Stikkord: E-post

Jeg sendte en ny e-post til Tesco

Gmail – New update/Fwd: Update/Fwd: Email to Chief executive's Office

Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>

New update/Fwd: Update/Fwd: Email to Chief executive’s Office

Erik Ribsskog

<eribsskog@gmail.com>

Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 10:20 PM

To:
ceo.customerservice@tesco.co.uk

Hi again,

if you look at the earlier e-mails, your representative writes this:

> I have also spoken to Colin with regards to the baskets, and while some of
> the baskets were inherited with the store

But I was at the shop again today, since Sainsbury's were sold out.

And I spotted that you really have two different types of _Tesco_-baskets.

So why do you write 'inherited with the store'?

It's absolute bullsh*t.

You just make up the sh*t you write, and don't really investigate.

I'm an earlier Rimi, (Ahold), shop-manager, and don't like being bullsh*ted like this.

I understand Tesco is a big retailer, but Ahold is also a big retailer.

I also know a bit about food-shops, and I don't like being treated like sh*t, like this Tesco custommer-support is doing.

Shame on you, Tesco!

Erik Ribsskog

———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

Date: Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 3:51 PM
Subject: Update/Fwd: Email to Chief executive's Office
To: ceo.customerservice@tesco.co.uk

Hi again,

and I used to have a lot of 'strange' shop-manager collegues, when I worked as a shop manager in Norway.

So I don't really like to speak with shop managers.

I think it's ok to deal with this in writing.

But I think I have got to say what I wanted now.

I have some favorite products at Tesco and some at Sainsbury's.

So I think I'm going to still shop at both shops.

But I haven't found very much to complain about at Sainsbury's Rice Lane yet.

So I haven't sent them any e-mails.

And I'm not going to send you anymore e-mails eighter.

As long as there isn't anything new that happens, in that Tesco-shop, which I think should be complained about.

Thanks you very much for that you have read my e-mails!

Best regards,

Erik Ribsskog

———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

Date: Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 2:06 PM
Subject: Re: Email to Chief executive's Office
To: ceo.customerservice@tesco.co.uk

Hi,

if you don't value my feed-back I have to agree that theres no point in continuing this.

There was a second vocher I didn't get, which your collegue wrote he'd sent to my old adress, around Christmas, last year.

But I guess it wasn't sent.

I don't think you have addressed it all, you haven't event mentioned the stained basket, which should be cleaned with high-preassure-cleaner.

I was at Aldi today, in Liverpool City Center, the baskets were very clean.

But if you don't value feedback from experienced shop managers then I guess it's no point.

Tesco are the biggest retailer in the UK, and the third biggest world-wide, I read on Wikipedia.

That you use Sommerfield-baskets and Tesco-baskets that don't mix, seems strange for the Worlds third biggest retailer, I think.

It's like what an independant corner-shop wouldn't even have done, I think.

I'm just giving you my sincere feed-back here, but you don't seem to interested, to be honest.

I've alse seen in the news that Tesco-shares fell over Christmas.

Maybe you should listen more to your customers, if you want the shares to stop falling.

But I guess it's no use trying to speak to deaf ears, like a Norwegian saying says.

Erik Ribsskog

On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 11:32 AM, <ceo.customerservice@tesco.co.uk> wrote:

Ref 13546692

Dear Mr Ribsskog,

Many thanks for your further emails regarding the Tesco County Road Metro store.

I am sorry you feel Elizabeth has not addressed your issues in full in her email of 20th August. Please be assured, Elizabeth has taken all necessary steps to ensure the points you have raised in your emails have been passed to Colin Richardson, the Manager at the store. If you would like to discuss any of the issues, Colin will be happy to meet with you when you are next in the store.

On checking your previous correspondence, I can see my colleague Yvonne Edmonds, sent you a £10 Tesco Moneycard to
Flat 3, 5
Leather Lane, Liverpool.L2 2AE. This was sent on 12th May 2011.

As a company committed to delivering the very best in terms
of customer service it is very disappointing when any of our customers are
unhappy with us and I do hope you will accept my apologies for any
inconvenience or upset that these matters may have caused.

Unfortunately, there is nothing more we can add to what has already been said, and I do not feel that continuing this correspondence will bring any further benefit to either of us. Therefore we will not be entering into any further contact with regards to these issues.

Many thanks once again for contacting the Chief Executive's Office.

Kind regards,

Shaun Wheeldon
Executive Response Team Leader

……………… Original Message ………………

To: ceo.customerservice@tesco.co.uk
From: eribsskog@gmail.com

Received: 20/08/2012

Subject: Re: Email to Chief Executive's Office

Hi,

I'm not happy with your reply about the bike-boys.

Because the security-guard didn't even try to get the bike boys to move,

even if he was standing just a couple of meters away from the
enterance-door, which the bike-boys blocked.

It was like he didn't care, I think.

Also, like I wrote in my earlier e-mail I think it's very unpractical,

(bordering idiocracy), to have two types of baskets, which don't mix.

This is so dum, I think, that I want to escalate this please.

These baskets doesn't cost much.

And you haven't replied about the dirt and grease in the baskets eighter.

Rotten fruit etc., have been laying in the baskets, and made a kind of oil,
that is tacky and sticky at the bottom of many of the baskets.

This is unhygenic, I think.

Please escalate to your line-manager.

Erik Ribsskog

On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 4:14 PM, <ceo.customerservice@tesco.co.uk> wrote:

> **
> Ref 13546692
>

> Dear Mr Ribsskog,
>
> Thank you for your email addressed to the Chief Executive’s Office, to
> which I have been asked to reply.
> I was very sorry to learn of the problems you encountered when trying to

> enter the Tesco Metro store in County Road, Liverpool recently. I can
> appreciate how intimidating this must have been.
>
> Unfortunately, our security staff are on duty to protect the staff and

> stock in the store, and while we do watch the boys when they come in to the
> car park, it is very hard for the security staff and Managers to move them
> on. I have spoken to the new store Manager, Colin Richardson and he is

> aware of the problem. The police are also aware of the youths congregating
> at the store, and hopefully any disruptions are kept to a minimum.
>
> I have also spoken to Colin with regards to the baskets, and while some of

> the baskets were inherited with the store, they are all in good condition
> and maintained on a daily basis. Colin has asked me to pass on his
> apologies for any inconvenience caused with regards to the different size

> of baskets and he will speak with the Checkout Manager to see that they are
> regularly tidied up.
>
> Unfortunately, there are no plans at present to have the store extended,
> however I have passed your comments on to the store Director for future

> reference.
>
> Many thanks for bringing these issues to the attention of the Chief
> Executive's Office, and allowing us the opportunity to address these with
> the store.
>
> Kind regards,

>
> Elizabeth Johnston
> Customer Service Executive
>
> [image: Tesco Logo]
>
> ……………… Original Message ………………
>
> To: ceo.customerservice@tesco.co.uk

> From: eribsskog@gmail.com
> Received: 19/08/2012
>
>
> Subject: Complaint
>
> Hi,
>
> I've earlier complained about your shops in Liverpool City Centre,

> Sunderland and Fairfield, and I've now moved back to Walton, and the
> Summerfield-shop has become a Tesco Metro.
>
> I don't really like your custommer-support who doesn't let me escalate,

> etc., so I have waited very long, before I've sent a complaint, but now I
> think I have to complain anyway.
>
> Today, (18/8), at around 9 PM, I went to Tesco Walton.
>
> Five or six boys on bikes obstructed my way, when I went in to the shop.

>
> The security-guard just stood there, a few meters away, and he didn't tell
> the boys-crowd to make passage for the custommers.
>
> So I had to kick some cartoon laying on the ground, to make a noise, to try

> to make the boys move their bikes.
>
> Why does the security-guard get his pay?
>
> To just stand there looking at boys-crowds obstructing the custommers, like
> an idiot?
>
> There was even a boy looking at me through the window when I picked up a

> basket there.
>
> Tesco was invaded by bike-boys, and the security-guard just stood there
> like an idiot, and didn't try to break up the congestion.
>
> Also, this shop has two types of baskets.

>
> Half of the baskets are Sommerfield-baskets, and half of them are
> Tesco-baskets.
>
> So there's always a caos, in the check-out, since these baskets don't mix.
>
> So always untidy basket-piles at the check-out.

>
> I've worked as a Shop Manager, and know these baskets aren't that
> expensive.
>
> In the chain I worked in, a company came once a year or so, to wash
> baskets.
>
> Something unheard of in Tesco, I think, because some of these baskets are

> really dirty and greasy etc.
>
> Also, the ailes in this Tesco are to long and to narrow.
>
> It's always a congestion everywhere.
>
> I wish this shop could have been more like the Sainsbury's-shop, in Rice

> Lane.
>
> It's really a much better shop in almost every way.
>
> Except for that the prices are a bit lower at Tesco for nudles, etc.
>
> Also, no self-service check-outs, in this shop, which other Tesco Metro

> has.
>
> It's fine with a Tesco Metro, but here you have put a Tesco Metro into an
> ordinary Sommerfields-shop, I think, and it doesn't really fit in.
>
> So custommers get stressed shopping in this shop, I think.

>
> How about making it bigger?
>
> Erik Ribsskog
> ——————————
> This is a confidential email. Tesco may monitor and record all emails. The
> views expressed in this email are those of the sender and not Tesco.

>
> Tesco Stores Limited
> Company Number: 519500
> Registered in England
> Registered Office: Tesco House, Delamare Road, Cheshunt, Hertfordshire EN8
> 9SL
> VAT Registration Number: GB 220 4302 31

>

24. august 2012

Jeg sendte en e-post til LHT

Gmail – Update/Fwd: Lifeline Alarm (Complaint)

Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>

Update/Fwd: Lifeline Alarm (Complaint)

Erik Ribsskog

<eribsskog@gmail.com>

Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 9:08 PM

To:
jkavanagh@lht.co.uk

Cc:
info@tpas.org.uk

Bcc:
"emb.london" <emb.london@mfa.no>

Hi again,

I forgot to attach the mentioned letter, so I send an update e-mail.

Erik Ribsskog

———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

Date: Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 8:54 PM
Subject: Lifeline Alarm (Complaint)
To: jkavanagh@lht.co.uk
Cc: info@tpas.org.uk

Hi,

I'm refering to your letter of 22/8, which I recieved today.

I'm not interested in any lifeline-alarm.

This isn't anything that Landlords should deal with I think.

Are you my landlord or my doctor?

I've also got the Order of St. John in my line, in Norway, (which I had to find about in a newspaper-archive), and wonder if this is some plot, from them?

I don't want people here to discuss things I'm not interrested in.

This is a waste of my time and an invasion of my privacy, I think.

Is it a new law that says everyone have to have these alarms?

I don't think so.

This is just some funny stuff.

You at LHT are trying to be my landlord and my doctor at the same time here.

That's not fine, I think.

It's like in the Soviet then, I think.

You have earlier dragged me to your office in Walton Road, to discuss disrepair, I thought, only to find out that you wanted to discuss adoption with me.

Are you a landlord or the inner mission?

You have a bishop as a president I see, so I have to wonder.

I just want a tenancy and no crusader-stuff.

I wonder about this so I send it to the TPAS and the Norwegian Embassy, (since I'm from Norway).

Erik Ribsskog

lht brev.jpg
291K

PS.

Her er vedlegget:

24. august 2012

Jeg sendte en e-post til DFRI

Gmail – I slekt med Palle Ravn

Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>

I slekt med Palle Ravn

Erik Ribsskog

<eribsskog@gmail.com>

Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 4:28 PM

To:
DFRI Abuse Team <abuse@dfri.se>

Hei,

ok, jeg visste ikke at det hadde noe med Tor å gjøre.

Jeg så bare at det ble brukt deres organisasjonsnavn, som ISP.

Takk for svar uansett!

Mvh.

Erik Ribsskog

On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 2:44 PM, DFRI Abuse Team <abuse@dfri.se> wrote:

On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 12:24:30AM +0100, Erik Ribsskog wrote:

> Hei,

>

> jeg ser dere søker på 'palle ravn illuminati', på Google.

>

> Sender med skjermbilde fra tracking-cookie-programmet på min blogg.

>

> Jeg er i slekt med Palle Ravn gjennom Holger baron Adeler, (som var gift

> med min oldemors søster).

>

> Så jeg lurer på hva det her skal bety.

>

> Sender også kopi e-post til Palle Ravns sønn, Niels Ravn.

>

> Mvh.

>

> Erik Ribsskog

Hello,

We don't know. The IP address in question is a Tor exit relay, see

https://www.torproject.org/overview.html for more info about the Tor

Project.

There is little we can do to trace this matter further. As can be seen

from the overview page, the Tor network is designed to make tracing of

users impossible. The Tor network is run by some 2500 volunteers using

free software provided by the Tor Project to run Tor relays. Client

connections are routed through multiple relays. The system does not

record logs of client connections or previous hops.

Thank you for your understanding. If you have further questions, feel

free to contact us again.

Regards

:DFRI Abuse Team

24. august 2012

Jeg fortsetter å søke på jobber. Denne gang som Web and Marketing Assistant

Gmail – WEB AND MARKETING ASSISTANT

Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>

WEB AND MARKETING ASSISTANT

Erik Ribsskog

<eribsskog@gmail.com>

Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 3:52 PM

To:
hailey@cmf-ltd.co.uk

Hi,

I read about this vacancy on the Jobcentre website, and I wanted to please apply for this job.

I've designed four web-sites myself, from scratch, these year and last, on these web-addresses: http://www.godteposer.net/, http://www.goodyshop.co.uk/, http://www.ukgoodyshop.com/ and http://www.goodyshop.eu/.

I've gone to the Marketing-line, at Upper Seconday School, (in Norway), and I've also had Marketing as a module on a private Norwegian academy, named NHI, (now NITH).

I've used the Microsoft Office-programmes, when I worked as self employed, in 2007 and 2008, and I've also learned about these programmes, at Learn Direct, where I was on and ECDL-course, (full), there.

I've also got a degree in IT, from Oslo University College, which means I can learn new IT-skills fast.

I attach my CV and hope to hear back from you!

Yours sincerely,

Erik Ribsskog

CV – Erik Ribsskog.doc
33K

24. august 2012

Jeg sendte en ny e-post til Ahold

Gmail – request for Course-certifiactes, etc

Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>

request for Course-certifiactes, etc

Erik Ribsskog

<eribsskog@gmail.com>

Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 2:03 PM

To:
Human Resources <humanresources@ahold.com>

Hi,

ok, I remember that it was written about that I won this competition, ('Rimi Gullårer'), in the weekly Rimi-'newspaper', 'Rimi-nytt'.

Perhaps you could find it there or on the intranet, and print a copy of that for me?

Best regards,

Erik Ribsskog

On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 1:32 PM, Human Resources <humanresources@ahold.com> wrote:

Dear Erik Ribsskog,

As a response to your enquiry, we have looked into the matter but we are sorry to inform that there is unfortunately nothing more that can be done regarding this case. Regrettably, the requested documentation is no longer available in the ICA archives.

Kind regards,

Ahold Corporate Human Relations

This email and any attachments may contain information that is proprietary,

confidential and/or privileged and for the sole use of the intended recipients(s)

only.

If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender by return

email and delete all copies of this email and any attachments. Ahold and/or its

subsidiaries shall neither be liable for the inaccurate or incomplete transmission

of the information contained in this email or any attachments, nor for any delay

in its receipt. To the extent this email is intended to create any legal obligation,

the obligation shall bind only the contracting entity and not any other entity within

the Ahold Group.

24. august 2012

Jeg sendte en ny e-post til Twitter

Gmail – #6026989 Twitter Support: update on "Impersonation – johncons"

Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>

#6026989 Twitter Support: update on "Impersonation – johncons"

Erik Ribsskog

<eribsskog@gmail.com>

Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 3:34 AM

To:
Twitter Support <support+id6026989@twitter.zendesk.com>

Hi,

it doesn't seem like you've even investigated this.

Then you would have told me what I've found out in the meantime, that his account is really @johnconstantin-(something), like I spotted after sending the impersonation-report to you.

But it was shortened, in the tweet, to @johncons….

And I just assumed it was a new impersonaton-attack in a row of many.

But I have to say that after I spotted what I mentioned above, (that it was really the account @johnconstantin-(something), the person meant).

Then I _don't_ think it was an impersonation-attack.

This could have been unintentional, that it looked like the user claimed to 'own' my account.

But even so, my earlier impersonation-reports, have also been 'sloppily' investigated, I think.

Could you please send my e-mail to your line-manager, since I still would have liked to please get the first impersonation-reports investigated properly.

It seems like all I get sent back is standard e-mails, and no customised feed-back.

Thanks in advance for any help with this!

Best regards,

Erik Ribsskog

On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 1:25 AM, MUP <notifications-support@twitter.zendesk.com> wrote:

##- Please type your reply above this line -##

MUP, Aug 23 05:25 pm (PDT):

Hello,

While we understand your frustration, the reported behavior is not in violation of the Twitter Rules (http://twitter.com/rules).

We have found overwhelmingly that responding to users who are intentionally attempting to aggravate you encourages that user to continue their behavior. We recommend you don’t reply, retweet, comment on their behavior, or instigate them. If you'd prefer not to see content from that person, you can block the user using the blocking feature described here: https://support.twitter.com/entries/117063

As a policy, we do not mediate content and we do not intervene in disputes between users. This means that users are allowed to post potentially inflammatory content, provided that they do not violate the Twitter Rules.

If you believe the content or behavior you are reporting is prohibited in your local jurisdiction, please contact your local authorities so they can accurately assess the content or behavior for possible violations of local law. If Twitter is contacted directly by law enforcement, we can work with them and provide assistance for their investigation as well as guidance around possible approaches. You can point local law enforcement to our Law Enforcement Guidelines here: https://support.twitter.com/articles/41949.

If you’re concerned for your physical safety, please contact your local authorities for further assistance. Please let us know if you believe the behavior has escalated or otherwise violates our rules.

Sincerely,

@MUP
Twitter Trust and Safety

Additional information:

* Dealing with abusive users: https://support.twitter.com/articles/15794

* Blocking other users: https://support.twitter.com/entries/117063
* Making your profile protected: https://support.twitter.com/entries/14016

johncons, Aug 22 12:45 pm (PDT):

Full name: Erik Ribsskog
Username of reported account: @johncons

Description: I saw this tweet on Interactions today:

Mr. Wizard ‏@theWoZHimself
My accounts as of 8/21/12 – @drbrucebanner1 / @hulkstrongest1 @seekerofdeath @johncons… http://twextra.com/a8261t

So this person pretends to me, since he says he has my account.

Email address: eribsskog@gmail.com
Twitter username (optional): @johncons

Anything else? (optional): I've really been impersonated a lot lately on Twitter.

Not that much on Facebook, but a lot on Twitter.

Earlier it used to be the other way, I was impersonated a lot on Facebook.

But I think Facebook are stricter towards impersonation and harassment, where as Twitter let much of this pass, it seems to me.

So harassers and impersonators seeks to Twitter, it seems to me.

Message-Id:CBRAF79Y_5036c9e0d3331_20b115eea74131106d_sprut

24. august 2012

Jeg sendte en ny e-post til ICE

Gmail – Second update/Fwd: New update/Fwd: Update/Fwd: Complaint

Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>

Second update/Fwd: New update/Fwd: Update/Fwd: Complaint

Erik Ribsskog

<eribsskog@gmail.com>

Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 2:25 AM

To:
ice@dwp.gsi.gov.uk

Cc:
mail.gva@efta.int

Hi,

also the Jobcentre and Elect 'nag' about that my web-shop isn't making a profit.

But it just needs marketing.

The contribution-margin is positive for the sold units each month.

I remember that term from business-school, and I attach a screen-shot from Wikipedias page about contribution margin.

Perhaps the business-coaches and jobcentre-staff should read more about contribution-margin before they want to advice people who have businesess, I think.

So my complaint 6 is that the Jobcentre in Aintree 'naged' about my business having a loss, even if the contribution-margin is positive.

The same with Elect/Ingeus and Ralph there.

Perhaps you could explain to them about contribution margin?

Maybe they need some education in economics?

It isn't fun for a business guy to have meetings about the business, when people don't understand about basic economics.

(Even I'm a bit rusty myself on economics, I must admit.

It's some years since I went on business-school.

But I have this in the back of my head still, I think, so I luckily managed to find the English term now.

I really thought about a Norwegian term named 'dekningsbidrag', but this should be the same term, it seems from Wikipedia.

Hope this is alright!

Yours sincerely,

Erik Ribsskog

PS.

Here is a link to the mentioned page on Wikipedia:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contribution_margin

PS 2.

The web-shop has also been hacked a lot of times, and someone even hi-jacked my account with One, and took over my business.

Also, the postage for packets to Norway has suddently almost doubled, around March/April of this year, so I had to increase prices, which is good for the sale of units-number.

PS 3.

I'm also sending an update e-mail to EFTA, since I'm from Norway, and have started updating them about the mentioned problems.

———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 9:02 PM

Subject: New update/Fwd: Update/Fwd: Complaint
To: ice@dwp.gsi.gov.uk
Cc: mail.gva@efta.int

Hi,

there's also a complaint 5.

I contacted the Jobcentre by e-mail, and then they send me an e-mail asking me to contact them(!)

It's almost like I have to call them something bad like idiots then, I think.

Why do these people have a job, while I don't?

And these people also have power over me.

If I don't act like I think these people want, then they're going to stop my jobseekers allowance, (like has happened before), so that I can't buy food, etc.

This is power-abuse, I think.

Regards,

Erik Ribsskog

———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

Date: Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 7:32 PM
Subject: Update/Fwd: Complaint
To: ice@dwp.gsi.gov.uk
Cc: mail.gva@efta.int

Hi again,

other things that almost shocked me, with this jobcentre, (Aintree).

Was that I went there just to sign-on, today.

The guy by desk 2, (where I normally go to sign on), starts talking about a 'part-time-job'.

And don't let me sign on.

I have to sit and wait for the manager to be finished with a meeting.

So there was an unscheduled meeting, today.

Instead of answering my e-mails the Jobcentre just grabs hold of me, (like happened at the Jobcentre in Williamsson Sq), when I'm there to sign-on.

So no agenda for the meeting.

So I have some more complaints:

Jobcentre Plus didn't give me time to prepare for a meeting, (about my businesses), but just grabbed hold of me, when I was there for a regular sign-on-meeting.

The Jobcentre-manager, (I think she was, a woman with blonde hair), asked me a personal question, if I had a partner, during the unscheduled meeting. I think this was a strange thing to ask.

(People on the internet call med 'the refugee from Norway', but the UK don't let me be a refugee, so I have to be an 'EEA-guy').

Anyway I'm not sure if you are supposed to ask people about (sex)-partners, in Jobcentre-meetings.

I think Jobcentre Plus goes a bit close, to be honest.

Best regards,

Erik Ribsskog

———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

Date: Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 6:03 PM
Subject: Complaint
To: DWP ICE gateway team <ice@dwp.gsi.gov.uk>
Cc: mail.gva@efta.int

Hi,

I've had a small web-shop, for a couple of years now.

I've updated the Jobcentre about it the whole time.

Last spring, Mark at the Jobcentre, Williamsson Sq., Liverpool, said the web-shop was a 'hobby'.

Some time later, I ended up on the Work Programme.

Ingeus in Sunderland, (where I lived some months, last year), told me to buy a Double Entry Ledger, for the web-shop.

Ingeus in Liverpool, sent me to speak with Ralph, from Elect, who told me they had no founds for marketing, for my web-shop.

I've now started self-publishing some books, and at my sign-on-meeting at the Jobcentre, in Aintree, two weeks ago, I explained about some royalties I've got from the books.

I was told this was a part-time-job, and got some forms.

Some days ago I was frustrated when filling out the forms.

Because I now have two small business.

The web-shop and the books.

Where as I only had one form.

I wrote a complaint about that the Jobcentre have been inconsistent, since they call the web-shop a 'hobby', and the books a part-time-job.

I find this comfusing.

Today, at the Jobcentre, in Aintree, they got me to write a form, for the web-shop(!), (but not for the books).

I still find this confusing.

Now the web-shop, (who has been at around the same size, (a turnover of £20-£100 a month, for a couple of years), is a part-time-job, it seems.

Why this change all the time?

Last year the web-shop was a hobby.

Now it's a business, it seems.

Was this to get me put on the Work Programme?

(Which seems a bit un-conventional to me, with business-coaches instead of business-advisors, etc).

So my complaints are:

Jobcentre Plus have changed the label on my web-shop from 'hobby' to 'part-time-job', from last year to this year, (and have possibly wrongly put me on the Work Programme it seems to me).

The Jobcentre in Aintree told me today that Ingeus have lots of founds, for businesses.

Still, Ralph from Elect, (who Ingeus sent me to), told me, (on a meeting at Ingeus), that there no founds for marketing, for my web-shop.

This doesn't add up, I think.

Hope you have the chance to look at this!

Yours sincerely,

Erik Ribsskog

PS.

I send an update to EFTA, since I'm from Norway and have started updating them a bit, about the problems with my web-shop.

contribution margin wikipedia.JPG
106K

PS.

Her er vedlegget:

24. august 2012

Jeg sendte en e-post til Norwegian-British Chamber of Commerce

Gmail – Problems with RBS

Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>

Problems with RBS

Erik Ribsskog

<eribsskog@gmail.com>

Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 3:58 PM

To:
info@nbccuk.com

Hi,

I'm a Norwegian citizen who lives in the UK.

I've set up an e-business: http://www.godteposer.net/ , after I became unemployed.

I'm still in the begining of setting up this business, after problems with hacking, etc.

But I've sold around 100 packets to Norway, (and the USA), now.

But when I contact RBS to get a business-account they tell me I have to have a business-plan.

My plan was to sell Glacier Mints on QXL after they've stopped selling Glacier Mints, (Isbre Mint), in Norway.

But QXL wanted a deposit I couldn't afford, (since I'm unemployed), so I set up my own web-show, (since I've studied IT and had programming as a hobby).

And I've also gone to business-school, (handel og kontor), economy-line, at Upper Secondary School.

But I haven't learned about business-plans.

Isn't it a bit inpolite of RBS to ask for a business-plan for an up and running business?

I've even gone to a respected private academy, in Norway, named NHI, and had business-modules there, but I haven't learned about business-plans, (as far as I can remember it at least).

Is it just RBS who asks about a business-plan if one want a business-account, for an up and running business, in the UK?

I haven't had any business earlier, eighter in Norway or the UK.

(But I've worked as a Shop Manager in Rimi, in Oslo, for several years).

So I'm not sure how to go forward regarding this.

Hope you have the chance to reply about this!

Yours sincerely,

Erik Ribsskog

23. august 2012

Nå dukket det opp en ny bestilling, fra Godteposer. Det var artig

23. august 2012

Jeg sendte en e-post til Advokatforeningen

Gmail – Klage på advokat Rukke/Fwd: Klage Advokat.no/Fwd: Oppdatering/Fwd: Klage på surr/Fwd: Klage på Advokatforeningen/Fwd: Hewan Negassi/Fwd: Din henvendelse til Advokatforeningen

Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>

Klage på advokat Rukke/Fwd: Klage Advokat.no/Fwd: Oppdatering/Fwd: Klage på surr/Fwd: Klage på Advokatforeningen/Fwd: Hewan Negassi/Fwd: Din henvendelse til Advokatforeningen

Erik Ribsskog

<eribsskog@gmail.com>

Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 9:52 AM

To:
Disiplinærnemnden for advokater <nemnden@jus.no>

Hei,

jeg får klage på advokaten da, siden lederen for Disiplinærnmenden mener at det er riktig.

Jeg har tidligere fått beskjed om at det er greit at jeg sender til dere på e-post siden jeg bor i utlandet, så jeg prøver å skrive klagen i denne e-posten:

Advokat Rukke påtok seg min sak enda hun ikke var ekspert på feltet, (barnevern), og det fantes flere eksperter på feltet barnevern i samme advokatfirma.

(Jeg ble ikke opplyst om at advokat Rukke ikke var ekspert på barnevern, (og at det fantes flere sånne eksperter på samme avdeling som hun jobbet), men jeg fant senere ut om dette, på nettsidene, til Advokat.no.

Jeg henvendte meg til Advokat.no på e-post, og spurte om jeg kunne få en advokat i Drammen, siden Drammens-avdelingen deres, er den avdelingen deres, som ligger nærmest Svelvik kommune, som jeg har en sak mot.

Men jeg ble tilbud Rukke i Oslo.

Jeg svarte at det var vel hipp som happ, om advokaten var i Oslo eller Drammen.

Men jeg ble senere sur da jeg så på nettsidene, til Advokat.no, at denne advokat Rukke ikke var ekspert på barnevern, samtidig som at Advokat.no hadde en drøss advokater som var nettopp ekspert på barnevern.

Da eksploderte jeg nesten, for å si det sånn.

For jeg hadde også min tvil, til hvor effektivt, som Rukke jobbet.

Og når jeg så det at de hadde eksperter på barnevern, som kunne ha gjort jobben mer effektivt, for den Fri Rettshjelp-støtten, som jeg har blitt tildelt, i denne saken, fra Fylkesmannen i Oslo og Akershus, så ble jeg irritert).

Advokat Rukke sluttet i jobben sin, uten å gjøre ferdig saken min, (og uten at jeg ble tilbudt ny advokat av Advokat.no, som jo har flere eksperter på barnevern som jeg har skrevet om, under punkt 1).

Jeg sliter fortsatt med å få ny advokat, til å ta den saken her nå, enda jeg har sendt dette til flere andre advokater i Drammen og Oslo nå, siden jeg fikk e-posten fra Advokat.no om at Rukke hadde sluttet.

Jeg mener at hu burde vel ha gjort ferdig de sakene hu hadde, før hu slutta i jobben.

Og jeg synes også at det minste Advokat.no burde ha gjort, var å tilby meg en ny advokat, med barnevern som ekspert-felt, etter at det stokket seg sånn, på det første forsøket.

Bare si fra til meg hvis det er noe jeg har glemt å forklare om, i denne klagen.

Mvh.

Erik Ribsskog

———- Forwarded message ———-

From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Date: 2012/8/22
Subject: Re: Klage Advokat.no/Fwd: Oppdatering/Fwd: Klage på surr/Fwd: Klage på Advokatforeningen/Fwd: Hewan Negassi/Fwd: Din henvendelse til Advokatforeningen

To: "Moe, Ernst" <Ernst.Moe@domstol.no>
Cc: Merete Smith <ms@advokatforeningen.no>

Hei,

takk for svar!

Men jeg synes det er en uskikk, at det bare er advokater, som kan klages inn.

Jeg synes at klagen min blir mye svakere, når den rettes mot advokaten.

Dette startet jo da jeg sendte e-post til Advokat.no, og ikke da Advokat.no ga meg den og den advokaten, synes jeg.

Jeg kan forklare:

Advokat.no ga meg en advokat, som ikke var ekspert på det området, som jeg trengte advokat innen.

Enda de hadde flere sånne eksperter, i samme kontorlandskap/adresse.

Den 'inkompetente' advokaten slutter, og Advokat.no tilbyr meg ikke ny advokat.

Altså det blir en sterkere klage enn:

1. Advokaten tok på seg mitt oppdrag på tross av at det fantes andre advokater i samme firma med bedre kompetanse på området som min sak gjaldt.

2. Advokaten sluttet i jobben uten å gjøre ferdig min sak.

Her forsvinner jo advokatfirmaets ansvar.

Skal ikke folk beskyttes mot tulling fra advokatfirma da?

Det er svakt at folk ikke blir beskyttet mot tulling fra advokatfirma _også_, synes jeg.

Mvh.

Erik Ribsskog

2012/8/22 Moe, Ernst <Ernst.Moe@domstol.no>

Erik Ribskog

Du finner informasjon om klageadgang og fremgangsmåte på advokatforeningens hjemmeside. Der finner du også Regler for god advokatskikk og Advokatforskriften.
Det er bare advokater (personer) som kan klages inn for disiplinærorganene.

Mvh

Ernst Moe

Fra: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

Sendt: 22. august 2012 14:05

Til: Moe, Ernst

Kopi: ms@advokatforeningen.no

Emne: Klage Advokat.no/Fwd: Oppdatering/Fwd: Klage på surr/Fwd: Klage på Advokatforeningen/Fwd: Hewan Negassi/Fwd: Din henvendelse til Advokatforeningen

Hei,

jeg fant denne e-post-adressen ved å bruke Google.

ms@advokatforeningen.no klarer visst ikke å gi meg e-post adressen din, så jeg måtte gjøre det sånn.

Jeg vil klage på Advokat.no til Displinærnemden, for jeg synes det er mer hensiktsmessig, enn å klage på en bestemt advokat, i denne saken.

Men noen advokater som ikke sier hva deres rolle er i advokatforeningen/disiplinærnemden, driver å motsier hverandre.

Når det gjelder hvem som skal avgjøre om det er greit å klage på Advokat.no.

En medarbeider skrev at dette er en Disiplinærnemd-avgjørelse.

Jeg vil derfor høre dette fra Disiplinærnemnden og ikke fra folk som bare utgir seg for å representere den.

Kan jeg klage på Advokat.no?

Hvis det er greit, så forklar meg hvordan jeg kan sende klagen.

Mvh.

Erik Ribsskog

———- Forwarded message ———-

From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

Date: 2012/8/22

Subject: Oppdatering/Fwd: Klage på surr/Fwd: Klage på Advokatforeningen/Fwd: Hewan Negassi/Fwd: Din henvendelse til Advokatforeningen

To: ms@advokatforeningen.no

Hei,

i dag fikk jeg et brev fra ei Elisabeth Wille, som sier hun er advokat.

Men det må være ei 'sabotøse' som har lest på bloggen min, og tuller, tror jeg.

For jeg har jo sent dette til generalsekretær
ms@advokatforeningen.no.

Jeg kan ikke se at vedkommende sabotøse er medlem av Disiplinærnemnden engang.

Nå må dere slutte å tulle!

La meg sende til disiplærnemnden nå.

Og slutt å foreta deres arbeid på maur, (byråkrat)-nivå.

Dette er MI6 og CIA og det som verre er, frykter jeg.

Skjerpings!

Vedlegger brevet det er snakkings om.

Erik Ribsskog

———- Forwarded message ———-

From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

Date: 2012/8/8

Subject: Klage på surr/Fwd: Klage på Advokatforeningen/Fwd: Hewan Negassi/Fwd: Din henvendelse til Advokatforeningen

To: ms@advokatforeningen.no

Hei,

jeg sender denne klagen til generalsekretæren, og satser på at det er riktig.

Jeg har først blitt opplyst om at jeg kan sende på e-post, og så har dette blitt forandret til vanlig post.

Dessuten, jeg prøver å klage på Advokat.no, til Disiplinærnemden.

Men byråkratene stopper klagen.

Den kommer ikke fram dit.

For byråkratene begynner å behandle klagen.

(Noe de selv har sagt de ikke har myndighet til).

Kan du være så snill og se på dette.

Egentlig så hadde jeg tenkt å sende dette, til lederen for Advokatforeningen.

Men jeg fant ikke e-post adressen til lederen deres, på nettsidene deres.

Mvh.

Erik Ribsskog

———- Forwarded message ———-

From: Jeppe Normann <J.Normann@selmer.no>

Date: 2012/8/7

Subject: SV: Klage på Advokatforeningen/Fwd: Hewan Negassi/Fwd: Din henvendelse til Advokatforeningen

To: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

Alle opplysninger og kontaktinfo til Advokatforeningen finner du på nettet.

Med vennlig hilsen

Jeppe Normann

Advokat –leder disiplinærutvalget Oslo krets

Fra: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

Sendt: 6. august 2012 16:23

Til: Jeppe Normann

Emne: Re: Klage på Advokatforeningen/Fwd: Hewan Negassi/Fwd: Din henvendelse til Advokatforeningen

Hei,

den er grei.

Men hvem er leder for Advokatforeningen?

Kan jeg være så snill å få e-post adressen til lederen der.

For jeg synes at de 'fotsoldatene' hans surrer så mye.

Så det vil jeg gjerne klage på da.

Mvh.

Erik Ribsskog

2012/8/6 Jeppe Normann <J.Normann@selmer.no>

Jeg har ikke fått besvart denne tidligere på grunn av ferieavvikling.

Alle klager på advokater skal sendes til advokatforeningen, som ivaretar sekreteriatfunksjonene for
disiplinærmyndighetene.

Jeg ber således om at alle henvendelser rettes dit.

Med vennlig hilsen

Jeppe Normann

leder disiplinærutvalget for Oslo Krets

Fra: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

Sendt: 30. juli 2012 13:56

Til: Jeppe Normann

Emne: Klage på Advokatforeningen/Fwd: Hewan Negassi/Fwd: Din henvendelse til Advokatforeningen

Hei,

jeg synes at Advokatforeningen vimser så mye, så jeg klager til leder for Disiplinærnemden, for Oslo.

1. Advokatforeningen sier først at jeg kan sende på e-post, og så sier de at jeg må sende pr. brev.

De kan ikke forandre på det de sier, mener jeg.

2. Advokatforeningen sier at det er Disiplinærnemnden som bestemmer om klagen kan godtas.

Likevel så sier de at jeg ikke kan klage på et advokatkontor.

Jeg mener at her passer det best å klage på advokatkontoret.

Og vil ha en saklig vurdering av klagen, fra Disiplinærnemnden.

Likevel så stopper Advokatforeningen klagen min før den når fram til Disiplinærnemnden.

Så derfor denne e-posten.

Klagen på advokat.no er som følger:

1.

Jeg ba om en advokat i Drammen, og fikk en i Oslo.

Men seinere så fant jeg ut, at denne advokaten ikke var spesialist i barnevernssaker, som min sak gikk på, (jeg fikk Fri Rettshjelp fra Fylkesmannen i Oslo og Akershus).

Advokat.no hadde derimot mange advokater som var spesialister på nettopp barnevern, (så jeg på deres nettsider).

Så dette var som noe helt meningsløst for meg, det blir som at hvis man leverer en bil på verkstedet, også er det elektrikeren som lakkerer bilen.

Da er det noe galt noe sted.

Men da har sikkert sjefen til elektrikeren beordret han å gjøre dette.

Så derfor er klagen på Advokat.no og ikke advokat Rukke.

2.

Da Rukke sluttet i jobben sin, så fikk jeg ikke noe ny advokat av Advokat.no.

De bare kastet meg på dør, så og si.

Jeg synes at både punkt 1 og 2 er brudd på god advokatskikk.

Mvh.

Erik Ribsskog

———- Forwarded message ———-

From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

Date: 2012/7/30

Subject: Re: Hewan Negassi/Fwd: Din henvendelse til Advokatforeningen

To: Disiplinærnemnden for advokater <nemnden@jus.no>

Hei,

jeg synes dere vingler så mye.

Du skrev i den forrige korrespondansen din at det var Disiplinærnemnden som avgjorde om man godta en klage på et advokatkontor.

Og nå stopper du klagen før den når fram til Dispilinærnemnden.

Dette kalles vimsing, mener jeg.

Det samme når det gjelder e-postene.

Du sa det var greit å sende på e-post, og så sier du at det må sender per brev.

Kan jeg få ta det her med en 'scafer' hos dere, som ikke er så stressa?

Jeg vil gjerne ha det her fra øverste hold nå.

Mvh.

Erik Ribsskog

2012/7/30 Disiplinærnemnden for advokater <nemnden@jus.no>

Det vises til din e-post av 27. juli og vårt brev til deg av 24. juli 2012.

Disiplinærmyndighetene behandler klage på
advokat (min understrekning) som skal ha opptrådt i strid med Regler for god advokatskikk eller for øvrig i strid med domstolloven eller annen lov, samt klager over at en advokat har krevd for høyt salær, jf. Advokatforskriftens

§ 5-3 og Behandlingsregler for Advokatforeningens disiplinærutvalg.

Din klage er fortsatt rettet mot advokatfirmaet Advokat.no. Det er, som tidligere opplyst, kun advokater og ikke advokatfirmaer som kan klages inn
for disiplinærordningen. Vi kan således ikke registrere din klage på Advokat.no.

Vi gjør for ordens skyld oppmerksom på at i tillegg til eventuelle e-postoversendelser, skal underskrevet klage med bilag sendes i to eksemplarer
per post.

Denne tilbakemeldingen kun som e-post.

Med vennlig hilsen

Beate Sundstrøm

advokatassistent DNA – sekretær / saksbehandler

Disiplinærnemnden for advokater

Kristian Augusts gate 9, 0164 Oslo T 22 03 50 50

Fra: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

Sendt: 27. juli 2012 21:16

Til: Disiplinærnemnden for advokater

Emne: Hewan Negassi/Fwd: Din henvendelse til Advokatforeningen

Hei,

jeg viser til deg/deres brev, som jeg mottok tidligere denne uken.

Jeg synes at i denne saken, så passer det best å rette klagen mot advokatkontoret og ikke advokaten.

Så om Disiplinærnevnden kunne ha kikket på dette.

(Og svart på om det er greit å klage sånn).

Klagen min er som følger, mot Advokat.no:

1.

Jeg ba om en advokat i Drammen, og fikk en i Oslo.

Men seinere så fant jeg ut, at denne advokaten ikke var spesialist i barnevernssaker, som min sak gikk på, (jeg fikk Fri Rettshjelp fra Fylkesmannen i Oslo og Akershus).

Advokat.no hadde derimot mange advokater som var spesialister på nettopp barnevern, (så jeg på deres nettsider).

Så dette var som noe helt meningsløst for meg, det blir som at hvis man leverer en bil på verkstedet, også er det elektrikeren som lakkerer bilen.

Da er det noe galt noe sted.

Men da har sikkert sjefen til elektrikeren beordret han å gjøre dette.

Så derfor er klagen på Advokat.no og ikke advokat Rukke.

2.

Da Rukke sluttet i jobben sin, så fikk jeg ikke noe ny advokat av Advokat.no.

De bare kastet meg på dør, så og si.

Jeg synes at både punkt 1 og 2 er brudd på god advokatskikk.

Sender også kopi til Tilsynsrådet for Advokatvirksomhet, (som en oppdatering), siden jeg har klaget til de også.

Håper dette er i orden!

Mvh.

Erik Ribsskog

PS.

Du har jo tidligere skrevet at det var greit at jeg sendte på e-post, så jeg regner med at det fortsatt gjelder og sender derfor på e-post istedet for per brev i to eksemplarer.

Jeg regner med at dette var en forglemmelse og at dere ikke mente å virke vinglete/uklare.

———- Forwarded message ———-

From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

Date: 2012/7/10

Subject: Re: Din henvendelse til Advokatforeningen

To: Disiplinærnemnden for advokater <nemnden@jus.no>

Hei,

det høres bra ut, jeg er vant til å ikke alltid få svar, fra Norge, hit til England, så dere er bedre enn mange andre, (inkludert Kunnskapsdepartementet, f.eks. er det jeg først
tenker på da).

Min adresse skal være:

Erik Ribsskog

10 Keith Court

Keith Avenue

Liverpool

GB-L4 5XJ

Storbritannia

Igjen takk for svar!

Mvh.

Erik Ribsskog

2012/7/10 Disiplinærnemnden for advokater <nemnden@jus.no>

Hei,

Det vises til din e-post som ble sendt oss i kopi den 20. juni 2012.

Grunnet ferieavvikling i sekretariatet har vi ikke hatt anledning til å svare på din e-post tidligere. Vi beklager dette.

Til orientering opplyses det om at all korrespondanse til Disiplinærnemnden skal skje pr. post, men grunnet avstand og sen postgang kan vi godta at
dine innlegg kun kommer som e-post. Vi ønsker for ordens skyld i denne forbindelse å opplyse om at dersom denne fremgangsmåten ønskes benyttet, vil du selv stå ansvarlig for om eventuelle personlige opplysninger kommer på
avveie da e-post ikke er en sikker korrespondanse mellom to parter. Du vil derfor motta svar fra oss per post.

Vi tør be deg opplyse oss om din postadresse slik at svarbrev til deg i forbindelse med nedenstående e-post kan postlegges så snart som mulig.

Med vennlig hilsen

Hewan Negassi

Disiplinærnemnden for advokater

Kristian Augusts gate 9, 0164 Oslo

Fra: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

Sendt: 20. juni 2012 20:57

Til: Mona Mjøen McKiernan

Kopi: Disiplinærnemnden for advokater

Emne: Re: Din henvendelse til Advokatforeningen

Hei,

ok, jeg videresender denne korrespondansen til dem, så får jeg håpe at de tar kontakt.

Også ønsker jeg samtidig å klage på Advokat.no.

Som tidligere nevnt, så ba jeg om en advokat i Drammen, siden dette er den nærmeste store byen, fra Bergeråsen, hvor omsorgssvikten fant sted.

(Etter at jeg ble innvilget Fri Rettshjelp, fra Fylkesmannen i Oslo og Akershus).

Jeg ble tilbudt en advokat i Oslo.

Og jeg tenkte at det var greit.

Men da jeg sjekket nettsidene til Advokat.no nærmere, så så jeg det, at Advokat.no hadde syv advokater i Oslo, som var spesialister på barnevern.

Og selv om min sak er en barnevernssak, (min far lot meg bo alene fra jeg var ni år, og jeg fikk fri rettshjelp til en barnevernssak mot Svelvik kommune).

Så ble jeg gitt en advokat som _ikke_ hadde barnevern som hovedfelt.

Og så, her om dagen, slutter plutselig den advokaten.

Advokat.no skulle jo da selvfølgelig ha tilbudt meg en ny advokat.

Men det gjorde de ikke.

De bare sa at de var ferdig med saken.

Og dette etter at jeg hadde forklart for hun Rukke der, at jeg blir snytt for arv også, og trenger hjelp av en advokat, til å få Tingretten i Larvik, til å ha offentlig skifte, etter min mormor, og fristen der er 26. juni, altså på tirsdag neste uke.

Så at Advokat.no bare sluttet å jobbe med sakene mine, det kan koste meg arven etter min mor, (som døde i 1999), og min mormor som var fra danske kongelige og adelige.

Så jeg synes Advokat.no oppfører seg så besynderlig, at jeg ønsker å klage.

Samtidlig så lurer jeg på hva vitsen er med å klage, for Øvergård fikk bare 2000 i bot, og jeg fikk ingenting i erstatning.

Og dette gjaldt salg av min del av et sameie i Holmsbu, som jeg ville selge for å ha råd til det nevnte offentlige skiftet da.

For meg så virker det som at jeg bare blir systematisk tullet med av norske advokater, (er det mafian som trekker i tråder, jeg har overhørt i 2003 at jeg er forfulgt av dem).

Hvordan skal jeg liksom få ordnet med det offentlige skiftet da.

Hvorfor kan liksom ingen i Norge hjelpe meg med det, nå er det bare noen dager igjen til fristen går ut.

Men Advokatforeningen er så idiotisk organisert at dere ikke gir erstatning til ofre for deres mafia-advokater, og kun gir mindre enn en timelønn i bot til disse mafia-advokatene så det er jo helt håpløst.

Det burde vært som i USA hvor folk får store erstatninger.

Ellers så kommer de aldri av flekken.

Jeg blir litt kvalm her jeg sitter i England av dette mafia-opplegget som foregår i Norge.

Så nå må dere forte dere å gi Advokat.no 2000 i bot, de også.

Hva skal liksom løse seg da, tenker dere?

Dette er jo helt meningsløst egentlig.

Kan dere ikke tilby meg advokathjelp, eller noe, i det minste?

Hvordan skal jeg få ordnet med dette offentlige skiftet hvor fristen går ut 26. juni.

Det kan jo være at den egentlige grunnen til at Advokat.no oppførte seg så besynderlig var for at jeg skulle miste kontrollen over det arveoppgjøret, pga. at en mafia står bak, og trekker i tråder.

Jeg rekker jo ikke nå å få en ny advokat til å ordne med dette.

Så om dere kan ordne med det.

Jeg har skrevet om disse problemene på blogg i tre år nå, og ingen i Norge gjør en dritt, så jeg er rimelig oppgitt, for å si det sånn.

Jeg vet nesten ikke hva jeg skal si.

Erik Ribsskog

2012/6/20 Mona Mjøen McKiernan <mmm@advokatforeningen.no>

Erik Ribsskog,

Vi viser til dine henvendelser av 19.juni 2012, vedrørende klage på advokat Erik Øvergård.

Det fremgår av din henvendelse at du har anket beslutningen fra disiplinærutvalget i tide.

Vi råder vi deg til å ta kontakt med Disiplinærnemnden dersom du ønsker å få vite hvordan det har gått med anken.

Disiplinærnemnden er offentlig oppnevnt nemnd, og hører ikke til Advokatforeningen.

Vi har derfor ikke mulighet til å sjekke hvordan det har gått med anken din.

Disiplinærnemndens kontaktinformasjon er
nemnden@jus.no

Vi håper dette var til hjelp.

Med vennlig hilsen

Mona Mjøen McKiernan

ADVOKATFORENINGEN / THE NORWEGIAN BAR ASSOCIATION

Kristian Augusts gate 9, N-0164 Oslo T
+47 22 03 50 50 E
mmm@advokatforeningen.no

www.advokatforeningen.no www.advokatenhjelperdeg.no

From: Erik
Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

Sent: 19. juni 2012 15:33

To: Mona Mjøen McKiernan

Subject: Re: Din henvendelse til Advokatforeningen

Hei,

jeg anket i tide.

Men problemet er at dere ikke har gjort noe.

Så det er jo skandale.

Erik Ribsskog

23. august 2012