
Måned: januar 2014
-
Jeg sendte en e-post til kirken i Rollag
Gmail – Slektsforskning (Berget og Margit Danielsdatter, Rollag Prestegård) body, td{font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px} a:link, a:active {color:#1155CC; text-decoration:none} a:hover {text-decoration:underline; cursor: pointer} a:visited{color:##6611CC} img{border:0px} pre { white-space: pre; white-space: -moz-pre-wrap; white-space: -o-pre-wrap; white-space: pre-wrap; word-wrap: break-word; max-width: 800px; overflow: auto;}
Erik Ribsskog<eribsskog@gmail.com>
Slektsforskning (Berget og Margit Danielsdatter, Rollag Prestegård)
Erik Ribsskog<eribsskog@gmail.com>Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 10:48 PMTo:aaseb@rollag.kommune.noCc:soknepresten.rollag@rollag.kommune.no, Rollag Bibliotek <Rollag.Bibliotek@rollag.kommune.no>, svelvik.menighet@svelvik.kirken.noHei,jeg driver fortsatt med slektsforskning, (noe jeg har fått svar om frabiblioteket i Rollag tidligere).Jeg har funnet ut at min farmor Ågot Mogan Olsen sin mor, (nemligBergit Tovsdatter Mogan), hadde to bestemødre, som begge hetDanielsdatter.Det var Margit og Berget.(Se vedlagt slektsforskning).Hu Berget har jeg funnet ut om, at var etter noen som bodde påprestegarden i Rollag, nemlig Daniel Hansen og Aase Gundersdatter.Men det var også fler Daniel oppi der, på den tida, (blant annet enDaniel Sevresen, (har jeg sett i kirkeboka).Men det er så mange år, å kikke gjennom, (i kirkeboka), for å finnebryllupet til Margit Danielsdatter og Gullek Olsen.Så jeg lurte på om disse folka fortsatt er kjent oppi der?Var a Margit også datter av han Daniel Hansen fra prestegarden.Bare at hu var attpåklatt?For hu var ikke med på folketellinga for 1801, (var det vel), for prestegarden.Men hu kunne jo ha blitt født like etterpå.Bestemor Ågot kunne kanskje noen ganger virke litt innavla.(Uten at jeg er noen ekspert).Så det er mulig at begge besteforeldra til mora hennes var søstre.Hva vet jeg.Har dere noen ‘forklarings’ på dette?Og hvor på det fine prestetunet deres bodde han Daniel Hansen forresten?Var det i en av de bygningene som det står om på nettet?(Det stod i folketellinga at han var bonde og også dreide rokker.Noe sånt.Jeg fikk forresten et sybord, (eller noe sånt), som var gammelt, til åha TV-en min på, på gutterommet, på 80-tallet.For jeg hadde VIC 20, osv.).Jeg har sett at det var en lav stue, på det tunet, med veggmalerier avKongsbergmaleren osv., på Wikipedia.Dessuten, så fant visst mora til Ågot sin foster-far, (GullekGullekson Gulleksrud/Traaen), Tråen-skatten, har jeg lest, på nettet.Den holder vel til like ved prestegården ettersom jeg har forstått?Håper dere har mulighet til å svare på dette.(Litt artig å vite hvor ‘innavla’ man er, liksom.Selv om jeg skal prøve å leite mer i kirkeboka sjæl og).Mvh.Erik Ribsskog -
Jeg sendte en ny e-post til the Parliamentary Ombudsman
Gmail – Our reference EN-178255 >//
function Print(){document.body.offsetHeight;window.print()};
// ]]>
Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>
Our reference EN-178255
Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 6:01 PM
To:
Phso Enquiries <Phso.Enquiries@ombudsman.org.uk>Hi,Thanks in advance for any help! Yours sincerely, Erik Ribsskog
the problem is that the IPCC has blocked my e-mail-address, (for some reason, which isn’t that clear to me, I think I have to say). If you could please send my e-mail on to them, or tell them to unblock my e-mail-address.
On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 2:18 PM, Phso Enquiries <Phso.Enquiries@ombudsman.org.uk> wrote:
PROTECT
We are committed to keeping your information secure. As part of that commitment we have decided that when we send you information by email we may have to remove some details. This includes information that may identify you, any other person and sometimes the organisation complained about.
Our reference EN-178255 (Please quote in any future correspondence with us)
Dear SirThank you for your email of 18 November 2013 to us. I was sorry to learn of your concerns. I am also sorry that we are unable to help you with your complaint. This email explains why we believe that is the case.
Your complaintYou appear to complain about Merseyside Police, and emails that you have received from ‘Takeaway.com,’ which is a private company.
Our roleOur role is to consider complaints that the NHS in England and government bodies in the UK have not acted properly or fairly, or has provided a poor service.
Our decision and next stepsUnfortunately we are unable to help you with your complaints, because we are unable to look at complaints about the police and private companies.
Your complaint about the policeIt may be that the Independent Police Complaints Commission can help you. I have included their contact details below:
Independent Police Complaints Commission
PO Box 473
Sale
M33 0BWTelephone: 0300 020 0096
Email: enquiries@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk
Your complaint about a private companyYou should contact the private company directly to complain to them about the emails you have been receiving.
I hope the information I have provided is helpfulIf you have any questions about what I have set out in this email, please contact me using the details below.
Yours faithfullyLaura Dear
Customer Services OfficerParliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman
Millbank TowerMillbankLondonSW1P 4QPTelephone: 0345 015 4033
Follow us on
If you think our decision is wrong, you can request a review. To enable us to review our decision you must provide us with evidence that our decision was based on inaccurate information; or you have new information that was not previously available to us; or we overlooked or misunderstood your complaint. To request a review, you can complete a ‘What to do if you think our decision is wrong’ form, which is available on our website: www.ombudsman.org.uk/make-a-complaint/unhappy-with-our- service. Alternatively, you can contact me for the form. You would need to submit your review request form to us within three months of the date of this correspondence.
Improving our serviceWe use an external research company to find out what our customers think. If you would prefer us not to pass your contact details on to them please call 0300 061 4222 or email us at customersurvey@ombudsman.org.uk
The original of this email was scanned for viruses by Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied exclusively by Cable & Wireless in partnership with MessageLabs.
On leaving the GSI this email was certified virus free.
All email communications with PHSO pass through the Government Secure Intranet, and may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes.
The MessageLabs Anti Virus Service is the first managed service to achieve the CSIA Claims Tested Mark (CCTM Certificate Number 2006/04/0007), the UK Government quality mark initiative for information security products and services. For more information about this please visit www.cctmark.gov.uk -
Mer om min Rollag-tippoldefar Tov Pedersen
PS.
Her kan man se at fødselsdatoen stemmer med folketellinga, (så det er nok riktig person):
http://digitalarkivet.arkivverket.no/ft/person/pf01036481001354
PS 2.
Tov/Thov Pedersen jobbet visst lenge som tjenestedreng på slektsgården:
http://digitalarkivet.arkivverket.no/ft/person/pf01038097002055
PS 3.
Her kan man se at min tipptippoldemor Bergit Danielsdatter ble konfirmert, (fra Ministralbok for Rollag 1792-1814):
PS 4.
Foreldrene til Bergit/Birgit holdt visst til på Rolloug Præstegaard:
http://digitalarkivet.arkivverket.no/ft/person/pf01058281000025
-
Jeg sendte enda en e-post til the Jobcentre
Gmail – New update/Fwd: Update/Fwd: jobs >//
function Print(){document.body.offsetHeight;window.print()};
// ]]>
Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>
New update/Fwd: Update/Fwd: jobs
Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 10:43 PM
To:
Bamber Sarah JCP AINTREE <SARAH.BAMBER@dwp.gsi.gov.uk>
Hi again, I’m also a bit afraid of applying for the jobs that Universal Jobmatch
recomends for me, in Knutsford. Because when I apply for jobs in Chorley or Blackpool. Then you start to ‘scream’ and critizise me in the meetings. But it says on the Jobseekers-agreement that I should apply for jobs
within 90 minutes travel-time, (which is about the time it takes to
get to Knutsford). (Even if it’s a bit expensive to go there, when one only have
jobseekers allowance. Because the train-tickets are £13.50. So I would have needed an advance quite quickly, to work in Knutsford). Also, one are supposed to leave feed-back, on the recommended jobs,
that one don’t apply for. But why was it again that I shouldn’t apply for jobs in
Blackpool/Chorley/Knutsford. Which reason should I choose from the drop-down-meny. Because it doesn’t say ‘Other’. And who get this feed-back by the way, (from the Universal Jobmatch). Just something I thought about here. Best regards, Erik Ribsskog
———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 9:57 PM
Subject: Update/Fwd: jobs
To: Bamber Sarah JCP AINTREE <SARAH.BAMBER@dwp.gsi.gov.uk>
Hi Sarah, I’ve applied for the two first jobs, in your e-mail now. In the job-description for the third job, they write a lot about UX and UI. And like I told you in the meeting yesterday, I learned about
usabilitiy, (and not UX/UI), at upper secondary and post-secondary
education, in Norway. So I’m not sure if they’re going to laugh at me, if I mention usability. Because I’m not that familiar with those terms, (UX and UI), even if I
understand partly what they mean, (but these fields seems a bit vague
to me, to be honest). Also the fourt and fifth job seems to be the same. And when I tried to apply for that, then I got an error-message: ‘HTTP Error 404.0 – Not Found
The resource you are looking for has been removed, had its name
changed, or is temporarily unavailable.’. Also, it says in the jobseekers-agreement that I should do my
jobsearch on the Universal Jobmatch, every day. But not all IT-jobs seems to end up there, (for some reason). Before the Jobcentre started insisting on that I do my job-search, on
Universal Jobmatch, then I used to find jobs on sites like CW Jobs. Is it ok, that I some days use other web-sites to look for jobs, (like CW Jobs)? Could we change the job-seekers-agreement so that it just says I
should do a job-search everyday, (week-day) (Because now it says I should do a Universal Jobmatch job-search every day. But some other web-sites, (like the ones you used in the meeting
yesterday), seems to be better, for finding e.g. Web Designer-jobs). Best regards, Erik Ribsskog
———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 5:22 PM
Subject: Re: jobs
To: Bamber Sarah JCP AINTREE <SARAH.BAMBER@dwp.gsi.gov.uk>
Hi Sarah, thank you for the e-mail! I’m also going to forward you the e-mail I mentioned in the meeting today. (The one from the IT-company, that were going to keep my CV, for three
months time. And which I said I was going to bring to the next meeting). Best regards, Erik Ribsskog
On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 4:03 PM, Bamber Sarah JCP AINTREE
<SARAH.BAMBER@dwp.gsi.gov.uk> wrote:
> http://jobview.monster.co.uk/Graduate-web-designer-HTML5- CSS3-Photoshop-Illustrator- Job-Chester-NW-UK-128547470. aspx?WT.mc_n=Indeed_UK&=olm_ sk_feed_indeed_uk
> http://www.indeed.co.uk/cmp/Connect-Internet-Solutions- Ltd/jobs/Digital-Designer- Front-End-Developer- d573d3b307b1d6b4
> http://www.totaljobs.com/JobSearch/JobDetails.aspx? JobId=58519544
> http://www.it-executive.com/pages/DataBase%20ASP/viewpub. asp?ID=48689
> http://www.it-executive.com/pages/DataBase%20ASP/viewpub. asp?ID=48689
>
>
> Sarah Bamber PWPS Advisor | Jobcentre Plus | CSD | Aintree Jobcentreplus |
> 70 Walton Vale | Liverpool | L9 2BU | 0151 801 6516 | | www.gov.uk | Please
> consider the environment before printing
>
>
>
> ************************************************************ **********
>
> This document is strictly confidential and is intended only for use by the
> addressee.
>
> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution
> or other
>
> action taken in reliance of the information contained in this e-mail is
> strictly prohibited.
>
> Any views expressed by the sender of this message are not necessarily those
> of the Department
>
> for Work and Pensions.
>
> If you have received this transmission in error, please use the reply
> function to tell us
>
> and then permanently delete what you have received.
>
> This email was scanned for viruses by the Department for Work and Pensions’
> anti-virus services and on leaving the Department was found to be virus
> free.
>
> Please note: Incoming and outgoing e-mail messages are routinely monitored
> for compliance
>
> with our policy on the use of electronic communications.
>
> ************************************************************ ********** -
Jeg sendte en e-post til the Jobcentre
Gmail – Update/Fwd: jobs >//
function Print(){document.body.offsetHeight;window.print()};
// ]]>
Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>
Update/Fwd: jobs
Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 9:57 PM
To:
Bamber Sarah JCP AINTREE <SARAH.BAMBER@dwp.gsi.gov.uk>
Hi Sarah, I’ve applied for the two first jobs, in your e-mail now. In the job-description for the third job, they write a lot about UX and UI. And like I told you in the meeting yesterday, I learned about
usabilitiy, (and not UX/UI), at upper secondary and post-secondary
education, in Norway. So I’m not sure if they’re going to laugh at me, if I mention usability. Because I’m not that familiar with those terms, (UX and UI), even if I
understand partly what they mean, (but these fields seems a bit vague
to me, to be honest). Also the fourt and fifth job seems to be the same. And when I tried to apply for that, then I got an error-message: ‘HTTP Error 404.0 – Not Found
The resource you are looking for has been removed, had its name
changed, or is temporarily unavailable.’. Also, it says in the jobseekers-agreement that I should do my
jobsearch on the Universal Jobmatch, every day. But not all IT-jobs seems to end up there, (for some reason). Before the Jobcentre started insisting on that I do my job-search, on
Universal Jobmatch, then I used to find jobs on sites like CW Jobs. Is it ok, that I some days use other web-sites to look for jobs, (like CW Jobs)? Could we change the job-seekers-agreement so that it just says I
should do a job-search everyday, (week-day) (Because now it says I should do a Universal Jobmatch job-search every day. But some other web-sites, (like the ones you used in the meeting
yesterday), seems to be better, for finding e.g. Web Designer-jobs). Best regards, Erik Ribsskog
———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 5:22 PM
Subject: Re: jobs
To: Bamber Sarah JCP AINTREE <SARAH.BAMBER@dwp.gsi.gov.uk>
Hi Sarah, thank you for the e-mail! I’m also going to forward you the e-mail I mentioned in the meeting today. (The one from the IT-company, that were going to keep my CV, for three
months time. And which I said I was going to bring to the next meeting). Best regards, Erik Ribsskog
On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 4:03 PM, Bamber Sarah JCP AINTREE
<SARAH.BAMBER@dwp.gsi.gov.uk> wrote:
> http://jobview.monster.co.uk/Graduate-web-designer-HTML5- CSS3-Photoshop-Illustrator- Job-Chester-NW-UK-128547470. aspx?WT.mc_n=Indeed_UK&=olm_ sk_feed_indeed_uk
> http://www.indeed.co.uk/cmp/Connect-Internet-Solutions- Ltd/jobs/Digital-Designer- Front-End-Developer- d573d3b307b1d6b4
> http://www.totaljobs.com/JobSearch/JobDetails.aspx? JobId=58519544
> http://www.it-executive.com/pages/DataBase%20ASP/viewpub. asp?ID=48689
> http://www.it-executive.com/pages/DataBase%20ASP/viewpub. asp?ID=48689
>
>
> Sarah Bamber PWPS Advisor | Jobcentre Plus | CSD | Aintree Jobcentreplus |
> 70 Walton Vale | Liverpool | L9 2BU | 0151 801 6516 | | www.gov.uk | Please
> consider the environment before printing
>
>
>
> ************************************************************ **********
>
> This document is strictly confidential and is intended only for use by the
> addressee.
>
> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution
> or other
>
> action taken in reliance of the information contained in this e-mail is
> strictly prohibited.
>
> Any views expressed by the sender of this message are not necessarily those
> of the Department
>
> for Work and Pensions.
>
> If you have received this transmission in error, please use the reply
> function to tell us
>
> and then permanently delete what you have received.
>
> This email was scanned for viruses by the Department for Work and Pensions’
> anti-virus services and on leaving the Department was found to be virus
> free.
>
> Please note: Incoming and outgoing e-mail messages are routinely monitored
> for compliance
>
> with our policy on the use of electronic communications.
>
> ************************************************************ **********











