Jeg sendte en e-post til IOPC

Erik Ribsskog eribsskog@gmail.com
IOPC reference – 2024/200913
Erik Ribsskog eribsskog@gmail.com 28. mars 2024 kl. 13:15
Til: !enquiries enquiries@policeconduct.gov.uk
Kopi: Complaints Resolution Customer_Relations2@lowellgroup.co.uk, Overdales Help help@overdales.com, “complaint.info” complaint.info@financial-ombudsman.org.uk, enquiry@commsombudsman.org, customerwellness@three.co.uk, Customer Services Customer_Services2@lowellgroup.co.uk, complaintsresolution@lowellgroup.co.uk, Lowell Norge AS svc.no.nova@lowell.com, bank.no@lowell.com, bank.no@lowell.mypurecloud.ie, kundeservice@mail.efi.no, boligbistand@baerum.kommune.no, Lowell Norge AS strom.no@lowell.com, NorgesEnergi kundeservice@norgesenergi.no, Lowell Norge – kundesenter kundesenter.no@lowell.com, kundeservice@hafslundstrom.no, Bærum Kommune post@baerum.kommune.no, LOS Kundesenter kundesenter@los.no, Sfovpost sfovpost@statsforvalteren.no, “post@sivilombudsmannen.no” post@sivilombudsmannen.no, amnestyis amnestyis@amnesty.org, HRW UK hrwuk@hrw.org, LbF Leieboerforeningen lbf@lbf.no, post post@finkn.no, Akademikerforbundet post@akademikerforbundet.no, kom@nve.no, rme@nve.no, trl@nve.no, morten.schau@elvia.no, Abuse abuse@telia.com, “inger.lise.blyverket” inger.lise.blyverket@forbrukerradet.no, Phso Enquiries phso.enquiries@ombudsman.org.uk, Info info@tpas.org.uk, Postmottak ASD postmottak@asd.dep.no, Runcorn Office runcornoffice@taroe.org, Postkasse postkasse@datatilsynet.no, Lisa Eian eian@eianadvokat.no, strom.no@lowell.mypurecloud.ie, post@arbeidstilsynet.no, corporationsecretary@ofcom.org.uk, post post@finanstilsynet.no, Post post@brukerklagenemnda.no, NKOM firmapost@nkom.no, Post post@forbrukerradet.no, newsroom@ee.co.uk, enquiries@policeconduct.gov.uk, customer.complaints@ee.co.uk, team@lumendatabase.org, takedowns@dmca.com, wendy@seltzer.org, wseltzer@w3.org, post@wikimedia.no, jwales@wikimedia.org, elisabeth@wikimedia.no, post@forbrukerombudet.no, postmottak@sivilombudet.no, fire@thefire.org, Studenterrådets Retshjælp ret@sr.au.dk, wikino-admin-l@lists.wikimedia.org, Blogger Help support@blogger.com, Politikk Høyre politikk@hoyre.no, report@phishing.gov.uk
Hi,

I think you have the wrong attitude.

You should be happy that you get emails to do with crime.

Then you get a chance to clean it up.

But you (at the IPCC’s replacer) just nag (in the same way as IPCC did, around 2011).

So this is destructive, I think.

If you haven’t got the time to do your job, you should hire more people, I think.

And stop complaining about the customers.

I’ve worked as a Store Manager.

And if someone shopped every day, then I didn’t warn them, and I didn’t tell them to shop less often.

This is idiocracy, I think.

There are some internet-trolls who contact people using my name, etc.

And the Police refuse to do their job.

And when I try to get you police-complaint-people to grasp the problem, by copying you relevant information, then you start to complain, and almost threaten.

That’s not fine and it’s also moronic, I think.

This I have to complain about.

It’s not my fault that I’m the victim in a lot of identity-theft-cases.

That makes a lot of case-work.

But then you should of course blame the internet-trolls (and the Police who refuse to do their job) and not the citizen (or earlier citizen I am now, due to this problem, with the Merseyside Police being tricked by internet-trolls (contacting a female jobcenter-staff using my name).

The Police were tricked by these internett-trolls about a hundred times.

Every time they came hammering on my front-door, they sometimes smashed it, they arrested me a lot of times (until some more intelligent cops understood that the gorillas had been idiots).

And this has been the topic of many idiotic court-cases now (or some years back).

And the Police also stole my computer (and the new one, and another one after that again).

A religious cult in Norway (Smiths Venner (translates to: ‘Smiths Friends’) aka. Brunstad Christian Church) they are based in a municipality (Melsomvik) that used to be in the same county (Vestfold) as my home-municipality (Svelvik).

And these religious people (that are maniacs according to a gypsy/’tater’-guy (Jan Snoghøj) that stole my father (and younger sister) in the 80’s.

Jan Snoghøj said that these people (Smiths Venner aka. Brunstad Christian Church) are like maniacs or zombies or robots.

And his younger half-sister (Christell Humblen) heard this, and she could have told on him (she later became a Godtemplar aka. anti-alcohol-organisation-member) and possibly put the blame on me.

And this organisation (Smiths Venner/Brunstad) has people that have roles to do with Wikipedia.

And they (a guy named Fosse) has complained about me, on behalf of Wikipedia, to Blogger/Google.

And he has made it look like I’m insane and a hacker, in a complaint that has been published by the Lumen-site (that publish files to do with copyright-infringement, etc.).

And I wonder if the ‘Gorilla-cops’ have surfed on the Lumen-website, and then been programmed by that ‘Russian’/’villedende’/’æreskrenkende’ complaint about me, from Wikipedia/Smiths Venner aka. Brunstad Christian Church.

So I want a reply from the Managing Director (or what the Police-titel is) about this.

Erik Ribsskog

PS.

The Norwegian newspaper VG have their own TV-channel, here in Norway.

And I’ve quite recently seen a British TV-programme on that TV-channel.

It was some people from Northern Ireland, who were fighting some internett-trolls/criminals.

And in that TV-programme, the Police mention that you have a ‘federal’ orgranisation named Action Fraud, who fight against internet-crime.

So I also send a copy of this email, that an email-address (report@phishing.gov.uk).

It could be, that this organisation (Action Fraud) are the right people, to deal with this (and not the Merseyside Police, who are perhaps a bit old-fashioned, and let themselves be tricked (again and again) by the criminals (so that it ended up, being like terror for me, living in the UK, because of these ‘gorilla-cops’, I think they perhaps should be called).

tir. 26. mars 2024 kl. 14:07 skrev !enquiries enquiries@policeconduct.gov.uk:
Dear Erik Ribsskog,

We are writing further to our email of 26 February 2024, where we advised you that we consider the amount of correspondence you are sending to us to be excessive.

Since this correspondence, you have sent at least a further 03 emails which have been copied to the IOPC, many of which relate to matters that do not fall under our remit. To clarify, the IOPC is solely responsible for overseeing the formal police complaints process in England and Wales. We have no remit over issues that lie outside of this process.

Despite our previous correspondence, you have continued to send excessive number of cpied emails to the IOPC. As such, we have no option but to issue a third and final formal warning regarding excessive non-remit copied emails being sent to us. Please be aware, continuing to send a high volume of non-remit copied emails will result in us restricting your email contact with the IOPC; this is not something which we would like to pursue.

To be as clear as possible regarding this matter, please note that we will file any copied emails we receive for you under the above reference, however we will not acknowledge or consider them. If you have any query which falls within our remit that you want the IOPC to consider, you should send it to us and only us.

If you wish to make a complaint concerning the conduct of a police force, please complete and submit a complaint form via our website at Submit a complaint | Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC). Alternatively, please submit your complaint directly to the Professional Standards Department (PSD) of the police force concerned. Please note that the IOPC does not need to be copied into the complaint correspondence if sent via email.

I trust this clarifies our position.

Yours sincerely

Lucas Crossley
Customer Contact Advisor
Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC)
PO Box 473
Sale
M33 0BW
Tel: 0300 020 0096
Email: enquiries@policeconduct.gov.uk
Website: www.policeconduct.gov.uk
Twitter: @policeconduct
Find out how we handle your personal data.
The IOPC is proud to have achieved Customer Service Excellence accreditation

We welcome correspondence in Welsh. If you contact us in Welsh, we will respond in Welsh and this will not delay our reply.

Rydym yn croesawu gohebiaeth yn Gymraeg. Os cysylltwch â ni yn Gymraeg, fe gewch ymateb yn Gymraeg, heb arwain at oedi.

How satisfied were you with your experience with the IOPC’s Customer Contact Centre? Let us know by taking this short survey

We welcome correspondence in Welsh. We will respond to you in Welsh and this will not lead to delay.
Rydym yn croesawu gohebiaeth yn y Gymraeg. Byddwn yn ymateb i chi yn y Gymraeg ac ni fydd hyn yn arwain at oedi.
This message and its content may contain confidential, privileged or copyright information. They are intended solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you received this message in error, you must not disclose, copy, distribute or take any action which relies on the contents. Instead, please inform the sender and then permanently delete it. Any views or opinions expressed in this communication are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the IOPC. Only specified staff are authorised to make binding agreements on behalf of the IOPC by email. The IOPC accepts no responsibility for unauthorised agreements reached with other employees or agents. The IOPC cannot guarantee the security of this email or any attachments. While emails are regularly scanned, the IOPC cannot take any liability for any virus that may be transmitted with the internet. The IOPC communication systems are monitored to the extent permitted by law. Consequently, any email and or attachments may be read by monitoring staff.
Gall y neges hon a’i chynnwys gynnwys gwybodaeth gyfrinachol, freintiedig neu hawlfraint. Fe’u bwriedir at ddefnydd y derbynnydd arfaethedig yn unig. Os derbynioch y neges hon mewn camgymeriad, mae’n rhaid i chi beidio â datgelu, copïo, dosbarthu na chymryd unrhyw gamau sy’n dibynnu ar y cynnwys. Yn hytrach, rhowch wybod i’r anfonwr ac yna dilëwch ef yn barhaol. Mae unrhyw farn neu safbwyntiau a fynegir yn y cyfathrebiad hwn yn eiddo i’r awdur yn unig ac nid ydynt o reidrwydd yn cynrychioli barn yr IOPC. Dim ond staff penodedig sydd wedi’u hawdurdodi i wneud cytundebau rhwymol ar ran yr IOPC trwy e-bost. Nid yw’r IOPC yn derbyn unrhyw gyfrifoldeb am gytundebau anawdurdodedig y daethpwyd iddynt â gweithwyr neu asiantau eraill. Ni all yr IOPC warantu diogelwch yr e-bost hwn nac unrhyw atodiadau. Tra bod negeseuon e-bost yn cael eu sganio’n rheolaidd, ni all yr IOPC gymryd unrhyw gyfrifoldeb am unrhyw firws y gellir ei drosglwyddo â’r rhyngrwyd. Mae systemau cyfathrebu’r IOPC yn cael eu monitro i’r graddau a ganiateir gan y gyfraith. O ganlyniad, gall unrhyw e-bost a/neu atodiadau gael eu darllen gan staff monitro.