johncons

Stikkord: E-post

  • Jeg sendte en ny e-post til the Jobcentre


    Gmail – Update/Fwd: Complaint

    Gmail


    Erik Ribsskog
    <eribsskog@gmail.com>



    Update/Fwd: Complaint



    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>


    Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 12:28 PM

    To:
    Contact-Us@jobcentreplus.gsi.gov.uk

    Hi,

    now the postman was on the door with a letter, (which I attach), from you, at JCP.
    It says I’m no longer banned from the Jobcentre.

    But my sign-on-day, was yesterday.


    Why do I get this letter, the day after my sign on day?

    I didn’t get any forms, in the post, comensing my sign-on meeting.

    So I went to the Jobcentre in Aintree, yesterday.
    Since I hadn’t been sent the relevant sign-on-forms.
    Just to explain about this.
    Also, I was banned for three months, for writing ‘threaths’, in e-mails.

    But to try to explain, I was only expressing my frustration and desperation, since JCP broke promisses made in a ‘funny’ meeting, which I was dragged to, in the middle of a sign on-meeting, at Aintree jobcentre, on 16/8.

    (Because these broken promisses/agreements led to that I suddently didn’t get money for food etc., and I didn’t know when I was going to get my next jobseekers allowance payments).

    I blogged about this, on my blog.

    And spoofing e-mails were sent in my name, to JCP.
    (I think, because the Police came on my door, and showed me an e-mail which wasn’t written by me.
    But the Police went so fast forward when they were here, so I didn’t get to explain them that.
    It’s easier to explain in an e-mail I think).

    So I’ve been unfairly punished here, I think, since I’ve been banned for threatening e-mails I haven’t written, but some computers-experts who have read my blog have fabricated.

    You should get some computer-experts to check the mentioned e-mails and you’ll see that yourselves, I would think.
    Just for the record.
    Also, it says in your letter, that I’ll be ‘monitored’.

    As far as I remember, you have a security-guard, by the door, in this Jobcentre, who monitors everything that happens there.

    So I don’t understand what you mean here.

    You write in big capital letters, a bit like I’m a slow person you’re trying to patronise.

    You don’t have to write with big letters like that to me, I understand anyway.
    (Just to explain).

    Well, I just wanted to try to level again here, because I think I have been punished for acting natural to JCP mistakes here.

    So I wanted to complain about this, for the record.
    The Jobcentre in Aintree told me me my next meeting was on 3/1, when I was there yesterday.
    So I’ll go there again then.


    I just wanted to complain, ‘for the record’, if that’s alright.
    Hope this is alright!

    Yours sincerely,


    Erik Ribsskog

    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
    Date: Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 7:33 AM
    Subject: Complaint
    To: Contact-Us <Contact-Us@jobcentreplus.gsi.gov.uk>

    Hi,

    when I went to the Jobcentre in Aintree yesterday, something happened which puzzles me.


    I showed my attandance arrangement-card to the reception, and was told: ‘box 2’, (like it says on the card), and to take a seat.

    The seats are placed so that ones backs face the boxes.
    And when I heard a woman call my last-name, I went to box 2.

    But the woman in box 2 just looked down.


    And the woman in box 3 wanted to speak with me, about the sign-on-meeting.

    What was going on here, I was wondering?
    Box 3 also didn’t have jobseekers-diary-forms in it, so the box 3-woman, (who didn’t say her name), had to go to box 2 to pick up a couple of them, when I mentioned that the reason I used my home-made form, was because I hadn’t been given proper forms lately.

    The box 3 woman also asked me if I had a car since I had applied to a job in Chorley on the Universal Jobmatch.
    I explained I was used to commute when I lived in Norway, and that the Universal Jobmatch is set on a 20 or 30 miles radius, I think, and therefore shows jobs in the whole North-West almost.

    I thought I was ridiuled because I had applied for a job outside of Merseyside.
    But there aren’t that many jobs at Merseyside, which fits with my jobseekers agreement.


    And earlier I’ve been told by the Jobcentre to also apply for jobs outside of Merseyside.

    So it’s like one arm of the Jobcentre doesn’t know what the other arm does.

    I’ve also been so unfortunate to have been unemployed a while now, and have gone to four different jobcentres.


    (Williamsson Sq, the one in Sunderland City Centre and Edge Hill).

    And the one in Aintree does it different from the three others.

    None of the three others had a fixed box-number for sign-on meetings.


    The box number would vary, for each appointment.

    So I think it’s a bit strange, with the box-number-system, in Aintree, (Walton Vale).

    And if they have this box-number-system.


    Then why was I called to the ‘wrong’ box yesterday, I was wondering.

    Hope it’s alright that I’m a bit currious about this.

    Best regards,

    Erik Ribsskog


    letter jcp.jpg
    91K

    PS.

    Her er vedlegget:
    letter jcp
  • Fler e-poster fra Philip Gabrielsen

    Noname 101
     
    Noname 102
     
    Noname 103
     
    Noname 104
     
    Noname 105
     
    Noname 106
     
    Noname 107
     
    Noname 108
     
    Noname 109
     
    Noname 110
     
    Noname 111
     
    Noname 112
     
    Noname 113
     
    Noname 114
     
    Noname 115
     
    Noname 116
     
    Noname 117
     
    Noname 118
     
    Noname 119
     
    Noname 120
     
    Noname 121
     
    Noname 122
     
    Noname 123
     
    Noname 124
     
    Noname 125
     
    Noname 126
     
    Noname 127
     
    Noname 128
     
    Noname 129
     
    Noname 130
     
    Noname 131
     
    Noname 132
     
    Noname 133
     
    Noname 134
     
    Noname 135
     
    Noname 136
     
    Noname 137
     
    Noname 138
     
    Noname 139
     
    Noname 140
     
    Noname 141
     
    Noname 142
     
    Noname 143
     
    Noname 144
     
    Noname 145
     
    Noname 146
     
    Noname 147
     
    Noname 148
     
    Noname 149
     
    Noname 150

    PS.

    Linkene ovenfor åpnes i et eget vindu.

    PS 2.

    Etter å ha lest denne bolken, med e-poster, fra Wiki-adminenes hverdag.

    Så er det som sitter igjen på minnet, at de har problemer med ukultur, i Wikipedia, (virker det som).

    Nemlig ved at de nye skribentene blir mobbet av de mer erfarne, da.

    Noe jeg selv synes at jeg opplevde, da jeg begynte å skrive på Wikipedia, for fire-fem år siden, (var det vel).

    Og etter å ha blitt hakket på en gang, så ble jeg liksom stemplet, som en problem-maker der, da.

    Og dette ble så mer og mer blåst opp, så tilslutt, så ble jeg bannet, bare jeg skrev et ord der liksom, da.

    Så jeg må si at jeg kjenner igjen dette med ukultur, på Wikipedia, litt.

    Og de siste årene, så har jeg holdt meg langt unna Wikipedia.

    (For å si det sånn).

    Jeg har bestemt meg for å heller prøve å være uavhengig, (av Wikipedia og andre), og fokusere på johncons-blogg, da.

    (Så dette med at jeg har skrevet litt på Wikipedia og Dagbladet sitt kommentarsystem, osv.

    Det må jeg vel kalle for noen relativt små feilskjær.

    Iforhold til hovedfokuset mitt, som er å drive med johncons-blogg, (og å være uavhengig), da).

    Så jeg syntes at jeg kjente meg litt igjen, da jeg nå nettopp leste om dette med ukultur, på Wikipedia, da.

    (For å si det sånn).

    Så sånn er det.

    Bare noe jeg tenkte på.

    Men men.

    Mvh.

    Erik Ribsskog

    PS 3.

    Så også at det ble skrevet, i et par av e-postene, at fotballspilleren Frode Olsen visstnok hadde gjort noe galt, forresten.

    Jeg vet ikke om det er så kjent?

    Hm.

    PS 4.

    Og hvorfor Philip Gabrielsen har sendt meg alle disse 800 e-postene, det veit jeg ikke.

    Men han er jo sønn av tidligere næringsminister Ansgar Gabrielsen, da.

    (Hvis jeg har skjønt det riktig, ihvertfall).

    Og Philip Gabrielsen, han er vel høyt oppe, i Wiki sine styrer, osv.

    Men Philip Gabrielsen, han skrev jo på Wikipedia, (for noen år siden), at Orkla ikke likte, at jeg skrev der.

    Men dette ble da kalt for en ‘practical joke’, av Wiki-admin Jeblad.

    Så nå har altså Philip Gabrielsen begått enda en ny practical joke, da?

    Og sendt meg bortimot tusen e-poster om Wiki-admin-enes vel egentlig hemmelige arbeid?

    Er virkelig Philip Gabrielsen en så stor tullebukk, som Jeblad vil ha det til?

    Og hvorfor har isåfall Wikipedia en så stor tullebukk, så høyt plassert, i sin organisasjon?

    (For det virker jo fra e-postene som at de har mange dyktige folk der, for å si det sånn).

    Så hva holder egentlig Philip Gabrielsen aka. Flums, Jeblad og Wikipedia på med?

    Det undrer meg litt, må jeg si.

    Men Philip Gabrielsen er jo kjent.

    Siden faren har vært minister, og siden han selv jo er høyt plassert i Wikipedia.

    Så jeg har valgt å likevel begynne å publisere disse e-postene, om Wiki-adminene sin hverdag, da.

    Selv om jeg må innrømme at jeg ikke skjønner helt hvorfor Philip Gabrielsen; (som jeg ikke hadde hørt navnet til engang, før han skrev på Wikipedia, at Orkla ikke likte, at jeg skrev der. Og som jeg ikke er på talefot med, etter at han deretter bannet meg, fra Wikipedia, og også skrev noen trusler mot meg, (hvis jeg husker det riktig), på sitt nettsted), har sendt meg alle disse e-postene.

    Så sånn er det.

    Bare noe jeg tenkte på.

    Men men.

    PS 5.

    Her er mer om dette:

    kødd fra wiki admin Flums

    http://johncons-mirror.blogspot.co.uk/2009/05/rumpa-til-stoltenberg.html

  • Jeg sendte en ny e-post til the Jobcentre


    Gmail – Complaint

    Gmail


    Erik Ribsskog
    <eribsskog@gmail.com>



    Complaint



    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>


    Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 7:33 AM

    To:
    Contact-Us <Contact-Us@jobcentreplus.gsi.gov.uk>

    Hi,

    when I went to the Jobcentre in Aintree yesterday, something happened which puzzles me.

    I showed my attandance arrangement-card to the reception, and was told: ‘box 2’, (like it says on the card), and to take a seat.

    The seats are placed so that ones backs face the boxes.
    And when I heard a woman call my last-name, I went to box 2.

    But the woman in box 2 just looked down.


    And the woman in box 3 wanted to speak with me, about the sign-on-meeting.

    What was going on here, I was wondering?
    Box 3 also didn’t have jobseekers-diary-forms in it, so the box 3-woman, (who didn’t say her name), had to go to box 2 to pick up a couple of them, when I mentioned that the reason I used my home-made form, was because I hadn’t been given proper forms lately.

    The box 3 woman also asked me if I had a car since I had applied to a job in Chorley on the Universal Jobmatch.
    I explained I was used to commute when I lived in Norway, and that the Universal Jobmatch is set on a 20 or 30 miles radius, I think, and therefore shows jobs in the whole North-West almost.

    I thought I was ridiuled because I had applied for a job outside of Merseyside.
    But there aren’t that many jobs at Merseyside, which fits with my jobseekers agreement.


    And earlier I’ve been told by the Jobcentre to also apply for jobs outside of Merseyside.

    So it’s like one arm of the Jobcentre doesn’t know what the other arm does.

    I’ve also been so unfortunate to have been unemployed a while now, and have gone to four different jobcentres.


    (Williamsson Sq, the one in Sunderland City Centre and Edge Hill).

    And the one in Aintree does it different from the three others.

    None of the three others had a fixed box-number for sign-on meetings.


    The box number would vary, for each appointment.

    So I think it’s a bit strange, with the box-number-system, in Aintree, (Walton Vale).

    And if they have this box-number-system.


    Then why was I called to the ‘wrong’ box yesterday, I was wondering.

    Hope it’s alright that I’m a bit currious about this.

    Best regards,

    Erik Ribsskog
  • Mer om Twitter-klage, (MegaHomofil)


    Gmail – #6942770 Twitter Support: update on “Offensive content – MegaHomofil”

    Gmail


    Erik Ribsskog
    <eribsskog@gmail.com>



    #6942770 Twitter Support: update on “Offensive content – MegaHomofil”



    Twitter Support

    <notifications-support@twitter.zendesk.com>


    Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 12:07 AM

    Reply-To:
    Twitter Support <support+id6942770@twitter.zendesk.com>

    To:
    johncons <eribsskog@gmail.com>

    ##- Please type your reply above this line -##

    Twitter

    Hello,
    This is confirmation that Twitter has received your report.
    What else can you do?
    • Do not respond to the user. We have found that responding to someone who is intentionally attempting to aggravate you or others encourages them to continue their behavior.
    • Block the user. You can block the user using the blocking feature described here: https://support.twitter.com/entries/117063
    • Learn more about how to deal with abusive users: https://support.twitter.com/articles/15794
    • Learn how to flag inappropriate media here: https://support.twitter.com/articles/20069937
    Contact Law Enforcement
    If something has gone beyond the point of a personal conflict and has escalated to the point of believable violent threats, whether it be online or offline, please contact your local law enforcement so they can accurately assess the validity of the issue.
    If contacted by law enforcement directly, we can work with them and provide the necessary information for their investigation of your issue. You can point local law enforcement to our Law Enforcement Guidelines (https://support.twitter.com/articles/41949).
    Please remember…
    Twitter is a platform that provides a global communication service which encompasses a variety of users with different voices, ideas, and perspectives. As a policy, Twitter does not mediate content or intervene in disputes between users.
    Please keep in mind that filing multiple reports will not resolve your issue faster. Rest assured, we are working as quickly as possible, but our ability to respond may be delayed due to a high number of tickets. We thank you for your patience.
    Thanks,
    Twitter Trust & Safety
    ————————————————-
    Your ticket number: #6942770

    Message-Id:KRTQXDC0_50d3a8451ff64_6103f8ca7811841c5_sprut

  • Mer om Twitter-klage, (GeirArneslek)


    Gmail – #6942666 Twitter Support: update on “Offensive content – GeirArneslek”

    Gmail


    Erik Ribsskog
    <eribsskog@gmail.com>



    #6942666 Twitter Support: update on “Offensive content – GeirArneslek”



    Twitter Support

    <notifications-support@twitter.zendesk.com>


    Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 11:51 PM

    Reply-To:
    Twitter Support <support+id6942666@twitter.zendesk.com>

    To:
    johncons <eribsskog@gmail.com>

    ##- Please type your reply above this line -##

    Twitter

    Hello,
    This is confirmation that Twitter has received your report.
    What else can you do?
    • Do not respond to the user. We have found that responding to someone who is intentionally attempting to aggravate you or others encourages them to continue their behavior.
    • Block the user. You can block the user using the blocking feature described here: https://support.twitter.com/entries/117063
    • Learn more about how to deal with abusive users: https://support.twitter.com/articles/15794
    • Learn how to flag inappropriate media here: https://support.twitter.com/articles/20069937
    Contact Law Enforcement
    If something has gone beyond the point of a personal conflict and has escalated to the point of believable violent threats, whether it be online or offline, please contact your local law enforcement so they can accurately assess the validity of the issue.
    If contacted by law enforcement directly, we can work with them and provide the necessary information for their investigation of your issue. You can point local law enforcement to our Law Enforcement Guidelines (https://support.twitter.com/articles/41949).
    Please remember…
    Twitter is a platform that provides a global communication service which encompasses a variety of users with different voices, ideas, and perspectives. As a policy, Twitter does not mediate content or intervene in disputes between users.
    Please keep in mind that filing multiple reports will not resolve your issue faster. Rest assured, we are working as quickly as possible, but our ability to respond may be delayed due to a high number of tickets. We thank you for your patience.
    Thanks,
    Twitter Trust & Safety
    ————————————————-
    Your ticket number: #6942666

    Message-Id:YCDK14Q9_50d3a467f5a1_5c31150ca701123449_sprut

  • Mer om Twitter-klage, (BengtWad)


    Gmail – #6942523 Twitter Support: update on “Offensive content – BengtWad”

    Gmail


    Erik Ribsskog
    <eribsskog@gmail.com>



    #6942523 Twitter Support: update on “Offensive content – BengtWad”



    Twitter Support

    <notifications-support@twitter.zendesk.com>


    Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 11:30 PM

    Reply-To:
    Twitter Support <support+id6942523@twitter.zendesk.com>

    To:
    johncons <eribsskog@gmail.com>

    ##- Please type your reply above this line -##

    Twitter

    Hello,
    This is confirmation that Twitter has received your report.
    What else can you do?
    • Do not respond to the user. We have found that responding to someone who is intentionally attempting to aggravate you or others encourages them to continue their behavior.
    • Block the user. You can block the user using the blocking feature described here: https://support.twitter.com/entries/117063
    • Learn more about how to deal with abusive users: https://support.twitter.com/articles/15794
    • Learn how to flag inappropriate media here: https://support.twitter.com/articles/20069937
    Contact Law Enforcement
    If something has gone beyond the point of a personal conflict and has escalated to the point of believable violent threats, whether it be online or offline, please contact your local law enforcement so they can accurately assess the validity of the issue.
    If contacted by law enforcement directly, we can work with them and provide the necessary information for their investigation of your issue. You can point local law enforcement to our Law Enforcement Guidelines (https://support.twitter.com/articles/41949).
    Please remember…
    Twitter is a platform that provides a global communication service which encompasses a variety of users with different voices, ideas, and perspectives. As a policy, Twitter does not mediate content or intervene in disputes between users.
    Please keep in mind that filing multiple reports will not resolve your issue faster. Rest assured, we are working as quickly as possible, but our ability to respond may be delayed due to a high number of tickets. We thank you for your patience.
    Thanks,
    Twitter Trust & Safety
    ————————————————-
    Your ticket number: #6942523

    Message-Id:S9BDJQQ6_50d39f7eb9df2_3d6a160f274999238_sprut

  • Mer om Twitter-klage, (Jodebrura)


    Gmail – #6942457 Twitter Support: update on “Offensive content – Jodebrura”

    Gmail


    Erik Ribsskog
    <eribsskog@gmail.com>



    #6942457 Twitter Support: update on “Offensive content – Jodebrura”



    Twitter Support

    <notifications-support@twitter.zendesk.com>


    Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 11:19 PM

    Reply-To:
    Twitter Support <support+id6942457@twitter.zendesk.com>

    To:
    johncons <eribsskog@gmail.com>

    ##- Please type your reply above this line -##

    Twitter

    Hello,
    This is confirmation that Twitter has received your report.
    What else can you do?
    • Do not respond to the user. We have found that responding to someone who is intentionally attempting to aggravate you or others encourages them to continue their behavior.
    • Block the user. You can block the user using the blocking feature described here: https://support.twitter.com/entries/117063
    • Learn more about how to deal with abusive users: https://support.twitter.com/articles/15794
    • Learn how to flag inappropriate media here: https://support.twitter.com/articles/20069937
    Contact Law Enforcement
    If something has gone beyond the point of a personal conflict and has escalated to the point of believable violent threats, whether it be online or offline, please contact your local law enforcement so they can accurately assess the validity of the issue.
    If contacted by law enforcement directly, we can work with them and provide the necessary information for their investigation of your issue. You can point local law enforcement to our Law Enforcement Guidelines (https://support.twitter.com/articles/41949).
    Please remember…
    Twitter is a platform that provides a global communication service which encompasses a variety of users with different voices, ideas, and perspectives. As a policy, Twitter does not mediate content or intervene in disputes between users.
    Please keep in mind that filing multiple reports will not resolve your issue faster. Rest assured, we are working as quickly as possible, but our ability to respond may be delayed due to a high number of tickets. We thank you for your patience.
    Thanks,
    Twitter Trust & Safety
    ————————————————-
    Your ticket number: #6942457

    Message-Id:RP3CKKAD_50d39d06caedb_3aa81d53a6c960066_sprut

  • Mer om Twitter-klage, (GeirArneJ)


    Gmail – #6942374 Twitter Support: update on “Offensive content – GeirArneJ”

    Gmail


    Erik Ribsskog
    <eribsskog@gmail.com>



    #6942374 Twitter Support: update on “Offensive content – GeirArneJ”



    Twitter Support

    <notifications-support@twitter.zendesk.com>


    Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 11:07 PM

    Reply-To:
    Twitter Support <support+id6942374@twitter.zendesk.com>

    To:
    johncons <eribsskog@gmail.com>

    ##- Please type your reply above this line -##

    Twitter

    Hello,
    This is confirmation that Twitter has received your report.
    What else can you do?
    • Do not respond to the user. We have found that responding to someone who is intentionally attempting to aggravate you or others encourages them to continue their behavior.
    • Block the user. You can block the user using the blocking feature described here: https://support.twitter.com/entries/117063
    • Learn more about how to deal with abusive users: https://support.twitter.com/articles/15794
    • Learn how to flag inappropriate media here: https://support.twitter.com/articles/20069937
    Contact Law Enforcement
    If something has gone beyond the point of a personal conflict and has escalated to the point of believable violent threats, whether it be online or offline, please contact your local law enforcement so they can accurately assess the validity of the issue.
    If contacted by law enforcement directly, we can work with them and provide the necessary information for their investigation of your issue. You can point local law enforcement to our Law Enforcement Guidelines (https://support.twitter.com/articles/41949).
    Please remember…
    Twitter is a platform that provides a global communication service which encompasses a variety of users with different voices, ideas, and perspectives. As a policy, Twitter does not mediate content or intervene in disputes between users.
    Please keep in mind that filing multiple reports will not resolve your issue faster. Rest assured, we are working as quickly as possible, but our ability to respond may be delayed due to a high number of tickets. We thank you for your patience.
    Thanks,
    Twitter Trust & Safety
    ————————————————-
    Your ticket number: #6942374

    Message-Id:Y3YHT0QG_50d39a3c2c9c1_3b9d1a20a709307bc_sprut

  • Mer om Twitter-klage, (Posegodt_)


    Gmail – #6942297 Twitter Support: update on “Offensive content – Posegodt_”

    Gmail


    Erik Ribsskog
    <eribsskog@gmail.com>



    #6942297 Twitter Support: update on “Offensive content – Posegodt_”



    Twitter Support

    <notifications-support@twitter.zendesk.com>


    Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 10:57 PM

    Reply-To:
    Twitter Support <support+id6942297@twitter.zendesk.com>

    To:
    johncons <eribsskog@gmail.com>

    ##- Please type your reply above this line -##

    Twitter

    Hello,
    This is confirmation that Twitter has received your report.
    What else can you do?
    • Do not respond to the user. We have found that responding to someone who is intentionally attempting to aggravate you or others encourages them to continue their behavior.
    • Block the user. You can block the user using the blocking feature described here: https://support.twitter.com/entries/117063
    • Learn more about how to deal with abusive users: https://support.twitter.com/articles/15794
    • Learn how to flag inappropriate media here: https://support.twitter.com/articles/20069937
    Contact Law Enforcement
    If something has gone beyond the point of a personal conflict and has escalated to the point of believable violent threats, whether it be online or offline, please contact your local law enforcement so they can accurately assess the validity of the issue.
    If contacted by law enforcement directly, we can work with them and provide the necessary information for their investigation of your issue. You can point local law enforcement to our Law Enforcement Guidelines (https://support.twitter.com/articles/41949).
    Please remember…
    Twitter is a platform that provides a global communication service which encompasses a variety of users with different voices, ideas, and perspectives. As a policy, Twitter does not mediate content or intervene in disputes between users.
    Please keep in mind that filing multiple reports will not resolve your issue faster. Rest assured, we are working as quickly as possible, but our ability to respond may be delayed due to a high number of tickets. We thank you for your patience.
    Thanks,
    Twitter Trust & Safety
    ————————————————-
    Your ticket number: #6942297

    Message-Id:8CB4Q5HP_50d397e0502d7_25d51862a6c921577_sprut