From: eribsskog@gmail.com Erik Ribsskog
To: Sarah.Brown@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk
Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2007 20:08:48 +0000
Subject: Fwd: IPCC Case Reference 2007/017332
Hi,
I can’t see that I have recieved a reply to this e-mail yet, that’s why I’m
trying to send it again.
Hope that this is alright!
Yours sincerely,
Erik Ribsskog
———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Erik Ribsskog
Date: Dec 11, 2007 3:47 PM
Subject: Re: IPCC Case Reference 2007/017332
To: Sarah Brown
Hi,
thank you very much your answer!
But the Standards Unit don’t even know their own e-mail address.
And when I go there to discuss the complaint against the Police, then I’m
being harassed.
I’m not sure if it’s right that I should go back to the meetings with the
Police then.
I think that would like saying that I liked to be harassed, and thats not
what I mean at all.
Do you understand what I mean now?
Thank you very much again for your answer!
Yours sincerely,
Erik Ribsskog
On 12/11/07, Sarah Brown
>
> Dear Mr Ribsskog,
>
> Thank you for your emailed dated 07 December 2007.
>
> Your new complaint will need to be raised separately from your current
> appeal. This is so that if the police are unable to resolve the matter to
> your satisfaction you then have the right of appeal to the IPCC.
>
> With regards to your lose of confidence in the police investigation into
> your complaint. Unfortunately whilst the police are conducting an
> investigation into your complaint the IPCC is unable to intervene and is not
> able to dictate which department carries out this investigation. You will
> need to speak to the Professional Standards Department (PSD) of Merseyside
> Police to discuss further.
>
> If you would like to proceed with the next stage of your complaint please
> provide your consent on the form I sent to your postal address on the 30
> November 2007. Your consent will allow me to forward your complaint details
> to the Professional Standards Department of the Merseyside Police for their
> consideration.
>
> Yours sincerely,
>
> *Sarah Brown*
> *Casework Manager*
> *Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC)*
> *90 High Holborn, London WC1V 6BH *
> *Phone: 0207 166 3934*
> *sarah.brown@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk*
>
> ——————————
> *From:* Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* 07 December 2007 16:14
> *To:* Sarah Brown
> *Subject:* TRIM: Re: IPCC Case Reference 2007/017332
>
>
> Hi,
>
> thank you very much for your answer!
>
> I’m not sure if you think that this case should be dealt with together
> with the other compalaint and appeal-case (see the last e-mail I sent your
> collegue).
>
> And I was also enquiering, in connection with the e-mail I sent some weeks
> ago, were I explained that I seem to have lost a bit
> of confidence with the police department conducting the investigation, so
> I was wondering if you think that it would maybe be
> possible for another department to handle the complaint and appeal, like
> I’ve enquiered about earler.
>
> And I havn’t recieved an answer to this enquiery.
>
> And I was wondering if I maybe should have had receved such an answer,
> because, now I’m not sure how to reply to the
> Merseyside Police, regarding the letter that I sent a scanned copy of,
> with the e-mail to your collegue.
>
> So I was wondering who I should contact, if I was wondering how to go
> forward with this.
>
> Hope that this is alright, and thanks in advance for the help!
>
> Yours sincerely,
>
> Erik Ribsskog
>
>
> On 12/7/07, Sarah Brown
> >
> > Dear Mr Ribsskog,
> >
> > Thank you for contacting the Independent Police Complaints Commission
> > (IPCC). Miss Joanne Fitzgerald has asked me to reply to your email
> > regarding your new complaint. If I could inform you that Miss Fitzgerald no
> > longer works within the casework department of the Commission and so will no
> > longer have involvement in the handling of your complaints.
> >
> > I am the Casework Manager for your new complaint surrounding issues you
> > raised about a female front desk staff member at the Walton Lane Police
> > Station. If you would like to continue with the next stage of the
> > complaints process please provide your consent on the form that I sent you
> > on the 30 November 2007. Once your consent has been received I will forward
> > your complaint details to the Professional Standards Department of the
> > Merseyside Police for consideration.
> >
> > Please note that the details of your new complaint have been noted under
> > reference : 2007/017332. Please quote this reference when contacting the
> > IPCC regarding your new complaint.
> >
> > Yours sincerely,
> >
> > *Sarah Brown*
> > *Casework Manager*
> > *Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC)*
> > *90 High Holborn, London WC1V 6BH*
> > *Phone: 0207 166 3934*
> > *sarah.brown@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk*
> >
>
>
>
>
> ******************************************************************************
> The information in this email is confidential and may be legally
> privileged.
> It is intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the intended
> recipient
> please notify the sender and delete this email; any disclosure, copying or
>
> distribution of this email is prohibited and may be unlawful. The content
> of
> this email represents the views of the individual and not necessarily
> those
> of IPCC. IPCC reserves the right to monitor the content of all emails in
> accordance with lawful business practice.This e-mail has been swept for
> computer viruses but IPCC does not accept any liability in respect of your
>
> receipt of this email.
>
> Independent Police Complaints Commission
> 90 High Holborn
> London,
> WC1V 6BH.
>
> ******************************************************************************
>
>
> The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government
> Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless in
> partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2007/11/0032.) On
> leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.
> Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
> recorded for legal purposes.
>
From: eribsskog@gmail.com Erik Ribsskog
To: EUteam@amnesty.org EUteam@amnesty.org
Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2007 21:52:20 +0000
Subject: Re: Fw: Enquiery
Hi,
thanks you very much for your answer.
My problem is that I’m beign terrorrised eighter by the police, or some
criminal network etc., each time I go out the door.
I’ve also been follwed by some mafia in Norway.
And also, I think something has happened to friends from my previous job in
Liverpool, and I’m sure that the police know about this.
The problem is that the police wont give me any information or advice, on
how to deal with these problems.
Neigheter the British or Norwegian Police are telling me whats going on etc.
And this is driving me insane.
And I think it is my right to get to know whats going on surrounding this.
But they won’t tell me anything, about whats going on or how one should deal
with this etc.
So I think this is my right, to get informartion and advice.
And I also suspect that the Police are telling people, like my bank, not
give me a loan etc., and not to help me with some legal
cases etc. I’m dealing with.
So this is also a violation against my rights.
And also I wanted to report about harassment from the Norwegian department
of Amnesty.
Hope that this is alright, I think it’s serious since I’m going a bit insane
here, and the police wont give me advice or information.
Hope that this is alright!
Yours sincerely,
Erik Ribsskog
On 12/21/07, EUteam@amnesty.org
>
>
> Dear Mr Ribsskog
>
> I apologise for the delay in responding to your email.
>
> I am not sure I understand from your email if you contacted Amnesty
> International’s offices in the UK and Norway – is that the case? Have you
> contacted the police about the concerns that you say you have?
>
> I do not think that Amnesty International is able to answer your question
> and that you may be better placed addressing your concerns to the police.
> If I have misunderstood you, please let me know.
>
> Yours sincerely
>
> Alice Atkinson
>
> EU team
> Amnesty International
> 1 Easton Street
> London WCIX ODW
> United Kingdom
>
> EUteam@amnesty.org
> *”Erik Ribsskog”
>
> 11/12/2007 18:30
>
> To
> amnestyis@amnesty.org cc
> Subject
> Fwd: Enquiery
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I can’t see that I have recieved an answer to this e-mail yet, that’s why
> I’m sending it again.
>
> Hope that this is ok!
>
> Yours sincerely,
>
> Erik Ribsskog
>
> ———- Forwarded message ———-
> From: *Erik Ribsskog* <*eribsskog@gmail.com*
> Date: Nov 30, 2007 9:46 AM
> Subject: Enquiery
> To: *amnestyis@amnesty.org*
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I’m a Norwegian Citizen living in the UK.
>
> I’ve been in contact with your Norwegian department, and also your British
> department.
>
> I was wondering about two things.
>
> I was told by your British Department, that the International Department,
> might be able to
> help me with some problems regarding not getting help from the Norwegian
> and British
> Governments, while being followed by criminal networks, in a case thats
> also seems to
> be linked with trafficing of Scandinavian women to Liverpool and Spain,
> and illigal
> management methods and serious organised harassment and more, I’d call it
> that
> people were being used more or less like slaves.
>
> (And I have dokumentation to support all of this).
>
> That was the first thing I was wondering about, who should I contact, if I
> was wondering
> if you maybe had the oppertunity to have a look at this?
>
> Secondly, it seems a bit to me, that I maybe was harassed, when I was in
> contact with
> your Norwegian department, who weren’t able to give me any help or advice,
> but who
> I think it might seem like were harassing me in their reply.
>
> And also, they seemed to have misunderstood the meaning of the e-mail I
> was sending them.
>
> Which I think was maybe a bit strange, since it seems reasonable to me, to
> presume that
> they work with human rights issues, on a daily basis.
>
> So that for them to not understand an e-mail, which I myself thought
> should be straight
> forward for representatives working with human rights issues, on a daily
> basis, to
> understand.
>
> So I was wondering, regarding this problem, because I think matters like
> this should be
> dealt with responsably.
>
> And I’ve heard many good things about your organisation, and I thought
> your British/UK
> department, also gave me good advice, so I don’t mean to complain, but I’m
> a bit
> worried about the quality of the advice from the mentioned department in
> Oslo.
>
> And also, they didn’t reply to my next e-mail, when I tryed to explain
> again, in case
> they had maybe misunderstood what I meant.
>
> So I thought this was a bit curious.
>
> So I was wondering, who I should contact, if I wanted to make a complaint
> about my
> contact with the deparment in Oslo.
>
> I’ll send more documents, to explain more about the issues I’m mentioning
> in this
> e-mail, as soon as possible, when I know more about who it is I should
> contact
> regarding these issues.
>
> And please just contact me, if there is some I have forgotten to explain
> about regarding
> these questions.
>
> I hope that this is alright!
>
> And thank you very much for your help in advance!
>
> Yours sincerely,
>
> Erik Ribsskog
>
>
>
>
> Working to protect human rights worldwide
>
> DISCLAIMER
> Internet communications are not secure and therefore Amnesty International Ltd does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this message. If you are not the intended recipient you must not disclose or rely on the information in this e-mail. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Amnesty International Ltd unless specifically stated. Electronic communications including email might be monitored by Amnesty International Ltd. for operational or business reasons.
>
> This message has been scanned for viruses by Postini.www.postini.com
>
>
When I was walking through town, to buy electricity earlier today, then at the end of Dale St., right before one gets to the Motorway, or what it’s called.
Where one have a parking-area, on the right.
There, two Police Constables, suddently wanted to cross the road right in front of me.
So they occupied the pavement, right were I was directed.
Even if there are almost never any cars in that road. (It’s not really Dale St., but it’s between Dale St. and the Motorway. Right before were the library is etc.
So when I think about this episode now, it seems to me that this episode was arranged.
That the PC’s tryed to eg. provoce a confrontation etc., by walking so that they obstructed the way I was walking, and then stopping there, for no appearent reason.
So it seems to me that they wanted to cross the street, and then stop on the pavement, right before me, to provoke some kind of confrontation.
And I’ve never seen police in that road before.
So I suspect a bit that this could have been some kind of arranged situation, perhaps linked with the electricity-machine at Spar in Dale St. not working, or ‘not working’ again, so that I had to walk through the whole town, to London RD., to buy the electricity-tickets.
Or it was really just one ticket, since I’m a bit low on cash etc.
So this is at least how the situation seemes to me, when I’m thinking back on it now.