johncons

Måned: juni 2009

  • Hun som grunnla Forsøksgym, er død. (In Norwegian)

    forsøksgym

    http://www.vg.no/nyheter/innenriks/artikkel.php?artid=557547

    PS.

    Hun som grunnla forsøksgym, er visst død.

    Tante Ellen, (Savoldelli født Ribsskog), hun gikk visst på forsøksgym, i Oslo, under hippie-enes storhetstid, på slutten av 60-tallet.

    Jeg vet egentlig ikke så mye, om Forsøksgym.

    Men, de hadde visst fritt fremmøte, så jeg nå.

    Så det var kanskje derfor, at tante Ellen, hang så mye i Slottsparken, og røyka hasj, sånn at bestefar Johannes måtte reise inn til Oslo, fra Klokkarstua, i Hurum, hvor de bodde.

    (Klokkarstua, er like over fjorden fra Svelvik, så mora mi og tanta mi, de var kanskje nesten som Svelvik-jenter, mistenker jeg litt.

    De bodde også i Holmsbu og på Sætre, på 60 og 70-tallet, og alle disse stedene ligger altså ganske nære hverandre, på Hurumlandet.

    Så ikke spør meg hvorfor de flytta så mye).

    Siden de ikke krevde fremmøte, på Forsøksgym, som da altså var i Oslo.

    Og tante Ellen bodde vel på Forsøksgym, tror jeg.

    Så bestefar Johannes og bestemor Ingeborg, de var nok ikke så smarte, da de sendte tante Ellen, som 15-16 år gammel ungjente, inn til Oslo, for å gå på Forsøksgym, hvor de ikke førte fravær.

    Så da valgte nok tante Ellen heller å gå ‘livets forsøksgym’, i Slottsparken, og de andre stedene hvor hippiene vanket i Oslo Sentrum.

    Jeg lagde en tegneserie, hvor vi så bestefar Johannes gikk rundt for å leite etter tante Ellen, i Oslo, mens hun var forsvunnet fra Forsøksgym da, hvor hun nok ble borte fra, i dagesvis i strekk, som 15-16 år gammel ungjente, i Oslo, siden de da ringte bestefar Johannes og lurte på om Ellen var i Klokkarstua.

    Noe hun selvfølgelig ikke var.

    Skal jeg se om jeg finner den tegneserien.

    Vi får se.

    Med vennlig hilsen

    Erik Ribsskog

    PS 2.

    Her er den tegneserien igjen:

    slottsparken

    PS 3.

    Så Ribsskog-familien, de bodde på Hurumlandet, på 60 og 70-tallet.

    Og nå bor hele gjengen.

    Av de som er igjen.

    Bestemor Ingeborg, og hennes barn Ellen og Martin.

    De bor nå i Larviksområdet.

    Mora mi var jo den første fra Ribsskog-familien, til å flytte ned dit, i 1973 ca.

    Faren min liker seg ikke så godt der.

    Det kan ha vært, at noe ‘mafian’, tulla med Ribsskog-familien.

    Blant annet at de tulla med tante Ellen, da hun gikk på forsøksgym i Oslo da.

    Og at faren min også var med i den mafian.

    Faren min var nesten en Oslo-gutt, selv om han bodde på Berger.

    Han kjente Atle, som var fra Oslo, og hadde også mange andre kjente i Oslo.

    Ei som nesten var dama hans, som het Margrethe, som bodde på Bislett, for eksempel.

    Så faren min kan også ha vært noe ‘mafian’, som tulla med mora mi da.

    Så flytta mora mi ned til Larvik, for der liker ikke faren min seg.

    Jeg tror grensen mellom ‘mafian’ og Norge går ved Tønsberg.

    Noe sånt.

    Men men.

    For når Axel er med ned å besøker bestemor Ingeborg, så slapper han alltid av, på tilbakeveien, når vi kommer til Tønsberg.

    Men kan tante Ellen ha blitt sendt av ‘mafian’, fra Sveits, for å tulle med bestemor Ingeborg?

    Bestemor Ingeborg, har også et nettverk, tror jeg.

    Ettersom at hun har så mange gjester i bursdagene sine, og at hun kjente så mange forretningsfolk osv., og hadde disse som gjester, (som hadde respekt for henne), da hun bodde i Stavern.

    Enda onkelen min Martin, ser mest på mormora mi som ei skrulle, så oppførte de i handelstanden seg i Stavern, seg veldig respektfullt, ovenfor bestemor, en sommer jeg besøkte bestemor i Stavern.

    Da hadde hun nok mange andre gjester.

    Jeg måtte ligge på sofaen i stua.

    Og da våkna jeg en morgen, så satt halve handelstanden i Stavern rundt et bord i stua til bestemor Ingeborg, da jeg våkna.

    Så det var en litt surrealistisk opplevelse, vil jeg si.

    Så sånn var det.

    Bare noe jeg kom på.

    PS 4.

    Så jeg følte meg ikke så hjemme i Stavern.

    Så da jeg så at halve handelstanden der, satt i stua til bestemor Ingeborg, da jeg våkna.

    Så da bare følte jeg, at her var jeg ikke helt med.

    Så jeg er nok mer fra Berger enn fra Larvik, vil jeg si.

    Siden Stavern jo er en del av Larvik nå.

    Jeg bodde jo seks år, i Larvik, under oppveksten.

    Men, jeg og søstra mi, var jo nesten hele tida, tilbake på ferier, på Berger.

    Og jeg bodde jo dobbelt så lenge på Berger, under oppveksten, som i Larvik.

    Så om jeg er fra Berger eller Larvik.

    Jeg er nok fra Berger, men jeg trivdes nok bedre i Larvik egentlig.

    For på Berger, så var det bare en hovedvei, og et byggefelt omtrent.

    Mens i Larvik, så var det jo masse veier både hit og dit, hadde jeg nær sagt.

    På Berger, så kunne jeg ikke gå overalt, uten å bli mobba, vil jeg si.

    Jeg for eksempel omtrent aldri opp på Øvre.

    Mens i Larvik, der pleide jeg å gå rundt overalt, uten at noe skjedde.

    Det var nok tøffere på Berger, enn i Larvik, vil jeg si.

    Men jeg har tenkt litt på, om jeg skal si at jeg er fra Larvik eller Berger.

    Og jeg kan jo si, at jeg er skillsmissebarn da, og at faren min bodde på Berger og mora mi i Larvik, og jeg vokste opp på begge de stedene da.

    Noe sånt.

    Pluss at jeg også vokste opp litt i England nesten, siden jeg var rimelig ofte på språkreise og ferie i England, under ungdomstida.

    Pluss en sommer, så var jeg og søstra mi hos tante Ellen i Sveits, og da bodde vi jo i byen der, Aesch, som vanlige folk.

    Og det var jo ikke sånn at vi bodde på hotell, eller noe.

    Og vi var også hos Viggo, (bodybuilderen), og dem, i Køge i Danmark, et par ganger.

    Så vi vokste opp litt i utlandet og.

    Men men.

    Så jeg får si at jeg vokste opp både i Larvik og på Berger da.

    Siden jeg jo var på Berger, i feriene, de årene jeg bodde hos moren min i Larvik.

    Men jeg var også i Larvik, i ganske mange av helgene, den tida jeg bodde hos faren min på Berger.

    Så jeg får si at jeg vokste opp også i Larvik da, selv om jeg er vel mest fra Berger, vil jeg si.

    Men jeg vel også litt fra Larvik, vil jeg si.

    Jeg føler meg hjemme på Berger, det gjør jeg.

    Bergeråsen er liksom hjemme da.

    Men Larvik, det er liksom ikke like mye hjemme, men jeg er kjent overalt der da.

    Så det er kanskje mer mora mi sin familie som er fra Larvik.

    For det var aldri sånn, at jeg følte meg så hjemme, da jeg bodde hos mora mi og den tidligere stefaren min, Arne Thormod Thomassen, i Larvik.

    Nei, det var så mye mas og stress.

    Det var omtrent som en krig.

    Mens da jeg bodde på Bergeråsen, så hadde jeg jo en hel leilighet for meg selv, og hadde mye lommepenger, og hadde kontrollen da.

    Så jeg er nok mer fra Berger enn fra Larvik ja.

    F.eks., i Larvik, så spilte jeg bare en fotballkamp, for Fram.

    Mens på Berger, så spilte jeg kanskje 50 kamper, eller noe, for Berger.

    Hvem vet.

    Og scorte 3-4 mål vel.

    Enda jeg var veldig tynn.

    Men men.

    Men jeg var i frimerkeklubben da, i Larvik.

    Så jeg fant aldri roen, da jeg bodde i Larvik, pga. at mora mi og også mormora mi og også tildels stefaren min, var slitsomme.

    Mens på Berger, så var det noen år, som var rolige.

    For eksempel de to årene jeg gikk på Sande Videregående.

    Og årene før jeg begynte på ungdomsskolen.

    Men jeg kan jo ikke vite hvordan det hadde vært å bodd i Larvik, de samme årene.

    Det er jo sant.

    Men jeg bodde i Larvik som barn da, og på Berger som ungdom, kan man vel nesten si.

    Og i Oslo som voksen.

    Noe sånt.

    Bare noe jeg kom på.

  • Jeg sendte en e-post om tilstandene hos the Financial Ombudsman, til Acas, som jobber med rådgivning innen arbeidsrett osv. (In Norwegian)







    Google Mail – The Finacial Ombudsman, using staff as slaves/Fwd: Complaint against RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mail







    Google Mail



    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>




    The Finacial Ombudsman, using staff as slaves/Fwd: Complaint against RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mail





    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>





    Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 4:48 PM





    To:

    acas@eclogistics.co.uk



    Hi,

    I've contacted you earlier, about that I was being used as a slave, and that
    they had illigal management methods, at Bertelsmanns Scand. Microsoft-activation,
    in Liverpool.

    Now, people at the Financial Ombudsman, are also being used as slaves, it seems.
    Or this could be connected with a cover-up, of the Bertelsmann/Microsoft-case, that
    I am being bullied by Government, to cover up what went on there.

    Please send this e-mail to the right people in Acas.
    Yours sincerely,
    Erik Ribsskog

    ———- Forwarded message ———-

    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
    Date: Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 4:31 PM
    Subject: Re: Complaint against RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mail

    To: "Collins, Jackie" <jackie.collins@financial-ombudsman.org.uk>

    Hi,

    Monday to Friday, 8 am to 6 pm, is alright, I think.

    But you also let your staff work Sunday mornings, at 6 am.
    It seems to me that you overload your representatives with work, and that they have to

    work 12 to 14 hours 7 days a week.
    I thought slavery was forbidden in our time.
    Why do you let your representatives work every Sunday morning, when other people in

    England are on their way home from the pub?
    Do your staff get summer-holiday at all?
    Sincerely,
    Erik Ribsskog


    On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 9:54 AM, Collins, Jackie <jackie.collins@financial-ombudsman.org.uk> wrote:

    Dear Mr Ribsskog

    We always try to provide the best service we can to our

    customers, and sometimes that means offering our staff the option of working

    overtime during very busy periods.

    Please be assured that they have to work within strict time

    guidelines, and these are always checked by Operations Managers to ensure they

    are not working too many hours.

    The service our department offers is outside of the usual

    office hours of 9am till 5pm because we have found that a lot of our

    customers have difficulties contacting us whilst they are at work themselves

    during the 9am to 5pm times, so we have opening hours of 8am – 6pm, as do

    many firms these days.

    I hope this explains.

    Regards

    Jackie

    Collins

    Operations Manager
    Direct Dial : 020 7964

    0116

    Direct Fax: 020 7964 0117


    From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

    Sent: 29 June 2009 19:32
    To: Collins,

    Jackie

    Subject: Re: Complaint against RBS/Fwd: Earlier

    e-mail

    Ok,

    that sound very fine!

    But, why is that you let your representatives work over-time every Sunday

    then?

    Shouldn't you as a main rule conduct your business, within the business

    hours?

    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

    On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 3:50 PM, Collins, Jackie <jackie.collins@financial-ombudsman.org.uk>

    wrote:

    Dear Mr

    Ribsskog

    Rosemary

    Cox has passed your complaint to me to take over as you have requested that

    she no longer deals with your case.

    I can

    confirmed that a letter has been sent to the firm, and we have asked that they

    issue you with a final response letter within 14 days. We have also

    asked them to copy us in on that response.

    If you

    remain unhappy with the firms response, or you have not received a response

    from them within 14 days, please let me know and I will arrange for your

    complaint to be moved forward for investigation by an

    Adjudicator.

    Regards

    Jackie Collins
    Operations Manager

    Direct Dial

    : 020 7964 0116

    Direct Fax: 020 7964

    0117


    From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

    Sent: 28 June 2009 11:17
    To: Cox,

    Rosemary
    Subject: Re: Complaint against RBS/Fwd: Earlier

    e-mail

    Hi,

    I don't think it's any use with me repeating myself.

    I don't think you should handle my complaint.

    The reason is, that if you are to overworked, you get to tired.

    And in dealing with complaints like these, one obviously needs ones

    judgement, to be like

    it should be.

    If one are out of balance, like I think you could be, then I don't

    think this is good for how the

    complaint is being dealt with.

    So please do as I ask Mrs .Cox, and tell your manager what I said,

    that I want someone else

    to deal with my complaint, due to that I think that you must be

    overworked.

    Haven't you seen how fine the weather is today, you should have a day

    off in the fine weather,

    I think.

    Sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

    On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 11:10 AM, Cox, Rosemary <Rosemary.Cox@financial-ombudsman.org.uk>

    wrote:


    Dear Mr Ribsskog


    Thank you for your

    e-mails


    As previously advised I am not going to debate

    with you the working hours of this office.


    I have written to you today to advise the steps

    we are taking with your complaint. If the firm fail to resolve the situation

    for you, your complaint will be passed onto our adjudication area for

    further consideration of the concerns you have

    raised.


    I should add that we do

    not tolerate rude or insulting language at this office, and

    would expect any further communication to be sent in a more acceptable

    manner.


    Kind Regards


    Rose Cox


    team manager



    From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

    Sent: 28 June 2009

    10:43

    To: Cox, Rosemary
    Subject: Re: Complaint against

    RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mail

    Hi,

    of course you can work on Sundays if you want.

    But business e-mails should just be sent within the

    business-hours.

    Or else, what's going to happen, is obvious.

    Someone are going to come drunk home from town, and answer the

    business-e-mails when they are drunk, which is what has happened today, with

    our correspondence.

    If this is something, you didn't know from before, then I think

    this Financial Ombudsman-stuff is just a load of crap really.

    Try to use the head that God gave you when you were born!

    Sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

    On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 10:33 AM, Cox, Rosemary <Rosemary.Cox@financial-ombudsman.org.uk>

    wrote:

    Dear

    Mr Ribsskog

    Thank

    you for your e-mail

    I must admit to being surprised and

    confused with the content of the

    e-mail
    .

    We are an extremely busy department and we often work at the

    weekends, this is obviously of help to consumers as we are able

    to deal with their complaints in a more timely manner. I would

    suggest that
    It is entirely up to each individual

    business to determine which hours their staff will work and I do not

    intend debating this with you.

    By working this weekend I have been able to deal with your

    complaint, which as you can appreciate is of a benefit to

    you.

    Perhaps you can clarify the spelling mistakes you are referring

    to?

    Kind

    Regards

    Rose

    Cox

    team

    manager



    From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

    Sent: 28 June 2009 10:20

    Subject: Re: Complaint against RBS/Fwd: Earlier

    e-mail

    Hi again,

    don't you think it's strange for an institutions like yours to send

    e-mails on Sunday mornings then?

    Shouldn't e-mails be sent within normal business hours then you

    think?

    This is what it says on Wikipedia:

    In

    the United

    States
    and United

    Kingdom
    , the hours between 9 am and 5 pm are typically considered to be standard business

    hours



    I

    think this is rather akward, as I also think your spelling-mistakes

    are.


    Sincerely,


    Erik Ribsskog

    On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 8:06 AM, Cox, Rosemary

    <Rosemary.Cox@financial-ombudsman.org.uk>

    wrote:

    Dear

    Mr Ribsskog

    Thank you for your e-mail

    That's no problem, however I should point out that we

    are not a government department, we are a independent complaints

    body.

    I will be in touch with your again in the next few

    days

    Kind

    Regards

    Rose

    Cox

    team

    manager



    From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

    Sent: 28 June 2009 08:02

    To: Cox, Rosemary
    Subject: Re: Complaint

    against RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mail

    Hi,

    ok that's very fine, I'm just home from town you see.

    I thought it was a bit strange, since noone in Government in

    Norway, work on Sundays.

    Sorry about this, I forget sometimes that I'm not in Norway any

    longer.

    Sorry about this!

    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

    On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 7:54 AM, Cox, Rosemary

    <Rosemary.Cox@financial-ombudsman.org.uk>

    wrote:

    Dear Mr Ribsskog

    Thank you for your e-mail

    I can assure you this is not a

    joke, I am currently in the office working

    today.

    I presume that you

    would like us to deal with your complaint, so am responding to your

    e-mails today

    Kind Regards

    Rose Cox

    team manager



    From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

    Sent: 28 June

    2009 07:36
    To: Cox, Rosemary
    Subject: Re:

    Complaint against RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mail

    Hi,

    why do send the e-mails early on a Sunday morning, by the

    way.

    Is this some kind of joke?

    Sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

    On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 7:33 AM, Cox, Rosemary

    <Rosemary.Cox@financial-ombudsman.org.uk>

    wrote:

    Dear Mr Ribsskog

    Thank you for your

    e-mails

    I will contact you again once

    I have considered the

    information.

    Kind Regards

    Rose Cox

    team manager



    From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

    Sent: 27

    June 2009 14:59
    To: Cox, Rosemary
    Subject:

    Complaint against RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mail

    Hi,

    thank you for you e-mail, that I recieved today.

    I'll contact your collegue back, regarding the

    Barclays-complaint.

    I sent the complaint on RBS Dale St., to Yvonne Williams at

    RBS, but she

    also harassed me, like this, she writes 'Dear Ms Ribsskog',

    even if my name

    is Erik, and in Britain, you have a movie called 'Erik the

    Viking', and Eric is

    also a quite usual name, in English-speaking countries.

    So I think Yvonne Williams, the complaint-investigator,

    also bullied me.

    I think this must have been a deliberate mistake.

    This ended with the complaint being partly resolved, in the way

    that RBS,

    gave me the bonus of £100, for moving my account to them, from

    Barclays,

    (who I also had problems with, that I'll exlain about to your

    collegue, like I

    mentioned earlier).

    I'll also find the actual complaint against RBS Dale St.

    now, and forward it

    to you.

    What I meant with the complaint-form, was that it didn't

    look anything at all

    like the ones you've sent me now.

    Maybe the complaint-form I was sent, was to do with other

    financial institutions,

    than banks?

    Like share-fonds etc?

    Have you also got other complaint-forms, other than to banks,

    perhaps someone

    sent me the wrong form intentionally?

    Just a thought I had.

    But anyway, thank you very much for your e-mail, and I'll

    also find the actual

    RBS Dale St. complaint, and e-mail it to you now.

    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

    ———- Forwarded message

    ———-
    From: Williams, Yvonne

    (CRU)
    <Yvonne.Williams@rbs.co.uk>
    Date: Tue,

    Jun 26, 2007 at 4:30 PM
    Subject: RE: Earlier e-mail
    To: Erik

    Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

    Dear Ms Ribsskog

    Could you please arrange another copy of your email to be

    sent to me for my investigation

    Regards

    Yvonne Williams


    From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
    Sent: 19 June 2007

    14:04
    To: Williams, Yvonne (CRU)
    Subject:

    Earlier e-mail

    *** WARNING : This message originates

    from the Internet ***


    Hi,

    I'm refering to the e-mail I sent you on 5/6.

    I was just wondering if you have recieved this e-mail,

    because I cant see

    that I have recieved any answer to it yet.

    Please just contact me if you want me to send you the e-mail

    again.

    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

    The Royal Bank of

    Scotland plc, Registered in Scotland No. 90312. Registered Office:

    36 St Andrew Square, Edinburgh EH2 2YB

    Authorised and

    regulated by the Financial Services Authority.

    This e-mail

    message is confidential and for use by the addressee only. If the

    message is received by anyone other than the addressee, please

    return the message to the sender by replying to it and then delete

    the message from your computer. Internet e-mails are not necessarily

    secure. The Royal Bank of Scotland plc does not accept

    responsibility for changes made to this message after it was

    sent.

    Whilst all reasonable care has been taken to avoid the

    transmission of viruses, it is the responsibility of the recipient

    to ensure that the onward transmission, opening or use of this

    message and any attachments will not adversely affect its systems or

    data. No responsibility is accepted by The Royal Bank of Scotland

    plc in this regard and the recipient should carry out such virus and

    other checks as it considers

    appropriate.



    This e-mail and any attachments are

    confidential and may be subject to legal privilege. If you are not

    the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and

    delete this e-mail and any attachment from your system. If you are

    not the intended recipient you must not copy, disclose or take any

    action in reliance to it.

    This e-mail and any attachments have been

    checked by virus detection software before transmission. You should

    carry out your own virus checks on the contents of this

    communication. We accept no liability for any loss or damage which

    may be caused by software viruses or by interception or interruption

    of this mail.

    Unless otherwise indicated, this e-mail

    has no contractual effect and may only be used for the purpose(s)

    indicated in it. The statements and opinions expressed in this

    e-mail are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those

    of the Financial Ombudsman Service Ltd.

    This email has originated from the

    Financial Ombudsman Service Ltd. South Quay Plaza, 183 Marsh Wall,

    London E14 9SR, United Kingdom. Registered as a limited company in

    England and Wales No. 3725015. Registered office as above.




    This e-mail and any attachments are

    confidential and may be subject to legal privilege. If you are not the

    intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and delete

    this e-mail and any attachment from your system. If you are not the

    intended recipient you must not copy, disclose or take any action in

    reliance to it.

    This e-mail and any attachments have been

    checked by virus detection software before transmission. You should

    carry out your own virus checks on the contents of this communication.

    We accept no liability for any loss or damage which may be caused by

    software viruses or by interception or interruption of this mail.

    Unless otherwise indicated, this e-mail has

    no contractual effect and may only be used for the purpose(s)

    indicated in it. The statements and opinions expressed in this e-mail

    are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the

    Financial Ombudsman Service Ltd.

    This email has originated from the

    Financial Ombudsman Service Ltd. South Quay Plaza, 183 Marsh Wall,

    London E14 9SR, United Kingdom. Registered as a limited company in

    England and Wales No. 3725015. Registered office as above.




    This e-mail and any attachments are

    confidential and may be subject to legal privilege. If you are not the

    intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and delete this

    e-mail and any attachment from your system. If you are not the intended

    recipient you must not copy, disclose or take any action in reliance to

    it.

    This e-mail and any attachments have been

    checked by virus detection software before transmission. You should

    carry out your own virus checks on the contents of this communication.

    We accept no liability for any loss or damage which may be caused by

    software viruses or by interception or interruption of this mail.

    Unless otherwise indicated, this e-mail has

    no contractual effect and may only be used for the purpose(s) indicated

    in it. The statements and opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of

    the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Financial

    Ombudsman Service Ltd.

    This email has originated from the Financial

    Ombudsman Service Ltd. South Quay Plaza, 183 Marsh Wall, London E14 9SR,

    United Kingdom. Registered as a limited company in England and Wales No.

    3725015. Registered office as above.




    This e-mail and any attachments are

    confidential and may be subject to legal privilege. If you are not the

    intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and delete this

    e-mail and any attachment from your system. If you are not the intended

    recipient you must not copy, disclose or take any action in reliance to

    it.

    This e-mail and any attachments have been

    checked by virus detection software before transmission. You should carry

    out your own virus checks on the contents of this communication. We accept

    no liability for any loss or damage which may be caused by software

    viruses or by interception or interruption of this mail.

    Unless otherwise indicated, this e-mail has no

    contractual effect and may only be used for the purpose(s) indicated in

    it. The statements and opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the

    author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Financial Ombudsman

    Service Ltd.

    This email has originated from the Financial

    Ombudsman Service Ltd. South Quay Plaza, 183 Marsh Wall, London E14 9SR,

    United Kingdom. Registered as a limited company in England and Wales No.

    3725015. Registered office as above.




    This e-mail and any attachments are

    confidential and may be subject to legal privilege. If you are not the

    intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and delete this

    e-mail and any attachment from your system. If you are not the intended

    recipient you must not copy, disclose or take any action in reliance to

    it.

    This e-mail and any attachments have been checked

    by virus detection software before transmission. You should carry out your

    own virus checks on the contents of this communication. We accept no

    liability for any loss or damage which may be caused by software viruses or

    by interception or interruption of this mail.

    Unless otherwise indicated, this e-mail has no

    contractual effect and may only be used for the purpose(s) indicated in it.

    The statements and opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the author

    and do not necessarily reflect those of the Financial Ombudsman Service

    Ltd.

    This email has originated from the Financial

    Ombudsman Service Ltd. South Quay Plaza, 183 Marsh Wall, London E14 9SR,

    United Kingdom. Registered as a limited company in England and Wales No.

    3725015. Registered office as above.




    This e-mail and any attachments are

    confidential and may be subject to legal privilege. If you are not the

    intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and delete this

    e-mail and any attachment from your system. If you are not the intended

    recipient you must not copy, disclose or take any action in reliance to

    it.

    This e-mail and any attachments have been checked

    by virus detection software before transmission. You should carry out your own

    virus checks on the contents of this communication. We accept no liability for

    any loss or damage which may be caused by software viruses or by interception

    or interruption of this mail.

    Unless otherwise indicated, this e-mail has no

    contractual effect and may only be used for the purpose(s) indicated in it.

    The statements and opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the author

    and do not necessarily reflect those of the Financial Ombudsman Service

    Ltd.

    This email has originated from the Financial

    Ombudsman Service Ltd. South Quay Plaza, 183 Marsh Wall, London E14 9SR,

    United Kingdom. Registered as a limited company in England and Wales No.

    3725015. Registered office as above.





    This e-mail and any attachments are confidential

    and may be subject to legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient,

    please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail and any attachment

    from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you must not copy,

    disclose or take any action in reliance to it.

    This e-mail and any attachments have been checked by

    virus detection software before transmission. You should carry out your own

    virus checks on the contents of this communication. We accept no liability for

    any loss or damage which may be caused by software viruses or by interception or

    interruption of this mail.

    Unless otherwise indicated, this e-mail has no

    contractual effect and may only be used for the purpose(s) indicated in it. The

    statements and opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the author and do

    not necessarily reflect those of the Financial Ombudsman Service Ltd.

    This email has originated from the Financial

    Ombudsman Service Ltd. South Quay Plaza, 183 Marsh Wall, London E14 9SR, United

    Kingdom. Registered as a limited company in England and Wales No. 3725015.

    Registered office as above.







  • Ny e-post til the Finacial Ombudsman, angående om hvorfor de behandler medarbeiderne sine som slaver. (In Norwegian)







    Google Mail – RE: Complaint against RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mail







    Google Mail



    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>




    RE: Complaint against RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mail





    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>





    Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 4:31 PM





    To:

    "Collins, Jackie" <jackie.collins@financial-ombudsman.org.uk>



    Hi,

    Monday to Friday, 8 am to 6 pm, is alright, I think.
    But you also let your staff work Sunday mornings, at 6 am.
    It seems to me that you overload your representatives with work, and that they have to

    work 12 to 14 hours 7 days a week.
    I thought slavery was forbidden in our time.
    Why do you let your representatives work every Sunday morning, when other people in

    England are on their way home from the pub?
    Do your staff get summer-holiday at all?
    Sincerely,
    Erik Ribsskog


    On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 9:54 AM, Collins, Jackie <jackie.collins@financial-ombudsman.org.uk> wrote:

    Dear Mr Ribsskog

    We always try to provide the best service we can to our

    customers, and sometimes that means offering our staff the option of working

    overtime during very busy periods.

    Please be assured that they have to work within strict time

    guidelines, and these are always checked by Operations Managers to ensure they

    are not working too many hours.

    The service our department offers is outside of the usual

    office hours of 9am till 5pm because we have found that a lot of our

    customers have difficulties contacting us whilst they are at work themselves

    during the 9am to 5pm times, so we have opening hours of 8am – 6pm, as do

    many firms these days.

    I hope this explains.

    Regards

    Jackie

    Collins

    Operations Manager
    Direct Dial : 020 7964

    0116

    Direct Fax: 020 7964 0117


    From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

    Sent: 29 June 2009 19:32
    To: Collins,

    Jackie

    Subject: Re: Complaint against RBS/Fwd: Earlier

    e-mail

    Ok,

    that sound very fine!

    But, why is that you let your representatives work over-time every Sunday

    then?

    Shouldn't you as a main rule conduct your business, within the business

    hours?

    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

    On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 3:50 PM, Collins, Jackie <jackie.collins@financial-ombudsman.org.uk>

    wrote:

    Dear Mr

    Ribsskog

    Rosemary

    Cox has passed your complaint to me to take over as you have requested that

    she no longer deals with your case.

    I can

    confirmed that a letter has been sent to the firm, and we have asked that they

    issue you with a final response letter within 14 days. We have also

    asked them to copy us in on that response.

    If you

    remain unhappy with the firms response, or you have not received a response

    from them within 14 days, please let me know and I will arrange for your

    complaint to be moved forward for investigation by an

    Adjudicator.

    Regards

    Jackie Collins
    Operations Manager

    Direct Dial

    : 020 7964 0116

    Direct Fax: 020 7964

    0117


    From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

    Sent: 28 June 2009 11:17
    To: Cox,

    Rosemary
    Subject: Re: Complaint against RBS/Fwd: Earlier

    e-mail

    Hi,

    I don't think it's any use with me repeating myself.

    I don't think you should handle my complaint.

    The reason is, that if you are to overworked, you get to tired.

    And in dealing with complaints like these, one obviously needs ones

    judgement, to be like

    it should be.

    If one are out of balance, like I think you could be, then I don't

    think this is good for how the

    complaint is being dealt with.

    So please do as I ask Mrs .Cox, and tell your manager what I said,

    that I want someone else

    to deal with my complaint, due to that I think that you must be

    overworked.

    Haven't you seen how fine the weather is today, you should have a day

    off in the fine weather,

    I think.

    Sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

    On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 11:10 AM, Cox, Rosemary <Rosemary.Cox@financial-ombudsman.org.uk>

    wrote:


    Dear Mr Ribsskog


    Thank you for your

    e-mails


    As previously advised I am not going to debate

    with you the working hours of this office.


    I have written to you today to advise the steps

    we are taking with your complaint. If the firm fail to resolve the situation

    for you, your complaint will be passed onto our adjudication area for

    further consideration of the concerns you have

    raised.


    I should add that we do

    not tolerate rude or insulting language at this office, and

    would expect any further communication to be sent in a more acceptable

    manner.


    Kind Regards


    Rose Cox


    team manager



    From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

    Sent: 28 June 2009

    10:43

    To: Cox, Rosemary
    Subject: Re: Complaint against

    RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mail

    Hi,

    of course you can work on Sundays if you want.

    But business e-mails should just be sent within the

    business-hours.

    Or else, what's going to happen, is obvious.

    Someone are going to come drunk home from town, and answer the

    business-e-mails when they are drunk, which is what has happened today, with

    our correspondence.

    If this is something, you didn't know from before, then I think

    this Financial Ombudsman-stuff is just a load of crap really.

    Try to use the head that God gave you when you were born!

    Sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

    On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 10:33 AM, Cox, Rosemary <Rosemary.Cox@financial-ombudsman.org.uk>

    wrote:

    Dear

    Mr Ribsskog

    Thank

    you for your e-mail

    I must admit to being surprised and

    confused with the content of the

    e-mail
    .

    We are an extremely busy department and we often work at the

    weekends, this is obviously of help to consumers as we are able

    to deal with their complaints in a more timely manner. I would

    suggest that
    It is entirely up to each individual

    business to determine which hours their staff will work and I do not

    intend debating this with you.

    By working this weekend I have been able to deal with your

    complaint, which as you can appreciate is of a benefit to

    you.

    Perhaps you can clarify the spelling mistakes you are referring

    to?

    Kind

    Regards

    Rose

    Cox

    team

    manager



    From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

    Sent: 28 June 2009 10:20

    Subject: Re: Complaint against RBS/Fwd: Earlier

    e-mail

    Hi again,

    don't you think it's strange for an institutions like yours to send

    e-mails on Sunday mornings then?

    Shouldn't e-mails be sent within normal business hours then you

    think?

    This is what it says on Wikipedia:

    In

    the United

    States
    and United

    Kingdom
    , the hours between 9 am and 5 pm are typically considered to be standard business

    hours



    I

    think this is rather akward, as I also think your spelling-mistakes

    are.


    Sincerely,


    Erik Ribsskog

    On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 8:06 AM, Cox, Rosemary

    <Rosemary.Cox@financial-ombudsman.org.uk>

    wrote:

    Dear

    Mr Ribsskog

    Thank you for your e-mail

    That's no problem, however I should point out that we

    are not a government department, we are a independent complaints

    body.

    I will be in touch with your again in the next few

    days

    Kind

    Regards

    Rose

    Cox

    team

    manager



    From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

    Sent: 28 June 2009 08:02

    To: Cox, Rosemary
    Subject: Re: Complaint

    against RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mail

    Hi,

    ok that's very fine, I'm just home from town you see.

    I thought it was a bit strange, since noone in Government in

    Norway, work on Sundays.

    Sorry about this, I forget sometimes that I'm not in Norway any

    longer.

    Sorry about this!

    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

    On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 7:54 AM, Cox, Rosemary

    <Rosemary.Cox@financial-ombudsman.org.uk>

    wrote:

    Dear Mr Ribsskog

    Thank you for your e-mail

    I can assure you this is not a

    joke, I am currently in the office working

    today.

    I presume that you

    would like us to deal with your complaint, so am responding to your

    e-mails today

    Kind Regards

    Rose Cox

    team manager



    From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

    Sent: 28 June

    2009 07:36
    To: Cox, Rosemary
    Subject: Re:

    Complaint against RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mail

    Hi,

    why do send the e-mails early on a Sunday morning, by the

    way.

    Is this some kind of joke?

    Sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

    On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 7:33 AM, Cox, Rosemary

    <Rosemary.Cox@financial-ombudsman.org.uk>

    wrote:

    Dear Mr Ribsskog

    Thank you for your

    e-mails

    I will contact you again once

    I have considered the

    information.

    Kind Regards

    Rose Cox

    team manager



    From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

    Sent: 27

    June 2009 14:59
    To: Cox, Rosemary
    Subject:

    Complaint against RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mail

    Hi,

    thank you for you e-mail, that I recieved today.

    I'll contact your collegue back, regarding the

    Barclays-complaint.

    I sent the complaint on RBS Dale St., to Yvonne Williams at

    RBS, but she

    also harassed me, like this, she writes 'Dear Ms Ribsskog',

    even if my name

    is Erik, and in Britain, you have a movie called 'Erik the

    Viking', and Eric is

    also a quite usual name, in English-speaking countries.

    So I think Yvonne Williams, the complaint-investigator,

    also bullied me.

    I think this must have been a deliberate mistake.

    This ended with the complaint being partly resolved, in the way

    that RBS,

    gave me the bonus of £100, for moving my account to them, from

    Barclays,

    (who I also had problems with, that I'll exlain about to your

    collegue, like I

    mentioned earlier).

    I'll also find the actual complaint against RBS Dale St.

    now, and forward it

    to you.

    What I meant with the complaint-form, was that it didn't

    look anything at all

    like the ones you've sent me now.

    Maybe the complaint-form I was sent, was to do with other

    financial institutions,

    than banks?

    Like share-fonds etc?

    Have you also got other complaint-forms, other than to banks,

    perhaps someone

    sent me the wrong form intentionally?

    Just a thought I had.

    But anyway, thank you very much for your e-mail, and I'll

    also find the actual

    RBS Dale St. complaint, and e-mail it to you now.

    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

    ———- Forwarded message

    ———-
    From: Williams, Yvonne

    (CRU)
    <Yvonne.Williams@rbs.co.uk>
    Date: Tue,

    Jun 26, 2007 at 4:30 PM
    Subject: RE: Earlier e-mail
    To: Erik

    Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

    Dear Ms Ribsskog

    Could you please arrange another copy of your email to be

    sent to me for my investigation

    Regards

    Yvonne Williams


    From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
    Sent: 19 June 2007

    14:04
    To: Williams, Yvonne (CRU)
    Subject:

    Earlier e-mail

    *** WARNING : This message originates

    from the Internet ***


    Hi,

    I'm refering to the e-mail I sent you on 5/6.

    I was just wondering if you have recieved this e-mail,

    because I cant see

    that I have recieved any answer to it yet.

    Please just contact me if you want me to send you the e-mail

    again.

    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

    The Royal Bank of

    Scotland plc, Registered in Scotland No. 90312. Registered Office:

    36 St Andrew Square, Edinburgh EH2 2YB

    Authorised and

    regulated by the Financial Services Authority.

    This e-mail

    message is confidential and for use by the addressee only. If the

    message is received by anyone other than the addressee, please

    return the message to the sender by replying to it and then delete

    the message from your computer. Internet e-mails are not necessarily

    secure. The Royal Bank of Scotland plc does not accept

    responsibility for changes made to this message after it was

    sent.

    Whilst all reasonable care has been taken to avoid the

    transmission of viruses, it is the responsibility of the recipient

    to ensure that the onward transmission, opening or use of this

    message and any attachments will not adversely affect its systems or

    data. No responsibility is accepted by The Royal Bank of Scotland

    plc in this regard and the recipient should carry out such virus and

    other checks as it considers

    appropriate.



    This e-mail and any attachments are

    confidential and may be subject to legal privilege. If you are not

    the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and

    delete this e-mail and any attachment from your system. If you are

    not the intended recipient you must not copy, disclose or take any

    action in reliance to it.

    This e-mail and any attachments have been

    checked by virus detection software before transmission. You should

    carry out your own virus checks on the contents of this

    communication. We accept no liability for any loss or damage which

    may be caused by software viruses or by interception or interruption

    of this mail.

    Unless otherwise indicated, this e-mail

    has no contractual effect and may only be used for the purpose(s)

    indicated in it. The statements and opinions expressed in this

    e-mail are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those

    of the Financial Ombudsman Service Ltd.

    This email has originated from the

    Financial Ombudsman Service Ltd. South Quay Plaza, 183 Marsh Wall,

    London E14 9SR, United Kingdom. Registered as a limited company in

    England and Wales No. 3725015. Registered office as above.




    This e-mail and any attachments are

    confidential and may be subject to legal privilege. If you are not the

    intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and delete

    this e-mail and any attachment from your system. If you are not the

    intended recipient you must not copy, disclose or take any action in

    reliance to it.

    This e-mail and any attachments have been

    checked by virus detection software before transmission. You should

    carry out your own virus checks on the contents of this communication.

    We accept no liability for any loss or damage which may be caused by

    software viruses or by interception or interruption of this mail.

    Unless otherwise indicated, this e-mail has

    no contractual effect and may only be used for the purpose(s)

    indicated in it. The statements and opinions expressed in this e-mail

    are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the

    Financial Ombudsman Service Ltd.

    This email has originated from the

    Financial Ombudsman Service Ltd. South Quay Plaza, 183 Marsh Wall,

    London E14 9SR, United Kingdom. Registered as a limited company in

    England and Wales No. 3725015. Registered office as above.




    This e-mail and any attachments are

    confidential and may be subject to legal privilege. If you are not the

    intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and delete this

    e-mail and any attachment from your system. If you are not the intended

    recipient you must not copy, disclose or take any action in reliance to

    it.

    This e-mail and any attachments have been

    checked by virus detection software before transmission. You should

    carry out your own virus checks on the contents of this communication.

    We accept no liability for any loss or damage which may be caused by

    software viruses or by interception or interruption of this mail.

    Unless otherwise indicated, this e-mail has

    no contractual effect and may only be used for the purpose(s) indicated

    in it. The statements and opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of

    the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Financial

    Ombudsman Service Ltd.

    This email has originated from the Financial

    Ombudsman Service Ltd. South Quay Plaza, 183 Marsh Wall, London E14 9SR,

    United Kingdom. Registered as a limited company in England and Wales No.

    3725015. Registered office as above.




    This e-mail and any attachments are

    confidential and may be subject to legal privilege. If you are not the

    intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and delete this

    e-mail and any attachment from your system. If you are not the intended

    recipient you must not copy, disclose or take any action in reliance to

    it.

    This e-mail and any attachments have been

    checked by virus detection software before transmission. You should carry

    out your own virus checks on the contents of this communication. We accept

    no liability for any loss or damage which may be caused by software

    viruses or by interception or interruption of this mail.

    Unless otherwise indicated, this e-mail has no

    contractual effect and may only be used for the purpose(s) indicated in

    it. The statements and opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the

    author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Financial Ombudsman

    Service Ltd.

    This email has originated from the Financial

    Ombudsman Service Ltd. South Quay Plaza, 183 Marsh Wall, London E14 9SR,

    United Kingdom. Registered as a limited company in England and Wales No.

    3725015. Registered office as above.




    This e-mail and any attachments are

    confidential and may be subject to legal privilege. If you are not the

    intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and delete this

    e-mail and any attachment from your system. If you are not the intended

    recipient you must not copy, disclose or take any action in reliance to

    it.

    This e-mail and any attachments have been checked

    by virus detection software before transmission. You should carry out your

    own virus checks on the contents of this communication. We accept no

    liability for any loss or damage which may be caused by software viruses or

    by interception or interruption of this mail.

    Unless otherwise indicated, this e-mail has no

    contractual effect and may only be used for the purpose(s) indicated in it.

    The statements and opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the author

    and do not necessarily reflect those of the Financial Ombudsman Service

    Ltd.

    This email has originated from the Financial

    Ombudsman Service Ltd. South Quay Plaza, 183 Marsh Wall, London E14 9SR,

    United Kingdom. Registered as a limited company in England and Wales No.

    3725015. Registered office as above.




    This e-mail and any attachments are

    confidential and may be subject to legal privilege. If you are not the

    intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and delete this

    e-mail and any attachment from your system. If you are not the intended

    recipient you must not copy, disclose or take any action in reliance to

    it.

    This e-mail and any attachments have been checked

    by virus detection software before transmission. You should carry out your own

    virus checks on the contents of this communication. We accept no liability for

    any loss or damage which may be caused by software viruses or by interception

    or interruption of this mail.

    Unless otherwise indicated, this e-mail has no

    contractual effect and may only be used for the purpose(s) indicated in it.

    The statements and opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the author

    and do not necessarily reflect those of the Financial Ombudsman Service

    Ltd.

    This email has originated from the Financial

    Ombudsman Service Ltd. South Quay Plaza, 183 Marsh Wall, London E14 9SR,

    United Kingdom. Registered as a limited company in England and Wales No.

    3725015. Registered office as above.





    This e-mail and any attachments are confidential

    and may be subject to legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient,

    please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail and any attachment

    from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you must not copy,

    disclose or take any action in reliance to it.

    This e-mail and any attachments have been checked by

    virus detection software before transmission. You should carry out your own

    virus checks on the contents of this communication. We accept no liability for

    any loss or damage which may be caused by software viruses or by interception or

    interruption of this mail.

    Unless otherwise indicated, this e-mail has no

    contractual effect and may only be used for the purpose(s) indicated in it. The

    statements and opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the author and do

    not necessarily reflect those of the Financial Ombudsman Service Ltd.

    This email has originated from the Financial

    Ombudsman Service Ltd. South Quay Plaza, 183 Marsh Wall, London E14 9SR, United

    Kingdom. Registered as a limited company in England and Wales No. 3725015.

    Registered office as above.







  • Media og myndighetene er helt håpløse. (In Norwegian)

    Jeg har jo et tracking-cookie program, på bloggen.

    Så jeg ser jo det, at det er over 100 faste lesere, som leser på bloggen, hver dag.

    Og alle leser vel ikke hver dag kanskje, så det er muligens noe sånt som 200-300 faste lesere på bloggen da.

    Og de som har lest bloggen en stund, de vet vel det, at jeg blir tullet med av omtrent alt som heter myndigheter i Norge og England.

    Men media og myndighetene er helt håpløse, når det gjelder dette at jeg overhørte i 2003, at jeg var forfulgt, av noe de kalte ‘mafian’, da jeg jobbet på Rimi Bjørndal, i Oslo, ved siden av studier på HiO.

    Men ingen vil fortelle noe om hvem denne ‘mafian’ er.

    Jeg ble tulla mye med, på jobb, på Rimi i Norge, og for Bertelsmanns Microsoft-aktivering, i England.

    Jeg klarte å få laget en jus-sak, mot Bertelsmann/Microsoft.

    Men etter at jeg begynte med det, så har jeg blitt tullet med, nesten uansett hvem jeg har prøvd å få rettighetene mine fra, i både Norge og England.

    Så det er nok noe politi, som tuller med meg, vil jeg tippe.

    Noe sånt.

    Og jeg har jo dokumentert om alt, som har foregått, på bloggen.

    Og skrevet alt jeg vet, om både det som har skjedd etter 2003, og om oppveksten.

    Men, har noen lesere på bloggen noen råd?

    Hva burde jeg gjøre for å få rettighetene mine fra myndighetene?

    Hvorfor skriver ikke media om hva som foregår?

    Med vennlig hilsen

    Erik Ribsskog

    PS.

    Trakasserende svar blir bare slettet, så vet politimyndighetene det, eller hvem det nå er som skriver alle tullemeldingene, må jeg vel kalle det, på bloggen.

  • Jeg syntes det var litt skummelt, med trussel på hebraisk, på bloggen, så jeg sendte det til politiet i Oslo. (In Norwegian)







    Google Mail – Trussel på hebraisk?







    Google Mail



    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>




    Trussel på hebraisk?





    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>





    Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 8:32 PM





    To:

    post.oslo@politiet.no



    Hei,

    noen driver å skriver trusler på hebraisk, på bloggen min.
    Noen sier jo at dere i politiet i Oslo, er sionister, så jeg tenkte at kanskje dere skjønte
    hva det stod.

    For å tulle litt, med det siste der.

    Men jeg vil gjerne anmelde trusselen, og ønsker gjerningsmannen tiltalt og straffet.
    Med vennlig hilsen
    Erik Ribsskog

    PS.
    Her er mer om dette:


    Anonymous said…

    אריק ריבסקוג, זה לא ככה. אתה רשע


    28 June 2009 18:34


    johncons said…

    Hei,

    ja du kan så si.

    Sånn som myndighetene holder på i Norge, så kan det begynne å rable for nesten alle og enhver.

    Sånn at man nesten begynner å skrive som marsboere, eller hva det er?

    Eller er det hebraisk?

    Med vennlig hilsen

    Erik Ribsskog

    28 June 2009 19:09


    Anonymous said…

    Hehe, det er litt vanskelig å skrive som marsboere på en datamaskin, i og med at alle tegn må kodes i Unicode. Du har forsåvidt rett i at det er hebraisk. Du kan jo ta en tur innom translate.google.com, der vil du nok få svar på hva det faktisk betyr.

    28 June 2009 23:40


    johncons said…

    Det er det som er feilen med Norge.

    Det er så mange uhøflige personer der, som gir en råd om å oversette ting på Google, istedet for å si hva det betyr osv.

    Når sånt skjer, så er litt mer glad for at jeg ikke er i Norge.

    Men men.

    Men for en som er norsk, så tror jeg det blir omtrent hipp som happ, om man skulle skrive hebraisk eller som en marsboer.

    For meg ville ihvertfall det blitt omtrent like vanskelig.

    Med vennlig hilsen

    Erik Ribsskog

    29 June 2009 01:15


    Anonymous said…

    Vel, det er jo et budskap i meldingen … ditt valg at du ikke gidder finne det ut!

    29 June 2009 01:45


    johncons said…

    Jeg har et budskap til deg og.

    Hvis du skriver hebraisk på en norsk blogg, og ber blogg-eieren om å oversette dette som står på hebraisk, istedet for å si hva det betyr, da er du en fitte.

    Så sånn er det.

    Så sånne mannlige fitter, det liker vi ikke i Norge, så du burde kanskje tenke på å lære deg noe folkeskikk.

    Med hilsen

    Erik Ribsskog


    29 June 2009 01:47


    Anonymous said…

    Jeg skrev på hebraisk i og med at du tillegger jødene mye dritt de ikke fortjener (ja, jeg går utifra at du leser igjennom bloggpostene dine; hvis du ikke skjønner hva jeg mener med dritt, må du lese denne posten om igjen).

    Jeg trodde du hadde litt nysgjerrighet, jeg, Ribsskog. Det hadde jo vært på sin plass, i og med at du er så nysgjerrig på å vite hva som foregår, og hvor det blir av rettighetene dine.

    Hvordan skal du noen gang finne ut hva det er som står der? Du er kanskje ikke interessert i det folk sier til deg?

    http://translate.google.com/

    29 June 2009 12:45


    johncons said…

    Nysgjerrighet?

    Skal jeg søke på Google, om hva du skriver på hebraisk, på min blogg?

    Det er det mest uhøflige jeg noen gang har hørt.

    Fy faen!

    Jeg skriver dritt om jødene sier du.

    Nei, det gjør jeg ikke, jeg skriver om verdens-sionismen.

    Som er politisk.

    Verdens-sionisme, er ingen rase eller religion, men det er ideologi, vil jeg si.

    Sionismen ble oppfunnet som ide, av Moses Hess, som sier at hele historien er en krig mellom jødene og arierne, og at jødene er den overlegne rasen.

    Man må få lov å prøve å forsvare seg mot en slik ideologi.

    Jeg er også mistroisk til Bilderberg-gruppen ettersom de har en hemmelig agenda.

    Så jeg mener jeg kan dokumentere, det jeg skriver om.

    At sionismen handler om at jødene ønsker å vinne en krig mot arierne, det har jeg lest på en svensk blogg, at er Moses Hess' tankegods.

    Og han er en anerkjent person innenfor sionismen osv.

    Det er hans ideer, som sionismen bygger på, såvidt jeg har forstått.

    Jeg er nysgjerrig, selvfølgelig, som de fleste andre.

    Men når folk er så uhølige som deg, så lar jeg heller nysgjerrigheten få hvile litt, skal jeg være ærlig.

    Det er bare noe ved en slik oppførsel, som du viser her, som jeg synes er uhøflig.

    Men men.

    Du får heller oversette det selv da vet du, hvis du vil ha det med på bloggen.

    Jeg bruker utrykket 'jødisk', innimellom, istedet for sionisme.

    Men det er fordi at dette er populært kalt 'den jødiske verdenskonspirasjonen', i aviser osv.

    Så jødiske er det populære navnet.

    Så da bruker jeg det for å forklare.

    Men jeg mener strengt tatt ikke jøder, som folkeslag eller religion.

    For jeg vet at det er mange typer jøder.

    Det er konservative jøder, og det er ashenazi jøder f.eks.

    Og noen jøder i USA, som lever på en gammeldags måte, de har jeg lest at protesterer mot Israel, og poltikken der, utenfor FN i New York osv.

    Så jeg beklager hvis noe jeg skriver sårer.

    Det er som sagt ikke meningen å angripe jøder som religion eller folkeslag.

    Men jeg prøver å finne ut hva som foregår, ettersom jeg ikke for rettighetene min.

    Og en teori er at dette kan ha noe med den såkalte verdens-sionismen å gjøre.

    Så beklager igjen hvis jeg har skrevet noe feil!

    Med vennlig hilsen

    Erik Ribsskog


    29 June 2009 20:13


    johncons said…

    Her er ip-adressen din forresten.

    Jeg synes det var truende med denne hebraisken, så jeg tar å sender en e-post om dette til politiet:

    VISITOR ANALYSIS
    Referring Link No referring link
    Host Name

    IP Address 84.38.149.14 [Label IP Address]
    Country Norway
    Region Oslo
    City Oslo
    ISP No-homebase-net
    Returning Visits 0
    Visit Length 13 hours 8 mins 50 secs
    VISITOR SYSTEM SPECS
    Browser Safari 1.2

    Operating System
    Resolution 1280×1024
    Javascript Enabled
    Navigation Path

    Date Time WebPage
    28th June 2009 23:36:23 No referring link
    johncons-mirror.blogspot.com/2009/06/her-kan-man-se-at-myndighetene-i-norge.html

    28th June 2009 23:40:15 www.blogger.com/comment-iframe.g?blogID=407973739067553285&postID=4084364361093825810&blogspotRpcToken=9951637

    johncons-mirror.blogspot.com/2009/06/her-kan-man-se-at-myndighetene-i-norge.html#comment-form
    28th June 2009 23:40:34 www.blogger.com/comment-iframe.g?blogID=407973739067553285&postID=4084364361093825810&blogspotRpcToken=8921664

    johncons-mirror.blogspot.com/2009/06/her-kan-man-se-at-myndighetene-i-norge.html#comment-form
    29th June 2009 00:42:39 No referring link

    johncons-mirror.blogspot.com/2009/06/her-kan-man-se-at-myndighetene-i-norge.html
    29th June 2009 01:43:19 No referring link

    johncons-mirror.blogspot.com/2009/06/her-kan-man-se-at-myndighetene-i-norge.html
    29th June 2009 01:45:06 www.blogger.com/comment-iframe.g?blogID=407973739067553285&postID=4084364361093825810&blogspotRpcToken=6673007

    johncons-mirror.blogspot.com/2009/06/her-kan-man-se-at-myndighetene-i-norge.html#comment-form
    29th June 2009 01:45:33 www.blogger.com/comment-iframe.g?blogID=407973739067553285&postID=4084364361093825810&blogspotRpcToken=7450149

    johncons-mirror.blogspot.com/2009/06/her-kan-man-se-at-myndighetene-i-norge.html#comment-form
    29th June 2009 01:50:22 ribsskog-fanclub.blogspot.com/

    www.johncons-mirror.blogspot.com/
    29th June 2009 01:50:26 ribsskog-fanclub.blogspot.com/
    www.johncons-mirror.blogspot.com/

    29th June 2009 01:50:30 ribsskog-fanclub.blogspot.com/
    www.johncons-mirror.blogspot.com/
    29th June 2009 01:50:37 ribsskog-fanclub.blogspot.com/

    www.johncons-mirror.blogspot.com/
    29th June 2009 12:33:30 No referring link
    johncons-mirror.blogspot.com/2009/06/her-kan-man-se-at-myndighetene-i-norge.html

    29th June 2009 12:45:08 www.blogger.com/comment-iframe.g?blogID=407973739067553285&postID=4084364361093825810&blogspotRpcToken=3705685

    johncons-mirror.blogspot.com/2009/06/her-kan-man-se-at-myndighetene-i-norge.html#comment-form
    29th June 2009 12:45:13 www.blogger.com/comment-iframe.g?blogID=407973739067553285&postID=4084364361093825810&blogspotRpcToken=4817195

    johncons-mirror.blogspot.com/2009/06/her-kan-man-se-at-myndighetene-i-norge.html#comment-form