Stikkord: E-post

Mer om budsjett

Gmail – CCCS

Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>

CCCS

Erik Ribsskog

<eribsskog@gmail.com>

Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 2:10 PM

To:
Q&A <contactus@cccs.co.uk>

Cc:
client.services@cccs.co.uk

Bcc:
offers <offers@wescot.co.uk>

Hi,

thank you very much for your e-mail.

I’ll copy this e-mail to your client services-depatment then.

Maybe they can give me advice on how to get Wescot to delete my debt.

Because they contact me all the time with their e-mails and ‘funny’ letters.

So I think that’s the only way to get them to stop wasting my time.

I’ve promised them I’ll start to pay them token-payments when I get my Jobseekers Allowance back.

Still they harass me and sabotage against me, like I explain about in more detail in the e-mail you replied to.

Thanks again for the advice!

Best regards,

Erik Ribsskog

On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 10:56 AM, Q&A <contactus@cccs.co.uk> wrote:

Good morning

Thank you for your recent e-mail.

As stated in the below emails the address that you need to send any such correspondence to is client.services@cccs.co.uk

Thank you for contacting CCCS.

If you have any further queries you can reply to this e-mail, use Online Chat or call us on free-phone 0800 197 1704 (weekdays 8am until 8pm).

Kind regards

Lauren

From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

Sent: 30 October 2012 15:29
To: Contact Us
Cc: Q&A
Subject: Re: Wescot ResponseRE: Correspondence Reply

Hi,

I have explained that in the e-mail where you have highlighted a sentence in red.

That your partner Capital One told me last year my signature wasn’t mine.

And that you this year have lied about me not replying to your correspondence.

And that you have made me waste my time since your partner Capital One and yourselves haven’t been able to accept my token-payment-offer like other companies like Swalec, DML and United Utilities have accepted, almost a year ago.

This is sabotage, I think.

I suspect you and Capital One have a secret agenda here.

And you really should contact your English-teacher about this.

Because I get anoyed when I have to explain the same again and again.

And it’s a saying you have here in the UK, which says it’s no excuse for ignorance.

So eighter you’re ignorant or slow.

So I think you should perhaps find another job.

Like putting spread on sandwiches, or something like that.

Just an advice.

Best regards,

Erik Ribsskog

On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 3:18 PM, Contact Us <contactus@wescot.co.uk> wrote:

Date 30th October 2012

Dear Mr Ribsskog

Further to your recent email regarding your email below. I acknowledge your comments and would like to confirm that Wescot always attempt to respond with an explanation or resolution as quickly as possible.

Please advise as to why this account would be deleted, we have no details in regards to a query for this account. If you believe this balance is not due we would require the full details of dispute on this account. Which would allow us to investigate your query with our client.

Please accept my apologies for any inconvenience you may have been caused whilst contacting us.

Yours sincerely

Ms H Thundercliffe

Accounts Controller

Registered in Scotland No. SC84131, Registered Office: Kyleshill House, 1 Glencairn Street, Saltcoats, Ayrshire KA21 5JT

From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

Sent: 30 October 2012 14:54
To: Contact Us
Subject: Re: Correspondence Reply

Hi,

this about that my debt has been deleted is something I’m still looking forward to hearing from you about.

Perhaps you should ask your old English-teacher for advice as to what my writings meant.

Best regards,

Erik Ribsskog

On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Contact Us <contactus@wescot.co.uk> wrote:

Date 30th October 2012

Dear Mr Ribsskog

Further to your recent email regarding the below account. I acknowledge your comments and would like to confirm that Wescot always attempt to respond with an explanation or resolution as quickly as possible.

In your email below you have you look forward to hearing that this debt has been deleted. Please could you advise further on this, as we haveno details in regards to the balance being deleted.

Please accept my apologies for any inconvenience you may have been caused whilst contacting us.

Yours sincereley

Ms H Thundercliffe

Accounts Controller

Registered in Scotland No. SC84131, Registered Office: Kyleshill House, 1 Glencairn Street, Saltcoats, Ayrshire KA21 5JT

From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

Sent: 19 October 2012 10:40

To: Correspondence Queries
Cc: offers

Subject: Re: Correspondence Reply

Hi,

ok, I don’t think I have gotten their sort-code and account-number.

Do you know this?

I also sent you an update, on Saturday, after the e-mail you replied to now.

I’ll paste that in this e-mail now.

Best regards,

Erik Ribsskog

PS.

Here’s the update e-mail from Saturday:

Hi,

I got a new income and expenditure-form in the post from you today.

From 11/10, with the reference D3/49597867.

I contacted your partned Capital One last automn, regarding my new budget.

I offered you a token-payment-agreement on £1 a month, untill I got a full-time-job.

Capital One told me my signature wasn’t mine, so this process have stalled, since last year.

Now you get back to me.

I’m still unemployed but I’m trying to set a business up, on my spare-time.

And the Jobcentre is ‘messing’ with my jobseekers allowance.

So at the moment, I have to say I don’t have any income.

I could get back to you when I get the jobseekers allowance back.

And then I would offer you the same as last time, £1 a month in token-payments.

I’ve since last year gotten a flat witch was unfurnitured.

So any money I have left after token-payments each month I now buy furniture and other things for the flat with.

And I was going to set up a new budget, when I got a full-time job.

And I’m going to do that.

But I don’t think it’s right that I have to set up a new budget now, because your partner said my signature wasn’t mine, and didn’t accept my new budget, last year.

This has taken so much of my time now, so you should really just delete the debt, I think.

I’m on Ladders, so I have a high income-potential.

All the hours I’ve spent on you and Captial One should add up to arround the debt I owe you, I think.

So I’m looking forward to hearing from you that my debt with you has been deleted!

Hope this is alright!

Best regards,

Erik Ribsskog

On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 10:24 AM, Correspondence Queries <client@cccs.co.uk> wrote:

Good morning Erik,

Thank you for contacting us about Wescot.

To make token payments to Wescot you do not need to fill in a giro slip. All you need is their sort code and account number and also the Wescot reference number starting with DM or D3. You then need to go into your bank and ask them to send £1 payment to Wescot by bank transfer. They may reject the offer of payment but they won’t reject the £1 payment you send and this will reduce the debt in time.

If you need any advice then please do not hesitate to call us.

Kind regards

Faye

Correspondence Advisor

From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

Sent: 12 October 2012 16:13
To: Correspondence Queries
Cc: offers
Subject: Re: Update/Fwd: *****7867/Fwd: CCCS

Hi,

thank you for your e-mail!

I’m not paying token-payments at the moment.

Wescot have sent me a budget-form again now.

But as your collegue there have previously told me I don’t have to fill out this form to get token-payments.

It should be enought that I’ve explained about my situation.

I’ve offered Wescot a token-payment-arrangement like a ‘million’ times.

But they haven’t sent me giros or anything.

And this is taking a lot of my time now.

Because I’ve been offering Wescot, (and Capital One), a token-payment-arrangement since last year now.

And all I get are standard letters which tells lies like that I haven’t replied to their letters.

When I’ve sent about a million e-mails to them, which I haven’t gotten replies to.

So I now copy this e-mail to Wescot.

And I hope they’ll send me some giros for the token-payment arrangement of £1 a month now.

Or tell me what information they need from me to set up a direct-debit-agreement.

So I hope this will be sorted now.

Thanks again for the e-mail!

Best regards,

Erik Ribsskog

On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 8:07 AM, Correspondence Queries <client@cccs.co.uk> wrote:

Hello Eric

Thank you for copying us in to the email you have sent to Wescot.

Please try not to worry about the contact you have received as this is a standard procedure for creditors to take. Nelson Guest & Partners are an internal collections department who work on behalf of Wescot to collect the outstanding balance.

As you have contacted this creditor to advise of your current financial situation and are making token payments, you are doing all you can at this time. If you receive any further contact regarding this matter, please advise of this.

I hope this is helpful and reassuring.

If you have any queries or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact us on 0845 272 5400. Lines are open 8am to 6pm, Monday to Friday. Email us at client.services@cccs.co.uk or go online to www.cccs.co.uk and follow the links to send us a web mail.

Kind regards

Hannah

Correspondence Advisor

From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

Sent: 08 October 2012 01:14
To: offers@wescot.co.uk
Cc: Q&A
Subject: Update/Fwd: *****7867/Fwd: CCCS

Hi,

on Saturday I got a letter from Nelson Guest & Partners Solicitiors, witch I attach a scanned copy of.

I’m don’t have the chance to pay 50% of the dept, av the moment, unfortunately.

I’m repeating my offer of a token-payment-arrangement again.

(Which I’ve done many times earlier).

I hope you can ‘stop messing around’ now, (like I think I have to call it), and just accept my token-payment-offer, like the other companies have done.

I don’t understand why you do so much ‘mumbo-jumbo’ surrounding this.

This should be a straight forward tokey-payment agreement.

I hope the CCCS can tell you to stop with your funny letters and just accept my token-payment-agreement, which I have offered you, a million times, (to exaggerate, but anyway).

Captial One even have a football-cup named after you, but you don’t seem to be a serious company.

It’s like being on the candid camera to try get a token-payment-agreement agreed with you.

Erik

———- Forwarded message ———-

From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 3:32 PM
Subject: Re: *****7867/Fwd: CCCS

To: offers <offers@wescot.co.uk>
Cc: Q&A <contactus@cccs.co.uk>

Hi,

it should be D3/49597867, (like I wrote in the subject-line in the e-mail I sent you on 20/9).

I repeat my token-payment offer on £1 a month, like I offer all my other creditors untill I find new employment.

Hope this is alright!

Best regards,

Erik Ribsskog

On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 8:30 AM, offers <offers@wescot.co.uk> wrote:

Good morning,

Please provide the wescot reference beginning with D3 or DM

Kind regards

Rebecca Stearman

Offers Administrator

email: offers@wescot.co.uk

From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

Sent: 28 September 2012 14:34
To: Correspondence Queries
Cc: offers
Subject: Re: *****7867/Fwd: CCCS

Hi,

thank you for your e-mail!

Yes, I send a copy of this e-mail to Wescot as a reminder of my token-payment-offer, of one pound a month untill I find new employement.

I thought it was like you write here, with the budget-form etc., from when I went to business-school, in the eighties.

Even if that was in Norway, I think business-law is mostly the same in the western world.

Mostly based on old British business-law, if I’m not mistaking.

Thank you very much for the help with this!

The information I sent to Capital One was a new token payment-offer after I had to move to Sunderland for some months last year.

If I remember it right.

I now found a letter on my blog, from Capital One, from 2009, when they also complained about my signature, (so this has happened in both 2009 and 2011), which I attach.

Thanks again for the advice!

Best regards,

Erik Ribsskog

On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 12:37 PM, Correspondence Queries <client@cccs.co.uk> wrote:

Hi Erick

Thank you for your email about your Wescot and Capital One accounts.

If you have concerns over the wording of the letter from Wescot, I would advise you to raise a complaint directly with them.

The complaint procedure can take up to 8 weeks and if you are unhappy with any response they give you, you can raise this further with the financial ombudsman service.

You don’t need to fill out the budget form that Wescot have sent you. You have advised them that you have already completed a budget with us. Both forms cover the same areas. If you need a copy of the budget that you completed with us, please let me know as I can send this out to you. The budget can also be sent to Capital One.

I wouldn’t advise you to stop making payments towards the Wescot account. It is in your best interest and benefit that you carry on making a token payment. It will show that you are willing to pay the account off.

If you don’t make a payment, the creditor can take further action.

I understand you would like to keep the contact in writing but it is also best that you call them to discuss your concerns. This will eliminate any responses about them not receiving your letters.

You can ask for a Data Access Request from them which will provide you with all the notes made on your account. There may be a charge for this request.

Can you advise me what information you sent to Capital One for them to reject your signature? If your signature hasn’t changed, I would advise you to contact Capital One and ask for a further explanation, i.e. are they comparing your signature to the signature on the original credit agreement?

Again, you can ask for a Data Access Request to see what has been noted on your account and there may be a charge for this request.

I hope this has been helpful.

If you have any further queries, please contact us on 0845 272 5400, lines are open 8am to 6pm, Monday to Friday, you can email us at client.service@cccs.co.uk.

Kind regards

Paul Marshall

Correspondence Co-ordinator

From: Erik [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

Sent: 26 September 2012 00:05
To: Correspondence Queries
Subject: Re: *****7867/Fwd: CCCS

Hi,

I’ve gone to business-school and letters shouldn’t contain lies even if they are standard letters.

Here it’s obvious that the standard letter is used wrongly.

I’m not making a token-payment here, you haven’t read up.

Please escalate to your line manager.

Regards,

Erik Ribsskog

PS.

And I don’t think it’s a good idea to call these companies.

It’s better to keep the correspondence in writing, so to keep documentation about what has been agreed.

PS 2.

You haven’t commented on that Capital One told me my signature wasn’t mine.

I want to please escalate this to your line-manager.

On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 10:33 AM, Correspondence Queries <client@cccs.co.uk> wrote:

Hi Erik

Thank you for contacting us about your account with Wescot.

Creditors will often send standard collection letters out to you. Standard letters will include certain phrases that may not fit entirely, such as “we have not received a reply”.

Unfortunately even though you are making a token payment we cannot stop creditors from contacting you. You should continue to keep your creditors up to date with your financial situation and offer them the most fair and reasonable offer you can.

It may be best to call your creditors and speak to someone directly. That way all issues can be discussed there and then.

If you have any further questions or need some more advise, you can call us on 0845 272 5400. Lines are open from 8am to 6pm, Monday to Friday. You can also email us at client.service@cccs.co.uk.

Kind regards

Gurj
Correspondence Advisor

We are altering the way in which we handle your correspondence to ensure we safeguard your personal information at all times.

In order for us to do this we will be making some changes to the way in which we validate your identity.
The next time you contact us, we will require you to provide us with at least 2 pieces of information from the list below:

· Client reference number
· Postal address
· Postcode
· Telephone number
· Email address

Please make sure you provide this information along with your full name on every communication you send to us. If not, we will prompt you for these details and this may delay your reply.

Thank you

The Correspondence Team

We are altering the way in which we handle your correspondence to ensure we safeguard your personal information at all times.

In order for us to do this we will be making some changes to the way in which we validate your identity.

The next time you contact us, we will require you to provide us with at least 2 pieces of information from the list below:

· Client reference number

· Postal address

· Postcode

· Telephone number

· Email address

Please make sure you provide this information along with your full name on every communication you send to us. If not, we will prompt you for these details and this may delay your reply.

Thank you

The Correspondence Team

Follow us on Twitter

http://twitter.com/moneyaware

Like us on Facebook

http://www.facebook.com/moneyaware

Read the MoneyAware blog

http://moneyaware.co.uk

P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.

We are altering the way in which we handle your correspondence to ensure we safeguard your personal information at all times.

In order for us to do this we will be making some changes to the way in which we validate your identity.

The next time you contact us, we will require you to provide us with at least 2 pieces of information from the list below:

· Client reference number

· Postal address

· Postcode

· Telephone number

· Email address

Please make sure you provide this information along with your full name on every communication you send to us. If not, we will prompt you for these details and this may delay your reply.

Thank you

The Correspondence Team

We are altering the way in which we handle your correspondence to ensure we safeguard your personal information at all times.

In order for us to do this we will be making some changes to the way in which we validate your identity.

The next time you contact us, we will require you to provide us with at least 2 pieces of information from the list below:

· Client reference number

· Postal address

· Postcode

· Telephone number

· Email address

Please make sure you provide this information along with your full name on every communication you send to us. If not, we will prompt you for these details and this may delay your reply.

Thank you

The Correspondence Team

Follow us on Twitter http://twitter.com/moneyaware

Like us on Facebook http://www.facebook.com/moneyaware

Read the MoneyAware bloghttp://moneyaware.co.uk

P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.

—–Original Message—–

From: Erik ******* [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
Sent: 20 September 2012 14:41
To: offers
Cc: Q&A
Subject: Your ref: ******7867/Fwd: CCCS

Hi,

I’m refering to your Final Notice-letter from 17/9, which I recieved today.

You there write: ‘but we have not received a replyto our previous correspondence’.

But this isn’t right, I’ve earlier written to you e-mails a lot of times offering a token-payment.

Is this the Candid Camera?

Your partner Capital One also did a practical joke like this, when they told me my signature wasn’t mine last year.

Please stop with the monkey-business, and be serious.

I hope the CCCS can stop your funny bailiff-actions and lies.

Erik ****

———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Q&A <contactus@cccs.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 17:37:39 +0100
Subject: CCCS
To: Erik******** <eribsskog@gmail.com>

Good afternoon

Thank you for your email.

There isn’t anything in the Consumer credit Act that states you must supply these details to a creditor. You can always provide them a copy of the budget and list of creditors that you have done through us.

Regardless of whether they accept the offer or not please continue to make the token payment.

Kind regards

Jonathan

Follow us on Twitter
http://twitter.com/moneyaware

Like us on Facebook
http://www.facebook.com/moneyaware

Read the MoneyAware blog
http://moneyaware.co.uk/

P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.

________________________________

From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
Sent: 19 August 2012 20:59
To: Q&A
Cc: offers@wescot.co.uk
Subject: Problems with Wescot/Fwd: Update/Fwd: Wescot reference:
*******867 (Regarding Capital One-debt).

Hi,

I’ve told Wescot I’m unemployed and have offered them a £1 monthly token-payment untill I find new employment.

(Like I’ve offered my other creditors).

Wescot don’t accept but wants me to fill out an income and expenditure-form.

I can’t remember that you at CCCS have mentioned that I have to fill out a form like that, when I do budget-work.

It’s like they go a bit to close, and this seems unecessary, to me.

What do you think at CCCS about this?

Does the law say that I have to fill out a form like that?

I attach the letter from Wescot.

Yours sincerely,

Erik *******

———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 10:35 PM
Subject: Update/Fwd: Wescot reference: *******867 (Regarding Capital One-debt).
To: offers@wescot.co.uk

Hi,

I got an income and expenditure-form, in the post, from you, earlier this week.

I don’t understand the point in me filling out that form.

I’ve already told you that I’m on budget in co-operation, with the CCCS, and that I only can afford to pay a token-payment, (on £1), untill I find new employment.

So this is my offer.

I don’t understand why you send me this form.

I think is unnessesary paper-work then.

None of my other creditors have sent me a form like that.

They have just accepted my token-payment-offer.

So I hope you can set up a direct debit-agreement, for £1 a month, for this debt.

Hope this is alright!

Best regards,

Erik *********

———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 10:31 AM
Subject: Wescot reference: ******867 (Regarding Capital One-debt).
To: offers@wescot.co.uk

Hi,

I’m refering to your letter from 19/7, which I got in the post today.

I’m currently unemployed, and on a budget in co-operation, with CCCS.

My offer to you is the same as to my other creditors, and that is that I pay a one pound token-payment, each month, until I find new employment.

Hope this is alright!

Yours sincerely,

Erik ********

VISIT OUR WEBSITE AT http://www.cccs.co.uk/
———————————————————————
This email message is intended for the individual to whom it’s addressed
and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If you are
not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use or dissemination
of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this information
in error, please return it to us immediately and delete it from your computer.
The contents or opinions expressed within this email are not intended to
represent the views of CCCS unless specifically stated to be so.
This email is not guaranteed to be free from any computer viruses, although
it has been checked using the Trend Virus Suite. You should check this email
and any attachments for the presence of viruses before downloading any files.
Foundation for Credit Counselling, trading as Consumer Credit Counselling Service (“CCCS”).
Registered Office: Wade House, Merrion Centre, Leeds, LS2 8NG. Registered in England
Company No 2757055. Registered Charity No. 1016630″

VISIT OUR WEBSITE AT http://www.cccs.co.uk

———————————————————————
This email message is intended for the individual to whom it’s addressed and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If you are
not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use or dissemination
of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this information
in error, please return it to us immediately and delete it from your computer.

The contents or opinions expressed within this email are not intended to

represent the views of CCCS unless specifically stated to be so.

This email is not guaranteed to be free from any computer viruses, although

it has been checked using the Trend Virus Suite. You should check this email
and any attachments for the presence of viruses before downloading any files.

Foundation for Credit Counselling, trading as Consumer Credit Counselling Service (“CCCS”).

Registered Office: Wade House, Merrion Centre, Leeds, LS2 8NG. Registered in England
Company No 2757055. Registered Charity No. 1016630″

Registered in Scotland No. SC84131, Registered Office: Kyleshill House, 1 Glencairn Street, Saltcoats, Ayrshire KA21 5JT
Please consider the environment before printing this email. Wescot, helping to make a difference
Confidentiality Notice. The information in this e-mail is confidential and for use by the addressee(s) only. If you are not the intended recipient (or responsible for delivery of the message to the intended recipient) please notify us immediately (on 01482 590590 (UK) or +44 1482 590590 (international)) and delete this message from your computer: you may not copy or forward it, or use or disclose its contents to any other person.

As Internet communications are capable of data corruption, Wescot Credit Services Ltd does not accept any responsibility for changes made to this message after it was sent. Please note that Wescot Credit Services Ltd does not accept any liability or responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan attachments (if any). Opinions and views expressed in this e-mail are those of the sender and may not reflect the opinions and views of Wescot Credit Services Ltd.

VISIT OUR WEBSITE AT http://www.cccs.co.uk

———————————————————————
This email message is intended for the individual to whom it’s addressed and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If you are
not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use or dissemination
of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this information
in error, please return it to us immediately and delete it from your computer.

The contents or opinions expressed within this email are not intended to

represent the views of CCCS unless specifically stated to be so.

This email is not guaranteed to be free from any computer viruses, although

it has been checked using the Trend Virus Suite. You should check this email
and any attachments for the presence of viruses before downloading any files.

Foundation for Credit Counselling, trading as Consumer Credit Counselling Service (“CCCS”).

Registered Office: Wade House, Merrion Centre, Leeds, LS2 8NG. Registered in England
Company No 2757055. Registered Charity No. 1016630″

VISIT OUR WEBSITE AT http://www.cccs.co.uk

———————————————————————
This email message is intended for the individual to whom it’s addressed and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If you are
not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use or dissemination
of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this information
in error, please return it to us immediately and delete it from your computer.

The contents or opinions expressed within this email are not intended to

represent the views of CCCS unless specifically stated to be so.

This email is not guaranteed to be free from any computer viruses, although

it has been checked using the Trend Virus Suite. You should check this email
and any attachments for the presence of viruses before downloading any files.

Foundation for Credit Counselling, trading as Consumer Credit Counselling Service (“CCCS”).

Registered Office: Wade House, Merrion Centre, Leeds, LS2 8NG. Registered in England
Company No 2757055. Registered Charity No. 1016630″

Registered in Scotland No. SC84131, Registered Office: Kyleshill House, 1 Glencairn Street, Saltcoats, Ayrshire KA21 5JT

Please consider the environment before printing this email. Wescot, helping to make a difference
Confidentiality Notice. The information in this e-mail is confidential and for use by the addressee(s) only. If you are not the intended recipient (or responsible for delivery of the message to the intended recipient) please notify us immediately (on 01482 590590 (UK) or +44 1482 590590 (international)) and delete this message from your computer: you may not copy or forward it, or use or disclose its contents to any other person.
As Internet communications are capable of data corruption, Wescot Credit Services Ltd does not accept any responsibility for changes made to this message after it was sent. Please note that Wescot Credit Services Ltd does not accept any liability or responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan attachments (if any). Opinions and views expressed in this e-mail are those of the sender and may not reflect the opinions and views of Wescot Credit Services Ltd.

Registered in Scotland No. SC84131, Registered Office: Kyleshill House, 1 Glencairn Street, Saltcoats, Ayrshire KA21 5JT
Please consider the environment before printing this email. Wescot, helping to make a difference
Confidentiality Notice. The information in this e-mail is confidential and for use by the addressee(s) only. If you are not the intended recipient (or responsible for delivery of the message to the intended recipient) please notify us immediately (on 01482 590590 (UK) or +44 1482 590590 (international)) and delete this message from your computer: you may not copy or forward it, or use or disclose its contents to any other person.
As Internet communications are capable of data corruption, Wescot Credit Services Ltd does not accept any responsibility for changes made to this message after it was sent. Please note that Wescot Credit Services Ltd does not accept any liability or responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan attachments (if any). Opinions and views expressed in this e-mail are those of the sender and may not reflect the opinions and views of Wescot Credit Services Ltd.

31. oktober 2012
Mer om jobbsøking i England

Gmail – FW: Software Developer Vacancy with Riverside

Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>

FW: Software Developer Vacancy with Riverside

Erik Ribsskog

<eribsskog@gmail.com>

Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 1:57 PM

To:
“Wilson, Margaret” <Margaret.Wilson@liverpool.gov.uk>

Hi,

thank you very much for your e-mail!

Is it ok if I scan the form, when I’ve finished filling it out, and e-mail it back to eighter you or the Jobcentre.

Thanks in advance for any reply!

Best regards,

Erik Ribsskog

On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 10:06 AM, Wilson, Margaret <Margaret.Wilson@liverpool.gov.uk> wrote:

It’s worth mentioning that

Iceland will not consider applicants with visible tatoos (hands, neck, face etc). – this is via Joe at jcp !!

Sub client to core and email

Iceland application form to client( I will email it to you all)

To give your customer the best chance, please make sure that they fully complete Section 4 and fill in the questionnaire correctly!

and return to

Joe McEvoy | Employer Adviser

Edge Hill Jobcentre Plus, Kinglake House,

Shenstone Street,
Liverpool, L7 3PF

Margaret
Wilson

Employer Liaison Officer

Liverpool City Council I
Municipal Buildings IDale Street I
Liverpool I L2 2DH

T: 0151 233 4645 M:07736883830 E: margaret.wilson@liverpool.gov.uk
Online:
www.liverpool.gov.uk
; www.liverpoolinwork@liverpool.gov.uk

From:

Donaldson, Emma
Sent: 30 October 2012 14:01
To: Wilson, Margaret
Subject: FW: Software Developer Vacancy with
Riverside

FYI

Emma Donaldson I

Recruitment Advisor

Liverpool City Council I Municipal Buildings I

Dale Street I
Liverpool I L2 2DH
T: 0151 233 1933 M: 07964676421

E:

emma.donaldson@liverpool.gov.uk

Online:
www.liverpool.gov.uk
I www.liverpoolinwork.org

From: Erik Ribsskog

[mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
Sent: 29 October 2012 16:34
To: Donaldson, Emma
Cc: Melanie Wright
Subject: Re: Software Developer Vacancy with
Riverside

Hi,

thank you for your e-mail.

I also wondered about the retail-assistant-jobs with Iceland, (Retail Assistant 607105):

http://www.liverpooljet.org/find_work/vacancies/details.asp?id=607105

I wondered if you could please send me an application-form for that job.

Thanks in advance for any help!

Yours sincerely,

Erik Ribsskog

On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 4:02 PM,

Donaldson, Emma <Emma.Donaldson@liverpool.gov.uk> wrote:

Thank you for applying for the position of Software Developer with

Riverside.

Please can you visit the following site to apply and state that you saw the vacancy on

Liverpool in Work website.

You will need to register and download the job description.

http://www.riverside.org.uk/corporate/working_with_us/jobs_with_riverside/software_developer-1.aspx

Good luck!

Emma Donaldson I
Recruitment Advisor

Liverpool City Council I Municipal Buildings I
Dale Street I
Liverpool I L2 2DH
T: 0151 223 1933 M: 07964676421

E:

emma.donaldson@liverpool.gov.uk

Online:
www.liverpool.gov.uk
I www.liverpoolinwork.org

______________________________________________________________________
DISCLAIMER:

The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be read, copied or used only by the intended recipient(s). If you have received it in error please contact the sender immediately by returning the e-mail or by telephoning a number contained in the body
of the e-mail then and please delete the e-mail without disclosing its contents elsewhere. No responsibility is accepted for loss or damage arising from viruses or changes made to this message after it was sent. The views contained in this email are those
of the author and not necessarily those of the authors employer or service provider.

This email has been automatically scanned for viruses and malicious content by MessageLabs for your protection
______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been automatically scanned for viruses and malicious content by MessageLabs for your protection
______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________
DISCLAIMER:

The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be read, copied or used only by the intended recipient(s). If you have received it in error please contact the sender immediately by returning the e-mail or by telephoning a number contained in the body of the e-mail then and please delete the e-mail without disclosing its contents elsewhere. No responsibility is accepted for loss or damage arising from viruses or changes made to this message after it was sent. The views contained in this email are those of the author and not necessarily those of the authors employer or service provider.

This email has been automatically scanned for viruses and malicious content by MessageLabs for your protection
______________________________________________________________________

31. oktober 2012
Jeg sendte enda en e-post til Tilsynsrådet for advokatvirksomhet

Gmail – Svar fra Tilsynsrådet for advokatvirksomhet

Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>

Svar fra Tilsynsrådet for advokatvirksomhet

Erik Ribsskog

<eribsskog@gmail.com>

Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 1:44 PM

To:
Jonas Haugsvold <JoHa@tilsynet.no>

Cc:
kundeservice@if.no

Bcc:
Mona Mjøen McKiernan <mmm@advokatforeningen.no>, Leder av Jussformidlingen <leder@jussformidlingen.no>, Postmottak@domstoladministrasjonen.no

Hei,

stemmer, det var det jeg tenkte på ja.

The Jobcentre her i England fører en slags krig mot meg, og sulter meg osv.

Så jeg er litt distre når det gjelder norske ting.

Jeg har en fetter som jobber i IF, som heter Tommy Andre Løff Olsen.

Får håpe at han ikke tuller med meg da.

Til IF:

Dere må sende meg erstatning.

Rukke ødela for min sak, ved å slutte midt i den, og jeg fikk ikke ny advokat av Advokat.no, og ingen andre advokater vil røre saken nå.

Jeg vil ha erstatning som om omsorgssvikt-saken min ble vunnet i retten.

Jeg blir tullet med av inhumane britiske byråkrater hos den britiske arbeidsformidlingen for øyeblikket, og er lei av å være avhengig av sånne ‘lurifakser’, så jeg håper på å få erstatning raskt.

Mvh.

Erik Ribsskog

2012/10/31 Jonas Haugsvold <JoHa@tilsynet.no>

Viser til din e-post av i dag.

Tilsynsrådet for advokatvirksomhet har ingen ordning for å utbetale erstatning i saker der advokater eventuelt pådrar seg et erstatningsansvar. Krav om dekning på grunn av feil eller misligheter fra advokatens side kan eventuelt meldes under advokatens sikkerhetsstillelse. Du må da ta kontakt med det selskapet som har stilt sikkerhet for vedkommende advokat.

Advokat Ida Valen Rukke har til orientering sin sikkerhetsstillelse gjennom If skadeforsikring AS.

Vennlig hilsen

Jonas Haugsvold

Rådgiver

Tilsynsrådet for advokatvirksomhet

Postboks 720 Sentrum, 0106 Oslo | Rådhusgt. 23
Tlf: 22 00 75 02 | Sentralbord: 22 00 75 00
* post@tilsynet.no þ www.tilsynet.no

Fra: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

Sendt: 31. oktober 2012 13:45
Til: Jonas Haugsvold
Kopi: Mona Mjøen McKiernan
Emne: Re: Svar fra Tilsynsrådet for advokatvirksomhet

Hei,

McKiernan i advokatforeningen, hun ga meg råd om å kontakte dere.

Det virker som at du juger meg opp i trynet her.

Sånn jeg har skjønt det på hun McKiernan, så gir dere erstatning, når advokater har ødelagt for ens sak.

Enten så lyver du Haugsvold, eller så har McKiernan villedet meg, vil jeg si.

Jeg er ikke noen advokat jeg.

Men jeg vil ha erstatning for at Advokat.no har ødelagt saken min.

(Sånn som jeg forstår det, ihvertfall).

Det er en ting å disiplinere advokater gjennom Advokatforeningen.

Men jeg vil ha erstatning for at en advokat har ødelagt for en sak jeg har hatt, ved å bruke sabotasje, (vil jeg si).

Hvem kontakter jeg for å få denne erstatningen?

Sånn som jeg skjønte McKiernan så er det dere som gir erstatning da.

Mvh.

Erik Ribsskog

2012/10/31 Jonas Haugsvold <JoHa@tilsynet.no>

Det vises til din e-post av 29.10.2012 til jussformidlingen.no, med kopi til Tilsynsrådet for advokatvirksomhet.

I ovennevnte e-post skriver du blant annet at du ikke har fått svar fra Tilsynsrådet.

Tilsynsrådet besvarte dine e-poster av hhv 22.6.2012 og 1.9.2012 ved e-post av 3.9.2012. Kopi av vår e-post, der det for øvrig fremgår at vi ikke kan bistå deg i sak vedr omsorgsvikt mv., følger vedlagt.

Vennlig hilsen

Jonas Haugsvold

Rådgiver

Tilsynsrådet for advokatvirksomhet
Postboks 720 Sentrum, 0106 Oslo | Rådhusgt. 23

Tlf: 22 00 75 02 | Sentralbord: 22 00 75 00
* post@tilsynet.no þ www.tilsynet.no

———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Jonas Haugsvold <JoHa@tilsynet.no>

To: “‘eribsskog@gmail.com‘” <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Cc:
Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2012 12:33:31 +0200
Subject: VS: Påminnelse/Fwd: Klage på tre advokater/Fwd: Din henvendelse til Advokatforeningen

Det vises til dine e-poster av 22.6.2012 og 1.9.2012.

Tilsynsrådet for advokatvirksomhet fører tilsyn med landets praktiserende advokater og rettshjelpere, bl.a. ved gjennomgang av deres regnskaper og behandling av betrodde midler. Tilsynsrådet er tillagt ansvaret for å påse at den som driver advokat- og øvrig rettshjelpvirksomhet har stillet lovbestemt sikkerhet for sin virksomhet. Som et av sine hovedmål skal Tilsynsrådet gjennom aktiv tilsynsvirksomhet søke å forebygge ansvarsskader.

Tilsynsrådet kan ikke bistå deg i denne saken. Det vises til at Tilsynsrådet, ut fra sin kompetanse, verken har anledning til å anbefale særskilte advokater eller til å ta nærmere stilling til konkrete rettstvister mellom private parter. Tilsynsrådet kan heller ikke bistå med et skifte.

Dersom du mener at en advokat har opptrådt i strid med gjeldende regler for god advokatskikk, gjør vi oppmerksom på at klage eventuelt kan fremsettes skriftlig til Disiplinærnemnden for advokater på følgende adresse:

Disiplinærnemnden

Kr. Augustgt. 9

0164 Oslo

Vennlig hilsen

Jonas Haugsvold

Rådgiver

Tilsynsrådet for advokatvirksomhet

Postboks 720 Sentrum, 0106 Oslo | Rådhusgt. 23
Tlf: 22 00 75 02 | Sentralbord: 22 00 75 00
* post@tilsynet.no þ www.tilsynet.no

Fra: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

Sendt: 1. september 2012 14:50
Til: Tilsynsrådet for Advokatvirksomhet
Emne: Påminnelse/Fwd: Klage på tre advokater/Fwd: Din henvendelse til Advokatforeningen

Hei,

jeg kan ikke se at jeg har mottatt noe svar på denne e-posten, så jeg sender en påminnelse om dette.

Håper dette er i orden!

Mvh.

Erik Ribsskog

———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Date: 2012/6/21
Subject: Klage på tre advokater/Fwd: Din henvendelse til Advokatforeningen

To: post@tilsynet.no
Cc: larvik.tingrett@domstol.no

Hei,

min mormor døde for tre år siden, på tirsdag neste uke.

Jeg har bare fått tre tusen i arv, enda hun var etter dansk adel og kongelige og hadde malerier fra Højris slott på veggen, da hun døde, og også mange andre artige ting, som brev og møbler og alt mulig, fra sine adelige slektninger, (Gjedde, Nyholm, Fog, Adeler, etc).

Jeg ville først at advokat Erik Øvergård, i Hurum, skulle selge min eiendom der, (del av sameie), sånn at jeg kunne betale 30.000 til Tingretten i Larvik, for offentlig skifte.

Øvergård sluttet plutselig å svare meg.

Så jeg kontaktet Tingretten i Drammen, (via Namsmannen i Hurum/Røyken), og de villedet meg om salg av sameie, (Høysæter der), så jeg fikk ikke ordnet dette, for man måtte betale gebyr, og sånn, og Høysæter bare lot som om hun skulle ordne det, så mange måneder gikk tapt da, og etter dette så har jeg fått en umøblert leilighet, så jeg har ikke hatt penger til gebyr for salg av sameie.

Jeg fikk derimot dekke litt fri rettshjelp for en barnevernssak mot Svelvik kommune, av Fylkesmannen i Oslo og Akershus.

Jeg sendte dette til Advokat.no og spurte om jeg kunne få en advokat i Drammen, siden dette er den nærmeste store byen, fra Svelvik.

Jeg fikk en advokat i Oslo, og tenkte at det var greit.

Men nå så jeg senere at hun Ida Valen Rukke, som jeg ble tildelt som advokat av Advokat.no, ikke har barnevern som hovedfelt.

Og at syv andre advokater hos Advokat.no hadde barnevern som hovedfelt.

Da jeg klagde på at Rukke var ineffektiv, antagelig siden hun ikke var vant til å jobbe med barnevernsaker, så slutten hun i jobben, (av en eller annen grunn), og jeg ble ikke tilbudt ny advokat, av Advokat.no.

Og dette var etter at Rukke hadde opplyst meg om at hun hadde en timelønn på over 2000, og etter at jeg hadde bedt henne om å ordne med det offentlige skiftet, i Larvik, for meg, samt oppløsing av sameie, i Holmsbu, og andre saker.

Jeg sendte så e-post til en advokat Bille, i Drammen, som ikke har svart meg.

Jeg mister nå antagelig den arven, etter min mormor, morfar og mor, (siden min mor og morfar døde før min mormor).

For fristen der er mandag eller tirsdag, neste uke, å be om offentlig skifte.

Og jeg har vært arbeidsledig i England, under finanskrisen, så jeg har ikke klart å spare opp penger, og salget av sameiet i Holmsbu har jo ikke latt seg gjennomføre grunnet sabotasje, (må jeg kalle det), fra Øverland og Tingretten i Drammen.

Jeg ønsker jo selvfølgelig først og fremst at jeg får innvilget offentlig skifte, etter min mormor, hos Tingretten i Larvik.

Kanskje kan gjøre dette for meg?

Sender kopi til Tingretten i Larvik og advokat Bille i Drammen.

Jeg ønsker også erstatning på grunn av tullet fra de nevnte advokatene.

Jeg har måttet gått rundt i Newcastle, en hel natt, med alt jeg har hatt av eiendom her borte, (City Self Storage vil ikke sende meg de ‘norske’ tingene mine), og nesten fryst ihjel, fordi jeg ikke har fått solgt eiendom i Norge og vært prislagt diverse lugubre britiske hosteller, osv.

Så disse advokatene kan man få billig av meg, og jeg håper dere lar de miste bevilgningen.

Jeg blir systematisk tullet med, synes jeg det virker som, og jeg ønsker å få mye penger i erstatning, for at det skal være enklere for meg, å beskytte meg mot slik systematisk tulling og jeg har også overhørt at jeg er forfulgt av ‘mafian’, som var grunnen til at jeg flytta fra Norge, i 2004.

Så jeg håper på amerikansk metode her, med mye erstatning til folk som er offer for maktmisbruk, osv.

Fikk også noen dokumenter etter de kjente slektningene mine Anders Gjedde Nyholm, en general og en dommer i Haag, Didrik Nyholm, av min mormor, på 80-tallet.

Men så skulle Ingeborg ha tilbake dette.

Og hu var jo gammel allerede da, så jeg sa det var greit.

Men nå som hun er død, så er jo dette egentlig mitt, mener jeg, man kan jo ikke ta tilbake en gave.

Og min mormor hadde også masse andre artige brev fra Maren Gjedde, mm., som jeg syntes at virker interessant både for meg selv og også historisk.

Og jeg er den eneste som har interesse for sånt, i slekta, sa min mormor, mens hun levde.

Også skal jeg liksom bare få 3000 i arv, enda min mormor og morfar hadde det største huset i Nevlugnhavn, på 80-tallet, og de så ut som en antikkforretning eller museum.

Hvor har det blitt av verdiene?

Det er ikke riktig at jeg bare skal få 3000 etter min mor, mormor og morfar, mener jeg.

Her er det noe alvorlig tull.

Hvorfor skal ikke jeg få offentlig skifte?

Kan dere ordne det?

Pluss erstatning også for det andre tøyset.

Men offentlig skifte-fristen går visst ut på mandag eller tirsdag neste uke.

Erik Ribsskog

———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Mona Mjøen McKiernan <mmm@advokatforeningen.no>

Date: 2012/6/21
Subject: Din henvendelse til Advokatforeningen
To: “eribsskog@gmail.com” <eribsskog@gmail.com>

Erik Ribsskog,

Det vises til din henvendelse av 20.juni 2012, vedrørende klage på advokat.

Av henvendelsen fremgår det at du ønsker å klage på advokat.no.

Vi viser til vårt tidligere svar av 18.juni 2012, der det fremgår at en klage må sendes per post og gjelde en navngitt advokat.

All informasjon om hvordan du skriver en klage finner du her: http://www.advokatenhjelperdeg.no/artikler/kan-jeg-klage-pa-advokaten/

Vedrørende hva en klage kan føre til finner du informasjon om dette her: http://www.advokatenhjelperdeg.no/artikler/kan-jeg-klage-pa-advokaten/#hvafrerklagenetil

Til ditt spørsmål om hva du skal gjøre med det offentlige skiftet minner vi om at Advokatforeningen ikke kan tilby juridisk rådgivning. Vi kan heller ikke tildele en advokat til deg.

Vi råder deg til å ta kontakt med en advokat for å få hjelp med dette. Din advokat finner du her:
http://www.advokatenhjelperdeg.no/finn-advokat/

Alle som praktiserer som advokat, er lovpålagt å gi sine klienter økonomisk trygghet for eventuelle feil de gjør som advokat. Du finner mer informasjon om erstatning og hvordan du kan rette et erstatningskrav mot advokaten her: http://www.advokatenhjelperdeg.no/artikler/kan-jeg-klage-pa-advokaten/#kanjegferstatning

Med vennlig hilsenMona Mjøen McKiernan

ADVOKATFORENINGEN / THE NORWEGIAN BAR ASSOCIATION

Kristian Augusts gate 9, N-0164 Oslo T +47 22 03 50 50 E mmm@advokatforeningen.no
www.advokatforeningen.no www.advokatenhjelperdeg.no

From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

Sent: 20. juni 2012 20:57
To: Mona Mjøen McKiernan
Cc: Disiplinærnemnden for advokater
Subject: Re: Din henvendelse til Advokatforeningen

Hei,

ok, jeg videresender denne korrespondansen til dem, så får jeg håpe at de tar kontakt.

Også ønsker jeg samtidig å klage på Advokat.no.

Som tidligere nevnt, så ba jeg om en advokat i Drammen, siden dette er den nærmeste store byen, fra Bergeråsen, hvor omsorgssvikten fant sted.

(Etter at jeg ble innvilget Fri Rettshjelp, fra Fylkesmannen i Oslo og Akershus).

Jeg ble tilbudt en advokat i Oslo.

Og jeg tenkte at det var greit.

Men da jeg sjekket nettsidene til Advokat.no nærmere, så så jeg det, at Advokat.no hadde syv advokater i Oslo, som var spesialister på barnevern.

Og selv om min sak er en barnevernssak, (min far lot meg bo alene fra jeg var ni år, og jeg fikk fri rettshjelp til en barnevernssak mot Svelvik kommune).

Så ble jeg gitt en advokat som _ikke_ hadde barnevern som hovedfelt.

Og så, her om dagen, slutter plutselig den advokaten.

Advokat.no skulle jo da selvfølgelig ha tilbudt meg en ny advokat.

Men det gjorde de ikke.

De bare sa at de var ferdig med saken.

Og dette etter at jeg hadde forklart for hun Rukke der, at jeg blir snytt for arv også, og trenger hjelp av en advokat, til å få Tingretten i Larvik, til å ha offentlig skifte, etter min mormor, og fristen der er 26. juni, altså på tirsdag neste uke.

Så at Advokat.no bare sluttet å jobbe med sakene mine, det kan koste meg arven etter min mor, (som døde i 1999), og min mormor som var fra danske kongelige og adelige.

Så jeg synes Advokat.no oppfører seg så besynderlig, at jeg ønsker å klage.

Samtidlig så lurer jeg på hva vitsen er med å klage, for Øvergård fikk bare 2000 i bot, og jeg fikk ingenting i erstatning.

Og dette gjaldt salg av min del av et sameie i Holmsbu, som jeg ville selge for å ha råd til det nevnte offentlige skiftet da.

For meg så virker det som at jeg bare blir systematisk tullet med av norske advokater, (er det mafian som trekker i tråder, jeg har overhørt i 2003 at jeg er forfulgt av dem).

Hvordan skal jeg liksom få ordnet med det offentlige skiftet da.

Hvorfor kan liksom ingen i Norge hjelpe meg med det, nå er det bare noen dager igjen til fristen går ut.

Men Advokatforeningen er så idiotisk organisert at dere ikke gir erstatning til ofre for deres mafia-advokater, og kun gir mindre enn en timelønn i bot til disse mafia-advokatene så det er jo helt håpløst.

Det burde vært som i USA hvor folk får store erstatninger.

Ellers så kommer de aldri av flekken.

Jeg blir litt kvalm her jeg sitter i England av dette mafia-opplegget som foregår i Norge.

Så nå må dere forte dere å gi Advokat.no 2000 i bot, de også.

Hva skal liksom løse seg da, tenker dere?

Dette er jo helt meningsløst egentlig.

Kan dere ikke tilby meg advokathjelp, eller noe, i det minste?

Hvordan skal jeg få ordnet med dette offentlige skiftet hvor fristen går ut 26. juni.

Det kan jo være at den egentlige grunnen til at Advokat.no oppførte seg så besynderlig var for at jeg skulle miste kontrollen over det arveoppgjøret, pga. at en mafia står bak, og trekker i tråder.

Jeg rekker jo ikke nå å få en ny advokat til å ordne med dette.

Så om dere kan ordne med det.

Jeg har skrevet om disse problemene på blogg i tre år nå, og ingen i Norge gjør en dritt, så jeg er rimelig oppgitt, for å si det sånn.

Jeg vet nesten ikke hva jeg skal si.

Erik Ribsskog

31. oktober 2012
Jeg sendte en e-post til Tilsynsrådet for advokatvirksomhet

Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

Svar fra Tilsynsrådet for advokatvirksomhet

Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 12:45 PM

To: Jonas Haugsvold <JoHa@tilsynet.no>

Cc: Mona Mjøen McKiernan <mmm@advokatforeningen.no>

Bcc: Leder av Jussformidlingen <leder@jussformidlingen.no>, Postmottak@domstoladministrasjonen.no

Hei,

McKiernan i advokatforeningen, hun ga meg råd om å kontakte dere.

Det virker som at du juger meg opp i trynet her.

Sånn jeg har skjønt det på hun McKiernan, så gir dere erstatning, når advokater har ødelagt for ens sak.

Enten så lyver du Haugsvold, eller så har McKiernan villedet meg, vil jeg si.

Jeg er ikke noen advokat jeg.

Men jeg vil ha erstatning for at Advokat.no har ødelagt saken min.

(Sånn som jeg forstår det, ihvertfall).

Det er en ting å disiplinere advokater gjennom Advokatforeningen.

Men jeg vil ha erstatning for at en advokat har ødelagt for en sak jeg har hatt, ved å bruke sabotasje, (vil jeg si).

Hvem kontakter jeg for å få denne erstatningen?

Sånn som jeg skjønte McKiernan så er det dere som gir erstatning da.

Mvh.

Erik Ribsskog

2012/10/31 Jonas Haugsvold <JoHa@tilsynet.no>

Det vises til din e-post av 29.10.2012 til jussformidlingen.no, med kopi til Tilsynsrådet for advokatvirksomhet.

I ovennevnte e-post skriver du blant annet at du ikke har fått svar fra Tilsynsrådet.

Tilsynsrådet besvarte dine e-poster av hhv 22.6.2012 og 1.9.2012 ved e-post av 3.9.2012. Kopi av vår e-post, der det for øvrig fremgår at vi ikke kan bistå deg i sak vedr omsorgsvikt mv., følger vedlagt.

Vennlig hilsen

Jonas Haugsvold

Rådgiver

Tilsynsrådet for advokatvirksomhet
Postboks 720 Sentrum, 0106 Oslo | Rådhusgt. 23

Tlf: 22 00 75 02 | Sentralbord: 22 00 75 00
* post@tilsynet.no þ www.tilsynet.no

———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Jonas Haugsvold <JoHa@tilsynet.no>
To: “‘eribsskog@gmail.com‘” <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Cc:
Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2012 12:33:31 +0200
Subject: VS: Påminnelse/Fwd: Klage på tre advokater/Fwd: Din henvendelse til Advokatforeningen

Det vises til dine e-poster av 22.6.2012 og 1.9.2012.

Tilsynsrådet for advokatvirksomhet fører tilsyn med landets praktiserende advokater og rettshjelpere, bl.a. ved gjennomgang av deres regnskaper og behandling av betrodde midler. Tilsynsrådet er tillagt ansvaret for å påse at den som driver advokat- og øvrig rettshjelpvirksomhet har stillet lovbestemt sikkerhet for sin virksomhet. Som et av sine hovedmål skal Tilsynsrådet gjennom aktiv tilsynsvirksomhet søke å forebygge ansvarsskader.

Tilsynsrådet kan ikke bistå deg i denne saken. Det vises til at Tilsynsrådet, ut fra sin kompetanse, verken har anledning til å anbefale særskilte advokater eller til å ta nærmere stilling til konkrete rettstvister mellom private parter. Tilsynsrådet kan heller ikke bistå med et skifte.

Dersom du mener at en advokat har opptrådt i strid med gjeldende regler for god advokatskikk, gjør vi oppmerksom på at klage eventuelt kan fremsettes skriftlig til Disiplinærnemnden for advokater på følgende adresse:

Disiplinærnemnden

Kr. Augustgt. 9

0164 Oslo

Vennlig hilsen

Jonas Haugsvold

Rådgiver

Tilsynsrådet for advokatvirksomhet
Postboks 720 Sentrum, 0106 Oslo | Rådhusgt. 23

Tlf: 22 00 75 02 | Sentralbord: 22 00 75 00
* post@tilsynet.no þ www.tilsynet.no

Fra: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

Sendt: 1. september 2012 14:50
Til: Tilsynsrådet for Advokatvirksomhet
Emne: Påminnelse/Fwd: Klage på tre advokater/Fwd: Din henvendelse til Advokatforeningen

Hei,

jeg kan ikke se at jeg har mottatt noe svar på denne e-posten, så jeg sender en påminnelse om dette.

Håper dette er i orden!

Mvh.

Erik Ribsskog

———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

Date: 2012/6/21
Subject: Klage på tre advokater/Fwd: Din henvendelse til Advokatforeningen
To: post@tilsynet.no
Cc: larvik.tingrett@domstol.no

Hei,

min mormor døde for tre år siden, på tirsdag neste uke.

Jeg har bare fått tre tusen i arv, enda hun var etter dansk adel og kongelige og hadde malerier fra Højris slott på veggen, da hun døde, og også mange andre artige ting, som brev og møbler og alt mulig, fra sine adelige slektninger, (Gjedde, Nyholm, Fog, Adeler, etc).

Jeg ville først at advokat Erik Øvergård, i Hurum, skulle selge min eiendom der, (del av sameie), sånn at jeg kunne betale 30.000 til Tingretten i Larvik, for offentlig skifte.

Øvergård sluttet plutselig å svare meg.

Så jeg kontaktet Tingretten i Drammen, (via Namsmannen i Hurum/Røyken), og de villedet meg om salg av sameie, (Høysæter der), så jeg fikk ikke ordnet dette, for man måtte betale gebyr, og sånn, og Høysæter bare lot som om hun skulle ordne det, så mange måneder gikk tapt da, og etter dette så har jeg fått en umøblert leilighet, så jeg har ikke hatt penger til gebyr for salg av sameie.

Jeg fikk derimot dekke litt fri rettshjelp for en barnevernssak mot Svelvik kommune, av Fylkesmannen i Oslo og Akershus.

Jeg sendte dette til Advokat.no og spurte om jeg kunne få en advokat i Drammen, siden dette er den nærmeste store byen, fra Svelvik.

Jeg fikk en advokat i Oslo, og tenkte at det var greit.

Men nå så jeg senere at hun Ida Valen Rukke, som jeg ble tildelt som advokat av Advokat.no, ikke har barnevern som hovedfelt.

Og at syv andre advokater hos Advokat.no hadde barnevern som hovedfelt.

Da jeg klagde på at Rukke var ineffektiv, antagelig siden hun ikke var vant til å jobbe med barnevernsaker, så slutten hun i jobben, (av en eller annen grunn), og jeg ble ikke tilbudt ny advokat, av Advokat.no.

Og dette var etter at Rukke hadde opplyst meg om at hun hadde en timelønn på over 2000, og etter at jeg hadde bedt henne om å ordne med det offentlige skiftet, i Larvik, for meg, samt oppløsing av sameie, i Holmsbu, og andre saker.

Jeg sendte så e-post til en advokat Bille, i Drammen, som ikke har svart meg.

Jeg mister nå antagelig den arven, etter min mormor, morfar og mor, (siden min mor og morfar døde før min mormor).

For fristen der er mandag eller tirsdag, neste uke, å be om offentlig skifte.

Og jeg har vært arbeidsledig i England, under finanskrisen, så jeg har ikke klart å spare opp penger, og salget av sameiet i Holmsbu har jo ikke latt seg gjennomføre grunnet sabotasje, (må jeg kalle det), fra Øverland og Tingretten i Drammen.

Jeg ønsker jo selvfølgelig først og fremst at jeg får innvilget offentlig skifte, etter min mormor, hos Tingretten i Larvik.

Kanskje kan gjøre dette for meg?

Sender kopi til Tingretten i Larvik og advokat Bille i Drammen.

Jeg ønsker også erstatning på grunn av tullet fra de nevnte advokatene.

Jeg har måttet gått rundt i Newcastle, en hel natt, med alt jeg har hatt av eiendom her borte, (City Self Storage vil ikke sende meg de ‘norske’ tingene mine), og nesten fryst ihjel, fordi jeg ikke har fått solgt eiendom i Norge og vært prislagt diverse lugubre britiske hosteller, osv.

Så disse advokatene kan man få billig av meg, og jeg håper dere lar de miste bevilgningen.

Jeg blir systematisk tullet med, synes jeg det virker som, og jeg ønsker å få mye penger i erstatning, for at det skal være enklere for meg, å beskytte meg mot slik systematisk tulling og jeg har også overhørt at jeg er forfulgt av ‘mafian’, som var grunnen til at jeg flytta fra Norge, i 2004.

Så jeg håper på amerikansk metode her, med mye erstatning til folk som er offer for maktmisbruk, osv.

Fikk også noen dokumenter etter de kjente slektningene mine Anders Gjedde Nyholm, en general og en dommer i Haag, Didrik Nyholm, av min mormor, på 80-tallet.

Men så skulle Ingeborg ha tilbake dette.

Og hu var jo gammel allerede da, så jeg sa det var greit.

Men nå som hun er død, så er jo dette egentlig mitt, mener jeg, man kan jo ikke ta tilbake en gave.

Og min mormor hadde også masse andre artige brev fra Maren Gjedde, mm., som jeg syntes at virker interessant både for meg selv og også historisk.

Og jeg er den eneste som har interesse for sånt, i slekta, sa min mormor, mens hun levde.

Også skal jeg liksom bare få 3000 i arv, enda min mormor og morfar hadde det største huset i Nevlugnhavn, på 80-tallet, og de så ut som en antikkforretning eller museum.

Hvor har det blitt av verdiene?

Det er ikke riktig at jeg bare skal få 3000 etter min mor, mormor og morfar, mener jeg.

Her er det noe alvorlig tull.

Hvorfor skal ikke jeg få offentlig skifte?

Kan dere ordne det?

Pluss erstatning også for det andre tøyset.

Men offentlig skifte-fristen går visst ut på mandag eller tirsdag neste uke.

Erik Ribsskog

———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Mona Mjøen McKiernan <mmm@advokatforeningen.no>

Date: 2012/6/21
Subject: Din henvendelse til Advokatforeningen
To: “eribsskog@gmail.com” <eribsskog@gmail.com>

Erik Ribsskog,

Det vises til din henvendelse av 20.juni 2012, vedrørende klage på advokat.

Av henvendelsen fremgår det at du ønsker å klage på advokat.no.

Vi viser til vårt tidligere svar av 18.juni 2012, der det fremgår at en klage må sendes per post og gjelde en navngitt advokat.

All informasjon om hvordan du skriver en klage finner du her: http://www.advokatenhjelperdeg.no/artikler/kan-jeg-klage-pa-advokaten/

Vedrørende hva en klage kan føre til finner du informasjon om dette her: http://www.advokatenhjelperdeg.no/artikler/kan-jeg-klage-pa-advokaten/#hvafrerklagenetil

Til ditt spørsmål om hva du skal gjøre med det offentlige skiftet minner vi om at Advokatforeningen ikke kan tilby juridisk rådgivning. Vi kan heller ikke tildele en advokat til deg.

Vi råder deg til å ta kontakt med en advokat for å få hjelp med dette. Din advokat finner du her:
http://www.advokatenhjelperdeg.no/finn-advokat/

Alle som praktiserer som advokat, er lovpålagt å gi sine klienter økonomisk trygghet for eventuelle feil de gjør som advokat. Du finner mer informasjon om erstatning og hvordan du kan rette et erstatningskrav mot advokaten her: http://www.advokatenhjelperdeg.no/artikler/kan-jeg-klage-pa-advokaten/#kanjegferstatning

Med vennlig hilsenMona Mjøen McKiernan

ADVOKATFORENINGEN / THE NORWEGIAN BAR ASSOCIATION

Kristian Augusts gate 9, N-0164 Oslo T +47 22 03 50 50 E mmm@advokatforeningen.no
www.advokatforeningen.no www.advokatenhjelperdeg.no

From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

Sent: 20. juni 2012 20:57
To: Mona Mjøen McKiernan
Cc: Disiplinærnemnden for advokater
Subject: Re: Din henvendelse til Advokatforeningen

Hei,

ok, jeg videresender denne korrespondansen til dem, så får jeg håpe at de tar kontakt.

Også ønsker jeg samtidig å klage på Advokat.no.

Som tidligere nevnt, så ba jeg om en advokat i Drammen, siden dette er den nærmeste store byen, fra Bergeråsen, hvor omsorgssvikten fant sted.

(Etter at jeg ble innvilget Fri Rettshjelp, fra Fylkesmannen i Oslo og Akershus).

Jeg ble tilbudt en advokat i Oslo.

Og jeg tenkte at det var greit.

Men da jeg sjekket nettsidene til Advokat.no nærmere, så så jeg det, at Advokat.no hadde syv advokater i Oslo, som var spesialister på barnevern.

Og selv om min sak er en barnevernssak, (min far lot meg bo alene fra jeg var ni år, og jeg fikk fri rettshjelp til en barnevernssak mot Svelvik kommune).

Så ble jeg gitt en advokat som _ikke_ hadde barnevern som hovedfelt.

Og så, her om dagen, slutter plutselig den advokaten.

Advokat.no skulle jo da selvfølgelig ha tilbudt meg en ny advokat.

Men det gjorde de ikke.

De bare sa at de var ferdig med saken.

Og dette etter at jeg hadde forklart for hun Rukke der, at jeg blir snytt for arv også, og trenger hjelp av en advokat, til å få Tingretten i Larvik, til å ha offentlig skifte, etter min mormor, og fristen der er 26. juni, altså på tirsdag neste uke.

Så at Advokat.no bare sluttet å jobbe med sakene mine, det kan koste meg arven etter min mor, (som døde i 1999), og min mormor som var fra danske kongelige og adelige.

Så jeg synes Advokat.no oppfører seg så besynderlig, at jeg ønsker å klage.

Samtidlig så lurer jeg på hva vitsen er med å klage, for Øvergård fikk bare 2000 i bot, og jeg fikk ingenting i erstatning.

Og dette gjaldt salg av min del av et sameie i Holmsbu, som jeg ville selge for å ha råd til det nevnte offentlige skiftet da.

For meg så virker det som at jeg bare blir systematisk tullet med av norske advokater, (er det mafian som trekker i tråder, jeg har overhørt i 2003 at jeg er forfulgt av dem).

Hvordan skal jeg liksom få ordnet med det offentlige skiftet da.

Hvorfor kan liksom ingen i Norge hjelpe meg med det, nå er det bare noen dager igjen til fristen går ut.

Men Advokatforeningen er så idiotisk organisert at dere ikke gir erstatning til ofre for deres mafia-advokater, og kun gir mindre enn en timelønn i bot til disse mafia-advokatene så det er jo helt håpløst.

Det burde vært som i USA hvor folk får store erstatninger.

Ellers så kommer de aldri av flekken.

Jeg blir litt kvalm her jeg sitter i England av dette mafia-opplegget som foregår i Norge.

Så nå må dere forte dere å gi Advokat.no 2000 i bot, de også.

Hva skal liksom løse seg da, tenker dere?

Dette er jo helt meningsløst egentlig.

Kan dere ikke tilby meg advokathjelp, eller noe, i det minste?

Hvordan skal jeg få ordnet med dette offentlige skiftet hvor fristen går ut 26. juni.

Det kan jo være at den egentlige grunnen til at Advokat.no oppførte seg så besynderlig var for at jeg skulle miste kontrollen over det arveoppgjøret, pga. at en mafia står bak, og trekker i tråder.

Jeg rekker jo ikke nå å få en ny advokat til å ordne med dette.

Så om dere kan ordne med det.

Jeg har skrevet om disse problemene på blogg i tre år nå, og ingen i Norge gjør en dritt, så jeg er rimelig oppgitt, for å si det sånn.

Jeg vet nesten ikke hva jeg skal si.

Erik Ribsskog

31. oktober 2012
Jeg sendte en e-post til Ingeus

Gmail – Meeting tomorrow

Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>

Meeting tomorrow

Erik Ribsskog

<eribsskog@gmail.com>

Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 12:31 PM

To:
Melanie Wright <MWright@ingeus.co.uk>

Cc:
Contact-Us <Contact-Us@jobcentreplus.gsi.gov.uk>, CONTACT-US <CONTACT-US@dwp.gsi.gov.uk>

Hi,

I haven’t gotten any money from the Jobcentre for more than two months now.

So I can’t afford to take the bus, to our meeting, in the City Centre tomorrow, unfortunately.

May I suggest that you contact the Jobcentre and ask them to send me my jobseekers-allowance.

Thanks in advance for any help!

Best regards,

Erik Ribsskog

31. oktober 2012
Jeg sendte en ny e-post til Barclays

Gmail – Re: Home Insurance (KMM1968006I30836L0KM)

Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>

Re: Home Insurance (KMM1968006I30836L0KM)

Erik Ribsskog

<eribsskog@gmail.com>

Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 11:53 AM

To:
Internethelp <internethelp@barclays.com>

Hi,

I don’t understand why you can’t just deal with this by e-mail.

Is it something you don’t want me to have documentation about since you want my mobile-number?

This seems very strange to me.

Erik Ribsskog

On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 8:31 AM, Internethelp <internethelp@barclays.com> wrote:

Dear Mr. Ribsskog ,

Thank you for your email dated 30/10/12.

As we have previously advised we can not email the Insurance Department on your behalf.

If you would like for us to escalate this on your behalf then we will need to log this as a complaint. If you would like for us to progress this
for you then please contact us again providing us with the following information:

Your contact telephone number and a preferred time of contact, your full postal code and the last four digits of your Barclays sorting code
number please. If your complaint is in regards to a Barclays business account can you please supply your business name and your full postal
code.

If you are not currently a Barclays customer please only provide your contact telephone number, preferred time of contact and your full postal
code.

As soon as this information is received, your complaint will be forwarded to the relevant area for investigation. For security reasons, we are
obliged to respond to your complaint in writing.

Alternatively please visit a local Barclays branch if convenient to do so, call our Customer Services Team.

Personal Customers call: 0845 7 555 555
Business Customers call: 0845 605 2345
International Customers call: +44 24 7684 2099

All available 07:00 – 23:00 (UK times) seven days a week.

As a further alternative please write to the following address:

Barclays Bank plc
Leicester
LE87 2BB

Yours sincerely,

Michelle O’Dowd
Barclays Bank PLC

Original Message Follows:
————————

Hi,

I don’t really want to complain.

I just want you to send the e-mail to your insurance-department, and to give me a loan, please.

The Jobcentre owes me more than £700 and I have no other income, so I’m going to need money for electricity etc., in a while.

Thanks in advance for any help!

Best regards,

Erik Ribsskog

On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Internethelp <internethelp@barclays.com> wrote:

Dear Mr. Ribsskog,

Thank you for your email dated 30/10/12.

For us to be able to progress with your complaint could you please contact us again providing us with the following information:

Your contact telephone number and a preferred time of contact, your full postal code and the last four digits of your Barclays sorting code
number please. If your complaint is in regards to a Barclays business account can you please supply your business name and your full postal
code.

If you are not currently a Barclays customer please only provide your contact telephone number, preferred time of contact and your full postal
code.

As soon as this information is received, your complaint will be forwarded to the relevant area for investigation. For security reasons, we are
obliged to respond to your complaint in writing.

We value your feedback and are sorry that you have experienced dissatisfaction on this occasion.

Please see our website for further information on how we deal with complaints:
http://www.personal.barclays.co.uk/BRC1/jsp/brccontrol?task=articlegroup&site=pfs&value=3659&menu=3136

—————–

Our website : http://www.barclays.co.uk

Yours sincerely,

Michelle O’Dowd
Barclays Bank PLC

Original Message Follows:
————————

Hi,

you haven’t exactly adviced that, I think.

But it’s the details in the first forwarded e-mail in this e-mail that is the case I wonder if I can get some compensation for.

I also have two small businesses, (that’s why the Jobcentre mess with my jobseekers-allowance, because they lack business-skills, I think, and
have no real understanding of budgeting and book-keeping), so I could need a loan from Barclays as well, both for my private budget and my
businesses, since the Jobcentre have started messing with me, and haven’t sent me my Jobseekers Allowance for more than two months.

For no good reason for me, since both these businesses run in minus.

But if you could be so kind as to send my case, (in the first e-mail in this e-mail), to your Insurance-department.

And if Barclays also could please let me have a loan.

I’m still a bit depressed from the loan-meeting, in 2006, in Barclays, in Water St., in Liverpool.

So I hope you can just give me a loan online.

Hope this is alright!

Yours sincerely,

Erik Ribsskog

On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 8:17 AM, Internethelp <internethelp@barclays.com> wrote:

Dear Mr. Ribsskog ,

Thank you for your email dated 29/10/12.

We reiterate that there is no email address which we can give, to customers, since this email service is not secure and we cannot, therefore,
take action on instructions received by this method.

Whilst written correspondence may appear to be less secure the high volumes of mail do give a level of anonymity and security.

As previously advised we will be happy to forward this issue to our Customer Care Team for investigation on receipt of the details requested

Yours sincerely,
Mike Coy
Barclays Bank PLC

Original Message Follows:
————————

Hi,

I don’t have money for stamps now, you see.

Since the Jobcentre are messing with my jobseekers-allowance.

But maybe Barclays could let me have a loan untill the burocrats are finished doing their stuff.

But I guess it’s no point asking for a loan from you, since I’ve tried that earlier, in 2006, I think it must have been.

It also seems unlikely to me that a Barclays-department doesn’t have an e-mail address.

It seems strange to me that you can’t forward them my e-mail.

Do you think letters are more secure than e-mails?

It’s also possible to imagine that letters might be insecure.

It’s known that letters can be opened if one put them over steam.

Then the glue is going to disolve, and one can read the letter.

And then put the letter back, and glue the envelope again.

So I don’t think you correspondance-policy make much sense, unfortunately.

As far as I can see it at least.

Regards,

Erik Ribsskog

On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 9:10 AM, Internethelp <internethelp@barclays.com> wrote:

Dear Erik Ribsskog,

Thank you for your email dated 26/10/12.

We have to advise that the Home Insurance Team do not have an email address therefore we are unable to forward this to them.

We use the email service to give general advice and do not discuss anything of a confidential nature.

We would like to advise that we are aware that there are plans to introduce a secure email service in the near future but do not have any
timescales at this time.

If you would like for us to log this as a complaint for you then contact us again providing us with the following information:

Your contact telephone number and a preferred time of contact, your full postal code and the last four digits of your Barclays sorting code
number please. If your complaint is in regards to a Barclays business account can you please supply your business name and your full postal
code.

If you are not currently a Barclays customer please only provide your contact telephone number, preferred time of contact and your full
postal
code.

As soon as this information is received, your complaint will be forwarded to the relevant area for investigation. For security reasons, we
are
obliged to respond to your complaint in writing.

We value your feedback and are sorry that you have experienced dissatisfaction on this occasion.

Please see our website for further information on how we deal with complaints:
http://www.personal.barclays.co.uk/BRC1/jsp/brccontrol?task=articlegroup&site=pfs&value=3659&menu=3136

—————–

Our website : http://www.barclays.co.uk

Yours sincerely,

Michelle O’Dowd
Barclays Bank PLC

Original Message Follows:
————————

Hi,

I don’t ask for a customer accessalbe e-mail address.

I ask for you to send my e-mail to them.

So I’m not asking for they’re e-mail address.

Further, if e-mails aren’t secure why do you use them yourselves?

This doesn’t make any sense.

I think Barclays have a confusing policy when it comes to correspondence, and I wanted to complain about this.

Best regards,

Erik Ribsskog

On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 2:30 PM, Internethelp <internethelp@barclays.com> wrote:

Dear Erik Ribsskog,

Thank you for your email dated 26/10/12.

We have to advise that we can not forward your email on to the Insurance Department as they do not have a customer accessible email address
since the email service is not secure.

We apologise for the inconvenience that this may cause

Yours sincerely,

Michelle O’Dowd
Barclays Bank PLC

Original Message Follows:
————————

Hi,

they don’t have an e-mail address?

Is this the stone-age?

I’m a bit frustrated now since the Jobcentre has started messing with my Jobseekers Allowance and you tell me you don’t know how to send
e-mails?

Erik Ribsskog

On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Internethelp <internethelp@barclays.com> wrote:

Dear Erik Ribsskog,

Thank you for your email dated 25/10/12.

We have to advise that we are unable to forward this on to the Home Insurance Department as they do not have access to customer email.

As previously advised you will need to contact them by telephone or by sending this in writing to the address that was provided in our
previous
email to you.

Once again we apologise for the inconvenience that this has caused you.

Yours sincerely,

Michelle O’Dowd
Barclays Bank PLC

Original Message Follows:
————————

Hi,

are you telling me that you can’t forward my e-mail to the right Barclays-deparment?

This seems very strange to me.

Some years ago regular post was called ‘snail mail’, that’s why I wanted to send this by e-mail.

It’s more practical and I haven’t got much money for postage now since the Jobcentre are messing with my jobseekers-allowance.

This is bad customer-support from Barclays, I think.

Erik Ribsskog

On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 9:20 AM, Internethelp <internethelp@barclays.com> wrote:

Dear Mr. Ribsskog ,

Thank you for your email dated 17/5/12.

We at the Online Banking Helpdesk (the area in receipt of your e-mail) have only limited access to your account details and are unable to
assist
with this type of request. Please accept our apologies for any inconvenience this may cause.
Additionally we are not able to direct this query to your branch as it has been received by e-mail, which is considered a non secure
method
of
communication.

We would suggest that you send your request, in writing, to:

Home Insurance Claim
Barclays Bank plc
Leicester
Leics. LE87 2BB
———————–

Yours sincerely,
Mike Coy
Barclays Bank PLC

Original Message Follows:
————————

Hi,

I’d like to deal with this in writing please, if it’s alright.

So if you could please just forward this e-mail to your Home Insurance-department?

Thanks in advance for any help!

Best regards,

Erik Ribsskog

On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 11:49 AM, Internethelp <internethelp@barclays.com> wrote:

Dear Erik Ribsskog,

Thank you for your email dated 13/5/12.

Due to the nature of your query, can you please contact the Home Insurance Department direct on the number below:

Home Insurance: General Enquiries – 0800 0150 246 or from overseas 0044 800 027 9844.
Monday – Friday 08:00 – 22:00, Saturday 08:00 – 18:00, Sunday & Bank Holidays 10:00 – 16:00 (all UK times).

Home Insurance: Claims -08000279844 or from overseas 0044 800 027 9844 (24 hours, 365 days a year)

Home Insurance: Quotes – Barclays Insurance Services on 0800 068 1696.Monday – Friday 08:00 – 21:00, Saturday 09:00 – 17:00, Sunday 10:00
–
16:00 (all UK times).

We hope this resolves your query.

—————–

Our website : http://www.barclays.co.uk

Yours sincerely,
Kirsty Jeremiah
Barclays Bank plc

Original Message Follows:
————————

Hi,

i had a Home Insurance, when I lived in Leather Lane.

I’ve been the victim of fraud, from my landlord, and have had problems getting income-support, from the Council, so I suddently didn’t
have
the
founds to afford the Home Insurance any longer.

Now I’ve been thrown out, (by Liverpool County Court), after an unfair trail, last automn.

The Landlord, (Imperial Properites/T. J. Thomas), don’t want to give me my stuff and deposit.

They’ve also done fraud, because payments that they collected by their representative George, on my door, for half a year, or so, isn’t on
the
rent-statement.

Also I had to walk through a restaurant, to throw my garbage, and the disco next door, (G-bar), played load music four nights a week.

This was going on from 2006 to 2011.

And I had Home Insurance the first of these years, when my economy allowed it.

I wonder if I have the right to get some sort of compensation from my Home Insurance, that I had with you, some years ago.

Have been thrown out many times, unfairly, since 2011, and haven’t got to contact you about this earlier.

I’m no lawyer but I think that perhaps the Home Insurance that I had with you could compensate me, (at least some), since I had it for
around
two of these years.

Hope this is alright!

Yours sincerely,

Erik Ribsskog
This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and intended
solely for the addressee and may also be privileged or exempt from
disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the addressee, or
have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender
immediately, delete it from your system and do not copy, disclose
or otherwise act upon any part of this e-mail or its attachments.

Internet communications are not guaranteed to be secure or
virus-free.
The Barclays Group does not accept responsibility for any loss
arising from unauthorised access to, or interference with, any
Internet communications by any third party, or from the
transmission of any viruses. Replies to this e-mail may be
monitored by the Barclays Group for operational or business
reasons.

Any opinion or other information in this e-mail or its attachments
that does not relate to the business of the Barclays Group is
personal to the sender and is not given or endorsed by the Barclays
Group.

Barclays Bank PLC. Registered in England and Wales (registered no.
1026167).
Registered Office: 1 Churchill Place, London, E14 5HP, United
Kingdom.

Barclays Bank PLC is authorised and regulated by the Financial
Services Authority.

31. oktober 2012
Jeg sendte en ny klage til Twitter

Gmail – #6492227 Twitter Support: update on “Offensive content – BaronAdelerSays”

Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>

#6492227 Twitter Support: update on “Offensive content – BaronAdelerSays”

Twitter Support

<notifications-support@twitter.zendesk.com>

Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 5:45 PM

Reply-To:
Twitter Support <support+id6492227@twitter.zendesk.com>

To:
johncons <eribsskog@gmail.com>

##- Please type your reply above this line -##

Hello,
We’ve received your report and will be taking a look at the issue you reported.
What happens next?
The Twitter Trust & Safety team will review your report and take action if the user is violating the Twitter Rules (https://twitter.com/rules). We may follow up with you if we need additional information.
Keep in mind, Twitter is a platform that provides a global communication service which encompasses a variety of users with different voices, ideas, and perspectives. As a policy, Twitter does not mediate content or intervene in disputes between users.
Please keep in mind that filing multiple reports will not resolve your issue faster. Rest assured, we are working as quickly as possible, but our ability to respond may be delayed due to a high number of tickets. We thank you for your patience.
What else can I do?
We recommend that you block users who you believe are being abusive towards you. Blocking the user prevents them from doing the following:
adding your Twitter account to their lists;
having their @replies or mentions show in your mentions tab (although these Tweets may still appear in search);
following you; and
seeing your profile picture on their profile page or in their timeline.
You can read more about how to block other users on the following page: https://support.twitter.com/articles/117063
You can also find more resources for dealing with abusive behavior at our Help Center:
https://support.twitter.com/articles/15794
Contact Law Enforcement
If something has gone beyond the point of a personal conflict and has escalated to the point of believable violent threats, whether it be online or offline, please contact your local law enforcement so they can accurately assess the validity of the issue.
If contacted by law enforcement directly, we can work with them and provide the necessary information for their investigation of your issue.
You can point local law enforcement to our Law Enforcement Guidelines (https://support.twitter.com/articles/41949).
Thanks,
Twitter Trust & Safety

Message-Id:MJFJQZVT_5090123bfdd7_795afaba7c1917de_sprut

PS.

Her er mer om dette:

30. oktober 2012
CCCS driver visst og søker om meg på nettet. Hm

Gmail – Reference 1105539

Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>

Reference 1105539

Erik Ribsskog

<eribsskog@gmail.com>

Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 4:50 PM

To:
supportcounsellor@cccs.co.uk

Hi,

why do search about me on the internet?

If you wonder about anything you could just ask in your e-mails.

Erik Ribsskog

PS.

Here is more about this:

Visitor Analysis & System Spec

Search Referral:

www.google.co.uk — erik ribsskog #2

Host Name:
21.cccs.ipi-group.co.uk Browser:
IE 8.0
IP Address: 85.159.128.21 — [Label IP Address]
Operating System:
Win7

Location:
Leeds, United Kingdom Resolution:
1440×900
Returning Visits: 0
Javascript:
Enabled Visit Length:
3 hours 19 mins 37 secs
ISP:
Ipi Co-managed Internet For Cccs

Navigation Path

Date

Time

WebPage Multiline URLs

www.google.co.uk — erik ribsskog #2

30 Oct
12:22:41

johncons-mirror.blogspot.co.uk/

www.google.co.uk — erik ribsskog #2

30 Oct
12:22:44

johncons-mirror.blogspot.co.uk/

(No referring link)

30 Oct
12:24:32

johncons-mirror.blogspot.co.uk/

(No referring link)

30 Oct
12:24:36

johncons-mirror.blogspot.co.uk/

www.google.co.uk — erik ribsskog #2

30 Oct
12:27:51

johncons-mirror.blogspot.co.uk/

www.google.co.uk — erik ribsskog #2

30 Oct
12:27:53

johncons-mirror.blogspot.co.uk/

(No referring link)

30 Oct
12:29:23

johncons-mirror.blogspot.co.uk/

(No referring link)

30 Oct
12:29:25

johncons-mirror.blogspot.co.uk/

johncons-mirror.blogspot.co.uk/

30 Oct
12:33:28

johncons-mirror.blogspot.co.uk/search/label/CCCS

johncons-mirror.blogspot.co.uk/

30 Oct
12:33:31

johncons-mirror.blogspot.co.uk/search/label/CCCS

(No referring link)

30 Oct
12:35:46

johncons-mirror.blogspot.co.uk/

(No referring link)

30 Oct
12:35:46

johncons-mirror.blogspot.co.uk/search/label/CCCS

(No referring link)

30 Oct
12:35:50

johncons-mirror.blogspot.co.uk/

(No referring link)

30 Oct
12:35:50

johncons-mirror.blogspot.co.uk/search/label/CCCS

www.google.co.uk — erik ribsskog tracey lowden #1

30 Oct
12:42:31

johncons-mirror.blogspot.co.uk/2010/12/jeg-sendte-en-ny-e-post-til-jobcentre_30.html

www.google.co.uk — erik ribsskog tracey lowden #1

30 Oct
12:42:34

johncons-mirror.blogspot.co.uk/2010/12/jeg-sendte-en-ny-e-post-til-jobcentre_30.html

www.google.co.uk — erik ribsskog #2

30 Oct
12:43:20

johncons-mirror.blogspot.co.uk/

www.google.co.uk — erik ribsskog #2

30 Oct
12:43:23

johncons-mirror.blogspot.co.uk/

(No referring link)

30 Oct
12:43:57

johncons-mirror.blogspot.co.uk/2010/12/jeg-sendte-en-ny-e-post-til-jobcentre_30.html

(No referring link)

30 Oct
12:44:00

johncons-mirror.blogspot.co.uk/2010/12/jeg-sendte-en-ny-e-post-til-jobcentre_30.html

twitter.com/BaronAdelerSays

30 Oct
12:48:08

johncons-mirror.blogspot.co.uk/

twitter.com/BaronAdelerSays

30 Oct
12:48:12

johncons-mirror.blogspot.co.uk/

(No referring link)

30 Oct
12:50:00

johncons-mirror.blogspot.co.uk/

(No referring link)

30 Oct
12:50:03

johncons-mirror.blogspot.co.uk/

(No referring link)

30 Oct
12:57:15

www.johncons-mirror.blogspot.co.uk/

(No referring link)

30 Oct
12:57:16

www.johncons-mirror.blogspot.co.uk/

johncons-mirror.blogspot.co.uk/2010/12/jeg-sendte-en-ny-e-post-til-jobcentre_30.html

30 Oct
12:57:41

johncons-mirror.blogspot.co.uk/2010_12_29_archive.html

johncons-mirror.blogspot.co.uk/2010/12/jeg-sendte-en-ny-e-post-til-jobcentre_30.html

30 Oct
12:57:44

johncons-mirror.blogspot.co.uk/2010_12_29_archive.html

(No referring link)

30 Oct
12:58:06

johncons-mirror.blogspot.co.uk/

(No referring link)

30 Oct
12:58:09

johncons-mirror.blogspot.co.uk/

(No referring link)

30 Oct
12:58:29

johncons-mirror.blogspot.co.uk/

(No referring link)

30 Oct
12:58:31

johncons-mirror.blogspot.co.uk/

www.johncons-mirror.blogspot.co.uk/

30 Oct
12:58:55

www.johncons-mirror.blogspot.co.uk/2012/10/jeg-sendte-en-e-post-til-cccs_30.html

www.johncons-mirror.blogspot.co.uk/

30 Oct
12:58:55

www.johncons-mirror.blogspot.co.uk/2012/10/jeg-sendte-en-e-post-til-cccs_30.html

(No referring link)

30 Oct
13:05:24

johncons-mirror.blogspot.co.uk/2010/12/jeg-sendte-en-ny-e-post-til-jobcentre_30.html

(No referring link)

30 Oct
13:05:27

johncons-mirror.blogspot.co.uk/2010/12/jeg-sendte-en-ny-e-post-til-jobcentre_30.html

30 Oct
13:06:54

www.godteposer.net/ (Exit Link)

(No referring link)

30 Oct
14:07:25

johncons-mirror.blogspot.co.uk/2011/03/na-var-det-fire-politifolk-her-og-henta.html

(No referring link)

30 Oct
14:07:28

johncons-mirror.blogspot.co.uk/2011/03/na-var-det-fire-politifolk-her-og-henta.html

www.bing.com — Erik Ribsskog

30 Oct
14:13:02

johncons-mirror.blogspot.co.uk/

www.bing.com — Erik Ribsskog

30 Oct
14:13:06

johncons-mirror.blogspot.co.uk/

johncons-mirror.blogspot.co.uk/

30 Oct
14:45:32

johncons-mirror.blogspot.co.uk/2012/10/jeg-sendte-en-e-post-til-cccs_30.html

johncons-mirror.blogspot.co.uk/

30 Oct
14:45:35

johncons-mirror.blogspot.co.uk/2012/10/jeg-sendte-en-e-post-til-cccs_30.html

www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&ved=0CCwQFjAB&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohncons-mirror.blogspot.com%2F&ei=leiPUOu6I4TQ0QX4z4HICg&usg=AFQjCNEaa94gAnOu33XUuVA7Mfa55TjDUg&sig2=Yn42QK83PVz4ucwdu6YIVg

30 Oct
14:47:55

johncons-mirror.blogspot.co.uk/

www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&ved=0CCwQFjAB&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohncons-mirror.blogspot.com%2F&ei=leiPUOu6I4TQ0QX4z4HICg&usg=AFQjCNEaa94gAnOu33XUuVA7Mfa55TjDUg&sig2=Yn42QK83PVz4ucwdu6YIVg

30 Oct
14:47:55

johncons-mirror.blogspot.co.uk/

johncons-mirror.blogspot.co.uk/

30 Oct
14:54:57

johncons-mirror.blogspot.co.uk/search/label/CCCS

johncons-mirror.blogspot.co.uk/

30 Oct
14:54:58

johncons-mirror.blogspot.co.uk/search/label/CCCS

(No referring link)

30 Oct
15:03:10

johncons-mirror.blogspot.co.uk/

(No referring link)

30 Oct
15:03:10

johncons-mirror.blogspot.co.uk/

www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CCIQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohncons-mirror.blogspot.com%2F&ei=gOyPUI_2KOaN0AWDl4DwBw&usg=AFQjCNEaa94gAnOu33XUuVA7Mfa55TjDUg&sig2=op5slrZvHU4HNf3wbkmfYA

30 Oct
15:04:42

johncons-mirror.blogspot.co.uk/

www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CCIQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohncons-mirror.blogspot.com%2F&ei=gOyPUI_2KOaN0AWDl4DwBw&usg=AFQjCNEaa94gAnOu33XUuVA7Mfa55TjDUg&sig2=op5slrZvHU4HNf3wbkmfYA

30 Oct
15:04:43

johncons-mirror.blogspot.co.uk/

(No referring link)

30 Oct
15:35:03

johncons-mirror.blogspot.co.uk/

(No referring link)

30 Oct
15:35:05

johncons-mirror.blogspot.co.uk/

(No referring link)

30 Oct
15:38:26

johncons-mirror.blogspot.co.uk/

(No referring link)

30 Oct
15:38:28

johncons-mirror.blogspot.co.uk/

www.google.co.uk — erik ribsskog #2

30 Oct
15:42:16

johncons-mirror.blogspot.co.uk/

www.google.co.uk — erik ribsskog #2

30 Oct
15:42:18

johncons-mirror.blogspot.co.uk/

———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 4:25 PM

Subject: Re: Reference 1105539
To: Support Counsellor <supportcounsellor@cccs.co.uk>
Cc: Contact-Us <Contact-Us@jobcentreplus.gsi.gov.uk>, CONTACT-US <CONTACT-US@dwp.gsi.gov.uk>, DWP ICE gateway team <ice@dwp.gsi.gov.uk>

Hi,

I’ve sent a lot of e-mails to the DWP, but they don’t reply.

And ICE are really horrible.

I’ve complained to them at least three times.

And they always mess with my complaint.

They rewrite all my complaints untill I can’t recognise them any longer, and untill they don’t hurt the Jobcentre anything.

I don’t think you should help legitimise ICE they are horrible.

I don’t want anything to do with them myself.

Just an advice.

Best regards,

Erik Ribsskog

On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Support Counsellor <supportcounsellor@cccs.co.uk> wrote:

Dear Erik,

We are not able to contact the Jobcentre on your behalf.

If you have a complaint about the Jobcentre Plus, you should

complain to the DWP first. If you are unhappy with the DWP’s final decision, you can contact the
Independent Case Examiner.

Kind regards,

From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

Sent: 30 October 2012 12:30
To: Support Counsellor
Cc: Contact-Us; amnestyis; CONTACT-US; Melanie Wright
Subject: Re: Reference 1105539

Hi,

well, I could do that.

But I don’t like to take phone-calls from my mobile.

It’s just a pay-as-you-go mobile.

And I often get told that it’s a bad line, when I use that mobile.

So I prefer to deal with this in writing.

Also because I have a blog where I give advice to other Norwegian Citizens about budget and job-seeking, etc.

So if you could be so kind as to call the job-centre on my behalf, since I want to deal with this writing.

Because then I think it’s easier for me to keep control.

I lost control of my Jobseekers-allowance in a meeting, at the Jobcentre, in Aintree, a couple of months ago.

It was just a sign-on meeting.

But they refused to let me sign on.

And dragged me to a ‘funny’ meeting, which I didn’t get a chance to prepare for.

And I wasn’t given the names of the people I spoke with.

And after that I haven’t gotten my Jobseekers Allowance for two months.

So I prefer to deal with this in writing.

So maybe you could be so kind as to tell the Jobcentre to send me the money they owe me.

It’s five payments of around £143, so that’s more than £700.

I have been starving in some of the weeks, that the Jobcentre have messed with my Jobseekers-allowance.

So I’ve really had enough of this case.

And the Jobcentre don’t reply, to my correspondence.

So it’s like it’s hopeless.

It doesn’t matter what I do, they don’t send my Jobseekers Allowance.

So this is like something by Kafka, I think.

(If you’ve hear of that writer).

Best regards,

Erik Ribsskog

——————————————————————————

This email message is intended for the individual to whom it is addressed and may
contain information that is privileged and confidential. If you are not
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use or dissemination
of this communication is strictly prohibited, If you have received this
information in error, please return it to us immediately and delete it from
your computer. The contents or opinions expressed within this email are not
intended to represent the views of CCCS unless specifically stated to so.
This email is not guaranteed to be free from viruses, although it has been
checked using Avast! and EPA Symantec.cloud. You should check this email and
any attachments for the presence of viruses before downloading any files.
Foundation for Credit Counselling, operating as Consumer Credit Counselling
Service (“CCCS”). Registered office: Wade House, Merrion Centre, Leeds, LS2 8NG.
Registered in England Company No 2757055. Registered Charity No. 1016630.

30. oktober 2012
Jeg sendte enda en e-post til CCCS

Gmail – Reference 1105539

Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>

Reference 1105539

Erik Ribsskog

<eribsskog@gmail.com>

Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 4:25 PM

To:
Support Counsellor <supportcounsellor@cccs.co.uk>

Cc:
Contact-Us <Contact-Us@jobcentreplus.gsi.gov.uk>, CONTACT-US <CONTACT-US@dwp.gsi.gov.uk>, DWP ICE gateway team <ice@dwp.gsi.gov.uk>

Hi,

I’ve sent a lot of e-mails to the DWP, but they don’t reply.

And ICE are really horrible.

I’ve complained to them at least three times.

And they always mess with my complaint.

They rewrite all my complaints untill I can’t recognise them any longer, and untill they don’t hurt the Jobcentre anything.

I don’t think you should help legitimise ICE they are horrible.

I don’t want anything to do with them myself.

Just an advice.

Best regards,

Erik Ribsskog

On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Support Counsellor <supportcounsellor@cccs.co.uk> wrote:

Dear Erik,

We are not able to contact the Jobcentre on your behalf.

If you have a complaint about the Jobcentre Plus, you should

complain to the DWP first. If you are unhappy with the DWP’s final decision, you can contact the
Independent Case Examiner.

Kind regards,

From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

Sent: 30 October 2012 12:30
To: Support Counsellor
Cc: Contact-Us; amnestyis; CONTACT-US; Melanie Wright
Subject: Re: Reference 1105539

Hi,

well, I could do that.

But I don’t like to take phone-calls from my mobile.

It’s just a pay-as-you-go mobile.

And I often get told that it’s a bad line, when I use that mobile.

So I prefer to deal with this in writing.

Also because I have a blog where I give advice to other Norwegian Citizens about budget and job-seeking, etc.

So if you could be so kind as to call the job-centre on my behalf, since I want to deal with this writing.

Because then I think it’s easier for me to keep control.

I lost control of my Jobseekers-allowance in a meeting, at the Jobcentre, in Aintree, a couple of months ago.

It was just a sign-on meeting.

But they refused to let me sign on.

And dragged me to a ‘funny’ meeting, which I didn’t get a chance to prepare for.

And I wasn’t given the names of the people I spoke with.

And after that I haven’t gotten my Jobseekers Allowance for two months.

So I prefer to deal with this in writing.

So maybe you could be so kind as to tell the Jobcentre to send me the money they owe me.

It’s five payments of around £143, so that’s more than £700.

I have been starving in some of the weeks, that the Jobcentre have messed with my Jobseekers-allowance.

So I’ve really had enough of this case.

And the Jobcentre don’t reply, to my correspondence.

So it’s like it’s hopeless.

It doesn’t matter what I do, they don’t send my Jobseekers Allowance.

So this is like something by Kafka, I think.

(If you’ve hear of that writer).

Best regards,

Erik Ribsskog

——————————————————————————

This email message is intended for the individual to whom it is addressed and may
contain information that is privileged and confidential. If you are not
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use or dissemination
of this communication is strictly prohibited, If you have received this
information in error, please return it to us immediately and delete it from
your computer. The contents or opinions expressed within this email are not
intended to represent the views of CCCS unless specifically stated to so.
This email is not guaranteed to be free from viruses, although it has been
checked using Avast! and EPA Symantec.cloud. You should check this email and
any attachments for the presence of viruses before downloading any files.
Foundation for Credit Counselling, operating as Consumer Credit Counselling
Service (“CCCS”). Registered office: Wade House, Merrion Centre, Leeds, LS2 8NG.
Registered in England Company No 2757055. Registered Charity No. 1016630.

30. oktober 2012
Mer om jobbsøking i England

Gmail – eribsskog@gmail.com – CWJobs.co.uk – Applicant details for Linux / Windows Administrator – EG-WINLINADMIN3

Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>

eribsskog@gmail.com – CWJobs.co.uk – Applicant details for Linux / Windows Administrator – EG-WINLINADMIN3

Erik Ribsskog

<eribsskog@gmail.com>

Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 4:16 PM

To:
Melanie Wright <MWright@ingeus.co.uk>

———- Forwarded message ———-
From: <cwjobs@cwjobsmail.co.uk>
Date: Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 4:11 PM

Subject: eribsskog@gmail.com – CWJobs.co.uk – Applicant details for Linux / Windows Administrator – EG-WINLINADMIN3
To: edwardg.46566.cwj@venturi.aplitrak.com
Cc: eribsskog@gmail.com

Sign In

Advertise Now

Buy Job Packs

NEW APPLICATION CONFIRMATION

SIGN IN

ADVERTISE NOW
BUY JOB PACKS
IT MARKET INDEX

The following candidate has applied online for the position: Linux / Windows Administrator.

Candidate email address: eribsskog@gmail.com.

Candidate’s comments:

Hi,

I read about this vacancy on CW Jobs, and wanted to please apply for this job.

I have a degree in IT, from Oslo University College, from 2009, where I got a ‘B’ in System Administration, (using Linux).

I’ve also used Windows a lot and have gone to a Windows NT Core Tech-course, with Global Knowledge Network, in Oslo, in 1998.

I also got a ‘1.9’ in a module called Computer Security, (and many other top grades), at an academy named Norwegian College of Information Technology (NHI), in 1992.

I attach my CV and hope to hear back from you!

Yours sincerely,

Erik Ribsskog

I confirm that I am eligible to live and work in the UK

If the candidate has supplied a CV it will be attached to this email.

Please provide your feedback to eribsskog@gmail.com.

Thank you for advertising on CWJobs.

Totaljobs Group
Holden House, 57 Rathbone Place, London W1T 1JU
Registered in England & Wales under company number 04269861

eribsskog_301020120411.doc
33K

30. oktober 2012

Stikkord: E-post

Navigation Path