Stikkord: E-post

Jeg sendte en oppdatering til the Jobcentre

Gmail – Update/Fwd: New update/Fwd: Update/Fwd: jobs

Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>

Update/Fwd: New update/Fwd: Update/Fwd: jobs

Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>

Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 8:39 PM

To:
Bamber Sarah JCP AINTREE <SARAH.BAMBER@dwp.gsi.gov.uk>

Hi, sorry if I send many e-mails! I’ve thought more about this now. An Arriva has bus-tickets that one can use in the whole North West, and which costs around £19 for one week, (and around £60 for four weeks). So it’s possible that I could use those types of tickets, to commute, to e.g. Manchester. I’m going to do some more reasearch about how long time this travel-way takes, and try to read some bus-times-folders etc., about this. So I could just tell the employers, in e.g. Manchester, that I can go by bus, the first weeks. And then I could perhaps go by train or car later, when I start to get the pay-cheques. Something like that. Just something I thought about here. Best regards, Erik Ribsskog ———- Forwarded message ———- From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com> Date: Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 3:29 PM Subject: Re: New update/Fwd: Update/Fwd: jobs To: Bamber Sarah JCP AINTREE <SARAH.BAMBER@dwp.gsi.gov.uk> Hi again, yes, I think I remember that you reacted when I applied for jobs in Leyland or Blackpool. And it could also be a problem, with traveling-costs, to towns, which are commutable, from Liverpool. (Even London is commutable, from Liverpool, I think. But the train-tickets are £50. So it’s not easy when one are unemployed and on a budget. But I can discuss that with employers, if they contact me, for an interview. And I can check the train-times, on the internet, before I apply for the jobs). Thank you very much for the reply! See you on the next interview, which is on Thursday next week, I see in my calender-book here. Best regards, Erik Ribsskog PS. The problem is of course the traveling, to work, before one get ones first pay-check. Then one often don’t have that much money, to use, on train-tickets, (I guess), if one have been unemployed for some time. On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 9:38 AM, Bamber Sarah JCP AINTREE <SARAH.BAMBER@dwp.gsi.gov.uk> wrote: > Hi Eric > > Was not in work yesterday which is the reason why I am only replying to your e-mails today, you can select what ever area you feel that you can travel to on a daily basis, the government makes the suggestion that 90 mins travel is adequate for any person when considering employment, I would not scream or critisise you for applying for any vacancies as long as you feel you can manage the travel and the cost to and from the employment, you can use any websites that you feel would be suitable for your jobsearch along with universal jobmatch to enhance you employment prospects and in the right hand column on Universal Jobmatch titled jobsearch activity you can type in there what other sights you have used when looking for the type of work that is most suitable for yourself. Any queries we can discuss at your next appointment. Hope this helps you. > > Speak to you soon. > Sarah > > Sarah Bamber PWPS Advisor | Jobcentre Plus | CSD | Aintree Jobcentreplus | 70 Walton Vale | Liverpool | L9 2BU | 0151 801 6516 | | www.gov.uk | Please consider the environment before > —–Original Message—– > From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com] > Sent: 03 January 2014 22:44 > To: Bamber Sarah JCP AINTREE > Subject: New update/Fwd: Update/Fwd: jobs > > Hi again, > > I’m also a bit afraid of applying for the jobs that Universal Jobmatch recomends for me, in Knutsford. > > Because when I apply for jobs in Chorley or Blackpool. > > Then you start to ‘scream’ and critizise me in the meetings. > > But it says on the Jobseekers-agreement that I should apply for jobs within 90 minutes travel-time, (which is about the time it takes to get to Knutsford). > > (Even if it’s a bit expensive to go there, when one only have jobseekers allowance. > > Because the train-tickets are £13.50. > > So I would have needed an advance quite quickly, to work in Knutsford). > > Also, one are supposed to leave feed-back, on the recommended jobs, that one don’t apply for. > > But why was it again that I shouldn’t apply for jobs in Blackpool/Chorley/Knutsford. > > Which reason should I choose from the drop-down-meny. > > Because it doesn’t say ‘Other’. > > And who get this feed-back by the way, (from the Universal Jobmatch). > > Just something I thought about here. > > Best regards, > > Erik Ribsskog > > > ———- Forwarded message ———- > From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com> > Date: Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 9:57 PM > Subject: Update/Fwd: jobs > To: Bamber Sarah JCP AINTREE <SARAH.BAMBER@dwp.gsi.gov.uk> > > > Hi Sarah, > > I’ve applied for the two first jobs, in your e-mail now. > > In the job-description for the third job, they write a lot about UX and UI. > > And like I told you in the meeting yesterday, I learned about usabilitiy, (and not UX/UI), at upper secondary and post-secondary education, in Norway. > > So I’m not sure if they’re going to laugh at me, if I mention usability. > > Because I’m not that familiar with those terms, (UX and UI), even if I understand partly what they mean, (but these fields seems a bit vague to me, to be honest). > > Also the fourt and fifth job seems to be the same. > > And when I tried to apply for that, then I got an error-message: > > ‘HTTP Error 404.0 – Not Found > The resource you are looking for has been removed, had its name changed, or is temporarily unavailable.’. > > Also, it says in the jobseekers-agreement that I should do my jobsearch on the Universal Jobmatch, every day. > > But not all IT-jobs seems to end up there, (for some reason). > > Before the Jobcentre started insisting on that I do my job-search, on Universal Jobmatch, then I used to find jobs on sites like CW Jobs. > > Is it ok, that I some days use other web-sites to look for jobs, (like CW Jobs)? > > Could we change the job-seekers-agreement so that it just says I should do a job-search everyday, (week-day) > > (Because now it says I should do a Universal Jobmatch job-search every day. > > But some other web-sites, (like the ones you used in the meeting yesterday), seems to be better, for finding e.g. Web Designer-jobs). > > Best regards, > > Erik Ribsskog > > > ———- Forwarded message ———- > From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com> > Date: Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 5:22 PM > Subject: Re: jobs > To: Bamber Sarah JCP AINTREE <SARAH.BAMBER@dwp.gsi.gov.uk> > > > Hi Sarah, > > thank you for the e-mail! > > I’m also going to forward you the e-mail I mentioned in the meeting today. > > (The one from the IT-company, that were going to keep my CV, for three months time. > > And which I said I was going to bring to the next meeting). > > Best regards, > > Erik Ribsskog > > > On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 4:03 PM, Bamber Sarah JCP AINTREE <SARAH.BAMBER@dwp.gsi.gov.uk> wrote: >> http://jobview.monster.co.uk/Graduate-web-designer-HTML5-CSS3-Photosho >> p-Illustrator-Job-Chester-NW-UK-128547470.aspx?WT.mc_n=Indeed_UK&=olm_ >> sk_feed_indeed_uk >> http://www.indeed.co.uk/cmp/Connect-Internet-Solutions-Ltd/jobs/Digita >> l-Designer-Front-End-Developer-d573d3b307b1d6b4 >> http://www.totaljobs.com/JobSearch/JobDetails.aspx?JobId=58519544 >> http://www.it-executive.com/pages/DataBase%20ASP/viewpub.asp?ID=48689 >> http://www.it-executive.com/pages/DataBase%20ASP/viewpub.asp?ID=48689 >> >> >> Sarah Bamber PWPS Advisor | Jobcentre Plus | CSD | Aintree >> Jobcentreplus | >> 70 Walton Vale | Liverpool | L9 2BU | 0151 801 6516 | | www.gov.uk | >> Please consider the environment before printing >> >> >> >> ********************************************************************** >> >> This document is strictly confidential and is intended only for use by >> the addressee. >> >> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, >> distribution or other >> >> action taken in reliance of the information contained in this e-mail >> is strictly prohibited. >> >> Any views expressed by the sender of this message are not necessarily >> those of the Department >> >> for Work and Pensions. >> >> If you have received this transmission in error, please use the reply >> function to tell us >> >> and then permanently delete what you have received. >> >> This email was scanned for viruses by the Department for Work and Pensions’ >> anti-virus services and on leaving the Department was found to be >> virus free. >> >> Please note: Incoming and outgoing e-mail messages are routinely >> monitored for compliance >> >> with our policy on the use of electronic communications. >> >> ********************************************************************** > ********************************************************************** > > This document is strictly confidential and is intended only for use by the addressee. > > If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or other > > action taken in reliance of the information contained in this e-mail is strictly prohibited. > > Any views expressed by the sender of this message are not necessarily those of the Department > > for Work and Pensions. > > If you have received this transmission in error, please use the reply function to tell us > > and then permanently delete what you have received. > > This email was scanned for viruses by the Department for Work and Pensions’ anti-virus services and on leaving the Department was found to be virus free. > > Please note: Incoming and outgoing e-mail messages are routinely monitored for compliance > > with our policy on the use of electronic communications. > > ********************************************************************** >

7. januar 2014

Jeg sendte enda en e-post til the Jobcentre

Gmail – New update/Fwd: Update/Fwd: jobs

Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>

New update/Fwd: Update/Fwd: jobs

Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>

Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 3:29 PM

To:
Bamber Sarah JCP AINTREE <SARAH.BAMBER@dwp.gsi.gov.uk>

Hi again, yes, I think I remember that you reacted when I applied for jobs in Leyland or Blackpool. And it could also be a problem, with traveling-costs, to towns, which are commutable, from Liverpool. (Even London is commutable, from Liverpool, I think. But the train-tickets are £50. So it’s not easy when one are unemployed and on a budget. But I can discuss that with employers, if they contact me, for an interview. And I can check the train-times, on the internet, before I apply for the jobs). Thank you very much for the reply! See you on the next interview, which is on Thursday next week, I see in my calender-book here. Best regards, Erik Ribsskog PS. The problem is of course the traveling, to work, before one get ones first pay-check. Then one often don’t have that much money, to use, on train-tickets, (I guess), if one have been unemployed for some time. On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 9:38 AM, Bamber Sarah JCP AINTREE <SARAH.BAMBER@dwp.gsi.gov.uk> wrote: > Hi Eric > > Was not in work yesterday which is the reason why I am only replying to your e-mails today, you can select what ever area you feel that you can travel to on a daily basis, the government makes the suggestion that 90 mins travel is adequate for any person when considering employment, I would not scream or critisise you for applying for any vacancies as long as you feel you can manage the travel and the cost to and from the employment, you can use any websites that you feel would be suitable for your jobsearch along with universal jobmatch to enhance you employment prospects and in the right hand column on Universal Jobmatch titled jobsearch activity you can type in there what other sights you have used when looking for the type of work that is most suitable for yourself. Any queries we can discuss at your next appointment. Hope this helps you. > > Speak to you soon. > Sarah > > Sarah Bamber PWPS Advisor | Jobcentre Plus | CSD | Aintree Jobcentreplus | 70 Walton Vale | Liverpool | L9 2BU | 0151 801 6516 | | www.gov.uk | Please consider the environment before > —–Original Message—– > From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com] > Sent: 03 January 2014 22:44 > To: Bamber Sarah JCP AINTREE > Subject: New update/Fwd: Update/Fwd: jobs > > Hi again, > > I’m also a bit afraid of applying for the jobs that Universal Jobmatch recomends for me, in Knutsford. > > Because when I apply for jobs in Chorley or Blackpool. > > Then you start to ‘scream’ and critizise me in the meetings. > > But it says on the Jobseekers-agreement that I should apply for jobs within 90 minutes travel-time, (which is about the time it takes to get to Knutsford). > > (Even if it’s a bit expensive to go there, when one only have jobseekers allowance. > > Because the train-tickets are £13.50. > > So I would have needed an advance quite quickly, to work in Knutsford). > > Also, one are supposed to leave feed-back, on the recommended jobs, that one don’t apply for. > > But why was it again that I shouldn’t apply for jobs in Blackpool/Chorley/Knutsford. > > Which reason should I choose from the drop-down-meny. > > Because it doesn’t say ‘Other’. > > And who get this feed-back by the way, (from the Universal Jobmatch). > > Just something I thought about here. > > Best regards, > > Erik Ribsskog > > > ———- Forwarded message ———- > From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com> > Date: Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 9:57 PM > Subject: Update/Fwd: jobs > To: Bamber Sarah JCP AINTREE <SARAH.BAMBER@dwp.gsi.gov.uk> > > > Hi Sarah, > > I’ve applied for the two first jobs, in your e-mail now. > > In the job-description for the third job, they write a lot about UX and UI. > > And like I told you in the meeting yesterday, I learned about usabilitiy, (and not UX/UI), at upper secondary and post-secondary education, in Norway. > > So I’m not sure if they’re going to laugh at me, if I mention usability. > > Because I’m not that familiar with those terms, (UX and UI), even if I understand partly what they mean, (but these fields seems a bit vague to me, to be honest). > > Also the fourt and fifth job seems to be the same. > > And when I tried to apply for that, then I got an error-message: > > ‘HTTP Error 404.0 – Not Found > The resource you are looking for has been removed, had its name changed, or is temporarily unavailable.’. > > Also, it says in the jobseekers-agreement that I should do my jobsearch on the Universal Jobmatch, every day. > > But not all IT-jobs seems to end up there, (for some reason). > > Before the Jobcentre started insisting on that I do my job-search, on Universal Jobmatch, then I used to find jobs on sites like CW Jobs. > > Is it ok, that I some days use other web-sites to look for jobs, (like CW Jobs)? > > Could we change the job-seekers-agreement so that it just says I should do a job-search everyday, (week-day) > > (Because now it says I should do a Universal Jobmatch job-search every day. > > But some other web-sites, (like the ones you used in the meeting yesterday), seems to be better, for finding e.g. Web Designer-jobs). > > Best regards, > > Erik Ribsskog > > > ———- Forwarded message ———- > From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com> > Date: Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 5:22 PM > Subject: Re: jobs > To: Bamber Sarah JCP AINTREE <SARAH.BAMBER@dwp.gsi.gov.uk> > > > Hi Sarah, > > thank you for the e-mail! > > I’m also going to forward you the e-mail I mentioned in the meeting today. > > (The one from the IT-company, that were going to keep my CV, for three months time. > > And which I said I was going to bring to the next meeting). > > Best regards, > > Erik Ribsskog > > > On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 4:03 PM, Bamber Sarah JCP AINTREE <SARAH.BAMBER@dwp.gsi.gov.uk> wrote: >> http://jobview.monster.co.uk/Graduate-web-designer-HTML5-CSS3-Photosho >> p-Illustrator-Job-Chester-NW-UK-128547470.aspx?WT.mc_n=Indeed_UK&=olm_ >> sk_feed_indeed_uk >> http://www.indeed.co.uk/cmp/Connect-Internet-Solutions-Ltd/jobs/Digita >> l-Designer-Front-End-Developer-d573d3b307b1d6b4 >> http://www.totaljobs.com/JobSearch/JobDetails.aspx?JobId=58519544 >> http://www.it-executive.com/pages/DataBase%20ASP/viewpub.asp?ID=48689 >> http://www.it-executive.com/pages/DataBase%20ASP/viewpub.asp?ID=48689 >> >> >> Sarah Bamber PWPS Advisor | Jobcentre Plus | CSD | Aintree >> Jobcentreplus | >> 70 Walton Vale | Liverpool | L9 2BU | 0151 801 6516 | | www.gov.uk | >> Please consider the environment before printing >> >> >> >> ********************************************************************** >> >> This document is strictly confidential and is intended only for use by >> the addressee. >> >> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, >> distribution or other >> >> action taken in reliance of the information contained in this e-mail >> is strictly prohibited. >> >> Any views expressed by the sender of this message are not necessarily >> those of the Department >> >> for Work and Pensions. >> >> If you have received this transmission in error, please use the reply >> function to tell us >> >> and then permanently delete what you have received. >> >> This email was scanned for viruses by the Department for Work and Pensions’ >> anti-virus services and on leaving the Department was found to be >> virus free. >> >> Please note: Incoming and outgoing e-mail messages are routinely >> monitored for compliance >> >> with our policy on the use of electronic communications. >> >> ********************************************************************** > ********************************************************************** > > This document is strictly confidential and is intended only for use by the addressee. > > If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or other > > action taken in reliance of the information contained in this e-mail is strictly prohibited. > > Any views expressed by the sender of this message are not necessarily those of the Department > > for Work and Pensions. > > If you have received this transmission in error, please use the reply function to tell us > > and then permanently delete what you have received. > > This email was scanned for viruses by the Department for Work and Pensions’ anti-virus services and on leaving the Department was found to be virus free. > > Please note: Incoming and outgoing e-mail messages are routinely monitored for compliance > > with our policy on the use of electronic communications. > > ********************************************************************** >

7. januar 2014

Jeg sendte en ny e-post til the Jobcentre

Gmail – Update/Fwd: jobs

Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>

Update/Fwd: jobs

Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>

Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 3:15 PM

To:
Bamber Sarah JCP AINTREE <SARAH.BAMBER@dwp.gsi.gov.uk>

Hi Sarah, ok, I hope I hear back from the two employers which I have contacted. I’ve also applied for more IT-jobs, from CW Jobs, since I sent the last e-mail. And I’m going to vary a bit which job-site I use, to find jobs, I thought. I can’t just delete one sentence in the e-mail. I have to delete the whole e-mail or nothing. But I understand what you mean, I think. Thank you very much for the reply! Best regards, Erik Ribsskog On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 9:46 AM, Bamber Sarah JCP AINTREE <SARAH.BAMBER@dwp.gsi.gov.uk> wrote: > Hi Eric > > As I discussed with you in our interview I sent you the vacancies for you to look at in depth at home and if you felt that they were not appropriate for yourself or you didn’t have the relevant qualifications then to delete them, but if you felt that they were suitable for you to apply for then apply direct for them, as I explained in my interview I do not understand all the technical terms with regards to information technology so that is why some of the vacancies could be really suited to yourself and others may not, so if I send them out to yourself you can decide what is appropriate and what isn’t. I hope this helps with regards to your concerns on vacancies I have sent any further queries do not hesitate to contact me. > > Sarah > > Sarah Bamber PWPS Advisor | Jobcentre Plus | CSD | Aintree Jobcentreplus | 70 Walton Vale | Liverpool | L9 2BU | 0151 801 6516 | | www.gov.uk | Please consider the environment before printing > > —–Original Message—– > From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com] > Sent: 03 January 2014 21:57 > To: Bamber Sarah JCP AINTREE > Subject: Update/Fwd: jobs > > Hi Sarah, > > I’ve applied for the two first jobs, in your e-mail now. > > In the job-description for the third job, they write a lot about UX and UI. > > And like I told you in the meeting yesterday, I learned about usabilitiy, (and not UX/UI), at upper secondary and post-secondary education, in Norway. > > So I’m not sure if they’re going to laugh at me, if I mention usability. > > Because I’m not that familiar with those terms, (UX and UI), even if I understand partly what they mean, (but these fields seems a bit vague to me, to be honest). > > Also the fourt and fifth job seems to be the same. > > And when I tried to apply for that, then I got an error-message: > > ‘HTTP Error 404.0 – Not Found > The resource you are looking for has been removed, had its name changed, or is temporarily unavailable.’. > > Also, it says in the jobseekers-agreement that I should do my jobsearch on the Universal Jobmatch, every day. > > But not all IT-jobs seems to end up there, (for some reason). > > Before the Jobcentre started insisting on that I do my job-search, on Universal Jobmatch, then I used to find jobs on sites like CW Jobs. > > Is it ok, that I some days use other web-sites to look for jobs, (like CW Jobs)? > > Could we change the job-seekers-agreement so that it just says I should do a job-search everyday, (week-day) > > (Because now it says I should do a Universal Jobmatch job-search every day. > > But some other web-sites, (like the ones you used in the meeting yesterday), seems to be better, for finding e.g. Web Designer-jobs). > > Best regards, > > Erik Ribsskog > > > ———- Forwarded message ———- > From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com> > Date: Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 5:22 PM > Subject: Re: jobs > To: Bamber Sarah JCP AINTREE <SARAH.BAMBER@dwp.gsi.gov.uk> > > > Hi Sarah, > > thank you for the e-mail! > > I’m also going to forward you the e-mail I mentioned in the meeting today. > > (The one from the IT-company, that were going to keep my CV, for three months time. > > And which I said I was going to bring to the next meeting). > > Best regards, > > Erik Ribsskog > > > On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 4:03 PM, Bamber Sarah JCP AINTREE <SARAH.BAMBER@dwp.gsi.gov.uk> wrote: >> http://jobview.monster.co.uk/Graduate-web-designer-HTML5-CSS3-Photosho >> p-Illustrator-Job-Chester-NW-UK-128547470.aspx?WT.mc_n=Indeed_UK&=olm_ >> sk_feed_indeed_uk >> http://www.indeed.co.uk/cmp/Connect-Internet-Solutions-Ltd/jobs/Digita >> l-Designer-Front-End-Developer-d573d3b307b1d6b4 >> http://www.totaljobs.com/JobSearch/JobDetails.aspx?JobId=58519544 >> http://www.it-executive.com/pages/DataBase%20ASP/viewpub.asp?ID=48689 >> http://www.it-executive.com/pages/DataBase%20ASP/viewpub.asp?ID=48689 >> >> >> Sarah Bamber PWPS Advisor | Jobcentre Plus | CSD | Aintree >> Jobcentreplus | >> 70 Walton Vale | Liverpool | L9 2BU | 0151 801 6516 | | www.gov.uk | >> Please consider the environment before printing >> >> >> >> ********************************************************************** >> >> This document is strictly confidential and is intended only for use by >> the addressee. >> >> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, >> distribution or other >> >> action taken in reliance of the information contained in this e-mail >> is strictly prohibited. >> >> Any views expressed by the sender of this message are not necessarily >> those of the Department >> >> for Work and Pensions. >> >> If you have received this transmission in error, please use the reply >> function to tell us >> >> and then permanently delete what you have received. >> >> This email was scanned for viruses by the Department for Work and Pensions’ >> anti-virus services and on leaving the Department was found to be >> virus free. >> >> Please note: Incoming and outgoing e-mail messages are routinely >> monitored for compliance >> >> with our policy on the use of electronic communications. >> >> ********************************************************************** > ********************************************************************** > > This document is strictly confidential and is intended only for use by the addressee. > > If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or other > > action taken in reliance of the information contained in this e-mail is strictly prohibited. > > Any views expressed by the sender of this message are not necessarily those of the Department > > for Work and Pensions. > > If you have received this transmission in error, please use the reply function to tell us > > and then permanently delete what you have received. > > This email was scanned for viruses by the Department for Work and Pensions’ anti-virus services and on leaving the Department was found to be virus free. > > Please note: Incoming and outgoing e-mail messages are routinely monitored for compliance > > with our policy on the use of electronic communications. > > ********************************************************************** >

7. januar 2014

Jeg sendte enda en e-post til Re kommune

Gmail – Slektsforskning Borge gård

Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>

Slektsforskning Borge gård

Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 4:16 PM

To:
#Re Postmottak <#rekpostmottak@v-man.no>

Cc:
kevens@online.no

Bcc:
Rollag Bibliotek <Rollag.Bibliotek@rollag.kommune.no>, aaseb@rollag.kommune.no, soknepresten.rollag@rollag.kommune.no, Norges Bondelag <bondelaget@bondelaget.no>

Hei, ok, mange takk! Da sender jeg bare en kopi av denne e-posten til dem. Takk for hjelp!

Mvh. Erik Ribsskog
2014/1/6 #Re Postmottak <#rekpostmottak@v-man.no>:
> Hei.
> Her følger informasjon til kontaktpersonene til Våle historielag.
>
> Våle historielag
> v / Knut H. Evensen, Bettumveien 6, 3178 Våle
> Bispeveien 1981
> 3178 Våle
>
> Telefon :
>
> 33 06 09 16
> 918 61 778
>
> E-post :
>
> kevens@online.no
>
> Mvh
> Postmottak
> Re kommune
> Tlf. 33 06 10 00
>
>
> —–Opprinnelig melding—–
> Fra: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
> Sendt: 6. januar 2014 09:31
> Til: #Re Postmottak
> Kopi: Rollag Bibliotek; Norges Bondelag; aaseb@rollag.kommune.no; soknepresten.rollag@rollag.kommune.no
> Emne: Re: Slektsforskning Borge gård
>
> Hei,
>
> ok, jeg likte ikke at den organisasjonen ikke hadde noen ordentlig e-post-adresse.
>
> De web-skjemaene synes jeg at er noe dritt.
>
> (For å si det på ordentlig bonde-norsk).
>
> Apropos dritt, så gikk jeg i samme klasse, som en Erik Re, på Berger skole og Svelvik ungdomsskole, på første halvdel av 80-tallet.
>
> Mora var fra Vestlandet, men faren var vel kanskje fra Re, da.
>
> Han hadde visst en gang satt opp en kabel, over veien.
>
> Så da Erik Re, (og muligens Ulf Havmo), kom syklende, så fikk de ledningen i halsen.
>
> Og Erik Re hadde en lillebror som het Kjetil Re.
>
> Og han hadde visst driti på veggen, en gang, som han skulle, på do.
>
> (Sa Erik Re en gang).
>
> Noe sånt.
>
> Disse bodde like ved der de svenske Glasshytte-damene bodde, (vil jeg si).
>
> (Noe sånt).
>
> Ikke så langt unna Berger kirke.
>
> Og de flytta vekk på midten av 80-tallet, (hvis jeg ikke tar helt feil).
>
> Og de flytta dit seinere enn meg.
>
> (Jeg flytta dit høsten 1979, fra mora mi i Larvik).
>
> Jeg kan kanskje høre med kriken der nede.
>
> For bestemor Ågot sin oldemor Berget Danielsdatter vokste opp på Rollag prestegård.
>
> Sender kopi til Rollag og, siden bestemor Ågot var derfra.
>
> Kanskje dem veit noe oppi der.
>
> Takk for svar, ihvertfall!
>
> Mvh.
>
> Erik Ribsskog
>
>
> 2014/1/6 #Re Postmottak <#rekpostmottak@v-man.no>:
>> Hei.
>>
>> Re kommune har mottatt din e-post og jeg anbefaler deg å ta kontakt med Våle Historielag. Linken under er til deres hjemmeside.
>> http://www.vaalehistorielag.net/
>>
>>
>> Mvh
>> Postmottak
>> Re kommune
>> Tlf. 33 06 10 00
>>
>>
>> —–Opprinnelig melding—–
>> Fra: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
>> Sendt: 3. januar 2014 00:39
>> Til: #Re Postmottak
>> Emne: Slektsforskning Borge gård
>>
>> Hei,
>>
>> jeg driver med slektsforskning, og min farmor, Ågot Mogan Olsen, hu fortalte meg en gang det, at de bodde noen år, nede i Vestfold, på den tida, som hu var lita jente.
>>
>> Og det stemmer med noe som står i bygdeboka for Rollag, (som biblioteket der sendte).
>>
>> (Se vedlegg).
>>
>> For der står det at Mogan-familien bodde noen år på Borge gård, i Våle.
>>
>> Har dere noen informasjon om Mogan-slekten, fra de årene, som de bodde, nede i Vestfold?
>>
>> (For min farmor var litt vag rundt dette, da.
>>
>> Så jeg lurte litt på det her).
>>
>> På forhånd takk for eventuelt svar!
>>
>> Mvh.
>>
>> Erik Ribsskog

6. januar 2014
Jeg sendte en e-post til Re kommune

Gmail – Slektsforskning Borge gård

Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>

Slektsforskning Borge gård

Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 8:31 AM

To:
#Re Postmottak <#rekpostmottak@v-man.no>

Cc:
Rollag Bibliotek <Rollag.Bibliotek@rollag.kommune.no>, Norges Bondelag <bondelaget@bondelaget.no>, aaseb@rollag.kommune.no, soknepresten.rollag@rollag.kommune.no

Hei, ok, jeg likte ikke at den organisasjonen ikke hadde noen ordentlig
e-post-adresse. De web-skjemaene synes jeg at er noe dritt. (For å si det på ordentlig bonde-norsk). Apropos dritt, så gikk jeg i samme klasse, som en Erik Re, på Berger
skole og Svelvik ungdomsskole, på første halvdel av 80-tallet. Mora var fra Vestlandet, men faren var vel kanskje fra Re, da. Han hadde visst en gang satt opp en kabel, over veien. Så da Erik Re, (og muligens Ulf Havmo), kom syklende, så fikk de
ledningen i halsen. Og Erik Re hadde en lillebror som het Kjetil Re. Og han hadde visst driti på veggen, en gang, som han skulle, på do. (Sa Erik Re en gang). Noe sånt. Disse bodde like ved der de svenske Glasshytte-damene bodde, (vil jeg si). (Noe sånt). Ikke så langt unna Berger kirke. Og de flytta vekk på midten av 80-tallet, (hvis jeg ikke tar helt feil). Og de flytta dit seinere enn meg. (Jeg flytta dit høsten 1979, fra mora mi i Larvik). Jeg kan kanskje høre med kriken der nede. For bestemor Ågot sin oldemor Berget Danielsdatter vokste opp på
Rollag prestegård. Sender kopi til Rollag og, siden bestemor Ågot var derfra. Kanskje dem veit noe oppi der. Takk for svar, ihvertfall! Mvh. Erik Ribsskog
2014/1/6 #Re Postmottak <#rekpostmottak@v-man.no>:
> Hei.
>
> Re kommune har mottatt din e-post og jeg anbefaler deg å ta kontakt med Våle Historielag. Linken under er til deres hjemmeside.
> http://www.vaalehistorielag.net/
>
>
> Mvh
> Postmottak
> Re kommune
> Tlf. 33 06 10 00
>
>
> —–Opprinnelig melding—–
> Fra: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
> Sendt: 3. januar 2014 00:39
> Til: #Re Postmottak
> Emne: Slektsforskning Borge gård
>
> Hei,
>
> jeg driver med slektsforskning, og min farmor, Ågot Mogan Olsen, hu fortalte meg en gang det, at de bodde noen år, nede i Vestfold, på den tida, som hu var lita jente.
>
> Og det stemmer med noe som står i bygdeboka for Rollag, (som biblioteket der sendte).
>
> (Se vedlegg).
>
> For der står det at Mogan-familien bodde noen år på Borge gård, i Våle.
>
> Har dere noen informasjon om Mogan-slekten, fra de årene, som de bodde, nede i Vestfold?
>
> (For min farmor var litt vag rundt dette, da.
>
> Så jeg lurte litt på det her).
>
> På forhånd takk for eventuelt svar!
>
> Mvh.
>
> Erik Ribsskog

6. januar 2014
Jeg sendte en e-post til kirken i Rollag

Gmail – Slektsforskning (Berget og Margit Danielsdatter, Rollag Prestegård)

Erik Ribsskog

<eribsskog@gmail.com>

Slektsforskning (Berget og Margit Danielsdatter, Rollag Prestegård)

Erik Ribsskog

<eribsskog@gmail.com>

Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 10:48 PM

To:

aaseb@rollag.kommune.no

Cc:

soknepresten.rollag@rollag.kommune.no, Rollag Bibliotek <Rollag.Bibliotek@rollag.kommune.no>, svelvik.menighet@svelvik.kirken.no

Hei,

jeg driver fortsatt med slektsforskning, (noe jeg har fått svar om fra

biblioteket i Rollag tidligere).

Jeg har funnet ut at min farmor Ågot Mogan Olsen sin mor, (nemlig

Bergit Tovsdatter Mogan), hadde to bestemødre, som begge het

Danielsdatter.

Det var Margit og Berget.

(Se vedlagt slektsforskning).

Hu Berget har jeg funnet ut om, at var etter noen som bodde på

prestegarden i Rollag, nemlig Daniel Hansen og Aase Gundersdatter.

Men det var også fler Daniel oppi der, på den tida, (blant annet en

Daniel Sevresen, (har jeg sett i kirkeboka).

Men det er så mange år, å kikke gjennom, (i kirkeboka), for å finne

bryllupet til Margit Danielsdatter og Gullek Olsen.

Så jeg lurte på om disse folka fortsatt er kjent oppi der?

Var a Margit også datter av han Daniel Hansen fra prestegarden.

Bare at hu var attpåklatt?

For hu var ikke med på folketellinga for 1801, (var det vel), for prestegarden.

Men hu kunne jo ha blitt født like etterpå.

Bestemor Ågot kunne kanskje noen ganger virke litt innavla.

(Uten at jeg er noen ekspert).

Så det er mulig at begge besteforeldra til mora hennes var søstre.

Hva vet jeg.

Har dere noen ‘forklarings’ på dette?

Og hvor på det fine prestetunet deres bodde han Daniel Hansen forresten?

Var det i en av de bygningene som det står om på nettet?

(Det stod i folketellinga at han var bonde og også dreide rokker.

Noe sånt.

Jeg fikk forresten et sybord, (eller noe sånt), som var gammelt, til å

ha TV-en min på, på gutterommet, på 80-tallet.

For jeg hadde VIC 20, osv.).

Jeg har sett at det var en lav stue, på det tunet, med veggmalerier av

Kongsbergmaleren osv., på Wikipedia.

Dessuten, så fant visst mora til Ågot sin foster-far, (Gullek

Gullekson Gulleksrud/Traaen), Tråen-skatten, har jeg lest, på nettet.

Den holder vel til like ved prestegården ettersom jeg har forstått?

Håper dere har mulighet til å svare på dette.

(Litt artig å vite hvor ‘innavla’ man er, liksom.

Selv om jeg skal prøve å leite mer i kirkeboka sjæl og).

Mvh.

Erik Ribsskog

to danielsdatter.JPG
174K

PS. Her er vedlegget:

4. januar 2014
Noen jeg ikke vet hvem er, har sendt meg en link, til en Huffington Post-artikkel, som kritiserer Amazon

PS.

Her er mer om dette:

http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2013/11/25/amazon-staff-investigation_n_4335894.html?utm_hp_ref=email_share

4. januar 2014
Jeg sendte en ny e-post til the Parliamentary Ombudsman

Gmail – Our reference EN-178255

Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>

Our reference EN-178255

Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 6:01 PM

To:
Phso Enquiries <Phso.Enquiries@ombudsman.org.uk>

Hi,

the problem is that the IPCC has blocked my e-mail-address, (for some reason, which isn’t that clear to me, I think I have to say). If you could please send my e-mail on to them, or tell them to unblock my e-mail-address.

Thanks in advance for any help! Yours sincerely, Erik Ribsskog

On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 2:18 PM, Phso Enquiries <Phso.Enquiries@ombudsman.org.uk> wrote:

PROTECT

We are committed to keeping your information secure. As part of that commitment we have decided that when we send you information by email we may have to remove some details. This includes information that may identify you, any other person and sometimes the organisation complained about.

Our reference EN-178255 (Please quote in any future correspondence with us)

Dear Sir

Thank you for your email of 18 November 2013 to us. I was sorry to learn of your concerns. I am also sorry that we are unable to help you with your complaint. This email explains why we believe that is the case.

Your complaint

You appear to complain about Merseyside Police, and emails that you have received from ‘Takeaway.com,’ which is a private company.

Our role

Our role is to consider complaints that the NHS in England and government bodies in the UK have not acted properly or fairly, or has provided a poor service.

Our decision and next steps

Unfortunately we are unable to help you with your complaints, because we are unable to look at complaints about the police and private companies.

Your complaint about the police

It may be that the Independent Police Complaints Commission can help you. I have included their contact details below:

Independent Police Complaints Commission
PO Box 473
Sale
M33 0BW

Telephone: 0300 020 0096

Email: enquiries@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk

Your complaint about a private company

You should contact the private company directly to complain to them about the emails you have been receiving.

I hope the information I have provided is helpful

If you have any questions about what I have set out in this email, please contact me using the details below.

Yours faithfully

Laura Dear

Customer Services Officer

Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman

Millbank Tower

Millbank

London

SW1P 4QP

Telephone: 0345 015 4033

Email: phso.enquiries@ombudsman.org.uk

www.ombudsman.org.uk

Follow us on

If you think our decision is wrong, you can request a review. To enable us to review our decision you must provide us with evidence that our decision was based on inaccurate information; or you have new information that was not previously available to us; or we overlooked or misunderstood your complaint. To request a review, you can complete a ‘What to do if you think our decision is wrong’ form, which is available on our website: www.ombudsman.org.uk/make-a-complaint/unhappy-with-our-service. Alternatively, you can contact me for the form. You would need to submit your review request form to us within three months of the date of this correspondence.

Improving our service

We use an external research company to find out what our customers think. If you would prefer us not to pass your contact details on to them please call 0300 061 4222 or email us at customersurvey@ombudsman.org.uk

The original of this email was scanned for viruses by Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied exclusively by Cable & Wireless in partnership with MessageLabs.
On leaving the GSI this email was certified virus free.
All email communications with PHSO pass through the Government Secure Intranet, and may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes.
The MessageLabs Anti Virus Service is the first managed service to achieve the CSIA Claims Tested Mark (CCTM Certificate Number 2006/04/0007), the UK Government quality mark initiative for information security products and services. For more information about this please visit www.cctmark.gov.uk

4. januar 2014
Jeg sendte enda en e-post til the Jobcentre

Gmail – New update/Fwd: Update/Fwd: jobs

Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>

New update/Fwd: Update/Fwd: jobs

Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 10:43 PM

To:
Bamber Sarah JCP AINTREE <SARAH.BAMBER@dwp.gsi.gov.uk>

Hi again, I’m also a bit afraid of applying for the jobs that Universal Jobmatch
recomends for me, in Knutsford. Because when I apply for jobs in Chorley or Blackpool. Then you start to ‘scream’ and critizise me in the meetings. But it says on the Jobseekers-agreement that I should apply for jobs
within 90 minutes travel-time, (which is about the time it takes to
get to Knutsford). (Even if it’s a bit expensive to go there, when one only have
jobseekers allowance. Because the train-tickets are £13.50. So I would have needed an advance quite quickly, to work in Knutsford). Also, one are supposed to leave feed-back, on the recommended jobs,
that one don’t apply for. But why was it again that I shouldn’t apply for jobs in
Blackpool/Chorley/Knutsford. Which reason should I choose from the drop-down-meny. Because it doesn’t say ‘Other’. And who get this feed-back by the way, (from the Universal Jobmatch). Just something I thought about here. Best regards, Erik Ribsskog
———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 9:57 PM
Subject: Update/Fwd: jobs
To: Bamber Sarah JCP AINTREE <SARAH.BAMBER@dwp.gsi.gov.uk>
Hi Sarah, I’ve applied for the two first jobs, in your e-mail now. In the job-description for the third job, they write a lot about UX and UI. And like I told you in the meeting yesterday, I learned about
usabilitiy, (and not UX/UI), at upper secondary and post-secondary
education, in Norway. So I’m not sure if they’re going to laugh at me, if I mention usability. Because I’m not that familiar with those terms, (UX and UI), even if I
understand partly what they mean, (but these fields seems a bit vague
to me, to be honest). Also the fourt and fifth job seems to be the same. And when I tried to apply for that, then I got an error-message: ‘HTTP Error 404.0 – Not Found
The resource you are looking for has been removed, had its name
changed, or is temporarily unavailable.’. Also, it says in the jobseekers-agreement that I should do my
jobsearch on the Universal Jobmatch, every day. But not all IT-jobs seems to end up there, (for some reason). Before the Jobcentre started insisting on that I do my job-search, on
Universal Jobmatch, then I used to find jobs on sites like CW Jobs. Is it ok, that I some days use other web-sites to look for jobs, (like CW Jobs)? Could we change the job-seekers-agreement so that it just says I
should do a job-search everyday, (week-day) (Because now it says I should do a Universal Jobmatch job-search every day. But some other web-sites, (like the ones you used in the meeting
yesterday), seems to be better, for finding e.g. Web Designer-jobs). Best regards, Erik Ribsskog
———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 5:22 PM
Subject: Re: jobs
To: Bamber Sarah JCP AINTREE <SARAH.BAMBER@dwp.gsi.gov.uk>
Hi Sarah, thank you for the e-mail! I’m also going to forward you the e-mail I mentioned in the meeting today. (The one from the IT-company, that were going to keep my CV, for three
months time. And which I said I was going to bring to the next meeting). Best regards, Erik Ribsskog
On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 4:03 PM, Bamber Sarah JCP AINTREE
<SARAH.BAMBER@dwp.gsi.gov.uk> wrote:
> http://jobview.monster.co.uk/Graduate-web-designer-HTML5-CSS3-Photoshop-Illustrator-Job-Chester-NW-UK-128547470.aspx?WT.mc_n=Indeed_UK&=olm_sk_feed_indeed_uk
> http://www.indeed.co.uk/cmp/Connect-Internet-Solutions-Ltd/jobs/Digital-Designer-Front-End-Developer-d573d3b307b1d6b4
> http://www.totaljobs.com/JobSearch/JobDetails.aspx?JobId=58519544
> http://www.it-executive.com/pages/DataBase%20ASP/viewpub.asp?ID=48689
> http://www.it-executive.com/pages/DataBase%20ASP/viewpub.asp?ID=48689
>
>
> Sarah Bamber PWPS Advisor | Jobcentre Plus | CSD | Aintree Jobcentreplus |
> 70 Walton Vale | Liverpool | L9 2BU | 0151 801 6516 | | www.gov.uk | Please
> consider the environment before printing
>
>
>
> **********************************************************************
>
> This document is strictly confidential and is intended only for use by the
> addressee.
>
> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution
> or other
>
> action taken in reliance of the information contained in this e-mail is
> strictly prohibited.
>
> Any views expressed by the sender of this message are not necessarily those
> of the Department
>
> for Work and Pensions.
>
> If you have received this transmission in error, please use the reply
> function to tell us
>
> and then permanently delete what you have received.
>
> This email was scanned for viruses by the Department for Work and Pensions’
> anti-virus services and on leaving the Department was found to be virus
> free.
>
> Please note: Incoming and outgoing e-mail messages are routinely monitored
> for compliance
>
> with our policy on the use of electronic communications.
>
> **********************************************************************

3. januar 2014
Jeg sendte en e-post til the Jobcentre

Gmail – Update/Fwd: jobs

Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>

Update/Fwd: jobs

Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 9:57 PM

To:
Bamber Sarah JCP AINTREE <SARAH.BAMBER@dwp.gsi.gov.uk>

Hi Sarah, I’ve applied for the two first jobs, in your e-mail now. In the job-description for the third job, they write a lot about UX and UI. And like I told you in the meeting yesterday, I learned about
usabilitiy, (and not UX/UI), at upper secondary and post-secondary
education, in Norway. So I’m not sure if they’re going to laugh at me, if I mention usability. Because I’m not that familiar with those terms, (UX and UI), even if I
understand partly what they mean, (but these fields seems a bit vague
to me, to be honest). Also the fourt and fifth job seems to be the same. And when I tried to apply for that, then I got an error-message: ‘HTTP Error 404.0 – Not Found
The resource you are looking for has been removed, had its name
changed, or is temporarily unavailable.’. Also, it says in the jobseekers-agreement that I should do my
jobsearch on the Universal Jobmatch, every day. But not all IT-jobs seems to end up there, (for some reason). Before the Jobcentre started insisting on that I do my job-search, on
Universal Jobmatch, then I used to find jobs on sites like CW Jobs. Is it ok, that I some days use other web-sites to look for jobs, (like CW Jobs)? Could we change the job-seekers-agreement so that it just says I
should do a job-search everyday, (week-day) (Because now it says I should do a Universal Jobmatch job-search every day. But some other web-sites, (like the ones you used in the meeting
yesterday), seems to be better, for finding e.g. Web Designer-jobs). Best regards, Erik Ribsskog
———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 5:22 PM
Subject: Re: jobs
To: Bamber Sarah JCP AINTREE <SARAH.BAMBER@dwp.gsi.gov.uk>
Hi Sarah, thank you for the e-mail! I’m also going to forward you the e-mail I mentioned in the meeting today. (The one from the IT-company, that were going to keep my CV, for three
months time. And which I said I was going to bring to the next meeting). Best regards, Erik Ribsskog
On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 4:03 PM, Bamber Sarah JCP AINTREE
<SARAH.BAMBER@dwp.gsi.gov.uk> wrote:
> http://jobview.monster.co.uk/Graduate-web-designer-HTML5-CSS3-Photoshop-Illustrator-Job-Chester-NW-UK-128547470.aspx?WT.mc_n=Indeed_UK&=olm_sk_feed_indeed_uk
> http://www.indeed.co.uk/cmp/Connect-Internet-Solutions-Ltd/jobs/Digital-Designer-Front-End-Developer-d573d3b307b1d6b4
> http://www.totaljobs.com/JobSearch/JobDetails.aspx?JobId=58519544
> http://www.it-executive.com/pages/DataBase%20ASP/viewpub.asp?ID=48689
> http://www.it-executive.com/pages/DataBase%20ASP/viewpub.asp?ID=48689
>
>
> Sarah Bamber PWPS Advisor | Jobcentre Plus | CSD | Aintree Jobcentreplus |
> 70 Walton Vale | Liverpool | L9 2BU | 0151 801 6516 | | www.gov.uk | Please
> consider the environment before printing
>
>
>
> **********************************************************************
>
> This document is strictly confidential and is intended only for use by the
> addressee.
>
> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution
> or other
>
> action taken in reliance of the information contained in this e-mail is
> strictly prohibited.
>
> Any views expressed by the sender of this message are not necessarily those
> of the Department
>
> for Work and Pensions.
>
> If you have received this transmission in error, please use the reply
> function to tell us
>
> and then permanently delete what you have received.
>
> This email was scanned for viruses by the Department for Work and Pensions’
> anti-virus services and on leaving the Department was found to be virus
> free.
>
> Please note: Incoming and outgoing e-mail messages are routinely monitored
> for compliance
>
> with our policy on the use of electronic communications.
>
> **********************************************************************

3. januar 2014