johncons

Jeg sendte en e-post til the Jobcentre


Gmail – FW: solicitor Colin ‘OFFICIAL’





Gmail
Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>





FW: solicitor Colin ‘OFFICIAL’





Erik Ribsskog

<eribsskog@gmail.com>

Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 6:57 PM



To:
CONTACT-US <CONTACT-US@dwp.gsi.gov.uk>


Cc:
Colin Simber <colin.simber@linskills.co.uk>, Pia Ribsskog <pia@nfunorge.org>


Bcc:
“emb.london” <emb.london@mfa.no>, “mail.gva” <mail.gva@efta.int>, Akademikerforbundet <post@akademikerforbundet.no>, she@topdanmark.dk, Bjørn Ribsskog <bribsskog@gmail.com>


Hi, I don’t think the Jobcentre have anything to do in between my solicitor and myself. I just sent you a copy e-mail to show that my solicitior was working with this. (That’s how I understood it from the meeting with the Police and the solicitor. The police-constable just hade some print out of e-mails, in the meeting. Which he considered was evidence. He didn’t have any competence in IT, (and wasn’t aware of that there’s e.g. something called IP-addresses), it seemed to me. The solicitor helped me fill out a form, (when I asked if that was the norm, here in the UK), so that I would recieve a tape, with a recording of the interwiev on it. But I haven’t received this, (even if I thought I would). So I have forgotten a bit from that meeting, I think, that I would perhaps rememberd, if I hadn’t promissed a cassette from it. Regards, Erik Ribsskog PS. I was also at a claim-meeting at Huyton Jobcentre today at 14.50, where I got to speak with Alan. Maria, (from the Jobcentre call-centre), had adviced me to back-date the claim, due to a misunderstanding about the meetings, with Gary, at Huyton Jobcentre, on 4/4, (I think it was). And I brought to the meeting today, print outs from Universal Jobmatch, showing that I had done my jobseeking, since January. And Alan told me that I was supposed to sign on there, on Thursday, next week. But he also have me a letter, where it says I’m banned from Huyton Jobcentre as well. So I’m supposed to do signing by post. And they have to have the signing-forms there, on Thursday next week. So Alan adviced me to post them on Tuesday next week. It’s a bit strange that they ban me from all the Jobcentres all the time, I think. It seems like something far out to me. I haven’t written any love e-mails, and even if I had been a ‘hippy’, I think this would be an over-reaction. I’ve wondered if this is some type of subtle ridiculing of me, since my Danish-born grand-mother was after Løvenbalk, (meaning lion-bar), and you in the UK read this as something with ‘love’, and say that e-mails from me are love-emails. Hm. I attach a copy of the mentioned letter I got today from Alan at Huyton Jobcentre in the meeting there. PS 2. When I got home from the meeting at Huyton Jobcentre, this afternoon. Then I noticed I had also received a strange e-mail from Sarah Bamber at Aintree Jobcentre. An e-mail that don’t make any sense to me. This could be something to do with internet-bully-ing, I’m thinking now. I going to forward that e-mail after I’ve sent this e-mail. On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 3:57 PM, CONTACT-US <CONTACT-US@dwp.gsi.gov.uk> wrote: > > Dear Mr Ribsskog > > As you are aware, the police are investigating this matter; if you require an update I suggest you contact them. > > Kind regards > > Ged > ‘Contact-Us’ > > > —–Original Message—– > From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com] > Sent: 17 April 2014 03:59 > To: info@linskills.co.uk > Cc: CONTACT-US; CONTACT-US > Subject: To: solicitor Colin > > Hi, > > I got a letter today, (Tuesday), from the Treasury Solicitor’s Department, regarding ‘funny’ e-mails, etc. > > Have you found out who are sending these funny e-mails in my name, I was wondering. > > Thanks in advance for any reply! > > Best regards, > > Erik Ribsskog > ********************************************************************** > > This document is strictly confidential and is intended only for use by the addressee. > > If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or other > > action taken in reliance of the information contained in this e-mail is strictly prohibited. > > Any views expressed by the sender of this message are not necessarily those of the Department > > for Work and Pensions. > > If you have received this transmission in error, please use the reply function to tell us > > and then permanently delete what you have received. > > This email was scanned for viruses by the Department for Work and Pensions’ anti-virus services and on leaving the Department was found to be virus free. > > Please note: Incoming and outgoing e-mail messages are routinely monitored for compliance > > with our policy on the use of electronic communications. > > **********************************************************************




2 attachments
huyton 1.jpg
107K
huyton 2.jpg
97K
PS. Her er vedleggene: huyton 1 huyton 2