Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
IOPC staff complaint ref: 03/25/102
Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com> 2. april 2025 kl. 16:13
Til: !Quality & Service Improvement Team <QSI@policeconduct.gov.uk>
Kopi: Postkasse <postkasse@datatilsynet.no>, post <post@finkn.no>, Sfovpost <sfovpost@statsforvalteren.no>, amnestyis <amnestyis@amnesty.org>, HRW UK <hrwuk@hrw.org>, postmottak@sivilombudet.no, Akademikerforbundet <post@akademikerforbundet.no>, Politikk Høyre <politikk@hoyre.no>, report@phishing.gov.uk, Phso Enquiries <phso.enquiries@ombudsman.org.uk>, 200018144 <epost@nito.no>, post@unio.no, post@hk.no, Post <post@forbrukerradet.no>, "inger.lise.blyverket" <inger.lise.blyverket@forbrukerradet.no>, lisa.eian@elden.no, Postmottak <postmottak@forbrukertilsynet.no>, postmottak@dfd.dep.no, mail@retshjaelpen.dk, h.bleken@haavind.no, "complaint.info" <complaint.info@financial-ombudsman.org.uk>, Info <info@tpas.org.uk>, Customer Services <Customer_Services2@lowellgroup.co.uk>, customer.complaints@ee.co.uk, enquiry@commsombudsman.org, customerwellness@three.co.uk, complaintsresolution@lowellgroup.co.uk, Lowell Norge AS <svc.no.nova@lowell.com>, bank.no@lowell.com, bank.no@lowell.mypurecloud.ie, kundeservice@mail.efi.no, boligbistand@baerum.kommune.no, Lowell Norge AS <strom.no@lowell.com>, NorgesEnergi <kundeservice@norgesenergi.no>, Lowell Norge – kundesenter <kundesenter.no@lowell.com>, kundeservice@hafslundstrom.no, Bærum Kommune <post@baerum.kommune.no>, LOS Kundesenter <kundesenter@los.no>, "“post@sivilombudsmannen.no”" <post@sivilombudsmannen.no>, LbF Leieboerforeningen <lbf@lbf.no>, kom@nve.no, rme@nve.no, trl@nve.no, Morten Schau <morten.schau@elvia.no>, Abuse <abuse@telia.com>, Postmottak ASD <postmottak@asd.dep.no>, Runcorn Office <runcornoffice@taroe.org>, Lisa Eian <eian@eianadvokat.no>, strom.no@lowell.mypurecloud.ie, post@arbeidstilsynet.no, corporationsecretary@ofcom.org.uk, post <post@finanstilsynet.no>, Post <post@brukerklagenemnda.no>, NKOM <firmapost@nkom.no>, newsroom@ee.co.uk, !enquiries <enquiries@policeconduct.gov.uk>, Complaints Resolution <Customer_Relations2@lowellgroup.co.uk>, Overdales Help <help@overdales.com>, Residential Services <residential.services@bt.com>
Hi,
It doesn't seem that you understand the context to do with this.
Around 2011 your 'dead uncle' IPCC (the organisation that you have replaced) did exactly the same thing.
Around then, the situation was, that internet-trolls were using my identity, in such a way, that my e-mail-account was spammed/bombed, with hundreds/thousands of emails.
And I reported this to the police (first in Liverpool, and then in Sunderland, when I moved there, in the automn/fall of 2011).
And then a woman at IPCC (Laura Bailey) said the same thing.
They were also lazy, and didn't want to do their job.
(I wanted complain to IPCC about, that the Merseyside and Northumbria Police didn't want investigate, and tell me who the internett-trolls were).
They (Laura Bailey) told me that I had to send the complaints by post.
But there were hundreds of cases.
And I was unemployed at the time.
So if I had to buy 100 stamps a month (and envelopes etc.) then I wouldn't have had money for food.
(I lived at Azalea Lodge in Sunderland (long story) and there one had to pay like £40 each forthnight, for food.
But I didn't want to socialise with the other people living there (the food was served at specific times, and like 20 people were seated around a table, like a big family.
And these people where people that were on probation, it seemed (from a letter (belonging to the earlier tenant) that hadn't been cleaned, on the room I got there).
So I spent like £40 pound on food, from Tesco etc. as well.
So I had to pay double for food, since I didn't want to eat with the criminals.
And the African landlady didn't want to make an exception.
I had to pay for her dinners etc., even if I never ate any of her food (due to that I bought my own food, every day, at Tesco etc.)).
So this was moronic, I think.
It was like the IPCC where dum and lazy.
And that didn't want to fight the criminals (or the Police who didn't do their job).
And also, I asked for this case to be sent to the Managing Director (for IPCC, or IOPC like your name seems to be now).
But this is not an email from the Managing Director.
This is from the Contact Centre.
So this I have complain about.
You are supposed to have a Director General, it says on Gov.uk (when I search on Google).
This was a person by the name Michael Lookwood (it says on Gov.uk) in 2017/2018.
Also due to the 'idiot-woman' in IPCC, then it wasn't a happy ending for me, in the UK.
The trolling got worse and worse.
The troll started sending e-mails in my name, to Aintree-jobcenter-woman Sarah Bamber.
And she never understood (even if the trolls sent perhaps a hundred emails) that these emails weren't sent by me.
Every time she called the Merseyside Police (I moved back to Liverpool in 2012).
And every time they came on my door (perhaps a hundred times, in 2013 and 2014).
And the sometimes crushed my front-door (so in the end it almost couldn't be called a door, because it was almost completely distroyed, and looked like it was going to go into pieces, any moment).
And they arrested me around ten times.
And at the same time, the Jobcenter stopped my allowance.
So I had to go on the streets, and look for coins.
So that I could buy a pack of spaghetti, at Asda, every day.
(I almost became a wreck because of this.
That I didn't get proper food etc.
I was in my 40's so I wasn't a teenager any longer).
And due to that the IPCC didn't want to do their job.
Then noone stopped the Merseyside Police (I have to say they were like gorillas) from harassing me, every day, for like a hundred days or so, due to the troll sending emails, using my identity.
And also my law-firm (Linskills) didn't understand this crime (spoofing/swatting) that I was the victim of.
They asked me for advice (since I had studied IT in Norway and at University of Sunderland).
And the courts (Liverpool Magistrates Court and Liverpool Crown Court) gave me hell.
And the Linskill-woman gave me poor advice.
So I ended up getting a punishment (it was murder of justice) even if I was also a victim in this (but they only felt sorry for Sarah Bamber, and they didn't understand that it was an internet-troll that was the real criminal).
And in the end I had to run back to Norway (in 2014 and again in 2017) to get away from the idiot lawyers, the idiot police-officers and the idiot-judges.
So this I have to complain about.
Please send this to your General-director now (for a second opinion).
Erik Ribsskog
PS.
Here is more about this:
'fromErik Ribsskog eribsskog@gmail.com
toTAYLORG@unhcr.org
cc”Oslo, Visa”
dateWed, Nov 9, 2011 at 5:24 PM
subjectProblems with the IPCC/Fwd: The restriction of contact with the IPCC/ blocking your email address
mailed-bygmail.com
hide details 5:24 PM (0 minutes ago)
Hi,
I’m a refugee from Norway, after I overheard I was followed by the ‘mafian’, in Oslo, in 2003.
Now the IPCC don’t want to reply to my e-mails.
They only give dispentions anyway, and let the Police call me ‘Miss’, etc.
I get hundeds of spoofing e-mails each day, and the Police don’t reply.
The IPCC don’t understand, and think it’s only one e-mail, and ignore that the Police don’t reply to me at all.
And when I send them copies of all the mails, then they say I send to many e-mails.
I don’t think the IPCC are fine.
They let the Police in the UK use illigal stun-guns when they murdered the mate of footballer Gazza, I saw in the news.
That they would have never let the Police get away with in the Norway I know.
Yours sincerely,
Erik Ribsskog
———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Laura Bailey
Date: Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 10:25 AM
Subject: The restriction of contact with the IPCC/ blocking your email address
To: “eribsskog@gmail.com”
Dear Mr Ribsskog
The IPCC has received a number of emails from you, over 80 have been received in recent weeks in relation to people using your details on websites, this goes against my request to you to only send information that relates to complaints against the police that have not previously been considered.
The receipt of these emails were acknowledged and you were again requested to refrain from sending information to the IPCC that does not fall under our remit or is already being considered.
In these emails I reiterated that it may be necessary to restrict your access to the IPCC.
You have continued to send emails of the nature described above and as warned, the IPCC now intend to block the email addresses that you have been using and as such all future correspondence to the IPCC should be received in writing only.
You are always, of course, entitled to make new complaints, providing they relate to issues that you have not already raised and that they are valid complaints against police forces in England and Wales. These must be made in writing (by post) and we would advise that you contact the relevant Professional Standards Department of the force directly to lodge new complaints.
If you contact the IPCC by email, your email will be returned unread as it is the policy of the IPCC to no longer accept emails from you, and no further action will be taken.
Kind regards
Laura Bailey
Casework Manager
Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC)
North Region – Sale
Phone: 08453 002 002
Email: CustomerContactCentre@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk
The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless Worldwide in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes.'.
ons. 2. apr. 2025 kl. 14:53 skrev !Quality & Service Improvement Team <QSI@policeconduct.gov.uk>:
Dear Erik Ribsskog,
Please find attached the senior manager’s response to your IOPC complaint ref:03/25/102.
This now concludes your IOPC complaint and we hope that you are satisfied with the response provided. Should you have a query in relation to the decision made, please let us know and we will forward your comments to the decision maker for a response.
If however you are unhappy with the decision, you can request a review by emailing feedback@policeconduct.gov.uk within 20 working days of receiving your response. The review will be conducted by a member of the Quality and Service Improvement team and will assess if the complaint response provided was reasonable and proportionate.
Further information on the complaint review process can be found on page 8 of the IOPC Complaint and Feedback policy, https://www.policeconduct.gov.uk/sites/default/files/documents/Complaints_and_Feedback_Policy_2022.pdf.
Once again, thank you for raising your concerns with us.
Yours sincerely,
Leanne Perkins-Warr
Quality & Service Improvement Support Officer
Swyddog Cymorth Gwella Ansawdd a Gwasanaethau
Independent Office for Police Conduct
Swyddfa Annibynnol Ymddygiad yr Heddlu
We welcome correspondence in Welsh and English - we will respond equally to both and will reply in your language of choice without delay.
Rydym yn croesawu gohebiaeth yn y Gymraeg a’r Saesneg - byddwn yn ymateb yn gyfartal i’r ddau ac yn ateb yn eich dewis iaith heb oedi.
www.policeconduct.gov.uk
Follow us on Twitter/X at: @policeconduct/Dilynwch ni ar Twitter/X yn: @policeconduct
Find out how we handle your personal data.
Dysgwch sut ydym yn delio â’ch data personol
The IOPC is proud to have achieved Customer Service Excellence accreditation
Mae’r IOPC yn filch o fod ennill achrediad Rhagoriaeth mewn Gwasanaethau Cwsmeriaid
We welcome correspondence in Welsh. We will respond to you in Welsh and this will not lead to delay.
Rydym yn croesawu gohebiaeth yn y Gymraeg. Byddwn yn ymateb i chi yn y Gymraeg ac ni fydd hyn yn arwain at oedi.
This message and its content may contain confidential, privileged or copyright information. They are intended solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you received this message in error, you must not disclose, copy, distribute or take any action which relies on the contents. Instead, please inform the sender and then permanently delete it. Any views or opinions expressed in this communication are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the IOPC. Only specified staff are authorised to make binding agreements on behalf of the IOPC by email. The IOPC accepts no responsibility for unauthorised agreements reached with other employees or agents. The IOPC cannot guarantee the security of this email or any attachments. While emails are regularly scanned, the IOPC cannot take any liability for any virus that may be transmitted with the internet. The IOPC communication systems are monitored to the extent permitted by law. Consequently, any email and or attachments may be read by monitoring staff.
Gall y neges hon a'i chynnwys gynnwys gwybodaeth gyfrinachol, freintiedig neu hawlfraint. Fe'u bwriedir at ddefnydd y derbynnydd arfaethedig yn unig. Os derbynioch y neges hon mewn camgymeriad, mae'n rhaid i chi beidio â datgelu, copïo, dosbarthu na chymryd unrhyw gamau sy'n dibynnu ar y cynnwys. Yn hytrach, rhowch wybod i'r anfonwr ac yna dilëwch ef yn barhaol. Mae unrhyw farn neu safbwyntiau a fynegir yn y cyfathrebiad hwn yn eiddo i’r awdur yn unig ac nid ydynt o reidrwydd yn cynrychioli barn yr IOPC. Dim ond staff penodedig sydd wedi'u hawdurdodi i wneud cytundebau rhwymol ar ran yr IOPC trwy e-bost. Nid yw’r IOPC yn derbyn unrhyw gyfrifoldeb am gytundebau anawdurdodedig y daethpwyd iddynt â gweithwyr neu asiantau eraill. Ni all yr IOPC warantu diogelwch yr e-bost hwn nac unrhyw atodiadau. Tra bod negeseuon e-bost yn cael eu sganio’n rheolaidd, ni all yr IOPC gymryd unrhyw gyfrifoldeb am unrhyw firws y gellir ei drosglwyddo â’r rhyngrwyd. Mae systemau cyfathrebu’r IOPC yn cael eu monitro i’r graddau a ganiateir gan y gyfraith. O ganlyniad, gall unrhyw e-bost a/neu atodiadau gael eu darllen gan staff monitro.
PS.
Her er e-brevet fra IOPC:
