johncons

Stikkord: EU-kommisjonen

  • Jeg sendte en ny klage, til the Jobcentre, og EU-kommisjonen







    Gmail – Stage 3 Complaint, to the Jobcentre Plus Chief Executive/Fwd: Stage 2 Complaint, to the District Manager, for the Jobcentre, Williamsson Sq., Liverpool/Fwd: Complaint about the Jobcentre, Williamson Sq./Fwd: Problems with the Employment-zone meeting/







    Gmail



    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>




    Stage 3 Complaint, to the Jobcentre Plus Chief Executive/Fwd: Stage 2 Complaint, to the District Manager, for the Jobcentre, Williamsson Sq., Liverpool/Fwd: Complaint about the Jobcentre, Williamson Sq./Fwd: Problems with the Employment-zone meeting/





    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>





    Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 11:24 PM





    To:

    Contact-Us@jobcentreplus.gsi.gov.uk


    Cc:

    SG-PLAINTES@ec.europa.eu



    Hi,

    I received a letter, the other day, regarding my stage 2-complaint, from the Senior Business Manager Gary Folkens.
    (Even if it says in your complaint procedure, that the District Manager, should have answered it).

    But anyway.
    Mr. Folkens write, that the Jobcentre-manager, Mr. Winter, asked me when I wanted to have a meeting, regarding my complaint.
    But that wasn't so.

    I was grabbed hold of, at the Jobcentre, by Mr. Winter, when I went there, for a sign-on meeting.
    (Like Mr. Winter have done a couple of times now).
    I had to suggest to come back the next day, and Mr. Winter didn't suggest this.

    I had to repeat myself, regarding that this was a surprise-meeting.
    This was definately, a surprise-meeting.
    So I still stand by my two new complaints.
    And to be frank, I think a lot of what Mr. Folkens write, in the 16 points, (from what I could stand to read, without getting sick), is b*llshit, frankly.

    (The reason I write a bit hars, is because I didn't like the tone of Mr. Folkens, from what I read.
    It was decending, I think, towards me.
    Like he writes, under point 1:

    'It is not acceptable for you to regard this as a protest'.
    But who's he to decide that.
    Where does it say that I'm not allowed to regard this as a protest?

    I think my action must be seen as a Freedom of Speech/Protest-act, really.
    At least, I don't think he can decide how to view my act.
    That is subjective.
    And maybe a court could have decided it.

    But Mr. Folkens isn't in a court, so he's not really allowed to jugde me.
    He makes this in to a complaint about me, I think.
    Where as we have already had several meeting, regarding my behaviour there.

    So this isn't about me.
    This is about the Jobcentre.
    Where as Mr. Folkens makes this about me, like e.g. in the quote from point 1., that I wrote above).
    So I'm not happy with Mr. Folkens answering-letter, unfortunately.

    And I still stand by every word I wrote, in the 16 complaints.
    Which I also wrote sincere.
    I want to please escalate this, to stage 3, in your complaint-procedure.

    So that the Jobcentre Plus Chief Executive, can answer the complaints, about the Jobcentre, without making this into something about me, because I'm at trial, in this complaint, like it seem's to me, isn't that clear, possibly, for Mr. Folkens.

    I attach Mr. Folkens letter, with his answers, which I thought were a bit sickening really, in the way the thruth was threated, in his reply.
    So I want to please try to get a better answer from you, therefore I escalate this.

    My complaint also have 3-4 police-complaints in it, for reasons I've explained in the complaint.
    I had an IPCC-case against the Merseyside Police, to do with how they treated me, regarding my employment-case against Bertelsmann Arvato.

    The IPCC, have never replied to this complaint, so I've escalated to the Prime Ministers Office, when Mr. Brown was in Office.
    But they sent it back, twice, to the Ministry of Justice/Home Office.

    So then I've sent it to the UN.
    So I also forward this to the UN, since that's where my police-complaint is now.
    I'm also attatching the letter from Mr. Folkens.

    Hope this is alright!
    Yours sincerely,
    Erik Ribsskog

    PS.
    I think it's my refugee-case, that's with the UN.
    So I have to forward this to the EU-commission, where my Police-complaint is.

    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

    Date: Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 4:00 PM
    Subject: Stage 2 Complaint, to the District Manager, for the Jobcentre, Williamsson Sq., Liverpool/Fwd: Complaint about the Jobcentre, Williamson Sq./Fwd: Problems with the Employment-zone meeting/Fwd: New review-meeting?

    To: Contact-Us@jobcentreplus.gsi.gov.uk

    Hi,

    I was at the Williamsson Sq. jobcentre today, regarding a regular sign-on meeting.
    But, the Jobcentre Manager, Mr. Winther, surprised me, with an un-scheduled meeting.

    He told me, he wanted to discuss, my complaint, from 6/9.

    He started accusing me of always complaining, and tryed to make this to a complaint about me, instead about the jobcentre.
    But, I told Mr. Winther, that I hadn't had time, to prepare, for a meeting like this.

    I only went there, to have a sign-on meeting.
    I would have needed to read through the complaint from 6/9 again, since I've been at Employment Zones, and dealt a lot with JET, etc., since then, to update my memory, about this complaint.

    So we agreed, that I would read up, and go back there tomorrow, at 10 AM.
    But, now I'm reading up here, at home, and I'm going through the Jobcenter-folder, that's called 'Our service standards', which among other subjects, also contains your complaint-procedure.

    And it says there, for 'Stage 1', that I would be sent a written answer.
    But I haven't been sent that.
    So I think the Jobcentre has failed, with Stage 1, and that this complaint now is at Stage 2, in the Jobcentre complaint-procedure.

    I would also have liked, to make a new complaint, today.
    And that's these complaints:
    1.
    Mr. Winther didn't inform me, in advance, that we had a complaint-meeting, today.

    This was an indexed complaint, with 16 complaints in it, so I would have needed to prepare myself, for å meeting like this, I think.
    2.
    Mr. Winther, didn't do it like it says in the Jobcentre Complaint Procedure, in the folder, 'Out service standards'.

    From what I understand, from the Complaint Procedure, on page 14, in that folder, I should have received an answer to complaint.
    It says 'We will aim to send you a full reply within 10 working days'

    Today it seemed to me, that Mr. Winther wanted to argue with me almost.
    And he started blaiming me for the problems, by accusing me of complaining more than other clients there.

    But, I wasn't the one, who my complaint was about.

    So I thought Mr. Winther started mixing things up.
    And it could be, he wanted to trick me, I suspect, since he rather wanted to deal with the 16 complaints, from 6/9, in an un-scheduled meeting.

    Rather than sending documents in the post, like I understand he is meant to do, from your Standard of services-folder.
    So now, I'm just trying to escalate this, to Stage 2, in your Complaint Procedure.

    Since Stage 1, didn't work at all, according to the Complaint Procedure, I think.
    And it's now 17 days, since I sent the complaint, so I think I should have received a written answer, on Stage 1, by now.

    Hope you agree with this.
    And now I found it most reasonable, to take this from here.
    So if you could please inform Mr. Winther about this, so that he doesn't expect me, to be on the meeting, at the Jobcentre tomorrow.

    Since I wanted to make sure about these things first.
    Hope this is alright!
    Yours sincerely,
    Erik Ribsskog


    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
    Date: Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 8:32 PM

    Subject: Complaint about the Jobcentre, Williamson Sq./Fwd: Problems with the Employment-zone meeting/Fwd: New review-meeting?
    To: Contact-Us@jobcentreplus.gsi.gov.uk

    Cc: Sommerstad Gunn Karin <Gunn.Karin.Engeland.Sommerstad@mfa.no>

    Hi,

    regarding this complaint, I have to explain what happened, at the Jobcentre, last Thursday.

    I've been unemployed now, for two years here in the UK, and it has never happened anything similar, with me, earlier.

    I went on the meeting, with Jenny there, and gave her a form, where I've written all the things I've done, to find work, since the last 'sign on'-meeting.
    I also gave her two vacancy-files, from the Jobcentre-machine.

    Then, Jenny pointet at the screen, and she said I had a sanction, so I wouldn't get money, on Tuesday, (last week).
    I thought this was very unfair, because I don't think I've done anything wrong, to do with Sencia/Employment Zones.

    (Which I'm going to write an appeal about, so I won't go into detail about this here).
    But I was in a daze almost, since I was a bit tired, and since I've unemployed a long time, perhaps.

    I got very angry, because I need those money, to pay my bills, and to pay for food.
    I'm on a shoe-string budget, that I've set up, in co-operationg, with the CCCS.

    So I depend on the Jobseekers Allowance, to have money, to pay for bills and food.

    So when I was told, I wouldn't get the money, for two weeks, then I got very mad, and it was like my whole world fell apart.
    Since I almost have no money.
    And I have hard fought payment-plans, with creditors, that I know I can lose, (and get taken to court about), if I don't pay those bills.

    So I thought this sanction was very disrespectful, and I don't think a thing like this, could ever have happened, in Norway, that people get punished like that, in a way, so that one risk running out of food.

    This was very low-ly, I think.
    So I got angy.
    And on top of this, Jenny there, said I could write about my feelings, in an appeal.
    But I thought that was just a provocation, to ridicule and harass me.

    Because I would have wanted to write about facts, and write my thoughts and opinions.
    But I wouldn't just write about my feelings.
    That wouldn't have made any sense, to just write 'I want my money because I'm sad/angry'.

    So I think I was very ridiculed, by Jenny there.
    And each time I go to that Jobcentre, I have to write a new complaint, because they really mess with me there.
    (Some mobsters or some mafia, or something).

    Like I think you know, since I've sent you a large number of e-mails, about this, in the last months.
    I thought I was so unfairly threated, so I lost my temper, (like the police said).

    Or rather, I thought I had to protest, for being threated, in a way like this.
    So while Jenny went to find the appeal-form.
    I got up from my chair, and went further into the corner, of the Jobcentre there, on the First floor, and wondered how I could protest.

    I thought, maybe I should throw Jennys computer out the window.
    But I decided that that would have been a bit much.
    So I decided not to do that.
    But I was very angry.

    (I don't think I've ever been this angry before.
    Only if someone steal from me, then I sometimes get angry, if I'm tired etc.
    But this isn't very often.

    I'm 40 years old, and this has happened a couple of time only.

    And the last time, was in the 90's, I think, when someone stole some orange-juice from me, in Oslo, and the house was full of people my sister had let in to our house, (Ungbo), then I got angry, and kicked a football, in the wall.

    But, there wasn't a football at the Jobcentre, but I kicked a litter bin there.
    Just to protest and get out my aggression.
    It fell over and made a plump noise, and I saw that it had some documents inside it.

    Then, I had got to protest and got my aggression out.
    So then I was calm and quiet and fine.
    But then, someone screamed at me.
    A jobcentre-woman.
    'Go out of this office now'.

    Even if I was calm and quiet, I was just walking back to my chair.
    Then I just tryed to get my files with me, from Jennys desk.

    Before the screaming woman and a man, attacked me, I think I have to say.

    They went so close behind me, (while they screamed at me, to get out), that when I tried to put my Attendance arrangement booklet, (that had been lying on Jennys desk), in my back-pocket, while I walked towards the exit-door, then my elbow thouched the blond job-centre woman, in her 40's, I think, 'tits', since she walked so close behind me.

    And also a man walked this close to me.
    So I think I have to say, that I was throuwn out of there, even if I was calm and quiet, and just wanted to protest.
    They screamed at me several times, that they would call the Police, and that the Police would contact me, etc.

    So I think this was a punishment, for my protest, that I was throwed out, and screamed at.
    So I think I've already been punished, by the Jobcentre-staff for my protest there.

    This was just to explain what happend, at the Jobcenter, on 26/8.
    Now to my complaint.
    Today I was at the Jobcentre, again, after receiving a letter, from the Jobcentre-manager, (for Williamson Sq. Jobcentre, Liverpool), telling me to come to the Jobcentre, today, at 9.30, for an extra meeting there.

    I'll index the comlaints, since there are a lot.
    1.
    I was thrown out of the Jobcentre, Williamson Sq., on 26/8, even if I was calm and quiet, and was no threat.

    I just wanted to protest.
    But after that, I was fine, calm and quiet.
    Still I was thrown out, and screamed at, many times.
    So I think I was a bit harassed then.
    Just to also explain about this.
    2.
    The Jobcentre-manager, tell me I distroyed a fan.
    But I didn't see any fan.

    And I think I would have heard it, if the litter-bin had fallen on a fan.

    So I can't see, that the Jobcentre, has given evidence, that I distroyed the fan.
    This Jobcentre, has messed with me a lot, I'd see, (see all my earlier complaints).

    I suspect that this could have been a fabrication/plot, by someone at the Jobcentre.
    And I'm not convinced, that I did this.
    So therefore I don't think I've really distroyed anything there, and I think it's un-fair that I have to pay for repair-work, on a fan.

    This was probably a fan, that didn't work from before, and therefore was put away in the corner, close to the litter-bin there.
    So I think you should tell Mr. Winter, the Jobcentre-manager, that he has to give me evidence on, that I have distroyed a fan there, before I have to pay for any damage.

    Because this with the fan, was a big surprise, for me, when I read the letter, from Mr. Winter, last week.
    My senses are quite good.
    So I think I would have seen or heard it, if a fan had been damaged, in connection with my protest there.

    So I'm not convinced, that this was my fault, and I haven't got much money, and I don't want to pay £50, for a fan, that I'm not convinced that I've damaged.
    Like I told the Police, I didn't see any fan.

    And then the Police desribed it, as an 'accident'.
    And then I'm not sure, if I should.
    I'm not sure if it was an accident, I think it could have been a fabrication, just to cause me problems, by some 'mafia', since I've overheard, in 2003, that I'm being followed, by the 'mafia', (who ever which mafia they meant).

    And I have relatives in Norway, in the Order of St. John, whom I suspect, that also mess with me, through that crusader-organisation.
    3.
    I was harassed by Jenny there.

    She told me to write my 'feelings', on a form.
    (On the sign-on meeting there, on 26/8).
    But that form, is ment to be written 'thoughts' on.

    So to describe my thoughts, as only 'feelings', that I think is to ridicule me, and to harass me.
    So this was the last drop, from that Jobcentre.
    They are horrible there, I think.

    That's why I protested.

    I wanted to escalate this complaint, from the Jobcentre-manager, Mr. Winter, who said today, he wouldn't go on with that complaint, in the meeting today.

    But I think I can't accept being threated as degrading, as that, so I wanted to please escalate, that complaint.

    4.
    I have been informed, by the Jobcentre, (by Jenny and Mr. Rimmer, at the Jobcentre Birkenhead), that I wouldn't get my Jobseekers Allowance, on 31/8.

    Yet, I got it anyway.
    (I thought that maybe the Jobcentre had understood, that they had made a bad desition or mistake.
    And therefore let me have the money, anyway).

    And now, Mr. Winter tells me, that now I'll lose the next payment, on 14/9 in stead.
    So now, I've lost even more control, on my economy, since the Jobcentre change the sanction-date, all the time.

    I think you shouldn't sanction me now, since you have 'messed' with the sanction-date.
    And then, a sanction, would be even more unfair, against me, since this now has messed my economy, more up.

    How am I supposed to keep track on my economy, when you change dates like this, all the time, more or less.
    I think this is just silly.
    I think you should stop 'messing' with my Jobseekers Allowance, and don't have a sanction at all, since you've messed with the dates, and completely ruined, more or less, my last weeks.

    5.
    I'm also on a shoe-string budget, in co-operation, with the CCCS.
    And my budget can't take sanctions on my job-seekers allowance, for two weeks.

    I don't think it's healty to e.g. only eat rice og purridge, for two weeks.
    What if this makes me lose my phone or electricity etc.
    I live in my own flat, so you distroy a lot for me.

    I isn't like I'm a teenager, who lives with his parents.
    Then I could perhaps have understood a sanction like that.
    But this is just ridicules I think, and iresponsible, I think, by the Jobcenter, to distroy peoples lives and mess with their economy, in a way like this.

    So I hope you can please stop this mentioned sanction.
    And please don't this again.
    I don't think this is like a funny practical joke, or something like this.

    I think the Jobcentre, show a lack of understanding, regarding how adult people are dependant on their regular income/allowance, (that they rely on), to be able to have control of their lives.

    How can you expect people to keep control, and get their lifes sorted, in a way, that makes them able/fit for contributing, to society, when you mess with them like this?

    This is just cruel/evin/silly, by the Jobcentre, I think.
    So this I wanted to please complain about.
    6.
    The letter from Mr. Rimmer, (the Jobcentre, Birkenhead), was sent, on 27/8, informing me about the mentioned sanction.

    Yet, I was told about this, on 26/8, by Jenny, at the Jobcentre, Williamsson Sq.
    That's why I lost my temper, since she said this, like lightning from clear sky, (like we say in Norway).

    Why wasn't the letter from Mr. Rimmer, sent to me, before the meeting with Jenny, on 27/8.
    I think this was a bit stupid almost, I think I have to say.
    Like I told Mr. Winter, in the meeting today.

    If I'd got the letter from Mr. Rimmer, before the sign-on meeting, last Thursday.
    Then I would have just maybe hit the wall, at home, in anger, after un-fairly, (I think I have to say), losing my Jobseekers Allowance.

    Why do you tell people about sanction-desitions face-to-face, rathing than sending a letter.
    Wouldn't it be better to send the letter about this, before the face-to-face sign-on meeting?

    I think that would have been better, so I wanted to please complain about this, as well.
    7.
    Mr. Winter, today had four meetings set up for me, at the Jobcentre, in a row.

    First a security-meeting, (held by himself).
    Then a police-meeting, (where Mr. Winter also was present).
    Then a sign-on meeting, (by a young man in his 20's, I think. Mr Winter wasn't present in this meeting. This was a meeting to replace the meeting, on Thursday 26/8, which really finished then, since I had signed on and all, I just didn't get the appeal-leaflet).

    And then a final summarisation-meeting, by Mr. winter.
    I think this is to many meetings, on a row.
    I didn't have time, to prepare, for the Police-meeting.
    And in the sign-on meeting, I didn't get to exlain, that I had really signed on, last Thursday.
    Because I was really over-run, (or what it's called), with all these meeting, I think.

    I think I should only go to one Jobcentre-meeting, at a time.

    And not on three or four, like Mr. Winter arranged for me, today.

    Because then it's hard to stay on top, through all these meetings.

    And then I can get tired, and forget to make points, that would have helped my side/case, etc.
    So I wanted to please complain about.
    8.

    Mr. Winter, didn't tell me, in advance, that the Police would meet with me, today, at the Jobcentre.
    When I was thrown out, last Thursday, they screamed at me, that the Police would visit me, at my address.

    Williamsson Sq. Jobcentre, isn't my address.
    I didn't have the chance to prepare for this.
    And Mr. Winter, was present in this meeting.
    Which I think, was really between me, and the Police.

    Why didn't the Police go to my address, if they wanted to speak with me?
    I have an IPCC-case, against the Merseyside police, (to do with an employment-case, against Arvato, etc), and I thought I recognised Mr. O'Brian, from that complaint(?).

    Why are the Police and the Jobcentre, having secret Police-meetings at the Williamsson Sq. Jobcentre.
    I find it hard to trust Mr. Winter after this surprise.
    Why didn't he prepare me for that the police would be there.

    Mr. Winter told me, after the security-meeting, to prepare for a sign-on meeting.
    And suddently, to Police-officers, in white shirts and black wests, shows up, to speak with me.
    Then I have to go upstairs, with Mr. Winter in front, and the two Police-officers behind.

    In front of all the people at the Jobcentre.
    I thought this was embarrasing.

    Just because I wanted to protest, doesn't make me a criminal.

    Is there a secret police, in the UK, I'm wondering.

    Shouldn't there be opennes, in society.
    Why wasn't I told that the Police would be present, in today's meeting.
    This I want to please complain about.

    9.
    Mr.Winter said I had been using violence there.
    But, I don't think one can call kicking a litter-bin over, (as a protest), for violence.

    Violence, as far as I understand it, is if you kick og hit a person or an animal.

    So I can't say I've done violence.
    Just protest, I'd call it.

    I don't think I was violent there, since a plastic wheelie litter-bin, doesn't get damaged by a kick like that.
    So this was very unfair I think.
    So this I wanted to please complain about.

    10.
    I remember that I signed on, (in the meeting with Jenny), on 26/8.
    Why did I have to sign on, for the two weeks commencing 26/8 again today?

    This makes no sense.
    How could you lose that form, that I signed on, on 26/8.
    This I wanted to please complain about.
    11.

    In the meeting today, I was writing down notes.
    But the Police, (the officer in his 20's, I think, with brown eyes. (he ordered me to look in his eyes, that's why I remember)), ordered me, not to write notes.

    Is this civil?
    Are the Police at war?
    This was very out of line I think.
    What has this go to, with civilised behaviour, to order people not to write notes, in a meeting, with the Police.

    What was it that the Police wanted to cover up.
    Why do the Merseyside Police act like we are living in a police/fascist-state?
    Is there a war I don't know about?

    This I wanted to please complain about.

    12.
    The Police, (the officer in his 20's, I think, with brown eyes), in todays meeting, threatened my, that they would arrest me.

    If I escalated the complaint, against Jenny there.
    How can the Police mix cases like this?

    This seems corrupt and dirty to me.

    Are they allowed to make threats?
    I don't think so.

    So this I want to please complain about.
    13.
    The police accused me of 'Criminal damage' on a fan there, at the Jobcentre.
    But, I haven't even touched a fan there.

    He then changed it to 'accident'.
    But I think something is wrong, how can he accuse me of this, when I haven't done it.
    Someone must have lied there.

    At worst it was an accident.
    Then how could he get it to 'criminal damage'.
    Someone must have lied at the Jobcentre, I reackon.
    So this I please want to complain about.

    14.
    The Police didn't interduce themselves, to me, in today's meeting.
    This I think, isn't good behaviour.
    So this I wanted to please complain about.

    15.
    After the sign-on meeting, on 26/8, when I kicked the litter-bin, as a protest.
    Then I sent two e-mails, to this e-mail address.

    One with an explanation, and an update later, where I apologised.

    Mr. Winter hadn't received the e-mail where I apologised, (he told me in the security-part of the meeting, today).
    I also remember, from a meeting with the former Jobcentre Manager, Mrs. Hart, that she also didn't get e-mails sent to her, from you at the Contact-us department, I think it was.

    So this I wanted to please complain about, that your system for giving your managers e-mails, doesn't seem to work, at the Jobcentre, Williamson Sq.
    So this I wanted to please complain about.

    16.
    In the letter, from Mr. Brimmer, (from the Jobcentre, Birkenhead), from 27/8.
    It says something that doesn't make any sense, really.

    It first says, (to do with the mentioned sanction):
    'We can't pay you Jobseekers Allowance from 27 August 2010'.
    Adn then:

    'We can't pay you Jobseekers Allowance from 10 September 2010'.

    This I don't think makes any sense at all.
    Why have you written two different dates?

    This I please wanted to compain about, that looks confusing.

    Why do you want to confuse your clients.

    This I want to please complain about.
    I send a copy of this e-mail, to the Norwegian Embassy, (since they are involved in the Arvato-case, which I've mentioned), to the UN, (since the IPCC and other British Government, don't answer my correspondance, and don't accept me as a refugee, after I've run to the UK, after I overheard, in Oslo that I was followed by "the mafia'n", and after I was attemped killed, in Kvelde, near Larvik, in 2005, and then went here to Liverpool, and has stayed here since), also I send a copy to the CCCS, since I have co-operated, and gotten a lot of advice, from them, with setting up a budget, that I can live with, while I'm unemployed.

    So I guess you can't answer the complaints about the Police, at the Jobcentre.
    So please just ignore the complaints about Police-officers.
    Those are really for IPCC, but they don't reply to my correspondence, so those complaints are really to the UN.

    I just write them here, since the Police was at the meeting at the Jobcentre.

    So they fit in, in this complaint, I think, due to this.
    To get the whole picture and better overview.

    But please just ignore answering the compaints about the Police, that you at the Jobcentre, really can't answer, since you don't control the Police.

    This I understand, I just thought those complaints, belonged in this complained, since the Police and the Jobcentre, where so closely 'knitted', at least from my point of view, in this case, to do with my protest at the Jobcentre.

    Again, I apologise, that I kicked the litter-bin.

    I'm not going to that again.

    But I think that Jobcentre threat me in a horrible way, unfortunatly.
    I hope you have the chance to look at this complaint.

    And I hope you don't think I'm inpolite, since I complain so much.
    I really hope I wouldn't have to write complaints like this.
    So I'm sorry that I have to.

    Hope this is alright!

    Yours sincerely,
    Erik Ribsskog
    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

    Date: Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 1:57 PM
    Subject: Problems with the Employment-zone meeting/Fwd: New review-meeting?
    To: CONTACT-US@dwp.gsi.gov.uk

    Hi,

    now I was at Sencia, in Pall Mall, for the Employment-zone meeting, at 1.30 pm.
    The only problem was, that while I tried to get the calling to work, in that building, in Pall Mall 30-32, then someone told me, that they've moved, to Hanover St.

    Then I called Sencia, on 0151 236 1204.
    And they told me, that the inductions would start in 5 minuttes, and that it would probably take me 10-15 minuttes, to get to their new address.

    So Sencia told me to contact the Jobcentre, and get a new appointment.
    So that's why I'm sending this e-mail.
    And to complain about that your Employment-zone information-pack litterature, should be up to date.

    I remember telling Mrs. Smart, at Jobcentre, Williamsson Sq., that I chose Sencia, among other things, that they were close to my address, (in Leather Lane).
    So I wasn't given the information about the new Sencia-address, by Mrs. Smart eighter.

    So this is a new complaint in the long line of complaints, that I've had to send about Williamson Sq. Jobcentre.
    Can you please explain how you can not have up to date litterature, in you information-packs, about Employment-zones, after you didn't give me the right information at first eighter, (like I've also complained about, to this e-mail address, on 20/5).

    Regards,
    Erik Ribsskog

    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

    Date: Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 11:22 AM
    Subject: New review-meeting?
    To: CONTACT-US@dwp.gsi.gov.uk

    Hi,

    almost a year ago, I received my university-level degree in IT, from my 'home-university', Oslo University College.

    And I've mentioned this, from time to time, in sign-on meetings, at the job-centre, (Williamson Sq.).

    But, I was wondering.
    Should one have a new review-meeting, if one get a new university-level degree, (and a new jobseekers-agreement).
    Also, I was wondering.

    I have the internet at home.
    Do I still have to use the machines at the Jobcentre, for the job-search?
    (I think it's better to do at home, because then there's less noise, etc.).

    I haven't got a regular contact-person, at the Jobcentre, so I thought I could try to send an e-mail about this.
    Thank you very much for any help in advance!
    Yours Sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog





    3 attachments

    img057.jpg
    780K
    img058.jpg
    917K
    img059.jpg
    776K




    PS.

    Her er vedleggene:

    img057

    img058

    img059

  • Jeg sendte en ny klage til EU-kommisjonen







    Gmail – Complaint/Fwd: Adobe Dreamweaver







    Gmail



    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>




    Complaint/Fwd: Adobe Dreamweaver





    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>





    Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 2:36 PM





    To:

    SG-PLAINTES@ec.europa.eu



    Hi,

    I suspect that this could be some harassment, targeted against me, by some Brits, who really are like muslims og Jehova Witnesses.
    Since I've spotted, that I'm being searched on, from Mecca etc., on Google.

    And by some Russians.
    I also have the Order of St. John, (my fathers steph-daughters halv-brother), Bjørn Humblen, in my familiy, (who I have no more contact with).
    So I think this could be due to that I'm being followed, by some kind of fanatics?

    SInce Liverpool Community College, don't let me go to courses there, it seems to me.
    I've also been harassed by Arhtur Pooley, in the EU-commission, and the Swedish Commission, they didn't understand my English, I think.

    So please let someone 'normal' look at this.
    (If it's possible to find someone close to being normal in the EU-commission).
    Thanks in advance for the help!
    Best regards,

    Erik Ribsskog

    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

    Date: Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 2:22 PM
    Subject: Re: Adobe Dreamweaver
    To: "Griffiths, Ian" <Ian.Griffiths@liv-coll.ac.uk>
    Cc: "Hartley, Gillian" <Gillian.Hartley@liverpool.gov.uk>, "Elliott, Lorraine" <Lorraine.Elliott@liverpool.gov.uk>

    Hi Mr. Griffihs,

    that's brilliant.
    I'll forward a copy of this e-mail to JET, so perhaps they can send a letter then, before January.
    I'm now on a programme called Employment Zones, with Sencia, so if I e.g. get a job, in the mean-time, I'll notify both you and Jet.

    This is the second time, by the way, that this happens, (out of two applications), for me, when I've tried to go on a course with Liverpool Communtiy College.
    So maybe I'm cursed.

    If this was in Norway, then I would have wanted to get a voucher, for a free course, or something, but I don't think I can expect this, since I am abroad, (as a refuge from Norway actually, since I've over-heard that I was followed by the 'mafian', in Oslo, in 2003).

    Thank you for your e-mail anyway.
    Regards,
    Erik Ribsskog

    On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 2:14 PM, Griffiths, Ian <Ian.Griffiths@liv-coll.ac.uk> wrote:

    Erik,

    Further to my previous emails, please be advised that the class will not run next week.

    I apologise for this, I appreciate this represents a change to the advertised plan but I'm not in a position to go ahead as we've not fully recruited the class.

    As an alternative, I have already reserved you a place on the January class subject to your acceptance.

    Again, please note, this decision is based upon student numbers and largely out of my control. I have attempted to fill the class over the last few weeks, hence my having contacted you and another of other people on the matter, but I have not been able to do that this time.

    Ian

    From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

    Sent: 27 September 2010 16:50

    To: Griffiths, Ian

    Subject: Re: Adobe Dreamweaver

    Ok,

    I don't want to argue, but this was a course you also had last year.

    And last year, then I tried to get on a course in PHP, but then you also had problems, and changed it from a 3 month course to a 12 month course.

    Is this, (you contacting me), a reply to my web-mail to you, from your web-site, from last week, by the way?

    Erik Ribsskog

    On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 4:46 PM, Griffiths, Ian <Ian.Griffiths@liv-coll.ac.uk> wrote:

    Erik,

    We need to have a sufficient number of people interested before starting to enrol them. I'm sorry that I've not been in touch but my primary concern is that we don't enrol unnecessarily if the course is not viable.

    There has also been a summer recess in August and day time recruitment during September to contend which, which further delays us. I appreciate that these are no concern of yours but I hope this goes some way towards explaining the timescales with regards this course.

    Ian

    From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

    Sent: 27 September 2010 16:43

    To: Griffiths, Ian

    Cc: Elliott, Lorraine

    Subject: Re: Adobe Dreamweaver

    Hi,

    yes, I also hope that.

    How is it by the way, that I haven't heard from the College before.

    Since I got the acknowedment-card, (for my application), from you, in June.

    So something must have been wrong at your college, since you wait this long, with contacting me about enrolement.

    I mean, the course starts next week.

    Why didn't you contact me, about this, in July or August?

    Just something I think I should complain about.

    Because, I think one week, to sort enrolement and the letter from JET, is a bit short time.

    Best regards,

    Erik Ribsskog

    On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 4:08 PM, Griffiths, Ian <Ian.Griffiths@liv-coll.ac.uk> wrote:

    Erik,

    Please keep me informed of your progress, I hope to see you Friday.

    Ian

    From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

    Sent: 27 September 2010 16:06

    To: Griffiths, Ian

    Cc: Elliott, Lorraine

    Subject: Re: Adobe Dreamweaver

    Hi,

    I contacted Lorraine Elliott, manager of JET, regarding the course-fee, in May.

    And I have agreed to apply for the course, in co-operation with Gillian, from JET County Rd., in a meeting, at JET Breck Rd., (where she wanted to meet me, for some reason).

    I hope Lorraine Elliott, can get back to us, regarding such a letter, before Friday.

    (Since I forward this e-mail to her).

    And I think Friday at 16:15 is best then, since I also need to get a confirmation-message/letter, from JET, before the meeting.

    Best regards,

    Erik Ribsskog

    PS.

    Here is my e-mail to Elliott, from May, (I've since then had many meetings, with Gill there, about the course-application etc):

    Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

    to

    Lorraine.Elliott@liverpool.gov.uk

    date

    Thu, May 20, 2010 at 3:16 AM

    subject

    Course in Web-design/Fwd: Complaint/Fwd: Reminder/Fwd: Update/Fwd: Complaint <<#22175-33652#>>

    mailed-by

    gmail.com

    hide details May 20

    Hi,

    I was a bit stressed, when I went to JET last year, because I was at the dentist, right before I went to your office.

    What Working Links said, was that if I wanted to go to an IT course, with Liverpool Community College, then maybe JET could help me found the course, or send me to an organisation that could.

    But I ended up a course in Food Hygiene and not IT.

    This must have been because I had an ache in my tooth, so I was a bit stressed, in my initial meeting, unfortunatly, and since I had to go to the dentist every week, and I had a bad tooth-ache from this.

    But now I was wondering about the IT-course.

    Is it possible, like Working Links said, that Jet could help me found e.g. a course in Web-design, at Liverpool Community College?

    Thank you very much in advance for any help!

    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

    On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 3:46 PM, Griffiths, Ian <Ian.Griffiths@liv-coll.ac.uk> wrote:

    Erik,

    As soon as you have the letter stating that JET are willing to fund, we can enrol.

    Thursday and Friday are both OK but only at certain times, on Thursday this is 13:00 until 13:30 and on Friday only after 16:15 as I am not in Clarence Street before then on Friday. Please let me know which is best so I can ensure that I am available.

    Ian

    From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

    Sent: 27 September 2010 15:38

    To: Griffiths, Ian

    Cc: Elliott, Lorraine

    Subject: Re: Adobe Dreamweaver

    Hi,

    yes, I have agreed with Gillian, at JET, that they would found the course.

    (But she hasen't replied, to my e-mail, so I'm sending a copy of this e-mail to the Jet-manager Lorraine, about the Course-fee).

    I'm doing budget-work, and am going to Employment-zones on Wednesday.

    But I can go to an enrolment-meeting, on eighter Thursday or Friday, if that's alright?

    Best regards,

    Erik Ribsskog

    On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 3:25 PM, Griffiths, Ian <Ian.Griffiths@liv-coll.ac.uk> wrote:

    Erik,

    I've recently received your application for Adobe Dreamweaver. The course starts on the 4th October. Can you let me know your availability this week so that you may enrol on this. The course fee is £129.

    Ian

    —————————————————————————————

    Please consider the environment before printing this email.

    —————————————————————————————

    This email and any attachments are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Liverpool Community College or associated companies. You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended recipient.

    The message content of in-coming emails is automatically scanned to identify Spam and viruses otherwise Liverpool Community College does not actively monitor content. However, sometimes it will be necessary for Liverpool Community College to access business communications during staff absence.

    Liverpool Community College has taken steps to ensure that this email and any attachments are virus free. However, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that it is virus free and no responsibility is accepted by Liverpool Community College for any loss or damage arising in any way from its use.

    —————————————————————————————

    —————————————————————————————

    Please consider the environment before printing this email.

    —————————————————————————————

    This email and any attachments are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Liverpool Community College or associated companies. You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended recipient.

    The message content of in-coming emails is automatically scanned to identify Spam and viruses otherwise Liverpool Community College does not actively monitor content. However, sometimes it will be necessary for Liverpool Community College to access business communications during staff absence.

    Liverpool Community College has taken steps to ensure that this email and any attachments are virus free. However, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that it is virus free and no responsibility is accepted by Liverpool Community College for any loss or damage arising in any way from its use.

    —————————————————————————————

    —————————————————————————————

    Please consider the environment before printing this email.

    —————————————————————————————

    This email and any attachments are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Liverpool Community College or associated companies. You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended recipient.

    The message content of in-coming emails is automatically scanned to identify Spam and viruses otherwise Liverpool Community College does not actively monitor content. However, sometimes it will be necessary for Liverpool Community College to access business communications during staff absence.

    Liverpool Community College has taken steps to ensure that this email and any attachments are virus free. However, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that it is virus free and no responsibility is accepted by Liverpool Community College for any loss or damage arising in any way from its use.

    —————————————————————————————

    —————————————————————————————

    Please consider the environment before printing this email.

    —————————————————————————————

    This email and any attachments are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Liverpool Community College or associated companies. You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended recipient.

    The message content of in-coming emails is automatically scanned to identify Spam and viruses otherwise Liverpool Community College does not actively monitor content. However, sometimes it will be necessary for Liverpool Community College to access business communications during staff absence.

    Liverpool Community College has taken steps to ensure that this email and any attachments are virus free. However, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that it is virus free and no responsibility is accepted by Liverpool Community College for any loss or damage arising in any way from its use.

    —————————————————————————————

    —————————————————————————————

    Please consider the environment before printing this email.

    —————————————————————————————

    This email and any attachments are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Liverpool Community College or associated companies. You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended recipient.

    The message content of in-coming emails is automatically scanned to identify Spam and viruses otherwise Liverpool Community College does not actively monitor content. However, sometimes it will be necessary for Liverpool Community College to access business communications during staff absence.

    Liverpool Community College has taken steps to ensure that this email and any attachments are virus free. However, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that it is virus free and no responsibility is accepted by Liverpool Community College for any loss or damage arising in any way from its use.

    —————————————————————————————






  • Jeg kontaktet EFTA angående en klage på EU-kommisjonen







    Gmail – Til Efta, klage på EU-kommisjonen/Fwd: Oppdatering/Fwd: To Arthur Pooley/Fwd: Your e-mail of 22/8/2009







    Gmail



    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>




    Til Efta, klage på EU-kommisjonen/Fwd: Oppdatering/Fwd: To Arthur Pooley/Fwd: Your e-mail of 22/8/2009





    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>





    Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 5:27 PM





    To:

    mail.bxl@efta.int



    Hei,

    jeg kontaktet Efta, ifjor, var det vel, angående en klage på politiet og Ipcc og the Home Office, mm., i England.
    Etter dette har det også blitt problemer med diverse engelske ombudsmenn.

    Jeg blir dårlig behandlet.
    Politiet her kaller meg 'Miss', IPCC, de behandler ikke klagen min på politiet, osv.
    Og jeg fikk beskjed av dere om å sende det til Solvit, som har bedt meg sende det til EU-kommisjonen.

    Men hverken dansker, briter eller svensker har klart å behandle dette.
    De nekter å behandle det, må jeg nok si.
    Så da ser jeg ingen annen bra utvei, enn å sende dette tilbake til EFTA, som en klage på EU-kommisjonen.

    Mvh.
    Erik Ribsskog

    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

    Date: 2010/8/18
    Subject: Re: Oppdatering/Fwd: To Arthur Pooley/Fwd: Your e-mail of 22/8/2009
    To: Eric.Degerbeck@ec.europa.eu

    Det er ikke riktig dessverre, det gjelder bare noen få av sakene.

    Og det er bare bullshit det de skriver.

    Jævla svensker, dere har vel blitt albanere hele gjengen.
    Käldë köttbüllär tïl jül,

    Erik Ribsskog

    On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 3:44 PM, <Eric.Degerbeck@ec.europa.eu> wrote:

    Bäste Herr Ribsskog,

    tack för dina e-brev till Pierre Schellekens, chef för

    EU-kommissionens

    representation i Sverige.

    Av korrespondensen att döma har EU-kommissionen redan givit

    dig svar

    i de angelägenheter du tar upp. Därför kommer inga vidare

    åtgärder att vidtas

    i anledning av dina meddelanden från EU-kommissionen i

    Sveriges sida.

    Bästa hälsningar,

    Eric Degerbeck

    Mediechef

    EU-kommissionen i Sverige


    From: Erik Ribsskog

    [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
    Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2010 8:26

    PM
    To: SCHELLEKENS Pierre (COMM-STOCKHOLM)
    Subject:

    Oppdatering/Fwd: To Arthur Pooley/Fwd: Your e-mail of

    22/8/2009

    Hei,

    som jeg nevnte i min e-post til dere igår, så har jeg også sendt noe til

    EU-kommisjonen i Danmark.

    Som jeg klagde på, siden de søkte om meg og Mette-Marit, på Google,

    så jeg på StatCounter, som jeg har på bloggen min.

    (Jeg har også sendt om dette til norsk UD).

    Men det skjer visst ingenting, rundt denne/disse sakene.

    Så hvis dere kan ta dette i samme slengen og, eventuelt.

    Isåfall så hadde det vært veldig bra!

    Mvh.

    Erik Ribsskog

    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

    Date:

    Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 3:56 PM
    Subject: To Arthur Pooley/Fwd: Your e-mail of

    22/8/2009
    To: SG-PLAINTES@ec.europa.eu

    Hi,

    I'm just sending you a reminder, since I haven't heard anything from

    you, after I received you letter from 22/12, last year.

    Hope this is alright!

    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: <SG-PLAINTES@ec.europa.eu>

    Date: Tue, Dec 22,

    2009 at 9:51 AM
    Subject: Your e-mail of 22/8/2009
    To: eribsskog@gmail.com






  • Jeg sendte en klage på the Legal Services Ombudsman, til EU-kommisjonen i Sverige







    Gmail – Klage på the Legal Services Ombudsman, i Storbritannia/Fwd: Complaint/Fwd: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)







    Gmail



    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>




    Klage på the Legal Services Ombudsman, i Storbritannia/Fwd: Complaint/Fwd: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)





    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>





    Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 11:58 PM





    To:

    pierre.schellekens@ec.europa.eu



    Hei,

    enda en ombudsman, (siden dere i Sverige er spesialister på ombudsmenn).
    Denne gangen the Legal Services Ombudsman, som lar the Law Society slippe unna, med å la to britiske advokatfirma, Moorecrofts og EAD, lyve og trakassere og ødelegge for en arbeidssak jeg har mot Bertelsmann Arvato Ltd's Microsoft Scandinavian Product Activation, (hvor det ble brukt 'reinforcement' som ledelsesmetode, og hvor jeg ble mobbet og trakassert og behandlet dårlig, og hvor mange nordiske damer ville gråte på jobb og etter, av ukjent grunn for meg):

    Håper dere kan se på denne klagen!
    Mvh.
    Erik Ribsskog

    PS.
    Sivilombudsmannen i Norge, tuller også mye med meg, men det kan jeg kanskje ikke sende om til dere, siden Norge ikke er i EU?
    (Bare fleiper.

    Det er litt sent her).

    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

    Date: Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 3:07 PM
    Subject: Complaint/Fwd: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
    To: lso@olso.gsi.gov.uk

    Hi,

    I called your offices today, and got confirmed, that the e-mail

    address on your website, should

    be your right e-mail address, so I'm trying to send the complaint again.

    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

    ———- Forwarded message ———-

    From: <postmaster@dca.local>

    Date: Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 3:00 AM

    Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)

    To: eribsskog@gmail.com

    This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification.

    Delivery to the following recipients failed.

    LSO@OLSO.GSI.GOV.UK

    This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of

    the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying

    is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please

    destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.

    This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of

    the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying

    is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please

    destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.

    This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be

    monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail

    monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be

    read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not

    broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.

    ______________________________________________________________________

    This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.

    For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email

    ______________________________________________________________________

    Final-Recipient: rfc822;LSO@OLSO.GSI.GOV.UK

    Action: failed

    Status: 5.2.2

    X-Display-Name: Legal Services Ombudsman

    ———- Forwarded message ———-

    From: "Erik Ribsskog" <eribsskog@gmail.com>

    To: <lso@olso.gsi.gov.uk>

    Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 03:00:46 +0000

    Subject: Questions about the LSO complaint-procedure etc.

    Hi,

    I've also been contacting you earlier, about your complaint-procedure.

    I had a complaint against the Law Society, and how they dealt with

    complaints on two law-firms,

    Morecrofts and EAD with you.

    The two complaints were dealt with collected with the LSO.

    I've now read, on the internet, that there seem to be a fatwa against

    my, by the muslims.

    So now I'm sending you a new e-mail, due to this new information to me.

    I have two questions now, reagarding this:

    1.

    Like I wrote to you, when you freed the Law Society, I thought you

    must have been corrupted,

    at the LSO since you freed the Law Society, even if they hade several

    faults that were very

    obvious, I think.

    Now I wonder, because I think your case-worker could have been a

    muslim woman, from how

    I remeber the name.

    Should a muslim woman threat a compaint if there is a fatwa against me

    from the muslims?`

    2.

    Shouldn't the LSO have a complaints-procedure, in case problems like

    this appear?

    I hope you have the chance to answer about this, and thanks in advance

    for the answer!

    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

    This email was received from the INTERNET and scanned by the

    Government Secure Intranet anti-virus service supplied by

    Cable&Wireless in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate

    Number 2007/11/0032.) In case of problems, please call your

    organisation's IT Helpdesk.

    Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored

    and/or recorded for legal purposes.

    This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of

    the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying

    is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please

    destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.

    This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of

    the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying

    is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please

    destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.

    This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be

    monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail

    monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be

    read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not

    broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.






  • Jeg sendte en klage på ICE til EU-kommisjonen i Sverige







    Gmail – Klage på ICE i Storbritannia/Fwd: FW: RESTRICTED – PERSONAL DATA – Independent Case Examiner







    Gmail



    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>




    Klage på ICE i Storbritannia/Fwd: FW: RESTRICTED – PERSONAL DATA – Independent Case Examiner





    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>





    Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 8:41 PM





    To:

    pierre.schellekens@ec.europa.eu



    Hei,

    kan dere så på denne saken?
    ICE i Storbritannia, har overstyrt meg, når det gjelder å definere min klage, mot the Jobcentre, i Willamsson Sq., i Liverpool.

    Jeg har tidligere sendt til EU-kommisjonen i Danmark, angående andre klager, men jeg tenkte jeg kunne prøve å sende til Sverige nå, grunnet at jeg vel da kan skrive på norsk, siden både Norge og Sverige er med i bl.a. Nordisk Råd, og da er det vel greit å skrive på norsk, til etater i Sverige, hvis jeg ikke tar helt feil.

    Så jeg prøver ihvertfall, siden det finnes noen norsk EU-kommisjon, og Solvit ber meg sende ting som dette til EU-kommisjonen, og EFTA sier at dette er EU/Solvit sitt bord.
    Håper dere har muligehet til å se på dette!

    Mvh.
    Erik Ribsskog
    ———- Forwarded message ———-

    From: DWP ICE gateway team <ICE@dwp.gsi.gov.uk>
    Date: Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 2:47 PM
    Subject: FW: RESTRICTED – PERSONAL DATA – Independent Case Examiner

    To: Eribsskog@gmail.com

    **********************************************************************
    
    This document is strictly confidential and is intended only for use by the addressee.
    If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or other
    action taken in reliance of the information contained in this e-mail is strictly prohibited.
    Any views expressed by the sender of this message are not necessarily those of the Department
    for Work and Pensions.
    If you have received this transmission in error, please use the reply function to tell us
    and then permanently delete what you have received.
    This email was scanned for viruses by the Department for Work and Pensions' anti-virus services and on leaving the Department was found to be virus free.
    Please note: Incoming and outgoing e-mail messages are routinely monitored for compliance
    with our policy on the use of electronic communications.
    **********************************************************************





    RS902279.doc
    30K




  • Jeg sendte en ny e-post til Utenriksdepartementet







    Gmail – Problemer med EU-kommisjonen/Fwd: Complaint about the Local Goverment Ombudsman/Fwd: Complaint against Liverpool City Council







    Gmail



    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>




    Problemer med EU-kommisjonen/Fwd: Complaint about the Local Goverment Ombudsman/Fwd: Complaint against Liverpool City Council





    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>





    Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 4:57 PM





    To:

    post@mfa.no



    Hei,

    kan ikke dere høre hva de kjepphøye EU-folka driver med?
    Jeg har klaget til EU-kommisjonen, på at jeg ikke får svar på en IPCC-klage i England, mm.
    Men de sier her at jeg har fått ordentlig svar fra de, men det har jeg ikke.

    Og de trakasserer meg også, og sier at de ikke vil svare på korrespondansen min, for å spare skattepenger.
    Dette er korrupsjon og EU-imperalisme i praksis.
    Jeg håper dere kan jekke dem ned litt, selv om Norge kanskje ikke er så stort land, og er redde for tyskere og det som er, hvis jeg skjønte det riktig på ambassaden i London.

    Men men.
    Mvh.
    Erik Ribsskog

    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

    Date: Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 4:26 PM
    Subject: Re: Complaint about the Local Goverment Ombudsman/Fwd: Complaint against Liverpool City Council
    To: Arthur.Pooley@ec.europa.eu

    Hi,

    I think I should remind you that Norway pay the EU a lot of money each year, for the EEA-agreement.
    Just to be treated like shit, by assholes like you.
    EU sucks!

    EU is a catholic club!

    This is patetic.

    Erik Ribsskog

    On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 3:48 PM, <Arthur.Pooley@ec.europa.eu> wrote:

    dear sir

    i refer to your email of 7 june and to your previous

    emails, some in norwegian which is not an official language for

    us,

    and i refer to the commission answers including an email

    from mrs wigbold on 2-9-2009 and a letter from me on

    22-12-2009

    unfortunately i find your communications rather strange and

    apparently on subjects far from the competences of the

    commission

    your suggestion that the commission could make the

    liverpool city council or the local government ombudsman pay you

    money

    is quite eccentric, and really not a subject for

    correspondence, apart from your repeated references to "a sweaty

    gym"

    your suggestion that the commission should be seaching

    about you on the internet is not understood either

    in these circumstances i have reached the conclusion that

    the commission will not enter into further correspondence with

    you

    on these subjects, to avoid wasting taxpayers money, so any

    further such emails will not receive any answer

    your

    faithfully

    af

    pooley

    head of unit

    SG-R2

    mail and document management


    From: Erik Ribsskog

    [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
    Sent: Monday, June 07, 2010 4:50

    PM
    To: SG PLAINTES
    Subject: Complaint about the Local

    Goverment Ombudsman/Fwd: Complaint against Liverpool City

    Council

    Hi,

    I'm from Norway, but live in the UK.

    Here one can see how some people treats Norwegians in the UK.

    They bully me and call me 'Ms', like mobsters, and they suggest to

    meet foreigners at a sweaty Gym, instead of replying in writing, like I

    wanted.

    I think that some mobsters attacked me at the Liverpool City

    Council Gym and that some mobsters in the Council and at the Local

    Government Ombudsman covered it up.

    I guess this could be, since I'm Norway.

    And according to the EEA-agreement, I have the same rights as

    EU-citizens, in the UK.

    So I think you should make the Liverpool City Counil and the Local

    Government Ombudsman, pay me a lot of money in compensation, for all their

    crap, that I have to take, since I'm from Norway, or why they do this.

    Best Regards,

    Erik Ribsskog

    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

    Date:

    Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 3:36 PM
    Subject: Re: Complaint against Liverpool City

    Council
    To: LGOAT Mailbox <L.Mailbox@lgo.org.uk>

    Hi,

    ok, I guess it's nothing to do about that case then.

    I thought you let the Coucil get away to easy.

    I mean, I send them a written complaint, and the offer to meet me

    in a sweaty gym.

    I go to the gym to work-out, not to have meetings.

    Meetings I think should be held somewhere with less sweat,

    endorfines and hormones in the air.

    So I thought it was just riddiculus, that you let the Council get

    away.

    All I wanted was a reply in writing from them.

    Which I think is the norm, if one send a written complaint.

    But all this non-sense with the Council suggesting meetings at the Gym,

    and you at the Ombudsman letting Liverpool City Council getting away with

    that.

    I think that this reminds me of another smell than the one at the

    gym.

    All of this smells really, I think.

    But I guess it's nothing to do about this.

    Regards,

    Erik Ribsskog

    On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 3:21 PM, LGOAT Mailbox <L.Mailbox@lgo.org.uk> wrote:

    Dear Ms

    Ribsskog,

    Thank you for your

    reply.

    You could continue with

    the case that you regard more serious if you wish but the previous advice

    would still apply and you would need to provide us with evidence that the

    council’s complaints process has been completed (The council would

    normally respond in writing at each stage of a formal

    complaint)

    If the issue regarding

    harassment at the gym is something that we have considered before however

    we would not be able to consider it again.

    Yours

    Sincerely

    Kerry Anne

    Hartnett

    Customer Service

    Advisor
    |

    LG
    O Advice Team

    | DL: 02476 820 132 | 0300 061 0614

    The Oaks, No 2 | Westwood Way | Westwood Business Park | Coventry | CV4 8JB |

    www.lgo.org.uk

    LGO 4 col SML at 70%

    From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

    Sent: 07 June 2010 15:04
    To: LGOAT

    Mailbox
    Subject: Re: Complaint against Liverpool City

    Council

    Hi,

    I don't think one phone-call like that, is something to

    make a fuss about.

    But I thought the problems with the harassment

    against me at the Council Gym, was more important.

    So I thougth that maybe I could go on with that case,

    since I didn't think it was properly sorted.

    Best Regards,

    Erik Ribsskog

    On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 12:08 PM, LGOAT Mailbox <L.Mailbox@lgo.org.uk> wrote:

    Dear Mr

    Ribsskog,

    Thank you for your

    email.

    I have established from

    searching for your details that you had a complaint investigated by the

    Local Government Ombudsman which was closed in February 2009. (08 000

    279)

    If you have a new

    complaint with the council you will need to complete the council’s own

    complaints procedure before requesting that the Ombudsman considers your

    complaint for investigation

    Please also note that we

    do not simply tell councils what to do, we would only make recommendations

    to a council in the event that fault was found during a complaint

    investigation by the Ombudsman.

    If you would like to

    raise a new complaint because you have completed the council’s complaints

    procedure then please fill out the attached form and return it with a copy

    of the council’s final response to your complaint.

    Yours

    Sincerely

    Kerry Anne

    Hartnett

    Customer Service

    Advisor
    |

    LG
    O Advice Team

    | DL: 02476 820 132 | 0300 061 0614

    The Oaks, No 2 | Westwood Way | Westwood Business Park | Coventry | CV4 8JB |

    www.lgo.org.uk

    Error!

    Filename not specified.

    From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

    Sent: 06 June 2010 23:46
    To: LGOAT

    Mailbox
    Subject: Complaint against Liverpool City

    Council

    Hi,

    I had a complaint against Liverpool City Council,

    (Lifestyles Gym), that I wanted them to reply to in writing, (back in

    2006!).

    You at the Ombudsman said they didn't have to, since

    they offered to meet me at the gym.

    On 28/5, Lifestyles called me, wanting me to reply to a

    customer survey.

    I tried to explain, that I had a complaint against

    them, and because of this, didn't want to be part of the survey.

    But the person calling didn't speak that good

    English, I think I have to say.

    So it ended with me having to hang up.

    Can't you please tell the Council to reply to my

    complaint in writing, so that we get this case over with?

    Best Regards,

    Erik

    Ribsskog

    NOTICE - This message contains information intended only for the use of the addressee named above.  If you have received this message in error please advise us at once and do not make any use of the information.

    NOTICE - This message contains information intended only for the use of the addressee named above. If you have received this message in error please advise us at once and do not make any use of the information.
    






  • Jeg ble litt irritert på EU







    Gmail – Complaint about the Local Goverment Ombudsman/Fwd: Complaint against Liverpool City Council







    Gmail



    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>




    Complaint about the Local Goverment Ombudsman/Fwd: Complaint against Liverpool City Council





    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>





    Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 4:26 PM





    To:

    Arthur.Pooley@ec.europa.eu



    Hi,

    I think I should remind you that Norway pay the EU a lot of money each year, for the EEA-agreement.
    Just to be treated like shit, by assholes like you.
    EU sucks!

    EU is a catholic club!

    This is patetic.

    Erik Ribsskog

    On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 3:48 PM, <Arthur.Pooley@ec.europa.eu> wrote:

    dear sir

    i refer to your email of 7 june and to your previous

    emails, some in norwegian which is not an official language for

    us,

    and i refer to the commission answers including an email

    from mrs wigbold on 2-9-2009 and a letter from me on

    22-12-2009

    unfortunately i find your communications rather strange and

    apparently on subjects far from the competences of the

    commission

    your suggestion that the commission could make the

    liverpool city council or the local government ombudsman pay you

    money

    is quite eccentric, and really not a subject for

    correspondence, apart from your repeated references to "a sweaty

    gym"

    your suggestion that the commission should be seaching

    about you on the internet is not understood either

    in these circumstances i have reached the conclusion that

    the commission will not enter into further correspondence with

    you

    on these subjects, to avoid wasting taxpayers money, so any

    further such emails will not receive any answer

    your

    faithfully

    af

    pooley

    head of unit

    SG-R2

    mail and document management


    From: Erik Ribsskog

    [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
    Sent: Monday, June 07, 2010 4:50

    PM
    To: SG PLAINTES
    Subject: Complaint about the Local

    Goverment Ombudsman/Fwd: Complaint against Liverpool City

    Council

    Hi,

    I'm from Norway, but live in the UK.

    Here one can see how some people treats Norwegians in the UK.

    They bully me and call me 'Ms', like mobsters, and they suggest to

    meet foreigners at a sweaty Gym, instead of replying in writing, like I

    wanted.

    I think that some mobsters attacked me at the Liverpool City

    Council Gym and that some mobsters in the Council and at the Local

    Government Ombudsman covered it up.

    I guess this could be, since I'm Norway.

    And according to the EEA-agreement, I have the same rights as

    EU-citizens, in the UK.

    So I think you should make the Liverpool City Counil and the Local

    Government Ombudsman, pay me a lot of money in compensation, for all their

    crap, that I have to take, since I'm from Norway, or why they do this.

    Best Regards,

    Erik Ribsskog

    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

    Date:

    Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 3:36 PM
    Subject: Re: Complaint against Liverpool City

    Council
    To: LGOAT Mailbox <L.Mailbox@lgo.org.uk>

    Hi,

    ok, I guess it's nothing to do about that case then.

    I thought you let the Coucil get away to easy.

    I mean, I send them a written complaint, and the offer to meet me

    in a sweaty gym.

    I go to the gym to work-out, not to have meetings.

    Meetings I think should be held somewhere with less sweat,

    endorfines and hormones in the air.

    So I thought it was just riddiculus, that you let the Council get

    away.

    All I wanted was a reply in writing from them.

    Which I think is the norm, if one send a written complaint.

    But all this non-sense with the Council suggesting meetings at the Gym,

    and you at the Ombudsman letting Liverpool City Council getting away with

    that.

    I think that this reminds me of another smell than the one at the

    gym.

    All of this smells really, I think.

    But I guess it's nothing to do about this.

    Regards,

    Erik Ribsskog

    On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 3:21 PM, LGOAT Mailbox <L.Mailbox@lgo.org.uk> wrote:

    Dear Ms

    Ribsskog,

    Thank you for your

    reply.

    You could continue with

    the case that you regard more serious if you wish but the previous advice

    would still apply and you would need to provide us with evidence that the

    council’s complaints process has been completed (The council would

    normally respond in writing at each stage of a formal

    complaint)

    If the issue regarding

    harassment at the gym is something that we have considered before however

    we would not be able to consider it again.

    Yours

    Sincerely

    Kerry Anne

    Hartnett

    Customer Service

    Advisor
    |

    LG
    O Advice Team

    | DL: 02476 820 132 | 0300 061 0614

    The Oaks, No 2 | Westwood Way | Westwood Business Park | Coventry | CV4 8JB |

    www.lgo.org.uk

    LGO 4 col SML at 70%

    From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

    Sent: 07 June 2010 15:04
    To: LGOAT

    Mailbox
    Subject: Re: Complaint against Liverpool City

    Council

    Hi,

    I don't think one phone-call like that, is something to

    make a fuss about.

    But I thought the problems with the harassment

    against me at the Council Gym, was more important.

    So I thougth that maybe I could go on with that case,

    since I didn't think it was properly sorted.

    Best Regards,

    Erik Ribsskog

    On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 12:08 PM, LGOAT Mailbox <L.Mailbox@lgo.org.uk> wrote:

    Dear Mr

    Ribsskog,

    Thank you for your

    email.

    I have established from

    searching for your details that you had a complaint investigated by the

    Local Government Ombudsman which was closed in February 2009. (08 000

    279)

    If you have a new

    complaint with the council you will need to complete the council’s own

    complaints procedure before requesting that the Ombudsman considers your

    complaint for investigation

    Please also note that we

    do not simply tell councils what to do, we would only make recommendations

    to a council in the event that fault was found during a complaint

    investigation by the Ombudsman.

    If you would like to

    raise a new complaint because you have completed the council’s complaints

    procedure then please fill out the attached form and return it with a copy

    of the council’s final response to your complaint.

    Yours

    Sincerely

    Kerry Anne

    Hartnett

    Customer Service

    Advisor
    |

    LG
    O Advice Team

    | DL: 02476 820 132 | 0300 061 0614

    The Oaks, No 2 | Westwood Way | Westwood Business Park | Coventry | CV4 8JB |

    www.lgo.org.uk

    Error!

    Filename not specified.

    From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

    Sent: 06 June 2010 23:46
    To: LGOAT

    Mailbox
    Subject: Complaint against Liverpool City

    Council

    Hi,

    I had a complaint against Liverpool City Council,

    (Lifestyles Gym), that I wanted them to reply to in writing, (back in

    2006!).

    You at the Ombudsman said they didn't have to, since

    they offered to meet me at the gym.

    On 28/5, Lifestyles called me, wanting me to reply to a

    customer survey.

    I tried to explain, that I had a complaint against

    them, and because of this, didn't want to be part of the survey.

    But the person calling didn't speak that good

    English, I think I have to say.

    So it ended with me having to hang up.

    Can't you please tell the Council to reply to my

    complaint in writing, so that we get this case over with?

    Best Regards,

    Erik

    Ribsskog

    NOTICE - This message contains information intended only for the use of the addressee named above.  If you have received this message in error please advise us at once and do not make any use of the information.

    NOTICE - This message contains information intended only for the use of the addressee named above. If you have received this message in error please advise us at once and do not make any use of the information.
    






  • Jeg sendte en klage på Liverpool City Council og the Local Government Ombudsman, til EU-kommisjonen







    Gmail – Complaint about the Local Goverment Ombudsman/Fwd: Complaint against Liverpool City Council







    Gmail



    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>




    Complaint about the Local Goverment Ombudsman/Fwd: Complaint against Liverpool City Council





    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>





    Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 3:49 PM





    To:

    SG-PLAINTES@ec.europa.eu



    Hi,

    I'm from Norway, but live in the UK.
    Here one can see how some people treats Norwegians in the UK.
    They bully me and call me 'Ms', like mobsters, and they suggest to meet foreigners at a sweaty Gym, instead of replying in writing, like I wanted.

    I think that some mobsters attacked me at the Liverpool City Council Gym and that some mobsters in the Council and at the Local Government Ombudsman covered it up.
    I guess this could be, since I'm Norway.

    And according to the EEA-agreement, I have the same rights as EU-citizens, in the UK.
    So I think you should make the Liverpool City Counil and the Local Government Ombudsman, pay me a lot of money in compensation, for all their crap, that I have to take, since I'm from Norway, or why they do this.

    Best Regards,
    Erik Ribsskog

    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

    Date: Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 3:36 PM
    Subject: Re: Complaint against Liverpool City Council
    To: LGOAT Mailbox <L.Mailbox@lgo.org.uk>

    Hi,

    ok, I guess it's nothing to do about that case then.

    I thought you let the Coucil get away to easy.
    I mean, I send them a written complaint, and the offer to meet me in a sweaty gym.

    I go to the gym to work-out, not to have meetings.
    Meetings I think should be held somewhere with less sweat, endorfines and hormones in the air.
    So I thought it was just riddiculus, that you let the Council get away.

    All I wanted was a reply in writing from them.
    Which I think is the norm, if one send a written complaint.
    But all this non-sense with the Council suggesting meetings at the Gym, and you at the Ombudsman letting Liverpool City Council getting away with that.

    I think that this reminds me of another smell than the one at the gym.
    All of this smells really, I think.
    But I guess it's nothing to do about this.
    Regards,

    Erik Ribsskog

    On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 3:21 PM, LGOAT Mailbox <L.Mailbox@lgo.org.uk> wrote:

    Dear

    Ms Ribsskog,

    Thank

    you for your reply.

    You

    could continue with the case that you regard more serious if you wish but the

    previous advice would still apply and you would need to provide us with

    evidence that the council’s complaints process has been completed (The council

    would normally respond in writing at each stage of a formal complaint)

    If

    the issue regarding harassment at the gym is something that we have considered

    before however we would not be able to consider it again.

    Yours

    Sincerely

    Kerry

    Anne Hartnett

    Customer

    Service Advisor
    | LGO Advice Team | DL:

    02476 820 132 | 0300 061 0614

    The

    Oaks, No 2 | Westwood Way | Westwood Business Park | Coventry |

    CV4 8JB |

    www.lgo.org.uk

    LGO 4 col SML at 70%

    From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

    Sent: 07 June 2010 15:04

    To: LGOAT Mailbox

    Subject: Re: Complaint against Liverpool City Council

    Hi,

    I don't think one phone-call like that, is something to make

    a fuss about.

    But I thought the problems with the harassment against me at the Council Gym,

    was more important.

    So I thougth that maybe I could go on with that case, since

    I didn't think it was properly sorted.

    Best Regards,

    Erik Ribsskog

    On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 12:08 PM, LGOAT Mailbox <L.Mailbox@lgo.org.uk> wrote:

    Dear Mr Ribsskog,

    Thank you for your email.

    I have established from searching for your details

    that you had a complaint investigated by the Local Government Ombudsman which

    was closed in February 2009. (08 000 279)

    If you have a new complaint with the council you will

    need to complete the council’s own complaints procedure before requesting that

    the Ombudsman considers your complaint for investigation

    Please also note that we do not simply tell councils

    what to do, we would only make recommendations to a council in the event that

    fault was found during a complaint investigation by the Ombudsman.

    If you would like to raise a new complaint because you

    have completed the council’s complaints procedure then please fill out the

    attached form and return it with a copy of the council’s final response to your

    complaint.

    Yours Sincerely

    Kerry Anne Hartnett

    Customer Service Advisor | LGO Advice Team | DL: 02476 820 132 | 0300 061 0614

    The Oaks, No 2 | Westwood

    Way | Westwood Business Park | Coventry |

    CV4 8JB |

    www.lgo.org.uk

    Error!

    Filename not specified.

    From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

    Sent: 06 June 2010 23:46

    To: LGOAT Mailbox

    Subject: Complaint against Liverpool City Council

    Hi,

    I had a complaint against Liverpool City Council, (Lifestyles Gym), that I

    wanted them to reply to in writing, (back in 2006!).

    You

    at the Ombudsman said they didn't have to, since they offered to meet me at the

    gym.

    On

    28/5, Lifestyles called me, wanting me to reply to a customer survey.

    I tried to explain, that I had a complaint against them, and because of this,

    didn't want to be part of the survey.

    But the person calling didn't speak that good English, I think I have to say.

    So

    it ended with me having to hang up.

    Can't

    you please tell the Council to reply to my complaint in writing, so that we get

    this case over with?

    Best

    Regards,

    Erik Ribsskog

    NOTICE - This message contains information intended only for the use of the addressee named above.  If you have received this message in error please advise us at once and do not make any use of the information.

    NOTICE - This message contains information intended only for the use of the addressee named above. If you have received this message in error please advise us at once and do not make any use of the information.
    






  • Jeg sendte en påminnelse til EU-kommisjonen







    Google Mail – To Arthur Pooley/Fwd: Your e-mail of 22/8/2009







    Google Mail



    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>




    To Arthur Pooley/Fwd: Your e-mail of 22/8/2009





    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>





    Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 3:56 PM





    To:

    SG-PLAINTES@ec.europa.eu



    Hi,

    I'm just sending you a reminder, since I haven't heard anything from you, after I received you letter from 22/12, last year.
    Hope this is alright!
    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: <SG-PLAINTES@ec.europa.eu>

    Date: Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 9:51 AM
    Subject: Your e-mail of 22/8/2009
    To: eribsskog@gmail.com





    393930.pdf
    27K




  • Jeg sendte en oppdatering til Nærings- og Handelsdepartementet







    Google Mail – Oppdatering min klage på EU-kommisjonen, fra 22/8/Fwd: Your e-mail of 22/8/2009







    Google Mail



    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>




    Oppdatering min klage på EU-kommisjonen, fra 22/8/Fwd: Your e-mail of 22/8/2009





    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>





    Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 7:11 PM





    To:

    postmottak@nhd.dep.no


    Cc:

    post@mfa.no



    Hei,

    beklager, den skulle til Nærings- og Handelsdepartementet, den e-posten her.
    Jeg har kanskje tatt jula litt tidlig her.
    Men 'mfa.no', det betyr liksom ikke UD for meg.

    Men men.
    Beklager dette!
    Mvh.

    Erik Ribsskog

    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

    Date: 2009/12/22
    Subject: Oppdatering min klage på EU-kommisjonen, fra 22/8/Fwd: Your e-mail of 22/8/2009
    To: post@mfa.no

    Hei,

    nå fikk jeg et svar fra EU-kommisjonen, fra en brite, virker det som.

    Men jeg har jo klaget på, at EU-kommisjonen søkte på 'Erik Ribsskog Mette-Marit', og blanda inn i saken, at jeg har skrevet om problemer med Mette-Marit videoen, og om den er en risiko for rikets sikkerhet, på blogg.

    Jeg vet ikke om dere har tenkt å gjøre noe med klagen min på EU-kommisjonen?
    Dette er også en purring, for dere har ikke svart meg på den første e-posten jeg sendte om dette.

    På forhånd takk for svar!
    Mvh.
    Erik Ribsskog

    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: <SG-PLAINTES@ec.europa.eu>

    Date: Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 9:51 AM
    Subject: Your e-mail of 22/8/2009
    To: eribsskog@gmail.com





    393930.pdf
    27K