Måned: oktober 2008
-
Frankrike. (In Norwegian).
http://www.dagbladet.no/dinside/2008/09/26/548237.html
Ja, nå spiste jeg ganske bra middag i går, som man kunne se i en av de forrige e-postene.
Så da begynte jeg å tenke litt.
Det er mulig at noe av den middagen også har klart å komme fram til hjernen, eller noe, det er mulig.
Noe sånt.
Jeg var jo i den katolske katedralen i Liverpool i går, og når jeg tenkte på det, så tenkte jeg på, at jeg bodde jo i Paris, i nesten et par måneder, på hotell, i 2005.
Da prøvde jeg å finne ut hvor jeg kunne dra, etter at jeg hørte at jeg var forfulgt av ‘mafian’, i Oslo, og etter at studiene gikk skeis i Sunderland.
Og jeg kunne jo ikke bare sitte inne på hotellet, hele dagen, så jeg gikk litt rundt i Paris, og så på Napoleons grav i invaliderdomen, og jeg var og kikket i Notre Dame et par ganger, i løpet av de to månedene, og jeg så på Bastillen der, selv om festningen de stormet var borte, kjedelig nok, så hadde de bygget opera, eller noe, i stedet.
Sånne ting.
Jeg var vel også innom Notre Dame, da jeg var med STS Språkreiser til Brighton, med helgetur til Paris, i 1985 forresten.
Og også i Eifeltårent og Louvre, og den høyden ikke langt fra hotellet, hvor det er en kirke og man kan se ut over byen osv.
Men jeg gikk og så litt langs Seinen, og var en par ganger på byen på en irsk pub, som lå ikke langt fra det stedet, hvor cabaret, Moulin Rouge, men der var jeg ikke, jeg prøvde å spare litt penger, for det var dyrt å bo på hotell hele tida.
Men jeg gikk og trente en gang i Paris.
Og jeg fikk ikke vaska klær, selv om jeg kanskje kunne ha spurt på hotellet.
Men jeg var litt anspent, pga. det her mafia-greiene, som jeg ikke forstod hva var osv.
Men Paris var grei by, synes jeg.
I begynnelsen så kunne jeg bare si ‘merci’ og ‘oui’, som betyr takk og ja.
Og da fikk jeg noen rare kaker og kaffe, på McDonalds, første dagen.
Men men.
Men etterhvert så lærte jeg å si sandwich avec jambon et fromage si voul plait, eller hvordan det skrives.
Som betyr baguett med ost og skinke.
Men men.
Og hva vann heter og flere sånne ting.
Men men.
Men jeg tenkte på Frankrike da.
Der har de jo ganske nylig fått ny president.
Og det var i nyhetene, at Frankrike nå har blitt vanlig medlem av Nato.
Frankrike var jo i gamle dager, ikke vanlig medlem av Nato, men sånn halvveis medlem, og kalte Nato for ‘Otan’.
Jeg lurer på om dette var Frankrikes måte, å si fra at noe var galt med Nato.
At Nato er sionismens og den jødiske verdenskonspirasjonen og New World Orders apparat for å oppnå verdensherredømme.
Dette er ganske heavy greier så jeg får ta en pause her.
Vi husker jo også at amerikanerne, etter 11. september, mislikte Frankrikes holdning, som vel i ettertid, på sies å ha vært mer fornuftig, enn å starte krig i Irak og Afganistan osv., som vel ikke var så velbegrunnet, men som kanskje passet inn i NWO’s agenda, siden disse landene ikke var under plutokratenes, de 12 familiene som kontrollerer verden, sin kontroll.
Så amerikanerne sluttet å si ‘french fries’, men sa istedet ‘freedom fries’, for pommes frites.
Men nå, med den ny presidenten, og frankrikes fulle medlemskap i Nato, så er nok Frankrike med i New World Order også, som et av de siste landene i Europa og Verden, vil jeg tippe.
Man ser at pengene kommer inn nå, fra de 12 rike familiene antagelig, Rotchilds og Rockefeller osv., de 12 jødiske familiene, som kontrollerer verden, som det sies.
Og som også har Bilderbeger-group, som en slags verdensregjering, hvor Jens Stoltenberg og Siv Jensen er medlem.
Så hvis Stoltenberg må gå av etter stortingsvalget neste år, så sitter Siv Jensen antagelig i den nye regjeringen.
Og Erna Solberg, har tynnet ut øyabryna sine, som en h*re omtrent, så jeg på bilde i avisa nå.
Så det spørrs om ikke hu er under NWO/Illuminati kontroll også.
Og den skjulte agendaen til NWO/Illuminati, er en krig mot Norden, mistenker jeg, som jeg har skrevet om i går på bloggen, blant annet.
Se på andre verdenskrig.
Hvor mange innbyggere kan Norge ha hatt i 1940?
3 millioner?
Hvor mange tyske soldater var det i Norge?
400.000, eller noe?
En for hver åttende nordmann omtrent.
Og etter krigen, så fortsetter det, med rasjonering, i årevis, etter krigen.
Og man plagde tyskerjentene, og satte de i leire osv.
Det var vel gutta fra skauen, som arresterte dem.
Titusener av politistyrker, eller ‘politistyrker’, dukket opp fra over grensa til Sverige.
Og arresterte disse tyskerjentene kanskje.
Hva vet jeg.
Hvorfor ønsket tyskerne å binde så mange folk i Norge?
Bare pga. jernmalmen fra Kiruna osv.
Jeg synes det hørtes rart ut.
Jeg tror det må ha vært noe rart med 2. verdenskrig også.
At den var del av noe NWO opplegg.
Og den amerikanske krigsherren Eisenhower, var det vel, tilbydde også Norge, til Stalin.
Stod det i avisa.
Ja, nå mista jeg litt tråen her.
Det var vel Frankrike jeg skulle skrive om.
Jo, Frankrike og Paris, det har ikke så mange moderne bygg, og moderne arkitektur, som andre byer, la jeg merke til, da toget fra Berlin, rulla inn i Paris.
Paris så kanskje mye ut som London eller Frankfurt kanskje så ut som, for 50 år siden.
Det er kanskje et tegn, på at Rockefeller og de andre 12 familiene som styrer verden.
‘Den jødiske verdenskonspirasjon’ osv.
At de har holdt seg unna Frankrike og Paris.
Vi så jo at Rockefeller bygde den kjente skyskraperen i New York, hva heter den da, Empire State Building, eller noe.
Imperie-bygning ja.
Det var kanskje New World Order imperiet det da.
Hva vet jeg.
Men men.
Man ser det, f.eks. i London, at her har nye rare bygninger dukket opp.
Den der gurkien, eller hva den heter.
Så om sånne rare bygninger, har noe med New World Order, å gjøre.
Liverpool har også noen sånne rare bygninger.
Dog ikke fullt så rare:
Liverpool har jo fått veldig mange nye bygninger, de to siste årene.
Jeg lurer på om det betyr at New World Order, og Illuminati, og krigen mot blonde folk, har gjort sitt inntog.
Noe sånt.
Mer da.
Jo man så jo at han nye franske presidenten, bytta ut kona si, og fikk en ny, som hadde vært med på nakenbilde osv., altså ei hore mer eller mindre da.
Så om det er noe mafia-greier forbundet med det her NWO/Illuminati-greiene.
Noe sånt.
Ja, nå har jeg sikkert glemt noe poenger, men jeg kan vel ikke sitte å skrive hele dagen heller, så jeg får prøve å ta en pause.
Vi får se.
Med vennlig hilsen
Erik Ribsskog
PS.
Nå tenkte jeg på noe mer her.
Cunard Building, hvor Arvatos Microsoft Scandinavian Produkt Activation, holdt til i.
Den bygningen, er jo nesten som en skyskraper.
Den er like stor som en katedral.
Nå har ikke jeg sett noen ordentlige skyskrapere, på nært hold.
Men jeg vet ikke om the Cunard Building, er som f.eks. Empire State Building.
Bare at the Cunard Building, bare er 8-9 etasjer høy, eller noe.
Noe sånt.
Jeg husker når vi skulle ha møte, Senior Team-leader Tippins, Rushby fra HR, og Baines, team-leader fra Bon-Prix, etter at Baines hadde mobba meg, ved å følge etter meg hjem fra jobben, og angrepet meg, for å ha stålet hodetelefoner, direkte, på en uhølig måte, enda jeg ikke hadde gjort noe galt, og enda han ikke var min team-leader, men leder på en annen avdeling.
Hvis han trodde jeg gjorde noe galt, så burde han tatt det med team-leaderen på Microsoft-kampanjen, hvor jeg jobbet, og ikke med meg.
Han burde ha fulgt ordre-veien, som det vel heter.
For han var ikke min sjef, selv om han var sjef på Bon Prix.
Da var han sjef for de som jobbet på Bon Prix, men ikke for de som jobbet på Microsoft.
Bare for å forklare det enkelt.
Men Baines forstod visst ikke dette.
Eller lot som at han ikke forstod det.
Og det var også flere episoder.
Møte om disse problemene, med de nevnte personene som deltok.
For min team-leader, Line Slettvold, som var min line-manager, hun ville ikke være med på møte, så da synes ikke jeg at jeg kunne tvinge henne.
Hun var litt vanskelig å komme på bølgelengde med, og var vel mer nerd enn en som var flink med mennesker, var mitt inntrykk i hvertfall.
Og hun løy også hele tida, så jeg visste ikke hvor jeg hadde henne uansett så.
Men men.
Men dette møte, ble holdt i third floor, eller noe.
Enda Arvato leide, i first floor og fourt floor.
Andre og femte etasje.
Og næringslivet i Liverpool, har ikke alltid gått like bra.
Så mye av the Cunard Building, står vel ganske tom.
Det var nok ikke så mye aktivitet, i second floor og third floor, f.eks.
Så hva som kan ha foregått, når de dro unge, pene jenter, til sånne møterom, det vet jeg ikke.
Men Arvato hadde altså flust med rom, i first floor, og fourt floor, i det skyskraper/katedral-lignende bygget, Cunard Building.
Men alikevel, så skulle møte vårt være i second eller third floor, i et møterom der, hvor jeg ikke så noen andre folk.
Så det synes jeg var litt rart.
Team-leader Marianne dukket opp gråtende, etter et slikt møte, rundt jul 2005, med Tippins, mener jeg å huske at hun sa det var, om forlengelse av 3 måneders vikariat, for team-leader.
Kanskje hun ble voldtatt i møte, eller noe annet sted, og at det var derfor hun gråt.
Hvis hun måte bli vanlig medarbeider, etter å ha vært Team-leader, så dummet hun seg vel ut.
Så kanskje hun gikk med på å bli hore, eller ble truet til det, for noen der., for å få lov å jobbe som TL, de resterende månedene, før hun dro tilbake til Norge?
For hun sa rundt jul 2005, at hun ikke fikk lov å fortsett som team-leader.
Men hun fortsatte likevel, frem til ca. juni 2006.
Og noen ganger, rundt mars-april 2006, var det kanskje, så så jeg at hun gikk med sånne små trippende skritt.
Som om hun hadde vondt når hun gikk.
Når hun kom på jobb.
Så om hun ble voldtatt av noe mob, eller Illuminati var det vel antagelig, på jobb.
Det ville jeg ikke funnet usannsynlig.
Kanskje det var derfor de utlyste en sånn stilling igjen, etter at Marianne slutta.
Da hadde vi jo to team-leadere.
Kanskje de ville ha hun Emelie Wallin, fra Sverige, inn i samme fella?
Men, da hadde jo jeg flytta til denne leiligheten, som jeg postet bilder fra, på bloggen, i går.
Og da trengte jeg jo mer penger, for jeg pleide å bo i et ‘shared house’, et bokollektiv, i Walton.
Og det kosta bare £240 i måneden.
Men denne leiligheten, koster £520 i måneden.
Så da søkte jeg på team-leader, for da ville jeg fått omtrent £100 mer i måneden, mener jeg Marianne nevnte.
Altså ikke så mye, men jeg sleit skikkelig med å betale regningene, da jeg jobbet på Arvato.
For jeg fikk utbetalt ca. £800 i måneden kanskje.
Noe sånt.
Og jeg hadde jo strøm og vann og mange andre regninger, enn husleie.
Så jeg kjøpte ikke lunch, i butikk.
F.eks ferdigsmurt sandwich, som er vanlig her.
Men jeg gikk 10 minutter hjem, i lunchen, og tok ut brødskiver fra frysern.
Og tinte dem i brødristeren.
Og tok på peanøttsmør.
Og så stressa jeg i ti minutter, for å komme tilbake til jobben, på 40 minutter, som pausen da ikke fikk lov å være et minutt lengre enn, plutselig, fordi de pluteslig ble så firkanta.
Jeg prøvde å forklare, at jeg dro hjem osv., men de var like firkanta som Hitler ville ha vært, kan jeg tenke meg.
Bare for å ta et eksempel.
Så da måtte jeg stresse i lunchen også.
Så hele dagen ble bare stress da.
For jeg ble sendt så mange danske samtaler, som de maste om at jeg måtte ta like bra som norske, så jeg sleit veldig.
Og jeg måtte jobbe på fridagene, for å få råd til å betale regningene.
Så da jeg skulle ha ferie, i desember, så var jeg veldig utslitt, etter flere måneders stress og mas.
Jeg tok jo opp problemene med Managing Director, og han ville ikke la meg jobbe der lengre, pga. min egen sikkerhet, sa han.
Jeg prøvde å nekte, men ble sendt hjem.
Så ble jeg konstruktivt oppsagt.
Men men.
Men jeg ble jo tilbudt en datajobb, av Rushby og team-leader Steinsland, da jeg leverte team-leader søknaden, den siste dagen før fristen, 30. juni vel, i 2006.
Emelie sa at hun ikke hadde søkt, men kanskje hun jugde.
Eller kanskje hun forrandret mening.
Det er mulig.
Noe sånt.
Men jeg hadde jo søkt team-leader, så jeg synes det var mer ryddig å ta ferdig den søknadsprosessen, før jeg søkte den ledige datajobben.
Jeg hadde jo erfaring med ledelse, fra Norge.
Så de kunne vel nesten ikke droppe å la meg bli team-leader, siden jeg hadde en bra søknad.
Og heller la Emelie Wallin, havne i den samme fella som Marianne.
Og så gjøre henne til hore, etter tre måneder, etter å ha truet med å gjøre henne til en vanlig medarbeider igjen.
Så derfor begynte de å mobbe meg, hele tida, på jobben, som jeg har forklart om i Arvato-filene, på Scribd.
For at jeg skulle slutte.
Steinsland mobba meg hele tida.
Hun er nok noe mob/illuminati, eller lignende.
Men jeg hadde jo ikke noen familie eller noe, som jeg kunne stole på.
Og heller ikke venner.
Og politiet i Norge og England, de bare tullet med meg.
Så jeg var avhengig av jobben.
Så jeg startet heller å ta opp mobbingen i møter osv.
For å prøve å løse problemene.
For jeg var jo bekymret for familien min i Norge, om de var under kontroll av noe mafia.
Så jeg ga meg ikke så lett, når det gjaldt å miste den eneste sikkerheten jeg hadde, som var jobben min, og de ca. £800 i måneden.
Som jeg trengte, for å fortsett kampen, for å få rettighetene min, altså vite hva som skjedde, fra Kripos og andre myndigheter.
Så, siste dagen hun Emelie jobba.
Så satt hun på team-leader plassen.
Så om de gjorde henne til team-leader, enda jeg nettopp hadde søkt.
Det synes jeg at jeg hørte at Line sa til Emelie.
At Steinsland, skulle ha permisjon i februar eller mars, i 2007, fødselspermisjon, så de trengte en team-leader.
Jeg hadde jo søkt.
Og hadde ti år erfaring, med ledelse, blandt annet som butikksjef, fra Rimi i Oslo.
Men meg ville de ikke gi noe tre måneders vikariat.
Jeg spurte Line i møte samme dag, om det her.
Men hun bare dekket over det, med å si at hun og Emelie bare hadde prata om noe venninne-greier.
Jeg hadde jo flere eksempler fra før, på at Line jugde til meg.
Det er filer om dette på Scribd.
Så jeg tenkte, at jeg kunne jo spørre Emelie, om jeg hadde hørt riktig.
Men hun svarte ikke i det hele tatt.
Dette var etter at Line hadde gått hjem.
Men da satt Emelie, på team-leader plassen.
Så om de hadde avtalt at hun skulle ha team-leader opplæring f.eks.
Men ikke sa fra til meg.
Men det skal jo være åpenhet, på slike arbeidsplasser.
Så de kunne jo ikke drive med noe sånn venninne-tisking, på jobben.
I hvertfall ikke om ting som hadde med jobben.
For alle har krav på å ha klarhet i, hvem som har hvilken funksjon osv., i firmaet, eller avdelingen, som man jobber.
Var f.eks. hun Emelie sjefen eller kollegaen min, den dagen, siden hun satt på team-leader plass, og hadde på noe team-leader skjerm osv.
Da hadde vel jeg rett til å vite det, om hun var sjef eller vanlig medarbeider.
For å unngå misforståelser.
Sånn var det også med han svensk/irske Michael, eller hvor han var fra, og som hadde et vanskelige etternavnet, så jeg skriver ikke det.
Han oppførte seg jo som en sjef der, ved at han ga meg skjema for å skrive opp arbeidstid osv., på slutten av dagen.
Uansett om jeg hadde skrevet på skjema, eller ikke.
Og uansett om jeg flere ganger tidligere, hadde fortalt han, at jeg klarte å huske det selv, og at han ikke trengte å gi meg skjema, på slutten av dagen.
Men da spurte jeg Lill, som var en tidligere team-leader der, om Michael, var sjef eller vanlig medarbeider.
Han var vanlig medarbeider, kom det fram da.
Men når jeg spørr om det samme, bare med en litt annen ordlyd, til Line og Emelie, da fikk jeg ikke noe svar.
Bare noe intetsigende svar fra Line, og ikke et ord til svar, fra Emelie.
Hun Emelie, var jo ganske ung, uten at jeg vet nøyaktig hvor ung.
Så jeg snakket ikke mer til henne den dagen da, i tilfelle hun ble redd for meg, at det var derfor hun ikke svarte, om hun var team-leader, eller ikke.
Og det var siste dagen, som hun jobba der.
Men hun var jo veldig pen jente, så da hun ikke dukka opp på jobb, så ble jeg bekymra, for om hun kunne vært kidnappa av noe mob el.
Noen ringte og sa til Line at hvis noen lurte på hvorfor hun Emelie var syk, så måtte vi ringe Emelie, å spørre.
Dette sa Line, til hele kampanjen.
Men jeg hadde ikke telefonnummeret, så jeg kunne ikke ringe.
Men jeg sa fra til Line, en drøy uke seinere, om det gikk bra med Emelie, siden hun ikke kom tilbake på jobb.
Jeg ble jo tullet med av politiet i både Norge og England.
Og jeg har jo publisert den journalen (som var forfalsket), fra psykiatrien i Vestfold, hvor hun litt dumme, tror jeg at jeg tørr å si, tyske psykologen, som skrev at jeg var 24 år, og ikke 34, og ga meg medisiner, mot paranoia og schizofreni.
Som jeg ikke tok da, for jeg trodde ikke det var noe galt med meg.
Hvis jeg sa til hun, etter råd fra onkelen min, som var urolig, at jeg hadde hørt at jeg var forfulgt av ‘mafian’, så trodde hun jeg var paranoid, siden det ikke står noe i avisene i Norge, om at det er noe mafia i Norge.
Men men.
Så jeg var redd for, at hvis jeg kontaktet politiet i England, eller Norge, og sa at Emelie på jobben, kanskje var borført, siden hun var sykmeldt.
Så ville bare politiet sagt at jeg var sinnsyk, og aldri hørt på meg igjen senere.
Så jeg skjønte at jeg trengte dokumenter, sånn at det ikke var noen tvil.
Så derfor startet jeg den arbeidssaken.
Eller jeg holdt allerede på med den, siden jeg ble som jeg skrev, mobbet av Steinsland, med flere, særlig etter at jeg søkte team-leader, i juni.
Og dette var i oktober.
Og da hadde jeg ikke fått noe tilbakemelding på team-leader søknaden.
Så jeg var litt anspent pga. dette.
Men men.
Så jeg var jo utslitt, pga. all overtiden, og stresset i lunchen, og alle de danske samtalene, og all mobbingen fra Steinsland og Baines osv.
Men, jeg prøvde å kjappe meg med arbeidssaken, enclosure 7, på scribd.
For jeg hadde tenkt å ringe avisene om, at de brukte reinforcement, som Steinsland hadde fortalt meg, på Microsoft-aktiveringa, for det var ment for å dressere hunder, hadde jeg lest.
Og andre problemer.
Da kunne jeg prøve å få lys på problemene i firma, og da ville det også gi lys på situasjonen med Emelie Wallin, uansett om det var noe galt her, eller ikke.
Tenkte jeg.
Så jeg tenkte at det smarteste jeg kunne gjøre, i den situasjonen, var å gå videre med den arbeids-saken, for politiet bare tullet med meg, jeg hadde vært der mange ganger, og de ga meg ikke noe hjelp.
Så overtrakk jeg kontoen, i Nordea, med £800, eller noe.
Så da fikk jeg litt pusterom økonomisk.
For jeg var bekymret for hun Wallin, hun var så lenge borte fra jobb.
Så jeg bestemte meg for, at nå fikk jeg heller overtrekke kontoen, og heller bruke fridagene, på den arbeidssaken, enn å jobbe overtid, sånn at jeg kom noen vei.
Så fulgte Baines etter meg hjem fra jobb.
Så tok jeg taxi til politiet, for pengene jeg overtrakk, og rapporterte dette.
Logførte dette.
Så begynte senior team-leader Tippins, å juge, og si at det ikke var noen team-leader med navn Baines, i Arvato, enda Slettvold, allerede hadde fortalt meg at hans navn var Baines.
Så da rapporterte jeg Tippins også, til politiet.
Og også Rushby, fra HR, for de prøvde å hjelpe Baines, å dekke over de episodene jeg tok opp, hvor han mobbet.
På dette nevnte møte, i second floor, eller third floor, i the Cunard Building.
Så ringte politiet om kvelden, og ba meg ta det med Managing Director.
Jeg tok det med pressen også, for sikkerhets skyld.
Og jeg holder på med den saken ennå, snart to år senere.
For å prøve å få lys på firma, og problemene der.
Også det problemet, at det virka som at nordiske damer ble brukt som horer der.
Og de problemene med at lederne der læres opp til å bruke forsterkning, som er en psykologisk straffe/dressur-metode, må man vel si.
Dette er alvorlig nok i seg selv.
Synes jeg etter å ha jobbet med ledelse i ti år, i Rimi i Norge, og etter å ha hatt ledelse og organisasjon, som fag, på videregående og høyskole, i Norge.
Og det var også masse andre problemer i organisasjonen der, som jeg syntes var alvorlige.
Se Scribd.
http://www.scribd.com/groups/view/14830-arvato-services-ltd-s-microsoft-scandinavian-product-activation
Og jeg ble konstruktivt oppsagt, og presset til å jobbe så hardt, at jeg omtrent jobbet meg i hjel.
Og noen ganger, ikke klarte å prate vanlig på telefonen.
Men pratet veldig sakte, pga. at jeg hadde tatt for mange telefoner.
Så om det var planen deres, at jeg skulle jobbe meg ihjel, eller noe.
Jeg har ikke kommet til meg selv igjen, etter de månedene med slavedrift der, må jeg vel kalle det, i 2006, før nå de siste ukene.
Og det er jo to år siden nå.
Så da var jeg rimelig nedkjørt, da jeg ble permitert med lønn, før jeg ble konstruktivt oppsagt, fra Arvato.
Så det kan man nesten kalle drapsforsøk vil jeg si.
Så sånn var det.
Og noe annet.
De hadde også en sånn nesten hemmelig, eller i hvertfall skjult, nødutgang, som var inne i konstruksjonen av bygget omtrent, i the Cunard Building.
Branntrapp, het det kanskje.
Der gikk vi ved en brannøvelse.
Så det er mye rom og gjemte værelser, eller i hvertall mange rom i en sånn bygning.
Det var jo som en stor katedral, eller en liten skyskraper.
Så der kan det nok foregå mye rart, i sånne store bygninger.
For det er jo nesten som en by, en sånn bygning.
I hvertfall som en landsby.
La oss si at 300 personer kunne jobbe på Arvato, i first floor, samtidig da.
I hvertfall 200.
Noe sånt.
Og det var vel ikke fullt halve first floor.
Uten at jeg skal si det for sikkert.
Kanskje det var halve first floor.
Men si at 400 personer kunne jobbe i hver etasje da.
Eller 300.
Noe sånt.
Og så var det kanskje 9 etasjer da.
Det var jo kjeller og.
9 ganger 350 personer, på jobb samtidig.
Hvis hele bygget hadde vært fullt utleid.
Det er ihvertfall mulig, selv om det nok ikke jobbet så mange der.
Men det blir jo over 3000 folk.
Hjemkommunen min, i Norge, Svelvik.
Svelvik hadde 5000 innbyggere.
Men i et sånnt bygg, som the Cunard Building, så er det jo egne vakter osv.
Politiet og andre, de kan jo ikke se hva som foregår.
Ingen vanlige folk, lusker rundt der, for å se hva som skjer.
Og i skyskrapere, som i USA osv., der må det jo være enda mer folk på jobb osv.
Jeg tror kanskje ikke det var 3000 folk på jobb samtidig, i the Cunard Building.
Men kanskje 1000, kunne det vel vært.
Vanskelig å si.
Men mye stod også tomt der.
Så om det jobbet 500 eller 1000 der da, men at det kunne ha jobbet 3000 der da.
Noe sånt.
Så der var det nok mye krinker og kroker, og møterom, som det kunne skje mye rart i, i de forskjellige etasjene.
Hun Emelie Wallin, hun dukket jo opp gråtende, i heisen, i en sånn litt ‘ubebodd’ etasje, en gang.
Da kanskje hun hadde blitt brukt som hore, i et sånt ‘øde’ møterom, eller noe.
Hva vet jeg.
Her er det i hvertfall noe galt som har foregått.
Hva skulle Wallin gjøre, gråtende, i second floor, eller third floor.
Når disse var ‘øde’, og Arvato holdt til i first floor og fourth floor.
Jeg måtte hente noe greier i fourth floor, før jeg dro hjem for å spise lunch.
Fordi Microsoft-aktiveringa, bytta plass, mellom first floor og forth floor osv., kanskje ti ganger, på en måneds tid, sommeren 2006.
Så jeg hadde noe papirer eller noe, som jeg henta, på den forrige plassen vår, i fourth floor, før jeg dro på lunch.
Kanskje noe til en sånn ‘service-level konkurranse’, som Steinsland underlig nok, sa jeg skulle organisere.
Jeg tenkte det kunne være noe i forbindelse med team-leader utanning, på forskudd, siden jeg hadde søkt, så jeg gjorde som hun sa, selv om det virka for meg, som klart å være en team-leader oppgave.
Men jeg var vanlig medarbeider, som ble satt av Steinsland, til å gjøre en team-leader arbeidsoppgave da.
Jeg prøvde å lære mer om firma, siden jeg regna med jeg stod sterkt, til å bli team-leader, så jeg synes det var greit, å bli litt innblandet i driften av kampanjen.
Noe lignende var det i Rimi, da jeg ble leder der, så gikk det veldig gradvist, og ganske smått.
Jeg fikk først litt ansvar, og så litt mer og mer osv.
Men men.
Så jeg vil gjerne advare litt mot sånne store, uoversiktelige bygninger, som the Cunard Building.
For her er det ikke lett for byen, å vite hva som foregår.
Som man kunne klart, vil jeg gjette, hvis en avdeling var i en vanlig bygning, eller hus.
Og folk måtte gått ut av bygningen, for å spise, for eksempel.
Sånne ting.
Ikke sånn, at man gikk på jobb klokken 7, og ble i bygget hele dagen, til man gikk hjem kl 17.
Da er det vel bedre å ha mindre bygninger, sånn at det blir litt mer gjennomsiktig, hva som foregår.
Vil jeg tippe.
Så litt varsko mot sånne bygninger, som the Cunard Buiding.
Og også sånne bygg, som den pyramiden, som er planlagt bygget, i Paris.
Hvis bygget har egne vaktfolk osv., som en slags erstatning for politi, så kan de være både værre og bedre enn politiet, vil jeg tippe.
Men det virker som at en vanlig leietager, vil være sårbar, i en sånn bosituasjon, hvis noen bygger et nettverk, av naboer osv., så kanskje man blir der resten av livet.
Er det derfor det er edderkopper, i Liverpool hele tida nå. (Se ‘spider’ tag).
Fordi noen skal forklare folk om at noen bygger nettverk, eller nett, og prøver å fange de pene, unge damene, og andre, i dem?
Hva vet jeg.
Noe rart er det nok, vil jeg tippe.
Så sånn er vel det, får man regne med.
Så får jeg ta en pause her, for det er vel grenser for hvor mye energi jeg fikk av den middagen fra i går.
Men jeg tror sånn rødt kjøtt, som er i biff og kjøttdeig osv., blir litt dårlig behandlet for tiden, at man sier det usunt osv. Men jeg tror det er mer energi, i sånt rødt oksekjøtt f.eks., enn kanskje i kylling f.eks.
Uten at jeg skal si det for sikkert.
Men jeg lurer i hvertfall.
Og det har man vel lov å gjøre, får jeg håpe.
Vi får se.
PS 2.
Nå skrev jeg tekstmelding til hun Marianne Høkås, som var team-leader, på Microsoft-aktiveringa, i 2005 og 2006.
Om hun ble misbrukt, av han Aidan Tippins, eller noen andre, på det møterommet i second floor, da hun gråt etter møte.
Også fordi, at hun Sarah Rushby, hun gikk med så små skritt, ut av møterommet, etter at møtet var ferdig, og Baines og Tippins, hadde gått.
Da jeg hadde klagemøte mot Baines, høsten 2006.
Om hun herma etter måten, som hun Marianne, hadde gått på, når hun kom på jobb, noen ganger, som jeg la merke til, våren 2006, for da gikk hun med så korte skritt.
Om hun Rushby, skulle herme etter hun Marianne.
Som en slags mafia/mob vits?
Noe sånt, lurer jeg.
PS 3.
Nå fikk jeg tekstmelding fra hun Marianne.
Og hun skriver at hverken hun, eller noen av de andre jentene som jobbet der, ble misbrukt i det hele tatt.
Hvordan hun nå kan vite det.
Men men.
Så jeg måtte love, at jeg skulle slette alt om det her, så fort som den saken mot Arvato/Microsoft var ferdig.
Så sånn var det.
-
E-mail to the Home Office. (Reminder).
Google Mail – To the Minister of Justice/Fwd: Our ref: TO08/2153
Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>
To the Minister of Justice/Fwd: Our ref: TO08/2153
Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>
Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 11:30 PM
To:
public.enquiries@homeoffice.gsi.gov.uk
Hi,I can’t see that I’ve recieved an answer to this e-mail yet, so I’m
trying to send it again.Yours sincerely,
Erik Ribsskog
———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 10:42 AMSubject: Fwd: To the Minister of Justice/Fwd: Our ref: TO08/2153
To: public.enquiries@homeoffice.gsi.gov.uk Hi,
I’ve been having some problems with the IPCC, that they don’t want to
investigate some problems,
regarding a complaint against the Merseyside Police.
They have freed the Police, even if it’s clear that the Police have
done a lot of things wrong, they
have been operating with phoney e-mail addresses, and they have been
calling me ‘Miss Erik
Ribsskog’, and they have been lieing, and sending me to the CAB,
saying they are Government,
when they are a charity, and much more.
I also sent an update, with a new complaint, and I thought the
complaints should be investigated
collected.
But the IPCC didn’t want to do this.
I think the whole process there is a mess now.
My last two e-mails to them, haven’t been answered at all.
I think this is unaceptable by an institution like the IPCC, that have
an important function
in society.
At first, I thought that these problems I’ve been having, with the
IPCC and the Police, could be due
to, that I am a Norwegian citizen.
But I’ve now contacted EFTA, who explained to me, that since I am an
EEA-citizen, then I have the
same rights in Britain, as a UK citizen.
So I don’t think I should be bullied by the Police like this, or
‘messed with’, by the IPPC, like this then.
I’ve thought that it was the Ministry of Justice, that IPCC sorted
under, in Britain, since it’s like this Norway, that
Spesialenheten, the Norwegian equivalent of the IPCC, are sorting
under the Ministry of Justice there.
So I’ve been having a rather leangthy correspondence, with the
Ministry of Justice, regaring the problems with
the IPCC.
But today, I recieved an e-mail from the Ministry of Jusitice, that’s
in this forward, where it was expained to me,
that the IPCC, is in fact, sorting under the Home Office.
So I’m sorry that I’ve been comunicating with the Ministry of Justice,
regarding the problems with the IPCC, when
I understand now, that I should have been contacting you.
Sorry about this!
I think you should maybe contact the IPCC, and look through the files,
for the compaints I’ve sent them, and the
correspondence, since I think there must be some problems there, since
they aren’t answering my e-mails etc.
So I hope very much, that you have the chance to have a look at this!
Yours sincerely,
Erik Ribsskog
PS.
Here are the e-mails, that IPCC didn’t answer:
From: eribsskog@gmail.com Erik Ribsskog
To: peter.crouch@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk Peter Crouch
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 14:37:05 +0000
Subject: Fwd: Your Complaint To IPCC
Hi,
I can’t see that I have recieved an answer to this e-mail yet, that’s why
I’m sending it again.
Hope this is alright!
Yours sincerely,
Erik Ribsskog
———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Date: Mar 4, 2008 11:29 AM
Subject: Re: Your Complaint To IPCC
To: Peter Crouch <peter.crouch@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk>
Hi,
well like I had decided to wait on the Ipcc answer which you sent me last
week.
I didn’t get a letter sent to me on 10/1, so I have not recieved
confirmation of dispensation, untill I read this e-mail now.
But now I’m aware of this, and I would please like to appeal to the Ipcc,
with the reason that I haven’t got any confidense
in the force, due to the reasons already mentioned.
That they have a phoney general enquiery e-mail address and more.
And I also think the cases are linked.
I have sent the new case as an update to the old case, when I have been
contacting you.
So I think they should be investigated collected, by the Ipcc.
Hope this is alright!
Yours sincerely,
Erik Ribsskog
On 3/4/08, Peter Crouch <peter.crouch@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk> wrote:
>
> Dear Mr Ribsskog,
>
> Thank you for your reply.
>
> I understand that you have lost of confidence in the Merseyside Police and
> have decided to await confirmation of dispensation. It appears from my
> records that a dispensation was granted by IPCC and a letter sent to you on
> 10th January 2008.
>
> With regard to any more recent complaints that we have forwarded to
> Merseyside Professional Standards department (PSD), the same situation may
> arise if you do not respond to any letters you have been sent. You may be
> better advised to cooperate with the PSD, despite your lack of confidence,
> allowing them to complete any enquiries they intend to make. At the end of
> this process you then may have a right of appeal to the IPCC. Ultimately the
> decision is yours, but I just wanted to make it clear that you may
> disadvantage yourself by not cooperating.
>
> yours sincerely
>
> *Peter Crouch*
> *Senior Casework Manager*
> *Telephone Complaints Centre*
> *Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC)*
> 90 High Holborn
> London WC1V 6BH
> Direct Line: 020 7166 3123
> Personal Fax: 020 7166 3423
> E-mail: peter.crouch@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk
>
>
> ——————————
> *From:* Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* 28 February 2008 19:12
> *To:* Peter Crouch
> *Subject:* Re: Your Complaint To IPCC
>
>
> Hi,
>
> thank you very much for your answer!
>
> Like I exlained earlier, I’ve lost a bit of confidence in the Merseyside
> Police, due
> to the phoney e-mail addresses etc., so I don’t think theres any point in
> me
> going to any more meetings with them etc.
>
> I’ll just wait untill they’re finished, and then I’ll appeal to the Ipcc,
> for the Ipcc,
> to have a look at the incidents collected.
>
> Like I informed the Ipcc about in one of the former e-mail, which you are
> answering
> me on now, I recieved a letter from the Merseyside Police, from 3/12, last
> year,
> from an Inspector on the Complaints Investigation Bureau.
>
> It says in the letter, that they want an answer, within 21 days from 3/12.
>
> Then they were going to inform the Ipcc, that ‘the need for further
> investigation
> of your complaint be discontinued because of lack of co-operation’.
>
> So I reackon I’ll eighter hear from you, the Ipcc, or the Force then, once
> the Force
> have finished with their enquieries.
>
> And then I’ll contact the Ipcc, when I’ve got confirmation from the Force
> or the Ipcc,
> that the investigation from the Force have been discontinued.
>
> Hope this is alright!
>
> Yours sincerely,
>
> Erik Ribsskog
>
>
>
>
> On 2/28/08, Peter Crouch <peter.crouch@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk> wrote:
> >
> > Dear Mr Ribsskog,
> >
> > I am writing in reference to your e-mail of 3rd January 2008 marked for
> > the attention of Douglas Cleaver. As the line manager for Sarah Brown
> > and previously the line manager for Joanne Fitzgerald, he has asked me
> > to respond to the concerns that you raise.
> >
> > Firstly please accept my sincere apologies for the prolonged delay in
> > contacting you.
> >
> > The first issue that you raised concerned an e-mail that you sent to my
> > colleague Joanne Fitzgerald on 10th November 2007, in which you
> > expressed a lack of confidence in the Police, following a meeting with
> > Walton Lane Police Station on 8th November 2007. You were informed by Ms
> > Fitzgerald that she had forwarded the e-mail to Michael Gibbs, the IPCC
> > Casework Manager who had been dealing with an Appeal that you had
> > submitted. Your concern appears to be a lack of response from Mr Gibbs.
> > Having looked into the matter I can see that Ms Fitzgerald asked Mr
> > Gibbs to consider whether the e-mail you had sent was part of the
> > previous Appeal. She also stated that he should pass the e-mail back if
> > he believed it to be a new complaint, which he duly did.
> > For your information the IPCC allocates the work to its staff based on
> > the category of work and geographical location of the force who are the
> > subject of the complaint. Accordingly all new complaints are dealt with
> > by my team at our London office and all Appeals, Dispensations and
> > Discontinuances are dealt with by the IPCC regional office dealing with
> > the Police Force concerned. In your case our Sale office deal with all
> > such matters regarding Merseyside Police related Appeals, Dispensation
> > And Discontinuances.
> > Since the e-mail of the 10th November 2007 was considered a new
> > complaint it was passed back to my department where it was assigned to
> > Casework Manager Sarah Brown, Joanne Fitzgerald having since moved into
> > a different department. Ms Brown contacted you on the 7th December 2007
> > and informed you that she had taken over the matter from Ms Fitzgerald.
> > However, I can see that since Ms Fitzgerald had informed you that she
> > had passed the e-mail to Mr Gibbs, you might still have expected a reply
> > from him even though you had been contacted by Ms Brown. I apologise if
> > there was any confusion there.
> > Also in your e-mail of 3rd January I notice that you refer to advice
> > received from Ms Brown that you should contact the police regarding your
> > lack of confidence in them. You state that this doesn’t make sense.
> > While I appreciate you may wish the IPCC to become involved at this
> > point, you must remember that each police force is responsible for
> > considering complaints made against that force and for recording your
> > complaint. If you are not happy with the police’s decision on recording
> > your complaint, you have the right to appeal to us. Therefore, while I
> > acknowledge your frustration with the response, Ms Brown advice to you
> > was appropriate.
> >
> > You also raised 3 concerns following a new e-mail sent to Ms Fitzgerald
> > on 5th December 2007.
> > 1) How to deal with a letter from the police.
> > 2) How to deal with a letter from the IPCC, in connection with an
> > harassment episode on Walton Lane Police Station on 8/11.
> > 3) The problem with Mr. Gibbs not answering the e-mail sent on 10th
> > November 2007.
> >
> > You go on to say that you consider only the 2nd point to have been
> > answered by Sarah Brown. However I can see that Ms Brown contacted you
> > by e-mail on 11th December 2007 and stated that whilst the police are
> > conducting an investigation into your complaint the IPCC is unable to
> > intervene and is not able to dictate which department carries out this
> > investigation. She went on to say that you will need to speak to the
> > Professional Standards Department (PSD) of Merseyside Police to discuss
> > further. While I appreciate that this does not make specific reference
> > to the letter received from the police, dated 3rd December 2007, it is
> > quite clear that we were not able to intervene and that you should
> > contact the PSD. As for the 3rd point concerning Mr Gibbs not
> > responding, I assume that Mr Gibbs did not feel it was necessary to
> > contact you since Ms Brown was now dealing with the e-mail from you. Ms
> > Brown similarly did not make reference to Mr Gibbs since she had
> > informed you that she would be responding to the e-mail that you had
> > sent Miss Fitzgerald.
> >
> > The final point you make in your e-mail, dated 3rd January 2008, was,
> > broadly, that the latest complaint should perhaps be dealt with together
> > with the previously made complaints. As you will be aware, the Appeal
> > that you submitted to IPCC in August 2007 had already been upheld and
> > the Merseyside Force instructed to ‘record’ your complaint. Therefore
> > they were already looking into that matter and the IPCC would not have
> > been able to instruct them to add any new matters to the existing
> > complaint. However, it is entirely possible that they might have chosen
> > to add them together once the new complaint was submitted. Once the
> > Force had completed their enquiries into any of the complaints that you
> > raised, you would have had a right to Appeal to the IPCC.
> >
> > I hope that this e-mail addresses the concerns that you have raised and
> > helps to explain the process that the IPCC has to follow and the reasons
> > behind some of the decisions that we took.
> >
> > yours sincerely
> >
> >
> > Peter Crouch
> > Senior Casework Manager
> > Telephone Complaints Centre
> > Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC)
> > 90 High Holborn
> > London WC1V 6BH
> > Direct Line: 020 7166 3123
> > Personal Fax: 020 7166 3423
> > E-mail: peter.crouch@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ******************************
****************************** ****************** > > The information in this email is confidential and may be legally
> > privileged.
> > It is intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the intended
> > recipient
> > please notify the sender and delete this email; any disclosure, copying
> > or
> > distribution of this email is prohibited and may be unlawful. The
> > content of
> > this email represents the views of the individual and not necessarily
> > those
> > of IPCC. IPCC reserves the right to monitor the content of all emails in
> > accordance with lawful business practice.This e-mail has been swept for
> > computer viruses but IPCC does not accept any liability in respect of
> > your
> > receipt of this email.
> >
> > Independent Police Complaints Commission
> > 90 High Holborn
> > London,
> > WC1V 6BH.
> >
> > ******************************
****************************** ****************** > >
> > The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government
> > Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless in
> > partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2007/11/0032.) On
> > leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.
> > Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
> > recorded for legal purposes.
> >
>
>
> This email was received from the INTERNET and scanned by the Government
> Secure Intranet anti-virus service supplied by Cable&Wireless in partnership
> with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2007/11/0032.) In case of
> problems, please call your organisation’s IT Helpdesk.
> Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
> recorded for legal purposes.
>
>
>
>
> ******************************
****************************** ****************** > The information in this email is confidential and may be legally
> privileged.
> It is intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the intended
> recipient
> please notify the sender and delete this email; any disclosure, copying or
>
> distribution of this email is prohibited and may be unlawful. The content
> of
> this email represents the views of the individual and not necessarily
> those
> of IPCC. IPCC reserves the right to monitor the content of all emails in
> accordance with lawful business practice.This e-mail has been swept for
> computer viruses but IPCC does not accept any liability in respect of your
>
> receipt of this email.
>
> Independent Police Complaints Commission
> 90 High Holborn
> London,
> WC1V 6BH.
>
> ******************************
****************************** ****************** >
>
> The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government
> Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless in
> partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2007/11/0032.) On
> leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.
> Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
> recorded for legal purposes.
>
———- Forwarded message ———-
From: general.queries <general.queries@justice.gsi.
gov.uk> Date: Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 9:59 AM
Subject: RE: To the Minister of Justice/Fwd: Our ref: TO08/2153
To: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Dear Sir,
Thank you for your email,
The Ministry of Justice are not responsible for the IPCC.
The IPCC falls under the responsibility of the Home Office, therefore
any further matters you wish to raise regarding the IPCC will need to
be directed to the Home Office.
Many Thanks
______________________________
__ From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
Sent: 18 September 2008 17:54
To: general.queries
Subject: Fwd: To the Minister of Justice/Fwd: Our ref: TO08/2153
Hi,
I can’t see that I’ve recieved an answer to this e-mail yet, so I’m
sending it again.
Yours sincerely,
Erik Ribsskog
———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 1:47 PM
Subject: To the Minister of Justice/Fwd: Our ref: TO08/2153
To: general.queries@justice.gsi.
gov.uk Hi,
I’ve tried to escalate a complaint, but it doesn’t seem like your
representative is answering, to his
correspondence.
And I also thought that the original complaint, wasn’t answered that
well, by another of your
representatives.
So it seems to me, that there are a lot of problems in the Ministry,
so I thought it would be
best, to send it to the top of the Ministry, so that you could have
the chance to have a look
at these problems, and to get these problems sorted, so that I maybe
could get a second
opinion, from the right person in your Ministry, to the original complaint.
Hope this is alright!
Yours sincerely,
Erik Ribsskog
———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 2:42 PM
Subject: Fwd: Our ref: TO08/2153
To: jan.farenden@justice.gsi.gov.
uk Hi,
I can’t see that I’ve recieved an answer to this e-mail yet, so I’m
sending it again.
Yours sincerely,
Erik Ribsskog
———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 9:31 AM
Subject: Fwd: Our ref: TO08/2153
To: jan.farenden@justice.gsi.gov.
uk Hi,
I called the Ministry of Justice today, and I got your e-mail address,
from the clerk there.
The reason that I’m sending you this e-mail, is that I was wondering,
who it is, that one
should contact, if one are having problems with the IPCC.
Since they are not answering my e-mails, and I’ve already been in
contact, with the
complaints-manager there, so I think I’ve escalated it, as far as it’s
possible to
escalate, at the IPCC.
So I was wondering, if it isn’t the Ministry of Justice, that one
should contact, if the
IPCC, are having problems in the way, that they aren’t answering e-mails etc.
Thanks in advance for any help regarding this!
Yours sincerely,
Erik Ribsskog
———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Date: Jun 30, 2008 7:23 PM
Subject: Re: Our ref: TO08/2153
To: "Holmes, Ryan" <Ryan.Holmes@justice.gsi.gov.
uk> Hi,
thank you very much for your answer!
I think that the IPCC, probably recieves founding from the Government.
And, I think, that if the IPCC, don’t answer their e-mails etc, then
this is a matter, for the Ministry,
who are administratively in charge of the IPCC.
Which I think must be the Ministry of Justice.
I don’t think the Ministry of Justice, can’t pretend that they aren’t
in charge of the Police, like
you are trying now.
So, I write this, mostly, to put it on my blog, and then I’ll think
further, on how to go forward with this.
Yours sincerely,
Erik Ribsskog
On 6/30/08, Holmes, Ryan <Ryan.Holmes@justice.gsi.gov.
uk> wrote: Dear Mr Ribsskog
Thank you for your email reply of 23 June.
While I am sorry to read of your ongoing concerns, I am afraid there
is little useful information I can add to the previous correspondence
that you have received from this Department.
As previously explained, if you choose to further your concerns
regarding your complaint with the Independent Police Complaints
Commission (IPCC), you must address the matter to the IPCC directly.
Similarly, the Ministry of Justice is unable to comment on or give
advice on how to escalate your case with the Federal Bureau of
Investigation (FBI) or the American Embassy. I can only confirm that
the points you have raised have been thoroughly considered and that
the Department has been as helpful as possible in answering your
concerns.
I am sorry that I am unable to be of more help, but I hope you can
appreciate for the reasons given above that the Department is unable
to intervene in your case. Hence, any further correspondence sent that
addresses the same points will be placed on file and not responded to.
Yours sincerely,
Ryan Holmes
Legal Services Regulation and Redress Division
—–Original Message—–
From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
Sent: 23 June 2008 14:20
To: Holmes, Ryan
Subject: Re: Our ref: TO08/2153
Hi,
I’ve already been in contact with the Complaints Manager at the IPCC,
but this hasn’t resovled the problems.
I suspect could be some corruption involved there, because something
is obviouslly wrong there in my opinion.
Also I wondering a bit on how to escalate the case I’ve been in
contact with the FBI, or the American Embassy,
about.
Also, I’ve been in contact with the Norwegian equivalent, of the IPCC,
that’s Spesialenheten, regarding another,
but linked, matter.
And they sort under the Norwegian Ministry of Justice.
So, I think that the IPCC are sorting under the British Ministy of Justice(?)
If not, who should they then be sorting under?
Sorry if I’m asking stupid questions.
Yours sincerely,
Erik Ribsskog
On 6/23/08, Holmes, Ryan <Ryan.Holmes@justice.gsi.gov.
uk> wrote: Dear Mr Ribsskog
Thank you for your email reply of 19 June.
The Ministry of Justice is unable to submit a complaint on your behalf
to the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC). Additionally,
a complaint against the IPCC cannot be directed to the Ministry of
Justice for review as this does not fall within the remit of this
Department. If you wish to make a complaint against the IPCC you must
do this by addressing your concerns to the IPCC directly. The
information provided below outlines how to do this.
If you have a complaint or query about a casework decision, the IPCC
will do their best to clearly explain the reason for their decisions
and answer any concerns you have. Please note however that IPCC
casework decisions are final and they will not necessarily be able to
change the outcome. For further information or advice on your rights
you can contact a Citizens Advice Bureau, solicitor or your local MP.
If you have a complaint about a member of staff at the IPCC, in the
first instance you can contact the person concerned and the matter may
be resolved there and then. As mentioned in my previous email,
Casework Manager Sarah Brown is one of a number of IPCC staff that has
conducted an investigation into your file and she can be contacted on
0207 166 3934 should you wish to discuss the details of your complaint
further. However, since you mention that Miss Brown has not contacted
you in the past, you may wish to raise any issues of concern through a
line manager, or write to the Internal Complaints Manager.
Alternatively, you can download a complaint form via the link
http://www.ipcc.gov.uk/index/
contact-us/complaints_ipcc.htm and make your complaint against the IPCC using the contact details below.
Internal Complaints Manager
Independent Police Complaints Commission
90 High Holborn
London
WC1V 6BH
Fax: 0207 404 0695
Email:
internal.complaints.unit@ipcc.
gsi.gov.uk. I do hope that this information is of some use to you.
Yours sincerely,
Ryan Holmes
Legal Services Regulation and Redress Division
—–Original Message—–
From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
Sent: 19 June 2008 20:35
To: Holmes, Ryan
Subject: Re: Our ref: TO08/2153
Hi,
thank you very much for your e-mail, and the advice!
I wanted to complain about the IPCC, since the whole case is a mess,
and they don’t reply to my e-mails,
and they don’t call me, you mention Brown, she has been supposed to
call me, regarding the problems
with the missing answers on the e-mails, but she haven’t called.
I think that the IPCC must have some serious problems, with handeling
the complaints I sent them,
which I view as one case really.
So I was wondering, how I could submit this complaint, on the IPCC, to
the Ministry of Justice.
If you think that you could please submit this complaint for me.
Also, I’ve contacted the FBI, in the American Embassy, in London.
And I asked them, on how should go forward, regarding reporting a
crime in the US, that someone,
has set up a hate-blog against me there.
The FBI/The American Embassy Legal Advice, tells me to contact my
local police-station, about this.
But I’ve lost a bit of confidence, with the Merseyside Police, due to
the things mentioned in the
complaints, sent to the IPCC, and more.
And then I thought, that I could contact the IPCC about this then,
since I didn’t think I could contact
the local Police about this.
But now there has been so much problems, with the IPCC, so that I’ve
lost a bit of confidence, in
the IPCC, as well.
So then I have to contact the Ministry of Justice about this, since I
don’t think that eighter the
Merseyside Police or the IPCC, have showed themselves, to be worthy,
of much confidence,
unfortunatly.
So I’m mentioning this now.
Hope this is alright!
Yours sincerely,
Erik Ribsskog
On 6/19/08, Holmes, Ryan <Ryan.Holmes@justice.gsi.gov.
uk> wrote: Dear Mr Ribsskog
Thank you for your email reply of 5 June. I am also in receipt of your
email dated 13 June.
As explained in my previous reply, the Law Society is the regulatory
body for solicitors in England and Wales and will keep a comprehensive
list of solicitors practising in your local area. Their website
promotes a searchable database to help you find a solicitor which
allows you to search by firm name, area of law and/or post code. To
alleviate your concerns about contacting the Law Society due to
previous personal experiences, I should point out that this list is a
resource to assist the public locate suitable legal representation and
promote solicitors across England and Wales. You can access the
facility via the following link:
http://www.lawsociety.org.uk/
choosingandusing/ findasolicitor.law. Alternatively, you could also look through a local directory, such as
the Yellow Pages, which might help identify a suitable firm. As
suggested in my previous reply, you may wish to contact the Law
Centres Federation on 0207 428 4401 who can provide contact details
for your local Law Centre. Also, you may find it helpful to access the
Community Legal Services Direct website for information on providers
of legal advice at
www.clsdirect.org.uk. These are all alternative options available to
you that do not involve the assistance of the Law Society.
With regard to the complaint you have submitted to the Independent
Police Complaints Commission (IPCC), I have contacted the IPCC to
investigate the status of your complaint. Senior lawyers at the IPCC
inform me that without your expressed consent, I am unable to obtain
any information that relates to your complaint. I was informed however
that Casework Manager Sarah Brown is one of a number of IPCC staff
that has conducted an investigation into your file and she can be
contacted on 0207 166 3934 should you wish to discuss the details of
your complaint further.
I do hope that this information is of some use to you.
Yours sincerely,
Ryan Holmes
Legal Services Regulation and Redress Division
—–Original Message—–
From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
Sent: 05 June 2008 01:51
To: Holmes, Ryan
Subject: Re: Our ref: TO08/2153
Hi,
thank you very much for your e-mail!
I have been thinking about contacting the Law Society, regarding
getting a list, like you say,
for law firms, who take on law-cases on a ‘pro bono’ service basis.
But, like I might have forgotten to explain, the Law Society, are
already involved in this,
I have complained about them to the Legal Services Ombudsman, who I
have been contacting
you about.
So I’ve maybe lost a bit of confidence, in the Law Society, since I
think they gave a bit of wrong
information, and some errors, that I thought were a bit strange, so
they are really involved in this
from before.
So then I was wondering about, if it would be right to involve the Law
Society again, since they
are involved from before.
Maybe there is someone else one could contact about getting the name
of companies like this?
Sorry if I’m asking a lot of questions.
I’ve also sent a complaint, on the Merseyside Police, to the IPCC.
But the IPCC, aren’t dealing with the complaint at all, it seems, so I
was wondering who I should
contact then, if I wanted to compain about the IPCC not dealing with
the complaint on the Police?
Sorry again that I’m asking so many questions!
Thanks in advance for the reply!
Yours sincerely,
Erik Ribsskog
On 4/25/08, Holmes, Ryan <Ryan.Holmes@justice.gsi.gov.
uk> wrote: Dear Mr Ribsskog
Thank you for your email reply of 7 April, in which you request
further advice on ways to proceed forward with your complaint against
the Legal Services Ombudsman (LSO). To assist you with your concerns,
I shall set out the avenues of legal assistance available to you that
acknowledge your specific financial concerns.
Firstly, while I understand you have already been in contact with the
Citizen’s Advice Bureau (CAB), you may also wish to consider
contacting your local Law Centre. Contact details for your local Law
Centre can be found via the Law Centres Federation on 0207 428 4401,
or by accessing their website www.lawcentres.org.uk. You may also find
it helpful to access the Community Legal Services Direct website for
information on providers of legal advice at www.clsdirect.org.uk.
Alternatively, you may choose to contact Community Legal Advice for
free confidential help regarding your legal queries on 0845 345 4345.
Secondly, it may be worth investigating the possibility of a
Conditional Fee Agreement (CFA). This allows a solicitor to accept a
case on a ‘no won, no fee’ basis, under which they receive a fee from
you only if the case is won. It is worth pointing that the
solicitor’s standard fees can be increased by up to 100% to reflect
the degree of risk to the solicitor in taking the case on (the
‘success fee’). However, should you lose your case, you may still be
liable to pay the successful party’s costs, as well as expert witness
fees and other disbursements. There are insurance schemes that, for a
premium, provide cover for these items. As part of the implementation
of the Access to Justice Act 1999, we have made it possible for the
successful side to recover their lawyer’s success fee and insurance
premium form the loser. Effectively, this has made the operation of
conditional fees fairer and more attractive to clients.
Thirdly, some solicitors may be prepared to take on your case on a pro
bono agreement (i.e. provide you with a free service). You can
contact the Law Society who can provide you with a list of solicitors
that may provide pro bono services. The Law Society is the regulatory
body for solicitors in England and Wales and you can write to them at
the following address:
The Law Society
113 Chancery Lane
London
WC2A 1SX
Tel: 0870 606 2555.
Alternatively, you can access the Law Society’s website at
I do hope that you find this information useful.
Yours sincerely
Ryan Holmes
Legal Services Regulation and Redress Division
This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of
the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying
is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please
destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.
Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message
could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in
mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this
message by e-mail.
This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be
monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail
monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be
read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not
broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.
The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government
Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless in
partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2007/11/0032.)
On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored
and/or recorded for legal purposes.
This email was received from the INTERNET and scanned by the
Government Secure Intranet anti-virus service supplied by
Cable&Wireless in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate
Number 2007/11/0032.) In case of problems, please call your
organisation’s IT Helpdesk.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored
and/or recorded for legal purposes.
This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of
the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying
is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please
destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.
Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message
could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in
mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this
message by e-mail.
This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be
monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail
monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be
read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not
broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.
The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government
Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless in
partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2007/11/0032.)
On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored
and/or recorded for legal purposes.
This email was received from the INTERNET and scanned by the
Government Secure Intranet anti-virus service supplied by
Cable&Wireless in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate
Number 2007/11/0032.) In case of problems, please call your
organisation’s IT Helpdesk.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored
and/or recorded for legal purposes.
This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of
the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying
is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please
destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.
Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message
could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in
mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this
message by e-mail.
This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be
monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail
monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be
read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not
broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.
The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government
Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless in
partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2007/11/0032.)
On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored
and/or recorded for legal purposes.
This email was received from the INTERNET and scanned by the
Government Secure Intranet anti-virus service supplied by
Cable&Wireless in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate
Number 2007/11/0032.) In case of problems, please call your
organisation’s IT Helpdesk.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored
and/or recorded for legal purposes.
This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of
the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying
is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please
destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.
Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message
could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in
mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this
message by e-mail.
This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be
monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail
monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be
read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not
broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.
The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government
Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless in
partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2007/11/0032.)
On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored
and/or recorded for legal purposes.
This email was received from the INTERNET and scanned by the
Government Secure Intranet anti-virus service supplied by
Cable&Wireless in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate
Number 2007/11/0032.) In case of problems, please call your
organisation’s IT Helpdesk.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored
and/or recorded for legal purposes.
This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of
the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying
is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please
destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.
Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message
could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in
mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this
message by e-mail.
This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be
monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail
monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be
read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not
broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.
The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government
Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless in
partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2007/11/0032.)
On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored
and/or recorded for legal purposes.
