Jeg sendte en e-post til LSC

Gmail Erik Ribsskog

Complaint/Fwd: Oppdatering/Fwd: Klage/Fwd: Delivery Status
Notification (Delay)

1
message

Erik Ribsskog Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 2:08 PM

To: legal.lsc@legalservices.gov.uk
Cc: she , Politikk Høyre , Akademikerforbundet , LHT Customer Service ,
Runcorn Office , Info ,
Bjørn Ribsskog , admin
, ITCGM- Norwegian Consulate
, “hv-02.kontakt” ,
“anne-kathrine.skodvin” , “post@nav.no” , “steve.rotheram.mp”
,
rcjchancery.judgeslisting@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk, “HRET (postmottak)” , findasolicitor
, “emb.london”

Hi,

I was at Liverpool &
Knowsley Magistates Court today.

In a meeting with National Probation
Service.

A Mr. Peter Lochart, (I think his name was).

The meeting
lasted for around two hours.

And Mr. Lochart explained, that my
solicitor-company Linskills, had
informed, (the court I guess), in June, that
I had Aspbergers.

But that’s a lie.

I don’t have any thing like
that.

So my own solicitor-company is doing sabotage against me, it
seems.

I’ve earlier complained about them, to the Law Society, and to you
at LSC.

Other solicitors says I have to stick with
Linskills.

(Even if I’ve tried to switch several times).

Due to
some administrative formalities to do with legal aid.

(April
Roberts-Cadwell from Kerwins told me this).

But can that be right, I was
wondering.

(Linskills has also sent me letters to late.

Letters
regarding new apointments.

So that I received the letters after the
apointment-time.

And then they naged at me for not going to the
meeting.

Is this the candid camera I’m wondering).

Is it right I
can’t switch solicitor-company at the time I want?

This seems strange and
as a type of corruption in society I think.

Erik
Ribsskog

———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Erik
Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Date:
Thu, 28 Aug 2014 13:58:52 +0100
Subject: Oppdatering/Fwd: Klage/Fwd: Delivery
Status Notification (Delay)
To: “emb.london” <emb.london@mfa.no>
Cc:
Legal LSC <legal.lsc@legalservices.gov.uk>,
she
<she@topdanmark.dk>,
Politikk Høyre <politikk@hoyre.no>,
Akademikerforbundet
<post@akademikerforbundet.no>,
LHT Customer
Service <csc@lht.co.uk>, Runcorn
Office <runcornoffice@taroe.org>,
Info
<info@tpas.org.uk>,
Bjørn Ribsskog <bribsskog@gmail.com>,
admin
<admin@lpl-norwegian-consulate.org.uk>,
ITCGM- Norwegian Consulate
<norconsulate@itcgm.co.uk>,
“hv-02.kontakt” <hv-02.kontakt@mil.no>,
“anne-kathrine.skodvin”
<anne-kathrine.skodvin@ica.no>,
post@nav.no
<post@nav.no>, “steve.rotheram.mp” <steve.rotheram.mp@parliament.uk>,
rcjchancery.judgeslisting@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk,
“HRET (postmottak)”
<post@hoyesterett.no>

Hei,

jeg
var hos Liverpool og Knowsley Magistrates Court, i dag.

I moete med noe
som heter National Probation Service.

Det var et cirka to timer langt
moete, med en Peter Lochart, (het han vel).

Det fremkom i moetet, at mitt
solicitor-firma Linskills har sagt, (i
juni, ifoelge Lochart), at jeg har
asberger.

Men det er oppdiktet.

Jeg maa si det er sabotasje mot
meg, fra mitt eget advokatfirma.

(Som representerer meg i en ‘dum’
sak.

Politi og dommere later som at de ikke forstaar hva spoofing
er.

Og noen har sendt rare e-poster, fra min e-post-konto, til
en
Jobcentre-dame, ved aa forfalske avsender-feltet, i e-posten.

Og
jeg ble funnet skyldig, i denne justismord-saken.

Hvor baade advokater,
politi og dommere preges av ignoranse, vil jeg si.

Hva er dette for noe
tull, lurer jeg).

Jeg har kontaktet min soester Pia, for aa faa et
noedlaan, for aa
flytte tilbake, til Norge.

Men hu svarer
ikke.

Saa jeg gjentar mitt spoersmaal til ambassaden, om et noedlaan, paa
i
stoerrelseorden 5 – 10.000 NOK.

For flybillett, noedpass og opphold
i Norge, de foreste dagene, etter
hjemkomsten.

(Foer jeg faar noe
bosted gjennom Oslo kommune, etc).

Politiet her i England, terroriserer
meg, gjennom mangfoldige
tulle-arrestasjoner.

Som jeg har opplyst dere
om tidligere.

De bryter seg inn i leiligheten min og hamrer paa doera, og
braaker
som om det er tyske bombefly, under krigen.

Ogsaa kidnapper de
meg, og holder meg innelaast, paa glattcelle i
timevis/dagevis, og tvinger
meg til aa prate med ‘mental-nurse’, osv.

Her blir jeg lurt opp i stry,
mener jeg.

Jeg bodde i Norge, de foerste 34 aarene, av mitt
liv.

Og jeg ble ikke arrestert, en eneste gang.

Saa dette vil jeg
klage paa, og om dere kunne begynne aa svare, paa
mine e-poster.

For
det har jeg til gode aa se enda, vil jeg si.

Erik
Ribsskog

———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Erik
Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Date:
Sun, 24 Aug 2014 02:24:14 +0100
Subject: Klage/Fwd: Delivery Status
Notification (Delay)
To: “emb.london” <emb.london@mfa.no>
Cc:
post <post@mfa.no>

Hei,


er det noe tull, hos konsulatet deres, i Manchester også.

Jeg har fått
masse rare e-poster fra dem, i hele kveld.

Og dere har stengt på onsdager
og svarer ikke.

Det er så mye tull, med den løven deres nå, synes
jeg.

Har den mista potene, (og øksa), sånn som den katta, (i Norge),
som
det har vært om, i nettavisene, i det siste?

Erik
Ribsskog

———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Mail
Delivery Subsystem <mailer-daemon@googlemail.com>
Date:
Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 2:01 AM
Subject: Delivery Status Notification
(Delay)
To: eribsskog@gmail.com

This
is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification

THIS IS A
WARNING MESSAGE ONLY.

YOU DO NOT NEED TO RESEND YOUR
MESSAGE.

Delivery to the following recipient has been delayed:

   
 norconsulate@itcgm.co.uk

Message
will be retried for 2 more day(s)

Technical details of temporary
failure:
The recipient server did not accept our requests to connect.
Learn
more at http://support.google.com/mail/bin/answer.py?answer=7720
[(0)
mailgate.manchester-enterprises.co.uk.
[217.113.164.131]:25:
Connection timed out]
[(10) mailgate.megroup.co.uk. [217.113.164.131]:25: Connection timed
out]

—– Original message —–

DKIM-Signature: v=1;
a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
       
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
 
       :cc:content-type;
       
bh=F1E6DE19SfY/MFnKBvWbkYLyWoNplz3zsmkx+DzYtiI=;
       
b=ltWGbMi62cBlLoy/cKqMw41sXqtxYiG1znxpRWsDRoBafKo2Ip6IpjFL3TvtICDtmG
 
     
 zlsYEWvmwaWOr7dxko9/KaZfQMVM449Z0TwUS4TXTyCU5zwsULewhwYO0AKL0ehAJFwW
 
     
 b9zBhlSs75FaqldxTV7Sv1lE7QP0xYLFjlWCapDXaoJMZcfQB7ZnrYzHEVvqAxME64ES
 
     
 Q2GpqGK1RDkeCBtxIOxPkSkpaNyP2UGLEAmkF4jtc+kBVU5AqQKPA+Z1alC4ATvC3lB/
 
     
 XQNWIEiVyIundBItSRBl0i4BoTkCbgj5i2GVEs33SNdmPkCSfh6O07TZ06zsgl31nzYU
 
       K9Cg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.66.141.109 with SMTP id
rn13mr10124609pab.117.1408751082565;
 Fri, 22 Aug 2014 16:44:42 -0700
(PDT)
Received: by 10.70.14.194 with HTTP; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 16:44:42 -0700
(PDT)
In-Reply-To: <6B1C1C191AA6F24D943E18C93CA8345197C71C4C@LEOEXPR01.LegalOmbudsman.me>
References:
<6B1C1C191AA6F24D943E18C93CA8345197C71C4C@LEOEXPR01.LegalOmbudsman.me>
Date:
Sat, 23 Aug 2014 00:44:42 +0100
Message-ID: <CAGtfns6Dt0X9mM4QJ1kuRWpuP7E8At+nj1aB6LUgseLqHCu2gQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:
Re: CASE_201410256
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
To:
Enquiries <Enquiries@legalombudsman.org.uk>
Cc:
Legal LSC <legal.lsc@legalservices.gov.uk>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Bcc: norconsulate@itcgm.co.uk

Hi,

thank
you for your e-mail!

I have escalated about this, to the Legal Services
Comission.

(Since I’ve earlier complained, to a different legal
ombudsman.

The Legal Services Ombudsman.

I wasn’t aware of that
they had closed down.

And I wasn’t aware of you, (the new legal
ombudsmans status).

So I have escalated about this, to the Legal Services
Commission).

Thanks again for your e-mail about this.

Best
regards,

Erik Ribsskog

On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 12:47 PM,
Enquiries
<Enquiries@legalombudsman.org.uk>
wrote:
> Thank you for contacting the Legal 
Ombudsman.
>
>
>
> Please see the attached
letter.
>
> ***********************
>
> This e-mail (and
any attachment) is intended only for the attention of the
> addressee(s).
Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not
> permitted.
If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies
>
and
> inform the sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a secure
medium.
> Any
> reply to this message could be intercepted and read
by someone else. Please
> bear
> that in mind when deciding whether
to send material in response to this
> message
> by e-mail. This
e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be
> monitored,
recorded and retained by the Legal Ombudsman. E-mail monitoring /
>
blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any
time.
> You
> have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken
when composing or
> forwarding
> e-mails and their
contents.
>
>
>
***********************