudsman (LSO).  To assist you with your concerns, I shall set out the avenues of legal assistance available to you that acknowledge your specific financial concerns.

    Firstly, while I understand you have already been in contact with the Citizen's Advice Bureau (CAB), you may also wish to consider contacting your local Law Centre.  Contact details for your local Law Centre can be found via the Law Centres Federation on 0207 428 4401, or by accessing their website www.lawcentres.org.uk. You may also find it helpful to access the Community Legal Services Direct website for information on providers of legal advice at www.clsdirect.org.uk.  Alternatively, you may choose to contact Community Legal Advice for free confidential help regarding your legal queries on 0845 345 4345.

    Secondly, it may be worth investigating the possibility of a Conditional Fee Agreement (CFA).  This allows a solicitor to accept a case on a 'no won, no fee' basis, under which they receive a fee from you only if the case is won.  It is worth pointing that the solicitor's standard fees can be increased by up to 100% to reflect the degree of risk to the solicitor in taking the case on (the 'success fee').  However, should you lose your case, you may still be liable to pay the successful party's costs, as well as expert witness fees and other disbursements.  There are insurance schemes that, for a premium, provide cover for these items.  As part of the implementation of the Access to Justice Act 1999, we have made it possible for the successful side to recover their lawyer's success fee and insurance premium form the loser. Effectively, this has made the operation of conditional fees fairer and more attractive to clients.

    Thirdly, some solicitors may be prepared to take on your case on a pro bono agreement (i.e. provide you with a free service).  You can contact the Law Society who can provide you with a list of solicitors that may provide pro bono services.  The Law Society is the regulatory body for solicitors in England and Wales and you can write to them at the following address:

    The Law Society

    113 Chancery Lane

    London

    WC2A 1SX

    Tel: 0870 606 2555.

    Alternatively, you can access the Law Society's website at www.solicitors-online.com.

    I do hope that you find this information useful.

    Yours sincerely

    Ryan Holmes

    Legal Services Regulation and Redress Division

    This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.

    Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail.

    This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.

    The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2007/11/0032.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.

    Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes.

    This email was received from the INTERNET and scanned by the Government Secure Intranet anti-virus service supplied by Cable&Wireless in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2007/11/0032.) In case of problems, please call your organisation's IT Helpdesk.

    Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes.


    This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.

    Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail.

    This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.

    The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2007/11/0032.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.

    Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes.

    This email was received from the INTERNET and scanned by the Government Secure Intranet anti-virus service supplied by Cable&Wireless in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2007/11/0032.) In case of problems, please call your organisation's IT Helpdesk.

    Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes.


    This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.

    Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail.

    This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.

    The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2007/11/0032.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.

    Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes.

    This email was received from the INTERNET and scanned by the Government Secure Intranet anti-virus service supplied by Cable&Wireless in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2007/11/0032.) In case of problems, please call your organisation's IT Helpdesk.

    Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes.

    This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.

    Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail.

    This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.

    The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2007/11/0032.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.

    Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes.






  • Det her var nyhet for meg. (In Norwegian).

    Etter
    Stoltenberg

    Skrevet
    av Erik 17.09.2008 kl. 13:23

    Hvorfor
    ikke innføre ny tidsregning etter valget neste år:
    "Etter Stoltenberg".

    Nytt
    innlegg
    Svar
    på innlegg
    Varsle

    2

    anbefalinger

    Bra!

     

    RE:
    Etter Stoltenberg

    Skrevet
    av What do we want? More lies &
    infotainment bullshit, PLEASE!!
    17.09.2008 kl. 13:34

    Ja
    han er jo jøde han også, så!

    Nytt
    innlegg
    Svar
    på innlegg
    Varsle

    http://www.dagbladet.no/nyheter/2008/09/16/547060.html#comments_container

  • Spikring av vinduer på SIA. (In Norwegian).

    På begynnelsen av 90-tallet, så jobba jeg på OBS Triaden, i Lørenskog, i et par år.

    Da hadde jeg to kamerater, som het Øystein og Glenn, som hadde gått på skole sammen, i Lillestrøm, eller noe sånt.

    Øystein var også tremenningen min, for mora hans, var kusina til fattern.

    Så dem hadde et sommerhus, etter foreldra hennes, eller noe, nederst ved fjorden, helt nederst i Havnehagen, fordi ‘teskjekjærringa’.

    Dem kallte det Sand.

    Men Sand, for meg, det var litt lenger bort mot Svelvik.

    Så jeg ville sagt, at det var på Bergeråsen.

    Siden det var like på nedsida, av husene, som lå på Bergeråsen.

    Så det var litt rart, synes jeg, at de kallte det Sand.

    Men de kallte Oslo S., for ‘S-en’ og, eller i hvertfall tremenningen min.

    Så jeg synes de var litt artige, for de, eller spesiellt Øystein da, brukte så mange rare ord og utrykk osv., fra Lørenskog osv., som ikke var så kjent på Bergeråsen.

    Og i helgene, på Bergeråsen, så hang han og jeg og Kjetil Holshagen, ofte oppe i leiligheten min, i Leirfaret.

    Og da så vi på de nyeste Hollywood action-filmene, og spilte de nyeste C64-spillene, og spiste masse junkfood, Pizza Grandiosa, og potetgull og Cola osv.

    Dette var veldig kult, synes jeg, i hvertfall da jeg gikk på ungdomsskolen osv.

    En gang, da jeg gikk i 2. klasse på videregående, så tok Øystein og slukka en røyk, i hånda mi.

    Så da synes jeg ikke det var så artig.

    Det var vel i 1987, kan jeg tenke meg.

    Og jeg har arr enda.

    Såvidt.

    21 år sida.

    Men da fikk jeg jo skikkelig sår osv.

    Så jeg ble så sinna, så jeg heiv ut Øystein og Kjetil og søstra mi, fra leiligheten i Leirfaret, og snakka nesten ikke med dem, på et halvt år.

    Og det var litt ergelig, for vi hadde egentlig en bra tone, på den tida, synes jeg.

    Men etter den sigarett-stumpinga, i hånda mi, fra Øystein, så var det ikke like bra lengre.

    Så det var litt dumt.

    Så jeg lot han få en pause, på et halvt år, etter det her, før jeg prata med han igjen.

    Det er mulig det ikke var for lang pause.

    Det er mulig.

    Men men.

    Men ihvertfall.

    Sånn rundt 1990 og 91, så hang jeg en del sammen med Øystein og Glenn, og spilte biljard og flipper osv., etter jobben, på OBS.

    Vi pleide å henge i en biljardhall, på Skårer, som ble eiet av familien til Bengt Rune, fra Rasta, som vi ble kjent med, siden vi hang der, ganske tilfeldig vel.

    Men vi pleide å henge på bowlinga, på Metro senteret.

    Men så åpna den biljardhallen, så da hang vi der og.

    Senere så hang jeg en del med Glenn, på bowlinga på Strømmen Storsenter.

    Og vi pleide å være hos meg eller Øystein, å spille poker og black jack, og se på kino, som Øystein hadde på rommet, noe projektor, som han kjøpte billig fra konferansesenteret, på hotellet på Triaden, da dem gikk konkurs, sånn rundt 1990.

    Så Øystein var ganske før sin tid, når det gjaldt hjemmekino osv.

    Vi pleide også å kjøre til Strømmen å kjøpe pizza.

    Eller vi dro på Robsrudjordet grill, og der jobba kusina til Øystein.

    Jeg husker ikke hva hu heter.

    Øystein var adoptert fra Korea, men kusina hans, som også var naboen, i Markus Thranes Vei, hadde lyst hår, og var ikke adoptert.

    Hun jobba på cruise-båt en gang, og likte ikke det, men kom hjem, fordi arbeidsforholdene var så dårlige, sa hu.

    Anita, tror jeg kanskje hu het.

    Noe sånt.

    En gang, så skulle hu vaske klær for meg, sommeren 1990, eller noe, etter at jeg Øystein hadde vært i England.

    Da hadde jeg ikke noe sted å bo den sommeren.

    For jeg sa opp leiligheten på Abilsø, etter juni måned.

    Så den sommeren, 1990, så var jeg i Brighton, hos Øystein på Hanaborg, hos bestemuttern på Sand i Svelvik, hos bestemuttern i Stavern, og jeg tror også, hos onkelen min, i Son.

    Før jeg flytta til halvbroren min og dem, høsten 1990 da, og leide et rom hos dem, på Furuset.

    Så sparte jeg husleia, hos de folka på Abildsø.

    Men hvor tinga mine var i mellomtida, det skal jeg ikke si.

    Men jeg solgte vannsenga mi, til Øystein.

    Men de andre tinga, husker jeg ikke hvor jeg gjorde av, før jeg flytta.

    Men jeg stua dem kanskje inn hos broren min og dem, før ferien.

    Noe sånt.

    Men men.

    En dag, i 1991 eller 1992, eller noe.

    Så kjørte jeg og Øystein og Glenn, forbi sentralsykehuset i Akershus.

    Det ligger vel i Lørenskog, blir det vel.

    Hvis jeg husker riktig.

    Jeg hadde ikke lappen, for jeg studerte på datahøyskole.

    Så jeg hadde ikke hatt råd til lappen og bil.

    Men Glenn hadde vært i en mopedulykke, på 80-tallet, og fikk mye erstatning, fordi han skada beinet, i et kryss, på Skjetten.

    Det var noe med vikeplikt, eller noe vel.

    Noe sånt.

    Så fikk han masse penger.

    Så starta han og Øystein spilleautomat-firma.

    Og det var jo veldig kult, på den tida.

    Med masse Street-fighter spill osv.

    Jeg hadde jo studert noen økonomifag osv., på handel og kontor, og datahøyskole.

    Så egentlig var det meg og Øystein, som skulle starte automatfirma.

    Men det ble ikke noe av.

    Men de sa jeg kunne kjøpe aksjer.

    Men dem visste at jeg ikke hadde så mye penger, siden jeg studerte, så det var mest kødd.

    Men det firma gikk etterhvert nedenom og hjem da.

    Så kanskje de hadde tjent på, å hatt en blåruss med på laget.

    Det er mulig.

    Men sånn er det.

    Men tilbake til SIA da.

    Vi kjørte forbi der, og da sa dem, at dem hadde måttet spikre igjen vinduene der.

    Fordi det var så mange folk som hoppa ut, fra de øverste etasjene i sykehusbygget der.

    Det var vel 15 etasjer høyt, eller noe sånt.

    Så de måtte spikre igjen vinduene, eller noe, var det vel de sa.

    Siden det var så mange som heiv seg ut av vinduene.

    Så spurte jeg hvorfor de heiv seg ut av vinduene.

    Da svarte de ikke.

    Men jeg vet ikke hvor smart det egentlig er å være på sånne sykehus.

    Jeg vet ikke hvem som egentlig har kontrollen der.

    Det virker egentlig litt for meg, som at undergrunnen har det meste av kontrollen i Norge.

    Så å havne på sånn sykehus, og bli tullet med av noe undergrunn.

    Det høres ikke så fristende ut.

    Så det var kanskje derfor de måtte spikre igjen vinduene.

    Siden en del pasienter ble plaget av noe undergrunn.

    Hva vet jeg.

    Med vennlig hilsen

    Erik Ribsskog