johncons

Stikkord: EAD Solicitors.

  • Jeg sendte en ny e-post til Dr. Harry Erwin, foreleser i E-Commerce, fra University of Sunderland







    Gmail – Problems with hi-jacking of web-shop/Fwd: Hello Dr. Erwin,







    Gmail


    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>



    Problems with hi-jacking of web-shop/Fwd: Hello Dr. Erwin,




    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>


    Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 3:09 AM





    To:

    Harry Erwin <harry.erwin@sunderland.ac.uk>



    Hi,

    yes I guess that's a possibility.
    But I have an employment-case, against Bertelsmann Arvato's Microsoft Scandinavian Product Activation-campaign.
    And have been in contact with lots of Law Firms, and I've had to complain about them, to the Law Society etc., because they have just been messing with me.

    Some mobster etc., I guess.
    But thanks anyway for the advice!

    Best regards,

    Erik Ribsskog

    On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 2:33 AM, Harry Erwin <harry.erwin@sunderland.ac.uk> wrote:

    For an initial consultation, it shouldn't cost that much. Perhaps you can find a lawyer who would be willing to accept a percentage of the judgment.

    On 20 Jul 2011, at 13:28, Erik Ribsskog wrote:

    > Hi,

    >

    > well I can't afford a lawyer, but maybe you know a lecturer at the Law Faculty, (in the Vardy-building), who I could ask for advice about this?

    >

    > Thanks again for your reply!

    >

    > Sorry that I'm sending many e-mails!

    >

    > Regards,

    >

    > Erik Ribsskog

    >

    >

    > On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 9:24 PM, Harry Erwin <harry.erwin@sunderland.ac.uk> wrote:

    > You need to talk to a competent lawyer.

    >

    > On 20 Jul 2011, at 11:22, Erik Ribsskog wrote:

    >

    > > Hi again Dr. Erwin,

    > >

    > > I was a student at University of Sunderland, in 2004/05.

    > >

    > > (Sorry if I write to many e-mails).

    > >

    > > The web-shop I wrote about earlier, www.godtebutikken.net, which was with One.com, was hi-jacked, by someone sending One and e-mail and got them to let them control the web-site.

    > >

    > > I've now changed web-hotel, to Spexhost, in the USA, since I think they perhaps take security more serious.

    > >

    > > A horrible picture was uploaded on my webshop, by the hijackers, and I've lost a lot customers and many families are probably never going to be the same.

    > >

    > > The police don't reply when I contact them about this crime.

    > >

    > > The hijackers had a g-mail e-mail address, and One.com couldn't find their IP-address for me.

    > >

    > > I've been told on a g-mail message-board:

    > >

    > > http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/gmail/thread?tid=3978267ab5cbd37e&hl=en&fid=3978267ab5cbd37e0004a88412220fe1

    > >

    > > That I need a court order, (in the USA, I guess), to get the identity of the criminals.

    > >

    > > I was wondering if you, (since I remember you are an American citizen, if I'm not mistaking), could please inform me, on how I should go forwad to get this court-order, and the the IP-address from Google.

    > >

    > > Should I contact an American or British court?

    > >

    > > (I still live in the UK, in Liverpool).

    > >

    > > Thanks very much again for the earlier help, with telling me my grades, on the assignments, in E-Commerce, and thanks in advance for any help with this.

    > >

    > > Best regards,

    > >

    > > Erik Ribsskog

    > >

    > >

    > > ———- Forwarded message ———-

    > > From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

    > > Date: Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 10:06 AM

    > > Subject: Fwd: Hello Dr. Erwin,

    > > To: harry.erwin@sunderland.ac.uk

    > >

    > >

    > > I remember I got exactly 50% on the second assignment.

    > >

    > > I also remember that there was a website, where I could log in, and check my results.

    > >

    > > But all my files are in Norway, and my relatives don't want to send them.

    > >

    > > But maybe I can get a new log in, and it will still work, so that I can see tests from 2004/05.

    > >

    > > I've contacted the Gateway now, so maybe they can help me with this.

    > >

    > > Sorry that I'm sending many updates!

    > >

    > > Thanks again for the replies.

    > >

    > > I've been going on for months, trying to get a confirmation like that, that I passes some tests.

    > >

    > > And been in contact with half of the university, of something.

    > >

    > > But they say they can't find my files, that they throw TROEF-test results after a couple of years.

    > >

    > > And things like that.

    > >

    > > So you are the only one at the university, who answer in a 'normal' way about this.

    > >

    > > I've been going on for more than a year, trying to the the uni. to send some files, but for no use.

    > >

    > > I even went to Sunderland by train, and spoke with the Gateway, but they like refuse to send me a confirmation about my results.

    > >

    > > So sorry that I had to send a lot of e-mails about this to you, when this is really Gateway/Students Office/Study Abroad-stuff!

    > >

    > > Best regards,

    > >

    > > Erik Ribsskog

    > >

    > >

    > > ———- Forwarded message ———-

    > > From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

    > > Date: Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 9:36 AM

    > > Subject: Fwd: Hello Dr. Erwin,

    > > To: Harry Erwin <harry.erwin@sunderland.ac.uk>

    > >

    > >

    > > I only lack like one mudule, to get a Bachelor degree, from my Home University, you see.

    > >

    > > So that's why I'm so interested in this.

    > >

    > > Erik Ribsskog

    > >

    > >

    > > ———- Forwarded message ———-

    > > From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

    > > Date: Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 9:32 AM

    > > Subject: Re: Hello Dr. Erwin,

    > > To: Harry Erwin <harry.erwin@sunderland.ac.uk>

    > >

    > >

    > > Hi again Dr. Erwin,

    > >

    > > yes I understand that.

    > >

    > > But I thought if I had gotten to 'C'-s and to 'F'-s.

    > >

    > > Then maybe I would have ended up with an 'E', which is the lowest pass.

    > >

    > > But I'm not an expert on this, so I don't want to argue.

    > >

    > > I just wanted to explained how I though.

    > >

    > > Thanks again for you reply!

    > >

    > > Best regards,

    > >

    > > Erik Ribsskog

    > >

    > >

    > > On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 9:20 AM, Harry Erwin <harry.erwin@sunderland.ac.uk> wrote:

    > > It was only half of the elements of assessment.

    > >

    > > On 27 Oct 2010, at 08:44, Erik Ribsskog wrote:

    > >

    > > > Ok,

    > > >

    > > > thank you very much Dr. Erwin.

    > > >

    > > > That wasn't enough to get a pass I guess?

    > > >

    > > > It's not important anyway I guess.

    > > >

    > > > I'll contact the study-office now, and hear if they can find my TROFL-test and other test-results.

    > > >

    > > > Thank you very much for your help again!

    > > >

    > > > Best regards,

    > > >

    > > > Erik Ribsskog

    > > >

    > > >

    > > > On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 7:30 AM, Harry Erwin <harry.erwin@sunderland.ac.uk> wrote:

    > > > You earned a 'C' (50-59) on each of those assignments.

    > > >

    > > > On 27 Oct 2010, at 04:49, Erik Ribsskog wrote:

    > > >

    > > > > I don't know if you remember me, but we had a meeting, at freshers week, in 2004, when I had gone from Norway, to the University of Sunderland.

    > > > >

    > > > > Because I had to try to find modules, that went ok with my Norwegian Bachelor, (even if I was at the British Bachelor Hons. program, year 3), but I was a bit stressed, and wanted to have both a degree from my home university, Oslo University College, and from the University of Sunderland.

    > > > >

    > > > > I didn't get my study-loan from Norway, untill four months late, so my studies got ruined, and also my sister and her friend, a woman from Norway, and their two children, insisted to stay at the Forge, to visit me for Christmas and New Year, for almost two weeks.

    > > > >

    > > > > So didn't get to read anything in the Christmas-holiday, because their kids wanted to use my computer, and play with Paint etc., and watch dinosaus-movies, or something, the whole holiday.

    > > > >

    > > > > And the university wanted to move me to another part of the Forge, in February, when the Germans went home.

    > > > >

    > > > > So I didn't think it was any idea to go on, at Sunderland.

    > > > >

    > > > > Because I would have just ended up without my degree, and without money, in June.

    > > > >

    > > > > So I went away, to London, in February, to find a job, etc.

    > > > >

    > > > > I passed two assignments in E-commerce, I remember.

    > > > >

    > > > > But the university don't want to give me a file that shows this.

    > > > >

    > > > > I know it isn't much, but it would be fine to have a file from my studies in Sunderland.

    > > > >

    > > > > Did I fail or pass the E-commerce-module, by the way, (since I passed on both the assignments I had, I mean).

    > > > >

    > > > > Also, I went a bit around, to try to get control, but I think I got some hooligans after me in London, for cheering at the 'wrong' football-team in a pub in Kensington.

    > > > >

    > > > > So I ended up going a bit around, on my study-loan.

    > > > >

    > > > > Because I really tried to find a job and a flat, but it wasn't that easy, with the hooligans etc.

    > > > >

    > > > > So I also went on a flight to Detroit actually, because I thought after a while I needed a break from Europe.

    > > > >

    > > > > But there, the police on the Detroit airport, just sent me back to Europe, and wouldn't let me in, in to the USA, for some reason.

    > > > >

    > > > > Even if I've never been a criminal etc.

    > > > >

    > > > > I've now had genealogy, as a hobby, and found I'm actually directly after, (after my Danish grandmother), Woden, Charlesmagne, the profet Muhammed(!), King David and King Salomon of Israel, and Batseba and Cleopatra, Willhelm the conqueror, etc.

    > > > >

    > > > > But I'm from Norway, so I'm most proud of being after Woden actually.

    > > > >

    > > > > But anyway, this makes me a relative of the Danish royals, who I wonder if are messing with me.

    > > > >

    > > > > I rent a shell from One.com, for the web-shop.

    > > > >

    > > > > One.com are from Denmark.

    > > > >

    > > > > The Danes have messed with me, in the EU, after I've complained about injustice against me from government.

    > > > >

    > > > > And they National Library, in Copenhagen, make red tape, especially for me, to refuse me to see my Danish grandmother, Ingeborg Ribsskog, Grand-uncle in law, Holger baron Adeler, (after a famous Norwegian sea-hero, that fought for Naples against the Turks etc), Cort Adeler.

    > > > >

    > > > > So I wonder if it's the Danes who are messing with my website, www.godtebutikken.net.

    > > > >

    > > > > A web-shop I've set up.

    > > > >

    > > > > Because they've stopped selling a British mint, called Glacier Mint, in Norway, after selling them threre, for at least a generation, I think.

    > > > >

    > > > > So people in Norway miss them, so I want to sell them on the internet.

    > > > >

    > > > > But I'm hacked all the time.

    > > > >

    > > > > I now have a very long passord, on osCommerce, with signs and letters and numbers.

    > > > >

    > > > > But still the hackers get in.

    > > > >

    > > > > I've had Accenture, from the USA, ripping my website, with a browser called 'Rippers0'.

    > > > >

    > > > > Do you btw. know what this is about?

    > > > >

    > > > > I send some screen-shots if you please have the time, to eighter send a confirmation that I passed two assignments, in 2004/05, in the module E-Commerce, (3rd year Bachelor Computing-module).

    > > > >

    > > > > Or if you have the time to please give advice about the hacking.

    > > > >

    > > > > Could it be a Trojan?

    > > > >

    > > > > I understand that lecturers on the university has a lot to do, so I understand it if you haven't got the time to reply.

    > > > >

    > > > > But thanks anyway, for the help with advice about the modules, in September 2004, in the Goldberg Building, I think it must have been.

    > > > >

    > > > > I'm sorry I couldn't stay for the whole year.

    > > > >

    > > > > (The univerisity don't even find the result of my TROEFL-test, where I got the best grade, so I think they mess with me.

    > > > >

    > > > > Is it muslim mob/mafia, since I'm also after the profet Muhammed, since I'm related to the Danish royals, (I'm directly after a king called Waldemar Victory of Denmark, who's after the profet Muhammed, if I've understood it right).

    > > > >

    > > > > My relatives have never told me about this, but I found it by chance almost, I think I have to say, on the internet, the other week, from several different genealogy-websites, when I added the information from them.

    > > > >

    > > > > Sorry if I write to much in the e-mails!

    > > > >

    > > > > Thanks in advance for any help!

    > > > >

    > > > > Yours sincerely,

    > > > >

    > > > > Erik Ribsskog

    > > > >

    > > > > PS.

    > > > >

    > > > > You talked about defending Unix and Windows from hackers, being like defending the coast of England and just a castle, from invading Scandinavian Vikings, since Windows had a much bigger core, than Unix.

    > > > >

    > > > > Maybe One should switch to Unix?

    > > > >

    > > > > I've also worked for Bertelsmann Arvato Microsoft Scandinavian Product Activation, in 2005 and 2006, here in Liverpool, and have an employment-case, against them:

    > > > >

    > > > > http://www.scribd.com/groups/view/14830-arvato-services-ltd-s-microsoft-scandinavian-product-activation

    > > > >

    > > > > You also mentioned something about the Scream-robbery, in one of your lectures.

    > > > >

    > > > > Have you been to Norway, since you know much about both Vikings and the Scream-robbery, in Oslo?

    > > > >

    > > > > I overheard in Oslo, in 2003, that I was followed by the 'mafian'.

    > > > >

    > > > > That's why I went to Sunderland.

    > > > >

    > > > > Last year, Oslo University College, gave me a foundation-degree, (from modules I took in Oslo, before I went to Sunderland).

    > > > >

    > > > > But I can't find an IT-job, even if I've made a website:

    > > > >

    > > > > http://www.johncons.org/

    > > > >

    > > > > And a web-shop:

    > > > >

    > > > > http://godtebutikken.net/

    > > > >

    > > > > So I'm now unemployed after working as self-employed, after I started with the Employement-case, that I've sent to the University of Sunderland Almuni about.

    > > > >

    > > > > Maybe some law-students at the unversity could have my employment-case as a Final Year Project etc?

    > > > >

    > > > > Sorry again that I write a lot, I've only spoken with you once, so I don't really know what you think of me, (an other students), updating about their university-problems etc.

    > > > >

    > > > > Hope this is alright anyway!

    > > > > <trojan eller.JPG><rippe-firma.JPG><noen har hacket godtebutikken net igjen.JPG>

    > > >

    > > > —

    > > > Harry Erwin

    > > > harry.erwin@sunderland.ac.uk

    > > > mobile: 07595494289

    > > >

    > > >

    > > >

    > > >

    > > >

    > > >

    > > >

    > > >

    > >

    > > —

    > > Harry Erwin

    > > harry.erwin@sunderland.ac.uk

    > > mobile: 07595494289

    > >

    > >

    > >

    > >

    > >

    > >

    > >

    > >

    > >

    > >

    > >

    >

    > —

    > Why I use a Macintosh: Eccl 12:3 "those who look through the windows see dimly" (Crossan's translation).

    > Harry Erwin

    >

    > Visit www.sunderland.ac.uk/tv to see the University's new TV ads

    >

    —

    Why I use a Macintosh: Eccl 12:3 "those who look through the windows see dimly" (Crossan's translation).

    Harry Erwin

    Visit www.sunderland.ac.uk/tv to see the University's new TV ads





  • Jeg sendte en klage på the Legal Services Ombudsman, til EU-kommisjonen i Sverige







    Gmail – Klage på the Legal Services Ombudsman, i Storbritannia/Fwd: Complaint/Fwd: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)







    Gmail


    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>



    Klage på the Legal Services Ombudsman, i Storbritannia/Fwd: Complaint/Fwd: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)




    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>


    Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 11:58 PM





    To:

    pierre.schellekens@ec.europa.eu



    Hei,

    enda en ombudsman, (siden dere i Sverige er spesialister på ombudsmenn).
    Denne gangen the Legal Services Ombudsman, som lar the Law Society slippe unna, med å la to britiske advokatfirma, Moorecrofts og EAD, lyve og trakassere og ødelegge for en arbeidssak jeg har mot Bertelsmann Arvato Ltd's Microsoft Scandinavian Product Activation, (hvor det ble brukt 'reinforcement' som ledelsesmetode, og hvor jeg ble mobbet og trakassert og behandlet dårlig, og hvor mange nordiske damer ville gråte på jobb og etter, av ukjent grunn for meg):

    Håper dere kan se på denne klagen!
    Mvh.
    Erik Ribsskog

    PS.
    Sivilombudsmannen i Norge, tuller også mye med meg, men det kan jeg kanskje ikke sende om til dere, siden Norge ikke er i EU?
    (Bare fleiper.

    Det er litt sent her).

    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

    Date: Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 3:07 PM
    Subject: Complaint/Fwd: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
    To: lso@olso.gsi.gov.uk

    Hi,

    I called your offices today, and got confirmed, that the e-mail

    address on your website, should

    be your right e-mail address, so I'm trying to send the complaint again.

    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

    ———- Forwarded message ———-

    From: <postmaster@dca.local>

    Date: Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 3:00 AM

    Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)

    To: eribsskog@gmail.com

    This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification.

    Delivery to the following recipients failed.

    LSO@OLSO.GSI.GOV.UK

    This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of

    the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying

    is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please

    destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.

    This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of

    the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying

    is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please

    destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.

    This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be

    monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail

    monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be

    read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not

    broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.

    ______________________________________________________________________

    This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.

    For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email

    ______________________________________________________________________

    Final-Recipient: rfc822;LSO@OLSO.GSI.GOV.UK

    Action: failed

    Status: 5.2.2

    X-Display-Name: Legal Services Ombudsman

    ———- Forwarded message ———-

    From: "Erik Ribsskog" <eribsskog@gmail.com>

    To: <lso@olso.gsi.gov.uk>

    Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 03:00:46 +0000

    Subject: Questions about the LSO complaint-procedure etc.

    Hi,

    I've also been contacting you earlier, about your complaint-procedure.

    I had a complaint against the Law Society, and how they dealt with

    complaints on two law-firms,

    Morecrofts and EAD with you.

    The two complaints were dealt with collected with the LSO.

    I've now read, on the internet, that there seem to be a fatwa against

    my, by the muslims.

    So now I'm sending you a new e-mail, due to this new information to me.

    I have two questions now, reagarding this:

    1.

    Like I wrote to you, when you freed the Law Society, I thought you

    must have been corrupted,

    at the LSO since you freed the Law Society, even if they hade several

    faults that were very

    obvious, I think.

    Now I wonder, because I think your case-worker could have been a

    muslim woman, from how

    I remeber the name.

    Should a muslim woman threat a compaint if there is a fatwa against me

    from the muslims?`

    2.

    Shouldn't the LSO have a complaints-procedure, in case problems like

    this appear?

    I hope you have the chance to answer about this, and thanks in advance

    for the answer!

    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

    This email was received from the INTERNET and scanned by the

    Government Secure Intranet anti-virus service supplied by

    Cable&Wireless in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate

    Number 2007/11/0032.) In case of problems, please call your

    organisation's IT Helpdesk.

    Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored

    and/or recorded for legal purposes.

    This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of

    the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying

    is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please

    destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.

    This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of

    the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying

    is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please

    destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.

    This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be

    monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail

    monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be

    read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not

    broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.





  • Jeg sendte en klage på advokatfirmaet Stephensons til LSC Liverpool







    Google Mail – Complaint about legal aid solicitiors/Fwd: To manger LSC Eve Clayton/Fwd: FW: Reminder/Fwd: FW: Reminder/Fwd: Employment-case against Bertelsmann Arvato







    Google Mail


    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>



    Complaint about legal aid solicitiors/Fwd: To manger LSC Eve Clayton/Fwd: FW: Reminder/Fwd: FW: Reminder/Fwd: Employment-case against Bertelsmann Arvato




    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>


    Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 4:07 PM





    To:

    liverpool@legalservices.gov.uk



    Hi,

    I want to complain about Stephenson law-firm, that they don't do the legal aid procedures, like Mr. Thompson, at LSC Liverpool says.
    I've earlier complained about Morecrofts and EAD to you.

    I don't know why all these three law-firms are seemingly 'messing' with me, but could it be since my employment case is against the big companies Bertelsmann and Microsoft?
    Anyway, I'll just try to find a new legal aid solicitor in your database, for my employment-case, in the mean-time.

    Please give me feedback regarding what to do, if I think legal aid law firms, don't stick to LSC procedures even if they are in the LSC database for legal aid solicitors.
    Thanks in advance for your help!

    Yours sincerely,
    Erik Ribsskog

    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

    Date: Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 12:53 PM
    Subject: To manger LSC Eve Clayton/Fwd: FW: Reminder/Fwd: FW: Reminder/Fwd: Employment-case against Bertelsmann Arvato
    To: liverpool@legalservices.gov.uk

    Cc: tmo@stephensons.co.uk

    Hi,

    I called Maureen today, at Liverpool LSC, and got the name of the LSC manager.
    I'm getting different directions, you see, from you representative Stuart Thompson, and the law firm.

    So I was just wondering if you could tell me one thing.
    I've checked that I'm eligable for legal aid, on your calculator, and I was, since I'm unemployed.
    And now, I need a reference-number, for legal-aid.

    And Mr. Thompson, in LSC, says that the law-firm should get this number.
    And the law firm says I should get this number by contacting the LSC.
    So we aren't getting anywhere.

    So I hope you can clear this a bit up, what the procedure is, regarding for me to obtain a reference number, for legal aid, from where the case is now, it's at where I've checked that I'm eligable for legal aid, on the calculator on your website.

    I'm also sending a copy of this e-mail to the solicitors firm.
    Hope this is alright!
    Yours sincerely,
    Erik Ribsskog
    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

    Date: Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 12:37 PM

    Subject: Re: FW: Reminder/Fwd: FW: Reminder/Fwd: Employment-case against Bertelsmann Arvato
    To: Tom Mooney <tmo@stephensons.co.uk>

    Hi,

    thank you very much for your e-mail!
    What I thought I'll do, is that I'll try to contact Stuarts manager, and then I'll get back to you, sooner rather than lather, I hope.

    Hope this is alright!
    Yours sincerely,
    Erik Ribsskog
    On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 9:08 AM, Tom Mooney <tmo@stephensons.co.uk> wrote:


    Erik,

    I refer to my previous email.

    It is not possible to commence any investigations into the merits of your claim until you have received a reference number from the LSC.

    It is essential that you contact the LSC, on 0845 345 4345, so they can verbally confirm your eligibility and

    provide you with a reference number.

    I look forward to hearing from you.

    Tom Mooney

    Trainee Solicitor

    Employment Department

    For and on behalf of Stephensons Solicitors LLP

    Wigan Investment Centre, Waterside Drive, Wigan WN3 5BA

    Direct Dial: 01942 774170

    Direct Fax: 01942 774525

    From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

    Sent: 07 December 2009 15:08

    To: Tom Mooney

    Subject: Re: Reminder/Fwd: FW: Reminder/Fwd: Employment-case against Bertelsmann Arvato

    Hi,

    I called LSC Liverpool now, on 0151 242 5200, and spoke with Stuart.

    He told me that you should just send it to the LSC, that this was the usual procedure, in cases like this, since you are a registered Legal Aid-programme solicitor-firm.

    So it should just be for you to send an application to the LSC, as I understood from Stuart there, today, since I've already checked that I'm eligable for legal aid, using the calculator on their website.

    Hope this is alright!

    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

    On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 1:20 PM, Tom Mooney

    <tmo@stephensons.co.uk>     wrote:


    Erik,

    I appreciate that you have assessed your financial merits online and have been informed that your are eligible for legal aid.

    Please note that it is essential that you also contact the Legal Services Commission (LSC), on 0845 345 4345, so they can verbally confirm your eligibility and provide you with a

    reference number.

    Once you have this reference number a member of our team will then be able to provide you with advice.

    Kind regards

    Tom Mooney

    Trainee Solicitor

    Employment Department

    For and on behalf of Stephensons Solicitors LLP

    Wigan Investment Centre, Waterside Drive, Wigan WN3 5BA

    Direct Dial: 01942 774170

    Direct Fax: 01942 774525


    From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

    Sent: 27 November 2009 13:12

    To: Tom Mooney

    Subject: Reminder/Fwd: FW: Reminder/Fwd: Employment-case against Bertelsmann Arvato

    Hi,

    I can't see that I've received an answer to this e-mail yet, so I'm sending a reminder about this.

    Hope this is alright!

    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

    ———- Forwarded message ———-

    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

    Date: Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 2:42 PM

    Subject: Re: FW: Reminder/Fwd: Employment-case against Bertelsmann Arvato

    To: Tom Mooney <tmo@stephensons.co.uk>

    Hi,

    thanks very much for the phone-number!

    I called LSC now, and they explained me how to log on, to their website, and answering some questions, that would determine, if I was eligible for legal aid, or not.

    And here's what the website said:


    As you or your partner are receiving one of the following:

    • Income Support
    • Income Based Job Seeker's Allowance
    • Income-based Employment and Support Allowance
    • Guarantee Credit

    you are automatically financially eligible for the following levels of service:

    Legal Help

    Help at Court

    Immigration cases: Legal Representation before the Immigration and Asylum Tribunal; and the High Court

    Asylum cases: Legal Representation before the Immigration and Asylum Tribunal; and the High Court

    Family Mediation

    Help with Mediation

    Other Legal Representation

    General Family Help

    So it shouldn't be a problem with the legal aid!

    That's good news!

    I also have a website, where I've published about the empoyment-case.

    It's on this link:

    And in this link, I explain about some of the problems that were going on, but there where also a lot more problems, that I was constructivly dismissed as well, and more:

    http://www.scribd.com/doc/4661735/7

    I post the links, since it was so much problems there, so it isn't easy for me, to summarise it, since there were so many problems going on there, in the one year and three months I worked there.

    Hope it's alright that I just refer to the website, but if it's anything I should answer, then please just tell me, and I'll explain it properly!

    Thanks again for you help so far!

    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog


    On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 2:20 PM, Tom Mooney

    <tmo@stephensons.co.uk>     wrote:



    Erik,

    My apologies, the LSC's telephone contact is 0845 345 4345.

    Kind regards

    Tom Mooney

    Trainee Solicitor

    Employment Department

    For and on behalf of Stephensons Solicitors LLP

    Wigan Investment Centre, Waterside Drive, Wigan WN3 5BA

    Direct Dial: 01942 774170

    Direct Fax: 01942 774525

    From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

    Sent: 23 October 2009 14:19

    To: Tom Mooney

    Subject: Re: FW: Reminder/Fwd: Employment-case against Bertelsmann Arvato

    Hi,

    thank you very much for your e-mail!

    I was just wondering, shouldn't it be one more number in the phone-number you gave, to call to check if I'm eligible for receiving legal aid?

    Is this number to the LSC?

    I think I'm eligible because I'm unemployed at the moment, due to the finance-crises, etc., unfourtuntly, even if I have a lot to do, with working on the employment-case and writing a blog etc.

    Thanks again for your e-mail!

    Best regards,

    Erik Ribsskog

    On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 9:09 AM, Tom Mooney

    <tmo@stephensons.co.uk>     wrote:



    Eric,

    To qualify for legal aid you must be financially eligible and your claim must also have sufficient prospects of success.

    In relation to the first requirement I would invite you to call 0845 345 434 to enable an advisor to ask you several questions to determine whether you are financially eligible to receive legal aid.

    If you are eligible, you will receive a reference number and you claim can then be assessed.

    Kind regards

    Tom Mooney

    Trainee Solicitor

    Employment Department

    For and on behalf of Stephensons Solicitors LLP

    Wigan Investment Centre, Waterside Drive, Wigan WN3 5BA

    Direct Dial: 01942 774170

    Direct Fax: 01942 774525

    From:

    eribsskog@gmail.com [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

    Sent: 09 October 2009 06:19

    To: Enquiries

    Subject: Reminder/Fwd: Employment-case against Bertelsmann Arvato

    Hi,

    I can't see that I've received an answer to this e-mail, so I'm sending a reminder about this.

    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

    ———- Forwarded message ———-

    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

    Date: Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 3:47 AM

    Subject: Employment-case against Bertelsmann Arvato

    To: enquiries@stephensons.co..uk

    Hi,

    I've been trying regularly, since 2006, to find some advice, within the legal aid-programme, regarding an employment-case I have, against Bertelsmann Arvato.

    There were problems with constructed dismissal, a lot of bullying and harassment from managers, illegal management-methods, etc.

    I've published about the employment-case, on this url:

    Hope you can help with giving advice regarding this case!

    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

    Debt Recovery Special Offer…

    If you have 5 or more debts to recover, instruct us to act now for only £5 plus VAT per Letter Before Action.

    This offer is valid until 30th September 2009. You must instruct us to send 5 or more Letter Before Actions to be eligible for this offer.

    Save energy, money and the environment – do you need to print this message?

    The information in this e-mail (which includes any files transmitted with it) is confidential and may also be legally privileged.

    It is intended for the addressee only. Access to this e-mail by anyone else is unauthorized.

    Unauthorized recipients are required to maintain confidentiality.

    If you have received this e-mail in error please notify us immediately, destroy any copies and delete it from your computer system.

    Any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of this e-mail is prohibited. Copyright in this e-mail and any document created by us and sent as an attachment to this e-mail will be and remain vested in us and will not be

    transferred to you.     All messages are scanned for viruses by McAfee VirusScan but please carry out such virus and other checks as you consider appropriate.

    No responsibility is accepted by us in this regard.     Stephensons Solicitors LLP is a limited liability partnership.

    Registered in England and Wales, registered number OC322962, registered office is 24 Lord Street, Leigh,

    WN7 1AB. Telephone: 01942 777777.

    A list of members is available for inspection at the registered office.

    Members of Stephensons Solicitors LLP will be referred to as partners.

    Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority. For the SRA rules click

    www.sra.org.uk/solicitors/code-of-conduct.page    .     Service of Documents by e-mail not accepted.




    CHRISTMAS CLOSE DOWN

    Please note that this office will be closed from 1pm on Thursday 24th December 2009 and re-open at 9am on Monday 4th January 2010.

    24 hour Crime call out-7 days a week including Christmas and New Year 07836 574607.

    Please do not take offence if you do not receive a Christmas card from us as this year we are making a contribution to our selected Charity of the year, Wigan & Leigh Hospice.





  • Letter from the Legal Services Ombudsman

    Letter from the Legal Services Ombudsman


    PS.

    This is about that the Law Society let the two law-firms mess with me, and about that the Legal Services Ombudsman let the Law Society get away with this.

  • E-mail to the LSC, 7/7/08.







    Google Mail – Complaint







    Google Mail


    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>



    Complaint




    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>


    Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 11:11 AM





    To:

    Sarah Thompson <Sarah.Thompson@legalservices.gov.uk>



    Hi,

     

    that's right, I did not recieve legal aid, since Morecrofts, said that they didn't participate, in the legal aid

    programme.

    (They said this about a month after the initial meeting, like explained in the complaint).

     

    However, the Law Society, if I remember right, told me, that if I wanted to complain, about unprofessional

    conduct, from law-firms, in connection with the Duty Solicitor programme, then I should contact the LSC,

    I was told.

     

    So that was why I was contacting your offices, earlier this year, I think it was.

     

    So the complaint wasn't really in regards to the Legal Aid Programme, it was to do with law-firms, and 

    unproffesional conduct etc., from them (Morecrofts and EAD), in connection with the Duty Solicitor Programme.

    Yours sincerely,

     


    Erik Ribsskog

     


    On 7/7/08, Sarah Thompson <Sarah.Thompson@legalservices.gov.uk> wrote:

    Dear Mr Ribsskog

    Mrs Dillon forwarded your complaint to me as I am the Account Manager
    for Morecrofts. I have investigated your complaint and find that you did

    not received Legal Aid and did not become a client of Morecrofts.
    Therefore, I am unable to take your complaint any further.

    Kind regards

    Sarah Thompson

    Account Manager

    >>> "Erik Ribsskog" <eribsskog@gmail.com> 02/07/2008 20:04 >>>

    Hi,

    there has been a lot going on regarding this case.

    I was wondering, is this e-mail to do with the e-mail I sent to Fiona
    Dillon
    at the LSC,
    earlier this week?

    Thanks in advance for the reply!

    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

    On 7/2/08, Sarah Thompson <Sarah.Thompson@legalservices.gov.uk> wrote:
    >
    > Dear Mr Ribsskog

    >
    > I have investigated your complaint and found that you did not
    receive
    > advice funded by the Legal Services Commission. Therefore, I am
    unable
    > to to investigate the matter further as it is not a Legal Services

    > Commission matter. It also seems from the correspondence that this
    > matter is also outside the Law Society's jurisdiction. Therefore,  I
    > cannot see how you can progress this complaint further.
    >

    > Kind regards
    >
    > Sarah Thompson
    >
    > Account Manager
    >
    >
    >
    ************************************************************************************
    > Disclaimer
    >

    > This e-mail (and any attachment(s)) is private and intended solely
    for the
    > use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. Its
    unauthorised
    > use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not

    the
    > intended recipient please destroy all copies and inform the sender by
    return
    > e-mail.
    >
    > Internet e-mail is not a secure medium, as messages can be
    intercepted and
    > read by someone else. Please bear this in mind when deciding whether

    to send
    > information by e-mail. Postal addresses for the Legal Services
    Commission
    > are available from
    > http://www.legalservices.gov.uk/aboutus/our_regional_network.asp

    >
    > The Legal Services Commission reserves the right to monitor, record
    and
    > retain any incoming and outgoing e-mails for security reasons and
    for
    > monitoring internal compliance with the Legal Services Commission

    policy on
    > staff use. E-mail monitoring and/or blocking software may be used and
    e-mail
    > content may be read. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not
    broken
    > when writing or forwarding e-mails and their contents. No contracts

    can be
    > entered into on our behalf by e-mail.
    >
    > Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do
    not
    > necessarily represent those of the Legal Services Commission.
    >

    > The Legal Services Commission checks all e-mails and attachments for
    known
    > viruses, however, you are advised that you open any attachments at
    your own
    > risk.
    >
    >
    ************************************************************************************

    >
    >



  • European Human Rights Court: E-mail sent 12/4/08.

    From: eribsskog@gmail.com Erik Ribsskog
    To: ECHRvisitors@echr.coe.int
    Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 00:14:59 +0100
    Subject: Being used as a ‘target guy’ by three different governments.

    Hi,

    I’m a Norwegian citizen living in Britain.

    I have to say I’m a refugee from Norway.

    I know I’m supposed to send a letter to the Hich Court of Human Rights in
    Europe, but I’m having some problems with my printer,
    so I hope it’s alright that I’m sending an e-mail.

    I’ve overheard that I have been followed by some ‘mafia’ in Norway, in 2003.

    In 2005, I was chased away from my uncles farm in Norway, by some people
    with guns and dogs, that I overheard saying that were going
    to shoot me.

    This year, I’ve overheard that I’ve been used as a ‘target-guy’.

    And it seems that I have been having phoney water-meter inspectors from
    probably the CIA in my flat, in 2007.

    I think this started when I went to Detroit in 2005.

    Then I had to wait at the imigration-control, for several hours, being
    questioned, inbetwen the questioning-offices was taking phone-calls.

    Then he said they couldn’t let me in, since I didn’t have a bond in Norway.

    So then I think they started to use me as a target-guy.

    And I also suspect that the Norwegian and British governments are involved.

    Then americans sent me back to Oslo, via Paris, in what seemed like a
    ‘terminal’ (like in the movie) plot, since they had written something in my
    passport,
    that I suspect would have led the French imigration-control, to send me back
    to America again, had they seen what the Americans had written in my
    passport.

    Also, in Britain, the Police have refused to give me any help, but I think
    have just let me go on, even if I suspect there was some mafia, in the
    company, Arvato
    Service Ltd., that I have been working in, in Liverpool, in 2005 and 2006.

    The Police didn’t give me any help or advice, even if I contacted them many
    times, and they still just pretend that there is nothing going on.

    And there are collegues that were working there, that I suspect something
    could have happened with, but the Police just pretend there have been
    nothing going
    on, even if I think it is my right to know what has been going on there,
    since I was working there.

    It was like slavery, working there, and I’m trying to a case ran throug the
    British court-system.

    But the Police wont even look at the case, even if there were being used
    illigal management methods there etc.

    The Police sent me to the CAB, to get the case up for the Crowns Court, but
    no lawyers want to help me, under the Duty Solicitors Programme, and the
    British Police are just harassing and lying etc, so I suspect that there
    could be some type of intellegence-activity, behind this, that no
    organisations or
    institutions want to help me in Norway or Britain, including Amnesty, the
    Red Cross and Human Rights Watch etc.

    I suspect that this could be due to some type of Goverment cover-up plan, in
    connection with what went on at Arvato, where I suspect Nordic women were
    being the subject of traficcing etc.

    I’ve been contacting the Norwegian Special Police, Kripos, but they dont
    anser my calls/emails.

    The organisation responsible for them, Politidirektoratet, dont answer my
    emails.

    The Norwegian embassy in London, and three Norwegian ministries,
    Justisdepartementet (The Justice Dep.), UD (The Foreign Ministry), and
    Fornyings og
    Adminstrasjonsdepartementet. (Translates to Renewal and Administration
    Minstry).

    Neighter of these institutions/ministries are answering my emails.

    I contacted the SMK (The Prime-ministers Office), in Norway.

    And complained on the three ministries.

    But they are ignoring my complaint, they are acting irresponsible, I would
    say, and are just refering me to the Sivilombudsmannen.

    Who is the Ombudsman, in Norway, that deals with irregularitites from the
    Goverment administration.

    But I think, that the Prime Ministers Office, should have a look at this,
    because this is regarding three ministries.

    I think, that the SMK probably are involved, since they wont even look at
    this.

    And it’s not allowed to use ones citizens as target-guys/spies, which it
    seem’s to me that has been going on.

    And I’m not sure if the Sivilombudsmannen, have any real power over the
    Government.

    And I think, using ones citizens as target-guys/spies, on some mafia etc.,
    without even asking the citizen if he want’s this.

    I think this is a serious crime towards the human rights.

    And neighter the Norwegian or British Amnesty or Human Rights Watch, wants
    to help me with this, so I think they are probably being
    told by some Government inteligence not to help me, or something like this.

    So I don’t really know who else that could look at this.

    So I hope the European Human Rights Court have the chance to have a look at
    this!

    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

  • Untitled Post

    Resolution form

    Part 1:

    Mr. Nick Laird

    EAD Solicitors

    Prospect House

    Colombus Quay

    Liverpool

    L3 4DB

    Solicitors reference: I called your office last week (4/7), and was informed that you

    were the person in the company that dealt with complaints.

    My name:

    Mr. Erik Ribsskog

    Flat 3

    5 Leather Lane

    Liverpool

    L2 2AE

    Phone-number: 0151 236 3298.

    Mobile: 0775 834 9954.

    Part 2:

    The person dealing with my case is or was:

    I wasn’t given the name of the Duty Solicitor that was supposed to meet me at the

    Citizens Advice Bureau.

    The person from your company that I spoke with on the phone was Mr. Michael Reiner.

    My complaint is:

    1. I think that the EAD, when they cancelled the Duty Solicitors meeting at the

    CAB (Dale Street, Liverpool), on 5/4/07, should have taken the initative to set

    up a new meeting with me, to replace the meeting that had been canceled.

    They didn’t want to set up a new meeting, even if I asked them about the

    possiblity of them doing this, when I called their office, explained the matter,

    and got to speak with their representativ Michael Reiner on 5/4.

    I think that the usual thing to do when one have to cancel a meeting,

    like this duty solicitor meeting, would be to set up a new meeting

    to replace the meeting that was canceled.

    And I think that it’s unacceptable that this wasn’t even offered.

    Complaint 1: I would like to complain about the EAD refusing to set up

    a new duty solicitor meeting after the inital meeting was canceled (by

    themselves).

    2. Michael Reiner informed me on the phone when I called the EAD

    company on 5/4, that EAD didn’t help members of the public with

    calculating if they are eligable for legal aid in (non union) employment-

    cases.

    I don’t think that the EAD should have agreed with the CAB to meet

    me in a duty solicitor meeting, to help me calculate if I was eligable

    for recieveing legal-aid, if this is a work-task that EAD doesn’t do.

    It makes no sence that they should agree with the CAB to help me

    calculate if I’m eligable for legal-aid, and then when I call them after

    they have canceled the meeting, then they tell me that they don’t

    do this type of work-task at all.

    It makes no sense that they should agree with the CAB to do a work-

    task they dont do.

    I don’t think it’s acceptable for a solicotors firm to act like this.

    Complaint 2 A.: I would like to complain about the EAD solicitors

    firm first agreeing to help me, and then refusing this.

    Complaint 2 B: I would like to complain about the EAD agreeing

    to to do a work-task they don’t do (Like Reiner explained, that

    they didn’t help people with calculating if they are eligable for

    recieving legal-aid in individual employment-cases).

    3. I think the EAD should have informed me on why they canceled

    the meeting.

    This was not informed to me by eighter the CAB or the EAD when I

    called the EAD later.

    I don’t remember if I asked them a direct question about this, but I

    think it’s a natural thing to do when one cancel a scheduled meeting

    like this.

    Complaint 3: I would like to complain about that the EAD didn’t

    inform me of the reason for why they canceled the duty solicitor

    meeting on the CAB 5/4.

    4. I think the EAD should have informed me about the name of the

    duty solicitor that was supposed to meet me.

    I asked the CAB twice about the name of the solicitor (because I

    reckoned that this was my contact with EAD, so it would be very

    usefull for me to know this). But the CAB couldn’t tell me who

    it was, even if I asked them twice. (First when I was there for

    the meeting that was canceled, and secondly when I called the

    CAB a bit later that day, to get the right phonenumber for the EAD).

    When I called EAD later the same day, and got to speak with Reiner,

    I again asked who the dury solicitor that I was supposed to meet

    at the CAB was, but Reiner didn’t give me the duty solicitors name.

    I think that if the duty solicitor cancels the meeting, and agrees with

    the CAB that I could instead call the EAD and get advice from them

    over the phone, then he should leave his name with the CAB, and

    tell them to give me the his name when I show up for the meeting,

    so that I know who to ask for when I call the EAD.

    When I called the EAD I got transfered a bit around from person

    to person, before I got to speak with Reiner. I think I was speaking

    with eighter two or three other people before I got to speak with

    Reiner.

    That one don’t know who to ask for, and that one have to explain

    about the case several times to several people, could maybe lead

    to that one gets a bit stressed, and maybe loses a bit of the focus

    that one normally would have had on the case, if one had been

    transfered directly to the right person.

    So I think that this also added to the general level of unproffesionalism

    that it seemed to me was quite characteristic to the way the EAD (and

    the CAB) handled the meeting on 5/4. So even if it sounds a bit stupid

    maybe, I think I’ll also add a complaint about that I wasn’t given the

    duty solicitors name by the EAD (eighter directly or through the CAB).


    Complaint 4: I would like to complain about that the EAD didn’t

    inform me about the name of the duty solicitor that was supposed

    to meet me, even if I asked both the EAD (Reiner) and the CAB

    about this.

    5. I think that the EAD shouldn’t have adviced me on such a complicated

    case over the phone.

    The EAD only wanted to help me over the phone, and therefore a

    misunderstanding happened regard what type of case it was.

    Since we only discussed it over the phone, and the EAD didnt get to see

    the documents that belonged to the case, and I answered that it was an

    employement-case when Reiner asked me, because this was what the

    police had told me that it was.

    If the EAD had agreed to meet me, they would have seen that it was,

    (like the Morecroft solicitor told me on 11/4), that it also was an

    harassment-case.

    So, because of this misunderstanding, Reiner on the phone, told me that

    the case had only got a three month ‘time-limit’, and that since it had

    passed more than three months since the last incident in the case,

    Reiner said that the three month ‘time-limit’ for the case had ‘expired’,

    and that there really wasn’t much hope regarding getting a case like

    this through the justice-system, due to the three month ‘time-limit’ having

    expired.

    But, when I told this to the solicitor from Morecrofts on 11/4, the solicitor

    told me that the case was also an harassment-case, and that it therefore

    had a longer ‘time-limit’ than three months.

    I think that, if EAD had done their job properly, then they would have

    read through the cases documents, and also come to the same

    conclusion.

    Therefore I think that it was a bit irresponsible to give advice about this

    over the phone. The way Reiner explaned it, was that it wasn’t really much

    hope for me to get any progress on the case due to the time-limit problem,

    so it sounded on him like that it wasn’t really worth the bother for me to

    be using more time on trying to get help with the case.

    So, if they do their advice-job in this way, I think it could lead to members

    of the public being given wrong information (in the same way I was given

    by Reiner on 5/4), which could lead to perfectly good cases being

    given up by the person contacting them for advice.

    And one could also think of many other types of misunderstandings that

    could happen due to them doing their duty soliciting work and

    legal-advice over the phone instead of in meetings, like one would think

    would be more practical when it comes to legal-cases, that I reckon often

    can be quite complicated.

    Complaint 5A: I would like to complain about that the EAD gave me wrong

    advice on the phone on 5/4 about the ‘time-limit’ for the case I had agreed

    to meet them about in a duty solicitor meeting at the CAB (To get help

    from them to see if I was eligable to recieve legal-aid for the case).

    Complaint 5B: I would like to complain about the EAD giving advice on

    the phone about cases that they have initialy agreed on to advice about

    in meetings. Reiner from EAD said in the phone-call on 5/4 that one

    needs to know the details of the case to see if someone are eligable for

    legal-aid.

    I think that if he didn’t know the details of the case, then he shouldn’t

    advice on how long ‘time-limit’ there is for the case eighter.

    I think this was an unaceptable way for them to do their duty solicitor

    job. (Which I think this must be called, since they had canceled

    the duty solicitor meeting, and I think the EAD and the CAB must

    have agreed on that it was ok for me to call them for advice instead,

    since the CAB adviced me to do this.)

    And even if one can’t call it a duty solicitor job, for some reason that

    I’m not aware of, then I still think it’s unaceptable of them to give advice

    on how long ‘time-limit’ there is for a case, without knowing the details

    of the case.

    6. If one goes to the EAD web-page on the internet, on the url:

    http://www.eadsolicitors.co.uk/employment/, it says that ‘EAD advices

    on all aspects of employement law work for trade unions, union members

    and individual workers’.

    I don’t think the EAD should put it on their web-site that they advice on

    all aspects of employement law for individual workers, when they don’t

    individual workers at all, like Reiner said in the phone-call on 5/4.

    He said that they only dealt with employment-cases that were trade-

    union cases, and that this was the reason that they couldn’t help me

    with calculating if I was eligable for legal aid.

    Also, the fact that they agreed with the CAB to meet me on 5/4, to

    help me calculate if I was eligable for recieving legal-aid, fits with what

    they write on the web-page, that they really help individual workers

    with things like this.

    So it’s a bit unclear to me if the information on their web-page is wrong,

    or if the information I was given by Reiner in the phone-call on 5/4 was

    wrong.

    So I think I’ll complain about that I have recieved contradicting information,

    and then someone who are more experts on this can hopefully have a

    look at it, and try to find out what these, to me, seemingly contradicting

    statements are due to.

    Complaint 6: I’d like to complain about that the information on the EAD

    webpage says that the EAD advices individual workers in employement

    cases, whereas Mr. Reiner in the phone-call on 5/4 informed me that

    EAD only gave advice about employement-cases when these cases

    were trade-union cases.

    Part 3

    I am happy for you to deal with my complaint in writing.

    I would like the following to sort out my complaint:

    The most important thing to me, is to try to find a solution on how to get some

    progress on the case, so that it is brought through the justice-system in an

    appropriate way.

    I think the complaint should be dealt with by you appropriately.

    I’ve lost a bit of confidence in your company due to what happened on 5/4, so

    I would like to see how your company deals with this complaint, before I decide

    how I should go further with this.