From: eribsskog@gmail.com Erik Ribsskog
To: support@blogger.com
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2007 02:01:33 +0000
Subject: Fwd: [#209091530] Fwd: Blogger DMCA Complaint received
Hi,
I can’t see that I have recieved an answer to this e-mail yet, that’s why
I’m trying to send it again.
Yours sincerely,
Erik Ribsskog
———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Erik Ribsskog
Date: Oct 26, 2007 9:12 PM
Subject: Re: [#209091530] Fwd: Blogger DMCA Complaint received
To: Blogger Help
Hi,
thank you very much for your answer!
I relly understood that you couldn’t give me legal advice, I just thought
that maybe
you knew about some organisation etc. who could maybe give advice on this.
I should probably have made it more clear in the e-mail, that it was this I
meant.
Since there isn’t always that easy, for different reasons, to get help from
an attorney.
But that’s my problem I guess.
But what I was hoping that you could maybe answer me about, was if there was
a
time-limit for filing the DMCA counter-complaint.
So this was the main reason for my enquiery, but I should maybe have
clearified this.
So that’s why I’m trying to e-mail you again, in case that point got a bit
lost in my last
e-mail.
(Also if you know what the next procedure usually is in an DMCA
complaint-process,
that would be fine, but I’m also going to search more on the internet
regarding this,
so this is only if you have the time and oppertunity to answer).
So I hope that you have the chance to answer me about this, and thanks in
advance for
the reply!
Yours sincerely,
Erik Ribsskog
On 10/26/07, Blogger Help
>
> Hello Erik,
>
> We are in receipt of your latest email. Blogger is not in a position to
> provide legal guidance or counsel to the legal issue at hand. We recommend
>
> that you seek an attorney to properly answer your questions and provide
> you with legal advice.
>
> Sincerely,
> The Blogger Team
>
>
> Original Message Follows:
> ————————
> From: “Erik Ribsskog” < eribsskog@gmail.com>
> Subject: Fwd: [#209091530] Blogger DMCA Complaint received
> Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 03:39:27 +0100
>
> Hi,
>
> I can’t see that I’ve recieved an answer to this e-mail yet.
>
> I’m not so used with dealing with cases like this, and also not used to
> deal
> with
> to copyright laws.
>
> But I’m trying to send a new e-mail anyway, since I’m not sure where to
> ask
> for
> advice regarding this.
>
> The reason I have put the files in the deleted entry on the blog, is
> because
> I’m
> trying to ‘whistleblow’ regarding whats going on in the Arvato Ltd. firm,
> and the
> Microsoft Scandinavian Product Activation there.
>
> This is about an (organised) harassment at work case.
>
> And it’s conected with a crime-case in the company, (which I have got
> confirmed
> about from the Norwegian embassy in London), and this most certianly, as
> far
> as
> I can understadn, must be an orginised crime/mafia/mob-case.
>
> And that’s why I think it’s important that I try to deal with this in an
> as
> proper way
> as possible.
>
> So, even if I’m a Norwegian living in Britain, I still would want to
> pursue
> this matter
> with a DMCA counter-complaint.
>
> I’m in the process of contacting law-firms in Britain, to get help with
> the
> (organised)
> harassment at work issues.
>
> And I think this DMCA issue propably should be included with that case.
>
> Also, I was wondering if not the purpose of ‘whistleblowing’, should be
> looked at as
> more relevant than copyright issues, (even if it also seems a bit strange
> to
> me
> that this should be a copyright issue, the files removed, where files like
>
> summarys
> from employee meetings at Arvato Ltd, and shift-plans, and also the entry
> containing
> only my CV, was deleted from the blog).
>
> So that’s why I’m trying to write to you again.
>
> I was wondering if you knew about how the rules are surrounding the
> ‘whistleblower’
> issues, in regards to the DMCA law?
>
> Because it could be that the British law-firms need a bit of time to deal
> with this,
> (from earlier experience with companies like these), so I was also
> wondering
>
> how long time I have got to file a DMCA counter-complaint.
>
> So I’m sorry that I’m sending you so many e-mails about this!
>
> I should have prepared more on the last e-mails I sent maybe, so I
> appologise for
> this.
>
> But I hope that you have the chance to have a look at this anyway!
>
> Thanks in advance for the help!
>
> Yours sincerely,
>
> Erik Ribsskog
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ———- Forwarded message ———-
> From: Erik Ribsskog
> Date: Oct 24, 2007 1:22 AM
> Subject: Re: [#209091530] Blogger DMCA Complaint received
> To: Blogger Help < support@blogger.com>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> thank you very much for your reply again!
>
> By the way, I’ve checked on the internet, and it said that DMCA, was a US
> copyright law.
>
> So is the fax-number American then?
>
> And is it Arvato in the US or in the UK, who has sent the complaint?
>
> I’m sorry I haven’t lived that long in the UK, so I got a bit cunfused
> here.
>
> Thanks in advance for the help!
>
> Yours sincerely,
>
> Erik Ribsskog
>
>
> On 10/24/07, Blogger Help
> >
> > Hello Erik,
> >
> > You can file a DMCA counter-complaint as soon as you’d like, and we will
>
> > forward it on to Arvato Services to give them notice of the
> > counter-complaint. Please fax your counter-complaint with all of the
> > necessary information to (650) 618-2680.
> >
> > Thank you for your understanding and cooperation in this regard.
> >
> > Sincerely,
> > The Blogger Team
> >
> >
> >
> > Original Message Follows:
> > ————————
> > From: “Erik Ribsskog” < eribsskog@gmail.com>
> > Subject: Re: [#209091530] Blogger DMCA Complaint received
> > Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 00:40:11 +0100
> >
> > Ok,
> >
> > thank you very much for your reply!
> >
> > I’ve tryed to search a bit on ‘DMCA complaints’, and I was wondering, if
> I
> > want
> > to file a DMCA Counter Notice, should I then wait until the link in your
> > e-mail,
> > with the compaint, is active.
> >
> > Or should file one right away you think?
> >
> > Thanks very much for the help, and sorry if the correspondence is busy!
> >
> > Yours sincerely,
> >
> > Erik Ribsskog
> >
> >
> > On 10/23/07, Blogger Help
> > >
> > > Hello Erik,
> > >
> > > We received a DMCA complaint from Arvato Services Limited regarding
> the
> > > content that we have removed based on their allegations of copyright
> > > infringement. The DMCA complaint that we received will be posted on
> the
> > > link we sent you ( http://www.chillingeffects.org/notice.cgi?sID=4463)
> > > within the next couple of weeks.
> > >
> > > Sincerely,
> > > The Blogger Team
> > >
> > >
> > > Original Message Follows:
> > > ————————
> > > From: “Erik Ribsskog”
> > > Subject: Re: [#209091530] Blogger DMCA Complaint received
> > > Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 20:21:27 +0100
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > these are my personal files from work.
> > >
> > > I don’t see how there could be any copyright issues with others, since
>
> > > these
> > > are my
> > > personal work-files.
> > >
> > > Who is it that has got you to delete the entries then, and shouldn’t
> you
> > > have checked
> > > it with me first, in case it was public files to do with my work,
> (like
> > it
> > > is)?
> > >
> > > Thanks for the fast reply by the way.
> > >
> > > Yours sincerely,
> > >
> > > Erik Ribsskog
> > >
> > >
> > > On 10/23/07, Blogger Help < support@blogger.com > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hello Erik,
> > > >
> > > > We apologize for the mix up. Blogger has been notified, according to
>
> > the
> > > > terms of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA), that some of
> > your
> > > > images allegedly infringe upon the copyrights of others. The URLs of
> > the
> > > > allegedly infringing images may be found at the end of this message.
>
> > > >
> > > > The notice that we received, with any personally identifying
> > information
> > > > removed, may be found at the following link:
> > > > http://www.chillingeffects.org/notice.cgi?sID=4463
> > > >
> > > > Please note that it may take several weeks for the notice to be
> posted
> >
> > > on
> > > > the above page.
> > > >
> > > > The DMCA is a United States copyright law that provides guidelines
> for
> > > > online service provider liability in case of copyright infringement.
> > We
> > > > are in the process of removing from our servers the images that
> > > allegedly
> > > > infringe upon the copyrights of others. If we did not do so, we
> would
> > be
> > > > subject to a claim of copyright infringement, regardless of its
> > merits.
> > > > See http://www.educause.edu/Browse/645?PARENT_ID=254 for more
> > > information
> > > > about the DMCA, and see http://www.google.com/dmca.html for the
> > process
> > > > that Blogger requires in order to make a DMCA complaint.
> > > >
> > > > Blogger can reinstate these images upon receipt of a counter
> > > notification
> > > > pursuant to sections 512(g)(2) and 3) of the DMCA. For more
> > information
> > > > about the requirements of a counter notification and a link to a
> > sample
> > > > counter notification, see http://www.google.com/dmca.html#counter.
> > > >
> > > > Please note that repeated violations to our Terms of Service may
> > result
> > > in
> > > > further remedial action taken against your Blogger account. If you
> > have
> > > > legal questions about this notification, you should retain your own
> > > legal
> > > > counsel. If you have any other questions about this notification,
> > please
> > > > let us know.
> > > >
> > > > Sincerely,
> > > > The Blogger Team
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Affected URLs:
> > > > https://johncons-blogg.net/2007/10/enclosure-8.html
> > > > https://johncons-blogg.net/2007/10/enclosure-9.html
> > > > https://johncons-blogg.net/2007/10/enclosure-15.html
> > > > https://johncons-blogg.net/2007/10/enclosure-16.html
> > > > https://johncons-blogg.net/2007/10/enclosure-17.html
> > > > https://johncons-blogg.net/2007/10/enclosure-18.html
> > > > https://johncons-blogg.net/2007/10/enclosure-19.html
> > > > https://johncons-blogg.net/2007/10/enclosure-20.html
> > > > https://johncons-blogg.net/2007/10/enclosure-21.html
> > > > https://johncons-blogg.net/2007/10/enclosure-22.html
> > > > https://johncons-blogg.net/2007/10/enclosure-23.html
> > > > https://johncons-blogg.net/2007/10/enclosure-24.html
> > > > https://johncons-blogg.net/2007/10/enclosure-25.html
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Original Message Follows:
> > > > ————————
> > > > From: “Erik Ribsskog”
> > > > Subject: Re: [#209091530] Blogger DMCA Complaint received
> > > > Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 01:41:26 +0100
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > thank you for your e-mail.
> > > >
> > > > I was wondering if there has been a misunderstanding somewhere,
> > because
> > > I
> > > > have not
> > > > sent any ‘infringement complaint’ regarding any of the mentioned
> > URL’s.
> > > >
> > > > I was just wondering if there had a mix-up or a misunderstanding
> > > > somewhere.
> > > >
> > > > So I hope very much that you have the time to have a look at this.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks in advance!
> > > >
> > > > Yours sincerely,
> > > >
> > > > Erik Ribsskog
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 10/22/07, Blogger Help < support@blogger.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hello,
> > > > >
> > > > > In accordance with the DMCA, we have completed processing your
> > > > > infringement complaint regarding the following URLs:
> > > > >
> > > > > https://johncons-blogg.net/2007/10/enclosure-8.html
> > > > > https://johncons-blogg.net/2007/10/enclosure-9.html
> > > > > https://johncons-blogg.net/2007/10/enclosure-15.html
> > > > > https://johncons-blogg.net/2007/10/enclosure-16.html
> > > > > https://johncons-blogg.net/2007/10/enclosure-17.html
> > > > > https://johncons-blogg.net/2007/10/enclosure-18.html
> > > > > https://johncons-blogg.net/2007/10/enclosure-19.html
> > > > > https://johncons-blogg.net/2007/10/enclosure-20.html
> > > > > https://johncons-blogg.net/2007/10/enclosure-21.html
> > > > > https://johncons-blogg.net/2007/10/enclosure-22.html
> > > > > https://johncons-blogg.net/2007/10/enclosure-23.html
> > > > > https://johncons-blogg.net/2007/10/enclosure-24.html
> > > > > https://johncons-blogg.net/2007/10/enclosure-25.html
> > > > > We appreciate your patience as we work to remove all of the images
> > > from
> > > > > our servers. Please note that all cached versions should expire
> > within
> > > a
> > > > > week.
> > > > >
> > > > > Please let us know if we can assist you further.
> > > > >
> > > > > Sincerely,
> > > > > The Blogger Team
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>