johncons

Stikkord: E-post

  • Jeg sendte en e-post til Sivilombudsmannen angående hvor lang tid, som man burde vente, før man sender purring, til forvaltningen, pga. manglende svar







    Google Mail – Spørsmål om hvor lang tid man bør vente, med å sende purring, når man ikke mottar svar fra forvaltningen







    Google Mail



    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>




    Spørsmål om hvor lang tid man bør vente, med å sende purring, når man ikke mottar svar fra forvaltningen





    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>





    Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 10:24 AM





    To:

    postmottak@sivilombudsmannen.no



    Hei,

    jeg har vært i kontakt med dere tidligere, angående en sak, hvor Ambassaden i London, ikke
    svarte på mine henvendelser.
    Dere sa at det var iorden, siden UD tilslutt svarte.

    Men, jeg ser jo på nettsidene deres, at dere har uttalelser, fra visse saker.
    Så lurte jeg på, om hvorfor dere ikke har noen uttalelse der, fra min sak.
    Jeg leste uttalelsen deres, i forbindelse med saken som involverte pasientombudet. Og der,

    så la Sivilombudsmannen vekt på, at helse Sør, til slutt beklaget, at de ikke hadde svart,
    på 15 måneder.
    Men, i saken min, så har jo ikke ambassaden beklaget enda, de har jo ikke engang svart

    meg, eller noe som helst, enda dere har bedt dem om det.
    Hvorfor tar dere hensyn til beklagelser i pasientombud-saken, men ikke i min sak, dere
    sa at det var greit, så lenge UD svarte, men jeg har jo ikke fått noe beklagelse fra

    ambassaden.
    Her lukter det forskjellsbehandling fra Sivilombudsmannen, vil jeg si.
    Til sist, så var grunnen til at jeg søkte på nettet, det var hvor lang tid, som man bør la
    forvaltningen ha, før man sender en purring, for manglende svar.

    (For jeg blir fortsatt tullet med over hele linja fra forvaltningen i Norge).
    Så jeg kunne tenkt å ha en tommelfingerregel, på hvor lenge man bør vente, før man
    sender en purring, på manglende svar, til forvaltningen.

    Dette høres kanskje bagatellmessig ut, og høres kanskje ikke ut som en grunn, til å
    kontakte dere, men nå er det så mange saker, hvor jeg blir tullet med av myndighetene,
    så nå må jeg prøve å få litt struktur inn i dette og litt rutiner, må man vel kalle det.

    Det virker som at det er en slags mafia innen offentlig forvaltning som driver å motarbeider
    meg her, bare se mine tidligere klager, som jeg har sendt dere.
    Om dere kan se disse i sammenheng.

    Så håper jeg at dere har mulighet til å svare på disse spørsmålene!
    Mvh.
    Erik Ribsskog






  • Jeg sendte en anmeldelse av the Financial Ombudsman, til politiet i Oslo, siden politiet i England også tuller med meg







    Google Mail – Anmeldelse av trakassering fra the Financial Ombudsman, i England/Fwd: Advice about how to deal with employment-cases/Fwd: Reminder/Fwd: The Finacial Ombudsman, using staff as slaves/Fwd: Complaint against RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mail







    Google Mail



    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>




    Anmeldelse av trakassering fra the Financial Ombudsman, i England/Fwd: Advice about how to deal with employment-cases/Fwd: Reminder/Fwd: The Finacial Ombudsman, using staff as slaves/Fwd: Complaint against RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mail





    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>





    Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 4:24 AM





    To:

    post.oslo@politiet.no



    Hei,

    i forretningsverdenen, så er det regler for når brev og e-poster skal sendes, i forbindelse med
    svartid og lover og slikt.
    Korrespondanse, fra the Financial Ombudsman, i England, til meg, regnes som forretnings-

    korrespondase.
    Og dette skal da foregå innenfor vanlig kontortid, etter vanlig og kjent praksis.
    Men jeg blir trakassert av the Financial Ombudsman.
    De sender meg e-poster, klokken 6 om morgenen, på søndager.

    Det er helt latterlig, hvem vil ha e-poster om bankklager da?
    Dette er tydlig en organisert mobbing av meg fra mafia i offentlig forvaltning.
    Som jeg tenker at dere hos politiet i Oslo også er med i, siden dere aldri gjøre noe,

    enda jeg har sendt dere utallige slike og lignende anmeldelser nå.
    Så ønsker the Financial Ombudsman tiltalt og straffet, (jeg vet at jeg burde ha sendt
    det til England, men politiet her tuller med meg og, pluss ambassaden i London,

    så jeg vet ikke hvem andre jeg skal sende det til).
    Så får dere ha lykke til med dette!
    Mvh.
    Erik Ribsskog

    ———- Forwarded message ———-

    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
    Date: Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 3:43 AM
    Subject: Advice about how to deal with employment-cases/Fwd: Reminder/Fwd: The Finacial Ombudsman, using staff as slaves/Fwd: Complaint against RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mail

    To: manchesterevents@acas.org.uk

    Hi,

    I looked at the ACAS website now, and saw that you were the ones to contact for problems in the North-West.

    I'm a Norwegian citizen, who lives in Liverpool, so I've understood that the North-West office, is the right office,

    for me to contact then, if I'm not mistaking.
    I have an employment-case, against Arvato, where I worked, in 2005 and 2006, where it was a lot of bullying,
    from managers, towards me, (and also others, but me in particular, I think), and I've also un-covered, that

    they were using illigal employment-methods, the team-leaders there, when they were screaming commands
    across the tables there, in the Cunard Building.
    (They were trained to do this screaming, which they called reinforcement, but really was punishment, I've

    understood later).
    I have a link to the employment-case, (which consists of a lot of documents), on this online publishing-
    site:

    I've tried, since 2006, to find a law-firm, to help me with this case, because I think it's unworthy, for people
    to be treated, like I was treated, at Arvato, and I also lost my job there, since I was contstructivly dismissed,

    I have to say, when I tried to bring the problems there up with the higher management.
    But I can get any law-firms to help, since they say the case is to complex, since I also brought in the Police,

    since I thought it was much bullying, that it was a crime, and one law-firm, Moorcrofts, where messing with
    me, I think I have to say, so I've also brought in the Law Society, who also messed with me, I think I have

    to say, and also ditto with the Legal Services Ombudsman.
    So I try to get advice on how to deal with this.
    I think it's to serious problems, to bring up in a Work Trial, it should be dealt with in the court, I think.

    It might seem strange, that I'm asking for advice, about a case from 2006, but I have been working with
    this case, continously, since then, so it still be an up and running case, so to speak.

    Other than this, I'm also trying to get advice about the problems with the Financial Ombudsman.

    They have put a woman there, to work, with sending e-mails etc, on 6 am, on Sunday mornings!!
    I'm a bit worried that this woman is being used as a slave there, and she obviously has been working
    so much, that she has lost a bit of her judgement, since she's emailing bank-complaint e-mails,

    to people, while people in the UK are still on their way home from the pub.
    People want their Sundays off from Bank-complaints, and things like that, so I think I was harassed
    by the Financial Ombudsman, and I fear for how they treat their staff there, since I've been working

    as a food shop manager, in Norway, for ten years, from 1994 to 2004, then I automatically thinks
    about this perspective, how on earth are the Financial Ombudsman treating their staff, so I wanted

    ACAS to have a look at that, that the people working for the Financial Ombudsman, aren't being
    used as slaves etc., like it can seem a bit to me.
    I hope that you can help me with these cases!

    Yours sincerely,
    Erik Ribsskog

    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: Natalie Bodden <NBodden@ecgroup.co.uk>

    Date: Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 9:42 AM
    Subject: RE: Reminder/Fwd: The Finacial Ombudsman, using staff as slaves/Fwd: Complaint against RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mail
    To: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

    Unfortunately we are unable to advice on this query via

    email; this facility is solely for ordering hard copy Acas publications. Please

    call the Acas helpline on 08457 47 47 47

    to speak to a trained advisor.

    Alternatively, please visit the Acas website at www.acas.org.uk,

    there

    is a search option on the homepage where you may type in key words. This

    search will bring up all publications that cover this subject. The website will

    list the publications available and all prices (although some are free). From

    there, you can order through the website using a credit card (if you are

    ordering priced publications) or, you can e-mail me with the stock codes,

    quantities and a delivery address. I will order the publications for you the

    same day.

    Kind regards,

    Natalie Bodden

    Account Executive

    +44 (0) 20 8867 3324

    nbodden@ecgroup.co.uk

    www.ecgroup.co.uk

    —–Original Message—–

    From: Erik Ribsskog

    [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

    Sent: 23 July 2009 22:27

    To: ACAS-01

    Subject: Reminder/Fwd: The

    Finacial Ombudsman, using staff as slaves/Fwd: Complaint against RBS/Fwd:

    Earlier e-mail

    Hi,

    I can't see that I've received an answer to this e-mail yet, so I'm sending you

    this reminder.

    Best Regards,

    Erik Ribsskog

    ———- Forwarded

    message ———-

    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

    Date: Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 4:48 PM

    Subject: The Finacial Ombudsman, using staff as slaves/Fwd: Complaint against

    RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mail

    To: acas@eclogistics.co.uk

    Hi,

    I've contacted you

    earlier, about that I was being used as a slave, and that

    they had illigal

    management methods, at Bertelsmanns Scand. Microsoft-activation,

    in Liverpool.

    Now, people at the

    Financial Ombudsman, are also being used as slaves, it seems.

    Or this could be connected with a cover-up, of the Bertelsmann/Microsoft-case,

    that

    I am being bullied by

    Government, to cover up what went on there.

    Please send this e-mail

    to the right people in Acas.

    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

    ———- Forwarded

    message ———-

    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

    Date: Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 4:31 PM

    Subject: Re: Complaint against RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mail

    To: "Collins, Jackie" <jackie.collins@financial-ombudsman.org.uk>

    Hi,

    Monday to Friday, 8 am to

    6 pm, is alright, I think.

    But you also let your staff work Sunday mornings, at 6 am.

    It seems to me that you

    overload your representatives with work, and that they have to

    work 12 to 14 hours 7

    days a week.

    I thought slavery was

    forbidden in our time.

    Why do you let your

    representatives work every Sunday morning, when other people in

    England are on their way

    home from the pub?

    Do your staff get

    summer-holiday at all?

    Sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

    On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at

    9:54 AM, Collins, Jackie <jackie.collins@financial-ombudsman.org.uk>

    wrote:

    Dear Mr

    Ribsskog

    We

    always try to provide the best service we can to our customers, and sometimes

    that means offering our staff the option of working overtime during very busy

    periods.

    Please

    be assured that they have to work within strict time guidelines, and these are

    always checked by Operations Managers to ensure they are not working too many

    hours.

    The

    service our department offers is outside of the usual office hours of 9am

    till 5pm because we have found that a lot of our customers have difficulties

    contacting us whilst they are at work themselves during the 9am to 5pm times,

    so we have opening hours of 8am – 6pm, as do many firms these days.

    I hope this

    explains.

    Regards

    Jackie Collins

    Operations

    Manager

    Direct

    Dial : 020 7964 0116

    Direct

    Fax: 020 7964 0117




    From: Erik

    Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

    Sent: 29 June

    2009 19:32

    To: Collins, Jackie

    Subject: Re: Complaint against

    RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mail

    Ok,

    that sound very fine!

    But, why is that you let

    your representatives work over-time every Sunday then?

    Shouldn't you as a main rule conduct your business, within the business hours?

    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

    On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at

    3:50 PM, Collins, Jackie <jackie.collins@financial-ombudsman.org.uk>

    wrote:

    Dear Mr

    Ribsskog

    Rosemary

    Cox has passed your complaint to me to take over as you have requested that she

    no longer deals with your case.

    I can

    confirmed that a letter has been sent to the firm, and we have asked that they issue

    you with a final response letter within 14 days. We have also asked them

    to copy us in on that response.

    If you

    remain unhappy with the firms response, or you have not received a response

    from them within 14 days, please let me know and I will arrange for your

    complaint to be moved forward for investigation by an Adjudicator.

    Regards

    Jackie Collins

    Operations

    Manager

    Direct

    Dial : 020 7964 0116

    Direct

    Fax: 020 7964 0117




    From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

    Sent: 28 June 2009 11:17

    To: Cox, Rosemary

    Subject: Re: Complaint against

    RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mail

    Hi,

    I don't think it's any

    use with me repeating myself.

    I don't think you should

    handle my complaint.

    The reason is, that if you are to overworked, you get to tired.

    And in dealing with

    complaints like these, one obviously needs ones judgement, to be like

    it should be.

    If one are out of balance, like I think you could be, then I don't think this

    is good for how the

    complaint is being dealt

    with.

    So please do as I ask Mrs .Cox, and tell your manager what I said, that I want

    someone else

    to deal with my

    complaint, due to that I think that you must be overworked.

    Haven't you seen how fine the weather is today, you should have a day off in

    the fine weather,

    I think.

    Sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

    On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at

    11:10 AM, Cox, Rosemary <Rosemary.Cox@financial-ombudsman.org.uk>

    wrote:

    Dear Mr Ribsskog

    Thank you for your

    e-mails

    As previously advised I

    am not going to debate with you the working hours of this office.

    I have written to you

    today to advise the steps we are taking with your complaint. If the firm fail

    to resolve the situation for you, your complaint will be passed onto our

    adjudication area for further consideration of the concerns you have raised.

    I should add that we do

    not tolerate rude or insulting language at this office, and would expect any

    further communication to be sent in a more acceptable manner.

    Kind Regards

    Rose Cox

    team manager




    From: Erik

    Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

    Sent: 28 June

    2009 10:43

    To: Cox, Rosemary

    Subject: Re: Complaint against

    RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mail

    Hi,

    of course you can work on

    Sundays if you want.

    But business e-mails should just be sent within the business-hours.

    Or else, what's going to happen, is obvious.

    Someone are going to come drunk home from town, and answer the business-e-mails

    when they are drunk, which is what has happened today, with our correspondence.

    If this is something, you didn't know from before, then I think this Financial

    Ombudsman-stuff is just a load of crap really.

    Try to use the head that

    God gave you when you were born!

    Sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

    On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at

    10:33 AM, Cox, Rosemary <Rosemary.Cox@financial-ombudsman.org.uk>

    wrote:

    Dear Mr

    Ribsskog

    Thank

    you for your e-mail

    I must

    admit to being surprised and confused with the content of the e-mail.

    We are

    an extremely busy department and we often work at the weekends, this is

    obviously of help to consumers as we are able to deal with their

    complaints in a more timely manner. I would suggest that It is entirely

    up to each individual business to determine which hours their staff will work

    and I do not intend debating this with you.

    By

    working this weekend I have been able to deal with your complaint, which as you

    can appreciate is of a benefit to you.

    Perhaps

    you can clarify the spelling mistakes you are referring to?

    Kind

    Regards

    Rose Cox

    team

    manager




    From: Erik

    Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

    Sent: 28 June

    2009 10:20

    Subject: Re: Complaint against

    RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mail

    Hi again,

    don't you think it's

    strange for an institutions like yours to send e-mails on Sunday mornings then?

    Shouldn't e-mails be sent within normal business hours then you think?

    This is what it says on

    Wikipedia:

    In

    the United States and United Kingdom, the hours between

    9 am and 5 pm are typically considered to be

    standard business hours

    I think

    this is rather akward, as I also think your spelling-mistakes are.

    Sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

    On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at

    8:06 AM, Cox, Rosemary <Rosemary.Cox@financial-ombudsman.org.uk>

    wrote:

    Dear Mr

    Ribsskog

    Thank

    you for your e-mail

    That's

    no problem, however I should point out that we are not a government department,

    we are a independent complaints body.

    I will

    be in touch with your again in the next few days

    Kind

    Regards

    Rose Cox

    team

    manager




    From: Erik

    Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

    Sent: 28 June

    2009 08:02

    To: Cox, Rosemary

    Subject: Re: Complaint against

    RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mail

    Hi,

    ok that's very fine, I'm

    just home from town you see.

    I thought it was a bit strange, since noone in Government in Norway, work on

    Sundays.

    Sorry about this, I forget sometimes that I'm not in Norway any longer.

    Sorry about this!

    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

    On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at

    7:54 AM, Cox, Rosemary <Rosemary.Cox@financial-ombudsman.org.uk>

    wrote:

    Dear Mr

    Ribsskog

    Thank

    you for your e-mail

    I can

    assure you this is not a joke, I am currently in the office working today.

    I

    presume that you would like us to deal with your complaint, so am responding to

    your e-mails today

    Kind

    Regards

    Rose Cox

    team

    manager




    From: Erik

    Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

    Sent: 28 June 2009 07:36

    To: Cox, Rosemary

    Subject: Re: Complaint against

    RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mail

    Hi,

    why do send the e-mails

    early on a Sunday morning, by the way.

    Is this some kind of joke?

    Sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

    On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at

    7:33 AM, Cox, Rosemary <Rosemary.Cox@financial-ombudsman.org.uk>

    wrote:

    Dear Mr

    Ribsskog

    Thank

    you for your e-mails

    I will

    contact you again once I have considered the information.

    Kind

    Regards

    Rose Cox

    team

    manager




    From: Erik

    Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

    Sent: 27 June 2009 14:59

    To: Cox, Rosemary

    Subject: Complaint against

    RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mail

    Hi,

    thank you for you e-mail,

    that I recieved today.

    I'll contact your collegue back, regarding the Barclays-complaint.

    I sent the complaint on

    RBS Dale St., to Yvonne Williams at RBS, but she

    also harassed me, like

    this, she writes 'Dear Ms Ribsskog', even if my name

    is Erik, and in Britain,

    you have a movie called 'Erik the Viking', and Eric is

    also a quite usual name,

    in English-speaking countries.

    So I think Yvonne Williams, the complaint-investigator, also bullied me.

    I think this must have

    been a deliberate mistake.

    This ended with the

    complaint being partly resolved, in the way that RBS,

    gave me the bonus of

    £100, for moving my account to them, from Barclays,

    (who I also had problems

    with, that I'll exlain about to your collegue, like I

    mentioned earlier).

    I'll also find the actual complaint against RBS Dale St. now, and forward it

    to you.

    What I meant with the complaint-form, was that it didn't look anything at all

    like the ones you've sent

    me now.

    Maybe the complaint-form I was sent, was to do with other financial

    institutions,

    than banks?

    Like share-fonds etc?

    Have you also got other

    complaint-forms, other than to banks, perhaps someone

    sent me the wrong form

    intentionally?

    Just a thought I had.

    But anyway, thank you very much for your e-mail, and I'll also find the actual

    RBS Dale St. complaint,

    and e-mail it to you now.

    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

    ———-

    Forwarded message ———-

    From: Williams, Yvonne (CRU) <Yvonne.Williams@rbs.co.uk>

    Date: Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 4:30 PM

    Subject: RE: Earlier e-mail

    To: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

    Dear Ms

    Ribsskog

    Could

    you please arrange another copy of your email to be sent to me for my

    investigation

    Regards

    Yvonne

    Williams




    From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

    Sent: 19 June 2007 14:04

    To: Williams, Yvonne (CRU)

    Subject: Earlier e-mail

    ***

    WARNING : This message originates from the Internet ***

    Hi,

    I'm refering to the

    e-mail I sent you on 5/6.

    I was just wondering if

    you have recieved this e-mail, because I cant see

    that I have recieved any

    answer to it yet.

    Please just contact me if

    you want me to send you the e-mail again.

    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

    The Royal Bank of Scotland plc, Registered in

    Scotland No. 90312. Registered Office: 36 St Andrew Square, Edinburgh EH2 2YB

    Authorised and regulated by the Financial

    Services Authority.

    This e-mail message is confidential and for use

    by the addressee only. If the message is received by anyone other than the

    addressee, please return the message to the sender by replying to it and then

    delete the message from your computer. Internet e-mails are not necessarily

    secure. The Royal Bank of Scotland plc does not accept responsibility for

    changes made to this message after it was sent.

    Whilst all reasonable care has been taken to

    avoid the transmission of viruses, it is the responsibility of the recipient to

    ensure that the onward transmission, opening or use of this message and any

    attachments will not adversely affect its systems or data. No responsibility is

    accepted by The Royal Bank of Scotland plc in this regard and the recipient

    should carry out such virus and other checks as it considers appropriate.




    This e-mail and any attachments are

    confidential and may be subject to legal privilege. If you are not the intended

    recipient, please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail and any

    attachment from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you must not

    copy, disclose or take any action in reliance to it.

    This e-mail and any attachments have been checked by

    virus detection software before transmission. You should carry out your own

    virus checks on the contents of this communication. We accept no liability for

    any loss or damage which may be caused by software viruses or by interception

    or interruption of this mail.

    Unless otherwise indicated, this e-mail has no

    contractual effect and may only be used for the purpose(s) indicated in it. The

    statements and opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the author and do

    not necessarily reflect those of the Financial Ombudsman Service Ltd.

    This email has originated from the Financial Ombudsman

    Service Ltd. South Quay Plaza, 183 Marsh Wall, London E14 9SR, United Kingdom.

    Registered as a limited company in England and Wales No. 3725015. Registered

    office as above.







    This e-mail and any attachments are

    confidential and may be subject to legal privilege. If you are not the intended

    recipient, please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail and any

    attachment from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you must not

    copy, disclose or take any action in reliance to it.

    This e-mail and any attachments have been checked by

    virus detection software before transmission. You should carry out your own

    virus checks on the contents of this communication. We accept no liability for

    any loss or damage which may be caused by software viruses or by interception

    or interruption of this mail.

    Unless otherwise indicated, this e-mail has no

    contractual effect and may only be used for the purpose(s) indicated in it. The

    statements and opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the author and do

    not necessarily reflect those of the Financial Ombudsman Service Ltd.

    This email has originated from the Financial

    Ombudsman Service Ltd. South Quay Plaza, 183 Marsh Wall, London E14 9SR, United

    Kingdom. Registered as a limited company in England and Wales No. 3725015.

    Registered office as above.







    This e-mail and any attachments are

    confidential and may be subject to legal privilege. If you are not the intended

    recipient, please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail and any

    attachment from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you must not

    copy, disclose or take any action in reliance to it.

    This e-mail and any attachments have been checked by

    virus detection software before transmission. You should carry out your own

    virus checks on the contents of this communication. We accept no liability for

    any loss or damage which may be caused by software viruses or by interception

    or interruption of this mail.

    Unless otherwise indicated, this e-mail has no

    contractual effect and may only be used for the purpose(s) indicated in it. The

    statements and opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the author and do

    not necessarily reflect those of the Financial Ombudsman Service Ltd.

    This email has originated from the Financial

    Ombudsman Service Ltd. South Quay Plaza, 183 Marsh Wall, London E14 9SR, United

    Kingdom. Registered as a limited company in England and Wales No. 3725015.

    Registered office as above.







    This e-mail and any attachments are

    confidential and may be subject to legal privilege. If you are not the intended

    recipient, please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail and any

    attachment from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you must not

    copy, disclose or take any action in reliance to it.

    This e-mail and any attachments have been checked by

    virus detection software before transmission. You should carry out your own

    virus checks on the contents of this communication. We accept no liability for

    any loss or damage which may be caused by software viruses or by interception

    or interruption of this mail.

    Unless otherwise indicated, this e-mail has no

    contractual effect and may only be used for the purpose(s) indicated in it. The

    statements and opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the author and do

    not necessarily reflect those of the Financial Ombudsman Service Ltd.

    This email has originated from the Financial

    Ombudsman Service Ltd. South Quay Plaza, 183 Marsh Wall, London E14 9SR, United

    Kingdom. Registered as a limited company in England and Wales No. 3725015.

    Registered office as above.







    This e-mail and any attachments are

    confidential and may be subject to legal privilege. If you are not the intended

    recipient, please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail and any

    attachment from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you must not

    copy, disclose or take any action in reliance to it.

    This e-mail and any attachments have been checked by

    virus detection software before transmission. You should carry out your own

    virus checks on the contents of this communication. We accept no liability for

    any loss or damage which may be caused by software viruses or by interception

    or interruption of this mail.

    Unless otherwise indicated, this e-mail has no

    contractual effect and may only be used for the purpose(s) indicated in it. The

    statements and opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the author and do

    not necessarily reflect those of the Financial Ombudsman Service Ltd.

    This email has originated from the Financial

    Ombudsman Service Ltd. South Quay Plaza, 183 Marsh Wall, London E14 9SR, United

    Kingdom. Registered as a limited company in England and Wales No. 3725015.

    Registered office as above.







    This e-mail and any attachments are

    confidential and may be subject to legal privilege. If you are not the intended

    recipient, please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail and any

    attachment from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you must not

    copy, disclose or take any action in reliance to it.

    This e-mail and any attachments have been checked by

    virus detection software before transmission. You should carry out your own

    virus checks on the contents of this communication. We accept no liability for

    any loss or damage which may be caused by software viruses or by interception

    or interruption of this mail.

    Unless otherwise indicated, this e-mail has no

    contractual effect and may only be used for the purpose(s) indicated in it. The

    statements and opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the author and do

    not necessarily reflect those of the Financial Ombudsman Service Ltd.

    This email has originated from the Financial

    Ombudsman Service Ltd. South Quay Plaza, 183 Marsh Wall, London E14 9SR, United

    Kingdom. Registered as a limited company in England and Wales No. 3725015.

    Registered office as above.







    This e-mail and any attachments are

    confidential and may be subject to legal privilege. If you are not the intended

    recipient, please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail and any

    attachment from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you must not

    copy, disclose or take any action in reliance to it.

    This e-mail and any attachments have been checked by

    virus detection software before transmission. You should carry out your own

    virus checks on the contents of this communication. We accept no liability for

    any loss or damage which may be caused by software viruses or by interception

    or interruption of this mail.

    Unless otherwise indicated, this e-mail has no

    contractual effect and may only be used for the purpose(s) indicated in it. The

    statements and opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the author and do

    not necessarily reflect those of the Financial Ombudsman Service Ltd.

    This email has originated from the Financial

    Ombudsman Service Ltd. South Quay Plaza, 183 Marsh Wall, London E14 9SR, United

    Kingdom. Registered as a limited company in England and Wales No. 3725015.

    Registered office as above.







    This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and

    intended solely for the addressee. Any unauthorised use is strictly

    prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the

    sender immediately and delete the email and any attachments. Any views

    or opinions expressed or presented in this email are those of the

    author(s) and may not necessarily represent those of EC Group and no

    representation is given nor liability accepted for the accuracy or

    completeness of any information. EC Group takes care to protect its

    systems from virus attacks and other harmful events but gives no

    warranty that this message (including attachments) is free of any virus

    or other harmful matter, and accepts no responsibility for any loss or

    damage resulting from the recipient receiving, opening or using it.

    EC Group is the trading name of E.Christian & Co Ltd. Registered Office:

    Swallowfield Way, Hayes, Middlesex, UB3 1DQ. Registered in England

    number 463298






    2 attachments

    img016.jpg
    1701K
    img017.jpg
    1152K




  • Jeg sendte en klage på ICE







    Google Mail – Complaint about ICE, to Complaints Manager







    Google Mail



    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>




    Complaint about ICE, to Complaints Manager





    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>





    Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 12:26 PM





    To:

    DWP ICE gateway team <ice@dwp.gsi.gov.uk>



    ICE Ref: DWP00408/09

    Hi,
    I got your letter today, with the date 3. august.
    You write, that if I haven't got a response, to my jobcenter-complaint, within 5 weeks,

    then I should contact you again.
    But, I sent the compaint in May, so this is already more than five weeks ago, and I haven't
    received a response yet, from the jobcenter, which I informed you about, in my e-mail from

    24/7, then it was already gone TWO MONTHS, when I sent you the e-mail.
    How can you fail to understand that two months are more than five weeks?
    This is ridiculus, how can people trust you, if you act in a 'moronic' way like this?

    Please clean up this now!
    Sincerely,
    Erik Ribsskog






  • Lindorff inkasso begynner å plage meg nå. Sånn er det når man ikke får rettighetene sine fra norsk politi og andre myndigheter







    Google Mail – RE: Sak nr: 15202125/Fwd: Saksnr 15887079







    Google Mail



    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>




    RE: Sak nr: 15202125/Fwd: Saksnr 15887079





    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>





    Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 9:01 AM





    To:

    kundesenter@lindorff.com



    Hei,

    nå får dere gi dere, jeg har vært i kontakt med deres internasjonale avdeling om dette før,
    og dere har ikke begynt å kreve så her mye dokumentasjon tidligere.
    Dere får forholde dere til det jeg sier, om at jeg har tar dette gjennom gjeldsordning,

    med Larvik kommune.
    Mvh.
    Erik Ribsskog
    2009/8/5 kundesenter@lindorff.com <kundesenter@lindorff.com>

    Lindorff ønsker i utgangspunktet å bidra til å finne utenrettslige løsninger. I denne saken beklager vi at vi ikke har et godt nok beslutningsgrunnlag til å kunne ta stilling til forslaget, og vi ber om konkret forslag til løsning med følgende informasjon:

    * Bakgrunn for deres gjeldsproblemer og litt om deres fremtidsutsikter.

    * Informasjon om husstandens sivilstand, antall barn og alder på disse.

    * Budsjett over husholdningens totale inntekter og utgifter, dokumentert med selvangivelse og siste 3 måneders lønnslipper.

    * Opplysninger om eventuelle eiendeler, slik som fast eiendom, bil, båt og lignende, dokumentert med verdi og heftelser.

    * Opplysninger om eventuelle næringsinteresser.

    * Fullstendig kreditorliste eventuelt med oversikt over foreslått dividende.

    Vi anbefaler at du tar kontakt med din kommunes gjeldsrådgiver for hjelp til dette.

    Vi ber om dokumentasjon for å vurdere forslaget. Dokumentasjonen er nødvendig da våre oppdragsgivere krever dette ved en eventuell innstilling.

    Vi foretar ingen endring i saksgangen på bakgrunn av deres henvendelse, men imøteser nødvendig informasjon slik at vi kan vurdere forslaget på best mulig måte.

    Med vennlig hilsen

    Lindorff Kundeservice

    kundesenter@lindorff.com

    Tel: (+47) 31 27 90 00

    Faks: (+47) 31 27 93 01

    – 101346-

    ** This message including any attachments may

    contain confidential and/or privileged information

    intended only for the person or entity to which it is

    addressed. If you are not the intended recipient

    you should delete this message. Any printing, copying,

    distribution or other use of this message is strictly

    prohibited. If you have received this message in

    error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone,

    fax or e-mail and delete all copies of this message and

    any attachments from your system. Thank you.

    —–Original Message—–

    From: Lindorff Kundesenter

    Sent: 20. juli 2009 19:15

    To: Kundesenterst

    Subject: Sak nr: 15202125/Fwd: Saksnr 15887079

    Hei,

    som dere kan se, så har jeg også vært i kontakt med deres internasjonale

    avdeling, og jeg får nesten si det samme til dere, som jeg sier til de,

    at jeg er arbeidsledig i England, og at jeg er i kontakt med Larvik kommune,

    om en gjelds-tilbakebetalingsordning, men at jeg først må ha fast inntekt,

    før en sånn ordning, kan igangsettes.

    Derfor prøver jeg å få meg en ganske bra betalt jobb, siden jeg har bra

    utdannelse,

    og har jobbet som butikksjef osv., så jeg burde klare å få meg en rimelig

    bra betalt

    lederjobb f.eks., etterhvert.

    I mellomtiden, så går jeg på engelsk arbeidsledighetstrygd, og det er ikke

    mye penger, så da må jeg nesten si til alle kreditorer, at jeg må nesten

    vente,

    til jeg har fått meg en jobb, og da skal jeg sette igang en

    gjeldstilbakebetalings-

    ordning, i samarbeid med gjeldsrådgiver hos Larvik kommune, som jeg er i

    løpende kontakt med, om dette.

    Så håper jeg at dette er i orden, og beklager forsinkelsen!

    Med vennlig hilsen

    Erik Ribsskog

    ———- Forwarded message ———-

    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

    Date: 2009/6/29

    Subject: Re: Saksnr 15887079

    To: international@lindorff.com

    Hei,

    jeg viser til brev fra dere angående gjeld til City Self-Storage, som jeg

    mottok idag.

    Min situasjon er fortsatt sånn, at jeg er arbeidsledig, og ikke har råd til

    å betale noen

    avdrag, for øyeblikket.

    Jeg behandler all gjeld samlet, gjennom gjeldsrådgivning, i Larvik

    kommune, som jeg

    skal kontakte igjen, når jeg har fått meg fast jobb.

    Håper dette er iorden, og beklager forsinkelsen!

    Med vennlig hilsen

    Erik Ribsskog

    2009/5/11 Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

    Hei,

    > jeg har dessverre ikke råd til å betale dette nå, ettersom jeg er

    > arbeidsledig og lever på budsjett, og

    > ikke har midler til slikt.

    >

    > Dere må nok smøre dere tålmodighet og vente til at jeg har fått en jobb her

    > dessverre.

    >

    > Med vennlig hilsen

    >

    > Erik Ribsskog

    >

    > 2009/5/11 international@lindorff.com <international@lindorff.com>

    >

    > Vennligst finn dokumentet 15887079_FD66_2009051112284633318.pdf vedlagt.

    >> Benytt gjerne saksnr: 15887079 i emnefeltet ved epost kontakt med oss.

    >>

    >> Kontakt opplysninger finnes også i vedlegget.

    >> Tina Martinsen

    >> Tlf nr: +47 2321 1552

    >> Åpningstid:

    >> Fax nr: +47 2321 1411

    >> Epost: international@lindorff.com

    >>

    >> For å lese vedlegget benyttes Adobe Acrobat Reader.

    >> http://www.adobe.com/

    >>

    >>

    >> Med vennlig hilsen

    >> LINDORFF AS

    >

    >

    >






  • Jeg synes ikke at ANSA svarte bra nok på klagen min







    Google Mail – klage til ANSA







    Google Mail



    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>




    klage til ANSA





    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>





    Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 4:51 PM





    To:

    tore.berg@ansa.no



    Hei,

    jeg har tenkt litt mer på det her nå.
    Jeg synes at det er rart, at dere gjør sånne feil, når dere er en profesjonell organisasjon,
    med 11 heltidsansatte.

    Dette er jo som sagt en sak, hvor jeg har blitt tullet med av HiO og Lånekassa, så jeg synes

    jeg kunne fått en bedre forklaring, på hva som skjedde her.
    I tillegg, så svarte du ikke om ANSA.

    Det jeg lurer på, er hva hovedformålet med ANSA er, og hvem får dere midler fra, dette kunne
    jeg ikke finne på nettsidene deres.
    Får dere støtte av staten, eller har dere 11 personer heltidsansatt dekket av medlemsgebyr?

    På forhånd takk for svar!
    Mvh.
    Erik Ribsskog

    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

    Date: 2009/8/4
    Subject: Re: klage til ANSA
    To: tore.berg@ansa.no

    Hei,

    ok, jeg får prøve det, så får jeg heller kontakte dere, eller andre, seinere, hvis jeg synes

    det virker som at de er for urimelige.
    Igjen takk for svar!
    Mvh.
    Erik Ribsskog
    2009/8/4 <tore.berg@ansa.no>

    Hei,

    Jeg vil råde deg til å ta skriftlig

    kontakt med Lånekassen, så vil du få et skriftlig svar på hvordan du skal

    forholde deg til Lånekassen og hva som kan gjøres for å rydde opp i

    situasjonen.

    Med vennlig hilsen

    Tore C. Berg

    Generalsekretær Tlf:

    +47 22 47 76 02

    ANSA – Association of Norwegian Students

    Abroad

    Storgata 19, 0184

    Oslo Tlf:

    04544




    Fra: Erik Ribsskog

    [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

    Sendt: 3. august 2009 22:07

    Til: Tore Christian Berg

    Emne: Re: klage til ANSA

    Hei,

    mange takk for svar!

    Hva synes du at jeg burde gjøre med problemene med Lånekassa, at de

    tuller med meg,

    og at HiO tullet med studiene mine i Sunderland, søknaden dit,

    godkjenning av fagene,

    og tre Erasmus stipend søknader, og også søknaden om studielån.

    Jeg vil gå så langt som til å si at HiO saboterte studiene mine i Sunderland,

    og de

    ødela karriæren min, for studiene gikk i vasken pga. dette, og jeg

    mistet også

    kontrollen over gjeld i Norge, mens jeg var i England.

    Og nå tuller Lånekassa på samme måten.

    Jeg burde kanskje være medlem i ANSA, for å spørre om dette, men jeg

    har studert i utlandet,

    men jeg har ikke helt fått med meg hva ANSA er, hva er hovedpoenget med

    ANSA, vil du si,

    hvis det er lov å spørre om dette?

    Igjen takk for svar!

    Mvh.

    Erik Ribsskog

    2009/8/3 <tore.berg@ansa.no>

    Hei

    Erik Ribsskog,

    Jeg

    har mottatt klagen din. Jeg beklager at du har mottatt to svar fra ANSAs rådgivere.

    Det var en feil i administrasjonen av e-poster og ikke med hensikt.

    Med

    vennlig hilsen

    Tore C. Berg

    Generalsekretær Tlf:

    +47 22 47 76 02

    ANSA – Association of Norwegian Students

    Abroad

    Storgata 19, 0184

    Oslo Tlf:

    04544






  • Jeg lurer på om ACAS er mest for firmaene. Jeg lurer på om de har noen her som er mer for arbeidstagerne. Det må vel bli fagforeningen? Hm







    Google Mail – Advice about how to deal with employment-cases/Fwd: Reminder/Fwd: The Finacial Ombudsman, using staff as slaves/Fwd: Complaint against RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mail







    Google Mail



    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>




    Advice about how to deal with employment-cases/Fwd: Reminder/Fwd: The Finacial Ombudsman, using staff as slaves/Fwd: Complaint against RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mail





    Philip GREY

    <PGREY@acas.org.uk>





    Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 11:50 AM





    To:

    eribsskog@gmail.com




    Dear Erik

    Thank you for your email to the Acas Events Team in Manchester.

    Acas are able to provide impartial information about Employment Law via our Helpline. If you wish to speak to one of our advisers you can contact us on 08457 47 47 47. We are open from 08:00 to 20:00 Monday

    to Friday and from 09:00 till 13:00 on Saturday's.

    Yours sincerely

    Philip Grey

    Acas, Manchester

    >>> Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com> 31/07/2009 03:43 >>>
    Hi,
    I looked at the ACAS website now, and saw that you were the ones to contact
    for problems in the North-West.

    I'm a Norwegian citizen, who lives in Liverpool, so I've understood that the
    North-West office, is the right office,
    for me to contact then, if I'm not mistaking.

    I have an employment-case, against Arvato, where I worked, in 2005 and 2006,
    where it was a lot of bullying,
    from managers, towards me, (and also others, but me in particular, I think),
    and I've also un-covered, that
    they were using illigal employment-methods, the team-leaders there, when
    they were screaming commands
    across the tables there, in the Cunard Building.

    (They were trained to do this screaming, which they called reinforcement,
    but really was punishment, I've
    understood later).

    I have a link to the employment-case, (which consists of a lot of
    documents), on this online publishing-
    site:

    http://www.scribd.com/groups/view/14830-arvato-services-ltd-s-microsoft-scandinavian-product-activation

    I've tried, since 2006, to find a law-firm, to help me with this case,
    because I think it's unworthy, for people
    to be treated, like I was treated, at Arvato, and I also lost my job there,
    since I was contstructivly dismissed,
    I have to say, when I tried to bring the problems there up with the higher
    management.

    But I can get any law-firms to help, since they say the case is to complex,
    since I also brought in the Police,
    since I thought it was much bullying, that it was a crime, and one law-firm,
    Moorcrofts, where messing with
    me, I think I have to say, so I've also brought in the Law Society, who also
    messed with me, I think I have
    to say, and also ditto with the Legal Services Ombudsman.

    So I try to get advice on how to deal with this.

    I think it's to serious problems, to bring up in a Work Trial, it should be
    dealt with in the court, I think.

    It might seem strange, that I'm asking for advice, about a case from 2006,
    but I have been working with
    this case, continously, since then, so it still be an up and running case,
    so to speak.

    Other than this, I'm also trying to get advice about the problems with the
    Financial Ombudsman.

    They have put a woman there, to work, with sending e-mails etc, on 6 am, on
    Sunday mornings!!

    I'm a bit worried that this woman is being used as a slave there, and she
    obviously has been working
    so much, that she has lost a bit of her judgement, since she's emailing
    bank-complaint e-mails,
    to people, while people in the UK are still on their way home from the pub.

    People want their Sundays off from Bank-complaints, and things like that, so
    I think I was harassed
    by the Financial Ombudsman, and I fear for how they treat their staff there,
    since I've been working
    as a food shop manager, in Norway, for ten years, from 1994 to 2004, then I
    automatically thinks
    about this perspective, how on earth are the Financial Ombudsman treating
    their staff, so I wanted
    ACAS to have a look at that, that the people working for the Financial
    Ombudsman, aren't being
    used as slaves etc., like it can seem a bit to me.

    I hope that you can help me with these cases!

    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: Natalie Bodden <NBodden@ecgroup.co.uk>
    Date: Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 9:42 AM
    Subject: RE: Reminder/Fwd: The Finacial Ombudsman, using staff as
    slaves/Fwd: Complaint against RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mail
    To: Erik Ribsskog <
    eribsskog@gmail.com>

    Unfortunately we are unable to advice on this query via email; this
    facility is solely for ordering hard copy Acas publications. Please call the
    Acas helpline on *08457 47 47 47* to speak to a trained advisor.

    Alternatively, please visit the Acas website at www.acas.org.uk, there is a
    search option on the homepage where you may type in key words. This search
    will bring up all publications that cover this subject. The website will
    list the publications available and all prices (although some are free).
    From there, you can order through the website using a credit card (if you
    are ordering priced publications) or, you can e-mail me with the stock
    codes, quantities and a delivery address. I will order the publications for
    you the same day.

    Kind regards,

    *Natalie Bodden*

    Account Executive

    +44 (0) 20 8867 3324

    *nbodden@ecgroup.co.uk*

    www.ecgroup.co.uk

    —–Original Message—–
    *From:* Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
    *Sent:* 23 July 2009 22:27
    *To:* ACAS-01
    *Subject:* Reminder/Fwd: The Finacial Ombudsman, using staff as slaves/Fwd:
    Complaint against RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mail

    Hi,

    I can't see that I've received an answer to this e-mail yet, so I'm sending
    you this reminder.

    Best Regards,

    Erik Ribsskog

    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: *Erik Ribsskog* <eribsskog@gmail.com>
    Date: Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 4:48 PM
    Subject: The Finacial Ombudsman, using staff as slaves/Fwd: Complaint
    against RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mail
    To:
    acas@eclogistics.co.uk

    Hi,

    I've contacted you earlier, about that I was being used as a slave, and that

    they had illigal management methods, at Bertelsmanns Scand.
    Microsoft-activation,

    in Liverpool.

    Now, people at the Financial Ombudsman, are also being used as slaves, it
    seems.

    Or this could be connected with a cover-up, of the
    Bertelsmann/Microsoft-case, that

    I am being bullied by Government, to cover up what went on there.

    Please send this e-mail to the right people in Acas.

    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: *Erik Ribsskog* <eribsskog@gmail.com>
    Date: Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 4:31 PM
    Subject: Re: Complaint against RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mail
    To: "Collins, Jackie" <
    jackie.collins@financial-ombudsman.org.uk>

    Hi,

    Monday to Friday, 8 am to 6 pm, is alright, I think.

    But you also let your staff work Sunday mornings, at 6 am.

    It seems to me that you overload your representatives with work, and that
    they have to

    work 12 to 14 hours 7 days a week.

    I thought slavery was forbidden in our time.

    Why do you let your representatives work every Sunday morning, when other
    people in

    England are on their way home from the pub?

    Do your staff get summer-holiday at all?

    Sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

    On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 9:54 AM, Collins, Jackie <
    jackie.collins@financial-ombudsman.org.uk> wrote:

    Dear Mr Ribsskog

    We always try to provide the best service we can to our customers, and
    sometimes that means offering our staff the option of working overtime
    during very busy periods.

    Please be assured that they have to work within strict time guidelines, and
    these are always checked by Operations Managers to ensure they are not
    working too many hours.

    The service our department offers is outside of the usual office hours of
    9am till 5pm because we have found that a lot of our customers have
    difficulties contacting us whilst they are at work themselves during the 9am
    to 5pm times, so we have opening hours of 8am – 6pm, as do many firms these
    days.

    I hope this explains.

    Regards

    *Jackie Collins*
    *Operations Manager*
    *Direct Dial : 020 7964 0116*
    *Direct Fax: 020 7964 0117*

    ——————————

    *From:* Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

    *Sent:* 29 June 2009 19:32
    *To:* Collins, Jackie

    *Subject:* Re: Complaint against RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mail

    Ok,

    that sound very fine!

    But, why is that you let your representatives work over-time every Sunday
    then?

    Shouldn't you as a main rule conduct your business, within the business
    hours?

    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

    On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 3:50 PM, Collins, Jackie <
    jackie.collins@financial-ombudsman.org.uk> wrote:

    Dear Mr Ribsskog

    Rosemary Cox has passed your complaint to me to take over as you have
    requested that she no longer deals with your case.

    I can confirmed that a letter has been sent to the firm, and we have asked
    that they issue you with a final response letter within 14 days. We have
    also asked them to copy us in on that response.

    If you remain unhappy with the firms response, or you have not received a
    response from them within 14 days, please let me know and I will arrange for
    your complaint to be moved forward for investigation by an Adjudicator.

    Regards

    *Jackie Collins*
    *Operations Manager*
    *Direct Dial : 020 7964 0116*
    *Direct Fax: 020 7964 0117*

    ——————————

    *From:* Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
    *Sent:* 28 June 2009 11:17
    *To:* Cox, Rosemary
    *Subject:* Re: Complaint against RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mail

    Hi,

    I don't think it's any use with me repeating myself.

    I don't think you should handle my complaint.

    The reason is, that if you are to overworked, you get to tired.

    And in dealing with complaints like these, one obviously needs ones
    judgement, to be like

    it should be.

    If one are out of balance, like I think you could be, then I don't think
    this is good for how the

    complaint is being dealt with.

    So please do as I ask Mrs .Cox, and tell your manager what I said, that I
    want someone else

    to deal with my complaint, due to that I think that you must be overworked.

    Haven't you seen how fine the weather is today, you should have a day off in
    the fine weather,

    I think.

    Sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

    On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 11:10 AM, Cox, Rosemary <
    Rosemary.Cox@financial-ombudsman.org.uk> wrote:

    Dear Mr Ribsskog

    Thank you for your e-mails

    As previously advised I am not going to debate with you the working hours of
    this office.

    I have written to you today to advise the steps we are taking with your
    complaint. If the firm fail to resolve the situation for you, your complaint
    will be passed onto our adjudication area for further consideration of the
    concerns you have raised.

    I should add that we do not tolerate rude or insulting language at this
    office, and would expect any further communication to be sent in a more
    acceptable manner.

    Kind Regards

    Rose Cox

    team manager

    ——————————

    *From:* Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

    *Sent:* 28 June 2009 10:43

    *To:* Cox, Rosemary
    *Subject:* Re: Complaint against RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mail

    Hi,

    of course you can work on Sundays if you want.

    But business e-mails should just be sent within the business-hours.

    Or else, what's going to happen, is obvious.

    Someone are going to come drunk home from town, and answer the
    business-e-mails when they are drunk, which is what has happened today, with
    our correspondence.

    If this is something, you didn't know from before, then I think this
    Financial Ombudsman-stuff is just a load of crap really.

    Try to use the head that God gave you when you were born!

    Sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

    On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 10:33 AM, Cox, Rosemary <
    Rosemary.Cox@financial-ombudsman.org.uk> wrote:

    Dear Mr Ribsskog

    Thank you for your e-mail

    I must admit to being surprised and confused with the content of the e-mail.

    We are an extremely busy department and we often work at the weekends, this
    is obviously of help to consumers as we are able to deal with their
    complaints in a more timely manner. I would suggest that It is entirely up
    to each individual business to determine which hours their staff will work
    and I do not intend debating this with you.

    By working this weekend I have been able to deal with your complaint, which
    as you can appreciate is of a benefit to you.

    Perhaps you can clarify the spelling mistakes you are referring to?

    Kind Regards

    Rose Cox

    team manager

    ——————————

    *From:* Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

    *Sent:* 28 June 2009 10:20

    *Subject:* Re: Complaint against RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mail

    Hi again,

    don't you think it's strange for an institutions like yours to send e-mails
    on Sunday mornings then?

    Shouldn't e-mails be sent within normal business hours then you think?

    This is what it says on Wikipedia:

    In the United States <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States> and United
    Kingdom <
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom>, the hours between 9
    am <
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/12-hour_clock> and 5
    pm<
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/12-hour_clock> are
    typically considered to be standard business hours

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Business_hours

    <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Business_hours>I think this is rather akward,
    as I also think your spelling-mistakes are.

    Sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

    On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 8:06 AM, Cox, Rosemary <
    Rosemary.Cox@financial-ombudsman.org.uk> wrote:

    Dear Mr Ribsskog

    Thank you for your e-mail

    That's no problem, however I should point out that we are not a government
    department, we are a independent complaints body.

    I will be in touch with your again in the next few days

    Kind Regards

    Rose Cox

    team manager

    ——————————

    *From:* Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

    *Sent:* 28 June 2009 08:02

    *To:* Cox, Rosemary
    *Subject:* Re: Complaint against RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mail

    Hi,

    ok that's very fine, I'm just home from town you see.

    I thought it was a bit strange, since noone in Government in Norway, work on
    Sundays.

    Sorry about this, I forget sometimes that I'm not in Norway any longer.

    Sorry about this!

    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

    On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 7:54 AM, Cox, Rosemary <
    Rosemary.Cox@financial-ombudsman.org.uk> wrote:

    Dear Mr Ribsskog

    Thank you for your e-mail

    I can assure you this is not a joke, I am currently in the office working
    today.

    I presume that you would like us to deal with your complaint, so am
    responding to your e-mails today

    Kind Regards

    Rose Cox

    team manager

    ——————————

    *From:* Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

    *Sent:* 28 June 2009 07:36
    *To:* Cox, Rosemary
    *Subject:* Re: Complaint against RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mail

    Hi,

    why do send the e-mails early on a Sunday morning, by the way.

    Is this some kind of joke?

    Sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

    On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 7:33 AM, Cox, Rosemary <
    Rosemary.Cox@financial-ombudsman.org.uk> wrote:

    Dear Mr Ribsskog

    Thank you for your e-mails

    I will contact you again once I have considered the information.

    Kind Regards

    Rose Cox

    team manager

    ——————————

    *From:* Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

    *Sent:* 27 June 2009 14:59
    *To:* Cox, Rosemary
    *Subject:* Complaint against RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mail

    Hi,

    thank you for you e-mail, that I recieved today.

    I'll contact your collegue back, regarding the Barclays-complaint.

    I sent the complaint on RBS Dale St., to Yvonne Williams at RBS, but she

    also harassed me, like this, she writes 'Dear Ms Ribsskog', even if my name

    is Erik, and in Britain, you have a movie called 'Erik the Viking', and Eric
    is

    also a quite usual name, in English-speaking countries.

    So I think Yvonne Williams, the complaint-investigator, also bullied me.

    I think this must have been a deliberate mistake.

    This ended with the complaint being partly resolved, in the way that RBS,

    gave me the bonus of £100, for moving my account to them, from Barclays,

    (who I also had problems with, that I'll exlain about to your collegue, like
    I

    mentioned earlier).

    I'll also find the actual complaint against RBS Dale St. now, and forward it

    to you.

    What I meant with the complaint-form, was that it didn't look anything at
    all

    like the ones you've sent me now.

    Maybe the complaint-form I was sent, was to do with other financial
    institutions,

    than banks?

    Like share-fonds etc?

    Have you also got other complaint-forms, other than to banks, perhaps
    someone

    sent me the wrong form intentionally?

    Just a thought I had.

    But anyway, thank you very much for your e-mail, and I'll also find the
    actual

    RBS Dale St. complaint, and e-mail it to you now.

    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: *Williams, Yvonne (CRU)* <Yvonne.Williams@rbs.co.uk>
    Date: Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 4:30 PM
    Subject: RE: Earlier e-mail
    To: Erik Ribsskog <
    eribsskog@gmail.com>

    Dear Ms Ribsskog

    Could you please arrange another copy of your email to be sent to me for my
    investigation

    Regards

    Yvonne Williams

    ——————————

    *From:* Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
    *Sent:* 19 June 2007 14:04
    *To:* Williams, Yvonne (CRU)
    *Subject:* Earlier e-mail

    *** WARNING : This message originates from the Internet ***

    Hi,

    I'm refering to the e-mail I sent you on 5/6.

    I was just wondering if you have recieved this e-mail, because I cant see

    that I have recieved any answer to it yet.

    Please just contact me if you want me to send you the e-mail again.

    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

    The Royal Bank of Scotland plc, Registered in Scotland No. 90312. Registered
    Office: 36 St Andrew Square, Edinburgh EH2 2YB

    Authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority.

    This e-mail message is confidential and for use by the addressee only. If
    the message is received by anyone other than the addressee, please return
    the message to the sender by replying to it and then delete the message from
    your computer. Internet e-mails are not necessarily secure. The Royal Bank
    of Scotland plc does not accept responsibility for changes made to this
    message after it was sent.

    Whilst all reasonable care has been taken to avoid the transmission of
    viruses, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that the onward
    transmission, opening or use of this message and any attachments will not
    adversely affect its systems or data. No responsibility is accepted by The
    Royal Bank of Scotland plc in this regard and the recipient should carry out
    such virus and other checks as it considers appropriate.

    ——————————

    This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and may be subject to legal
    privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender
    immediately and delete this e-mail and any attachment from your system. If
    you are not the intended recipient you must not copy, disclose or take any
    action in reliance to it.

    This e-mail and any attachments have been checked by virus detection
    software before transmission. You should carry out your own virus checks on
    the contents of this communication. We accept no liability for any loss or
    damage which may be caused by software viruses or by interception or
    interruption of this mail.

    Unless otherwise indicated, this e-mail has no contractual effect and may
    only be used for the purpose(s) indicated in it. The statements and opinions
    expressed in this e-mail are those of the author and do not necessarily
    reflect those of the Financial Ombudsman Service Ltd.

    This email has originated from the Financial Ombudsman Service Ltd. South
    Quay Plaza, 183 Marsh Wall, London E14 9SR, United Kingdom. Registered as a
    limited company in England and Wales No. 3725015. Registered office as
    above.
    ——————————

    ——————————

    This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and may be subject to legal
    privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender
    immediately and delete this e-mail and any attachment from your system. If
    you are not the intended recipient you must not copy, disclose or take any
    action in reliance to it.

    This e-mail and any attachments have been checked by virus detection
    software before transmission. You should carry out your own virus checks on
    the contents of this communication. We accept no liability for any loss or
    damage which may be caused by software viruses or by interception or
    interruption of this mail.

    Unless otherwise indicated, this e-mail has no contractual effect and may
    only be used for the purpose(s) indicated in it. The statements and opinions
    expressed in this e-mail are those of the author and do not necessarily
    reflect those of the Financial Ombudsman Service Ltd.

    This email has originated from the Financial Ombudsman Service Ltd. South
    Quay Plaza, 183 Marsh Wall, London E14 9SR, United Kingdom. Registered as a
    limited company in England and Wales No. 3725015. Registered office as
    above.
    ——————————

    ——————————

    This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and may be subject to legal
    privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender
    immediately and delete this e-mail and any attachment from your system. If
    you are not the intended recipient you must not copy, disclose or take any
    action in reliance to it.

    This e-mail and any attachments have been checked by virus detection
    software before transmission. You should carry out your own virus checks on
    the contents of this communication. We accept no liability for any loss or
    damage which may be caused by software viruses or by interception or
    interruption of this mail.

    Unless otherwise indicated, this e-mail has no contractual effect and may
    only be used for the purpose(s) indicated in it. The statements and opinions
    expressed in this e-mail are those of the author and do not necessarily
    reflect those of the Financial Ombudsman Service Ltd.

    This email has originated from the Financial Ombudsman Service Ltd. South
    Quay Plaza, 183 Marsh Wall, London E14 9SR, United Kingdom. Registered as a
    limited company in England and Wales No. 3725015. Registered office as
    above.
    ——————————

    ——————————

    This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and may be subject to legal
    privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender
    immediately and delete this e-mail and any attachment from your system. If
    you are not the intended recipient you must not copy, disclose or take any
    action in reliance to it.

    This e-mail and any attachments have been checked by virus detection
    software before transmission. You should carry out your own virus checks on
    the contents of this communication. We accept no liability for any loss or
    damage which may be caused by software viruses or by interception or
    interruption of this mail.

    Unless otherwise indicated, this e-mail has no contractual effect and may
    only be used for the purpose(s) indicated in it. The statements and opinions
    expressed in this e-mail are those of the author and do not necessarily
    reflect those of the Financial Ombudsman Service Ltd.

    This email has originated from the Financial Ombudsman Service Ltd. South
    Quay Plaza, 183 Marsh Wall, London E14 9SR, United Kingdom. Registered as a
    limited company in England and Wales No. 3725015. Registered office as
    above.
    ——————————

    ——————————

    This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and may be subject to legal
    privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender
    immediately and delete this e-mail and any attachment from your system. If
    you are not the intended recipient you must not copy, disclose or take any
    action in reliance to it.

    This e-mail and any attachments have been checked by virus detection
    software before transmission. You should carry out your own virus checks on
    the contents of this communication. We accept no liability for any loss or
    damage which may be caused by software viruses or by interception or
    interruption of this mail.

    Unless otherwise indicated, this e-mail has no contractual effect and may
    only be used for the purpose(s) indicated in it. The statements and opinions
    expressed in this e-mail are those of the author and do not necessarily
    reflect those of the Financial Ombudsman Service Ltd.

    This email has originated from the Financial Ombudsman Service Ltd. South
    Quay Plaza, 183 Marsh Wall, London E14 9SR, United Kingdom. Registered as a
    limited company in England and Wales No. 3725015. Registered office as
    above.
    ——————————

    ——————————

    This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and may be subject to legal
    privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender
    immediately and delete this e-mail and any attachment from your system. If
    you are not the intended recipient you must not copy, disclose or take any
    action in reliance to it.

    This e-mail and any attachments have been checked by virus detection
    software before transmission. You should carry out your own virus checks on
    the contents of this communication. We accept no liability for any loss or
    damage which may be caused by software viruses or by interception or
    interruption of this mail.

    Unless otherwise indicated, this e-mail has no contractual effect and may
    only be used for the purpose(s) indicated in it. The statements and opinions
    expressed in this e-mail are those of the author and do not necessarily
    reflect those of the Financial Ombudsman Service Ltd.

    This email has originated from the Financial Ombudsman Service Ltd. South
    Quay Plaza, 183 Marsh Wall, London E14 9SR, United Kingdom. Registered as a
    limited company in England and Wales No. 3725015. Registered office as
    above.
    ——————————

    ——————————

    This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and may be subject to legal
    privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender
    immediately and delete this e-mail and any attachment from your system. If
    you are not the intended recipient you must not copy, disclose or take any
    action in reliance to it.

    This e-mail and any attachments have been checked by virus detection
    software before transmission. You should carry out your own virus checks on
    the contents of this communication. We accept no liability for any loss or
    damage which may be caused by software viruses or by interception or
    interruption of this mail.

    Unless otherwise indicated, this e-mail has no contractual effect and may
    only be used for the purpose(s) indicated in it. The statements and opinions
    expressed in this e-mail are those of the author and do not necessarily
    reflect those of the Financial Ombudsman Service Ltd.

    This email has originated from the Financial Ombudsman Service Ltd. South
    Quay Plaza, 183 Marsh Wall, London E14 9SR, United Kingdom. Registered as a
    limited company in England and Wales No. 3725015. Registered office as
    above.
    ——————————

    This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
    solely for the addressee. Any unauthorised use is strictly prohibited. If
    you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender immediately and
    delete the email and any attachments. Any views or opinions expressed or
    presented in this email are those of the author(s) and may not necessarily
    represent those of EC Group and no representation is given nor liability
    accepted for the accuracy or completeness of any information. EC Group takes
    care to protect its systems from virus attacks and other harmful events but
    gives no warranty that this message (including attachments) is free of any
    virus or other harmful matter, and accepts no responsibility for any loss or
    damage resulting from the recipient receiving, opening or using it. EC Group
    is the trading name of E.Christian & Co Ltd. Registered Office: Swallowfield
    Way, Hayes, Middlesex, UB3 1DQ. Registered in England number 463298

    __________________________________________________________________

    Should this communication contain any discussion of legal matters,

    this is not to be taken as an authoritative interpretation of the law.

    If you have received this communication and it was not intended for

    you, please dispose of it and let us know immediately, and treat any

    information in it as confidential.

    ___________________________________________________________________

    Acas – improving working life through better employment relations.

    Providing information, advice, training and a range of services for

    employers and employees.

    For more information about any of our services, visit our website

    at www.acas.org.uk



    *******************************************************************

    From April 2009, Acas National is moving to Euston Tower,

    286 Euston Road, London, NW1 3JJ.

    *******************************************************************






  • Jeg anmeldte Buskerud Fylkeskommune, til politiet i Drammen, for forfalskning av vitnemål







    Google Mail – Anmeldelse for dokumentfalsk/Fwd: Tulling med vitnemål/Fwd: Vitnemål fra Gjerdes videregående skole







    Google Mail



    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>




    Anmeldelse for dokumentfalsk/Fwd: Tulling med vitnemål/Fwd: Vitnemål fra Gjerdes videregående skole





    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>





    Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 5:21 AM





    To:

    post.sondre.buskerud@politiet.no



    Hei,

    jeg vil gjerne anmelde Buskerud Fylkeskommune, som det virker som, at har forfalsket mitt vitnemål,
    fra Gjerdes VGS., 1988/89, som jeg fikk i posten fra de, igår.

    Jeg sender med en kopi av vitnemålet, hvor jeg har fått karakter
    4, på eksamen og i standpunktkarakter, i faget programmering,
    mens jeg egentlig fikk 5.
    (Det kan man se, av at det var kombinert eksamen, i datafagene,

    og det var derfor sånn, at man fikk samme karakter, i tre fag,
    til eksamen.
    Det var en dataeksamen, et prosjekt, som gikk over tre dager,
    og vi fikk da 5 på det prosjektet, og da fikk vi 5-er på vitnemålet,

    i programmering, 4. generasjonsverktøy og systemering.
    Det var derfor jeg med en gang la merke til dette, for siden det
    var kombinert eksamen, for datafagene, så går det ikke ann å

    få dårligere karakter i et fag.
    Jeg husker også dette fra hukommelsen).
    Dessuten, så står det at programmeringsfaget var COBOL, mens
    vi i virkeligheten lærte Pascal.

    Jeg ønsker de som har utført denne forfalskningen tiltalt og straffet.

    Mvh.
    Erik Ribsskog
    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

    Date: 2009/8/4
    Subject: Tulling med vitnemål/Fwd: Vitnemål fra Gjerdes videregående skole
    To: Kari-Langdahl.Andresen@bfk.no
    Cc: knut.hovde@bfk.no

    Hei,

    det er noen som har tulla med vitnemålet mitt, som dere sendte meg.
    Jeg fikk karakter fem i pascal-programmering, både i standpunktkarakter, og til eksamen.

    Mens på vitnemålet, så står det at jeg fikk karakteren fire, både i standpunkt og til eksamen,
    og det står Cobol istedet for Pascal.
    Så her må dere undersøke hva som har skjedd!
    Mvh.
    Erik Ribsskog
    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

    Date: 2009/7/31
    Subject: Re: Vitnemål fra Gjerdes videregående skole
    To: Kari Langdahl Andresen <Kari-Langdahl.Andresen@bfk.no>

    Hei,

    ok, da er jeg med.
    For da jeg gikk på Sande VGS., i 1987/88, så var det sånn, at det bare var ti stykker, i Vestfold,
    som fikk lov å gå på videregående i Buskerud.
    Men jeg hadde så gode karakterer, så jeg kom inn på Gjerde.
    Mens ei som hadde gått i klassen min, Monika Ødegård, som var datter av ei lærerinne,
    fra Nordland, på Svelvik Ungdomsskole, husker jeg, for hu hadde vi i data valgfag.

    Hu bytta adresse til ei tante av seg, i Drammen, for å komme inn på Gjerde, for
    hu hadde ikke så bra karakterer.
    Men jeg husker at hu bodde i Svelvik alikevel, for jeg fikk noen ganger haik til

    Svelvik, og da tok jeg bussen som gikk fra Svelvik, klokka 7.30, og da pleide
    hu å ta den bussen, husker jeg.
    Så i gamle dager, så var det sånn, at bare de ti beste fra Vestfold, fikk lov å gå på skole

    i Buskerud.
    Og da måtte vi få noen sånne spesielle busskort, husker jeg, som var rosa, mener jeg,
    eller lyserøde.
    Men hu Monica Ødegård da, fra Svelvik, hu måtte da kjøpe månedskort, mens jeg slapp

    dette da, siden jeg hadde så bra karakterer, så fikk jeg månedskort, av enten Buskerud
    eller Vestfold fylke da.
    Men på 80-tallet, så jobba kanskje ikke du i Buskerud Fylkeskommune?

    Men dere burde vel ha arkiv på hvem det er som kommer inn på sånne ordninger?
    Jeg skjønner at reglene ikke skal oppbevares i 20 år kanskje, men det er vel en slags
    samarbeidskomite, mellom Vestfold og Buskerud, som har tatt disse avgjørelsene,

    om hvordan Vestfold og Buskerud, skal samarbeide om dette.
    På inter-fylkeskommunalt nivå, som det vel da kanskje heter.
    Hvem er det som har med slikt å gjøre, jeg kan kanskje kontakte Sande eller Svelvik

    kommune, eller Vestfold fylkesadministrasjon, som sikkert ligger i Tønsberg.
    Vi får se.
    Nå kom ikke det vitnemålet med posten idag, men jeg regner med at det dukker opp,

    i begynnelsen av neste uke.
    (Hvis ikke så vet jeg ihvertfall hvor jeg skal sende e-post da).
    Igjen takk for hjelpen med dette!
    Mvh.

    Erik Ribsskog

    2009/7/31 Kari Langdahl Andresen <Kari-Langdahl.Andresen@bfk.no>

    Hei igjen

    Inntaksordningen som gjelder i dag, er at elever fra

    Vestfold som bor i grenseområder til Buskerud, kan søke til videregående skoler

    i Buskerud på lik linje med elever fra Buskerud. Det er ikke satt noen øvre

    grense på hvor mange fra Vestfold som blir tatt inn, det avhenger av

    karaktergrunnlaget de søker på. At elever fra Vestfold blir tatt inn til skoler

    i Buskerud behøver derfor ikke nødvendigvis bety at de har spesielt gode

    karakterer. Det kan også bety at karaktergrunnlaget for søkere fra Buskerud er

    lavt.

    Arkivloven har ingen bestemmelser om at inntaksreglement

    skal oppbevares i 20 år. Derfor har vi ingen dokumentasjon på hvordan

    inntaksordningen var for skoleåret 1988/1989.


    Med vennlig

    hilsen

    Kari Langdahl

    Andresen

    Eksamenskontoret i Buskerud
    Tlf.: 32 80 87 69

    E-post:

    Kari-Langdahl.Andresen@bfk.no


    Fra: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

    Sendt: 31. juli 2009 09:23
    Til: Kari Langdahl

    Andresen
    Emne: Re: Vitnemål fra Gjerdes videregående

    skole

    Hei,

    takk for at dere endelig sender vitnemålet, jeg skal betale så fort som

    mulig!

    Denne ordningen, med at de ti beste fra Sande VGS., kunne studere i

    Drammen, den

    ordningen, den er det jo dere, i skoleseksjonen, som administrerer, og

    ikke Gjerdes VGS.

    Dette fortalte du jo meg, da jeg ringte i våres, at denne ordningen

    fortsatt er oppe

    å kjøre, en samarbeidsordning, mellom Sande VGS og Buskerud

    Fylkeskommune,

    er vel dette snakk om, såvidt jeg husker, fra hva du sa.

    Så det var ikke snakk om en ordning mellom Sande VGS. og Gjerdes

    VGS.,

    så nå synes jeg at du gjør deg litt vanskelig.

    Dere må da ha slikt arkivert.

    Men jeg skjønner det at det tar for mye tid, for vanlige folk, som meg,

    å ta opp ting

    som dette med byråkratiet.

    Og jeg stoler heller ikke så mye på det du skriver, fordi at du lovte

    meg nemlig to ganger,

    å sende vitnemålet, samme uka, når jeg ringte i april og juni og pratet med

    deg, Kari,

    står det på en huskelapp jeg har her.

    Så dette henger ikke på greip, men jeg får være fornøyd, så lenge dere har

    sendt

    vitnemålet da, og jeg får det endelig i posten.

    Så regner jeg med at det dukker opp i begynnelsen av neste uke, eller

    noe.

    Så igjen takk for hjelpen med dette.

    Mvh.

    Erik Ribsskog

    2009/7/31 Kari Langdahl Andresen <Kari-Langdahl.Andresen@bfk.no>

    Hei

    Jeg beklager at du ennå ikke har mottatt duplikat

    av vitnemål fra VKII ved Gjerdes videregående skole. Vitnemålet ble gjort

    klart etter at du tok kontakt med oss i juni.

    Rutinene hos oss er at duplikat av vitnemål blir

    sendt ut når det foreligger kvittering for innbetalt gebyr. På grunn av en

    misforståelse internt hos oss, ble vitnemålet liggende her i påvente av

    innbetaling. Jeg har vært på ferie og ble derfor ikke klar over dette før jeg

    kom tilbake i går.

    Vitnemålet ble sendt herfra pr. post i går.

    Jeg har vært i kontakt med Inntakskontoret for de

    videregående skolene i Buskerud angående din forespørsel om å få en

    bekreftelse på at du var en av 10 fra Sande videregående skole som ble tatt

    inn til VKII ved Gjerdes videregående skole. Det foreligger ikke dokumentasjon

    på inntaksrutinene til Gjerdes videregående skole for skoleåret 1988/1989.

    Derfor kan vi ikke innfri ditt ønske om en slik bekreftelse.

    Jeg ønsker deg lykke til med videre studier og

    jobbsøknader.

    Med vennlig hilsen

    Kari Langdahl Andresen

    Eksamenskontoret i Buskerud

    Tlf.: 32 80 87 69
    E-post: Kari-Langdahl.Andresen@bfk.no





    img014.jpg
    1151K




  • Jeg sendte e-post til Buskerud Fylkeskommune, angående at noen har tullet med vitnemålet mitt, som de sendte meg







    Google Mail – Tulling med vitnemål/Fwd: Vitnemål fra Gjerdes videregående skole







    Google Mail



    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>




    Tulling med vitnemål/Fwd: Vitnemål fra Gjerdes videregående skole





    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>





    Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 12:43 AM





    To:

    Kari-Langdahl.Andresen@bfk.no


    Cc:

    knut.hovde@bfk.no



    Hei,

    det er noen som har tulla med vitnemålet mitt, som dere sendte meg.
    Jeg fikk karakter fem i pascal-programmering, både i standpunktkarakter, og til eksamen.

    Mens på vitnemålet, så står det at jeg fikk karakteren fire, både i standpunkt og til eksamen,
    og det står Cobol istedet for Pascal.
    Så her må dere undersøke hva som har skjedd!
    Mvh.
    Erik Ribsskog
    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

    Date: 2009/7/31
    Subject: Re: Vitnemål fra Gjerdes videregående skole
    To: Kari Langdahl Andresen <Kari-Langdahl.Andresen@bfk.no>

    Hei,

    ok, da er jeg med.
    For da jeg gikk på Sande VGS., i 1987/88, så var det sånn, at det bare var ti stykker, i Vestfold,
    som fikk lov å gå på videregående i Buskerud.
    Men jeg hadde så gode karakterer, så jeg kom inn på Gjerde.
    Mens ei som hadde gått i klassen min, Monika Ødegård, som var datter av ei lærerinne,
    fra Nordland, på Svelvik Ungdomsskole, husker jeg, for hu hadde vi i data valgfag.

    Hu bytta adresse til ei tante av seg, i Drammen, for å komme inn på Gjerde, for
    hu hadde ikke så bra karakterer.
    Men jeg husker at hu bodde i Svelvik alikevel, for jeg fikk noen ganger haik til

    Svelvik, og da tok jeg bussen som gikk fra Svelvik, klokka 7.30, og da pleide
    hu å ta den bussen, husker jeg.
    Så i gamle dager, så var det sånn, at bare de ti beste fra Vestfold, fikk lov å gå på skole

    i Buskerud.
    Og da måtte vi få noen sånne spesielle busskort, husker jeg, som var rosa, mener jeg,
    eller lyserøde.
    Men hu Monica Ødegård da, fra Svelvik, hu måtte da kjøpe månedskort, mens jeg slapp

    dette da, siden jeg hadde så bra karakterer, så fikk jeg månedskort, av enten Buskerud
    eller Vestfold fylke da.
    Men på 80-tallet, så jobba kanskje ikke du i Buskerud Fylkeskommune?

    Men dere burde vel ha arkiv på hvem det er som kommer inn på sånne ordninger?
    Jeg skjønner at reglene ikke skal oppbevares i 20 år kanskje, men det er vel en slags
    samarbeidskomite, mellom Vestfold og Buskerud, som har tatt disse avgjørelsene,

    om hvordan Vestfold og Buskerud, skal samarbeide om dette.
    På inter-fylkeskommunalt nivå, som det vel da kanskje heter.
    Hvem er det som har med slikt å gjøre, jeg kan kanskje kontakte Sande eller Svelvik

    kommune, eller Vestfold fylkesadministrasjon, som sikkert ligger i Tønsberg.
    Vi får se.
    Nå kom ikke det vitnemålet med posten idag, men jeg regner med at det dukker opp,

    i begynnelsen av neste uke.
    (Hvis ikke så vet jeg ihvertfall hvor jeg skal sende e-post da).
    Igjen takk for hjelpen med dette!
    Mvh.

    Erik Ribsskog

    2009/7/31 Kari Langdahl Andresen <Kari-Langdahl.Andresen@bfk.no>

    Hei igjen

    Inntaksordningen som gjelder i dag, er at elever fra

    Vestfold som bor i grenseområder til Buskerud, kan søke til videregående skoler

    i Buskerud på lik linje med elever fra Buskerud. Det er ikke satt noen øvre

    grense på hvor mange fra Vestfold som blir tatt inn, det avhenger av

    karaktergrunnlaget de søker på. At elever fra Vestfold blir tatt inn til skoler

    i Buskerud behøver derfor ikke nødvendigvis bety at de har spesielt gode

    karakterer. Det kan også bety at karaktergrunnlaget for søkere fra Buskerud er

    lavt.

    Arkivloven har ingen bestemmelser om at inntaksreglement

    skal oppbevares i 20 år. Derfor har vi ingen dokumentasjon på hvordan

    inntaksordningen var for skoleåret 1988/1989.


    Med vennlig

    hilsen

    Kari Langdahl

    Andresen

    Eksamenskontoret i Buskerud
    Tlf.: 32 80 87 69

    E-post:

    Kari-Langdahl.Andresen@bfk.no


    Fra: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

    Sendt: 31. juli 2009 09:23
    Til: Kari Langdahl

    Andresen
    Emne: Re: Vitnemål fra Gjerdes videregående

    skole

    Hei,

    takk for at dere endelig sender vitnemålet, jeg skal betale så fort som

    mulig!

    Denne ordningen, med at de ti beste fra Sande VGS., kunne studere i

    Drammen, den

    ordningen, den er det jo dere, i skoleseksjonen, som administrerer, og

    ikke Gjerdes VGS.

    Dette fortalte du jo meg, da jeg ringte i våres, at denne ordningen

    fortsatt er oppe

    å kjøre, en samarbeidsordning, mellom Sande VGS og Buskerud

    Fylkeskommune,

    er vel dette snakk om, såvidt jeg husker, fra hva du sa.

    Så det var ikke snakk om en ordning mellom Sande VGS. og Gjerdes

    VGS.,

    så nå synes jeg at du gjør deg litt vanskelig.

    Dere må da ha slikt arkivert.

    Men jeg skjønner det at det tar for mye tid, for vanlige folk, som meg,

    å ta opp ting

    som dette med byråkratiet.

    Og jeg stoler heller ikke så mye på det du skriver, fordi at du lovte

    meg nemlig to ganger,

    å sende vitnemålet, samme uka, når jeg ringte i april og juni og pratet med

    deg, Kari,

    står det på en huskelapp jeg har her.

    Så dette henger ikke på greip, men jeg får være fornøyd, så lenge dere har

    sendt

    vitnemålet da, og jeg får det endelig i posten.

    Så regner jeg med at det dukker opp i begynnelsen av neste uke, eller

    noe.

    Så igjen takk for hjelpen med dette.

    Mvh.

    Erik Ribsskog

    2009/7/31 Kari Langdahl Andresen <Kari-Langdahl.Andresen@bfk.no>

    Hei

    Jeg beklager at du ennå ikke har mottatt duplikat

    av vitnemål fra VKII ved Gjerdes videregående skole. Vitnemålet ble gjort

    klart etter at du tok kontakt med oss i juni.

    Rutinene hos oss er at duplikat av vitnemål blir

    sendt ut når det foreligger kvittering for innbetalt gebyr. På grunn av en

    misforståelse internt hos oss, ble vitnemålet liggende her i påvente av

    innbetaling. Jeg har vært på ferie og ble derfor ikke klar over dette før jeg

    kom tilbake i går.

    Vitnemålet ble sendt herfra pr. post i går.

    Jeg har vært i kontakt med Inntakskontoret for de

    videregående skolene i Buskerud angående din forespørsel om å få en

    bekreftelse på at du var en av 10 fra Sande videregående skole som ble tatt

    inn til VKII ved Gjerdes videregående skole. Det foreligger ikke dokumentasjon

    på inntaksrutinene til Gjerdes videregående skole for skoleåret 1988/1989.

    Derfor kan vi ikke innfri ditt ønske om en slik bekreftelse.

    Jeg ønsker deg lykke til med videre studier og

    jobbsøknader.

    Med vennlig hilsen

    Kari Langdahl Andresen

    Eksamenskontoret i Buskerud

    Tlf.: 32 80 87 69
    E-post: Kari-Langdahl.Andresen@bfk.no






  • Jeg sendte en ny e-post til generalsekretæren i ANSA







    Google Mail – klage til ANSA







    Google Mail



    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>




    klage til ANSA





    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>





    Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 9:06 PM





    To:

    tore.berg@ansa.no



    Hei,

    mange takk for svar!
    Hva synes du at jeg burde gjøre med problemene med Lånekassa, at de tuller med meg,
    og at HiO tullet med studiene mine i Sunderland, søknaden dit, godkjenning av fagene,

    og tre Erasmus stipend søknader, og også søknaden om studielån.
    Jeg vil gå så langt som til å si at HiO saboterte studiene mine i Sunderland, og de
    ødela karriæren min, for studiene gikk i vasken pga. dette, og jeg mistet også

    kontrollen over gjeld i Norge, mens jeg var i England.
    Og nå tuller Lånekassa på samme måten.
    Jeg burde kanskje være medlem i ANSA, for å spørre om dette, men jeg har studert i utlandet,

    men jeg har ikke helt fått med meg hva ANSA er, hva er hovedpoenget med ANSA, vil du si,
    hvis det er lov å spørre om dette?
    Igjen takk for svar!
    Mvh.
    Erik Ribsskog
    2009/8/3 <tore.berg@ansa.no>

    Hei Erik Ribsskog,

    Jeg har mottatt klagen din. Jeg beklager at du har mottatt

    to svar fra ANSAs rådgivere. Det var en feil i administrasjonen av e-poster og

    ikke med hensikt.

    Med vennlig hilsen

    Tore C. Berg

    Generalsekretær Tlf:

    +47 22 47 76 02

    ANSA – Association of Norwegian

    Students Abroad

    Storgata 19, 0184

    Oslo Tlf:

    04544






  • EF språkreiser hadde visst ikke oppdatert nettsidene sine. Men men







    Google Mail – Fraværende: Kursbevis for EF språkreiser







    Google Mail



    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>




    Fraværende: Kursbevis for EF språkreiser





    Mariann Myrli

    <Mariann.Myrli@ef.com>





    Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 10:22 AM





    To:

    Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>



    Takk for din e-mail. Jeg jobber ikke lenger for EF Internasjonale Språkskoler i Oslo. Vennligst send alle henvendelser til Lena Hansen: lena.hansen@ef.com eller ring kontoret på 22 94 12 30.

    Thank you for your e-mail.

    I am no no longer working for ILS in Oslo. For all matters please e-mail CPM Lena Hansen at lena.hansen@ef.com, or call the office at +47 22 94 12 30.

    All the best,

    MariannThis e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential and

    privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient,

    please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, delete this

    e-mail and destroy any copies. Any dissemination or use of this

    information by a person other than the intended recipient is

    unauthorized and may be illegal.












    Google Mail – Kursbevis for EF språkreiser







    Google Mail



    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>




    Kursbevis for EF språkreiser





    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>





    Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 10:33 AM





    To:

    lena.hansen@ef.com



    Hei,

    hun hadde visst slutta hun Myrli, fikk jeg et automatisk svar om her, hvor det stod at jeg skulle sende
    e-posten til deg.

    Så lykke til med å ordne opp!

    Mvh.

    Erik Ribsskog

    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

    Date: 2009/8/1
    Subject: Kursbevis for EF språkreiser
    To: Mariann.Myrli@ef.com

    Hei,

    jeg var i Weymouth, på språkreise med EF, sommeren 1986.

    Og jeg var også i Brighton, med EF, sommeren 1988.
    Jeg var også med STS, til Brighton, sommeren 1985, så på kurset i 1988, som

    var på Soutwick Community Center, utenfor Brighton, så fikk jeg beste resultat,
    av alle elevene, på avslutningstesten.
    Jeg fikk vel 94 av 100 poeng, eller noe.
    Kursleder var en norsk-amerikaner ved navn Paul Wilkie.

    Nå hadde det seg sånn, at selv om jeg var god i engelsk og de andre fagene,
    på skolen, så gikk det ikke så bra med meg i arbeidslivet.
    Jeg ble gående å tråkke, hos Rimi, i mange år, i Oslo, uten å få noen særlig

    utfordringer, jeg ble mest brukt som en slags robot, som fylte opp de tyngste
    kjølevarene osv.
    Men men.
    I 2003, så overhørte jeg i Oslo, at jeg var forfulgt av noe 'mafian'.

    Så dro jeg til Sunderland, hvor HiO og Lånekassa, tulle med meg, så studiene
    gikk i vasken.
    Så dro jeg til en onkel i Larvik, hvor jeg jobba på gården til dama hans.

    Så dukka det opp et team der, som skulle skyte meg, hørte jeg, så dro jeg til
    Liverpool.
    Men familien min, på morssida, som er innflyttere til Larvik, de nekter å sende
    meg mine vitnemål og attester og kursbevis osv., over til England, enda dette

    skjedde i 2005.
    Så jeg må kontakte alle mulige skoler og høyskoler og universiteter, for å prøve
    å få tak i duplikater da, av papirene mine.
    Og jeg har også gått jobbsøkerkurs, her i England, og da sier de her, at man skal

    skrive opp noen av sine prestasjoner, på CV-en.
    Jeg var jo en av de beste elevene i Vestfold, det året før jeg var russ, så da fikk
    de beste i Vestfold, lov å studere i Drammen, siden nordre Vestfold sogner til

    Drammen.
    Og jeg vant også en ganske gjev Rimi-konkurranse, kalt Rimi Gullårer, etter at jeg
    etter mange år endelig fikk lov å bli butikksjef i Rimi, så fikk jeg et brev fra Stein Erik

    Hagen da, som var slitt et avlangt hull i, i bretten på brevet, gjennom konvolutten.
    Og jeg fikk også beste resultat på engelsk-prøven, som alle utenlandsstudentene, ved
    University of Sunderland, måtte igjennom.

    Så jeg tenkte, at hvis jeg hadde hatt noe dokumentasjon/kursbevis, fra da jeg fikk så
    bra resultater, på språkskole i England, så hadde det vært bra å ha.
    Jeg og tremenningen min, som er adopetert fra Korea, Øystein Andersen, vi dro over

    sommeren 1988, til Brighton, med EF da.
    Og da bodde vi først i King George Road, hos et par, som hadde ei dame liggende i ei
    sykeseng, i stua, husker jeg.
    Og hu våkna opp, og begynte å hoie, men da ble hu bare dopa ned igjen, av fruen i huset,

    husker jeg.
    Så ble vi flytta derfra, til en annen familie, i Shoreham, jeg og tremenningen min, etter et
    par uker.
    Men jeg lurer fortsatt noen ganger, på hu der dama som lå i en sykeseng i stua der, om

    hva som foregikk, siden hu var som en pasient, i en stue, i et hus som ble brukt som
    vertsbolig, for språkstudenter, og ikke på f.eks. et sykehus.
    Så jeg lurer på hva slags opplegg dette egentlig var.

    Det har jeg lurt på noen ganger.
    Kanskje dere kan hjelpe meg med disse spørsmålene og kursbevisene, håpte jeg.
    På forhånd takk for hjelp!
    Mvh.
    Erik Ribsskog