johncons

Stikkord: Ipcc

  • Jeg sendte en ny e-post til IPCC

    from Erik Ribsskog eribsskog@gmail.com

    to !enquiries

    cc emb.london@mfa.no,

    alumni@sunderland.ac.uk,

    president@ansa.no,

    amnestyis@amnesty.org,

    TAYLORG@unhcr.org,

    public.enquiries@homeoffice.gsi.gov.uk,

    eftacourt@eftacourt.int

    date Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 12:10 PM

    subject Re: Our reference: 2011/004716

    mailed-by gmail.com

    hide details 12:10 PM (0 minutes ago)

    Hi,

    I also have an update now, which could or could not be linked with this.

    I was cleared for studying History, at University of Sunderland, (my old university in the UK), and went to Sunderland, after the eviction in Liverpool, which I’ve complained about.

    I was with Accommodation in Sunderland, (sent there by the Student Helpline, Sarah there), and got temporary accommodation when I arrived in Sunderland, later the same day I was evicted, from 5 Leather Lane, in Liverpool.

    On Monday evening, I got a letter from the University telling me to go to a meeting in September to discuss the modules further.

    On Tuesday morning, someone from the university came and dragged me out of bed, and to a meeting before I could shave, brush my teeth or have e.g. a cup of coffee, to wake up.

    So I was dragged to a meeting half asleep.

    It reminded me like one have seen on telly, regarding how the Nazis acted when they sent the Jews to the concentration camps.

    A blonde woman in her early 30’s and a man with brown eyes in his 50’s sat behind a long table there, in a room with lot of present-boxes from the University to the new students.

    They told me I had to move, the woman said that the letter had a ‘typo’, the meeting was on Monday, at midday, (before I saw the meeting-letter so very unlikely), and not in September.

    I was just feed lies the way it seemed to me, and got upset, due to the ‘Gestapo-methods’ used and lies feed, so I wanted to leave the meeting.

    I wasn’t allowed at first, by the man with the brown eyes.

    I looked him in the eye, (that’s why I remember it was brown), and asked him if he was something with the Police.

    (Because I was really upset and really wanted to leave the meeting, due to being very, very badly threated I thought. I was one of the worst things ever happened to me, I think. It was horrible. Like terror/warfare almost, or more or less. Very unsivilised).

    I asked if I was under ‘university custody’.

    (As a joke since I think the University of Sunderland seems more like a boarding-school sometimes).

    He said no.

    I asked him again if he was something with the police, and he said ‘no’ again.

    Then I said ‘then shut up’.

    Because I was tired and very upset, it was like I was dreaming still, and this was one of my worst nightmares.

    Something like this.

    Then the man with the brown eyes did’t say anything.

    I think I have the right to leave a meeting when I want, so I went out, due to the really, really bad/cruel/inhume and unsivilised threatment from the university.

    I before this told them I thought it was like in ‘Hitler Germany’.

    When I left the room, to police-officers appeared from seemingly nowhere, to me.

    And they had listened to the meeting.

    Since they said they were the police.

    They asked me to go to my room, and followed me there, and looked on while I had to pack.

    Not hurrying me as much as the Merseyside-police did, when I was thrown out the first time, dough.

    The Police told me I was ‘homeless’, and drove me in a small, dark civil, (Japanese?) car, (not a proper Police-car that is), to the Sunderland Council, in Fawcett St.

    One of them got me a queue-ticket there, while I got my suitcase and two bags out of the car.

    When I went in there, he then talked to the blonde woman in reception, in her 20’s, (very beautiful woman), and when my ticket was called up, he spoke with the case-worker, he dragged her to in front of the reception, and spoke with her, about ten meters away from me, so I couldn’t hear what was being said.

    I thought this was peculiar, and went to the reception-area and heard the police-man saying about me to the case-worker.

    ‘I don’t know if he’s on benefits’.

    Something like this.

    I’m not used with being patronised like this, so after they were finished speaking, I approached the police-man, (a man with a ‘square’ head-form, short blond hair, a bit shorter than me, and I’m 1.85, a bit heavier built than me, I think, and I weigh around 100 kg. He was in his 30’s I think, or maybe around my age, and I’m 41. He had a cut, it seemed, in one of his lips, I think, like a boxer had hit him, or something).

    I asked ‘were you speaking on my behalf’, (with the case-worker).

    He didn’t reply.

    I asked again ‘were you speaking on my behalf’.

    Again the police-man didn’t reply.

    I decided to try to calm it down, and tried to use a cheerful tone, and explained that I got the best grade on the English-test, (the TOEFL-test at University of Sunderland, in 2004/05).

    The case-worker laughed at this, like she thought it was a joke/something funny/entertaining.

    I rounded off the one-sided conversation, and said that ‘so I know how to speak for myself’.

    I’m a Home Defence-soldier from Norway, and thus also a NATO-soldier, I’m an earlier Shop Manager and I have a degree in IT, and have a medal from the Norwegian Army, for finishing conscription-service.

    Due to this, and also before I had done all this, I don’t like being patronised.

    So I wanted to complain about that I was patronised by police.

    I was sent to a hostel, in Ashbrow, Azalea Lounge, where they didn’t even have a sign on the building.

    And where I still live, since I haven’t got my flat in Liverpool or university accommodation in Sunderland, and haven’t got my property in Norway sold yet.

    Then I’ll buy a flat, I reckoned, in Hove, Brighton, or something, I’ve thought.

    We’ll see.

    The landlady, (an African lady in her 40’s I think), told me the place was ‘though’ and ‘very friendly’.

    They first wanted to put me in room 3 which was without a door and with fancy furniture, and a big room.

    I’ve thought if that was a ‘funny-room’, for people who where going to be as*-raped, like one see on telly, that the Police threaten youths with, ‘if you get in jail a big guy is going to rape you’, in American movies etc., I guess, this is a well-known ‘cliche’ I think.

    I didn’t go into that room and got room 10.

    Some file that said something with ‘Northumbria Probition’ from the former tenant, was lying there, and I gave that to the assistant there today, (after ‘rydde’ (Norwegian)/cleaning my room), so that room wasn’t really prepared.

    I saw a young man in the reception/office there yesterday, so maybe they’ve got a new ‘batty boy’, or what it’s called.

    So I think that cop could have said to the Council, to send me to a place as a ‘batty boy’ for criminals on probation.

    That is the police are having a vendetta against me, I’ve been thinking a bit, that this could seem like, sometimes, since I was thrown out the last time.

    I’ve overheard I’ve been used as a ‘target-guy’, (even if I’m not that familiar with this expression), in Liverpool, some years ago, so I think the Police must be playing games with me and messing with me, and ignoring my rights.

    My sister Pia Ribsskog, told me on her favorite pub, Jollys, in Oslo, in 1993, that ‘du faar ikke noe hjelp av politiet’, meaning ‘the police wont help you’.

    Appaerently my Danish-born grandmother are after Danish kings, farao, cesar, etc, and King David of Israel, and Odin, so this could be some Illuminati-stuff I guess, since I’ve read some where on the net, that they are very interested/obcessed by King David-lines.

    Something like this.

    Yesterday morning, a police-man, (possible the college of the other I described, a bit older and with a bit rougher face, I think, than the other police-man I described above).

    He have me some water-bottles and soap for cloth-washing etc., which I didn’t bring from Clanny House, since they sometime leak during travel, I didn’t want soap on my other stuff, so to speak.

    I also got my nail-cutter back.

    So now I have three nail-cutters.

    One which was in 5 Leather Lane.

    One which I had at campus.

    And one I bought after I was thrown out of campus.

    And one in Norway, at Loevaas farm, where someone chased me away from, and I went to the UK, in 2005.

    So I have four nail-cutters.

    Why did the Police have my nail-cutter?

    Because when I finished the ‘Gestapo-meeting’ with University staff, the morning I was ‘dragged’ to that meeting, on Tuesday.

    Then the police asked for the room-key.

    I was a bit dozed, and hadn’t woken up yet, so I gave my key chain, with the room-key, nail-cutter on, and the key to my storage in Oslo, an Abus pad-lock key, to City Self Storage, where I have my Machine gun and uniform from the Home Defence, and valuable 16’th century antiques after my late Danish grandmother, and letters from old girl-friends, etc., etc.

    That key I _didn’t_ get back.

    So the Police still have this key.

    That’s another complaint.

    I can document the Illuminati-stuff, I wrote above, but I have to Google to find the websites.

    But this isn’t formal websites, so I aqnowledge that the Illuminati-stuff I wrote above is a bit bad documented.

    Sorry about this!

    I had gotten clearing from University of Sunderland, to study History, the academic year 2011/12.

    Why did the Police then help the university break this agreement and throw me out, when I wasn’t even properly awake, but was ‘dragged’ right out of bed, by a university messenger, like accomodation there, Leslie, said they used, when I spoke to her, last week, at the Gateway, at the City Campus.

    I wanted to include the compaints above in the IPCC-case.

    Please tell the Police to give me my rights.

    I overheard in 2003 and 2004 that I was followed by someone called the ‘mafian’ in Oslo.

    Someone tried to murder me at Loevaas Farm in Norway, on 25 th of July 2005.

    The Police should investigate the murder attempt and inform me who this ‘mafian’ is, and give me advice regarding self-defence adequate to my situation, so I could have a normal life.

    These are my rights, and these I claim.

    The Police are just messing with me and try to get me but-raped etc., it seems to me.

    The Home Office should have let me be a refugee, I think, so I also send a copy e-mail to them and others which I’ve started updating about this.

    With ‘oppgitt’ (Norwegian, meaning something like ‘more or less given up (on Police)’) Regards

    Erik Ribsskog

    – Hide quoted text –

    On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 9:38 AM, !enquiries wrote:

    Dear Mr Ribsskog

    Thank you for contacting the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC). We acknowledge your consent and note the details of your complaint against the Merseyside Police. The case reference number is 2011/004716, which you should quote in all future correspondence.

    We are completely independent of the police service and are responsible for making sure that the police complaints system in England and Wales works effectively and fairly. However, each police force is responsible for considering complaints made against that force and recording your complaint.

    Our role at this stage is to forward your complaint to the relevant police force. If you are not happy with the police’s decision on recording your complaint, you have the right to appeal to us.

    I have passed the matter to the Professional Standards Department (PSD) of the Merseyside Police for them to consider. We have done this with your consent and the police will be contacting you soon.

    If you have not heard from the relevant police force within 15 working days you may wish to contact them directly.

    Merseyside Police

    Professional Standards

    PO Box 814

    Central Liverpool

    L69 3YT

    0151 709 6010

    If you have any further information you wish to pass on, please forward it directly to the PSD at the above address.

    Regards

    Steven Ireland

    Customer Contact Advisor

    Independent Police Complaints Commission

    Tel: 08453 002 002

    Email: enquiries@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk

    The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless Worldwide in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.

    Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes.

  • Jeg sendte en ny e-post til IPCC

    from Erik Ribsskog eribsskog@gmail.com

    to !enquiries

    date Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 12:28 PM

    subject Re: IPCC ref 2011/004716

    mailed-by gmail.com

    hide details 12:28 PM (0 minutes ago)

    Hi,

    I’m sitting at a library now, without access to a printer, so I just wish to declare my consent that you go on with this case, in writing, with this e-mail.

    Hope this is alright!

    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog (sign)

    – Hide quoted text –

    On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 11:18 AM, !enquiries wrote:

    Dear Mr Ribsskog

    Thank you for contacting the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC). I can confirm that we have noted the details of your complaint against the Merseyside Police. The case reference number is 2011/004716. Please quote this whenever you contact us.

    The IPCC is completely independent of the police service and is responsible for making sure that the police complaints system in England and Wales works effectively and fairly. However, each police force is responsible for considering complaints made against that force and for recording your complaint. If you are not happy with the police’s decision on recording your complaint, you have the right to appeal to us.

    We now need your permission, either by letter, phone or on the below form, to pass details of your complaint to the Professional Standards Department of the Merseyside Police, which is responsible for enforcing standards of conduct within the force. Without your consent, we cannot pass on the details of a complaint to a force unless, in exceptional cases, the details of the complaint indicate that it is in the public interest to do so.

    Please consider that any delay in providing your consent could result in evidence related to your complaint being lost or destroyed (i.e. CCTV footage), or an account of events being forgotten by any potential witnesses.

    Yours sincerely

    Richard Steadman

    Customer Contact Adviser

    Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC)

    Our reference: 2011/004716

    Dear Mr Ribsskog

    Please read the attached letter carefully. If you wish to give your consent please sign and print your name below.

    I, ____________________________ (print your name), give my consent for my complaint to be forwarded to the appropriate authority for them to consider.

    Signature: ________________________

    Date: _______/______/_____________

    If you wish to provide your consent please return this document to:

    Richard Steadman

    Customer Contact Advisor

    Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC)

    Phone: 0845 300 2002

    Email: enquiries@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk

    The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless Worldwide in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.

    Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes.

  • Jeg sendte en ny e-post til IPCC

    fromErik Ribsskog eribsskog@gmail.com

    toenquiries@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk

    ccPhso Enquiries

    bccLiverpool Direct ,

    emb.london@mfa.no

    dateSat, Aug 20, 2011 at 1:14 PM

    subjectFwd: IPCC reference: 2011/004716

    mailed-bygmail.com

    hide details 1:14 PM (0 minutes ago)

    Hi,

    yes I wanted to complain about what happened.

    It started really back in 2006, when I moved to Leather Lane.

    Mr. Grimes, from Imperial Property, (the Landlord company), wanted to keep the original of my tenancy-statement, from the shared flat, in Mandeville St., in Walton, where I moved to when I got employment at Arvato, in the automn of 2005.

    There it wasn’t fun to live, people stole my food, woke me up in the middle of the night to get cigarettes and some people didn’t pay for electricity, etc.

    The landlord, (John, who has a furniture store in Breck Rd., I think it was), took away the heather in my room, for ‘refurbishment’, or something, so I had a cold winter, without any heating in my room.

    So I wanted out of that place.

    So I let Mr. Grimes have the statement.

    I was a bit desperate to move, due to that it’s quite cold not having heating in your room.

    Also, the garbage-throwing arrangement in 5 Leather Lane, are hillarious.

    One have to walk trough a restaurant/pub-patio, where a lot of people in suits etc., sits to drink imported lager or to have a meal.

    It’s degrading to live there, I’d say, due to the placement of the garbage-bins.

    The boiler wasn’t fixed for two years there, and when the washing-machine also broke down, I kept some of the Housing Benefit, (I got constructivly dismissed from Arvato and have an employment-case), and bought a washing-machine.

    The tone between me and the Landlord-office was a bit heated.

    I went there to pay the rent since there were also other problems I could discuss at the same time, like disrepair.

    And I was a bit in arrears with the rent, so I thought it would be more polite to show up at their office in person.

    Then Lorna sent George, from their Preston-office to collect the rent, for some time, on my door.

    George, (I don’t think I got the last-name), never where there on the agreed dates, so I had to go to the bank all the time to withdraw and deposit the rent.

    Some, (or perhaps all, this is some years ago, so I don’t have all the receipts yet), of the money George collected aren’t on the statement.

    So it’s a dispute between me and the landlord, regarding many things.

    Mr. Grimes said he would go to my flat to give me a ‘special gift’.

    I’m a bit vary about Mr. Grimes and Lorna due to that they kept the original statement, and have acted very strange when I have called.

    Once I called Lorna if she had gotten an envelope with money for the rent, which I put in their letter hole in the wall.

    Since they closed earlier than I thought.

    The next working day I called them to check if they’ve gotten the money, and Lorna said I shouldn’t put envelopes in their hole in the wall, due to that ‘the children could find them’.

    In an office?

    That really freaked me out.

    So both Mr. Grimes, Lorna, George and the garbage-throwing-arrangement really freaked me out.

    The dispute was taken to the County Court.

    The County Court didn’t send me a letter about a court-hearing.

    (Or at least I didn’t get the letter).

    I complained about this, to Admin Appeals, and didn’t prepare for the next hearing, since I’d frozen the process, I thought.

    (The court called me three times about these hearings, while I told them I wanted this in writing).

    I also complained to the Parliamentary Ombudsman, (who I also update now).

    But the Liverpool County Court, ignored my complaints, and on Wednesday at 1 PM., the Bailiff and the Police where at my door.

    I didn’t expect the Police, only the Bailiff, and I thought he didn’t have the right to throw me out, after I’d complained to the Parliamentary Ombudsman, so I put a sofa in from of my door, on Tuesday night.

    The Police and the Bailiff had keys to my door, but couldn’t get in due to the sofa.

    I complained again to the IPCC and the Parliamentary Ombudsman, while the Police and the Bailiff tried to get in.

    I handed the Police printed copies of these complaints through a slight opening in the door.

    The Police just removed my enterance-door, after I’d given them the letters.

    (Probably with some tools etc).

    The Police were also shouting and hammering on my door, even if I told them I’d complained to the Parliamentary Ombudsman and told them to leave me alone.

    It was horrible with all their noise etc., so it was a bit uncivilised I think.

    The Police were at my door two times, in March, with stun-guns etc., due to that some readers on my blog had told them I’d bought an axe, for self-defence, (since I thought Mr. Grimes was threatening me).

    I used to be in the Home Defence in Norway, so I’m used to having a machine-gun in my home, and thought it was calming having an axe in my appartment, so that I could defend myself in case something happened, and the axe could also be used as a fire-axe, in case of a fire, etc.

    An in-expensive axe from Wilkinson.

    But then four Police-officers came to my flat with stun-guns and all.

    I’ve read in the Times, in 2005 or 2006, that in the UK one are allowed to defend oneselves, if burglars etc., want to attack you in your home, and after being in the Norwegian Home-Defence, I don’t think it’s that dramatic having an axe in one’s flat, for self-defense.

    (Like Duncan Ferguson, he use to beat burglars up, I’ve read.

    So one are allowed to defend one’s flat in the UK, I think).

    The Police dramatised this a lot, and fist four Police-officers with stun-guns came to my flat, and looked at my cutlery and all my other things in my kitchen and my bed-room.

    And stole my axe.

    Which I had bought in self-defence against Mr. Grimes who freaks me out a bit.

    (It’s the story with the tenancy-contract, etc.

    I don’t think a ‘normal’ guy would have wanted the orginal of one of my documents.

    So he freaked me out a bit.

    He also wanted to give me a special goodbye gift, etc.

    This I thought was peculiar.

    And freaked me out).

    Also two inspectors from the Police, came to my flat.

    (One had a hare-lip).

    And asked a lot of questions regarding the Wilkinson-axe.

    So I got a bit fed up, I thought the Police dramatised and I refered to the castle doctrine, which says people have the right to defend one’s home.

    So I felt harassed by the Police and the Landlord, and put a poster on my door, telling the Police to just send a letter in the post, and don’t scream outside my door, all the time.

    The Police just ignored this poster/paper-sheet, on Wednesday, and just broke the door down.

    The Bailiff and the Police told me I could bring some of my personal stuff with me.

    But the Police nagged about that I had to hurry, and stressed me, so I didn’t get things like extra underway, socks, my tooth-brush, mobile-charger, camera-charger, laptop, etc.

    The Police told me noone could stop a warrant from the County Court, so I just calmed it down, and filled my suit-case with my desk-top computer and some clothes.

    And brought with me two bags as well, one containing all the files from my employment-case against Arvato, who I’ve contaced a lot of law-firms, (on the legal aid programme), and the Police about, without any progress, for some reason.

    Then I took a National Express-bus to Sunderland, since I’d recently been in contact with them about starting studying again, and my enquiery was sent to the accommodation-office, at University of Sunderland, so I reackoned I just needed to speak with accommodation, to get a flat at campus.

    I got temperary accommodation, at campus, at University of Sunderland, the same day, (Wednesday), and am now corresponding with my old faculty, Faculty of Applied Sciences, which modules I’m going to study.

    But the dispute between me and my Landlord wasn’t really resolved.

    I think the Police should have respected the copies of the e-mails to the Parliamentary Ombudsman and the IPCC, which I gave them, and not broken down my front-door.

    I couldn’t really live there then, with a distroyed front-door, so it didn’t really mather much which arguments I used, when I spoke with the Police and the Bailiff, after that.

    So I want to complain about both the Court, the Landlord, the Bailiff and the Police, so I send copies to the Ombudsman and the Liverpool City Council, (who I’ve updated about this case earlier).

    Hope this is alright!

    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

    PS.

    I also have an IPCC-case, from 2007, which is stalled at the IPCC, from when the Merseyside Police called me ‘Miss Erik Ribsskog’, in a letter, and other complaints.

    I’ve also sent a lot of e-mails to the Merseyside Police, in the last months, about that I’m being attacked on the internet, with identity-theft attacks etc., a lot.

    I also send a copy e-mail to the Norwegian embassy, in London, since I also contacted them, while the Police broke down my door, on Wednesday.

    – Hide quoted text –

    ———- Forwarded message ———-

    From: !enquiries

    Date: Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 4:52 PM

    Subject: IPCC reference: 2011/004716

    To: Erik Ribsskog

    Dear Mr Ribsskog

    Thank you for contacting the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC). It appears that you are unhappy with police wantign to break into your apartment, I therefore thought it would be helpful to explain the police complaints process to enable you to raise your concerns.

    If you feel that you have been treated badly by the police you have the right to make a complaint. Through this process you can raise your concerns and the police can have the opportunity to address them.

    There are different ways to make your complaint, however the quickest way is to make your complaint to the police force concerned as they will be responsible for resolving your complaint. Contact details for police forces can be found at the following link: http://www.ipcc.gov.uk/index/complaints/who_complaint/professional_standards_contact_details.htm. To help you find which police force you wish to complain about you can visit the Direct.gov website : http://www.direct.gov.uk/en/Diol1/DoItOnline/DG_4017475

    If you prefer you can make your complaint to the IPCC and we will forward the details onto the Professional Standards Department of the police service concerned on your behalf. The easiest way to make your complaint to the IPCC is to complete our online complaint form. The form will prompt you for all the information we need in order to process your complaint. If you would prefer a hard copy please provide contact details and we will send you a copy in the post.

    Link to IPCC online complaint form: http://www.ipcc.gov.uk/index/complainants/forms/form_complaint.htm

    Alternatively you can contact a solicitor, a representative or your MP to act on your behalf.

    If you are unhappy with the way your complaint was handled or the decisions made you may have a right of appeal to the IPCC. It is at this stage of the process the IPCC would become involved.

    If you have any further queries please contact Customer Services on 08453 002 002.

    Kind regards

    Caroline Wilson

    Customer Contact Advisor

    Independent Police Complaints Commission

    Tel: 08453 002 002

    Email: enquiries@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk

    The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless Worldwide in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.

    Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes.

  • Her er enda en e-post jeg sendte igår, mens politiet prøvde å bryte seg inn i leiligheten min. (Jeg hadde en sofa foran døra, så det tok litt tid)







    Gmail – Complaint about Merseyside Police/Fwd: Complaint about Liverpool County Court







    Gmail


    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>



    Complaint about Merseyside Police/Fwd: Complaint about Liverpool County Court




    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>


    Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 1:37 PM





    To:

    emb.london@mfa.no



    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>


    Date: Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 1:31 PM
    Subject: Complaint about Merseyside Police/Fwd: Complaint about Liverpool County Court
    To: enquiries@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk

    Hi,

    the police still wants to break in to my appartment.
    I want you to compain.
    Please stop them.
    Yours sincerely,
    Erik Ribsskog

    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

    Date: Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 1:20 PM
    Subject: Complaint about Liverpool County Court
    To: "Liverpool County, Enquiries" <enquiries@liverpool.countycourt.gsi.gov.uk>

    Cc: Phso Enquiries <phso.enquiries@ombudsman.org.uk>

    Hi,

    now the clock is 13.19, and there have been no bailiff on my door.

    I therefore think that there isn't going to be any eviction.
    How is the investigation of your missing letter going to be?

    Thank you very much for your reply in advance!

    Erik Ribsskog





    PS.

    Jeg visste ikke at politiet kom til å dukke opp på døra.

    Jeg trodde at det bare ville være the Bailiff.

    Derfor satte jeg en hindring foran døra, for jeg ville ikke ha han inn i leiligheten min, for the County Court tulla fælt med meg, (jeg ble ikke informert om rettshøringer, osv.), og jeg hadde klaget til the Parliamentary Ombudsman, med flere.

    Politiet klarte ikke å komme inn døra, (selv om de hadde nøkkel), på grunn av møblene jeg hadde satt der, (like foran døra), dagen før.

    Jeg ga de noen kopier av e-poster jeg hadde sendt til the Parliamentary Ombudsman og IPCC, gjennom en glippe i døra.

    (For å få de til å slutte å herje med døra, (for de bråkte fælt), og dra igjen).

    Jeg ba de først bare om å ‘go away’, men de maste så fælt, at det ble rimelig utrivelig der.

    De kom med trusler om å arrestere meg, osv, (gjennom døra).

    Så sånn var det.

    Til slutt brukte politiet noe verktøy, eller lignende, på døra.

    Og fjernet døra utenfra, og så møblene foran døra.

    Men jeg rakk å sende e-post og ringe til den norske ambassaden i London.

    Politiet sa at jeg ikke kunne klage på en sånn ‘warrant’, fra the County Court.

    Jeg ønsket ikke å ha slåsskamp med 3-4 politifolk, (eller hvor mange de var), og the Bailiff.

    Så jeg bare roa det ned.

    De sa jeg kunne ta med noen personlige ting.

    De mest verdifulle tingene mine, (og dokumenter), er på City Self Storage, i Oslo, og på Løvås gård, i Kvelde, hvor jeg ble forsøkt myrdet, i 2005.

    Men jeg hadde likevel ganske mange ting, klær og TV-er og kjøkkensaker og dyner og puter osv., som jeg har kjøpte det meste av i 2006, da jeg flyttet inn i Leather Lane, mens jeg fortsatt jobbet på Arvato, og fortsatt hadde en del igjen av arven min, etter grandonkelen min Gunnar Bergstø, fra Holmsbu.

    Og politiet maste også om at jeg måtte kjappe meg, så jeg fikk ikke tatt med alt.

    (Selv om jeg ikke kunne ha bært på så utrolig mye mer heller, for å være ærlig, men jeg hadde nok tatt med mer ledninger til PC-en og lader til mobilen osv., hvis ikke politiet hadde mast og sagt at jeg bare fikk ta med det mest nødvendige, var det vel.

    Noe sånt).

    Men jeg fikk med dokumentene mine, den stasjonære PC-en min og noen klær, etc.

    Og papirene i forbindelse med arbeidssaken min mot Arvato, (som ligger i en egen bag).

    Sånne ting.

    Men på langt nær alle tingene jeg hadde der.

    Kanskje cirka halvparten.

    Noe sånt.

    Jeg hadde såvidt råd til en billett med National Express-buss, til Sunderland.

    Jeg regnet med det var bedre å dra hit, for jeg var ikke sikker på å få ny bolig i Liverpool, av the Council, (noe som også kanskje ville vært litt nedtur, å bo i en sånn trygdebolig. Men men), og jeg var litt ‘fed-up’ av alle problemene i Liverpool, med the County Court og the Landlord, osv.

    Jeg tenkte det ville vært digg å fått litt ‘frisk luft’, (eller hva man skal kalle det), i Sunderland.

    (Jeg har ikke engang hatt en dags sommerferie, (en dagstur), som jeg pleier å ha hver sommer, (for jeg har vært arbeidsledig lenge, og har ganske dårlig råd, pluss at jeg har mye arbeid med blogg, webshop, webdesign, jobbsøking og hat e-poster, mm), til Blackpool eller Thurstaston, eller lignende, som jeg har pleid å dra på, så jeg har vært litt lei).

    Jeg dro med en ganske stor koffert, med hjul og to bager, til National Express-busstasjonen, i Liverpool.

    Jeg gikk innom the Jobcentre på Willamsson Sq., og spurte om det var greit at jeg ‘signed on’, en dag for tidlig.

    Men de mente at det ikke var greit.

    Så jeg sa at jeg fikk gjøre det i morgen, eller noe.

    (Jeg sendte ihvertfall e-post tidligere i dag).

    Bussen til Sunderland gikk cirka klokken 15 vel, så jeg venta en halvtime eller en time, på busstasjonen, før bussen gikk.

    Så var jeg her i Sunderland, rundt klokka 21-22.

    Jeg gikk til Wearmouth Hall, (en av hovedbygningene til universitetet, som jeg såvidt husket veien til, etter å ha surra litt).

    Og noen som jobbet på universitetet spurte meg hva jeg surra med rundt der, (en kar som kjørte rundt, noe sikkerhet antagelig).

    Jeg forklarte at jeg skulle prate med accommodation, i dag, og lurte på om det var et sted jeg kunne sitte, de timene, fram til accommodation åpnet da.

    Universitetet ‘heiv’ meg inn på midlertidig ‘accommodation’ i Clanny House, etter at jeg visste de noen e-poster, som Sarah, ved Student Helpline, sendte meg, for et par-tre dager siden.

    (Siden jeg var inne på å dra til Sunderland, også før politiet kom og brøyt ned inngangsdøra mi, i Leather Lane.

    Jeg klagde til ganske mange, på the County Court, så jeg var ikke sikker på om den utkastelsen ville bli gjennomført.

    (Retten surra jo med brev, osv).

    Og politiet og the Bailiff var jo der også for seint, som jeg skrev om på bloggen i går).

    Jeg hadde også en lapp, hvor det stod mitt studentnummer, i lommeboka, som jeg fikk den gangen jeg dro hit til Sunderland, i 2009 vel, med toget, fra ei i the Gateway, resepsjonen her.

    Så det ordna seg.

    Jeg har litt lite penger, men regner med å få noen penger fra the Jobcentre, på tirsdag.

    Vi får se.

    Så jeg regner med at det ordner seg.

    At jeg bare må prate med the Jobcentre og universitetet, som jeg begge allerede har sendt e-poster til, tidligere i dag, (og jeg har også hatt et kort møte, med Leslie, i fra Accommodation Office, i dag morges, og hun sa at jeg fikk lov å bli, på det rommet jeg bor på nå, fram til jeg får bekreftelse på hvilke fag jeg skal studere, det neste året. Så sånn var det).

    Jeg har bare cirka 15 pund igjen på kontoen, så håper det går greit.

    (Jeg får handle litt mat på Aldi osv., og håpe at jeg får penger på tirsdag).

    Vi får se.

    Beklager at det blir litt lite bilder, som hjelper å dokumenterer dette, på bloggen nå, men jeg få se om jeg får kjøpt meg en sånn minnekort-leser, hvis jeg får penger, på tirsdag.

    Vi får se.

    Mvh.

    Erik Ribsskog

    PS 2.

    Jeg fikk med et brev, fra the Bailiff, (som jeg ikke har fått lest enda).

    Han sa at resten av tingene mine, ville bli satt i et ‘storage’.

    Og at jeg måtte kontakte the Landlord vel, for å få de tilbake.

    Noe sånt.

    Bare noe jeg tenkte på.

    Men vi får se hva som skjer.

    Vi får se.

    PS 3.

    Jeg prøvde å sende oppdateringer, fra mobilen min, til Twitter, da jeg satt på bussen til Sunderland, og etter at jeg hadde fått midlertidig bolig, på Clanny House.

    Men, jeg så nå, når jeg fikk ei som jobber på biblioteket her, (Murray Library), til å gi meg et dagspass, for internett, at Twitter-kontoen min ikke har blitt oppdatert.

    Så da er det nok noe problem med oppsettet på mobilen min, eller lignende, (vil jeg tippe på).

    Jeg har litt lite credit igjen på mobilen, men det skulle være nok til å sende noen SMS-er.

    Så hva som har skjedd der, det veit jeg ikke.

    Kanskje Twitter har fått nytt telefonnummer?

    Hvem vet.

    Mobilnummeret mitt, som var registrert der, var ihvertfall riktig.

    Men men.

    Hm.

    Men jeg får se mer på det seinere.

    Vi får se om jeg klarer det.

    Vi får se.

    PS 4.

    Jeg hadde egentlig tenkt å studere historie nå.

    Men jeg ringte det fakultetet fra the Gateway, og fikk til svar at det var fullt der.

    Noen studenter vel, (utenlandske vel, fra Pakistan, eller noe, vel), satt eller stod og så på/mer eller mindre overvåket, the Gateway.

    Jeg spurte om de stod i kø, men det gjorde de ikke, fikk jeg til svar.

    Så gudene vet hva dem drei med.

    Men men.

    Hm.

    Med forbehold om at det ikke var noe ‘tullings’.

    Men vi får se hva som skjer.

    Vi får se.

  • Jeg sendte en ny e-post til konsulatet i Liverpool







    Gmail – To Consul Peter Oranmore Copland







    Gmail


    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>



    To Consul Peter Oranmore Copland




    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>


    Thu, May 5, 2011 at 9:34 PM





    To:

    admin@lpl-norwegian-consulate.org.uk


    Cc:

    emb.london@mfa.no



    Hi,

    in 2007, I visited the consulate, in India Building, for a meeting, with Liz there, (who I think must be the vice-consul Elisabeth Murphy).
    I asked about some questions to do with an employment-case, I have, against Arvato, and I also asked her, why the Merseyside Police, have called me 'Miss Erik Ribsskog', in a letter.

    She answered that they were 'uneducated'.
    I have a blog and try to chat on the internet, but is being attacked, by mobsters, on the internet.
    I try to send this to the Police in Norway, (and also about other problems from when I lived in Norway), but they say they don't want me to report to them, since I don't live in Norway.

    (I'm really a refugee after someone tried to kill me, (a gang), in Kvelde in 2005 and after overhearing that I'm followed by the 'mafian', in Oslo, in 2003 and 2004).

    And, I think it's to degrading for me, to have much to do, with the Merseyside Police, after they've called me 'Miss'.
    Have the consulate done anything about this case?
    I now have no police-office to contact if I want to report a crime, to the Police.
    This I find not be ideal.
    So I try to clean up in this.
    Maybe the Merseyside Police could appologise for calling me 'Miss', or maybe they could go on a course or something, if they are uneducated.

    Because this situation isn't ideal, I think.
    I have complained to the IPCC, but they don't reply, (about the Merseyside Police, 18 complaints to do the employment-case, and more).
    And I've tried to send it to the EU, since the IPCC don't reply, but the EU don't deal with this properly, I think I have to say.
    Thanks in advance for any help!


    Yours sincerely,
    Erik Ribsskog





  • Jeg sendte enda en e-post til the Home Office







    Gmail – Second update/Fwd: Update/Fwd: FW: MOJ – Erik Ribsskog (2) – PPPU – 4/4/11







    Gmail


    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>



    Second update/Fwd: Update/Fwd: FW: MOJ – Erik Ribsskog (2) – PPPU – 4/4/11




    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>


    Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 5:29 PM





    To:

    public.enquiries@homeoffice.gsi.gov.uk


    Cc:

    inquiries2@un.org, emb.london@mfa.no, mail.gva@efta.int



    Hi again,

    sorry I'm sending many e-mails.
    But, I think the IPCC is what we call in Norway, a 'soup-council'.
    Maybe you should let the police-complaints follow the order-lines?

    Like it used to be in Norway, in the 70's, I think, if I remember my grandfather there, Øivind Olsen right, when the Norweigan IPCC was started, in the 70's or early 80's.
    If I remeber it right.

    Just as a suggestion.
    Best regards,
    Erik Ribsskog

    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

    Date: Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 4:44 PM
    Subject: Update/Fwd: FW: MOJ – Erik Ribsskog (2) – PPPU – 4/4/11
    To: public.enquiries@homeoffice.gsi.gov.uk
    Cc: inquiries2@un.org, emb.london@mfa.no, mail.gva@efta.int

    Hi,

    you also suggest that I should use the IPCC Complaint Procedure, and writes a link to their contact us-section at their website.
    But the IPCC stopped replying to my correspondence.

    So I haven't been able to go through any such complaint-procedure.
    But I've complained about the IPCC to the EU-commission, but the Danish EU-commission, just searched about my name and the Crown-princess of Norway, Mette-Marit, on Google, I saw on StatCounter, a tracking-cookie-program, that I have on my blog.

    This is IPCC in Manchester who are messing with me.
    In Manchester they have 'Kro'-restaurants, which are Danish-like, I think.
    My Danish-born grandmother, Ingeborg Ribsskog born Heegaard, was after old Danish royals and Woden, etc.

    There's also the Order of St. John, in my fathers new family, I saw by chance, in a Norwegian newspaper, (Aftenposten), archive.
    So I think it could be the Danes or the Order of St. John, or something, who are messing with my IPCC-case, etc.

    Just to try to level.
    Best regards,
    Erik Ribsskog

    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

    Date: Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 4:17 PM
    Subject: Re: FW: MOJ – Erik Ribsskog (2) – PPPU – 4/4/11
    To: public.enquiries@homeoffice.gsi.gov.uk

    Cc: inquiries2@un.org, emb.london@mfa.no, mail.gva@efta.int

    Hi,

    I've tried to apply to be a refugee, in the UK.
    (I overheard I was followed by the 'mafian', in Oslo, in 2003 and 2004, and was attempted to be killed, by a group of people, who I don't know who are, in Kvelde, in Norway, in 2005, so then I fled to the UK, (again, I also fled to the UK in 2004, when I went to study at the University of Sunderland).

    The Home Office, wouldn't let me apply to be a refugee.
    So I've complained about this to the Prime Ministers Office, and later the UN.
    So this is really a UN-case now, since a few years ago.

    (Even if the UN don't reply to my correspondence, for some reason).
    Just as an update.
    Best regards,
    Erik Ribsskog


    On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 3:29 PM, <public.enquiries@homeoffice.gsi.gov.uk> wrote:


    Reference : T6383/11

    Thank you for your e-mail enquiry of 06/04/2011 1:21:53 PM

    A reply is attached.

    **********************************************************************

    This email and any files transmitted with it are private and intended

    solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.

    If you have received this email in error please return it to the address

    it came from telling them it is not for you and then delete it from your system.

    This email message has been swept for computer viruses.

    **********************************************************************

    The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless Worldwide in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.

    Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes.





    PS.

    Her er mer om dette:

  • Jeg sendte en ny e-post til the Home Office







    Gmail – Update/Fwd: FW: MOJ – Erik Ribsskog (2) – PPPU – 4/4/11







    Gmail


    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>



    Update/Fwd: FW: MOJ – Erik Ribsskog (2) – PPPU – 4/4/11




    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>


    Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 4:44 PM





    To:

    public.enquiries@homeoffice.gsi.gov.uk


    Cc:

    inquiries2@un.org, emb.london@mfa.no, mail.gva@efta.int



    Hi,

    you also suggest that I should use the IPCC Complaint Procedure, and writes a link to their contact us-section at their website.
    But the IPCC stopped replying to my correspondence.

    So I haven't been able to go through any such complaint-procedure.
    But I've complained about the IPCC to the EU-commission, but the Danish EU-commission, just searched about my name and the Crown-princess of Norway, Mette-Marit, on Google, I saw on StatCounter, a tracking-cookie-program, that I have on my blog.

    This is IPCC in Manchester who are messing with me.
    In Manchester they have 'Kro'-restaurants, which are Danish-like, I think.
    My Danish-born grandmother, Ingeborg Ribsskog born Heegaard, was after old Danish royals and Woden, etc.

    There's also the Order of St. John, in my fathers new family, I saw by chance, in a Norwegian newspaper, (Aftenposten), archive.
    So I think it could be the Danes or the Order of St. John, or something, who are messing with my IPCC-case, etc.

    Just to try to level.
    Best regards,
    Erik Ribsskog

    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

    Date: Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 4:17 PM
    Subject: Re: FW: MOJ – Erik Ribsskog (2) – PPPU – 4/4/11
    To: public.enquiries@homeoffice.gsi.gov.uk
    Cc: inquiries2@un.org, emb.london@mfa.no, mail.gva@efta.int

    Hi,

    I've tried to apply to be a refugee, in the UK.
    (I overheard I was followed by the 'mafian', in Oslo, in 2003 and 2004, and was attempted to be killed, by a group of people, who I don't know who are, in Kvelde, in Norway, in 2005, so then I fled to the UK, (again, I also fled to the UK in 2004, when I went to study at the University of Sunderland).

    The Home Office, wouldn't let me apply to be a refugee.
    So I've complained about this to the Prime Ministers Office, and later the UN.
    So this is really a UN-case now, since a few years ago.

    (Even if the UN don't reply to my correspondence, for some reason).
    Just as an update.
    Best regards,
    Erik Ribsskog


    On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 3:29 PM, <public.enquiries@homeoffice.gsi.gov.uk> wrote:


    Reference : T6383/11

    Thank you for your e-mail enquiry of 06/04/2011 1:21:53 PM

    A reply is attached.

    **********************************************************************

    This email and any files transmitted with it are private and intended

    solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.

    If you have received this email in error please return it to the address

    it came from telling them it is not for you and then delete it from your system.

    This email message has been swept for computer viruses.

    **********************************************************************

    The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless Worldwide in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.

    Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes.





  • Jeg sendte en oppdatering til EFTA







    Gmail – Update/Fwd: Your correspondence with the IPCC regarding Merseyside Police







    Gmail


    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>



    Update/Fwd: Your correspondence with the IPCC regarding Merseyside Police




    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>


    Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 11:27 AM





    To:

    mail.gva@efta.int


    Cc:

    "general.queries@justice.gsi.gov.uk" <general.queries@justice.gsi.gov.uk>, inquiries2@un.org, emb.london@mfa.no



    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: Caroline Wilson <Caroline.Wilson@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk>

    Date: Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 10:30 AM
    Subject: Your correspondence with the IPCC regarding Merseyside Police
    To: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

    Dear Mr Ribsskog

    I acknowledge receipt of your emails sent on 23 March 2011. In order to clarify our position and respond to your further queries, I would like to explain the following:

    The Police Reform Act 2002 (the legislation that governs the complaints process), states that the same complaint cannot be made twice therefore if your allegations against Merseyside Police are the same as those made in 2007, you cannot repeat them. I reiterate that a dispensation was granted in your previous complaint which concluded the matter. However, if you feel that you have new allegations about Merseyside Police, I invite you to provide further information regarding your complaint in order that your new allegations can be considered fully. You can do this via the link provided in my earlier email.

    You asked about the reference to "TRIM" within the subject line of my email. I should explain that this is simply the name of a computer system used to store correspondence received by the IPCC.

    If you wish to make a complaint about the IPCC, our internal complaints department can be contacted via email at iiu@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk.

    I hope this information has been helpful to you.

    Your sincerely

    Caroline Wilson

    Customer Contact Advisor

    Independent Police Complaints Commission

    1st Floor, Oaklands House,

    Washway Road, Sale,

    M33 6FS

    Tel: 0161 246 8561

    Email:caroline.wilson@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk

    The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless Worldwide in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.

    Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes.





  • Jeg sendte en ny e-post til IPCC







    Gmail – RE: TRIM: Re: Your concerns about Merseyside Police







    Gmail


    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>



    RE: TRIM: Re: Your concerns about Merseyside Police




    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>


    Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 5:07 PM





    To:

    Caroline Wilson <Caroline.Wilson@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk>


    Cc:

    inquiries2@un.org



    Besides, one can't trust the English police because they are pigs, I learned when I was at summer-school, in Brighton, in the 80's.

    Erik Ribsskog
    ———- Forwarded message ———-

    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
    Date: Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 4:32 PM
    Subject: Fwd: TRIM: Re: Your concerns about Merseyside Police

    To: Caroline Wilson <Caroline.Wilson@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk>
    Cc: inquiries2@un.org


    Trim may refer to:

    • Cutting small pieces off something

    Is this the same as the Merseyside Police call me miss that your a mafia-whore, and to cut my pecker off?
    Erik Ribsskog


    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
    Date: Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 4:22 PM

    Subject: Fwd: TRIM: Re: Your concerns about Merseyside Police
    To: Caroline Wilson <Caroline.Wilson@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk>
    Cc: inquiries2@un.org

    And first you refer to my complaint, from 2007, and comment about it, and then in the next e-mail you don't want to discuss the complaint you brought up yourself.

    That's very strange I think.

    And this with Trim, on top of that.

    This is very strange I think.
    I think maybe someone in charge, at the IPCC, should answer about this, and give me a second opinion, if that's alright.

    Hope this is alright!

    Regards,

    Erik Ribsskog

    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>


    Date: Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 4:17 PM
    Subject: Fwd: TRIM: Re: Your concerns about Merseyside Police
    To: Caroline Wilson <Caroline.Wilson@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk>

    Cc: inquiries2@un.org

    Who is Trim by the way, if I can ask.

    Erik Ribsskog
    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

    Date: Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 4:13 PM
    Subject: Re: TRIM: Re: Your concerns about Merseyside Police
    To: Caroline Wilson <Caroline.Wilson@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk>

    Cc: inquiries2@un.org

    Hi,

    thank you very much for your e-mail!
    Are you sure I should write a new complaint about the same issues?
    Shouldn't the old case have been cleaned up?

    The complaint-process just stalled, and has never been put back right again.
    Shouldn't someone investigate what has been goving on?
    Do you have an IPCC complaint-unit?

    (Since I think it's a bit strange that I have to complain about the same issues twice).
    Best regards,

    Erik Ribsskog

    On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 4:01 PM, Caroline Wilson <Caroline.Wilson@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk> wrote:

    Dear Mr Ribsskog

    Thank you for your email.

    The IPCC is an independent organisation, I am

    therefore unable to comment on your complaint about Merseyside Police. I

    have provided you with details of how to make a complaint against them and can

    only advise that you consider submitting a new complaint in order to progress

    matters.

    I have not looked in detail at your previous cases and

    complaints with the IPCC as I did not consider this to be relevant to your

    enquiry. Your comments have been noted but I have nothing further to add on

    this matter.

    Yours sincerely

    Caroline Wilson

    Customer Contact

    Advisor
    Independent Police Complaints Commission

    1st Floor,

    Oaklands House,
    Washway Road, Sale,
    M33 6FS
    Tel:

    0161 246 8561
    Email:caroline.wilson@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk

    From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

    Sent: 23 March 2011 14:19
    To: Caroline Wilson
    Cc:

    inquiries2@un.org
    Subject: TRIM: Re: Your concerns about Merseyside

    Police

    Hi,

    so you think it's ok for the Merseyside Police to call me 'Miss Erik

    Ribsskog'?

    I also wrote an appeal, to the IPCC, which was upheld.

    Why don't you mention this in your summary?

    Have the files been messed with?

    Erik Ribsskog

    On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Caroline Wilson <Caroline.Wilson@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk>

    wrote:

    Dear Mr

    Ribsskog

    Thank you

    for your email, I am sorry that you did not find the information helpful.

    Having checked our records I note that you sent in a complaint about

    Merseyside Police to the IPCC in 2007. With your consent, we

    forwarded your complaint to them for their consideration in line

    with our procedures. I note that Merseyside Police applied for a dispensation,

    which means that they decided that no further action should be taken, and that

    this was approved by the IPCC, which concluded the matter.

    If you

    wish to make a new complaint about Merseyside Police, you may do so by

    completing the online form on the IPCC website, the link to which I provided

    in my previous email. By law all complaints of misconduct against the

    police must be recorded. The IPCC does not have the power to record complaints

    and any complaint that you submit to us will, in the first instance, be

    forwarded to the Professional Standards Department of Merseyside Police for a

    recording decision, as they are the appropriate authority. I should explain

    that we are unable to forward your complaint unless you give us your consent

    to do so. In other words, if you wish to make a complaint about misconduct of

    Merseyside Police officers you need to be willing to engage with

    them.

    As a way

    forward, I would therefore suggest that you include any concerns you have

    about misconduct of Merseyside Police officers on the online form and submit

    this to begin the complaints procedure through the appropriate

    channels.

    Yours

    sincerely

    Caroline

    Wilson
    Customer Contact Advisor
    Independent Police

    Complaints Commission
    1st Floor, Oaklands House,

    Washway Road, Sale,

    M33 6FS
    Tel: 0161 246 8561
    Email:caroline.wilson@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk

    From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

    Sent: 22 March 2011 16:54
    To: Caroline

    Wilson
    Cc: joe.anderson@liverpool.gov.uk; inquiries2@un.org; mail.gva@efta.int; Harker,

    David; emb.london@mfa.no;

    Liverpool County, Enquiries
    Subject: TRIM: Re: Your email

    correspondence to the IPCC

    Hi,

    no, this isn't helpful at all.

    If you read the e-mail again, it should be possible for you to

    understand, that this is a complaint, on that you haven't processed the

    complaint against the Merseyside Police, which I sent you, 3 or 4 years

    ago.

    Now it looks to me, like you make yourself dumb, like we say in

    Norway.

    Have you read my e-mail at all, I'm wondering.

    Sorry if I'm direct now, but I'm really very disappointed in

    you.

    But you have been messing me around for years, so I guess you, (the

    IPCC), will find a way out of this, so that you don't have to do your job,

    again.

    Also at least one of the people writing to me, on behalf of the

    Liverpool County Court today, was a hoax, it seems, from what the County Court

    wrote me directly.

    I think it's so degrading for me to contact the Merseyside Police now,

    after they've called me 'Miss Erik Ribsskog', and after you've not charged

    them/told them off, for this, so I don't like to contact them.

    But I mention it now.

    I'm not sure if I should write regards since you are just messing with

    me, I think,

    Erik Ribsskog

    PS.

    I'm also sending this as an update to the organisations I sent to

    earlier today.

    On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 4:41 PM, Caroline Wilson <Caroline.Wilson@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk> wrote:

    Dear Mr

    Ribsskog

    Thank you for

    writing to the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC).

    We are an independent body responsible for

    making sure that the police complaints system in England and Wales works

    effectively and fairly.

    It appears that you have

    included the IPCC in correspondence sent to Liverpool County Court relating

    to difficulties you have been experiencing with your landlord. I should

    explain that the IPCC is unable to assist you with these particular issues

    as they do not fall within our remit. You may wish to contact the Citizen's

    Advice Bureau for further advice on how to deal with these

    matters.

    You have however mentioned

    that you complained about Merseyside Police several years ago, but it is not

    clear from your correspondence whether you wish to make a new

    complaint against this police force. I thought it may be helpful to

    explain the process involved, should you wish to

    complain.

    You

    can only make a complaint against the police if you:

    ·

    have

    been the victim of the alleged misconduct of a person serving with the

    police (misconduct could include a police officer or member of police staff

    being rude to you or using unnecessary force, an unlawful arrest, or a

    police officer abusing your rights);

    ·

    were

    present when the alleged misconduct took place, or were close enough to see

    or hear the misconduct, and as a result suffered loss, damage, distress or

    inconvenience, or were put in danger or at risk;

    ·

    are a

    friend or relative of the victim of the alleged misconduct, and

    were distressed by the effects of the incident on the

    victim;

    ·

    witnessed the alleged misconduct; or

    ·

    are

    acting on behalf of any of the above.

    When we receive a complaint, the IPCC must seek the complainant’s

    consent in order to forward the matter to the police force

    concerned. The complaint is then assessed by

    the police and they will decide whether to record it officially.

    If you wish

    to make a complaint about police misconduct, further details about the

    process, as well as our online form can be accessed via the following web

    page:

    http://www.ipcc.gov.uk/Pages/how_complaint.aspx

    I hope this

    response has been helpful to you.

    Yours

    sincerely

    Caroline

    Wilson
    Customer Contact

    Advisor
    Independent

    Police Complaints Commission
    1st Floor, Oaklands

    House,
    Washway Road,

    Sale,
    M33

    6FS
    Tel: 0161 246

    8561
    Email:caroline.wilson@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk

    From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

    Sent: 22 March 2011 12:00
    To: Liverpool County,

    Enquiries
    Cc: joe.anderson@liverpool.gov.uk; inquiries2@un.org; mail.gva@efta.int; Harker,

    David; emb.london@mfa.no
    Subject: Re: To the Superior

    of Mr. Johan Hawley/Fwd: Update/Fwd: To the s uperior of Johan Hawley/Fwd:

    Update/Fwd: Taking my landlord to the County …

    (Caroline)

    Hi,

    thank you for your reply!

    This hoax made me distracted now.

    What initiated my first e-mail was that my Landlord claims he can

    throw me out, without a possession order.

    It's really my Landlord who's supposed to contact the County Court, and

    not me.

    So it's just that my Landlord is writing a lot of non-sense that

    upsets me really.

    Sorry about this!

    Best regards,

    Erik Ribsskog

    PS.

    Here's more about what my Landlord writes:

    From: Kieron Grimes <kierongrimes@tjthomas.co.uk>

    Date: Mon, Mar

    21, 2011 at 3:34 PM
    Subject: Your situation…
    To: eribsskog@gmail.com

    Eric,

    Now there is

    only 2 weeks before your departure.
    I read on your blog you are trying to

    postpone the kick-out, however this idea of yours will never work. I have

    many years experience handling bad tennants, and the same tactic is used

    every time(quoting a law paragraph, hardly any relevance of the

    situation).

    I hope you find a new place in Liverpool. I don't

    understand why you don't look for a new place, as I doubt you want to be

    homeless or live in a church.

    We will meet soon, as I will come to

    the apartment 3th of April to deliver a good-bye

    gift.

    Sincerly,

    Kieron

    Grimes



    PS 2.

    I want to do this properly.

    I don't like it that Mr. Grimes want's to go here with a

    presant.

    I want this to be dealt with in court.

    But like I wrote above, it's really my Landlord who has to take

    this to Court, and what upset me in his e-mail is really just non-sense, the

    way I see it.

    I think I should start to work out a bit more, then maybe I don't

    care about phoney stuff like this.

    The Merseyside Police have called me 'Miss Erik Ribsskog', in a

    letter, that I've put in a compaint of 18 points to IPCC, 3 or 4 yeats ago,

    which they don't reply to.

    Or else I would have sent about the hoax

    with Mr. Johan Hayley to the Merseyside Police.

    But now I think this would be to degrading for me to do, when the

    Merseyside Police haven't been told off, for calling me 'Miss Erik

    Ribsskog'.

    Just to update.

    Thanks again for your reply!

    On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 11:32 AM, Liverpool County,

    Enquiries <enquiries@liverpool.countycourt.gsi.gov.uk>

    wrote:

    Good

    Morning,

    The county Court

    has received a number or emails from you today, but I must inform you that

    we do not have a member of staff by the name of Johan Hayley working at

    this court. I you wish to take out proceedings at court you must seek some

    legal advice to ensure that you take out the correct type of

    process.

    Regards

    Jim

    Reid

    J

    Reid

    Issue /File

    Registry

    Liverpool Civil

    & Family Court

    Tel: 0151 296

    2403

    —–Original

    Message—–
    From: Erik

    Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
    Sent: 22 March 2011 11:15
    To: enquiries@liverpool.countycourt.gsi.gov.uk

    Cc: joe.anderson@liverpool.gov.uk; inquiries2@un.org; mail.gva@efta.int;

    Harker, David; emb.london@mfa.no
    Subject: To the Superior of Mr. Johan

    Hawley/Fwd: Update/Fwd: To the superior of Johan Hawley/Fwd: Update/Fwd:

    Taking my landlord to the County…

    Hi,

    why do I get an answer e-mail from

    Mr. Johan Hawley, when I send this to the Superior of Mr. Johan

    Hawley.

    I want to bring this case up in the

    County Court, that's my main objective in this.

    Could I please get a reply from Mr.

    Hawleys line-manager, telling me how to do this, if that's

    alright?


    Best regards,

    Erik

    Ribsskog

    ———- Forwarded message

    ———-
    From: Liverpool County

    Court     <enquiries@liverpool.countycourt.gsi.gov.uk>
    Date:

    Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 11:06 AM
    Subject: RE: Update/Fwd: To the superior

    of Johan Hawley/Fwd: Update/Fwd: Taking my landlord to the

    County…
    To: eribsskog@gmail.com

    I'm afraid UK do not have

    the castle doctrine laws. Please search "castle doctrine UK" to see

    evidence or call a lawcentre.

    Also, it's highly unlikely that the

    Council, Merseyside Police, IPCC, Landlord, Microsoft, Order of St. John,

    Goverment in Norway, Goverment in UK, Brits, Muslims or Muslims gangs,

    Illuminists and CAB is messing to you at the same time as you state in the

    emails.

    Instead of emailing what I would belive is prank to us, I

    would recommend you to meet us at our centre to discuss this in detail and

    in a formal manner.

    Regards,

    Johan Hawley

    35

    Vernon Street
    Liverpool Merseyside
    England
    L2 2BX

    DX

    702600 Liverpool 5

    Court number 251


    This email was received from the

    INTERNET and scanned by the Government Secure Intranet anti-virus service

    supplied by Cable&Wireless Worldwide in partnership with MessageLabs.

    (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) In case of problems, please call

    your organisation's IT Helpdesk.
    Communications via the GSi may be

    automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal

    purposes.

    This e-mail

    (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of
    the

    addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying
    is

    not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy

    all
    copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.

    Internet

    e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message
    could be

    intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in
    mind when

    deciding whether to send material in response to this message
    by

    e-mail.

    This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient)

    may be
    monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice.

    E-mail
    monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content

    may be
    read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are

    not
    broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their

    contents.
    The original of this email was scanned for viruses by

    the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by

    Cable&Wireless Worldwide in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM

    Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) On leaving the GSi this email was

    certified virus free.
    Communications via the GSi may be automatically

    logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal

    purposes.

    This email was received

    from the INTERNET and scanned by the Government Secure Intranet anti-virus

    service supplied by Cable&Wireless Worldwide in partnership with

    MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) In case of problems,

    please call your organisation’s IT Helpdesk.
    Communications via the GSi

    may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal

    purposes.

    The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the

    Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by

    Cable&Wireless Worldwide in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM

    Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) On leaving the GSi this email was

    certified virus free.
    Communications via the GSi may be automatically

    logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal

    purposes.

    This email was received

    from the INTERNET and scanned by the Government Secure Intranet anti-virus

    service supplied by Cable&Wireless Worldwide in partnership with

    MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) In case of problems,

    please call your organisation’s IT Helpdesk.
    Communications via the GSi

    may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal

    purposes.

    The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the

    Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by

    Cable&Wireless Worldwide in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM

    Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified

    virus free.
    Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged,

    monitored and/or recorded for legal

    purposes.

    This email was received from

    the INTERNET and scanned by the Government Secure Intranet anti-virus service

    supplied by Cable&Wireless Worldwide in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM

    Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) In case of problems, please call your

    organisation’s IT Helpdesk.
    Communications via the GSi may be automatically

    logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes.

    The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless Worldwide in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.

    Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes.





  • Jeg sendte en ny e-post til IPCC







    Gmail – Your concerns about Merseyside Police







    Gmail


    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>



    Your concerns about Merseyside Police




    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>


    Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 2:18 PM





    To:

    Caroline Wilson <Caroline.Wilson@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk>


    Cc:

    inquiries2@un.org



    Hi,

    so you think it's ok for the Merseyside Police to call me 'Miss Erik Ribsskog'?
    I also wrote an appeal, to the IPCC, which was upheld.
    Why don't you mention this in your summary?

    Have the files been messed with?
    Erik Ribsskog

    On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Caroline Wilson <Caroline.Wilson@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk> wrote:

    Dear Mr Ribsskog

    Thank you for your email, I am sorry that you did not find

    the information helpful. Having checked our records I note that you sent in

    a complaint about Merseyside Police to the IPCC in 2007. With your

    consent, we forwarded your complaint to them for their consideration

    in line with our procedures. I note that Merseyside Police applied for a

    dispensation, which means that they decided that no further action should be

    taken, and that this was approved by the IPCC, which concluded the

    matter.

    If you wish to make a new complaint about Merseyside

    Police, you may do so by completing the online form on the IPCC website, the

    link to which I provided in my previous email. By law all complaints of

    misconduct against the police must be recorded. The IPCC does not have the

    power to record complaints and any complaint that you submit to us will, in the

    first instance, be forwarded to the Professional Standards Department of

    Merseyside Police for a recording decision, as they are the appropriate

    authority. I should explain that we are unable to forward your complaint unless

    you give us your consent to do so. In other words, if you wish to make a

    complaint about misconduct of Merseyside Police officers you need to be

    willing to engage with them.

    As a way forward, I would therefore suggest that you

    include any concerns you have about misconduct of Merseyside Police officers on

    the online form and submit this to begin the complaints procedure through the

    appropriate channels.

    Yours sincerely

    Caroline Wilson

    Customer Contact

    Advisor
    Independent Police Complaints Commission

    1st Floor,

    Oaklands House,
    Washway Road, Sale,
    M33 6FS
    Tel:

    0161 246 8561
    Email:caroline.wilson@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk

    From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

    Sent: 22 March 2011 16:54
    To: Caroline Wilson
    Cc:

    joe.anderson@liverpool.gov.uk; inquiries2@un.org; mail.gva@efta.int; Harker,

    David; emb.london@mfa.no; Liverpool County, Enquiries
    Subject: TRIM:

    Re: Your email correspondence to the IPCC

    Hi,

    no, this isn't helpful at all.

    If you read the e-mail again, it should be possible for you to

    understand, that this is a complaint, on that you haven't processed the

    complaint against the Merseyside Police, which I sent you, 3 or 4 years

    ago.

    Now it looks to me, like you make yourself dumb, like we say in

    Norway.

    Have you read my e-mail at all, I'm wondering.

    Sorry if I'm direct now, but I'm really very disappointed in

    you.

    But you have been messing me around for years, so I guess you, (the IPCC),

    will find a way out of this, so that you don't have to do your job, again.

    Also at least one of the people writing to me, on behalf of the

    Liverpool County Court today, was a hoax, it seems, from what the County Court

    wrote me directly.

    I think it's so degrading for me to contact the Merseyside Police now,

    after they've called me 'Miss Erik Ribsskog', and after you've not charged

    them/told them off, for this, so I don't like to contact them.

    But I mention it now.

    I'm not sure if I should write regards since you are just messing with me,

    I think,

    Erik Ribsskog

    PS.

    I'm also sending this as an update to the organisations I sent to

    earlier today.

    On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 4:41 PM, Caroline Wilson <Caroline.Wilson@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk>

    wrote:

    Dear Mr

    Ribsskog

    Thank you for

    writing to the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC).

    We are an independent body responsible for

    making sure that the police complaints system in England and Wales works

    effectively and fairly.

    It appears that you have

    included the IPCC in correspondence sent to Liverpool County Court relating to

    difficulties you have been experiencing with your landlord. I should explain

    that the IPCC is unable to assist you with these particular issues as they do

    not fall within our remit. You may wish to contact the Citizen's Advice Bureau

    for further advice on how to deal with these

    matters.

    You have however mentioned

    that you complained about Merseyside Police several years ago, but it is not

    clear from your correspondence whether you wish to make a new complaint

    against this police force. I thought it may be helpful to explain the

    process involved, should you wish to

    complain.

    You can

    only make a complaint against the police if you:

    ·

    have been

    the victim of the alleged misconduct of a person serving with the police

    (misconduct could include a police officer or member of police staff being

    rude to you or using unnecessary force, an unlawful arrest, or a police

    officer abusing your rights);

    ·

    were

    present when the alleged misconduct took place, or were close enough to see or

    hear the misconduct, and as a result suffered loss, damage, distress or

    inconvenience, or were put in danger or at risk;

    ·

    are a

    friend or relative of the victim of the alleged misconduct, and

    were distressed by the effects of the incident on the

    victim;

    ·

    witnessed

    the alleged misconduct; or

    ·

    are acting

    on behalf of any of the above.

    When we receive a complaint, the IPCC must seek the complainant’s

    consent in order to forward the matter to the police force

    concerned. The complaint is then assessed by

    the police and they will decide whether to record it officially.

    If you wish to

    make a complaint about police misconduct, further details about the process,

    as well as our online form can be accessed via the following web page:

    http://www.ipcc.gov.uk/Pages/how_complaint.aspx

    I hope this

    response has been helpful to you.

    Yours

    sincerely

    Caroline

    Wilson
    Customer Contact

    Advisor
    Independent

    Police Complaints Commission
    1st Floor, Oaklands

    House,
    Washway Road,

    Sale,
    M33

    6FS
    Tel: 0161 246

    8561
    Email:caroline.wilson@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk

    From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

    Sent: 22 March 2011 12:00
    To: Liverpool County,

    Enquiries
    Cc: joe.anderson@liverpool.gov.uk; inquiries2@un.org; mail.gva@efta.int; Harker,

    David; emb.london@mfa.no
    Subject: Re: To the Superior of

    Mr. Johan Hawley/Fwd: Update/Fwd: To the s uperior of Johan Hawley/Fwd:

    Update/Fwd: Taking my landlord to the County …

    (Caroline)

    Hi,

    thank you for your reply!

    This hoax made me distracted now.

    What initiated my first e-mail was that my Landlord claims he can

    throw me out, without a possession order.

    It's really my Landlord who's supposed to contact the County Court, and

    not me.

    So it's just that my Landlord is writing a lot of non-sense that

    upsets me really.

    Sorry about this!

    Best regards,

    Erik Ribsskog

    PS.

    Here's more about what my Landlord writes:

    From: Kieron Grimes <kierongrimes@tjthomas.co.uk>

    Date: Mon, Mar 21,

    2011 at 3:34 PM
    Subject: Your situation…
    To: eribsskog@gmail.com

    Eric,

    Now there is

    only 2 weeks before your departure.
    I read on your blog you are trying to

    postpone the kick-out, however this idea of yours will never work. I have many

    years experience handling bad tennants, and the same tactic is used every

    time(quoting a law paragraph, hardly any relevance of the situation).

    I

    hope you find a new place in Liverpool. I don't understand why you don't look

    for a new place, as I doubt you want to be homeless or live in a

    church.

    We will meet soon, as I will come to the apartment 3th of April

    to deliver a good-bye gift.

    Sincerly,

    Kieron

    Grimes



    PS 2.

    I want to do this properly.

    I don't like it that Mr. Grimes want's to go here with a

    presant.

    I want this to be dealt with in court.

    But like I wrote above, it's really my Landlord who has to take this

    to Court, and what upset me in his e-mail is really just non-sense, the way I

    see it.

    I think I should start to work out a bit more, then maybe I don't

    care about phoney stuff like this.

    The Merseyside Police have called me 'Miss Erik Ribsskog', in a

    letter, that I've put in a compaint of 18 points to IPCC, 3 or 4 yeats ago,

    which they don't reply to.

    Or else I would have sent about the hoax

    with Mr. Johan Hayley to the Merseyside Police.

    But now I think this would be to degrading for me to do, when the

    Merseyside Police haven't been told off, for calling me 'Miss Erik

    Ribsskog'.

    Just to update.

    Thanks again for your reply!

    On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 11:32 AM, Liverpool County,

    Enquiries <enquiries@liverpool.countycourt.gsi.gov.uk>

    wrote:

    Good

    Morning,

    The county Court

    has received a number or emails from you today, but I must inform you that

    we do not have a member of staff by the name of Johan Hayley working at this

    court. I you wish to take out proceedings at court you must seek some legal

    advice to ensure that you take out the correct type of

    process.

    Regards

    Jim

    Reid

    J

    Reid

    Issue /File

    Registry

    Liverpool Civil

    & Family Court

    Tel: 0151 296

    2403

    —–Original

    Message—–
    From: Erik

    Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
    Sent: 22 March 2011 11:15
    To: enquiries@liverpool.countycourt.gsi.gov.uk

    Cc: joe.anderson@liverpool.gov.uk; inquiries2@un.org; mail.gva@efta.int; Harker,

    David; emb.london@mfa.no
    Subject: To the Superior of Mr. Johan

    Hawley/Fwd: Update/Fwd: To the superior of Johan Hawley/Fwd: Update/Fwd:

    Taking my landlord to the County…

    Hi,

    why do I get an answer e-mail from Mr.

    Johan Hawley, when I send this to the Superior of Mr. Johan

    Hawley.

    I want to bring this case up in the

    County Court, that's my main objective in this.

    Could I please get a reply from Mr.

    Hawleys line-manager, telling me how to do this, if that's

    alright?


    Best regards,

    Erik

    Ribsskog

    ———- Forwarded message

    ———-
    From: Liverpool County

    Court     <enquiries@liverpool.countycourt.gsi.gov.uk>
    Date:

    Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 11:06 AM
    Subject: RE: Update/Fwd: To the superior of

    Johan Hawley/Fwd: Update/Fwd: Taking my landlord to the County…
    To: eribsskog@gmail.com

    I'm afraid UK do not have

    the castle doctrine laws. Please search "castle doctrine UK" to see evidence

    or call a lawcentre.

    Also, it's highly unlikely that the Council,

    Merseyside Police, IPCC, Landlord, Microsoft, Order of St. John, Goverment

    in Norway, Goverment in UK, Brits, Muslims or Muslims gangs, Illuminists and

    CAB is messing to you at the same time as you state in the

    emails.

    Instead of emailing what I would belive is prank to us, I

    would recommend you to meet us at our centre to discuss this in detail and

    in a formal manner.

    Regards,

    Johan Hawley

    35 Vernon

    Street
    Liverpool Merseyside
    England
    L2 2BX

    DX 702600

    Liverpool 5

    Court number 251


    This email was received from the

    INTERNET and scanned by the Government Secure Intranet anti-virus service

    supplied by Cable&Wireless Worldwide in partnership with MessageLabs.

    (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) In case of problems, please call

    your organisation's IT Helpdesk.
    Communications via the GSi may be

    automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal

    purposes.

    This e-mail

    (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of
    the

    addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying
    is not

    permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy

    all
    copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.

    Internet e-mail

    is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message
    could be intercepted

    and read by someone else. Please bear that in
    mind when deciding whether

    to send material in response to this message
    by e-mail.

    This

    e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be
    monitored,

    recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail
    monitoring /

    blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be
    read at any

    time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not
    broken when

    composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.
    The original

    of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet

    virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless Worldwide in

    partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) On

    leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.
    Communications via

    the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal

    purposes.

    This email was received

    from the INTERNET and scanned by the Government Secure Intranet anti-virus

    service supplied by Cable&Wireless Worldwide in partnership with

    MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) In case of problems,

    please call your organisation’s IT Helpdesk.
    Communications via the GSi

    may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal

    purposes.

    The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the

    Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by

    Cable&Wireless Worldwide in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM

    Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified

    virus free.
    Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged,

    monitored and/or recorded for legal

    purposes.

    This email was received from

    the INTERNET and scanned by the Government Secure Intranet anti-virus service

    supplied by Cable&Wireless Worldwide in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM

    Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) In case of problems, please call your

    organisation’s IT Helpdesk.
    Communications via the GSi may be automatically

    logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes.

    The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless Worldwide in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.

    Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes.