johncons

Stikkord: Arbeidsrett

  • Mer fra Facebook

    paulus facebook 1

    PS.

    Her er mer om dette:

    paulsen facebook 2

    PS 2.

    Enda mer om dette:

    paulsen facebook 3

  • Jeg sendte en e-post til Handelshoegskolen i Bergen

    Hjelp med arbeidssaker/Fwd: Til rektor Tom Colbjørnsen/Fwd: Mulig prosjektoppgave for mastergrader etc./Fwd: Mulig prosjektoppgave for studenter på f.eks. Masterstudium i styring og ledelse
    Reply |Erik Ribsskog to nhh.postmottak, executive
    show details 3:21 PM (0 minutes ago)

    fromErik Ribsskog eribsskog@gmail.com
    tonhh.postmottak@nhh.no

    ccexecutive@nhh.no

    dateSat, Sep 24, 2011 at 3:21 PM
    subjectHjelp med arbeidssaker/Fwd: Til rektor Tom Colbjørnsen/Fwd: Mulig prosjektoppgave for mastergrader etc./Fwd: Mulig prosjektoppgave for studenter på f.eks. Masterstudium i styring og ledelse
    mailed-bygmail.com

    hide details 3:21 PM (0 minutes ago)

    Hei,

    kan Handelshoegskolen i Bergen vaere saa snill aa hjelpe meg med to arbeidssaker, som ingen andre hjelper meg med.

    Det er mot Rimi, (forklart mere om i denne linken):

    https://johncons-blogg.net/search/label/%27Rimi-fella%27

    Og mot Bertelsmann Arvato sin Skandinaviske Microsoft Produkt-aktivering, (forklart mere om i denne linken):

    https://johncons-blogg.net/search/label/Arvato-case

    Jeg har kontaktet nesten uttalige advokatkontor her i England, og universiteter/hoegskoler, i Norge, Danmark og England, men ingen hjelper.

    ‘Microsoft-jobben’, (ansatt av Bertelsmann), var egentlig en tullejobb, mistenker jeg, hvor CIA, eller noe, utnyttet nordiske damer, som ‘hevn’, eller noe, for at nordiske folk broet sin Microsoft lisensavtale.

    Noe saant.

    Saa noen i Norge burde ogsaa hjelpe, synes jeg.

    Uansett om de fine, nordiske damene der gjorde dette frivillig, saa ble ihvertfall jeg tulla faelt med der.

    Saa ogsaa i Rimi, hvor jeg ble brukt som en brikke, i et spill fra ledere oppover i systemet.

    Altsaa utnyttet, og jeg fikk nok, og proever naa aa ta opp problemene.

    Dere er omtrent de siste jeg kan spoerre om dette vel, ihvertfall av akademier i Norge, mener jeg, saa veldig bra om dere kan hjelpe meg, med raad om hvordan jeg kan faa disse arbeidssakene opp for retten.

    Gjerne som prosjektoppgaver for Master-studenter i Arbeidsrett, for eksempel.

    Paa forhaand takk for eventuell hjelp!

    Mvh.

    Erik Ribsskog

    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: Erik Ribsskog
    Date: 2011/8/5
    Subject: Til rektor Tom Colbjørnsen/Fwd: Mulig prosjektoppgave for mastergrader etc./Fwd: Mulig prosjektoppgave for studenter på f.eks. Masterstudium i styring og ledelse
    To: info@bi.no

    Hei,

    min tidligere troppsjef, i Geværkompaniet, Løytnant Frøshaug, skriver i av Forsvarets tidsskrifter, at hvis du ikke vet helt sikkert hvor du bør sende noe, så send det til toppen.

    Jeg prøver derfor dette nå.

    Jeg har en arbeidssak, mot RIMI/ICA, hvor jeg ble tullet med av driftsdirektøret og distriktsjefer og det som var, da jeg jobbet som butikksjef, på Rimi Kalbakken, i 2001, (og det var også problemer i andre butikker, jeg jobbet i Rimi fra 1992 til 2004).

    Jeg ønsker å få de pengene i erstatning, som den arbeidssaken er verdt, og at problemene som var i de butikkene jeg jobbet, skal blir mer kjent.

    Jeg har skrevet om problemene på min blogg, under tagen ‘Rimi-fella’:

    https://johncons-blogg.net/search/label/%27Rimi-fella%27

    For det ble liksom satt opp en felle mot meg, av distriktsjef Per Øivind Fjellhøy & Co., i år 2000.

    Jeg jobbet som butikksjef på Rimi Nylænde, (gamle Balstad), på Lambertseter, og ble tilbudt og begynne i en større butikk, etter to år.

    Nemlig Rimi Kalbakken.

    Jeg hadde shinet opp Rimi Nylænde syntes jeg, og hadde så god kontroll, at det ble kjedelig å jobbe der, vil jeg si.

    Så jeg slo til på den.

    Jeg ble ‘programmert’ av Fjellhøy aka. PØF om at ‘vi vil at du skal drive Rimi Kalbakken som Rimi Nylænde’.

    Distriktsjefen på Rimi Kalbakken, Anne Neteland, hun ville ikke ha noe møte med meg, før jeg begynte på Rimi Kalbakken.

    (Noe jeg hadde ventet meg).

    Jeg visste at den forrige butikksjefen hadde 300′ i året, (en som het Kenneth som var yngre enn meg, og med kortere fartstid i Rimi vel).

    Og jeg lå på 260′.

    Som assistent så hadde jeg gått opp 10.000 i lønn, da jeg begynte i en større Rimi butikk, Rimi Bjørndal, (som ledd i karrieren min), i 1996.

    Så jeg regnet med at jeg kom til å gå opp i lønn, siden Rimi Kalbakken var mer enn dobbelt så stor, som Rimi Nylænde, når det gjaldt areal og omsetning.

    Og siden jeg visste det, (en tidligere kollega, fra Rimi Bjørndal, David Hjort, hadde fortalt meg det), at Kenneth hadde 300′ i året, pluss frynsegoder som kjøregodtgjørelse mm.

    Så da Anne Neteland ikke ville prate med meg, om hverken lønnsforhøyelse, eller noe, så følte jeg meg lurt.

    Jeg klagde fælt, og vi ble enige om et kompromiss, jeg skulle få 280′ i året.

    Men jeg og Anne Neteland kom skeivt ut da.

    Så det gikk noen måneder før hun fikk sagt til meg, at ‘du er så dårlig til å nullstille deg’.

    Men det var jo fordi Fjellhøy hadde sagt det, at ‘vi vil at du skal drive Rimi Kalbakken som du driver Rimi Nylænde nå’.

    Men etter noen måneder, på Kalbakken, så skjønte jeg det, at Neteland ikke var med i disse ‘vi’.

    Så da skjønte jeg at jeg ble lurt opp i stry.

    Og ville ut av Rimi.

    Noe jeg klarte i 2002, da kom jeg meg inn på Bachelor IT-studie, ved HiO IU.

    Jeg hadde studert Informasjonsbehandling, i to år, på begynnelsen av 90-tallet, på NHI.

    Så jeg hadde noen fag i bakhånd.

    Jeg ville ta det rolig noen år, for jeg var fullstendig utslitt, må man vel si, etter mange års hardslit i Rimi, spesielt etter at jeg begynte som Assisterende Butikksjef, under Kristian Kvehaugen, på Rimi Bjørndal, i 1996 og fram til 2001 da, da jeg sluttet på Rimi Kalbakken.

    Så her var det en felle som jeg havnet i.

    Distriktssjefene/de høyere lederne, i Rimi, motarbeidet hverandre, vil jeg si, og jeg havnet i klemma, og mistet autoritet ovenfor medarbeidere og ble til slutt bare ydmyket og nedverdiget der, på Rimi Kalbakken, og fikk medarbeiderne mot meg, og ble sliten, for jeg prøvde jo også å holde standarden oppe, sånn at butikken ikke skulle få dårlig renome, blant kundene.

    Det er også mye mer som skjedde.

    Driftsdirektør Rune Hestenes og den da nye regionsskjefen, (Steinar noe vel), var innom Rimi Kalbakken, et par dager før 17. mai 2001 vel.

    Og da psyket jeg meg opp, og klagde til Hestenes, når jeg plutselig så han og regionssjefen i butikken.

    Han Hestenes er ganske høy og myndig, så jeg var kanskje ikke så velformulert.

    Men han sa det, at jeg hadde fått en ny butikk, (Rimi Langhus, som jeg begynte i, rundt Kristi Himmelfartsdag, i 2001, som butikksjef), og derfor skulle ikke jeg klage.

    Men, jeg ville klage på distriktsjefene, men Hestenes ville ikke ha en prat med meg, om problemene.

    Så jeg fikk ikke rydda opp i det.

    Etter dette, så prøvde jeg også å forklare, for distriktsjefen på Rimi Langhus, Anne Katrine Skodvin, at jeg var på vei ut av Rimi, og prøvde å forklare hva som hadde foregått, rundt den her ‘Rimi-fella’ da, som jeg kaller dette for nå.

    Men Skodvin ville ikke bli innblandet.

    Og jeg ville vel skremt assistent Sølvi der, på Rimi Langhus, og de andre der, hvis jeg satt på kontoret og skulle ringe til Rimi-Hagen.

    Da hadde nok dem trodd at det hadde klikka for meg.

    For det var jo over 500 butikker i Rimi, på den tiden, og Rimi-Hagen, han var det vel bare direktørene som fikk prate med, tror jeg.

    Så jeg gikk ikke høyere enn driftsdirektøren, av redsel for å få ‘kink i nakken’, og at folk skulle tro det hadde klikka for meg, for å si det sånn.

    Jeg vil jeg gjerne få de pengene som den arbeidssaken er verdt.

    Og at problemene i firmaet skal bli mer kjent.

    Det er vel bare BI, i Norge, vil jeg tippe på, som er store nok, til å stå opp mot ICA, når det er tull i det store firmaet vel.

    Det er jo skandinavias største detaljistkjede, i omsetning, har jeg lest på Wikipedia.

    Kan dere være så snill å hjelpe meg, hos BI.

    Kan en professor gi råd, om hvordan jeg kan får pengene som denne arbeidssaken er verdt.

    Og også få det til sånn, at det som har foregått, blir mer kjent.

    Eventuelt, kan noen studenter føre min sak, som en ‘Final Year Project’, i retten, i Norge, (noen som vil bli master eller professor i arbeidsrett kanskje), og med råd av en professor hos dere kanskje, få det til sånn, at jeg får realisert denne arbeidssaken, i penger og at problemene i denne arbeidssaken blir mer kjent.

    Håper dere har mulighet til å hjelpe meg med dette!

    Mvh.

    Erik Ribsskog

    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: Erik Ribsskog
    Date: 2011/8/1
    Subject: Re: Mulig prosjektoppgave for mastergrader etc./Fwd: Mulig prosjektoppgave for studenter på f.eks. Masterstudium i styring og ledelse
    To: stein.lavik@bi.no

    Hei,

    ok, Bergen ja.

    Det skulle til han lederen i Sandvika det her, hva er det han heter igjen?

    Mvh.

    Erik Ribsskog

    2011/8/1

    Jeg kan dessverre ikke hjelpe deg med dett.

    Vennlig hilsen
    Stein Lavik

    BI Bergen
    tlf. BI / mobil 98251607
    priv. 55 53 03 29
    Privat mobil 46 42 89 60

  • Jeg sendte en e-post om tilstandene hos the Financial Ombudsman, til Acas, som jobber med rådgivning innen arbeidsrett osv. (In Norwegian)







    Google Mail – The Finacial Ombudsman, using staff as slaves/Fwd: Complaint against RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mail







    Google Mail



    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>




    The Finacial Ombudsman, using staff as slaves/Fwd: Complaint against RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mail





    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>





    Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 4:48 PM





    To:

    acas@eclogistics.co.uk



    Hi,

    I've contacted you earlier, about that I was being used as a slave, and that
    they had illigal management methods, at Bertelsmanns Scand. Microsoft-activation,
    in Liverpool.

    Now, people at the Financial Ombudsman, are also being used as slaves, it seems.
    Or this could be connected with a cover-up, of the Bertelsmann/Microsoft-case, that
    I am being bullied by Government, to cover up what went on there.

    Please send this e-mail to the right people in Acas.
    Yours sincerely,
    Erik Ribsskog

    ———- Forwarded message ———-

    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
    Date: Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 4:31 PM
    Subject: Re: Complaint against RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mail

    To: "Collins, Jackie" <jackie.collins@financial-ombudsman.org.uk>

    Hi,

    Monday to Friday, 8 am to 6 pm, is alright, I think.

    But you also let your staff work Sunday mornings, at 6 am.
    It seems to me that you overload your representatives with work, and that they have to

    work 12 to 14 hours 7 days a week.
    I thought slavery was forbidden in our time.
    Why do you let your representatives work every Sunday morning, when other people in

    England are on their way home from the pub?
    Do your staff get summer-holiday at all?
    Sincerely,
    Erik Ribsskog


    On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 9:54 AM, Collins, Jackie <jackie.collins@financial-ombudsman.org.uk> wrote:

    Dear Mr Ribsskog

    We always try to provide the best service we can to our

    customers, and sometimes that means offering our staff the option of working

    overtime during very busy periods.

    Please be assured that they have to work within strict time

    guidelines, and these are always checked by Operations Managers to ensure they

    are not working too many hours.

    The service our department offers is outside of the usual

    office hours of 9am till 5pm because we have found that a lot of our

    customers have difficulties contacting us whilst they are at work themselves

    during the 9am to 5pm times, so we have opening hours of 8am – 6pm, as do

    many firms these days.

    I hope this explains.

    Regards

    Jackie

    Collins

    Operations Manager
    Direct Dial : 020 7964

    0116

    Direct Fax: 020 7964 0117


    From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

    Sent: 29 June 2009 19:32
    To: Collins,

    Jackie

    Subject: Re: Complaint against RBS/Fwd: Earlier

    e-mail

    Ok,

    that sound very fine!

    But, why is that you let your representatives work over-time every Sunday

    then?

    Shouldn't you as a main rule conduct your business, within the business

    hours?

    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

    On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 3:50 PM, Collins, Jackie <jackie.collins@financial-ombudsman.org.uk>

    wrote:

    Dear Mr

    Ribsskog

    Rosemary

    Cox has passed your complaint to me to take over as you have requested that

    she no longer deals with your case.

    I can

    confirmed that a letter has been sent to the firm, and we have asked that they

    issue you with a final response letter within 14 days. We have also

    asked them to copy us in on that response.

    If you

    remain unhappy with the firms response, or you have not received a response

    from them within 14 days, please let me know and I will arrange for your

    complaint to be moved forward for investigation by an

    Adjudicator.

    Regards

    Jackie Collins
    Operations Manager

    Direct Dial

    : 020 7964 0116

    Direct Fax: 020 7964

    0117


    From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

    Sent: 28 June 2009 11:17
    To: Cox,

    Rosemary
    Subject: Re: Complaint against RBS/Fwd: Earlier

    e-mail

    Hi,

    I don't think it's any use with me repeating myself.

    I don't think you should handle my complaint.

    The reason is, that if you are to overworked, you get to tired.

    And in dealing with complaints like these, one obviously needs ones

    judgement, to be like

    it should be.

    If one are out of balance, like I think you could be, then I don't

    think this is good for how the

    complaint is being dealt with.

    So please do as I ask Mrs .Cox, and tell your manager what I said,

    that I want someone else

    to deal with my complaint, due to that I think that you must be

    overworked.

    Haven't you seen how fine the weather is today, you should have a day

    off in the fine weather,

    I think.

    Sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

    On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 11:10 AM, Cox, Rosemary <Rosemary.Cox@financial-ombudsman.org.uk>

    wrote:


    Dear Mr Ribsskog


    Thank you for your

    e-mails


    As previously advised I am not going to debate

    with you the working hours of this office.


    I have written to you today to advise the steps

    we are taking with your complaint. If the firm fail to resolve the situation

    for you, your complaint will be passed onto our adjudication area for

    further consideration of the concerns you have

    raised.


    I should add that we do

    not tolerate rude or insulting language at this office, and

    would expect any further communication to be sent in a more acceptable

    manner.


    Kind Regards


    Rose Cox


    team manager



    From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

    Sent: 28 June 2009

    10:43

    To: Cox, Rosemary
    Subject: Re: Complaint against

    RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mail

    Hi,

    of course you can work on Sundays if you want.

    But business e-mails should just be sent within the

    business-hours.

    Or else, what's going to happen, is obvious.

    Someone are going to come drunk home from town, and answer the

    business-e-mails when they are drunk, which is what has happened today, with

    our correspondence.

    If this is something, you didn't know from before, then I think

    this Financial Ombudsman-stuff is just a load of crap really.

    Try to use the head that God gave you when you were born!

    Sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

    On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 10:33 AM, Cox, Rosemary <Rosemary.Cox@financial-ombudsman.org.uk>

    wrote:

    Dear

    Mr Ribsskog

    Thank

    you for your e-mail

    I must admit to being surprised and

    confused with the content of the

    e-mail
    .

    We are an extremely busy department and we often work at the

    weekends, this is obviously of help to consumers as we are able

    to deal with their complaints in a more timely manner. I would

    suggest that
    It is entirely up to each individual

    business to determine which hours their staff will work and I do not

    intend debating this with you.

    By working this weekend I have been able to deal with your

    complaint, which as you can appreciate is of a benefit to

    you.

    Perhaps you can clarify the spelling mistakes you are referring

    to?

    Kind

    Regards

    Rose

    Cox

    team

    manager



    From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

    Sent: 28 June 2009 10:20

    Subject: Re: Complaint against RBS/Fwd: Earlier

    e-mail

    Hi again,

    don't you think it's strange for an institutions like yours to send

    e-mails on Sunday mornings then?

    Shouldn't e-mails be sent within normal business hours then you

    think?

    This is what it says on Wikipedia:

    In

    the United

    States
    and United

    Kingdom
    , the hours between 9 am and 5 pm are typically considered to be standard business

    hours



    I

    think this is rather akward, as I also think your spelling-mistakes

    are.


    Sincerely,


    Erik Ribsskog

    On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 8:06 AM, Cox, Rosemary

    <Rosemary.Cox@financial-ombudsman.org.uk>

    wrote:

    Dear

    Mr Ribsskog

    Thank you for your e-mail

    That's no problem, however I should point out that we

    are not a government department, we are a independent complaints

    body.

    I will be in touch with your again in the next few

    days

    Kind

    Regards

    Rose

    Cox

    team

    manager



    From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

    Sent: 28 June 2009 08:02

    To: Cox, Rosemary
    Subject: Re: Complaint

    against RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mail

    Hi,

    ok that's very fine, I'm just home from town you see.

    I thought it was a bit strange, since noone in Government in

    Norway, work on Sundays.

    Sorry about this, I forget sometimes that I'm not in Norway any

    longer.

    Sorry about this!

    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

    On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 7:54 AM, Cox, Rosemary

    <Rosemary.Cox@financial-ombudsman.org.uk>

    wrote:

    Dear Mr Ribsskog

    Thank you for your e-mail

    I can assure you this is not a

    joke, I am currently in the office working

    today.

    I presume that you

    would like us to deal with your complaint, so am responding to your

    e-mails today

    Kind Regards

    Rose Cox

    team manager



    From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

    Sent: 28 June

    2009 07:36
    To: Cox, Rosemary
    Subject: Re:

    Complaint against RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mail

    Hi,

    why do send the e-mails early on a Sunday morning, by the

    way.

    Is this some kind of joke?

    Sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

    On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 7:33 AM, Cox, Rosemary

    <Rosemary.Cox@financial-ombudsman.org.uk>

    wrote:

    Dear Mr Ribsskog

    Thank you for your

    e-mails

    I will contact you again once

    I have considered the

    information.

    Kind Regards

    Rose Cox

    team manager



    From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

    Sent: 27

    June 2009 14:59
    To: Cox, Rosemary
    Subject:

    Complaint against RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mail

    Hi,

    thank you for you e-mail, that I recieved today.

    I'll contact your collegue back, regarding the

    Barclays-complaint.

    I sent the complaint on RBS Dale St., to Yvonne Williams at

    RBS, but she

    also harassed me, like this, she writes 'Dear Ms Ribsskog',

    even if my name

    is Erik, and in Britain, you have a movie called 'Erik the

    Viking', and Eric is

    also a quite usual name, in English-speaking countries.

    So I think Yvonne Williams, the complaint-investigator,

    also bullied me.

    I think this must have been a deliberate mistake.

    This ended with the complaint being partly resolved, in the way

    that RBS,

    gave me the bonus of £100, for moving my account to them, from

    Barclays,

    (who I also had problems with, that I'll exlain about to your

    collegue, like I

    mentioned earlier).

    I'll also find the actual complaint against RBS Dale St.

    now, and forward it

    to you.

    What I meant with the complaint-form, was that it didn't

    look anything at all

    like the ones you've sent me now.

    Maybe the complaint-form I was sent, was to do with other

    financial institutions,

    than banks?

    Like share-fonds etc?

    Have you also got other complaint-forms, other than to banks,

    perhaps someone

    sent me the wrong form intentionally?

    Just a thought I had.

    But anyway, thank you very much for your e-mail, and I'll

    also find the actual

    RBS Dale St. complaint, and e-mail it to you now.

    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

    ———- Forwarded message

    ———-
    From: Williams, Yvonne

    (CRU)
    <Yvonne.Williams@rbs.co.uk>
    Date: Tue,

    Jun 26, 2007 at 4:30 PM
    Subject: RE: Earlier e-mail
    To: Erik

    Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

    Dear Ms Ribsskog

    Could you please arrange another copy of your email to be

    sent to me for my investigation

    Regards

    Yvonne Williams


    From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
    Sent: 19 June 2007

    14:04
    To: Williams, Yvonne (CRU)
    Subject:

    Earlier e-mail

    *** WARNING : This message originates

    from the Internet ***


    Hi,

    I'm refering to the e-mail I sent you on 5/6.

    I was just wondering if you have recieved this e-mail,

    because I cant see

    that I have recieved any answer to it yet.

    Please just contact me if you want me to send you the e-mail

    again.

    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

    The Royal Bank of

    Scotland plc, Registered in Scotland No. 90312. Registered Office:

    36 St Andrew Square, Edinburgh EH2 2YB

    Authorised and

    regulated by the Financial Services Authority.

    This e-mail

    message is confidential and for use by the addressee only. If the

    message is received by anyone other than the addressee, please

    return the message to the sender by replying to it and then delete

    the message from your computer. Internet e-mails are not necessarily

    secure. The Royal Bank of Scotland plc does not accept

    responsibility for changes made to this message after it was

    sent.

    Whilst all reasonable care has been taken to avoid the

    transmission of viruses, it is the responsibility of the recipient

    to ensure that the onward transmission, opening or use of this

    message and any attachments will not adversely affect its systems or

    data. No responsibility is accepted by The Royal Bank of Scotland

    plc in this regard and the recipient should carry out such virus and

    other checks as it considers

    appropriate.



    This e-mail and any attachments are

    confidential and may be subject to legal privilege. If you are not

    the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and

    delete this e-mail and any attachment from your system. If you are

    not the intended recipient you must not copy, disclose or take any

    action in reliance to it.

    This e-mail and any attachments have been

    checked by virus detection software before transmission. You should

    carry out your own virus checks on the contents of this

    communication. We accept no liability for any loss or damage which

    may be caused by software viruses or by interception or interruption

    of this mail.

    Unless otherwise indicated, this e-mail

    has no contractual effect and may only be used for the purpose(s)

    indicated in it. The statements and opinions expressed in this

    e-mail are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those

    of the Financial Ombudsman Service Ltd.

    This email has originated from the

    Financial Ombudsman Service Ltd. South Quay Plaza, 183 Marsh Wall,

    London E14 9SR, United Kingdom. Registered as a limited company in

    England and Wales No. 3725015. Registered office as above.




    This e-mail and any attachments are

    confidential and may be subject to legal privilege. If you are not the

    intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and delete

    this e-mail and any attachment from your system. If you are not the

    intended recipient you must not copy, disclose or take any action in

    reliance to it.

    This e-mail and any attachments have been

    checked by virus detection software before transmission. You should

    carry out your own virus checks on the contents of this communication.

    We accept no liability for any loss or damage which may be caused by

    software viruses or by interception or interruption of this mail.

    Unless otherwise indicated, this e-mail has

    no contractual effect and may only be used for the purpose(s)

    indicated in it. The statements and opinions expressed in this e-mail

    are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the

    Financial Ombudsman Service Ltd.

    This email has originated from the

    Financial Ombudsman Service Ltd. South Quay Plaza, 183 Marsh Wall,

    London E14 9SR, United Kingdom. Registered as a limited company in

    England and Wales No. 3725015. Registered office as above.




    This e-mail and any attachments are

    confidential and may be subject to legal privilege. If you are not the

    intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and delete this

    e-mail and any attachment from your system. If you are not the intended

    recipient you must not copy, disclose or take any action in reliance to

    it.

    This e-mail and any attachments have been

    checked by virus detection software before transmission. You should

    carry out your own virus checks on the contents of this communication.

    We accept no liability for any loss or damage which may be caused by

    software viruses or by interception or interruption of this mail.

    Unless otherwise indicated, this e-mail has

    no contractual effect and may only be used for the purpose(s) indicated

    in it. The statements and opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of

    the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Financial

    Ombudsman Service Ltd.

    This email has originated from the Financial

    Ombudsman Service Ltd. South Quay Plaza, 183 Marsh Wall, London E14 9SR,

    United Kingdom. Registered as a limited company in England and Wales No.

    3725015. Registered office as above.




    This e-mail and any attachments are

    confidential and may be subject to legal privilege. If you are not the

    intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and delete this

    e-mail and any attachment from your system. If you are not the intended

    recipient you must not copy, disclose or take any action in reliance to

    it.

    This e-mail and any attachments have been

    checked by virus detection software before transmission. You should carry

    out your own virus checks on the contents of this communication. We accept

    no liability for any loss or damage which may be caused by software

    viruses or by interception or interruption of this mail.

    Unless otherwise indicated, this e-mail has no

    contractual effect and may only be used for the purpose(s) indicated in

    it. The statements and opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the

    author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Financial Ombudsman

    Service Ltd.

    This email has originated from the Financial

    Ombudsman Service Ltd. South Quay Plaza, 183 Marsh Wall, London E14 9SR,

    United Kingdom. Registered as a limited company in England and Wales No.

    3725015. Registered office as above.




    This e-mail and any attachments are

    confidential and may be subject to legal privilege. If you are not the

    intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and delete this

    e-mail and any attachment from your system. If you are not the intended

    recipient you must not copy, disclose or take any action in reliance to

    it.

    This e-mail and any attachments have been checked

    by virus detection software before transmission. You should carry out your

    own virus checks on the contents of this communication. We accept no

    liability for any loss or damage which may be caused by software viruses or

    by interception or interruption of this mail.

    Unless otherwise indicated, this e-mail has no

    contractual effect and may only be used for the purpose(s) indicated in it.

    The statements and opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the author

    and do not necessarily reflect those of the Financial Ombudsman Service

    Ltd.

    This email has originated from the Financial

    Ombudsman Service Ltd. South Quay Plaza, 183 Marsh Wall, London E14 9SR,

    United Kingdom. Registered as a limited company in England and Wales No.

    3725015. Registered office as above.




    This e-mail and any attachments are

    confidential and may be subject to legal privilege. If you are not the

    intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and delete this

    e-mail and any attachment from your system. If you are not the intended

    recipient you must not copy, disclose or take any action in reliance to

    it.

    This e-mail and any attachments have been checked

    by virus detection software before transmission. You should carry out your own

    virus checks on the contents of this communication. We accept no liability for

    any loss or damage which may be caused by software viruses or by interception

    or interruption of this mail.

    Unless otherwise indicated, this e-mail has no

    contractual effect and may only be used for the purpose(s) indicated in it.

    The statements and opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the author

    and do not necessarily reflect those of the Financial Ombudsman Service

    Ltd.

    This email has originated from the Financial

    Ombudsman Service Ltd. South Quay Plaza, 183 Marsh Wall, London E14 9SR,

    United Kingdom. Registered as a limited company in England and Wales No.

    3725015. Registered office as above.





    This e-mail and any attachments are confidential

    and may be subject to legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient,

    please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail and any attachment

    from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you must not copy,

    disclose or take any action in reliance to it.

    This e-mail and any attachments have been checked by

    virus detection software before transmission. You should carry out your own

    virus checks on the contents of this communication. We accept no liability for

    any loss or damage which may be caused by software viruses or by interception or

    interruption of this mail.

    Unless otherwise indicated, this e-mail has no

    contractual effect and may only be used for the purpose(s) indicated in it. The

    statements and opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the author and do

    not necessarily reflect those of the Financial Ombudsman Service Ltd.

    This email has originated from the Financial

    Ombudsman Service Ltd. South Quay Plaza, 183 Marsh Wall, London E14 9SR, United

    Kingdom. Registered as a limited company in England and Wales No. 3725015.

    Registered office as above.