I’m escalating this to the top of the Ministry, since it seems to me

that there is a problem in your ministry,

with that the people working there, pretends to not understand what

I’m complaining to you about.

That they make themselves a bit stupid, one can say.

This is how it seems to me, after communicating with the Home Office.

I’ll explain more about this.

I’ve contacted you since the IPCC aren’t returning phone-calls, and

aren’t answering e-mails, that I sent

to them, almost a year ago now.

This can’t be explained as a slight delay, like I was told by you, in

the previous correspondence.

And you also write, that you have no influence on IPCC decitions.

But this isn’t about IPCC desition-making.

I’m not asking you to interfere with that.

But, I’ve been informed, by the Ministry of Justice, that the IPCC is

sorting under the Home Office

ADMINISTRATIVLY.

I’m writing that word in captial letters, since you in the Home

Office, don’t seem to want to understand, that

I’m not complaining to you, about IPCC desition-making.

I’m complaining to you, on that the IPCC is poorly administrated.

Since they don’t return phone-calls, and they don’t answer e-mails

I’ve sent them, even if I’ve also sent

reminder e-mails.

So this is poor administration of the IPCC, I think.

I’ve been informed, like I explained, that the IPCC is sorting under

the Home Office administratively.

So therefore it’s your responsibility, at the Home Office, to recieve

and deal with the complaint on the IPCC

poor administration, since they sort under you administrativly, since

they recieve founding from your budget.

I’m begining to be a bit bored of repeating this in several e-mails to

the Home Office.

Please stop pretending not to understand this now, or I have to

contact the Prime Ministers Office again.

I’m sorry that I’m very direct in this e-mail, but it’s a bit

frusterating, having to write the same again and again.

(And there are also problems with you minstry, that you could look at

seperatly, if that isn’t to much of an

abrastaction.

Why do your representatives pretend to be a bit stupid, and why do the

Home Office repeatedly send ‘scrambeled’

attachments.

This could seem like ‘time-delaying’ to me.

This within the paranteses, is not the IPCC complaint, but a seperate

Home Office complaint, that you can look at,

if it’s not to much of an abstraction, with to complaints at the same time.).

I’m again sorry that I’m writing this complaint very direct, but I’m

sorry to say that I’ve run a bit out of patience with

the Home Office now, so that’s the reason for the direct tone.

But I trust that these problems will be sorted now, since I’m sending

this e-mail to the top of the Ministry.

So I’m confident, or at least I hope, that I wont be disapointed with

you yet again, like when I’ve recieved your previous

e-mails, regarding these problems.

Yours sincerely,

I’m refering to your e-letter of 24. November, with the reference:

T23047/8, which I recieved today.

You write that ‘Having been in contact with IPCC officials, I am

informed that the IPCC is working to a slight backlog’.

But, the problem that I’m contacting you about isn’t to do with

backlog, unfortunatly.

The problem is that the IPCC aren’t answering e-mails and returing

phone-calls, that are from more than half a year ago.

(From the month of March, this year).

So they aren’t answering me back at all.

So this is a problem that I think the Home Office has to sort out,

since the IPCC are administratively sorting under the

Home Office, as I’ve understood it.

Yours sincerley,

I can’t see that I’ve recieved an answer to this e-mail yet, so I’m

sending it again.

Yours sincerely,

Erik Ribsskog

———- Forwarded message ———-

From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

Date: Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 3:47 PM

Subject: Fwd: Document14

To: public.enquiries@homeoffice.gsi.gov.uk

Hi,

I’m just trying to send this e-mail again, to the e-mail address on

your website, since I haven’t

recieved an answer yet, from the e-mail address that was used to send

me your last letter.

Yours sincerely,

Erik Ribsskog

———- Forwarded message ———-

From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

Date: Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 9:37 AM

Subject: Re: Document14

To: CTS Public enquiry account 1 <PUBLICENQ1@homeoffice.gsi.gov.uk>

To Mr. Kevin Allen/Reference:  T20645/8

Thank you for your letter, that I recieved today.

You write that I’m unhappy with the IPCC investigation.

But no, this is not why I wrote you.

I’m unhappy with that the IPCC aren’t answering my e-mails at all.

So they aren’t communitaction.

So we can’t get to communicate about any investigation.

So who should one contact, if the IPCC, aren’t answering their

phone-calls and e-mails?

Yours sincerely,

Erik Ribsskog

On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 9:15 AM, CTS Public enquiry account 1

<PUBLICENQ1@homeoffice.gsi.gov.uk> wrote:

> Please see attached response.

>

> **********************************************************************

> This email and any files transmitted with it are private and intended

> solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.

> If you have received this email in error please return it to the address

> it came from telling them it is not for you and then delete it from your

> system.

>

> This email message has been swept for computer viruses.

>

> **********************************************************************

>

> The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure

> Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless in partnership

> with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2007/11/0032.) On leaving the GSi

> this email was certified virus free.

> Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or

> recorded for legal purposes.

>