Forfatter: Erik Ribsskog
-
Jeg sendte en ny e-post til Wescot
Gmail – Your letter from 7/9/Fwd: Wescot Response 49597867 RE: Correspondence Reply >//
function Print(){document.body.offsetHeight;window.print()};
// ]]>
Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>
Your letter from 7/9/Fwd: Wescot Response 49597867 RE: Correspondence Reply
Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 11:50 AM
To:
offers <offers@wescot.co.uk>
Hi,Regards, Erik Ribsskogmy date of birth is 25/7/70.
Which part of the Data Protection Act are you refering to?It this something new you’ve started with? You normally just ask for the reference-number, (which I’ve provided), I think.
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 11:06 AM, offers <offers@wescot.co.uk> wrote:
Dear Mr Ribsskog
Wescot Reference: DM/472365139
Further to your recent email.
We acknowledge your comments and would like to confirm that Wescot always attempt to respond as quickly as possible.
In order to proceed with your enquiry, please confirm your date of birth for security purposes and to prevent a breach of the Data Protection Act.
Please accept our apologies for any inconvenience you may have been caused whilst contacting us.
Yours sincerely
Sarah Stark
Account Controller
From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
Sent: 13 September 2013 22:25
To: Contact Us
Subject: Your letter from 7/9/Fwd: Wescot Response 49597867 RE: Correspondence Reply
Hi
I’m refering to your letter from 7/9, (with Wescot reference 472365139), which I received today and which I attach a scanned copy of.
I’ve earlier informed you that I’m unemployed and only can afford to pay you token-payments until I find new employment.
I have unfortunately not found new employment, (even if I apply for new jobs every day), but I hope to find a new job soon. In the mean-time I can unfortunately only repeat my offer of one pound monthly token-payments.
(Like I have agreed with you earlier).
This is also what I pay my other creditors, by the way. But I’m going to pay you more, and contact you about this, as soon as possible, when I get a new job. Hope this is alright! Yours sincerely, Erik Ribsskog
———- Forwarded message ———-From: Contact Us <contactus@wescot.co.uk>
Date: Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 8:27 AM
Subject: Wescot Response 49597867 RE: Correspondence Reply
To: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
02 November 2012
Dear Mr Ribsskog
Further to your recent email, I am sorry to note there appears to be some confusion over the account. To resolve this and offer a detailed explanation I have referred the points you have raised to our client
and we are currently awaiting an update from them.
I trust the above answers your query and I apologise you had to contact us again to confirm the details.
Yours sincerely
Funmi Olugbenga-Dada
Account Controller
email:contactus@wescot.co.uk
From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2012 3:29 PM
To: Contact Us
Cc: Q&A
Subject: Re: Wescot ResponseRE: Correspondence Reply
Hi,
I have explained that in the e-mail where you have highlighted a sentence in red.
That your partner Capital One told me last year my signature wasn’t mine.
And that you this year have lied about me not replying to your correspondence.
And that you have made me waste my time since your partner Capital One and yourselves haven’t been able to accept my token-payment-offer like other companies like Swalec, DML and United Utilities have accepted,almost a year ago.
This is sabotage, I think.
I suspect you and Capital One have a secret agenda here.
And you really should contact your English-teacher about this.
Because I get anoyed when I have to explain the same again and again.
And it’s a saying you have here in the UK, which says it’s no excuse for ignorance.
So eighter you’re ignorant or slow.
So I think you should perhaps find another job.
Like putting spread on sandwiches, or something like that.
Just an advice.
Best regards,
Erik Ribsskog
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 3:18 PM, Contact Us <contactus@wescot.co.uk> wrote:
Date 30th October 2012
Dear Mr Ribsskog
Further to your recent email regarding your email below. I acknowledge your comments and would like to confirm that Wescot always attempt to respond with an explanationor resolution as quickly as possible.
Please advise as to why this account would be deleted, we have no details in regards to a query for this account. If you believe this balance is not due we would requirethe full details of dispute on this account. Which would allow us to investigate your query with our client.
Please accept my apologies for any inconvenience you may have been caused whilst contacting us.
Yours sincerely
Ms H Thundercliffe
Accounts Controller
Registered in Scotland No. SC84131, Registered Office: Kyleshill House, 1 Glencairn Street, Saltcoats, Ayrshire KA21 5JT
From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
Sent: 30 October 2012 14:54
To: Contact Us
Subject: Re: Correspondence Reply
Hi,
this about that my debt has been deleted is something I’m still looking forward to hearing from you about.
Perhaps you should ask your old English-teacher for advice as to what my writings meant.
Best regards,
Erik Ribsskog
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Contact Us <contactus@wescot.co.uk> wrote:
Date 30th October 2012
Dear Mr Ribsskog
Further to your recent email regarding the below account. I acknowledge your comments and would like to confirm that Wescot always attempt to respond with an explanationor resolution as quickly as possible.
In your email below you have you look forward to hearing that this debt has been deleted. Please could you advise further on this, as we haveno details in regards tothe balance being deleted.
Please accept my apologies for any inconvenience you may have been caused whilst contacting us.
Yours sincereley
Ms H Thundercliffe
Accounts Controller
Registered in Scotland No. SC84131, Registered Office: Kyleshill House, 1 Glencairn Street, Saltcoats, Ayrshire KA21 5JT
From: Erik Ribsskog[mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com] Sent: 19 October 2012 10:40
To: Correspondence Queries
Cc: offersSubject: Re: Correspondence Reply
Hi,
ok, I don’t think I have gotten their sort-code and account-number.
Do you know this?
I also sent you an update, on Saturday, after the e-mail you replied to now.
I’ll paste that in this e-mail now.
Best regards,
Erik Ribsskog
PS.
Here’s the update e-mail from Saturday:
Hi,
I got a new income and expenditure-form in the post from you today.
From 11/10, with the reference D3/49597867.
I contacted your partned Capital One last automn, regarding my new budget.
I offered you a token-payment-agreement on £1 a month, untill I got a full-time-job.
Capital One told me my signature wasn’t mine, so this process have stalled, since last year.
Now you get back to me.
I’m still unemployed but I’m trying to set a business up, on my spare-time.
And the Jobcentre is ‘messing’ with my jobseekers allowance.
So at the moment, I have to say I don’t have any income.
I could get back to you when I get the jobseekers allowance back.
And then I would offer you the same as last time, £1 a month in token-payments.
I’ve since last year gotten a flat witch was unfurnitured.
So any money I have left after token-payments each month I now buy furniture and other things for the flat with.
And I was going to set up a new budget, when I got a full-time job.
And I’m going to do that.
But I don’t think it’s right that I have to set up a new budget now, because your partner said my signature wasn’t mine, and didn’t accept my new budget, last year.
This has taken so much of my time now, so you should really just delete the debt, I think.
I’m on Ladders, so I have a high income-potential.
All the hours I’ve spent on you and Captial One should add up to arround the debt I owe you, I think.
So I’m looking forward to hearing from you that my debt with you has been deleted! Hope this is alright! Best regards,
Erik Ribsskog
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 10:24 AM, Correspondence Queries <client@cccs.co.uk> wrote:
Good morning Erik,
Thank you for contacting us about Wescot.
To make token payments to Wescot you do not need to fill in a giro slip. All you need is their sort code and account number and also the Wescot referencenumber starting with DM or D3. You then need to go into your bank and ask them to send £1 payment to Wescot by bank transfer. They may reject the offer of payment but they won’t reject the £1 payment you send and this will reduce the debt in time.
If you need any advice then please do not hesitate to call us.
Kind regards
Faye
Correspondence Advisor
From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
Sent: 12 October 2012 16:13
To: Correspondence Queries
Cc: offers
Subject: Re: Update/Fwd: *****7867/Fwd: CCCS
Hi,
thank you for your e-mail!
I’m not paying token-payments at the moment.
Wescot have sent me a budget-form again now.
But as your collegue there have previously told me I don’t have to fill out this form to get token-payments. It should be enought that I’ve explained about my situation.
I’ve offered Wescot a token-payment-arrangement like a ‘million’ times.
But they haven’t sent me giros or anything.
And this is taking a lot of my time now.
Because I’ve been offering Wescot, (and Capital One), a token-payment-arrangement since last year now.
And all I get are standard letters which tells lies like that I haven’t replied to their letters.
When I’ve sent about a million e-mails to them, which I haven’t gotten replies to.
So I now copy this e-mail to Wescot.
And I hope they’ll send me some giros for the token-payment arrangement of £1 a month now.
Or tell me what information they need from me to set up a direct-debit-agreement.
So I hope this will be sorted now.
Thanks again for the e-mail! Best regards,
Erik Ribsskog
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 8:07 AM, Correspondence Queries <client@cccs.co.uk> wrote:
Hello Eric
Thank you for copying us in to the email you have sent to Wescot.
Please try not to worry about the contact you have received as this is a standard procedure for creditors to take. Nelson Guest & Partnersare an internal collections department who work on behalf of Wescot to collect the outstanding balance.
As you have contacted this creditor to advise of your current financial situation and are making token payments, you are doing all youcan at this time. If you receive any further contact regarding this matter, please advise of this.
I hope this is helpful and reassuring.
If you have any queries or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact us on 0845 272 5400. Lines are open 8am to 6pm, Mondayto Friday. Email us at
client.services@cccs.co.uk
or go online to www.cccs.co.uk
and follow the links to send us a web mail.
Kind regards
Hannah
Correspondence Advisor
From: Erik Ribsskog[mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com] Sent: 08 October 2012 01:14
To: offers@wescot.co.uk
Cc: Q&A
Subject: Update/Fwd: *****7867/Fwd: CCCS
Hi,
on Saturday I got a letter from Nelson Guest & Partners Solicitiors, witch I attach a scanned copy of.
I’m don’t have the chance to pay 50% of the dept, av the moment, unfortunately.
I’m repeating my offer of a token-payment-arrangement again.
(Which I’ve done many times earlier).
I hope you can ‘stop messing around’ now, (like I think I have to call it), and just accept my token-payment-offer, like the other companies have done.
I don’t understand why you do so much ‘mumbo-jumbo’ surrounding this.
This should be a straight forward tokey-payment agreement.
I hope the CCCS can tell you to stop with your funny letters and just accept my token-payment-agreement, which I have offered you, a million times, (to exaggerate, but anyway).
Captial One even have a football-cup named after you, but you don’t seem to be a serious company.
It’s like being on the candid camera to try get a token-payment-agreement agreed with you.
Erik
———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 3:32 PM
Subject: Re: *****7867/Fwd: CCCS
To: offers <offers@wescot.co.uk>
Cc: Q&A <contactus@cccs.co.uk>
Hi,
it should be D3/49597867, (like I wrote in the subject-line in the e-mail I sent you on 20/9).
I repeat my token-payment offer on £1 a month, like I offer all my other creditors untill I find new employment.
Hope this is alright!
Best regards,
Erik Ribsskog
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 8:30 AM, offers <offers@wescot.co.uk> wrote:
Good morning,
Please provide the wescot reference beginning with D3 or DM
Kind regards
Rebecca Stearman
Offers Administrator
email:offers@wescot.co.uk
From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
Sent: 28 September 2012 14:34
To: Correspondence Queries
Cc: offers
Subject: Re: *****7867/Fwd: CCCS
Hi,
thank you for your e-mail!
Yes, I send a copy of this e-mail to Wescot as a reminder of my token-payment-offer, of one pound a month untill I find new employement.
I thought it was like you write here, with the budget-form etc., from when I went to business-school, in the eighties.
Even if that was in Norway, I think business-law is mostly the same in the western world.
Mostly based on old British business-law, if I’m not mistaking.
Thank you very much for the help with this!
The information I sent to Capital One was a new token payment-offer after I had to move to Sunderland for some months last year.
If I remember it right.
I now found a letter on my blog, from Capital One, from 2009, when they also complained about my signature, (so this has happened in both 2009 and 2011), which I attach.
Thanks again for the advice!
Best regards,
Erik Ribsskog
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 12:37 PM, Correspondence Queries <client@cccs.co.uk> wrote:
Hi Erick
Thank you for your email about your Wescot and Capital One accounts.
If you have concerns over the wording of the letter from Wescot, I would advise you to raise a complaint directly with them.
The complaint procedure can take up to 8 weeks and if you are unhappy with any response they give you, you can raise this further with the financial ombudsman service.
You don’t need to fill out the budget form that Wescot have sent you. You have advised them that you have already completed a budget with us. Both forms cover thesame areas. If you need a copy of the budget that you completed with us, please let me know as I can send this out to you. The budget can also be sent to Capital One.
I wouldn’t advise you to stop making payments towards the Wescot account. It is in your best interest and benefit that you carry on making a token payment. It willshow that you are willing to pay the account off.
If you don’t make a payment, the creditor can take further action.
I understand you would like to keep the contact in writing but it is also best that you call them to discuss your concerns. This will eliminate any responses aboutthem not receiving your letters.
You can ask for a Data Access Request from them which will provide you with all the notes made on your account. There may be a charge for this request.
Can you advise me what information you sent to Capital One for them to reject your signature? If your signature hasn’t changed, I would advise you to contact CapitalOne and ask for a further explanation, i.e. are they comparing your signature to the signature on the original credit agreement?
Again, you can ask for a Data Access Request to see what has been noted on your account and there may be a charge for this request.
I hope this has been helpful.
If you have any further queries, please contact us on 0845 272 5400, lines are open 8am to 6pm, Monday to Friday, you can email us atclient.service@cccs.co.uk.
Kind regards
Paul Marshall
Correspondence Co-ordinator
From: Erik[mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com] Sent: 26 September 2012 00:05
To: Correspondence Queries
Subject: Re: *****7867/Fwd: CCCS
Hi,
I’ve gone to business-school and letters shouldn’t contain lies even if they are standard letters.
Here it’s obvious that the standard letter is used wrongly.
I’m not making a token-payment here, you haven’t read up.
Please escalate to your line manager.
Regards,
Erik Ribsskog
PS.
And I don’t think it’s a good idea to call these companies.
It’s better to keep the correspondence in writing, so to keep documentation about what has been agreed.
PS 2.
You haven’t commented on that Capital One told me my signature wasn’t mine.
I want to please escalate this to your line-manager.
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 10:33 AM, Correspondence Queries <client@cccs.co.uk> wrote:
Hi Erik
Thank you for contacting us about your account with Wescot. Creditors will often send standard collection letters out to you. Standard letters will include certain phrases that may not fit entirely, such as “we have not received a reply”. Unfortunately even though you are making a token payment we cannot stop creditors from contacting you. You should continue to keep your creditors up to date with your financial situation and offer them the most fair and reasonable offer you can. It may be best to call your creditors and speak to someone directly. That way all issues can be discussed there and then. If you have any further questions or need some more advise, you can call us on 0845 272 5400. Lines are open from 8am to 6pm, Monday to Friday. You can also email us at
client.service@cccs.co.uk. Kind regards Gurj
Correspondence Advisor
We are altering the way in which we handle your correspondence to ensure we safeguard your personal information at all times. In order for us to do this we will be making some changes to the way in which we validate your identity.
The next time you contact us, we will require you to provide us with at least 2 pieces of information from the list below: · Client reference number
· Postal address
· Postcode
· Telephone number
· Email address Please make sure you provide this information along with your full name on every communication you send to us. If not, we will prompt you for these details and this may delay your reply.
Thank you The Correspondence Team
We are altering the way in which we handle your correspondence to ensure we safeguard your personal information at all times.
In order for us to do this we will be making some changes to the way in which we validate your identity.
The next time you contact us, we will require you to provide us with at least 2 pieces of information from the list below:
·
Client reference number·
Postal address·
Postcode·
Telephone number·
Email address
Please make sure you provide this information along with your full name on every communication you send to us. If not, we will prompt you for thesedetails and this may delay your reply.
Thank you
The Correspondence Team
http://twitter.com/moneyawareFollow us on Twitter
http://www.facebook.com/Like us on Facebook
moneyaware
Read the MoneyAware blog
http://moneyaware.co.uk
P
Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.
We are altering the way in which we handle your correspondence to ensure we safeguard your personal information at all times.
In order for us to do this we will be making some changes to the way in which we validate your identity.
The next time you contact us, we will require you to provide us with at least 2 pieces of information from the list below:
·
Client reference number·
Postal address·
Postcode·
Telephone number·
Email address
Please make sure you provide this information along with your full name on every communication you send to us. If not, we will prompt you for thesedetails and this may delay your reply.
Thank you
The Correspondence Team
We are altering the way in which we handle your correspondence to ensure we safeguard your personal information at all times.
In order for us to do this we will be making some changes to the way in which we validate your identity.
The next time you contact us, we will require you to provide us with at least 2 pieces of information from the list below:
·
Client reference number·
Postal address·
Postcode·
Telephone number·
Email address
Please make sure you provide this information along with your full name on every communication you send to us. If not, we will prompt you for thesedetails and this may delay your reply.
Thank you
The Correspondence Team
—–Original Message—–
From: Erik ******* [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
Sent: 20 September 2012 14:41
To: offers
Cc: Q&A
Subject: Your ref: ******7867/Fwd: CCCS Hi, I’m refering to your Final Notice-letter from 17/9, which I recieved today. You there write: ‘but we have not received a replyto our previous correspondence’. But this isn’t right, I’ve earlier written to you e-mails a lot of times offering a token-payment. Is this the Candid Camera? Your partner Capital One also did a practical joke like this, when they told me my signature wasn’t mine last year. Please stop with the monkey-business, and be serious. I hope the CCCS can stop your funny bailiff-actions and lies. Erik ****
———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Q&A <contactus@cccs.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 17:37:39 +0100
Subject: CCCS
To: Erik******** <eribsskog@gmail.com> Good afternoon Thank you for your email. There isn’t anything in the Consumer credit Act that states you must supply these details to a creditor. You can always provide them a copy of the budget and list of creditors that you have done through us. Regardless of whether they accept the offer or not please continue to make the token payment. Kind regards
Jonathan Follow us on Twitter
http://twitter.com/moneyaware Like us on Facebook
http://www.facebook.com/moneyaware Read the MoneyAware blog
http://moneyaware.co.uk/ P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail. ________________________________
From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
Sent: 19 August 2012 20:59
To: Q&A
Cc: offers@wescot.co.uk
Subject: Problems with Wescot/Fwd: Update/Fwd: Wescot reference:
*******867 (Regarding Capital One-debt).
Hi, I’ve told Wescot I’m unemployed and have offered them a £1 monthly token-payment untill I find new employment. (Like I’ve offered my other creditors). Wescot don’t accept but wants me to fill out an income and expenditure-form. I can’t remember that you at CCCS have mentioned that I have to fill out a form like that, when I do budget-work. It’s like they go a bit to close, and this seems unecessary, to me. What do you think at CCCS about this? Does the law say that I have to fill out a form like that? I attach the letter from Wescot. Yours sincerely, Erik *******
———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 10:35 PM
Subject: Update/Fwd: Wescot reference: *******867 (Regarding Capital One-debt).
To: offers@wescot.co.uk
Hi, I got an income and expenditure-form, in the post, from you, earlier this week. I don’t understand the point in me filling out that form. I’ve already told you that I’m on budget in co-operation, with the CCCS, and that I only can afford to pay a token-payment, (on £1), untill I find new employment. So this is my offer. I don’t understand why you send me this form. I think is unnessesary paper-work then. None of my other creditors have sent me a form like that. They have just accepted my token-payment-offer. So I hope you can set up a direct debit-agreement, for £1 a month, for this debt. Hope this is alright! Best regards, Erik *********
———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 10:31 AM
Subject: Wescot reference: ******867 (Regarding Capital One-debt).
To: offers@wescot.co.uk
Hi, I’m refering to your letter from 19/7, which I got in the post today. I’m currently unemployed, and on a budget in co-operation, with CCCS. My offer to you is the same as to my other creditors, and that is that I pay a one pound token-payment, each month, until I find new employment. Hope this is alright! Yours sincerely, Erik ********
VISIT OUR WEBSITE AT http://www.cccs.co.uk/
———————————————————— ———
This email message is intended for the individual to whom it’s addressed
and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If you are
not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use or dissemination
of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this information
in error, please return it to us immediately and delete it from your computer.
The contents or opinions expressed within this email are not intended to
represent the views of CCCS unless specifically stated to be so.
This email is not guaranteed to be free from any computer viruses, although
it has been checked using the Trend Virus Suite. You should check this email
and any attachments for the presence of viruses before downloading any files.
Foundation for Credit Counselling, trading as Consumer Credit Counselling Service (“CCCS”).
Registered Office: Wade House, Merrion Centre, Leeds, LS2 8NG. Registered in England
Company No 2757055. Registered Charity No. 1016630″
VISIT OUR WEBSITE AT
http://www.cccs.co.uk
———————————————————— ———This email message is intended for the individual to whom it’s addressed
and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If you are
not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use or dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this information in error, please return it to us immediately and delete it from your computer.
The contents or opinions expressed within this email are not intended to
represent the views of CCCS unless specifically stated to be so.
This email is not guaranteed to be free from any computer viruses, although
it has been checked using the Trend Virus Suite. You should check this email
and any attachments for the presence of viruses before downloading any files.
Foundation for Credit Counselling, trading as Consumer Credit Counselling Service (“CCCS”).
Registered Office: Wade House, Merrion Centre, Leeds, LS2 8NG. Registered in England Company No 2757055. Registered Charity No. 1016630″
Registered in Scotland No. SC84131, Registered Office: Kyleshill House, 1 Glencairn Street, Saltcoats, Ayrshire KA21 5JT
Please consider the environment before printing this email. Wescot, helping to make a difference Confidentiality Notice. The information in this e-mail is confidential and for use by the addressee(s) only. If you are not the intended recipient (or responsible for delivery of the message
to the intended recipient) please notify us immediately (on 01482 590590 (UK) or
+44 1482 590590 (international)) and delete this message from your computer: you may not copy or forward it, or use or disclose its contents to any other person.
As Internet communications are capable of data corruption, Wescot Credit Services Ltd does not accept any responsibility for changes made to this message after it was sent. Please notethat Wescot Credit Services Ltd does not accept any liability or responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan attachments (if any). Opinions and views expressed in this e-mail are those of the sender and may not reflect the opinions and
views of Wescot Credit Services Ltd.
VISIT OUR WEBSITE AT
http://www.cccs.co.uk
———————————————————— ———This email message is intended for the individual to whom it’s addressed
and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If you are
not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use or dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this information in error, please return it to us immediately and delete it from your computer.
The contents or opinions expressed within this email are not intended to
represent the views of CCCS unless specifically stated to be so.
This email is not guaranteed to be free from any computer viruses, although
it has been checked using the Trend Virus Suite. You should check this email
and any attachments for the presence of viruses before downloading any files.
Foundation for Credit Counselling, trading as Consumer Credit Counselling Service (“CCCS”).
Registered Office: Wade House, Merrion Centre, Leeds, LS2 8NG. Registered in England Company No 2757055. Registered Charity No. 1016630″
VISIT OUR WEBSITE AT
http://www.cccs.co.uk
———————————————————— ———This email message is intended for the individual to whom it’s addressed
and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If you are
not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use or dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this information in error, please return it to us immediately and delete it from your computer.
The contents or opinions expressed within this email are not intended to
represent the views of CCCS unless specifically stated to be so.
This email is not guaranteed to be free from any computer viruses, although
it has been checked using the Trend Virus Suite. You should check this email
and any attachments for the presence of viruses before downloading any files.
Foundation for Credit Counselling, trading as Consumer Credit Counselling Service (“CCCS”).
Registered Office: Wade House, Merrion Centre, Leeds, LS2 8NG. Registered in England Company No 2757055. Registered Charity No. 1016630″
Registered in Scotland No. SC84131, Registered Office: Kyleshill House, 1 Glencairn Street, Saltcoats, Ayrshire KA21 5JT
Please consider the environment before printing this email. Wescot, helping to make a difference
Confidentiality Notice. The information in this e-mail is confidential and for use by the addressee(s) only. If you are not the intended recipient (or responsible for delivery of the message to the intended
recipient) please notify us immediately (on 01482 590590 (UK) or
+44 1482 590590
(international)) and delete this message from your computer: you may not copy or forward it, or use or disclose its contents to any other person.
As Internet communications are capable of data corruption, Wescot Credit Services Ltd does not accept any responsibility for changes made to this message after it was sent. Please note that Wescot Credit Services
Ltd does not accept any liability or responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan attachments (if any). Opinions and views expressed in this e-mail are those of the sender and may not reflect the opinions and views of Wescot Credit Services
Ltd.
Registered in Scotland No. SC84131, Registered Office: Kyleshill House, 1 Glencairn Street, Saltcoats, Ayrshire KA21 5JT
Please consider the environment before printing this email. Wescot, helping to make a difference
Confidentiality Notice. The information in this e-mail is confidential and for use by the addressee(s) only. If you are not the intended recipient (or responsible for delivery of the message to the intended
recipient) please notify us immediately (on 01482 590590 (UK) or
+44 1482 590590
(international)) and delete this message from your computer: you may not copy or forward it, or use or disclose its contents to any other person.
As Internet communications are capable of data corruption, Wescot Credit Services Ltd does not accept any responsibility for changes made to this message after it was sent. Please note that Wescot Credit Services
Ltd does not accept any liability or responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan attachments (if any). Opinions and views expressed in this e-mail are those of the sender and may not reflect the opinions and views of Wescot Credit Services
Ltd.
Registered in Scotland No. SC84131, Registered Office: Kyleshill House, 1 Glencairn Street, Saltcoats, Ayrshire KA21 5JT
Please consider the environment before printing this email. Wescot, helping to make a difference Confidentiality Notice. The information in this e-mail is confidential and for use by the addressee(s) only. If you are not the intended recipient (or responsible for delivery of the message to
the intended recipient) please notify us immediately (on 01482 590590 (UK) or
+44 1482 590590
(international)) and delete this message from your computer: you may not copy or forward it, or use or disclose its contents to any other person. As Internet communications are capable of data corruption, Wescot Credit Services Ltd does not accept any responsibility for changes made to this message after it was sent. Please note thatWescot Credit Services Ltd does not accept any liability or responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan attachments (if any). Opinions and views expressed in this e-mail are those of the sender and may not reflect the opinions and views
of Wescot Credit Services Ltd.
Registered in Scotland No. SC84131, Registered Office: Kyleshill House, 1 Glencairn Street, Saltcoats, Ayrshire KA21 5JT Please consider the environment before printing this email. Wescot, helping to make a difference Confidentiality Notice. The information in this e-mail is confidential and for use by the addressee(s) only. If you are not the intended recipient (or responsible for delivery of the message to the intended recipient)
please notify us immediately (on 01482 590590 (UK) or +44 1482 590590 (international)) and delete this message from your computer: you may not copy or forward it, or use or disclose its contents to any other person. As Internet communications are capable of data corruption, Wescot Credit Services Ltd does not accept any responsibility for changes made to this message after it was sent. Please note that Wescot Credit Services Ltd
does not accept any liability or responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan attachments (if any). Opinions and views expressed in this e-mail are those of the sender and may not reflect the opinions and views of Wescot Credit Services
Ltd. -
Noen skriver i mitt navn, på 4chan. Dette er identitetstyveri. Jeg har aldri skrevet på 4chan
http://boards.4chan.org/int/res/15101517
PS.
Jeg har et tracking-cookie-program, som heter StatCounter, på bloggen, og der kan jeg se, hvilke nettsteder, som sender trafikk, til johncons-blogg:
-
Jeg fortsetter å søke på jobber. Denne gang som Store Manager Designate
Gmail – Store Manager Designate (Ellesmere Port) >//
function Print(){document.body.offsetHeight;window.print()};
// ]]>
Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>
Store Manager Designate (Ellesmere Port)
Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 10:46 PM
To:
LJohnston@martinmccoll.co.uk
Hi, I read about this vacancy on the Direct Gov-website, and I wanted to
please apply for this job. I’ve worked as a Store Manager for four years, (I was a
Cashier/Stocker from 1992 to 1994, then a Key Holder in the summer of
1994, then an Aspiring Manager the rest of 1994, then an Assistant
Manager, (in two different stores), from 1995 til 1998, then a Store
Manager, (in three different stores), from 1998 to 2002, then Key
Holder, (in two different stores while I studied full-time), from 2002
to 2004), in the Norwegian grocery-chain Rimi, (now owned by ICA). I was responsible for motivating, training and developing up to 25
employees, at a time, when I worked as a Store Manager, in Rimi, and
one of the shops I worked as a Store Manager in, (Rimi Kalbakken, in
Oslo), from 2000 to 2001, had a weekly turn-over, at around 850.000
NOK, (which is around £90.000). I’ve also worked as a full-time Cashier, (later part-time Cashier and
Delicatessen-employee, while studying), in the big hypermarked
Matland, (which was bought by Coop while I worked there, and changed
its name to OBS! Triaden), in Lørenskog in Norway. I attach my CV and hope to hear back from you! Yours sincerely, Erik Ribsskog

CV (Retail) – Erik Ribsskog.doc
49K -
Jeg sendte en ny e-post til Steffen Heegaard, (som er min avdøde mors danske fetter, som jobber, som direktør, i forsikring)
Gmail – Påminnelse/Fwd: Påminnelse/Fwd: Ny oppdatering/Fwd: Oppdatering om tull fra IF/Fwd: Klage/Fwd: Skadenummer: SA59484-001-BIK (H163117989M) >//
function Print(){document.body.offsetHeight;window.print()};
// ]]>
Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>
Påminnelse/Fwd: Påminnelse/Fwd: Ny oppdatering/Fwd: Oppdatering om tull fra IF/Fwd: Klage/Fwd: Skadenummer: SA59484-001-BIK (H163117989M)
Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 9:01 PM
To:
she@topdanmark.dk
Hei,Mvh. Erik Ribsskogi denne forsikringssaken, så er det nordmennene, (og ikke britene), som tuller Steffen.
Du får se på det hvis du har tid.
(Siden du er min avdøde mors fetter og jobber som direktør i forsikring, mener jeg).
Date: 2013/5/3———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Subject: Påminnelse/Fwd: Påminnelse/Fwd: Ny oppdatering/Fwd: Oppdatering om tull fra IF/Fwd: Klage/Fwd: Skadenummer: SA59484-001-BIK (H163117989M)
To: Postmottak Sivilombudsmannen <postmottak@sivilombudsmannen.no>
Cc: Robin MacKenzie-Robinson <RoMa@tilsynet.no>
Hei,jeg får ikke noe svar fra Tilsynsrådet for Advokatvirksomhet her.Jeg ber de bare bekrefte hvilket forsikringsselskap som er riktig.
Det er vanskelig for meg å gå videre, i denne saken, før de har svar på den e-posten.
Kan dere ‘banke dem opp’ litt, og få dem til å bekrefte hvilket selskap som er det riktige? På forhånd takk for svar! Mvh.
Erik Ribsskog
———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Date: 2013/2/25
Subject: Påminnelse/Fwd: Ny oppdatering/Fwd: Oppdatering om tull fra IF/Fwd: Klage/Fwd: Skadenummer: SA59484-001-BIK (H163117989M)
To: RoMa@tilsynet.no
Cc: Postmottak Sivilombudsmannen <postmottak@sivilombudsmannen.no>
Hei,
jeg kan ikke se at jeg har mottatt noe svar, på denne e-posten, så jeg sender en påminnelse, om dette.
Håper dette er i orden! Mvh. Erik Ribsskog
———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Date: 2013/1/17
Subject: Ny oppdatering/Fwd: Oppdatering om tull fra IF/Fwd: Klage/Fwd: Skadenummer: SA59484-001-BIK (H163117989M)
To: Robin MacKenzie-Robinson <RoMa@tilsynet.no>
Cc: Bjorge.Skjeldestad@tryg.no, kundeservice@if.no, post <post@finanstilsynet.no>, postmottak@fd.dep.no
Hei,jeg sjekket det igjen nå, og jeg klagde første gang på Rukke, til Tilsynsrådet for advokatvirksomhet, i juni:From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Date: 2012/6/21
Subject: Klage på tre advokater/Fwd: Din henvendelse til Advokatforeningen
To: post@tilsynet.no
Og ettersom jeg har forstått nå, (fra deres siste e-post), så bytta Rukke til IF, i august.
Så da blir det Tryg som er riktig selskap likevel, (virker det som for meg nå).Så hun IF hadde vel da rett.
(Selv om hun kanskje ikke forklarte den paragrafen riktig).Er dere hos Tilsynsrådet for advokatvirksomhet enig i at det er Tryg som er riktig selskap, for å si det sånn?
(Sorry at jeg surrer litt, men jeg er ikke vant til å drive med sånt her.
Min fetter Tommy A. L. Olsen jobber visst nå i Borg forsikring, og har Tryg e-post-adresse, så jeg på nettet.
Men jeg har ikke snakket med han siden rett etter jeg var i bryllupet hans, i 2002 vel.Så dette var nytt for meg.
Men han er kanskje da inhabil hos både IF og Tryg?).
Vennligst bekreft at Tryg er riktig selskap.(Som jeg vel ba dere om å gjøre i min forrige e-post.
Så tar vi en ting av gangen liksom, i den her saken da, hvis det er greit).
Mvh.
Erik Ribsskog———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Date: 2013/1/17
Subject: Oppdatering om tull fra IF/Fwd: Klage/Fwd: Skadenummer: SA59484-001-BIK (H163117989M)
To: post <post@finanstilsynet.no>
Cc: postmottak@fd.dep.no
———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Date: 2013/1/17
Subject: Re: Klage/Fwd: Skadenummer: SA59484-001-BIK (H163117989M)
To: Robin MacKenzie-Robinson <RoMa@tilsynet.no>
Cc: Bjorge.Skjeldestad@tryg.no
Hei,ok, da fikk jeg klarhet i dette.Da virker det for meg som om IF har forsøkt å lure meg.
Jeg sender derfor kopi til IF og Tryg.
Så håper jeg at IF skjerper seg.
For det her syntes jeg at var rimelig sleipt.
Jeg har som sagt en fetter i IF, som heter Tommy Løff Olsen.
(Hvis han jobber der enda da).Og har overhørt at jeg er forfulgt av ‘mafian’.
Så her kan det være mafia i IF, frykter jeg.Så dette er også en formell klage på lureri fra IF.
Mvh.
Erik Ribsskog
2013/1/17 Robin MacKenzie-Robinson <RoMa@tilsynet.no>
Det vises til dine e-poster av 12. desember 2012 og 12. januar 2013 hvor De ønsker å klage på saksbehandlingen til Tilsynsrådet for advokatvirksomhets medarbeider Jonas Haugsvold.
Tilsynsrådet for advokatvirksomhet kan ved forespørsel informere om advokaters sikkerhetsstiller. I dette tilfellet ønsket De informasjon om sikkerhetsstiller for advokat Ida Valen Rukke. På det tidspunktet De ønsket denne informasjonen var IF sikkerhetsstiller for advokat Rukke. Det informerte Jonas Haugsvold Dem om.
De ønsker nå å få opplyst hvem som var sikkerhetsstiller for advokat Rukke før hun tegnet sikkerhetsstillelse hos If Skadeforsikring.
Fra 16. februar 2009 og frem til 1. august 2012 har Tryg vært sikkerhetsstiler for advokat Rukke.
Til Deres informasjon følger det av advokatforskriften § 2-4 første ledd at: ”Den sikkerhetsstilleren som advokaten har når skadelidte fremsetter krav om erstatning, er ansvarlig overfor skadelidte. Dette gjelder selv om tapet ble forårsaket mens advokaten hadde en annen sikkerhetsstiller”.
Med vennlig hilsen
Robin Mackenzie-RobinsonPostboks 720 Sentrum, 0106 Oslo | Rådhusgt. 23
Rådgiver
Tilsynsrådet for advokatvirksomhet
Tlf: 22 00 75 03 | Sentralbord: 22 00 75 00
* post@tilsynet.no þ www.tilsynet.no
Fra: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]Sendt: 12. januar 2013 20:03
Til: Tilsynsrådet for Advokatvirksomhet
Kopi: Bjorge.Skjeldestad@tryg.no
Emne: Klage/Fwd: Skadenummer: SA59484-001-BIK (H163117989M)Hei,jeg vil klage på deres medarbeider Haugsvold, for å ha villedet meg.
Først så opplyste han ikke om sikringsstiller, for advokaten, enda jeg mener at det burde ha fremgått av mine e-poster, at det var det jeg ønsket at han skulle opplyse meg om.
Den andre klagen går på at deres nevnte medarbeider så skrev at IF var riktig sikringsstiller, men IF sier at Tryg var riktig selskap.
Jeg mener at det fremgikk av min korrespondanse, med deres medarbeider, at dette gjaldt et forhold da advokat Rukke jobbet for Advokat.no.Så her mener jeg at deres medarbeider Haugsvold ved to anledninger har vært ‘vrang’ og bevisst har prøvd å lure meg.
Jeg skal kopiere den første e-posten jeg sendte dere om dette, i denne e-posten, så burde dette da være mulig å se.
Jeg ser frem til å motta deres kommentar om dette.
Kan dere også bekrefte det som IF sier at Tryg var riktig sikringsstiller for denne saken, som var fra da Rukke jobbet hos Advokat.no, med min sak, som var fra 16. april til 18. juni, som jeg har skrevet til Tryg.
Mvh.Erik RibsskogPS.Her er mer om dette:
2012/9/3 Jonas Haugsvold <JoHa@tilsynet.no>
Det vises til dine e-poster av 22.6.2012 og 1.9.2012.
Tilsynsrådet for advokatvirksomhet fører tilsyn med landets praktiserende advokater og rettshjelpere, bl.a. ved gjennomgang av deres regnskaper og behandling av betrodde midler. Tilsynsrådet er tillagt ansvaret for å påse at den som driver advokat- og øvrig rettshjelpvirksomhet har stillet lovbestemt sikkerhet for sin virksomhet. Som et av sine hovedmål skal Tilsynsrådet gjennom aktiv tilsynsvirksomhet søke å forebygge ansvarsskader.
Tilsynsrådet kan ikke bistå deg i denne saken. Det vises til at Tilsynsrådet, ut fra sin kompetanse, verken har anledning til å anbefale særskilte advokater eller til å ta nærmere stilling til konkrete rettstvister mellom private parter. Tilsynsrådet kan heller ikke bistå med et skifte.
Dersom du mener at en advokat har opptrådt i strid med gjeldende regler for god advokatskikk, gjør vi oppmerksom på at klage eventuelt kan fremsettes skriftlig til Disiplinærnemnden for advokater på følgende adresse:
Disiplinærnemnden
Kr. Augustgt. 9
0164 Oslo
Vennlig hilsen
Jonas Haugsvold
Rådgiver
Tilsynsrådet for advokatvirksomhetPostboks 720 Sentrum, 0106 Oslo | Rådhusgt. 23
Tlf: 22 00 75 02 | Sentralbord: 22 00 75 00
* post@tilsynet.no þ www.tilsynet.no
Fra: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]Sendt: 1. september 2012 14:50
Til: Tilsynsrådet for Advokatvirksomhet
Emne: Påminnelse/Fwd: Klage på tre advokater/Fwd: Din henvendelse til Advokatforeningen
Hei,jeg kan ikke se at jeg har mottatt noe svar på denne e-posten, så jeg sender en påminnelse om dette.
Håper dette er i orden!
Mvh. Erik Ribsskog———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Date: 2012/6/21
Subject: Klage på tre advokater/Fwd: Din henvendelse til Advokatforeningen
To: post@tilsynet.no
Cc: larvik.tingrett@domstol.no
Hei,min mormor døde for tre år siden, på tirsdag neste uke.
Jeg har bare fått tre tusen i arv, enda hun var etter dansk adel og kongelige og hadde malerier fra Højris slott på veggen, da hun døde, og også mange andre artige ting, som brev og møbler og alt mulig, fra sine adelige slektninger, (Gjedde, Nyholm, Fog, Adeler, etc).
Jeg ville først at advokat Erik Øvergård, i Hurum, skulle selge min eiendom der, (del av sameie), sånn at jeg kunne betale 30.000 til Tingretten i Larvik, for offentlig skifte.
Øvergård sluttet plutselig å svare meg.Så jeg kontaktet Tingretten i Drammen, (via Namsmannen i Hurum/Røyken), og de villedet meg om salg av sameie, (Høysæter der), så jeg fikk ikke ordnet dette, for man måtte betale gebyr, og sånn, og Høysæter bare lot som om hun skulle ordne det, så mange måneder gikk tapt da, og etter dette så har jeg fått en umøblert leilighet, så jeg har ikke hatt penger til gebyr for salg av sameie.
Jeg fikk derimot dekke litt fri rettshjelp for en barnevernssak mot Svelvik kommune, av Fylkesmannen i Oslo og Akershus.
Jeg sendte dette til Advokat.no og spurte om jeg kunne få en advokat i Drammen, siden dette er den nærmeste store byen, fra Svelvik.
Jeg fikk en advokat i Oslo, og tenkte at det var greit.
Men nå så jeg senere at hun Ida Valen Rukke, som jeg ble tildelt som advokat av Advokat.no, ikke har barnevern som hovedfelt.
Og at syv andre advokater hos Advokat.no hadde barnevern som hovedfelt.
Da jeg klagde på at Rukke var ineffektiv, antagelig siden hun ikke var vant til å jobbe med barnevernsaker, så slutten hun i jobben, (av en eller annen grunn), og jeg ble ikke tilbudt ny advokat, av Advokat.no.
Og dette var etter at Rukke hadde opplyst meg om at hun hadde en timelønn på over 2000, og etter at jeg hadde bedt henne om å ordne med det offentlige skiftet, i Larvik, for meg, samt oppløsing av sameie, i Holmsbu, og andre saker.
Jeg sendte så e-post til en advokat Bille, i Drammen, som ikke har svart meg.
Jeg mister nå antagelig den arven, etter min mormor, morfar og mor, (siden min mor og morfar døde før min mormor).
For fristen der er mandag eller tirsdag, neste uke, å be om offentlig skifte.
Og jeg har vært arbeidsledig i England, under finanskrisen, så jeg har ikke klart å spare opp penger, og salget av sameiet i Holmsbu har jo ikke latt seg gjennomføre grunnet sabotasje, (må jeg kalle det), fra Øverland og Tingretten i Drammen.
Jeg ønsker jo selvfølgelig først og fremst at jeg får innvilget offentlig skifte, etter min mormor, hos Tingretten i Larvik.
Kanskje kan gjøre dette for meg?
Sender kopi til Tingretten i Larvik og advokat Bille i Drammen.
Jeg ønsker også erstatning på grunn av tullet fra de nevnte advokatene.
Jeg har måttet gått rundt i Newcastle, en hel natt, med alt jeg har hatt av eiendom her borte, (City Self Storage vil ikke sende meg de ‘norske’ tingene mine), og nesten fryst ihjel, fordi jeg ikke har fått solgt eiendom i Norge og vært prislagt diverse lugubre britiske hosteller, osv.
Så disse advokatene kan man få billig av meg, og jeg håper dere lar de miste bevilgningen.
Jeg blir systematisk tullet med, synes jeg det virker som, og jeg ønsker å få mye penger i erstatning, for at det skal være enklere for meg, å beskytte meg mot slik systematisk tulling og jeg har også overhørt at jeg er forfulgt av ‘mafian’, som var grunnen til at jeg flytta fra Norge, i 2004.
Så jeg håper på amerikansk metode her, med mye erstatning til folk som er offer for maktmisbruk, osv.
Fikk også noen dokumenter etter de kjente slektningene mine Anders Gjedde Nyholm, en general og en dommer i Haag, Didrik Nyholm, av min mormor, på 80-tallet.
Men så skulle Ingeborg ha tilbake dette.Og hu var jo gammel allerede da, så jeg sa det var greit.
Men nå som hun er død, så er jo dette egentlig mitt, mener jeg, man kan jo ikke ta tilbake en gave.
Og min mormor hadde også masse andre artige brev fra Maren Gjedde, mm., som jeg syntes at virker interessant både for meg selv og også historisk.
Og jeg er den eneste som har interesse for sånt, i slekta, sa min mormor, mens hun levde.
Også skal jeg liksom bare få 3000 i arv, enda min mormor og morfar hadde det største huset i Nevlugnhavn, på 80-tallet, og de så ut som en antikkforretning eller museum.
Hvor har det blitt av verdiene? Det er ikke riktig at jeg bare skal få 3000 etter min mor, mormor og morfar, mener jeg.
Her er det noe alvorlig tull.
Hvorfor skal ikke jeg få offentlig skifte? Kan dere ordne det? Pluss erstatning også for det andre tøyset.
Men offentlig skifte-fristen går visst ut på mandag eller tirsdag neste uke.
Erik Ribsskog
———- Forwarded message ———-Date: 2012/6/21
From: Mona Mjøen McKiernan <mmm@advokatforeningen.no>
Subject: Din henvendelse til Advokatforeningen
To: “eribsskog@gmail.com” <eribsskog@gmail.com>Erik Ribsskog,
Det vises til din henvendelse av 20.juni 2012, vedrørende klage på advokat.
Av henvendelsen fremgår det at du ønsker å klage på advokat.no.
Vi viser til vårt tidligere svar av 18.juni 2012, der det fremgår at en klage må sendes per post og gjelde en navngitt advokat.
All informasjon om hvordan du skriver en klage finner du her: http://www.advokatenhjelperdeg.no/ artikler/kan-jeg-klage-pa- advokaten/
Vedrørende hva en klage kan føre til finner du informasjon om dette her:http://www.advokatenhjelperdeg.no/ artikler/kan-jeg-klage-pa- advokaten/#hvafrerklagenetil
Til ditt spørsmål om hva du skal gjøre med det offentlige skiftet minner vi om at Advokatforeningen ikke kan tilby juridisk rådgivning. Vi kan heller ikke tildele en advokat til deg.
Vi råder deg til å ta kontakt med en advokat for å få hjelp med dette. Din advokat finner du her:
http://www.advokatenhjelperdeg.no/finn- advokat/ Alle som praktiserer som advokat, er lovpålagt å gi sine klienter økonomisk trygghet for eventuelle feil de gjør som advokat. Du finner mer informasjon om erstatning og hvordan du kan rette et erstatningskrav mot advokaten her: http://www.advokatenhjelperdeg.no/ artikler/kan-jeg-klage-pa- advokaten/#kanjegferstatning
Med vennlig hilsen
Mona Mjøen McKiernan
ADVOKATFORENINGEN / THE NORWEGIAN BAR ASSOCIATION
Kristian Augusts gate 9, N-0164 Oslo T +47 22 03 50 50 E mmm@advokatforeningen.no
www.advokatforeningen.no www.advokatenhjelperdeg.no
From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
Sent: 20. juni 2012 20:57
To: Mona Mjøen McKiernan
Cc: Disiplinærnemnden for advokater
Subject: Re: Din henvendelse til Advokatforeningen
Hei,ok, jeg videresender denne korrespondansen til dem, så får jeg håpe at de tar kontakt.Også ønsker jeg samtidig å klage på Advokat.no.
Som tidligere nevnt, så ba jeg om en advokat i Drammen, siden dette er den nærmeste store byen, fra Bergeråsen, hvor omsorgssvikten fant sted.
(Etter at jeg ble innvilget Fri Rettshjelp, fra Fylkesmannen i Oslo og Akershus).
Jeg ble tilbudt en advokat i Oslo.
Og jeg tenkte at det var greit.Men da jeg sjekket nettsidene til Advokat.no nærmere, så så jeg det, at Advokat.no hadde syv advokater i Oslo, som var spesialister på barnevern.Og selv om min sak er en barnevernssak, (min far lot meg bo alene fra jeg var ni år, og jeg fikk fri rettshjelp til en barnevernssak mot Svelvik kommune).
Så ble jeg gitt en advokat som _ikke_ hadde barnevern som hovedfelt.
Og så, her om dagen, slutter plutselig den advokaten.
Advokat.no skulle jo da selvfølgelig ha tilbudt meg en ny advokat.
Men det gjorde de ikke.
De bare sa at de var ferdig med saken.Og dette etter at jeg hadde forklart for hun Rukke der, at jeg blir snytt for arv også, og trenger hjelp av en advokat, til å få Tingretten i Larvik, til å ha offentlig skifte, etter min mormor, og fristen der er 26. juni, altså på tirsdag neste uke.
Så at Advokat.no bare sluttet å jobbe med sakene mine, det kan koste meg arven etter min mor, (som døde i 1999), og min mormor som var fra danske kongelige og adelige.
Så jeg synes Advokat.no oppfører seg så besynderlig, at jeg ønsker å klage.
Samtidlig så lurer jeg på hva vitsen er med å klage, for Øvergård fikk bare 2000 i bot, og jeg fikk ingenting i erstatning.
Og dette gjaldt salg av min del av et sameie i Holmsbu, som jeg ville selge for å ha råd til det nevnte offentlige skiftet da.
For meg så virker det som at jeg bare blir systematisk tullet med av norske advokater, (er det mafian som trekker i tråder, jeg har overhørt i 2003 at jeg er forfulgt av dem).
Hvordan skal jeg liksom få ordnet med det offentlige skiftet da.
Hvorfor kan liksom ingen i Norge hjelpe meg med det, nå er det bare noen dager igjen til fristen går ut.Men Advokatforeningen er så idiotisk organisert at dere ikke gir erstatning til ofre for deres mafia-advokater, og kun gir mindre enn en timelønn i bot til disse mafia-advokatene så det er jo helt håpløst.
Det burde vært som i USA hvor folk får store erstatninger.
Ellers så kommer de aldri av flekken.Jeg blir litt kvalm her jeg sitter i England av dette mafia-opplegget som foregår i Norge.Så nå må dere forte dere å gi Advokat.no 2000 i bot, de også.
Hva skal liksom løse seg da, tenker dere?
Dette er jo helt meningsløst egentlig.Kan dere ikke tilby meg advokathjelp, eller noe, i det minste? Hvordan skal jeg få ordnet med dette offentlige skiftet hvor fristen går ut 26. juni.
Det kan jo være at den egentlige grunnen til at Advokat.no oppførte seg så besynderlig var for at jeg skulle miste kontrollen over det arveoppgjøret, pga. at en mafia står bak, og trekker i tråder.
Jeg rekker jo ikke nå å få en ny advokat til å ordne med dette.
Så om dere kan ordne med det.
Jeg har skrevet om disse problemene på blogg i tre år nå, og ingen i Norge gjør en dritt, så jeg er rimelig oppgitt, for å si det sånn.
Jeg vet nesten ikke hva jeg skal si.
Erik Ribsskog
———- Forwarded message ———-Date: 2012/12/10
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Skadenummer: SA59484-001-BIK (H163117989M)
To: ansvarskade@if.no
Cc: arne.einar.brun@tryg.no
Hei,
ok, det var en ‘premie-idiot’, hos Tilsynsrådet for Advokatvirksomhet, som sa at IF var riktig selskap, skjønner du.
Jeg sender nå e-post til en i Tryg, så håper jeg at jeg får erstatning tilsvarende det denne nå ødelagte saken, (må man vel si), ville vært verdt, etter å ha vunnet den, i retten.
Takk for deres forklaring om dette! Og hils min fetter Tommy.
Dere må ikke glemme å bytte ut Audi-en hans, med jevne mellomrom, sånn at han slipper å kjøre rundt i et gammelt vrak som snart må kondemneres.
Mvh.
Erik Ribsskog2012/12/10 <ansvarskade@if.no>
Vedr. erstatningskrav mot Advokat.no/Ida Valen Rukke
Det vises til mottatt erstatningskrav under sikkerhetsstillelsen/forsikringen til advokat Ida Valen Rukke. På bakgrunn av denne henvendelsen har vi opprettet et referansenummer SA59484-BIK. Jeg ber om at det vises til dette referansenummeret ved henvendelser vedrørende saken.
Ida Valen Rukke sluttet i Advokat.no og tegnet ny forsikring og sikkerhetsstillelse hos If Skadeforsikring 01.08.12 gjennom ny arbeidsgiver. Det fremgår av forsikringsbeviset hos oss at et krav må være reist mot sikrede eller forsikringsselskapet i forsikringstiden for å falle inn under ordningen.
Ut fra dokumentasjonen vi har mottatt synes kravet i nærværende sak å være rettet mot Advokat.no/Rukke i perioden før If Skadeforsikring tegnet forsikringen/sikkerhetsstillelsen. Kravet må således gjøres gjeldende mot det forsikringsselskapet der Advokat.no/Rukke hadde sin forsikring tidligere. Jeg har fått opplyst at dette er Tryg.
Ut fra ovenstående vil forholdet ikke bli behandlet videre hos If skadeforsikring.
Vennlig hilsen
If
Birgitte KnudtzonAdvokat – Ansvar Skade
Telefon: 21495821
e-post: ansvarskade@if.no









