johncons

Måned: oktober 2012

  • Min Bok 5 – Kapittel 113: Rimi Langhus sitt bedriftsfotball-lag

    Etter at jeg hadde jobbet som butikksjef, på Rimi Langhus, i et par måneder, vel.

    (Noe sånt).

    Så dukka det opp en hel ‘bøling’, av Rimi Langhus-gutter, og spurte meg, mens jeg satt på kontoret, og regna lønninger, (eller noe sånt),  vel.

    Om vi på Rimi Langhus kunne ha vårt eget bedriftsfotball-lag, da.

    Og jeg hadde jo vært med, å spille, en kamp, for et Rimi bedriftsfotball-lag, i Vollsløkka-hallen, (eller om det heter Skeid-hallen), i 1993, (var det vel), som jeg har skrevet om, i Min Bok 4.

    Og jeg var jo også med Magne Winnem, og spilte bedriftsfotball, for IT Akademiet, (hvor jeg jo også hadde dratt med låseansvarlig Kjetil Furuseth, fra Rimi Langhus), som jeg har skrevet om tidligere, i denne boken.

    Så jeg var ikke helt avvisende, til den her ideen, da.

    Hvis Rimi Langhus-gutta så gjerne ville ha et bedriftsfotball-lag, så kunne jeg vel høre om det var mulig å få til, liksom.

    Men, jeg var jo overarbeidet, fra Rimi Kalbakken-tida.

    Og jeg hadde jo egentlig nok å gjøre, fra før, på Rimi Langhus, (og ellers), syntes jeg.

    (Jeg var jo også op på #quiz-show, (på irc), og sånn, da.

    Og jeg hadde jo også min egen chattekanal, (på irc), som het #blablabla, da.

    Som jeg har skrevet om tidligere, i denne boken).

    Så jeg sa det, at jeg kunne ringe Rimi’s hovedkontor, (på Sinsen), og høre, om vi kunne få ha et bedriftsfotball-lag, da.

    Hvis en av Rimi Langhus-gutta, tok på seg det ansvaret, å drive den her fotball-klubben, (eller hva man skal kalle det), da.

    Og da sa Jokke det, at han kunne ta på seg det her ansvaret, da.

    Og han var vel bare søtten år gammel, på den her tida, vel.

    Men, på Rimi Langhus, så jobba jo også, (blant annet), Morten Saksgård, som hadde fått lov til å bli verneombud, da han bare var femten år gammel, av trainee-butikksjef Thomas, et par år, før jeg begynte å jobbe der, da.

    Så jeg syntes ikke at jeg kunne nekte Jokke å være fotball-ansvarlig.

    Selv om han var under atten år, da.

    Siden det jo var en tradisjon, på Rimi Langhus, (startet av trainee-butikksjef Thomas).

    Å la tenåringene der få ha ansvar, da.

    Så sånn var det.

    Bare noe jeg tenkte på.

    Men men.

    Så jeg tok en telefon, inn til Hakon sitt hovedkontor da, (på Sinsen).

    Og fikk snakke med en eller annen der, (som jeg ikke husker navnet på nå), da.

    Men som var Hakon sin ansvarlige, for idrett da, (må det vel ha vært).

    Og jeg forklarte vel først det, at jeg hadde vært med å spille en kamp, for det bedriftsfotball-laget, som Rimi hadde, i Oslo, rundt 1993, da.

    Så jeg lurte på om vi kunne få ha et sånt bedriftsfotball-lag, ute i Langhus også, da.

    Og han idrettsansvarlige, han sa at det var greit, at vi starta opp et sånt fotball-lag, da.

    Og vi fikk vel også noen drakter, (som jeg ikke husker helt fargen på nå), sendt i posten, fra Rimi sitt hovedkontor, da.

    (Noe sånt).

    Så sånn var det.

    Bare noe jeg tenkte på.

    Men men.

    Og det ble også sånn, at Rimi Langhus, sponset en halvliter brus, på hver spiller, som var med, og spilte, de her kampene, da.

    (Hadde jeg vel gått med på, da).

    Og da var det sånn, at de som jobba, på Rimi Langhus.

    De var så glade, i iste, da.

    (Av merke Lipton, vel).

    Så de tok med seg bare iste da, på de her kampene, som vi spilte.

    (Av en eller annen grunn).

    Så det skeia ut litt, da.

    For de halvliterne med iste, de var mye dyrere, enn halvlitere med brus, da.

    Og det var jo liksom et stress, når vi skulle dra, på de her kampene, da.

    Og det var jo sånn på varetellinger, i Rimi, at de ansatte fikk ihvertfall en brus hver, da.

    Men om man skulle skille mellom brus og iste, (som var en ny vare vel, på den her tida).

    Det var ikke noe jeg begynte å liksom ‘arrestere’ folk for da, (for å si det sånn).

    For det hadde nemlig stått i Rimi-nytt, (husker jeg), på den tida, som jeg jobba, som butikksjef, på Rimi Langhus.

    At butikksjefene liksom ikke skulle være som politi, rundt om i butikkene, da.

    Noe som jeg vel ikke hadde hørt før.

    Men som jeg vel begynte å tenkte litt over, (etter at jeg hadde lest om det her i Rimi-nytt), da.

    For det var vel ikke vanlig, at sånne befalinger, dukka opp, i Rimi-nytt, vel.

    (Sånn som jeg husker det, ihvertfall).

    Så sånn var det.

    Bare noe jeg tenkte på.

    Men men.

    Og det var vel ikke så lett, for meg, (som butikksjef), å hanskes, med den her bølingen, da.

    I det maset som var, før vi skulle kjøre, til kampene, da.

    Og Jokke, han befant seg, så godt som alltid, i par, med Trond Berget, (på jobben), da.

    Og disse to kara, de satt som oftest nede på spiserommet, da.

    Så det var ikke sånn at jeg fikk snakka noe med Jokke, om det her fotball-laget, da.

    Så hvordan han gjorde ditt og datt, det veit jeg ikke.

    Men det var jo også avtalen, at Jokke skulle ordne med alt det her selv, da.

    (Siden jeg egentlig hadde nok å gjøre, fra før, da).

    Så Jokke holdt sin del av den avtalen da, (må jeg si).

    (Om at han skulle ta på seg ansvaret for det her bedriftsfotball-laget, da).

    Så sånn var det.

    Bare noe jeg tenkte på.

    Men men.

    Og det ble også sånn.

    At jeg ble med å spille, på mange av de her kampene, (det året jeg jobba som butikksjef der), da.

    Selv om jeg var reserve en god del, (må jeg innrømme).

    For mange av de som spilte på Rimi Langhus sitt bedriftsfotball-lag.

    (Det vil si spillere som Kjetil Furuset, Eivind Danielsen, Anders Berle, Espen Kristiansen og David Ulriksen).

    De spilte også fotball, på ‘vanlige’ fotball-lag, da.

    (Espen Kristiansen spilte vel for eksempel på Follo sitt A-lag eller junior-lag, tror jeg.

    Hvis jeg ikke husker helt feil, da).

    Så det var mulig at de da ikke samtidig hadde lov til å spille, på et bedriftsfotball-lag, da.

    Men det kunne nesten ikke jeg drive å surre med, (syntes jeg).

    For jeg hadde egentlig nok med å drive butikken, da.

    Og de reglene, for bedriftsfotball-lag, de har jeg egentlig aldri lært, da.

    Selv om jeg må innrømme det, at jeg overhørte noe av det som Kjetil Furuseth og andre på laget, prata om, når det gjaldt den her fotballen, da.

    Og utifra det, så virka det sånn for meg, at de som spilte på Follo osv., ikke samtidig hadde ‘lov’ til å spille, på Rimi Langhus, da.

    Men vi hadde jo så få folk, på Rimi Langhus.

    Så det er mulig at de hadde lov likevel, da.

    Det er mulig.

    Og dette her var jo bare bedriftsfotball, (tenkte vel jeg).

    (Hvis jeg skal være ærlig).

    Så jeg tok ikke det her så alvorlig, da.

    For det her var jo ikke fotball-VM liksom da, (for å si det sånn).

    Så sånn var det.

    Bare noe jeg tenkte på.

    Men men.

    Og det var jo Jokke som var ansvarlig, for det her fotball-laget, så.

    Så det var egentlig ikke min jobb, å blande meg opp i, hvordan han dreiv det her fotball-laget.

    (Må jeg vel si).

    På samme måte som at det ikke var min jobb, å blande meg opp i, hvordan verneombud Morten Saksgård, gjorde jobben sin, (som verneombud), da.

    (Noe sånt).

    Så sånn var det.

    Bare noe jeg tenkte på.

    Men men.

    Når det gjelder fotballkampene, så husker jeg at jeg kjørte Sierra-en min, til den første av de, vel.

    Og det var i Ski, (eller noe sånt), vel.

    Jeg lurer på om det var kampen, mot Follo Taxi.

    Jeg spilte forsvar en del, (når jeg ikke var reserve da), i kampen mot Follo Taxi, (husker jeg).

    Og jeg husker at jeg var høyre-back.

    Og på vår venstre side, så kom en taxisjåfør dundrende, (aleine), da.

    Som må ha sluppet forbi en Rimi Langhus-forsvarer, da

    Og jeg stilte meg da bak keeperen, (som var David Ulriksen muligens), da.

    For å liksom prøve å stoppe skuddet, som jeg forsto at nok ville komme, da.

    Og skuddet, det var hardt, så keeperen nådde ikke fram, til ballen, da.

    Men jeg rakk såvidt å få opp beinet mitt, sånn at ballen gikk i tverrliggeren, da.

    Og så heada jeg ballen over tverrliggeren, når ballen falt ned igjen, da.

    (I tilfelle noen drosjesjåfører kom stormende, bak ryggen min, da).

    Så jeg redda et mål ihvertfall da, som spiller, på Rimi Langhus.

    Så sånn var det.

    Bare noe jeg tenkte på.

    Men men.

    En annen gang, så skulle vi spille, ute i Greverud, (eller ihvertfall et sted, som ligger ved en togstasjon, cirka midt mellom Oslo og Ski), da.

    Og da, så hadde jeg vaska joggebuksa mi, nede i vaskekjelleren, i Rimi-bygget der da, (husker jeg).

    For jeg spilte jo kamper for IT-akademiet også, på den her tida.

    Så jeg måtte nok vaske fotballtøyet mitt ganske ofte, da.

    Og da jeg skulle dra, for å spille fotball, på Greverud der, (eller hvor det var igjen).

    Så så jeg at noen hadde tatt ut den grå joggebuksa mi, av tørketrommelen, (eller noe sånt), da.

    Og lagt den oppå en vaskemaskin, (eller noe sånt), i vaskekjelleren, da.

    Og jeg måtte vel ta toget, til det her stedet, (mener jeg å huske).

    For det var ofte noe feil med bilen min, (på den her tida også), da.

    Og da jeg tok på meg, den her joggebuksa, da.

    Så merka jeg det, at det ikke var min joggebukse, da.

    For noen hadde lurt meg, (må jeg vel si), nede i vaskekjelleren der, da.

    Så den joggabuksa, den var alt for trang, da.

    Så jeg kunne nesten ikke bevege meg, ute på banen der, da.

    Så jeg ble byttet ut, etter bare noen få minutter, da.

    Og jeg satt så det meste av kampen der, og chatta med hu Christina Brynteson, (som var ei ‘håndball-venninne’ av Anders Karlsson og Ingvill Storø), som jeg hadde ansatt, som deltidsmedarbeider i kassa, like etter at jeg hadde begynt, som butikksjef, på Rimi Langhus der, da.

    Så sånn var det.

    Bare noe jeg tenkte på.

    Men men.

    Jeg husker også en bortekamp, mot Ås Landbrukshøyskole.

    De hadde så fint gress der, så man kunne nesten merke det, at vi spilte mot Landbrukshøyskolen, (husker jeg).

    Og der, så løp jeg over cirka halve banen, (mot slutten av kampen), og redda en målsjanse, (husker jeg).

    Og Espen Karlsson, (han som kanskje kunne minne litt om Eric Cartman, i South Park), han scorte et mål da, (husker jeg).

    Noe som var litt overraskende, vel.

    For han spilte vel ikke akkurat på A-laget til Follo, (for å si det sånn).

    Så sånn var det.

    Bare noe jeg tenkte på.

    Men men.

    Og dette laget, de hadde visst dratt ned på en fotballturnering, på Sørlandet, ikke så lenge etter at jeg slutta, som butikksjef, på Rimi Langhus.

    (For jeg begynte å studere, på en Bachelor IT-grad, ved HiO IU, høsten 2002).

    Og da vant de visst hele turneringen, da.

    (Eller om de kom på andre plass).

    Husker jeg, at jeg fikk høre, en god stund etter det her, da.

    (Noe sånt).

    Så sånn var det.

    Bare noe jeg tenkte på.

    Men men.

    Det var fortsatt mye mer som hendte, den tida, som jeg bodde, på St. Hanshaugen.

    Og dette tenkte jeg at jeg skulle prøve å få skrevet mer om, i de neste kapitlene, av Min Bok 5.

    Så vi får se om jeg klarer å få til det.

    Vi får se.

    PS.

    Til og fra den kampen, mot Landbrukshøyskolen, i Ås.

    (Må det vel ha vært).

    Så satt jeg vel på med Eivind Danielsen, (mener jeg å huske).

    (Hvis ikke det var til en annen kamp, da).

    Og han kjørte som et svin, (husker jeg).

    Og det overrasket meg, husker jeg.

    For han hadde vel ikke hatt lappen så lenge, (tror jeg).

    (Siden han bare var 18-19 år, på den her tida, vel).

    Men han kjørte skikkelig rått, da.

    Men han hadde kanskje en bil, som hadde bra forstilling, (eller noe sånt).

    Det er mulig.

    Og etter denne kampen, (må det vel ha vært).

    Så slapp Eivind Danielsen, (var det vel), meg av, ved togstasjonen, i Ski der, da.

    Og da syntes jeg faktisk at jeg så hu Aziza, (heltidsmedarbeider i kassa), fra Rimi Kalbakken, der.

    På Ski togstasjon.

    Men det er mulig at jeg så syner, da.

    Hvem vet.

    Så sånn var kanskje det.

    Bare noe jeg tenkte på.

    Men men.

  • Mer om kommunikasjon


    Gmail – Angående vår kommunikasjon

    Gmail


    Erik Ribsskog
    <eribsskog@gmail.com>



    Angående vår kommunikasjon



    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>


    Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 6:13 PM

    To:
    Ove Gedde <gedde@tdcadsl.dk>, Jorunn Frosch <jorunn.frosch@googlemail.com>

    Cc:
    she@topdanmark.dk, “Nils G. Bartholdy” <ngb@ra.sa.dk>

    Hei,

    jeg har jo jobbet som butikksjef, i Rimi, i Norge, og i den anledning, så var jeg på videregående kurs, for butikksjefer, (var det vel), på ICA’s hovedkontor, i Oslo, i 2001.

    (Som jeg nå har tenkt på, siden jeg har kommet til år 2001, i mine memoar-bøker).

    Og der lærte vi om kommunikasjon.
    At det finnes en avsender, mottager og et budskap.

    Når det gjelder deres budskap, så må jeg nesten sette et lite spørsmålstegn, ved det.


    Jeg selv har jo Facebook-side, LinkedIn, Twitter, nettsted og blogg.

    Har dere noe lignende, som kan vise mer om hvem avsender er for deres budskap?

    På forhånd takk for eventuell hjelp!

    Mvh.

    Erik Ribsskog

  • Jeg sendte enda en e-post om jobbsøking i England


    Gmail – Update/Fwd: FW: Software Developer Vacancy with Riverside

    Gmail


    Erik Ribsskog
    <eribsskog@gmail.com>



    Update/Fwd: FW: Software Developer Vacancy with Riverside



    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>


    Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 4:36 PM

    To:
    Margaret.Wilson@liverpool.gov.uk

    Cc:
    Contact-Us <Contact-Us@jobcentreplus.gsi.gov.uk>, CONTACT-US <CONTACT-US@dwp.gsi.gov.uk>, Melanie Wright <MWright@ingeus.co.uk>

    Bcc:
    “mail.gva” <mail.gva@efta.int>, “emb.london” <emb.london@mfa.no>, amnestyis <amnestyis@amnesty.org>

    Hi,

    I also need to cut my hair I saw now in the bathroom-mirror.
    Perhaps Mr. McEvoy has a daughter who can go here and cut my hair?
    Sorry to be sarcastic but I’m tired of the Jobcentre now, I have been starving for weeks earlier due to this case.


    And I’ve had to use some money that probably was the Housing Benefit, this month and last month.

    That I got at the end of September.

    But this month I haven’t even gotten that, so I have no money for things like bus-tickets, stamps, barbers, etc.

    I’m from Norway, and have worked as a Shop Manager there.
    I’m not with being treated as bad as this.
    Norway pay the EU billions of pounds etc year, so that Norwegian citizens can live and work in the EU.


    And now I have to go to a food-bank due to some buraucracy.
    And I’m not even sure how that works.
    I’m sending this to EFTA.
    Maybe Norway, should stop paying so much money to the EU.


    Even if I’m really a refuge.

    But the Home Office don’t let me formalise that.

    Erik Ribsskog

    ———- Forwarded message ———-

    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
    Date: Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 4:11 PM
    Subject: Re: FW: Software Developer Vacancy with Riverside
    To: “Wilson, Margaret” <Margaret.Wilson@liverpool.gov.uk>
    Cc: Contact-Us <Contact-Us@jobcentreplus.gsi.gov.uk>, CONTACT-US <CONTACT-US@dwp.gsi.gov.uk>

    Hi,

    ok, the Jobcentre haven’t sent my Jobseekers-allowance, for more than two months now, so maybe Mr. McEvoy can sort that at the same time then.

    Maybe you could send him an e-mail about this, so that I can get some money for the bus there?

    Because I don’t have money for eighter stamps or a bus-ticket, at the moment, (due to the problems with the Jobcentre, unfortunately).
    Best regards,

    Erik Ribsskog

    On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Wilson, Margaret <Margaret.Wilson@liverpool.gov.uk> wrote:

    Hi Erik

    You need to post or hand deliver the application form back to ;!

    Joe McEvoy | Employer Adviser 

    Edge Hill Jobcentre Plus, Kinglake House,

    Shenstone Street,
    Liverpool, L7 3PF

    please make sure that they fully complete Section 4 and fill in the questionnaire correctly

    Margaret
    Wilson

    Employer Liaison Officer

    Liverpool City Council I
    Municipal Buildings IDale Street I
    Liverpool I L2 2DH

    T: 0151 233 4645 M:07736883830 E: margaret.wilson@liverpool.gov.uk
    Online:
    www.liverpool.gov.uk
    ; www.liverpoolinwork@liverpool.gov.uk


    From: Erik Ribsskog

    [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
    Sent: 31 October 2012 13:58
    To: Wilson, Margaret
    Subject: Re: FW: Software Developer Vacancy with
    Riverside

    Hi,

    thank you very much for your e-mail!

    Is it ok if I scan the form, when I’ve finished filling it out, and e-mail it back to eighter you or the Jobcentre.

    Thanks in advance for any reply!

    Best regards,

    Erik Ribsskog

    On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 10:06 AM,

    Wilson, Margaret <Margaret.Wilson@liverpool.gov.uk> wrote:

    It’s worth mentioning that

    Iceland will not consider applicants with visible tatoos (hands, neck, face etc). – this is via Joe at jcp !!

    Sub client to core and email

    Iceland application form to client( I will email it to you all)

    To give your customer the best chance, please make sure that they fully complete

    Section 4 and fill in the questionnaire correctly!

    and return to

    Joe McEvoy | Employer Adviser 

    Edge Hill Jobcentre Plus, Kinglake House,

    Shenstone Street,
    Liverpool, L7 3PF

    Margaret
    Wilson

    Employer Liaison Officer

    Liverpool City Council I
    Municipal Buildings IDale Street I
    Liverpool I L2 2DH

    T: 0151 233 4645 M:07736883830 E:
    margaret.wilson@liverpool.gov.uk

    Online:
    www.liverpool.gov.uk
    ; www.liverpoolinwork@liverpool.gov.uk


    From:

    Donaldson, Emma
    Sent: 30 October 2012 14:01
    To: Wilson, Margaret
    Subject: FW: Software Developer Vacancy with
    Riverside

    FYI

    Emma Donaldson I
    Recruitment Advisor

    Liverpool City Council I Municipal Buildings I
    Dale Street I
    Liverpool I L2 2DH
    T: 0151 233 1933 M: 07964676421

    E:

    emma.donaldson@liverpool.gov.uk

    Online:
    www.liverpool.gov.uk
    I www.liverpoolinwork.org


    From:

    Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

    Sent: 29 October 2012 16:34
    To: Donaldson, Emma
    Cc: Melanie Wright
    Subject: Re: Software Developer Vacancy with
    Riverside

    Hi,

    thank you for your e-mail.


    I also wondered about the retail-assistant-jobs with
    Iceland, (Retail Assistant 607105):

    I wondered if you could please send me an application-form for that job.


    Thanks in advance for any help!

    Yours sincerely,


    Erik Ribsskog

    On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 4:02 PM,

    Donaldson, Emma <Emma.Donaldson@liverpool.gov.uk> wrote:

    Thank you for applying for the position of Software Developer with

    Riverside.

    Please can you visit the following site to apply and state that you saw the vacancy on

    Liverpool in Work website.

    You will need to register and download the job description.

    Good luck!

    Emma Donaldson I
    Recruitment Advisor

    Liverpool City Council I Municipal Buildings I
    Dale Street I
    Liverpool I L2 2DH
    T: 0151 223 1933 M: 07964676421

    E:

    emma.donaldson@liverpool.gov.uk

    Online:
    www.liverpool.gov.uk
    I www.liverpoolinwork.org


    ______________________________________________________________________
    DISCLAIMER:

    The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be read, copied or used only by the intended recipient(s). If you have received it in error please contact the sender immediately by returning the e-mail or by telephoning a number contained in the body
    of the e-mail then and please delete the e-mail without disclosing its contents elsewhere. No responsibility is accepted for loss or damage arising from viruses or changes made to this message after it was sent. The views contained in this email are those
    of the author and not necessarily those of the authors employer or service provider.

    This email has been automatically scanned for viruses and malicious content by MessageLabs for your protection
    ______________________________________________________________________


    ______________________________________________________________________
    This email has been automatically scanned for viruses and malicious content by MessageLabs for your protection
    ______________________________________________________________________


    ______________________________________________________________________
    DISCLAIMER:

    The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be read, copied or used only by the intended recipient(s). If you have received it in error please contact the sender immediately by returning the e-mail or by telephoning a number contained in the body
    of the e-mail then and please delete the e-mail without disclosing its contents elsewhere. No responsibility is accepted for loss or damage arising from viruses or changes made to this message after it was sent. The views contained in this email are those
    of the author and not necessarily those of the authors employer or service provider.

    This email has been automatically scanned for viruses and malicious content by MessageLabs for your protection
    ______________________________________________________________________


    ______________________________________________________________________
    This email has been automatically scanned for viruses and malicious content by MessageLabs for your protection
    ______________________________________________________________________



    ______________________________________________________________________
    DISCLAIMER:

    The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be read, copied or used only by the intended recipient(s). If you have received it in error please contact the sender immediately by returning the e-mail or by telephoning a number contained in the body of the e-mail then and please delete the e-mail without disclosing its contents elsewhere. No responsibility is accepted for loss or damage arising from viruses or changes made to this message after it was sent. The views contained in this email are those of the author and not necessarily those of the authors employer or service provider.

    This email has been automatically scanned for viruses and malicious content by MessageLabs for your protection
    ______________________________________________________________________

  • Enda mer om jobbsøking i England


    Gmail – FW: Software Developer Vacancy with Riverside

    Gmail


    Erik Ribsskog
    <eribsskog@gmail.com>



    FW: Software Developer Vacancy with Riverside



    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>


    Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 4:11 PM

    To:
    “Wilson, Margaret” <Margaret.Wilson@liverpool.gov.uk>

    Cc:
    Contact-Us <Contact-Us@jobcentreplus.gsi.gov.uk>, CONTACT-US <CONTACT-US@dwp.gsi.gov.uk>

    Bcc:
    Melanie Wright <MWright@ingeus.co.uk>

    Hi,

    ok, the Jobcentre haven’t sent my Jobseekers-allowance, for more than two months now, so maybe Mr. McEvoy can sort that at the same time then.

    Maybe you could send him an e-mail about this, so that I can get some money for the bus there?

    Because I don’t have money for eighter stamps or a bus-ticket, at the moment, (due to the problems with the Jobcentre, unfortunately).
    Best regards,

    Erik Ribsskog

    On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Wilson, Margaret <Margaret.Wilson@liverpool.gov.uk> wrote:

    Hi Erik

    You need to post or hand deliver the application form back to ;!

    Joe McEvoy | Employer Adviser 

    Edge Hill Jobcentre Plus, Kinglake House,

    Shenstone Street,
    Liverpool, L7 3PF

    please make sure that they fully complete Section 4 and fill in the questionnaire correctly

    Margaret
    Wilson

    Employer Liaison Officer

    Liverpool City Council I
    Municipal Buildings IDale Street I
    Liverpool I L2 2DH

    T: 0151 233 4645 M:07736883830 E: margaret.wilson@liverpool.gov.uk
    Online:
    www.liverpool.gov.uk
    ; www.liverpoolinwork@liverpool.gov.uk


    From: Erik Ribsskog

    [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
    Sent: 31 October 2012 13:58
    To: Wilson, Margaret
    Subject: Re: FW: Software Developer Vacancy with
    Riverside

    Hi,

    thank you very much for your e-mail!

    Is it ok if I scan the form, when I’ve finished filling it out, and e-mail it back to eighter you or the Jobcentre.

    Thanks in advance for any reply!

    Best regards,

    Erik Ribsskog

    On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 10:06 AM,

    Wilson, Margaret <Margaret.Wilson@liverpool.gov.uk> wrote:

    It’s worth mentioning that

    Iceland will not consider applicants with visible tatoos (hands, neck, face etc). – this is via Joe at jcp !!

    Sub client to core and email

    Iceland application form to client( I will email it to you all)

    To give your customer the best chance, please make sure that they fully complete

    Section 4 and fill in the questionnaire correctly!

    and return to

    Joe McEvoy | Employer Adviser 

    Edge Hill Jobcentre Plus, Kinglake House,

    Shenstone Street,
    Liverpool, L7 3PF

    Margaret
    Wilson

    Employer Liaison Officer

    Liverpool City Council I
    Municipal Buildings IDale Street I
    Liverpool I L2 2DH

    T: 0151 233 4645 M:07736883830 E:
    margaret.wilson@liverpool.gov.uk

    Online:
    www.liverpool.gov.uk
    ; www.liverpoolinwork@liverpool.gov.uk


    From:

    Donaldson, Emma
    Sent: 30 October 2012 14:01
    To: Wilson, Margaret
    Subject: FW: Software Developer Vacancy with
    Riverside

    FYI

    Emma Donaldson I
    Recruitment Advisor

    Liverpool City Council I Municipal Buildings I
    Dale Street I
    Liverpool I L2 2DH
    T: 0151 233 1933 M: 07964676421

    E:

    emma.donaldson@liverpool.gov.uk

    Online:
    www.liverpool.gov.uk
    I www.liverpoolinwork.org


    From:

    Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

    Sent: 29 October 2012 16:34
    To: Donaldson, Emma
    Cc: Melanie Wright
    Subject: Re: Software Developer Vacancy with
    Riverside

    Hi,

    thank you for your e-mail.


    I also wondered about the retail-assistant-jobs with
    Iceland, (Retail Assistant 607105):

    I wondered if you could please send me an application-form for that job.


    Thanks in advance for any help!

    Yours sincerely,


    Erik Ribsskog

    On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 4:02 PM,

    Donaldson, Emma <Emma.Donaldson@liverpool.gov.uk> wrote:

    Thank you for applying for the position of Software Developer with

    Riverside.

    Please can you visit the following site to apply and state that you saw the vacancy on

    Liverpool in Work website.

    You will need to register and download the job description.

    Good luck!

    Emma Donaldson I
    Recruitment Advisor

    Liverpool City Council I Municipal Buildings I
    Dale Street I
    Liverpool I L2 2DH
    T: 0151 223 1933 M: 07964676421

    E:

    emma.donaldson@liverpool.gov.uk

    Online:
    www.liverpool.gov.uk
    I www.liverpoolinwork.org


    ______________________________________________________________________
    DISCLAIMER:

    The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be read, copied or used only by the intended recipient(s). If you have received it in error please contact the sender immediately by returning the e-mail or by telephoning a number contained in the body
    of the e-mail then and please delete the e-mail without disclosing its contents elsewhere. No responsibility is accepted for loss or damage arising from viruses or changes made to this message after it was sent. The views contained in this email are those
    of the author and not necessarily those of the authors employer or service provider.

    This email has been automatically scanned for viruses and malicious content by MessageLabs for your protection
    ______________________________________________________________________


    ______________________________________________________________________
    This email has been automatically scanned for viruses and malicious content by MessageLabs for your protection
    ______________________________________________________________________


    ______________________________________________________________________
    DISCLAIMER:

    The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be read, copied or used only by the intended recipient(s). If you have received it in error please contact the sender immediately by returning the e-mail or by telephoning a number contained in the body
    of the e-mail then and please delete the e-mail without disclosing its contents elsewhere. No responsibility is accepted for loss or damage arising from viruses or changes made to this message after it was sent. The views contained in this email are those
    of the author and not necessarily those of the authors employer or service provider.

    This email has been automatically scanned for viruses and malicious content by MessageLabs for your protection
    ______________________________________________________________________


    ______________________________________________________________________
    This email has been automatically scanned for viruses and malicious content by MessageLabs for your protection
    ______________________________________________________________________



    ______________________________________________________________________
    DISCLAIMER:

    The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be read, copied or used only by the intended recipient(s). If you have received it in error please contact the sender immediately by returning the e-mail or by telephoning a number contained in the body of the e-mail then and please delete the e-mail without disclosing its contents elsewhere. No responsibility is accepted for loss or damage arising from viruses or changes made to this message after it was sent. The views contained in this email are those of the author and not necessarily those of the authors employer or service provider.

    This email has been automatically scanned for viruses and malicious content by MessageLabs for your protection
    ______________________________________________________________________

  • Mer om jobbsøking i England


    Gmail – eribsskog@gmail.com – CWJobs.co.uk – Applicant details for Java Developer – Manchester £40K – 391959-D

    Gmail


    Erik Ribsskog
    <eribsskog@gmail.com>



    eribsskog@gmail.com – CWJobs.co.uk – Applicant details for Java Developer – Manchester £40K – 391959-D



    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>


    Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 3:32 PM

    To:
    Melanie Wright <MWright@ingeus.co.uk>

    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: <cwjobs@cwjobsmail.co.uk>
    Date: Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 3:30 PM


    Subject: eribsskog@gmail.comCWJobs.co.uk – Applicant details for Java Developer – Manchester £40K – 391959-D
    To: GregLombard.59655.cwj@computerpeople.aplitrak.com
    Cc: eribsskog@gmail.com

    Sign In

    Advertise Now

    Buy Job Packs

    CWJobs

    NEW APPLICATION CONFIRMATION

    SIGN IN

    ADVERTISE NOW

    BUY JOB PACKS

    IT MARKET INDEX

    The following candidate has applied online for the position: Java Developer – Manchester £40K.

    Candidate email address: eribsskog@gmail.com.

    Candidate’s comments:

    Hi,

    I read about this vacany on CW Jobs and wanted to please apply for this job.

    I have good knowledge of Java from when I studied at Oslo Univeristy College, from 2002 to 2004, where I got a ‘B’ in Programming, (using Java), and also a ‘B’ in Programme Development, (using Java).

    I also have knowledge of Unix/Linux, Apache, HTML, SQL Server from studying IT at Oslo University College, (from 2002 to 2004), and from studying at Norwegian College of Information Technology, (1989/90 and 1991/92).

    I also have knowledge of Windows and XML from working with web-shops, ([url removed] this year and last. (And I also went on a course in Windows NT Core Tech, at Global Knowledge Network, in Oslo, in 1998).

    I attach my CV and hope to hear back from you!

    Yours sincerely,


    Erik Ribsskog

    I confirm that I am eligible to live and work in the UK

    If the candidate has supplied a CV it will be attached to this email.

    Please provide your feedback to eribsskog@gmail.com.

    Thank you for advertising on CWJobs.

    Totaljobs Group
    Holden House, 57 Rathbone Place, London W1T 1JU
    Registered in England & Wales under company number 04269861


    eribsskog_311020120330.doc
    33K

  • Jeg sendte en ny e-post til Barclays


    Gmail – Update/Fwd: Home Insurance (KMM1968006I30836L0KM)

    Gmail


    Erik Ribsskog
    <eribsskog@gmail.com>



    Update/Fwd: Home Insurance (KMM1968006I30836L0KM)



    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>


    Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 3:03 PM

    To:
    internethelp@barclays.com

    Hi,


    I’m also in contact with a Nordic insurance-company, (IF), at the moment.

    And they have a general enquiry e-mail address on their web-site, (in case people wants to send them attachments, etc), so I think it’s strange that Barclays are this stubborn.

    Just as an update.

    Regards,

    Erik Ribsskog
    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

    Date: Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 11:53 AM
    Subject: Re: Home Insurance (KMM1968006I30836L0KM)
    To: Internethelp <internethelp@barclays.com>

    Hi,

    I don’t understand why you can’t just deal with this by e-mail.

    Is it something you don’t want me to have documentation about since you want my mobile-number?

    This seems very strange to me.

    Erik Ribsskog

    On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 8:31 AM, Internethelp <internethelp@barclays.com> wrote:

    Dear  Mr. Ribsskog ,

    Thank you for your email dated 30/10/12.

    As we have previously advised we can not email the Insurance Department on your behalf.

    If you would like for us to escalate this on your behalf then we will need to log this as a complaint. If you would like for us to progress this
    for you then please contact us again providing us with the following information:

    Your contact telephone number and a preferred time of contact, your full postal code and the last four digits of your Barclays sorting code
    number please. If your complaint is in regards to a Barclays business account can you please supply your business name and your full postal
    code.

    If you are not currently a Barclays customer please only provide your contact telephone number, preferred time of contact and your full postal
    code.

    As soon as this information is received, your complaint will be forwarded to the relevant area for investigation. For security reasons, we are
    obliged to respond to your complaint in writing.

    Alternatively please visit a local Barclays branch if convenient to do so, call our Customer Services Team.

    Personal Customers call: 0845 7 555 555
    Business Customers call: 0845 605 2345
    International Customers call: +44 24 7684 2099

    All available 07:00 – 23:00 (UK times) seven days a week.

    As a further alternative please write to the following address:

    Barclays Bank plc
    Leicester
    LE87 2BB

    Yours sincerely,

    Michelle O’Dowd
    Barclays Bank PLC

    Original Message Follows:
    ————————

    Hi,

    I don’t really want to complain.

    I just want you to send the e-mail to your insurance-department, and to give me a loan, please.

    The Jobcentre owes me more than £700 and I have no other income, so I’m going to need money for electricity etc., in a while.

    Thanks in advance for any help!

    Best regards,

    Erik Ribsskog

    On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Internethelp <internethelp@barclays.com> wrote:

    Dear  Mr. Ribsskog,

     Thank you for your email dated 30/10/12.

     For us to be able to progress with your complaint could you please contact us again providing us with the following information:

     Your contact telephone number and a preferred time of contact, your full postal code and the last four digits of your Barclays sorting code
     number please. If your complaint is in regards to a Barclays business account can you please supply your business name and your full postal
     code.

     If you are not currently a Barclays customer please only provide your contact telephone number, preferred time of contact and your full postal
     code.

     As soon as this information is received, your complaint will be forwarded to the relevant area for investigation. For security reasons, we are
     obliged to respond to your complaint in writing.

     We value your feedback and are sorry that you have experienced dissatisfaction on this occasion.

     Please see our website for further information on how we deal with complaints:
     http://www.personal.barclays.co.uk/BRC1/jsp/brccontrol?task=articlegroup&site=pfs&value=3659&menu=3136

     —————–

     Our website : http://www.barclays.co.uk

     Yours sincerely,

     Michelle O’Dowd
     Barclays Bank PLC

     Original Message Follows:
     ————————

     Hi,

     you haven’t exactly adviced that, I think.

     But it’s the details in the first forwarded e-mail in this e-mail that is the case I wonder if I can get some compensation for.

     I also have two small businesses, (that’s why the Jobcentre mess with my jobseekers-allowance, because they lack business-skills, I think, and
     have no real understanding of budgeting and book-keeping), so I could need a loan from Barclays as well, both for my private budget and my
     businesses, since the Jobcentre have started messing with me, and haven’t sent me my Jobseekers Allowance for more than two months.

     For no good reason for me, since both these businesses run in minus.

     But if you could be so kind as to send my case, (in the first e-mail in this e-mail), to your Insurance-department.

      And if Barclays also could please let me have a loan.

     I’m still a bit depressed from the loan-meeting, in 2006, in Barclays, in Water St., in Liverpool.

     So I hope you can just give me a loan online.

     Hope this is alright!

     Yours sincerely,

     Erik Ribsskog

     On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 8:17 AM, Internethelp <internethelp@barclays.com> wrote:

     Dear Mr. Ribsskog ,

      Thank you for your email dated 29/10/12.

      We reiterate that there is no email address which we can give, to customers, since this email service is not secure and we cannot, therefore,
      take action on instructions received by this method.

      Whilst written correspondence may appear to be less secure the high volumes of mail do give a level of anonymity and security.

      As previously advised we will be happy to forward this issue to our Customer Care Team for investigation on receipt of the details requested

      Yours sincerely,
      Mike Coy
      Barclays Bank PLC

      Original Message Follows:
      ————————

      Hi,

      I don’t have money for stamps now, you see.

      Since the Jobcentre are messing with my jobseekers-allowance.

      But maybe Barclays could let me have a loan untill the burocrats are finished doing their stuff.

      But I guess it’s no point asking for a loan from you, since I’ve tried that earlier, in 2006, I think it must have been.

      It also seems unlikely to me that a Barclays-department doesn’t have an e-mail address.

      It seems strange to me that you can’t forward them my e-mail.

      Do you think letters are more secure than e-mails?

      It’s also possible to imagine that letters might be insecure.

      It’s known that letters can be opened if one put them over steam.

      Then the glue is going to disolve, and one can read the letter.

      And then put the letter back, and glue the envelope again.

      So I don’t think you correspondance-policy make much sense, unfortunately.

      As far as I can see it at least.

      Regards,

      Erik Ribsskog

      On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 9:10 AM, Internethelp <internethelp@barclays.com> wrote:

      Dear  Erik Ribsskog,

       Thank you for your email dated 26/10/12.

       We have to advise that the Home Insurance Team do not have an email address therefore we are unable to forward this to them.

       We use the email service to give general advice and do not discuss anything of a confidential nature.

       We would like to advise that we are aware that there are plans to introduce a secure email service in the near future but do not have any
       timescales at this time.

       If you would like for us to log this as a complaint for you then  contact us again providing us with the following information:

       Your contact telephone number and a preferred time of contact, your full postal code and the last four digits of your Barclays sorting code
       number please. If your complaint is in regards to a Barclays business account can you please supply your business name and your full postal
       code.

       If you are not currently a Barclays customer please only provide your contact telephone number, preferred time of contact and your full
    postal
       code.

       As soon as this information is received, your complaint will be forwarded to the relevant area for investigation. For security reasons, we
    are
       obliged to respond to your complaint in writing.

       We value your feedback and are sorry that you have experienced dissatisfaction on this occasion.

       Please see our website for further information on how we deal with complaints:
       http://www.personal.barclays.co.uk/BRC1/jsp/brccontrol?task=articlegroup&site=pfs&value=3659&menu=3136

       —————–

       Our website : http://www.barclays.co.uk

       Yours sincerely,

       Michelle O’Dowd
       Barclays Bank PLC

       Original Message Follows:
       ————————

       Hi,

       I don’t ask for a customer accessalbe e-mail address.

       I ask for you to send my e-mail to them.

       So I’m not asking for they’re e-mail address.

       Further, if e-mails aren’t secure why do you use them yourselves?

       This doesn’t make any sense.

       I think Barclays have a confusing policy when it comes to correspondence, and I wanted to complain about this.

       Best regards,

       Erik Ribsskog

       On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 2:30 PM, Internethelp <internethelp@barclays.com> wrote:

       Dear Erik Ribsskog,

        Thank you for your email dated 26/10/12.

        We have to advise that we can not forward your email on to the Insurance Department as they do not have a customer accessible email address
        since the email service is not secure.

        We apologise for the inconvenience that this may cause

        Yours sincerely,

        Michelle O’Dowd
        Barclays Bank PLC

        Original Message Follows:
        ————————

        Hi,

        they don’t have an e-mail address?

        Is this the stone-age?

        I’m a bit frustrated now since the Jobcentre has started messing with my Jobseekers Allowance and you tell me you don’t know how to send
        e-mails?

        Erik Ribsskog

        On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Internethelp <internethelp@barclays.com> wrote:

        Dear Erik Ribsskog,

         Thank you for your email dated 25/10/12.

         We have to advise that we are unable to forward this on to the Home Insurance Department as they do not have access to customer email.

         As previously advised you will need to contact them by telephone or by sending this in writing to the address that was provided in our
       previous
         email to you.

         Once again we apologise for the inconvenience that this has caused you.

         Yours sincerely,

         Michelle O’Dowd
         Barclays Bank PLC

         Original Message Follows:
         ————————

         Hi,

         are you telling me that you can’t forward my e-mail to the right Barclays-deparment?

         This seems very strange to me.

         Some years ago regular post was called ‘snail mail’, that’s why I wanted to send this by e-mail.

         It’s more practical and I haven’t got much money for postage now since the Jobcentre are messing with my jobseekers-allowance.

         This is bad customer-support from Barclays, I think.

         Erik Ribsskog

         On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 9:20 AM, Internethelp <internethelp@barclays.com> wrote:

         Dear Mr. Ribsskog ,

          Thank you for your email dated 17/5/12.

          We at the Online Banking Helpdesk (the area in receipt of your e-mail) have only limited access to your account details and are unable to
         assist
          with this type of request. Please accept our apologies for any inconvenience this may cause.
          Additionally we are not able to direct this query to your branch as it has been received by e-mail, which is considered a non secure
    method
       of
          communication.

          We would suggest that you send your request, in writing, to:

          Home Insurance Claim
          Barclays Bank plc
          Leicester
          Leics.         LE87 2BB
          ———————–

          Yours sincerely,
          Mike Coy
          Barclays Bank PLC

          Original Message Follows:
          ————————

          Hi,

          I’d like to deal with this in writing please, if it’s alright.

          So if you could please just forward this e-mail to your Home Insurance-department?

          Thanks in advance for any help!

          Best regards,

          Erik Ribsskog

          On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 11:49 AM, Internethelp <internethelp@barclays.com> wrote:

          Dear Erik Ribsskog,

          Thank you for your email dated 13/5/12.

          Due to the nature of your query, can you please contact the Home Insurance Department direct on the number below:

          Home Insurance: General Enquiries – 0800 0150 246 or from overseas  0044 800 027 9844.
          Monday – Friday 08:00 – 22:00, Saturday 08:00 – 18:00, Sunday & Bank Holidays 10:00 – 16:00 (all UK times).

          Home Insurance: Claims -08000279844 or from overseas 0044 800 027 9844 (24 hours, 365 days a year)

          Home Insurance: Quotes – Barclays Insurance Services on 0800 068 1696.Monday – Friday 08:00 – 21:00, Saturday 09:00 – 17:00, Sunday 10:00

          16:00 (all UK times).

          We hope this resolves your query.

          —————–

          Our website : http://www.barclays.co.uk

          Yours sincerely,
          Kirsty Jeremiah
          Barclays Bank plc

          Original Message Follows:
          ————————

          Hi,

          i had a Home Insurance, when I lived in Leather Lane.

          I’ve been the victim of fraud, from my landlord, and have had problems getting income-support, from the Council, so I suddently didn’t
    have
        the
           founds to afford the Home Insurance any longer.

          Now I’ve been thrown out, (by Liverpool County Court), after an unfair trail, last automn.

          The Landlord, (Imperial Properites/T. J. Thomas), don’t want to give me my stuff and deposit.

          They’ve also done fraud, because payments that they collected by their representative George, on my door, for half a year, or so, isn’t on
       the
          rent-statement.

          Also I had to walk through a restaurant, to throw my garbage, and the disco next door, (G-bar), played load music four nights a week.

          This was going on from 2006 to 2011.

          And I had Home Insurance the first of these years, when my economy allowed it.

          I wonder if I have the right to get some sort of compensation from my Home Insurance, that I had with you, some years ago.

          Have been thrown out many times, unfairly, since 2011, and haven’t got to contact you about this earlier.

          I’m no lawyer but I think that perhaps the Home Insurance that I had with you could compensate me, (at least some), since I had it for
      around
           two of these years.

          Hope this is alright!

          Yours sincerely,

          Erik Ribsskog
          This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and intended
          solely for the addressee and may also be privileged or exempt from
           disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the addressee, or
          have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender
          immediately, delete it from your system and do not copy, disclose
          or otherwise act upon any part of this e-mail or its attachments.

          Internet communications are not guaranteed to be secure or
          virus-free.
          The Barclays Group does not accept responsibility for any loss
          arising from unauthorised access to, or interference with, any
          Internet communications by any third party, or from the
           transmission of any viruses. Replies to this e-mail may be
          monitored by the Barclays Group for operational or business
          reasons.

          Any opinion or other information in this e-mail or its attachments
          that does not relate to the business of the Barclays Group is
           personal to the sender and is not given or endorsed by the Barclays
          Group.

          Barclays Bank PLC. Registered in England and Wales (registered no.
          1026167).
          Registered Office: 1 Churchill Place, London, E14 5HP, United
           Kingdom.

          Barclays Bank PLC is authorised and regulated by the Financial
          Services Authority.

  • Mer om jobbsøking i England


    Gmail – DEPUTY STORE MANAGER

    Gmail


    Erik Ribsskog
    <eribsskog@gmail.com>



    DEPUTY STORE MANAGER



    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>


    Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 2:46 PM

    To:
    Recruitment <Recruitment@bmstores.co.uk>

    Cc:
    Melanie Wright <MWright@ingeus.co.uk>

    Hi,

    this is a job in Bolton, that I saw on the Jobcentre web-site, with the Jobcentre reference: BOL/119796.
    But I would also be interested in jobs at Merseyside, of course.

    It’s just that I sometimes apply for a lot of jobs, while I’m at it, at am used with comuting in earlier jobs.
    I’m attaching my CV again, and hope to hear back from you!

    Best regards,


    Erik Ribsskog

    On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 12:30 PM, Recruitment <Recruitment@bmstores.co.uk> wrote:

    Please reply stating the job reference and location of the

    vacancy, and where you saw it advertised. Also please reattach your CV.

    Thankyou

    B&M Retail Recruitment

    Tel: 0151 728 5400 ext 5675

    From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

    Sent: 24 October 2012 13:11
    To: Recruitment
    Cc: Melanie Wright
    Subject: DEPUTY STORE MANAGER

    Hi,

    I read about this vacancy on the Jobcentre website, and I

    wanted to please apply for this job.

    I’ve worked as a Shop Manager for four years, in Rimi,

    (owned by ICA and Ahold), in Norway, and one of the shops I ran, (Rimi
    Kalbakken), was one of the biggest Rimi-shops in Oslo, with a turn-over of
    around £90.000 a week.

    I’ve also worked for four years as an assistant, in Rimi in

    Norway, and two years as a Key Holder, (part-time), after I started studying
    again, (at Oslo University College), in 2002.

    I’ve gone to business-school at Upper Secondary-level, and

    I’ve also studied Information Management, (including many business-modules), at
    Norwegian College of Information Technology, in the late eighties and early
    nineties.

    I attach my CV and hope to hear back from you!

    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog


    CV – Erik Ribsskog.doc
    33K

  • Jeg sendte enda en e-post til Tilsynsrådet for advokatvirksomhet


    Gmail – VS: Klage på advokatforeningen/Fwd: Tull med Advokatforeningen/Fwd: Klage på advokat Rukke/Fwd: Klage Advokat.no/Fwd: Oppdatering/Fwd: Klage på surr/Fwd: Klage på Advokatfor eningen/Fwd: Hewan Negassi/Fwd: Din henvendelse til Advokatforeningen

    Gmail


    Erik Ribsskog
    <eribsskog@gmail.com>



    VS: Klage på advokatforeningen/Fwd: Tull med Advokatforeningen/Fwd: Klage på advokat
    Rukke/Fwd: Klage Advokat.no/Fwd: Oppdatering/Fwd: Klage på surr/Fwd: Klage på Advokatfor
    eningen/Fwd: Hewan Negassi/Fwd: Din henvendelse til Advokatforeningen



    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>


    Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 2:32 PM

    To:
    Jonas Haugsvold <JoHa@tilsynet.no>

    Cc:
    Mona Mjøen McKiernan <mmm@advokatforeningen.no>, Leder av Jussformidlingen <leder@jussformidlingen.no>, Postmottak@domstoladministrasjonen.no, kundeservice@if.no

    Hei,

    nei jeg har jo sendt om dette, til IF forsikring nå.
    Jeg har jo en fetter, som jobber der.
    Er det riktig av meg å sende det til IF forsikring da?

    Jeg har ikke hatt mye med min fetter Tommy Andre Løff Olsen å gjøre, siden oppveksten.

    Han var en nabo, på Bergeråsen, hvor jeg måtte bo alene, fra jeg var ni år.

    Jeg er redd for at han vil hjelpe min far og/eller Svelvik kommune, ved å tulle med min erstatningssak, i IF.
    Hva er vanlig å gjøre i sånne tilfeller, når man har en inhabil fetter som jobber i forsikringsselskapet?

    Mvh.

    Erik Ribsskog

    2012/10/31 Jonas Haugsvold <JoHa@tilsynet.no>

    Det vises til din e-post av 19.10.2012.

    Som tidligere nevnt i vår e-post av 3.9.2012 kan vi ikke bistå deg i denne saken.

    Vennlig hilsen

    Jonas Haugsvold

    Rådgiver

    Tilsynsrådet for advokatvirksomhet

    Postboks 720 Sentrum, 0106 Oslo | Rådhusgt. 23
    Tlf: 22 00 75 02 | Sentralbord: 22 00 75 00
    *  post@tilsynet.no   þ  www.tilsynet.no

    Fra: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

    Sendt: 19. oktober 2012 13:27
    Til: Tilsynsrådet for Advokatvirksomhet
    Kopi: post@advokatforeningen.no
    Emne: Klage på advokatforeningen/Fwd: Tull med Advokatforeningen/Fwd: Klage på advokat Rukke/Fwd: Klage Advokat.no/Fwd: Oppdatering/Fwd: Klage på surr/Fwd: Klage på Advokatforeningen/Fwd: Hewan Negassi/Fwd: Din henvendelse til Advokatforeningen

    Hei,
    jeg har prøvd å klage på Advokat.no, til Advokatforeningen.


    Jeg fikk svar at jeg måtte klage på advokat Rukke.
    Og nå, så svarer Advokat.no for advokat Rukke.

    Jeg synes dette blir uklart.
    Dette blir som noe samrøre, som går over hue på vanlige folk, som meg.

    Jeg har ikke lyst til å være med å legitimere den prosessen hos Advokatforeningen mer.

    Så jeg sender bare til dere.


    Jeg ber om at jeg får erstatning som hvis omsorgssvikt-saken min hadde blitt vunnet i retten.

    Jeg har tidligere sendt dere oppdateringer.


    Min far lot meg bo alene som barn, uten at kommunen, (Svelvik), brøyt inn.

    Jeg fikk noen tusen i Fri Rettshjelp, fra FMOA.

    Jeg sendte en e-post til Advokat.no og spurte om å få en advokat i Drammen, siden det er den byen de jobber fra som er nærmest Svelvik.


    Jeg fikk istedet advokat Rukke, i Oslo.

    Jeg tenkte at det var greit.

    Men så senere at hun ikke stod oppført som ekspert på barnevern, noe mange andre advokater hos dem gjorde, på deres nettside.


    Da mistet jeg tilliten til Rukke, som jeg heller ikke syntes at fikk gjort noe konstruktivt, for den frie rettshjelpen, min.

    Så min klage var at Advokat.no ga saken min til en advokat som ikke var ekspert på feltet.


    Senere sier Advokat.no at hun var ekspert.

    Men hvorfor opplyste de ikke meg om det før, da?

    De sa dette til Advokatforeningen, og ikke til meg.

    Og når Rukke sluttet i jobben, uten å gjøre ferdig min sak.

    Så fikk jeg ikke tilbud om ny advokat, fra Advokat.no.


    Og andre advokatfirma vil ikke røre den saken nå.
    Så jeg synes dette kan virke som sabotasje.

    Advokat.no virka fiendtlige i sine svar til Advokatforeningen, synes jeg.

    De sier at de trodde at jeg ikke ville ha mer med de å gjøre, siden jeg klagde på Rukke.

    Så derfor tilbydde de meg ikke ny advokat.

    Ok, jeg har jobbet på Rimi.


    Hvis en kunde klager på at melka er sur, så tilbyr jeg ikke ny melk, siden jeg regna med at kunden ville begynne å handle på Rema.


    Det blir noe goddag mann økseskaft, over det her.
    Når jeg vil klage på Advokat.no og ikke får lov.


    Og så svarer Advokat.no på klagen, på Rukke.

    Da blir det så mye surr og samrøre.


    Så da må man nesten være advokat, for å holde tunga rett i munnen, tror jeg.


    Dette surret vil ikke jeg være med på.

    Så jeg sender dette til Tilsynsrådet for advokatvirksomhet.

    Så håper jeg at jeg får erstatning her.


    Mvh.

    Erik Ribsskog

    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
    Date: 2012/9/28
    Subject: Tull med Advokatforeningen/Fwd: Klage på advokat Rukke/Fwd: Klage Advokat.no/Fwd: Oppdatering/Fwd: Klage på surr/Fwd: Klage på Advokatforeningen/Fwd: Hewan Negassi/Fwd: Din henvendelse til Advokatforeningen

    To: Ernst.Moe@domstol.no
    Cc: Jeppe Normann <J.Normann@selmer.no>, Mona Mjøen McKiernan <mmm@advokatforeningen.no>, post@tilsynet.no

    Hei,

    nå er det tull her.

    Nå har Advokatforeningen fått meg til å klage på advokaten.

    (En klage jeg syntes at ble svakere enn en klage på advokatfirmaet).

    Også får jeg et skriv nå, hvor advokat.no sier de ‘eier’ saken.

    Hvorfor sier Advokatforeningen at dette går på advokat.

    Mens advokatfirmaet sier at de eier saken.

    Hvordan dette fungerer har ikke Advokatforeningen forklart for meg, mener jeg.

    Jeg vil klage på at dere ikke har fortalt meg at advokatfirmaet liksom eier saken.

    Dette har dere ignorert.


    For dere vil at jeg skal klage på advokaten.
    Mens dere godtar et svar fra advokatfirmaet.


    Her er det veldig bakvendt-land fra Advokatforeningen, mener jeg.
    Det er som at det bare er tull og tøys og idioti, synes jeg.

    Med hilsen,

    Erik Ribsskog

    PS.


    Sender med brev jeg fikk i dag fra Advokatforeningen.

    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
    Date: 2012/8/23
    Subject: Klage på advokat Rukke/Fwd: Klage Advokat.no/Fwd: Oppdatering/Fwd: Klage på surr/Fwd: Klage på Advokatforeningen/Fwd: Hewan Negassi/Fwd: Din henvendelse til Advokatforeningen
    To: Disiplinærnemnden for advokater <nemnden@jus.no>

    Hei,

    jeg får klage på advokaten da, siden lederen for Disiplinærnmenden mener at det er riktig.

    Jeg har tidligere fått beskjed om at det er greit at jeg sender til dere på e-post siden jeg bor i utlandet, så jeg prøver å skrive klagen i denne e-posten:

    1.

    Advokat Rukke påtok seg min sak enda hun ikke var ekspert på feltet, (barnevern), og det fantes flere eksperter på feltet barnevern i samme advokatfirma.

    (Jeg ble ikke opplyst om at advokat Rukke ikke var ekspert på barnevern, (og at det fantes flere sånne eksperter på samme avdeling som hun jobbet), men jeg fant senere ut om dette, på nettsidene, til Advokat.no.


    Jeg henvendte meg til Advokat.no på e-post, og spurte om jeg kunne få en advokat i Drammen, siden Drammens-avdelingen deres, er den avdelingen deres, som ligger nærmest Svelvik kommune, som jeg har en sak mot.

    Men jeg ble tilbud Rukke i Oslo.

    Jeg svarte at det var vel hipp som happ, om advokaten var i Oslo eller Drammen.


    Men jeg ble senere sur da jeg så på nettsidene, til Advokat.no, at denne advokat Rukke ikke var ekspert på barnevern, samtidig som at Advokat.no hadde en drøss advokater som var nettopp ekspert på barnevern.


    Da eksploderte jeg nesten, for å si det sånn.

    For jeg hadde også min tvil, til hvor effektivt, som Rukke jobbet.


    Og når jeg så det at de hadde eksperter på barnevern, som kunne ha gjort jobben mer effektivt, for den Fri Rettshjelp-støtten, som jeg har blitt tildelt, i denne saken, fra Fylkesmannen i Oslo og Akershus, så ble jeg irritert).

    2.

    Advokat Rukke sluttet i jobben sin, uten å gjøre ferdig saken min, (og uten at jeg ble tilbudt ny advokat av Advokat.no, som jo har flere eksperter på barnevern som jeg har skrevet om, under punkt 1).

    Jeg sliter fortsatt med å få ny advokat, til å ta den saken her nå, enda jeg har sendt dette til flere andre advokater i Drammen og Oslo nå, siden jeg fikk e-posten fra Advokat.no om at Rukke hadde sluttet.

    Jeg mener at hu burde vel ha gjort ferdig de sakene hu hadde, før hu slutta i jobben.

    Og jeg synes også at det minste Advokat.no burde ha gjort, var å tilby meg en ny advokat, med barnevern som ekspert-felt, etter at det stokket seg sånn, på det første forsøket.

    Bare si fra til meg hvis det er noe jeg har glemt å forklare om, i denne klagen.


    Mvh.

    Erik Ribsskog

    ———- Forwarded message ———-

    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
    Date: 2012/8/22
    Subject: Re: Klage Advokat.no/Fwd: Oppdatering/Fwd: Klage på surr/Fwd: Klage på Advokatforeningen/Fwd: Hewan Negassi/Fwd: Din henvendelse til Advokatforeningen
    To: “Moe, Ernst” <Ernst.Moe@domstol.no>
    Cc: Merete Smith <ms@advokatforeningen.no>

    Hei,

    takk for svar!

    Men jeg synes det er en uskikk, at det bare er advokater, som kan klages inn.

    Jeg synes at klagen min blir mye svakere, når den rettes mot advokaten.

    Dette startet jo da jeg sendte e-post til Advokat.no, og ikke da Advokat.no ga meg den og den advokaten, synes jeg.
    Jeg kan forklare:
    1.

    Advokat.no ga meg en advokat, som ikke var ekspert på det området, som jeg trengte advokat innen.

    Enda de hadde flere sånne eksperter, i samme kontorlandskap/adresse.
    2.

    Den ‘inkompetente’ advokaten slutter, og Advokat.no tilbyr meg ikke ny advokat.

    Altså det blir en sterkere klage enn:

    1. Advokaten tok på seg mitt oppdrag på tross av at det fantes andre advokater i samme firma med bedre kompetanse på området som min sak gjaldt.

    2. Advokaten sluttet i jobben uten å gjøre ferdig min sak.

    Her forsvinner jo advokatfirmaets ansvar.
    Skal ikke folk beskyttes mot tulling fra advokatfirma da?


    Det er svakt at folk ikke blir beskyttet mot tulling fra advokatfirma _også_, synes jeg.

    Mvh.

    Erik Ribsskog

    2012/8/22 Moe, Ernst <Ernst.Moe@domstol.no>

    Erik Ribskog

    Du finner informasjon om klageadgang og fremgangsmåte på advokatforeningens hjemmeside. Der finner du også Regler for god advokatskikk og Advokatforskriften. Det er bare advokater (personer) som kan klages inn for disiplinærorganene.

    Mvh
    Ernst Moe

    Fra: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

    Sendt: 22. august 2012 14:05
    Til: Moe, Ernst
    Kopi: ms@advokatforeningen.no
    Emne: Klage Advokat.no/Fwd: Oppdatering/Fwd: Klage på surr/Fwd: Klage på Advokatforeningen/Fwd: Hewan Negassi/Fwd: Din henvendelse til Advokatforeningen

    Hei,
    jeg fant denne e-post-adressen ved å bruke Google.

    ms@advokatforeningen.no klarer visst ikke å gi meg e-post adressen din, så jeg måtte gjøre det sånn.
    Jeg vil klage på Advokat.no til Displinærnemden, for jeg synes det er mer hensiktsmessig, enn å klage på en bestemt advokat, i denne saken.

    Men noen advokater som ikke sier hva deres rolle er i advokatforeningen/disiplinærnemden, driver å motsier hverandre.

    Når det gjelder hvem som skal avgjøre om det er greit å klage på Advokat.no.
    En medarbeider skrev at dette er en Disiplinærnemd-avgjørelse.


    Jeg vil derfor høre dette fra Disiplinærnemnden og ikke fra folk som bare utgir seg for å representere den.
    Kan jeg klage på Advokat.no?

    Hvis det er greit, så forklar meg hvordan jeg kan sende klagen.

    Mvh.

    Erik Ribsskog

    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

    Date: 2012/8/22
    Subject: Oppdatering/Fwd: Klage på surr/Fwd: Klage på Advokatforeningen/Fwd: Hewan Negassi/Fwd: Din henvendelse til Advokatforeningen
    To: ms@advokatforeningen.no

    Hei,

    i dag fikk jeg et brev fra ei Elisabeth Wille, som sier hun er advokat.

    Men det må være ei ‘sabotøse’ som har lest på bloggen min, og tuller, tror jeg.


    For jeg har jo sent dette til generalsekretær ms@advokatforeningen.no.

    Jeg kan ikke se at vedkommende sabotøse er medlem av Disiplinærnemnden engang.

    Nå må dere slutte å tulle!

    La meg sende til disiplærnemnden nå.

    Og slutt å foreta deres arbeid på maur, (byråkrat)-nivå.

    Dette er MI6 og CIA og det som verre er, frykter jeg.

    Skjerpings!

    Vedlegger brevet det er snakkings om.


    Erik Ribsskog
    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

    Date: 2012/8/8
    Subject: Klage på surr/Fwd: Klage på Advokatforeningen/Fwd: Hewan Negassi/Fwd: Din henvendelse til Advokatforeningen
    To: ms@advokatforeningen.no

    Hei,

    jeg sender denne klagen til generalsekretæren, og satser på at det er riktig.
    Jeg har først blitt opplyst om at jeg kan sende på e-post, og så har dette blitt forandret til vanlig post.
    Dessuten, jeg prøver å klage på Advokat.no, til Disiplinærnemden.

    Men byråkratene stopper klagen.

    Den kommer ikke fram dit.


    For byråkratene begynner å behandle klagen.

    (Noe de selv har sagt de ikke har myndighet til).


    Kan du være så snill og se på dette.

    Egentlig så hadde jeg tenkt å sende dette, til lederen for Advokatforeningen.


    Men jeg fant ikke e-post adressen til lederen deres, på nettsidene deres.

    Mvh.

    Erik Ribsskog

    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: Jeppe Normann <J.Normann@selmer.no>

    Date: 2012/8/7
    Subject: SV: Klage på Advokatforeningen/Fwd: Hewan Negassi/Fwd: Din henvendelse til Advokatforeningen
    To: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

    Alle opplysninger og kontaktinfo til Advokatforeningen finner du på nettet.

    Med vennlig hilsen

    Jeppe Normann

    Advokat –leder disiplinærutvalget Oslo krets

    Fra: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

    Sendt: 6. august 2012 16:23
    Til: Jeppe Normann
    Emne: Re: Klage på Advokatforeningen/Fwd: Hewan Negassi/Fwd: Din henvendelse til Advokatforeningen

    Hei,
    den er grei.

    Men hvem er leder for Advokatforeningen?

    Kan jeg være så snill å få e-post adressen til lederen der.


    For jeg synes at de ‘fotsoldatene’ hans surrer så mye.
    Så det vil jeg gjerne klage på da.

    Mvh.

    Erik Ribsskog

    2012/8/6 Jeppe Normann <J.Normann@selmer.no>
    Jeg har ikke fått besvart denne tidligere på grunn av ferieavvikling.

    Alle klager på advokater skal sendes til advokatforeningen, som ivaretar sekreteriatfunksjonene for disiplinærmyndighetene.

    Jeg ber således om at alle henvendelser rettes dit.

    Med vennlig hilsen

    Jeppe Normannleder disiplinærutvalget for Oslo Krets

    Fra: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

    Sendt: 30. juli 2012 13:56
    Til: Jeppe Normann
    Emne: Klage på Advokatforeningen/Fwd: Hewan Negassi/Fwd: Din henvendelse til Advokatforeningen

    Hei,
    jeg synes at Advokatforeningen vimser så mye, så jeg klager til leder for Disiplinærnemden, for Oslo.

    1. Advokatforeningen sier først at jeg kan sende på e-post, og så sier de at jeg må sende pr. brev.

    De kan ikke forandre på det de sier, mener jeg.

    2. Advokatforeningen sier at det er Disiplinærnemnden som bestemmer om klagen kan godtas.

    Likevel så sier de at jeg ikke kan klage på et advokatkontor.
    Jeg mener at her passer det best å klage på advokatkontoret.


    Og vil ha en saklig vurdering av klagen, fra Disiplinærnemnden.

    Likevel så stopper Advokatforeningen klagen min før den når fram til Disiplinærnemnden.

    Så derfor denne e-posten.


    Klagen på advokat.no er som følger:

    1.

    Jeg ba om en advokat i Drammen, og fikk en i Oslo.

    Men seinere så fant jeg ut, at denne advokaten ikke var spesialist i barnevernssaker, som min sak gikk på, (jeg fikk Fri Rettshjelp fra Fylkesmannen i Oslo og Akershus).


    Advokat.no hadde derimot mange advokater som var spesialister på nettopp barnevern, (så jeg på deres nettsider).

    Så dette var som noe helt meningsløst for meg, det blir som at hvis man leverer en bil på verkstedet, også er det elektrikeren som lakkerer bilen.


    Da er det noe galt noe sted.

    Men da har sikkert sjefen til elektrikeren beordret han å gjøre dette.

    Så derfor er klagen på Advokat.no og ikke advokat Rukke.

    2.

    Da Rukke sluttet i jobben sin, så fikk jeg ikke noe ny advokat av Advokat.no.

    De bare kastet meg på dør, så og si.


    Jeg synes at både punkt 1 og 2 er brudd på god advokatskikk.
    Mvh.

    Erik Ribsskog

    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
    Date: 2012/7/30
    Subject: Re: Hewan Negassi/Fwd: Din henvendelse til Advokatforeningen
    To: Disiplinærnemnden for advokater <nemnden@jus.no>

    Hei,

    jeg synes dere vingler så mye.


    Du skrev i den forrige korrespondansen din at det var Disiplinærnemnden som avgjorde om man godta en klage på et advokatkontor.


    Og nå stopper du klagen før den når fram til Dispilinærnemnden.

    Dette kalles vimsing, mener jeg.

    Det samme når det gjelder e-postene.

    Du sa det var greit å sende på e-post, og så sier du at det må sender per brev.


    Kan jeg få ta det her med en ‘scafer’ hos dere, som ikke er så stressa?

    Jeg vil gjerne ha det her fra øverste hold nå.

    Mvh.


    Erik Ribsskog

    2012/7/30 Disiplinærnemnden for advokater <nemnden@jus.no>
    Det vises til din e-post av 27. juli og vårt brev til deg av 24. juli 2012.
    Disiplinærmyndighetene behandler klage på advokat (min understrekning) som skal ha opptrådt i strid med Regler for god advokatskikk eller for øvrig i strid med domstolloven eller annen lov, samt klager over at en advokat har krevd for høyt salær, jf. Advokatforskriftens

    § 5-3 og Behandlingsregler for Advokatforeningens disiplinærutvalg.

    Din klage er fortsatt rettet mot advokatfirmaet Advokat.no. Det er, som tidligere opplyst, kun advokater og ikke advokatfirmaer som kan klages inn for disiplinærordningen. Vi kan således ikke registrere din klage på Advokat.no.

    Vi gjør for ordens skyld oppmerksom på at i tillegg til eventuelle e-postoversendelser, skal underskrevet klage med bilag sendes i to eksemplarer per post.

    Denne tilbakemeldingen kun som e-post.

    Med vennlig hilsen
    Beate Sundstrøm

    advokatassistent DNA – sekretær / saksbehandler

    Disiplinærnemnden for advokater

    Kristian Augusts gate 9, 0164 Oslo T 22 03 50 50

    Fra: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
    Sendt: 27. juli 2012 21:16
    Til: Disiplinærnemnden for advokater
    Emne: Hewan Negassi/Fwd: Din henvendelse til Advokatforeningen

    Hei,
    jeg viser til deg/deres brev, som jeg mottok tidligere denne uken.
    Jeg synes at i denne saken, så passer det best å rette klagen mot advokatkontoret og ikke advokaten.

    Så om Disiplinærnevnden kunne ha kikket på dette.
    (Og svart på om det er greit å klage sånn).

    Klagen min er som følger, mot Advokat.no:
    1.
    Jeg ba om en advokat i Drammen, og fikk en i Oslo.

    Men seinere så fant jeg ut, at denne advokaten ikke var spesialist i barnevernssaker, som min sak gikk på, (jeg fikk Fri Rettshjelp fra Fylkesmannen i Oslo og Akershus).


    Advokat.no hadde derimot mange advokater som var spesialister på nettopp barnevern, (så jeg på deres nettsider).

    Så dette var som noe helt meningsløst for meg, det blir som at hvis man leverer en bil på verkstedet, også er det elektrikeren som lakkerer bilen.


    Da er det noe galt noe sted.

    Men da har sikkert sjefen til elektrikeren beordret han å gjøre dette.

    Så derfor er klagen på Advokat.no og ikke advokat Rukke.

    2.

    Da Rukke sluttet i jobben sin, så fikk jeg ikke noe ny advokat av Advokat.no.

    De bare kastet meg på dør, så og si.


    Jeg synes at både punkt 1 og 2 er brudd på god advokatskikk.

    Sender også kopi til Tilsynsrådet for Advokatvirksomhet, (som en oppdatering), siden jeg har klaget til de også.

    Håper dette er i orden!

    Mvh.

    Erik Ribsskog

    PS.

    Du har jo tidligere skrevet at det var greit at jeg sendte på e-post, så jeg regner med at det fortsatt gjelder og sender derfor på e-post istedet for per brev i to eksemplarer.

    Jeg regner med at dette var en forglemmelse og at dere ikke mente å virke vinglete/uklare.
    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

    Date: 2012/7/10
    Subject: Re: Din henvendelse til Advokatforeningen
    To: Disiplinærnemnden for advokater <nemnden@jus.no>

    Hei,

    det høres bra ut, jeg er vant til å ikke alltid få svar, fra Norge, hit til England, så dere er bedre enn mange andre, (inkludert Kunnskapsdepartementet, f.eks. er det jeg først tenker på da).

    Min adresse skal være:

    Erik Ribsskog

    10 Keith Court

    Keith Avenue

    Liverpool
    GB-L4 5XJ
    Storbritannia

    Igjen takk for svar!

    Mvh.

    Erik Ribsskog

    2012/7/10 Disiplinærnemnden for advokater <nemnden@jus.no>
    Hei,
    Det vises til din e-post som ble sendt oss i kopi den 20. juni 2012.

    Grunnet ferieavvikling i sekretariatet har vi ikke hatt anledning til å svare på din e-post tidligere. Vi beklager dette.

    Til orientering opplyses det om at all korrespondanse til Disiplinærnemnden skal skje pr. post, men grunnet avstand og sen postgang kan vi godta at dine innlegg kun kommer som e-post. Vi ønsker for ordens skyld i denne forbindelse å opplyse om at dersom denne fremgangsmåten ønskes benyttet, vil du selv stå ansvarlig for om eventuelle personlige opplysninger kommer på avveie da e-post ikke er en sikker korrespondanse mellom to parter. Du vil derfor motta svar fra oss per post.

    Vi tør be deg opplyse oss om din postadresse slik at svarbrev til deg i forbindelse med nedenstående e-post kan postlegges så snart som mulig.

    Med vennlig hilsen

    Hewan Negassi

    Disiplinærnemnden for advokater
    Kristian Augusts gate 9, 0164 Oslo

    Fra: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

    Sendt: 20. juni 2012 20:57
    Til: Mona Mjøen McKiernan
    Kopi: Disiplinærnemnden for advokater
    Emne: Re: Din henvendelse til Advokatforeningen

    Hei,
    ok, jeg videresender denne korrespondansen til dem, så får jeg håpe at de tar kontakt.

    Også ønsker jeg samtidig å klage på Advokat.no.

    Som tidligere nevnt, så ba jeg om en advokat i Drammen, siden dette er den nærmeste store byen, fra Bergeråsen, hvor omsorgssvikten fant sted.

    (Etter at jeg ble innvilget Fri Rettshjelp, fra Fylkesmannen i Oslo og Akershus).

    Jeg ble tilbudt en advokat i Oslo.

    Og jeg tenkte at det var greit.

    Men da jeg sjekket nettsidene til Advokat.no nærmere, så så jeg det, at Advokat.no hadde syv advokater i Oslo, som var spesialister på barnevern.

    Og selv om min sak er en barnevernssak, (min far lot meg bo alene fra jeg var ni år, og jeg fikk fri rettshjelp til en barnevernssak mot Svelvik kommune).

    Så ble jeg gitt en advokat som _ikke_ hadde barnevern som hovedfelt.

    Og så, her om dagen, slutter plutselig den advokaten.


    Advokat.no skulle jo da selvfølgelig ha tilbudt meg en ny advokat.

    Men det gjorde de ikke.

    De bare sa at de var ferdig med saken.


    Og dette etter at jeg hadde forklart for hun Rukke der, at jeg blir snytt for arv også, og trenger hjelp av en advokat, til å få Tingretten i Larvik, til å ha offentlig skifte, etter min mormor, og fristen der er 26. juni, altså på tirsdag neste uke.

    Så at Advokat.no bare sluttet å jobbe med sakene mine, det kan koste meg arven etter min mor, (som døde i 1999), og min mormor som var fra danske kongelige og adelige.

    Så jeg synes Advokat.no oppfører seg så besynderlig, at jeg ønsker å klage.

    Samtidlig så lurer jeg på hva vitsen er med å klage, for Øvergård fikk bare 2000 i bot, og jeg fikk ingenting i erstatning.


    Og dette gjaldt salg av min del av et sameie i Holmsbu, som jeg ville selge for å ha råd til det nevnte offentlige skiftet da.

    For meg så virker det som at jeg bare blir systematisk tullet med av norske advokater, (er det mafian som trekker i tråder, jeg har overhørt i 2003 at jeg er forfulgt av dem).


    Hvordan skal jeg liksom få ordnet med det offentlige skiftet da.

    Hvorfor kan liksom ingen i Norge hjelpe meg med det, nå er det bare noen dager igjen til fristen går ut.


    Men Advokatforeningen er så idiotisk organisert at dere ikke gir erstatning til ofre for deres mafia-advokater, og kun gir mindre enn en timelønn i bot til disse mafia-advokatene så det er jo helt håpløst.


    Det burde vært som i USA hvor folk får store erstatninger.

    Ellers så kommer de aldri av flekken.
    Jeg blir litt kvalm her jeg sitter i England av dette mafia-opplegget som foregår i Norge.

    Så nå må dere forte dere å gi Advokat.no 2000 i bot, de også.


    Hva skal liksom løse seg da, tenker dere?

    Dette er jo helt meningsløst egentlig.

    Kan dere ikke tilby meg advokathjelp, eller noe, i det minste?

    Hvordan skal jeg få ordnet med dette offentlige skiftet hvor fristen går ut 26. juni.


    Det kan jo være at den egentlige grunnen til at Advokat.no oppførte seg så besynderlig var for at jeg skulle miste kontrollen over det arveoppgjøret, pga. at en mafia står bak, og trekker i tråder.

    Jeg rekker jo ikke nå å få en ny advokat til å ordne med dette.

    Så om dere kan ordne med det.

    Jeg har skrevet om disse problemene på blogg i tre år nå, og ingen i Norge gjør en dritt, så jeg er rimelig oppgitt, for å si det sånn.

    Jeg vet nesten ikke hva jeg skal si.

    Erik Ribsskog
    2012/6/20 Mona Mjøen McKiernan <mmm@advokatforeningen.no>
    Erik Ribsskog,

    Vi viser til dine henvendelser av 19.juni 2012, vedrørende klage på advokat Erik Øvergård.

    Det fremgår av din henvendelse at du har anket beslutningen fra disiplinærutvalget i tide.

    Vi råder vi deg til å ta kontakt med Disiplinærnemnden dersom du ønsker å få vite hvordan det har gått med anken.

    Disiplinærnemnden er offentlig oppnevnt nemnd, og hører ikke til Advokatforeningen.
    Vi har derfor ikke mulighet til å sjekke hvordan det har gått med anken din.

    Disiplinærnemndens kontaktinformasjon er nemnden@jus.no

    Vi håper dette var til hjelp.

    Med vennlig hilsen

    Mona Mjøen McKiernan

    ADVOKATFORENINGEN / THE NORWEGIAN BAR ASSOCIATION

    Kristian Augusts gate 9, N-0164 Oslo T +47 22 03 50 50 E mmm@advokatforeningen.no
    www.advokatforeningen.no www.advokatenhjelperdeg.no  

    From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

    Sent: 19. juni 2012 15:33


    To: Mona Mjøen McKiernan
    Subject: Re: Din henvendelse til Advokatforeningen

    Hei,
    jeg anket i tide.

    Men problemet er at dere ikke har gjort noe.


    Så det er jo skandale.

    Erik Ribsskog

  • Mer om budsjett


    Gmail – CCCS

    Gmail


    Erik Ribsskog
    <eribsskog@gmail.com>



    CCCS



    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>


    Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 2:10 PM

    To:
    Q&A <contactus@cccs.co.uk>

    Cc:
    client.services@cccs.co.uk

    Bcc:
    offers <offers@wescot.co.uk>

    Hi,

    thank you very much for your e-mail.

    I’ll copy this e-mail to your client services-depatment then.
    Maybe they can give me advice on how to get Wescot to delete my debt.


    Because they contact me all the time with their e-mails and ‘funny’ letters.

    So I think that’s the only way to get them to stop wasting my time.
    I’ve promised them I’ll start to pay them token-payments when I get my Jobseekers Allowance back.


    Still they harass me and sabotage against me, like I explain about in more detail in the e-mail you replied to.


    Thanks again for the advice!

    Best regards,


    Erik Ribsskog

    On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 10:56 AM, Q&A <contactus@cccs.co.uk> wrote:

    Good morning

    Thank you for your recent e-mail.

    As stated in the below emails the address that you need to send any such correspondence to is client.services@cccs.co.uk

    Thank you for contacting CCCS.

    If you have any further queries you can reply to this e-mail, use Online Chat or call us on free-phone 0800 197 1704 (weekdays 8am until 8pm).

    Kind regards

    Lauren

    From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

    Sent: 30 October 2012 15:29
    To: Contact Us
    Cc: Q&A
    Subject: Re: Wescot ResponseRE: Correspondence Reply

    Hi,

    I have explained that in the e-mail where you have highlighted a sentence in red.

    That your partner Capital One told me last year my signature wasn’t mine.

    And that you this year have lied about me not replying to your correspondence.

    And that you have made me waste my time since your partner Capital One and yourselves haven’t been able to accept my token-payment-offer like other companies like Swalec, DML and United Utilities have accepted, almost a year ago.

    This is sabotage, I think.
    I suspect you and Capital One have a secret agenda here.

    And you really should contact your English-teacher about this.

    Because I get anoyed when I have to explain the same again and again.

    And it’s a saying you have here in the UK, which says it’s no excuse for ignorance.

    So eighter you’re ignorant or slow.
    So I think you should perhaps find another job.


    Like putting spread on sandwiches, or something like that.

    Just an advice.

    Best regards,


    Erik Ribsskog
    On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 3:18 PM, Contact Us <contactus@wescot.co.uk> wrote:
    Date 30th October 2012

    Dear Mr Ribsskog

    Further to your recent email regarding your email below. I acknowledge your comments and would like to confirm that Wescot always attempt to respond with an explanation or resolution as quickly as possible.

    Please advise as to why this account would be deleted, we have no details in regards to a query for this account. If you believe this balance is not due we would require the full details of dispute on this account. Which would allow us to investigate your query with our client.

    Please accept my apologies for any inconvenience you may have been caused whilst contacting us.

    Yours sincerely

    Ms H Thundercliffe

    Accounts Controller

    Description: image002

    Registered in Scotland No. SC84131, Registered Office: Kyleshill House, 1 Glencairn Street, Saltcoats, Ayrshire KA21 5JT

    From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

    Sent: 30 October 2012 14:54
    To: Contact Us
    Subject: Re: Correspondence Reply

    Hi,
    this about that my debt has been deleted is something I’m still looking forward to hearing from you about.

    Perhaps you should ask your old English-teacher for advice as to what my writings meant.

    Best regards,


    Erik Ribsskog

    On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Contact Us <contactus@wescot.co.uk> wrote:
    Date 30th October 2012

    Dear Mr Ribsskog

    Further to your recent email regarding the below account. I acknowledge your comments and would like to confirm that Wescot always attempt to respond with an explanation or resolution as quickly as possible.

    In your email below you have you look forward to hearing that this debt has been deleted. Please could you advise further on this, as we haveno details in regards to the balance being deleted.

    Please accept my apologies for any inconvenience you may have been caused whilst contacting us.

    Yours sincereley

    Ms H Thundercliffe

    Accounts Controller

    Description: image002

    Registered in Scotland No. SC84131, Registered Office: Kyleshill House, 1 Glencairn Street, Saltcoats, Ayrshire KA21 5JT

    From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

    Sent: 19 October 2012 10:40


    To: Correspondence Queries
    Cc: offers
    Subject: Re: Correspondence Reply
    Hi,
    ok, I don’t think I have gotten their sort-code and account-number.
    Do you know this?
    I also sent you an update, on Saturday, after the e-mail you replied to now.

    I’ll paste that in this e-mail now.

    Best regards,

    Erik Ribsskog

    PS.

    Here’s the update e-mail from Saturday:

    Hi,

    I got a new income and expenditure-form in the post from you today.

    From 11/10, with the reference D3/49597867.

    I contacted your partned Capital One last automn, regarding my new budget.


    I offered you a token-payment-agreement on £1 a month, untill I got a full-time-job.

    Capital One told me my signature wasn’t mine, so this process have stalled, since last year.


    Now you get back to me.

    I’m still unemployed but I’m trying to set a business up, on my spare-time.

    And the Jobcentre is ‘messing’ with my jobseekers allowance.

    So at the moment, I have to say I don’t have any income.


    I could get back to you when I get the jobseekers allowance back.


    And then I would offer you the same as last time, £1 a month in token-payments.

    I’ve since last year gotten a flat witch was unfurnitured.

    So any money I have left after token-payments each month I now buy furniture and other things for the flat with.

    And I was going to set up a new budget, when I got a full-time job.


    And I’m going to do that.


    But I don’t think it’s right that I have to set up a new budget now, because your partner said my signature wasn’t mine, and didn’t accept my new budget, last year.


    This has taken so much of my time now, so you should really just delete the debt, I think.


    I’m on Ladders, so I have a high income-potential.


    All the hours I’ve spent on you and Captial One should add up to arround the debt I owe you, I think.


    So I’m looking forward to hearing from you that my debt with you has been deleted!

    Hope this is alright!

    Best regards,


    Erik Ribsskog

    On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 10:24 AM, Correspondence Queries <client@cccs.co.uk> wrote:
    Good morning Erik,

    Thank you for contacting us about Wescot.

    To make token payments to Wescot you do not need to fill in a giro slip. All you need is their sort code and account number and also the Wescot reference number starting with DM or D3. You then need to go into your bank and ask them to send £1 payment to Wescot by bank transfer. They may reject the offer of payment but they won’t reject the £1 payment you send and this will reduce the debt in time.

    If you need any advice then please do not hesitate to call us.

    Kind regards

    Faye

    Correspondence Advisor

    From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

    Sent: 12 October 2012 16:13
    To: Correspondence Queries
    Cc: offers
    Subject: Re: Update/Fwd: *****7867/Fwd: CCCS

    Hi,

    thank you for your e-mail!

    I’m not paying token-payments at the moment.

    Wescot have sent me a budget-form again now.


    But as your collegue there have previously told me I don’t have to fill out this form to get token-payments.

    It should be enought that I’ve explained about my situation.

    I’ve offered Wescot a token-payment-arrangement like a ‘million’ times.


    But they haven’t sent me giros or anything.

    And this is taking a lot of my time now.
    Because I’ve been offering Wescot, (and Capital One), a token-payment-arrangement since last year now.

    And all I get are standard letters which tells lies like that I haven’t replied to their letters.


    When I’ve sent about a million e-mails to them, which I haven’t gotten replies to.

    So I now copy this e-mail to Wescot.


    And I hope they’ll send me some giros for the token-payment arrangement of £1 a month now.

    Or tell me what information they need from me to set up a direct-debit-agreement.

    So I hope this will be sorted now.

    Thanks again for the e-mail!

    Best regards,


    Erik Ribsskog
    On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 8:07 AM, Correspondence Queries <client@cccs.co.uk> wrote:
    Hello Eric

    Thank you for copying us in to the email you have sent to Wescot.

    Please try not to worry about the contact you have received as this is a standard procedure for creditors to take. Nelson Guest & Partners are an internal collections department who work on behalf of Wescot to collect the outstanding balance.

    As you have contacted this creditor to advise of your current financial situation and are making token payments, you are doing all you can at this time. If you receive any further contact regarding this matter, please advise of this.

    I hope this is helpful and reassuring.

    If you have any queries or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact us on  0845 272 5400. Lines are open 8am to 6pm, Monday to Friday. Email us at client.services@cccs.co.uk or go online to www.cccs.co.uk and follow the links to send us a web mail.                                                      

    Kind regards

    Hannah

    Correspondence Advisor

    From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

    Sent: 08 October 2012 01:14
    To: offers@wescot.co.uk
    Cc: Q&A
    Subject: Update/Fwd: *****7867/Fwd: CCCS

    Hi,
    on Saturday I got a letter from Nelson Guest & Partners Solicitiors, witch I attach a scanned copy of.

    I’m don’t have the chance to pay 50% of the dept, av the moment, unfortunately.

    I’m repeating my offer of a token-payment-arrangement again.

    (Which I’ve done many times earlier).

    I hope you can ‘stop messing around’ now, (like I think I have to call it), and just accept my token-payment-offer, like the other companies have done.

    I don’t understand why you do so much ‘mumbo-jumbo’ surrounding this.

    This should be a straight forward tokey-payment agreement.

    I hope the CCCS can tell you to stop with your funny letters and just accept my token-payment-agreement, which I have offered you, a million times, (to exaggerate, but anyway).


    Captial One even have a football-cup named after you, but you don’t seem to be a serious company.

    It’s like being on the candid camera to try get a token-payment-agreement agreed with you.


    Erik
    ———- Forwarded message ———-

    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
    Date: Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 3:32 PM
    Subject: Re: *****7867/Fwd: CCCS

    To: offers <offers@wescot.co.uk>
    Cc: Q&A <contactus@cccs.co.uk>

    Hi,

    it should be D3/49597867, (like I wrote in the subject-line in the e-mail I sent you on 20/9).

    I repeat my token-payment offer on £1 a month, like I offer all my other creditors untill I find new employment.
    Hope this is alright!

    Best regards,


    Erik Ribsskog
    On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 8:30 AM, offers <offers@wescot.co.uk> wrote:

    Good morning,

    Please provide the wescot reference beginning with D3 or DM

    Kind regards

    Rebecca Stearman

    Offers Administrator

    Description: Description: Description: cid:image001.jpg@01CA4CD1.636A7F00

    From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

    Sent: 28 September 2012 14:34
    To: Correspondence Queries
    Cc: offers
    Subject: Re: *****7867/Fwd: CCCS

    Hi,

    thank you for your e-mail!

    Yes, I send a copy of this e-mail to Wescot as a reminder of my token-payment-offer, of one pound a month untill I find new employement.


    I thought it was like you write here, with the budget-form etc., from when I went to business-school, in the eighties.

    Even if that was in Norway, I think business-law is mostly the same in the western world.


    Mostly based on old British business-law, if I’m not mistaking.
    Thank you very much for the help with this!

    The information I sent to Capital One was a new token payment-offer after I had to move to Sunderland for some months last year.


    If I remember it right.


    I now found a letter on my blog, from Capital One, from 2009, when they also complained about my signature, (so this has happened in both 2009 and 2011), which I attach.

    Thanks again for the advice!

    Best regards,


    Erik Ribsskog
    On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 12:37 PM, Correspondence Queries <client@cccs.co.uk> wrote:

    Hi Erick

    Thank you for your email about your Wescot and Capital One accounts.

    If you have concerns over the wording of the letter from Wescot, I would advise you to raise a complaint directly with them.

    The complaint procedure can take up to 8 weeks and if you are unhappy with any response they give you, you can raise this further with the financial ombudsman service.

    You don’t need to fill out the budget form that Wescot have sent you. You have advised them that you have already completed a budget with us. Both forms cover the same areas. If you need a copy of the budget that you completed with us, please let me know as I can send this out to you. The budget can also be sent to Capital One.

    I wouldn’t advise you to stop making payments towards the Wescot account. It is in your best interest and benefit that you carry on making a token payment. It will show that you are willing to pay the account off.

    If you don’t make a payment, the creditor can take further action.

    I understand you would like to keep the contact in writing but it is also best that you call them to discuss your concerns. This will eliminate any responses about them not receiving your letters.

    You can ask for a Data Access Request from them which will provide you with all the notes made on your account. There may be a charge for this request.

    Can you advise me what information you sent to Capital One for them to reject your signature? If your signature hasn’t changed, I would advise you to contact Capital One and ask for a further explanation, i.e. are they comparing your signature to the signature on the original credit agreement?

    Again, you can ask for a Data Access Request to see what has been noted on your account and there may be a charge for this request.

    I hope this has been helpful.

    If you have any further queries, please contact us on 0845 272 5400, lines are open 8am to 6pm, Monday to Friday, you can email us at client.service@cccs.co.uk.

    Kind regards

    Paul Marshall
    Correspondence Co-ordinator


    Sent: 26 September 2012 00:05
    To: Correspondence Queries
    Subject: Re: *****7867/Fwd: CCCS

    Hi,
    I’ve gone to business-school and letters shouldn’t contain lies even if they are standard letters.

    Here it’s obvious that the standard letter is used wrongly.

    I’m not making a token-payment here, you haven’t read up.


    Please escalate to your line manager.

    Regards,

    Erik Ribsskog

    PS.


    And I don’t think it’s a good idea to call these companies.


    It’s better to keep the correspondence in writing, so to keep documentation about what has been agreed.


    PS 2.


    You haven’t commented on that Capital One told me my signature wasn’t mine.


    I want to please escalate this to your line-manager.

    On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 10:33 AM, Correspondence Queries <client@cccs.co.uk> wrote:
    Hi Erik

    Thank you for contacting us about your account with Wescot.

    Creditors will often send standard collection letters out to you. Standard letters will include certain phrases that may not fit entirely, such as “we have not received a reply”.

    Unfortunately even though you are making a token payment we cannot stop creditors from contacting you. You should continue to keep your creditors up to date with your financial situation and offer them the most fair and reasonable offer you can.

    It may be best to call your creditors and speak to someone directly. That way all issues can be discussed there and then.

    If you have any further questions or need some more advise, you can call us on 0845 272 5400. Lines are open from 8am to 6pm, Monday to Friday. You can also email us at client.service@cccs.co.uk.

    Kind regards

    Gurj
    Correspondence Advisor

    We are altering the way in which we handle your correspondence to ensure we safeguard your personal information at all times.

    In order for us to do this we will be making some changes to the way in which we validate your identity.
    The next time you contact us, we will require you to provide us with at least 2 pieces of information from the list below:

    ·         Client reference number
    ·         Postal address
    ·         Postcode
    ·         Telephone number
    ·         Email address

    Please make sure you provide this information along with your full name on every communication you send to us. If not, we will prompt you for these details and this may delay your reply.

    Thank you

    The Correspondence Team

    We are altering the way in which we handle your correspondence to ensure we safeguard your personal information at all times.
    In order for us to do this we will be making some changes to the way in which we validate your identity.

    The next time you contact us, we will require you to provide us with at least 2 pieces of information from the list below:

    ·          Client reference number

    ·          Postal address

    ·          Postcode

    ·          Telephone number

    ·          Email address

    Please make sure you provide this information along with your full name on every communication you send to us. If not, we will prompt you for these details and this may delay your reply.

    Thank you

    The Correspondence Team
    Twitter Follow us on Twitter

    http://twitter.com/moneyaware

    Facebook Like us on Facebook

    http://www.facebook.com/moneyaware

    Read the MoneyAware blog

    http://moneyaware.co.uk

    P  Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.

    We are altering the way in which we handle your correspondence to ensure we safeguard your personal information at all times.
    In order for us to do this we will be making some changes to the way in which we validate your identity.

    The next time you contact us, we will require you to provide us with at least 2 pieces of information from the list below:

    ·          Client reference number

    ·          Postal address

    ·          Postcode

    ·          Telephone number

    ·          Email address

    Please make sure you provide this information along with your full name on every communication you send to us. If not, we will prompt you for these details and this may delay your reply.

    Thank you

    The Correspondence Team

    We are altering the way in which we handle your correspondence to ensure we safeguard your personal information at all times.
    In order for us to do this we will be making some changes to the way in which we validate your identity.

    The next time you contact us, we will require you to provide us with at least 2 pieces of information from the list below:

    ·          Client reference number

    ·          Postal address

    ·          Postcode

    ·          Telephone number

    ·          Email address

    Please make sure you provide this information along with your full name on every communication you send to us. If not, we will prompt you for these details and this may delay your reply.

    Thank you

    The Correspondence Team

    Twitter Follow us on Twitter http://twitter.com/moneyaware

    Read the MoneyAware bloghttp://moneyaware.co.uk

    P  Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.

    —–Original Message—–


    From: Erik ******* [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
    Sent: 20 September 2012 14:41
    To: offers
    Cc: Q&A
    Subject: Your ref: ******7867/Fwd: CCCS

    Hi,

    I’m refering to your Final Notice-letter from 17/9, which I recieved today.

    You there write: ‘but we have not received a replyto our previous correspondence’.

    But this isn’t right, I’ve earlier written to you e-mails a lot of times offering a token-payment.

    Is this the Candid Camera?

    Your partner Capital One also did a practical joke like this, when they told me my signature wasn’t mine last year.

    Please stop with the monkey-business, and be serious.

    I hope the CCCS can stop your funny bailiff-actions and lies.

    Erik ****

    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: Q&A <contactus@cccs.co.uk>
    Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 17:37:39 +0100
    Subject: CCCS
    To: Erik******** <eribsskog@gmail.com>

    Good afternoon

    Thank you for your email.

    There isn’t anything in the Consumer credit Act that states you must supply these details to a creditor. You can always provide them a copy of the budget and list of creditors that you have done through us.

    Regardless of whether they accept the offer or not please continue to make the token payment.

    Kind regards

    Jonathan

    Follow us on Twitter
    http://twitter.com/moneyaware

    Like us on Facebook
    http://www.facebook.com/moneyaware

    Read the MoneyAware blog
    http://moneyaware.co.uk/

    P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.

    ________________________________

    From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
    Sent: 19 August 2012 20:59
    To: Q&A
    Cc: offers@wescot.co.uk
    Subject: Problems with Wescot/Fwd: Update/Fwd: Wescot reference:
    *******867 (Regarding Capital One-debt).

    Hi,

    I’ve told Wescot I’m unemployed and have offered them a £1 monthly token-payment untill I find new employment.

    (Like I’ve offered my other creditors).

    Wescot don’t accept but wants me to fill out an income and expenditure-form.

    I can’t remember that you at CCCS have mentioned that I have to fill out a form like that, when I do budget-work.

    It’s like they go a bit to close, and this seems unecessary, to me.

    What do you think at CCCS about this?

    Does the law say that I have to fill out a form like that?

    I attach the letter from Wescot.

    Yours sincerely,

    Erik *******

    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
    Date: Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 10:35 PM
    Subject: Update/Fwd: Wescot reference: *******867 (Regarding Capital One-debt).
    To: offers@wescot.co.uk

    Hi,

    I got an income and expenditure-form, in the post, from you, earlier this week.

    I don’t understand the point in me filling out that form.

    I’ve already told you that I’m on budget in co-operation, with the CCCS, and that I only can afford to pay a token-payment, (on £1), untill I find new employment.

    So this is my offer.

    I don’t understand why you send me this form.

    I think is unnessesary paper-work then.

    None of my other creditors have sent me a form like that.

    They have just accepted my token-payment-offer.

    So I hope you can set up a direct debit-agreement, for £1 a month, for this debt.

    Hope this is alright!

    Best regards,

    Erik *********

    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
    Date: Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 10:31 AM
    Subject: Wescot reference: ******867 (Regarding Capital One-debt).
    To: offers@wescot.co.uk

    Hi,

    I’m refering to your letter from 19/7, which I got in the post today.

    I’m currently unemployed, and on a budget in co-operation, with CCCS.

    My offer to you is the same as to my other creditors, and that is that I pay a one pound token-payment, each month, until I find new employment.

    Hope this is alright!

    Yours sincerely,

    Erik ********

    VISIT OUR WEBSITE AT http://www.cccs.co.uk/
    ———————————————————————
    This email message is intended for the individual to whom it’s addressed
    and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If you are
    not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use or dissemination
    of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this information
    in error, please return it to us immediately and delete it from your computer.
    The contents or opinions expressed within this email are not intended to
    represent the views of CCCS unless specifically stated to be so.
    This email is not guaranteed to be free from any computer viruses, although
    it has been checked using the Trend Virus Suite. You should check this email
    and any attachments for the presence of viruses before downloading any files.
    Foundation for Credit Counselling, trading as Consumer Credit Counselling Service (“CCCS”).
    Registered Office: Wade House, Merrion Centre, Leeds, LS2 8NG. Registered in England
    Company No 2757055. Registered Charity No. 1016630″

    VISIT OUR WEBSITE AT http://www.cccs.co.uk

    ———————————————————————
    This email message is intended for the individual to whom it’s addressed
    and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If you are
    not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use or dissemination
    of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this information
    in error, please return it to us immediately and delete it from your computer.

    The contents or opinions expressed within this email are not intended to

    represent the views of CCCS unless specifically stated to be so.

    This email is not guaranteed to be free from any computer viruses, although

    it has been checked using the Trend Virus Suite. You should check this email
    and any attachments for the presence of viruses before downloading any files.

    Foundation for Credit Counselling, trading as Consumer Credit Counselling Service (“CCCS”).

    Registered Office: Wade House, Merrion Centre, Leeds, LS2 8NG. Registered in England
    Company No 2757055. Registered Charity No. 1016630″


    Registered in Scotland No. SC84131, Registered Office: Kyleshill House, 1 Glencairn Street, Saltcoats, Ayrshire KA21 5JT
    Please consider the environment before printing this email. Wescot, helping to make a difference
    Confidentiality Notice. The information in this e-mail is confidential and for use by the addressee(s) only. If you are not the intended recipient (or responsible for delivery of the message to the intended recipient) please notify us immediately (on 01482 590590 (UK) or +44 1482 590590 (international)) and delete this message from your computer: you may not copy or forward it, or use or disclose its contents to any other person.

    As Internet communications are capable of data corruption, Wescot Credit Services Ltd does not accept any responsibility for changes made to this message after it was sent. Please note that Wescot Credit Services Ltd does not accept any liability or responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan attachments (if any). Opinions and views expressed in this e-mail are those of the sender and may not reflect the opinions and views of Wescot Credit Services Ltd.

    VISIT OUR WEBSITE AT http://www.cccs.co.uk

    ———————————————————————
    This email message is intended for the individual to whom it’s addressed
    and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If you are
    not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use or dissemination
    of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this information
    in error, please return it to us immediately and delete it from your computer.

    The contents or opinions expressed within this email are not intended to

    represent the views of CCCS unless specifically stated to be so.

    This email is not guaranteed to be free from any computer viruses, although

    it has been checked using the Trend Virus Suite. You should check this email
    and any attachments for the presence of viruses before downloading any files.

    Foundation for Credit Counselling, trading as Consumer Credit Counselling Service (“CCCS”).

    Registered Office: Wade House, Merrion Centre, Leeds, LS2 8NG. Registered in England
    Company No 2757055. Registered Charity No. 1016630″

    VISIT OUR WEBSITE AT http://www.cccs.co.uk

    ———————————————————————
    This email message is intended for the individual to whom it’s addressed
    and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If you are
    not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use or dissemination
    of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this information
    in error, please return it to us immediately and delete it from your computer.

    The contents or opinions expressed within this email are not intended to

    represent the views of CCCS unless specifically stated to be so.

    This email is not guaranteed to be free from any computer viruses, although

    it has been checked using the Trend Virus Suite. You should check this email
    and any attachments for the presence of viruses before downloading any files.

    Foundation for Credit Counselling, trading as Consumer Credit Counselling Service (“CCCS”).

    Registered Office: Wade House, Merrion Centre, Leeds, LS2 8NG. Registered in England
    Company No 2757055. Registered Charity No. 1016630″


    Registered in Scotland No. SC84131, Registered Office: Kyleshill House, 1 Glencairn Street, Saltcoats, Ayrshire KA21 5JT

    Please consider the environment before printing this email. Wescot, helping to make a difference
    Confidentiality Notice. The information in this e-mail is confidential and for use by the addressee(s) only. If you are not the intended recipient (or responsible for delivery of the message to the intended recipient) please notify us immediately (on 01482 590590 (UK) or +44 1482 590590 (international)) and delete this message from your computer: you may not copy or forward it, or use or disclose its contents to any other person.
    As Internet communications are capable of data corruption, Wescot Credit Services Ltd does not accept any responsibility for changes made to this message after it was sent. Please note that Wescot Credit Services Ltd does not accept any liability or responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan attachments (if any). Opinions and views expressed in this e-mail are those of the sender and may not reflect the opinions and views of Wescot Credit Services Ltd.

    Registered in Scotland No. SC84131, Registered Office: Kyleshill House, 1 Glencairn Street, Saltcoats, Ayrshire KA21 5JT
    Please consider the environment before printing this email. Wescot, helping to make a difference
    Confidentiality Notice. The information in this e-mail is confidential and for use by the addressee(s) only. If you are not the intended recipient (or responsible for delivery of the message to the intended recipient) please notify us immediately (on 01482 590590 (UK) or +44 1482 590590 (international)) and delete this message from your computer: you may not copy or forward it, or use or disclose its contents to any other person.
    As Internet communications are capable of data corruption, Wescot Credit Services Ltd does not accept any responsibility for changes made to this message after it was sent. Please note that Wescot Credit Services Ltd does not accept any liability or responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan attachments (if any). Opinions and views expressed in this e-mail are those of the sender and may not reflect the opinions and views of Wescot Credit Services Ltd.