Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>
Steve Rotheram MP : Problems with IPCC/Fwd: Problemer med politiet i England/Fwd: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 1:40 PM
To:
“BYRNE, Maureen” <maureen.byrne@parliament.uk>
Hi, I found more about the Ofcom-case now, on my e-mail programme. Yours sincerely, Erik Ribsskog PS. Here is more about this: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 2:23 PM To:
“BOOTH, Gary” <gary.booth@parliament.uk>
Hi, thank you for your e-mail!
My National Insurance Number is SG 27 09 67 D. It’s also a complaint from May. And then I wondered why Ofcom doesn’t have a general enquiery e-mail
address on their website.
(Because I wanted to complain to Ofcom about Virgin Broadband, some
months ago, and ended up complaining to ICO instead, since I don’t
like ‘web-mail’, like Ofcom has, (on their website), since then the
citizens sometimes lose control of their complaints, I think, since
one sometimes doesn’t recieve an e-mail where the complaint is
written, when one use ‘web-mail’, instead of proper e-mail-addresses,
because then one can have a copy of the sent e-mail in ones
e-mail-programme, and have documentation about what one wrote). Thanks again for the reply! Best regards, Erik Ribsskog On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 1:36 PM, BYRNE, Maureen
<maureen.byrne@parliament.uk> wrote:
>
>
> —–Original Message—–
> From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
> Sent: 14 November 2013 13:32
> To: BYRNE, Maureen
> Subject: Re: Steve Rotheram MP : Problems with IPCC/Fwd: Problemer med politiet i England/Fwd: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
>
> Hi,
>
> the problem is that when I send e-mails to the IPCC, then that e-mail address doesn’t work.
>
> I’d like to hear this from the IPCC.
>
> I don’t like the webforms, since I think the citizens has more control on the communication if they have a copy of the correspondence, in their e-mail-programme.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Erik Ribsskog
>
> PS.
>
> Then I guess it should be a special department, within the Merseyside Police, that I should send the IPCC-case to?
>
> PS 2.
>
> I’ll also try to find more about the other case I mentioned in the previous e-mail.
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 1:00 PM, BYRNE, Maureen <maureen.byrne@parliament.uk> wrote:
>> Thank you for your address. It is unclear from your email what you are asking Steve Rotheram MP to do on your behalf. If you have a complaint against the police you would in the first instance have to make this to the police force concerned for them to investigate. If you remain dissatisfied with their response you can of course take this to the Independent Police Complaints Commission which can investigate, as this is not the role of the Parliamentary Ombuds. The IPCC website gives details of how to make a complaint and has the required form for you to complete, which does not require your Member of Parliament to sign.
>>
>> Yours sincerely
>>
>> Maureen Byrne
>> Office of Steve Rotheram MP
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> —–Original Message—–
>> From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
>> Sent: 14 November 2013 11:47
>> To: BYRNE, Maureen
>> Subject: Re: Steve Rotheram MP : Problems with IPCC/Fwd: Problemer med
>> politiet i England/Fwd: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> thank you for your e-mail!
>>
>> My home address should be:
>>
>> 10 Keith Court
>> Keith Avenue
>> Liverpool
>> L4 5XJ
>>
>> (I’ve earlier been in touch with you regarding some cases in July, (to do with the Jobcentre), and which were resolved, if I remember it right.
>>
>> And there was also a case before that, I think, regarding the ‘telephone ombudsman’, (or something like that), which I can’t remember now it was resolved.
>>
>> Just something I thought about now, as an update).
>>
>> Thanks very much for the help with this!
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Erik Ribsskog
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 10:51 AM, BYRNE, Maureen <maureen.byrne@parliament.uk> wrote:
>>> Steve has received your email and passed this to the constituency office. In order for this to be progressed we will need to have your home address in line with parliamentary protocol.
>>>
>>> Yours sincerely
>>>
>>> Maureen Byrne
>>> Office of Steve Rotheram MP
>>> 0151 525 5025
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> —–Original Message—–
>>> From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
>>> Sent: 14 November 2013 08:18
>>> To: ROTHERAM, Steve
>>> Cc: post
>>> Subject: Problems with IPCC/Fwd: Problemer med politiet i England/Fwd:
>>> Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> when I send an e-mail to the e-mail address which is on the IPCC website, then this e-mail address doesn’t work, (see forwarded e-mail).
>>>
>>> Could you contact the Parliamentary Ombudsman please.
>>>
>>> And hear if they can get the IPCC to put a working e-mail address on their website, (so that I can send some police-complaints to the IPCC).
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance for any help!
>>>
>>> Yours sincerely,
>>>
>>> Erik Ribsskog
>>>
>>>
>>> ———- Forwarded message ———-
>>> From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
>>> Date: Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 7:36 PM
>>> Subject: Problemer med politiet i England/Fwd: Delivery Status
>>> Notification (Failure)
>>> To: post <post@spesialenheten.no>
>>> Cc: COMMCEN <COMMCEN@merseyside.police.uk>
>>>
>>>
>>> Hei,
>>>
>>> jeg sender denne til dere, for e-post-adressen som står på nettstedet til den engelske spesialenheten, (IPCC), virker ikke, virker det som for meg.
>>>
>>> Erik Ribsskog
>>>
>>>
>>> ———- Forwarded message ———-
>>> From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <mailer-daemon@googlemail.com>
>>> Date: Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 7:25 PM
>>> Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
>>> To: eribsskog@gmail.com
>>>
>>>
>>> Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently:
>>>
>>> enquiries@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk
>>>
>>> Technical details of permanent failure:
>>> Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the server for the recipient domain ipcc.gsi.gov.uk by cluster.gsi.messagelabs.com. [194.106.220.3].
>>>
>>> The error that the other server returned was:
>>> 553-Sorry, your email address eribsskog@gmail.com has been
>>> 553-blacklisted. Please see the FAQs section on spam at
>>> 553-http://www.messagelabs.
>>> 553 information. (#5.7.1)
>>>
>>> —– Original message —–
>>>
>>> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
>>> d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
>>> h=mime-version:date:message-
>>> bh=nPZSbZji+/
>>> b=U8KfBaTGbB/63//aMD4U0koRuO+
>>> SB9yGPoj/K8RyPkvjAz2OtzZO+
>>> UjDhLre5HwYDpImcH6PUhV5mWw19Ih
>>> Ois16iO2oePldlAP56ufhH9RREhlJ3
>>> jPBpmam7d4+mNko1xCxaLZFmv+
>>> wp5g==
>>> MIME-Version: 1.0
>>> X-Received: by 10.66.191.198 with SMTP id
>>> ha6mr26217796pac.72.
>>> Tue, 12 Nov 2013 11:25:55 -0800 (PST)
>>> Received: by 10.70.72.99 with HTTP; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 11:25:55 -0800
>>> (PST)
>>> Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 19:25:55 +0000
>>> Message-ID:
>>> <
>>> Subject: Update/Fwd: LOG 1507 02/11/13…….Harassment from Hungry
>>> House –
>>> 17991 – [Not Protectively Marked]
>>> From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
>>> To: COMMCEN <COMMCEN@merseyside.police.uk>
>>> Cc: “!enquiries” <enquiries@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk>
>>> Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I was at Walton Lane police-station right now regarding four cases.
>>>
>>> I spoke with constable 3174.
>>>
>>> He ridiculed me and said the reason I had gotten 70 dodgy phone-calls and a lot of e-mails and 14 fast food-delivery guys on my door was because I had ticked a box on the internet.
>>>
>>> But I have a degree in IT and don’t think there is a box like that.
>>>
>>> I think some criminals are terrorising me.
>>>
>>> Regarding the strangler today at around 3PM at Heymarket.
>>>
>>> I attach a photograph of him.
>>>
>>> But the photo wasn’t that fine, due to that I wasn’t myself after the attack.
>>>
>>> Regarding the neighbour, (in 9 Keith Court), I think he’s a criminal.
>>>
>>> Since I overheard him treateing a guy in his 20’s some months ago that he would scrape up his car, (with his house-key), after they’d had an argument, (since the young Keith Court-guy said he would have hit the old guy in number nine if he had done a thing like that on the street).
>>>
>>> Also the guy in number 9 walks around in his underwear.
>>>
>>> He has been going on my door, with two, (and sometimes three), clocks, which he has asked me if were set right, (and sometimes he did this in his under-wear).
>>>
>>> He started the community care system, (since these are converted flats for the elderly), this spring, and I went out to see what was wrong with him.
>>>
>>> He said he needed to go to hospital, but really the problem was his door that had been smashed in the day before, it seemed.
>>>
>>> So I called the police, and a lock-smith fixed the door, later that day.
>>>
>>> Just to sumarise a bit.
>>>
>>> I’ve told this neighbour I want him to leave me alone.
>>>
>>> (Since he’s a criminal and I noticed his flat smelt very bad, when I called the police for him, when he had started the alarm for the elderly).
>>>
>>> But yesteday he stood outside my door and said ‘Good Morning’ when I was going to Tesco.
>>>
>>> I don’t think thats to leave me alone.
>>>
>>> So I told him, (loudly, to warn the neighbours etc.), to leave me alone.
>>>
>>> So I hope he leaves me alone now.
>>>
>>>
>>> —– Message truncated —–
>>>
>>> ______________________________
>>>
>>> UK Parliament Disclaimer:
>>> This e-mail is confidential to the intended recipient. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system. Any unauthorised use, disclosure, or copying is not permitted. This e-mail has been checked for viruses, but no liability is accepted for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this e-mail.
>>
>> ______________________________
>>
>> UK Parliament Disclaimer:
>> This e-mail is confidential to the intended recipient. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system. Any unauthorised use, disclosure, or copying is not permitted. This e-mail has been checked for viruses, but no liability is accepted for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this e-mail.
>
> ______________________________
>
> UK Parliament Disclaimer:
> This e-mail is confidential to the intended recipient. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system. Any unauthorised use, disclosure, or copying is not permitted. This e-mail has been checked for viruses, but no liability is accepted for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this e-mail.