Jeg sendte en ny e-post til IPCC







Gmail – RE: TRIM: Re: Your concerns about Merseyside Police







Gmail



Erik Ribsskog

<eribsskog@gmail.com>




RE: TRIM: Re: Your concerns about Merseyside Police





Erik Ribsskog

<eribsskog@gmail.com>





Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 5:07 PM





To:

Caroline Wilson <Caroline.Wilson@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk>


Cc:

inquiries2@un.org



Besides, one can't trust the English police because they are pigs, I learned when I was at summer-school, in Brighton, in the 80's.

Erik Ribsskog
———- Forwarded message ———-

From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 4:32 PM
Subject: Fwd: TRIM: Re: Your concerns about Merseyside Police

To: Caroline Wilson <Caroline.Wilson@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk>
Cc: inquiries2@un.org


Trim may refer to:

  • Cutting small pieces off something
Is this the same as the Merseyside Police call me miss that your a mafia-whore, and to cut my pecker off?
Erik Ribsskog


———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 4:22 PM

Subject: Fwd: TRIM: Re: Your concerns about Merseyside Police
To: Caroline Wilson <Caroline.Wilson@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk>
Cc: inquiries2@un.org

And first you refer to my complaint, from 2007, and comment about it, and then in the next e-mail you don't want to discuss the complaint you brought up yourself.

That's very strange I think.

And this with Trim, on top of that.

This is very strange I think.
I think maybe someone in charge, at the IPCC, should answer about this, and give me a second opinion, if that's alright.

Hope this is alright!

Regards,

Erik Ribsskog

———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>


Date: Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 4:17 PM
Subject: Fwd: TRIM: Re: Your concerns about Merseyside Police
To: Caroline Wilson <Caroline.Wilson@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk>

Cc: inquiries2@un.org

Who is Trim by the way, if I can ask.

Erik Ribsskog
———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

Date: Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 4:13 PM
Subject: Re: TRIM: Re: Your concerns about Merseyside Police
To: Caroline Wilson <Caroline.Wilson@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk>

Cc: inquiries2@un.org

Hi,

thank you very much for your e-mail!
Are you sure I should write a new complaint about the same issues?
Shouldn't the old case have been cleaned up?

The complaint-process just stalled, and has never been put back right again.
Shouldn't someone investigate what has been goving on?
Do you have an IPCC complaint-unit?

(Since I think it's a bit strange that I have to complain about the same issues twice).
Best regards,

Erik Ribsskog

On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 4:01 PM, Caroline Wilson <Caroline.Wilson@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk> wrote:

Dear Mr Ribsskog

Thank you for your email.

The IPCC is an independent organisation, I am

therefore unable to comment on your complaint about Merseyside Police. I

have provided you with details of how to make a complaint against them and can

only advise that you consider submitting a new complaint in order to progress

matters.

I have not looked in detail at your previous cases and

complaints with the IPCC as I did not consider this to be relevant to your

enquiry. Your comments have been noted but I have nothing further to add on

this matter.

Yours sincerely

Caroline Wilson

Customer Contact

Advisor

Independent Police Complaints Commission

1st Floor,

Oaklands House,

Washway Road, Sale,
M33 6FS
Tel:

0161 246 8561

Email:caroline.wilson@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk


From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

Sent: 23 March 2011 14:19
To: Caroline Wilson
Cc:

inquiries2@un.org
Subject: TRIM: Re: Your concerns about Merseyside

Police

Hi,

so you think it's ok for the Merseyside Police to call me 'Miss Erik

Ribsskog'?

I also wrote an appeal, to the IPCC, which was upheld.

Why don't you mention this in your summary?

Have the files been messed with?

Erik Ribsskog

On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Caroline Wilson <Caroline.Wilson@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk>

wrote:

Dear Mr

Ribsskog

Thank you

for your email, I am sorry that you did not find the information helpful.

Having checked our records I note that you sent in a complaint about

Merseyside Police to the IPCC in 2007. With your consent, we

forwarded your complaint to them for their consideration in line

with our procedures. I note that Merseyside Police applied for a dispensation,

which means that they decided that no further action should be taken, and that

this was approved by the IPCC, which concluded the matter.

If you

wish to make a new complaint about Merseyside Police, you may do so by

completing the online form on the IPCC website, the link to which I provided

in my previous email. By law all complaints of misconduct against the

police must be recorded. The IPCC does not have the power to record complaints

and any complaint that you submit to us will, in the first instance, be

forwarded to the Professional Standards Department of Merseyside Police for a

recording decision, as they are the appropriate authority. I should explain

that we are unable to forward your complaint unless you give us your consent

to do so. In other words, if you wish to make a complaint about misconduct of

Merseyside Police officers you need to be willing to engage with

them.

As a way

forward, I would therefore suggest that you include any concerns you have

about misconduct of Merseyside Police officers on the online form and submit

this to begin the complaints procedure through the appropriate

channels.

Yours

sincerely

Caroline

Wilson

Customer Contact Advisor
Independent Police

Complaints Commission

1st Floor, Oaklands House,

Washway Road, Sale,

M33 6FS
Tel: 0161 246 8561
Email:caroline.wilson@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk


From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

Sent: 22 March 2011 16:54
To: Caroline

Wilson
Cc: joe.anderson@liverpool.gov.uk; inquiries2@un.org; mail.gva@efta.int; Harker,

David; emb.london@mfa.no;

Liverpool County, Enquiries
Subject: TRIM: Re: Your email

correspondence to the IPCC

Hi,

no, this isn't helpful at all.

If you read the e-mail again, it should be possible for you to

understand, that this is a complaint, on that you haven't processed the

complaint against the Merseyside Police, which I sent you, 3 or 4 years

ago.

Now it looks to me, like you make yourself dumb, like we say in

Norway.

Have you read my e-mail at all, I'm wondering.

Sorry if I'm direct now, but I'm really very disappointed in

you.

But you have been messing me around for years, so I guess you, (the

IPCC), will find a way out of this, so that you don't have to do your job,

again.

Also at least one of the people writing to me, on behalf of the

Liverpool County Court today, was a hoax, it seems, from what the County Court

wrote me directly.

I think it's so degrading for me to contact the Merseyside Police now,

after they've called me 'Miss Erik Ribsskog', and after you've not charged

them/told them off, for this, so I don't like to contact them.

But I mention it now.

I'm not sure if I should write regards since you are just messing with

me, I think,

Erik Ribsskog

PS.

I'm also sending this as an update to the organisations I sent to

earlier today.

On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 4:41 PM, Caroline Wilson <Caroline.Wilson@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk> wrote:

Dear Mr

Ribsskog

Thank you for

writing to the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC).

We are an independent body responsible for

making sure that the police complaints system in England and Wales works

effectively and fairly.

It appears that you have

included the IPCC in correspondence sent to Liverpool County Court relating

to difficulties you have been experiencing with your landlord. I should

explain that the IPCC is unable to assist you with these particular issues

as they do not fall within our remit. You may wish to contact the Citizen's

Advice Bureau for further advice on how to deal with these

matters.

You have however mentioned

that you complained about Merseyside Police several years ago, but it is not

clear from your correspondence whether you wish to make a new

complaint against this police force. I thought it may be helpful to

explain the process involved, should you wish to

complain.

You

can only make a complaint against the police if you:

·

have

been the victim of the alleged misconduct of a person serving with the

police (misconduct could include a police officer or member of police staff

being rude to you or using unnecessary force, an unlawful arrest, or a

police officer abusing your rights);

·

were

present when the alleged misconduct took place, or were close enough to see

or hear the misconduct, and as a result suffered loss, damage, distress or

inconvenience, or were put in danger or at risk;

·

are a

friend or relative of the victim of the alleged misconduct, and

were distressed by the effects of the incident on the

victim;

·

witnessed the alleged misconduct; or

·

are

acting on behalf of any of the above.

When we receive a complaint, the IPCC must seek the complainant’s

consent in order to forward the matter to the police force

concerned. The complaint is then assessed by

the police and they will decide whether to record it officially.

If you wish

to make a complaint about police misconduct, further details about the

process, as well as our online form can be accessed via the following web

page:

http://www.ipcc.gov.uk/Pages/how_complaint.aspx

I hope this

response has been helpful to you.

Yours

sincerely

Caroline

Wilson

Customer Contact

Advisor

Independent

Police Complaints Commission

1st Floor, Oaklands

House,

Washway Road,

Sale,

M33

6FS

Tel: 0161 246

8561

Email:caroline.wilson@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk


From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

Sent: 22 March 2011 12:00
To: Liverpool County,

Enquiries
Cc: joe.anderson@liverpool.gov.uk; inquiries2@un.org; mail.gva@efta.int; Harker,

David; emb.london@mfa.no
Subject: Re: To the Superior

of Mr. Johan Hawley/Fwd: Update/Fwd: To the s uperior of Johan Hawley/Fwd:

Update/Fwd: Taking my landlord to the County …

(Caroline)

Hi,

thank you for your reply!

This hoax made me distracted now.

What initiated my first e-mail was that my Landlord claims he can

throw me out, without a possession order.

It's really my Landlord who's supposed to contact the County Court, and

not me.

So it's just that my Landlord is writing a lot of non-sense that

upsets me really.

Sorry about this!

Best regards,

Erik Ribsskog

PS.

Here's more about what my Landlord writes:

From: Kieron Grimes <kierongrimes@tjthomas.co.uk>

Date: Mon, Mar

21, 2011 at 3:34 PM
Subject: Your situation…
To: eribsskog@gmail.com

Eric,

Now there is

only 2 weeks before your departure.
I read on your blog you are trying to

postpone the kick-out, however this idea of yours will never work. I have

many years experience handling bad tennants, and the same tactic is used

every time(quoting a law paragraph, hardly any relevance of the

situation).

I hope you find a new place in Liverpool. I don't

understand why you don't look for a new place, as I doubt you want to be

homeless or live in a church.

We will meet soon, as I will come to

the apartment 3th of April to deliver a good-bye

gift.

Sincerly,

Kieron

Grimes



PS 2.

I want to do this properly.

I don't like it that Mr. Grimes want's to go here with a

presant.

I want this to be dealt with in court.

But like I wrote above, it's really my Landlord who has to take

this to Court, and what upset me in his e-mail is really just non-sense, the

way I see it.

I think I should start to work out a bit more, then maybe I don't

care about phoney stuff like this.

The Merseyside Police have called me 'Miss Erik Ribsskog', in a

letter, that I've put in a compaint of 18 points to IPCC, 3 or 4 yeats ago,

which they don't reply to.

Or else I would have sent about the hoax

with Mr. Johan Hayley to the Merseyside Police.

But now I think this would be to degrading for me to do, when the

Merseyside Police haven't been told off, for calling me 'Miss Erik

Ribsskog'.

Just to update.

Thanks again for your reply!

On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 11:32 AM, Liverpool County,

Enquiries <enquiries@liverpool.countycourt.gsi.gov.uk>

wrote:

Good

Morning,

The county Court

has received a number or emails from you today, but I must inform you that

we do not have a member of staff by the name of Johan Hayley working at

this court. I you wish to take out proceedings at court you must seek some

legal advice to ensure that you take out the correct type of

process.

Regards

Jim

Reid

J

Reid

Issue /File

Registry

Liverpool Civil

& Family Court

Tel: 0151 296

2403

—–Original

Message—–
From: Erik

Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
Sent: 22 March 2011 11:15
To: enquiries@liverpool.countycourt.gsi.gov.uk

Cc: joe.anderson@liverpool.gov.uk; inquiries2@un.org; mail.gva@efta.int;

Harker, David; emb.london@mfa.no
Subject: To the Superior of Mr. Johan

Hawley/Fwd: Update/Fwd: To the superior of Johan Hawley/Fwd: Update/Fwd:

Taking my landlord to the County…

Hi,

why do I get an answer e-mail from

Mr. Johan Hawley, when I send this to the Superior of Mr. Johan

Hawley.

I want to bring this case up in the

County Court, that's my main objective in this.

Could I please get a reply from Mr.

Hawleys line-manager, telling me how to do this, if that's

alright?


Best regards,

Erik

Ribsskog

———- Forwarded message

———-
From: Liverpool County

Court
<enquiries@liverpool.countycourt.gsi.gov.uk>
Date:

Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 11:06 AM
Subject: RE: Update/Fwd: To the superior

of Johan Hawley/Fwd: Update/Fwd: Taking my landlord to the

County…
To: eribsskog@gmail.com

I'm afraid UK do not have

the castle doctrine laws. Please search "castle doctrine UK" to see

evidence or call a lawcentre.

Also, it's highly unlikely that the

Council, Merseyside Police, IPCC, Landlord, Microsoft, Order of St. John,

Goverment in Norway, Goverment in UK, Brits, Muslims or Muslims gangs,

Illuminists and CAB is messing to you at the same time as you state in the

emails.

Instead of emailing what I would belive is prank to us, I

would recommend you to meet us at our centre to discuss this in detail and

in a formal manner.

Regards,

Johan Hawley

35

Vernon Street
Liverpool Merseyside
England
L2 2BX

DX

702600 Liverpool 5

Court number 251


This email was received from the

INTERNET and scanned by the Government Secure Intranet anti-virus service

supplied by Cable&Wireless Worldwide in partnership with MessageLabs.

(CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) In case of problems, please call

your organisation's IT Helpdesk.
Communications via the GSi may be

automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal

purposes.

This e-mail

(and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of
the

addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying
is

not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy

all
copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.

Internet

e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message
could be

intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in
mind when

deciding whether to send material in response to this message
by

e-mail.

This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient)

may be
monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice.

E-mail
monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content

may be
read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are

not
broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their

contents.

The original of this email was scanned for viruses by

the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by

Cable&Wireless Worldwide in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM

Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) On leaving the GSi this email was

certified virus free.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically

logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal

purposes.

This email was received

from the INTERNET and scanned by the Government Secure Intranet anti-virus

service supplied by Cable&Wireless Worldwide in partnership with

MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) In case of problems,

please call your organisation’s IT Helpdesk.
Communications via the GSi

may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal

purposes.

The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the

Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by

Cable&Wireless Worldwide in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM

Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) On leaving the GSi this email was

certified virus free.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically

logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal

purposes.

This email was received

from the INTERNET and scanned by the Government Secure Intranet anti-virus

service supplied by Cable&Wireless Worldwide in partnership with

MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) In case of problems,

please call your organisation’s IT Helpdesk.
Communications via the GSi

may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal

purposes.

The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the

Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by

Cable&Wireless Worldwide in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM

Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified

virus free.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged,

monitored and/or recorded for legal

purposes.

This email was received from

the INTERNET and scanned by the Government Secure Intranet anti-virus service

supplied by Cable&Wireless Worldwide in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM

Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) In case of problems, please call your

organisation’s IT Helpdesk.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically

logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes.

The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless Worldwide in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.

Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes.