Måned: juli 2013
-
Mer om Twitter-klage, (DirectlyAfterOd)
Gmail – #11111663 Twitter Support: update on “Offensive content – DirectlyAfterOd”
Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>
#11111663 Twitter Support: update on “Offensive content – DirectlyAfterOd”
Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 1:20 AM
To:
Twitter Support <support+id11111663@twitter.zendesk.com>
Hi,it’s also impersonation.I’m directly after some Danish kings that were after Wodin, (in mytology at least).Erik Ribsskog
So this is also impersonation. I would have wanted someone else at Twitter to have a look at this for a second opinion.
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 10:37 PM, FlynnJackson <notifications-support@twitter.zendesk.com> wrote:
##- Please type your reply above this line -##
FlynnJackson, Jul 17 02:37 pm (PDT): Hello,
Thanks for providing this information. As a policy, we do not mediate user content, including images, unless it violates the Twitter media policy (https://support.twitter.com/articles/20169199). Based on this policy, we will not remove the reported image.
Twitter does investigate and remove profile photos, header photos, and background images for violations such as nudity or pornographic content.
Media within Tweets that might be considered sensitive content such as nudity, violence, or medical procedures, can be flagged for our review by using the flagging feature on the Tweet. If the media is considered sensitive content, users will be required to click through a warning message before media is displayed to them. You can find more information about about media on Twitter at the following links:
Flagging and reporting media: https://support.twitter.com/articles/20069937
Media policy: https://support.twitter.com/articles/20169199
To learn more on how to protect your online photos, read the following article: https://support.twitter.com/articles/20170136
If you are making an allegation of copyright infringement (please note that in most instances, the subject of a photograph is not the copyright owner), our copyright page has more information about the proper process for requesting removal: http://support.twitter.com/articles/15795
Thanks,
FlynnJackson
Twitter Trust & Safety
johncons, Jul 14 04:02 pm (PDT):
What username is causing the issue?: @DirectlyAfterOd
Tweet I am reporting: https://twitter.com/DirectlyAfterOd/status/ 313389899745198080
n/a
n/a Blocked user(s): Yes
How many times has this happened?: Only once, but this is an account which has only written one tweet.
So I think this account is dedicated to attacking me.
I’ve sent you more than a hundred similar reports in the last months.
Further description of problem: This person links to a picture of me, which I own the copyrights for.
I think that’s some kind of provocation, which I think is offensive.
Your full name: Erik Ribsskog
I understand that Twitter may provide third parties, such as the affected user, with a copy of this report.
Twitter username: @johncons
Email address: eribsskog@gmail.com
Message-Id:S7E6F8MV_51e70eafbdca3_ 24e8f086816317b2_sprut
-
Mer om Twitter-klage, (baronesse_e_r)
Gmail – #11111407 Twitter Support: update on “Offensive content – baronesse_e_r”
Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>
#11111407 Twitter Support: update on “Offensive content – baronesse_e_r”
Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 1:11 AM
To:
Twitter Support <support+id11111407@twitter.zendesk.com>
Hi,
this account and the tweets from it breaches so many of the Twitter-rules.
– It’s demasculation of me. (They call me baronesse).– It’s impersonation.– It’s copyright-infridgement. (They use photo’s I have the copyrights for).
– They insult me. (They say I’m an ‘oinker’, or a swine, I guess. This might be Al Quaida, or something).
And you say this doesn’t break any of your rules.
I think I would have wanted someone else at Twitter to have a look at this for a second opinion.
Erik Ribsskog
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 10:37 PM, FlynnJackson <notifications-support@twitter.zendesk.com> wrote:
##- Please type your reply above this line -##
FlynnJackson, Jul 17 02:37 pm (PDT): Hello,
While we understand your frustration, the reported behavior is not in violation of the Twitter Rules (http://twitter.com/rules).
Here are some quick tips to help you with your situation:
• Do not respond to the user. We have found that responding to someone who is intentionally attempting to aggravate you or others encourages them to continue their behavior.As a policy, we do not mediate content and we do not intervene in disputes between users. This means that users are allowed to post potentially inflammatory content, provided that they do not violate the Twitter Rules.
• Block the user. You can block the user using the blocking feature described here: https://support.twitter.com/entries/117063
• Learn more about how to deal with abusive users: https://support.twitter.com/articles/15794
• Learn how to flag inappropriate media here: https://support.twitter.com/articles/20069937
If someone feels personally threatened, or if you believe the content you are reporting is prohibited in your local jurisdiction, please contact your local authorities with the information you provided to us. You can point local law enforcement to our Law Enforcement Guidelines here: https://support.twitter.com/articles/41949.
Please let us know if you believe the behavior has escalated or otherwise violates our rules.
Thanks,
FlynnJackson
Twitter Trust & Safety
johncons, Jul 14 03:49 pm (PDT): What username is causing the issue?: @baronesse_e_r
Tweet I am reporting: https://twitter.com/baronesse_e_r/status/311604412550373376
n/a
n/a Blocked user(s): Yes
How many times has this happened?: Only once, but this is an account which only has written one tweet.
So it seems like this Twitter-account is dedicated to attacking me.
I’ve sent you more than one hundred similar reports in the last months.
Further description of problem: The tweet calls me an ‘oinker’, which I think is offensive.
The Twitter-account also uses pictures, (of me), which I have taken myself, and own the copyrights for.
Your full name: Erik Ribsskog
I understand that Twitter may provide third parties, such as the affected user, with a copy of this report.
Twitter username: @johncons
Email address: eribsskog@gmail.com
Message-Id:MWV4ZQZD_51e70e7d6cecb_ 5e3fed70741577753_sprut
-
Jeg sendte en e-post til Jan Thoresen, som er redaktør, på Klikk.no-nettstedet Kvinneguiden.no
Gmail – Til redaktør Jan Thoresen, Klikk.no
Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>
Til redaktør Jan Thoresen, Klikk.no
Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 11:53 PM
To:
firmapost@egmonthm.no
Hei,Jeg så på Wikipedia at du er redaktør for Klikk.no:
jeg har en blogg, (johncons-blogg: http://johncons-mirror.blogspot.co.uk/). Og min blogg blir stadig nevnt, på deres Klikk.no-nettsted Kvinneguiden.no.
Jeg har et tracking-cookie program, på bloggen min, som heter StatCounter:Og der kan jeg se det, at deres nettsted, sender trafikk, til bloggen min.Og dette har skjedd hundrevis av ganger nå.
Og det er noen som utgir seg for å være meg, når de skriver om bloggen min.Så andre på deres nettsted, (Kvinneguiden.no), blir forvirret, og tror at jeg skriver der.Hva har dere tenkt til å gjøre med dette problemet, lurer jeg.Jeg mener at dette blir som identietstyveri og æreskrenkelse og det som verre er.Erik RibsskogPS.
I denne linken så kan man se det, at dette, (at folk trakasserer meg, på deres nettsted), har skjedd mange ti-talls ganger nå: http://johncons-mirror.blogspot.co.uk/search/label/ Kvinneguiden.no -
Det er noen som sier at jeg skriver på Kvinneguiden. Det har jeg aldri gjort. De skriveriene der om bloggen min har jeg ikke noe med, dessverre
http://forum.kvinneguiden.no/index.php?showtopic=758526
PS.
Jeg kan se hvem som sender trafikk til bloggen min, på StatCounter:
-
Min Bok 5 – Kapittel 233: Fler erindringer fra tiden jeg bodde på St. Hanshaugen VI
Det var også sånn, at en del uker, før jeg skulle flytte til England, for å studere, ved University of Sunderland.
Så dro jeg innom Sentrum politistasjon.
(Den ganske nye, som holder til like ovenfor gamle Sentrum kino der, blir det vel.
Ikke så langt unna Youngstorget).
Og jeg fikk meg et nytt pass, (igjen), da.
Og jeg hadde jo fått meg et nytt pass, sommeren før også.
(Nemlig sommeren 2003).
Og det var fordi at passet mitt hadde blitt borte.
(Mens det hadde ligget, i leiligheten min, på St. Hanshaugen.
Må det vel ha vært).
Og sommeren 2004, så hadde altså passet mitt blitt borte igjen da, (husker jeg).
(På en eller annen merkverdig måte.
Må det vel ha vært).
Og jeg hadde jo ikke likt de ‘biffete’ og ‘cowboy-aktige’ politifolka, som hadde laget nytt pass for meg, på Grønland politistasjon, sommeren 2003.
Så sommeren 2004, så dro jeg til Sentrum politistasjon, for å få meg nytt pass, da.
Og jeg husker at jeg tok passbilde, i en fotoautomat, som stod i rolig del, av politistasjonen der.
Og at ei ganske stille dame, (var det vel), tok imot min bestilling på nytt pass, da.
Og passene, de hadde blitt en del dyrere, fra 2003 til 2004.
Men det hadde det stått en del om i nettavisene, hva kom av.
Og det var fordi at det siden sommeren 2003 hadde kommet en ny type pass, med en slags microchips i, (eller noe sånt).
Og denne typen pass, hadde også et slags innebygget visum, til USA, husker jeg, at det stod skrevet om, i nettavisene, på den her tiden.
Så sånn var det.
Bare noe jeg tenkte på.
Men men.
Så hva som kan ha vært grunnen, til at passene mine ble borte, ‘hele tiden’, mens jeg bodde, på St. Hanshaugen.
Det veit jeg ikke.
Hm.
Men jeg fikk meg ihvertfall et nytt pass, (som kosta cirka tusen kroner vel), i posten, (var det vel), i ganske god tid, før jeg flytta, til Sunderland, da.
(Hvis jeg husker det riktig, ihvertfall).
Så sånn var det.
Bare noe jeg tenkte på.
Men men.
Det var fortsatt mye mer som hendte, den tida som jeg bodde, på St. Hanshaugen.
Og dette tenkte jeg at jeg skulle prøve å få skrevet mer om, i de neste kapitlene, av Min Bok 5.
Så vi får se om jeg klarer å få til det.
Vi får se.
