Forfatter: Erik Ribsskog
-
Her kan man se at jeg gjorde slektforskinga riktig. Det programmet sa fra om matcher. Selv om ingen av de visste at Maren Gjeddes far var en bondesønn
PS.
Legg merke til at Anders Gjedde Nyholm, den viktige danske generalen, døde i 1939, året før den tyske operasjon weserubung.
Så var det bestemor Ingeborg som lurte noe gift i konjakken hans?
Hvem vet.
Var det derfor bestemor Ingeborg ville flytte til Norge, etter krigen?
Dette får vi nok aldri vite, så her må vi prøve å holde holdet kaldt, og ikke spekulere for mye, så jeg får prøve å gjøre det.
Så da får jeg ta tilbake det om bestemor Ingeborg.
Men men.
Men vi får se hva som skjer.
Mvh.
Erik Ribsskog
PS 2.
Eller kanskje det var sånn, at tyskerne ikke turte å angripe Norden, før den falske Gjedde-spionen deres, Anders Gjedde Nyholm, var død.
Så døde han, og da angrep Hitler Polen.
Var det sånn det hang sammen?
Isåfall, så var hele poenget med krigen, å svekke de nordiske eller blonde da, vil jeg si.
Hele 2. verdenskrig, var et plot, i Moses Hess’ tegn, mannen som fant opp sionismen, og som sa at hele historien var en krig, mellom arier og semitter, eller lyshårede/nordiske mot mørkhårede/sorthårede, og Hess sa også, at semittene var den overlegne rasen.
Så her må semittene (populært kalt jødene), ha tenkt og planlagt fælt, før dem begynte krigen.
Legg merke til at dette også stemmer, med det Mel Gibson sa, at ‘jøder har startet alle kriger’.
Selv om dette ikke kan bekreftes da.
Og det er nok også feil å bruker ordet ‘jøder’ her, det riktige, eller ihvertfall det politisk korrekte, skal nok være sionister.
Så sånn er nok det.
Så det er mye rart.
PS 3.
Her er den e-posten jeg fikk fra MyHeritage.com, angående slektstre da:
Google Mail – Erik Ribsskog, you've got Smart Matches! (Aug 6 2009)
Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>
Erik Ribsskog, you’ve got Smart Matches! (Aug 6 2009)
MyHeritage Smart Matches
<smartmatch2@myheritage.com>
Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 7:51 PM
Reply-To:
smartmatch@myheritage.com
To:
eribsskog@gmail.com
Dear Erik,Good news!
MyHeritage.com has found new Smart Matches for you!
Smart Matches are people thought to be the same, in your family tree and family trees of other users on MyHeritage.com.
Correct Smart Matches may lead your way to discover new relatives and ancestors!
If you’d like to learn more about Smart Matches and the technology behind this feature, visit our blog on http://www.myheritage.com/
blogs/companyblog/ Family tree: Ribsskog Family Tree
Today, 7 new Smart Matches were found for you:
1. Johannes Ribsskog in your family tree was matched to:
Johannes Ribsskog, in a family tree of 17688 people submitted by Werner Brandstrup Andreasen, on MyHeritage.com site "Andreasen Web Site". This family tree was last updated on May 28 2007.
Johannes Ribsskog, in a family tree of 43954 people submitted by Werner Brandstrup Andreasen, on MyHeritage.com site "Andreasen Web Site". This family tree was last updated on May 28 2007.
Johannes Ribsskog, in a family tree of 90323 people submitted by Nikolaj Asgeir MacGregor Sadolin from Turkey, on MyHeritage.com site "OneTree Genealogy". This family tree was last updated on Jul 31 2009.
To view these matches, click the link below and then click the Compare link:
2. Ingeborg Heegaard in your family tree was matched to:
Ingeborg Elisabeth Ankerita Heegaard, in the above family tree submitted by Werner Brandstrup Andreasen.
Ingeborg Elisabeth Ankerita Heegaard, in the above family tree submitted by Nikolaj Asgeir MacGregor Sadolin.
To view these matches, click the link below and then click the Compare link:
3. Hans Louis Anker Heegaard in your family tree was matched to:
Hans Louis Anker Heegaard, in the above family tree submitted by Werner Brandstrup Andreasen.
Hans Louis Anker Heegaard, in the above family tree submitted by Nikolaj Asgeir MacGregor Sadolin.
To view these matches, click the link below and then click the Compare link:
4. Karen Marie Nyholm in your family tree was matched to:
Karen Margrethe Nyholm, in the above family tree submitted by Werner Brandstrup Andreasen.
Karen Margrethe Nyholm, in the above family tree submitted by Nikolaj Asgeir MacGregor Sadolin.
To view these matches, click the link below and then click the Compare link:
5. Anders Gjedde Nyholm in your family tree was matched to:
Anders Gjedde Nyholm, in the above family tree submitted by Werner Brandstrup Andreasen.
Anders Gjedde Nyholm, in the above family tree submitted by Nikolaj Asgeir MacGregor Sadolin.
To view these matches, click the link below and then click the Compare link:
6. Mary Eva Carla Fog in your family tree was matched to:
Mary Eva Carla Fog, in the above family tree submitted by Werner Brandstrup Andreasen.
Mary Eva Carla Fog, in the above family tree submitted by Nikolaj Asgeir MacGregor Sadolin.
To view these matches, click the link below and then click the Compare link:
7. Maren Gjedde in your family tree was matched to:
Maren Giedde, in the above family tree submitted by Werner Brandstrup Andreasen.
Maren Giedde, in the above family tree submitted by Nikolaj Asgeir MacGregor Sadolin.
To view these matches, click the link below and then click the Compare link:
You can view all your Smart Matches conveniently, by clicking the following link:
——————————
————————- What’s next?
You are encouraged to visit the above links and get in touch with the submitters of the other trees that were matched with yours, through MyHeritage.com, and find out what else you can learn from each other.
If you are unsure about how to get the most out your Smart Matches, or would like to share a Smart Matching success story, please use our support message boards at http://www.myheritage.com/
support-forum-16271_16706/ smart-matching, or email our friendly support staff at support@myheritage.com. Enjoy,
MyHeritage.com team
MyHeritage (UK) Ltd.
1.03 The Tea Building, 56 Shoreditch High Street, London E1 6JJ, United Kingdom
If you would like to stop receiving notifications on new Smart Matches, click here:
http://www.myheritage.com/
subscription/eribsskog@gmail. com/2009072803251/100019/EN
PS 4.
Jeg kunne også finne ut en annen ting, fra de linkene, i e-posten over.
Og det var at min morfar Johannes Ribsskogs mor, (min oldemor), var fra familien Dørumsgaard.
Jeg fikk bekreftet dette, som jeg mente å huske, at bestemor Ingeborg, fortalte meg, for noen år siden, før jeg flyttet til England, en gang jeg og søsteren min var å besøkte henne en helg i Nevlunghavn, i forbindelse med 85-års dagen hennes, eller noe.
Så sånn var det.
Bare noe jeg kom på nå.
Her er mer om dette:
PS 6.
Ovenfor, så står det også, at min morfar, Johannes Ribsskog, var født i Skedsmo.
Og det stemmer.
Begge foreldrene hans, var lærere, i Rælingen, har jeg fått opplyst, en eller to ganger tidligere.
Fra bestemor Ingeborg, og en rar gubbe, som Arne Thomassen, min halvbror Axels far, hadde med hjem en gang, det året jeg leide et rom av dem, i Høybråtenveien, på begynnelsen av 90-tallet.
Her er mer om dette:
http://johncons.blog.com/2990821/
Det står også at min morfar, var rådmann, og det stemmer, han var rådmann, i Hadsel, i Vesterålen vel, hvor han bl.a. fikk bygget en bro, mener jeg Ingeborg sa.
Og denne broen, tror jeg senere ble første del av en rekke broforbindelser, i Lofoten/Vesterålen.
Og noen ville visst legge broa utenfor Stokmarknes, men det fikk de visst avverget da, uten at jeg vet om Johannes var med på det, eller ikke.
Men min mormor, sa at den broa ikke var så suksessfull.
Men, kanskje den andre broa, som gikk over sundet, og ikke bare til en øy i sundet, hadde havnet et annet sted, hvis ikke Johannes hadde fått bygget den brua, til øya da.
Så Johannes redda kanskje Stokmarknes.
Det kan være en teori.
Men det kan jo være som bestemor Ingeborg sa og, at den broa ikke var så vellykka.
Jeg skal se om jeg finner en link til Wikipedias side, om den broa.
Vi får se.
PS 7.
Det her mistenker jeg, at kan være den broa, som Johannes fikk bygget, som rådmann, i Hadsel, ifølge bestemor Ingeborg.
Bestemor Ingeborg, sa bare at det var en bro ut til en eller flere øyer, men etter å ha lest på nettet, så tror jeg at det sannsynligvis må være denne broa:
-
Jeg sendte en e-post til Sivilombudsmannen angående hvor lang tid, som man burde vente, før man sender purring, til forvaltningen, pga. manglende svar
Google Mail – Spørsmål om hvor lang tid man bør vente, med å sende purring, når man ikke mottar svar fra forvaltningen
Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>
Spørsmål om hvor lang tid man bør vente, med å sende purring, når man ikke mottar svar fra forvaltningen
Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>
Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 10:24 AM
To:
postmottak@sivilombudsmannen.no
Hei,jeg har vært i kontakt med dere tidligere, angående en sak, hvor Ambassaden i London, ikkesvarte på mine henvendelser.Dere sa at det var iorden, siden UD tilslutt svarte.Men, jeg ser jo på nettsidene deres, at dere har uttalelser, fra visse saker.Så lurte jeg på, om hvorfor dere ikke har noen uttalelse der, fra min sak.Jeg leste uttalelsen deres, i forbindelse med saken som involverte pasientombudet. Og der,så la Sivilombudsmannen vekt på, at helse Sør, til slutt beklaget, at de ikke hadde svart,på 15 måneder.Men, i saken min, så har jo ikke ambassaden beklaget enda, de har jo ikke engang svartmeg, eller noe som helst, enda dere har bedt dem om det.Hvorfor tar dere hensyn til beklagelser i pasientombud-saken, men ikke i min sak, deresa at det var greit, så lenge UD svarte, men jeg har jo ikke fått noe beklagelse fraambassaden.Her lukter det forskjellsbehandling fra Sivilombudsmannen, vil jeg si.Til sist, så var grunnen til at jeg søkte på nettet, det var hvor lang tid, som man bør laforvaltningen ha, før man sender en purring, for manglende svar.(For jeg blir fortsatt tullet med over hele linja fra forvaltningen i Norge).Så jeg kunne tenkt å ha en tommelfingerregel, på hvor lenge man bør vente, før mansender en purring, på manglende svar, til forvaltningen.Dette høres kanskje bagatellmessig ut, og høres kanskje ikke ut som en grunn, til åkontakte dere, men nå er det så mange saker, hvor jeg blir tullet med av myndighetene,så nå må jeg prøve å få litt struktur inn i dette og litt rutiner, må man vel kalle det.Det virker som at det er en slags mafia innen offentlig forvaltning som driver å motarbeidermeg her, bare se mine tidligere klager, som jeg har sendt dere.Om dere kan se disse i sammenheng.Så håper jeg at dere har mulighet til å svare på disse spørsmålene!Mvh.Erik Ribsskog
-
Jeg lurer litt på det med illuminati-symbolet(?) solstrålene, hva det er om. Og det er visst noe med solhesten og solfisken å gjøre, kan det virke som
http://www.dagbladet.no/2009/08/06/nyheter/utenriks/narkokartell/narkotika/drap/7530229/
http://da.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solvognen
PS.
Her har vi kanskje en mistenkt, ja:
PS 2.
Hun Siri Rognli Olsen, som jeg har anmeldt for voldtekt av meg, da hu og venninna, ei lyshåra jente som var the Alarms største fan i Norge, besøkte meg, like før påsken 1990, på Abildsø.
Hu Siri Rognli Olsen, hu trodde på jing og jang, fortalte hun meg.
Og hun Siri Rognli Olsen, hun brukte også hu ‘the Alarms største fan i Norge’, som noe slags slave, virka det som.
Hun ble kallt Caroline, men det tror jeg var slavenavnet hennes.
Hu bor visst i England nå, hu ‘slavejenta’.
Så sånn var det.
Og hu fikk ikke lov å gå ut aleine, virka det som, så jeg måtte ta henne med, og gå tur med henne til kiosken osv.
Og da sa jeg at nå går vi til høyre her.
Og trodde hu slavejenta, at jeg sa ‘høyet’, så hu ville i høyet.
Men jeg ble bare irritert fordi hu skulle ha det til at jeg sa høyet, når jeg sa høyre.
Så sånn var det.
Så det er mye rart.
Men men.
Hu Lene, som var fra Abildsø, og som var sånn 15 år, på den tida.
Jeg var jo 19, men jeg ble kjent med alle ungdommene, på Abildsø, for jeg kjeda meg der, så jeg pleide å gå til kiosken der, på søndagene osv.
Men jeg ville ikke rote med hu Lene, siden hun ikke var 16, så jeg rørte aldri henne, selv om hun til og med ble med meg hjem en gang, i hybelen min, og satt på vannsenga, så holdt jeg meg unna, siden hun var så ung.
For jeg pleide å gå på byen hver helg, på Radio 1 club osv.
Og på den tida her, 1989/90, så var Radio 1 Club og andre diskoteker i Oslo, fortsatt sånn at det ble spilt rolige sanger, på slutten av kvelden, så jeg pleide å treffe mange damer på byen, som jeg ble sammen med, en eller to av dem ihvertfall, så jeg var ikke så desperat etter damer og jenter, at jeg gadd å rote med hu som bare var 15 år, det gjorde jeg ikke, bare for å ta med om det.
Jeg hadde sånn grense på 16 år da, når jeg var 19 selv.
Men, jeg syntes det var døvt, hvis damene var under 18 år, for da kunne de ikke bli med ut på byen og drikke og sånn.
Så sånn var det.
Bare noe jeg kom på.
Og jeg var i England, også sommeren 1989.
I Brighton.
Og da traff jeg hu Siri Rognli Olsen, og venninnene, på Englandsbåten, Braemar, som gikk fra Oslo til Hastings, i England.
Og det som skjedde da, var at hu fortalte om jing og jang og sånn da, hu Siri Rognli Olsen.
Og da kjøpte jeg sånn merke til henne, med jing og jang, og sånne stråler rundt da, i England, samme sommeren.
Og da hu fikk det merket, så spurte hu meg, om jeg visste hva det betydde.
Men det visste jeg jo egentlig ikke da, jeg bare huska at hu var fan av jing og jang.
Og hu forklarte det ikke heller.
Så sånn var det.
Bare noe jeg kom på.
Men hu Lene fra Abildsø, hu så altså meg og hu ‘slavejenta’ som var the Alarm-fan da, da jeg fulgte henne til telefonkiosken, ved Folkets Hus, på Abildsø der, som var like ved der jeg bodde, i Enebakkveien.
Så sånn var det.
Bare noe jeg kom på.
-
Jeg sendte en anmeldelse av the Financial Ombudsman, til politiet i Oslo, siden politiet i England også tuller med meg
Google Mail – Anmeldelse av trakassering fra the Financial Ombudsman, i England/Fwd: Advice about how to deal with employment-cases/Fwd: Reminder/Fwd: The Finacial Ombudsman, using staff as slaves/Fwd: Complaint against RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mail
Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>
Anmeldelse av trakassering fra the Financial Ombudsman, i England/Fwd: Advice about how to deal with employment-cases/Fwd: Reminder/Fwd: The Finacial Ombudsman, using staff as slaves/Fwd: Complaint against RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mail
Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>
Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 4:24 AM
To:
post.oslo@politiet.no
Hei,i forretningsverdenen, så er det regler for når brev og e-poster skal sendes, i forbindelse medsvartid og lover og slikt.Korrespondanse, fra the Financial Ombudsman, i England, til meg, regnes som forretnings-korrespondase.Og dette skal da foregå innenfor vanlig kontortid, etter vanlig og kjent praksis.Men jeg blir trakassert av the Financial Ombudsman.De sender meg e-poster, klokken 6 om morgenen, på søndager.Det er helt latterlig, hvem vil ha e-poster om bankklager da?Dette er tydlig en organisert mobbing av meg fra mafia i offentlig forvaltning.Som jeg tenker at dere hos politiet i Oslo også er med i, siden dere aldri gjøre noe,enda jeg har sendt dere utallige slike og lignende anmeldelser nå.Så ønsker the Financial Ombudsman tiltalt og straffet, (jeg vet at jeg burde ha sendtdet til England, men politiet her tuller med meg og, pluss ambassaden i London,så jeg vet ikke hvem andre jeg skal sende det til).Så får dere ha lykke til med dette!Mvh.Erik Ribsskog———- Forwarded message ———-From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 3:43 AM
Subject: Advice about how to deal with employment-cases/Fwd: Reminder/Fwd: The Finacial Ombudsman, using staff as slaves/Fwd: Complaint against RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mailTo: manchesterevents@acas.org.uk
Hi,
I looked at the ACAS website now, and saw that you were the ones to contact for problems in the North-West.I'm a Norwegian citizen, who lives in Liverpool, so I've understood that the North-West office, is the right office,for me to contact then, if I'm not mistaking.I have an employment-case, against Arvato, where I worked, in 2005 and 2006, where it was a lot of bullying,from managers, towards me, (and also others, but me in particular, I think), and I've also un-covered, thatthey were using illigal employment-methods, the team-leaders there, when they were screaming commandsacross the tables there, in the Cunard Building.(They were trained to do this screaming, which they called reinforcement, but really was punishment, I'veunderstood later).I have a link to the employment-case, (which consists of a lot of documents), on this online publishing-site:I've tried, since 2006, to find a law-firm, to help me with this case, because I think it's unworthy, for peopleto be treated, like I was treated, at Arvato, and I also lost my job there, since I was contstructivly dismissed,I have to say, when I tried to bring the problems there up with the higher management.But I can get any law-firms to help, since they say the case is to complex, since I also brought in the Police,since I thought it was much bullying, that it was a crime, and one law-firm, Moorcrofts, where messing withme, I think I have to say, so I've also brought in the Law Society, who also messed with me, I think I haveto say, and also ditto with the Legal Services Ombudsman.So I try to get advice on how to deal with this.I think it's to serious problems, to bring up in a Work Trial, it should be dealt with in the court, I think.It might seem strange, that I'm asking for advice, about a case from 2006, but I have been working withthis case, continously, since then, so it still be an up and running case, so to speak.Other than this, I'm also trying to get advice about the problems with the Financial Ombudsman.
They have put a woman there, to work, with sending e-mails etc, on 6 am, on Sunday mornings!!I'm a bit worried that this woman is being used as a slave there, and she obviously has been workingso much, that she has lost a bit of her judgement, since she's emailing bank-complaint e-mails,to people, while people in the UK are still on their way home from the pub.People want their Sundays off from Bank-complaints, and things like that, so I think I was harassedby the Financial Ombudsman, and I fear for how they treat their staff there, since I've been workingas a food shop manager, in Norway, for ten years, from 1994 to 2004, then I automatically thinksabout this perspective, how on earth are the Financial Ombudsman treating their staff, so I wanted
ACAS to have a look at that, that the people working for the Financial Ombudsman, aren't beingused as slaves etc., like it can seem a bit to me.I hope that you can help me with these cases!Yours sincerely,Erik Ribsskog———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Natalie Bodden <NBodden@ecgroup.co.uk>Date: Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 9:42 AM
Subject: RE: Reminder/Fwd: The Finacial Ombudsman, using staff as slaves/Fwd: Complaint against RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mail
To: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>Unfortunately we are unable to advice on this query via
email; this facility is solely for ordering hard copy Acas publications. Please
call the Acas helpline on 08457 47 47 47
to speak to a trained advisor.Alternatively, please visit the Acas website at www.acas.org.uk,
there
is a search option on the homepage where you may type in key words. This
search will bring up all publications that cover this subject. The website will
list the publications available and all prices (although some are free). From
there, you can order through the website using a credit card (if you are
ordering priced publications) or, you can e-mail me with the stock codes,
quantities and a delivery address. I will order the publications for you the
same day.Kind regards,
—–Original Message—–From: Erik Ribsskog
[mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]Sent: 23 July 2009 22:27To: ACAS-01
Subject: Reminder/Fwd: The
Finacial Ombudsman, using staff as slaves/Fwd: Complaint against RBS/Fwd:
Earlier e-mailHi,
I can't see that I've received an answer to this e-mail yet, so I'm sending you
this reminder.Best Regards,
Erik Ribsskog
———- Forwarded
message ———-From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 4:48 PM
Subject: The Finacial Ombudsman, using staff as slaves/Fwd: Complaint against
RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mailHi,
I've contacted you
earlier, about that I was being used as a slave, and thatthey had illigal
management methods, at Bertelsmanns Scand. Microsoft-activation,in Liverpool.
Now, people at the
Financial Ombudsman, are also being used as slaves, it seems.Or this could be connected with a cover-up, of the Bertelsmann/Microsoft-case,
thatI am being bullied by
Government, to cover up what went on there.Please send this e-mail
to the right people in Acas.Yours sincerely,
Erik Ribsskog
———- Forwarded
message ———-From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 4:31 PM
Subject: Re: Complaint against RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mail
To: "Collins, Jackie" <jackie.collins@financial-
ombudsman.org.uk >Hi,
Monday to Friday, 8 am to
6 pm, is alright, I think.But you also let your staff work Sunday mornings, at 6 am.
It seems to me that you
overload your representatives with work, and that they have towork 12 to 14 hours 7
days a week.I thought slavery was
forbidden in our time.Why do you let your
representatives work every Sunday morning, when other people inEngland are on their way
home from the pub?Do your staff get
summer-holiday at all?Sincerely,
Erik Ribsskog
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at
9:54 AM, Collins, Jackie <jackie.collins@financial-ombudsman.org.uk >
wrote:Dear Mr
RibsskogWe
always try to provide the best service we can to our customers, and sometimes
that means offering our staff the option of working overtime during very busy
periods.Please
be assured that they have to work within strict time guidelines, and these are
always checked by Operations Managers to ensure they are not working too many
hours.The
service our department offers is outside of the usual office hours of 9am
till 5pm because we have found that a lot of our customers have difficulties
contacting us whilst they are at work themselves during the 9am to 5pm times,
so we have opening hours of 8am – 6pm, as do many firms these days.I hope this
explains.Regards
Jackie Collins
Operations
ManagerDirect
Dial : 020 7964 0116Direct
Fax: 020 7964 0117
From: Erik
Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
Sent: 29 June
2009 19:32To: Collins, Jackie
Subject: Re: Complaint against
RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mailOk,
that sound very fine!
But, why is that you let
your representatives work over-time every Sunday then?Shouldn't you as a main rule conduct your business, within the business hours?
Yours sincerely,
Erik Ribsskog
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at
3:50 PM, Collins, Jackie <jackie.collins@financial-ombudsman.org.uk >
wrote:Dear Mr
RibsskogRosemary
Cox has passed your complaint to me to take over as you have requested that she
no longer deals with your case.I can
confirmed that a letter has been sent to the firm, and we have asked that they issue
you with a final response letter within 14 days. We have also asked them
to copy us in on that response.If you
remain unhappy with the firms response, or you have not received a response
from them within 14 days, please let me know and I will arrange for your
complaint to be moved forward for investigation by an Adjudicator.Regards
Jackie Collins
Operations
ManagerDirect
Dial : 020 7964 0116Direct
Fax: 020 7964 0117
From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
Sent: 28 June 2009 11:17
To: Cox, Rosemary
Subject: Re: Complaint against
RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mailHi,
I don't think it's any
use with me repeating myself.I don't think you should
handle my complaint.The reason is, that if you are to overworked, you get to tired.
And in dealing with
complaints like these, one obviously needs ones judgement, to be likeit should be.
If one are out of balance, like I think you could be, then I don't think this
is good for how thecomplaint is being dealt
with.So please do as I ask Mrs .Cox, and tell your manager what I said, that I want
someone elseto deal with my
complaint, due to that I think that you must be overworked.Haven't you seen how fine the weather is today, you should have a day off in
the fine weather,I think.
Sincerely,
Erik Ribsskog
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at
11:10 AM, Cox, Rosemary <Rosemary.Cox@financial-ombudsman.org.uk >
wrote:Dear Mr Ribsskog
Thank you for your
e-mailsAs previously advised I
am not going to debate with you the working hours of this office.I have written to you
today to advise the steps we are taking with your complaint. If the firm fail
to resolve the situation for you, your complaint will be passed onto our
adjudication area for further consideration of the concerns you have raised.I should add that we do
not tolerate rude or insulting language at this office, and would expect any
further communication to be sent in a more acceptable manner.Kind Regards
Rose Cox
team manager
From: Erik
Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
Sent: 28 June
2009 10:43To: Cox, Rosemary
Subject: Re: Complaint against
RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mailHi,
of course you can work on
Sundays if you want.But business e-mails should just be sent within the business-hours.
Or else, what's going to happen, is obvious.
Someone are going to come drunk home from town, and answer the business-e-mails
when they are drunk, which is what has happened today, with our correspondence.If this is something, you didn't know from before, then I think this Financial
Ombudsman-stuff is just a load of crap really.Try to use the head that
God gave you when you were born!Sincerely,
Erik Ribsskog
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at
10:33 AM, Cox, Rosemary <Rosemary.Cox@financial-ombudsman.org.uk >
wrote:Dear Mr
RibsskogThank
you for your e-mailI must
admit to being surprised and confused with the content of the e-mail.We are
an extremely busy department and we often work at the weekends, this is
obviously of help to consumers as we are able to deal with their
complaints in a more timely manner. I would suggest that It is entirely
up to each individual business to determine which hours their staff will work
and I do not intend debating this with you.By
working this weekend I have been able to deal with your complaint, which as you
can appreciate is of a benefit to you.Perhaps
you can clarify the spelling mistakes you are referring to?Kind
RegardsRose Cox
team
manager
From: Erik
Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
Sent: 28 June
2009 10:20Subject: Re: Complaint against
RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mailHi again,
don't you think it's
strange for an institutions like yours to send e-mails on Sunday mornings then?Shouldn't e-mails be sent within normal business hours then you think?
This is what it says on
Wikipedia:In
the United States and United Kingdom, the hours between
9 am and 5 pm are typically considered to be
standard business hoursSincerely,
Erik Ribsskog
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at
8:06 AM, Cox, Rosemary <Rosemary.Cox@financial-ombudsman.org.uk >
wrote:Dear Mr
RibsskogThank
you for your e-mailThat's
no problem, however I should point out that we are not a government department,
we are a independent complaints body.I will
be in touch with your again in the next few daysKind
RegardsRose Cox
team
manager
From: Erik
Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
Sent: 28 June
2009 08:02To: Cox, Rosemary
Subject: Re: Complaint against
RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mailHi,
ok that's very fine, I'm
just home from town you see.I thought it was a bit strange, since noone in Government in Norway, work on
Sundays.Sorry about this, I forget sometimes that I'm not in Norway any longer.
Sorry about this!
Yours sincerely,
Erik Ribsskog
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at
7:54 AM, Cox, Rosemary <Rosemary.Cox@financial-ombudsman.org.uk >
wrote:Dear Mr
RibsskogThank
you for your e-mailI can
assure you this is not a joke, I am currently in the office working today.I
presume that you would like us to deal with your complaint, so am responding to
your e-mails todayKind
RegardsRose Cox
team
manager
From: Erik
Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
Sent: 28 June 2009 07:36
To: Cox, Rosemary
Subject: Re: Complaint against
RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mailHi,
why do send the e-mails
early on a Sunday morning, by the way.Is this some kind of joke?
Sincerely,
Erik Ribsskog
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at
7:33 AM, Cox, Rosemary <Rosemary.Cox@financial-ombudsman.org.uk >
wrote:Dear Mr
RibsskogThank
you for your e-mailsI will
contact you again once I have considered the information.Kind
RegardsRose Cox
team
manager
From: Erik
Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
Sent: 27 June 2009 14:59
To: Cox, Rosemary
Subject: Complaint against
RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mailHi,
thank you for you e-mail,
that I recieved today.I'll contact your collegue back, regarding the Barclays-complaint.
I sent the complaint on
RBS Dale St., to Yvonne Williams at RBS, but shealso harassed me, like
this, she writes 'Dear Ms Ribsskog', even if my nameis Erik, and in Britain,
you have a movie called 'Erik the Viking', and Eric isalso a quite usual name,
in English-speaking countries.So I think Yvonne Williams, the complaint-investigator, also bullied me.
I think this must have
been a deliberate mistake.This ended with the
complaint being partly resolved, in the way that RBS,gave me the bonus of
£100, for moving my account to them, from Barclays,(who I also had problems
with, that I'll exlain about to your collegue, like Imentioned earlier).
I'll also find the actual complaint against RBS Dale St. now, and forward it
to you.
What I meant with the complaint-form, was that it didn't look anything at all
like the ones you've sent
me now.Maybe the complaint-form I was sent, was to do with other financial
institutions,than banks?
Like share-fonds etc?
Have you also got other
complaint-forms, other than to banks, perhaps someonesent me the wrong form
intentionally?Just a thought I had.
But anyway, thank you very much for your e-mail, and I'll also find the actual
RBS Dale St. complaint,
and e-mail it to you now.Yours sincerely,
Erik Ribsskog
———-
Forwarded message ———-From: Williams, Yvonne (CRU) <Yvonne.Williams@rbs.co.uk>
Date: Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 4:30 PM
Subject: RE: Earlier e-mail
To: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Dear Ms
RibsskogCould
you please arrange another copy of your email to be sent to me for my
investigationRegards
Yvonne
Williams
From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
Sent: 19 June 2007 14:04
To: Williams, Yvonne (CRU)
Subject: Earlier e-mail
***
WARNING : This message originates from the Internet ***Hi,
I'm refering to the
e-mail I sent you on 5/6.I was just wondering if
you have recieved this e-mail, because I cant seethat I have recieved any
answer to it yet.Please just contact me if
you want me to send you the e-mail again.Yours sincerely,
Erik Ribsskog
The Royal Bank of Scotland plc, Registered in
Scotland No. 90312. Registered Office: 36 St Andrew Square, Edinburgh EH2 2YBAuthorised and regulated by the Financial
Services Authority.This e-mail message is confidential and for use
by the addressee only. If the message is received by anyone other than the
addressee, please return the message to the sender by replying to it and then
delete the message from your computer. Internet e-mails are not necessarily
secure. The Royal Bank of Scotland plc does not accept responsibility for
changes made to this message after it was sent.Whilst all reasonable care has been taken to
avoid the transmission of viruses, it is the responsibility of the recipient to
ensure that the onward transmission, opening or use of this message and any
attachments will not adversely affect its systems or data. No responsibility is
accepted by The Royal Bank of Scotland plc in this regard and the recipient
should carry out such virus and other checks as it considers appropriate.
This e-mail and any attachments are
confidential and may be subject to legal privilege. If you are not the intended
recipient, please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail and any
attachment from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you must not
copy, disclose or take any action in reliance to it.This e-mail and any attachments have been checked by
virus detection software before transmission. You should carry out your own
virus checks on the contents of this communication. We accept no liability for
any loss or damage which may be caused by software viruses or by interception
or interruption of this mail.Unless otherwise indicated, this e-mail has no
contractual effect and may only be used for the purpose(s) indicated in it. The
statements and opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the author and do
not necessarily reflect those of the Financial Ombudsman Service Ltd.
This email has originated from the Financial Ombudsman
Service Ltd. South Quay Plaza, 183 Marsh Wall, London E14 9SR, United Kingdom.
Registered as a limited company in England and Wales No. 3725015. Registered
office as above.
This e-mail and any attachments are
confidential and may be subject to legal privilege. If you are not the intended
recipient, please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail and any
attachment from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you must not
copy, disclose or take any action in reliance to it.This e-mail and any attachments have been checked by
virus detection software before transmission. You should carry out your own
virus checks on the contents of this communication. We accept no liability for
any loss or damage which may be caused by software viruses or by interception
or interruption of this mail.Unless otherwise indicated, this e-mail has no
contractual effect and may only be used for the purpose(s) indicated in it. The
statements and opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the author and do
not necessarily reflect those of the Financial Ombudsman Service Ltd.
This email has originated from the Financial
Ombudsman Service Ltd. South Quay Plaza, 183 Marsh Wall, London E14 9SR, United
Kingdom. Registered as a limited company in England and Wales No. 3725015.
Registered office as above.
This e-mail and any attachments are
confidential and may be subject to legal privilege. If you are not the intended
recipient, please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail and any
attachment from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you must not
copy, disclose or take any action in reliance to it.This e-mail and any attachments have been checked by
virus detection software before transmission. You should carry out your own
virus checks on the contents of this communication. We accept no liability for
any loss or damage which may be caused by software viruses or by interception
or interruption of this mail.Unless otherwise indicated, this e-mail has no
contractual effect and may only be used for the purpose(s) indicated in it. The
statements and opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the author and do
not necessarily reflect those of the Financial Ombudsman Service Ltd.
This email has originated from the Financial
Ombudsman Service Ltd. South Quay Plaza, 183 Marsh Wall, London E14 9SR, United
Kingdom. Registered as a limited company in England and Wales No. 3725015.
Registered office as above.
This e-mail and any attachments are
confidential and may be subject to legal privilege. If you are not the intended
recipient, please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail and any
attachment from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you must not
copy, disclose or take any action in reliance to it.This e-mail and any attachments have been checked by
virus detection software before transmission. You should carry out your own
virus checks on the contents of this communication. We accept no liability for
any loss or damage which may be caused by software viruses or by interception
or interruption of this mail.Unless otherwise indicated, this e-mail has no
contractual effect and may only be used for the purpose(s) indicated in it. The
statements and opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the author and do
not necessarily reflect those of the Financial Ombudsman Service Ltd.
This email has originated from the Financial
Ombudsman Service Ltd. South Quay Plaza, 183 Marsh Wall, London E14 9SR, United
Kingdom. Registered as a limited company in England and Wales No. 3725015.
Registered office as above.
This e-mail and any attachments are
confidential and may be subject to legal privilege. If you are not the intended
recipient, please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail and any
attachment from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you must not
copy, disclose or take any action in reliance to it.This e-mail and any attachments have been checked by
virus detection software before transmission. You should carry out your own
virus checks on the contents of this communication. We accept no liability for
any loss or damage which may be caused by software viruses or by interception
or interruption of this mail.Unless otherwise indicated, this e-mail has no
contractual effect and may only be used for the purpose(s) indicated in it. The
statements and opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the author and do
not necessarily reflect those of the Financial Ombudsman Service Ltd.
This email has originated from the Financial
Ombudsman Service Ltd. South Quay Plaza, 183 Marsh Wall, London E14 9SR, United
Kingdom. Registered as a limited company in England and Wales No. 3725015.
Registered office as above.
This e-mail and any attachments are
confidential and may be subject to legal privilege. If you are not the intended
recipient, please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail and any
attachment from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you must not
copy, disclose or take any action in reliance to it.This e-mail and any attachments have been checked by
virus detection software before transmission. You should carry out your own
virus checks on the contents of this communication. We accept no liability for
any loss or damage which may be caused by software viruses or by interception
or interruption of this mail.Unless otherwise indicated, this e-mail has no
contractual effect and may only be used for the purpose(s) indicated in it. The
statements and opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the author and do
not necessarily reflect those of the Financial Ombudsman Service Ltd.
This email has originated from the Financial
Ombudsman Service Ltd. South Quay Plaza, 183 Marsh Wall, London E14 9SR, United
Kingdom. Registered as a limited company in England and Wales No. 3725015.
Registered office as above.
This e-mail and any attachments are
confidential and may be subject to legal privilege. If you are not the intended
recipient, please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail and any
attachment from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you must not
copy, disclose or take any action in reliance to it.This e-mail and any attachments have been checked by
virus detection software before transmission. You should carry out your own
virus checks on the contents of this communication. We accept no liability for
any loss or damage which may be caused by software viruses or by interception
or interruption of this mail.Unless otherwise indicated, this e-mail has no
contractual effect and may only be used for the purpose(s) indicated in it. The
statements and opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the author and do
not necessarily reflect those of the Financial Ombudsman Service Ltd.
This email has originated from the Financial
Ombudsman Service Ltd. South Quay Plaza, 183 Marsh Wall, London E14 9SR, United
Kingdom. Registered as a limited company in England and Wales No. 3725015.
Registered office as above.
This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the addressee. Any unauthorised use is strictly
prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the
sender immediately and delete the email and any attachments. Any views
or opinions expressed or presented in this email are those of the
author(s) and may not necessarily represent those of EC Group and no
representation is given nor liability accepted for the accuracy or
completeness of any information. EC Group takes care to protect its
systems from virus attacks and other harmful events but gives no
warranty that this message (including attachments) is free of any virus
or other harmful matter, and accepts no responsibility for any loss or
damage resulting from the recipient receiving, opening or using it.
EC Group is the trading name of E.Christian & Co Ltd. Registered Office:
Swallowfield Way, Hayes, Middlesex, UB3 1DQ. Registered in England
number 463298
2 attachments img016.jpg
1701Kimg017.jpg
1152K
-
Her er mer om ‘business hours’ i forbindelse med at the Financial Ombudsman, her i England, sender e-poster, klokken 6 på søndagsmorgenene
Business hours
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaThe examples and perspective in this article may not represent a worldwide view of the subject. Please improve this article or discuss the issue on the talk page.
Business hours are the hours during the day in which business is commonly conducted. Typical business hours vary widely by country. By observing common informal standards for business hours, workers may communicate with each other more easily and find a convenient divide between work life and home life.
In the United States and United Kingdom, the hours between 9 am and 5 pm are typically considered to be standard business hours, although in the United States this varies by region due to local tradition and the need to conduct business by telephone with people in other time zones. For instance, business in Chicago is often conducted between 8 am and 4:30 pm, while in New York City, business hours tend to be later — for instance, from 10 am to 6 pm.
In Mexico, the standard business hours are from 9 am to 2 pm and 4 pm to 6 pm.
Other countries have different business hour patterns. Many workers in warmer climates observe siesta during the afternoon, effecting a pause in business hours, and resuming business in the evenings.
Business hours take place on weekdays, exceptions apply for firemen, police men and other. The days of the week on which business is conducted also varies from region to region in the world.
[edit]Non-traditional Business hoursMany businesses and organizations, especially those that actively operate on a 24 hour basis, usually have extended or unlimited business hours as business and transactions take place continuously. An example being a hotel where the facility is open 24 hours a day and transactions can take place at any point in time requiring staffing and management availability at all times, especially during evening hours when guests are arriving to checkin and utilising facility amenities.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Business_hours
PS.
Her ser man, at unntakene, fra forretningstiden, det er sånne som politi- og brannvesen osv.
Og også hoteller, hvor det foregår transaksjoner, altså oppgjør for hotellrom, f.eks. 24 timer i døgnet.
Men the Financial Ombudsman, tror altså at de er en utradisjonell virksomhet, som har unntak fra forretningstiden.
Det er helt latterlig.
Det står på Wikipedia, at forretningstiden, det er tidspunktet for forretningskorrespondanse, (som betyr formell korrespondanse), mellom en organiasjasjon/firma og en klient/kunde.
Og det er det som det er snakk om her, forretningskorrespondanse, mellom meg og the Financial Ombudsman.
Og den skal da foregå i forretningstiden.
Så jeg blir trakassert av the Financial Ombudsman, de er ikke som brannvesen eller politi.
Det var ikke et nødsfall, at jeg skulle få e-post klokken 6 om morgenen, på en søndag.
Bare nødsfall og praktiske årsaker, i forbindelse med en transaksjon/handel, ville ha gjort et slikt tidspunkt, for forretningskorrespondanse naturlig.
Så jeg skal anmelde de for trakassering nå.
Mvh.
Erik Ribsskog
-
Jeg sendte en klage på ICE
Google Mail – Complaint about ICE, to Complaints Manager
Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>
Complaint about ICE, to Complaints Manager
Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>
Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 12:26 PM
To:
DWP ICE gateway team <ice@dwp.gsi.gov.uk>
ICE Ref: DWP00408/09Hi,I got your letter today, with the date 3. august.You write, that if I haven't got a response, to my jobcenter-complaint, within 5 weeks,
then I should contact you again.But, I sent the compaint in May, so this is already more than five weeks ago, and I haven'treceived a response yet, from the jobcenter, which I informed you about, in my e-mail from24/7, then it was already gone TWO MONTHS, when I sent you the e-mail.How can you fail to understand that two months are more than five weeks?This is ridiculus, how can people trust you, if you act in a 'moronic' way like this?Please clean up this now!Sincerely,Erik Ribsskog
