http://www.lulu.com/shop/erik-ribsskog/boka-mi/ebook/product-21456312.html
PS.
Her er den boka, som jeg har utgitt, (på Lulu):
http://www.lulu.com/shop/erik-ribsskog/min-bok-del-1/paperback/product-21598170.html
Erik Ribsskog
| Re: [Ticket#2011021710003281] Trine, MyHeritage Norway/Fwd: Re: MyHeritage Support – Request to delete my account […] |
Erik Ribsskog
Case# 37668212: Impersonation – RibsskogErik
Erik Ribsskog
To: Twitter Support
Hi,
thank you for your e-mail!
I wonder if it could be, a misunderstanding, to do, with this decision.
(Because I think this is clearly an impersonation-case).
So I was wondering, if you could please escalate this case, to a superior/line-manager there, (for å second opinion).
Thanks in advance for any help!
Best regards,
Erik Ribsskog
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 4:46 PM, Twitter Support
@JohnconsWeb.
Hello,
We’ve investigated the reported account and have determined that it is not in violation of Twitter’s impersonation policy.
In order for an account to be in violation of the policy, it must portray another person or business in a misleading or deceptive manner. Read the full policy here: https://support.twitter.com/articles/18366
Thank you for your report, and please note that any documents you may have uploaded will be deleted.
Twitter Support
Reference #ref:00DA0000000K0A8.500G00000120URK:ref
Help
Twitter, Inc. 1355 Market Street, Suite 900 San Francisco, CA 94103
Erik Ribsskog
Case# 37668249: Impersonation – MrErikRibsskog
Erik Ribsskog
To: Twitter Support
Hi,
thank you for your e-mail!
I wonder if it could be, a misunderstanding, to do, with this decision.
(Because I think this is clearly an impersonation-case).
So I was wondering, if you could please escalate this case, to a superior/line-manager there, (for å second opinion).
Thanks in advance for any help!
Best regards,
Erik Ribsskog
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 4:49 PM, Twitter Support
@JohnconsWeb.
Hello,
We’ve investigated the reported account and have determined that it is not in violation of Twitter’s impersonation policy.
In order for an account to be in violation of the policy, it must portray another person or business in a misleading or deceptive manner. Read the full policy here: https://support.twitter.com/articles/18366
Thank you for your report, and please note that any documents you may have uploaded will be deleted.
Twitter Support
Reference #ref:00DA0000000K0A8.500G00000120UUE:ref
Help
Twitter, Inc. 1355 Market Street, Suite 900 San Francisco, CA 94103
Erik Ribsskog
Case# 37668296: Impersonation – GaleRibsskog
Erik Ribsskog
To: Twitter Support
Hi,
thank you for your e-mail!
I wonder if it could be, a misunderstanding, to do, with this decision.
(Because I think this is clearly an impersonation-case).
So I was wondering, if you could please escalate this case, to a superior/line-manager there, (for å second opinion).
Thanks in advance for any help!
Best regards,
Erik Ribsskog
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 4:50 PM, Twitter Support
@JohnconsWeb.
Hello,
We’ve investigated the reported account and have determined that it is not in violation of Twitter’s impersonation policy.
In order for an account to be in violation of the policy, it must portray another person or business in a misleading or deceptive manner. Read the full policy here: https://support.twitter.com/articles/18366
Thank you for your report, and please note that any documents you may have uploaded will be deleted.
Twitter Support
Reference #ref:00DA0000000K0A8.500G00000120UY1:ref
Help
Twitter, Inc. 1355 Market Street, Suite 900 San Francisco, CA 94103
Erik Ribsskog
Case# 37667831: Impersonation – ErikGayman
Erik Ribsskog
To: Twitter Support
Hi,
thank you for your e-mail!
I wonder if it could be, a misunderstanding, to do, with this decision.
(Because I think this is clearly an impersonation-case).
So I was wondering, if you could please escalate this case, to a superior/line-manager there, (for å second opinion).
Thanks in advance for any help!
Best regards,
Erik Ribsskog
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 4:58 PM, Twitter Support
@JohnconsWeb.
Hello,
We’ve investigated the reported account and have determined that it is not in violation of Twitter’s impersonation policy.
In order for an account to be in violation of the policy, it must portray another person or business in a misleading or deceptive manner. Read the full policy here: https://support.twitter.com/articles/18366
Thank you for your report, and please note that any documents you may have uploaded will be deleted.
Twitter Support
Reference #ref:00DA0000000K0A8.500G00000120TwR:ref
Help
Twitter, Inc. 1355 Market Street, Suite 900 San Francisco, CA 94103
Erik Ribsskog
Case# 37667872: Impersonation – E_Ribsskog
Erik Ribsskog
To: Twitter Support
Hi,
thank you for your e-mail!
I wonder if it could be, a misunderstanding, to do, with this decision.
(Because I think this is clearly an impersonation-case).
So I was wondering, if you could please escalate this case, to a superior/line-manager there, (for å second opinion).
Thanks in advance for any help!
Best regards,
Erik Ribsskog
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 5:02 PM, Twitter Support
@JohnconsWeb.
Hello,
We’ve investigated the reported account and have determined that it is not in violation of Twitter’s impersonation policy.
In order for an account to be in violation of the policy, it must portray another person or business in a misleading or deceptive manner. Read the full policy here: https://support.twitter.com/articles/18366
Thank you for your report, and please note that any documents you may have uploaded will be deleted.
Twitter Support
Reference #ref:00DA0000000K0A8.500G00000120Tzk:ref
Help
Twitter, Inc. 1355 Market Street, Suite 900 San Francisco, CA 94103
Erik Ribsskog
Case# 37667916: Impersonation – TheOinker
Erik Ribsskog
To: Twitter Support
Hi,
thank you for your e-mail!
I wonder if it could be, a misunderstanding, to do, with this decision.
(Because I think this is clearly an impersonation-case).
So I was wondering, if you could please escalate this case, to a superior/line-manager there, (for å second opinion).
Thanks in advance for any help!
Best regards,
Erik Ribsskog
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 5:07 PM, Twitter Support
@JohnconsWeb.
Hello,
We’ve investigated the reported account and have determined that it is not in violation of Twitter’s impersonation policy.
In order for an account to be in violation of the policy, it must portray another person or business in a misleading or deceptive manner. Read the full policy here: https://support.twitter.com/articles/18366
Thank you for your report, and please note that any documents you may have uploaded will be deleted.
Twitter Support
Reference #ref:00DA0000000K0A8.500G00000120U3S:ref
Help
Twitter, Inc. 1355 Market Street, Suite 900 San Francisco, CA 94103
Erik Ribsskog
Case# 37667954: Impersonation – johncons_
Erik Ribsskog
To: Twitter Support
Hi,
thank you for your e-mail!
I wonder if it could be, a misunderstanding, to do, with this decision.
(Because I think this is clearly an impersonation-case).
So I was wondering, if you could please escalate this case, to a superior/line-manager there, (for å second opinion).
Thanks in advance for any help!
Best regards,
Erik Ribsskog
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 5:15 PM, Twitter Support
@JohnconsWeb.
Hello,
We’ve investigated the reported account and have determined that it is not in violation of Twitter’s impersonation policy.
In order for an account to be in violation of the policy, it must portray another person or business in a misleading or deceptive manner. Read the full policy here: https://support.twitter.com/articles/18366
Thank you for your report, and please note that any documents you may have uploaded will be deleted.
Twitter Support
Reference #ref:00DA0000000K0A8.500G00000120U6W:ref
Help
Twitter, Inc. 1355 Market Street, Suite 900 San Francisco, CA 94103