johncons

Måned: desember 2012

  • Fler e-poster fra Philip Gabrielsen

    Noname 251
     
    Noname 252
     
    Noname 253
     
    Noname 254
     
    Noname 255
     
    Noname 256
     
    Noname 257
     
    Noname 258
     
    Noname 259
     
    Noname 260
     
    Noname 261
     
    Noname 262
     
    Noname 263
     
    Noname 264
     
    Noname 265
     
    Noname 266
     
    Noname 267
     
    Noname 268
     
    Noname 269
     
    Noname 270
     
    Noname 271
     
    Noname 272
     
    Noname 273
     
    Noname 274
     
    Noname 275
     
    Noname 276
     
    Noname 277
     
    Noname 278
     
    Noname 279
     
    Noname 280
     
    Noname 281
     
    Noname 282
     
    Noname 283
     
    Noname 284
     
    Noname 285
     
    Noname 286
     
    Noname 287
     
    Noname 288
     
    Noname 289
     
    Noname 290
     
    Noname 291
     
    Noname 292
     
    Noname 293
     
    Noname 294
     
    Noname 295
     
    Noname 296
     
    Noname 297
     
    Noname 298
     
    Noname 299
     
    Noname 300

    PS.

    Linkene ovenfor åpnes i et eget vindu.

    PS 2.

    Etter å ha lest ‘dagens bolke’ med ‘Philip Gabrielsen e-poster’, så må jeg vel si det, at det som var mest spesielt.

    Det var de e-postene, om giftmorderen Terje Wiik, som driver og endrer på Wikipedia-artikkelen, om sitt eget mord.

    Det der kunne man vel nesten ha laget en film om.

    En thriller-film kanskje, (som det vel heter).

    Hvem vet.

    Bare noe jeg tenkte på.

    Mvh.

    Erik Ribsskog

    PS 3.

    Man kan også se det.

    At Wikipedianerne, (som de vel blir kalt).

    De skriver det, at å referere til en blogg.

    Det blir som noe annet, enn å referere til for eksempel en bok eller en avis.

    Siden at en bloggpost kan endres, da.

    Jeg studerte jo ved University of Sunderland, studieåret 2004/05.

    (Selv om jeg måtte avbryte studiene der, før tiden.

    Noe som jeg skal skrive mer om, i Min Bok 6, hadde jeg tenkt meg).

    Og der, så hadde jeg et fag, som het ‘Final Year Project’.

    (Jeg gikk det siste året, på en Bachelor i Computing, ved Faculty of Applied Sciences.

    Så dette var ganske ‘heavy-e’ greier, da).

    Og der, så lærte vi, (i begynnelsen av faget), om ‘research’ og ‘referencing’, da.

    (Eller rettere sagt, jeg lærte det.

    For dette var vel bare som en oppsummering, for de britiske studentene der, tror jeg.

    For de hadde vel antagelig lært om dette, iløpet av de to første studieårene.

    (Hvis jeg skulle tippe, ihvertfall).

    Mens man på HiO IU, ikke lærte noe om hverken forskning eller referering, vel.

    Sånn som jeg husker det, ihvertfall).

    Og når det gjaldt referanser.

    Så skulle de være ‘Oxford’, (mener jeg at de sa).

    (Noe sånt).

    Og i dette faget, (som var ledet av en professor, (eller noe), ved navn Peter White vel), så var de også skeptiske til å referere til noe som var på nettet, (husker jeg).

    Men de utelukket vel ikke helt å gjøre det.

    Ihvertfall så var det sånn, at i det referanse-systemet, som vi lærte å bruke.

    (Som vel het Oxford.

    Etter universitetet, må det vel være.

    Hvis jeg ikke husker helt feil, da).

    Så ble det forklart om, hvordan man skulle referere, til noe som var på nettet, da.

    Og det viktige da, (husker jeg), det var at når man linket til en nettside, så måtte man ta med hvilken dato, (og vel muligens også hvilket klokkeslett), som man hadde lest denne nettsiden, da.

    Og da ble det liksom som en gyldig referanse, da.

    (Hvis jeg husker det riktig, ihvertfall).

    Og det er vel også mulig, at andre lands Wiki-er, vet mer om hvordan dette er riktig å gjøre, (for å si det sånn).

    Så norske Wikipedianere, de burde kanskje komme seg litt mer ut av ‘andedammen’ sin.

    (Tenker jeg nå, etter å ha lest dagens e-poster).

    Og kanskje prate med Wikipedianere, fra andre land, om hvordan dem gjør ditt og datt der, da.

    (Tenkte jeg ihvertfall nå, etter å ha lest gjennom de her e-postene).

    Så sånn er det.

    Bare noe jeg tenkte på.

    Men men.

    PS 4.

    Her er mer om Oxford Referencing Style:

    internet article oxford

    http://www.deakin.edu.au/current-students/study-support/study-skills/handouts/oxford-docnote.php

  • Jeg sendte en e-post til Acer


    Gmail – Recovery CD/Fwd: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)

    Gmail


    Erik Ribsskog
    <eribsskog@gmail.com>



    Recovery CD/Fwd: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)



    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>


    Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 12:59 PM

    To:
    rekruttering@acer.no

    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <mailer-daemon@googlemail.com>


    Date: Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 12:56 PM
    Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
    To: eribsskog@gmail.com

    Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently:

         euro_mail@acer-euro.com

    Technical details of permanent failure:
    Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the recipient domain. We recommend contacting the other email provider for further information about the cause of this error. The error that the other server returned was: 550 550 5.1.1 <euro_mail@acer-euro.com>: Recipient address rejected: User unknown (state 13).

    —– Original message —–

    DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
            d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
            h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
            bh=eFlXhygmWjY0BWRhWrZFlVnedmru7vtLfRsDUQzQCow=;
            b=li8u8fF/6Fv8QLlKzChKS82aGwnxDHWrjZDzUH1KCgfBqYbVLeio3oh3poDRTU2/Tx
             GAkL09YtAotIQeSfgIXBAbbwNJiXkVlgWcUpkq3VixlZ20xEtrAp4YaCdhmpwFwYCSE7
             QpI9adTIBLscLev4nA1xNdPHU+BkZLeDf9ftXQCFSSKhN99Mmj8PMLx+6odmB+pbCuBj
             /cIpR1FFdiZMCNGfFMBlbXEU0Tdf2lc3cKDWcgwFpHB3lVAZG/jI/nsCU4uO3QRuEAgb
             xRaQMv42p+ownDR0jcKVK2XypExRJ04LkLKwKAPzN4lsZltUlMaw8EZSvliMzCFia1rJ
             64Iw==
    MIME-Version: 1.0
    Received: by 10.58.243.166 with SMTP id wz6mr33815667vec.28.1356353775711;
     Mon, 24 Dec 2012 04:56:15 -0800 (PST)
    Received: by 10.220.147.134 with HTTP; Mon, 24 Dec 2012 04:56:15 -0800 (PST)
    Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2012 12:56:15 +0000
    Message-ID: <CAGtfns5ReZG8fYe5q8ARKpGkNzfzr5wyTBMC9XitZSvDBvwgyA@mail.gmail.com>
    Subject: Recovery CD
    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
    To: euro_mail@acer-euro.com
    Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b86f4b2fdb4cf04d198b8da

    Hi,

    I recently bought a refurbished Acer Extensa E261, here in Liverpool.

    It didn’t come with a media.

    When I worked at Microsoft Scandinavian Product Activation, in 2005 and
    2006, (for Arvato in the Cunard Building), then we learned that if
    customers didn’t have the media, they should contact the manufacturer.

    I wonder if you can send me a recovery CD,  for Windows XP Professional,
    (no service pack).

    (There is a product key for this OS, on a sticker, on the box, so I have a
    valid licence, but no media).

    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

  • Jeg sendte en ny e-post til CCCS


    Gmail – Your reference: 1105539

    Gmail


    Erik Ribsskog
    <eribsskog@gmail.com>



    Your reference: 1105539



    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>


    Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 5:01 AM

    To:
    Customer Relations <CustomerRelations@stepchange.org>

    Hi,


    I must admit that I’ve only read the first line of your e-mail now.
    You bring my feelings into this.

    This I react on.


    Then I think you are not a serious business-person.


    I therefore would have wanted to please get this escalated to your line-manager.


    Erik RIbsskog

    On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 5:33 PM, Customer Relations <CustomerRelations@stepchange.org> wrote:

    Dear Mr Ribsskog

    Client reference: 1105539

    Complaint reference: 1076/1105539

    Further to my previous email which acknowledged your concerns about our recent name change. You’ve told us that you feel our new

    name is patronising and demoralising. I’m sure you’ll appreciate it isn’t our intention to upset any of our clients.

    Changing our name from Consumer Credit Counselling Service (CCCS) was a bold step for us. Although we help thousands

    of people every day with their debt problems, and we’re already the UK’s largest single provider of Debt Management Plans, millions of people still need our help. Becoming StepChange Debt Charity is part of our plan to be more visible and to help even more
    people.

    You’ve told us you dislike our new name but we believe it will help raise awareness of our services and provide a

    clear message about who we are and what we do. It will help people recognise the free services we offer and hopefully we’ll become the organisation that people turn to first when looking for debt help.

    We’re not here to judge people who contact us. We aim to give them the help and advice

    they need to take control of their financial situation no matter how they got in to difficulty.

    You’ve also raised concern that we’re funded by creditors which has caused you to have

    doubts about how independent we are. Unlike fee-charging debt management companies, we are funded by creditors. Their charitable contributions enable us to provide genuinely free advice and support to those who need it. Our advice is always based on what is
    best for an individual not what is most
    profitable for us. Creditors do not influence our advice or the debt solutions we discuss with individuals who need ourhelp.

    I hope my explanation helps you understand why we’ve changed our name and that I’ve restored your confidence in our

    service. I’m sorry you dislike our new name but we hope you’ll continue to use our free service to guide you through your financial difficulties.

    Details of the charity’s formal complaints procedure were sent to you in our initial email. If you aren’t satisfied with this response,

    you may refer your complaint to the Financial Ombudsman Service who’ll complete an impartial review of your concerns. You’ll need to do this within six months of the date of this email. Information relating to their service can be found using the following
    link http://www.financial-ombudsman.org.uk/consumer/complaints.htm.

    Kind regards

    Christina Eccles

    Client Liaison Officer

    ——————————————————————————This message may contain confidential information and is intended for the addressee only.
    If you have received this information in error, please return it to us and delete it from
    your computer.
    Although StepChange Debt Charity operates anti-virus programmes, it does not accept
    responsibility for any damage whatsoever that is caused by viruses being passed.
    As emails are not a secure method of communication, StepChange Debt Charity does not
    accept legal responsibility for the contents of this message.
    Foundation for Credit Counselling, trading as StepChange Debt Charity,
    Wade House, Merrion Centre, Leeds LS2 8NG. Company No. 2757055, Charity No. 1016630.

  • Mer om Twitter-klage, (MegaHomofil)


    Gmail – #6942770 Twitter Support: update on “Offensive content – MegaHomofil”

    Gmail


    Erik Ribsskog
    <eribsskog@gmail.com>



    #6942770 Twitter Support: update on “Offensive content – MegaHomofil”



    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>


    Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 4:56 AM

    To:
    Twitter Support <support+id6942770@twitter.zendesk.com>

    Hi,

    I think this must be a clear case of breaking Twitter rules.

    I would have wanted a second opinion about this.

    Could you please escalate to your line-manager?


    Erik Ribsskog

    On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 12:08 PM, SetantaRoss <notifications-support@twitter.zendesk.com> wrote:

    ##- Please type your reply above this line -##

    Twitter



    SetantaRoss, Dec 21 04:08 am (PST): Hello,
    While we understand your frustration, the reported behavior is not in violation of the Twitter Rules (http://twitter.com/rules).
    Here are some quick tips to help you with your situation:

    • Do not respond to the user. We have found that responding to someone who is intentionally attempting to aggravate you or others encourages them to continue their behavior.
    • Block the user. You can block the user using the blocking feature described here: https://support.twitter.com/entries/117063
    • Learn more about how to deal with abusive users: https://support.twitter.com/articles/15794
    • Learn how to flag inappropriate media here: https://support.twitter.com/articles/20069937

    As a policy, we do not mediate content and we do not intervene in disputes between users. This means that users are allowed to post potentially inflammatory content, provided that they do not violate the Twitter Rules.
    If someone feels personally threatened, or if you believe the content you are reporting is prohibited in your local jurisdiction, please contact your local authorities with the information you provided to us. You can point local law enforcement to our Law Enforcement Guidelines here: https://support.twitter.com/articles/41949.
    Please let us know if you believe the behavior has escalated or otherwise violates our rules.
    Thanks,
    SetantaRoss
    Twitter Trust & Safety


    johncons, Dec 20 04:07 pm (PST): How can we help?: Offensive content
    Reported user: @MegaHomofil
    Offensive Tweet: https://twitter.com/MegaHomofil/status/280491555998031872
    Text of Tweet: @johncons Du trenger ikke skamme deg. Neste gang finner jeg nok penisen din. Jeg tar med meg forstørrelsesglass, så ordner det seg nok. 😀
    Tweet time: Dec 17 2012 01:56:12 via web
    What are you reporting?: This user keeps sending me @replies and I don’t want to receive them.
    Blocked user(s): Yes
    How long ago did this begin?: Few days ago
    How many times has this happened?: Only once, (but this is a new account which seems dedicated to attacking me).
    I’ve sent you between fifty and one hundred similar reports lately.
    This seems organised.
    Further description of problem: The person calls himself ‘megahomofil’, which means mega-gay.
    The tweet means something like: ‘You don’t need to be ashamed. I think I’ll find your penis the next time. I’ll bring a magnifing-glas, then it will be alright :D’.
    As a heterosexual man, I find this tweet very offensive, inpolite and harassing.
    So I wanted to please report about this.
    Your full name: Erik Ribsskog
    I understand that Twitter may provide third parties, such as the affected user, with a copy of this report.
    Twitter username: @johncons
    Email address: eribsskog@gmail.com

    Message-Id:KRTQXDC0_50d4513875741_499c1c6fa7430334cd_sprut

  • Mer om Twitter-klage, (BengtWad)


    Gmail – #6942523 Twitter Support: update on “Offensive content – BengtWad”

    Gmail


    Erik Ribsskog
    <eribsskog@gmail.com>



    #6942523 Twitter Support: update on “Offensive content – BengtWad”



    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>


    Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 4:50 AM

    To:
    Twitter Support <support+id6942523@twitter.zendesk.com>

    Hi,

    I would have wanted a second opinion about this.
    Could you please escalate to your line-manager?


    Erik Ribsskog


    On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 12:06 PM, SetantaRoss <notifications-support@twitter.zendesk.com> wrote:

    ##- Please type your reply above this line -##

    Twitter



    SetantaRoss, Dec 21 04:06 am (PST): Hello,
    While we understand your frustration, the reported behavior is not in violation of the Twitter Rules (http://twitter.com/rules).
    Here are some quick tips to help you with your situation:

    • Do not respond to the user. We have found that responding to someone who is intentionally attempting to aggravate you or others encourages them to continue their behavior.
    • Block the user. You can block the user using the blocking feature described here: https://support.twitter.com/entries/117063
    • Learn more about how to deal with abusive users: https://support.twitter.com/articles/15794
    • Learn how to flag inappropriate media here: https://support.twitter.com/articles/20069937

    As a policy, we do not mediate content and we do not intervene in disputes between users. This means that users are allowed to post potentially inflammatory content, provided that they do not violate the Twitter Rules.
    If someone feels personally threatened, or if you believe the content you are reporting is prohibited in your local jurisdiction, please contact your local authorities with the information you provided to us. You can point local law enforcement to our Law Enforcement Guidelines here: https://support.twitter.com/articles/41949.
    Please let us know if you believe the behavior has escalated or otherwise violates our rules.
    Thanks,
    SetantaRoss
    Twitter Trust & Safety


    johncons, Dec 20 03:30 pm (PST): How can we help?: Offensive content
    Reported user: @BengtWad
    Offensive Tweet: https://twitter.com/BengtWad/status/280476659411460099
    Text of Tweet: @johncons klikk.no/forum/barnimag
    Tweet time: Dec 17 2012 00:57:01 via web
    What are you reporting?: This user keeps sending me @replies and I don’t want to receive them.
    Blocked user(s): Yes
    How long ago did this begin?: Few days ago
    How many times has this happened?: Only once, (but this is a new account, which seems dedicated to attacking me).
    I’ve sent you between fifty and one hundred similar reports lately.
    This seems organised.
    Further description of problem: This person messages me a link to a message-board for pregnant women.
    I’m a heterosexual man, and I think it’s offensive, inpolite and harassing to send me links to a message-board for pregnant women.
    This person also calles himself Bengt Wad, and a Wiki-admin named Harry Wad has been harassing me on the internet earlier, (like I’ve also reported to Twitter, if I remember it right).
    Your full name: Erik Ribsskog
    I understand that Twitter may provide third parties, such as the affected user, with a copy of this report.
    Twitter username: @johncons
    Email address: eribsskog@gmail.com

    Message-Id:S9BDJQQ6_50d450b63a54_20f7126d2743036726_sprut

  • Mer om Twitter-klage, (GeirArneJ)


    Gmail – #6942374 Twitter Support: update on “Offensive content – GeirArneJ”

    Gmail


    Erik Ribsskog
    <eribsskog@gmail.com>



    #6942374 Twitter Support: update on “Offensive content – GeirArneJ”



    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>


    Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 4:42 AM

    To:
    Twitter Support <support+id6942374@twitter.zendesk.com>

    Hi,

    I think this is a clear case of breaking Twitter-rules.

    So I would have wanted a second opinion about this.
    Could you please escalate to your line-manager?


    Erik Ribsskog

    On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 12:03 PM, SetantaRoss <notifications-support@twitter.zendesk.com> wrote:

    ##- Please type your reply above this line -##

    Twitter



    SetantaRoss, Dec 21 04:03 am (PST): Hello,
    While we understand your frustration, the reported behavior is not in violation of the Twitter Rules (http://twitter.com/rules).
    Here are some quick tips to help you with your situation:

    • Do not respond to the user. We have found that responding to someone who is intentionally attempting to aggravate you or others encourages them to continue their behavior.
    • Block the user. You can block the user using the blocking feature described here: https://support.twitter.com/entries/117063
    • Learn more about how to deal with abusive users: https://support.twitter.com/articles/15794
    • Learn how to flag inappropriate media here: https://support.twitter.com/articles/20069937

    As a policy, we do not mediate content and we do not intervene in disputes between users. This means that users are allowed to post potentially inflammatory content, provided that they do not violate the Twitter Rules.
    If someone feels personally threatened, or if you believe the content you are reporting is prohibited in your local jurisdiction, please contact your local authorities with the information you provided to us. You can point local law enforcement to our Law Enforcement Guidelines here: https://support.twitter.com/articles/41949.
    Please let us know if you believe the behavior has escalated or otherwise violates our rules.
    Thanks,
    SetantaRoss
    Twitter Trust & Safety


    johncons, Dec 20 03:07 pm (PST): How can we help?: Offensive content
    Reported user: @GeirArneJ
    Offensive Tweet: https://twitter.com/GeirArneJ/status/280395511540895744
    Text of Tweet: @johncons Hører du ble kjønnsoperert til slutt. Gratulerer med suksessen i livet, som godteriselger mm.
    Tweet time: Dec 16 2012 19:34:34 via web
    What are you reporting?: This user keeps sending me @replies and I don’t want to receive them.
    Blocked user(s): Yes
    How long ago did this begin?: Few days ago
    How many times has this happened?: Only once, (but this is a new account which seems dedicated to attacking me).
    I’ve sent you between fifty and one hundred similar reports lately.
    This seems organised.
    Further description of problem: This person seems to use the name of my earlier class-mate, (from Primary school and High school), Geir Arne Jørgensen.
    The person says I’ve had a sex-change-operation, which isn’t true.
    I’m a heterosexual man, and I think comments like this are very offensive, inpolite and harassing.
    Your full name: Erik Ribsskog
    I understand that Twitter may provide third parties, such as the affected user, with a copy of this report.
    Twitter username: @johncons
    Email address: eribsskog@gmail.com

    Message-Id:Y3YHT0QG_50d45012b1bbb_19cf18ec26c3024924_sprut

  • Mer om Twitter-klage, (Posegodt_)


    Gmail – #6942297 Twitter Support: update on “Offensive content – Posegodt_”

    Gmail


    Erik Ribsskog
    <eribsskog@gmail.com>



    #6942297 Twitter Support: update on “Offensive content – Posegodt_”



    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>


    Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 4:11 AM

    To:
    Twitter Support <support+id6942297@twitter.zendesk.com>

    Hi,

    you ignore that this is about more than the pictures here, I think.

    (And I also disagree about them).

    Could you please escalate to your line-manager?


    Erik Ribsskog

    On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 12:02 PM, SetantaRoss <notifications-support@twitter.zendesk.com> wrote:

    ##- Please type your reply above this line -##

    Twitter



    SetantaRoss, Dec 21 04:02 am (PST): Hello,
    Thanks for providing this information. As a policy, we do not mediate user content, including images, unless it violates the Twitter Rules (https://twitter.com/rules). Based on this policy, we will not remove the reported image.
    What violates the Twitter Rules?
    Twitter does investigate and remove profile photos, header photos, and background images
    for violations such as nudity or pornographic content.
    Media within Tweets that might be considered sensitive content such as nudity, violence, or medical procedures, can be flagged for our review by using the flagging feature on the Tweet. If the media is considered sensitive content, users will be required to click through a warning message before media is displayed to them. You can find more information about about media on Twitter at the following links:
    Flagging and reporting media: https://support.twitter.com/articles/20069937
    Media policy: https://support.twitter.com/articles/20169199
    To learn more on how to protect your online photos, read the following article:
    https://support.twitter.com/articles/20170136

    If you are making an allegation of copyright infringement (please note that in most instances, the subject of a photograph is not the copyright owner), our copyright page has more information about the proper process for requesting removal:
    http://support.twitter.com/articles/15795
    Thanks,
    SetantaRoss
    Twitter Trust & Safety


    johncons, Dec 20 02:57 pm (PST): How can we help?: Offensive content
    Reported user: @Posegodt_
    Offensive Tweet: https://twitter.com/Posegodt_/status/280134885803446272
    Text of Tweet: @johncons må være verdens dårligste forretningsmann. Endrer navn på butikken sin (nå til @Posegodt ) annenhver dag. Smart!
    Tweet time: Dec 16 2012 02:18:56 via web

    Offensive Tweet: https://twitter.com/Posegodt_/status/280134972344512512
    Text of Tweet: @Posegodt @johncons Gratulerer med Klodrik-prisen!
    Tweet time: Dec 16 2012 02:19:16 via web
    What are you reporting?: This user keeps sending me @replies and I don’t want to receive them.

    Blocked user(s): Yes
    How long ago did this begin?: Few days ago
    How many times has this happened?: Only twice, (but this is a new account which seems dedicated to attacking me).
    I’ve sent you between fifty and one hundred similar reports lately.
    This seems organised.
    Further description of problem: This person is using manipulated pictures of me, (which I have taken myself, and owns the copyrights for), on the Twitter-page.
    The person is using the name of my web-shop, (Posegodt).
    The person attacks me for changing the name on my web-shop, when this was initiated by that someone registered that name, (Godtebutikken), on Twitter, and impersonated my web-shop.
    And the web-shop was also hacked, and links to horrible pictures was put on the web-shop.
    This account is set up just to terrorise me, it seems to me.
    Your full name: Erik Ribsskog
    I understand that Twitter may provide third parties, such as the affected user, with a copy of this report.
    Twitter username: @johncons
    Email address: eribsskog@gmail.com

    Message-Id:8CB4Q5HP_50d44fee91cdb_49ac17d62743055495_sprut