 |
Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com> |
Klage/Fwd: Oppdatering/Fwd: Vedrørende forespørsel om slektskapsforhold
|
Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com> |
Sun, May 23, 2010 at 8:24 PM | |
|
To: firmapost@siv.no | ||
| ||
Stikkord: E-post
-
Jeg sendte en ny e-post til Sentralsykehuset i Vestfold
Gmail – Klage/Fwd: Oppdatering/Fwd: Vedrørende forespørsel om slektskapsforhold
-
Jeg sendte en klage på Nærings og handelsdepartementet til Sivilombudsmannen
Gmail – Klage på Nærings og Handelsdepartementet/Fwd: Påminnelse/Fwd: Oppdatering min klage på EU-kommisjonen, fra 22/8/Fwd: Your e-mail of 22/8/2009
Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>
Klage på Nærings og Handelsdepartementet/Fwd: Påminnelse/Fwd: Oppdatering min klage på EU-kommisjonen, fra 22/8/Fwd: Your e-mail of 22/8/2009
Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>
Sun, May 23, 2010 at 8:05 PM
To:
post@sivilombudsmannen.no
Hei,Nærings og handelsdepartementet, har ikke svart meg på e-poster, fra 22/12 ifjor, og 22/3 iår.Hvor lang tid regner dere at et departement skal ha til å svare?
(Nå er det jo snart et halvt år siden 22/12).Mvh.Erik Ribsskog———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>Date: 2010/3/22
Subject: Påminnelse/Fwd: Oppdatering min klage på EU-kommisjonen, fra 22/8/Fwd: Your e-mail of 22/8/2009
To: postmottak@nhd.dep.noHei,
jeg kan ikke se å ha mottatt noe svar på denne e-posten, så jeg sender en påminnelse om dette.Mvh.Erik Ribsskog
———- Forwarded message ———-From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Date: 2009/12/22
Subject: Fwd: Oppdatering min klage på EU-kommisjonen, fra 22/8/Fwd: Your e-mail of 22/8/2009To: postmottak@nhd.dep.no
Cc: post@mfa.noHei,
beklager, den skulle til Nærings- og Handelsdepartementet, den e-posten her.Jeg har kanskje tatt jula litt tidlig her.Men 'mfa.no', det betyr liksom ikke UD for meg.Men men.Beklager dette!Mvh.
Erik Ribsskog———- Forwarded message ———-From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Date: 2009/12/22
Subject: Oppdatering min klage på EU-kommisjonen, fra 22/8/Fwd: Your e-mail of 22/8/2009
To: post@mfa.noHei,
nå fikk jeg et svar fra EU-kommisjonen, fra en brite, virker det som.Men jeg har jo klaget på, at EU-kommisjonen søkte på 'Erik Ribsskog Mette-Marit', og blanda inn i saken, at jeg har skrevet om problemer med Mette-Marit videoen, og om den er en risiko for rikets sikkerhet, på blogg.Jeg vet ikke om dere har tenkt å gjøre noe med klagen min på EU-kommisjonen?Dette er også en purring, for dere har ikke svart meg på den første e-posten jeg sendte om dette.På forhånd takk for svar!Mvh.Erik Ribsskog———- Forwarded message ———-
From: <SG-PLAINTES@ec.europa.eu>Date: Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 9:51 AM
Subject: Your e-mail of 22/8/2009
To: eribsskog@gmail.com
393930.pdf
27K
-
Jeg sendte en ny klage til PFU, denne gang på SOL Klipps
Gmail – Klage på SOL Klipps/Fwd: Sletting av konto fra Sol Klipps
Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>
Klage på SOL Klipps/Fwd: Sletting av konto fra Sol Klipps
Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>
Sun, May 23, 2010 at 7:16 PM
To:
pfu@presse.no
Hei,jeg har tidligere sendt dere klage på fire debattforum, som sensurer det jeg skriver om, og trakasserer.Nå vil jeg også klage på Sol Klipps, som sensuerer det jeg skriver, og trakasserer meg, fordi jeg har laget en video om en arbeidssak jeg har.Yttringsfriheten vår dekker tydeligvis ikke arbeidsforhold.Firmaer er som en hellig ku, virker det som.Mens vanlige folk er null verdt.Hva har dette med sivilisasjon og åpenhet å gjøre, lurer jeg.Kanskje dere hos PFU vet dette.Det hadde vært fint om dere kunne ha behandlet klagene mine ordentlig, og ikke behandle de på en forenklet måte, som jeg har fått til svar av dere tidligere, at dere har gjort.Det virker også trakasserende, og det er ikke så artig.Det blir som at dere er like nedlatende som de jeg klager inn til dere, synes jeg.Så lykke til med å gjøre jobben deres på en ordentlig måte!Med hilsenErik Ribsskog———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>Date: 2009/11/18
Subject: Re: Sletting av konto fra Sol Klipps
To: SOL kundeservice <kundeservice@sol.no>Hei,
dette er bare en presentasjon av en arbeidssak.Jeg forklarer at det er en arbeidssak, og at det er et partsinnlegg.Dette er trakassering dere bedriver og jeg skal sende dere til PFU.Lykke til videre med trakasseringen og sensueringen, for et mer lukket Norge!Mvh.Erik Ribsskog2009/11/18 SOL kundeservice <kundeservice@sol.no>Hei,
Vi fjernet filmen din ettersom dette er en type video vi ikke
ønsker på våre tjenester. Uthenging av tidligere arbeidsgivere er ikke noe vi anser
som passende materiale for Klipps-tjenesten på SOL. Siden vi heller ikke ønsker
flere videoer fra deg, har vi også blokkert profilen din på Klipps.From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
Sent: 18. november 2009 01:03
To: Anders Frogner
Subject: Sletting av konto fra Sol Klipps
Hei,
min Sol Klipps-konto, ble slettet idag, uten noe forklaring.
Jeg vet ikke om jeg sender det her til riktig person, men
jeg får håpe det er greit at jeg spørr om dette, for jeg lurer fælt på det her.For jeg synes det minste dere kunne gjøre, er å forklare
hvorfor dere sletter kontoer, når dere gjør dette, av uforståelige grunner for
meg.På forhånd takk for svar!
Mvh.
Erik Ribsskog
-
Jeg sendte en påminnelse til Wikipedia
Gmail – Update/Fwd: Responsible person/Fwd: [Ticket#2010010610016951] Complaint about the Norwegian Wikipedia/Fwd: Klage: Dette her er bare trakassering av meg. Med hils […]
Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>
Update/Fwd: Responsible person/Fwd: [Ticket#2010010610016951] Complaint about the Norwegian Wikipedia/Fwd: Klage: Dette her er bare trakassering av meg. Med hils […]
Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>
Sun, May 23, 2010 at 6:51 PM
To:
info@wikimedia.org
Hi,I can't see that I've received an answer to this e-mail, so I'm sending a reminder about this.Hope this is alright!Best Regards,Erik Ribsskog
———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Date: 2010/2/18Subject: Responsible person/Fwd: [Ticket#2010010610016951] Complaint about the Norwegian Wikipedia/Fwd: Klage: Dette her er bare trakassering av meg. Med hils […]
To: info@wikimedia.orgHi,
I was wondering, is there a person, who is responsible, for what's written on Wikipedia in Norwegian?(There is harassment and lies written about me there).The admins on Wikipedia in Norwegian, tells me that no person in Norway, are responsible for what's written there.Wikipedia collects a lot of money, each year, there should be a person who is responsible, for Wikipedia.Which person could I contact, that is responsible for what's written about me on Wikipedia?Yours sincerely,Erik Ribsskog———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>Date: 2010/2/18
Subject: Re: [Ticket#2010010610016951] Complaint about the Norwegian Wikipedia/Fwd: Klage: Dette her er bare trakassering av meg. Med hils […]
To: Wikipedia Info Team <info-no@wikipedia.org>Hei,
du kan vente deg en anmeldelse for trakassering.Du skriver at jeg har paranoia, det er ikke sant.Hele norsk Wikipedia er en vits, uten noen form for ansvarlige.Du vrir og vrenger på det jeg skriver.
Du oppfører deg som en kommunist i Stalins Russland, og sånn var det også da jeg ble bannet fra Wikipeida, det var noe som Stalins hemmelige politi kunne være stolte av.Jeg har vært på internett siden 1996, og har hele tiden hatt nettiquette, i bakhodet.
Wikipedia trakasserer folk, som bruker vanlig nettiquette og som er elite på internett, kan man si.Dere er gjennomkurrupte og en skam for landet.
Det er sånn at et sånt kommunist-aktig reir, det vil man helst ikke ha noe med å gjøre.Dere kunne hatt et styre som representerte Wikipedia utad.Dere har ingen person som er ansvarlig for Wikipedia, og som representerer Wikipedia utad.Nå står jeg utenfor Wikipedia, og ønsker å klage på ting som er skrevet på Wikipedia, og Wikipedia har bare en som er russ til neste år, som ikke har noe ansvar, som svarer meg.
Wikipedia skulle hatt en ansvarlig person, som kunne svare folk på en ordentlig måte.Så hadde folk sluppet dette pisspreiket fra folk som drømmer om plass i russestyret.Hvis du ser på det her som løst, så er vi uenige.Jeg får ta det oppover i systemet, med Wiki i Amerika.Wikipedia samler inn millioner i støtte årlig.Det må være noen som har en ansvarlig stiling i Wikipedia.
God bedring til Wiki Norge, dere kunne trengt en god skammekroken, etter å ha kommet med en slik svada som jeg har prøvd å lese meg gjennom nå.God bedring igjen, din uhøflige russe-aspirant!Erik Ribsskog
2010/2/18 Wikipedia Info Team <info-no@wikipedia.org>Hei, Erik, og takk for din e-post.02/16/2010 22:21 – Erik Ribsskog wrote:> Hei,
>
> igjen takk for svar!
>
> Jeg synes det høres merkelig ut at Wikipedia bokmål kan operere uten å ha en
> ansvarlig redaktør, eller et ansvarlig styre.
>
> Jeg synes ikke du eller andre hos Wikipedia tar trakassering alvorlig.
>
> Du nevner et tilfelle, men det har vært mange slike tilfeller hos dere, som
> ikke blir ryddet opp i.
>
> Jeg prøver å ta det opp på irc-kanalen deres, og da blir jeg bannet der.
>
> Jeg prøver å ta det opp på Wikipedia, og da blir jeg bannet der.
>
> Jeg mener at de tilfellene hvor jeg har blitt trakassert hos dere, og blitt
> utsatt for æreskrenkelser, ikke har blitt ryddet opp i.
>
> Ingen sanksjoner er innført mot de som har mobbet meg.
>
> Så dette synes jeg er alt for dårlig.
>
> Hva har du tenkt å gjøre med disse tingene:
>
> 1) Jeg er bannet fra Wikipedia bokmål, uten å ha gjort noe galt.
>
> 2) Jeg er bannet fra Wikipedias irc-kanal, uten å ha gjort noe galt.
>
> 3) Det har forekommet mange tilfeller av trakassering mot meg, på Wikipedia
> bokmål, som ikke har blitt ordnet opp i.
>
> F.eks. så bruker dere metoden bortforklaring, og sier at Flums, tok en
> 'practical joke' mot meg, når han sa at Orkla nektet meg å skrive på
> Wikipedia.
>
> Dette skrev han på leksikonet Wikipedia bokmål.
>
> Og jeg hadde aldri engang pratet med han.
>
> Og dette er personen som jeg har lest styrer Wikimedia Norge, deres
> uavhengige organisasjon.
>
> Ingen vilje vises fra dere til å ønske å rydde opp disse tingene.
>
> Jeg har også klage mot Harry Was, Kjetil Ree, og Jeblad, og Bombadill.
>
> Men ingen har f.eks. bannet eller degradert disse, enda det er åpenbart at
> de trakasserer meg åpenlyst.
>
> Har du noe forslag til hvordan man kan løse disse tingene jeg har nevnt nå?
>
> Mvh.
>
> Erik Ribsskog
>
Jeg forstår ikke hvorfor du mener at et nettsamfunn skal ha et styre. Hva slags
funksjon skulle de hatt? Jeg syntes tanken på et styre på Wikipedia er merkelig.
Det er umulig å gjennomgå alle redigeringer som blir gjort på wikipedia for å
godkjenne dem, og alle er ansvarlige for hva man selv gjør. Dersom det blir lagt
inn noe som bryter med lover og regler så er det totalt sett Wikimedia Foundation
som er ansvarlige.
Men slike lokale konflikter som dette blander dem seg ikke borti.
Du er blokkert fra å bidra til Wikipedia, og uønsket som bidragsyter på
prosjektet. Det virker ikke som om du klarer å samarbeide med andre bidragsytere,
og da jeg tidligere fjernet blokkeringen din med melding om at du måtte prøve å
holde deg unna konflikter du tidligere hadde vært part i. Du viste ingen vilje til
å følge den meldingen, samarbeide, eller arbeide i samsvar med prosjektets formål.
Derfor har jeg ingen planer om å gjøre endringer på blokkeringen av deg fra
wikipedia-prosjektet, og om jeg må vil jeg aktivt argumentere sterkt imot at noen
andre gjør det.
Det beste for Wikipedia er om du ikke bidrar. Dette er ikke en straff, men en
helhetsvurdering av hva som er det beste for prosjektet.
IRC-kanalen til Wikipedia er en annen historie. Den har ingen særlige regler og
retningslinjer, og jeg kjenner ikke spesielt til hvorfor du er bannet derfra. Jeg
har dog ingen planer om å endre på dette da du ikke er spesielt ønsket der, og det
ikke er spesielt skadelig for samarbeidet som foregår der at du ikke deltar.
At du ikke ønsker å tro på den forklaringen du har fått ang Flums utspill må nok
tilskrives din egen paranoia. Det at du ikke tror på den forandrer ikke fakta, og
jeg ser ingen konstruktiv måte å overbevise deg.
Flums er en del av styret til Wikimedia Norge, i år har han hatt rollen som
kasserer. Han er ikke den som styrer foreningen.
Jeg er ikke helt enig i det du sier, at vi ikke har ryddet opp. Vi har blokkert
deg, og med det har vi effektivt fjernet kilden for konflikten og tatt godt vare
på de bidragsyterne som samarbeider godt med alle andre og jobber for prosjektets
formål.
Det kan godt hende du syntes dette er feil, urettferdig eller på andre måter galt.
Du har ikke kommet med særlig tunge argumenter for å overbevise meg om dette, og
ettersom alle andre enn deg virker fornøyd med løsningen slik den er nå så ser jeg
på dette som løst.
Med vennlig hilsen,
Hans-Petter Fjeld
—
Wikipedia – http://no.wikipedia.org
—
NB: Alle e-post til denne adressa besvares av frivillige, og svar anses ikke som
offisielle uttalelser fra Wikimedia Foundation. For offisiell korrespondanse kan
du kontakte sideoperatørene på <http://www.
wikimediafoundation.org >.
PS.
Noen skriver kommentar om at Wikimedia Norge, har et styre og en leder.
Men de har jeg vært borti før, og jeg klarer ikke å få de ‘Wiki-nerdene’, til å klare å forklare meg sammenhengen mellom Wikipedia Norge og Wikimedia Norge.
Det det er snakk om her, er ting som er skrevet om meg, på Wikipedia siden, på norsk, om baroniet Rosendal.
Som f.eks. dette, som ‘Jeblad’ skriver, som nok er ment å referere til meg:
Jeg håper alle har forståelse for at vi noen ganger sliter litt med personer fra «Hotell Koko-huset», og at vi alle kan se humoren i det hele. Vedkommende er ikke av de verste, men han kan av og til lage en del støy. — Jeblad 5. jan 2010 kl. 22:52 (CET) (Don’t feed the trolls!)
http://no.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diskusjon:Baroniet_Rosendal
Det er løgn og trakassering.
Det er sånn de gjorde i Stalins Sovjet.
Hvis det var noen de var uenige med der, myndighetene, så sa de bare at de var sinnsyke.
Hvis noen kjempet for demokrati f.eks., i Stalins Sovjet, så var det rett på galehuset.
Sånn er det hos Wikipedia Norge også.
Bare at der er det Jeblad som sier at jeg er sinnsyk, av grunner som jeg ikke ønsker å spekulere i.
Dette har allerede vært fram og tilbake, hos de norske adminene.
Så jeg vil gjerne ha dette fra noen i Wiki-systemet.
Og ikke fra en kommentar på bloggen.
For jeg kan liksom ikke referere til en anonym kommentar på bloggen.
Dette må nesten ledelsen i Wikipedia ordne opp i.
Først vil jeg vite hvem som er ansvarlig for hva som står på Wikipedia norsk.
Og det svaret vil jeg ha fra Wiki-systemet selv.
For det er kronglete, å finne ut av det systemet, for vanlige folk.
Hvis jeg sier at den og den er leder for Wikimedia Norge, så sier Wiki bare som Fjell her, at Wikimedia og Wikipedia ikke er det samme.
Og forklarer dette som en nerd, og ikke som en forretningsmann, så det er klin umulig å skjønne noen ting.
Så dette vil jeg gjerne ha svar på, på en formell måte.
Ellers så kommer jeg nok ingen vei mot de ‘kommunistene’ på Wikipedia Norge, eller hva man skal kalle dem.
Noe sånt.
Bare noe jeg tenkte på.
Mvh.
Erik Ribsskog
-
Jeg sendte en ny e-post til the Energy Ombudsman
Gmail – To the ombudsman Dr. Sills/Fwd: To the Superior of Complaints Manager Karen Swindells
Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>
To the ombudsman Dr. Sills/Fwd: To the Superior of Complaints Manager Karen Swindells
Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>
Fri, May 21, 2010 at 11:09 AM
To:
enquiries@energy-ombudsman.org.uk
Hi,now I've received an e-letter from Karen Swindells where she's quoting you.You seem to say, that I want several investigations, but I haven't asked for that.I've just asked for my four complaints not to be jammed together.I think I have a case consisting of four complaints against Scottish Power.Where as you think I have a case consisting of one complaint against Scottish Power.This is where we disagree.Mr. Swindells also quote you in a way that make you seem prejudice, I think.You say you've had a lot of complaints like these against all major electricity-providers.I think you really free Scottish Power already, before the investigation.It seems to me, that you at the Ombudsman think it's ok for companies, to mess with the customer as much as they want, if there is a problem with late payments involved.This I think is uncivilised, if I have understood you right.Also, when I send an e-mail to the superiour of Karen Swindells, then I don't expect to get an answer from Karen Swindells, since I really complain about her.Then I think this is harassment from you, when I still end up getting an answer from Karen Swindells and not her superior.I would have wanted to get an answer from Karen Swindells manager, to make it clear if this is something she says, or her manager says.I think that's really normal standards for organisations to have the person receiving the correspondence, sign the answering-letter.Hope this is alright!Best Regards,Erik Ribsskog———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>Date: Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 5:03 PM
Subject: To the Superior of Complaints Manager Karen Swindells
To: enquiries@energy-ombudsman.org.uk Hi,
I wanted to please complain about your Complaint Manager.I have a _case_ against Scottish Power, which I think consists of five _complaints_.But your organisation says it is a _case_, that consists of one _complaint_ that consists of many _elements_.
I have studied Object Orientation as part of an IT-degree at University-level in Norway, and I think this doesn't add up.It should be one case, that consists of five complaints.You just jam all the complaints together, so that one lose the overview.I wanted to please complain about this.(Also, Swindell, (or 'svindel'), means fraud in Norwegian.Just to joke a bit).But I think this should be one case that consists of five complaints, I think it's irrelevant if all of them were triggered by an occourence or not, since I think that means you think it's ok for a company to treat people bad, if they pay the bill to late, (or something like this).I don't think you or a company have the right to judge me, so I can't agree with this, I think it should be five complaints.I'm looking forward to receiving your updated case, consisting of five complaints, (and 'elements' jamed together).Yours sincerely,Erik Ribsskog
-
Jeg fikk et nytt e-brev fra the Energy Ombudsman
Gmail – Message from Ombudsman Services – Case 551841, Ribsskog
Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>
Message from Ombudsman Services – Case 551841, Ribsskog
The Ombudsman
<enquiries@energy-ombudsman.org.uk>
Thu, May 20, 2010 at 2:29 PM
To:
"eribsskog@gmail.com" <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Please find attached a letter from The Energy Ombudsman.
ADOSca0.pdf
203K
PS.
Her er e-brevet:
-
Jeg sendte en oppdatering til ICE
Gmail – Update/Fwd: Complaint about phoney meeting
Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>
Update/Fwd: Complaint about phoney meeting
Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>
Thu, May 20, 2010 at 3:45 PM
To:
DWP ICE gateway team <ice@dwp.gsi.gov.uk>
Hi,this is an update to the complaint I sent yesterday and earlier today.Best Regards,Erik Ribsskog———- Forwarded message ———-From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, May 20, 2010 at 11:20 AM
Subject: Re: Complaint about phoney meetingTo: CONTACT-US <CONTACT-US@dwp.gsi.gov.uk>
Hi,
my name is Erik Ribsskog, Flat 3, 5 Leather Lane, Liverpool, L2 2AE.
Phone-number should be 0151 236 3298 and date of birth is 25/7/70.Best Regards,Erik Ribsskog
PS.Here are the e-mails I've sent you regarding this:
Hi,I was there today, and spoke with the young woman in her early twenties with glasses and scars from pimples, or something, on her chin, (I couldn't see her ID-card, since it was the wrong way).She gave me a folder to an organisation in Church St.And I went back and asked her if the meeting was in Church St., (since she said the folder was to do with the meeting).But, it turned out the folder wasn't anything to do with the meeting at all, it was just some phoney stuff.So I wanted to complain about this jobcenter-representative.She also said it was a meeting, (next time), to do with that I had been unemployed, for 18 months.But, I can't find anything about an 18 month review-meeting on the net.And I have three ICE-complaints about this jobcenter from before.So I want ICE to deal with this complaint, and explain to me how the Jobcenter can call me in to a phoney meeting like this.So I also sendt this to ICE.Best Regards,
Erik Ribsskog– Hide quoted text –On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 10:28 AM, CONTACT-US <CONTACT-US@dwp.gsi.gov.uk > wrote:Thank you for your email.
Please contact your local Jobcentre or Jobcentre Plus office regarding this query.
You can find the address and telephone number for your local office at:
http://los.direct.gov.uk/
default.aspx?type=1&lang=en Regards
Dane Hurst
Contact us e-mailsJobcentre plus secretariat
—–Original Message—–From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
Sent: 20 May 2010 01:38
To: CONTACT-US
Cc: DWP ICE gateway teamSubject: Complaint about phoney meeting
Hi,
I've got a letter in the post, from the Jobcenter-manager Mrs. Hart, from the Jobcenter at Williamsson Sq., Liverpool, telling me to go to 'an interview', on Thursday 3 June 2010.But I can't find anything on the internet about a 76 week review-meeting.(Only 13 and 26 weeks).And I have three Ice-complaints about 'phoney stuff', from this Job-center, that Ice are slow at investigating.This seems like a phoney meeting to me.It should have been called a 'New Deal'-meeting, as far as I can see, on the Jobcenter website.And New Deal meetings aren't scheduled meetings, as far as I understand it.So I don't think they should have a meeting like this, while three ICE-cases are being investigated againts Mrs. Hart and the Jobcenter Williamsson Sq.I also send this to ICE.Yours sincerely,Erik Ribsskog
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 11:07 AM, CONTACT-US <CONTACT-US@dwp.gsi.gov.uk> wrote:Thank you for your email.
I will need to forward this query to your
local Jobcentre Plus District Manager's office for action.Could you please ‘reply’ to this email with
the following information – your full name, postal address, your telephone
number and your date of birth.Due to the vast amount of emails we
receive, please also attach your original email.Regards
Dane Hurst
Contact us e-mails
Jobcentre plus secretariat
Sent: 20 May 2010 10:45
To:
CONTACT-US
Cc: DWP ICE gateway teamSubject: Re: Complaint
about phoney meetingHi,
I was there today, and spoke with the young woman in her early twenties
with glasses and scars from pimples, or something, on her chin, (I couldn't
see her ID-card, since it was the wrong way).She gave me a folder to an organisation in Church St.And I went back and asked her if the meeting was in Church St., (since
she said the folder was to do with the meeting).But, it turned out the folder wasn't anything to do with the meeting
at all, it was just some phoney stuff.So I wanted to complain about this jobcenter-representative.She also said it was a meeting, (next time), to do with that I had
been unemployed, for 18 months.But, I can't find anything about an 18 month review-meeting on the
net.And I have three ICE-complaints about this jobcenter from before.So I want ICE to deal with this complaint, and explain to me how the
Jobcenter can call me in to a phoney meeting like this.So I also sendt this to ICE.Best Regards,
Erik
RibsskogOn Thu, May 20, 2010 at 10:28 AM, CONTACT-US <CONTACT-US@dwp.gsi.gov.uk>
wrote:Thank you for your email.
Please contact your local Jobcentre or
Jobcentre Plus office regarding this query.You can find the address and telephone
number for your local office at:http://los.direct.gov.uk/
default.aspx?type=1&lang=en
Regards
Dane Hurst
Contact us
e-mails
Jobcentre
plus secretariat—–Original
Message—–
From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]Sent: 20 May 2010 01:38
To: CONTACT-US
Cc:
DWP ICE gateway team
Subject: Complaint about phoney
meetingHi,
I've got a letter in the post, from the Jobcenter-manager Mrs. Hart,
from the Jobcenter at Williamsson Sq., Liverpool, telling me to go to 'an
interview', on Thursday 3 June 2010.But I can't find anything on the internet about a 76 week
review-meeting.(Only 13 and 26 weeks).And I have three Ice-complaints about 'phoney stuff', from this
Job-center, that Ice are slow at investigating.This seems like a phoney meeting to me.It should have been called a 'New Deal'-meeting, as far as I can see,
on the Jobcenter website.And New Deal meetings aren't scheduled meetings, as far as I
understand it.So I don't think they should have a meeting like this, while
three ICE-cases are being investigated againts Mrs. Hart and the Jobcenter
Williamsson Sq.I also send this to ICE.Yours sincerely,Erik Ribsskog******************************
****************************** **********
This document is strictly confidential and is intended only for use by the addressee.
If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or other
action taken in reliance of the information contained in this e-mail is strictly prohibited.
Any views expressed by the sender of this message are not necessarily those of the Department
for Work and Pensions.
If you have received this transmission in error, please use the reply function to tell us
and then permanently delete what you have received.
This email was scanned for viruses by the Department for Work and Pensions' anti-virus services and on leaving the Department was found to be virus free.
Please note: Incoming and outgoing e-mail messages are routinely monitored for compliance
with our policy on the use of electronic communications.
************************************************************ ********** ******************************
****************************** **********
This document is strictly confidential and is intended only for use by the addressee.
If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or other
action taken in reliance of the information contained in this e-mail is strictly prohibited.
Any views expressed by the sender of this message are not necessarily those of the Department
for Work and Pensions.
If you have received this transmission in error, please use the reply function to tell us
and then permanently delete what you have received.
This email was scanned for viruses by the Department for Work and Pensions' anti-virus services and on leaving the Department was found to be virus free.
Please note: Incoming and outgoing e-mail messages are routinely monitored for compliance
with our policy on the use of electronic communications.
************************************************************ **********
img065.jpg
960K
-
Jeg sendte en ny e-post til Jobcenter Plus
Gmail – Complaint about phoney meeting
Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>
Complaint about phoney meeting
Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>
Thu, May 20, 2010 at 11:20 AM
To:
CONTACT-US <CONTACT-US@dwp.gsi.gov.uk>
Hi,my name is Erik Ribsskog, Flat 3, 5 Leather Lane, Liverpool, L2 2AE.Phone-number should be 0151 236 3298 and date of birth is 25/7/70.Best Regards,Erik Ribsskog
PS.Here are the e-mails I've sent you regarding this:
Hi,I was there today, and spoke with the young woman in her early twenties with glasses and scars from pimples, or something, on her chin, (I couldn't see her ID-card, since it was the wrong way).She gave me a folder to an organisation in Church St.And I went back and asked her if the meeting was in Church St., (since she said the folder was to do with the meeting).But, it turned out the folder wasn't anything to do with the meeting at all, it was just some phoney stuff.So I wanted to complain about this jobcenter-representative.She also said it was a meeting, (next time), to do with that I had been unemployed, for 18 months.But, I can't find anything about an 18 month review-meeting on the net.And I have three ICE-complaints about this jobcenter from before.So I want ICE to deal with this complaint, and explain to me how the Jobcenter can call me in to a phoney meeting like this.So I also sendt this to ICE.Best Regards,
Erik Ribsskog– Hide quoted text –
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 10:28 AM, CONTACT-US <CONTACT-US@dwp.gsi.gov.uk > wrote:Thank you for your email.
Please contact your local Jobcentre or Jobcentre Plus office regarding this query.
You can find the address and telephone number for your local office at:
http://los.direct.gov.uk/
default.aspx?type=1&lang=en Regards
Dane Hurst
Contact us e-mailsJobcentre plus secretariat
—–Original Message—–From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
Sent: 20 May 2010 01:38
To: CONTACT-US
Cc: DWP ICE gateway teamSubject: Complaint about phoney meeting
Hi,
I've got a letter in the post, from the Jobcenter-manager Mrs. Hart, from the Jobcenter at Williamsson Sq., Liverpool, telling me to go to 'an interview', on Thursday 3 June 2010.But I can't find anything on the internet about a 76 week review-meeting.(Only 13 and 26 weeks).And I have three Ice-complaints about 'phoney stuff', from this Job-center, that Ice are slow at investigating.This seems like a phoney meeting to me.It should have been called a 'New Deal'-meeting, as far as I can see, on the Jobcenter website.And New Deal meetings aren't scheduled meetings, as far as I understand it.So I don't think they should have a meeting like this, while three ICE-cases are being investigated againts Mrs. Hart and the Jobcenter Williamsson Sq.I also send this to ICE.Yours sincerely,Erik RibsskogOn Thu, May 20, 2010 at 11:07 AM, CONTACT-US <CONTACT-US@dwp.gsi.gov.uk> wrote:Thank you for your email.
I will need to forward this query to your
local Jobcentre Plus District Manager's office for action.Could you please ‘reply’ to this email with
the following information – your full name, postal address, your telephone
number and your date of birth.Due to the vast amount of emails we
receive, please also attach your original email.Regards
Dane Hurst
Contact us e-mails
Jobcentre plus secretariat
Sent: 20 May 2010 10:45
To:
CONTACT-US
Cc: DWP ICE gateway teamSubject: Re: Complaint
about phoney meetingHi,
I was there today, and spoke with the young woman in her early twenties
with glasses and scars from pimples, or something, on her chin, (I couldn't
see her ID-card, since it was the wrong way).She gave me a folder to an organisation in Church St.And I went back and asked her if the meeting was in Church St., (since
she said the folder was to do with the meeting).But, it turned out the folder wasn't anything to do with the meeting
at all, it was just some phoney stuff.So I wanted to complain about this jobcenter-representative.She also said it was a meeting, (next time), to do with that I had
been unemployed, for 18 months.But, I can't find anything about an 18 month review-meeting on the
net.And I have three ICE-complaints about this jobcenter from before.So I want ICE to deal with this complaint, and explain to me how the
Jobcenter can call me in to a phoney meeting like this.So I also sendt this to ICE.Best Regards,
Erik
RibsskogOn Thu, May 20, 2010 at 10:28 AM, CONTACT-US <CONTACT-US@dwp.gsi.gov.uk>
wrote:Thank you for your email.
Please contact your local Jobcentre or
Jobcentre Plus office regarding this query.You can find the address and telephone
number for your local office at:http://los.direct.gov.uk/
default.aspx?type=1&lang=en
Regards
Dane Hurst
Contact us
e-mails
Jobcentre
plus secretariat—–Original
Message—–
From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]Sent: 20 May 2010 01:38
To: CONTACT-US
Cc:
DWP ICE gateway team
Subject: Complaint about phoney
meetingHi,
I've got a letter in the post, from the Jobcenter-manager Mrs. Hart,
from the Jobcenter at Williamsson Sq., Liverpool, telling me to go to 'an
interview', on Thursday 3 June 2010.But I can't find anything on the internet about a 76 week
review-meeting.(Only 13 and 26 weeks).And I have three Ice-complaints about 'phoney stuff', from this
Job-center, that Ice are slow at investigating.This seems like a phoney meeting to me.It should have been called a 'New Deal'-meeting, as far as I can see,
on the Jobcenter website.And New Deal meetings aren't scheduled meetings, as far as I
understand it.So I don't think they should have a meeting like this, while
three ICE-cases are being investigated againts Mrs. Hart and the Jobcenter
Williamsson Sq.I also send this to ICE.Yours sincerely,Erik Ribsskog******************************
****************************** **********
This document is strictly confidential and is intended only for use by the addressee.
If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or other
action taken in reliance of the information contained in this e-mail is strictly prohibited.
Any views expressed by the sender of this message are not necessarily those of the Department
for Work and Pensions.
If you have received this transmission in error, please use the reply function to tell us
and then permanently delete what you have received.
This email was scanned for viruses by the Department for Work and Pensions' anti-virus services and on leaving the Department was found to be virus free.
Please note: Incoming and outgoing e-mail messages are routinely monitored for compliance
with our policy on the use of electronic communications.
************************************************************ ********** ******************************
****************************** **********
This document is strictly confidential and is intended only for use by the addressee.
If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or other
action taken in reliance of the information contained in this e-mail is strictly prohibited.
Any views expressed by the sender of this message are not necessarily those of the Department
for Work and Pensions.
If you have received this transmission in error, please use the reply function to tell us
and then permanently delete what you have received.
This email was scanned for viruses by the Department for Work and Pensions' anti-virus services and on leaving the Department was found to be virus free.
Please note: Incoming and outgoing e-mail messages are routinely monitored for compliance
with our policy on the use of electronic communications.
************************************************************ **********
img065.jpg
960K
PS.
Her er vedlegget:
-
Jeg sendte en ny e-post til ICE
Gmail – Complaint about phoney meeting
Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>
Complaint about phoney meeting
Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>
Thu, May 20, 2010 at 10:45 AM
To:
CONTACT-US <CONTACT-US@dwp.gsi.gov.uk>
Cc:
DWP ICE gateway team <ice@dwp.gsi.gov.uk>
Hi,I was there today, and spoke with the young woman in her early twenties with glasses and scars from pimples, or something, on her chin, (I couldn't see her ID-card, since it was the wrong way).She gave me a folder to an organisation in Church St.And I went back and asked her if the meeting was in Church St., (since she said the folder was to do with the meeting).But, it turned out the folder wasn't anything to do with the meeting at all, it was just some phoney stuff.So I wanted to complain about this jobcenter-representative.She also said it was a meeting, (next time), to do with that I had been unemployed, for 18 months.But, I can't find anything about an 18 month review-meeting on the net.And I have three ICE-complaints about this jobcenter from before.So I want ICE to deal with this complaint, and explain to me how the Jobcenter can call me in to a phoney meeting like this.So I also sendt this to ICE.Best Regards,
Erik RibsskogOn Thu, May 20, 2010 at 10:28 AM, CONTACT-US <CONTACT-US@dwp.gsi.gov.uk> wrote:Thank you for your email.
Please contact your local Jobcentre or
Jobcentre Plus office regarding this query.You can find the address and telephone
number for your local office at:http://los.direct.gov.uk/
default.aspx?type=1&lang=en
Regards
Dane Hurst
Contact us e-mails
Jobcentre plus secretariat
—–Original Message—–
From: Erik Ribsskog
[mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
Sent: 20 May 2010 01:38
To:
CONTACT-US
Cc: DWP ICE gateway team
Subject: Complaint
about phoney meetingHi,
I've got a letter in the post, from the Jobcenter-manager Mrs. Hart, from
the Jobcenter at Williamsson Sq., Liverpool, telling me to go to 'an
interview', on Thursday 3 June 2010.But I can't find anything on the internet about a 76 week
review-meeting.(Only 13 and 26 weeks).And I have three Ice-complaints about 'phoney stuff', from this
Job-center, that Ice are slow at investigating.This seems like a phoney meeting to me.It should have been called a 'New Deal'-meeting, as far as I can see, on
the Jobcenter website.And New Deal meetings aren't scheduled meetings, as far as I
understand it.So I don't think they should have a meeting like this, while three
ICE-cases are being investigated againts Mrs. Hart and the Jobcenter
Williamsson Sq.I also send this to ICE.Yours sincerely,Erik Ribsskog******************************
****************************** **********
This document is strictly confidential and is intended only for use by the addressee.
If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or other
action taken in reliance of the information contained in this e-mail is strictly prohibited.
Any views expressed by the sender of this message are not necessarily those of the Department
for Work and Pensions.
If you have received this transmission in error, please use the reply function to tell us
and then permanently delete what you have received.
This email was scanned for viruses by the Department for Work and Pensions' anti-virus services and on leaving the Department was found to be virus free.
Please note: Incoming and outgoing e-mail messages are routinely monitored for compliance
with our policy on the use of electronic communications.
************************************************************ **********
-
Jeg sendte en ny e-post til JET
Gmail – Course in Web-design/Fwd: Complaint/Fwd: Reminder/Fwd: Update/Fwd: Complaint <<#22175-33652#>>
Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>
Course in Web-design/Fwd: Complaint/Fwd: Reminder/Fwd: Update/Fwd: Complaint <<#22175-33652#>>
Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>
Thu, May 20, 2010 at 3:16 AM
To:
Lorraine.Elliott@liverpool.gov.uk
Hi,I was a bit stressed, when I went to JET last year, because I was at the dentist, right before I went to your office.What Working Links said, was that if I wanted to go to an IT course, with Liverpool Community College, then maybe JET could help me found the course, or send me to an organisation that could.But I ended up a course in Food Hygiene and not IT.This must have been because I had an ache in my tooth, so I was a bit stressed, in my initial meeting, unfortunatly, and since I had to go to the dentist every week, and I had a bad tooth-ache from this.But now I was wondering about the IT-course.Is it possible, like Working Links said, that Jet could help me found e.g. a course in Web-design, at Liverpool Community College?Thank you very much in advance for any help!Yours sincerely,Erik Ribsskog———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>Date: Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 4:23 PM
Subject: Re: Complaint/Fwd: Reminder/Fwd: Update/Fwd: Complaint <<#22175-33652#>>
To: "Elliott, Lorraine" <Lorraine.Elliott@liverpool.gov.uk >Hi,
thank you very much for you e-mail!But as I remember it, a Jet person-called, saying she was you, and just said a sentence, and then hang up.About that I wanted to cancel the course.But they just hang up, when I started asking about when the next course was.I thought it was strange, that they would use your name.Since I called up JET again, and then I got to hear, that the person that had called, (Lorraine), was on annual leave.Also, this course was almost two months ago, (24. November), and I haven't received a certificate, or feedback from the test yet, even if I think must have gotten most of the answers right.But my complaint is really that your staff shouldn't be ignorant while taking calls, like they were, in the first call, that JET called back to me, after I discovered, that my Landlord, was coming here, on the same date, as the JET-course.So I think there's room for improvement, when it comes to manners, (with not being ignorant to what people are saying), with JET-staff, unfortunatly.Yours sincerely,Erik RibsskogOn Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Elliott, Lorraine <Lorraine.Elliott@liverpool.gov.uk > wrote:Dear Mr Ribsskog,
Further to our recent telephone conversations regarding your
complaint, I am writing to express my disappointment that you are dissatisfied
with our service and endeavour to respond to your complaint. The JET
service prides itself on its professional approach to helping people in our
communities gain work, education and training and our staff are dedicated to
the work that we do.You were first registered with the JET on the 7th
October in our JET Atlantic office in Walton when Working Links referred you to
JET Atlantic so that you could gain the Basic
Food Hygiene qualification. The way our service works is by appointing a
dedicated officer at the most convenient office, in order to ensure continuity and
a better understanding of our clients and the best possible service.A discretionary grant was arranged by your guidance officer,
Claire Walsh, in order to fund your place on the Food Hygiene course and you
were booked onto the course due to start on the 26th October. When you
called to cancel your attendance, you called and spoke to me at the JET in the Job
Bank on Tunnel Road
where we deliver the courses. I thanked you for letting me know and took
your details and said a member of staff would contact you to inform you when
the next course was due to start and arrange to re-book your place.As I mentioned when I spoke to you last week, I didn’t
call you after that, but my administrative officer, Joanne Quinn, at my
request, called to confirm that you were no longer attending the course and to
let you know that you would be informed when a further course was due to take
place. I am sorry if you felt that she hung up, but I am sure that this
wasn’t intentional, since she recorded the fact that you wished to attend
the next course, as I had informed her originally.On several occasions early in November, staff called you to keep
you informed that we were still awaiting details of the next course and on 24th
November you successfully attended the course.Because we dedicate officers to every registered client, as
a new client it was necessary for you to meet with your appointed guidance
officer, Claire Walsh, in order to confirm your place and grant funding for the
new course and update your details and support required. I am sorry if
this proved inconvenient, but one office holds all of your records for grant and
tracking purposes. However, if you wish to do job searches you can visit
any JET office in the city. If you wish to change your preferred JET
office and guidance officer to a more convenient location for you, this can be
arranged.I do hope that this serves as a satisfactory response to
your complaint and we can continue to work together to ensure that you are able
to pursue your desired career plan.Yours sincerely,
Lorraine
Elliott (Nee Hammond)JET
ManagerLiverpool East JET Service
Neighbourhood Employment Services
Job Bank
4 Tunnel Road
Liverpool
L7 6QD
0151 233 6177
0151 233 6117
07834 843648
2010
Year of Health and Wellbeingwww.2010healthandwellbeing.
org.uk From:
Liverpool Direct [mailto:Liverpool.Direct@liverpool.gov.uk ]Sent: 07 January 2010 12:18
To: JET
Subject: Re: Complaint/Fwd: Reminder/Fwd:
Update/Fwd: Complaint <<#22175-33652#>>Your unique reference number is: 33652
Please include your unique reference number in all email
communication.Dear Colleague,
Please could you assist
with the following enquiry, and then respond directly to the customer.Yours Sincerely
Liverpool Direct
liverpool.direct@liverpool.
gov.uk Liverpool's Year of the Environment 2009 – Our city Our planet www.ourcityourplanet.org.uk
P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.
Thank youWould you prefer to
receive your council tax bill via e-mail? Go to www.liverpool.gov.uk and complete the
easy online registration form.— Original Message —
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Received: 05/01/10 10:36:54 o'clock GMT
To: Liverpool Direct <liverpool.direct@liverpool.
gov.uk >Subject: Complaint/Fwd: Reminder/Fwd: Update/Fwd: Complaint
Hi,
I can't get JET to answer my e-mails, so I thought I could try to
complain about them to the Council.Yours sincerely,
Erik Ribsskog
———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 8:25 PM
Subject: Reminder/Fwd: Update/Fwd: Complaint
Hi,
I can't see that I've recieved an answer to this e-mail, so I'm sending
a reminder about this.Best regards,
Erik Ribsskog
———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 5:46 PM
Subject: Update/Fwd: Complaint
Hi,
I got a call from Neo today, about that you were going to put me on the next
course now, in 'Basic Food Hygiene'.But I haven't got an answer, to my complaint with you, why did your
representative call me, on her holyday from work?And why do one of your representatives tell me that I have to go to
Jet, to change the course-date, when your call today shows that this isn't
right?Best regards,
Erik Ribsskog
———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 8:21 PM
Subject: Complaint
Hi,
I called on Tuesday, regarding a 'Basic Food Hygenie'-course, that Walton Jet
put me on, after I was sent to Jet, from Working Links.I found out, when I got your letter, that the course crashed with
another appointment I have at 3 pm, on Monday.So I called, and spoke with Lorraine.
She was going to get someone to call me back, since I wanted to be put on the
next course.Then she called me today, just to tell me that she took me off the
list.And then she hang up, without listening to what I was saying, that I wanted to
be put on the next course.So then I called Jet up, and spoke with Kate, who told me that Lorraine was on annual
leave, and that I had to go to the Jet office, to re-sign on the next course.But why did Lorraine
call me, when she was on annual leave?I've been having some problems with some communist-mob, or something, in Norway,
is this something to do with this?Thanks in advance for help in advance, regarding finding out what's been going
on!Yours sincerely,
Erik Ribsskog
______________________________
______________________________ __________ This email has been automatically scanned for viruses and malicious content by
MessageLabs for your protection______________________________
______________________________ __________ —— Please do not remove your unique tracking number ——
<<#22175-33652#>>
______________________________
______________________________ __________ DISCLAIMER:
The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be read, copied or used only by the intended recipient(s). If you have received it in error please contact the sender immediately by returning the e-mail or by telephoning a number contained in the body of the e-mail then and please delete the e-mail without disclosing its contents elsewhere. No responsibility is accepted for loss or damage arising from viruses or changes made to this message after it was sent. The views contained in this email are those of the author and not necessarily those of the author’s employer or service provider.
This email has been automatically scanned for viruses and malicious content by MessageLabs for your protection
______________________________
______________________________ __________