johncons

Stikkord: Identitetstyveri

  • Jeg sendte en femte e-post til Twitter

    Erik Ribsskog
    Case# 37667483: Impersonation – sjefstulling
    Erik Ribsskog     Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 7:04 PM
    To: Twitter Support
    Hi,

    thank you for your e-mail!

    I wonder if it could be, a misunderstanding, to do, with this decision.

    (Because I think this is clearly an impersonation-case).

    So I was wondering, if you could please escalate this case, to a superior/line-manager there, (for å second opinion).

    Thanks in advance for any help!

    Best regards,

    Erik Ribsskog

    On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 6:19 PM, Twitter Support wrote:

        @JohnconsWeb.

        Hello,

        We’ve investigated the reported account and have determined that it is not in violation of Twitter’s impersonation policy.

        In order for an account to be in violation of the policy, it must portray another person or business in a misleading or deceptive manner. Read the full policy here: https://support.twitter.com/articles/18366

        Thank you for your report, and please note that any documents you may have uploaded will be deleted.

        Twitter Support
        Reference #ref:00DA0000000K0A8.500G00000120TUw:ref
        Help
        Twitter, Inc. 1355 Market Street, Suite 900 San Francisco, CA 94103

  • Jeg sendte en fjerde e-post til Twitter

    Erik Ribsskog
    Case# 37667529: Impersonation – JodenRibsskog
    Erik Ribsskog     Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 6:25 PM
    To: Twitter Support
    Hi,

    thank you for your e-mail!

    I wonder if it could be, a misunderstanding, to do, with this decision.

    (Because I think this is clearly an impersonation-case).

    So I was wondering, if you could please escalate this case, to a superior/line-manager there, (for å second opinion).

    Thanks in advance for any help!

    Best regards,

    Erik Ribsskog

    On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 6:20 PM, Twitter Support wrote:

        @JohnconsWeb.
        Hello,

        We’ve investigated the reported account and have determined that it is not in violation of Twitter’s impersonation policy.

        In order for an account to be in violation of the policy, it must portray another person or business in a misleading or deceptive manner. Read the full policy here: https://support.twitter.com/articles/18366

        Thank you for your report, and please note that any documents you may have uploaded will be deleted.

        Twitter Support
        Reference #ref:00DA0000000K0A8.500G00000120TYP:ref
        Help
        Twitter, Inc. 1355 Market Street, Suite 900 San Francisco, CA 94103

  • Jeg sendte en tredje e-post til Twitter

    Erik Ribsskog
    Case# 37667579: Impersonation – BaronErikR
    Erik Ribsskog     Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 5:57 PM
    To: Twitter Support
    Hi,

    thank you for your e-mail!

    I wonder if it could be, a misunderstanding, to do, with this decision.

    (Because I think this is clearly an impersonation-case).

    So I was wondering, if you could please escalate this case, to a superior/line-manager there, (for å second opinion).

    Thanks in advance for any help!

    Best regards,

    Erik Ribsskog

    On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 6:20 PM, Twitter Support wrote:

        @JohnconsWeb.
        Hello,

        We’ve investigated the reported account and have determined that it is not in violation of Twitter’s impersonation policy.

        In order for an account to be in violation of the policy, it must portray another person or business in a misleading or deceptive manner. Read the full policy here: https://support.twitter.com/articles/18366

        Thank you for your report, and please note that any documents you may have uploaded will be deleted.

        Twitter Support
        Reference #ref:00DA0000000K0A8.500G00000120TcW:ref
        Help
        Twitter, Inc. 1355 Market Street, Suite 900 San Francisco, CA 94103

  • Jeg sendte enda en e-post til Twitter

    Erik Ribsskog
    Case# 37667633: Impersonation – erikribs
    Erik Ribsskog     Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 5:46 PM
    To: Twitter Support
    Hi,

    thank you for your e-mail!

    I wonder if it could be, a misunderstanding, to do, with this decision.

    (Because I think this is clearly an impersonation-case).

    So I was wondering, if you could please escalate this case, to a superior/line-manager there, (for å second opinion).

    Thanks in advance for any help!

    Best regards,

    Erik Ribsskog

    On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 6:20 PM, Twitter Support wrote:

        @JohnconsWeb.
        Hello,

        We’ve investigated the reported account and have determined that it is not in violation of Twitter’s impersonation policy.

        In order for an account to be in violation of the policy, it must portray another person or business in a misleading or deceptive manner. Read the full policy here: https://support.twitter.com/articles/18366

        Thank you for your report, and please note that any documents you may have uploaded will be deleted.

        Twitter Support
        Reference #ref:00DA0000000K0A8.500G00000120Tgi:ref
        Help
        Twitter, Inc. 1355 Market Street, Suite 900 San Francisco, CA 94103

  • Jeg sendte en e-post til Twitter

    Erik Ribsskog
    Case# 37667382: Impersonation – minitissemann
    Erik Ribsskog     Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 5:35 PM
    To: Twitter Support
    Hi,

    thank you for your e-mail!

    I wonder if it could be, a misunderstanding, to do, with this decision.

    (Because I think this is clearly an impersonation-case).

    So I was wondering, if you could please escalate this case, to a superior/line-manager there, (for å second opinion).

    Thanks in advance for any help!

    Best regards,

    Erik Ribsskog

    On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 6:25 PM, Twitter Support wrote:

        @JohnconsWeb.

        Hello,

        We’ve investigated the reported account and have determined that it is not in violation of Twitter’s impersonation policy.

        In order for an account to be in violation of the policy, it must portray another person or business in a misleading or deceptive manner. Read the full policy here: https://support.twitter.com/articles/18366

        Thank you for your report, and please note that any documents you may have uploaded will be deleted.

        Twitter Support
        Reference #ref:00DA0000000K0A8.500G00000120TN2:ref
        Help
        Twitter, Inc. 1355 Market Street, Suite 900 San Francisco, CA 94103

  • Noen sender visst e-poster, i mitt navn

    noen sender visst e-poster i mitt navn

    http://lagertha.blogg.no/1472542814_jeg_fikk_en_mail.html

    PS.

    Jeg fikk en rar e-post, (og fant bloggposten ovenfor, etter å ha søkt, på Google, om det virkelig fantes noen, med navnet Laila Ribsskog):

    rar e-post

  • Et utenlandsk nettsted, (som jeg ikke skal nevne navn på, for de skriver så mye tull/trakassering, om meg), vil ha det til, at jeg står bak, fler nettsteder, enn det jeg gjør. Men de nettstedene jeg har nå, er bare johncons-web, (som har følgende url: http://johncons.angelfire.com), og de som er listet opp, på skjermbildet under

    sveitsisk nettsted

    http://johncons.angelfire.com/lenker.html

    PS.

    Jeg har også johncons-web, på Twitter og Facebook.

    (Og johncons-blogg, er vel også det).

    Og så har jeg YouTube-konto og Flickr-konto.

    Men jeg profilerer meg ikke, så mye, på YouTube og Flickr.

    Men jeg bruker liksom YouTube og Flickr, (og også Yudu og Vimeo), til å laste opp filer, som jeg så publiserer, (’embedded’, som det vel heter, på engelsk), på bloggen.

    Så sånn er det.

    Bare noe jeg tenkte på.

    Men men.

    Mvh.

    Erik Ribsskog

    PS 2.

    Det virker som, at folk på nettet, (blant annet de som skriver, på det beryktede utenlandske nettstedet), vil ha det til, at jeg står bak, fler nettsteder, enn jeg gjør.

    Men det som er problemet, er at folk blander mine nettsteder, med kopi-nettsteder og tulle-nettsteder, som andre folk har startet, og som ikke har noe, med meg å gjøre, (for å si det sånn).

    Så jeg tenkte, at det var greit, å prøve, å ta med, en oversikt, over hvilke nettsteder, som er mine.

    Så sånn er det.

    Bare noe jeg tenkte på.

    Men men.