johncons

Stikkord: Klage

  • Mer om Twitter-klage, (Robert_Jeffe)


    Gmail – #7146569 Twitter Support: update on “Offensive content – Robert_Jeffe”

    Gmail


    Erik Ribsskog
    <eribsskog@gmail.com>



    #7146569 Twitter Support: update on “Offensive content – Robert_Jeffe”



    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>


    Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 1:13 AM

    To:
    Twitter Support <support+id7146569@twitter.zendesk.com>

    Hi,
    I think the way you respond to the complaints I’m sending you, at Twitter, seems very inconsistent.
    So I would have wanted to please escalate this complaint, for a second opinion.

    Hope this is alright!
    Regards,
    Erik Ribsskog

    On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 8:25 PM, walterhcampbell <notifications-support@twitter.zendesk.com> wrote:

    ##- Please type your reply above this line -##

    Twitter



    walterhcampbell, Jan 18 12:25 pm (PST): Hello,
    While we understand your frustration, the reported behavior is not in violation of the Twitter Rules (http://twitter.com/rules).
    Here are some quick tips to help you with your situation:

    • Do not respond to the user. We have found that responding to someone who is intentionally attempting to aggravate you or others encourages them to continue their behavior.
    • Block the user. You can block the user using the blocking feature described here: https://support.twitter.com/entries/117063
    • Learn more about how to deal with abusive users: https://support.twitter.com/articles/15794
    • Learn how to flag inappropriate media here: https://support.twitter.com/articles/20069937

    As a policy, we do not mediate content and we do not intervene in disputes between users. This means that users are allowed to post potentially inflammatory content, provided that they do not violate the Twitter Rules.
    If someone feels personally threatened, or if you believe the content you are reporting is prohibited in your local jurisdiction, please contact your local authorities with the information you provided to us. You can point local law enforcement to our Law Enforcement Guidelines here: https://support.twitter.com/articles/41949.
    Please let us know if you believe the behavior has escalated or otherwise violates our rules.
    Thanks,
    walterhcampbell
    Twitter Trust & Safety


    johncons, Jan 09 02:31 am (PST): How can we help?: Offensive content
    Reported user: @Robert_Jeffe
    Offensive Tweet: https://twitter.com/Robert_Jeffe/status/288718129192902658
    Text of Tweet: @johncons No, I don’t know which film that would be, alas
    Tweet time: Jan 08 2013 18:45:40 via web

    Offensive Tweet: https://twitter.com/Robert_Jeffe/status/288718607775584257
    Text of Tweet: @johncons I don’t think I’ve heard of a film in which a 42-year old man marries an 18-year old boy and have sex in the Nevada desert.
    Tweet time: Jan 08 2013 18:47:34 via web

    Offensive Tweet: https://twitter.com/Robert_Jeffe/status/288718916547649536
    Text of Tweet: @johncons You could try contacting your local LGBT resource center or something? Maybe they can help?
    Tweet time: Jan 08 2013 18:48:48 via web
    What are you reporting?: This user keeps sending me @replies and I don’t want to receive them.
    Blocked user(s): Yes
    How long ago did this begin?: 24 hours ago
    How many times has this happened?: Three times. (This is a new account which seems dedicated to attacking me).
    I’ve sent you around one hundred similar reports lately.
    This seems organised.
    Further description of problem: This is a person I’ve never heard of, who pretends I’ve contacted him, to distroy my reputation, I guess.
    I have never contacted this person, and I have no idea what he is going on about.
    This must be some cruel and wicked atempt to distroy my life.
    This gay stuff is like something perverse to me.
    And I think this is shocking and outragous.
    You should ban this user for life, for constructing lies about me like this, I think.
    I don’t have the money to take this person and/or Twitter to court, or else I would have, for this and the around one hundred similar attacks.
    Your full name: Erik Ribsskog
    I understand that Twitter may provide third parties, such as the affected user, with a copy of this report.
    Twitter username: @johncons
    Email address: eribsskog@gmail.com

    Message-Id:3A7D5KMC_50f9afa167fc9_71e5132787c468953b_sprut

  • Mer om Twitter-klage, (skorpion8888)


    Gmail – #7146518 Twitter Support: update on “Offensive content – skorpion8888”

    Gmail


    Erik Ribsskog
    <eribsskog@gmail.com>



    #7146518 Twitter Support: update on “Offensive content – skorpion8888”



    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>


    Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 1:08 AM

    To:
    Twitter Support <support+id7146518@twitter.zendesk.com>

    Hi,
    I think the way you respond to the complaints I’m sending you, at Twitter, seems very inconsistent.
    So I would have wanted to please escalate this complaint, for a second opinion.

    Hope this is alright!
    Regards,
    Erik Ribsskog

    On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 8:24 PM, walterhcampbell <notifications-support@twitter.zendesk.com> wrote:

    ##- Please type your reply above this line -##

    div>

    Twitter



    walterhcampbell, Jan 18 12:24 pm (PST): Hello,
    While we understand your frustration, the reported behavior is not in violation of the Twitter Rules (http://twitter.com/rules).
    Here are some quick tips to help you with your situation:

    • Do not respond to the user. We have found that responding to someone who is intentionally attempting to aggravate you or others encourages them to continue their behavior.
    • Block the user. You can block the user using the blocking feature described here: https://support.twitter.com/entries/117063
    • Learn more about how to deal with abusive users: https://support.twitter.com/articles/15794
    • Learn how to flag inappropriate media here: https://support.twitter.com/articles/20069937

    As a policy, we do not mediate content and we do not intervene in disputes between users. This means that users are allowed to post potentially inflammatory content, provided that they do not violate the Twitter Rules.
    If someone feels personally threatened, or if you believe the content you are reporting is prohibited in your local jurisdiction, please contact your local authorities with the information you provided to us. You can point local law enforcement to our Law Enforcement Guidelines here: https://support.twitter.com/articles/41949.
    Please let us know if you believe the behavior has escalated or otherwise violates our rules.
    Thanks,
    walterhcampbell
    Twitter Trust & Safety


    johncons, Jan 13 05:45 am (PST): I think this must be the mafian or illuminati who is after me just because I am very gay.
    I think that I should be allowed to be gay without the mafian or illuminati going after me.
    And I think that you should not allow the mafian or illuminati to use twitter to harrass gay people like me.
    Regards,
    Erik Ribsskog,
    Supergay and proud of it!


    johncons, Jan 09 02:19 am (PST): How can we help?: Offensive content
    Reported user: @skorpion8888
    Offensive Tweet: https://twitter.com/skorpion8888/status/288622014397308928
    Text of Tweet: @johncons Jøss, er du her og. Jeg savner quizkonsernet
    Tweet time: Jan 08 2013 12:23:45 via Twitter for Android
    What are you reporting?: This user keeps sending me @replies and I don’t want to receive them.
    Blocked user(s): Yes
    How long ago did this begin?: 24 hours ago
    How many times has this happened?: Only once, (but this is new account which seems dedicated to attacking me).
    I’ve sent you around one hundred similar reports lately.
    This seems organised.
    Further description of problem: This is a person I don’t really know who is, who ‘sneaked up’ on me, on irc, a couple of years ago.
    I’ve decided I don’¨t want anything more to do with this person, so I’ve stopped irc-ing, for a while.
    And now this person contacts me on Twitter.
    I think that’s a bit offensive.
    Could this person be linked with the other reports I’ve sent you lately, I was wondering.
    So I thought I’d send a report about this as well, while I’m at it, so to speak.
    Your full name: Erik Ribsskog
    I understand that Twitter may provide third parties, such as the affected user, with a copy of this report.
    Twitter username: @johncons
    Email address: eribsskog@gmail.com

    Message-Id:KXSY6GFA_50f9af7e6a438_704276d07c462309b_sprut

  • Mer om Twitter-klage, (KurtSvenne)


    Gmail – #7146473 Twitter Support: update on “Offensive content – KurtSvenne”

    Gmail


    Erik Ribsskog
    <eribsskog@gmail.com>



    #7146473 Twitter Support: update on “Offensive content – KurtSvenne”



    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>


    Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 1:03 AM

    To:
    Twitter Support <support+id7146473@twitter.zendesk.com>

    Hi,
    I think the way you respond to the complaints I’m sending you, at Twitter, seems very inconsistent.
    So I would have wanted to please escalate this complaint, for a second opinion.

    Hope this is alright!
    Regards,
    Erik Ribsskog

    On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 8:23 PM, walterhcampbell <notifications-support@twitter.zendesk.com> wrote:

    ##- Please type your reply above this line -##

    Twitter



    walterhcampbell, Jan 18 12:23 pm (PST): Hello,
    While we understand your frustration, the reported behavior is not in violation of the Twitter Rules (http://twitter.com/rules).
    Here are some quick tips to help you with your situation:

    • Do not respond to the user. We have found that responding to someone who is intentionally attempting to aggravate you or others encourages them to continue their behavior.
    • Block the user. You can block the user using the blocking feature described here: https://support.twitter.com/entries/117063
    • Learn more about how to deal with abusive users: https://support.twitter.com/articles/15794
    • Learn how to flag inappropriate media here: https://support.twitter.com/articles/20069937

    As a policy, we do not mediate content and we do not intervene in disputes between users. This means that users are allowed to post potentially inflammatory content, provided that they do not violate the Twitter Rules.
    If someone feels personally threatened, or if you believe the content you are reporting is prohibited in your local jurisdiction, please contact your local authorities with the information you provided to us. You can point local law enforcement to our Law Enforcement Guidelines here: https://support.twitter.com/articles/41949.
    Please let us know if you believe the behavior has escalated or otherwise violates our rules.
    Thanks,
    walterhcampbell
    Twitter Trust & Safety


    johncons, Jan 09 02:11 am (PST): How can we help?: Offensive content
    Reported user: @KurtSvenne
    Offensive Tweet: https://twitter.com/KurtSvenne/status/286734333086138368
    Text of Tweet: @johncons Jeg har ikke sex med menn, så neitakk! Lykke til videre med letingen! Tror heller ikke @jeblad er interessert.
    Tweet time: Jan 03 2013 07:22:46 via web
    What are you reporting?: This user keeps sending me @replies and I don’t want to receive them.
    Blocked user(s): Yes
    How long ago did this begin?: About a week ago
    How many times has this happened?: Only once, (but this is a new account which seems dedicated to attacking me).
    I’ve sent you around one hundred smilar reports lately.
    This seems organised.
    Further description of problem: This is a person who I have no idea who is, and who I’ve never even heard of.
    The tweet, (in Norwegian), means something like this: ‘@johncons I don’t have sex with men, so no thanks! Good luck with searching. I don’t think @jeblad is interested eighter’.
    This person pretends that I’ve contacted him, with sex-suggestions.
    But I’m a heterosexual man who has never even heard of this person.
    So I find this tweet very offensive and this is some kind of fraud, one could say, because he pretends I’ve contacted him, to make me look silly, to other people, I guess.
    This @jeblad, which he mentions, is a Wiki-admin, (or at least an earlier Wiki-admin, as far as I know, from getting correspondence about him, from other Wikipedians), who I’ve earlier have complained about to you, because he writes lies about me, in many of his tweets.
    I’ve wanted to report this fabricated stuff you have on your network here, to make me look gay, when that’s the last thing I am, so to speak.
    Here someone have sat down for hours to make a cunning plan, to make me unpopular, and try to distroy my reputation, by trying to make me look like a homosexual person, and try to get other people to label me as gay, so to make me unpopular and perhaps isolate me.
    This is some kind of wichcraft perhaps.
    Something like this.
    Perhaps you should verify who people are before they are allowed to tweet?
    Perhaps you should have a rule which says that people can only tweet if they use their real name while tweeting?
    Your anonomious b*stards make me use hours and hours on writing your detailed reports.
    And this is distroying my reputation as well, I guess.
    And you at Twitter don’t even tell me who these criminals are, who writes all these lies and obsceneties about me.
    I could surely have taken these people to court, if you had told me their names.
    But you protect the criminals, it seems to me.
    Your full name: Erik Ribsskog
    I understand that Twitter may provide third parties, such as the affected user, with a copy of this report.
    Twitter username: @johncons
    Email address: eribsskog@gmail.com

    Message-Id:DH4EZFA5_50f9af4d280df_69e256187846200c0_sprut

  • Mer om Twitter-klage, (HomseGrandPrix)


    Gmail – #7146357 Twitter Support: update on “Offensive content – HomseGrandPrix”

    Gmail


    Erik Ribsskog
    <eribsskog@gmail.com>



    #7146357 Twitter Support: update on “Offensive content – HomseGrandPrix”



    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>


    Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 12:57 AM

    To:
    Twitter Support <support+id7146357@twitter.zendesk.com>

    Hi,
    I think the way you respond to the complaints I’m sending you, at Twitter, seems very inconsistent.
    So I would have wanted to please escalate this complaint, for a second opinion.

    Hope this is alright!
    Regards,
    Erik Ribsskog

    On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 8:22 PM, walterhcampbell <notifications-support@twitter.zendesk.com> wrote:

    ##- Please type your reply above this line -##

    Twitter



    walterhcampbell, Jan 18 12:22 pm (PST): Hello,
    While we understand your frustration, the reported behavior is not in violation of the Twitter Rules (http://twitter.com/rules).
    Here are some quick tips to help you with your situation:

    • Do not respond to the user. We have found that responding to someone who is intentionally attempting to aggravate you or others encourages them to continue their behavior.
    • Block the user. You can block the user using the blocking feature described here: https://support.twitter.com/entries/117063
    • Learn more about how to deal with abusive users: https://support.twitter.com/articles/15794
    • Learn how to flag inappropriate media here: https://support.twitter.com/articles/20069937

    As a policy, we do not mediate content and we do not intervene in disputes between users. This means that users are allowed to post potentially inflammatory content, provided that they do not violate the Twitter Rules.
    If someone feels personally threatened, or if you believe the content you are reporting is prohibited in your local jurisdiction, please contact your local authorities with the information you provided to us. You can point local law enforcement to our Law Enforcement Guidelines here: https://support.twitter.com/articles/41949.
    Please let us know if you believe the behavior has escalated or otherwise violates our rules.
    Thanks,
    walterhcampbell
    Twitter Trust & Safety


    johncons, Jan 09 01:51 am (PST): How can we help?: Offensive content
    Reported user: @HomseGrandPrix
    Offensive Tweet: https://twitter.com/HomseGrandPrix/status/286666594661314560
    Text of Tweet: Jeg skal pule @johncons baklengs gjennom fuglekassa.
    Tweet time: Jan 03 2013 02:53:36 via web
    What are you reporting?: This user keeps sending me @replies and I don’t want to receive them.
    Blocked user(s): Yes
    How long ago did this begin?: About a week ago
    How many times has this happened?: Only once, (but this is a new account which seems dedicated to attacking me).
    I’ve sent you around one hundred similar reports lately.
    This seems organised.
    Further description of problem: This is a person, (who I don’t know who is), with a homosexual nick.
    His nick means Homosexual Grand Prix.
    In the tweet he writes that he is going to f*ck me, etc.
    I’m a heterosexual man, and I’m not into gay stuff, so I think this is extremly offensive and also threatening.
    Your full name: Erik Ribsskog
    I understand that Twitter may provide third parties, such as the affected user, with a copy of this report.
    Twitter username: @johncons
    Email address: eribsskog@gmail.com

    Message-Id:V8NC7CVA_50f9aef2573e8_6fd91001878440233c_sprut

  • Mer om Twitter-klage, (Rettighetsblogg)


    Gmail – #7146288 Twitter Support: update on “Offensive content – Rettighetsblogg”

    Gmail


    Erik Ribsskog
    <eribsskog@gmail.com>



    #7146288 Twitter Support: update on “Offensive content – Rettighetsblogg”



    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>


    Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 12:48 AM

    To:
    Twitter Support <support+id7146288@twitter.zendesk.com>

    Hi,
    I think the way you respond to the complaints I’m sending you, at Twitter, seems very inconsistent.
    So I would have wanted to please escalate this complaint, for a second opinion.

    Hope this is alright!
    Regards,
    Erik Ribsskog

    On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 8:18 PM, walterhcampbell <notifications-support@twitter.zendesk.com> wrote:

    ##- Please type your reply above this line -##

    Twitter



    walterhcampbell, Jan 18 12:18 pm (PST): Hello,
    While we understand your frustration, the reported behavior is not in violation of the Twitter Rules (http://twitter.com/rules).
    Here are some quick tips to help you with your situation:

    • Do not respond to the user. We have found that responding to someone who is intentionally attempting to aggravate you or others encourages them to continue their behavior.
    • Block the user. You can block the user using the blocking feature described here: https://support.twitter.com/entries/117063
    • Learn more about how to deal with abusive users: https://support.twitter.com/articles/15794
    • Learn how to flag inappropriate media here: https://support.twitter.com/articles/20069937

    As a policy, we do not mediate content and we do not intervene in disputes between users. This means that users are allowed to post potentially inflammatory content, provided that they do not violate the Twitter Rules.
    If someone feels personally threatened, or if you believe the content you are reporting is prohibited in your local jurisdiction, please contact your local authorities with the information you provided to us. You can point local law enforcement to our Law Enforcement Guidelines here: https://support.twitter.com/articles/41949.
    Please let us know if you believe the behavior has escalated or otherwise violates our rules.
    Thanks,
    walterhcampbell
    Twitter Trust & Safety


    johncons, Jan 09 01:37 am (PST): How can we help?: Offensive content
    Reported user: @Rettighetsblogg
    Offensive Tweet: https://twitter.com/Rettighetsblogg/status/286364832402374657
    Text of Tweet: Og da jeg drev med pulings med @johncons, så gikk hu inn på badet, og var der i en halvtime
    Tweet time: Jan 02 2013 06:54:31 via web

    Offensive Tweet: https://twitter.com/Rettighetsblogg/status/286364901277057024
    Text of Tweet: Har hu @johncons kanskje tatt ut sæd, av kjeften sin, eller spytta ut den, og stappa i fitta?
    Tweet time: Jan 02 2013 06:54:47 via web
    What are you reporting?: This user keeps sending me @replies and I don’t want to receive them.
    Blocked user(s): Yes
    How long ago did this begin?: About a week ago
    How many times has this happened?: Only twice, (but this is a new account which seems dedicated to attacking me).
    I’ve sent you around one hundred similar reports lately.
    This seems organised.
    Further description of problem: This user is obscene.
    In the first tweet this person says he had sex with me(!), and then I(!) went into the bath-room and was there for half an hour.
    I’m a heterosexual man, and I don’t like being talked about like this.
    This is a person who uses pictures of me, (which are manipulated and I own the copyrights to. These are pictures from my blog which have been manipulated. Here’s the link to the blog again: http://johncons-mirror.blogspot.co.uk/.
    How can you have stuff like this on your network?
    It’s a scandal.
    These are evil lies from a wicked person.
    The other tweet is even worse.
    I don’t want to write what that says, but they, (the mafia?), write about me like I had a c*nt, etc.
    This is insane stuff from one of your many f*cked up users.
    Your full name: Erik Ribsskog
    I understand that Twitter may provide third parties, such as the affected user, with a copy of this report.
    Twitter username: @johncons
    Email address: eribsskog@gmail.com

    Message-Id:W09PSEKH_50f9ae2177aa_6682b1907c451441c_sprut

  • Mer om Twitter-klage, (Knut_Bergli)


    Gmail – #7129026 Twitter Support: update on “Offensive content – Knut_Bergli”

    Gmail


    Erik Ribsskog
    <eribsskog@gmail.com>



    #7129026 Twitter Support: update on “Offensive content – Knut_Bergli”



    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>


    Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 12:42 AM

    To:
    Twitter Support <support+id7129026@twitter.zendesk.com>

    Hi,

    I think the way you respond to the complaints I’m sending you, at Twitter, seems very inconsistent.

    So I would have wanted to escalate this complaint, for a second opinion.

    Hope this is alright!

    Regards,


    Erik Ribsskog

    On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 4:37 PM, SamuelFisher <notifications-support@twitter.zendesk.com> wrote:

    ##- Please type your reply above this line -##

    Twitter



    SamuelFisher, Jan 18 08:37 am (PST): Hello,
    While we understand your frustration, the reported behavior is not in violation of the Twitter Rules (http://twitter.com/rules).
    Here are some quick tips to help you with your situation:

    • Do not respond to the user. We have found that responding to someone who is intentionally attempting to aggravate you or others encourages them to continue their behavior.
    • Block the user. You can block the user using the blocking feature described here: https://support.twitter.com/entries/117063
    • Learn more about how to deal with abusive users: https://support.twitter.com/articles/15794
    • Learn how to flag inappropriate media here: https://support.twitter.com/articles/20069937

    As a policy, we do not mediate content and we do not intervene in disputes between users. This means that users are allowed to post potentially inflammatory content, provided that they do not violate the Twitter Rules.
    If someone feels personally threatened, or if you believe the content you are reporting is prohibited in your local jurisdiction, please contact your local authorities with the information you provided to us. You can point local law enforcement to our Law Enforcement Guidelines here: https://support.twitter.com/articles/41949.
    Please let us know if you believe the behavior has escalated or otherwise violates our rules.
    Thanks,
    SamuelFisher
    Twitter Trust & Safety


    johncons, Jan 07 10:27 am (PST): How can we help?: Offensive content
    Reported user: @Knut_Bergli
    Offensive Tweet: https://twitter.com/Knut_Bergli/status/286224501417574400
    Text of Tweet: @johncons Virker som du ikke er helt i balanse mentalt. Trenger du noe hjelp med å kontakte myndigheter, helsevesen mm for å få hjelp?
    Tweet time: Jan 01 2013 21:36:53 via web
    What are you reporting?: This user keeps sending me @replies and I don’t want to receive them.
    Blocked user(s): Yes
    How long ago did this begin?: About a week ago
    How many times has this happened?: Only once, (but this is a new account which seems dedicated to attacking me).
    I’ve sent you around one hundred similar reports lately.
    This seems organised.
    Further description of problem: This is a person I’ve never heard the name of earlier.
    He writes I seem insane and if I need help with contacting the mental-autoroties, etc.
    This is very offensive and inpolite, I think.
    So I wanted to complain about this harassment.
    Your full name: Erik Ribsskog
    I understand that Twitter may provide third parties, such as the affected user, with a copy of this report.
    Twitter username: @johncons
    Email address: eribsskog@gmail.com

    Message-Id:BDBW2PE0_50f97a432645f_47cb39807830962f2_sprut

  • Jeg sendte en e-post til Joe


    Gmail – Complaint/Fwd: Your Email Enquiry <<#22175-263877#>>

    Gmail


    Erik Ribsskog
    <eribsskog@gmail.com>



    Complaint/Fwd: Your Email Enquiry <<#22175-263877#>>



    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>


    Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 1:14 AM

    To:
    joe.anderson@liverpool.gov.uk

    Joe,

    Tony and Kerry calls me Erik.

    Shouldn’t they call me Mr. Ribsskog, I was wondering.

    (That’s what they normally do at least).

    I’m calling you Joe in this e-mail to show a point.


    Regards,

    Erik Ribsskog
    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

    Date: Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 1:35 PM
    Subject: Re: Your Email Enquiry <<#22175-263877#>>
    To: Liverpool Direct <Liverpool.Direct@liverpool.gov.uk>

    Hi,

    that’s Mr. Ribsskog to you, I think.

    Erik Ribsskog

    On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 11:34 AM, Liverpool Direct <Liverpool.Direct@liverpool.gov.uk> wrote:

    Your email reference number is: 263877

    Dear Erik

    Thank you for your e-mail about fly tipping

    The job has been logged on and estimate rubbish to be removed 25th January 2013

    Our Environmental Enforcement Team will be investigating this matter if rubbish not removed by the 25th January 2013

    If you would like any further assistance on this matter or anything else please let me know via the e-mail address below

    Kind regards

    Tony

    P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail. Thank you

     

    Would you prefer to receive your council tax bill via e-mail?  Go to www.liverpool.gov.uk and complete the easy online registration form.

    — Original Message —
    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
    Received: 17/01/13 18:22:44 o’clock UTC
    To: <Liverpool.Direct@liverpool.gov.uk>

    Subject: Update/Fwd: Your Email Enquiry

    Hi,

    I also understand that people doesn’t bother when they see problems like this, to contact the Council.


    Since you are poorly organised, I think.

    And I have to repeat myself all the time.


    And I have to use a lot of time on this now.


    Even if it isn’t in my street, (even if it’s in the same neighbourhood).

    This isn’t fly-tipping, I think.

    I think this a place that people in 79 City Road put their garbage as a routine, since the door to their back-yard is obstructed by garbage.

    So this isn’t something they do ‘on the fly’, so to speak.


    But they do this even on Monday’s, I think.

    Just to try to explain more about this.

    Regards,


    Erik Ribsskog

    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

    Date: Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 5:49 PM
    Subject: Re: Your Email Enquiry <<#22175-263877#>>
    To: Liverpool Direct <Liverpool.Direct@liverpool.gov.uk>

    Hi,

    ok, it’s just that I get replies from different case-workers with you, regarding this.


    I also got one from your collegue Kerry today, with a different reference-number I think.


    But this is really the same case, as far as I can understand it.


    Best regards,


    Erik Ribsskog

    PS.


    Here is more about this:

    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>





    Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 5:36 PM




    To:
    Liverpool Direct <Liverpool.Direct@liverpool.gov.uk>






    Hi,

    like I’ve tried to explain earlier, the photograph was from last week.


    And at the beginning of this week, I only saw one garbage-bag there.


    But this could perhaps be a recurring problem, (I think).


    But I can update you later, if I see a heap of garbage/garbage-bags there again, on the pavement.


    And you could have a look at this problem yourselves, then you’ll probably understand what’s going on there, I think.

    Thanks again for the emails!

    Best regards,

    Erik Ribsskog

    On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 2:07 PM, Liverpool Direct <Liverpool.Direct@liverpool.gov.uk> wrote:







    Your email reference number is: 263877






    Dear Erik,

    Thank you for your e-mail.




    It has been logged for action and we estimate that the rubbish will be removed by 24th January 2013.



    Please quote this reference number 5465231 should you need to contact us again about this.  




    If you would like any further assistance on this matter or anything else please let me know via the e-mail address below.



    Kind regards,


    Kerry




    On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 4:37 PM, Liverpool Direct <Liverpool.Direct@liverpool.gov.uk> wrote:

    Your email reference number is: 263877

    Dear Mr Ribsskog
    Thank you for your e-mail about fly tipping of the black bags.

     

    This has already been logged for you, our job reference number is 546523.

    If you would like any further assistance on this matter or anything else please let me know via the e-mail address below

    Kind regards

    Anita

    P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail. Thank you

     

    Would you prefer to receive your council tax bill via e-mail?  Go to www.liverpool.gov.uk and complete the easy online registration form.

    — Original Message —
    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

    Received: 16/01/13 19:55:31 o’clock UTC
    To: <Liverpool.Direct@liverpool.gov.uk>
    Subject: Update/Fwd: Your Email Enquiry

    Hi,

    by the way, I’ve earlier told you the exact address for this garbage-heap.

    (Between 62 Ripon St. and 79 City Road).

    So it’s almost in City Road, in Ripon St.

    79 City Road is both in City Road and Ripon Street, so to speak.

    (Since it’s on the corner of that road and street).

    I think I’ve really given you enough information so that this should be possible to understand now.


    So I hope you aren’t pulling my leg 🙂

    And and I don’t understand why you only use my first-name, in your latest e-mails.

    Normally you write Mr. Ribsskog, as I remember it.


    Regards,


    Erik Ribsskog

    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

    Date: Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 7:34 PM
    Subject: Re: Your Email Enquiry <<#22175-263877#>>
    To: Liverpool Direct <Liverpool.Direct@liverpool.gov.uk>

    Hi,

    like it should be possible to see on the pictures I sent you on 11/1, the garbage-bags are on the pavement.

    I attach those photographs again today, (with this e-mail), in case you can’t find them.

    I’m from Norway, so I’m not used with garbage bags laying on the pavement.


    But I’ve seen this problem before, in Liverpool City Centre.


    (But not this many garbage-bags in one heap, I think).

    And I must admit I’m not sure what the UK laws says about having garbage-bags on the pavement, (and not in bins).


    I can imagine that to have this much garbage stored in the street, (and not in bins), could lead to that rats easily find food.


    And in Norway we look at these animals as pests.


    At least I don’t think I’ve seen this much garbage in the streets in Oslo.


    So that’s why I reacted and sent about this to you.

    Hope this is alright!

    Best regards,


    Erik Ribsskog

    On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 4:44 PM, Liverpool Direct <Liverpool.Direct@liverpool.gov.uk> wrote:

    Your email reference number is: 263877

    Dear Erik,

    Thank you for your e-mail.

    To help you with this we need to ask you to provide some more details – is the rubbish in an alleyway or actually on the pavement?  

    We look forward to receiving your reply.

    If you would like any further assistance on this matter or anything else please let me know via the e-mail address below.

    Kind regards,

    Kerry

    P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail. Thank you

     

    Would you prefer to receive your council tax bill via e-mail?  Go to www.liverpool.gov.uk and complete the easy online registration form.

    — Original Message —
    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
    Received: 14/01/13 20:31:44 o’clock UTC
    To: Liverpool Direct <Liverpool.Direct@liverpool.gov.uk>

    Subject: Re: Your Email Enquiry

    Hi,

    this was something I wrote in a PS, (or something), to my landlord, LHT.


    So unfortunately, I got the street name a bit wrong.

    It should have been the parallell-street to Frodsham Street, that is Ripon Street.


    I checked this again today after recieving your e-mail and today it was only one garbage in, on the pavement.


    (So someone have collected the ‘mountain’ of garbage-bins, which I saw there, last week).

    The garbage bins are/where on the pavement outside of a garden/back-yard, which is between 62 Ripon St. and 79 City Road.

    (I live in Keith Avenue, which sort of become Ripon St., when it crosses City Road).

    The back-yard has a tall wooden fence, (it seemed), towards Ripon Street, and there is a gate/door, in that fence.


    The door was half open, and I could see a lot of garbage, on the ground, in this back-yard.

    So perhaps this back-yard is a garbage bag-store, or something, (for 79 City Road), but that the garbage, on the ground, in the back-yard, obstructs the gate/door, so that it can’t be opened, and tenants put the bins outside the store, on the pavement.


    Something like this.

    (I checked this a bit today, since I got the e-mail, from you at the Council.


    Or else I wouldn’t have looked at this place that thoroughly).

    I also send a copy e-mail to LHT, since I’ve started updateing them about this.


    (So they understand that this isn’t anything to do with LHT really, I think).

    Hope this was possible to understand!

    Best regards,


    Erik Ribsskog

    On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 2:27 PM, Liverpool Direct <Liverpool.Direct@liverpool.gov.uk> wrote:

    Your email reference number is: 263877

    Dear Erik,


    Thank you for your e-mail.

    To help you with this we need to ask you to provide some more details – Are the garbage-bin bags thrown in Frodsham Street still there today please? If not, when were there left them approximately? Is it next to a specific door number in Frodsham Street? This information is necessary so that the team can locate it quickly as well.

    We look forward to receiving your reply.

    If you would like any further assistance on this matter or anything else please let me know via the e-mail address below

    Kind regards

    Victorine

    P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail. Thank you

     

    Would you prefer to receive your council tax bill via e-mail?  Go to www.liverpool.gov.uk and complete the easy online registration form.

    — Original Message —
    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
    Received: 11/01/13 13:20:50 o’clock UTC
    To: LHT Customer Service <csc@lht.co.uk>

    CC:Liverpool Direct <liverpool.direct@liverpool.gov.uk>
    Subject: Re: Email confirmation of receipt –

    Hi,

    that’s brilliant.


    There was an electrician here on the door now, regarding the lamp in the court.


    I showed him which lamp it was, and he was going to take a picture of it, and get it fixed.

    I explained it wasn’t to do with this flat really, but with LHT.

    By the way, like you know, Keith Court is in Keith Avenue, and Keith Avenue sort of becomes Frodsham Street, when it crosses City Road.

    And in Frodsham St. someone have started trowing garbage-bins on the pavement, it seems.


    I guess this is to do with the Council, (or something), so I send a copy e-mail to them.

    Or else the whole area is going to start to turn into a slum, I think, if people just throw the garbage everywhere.


    My grandfather was a councelor, in the municipality of Hadsel, in Northern Norway, in the 60’s and 70’s, and he was on the radio, in Norway, when he quit in that job, and he didn’t like it that people threw garbage everywhere, on the mountain there, I heard when I got the radio-programme in the post, from Norway.

    So I think I should complain about this a bit.

    Also, I think it’s strange the electrician contacts me, (on my door), about the repair, in the comunal court/LHT-area.


    He should speak with LHT about repairs in that area, I think.

    That was a bit strange, I think now.

    I used to be a Shop Manager in Norway.


    And if one of the shops customers complained about something, I wouldn’t have sent a repair-guy on their door to ask whay they meant.

    I would have talked to the repair-guy myself.

    So this I thought was a bit strange.


    People doesn’t want to report problems then if they have to be like LHT-staff.

    How could you know I wasn’t out?

    Hm.

    Anyway I send the pictures from Frodsham Street.


    And I hope the Council don’t have to send people on my door to sort that problem.

    Best regards,


    Erik Ribsskog

    On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 12:01 PM, LHT Customer Service <csc@lht.co.uk> wrote:

    Good Morning Mr Ribsskog,

    Thank you for your email and I am delighted to hear that the gate with key access is working well for you.

    It is important that the area is maintained to a high standard and therefore we will go ahead with the jobs we have scheduled as a result of your earlier email.

    I will record on your account that there are no outstanding issues that we have yet to deal with for you. Thank you for your confirmation.

    Best Regards,

    Donna Sanders

    Assistant Co-ordinator

    Customer Service Centre

    Liverpool Housing Trust

    Priory House

    Runcorn

    WA7 2FS

    Tel No: 01928 796000

    LHT is part of Symphony Housing Group

    **********************************************************************
    This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
    intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
    are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
    the system manager.
    Scanned by the Clearswift SECURE Email Gateway.
    www.clearswift.com
    **********************************************************************


    ______________________________________________________________________
    This email has been automatically scanned for viruses and malicious content by MessageLabs for your protection
    ______________________________________________________________________

    —— Please do not remove your unique tracking number! ——
    <<#22175-263877#>>
    ______________________________________________________________________
    DISCLAIMER:

    The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be read, copied or used only by the intended recipient(s). If you have received it in error please contact the sender immediately by returning the e-mail or by telephoning a number contained in the body of the e-mail then and please delete the e-mail without disclosing its contents elsewhere. No responsibility is accepted for loss or damage arising from viruses or changes made to this message after it was sent. The views contained in this email are those of the author and not necessarily those of the authors employer or service provider.

    This email has been automatically scanned for viruses and malicious content by MessageLabs for your protection
    ______________________________________________________________________


    ______________________________________________________________________
    This email has been automatically scanned for viruses and malicious content by MessageLabs for your protection
    ______________________________________________________________________

    —— Please do not remove your unique tracking number! ——
    <<#22175-263877#>>
    ______________________________________________________________________
    DISCLAIMER:

    The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be read, copied or used only by the intended recipient(s). If you have received it in error please contact the sender immediately by returning the e-mail or by telephoning a number contained in the body of the e-mail then and please delete the e-mail without disclosing its contents elsewhere. No responsibility is accepted for loss or damage arising from viruses or changes made to this message after it was sent. The views contained in this email are those of the author and not necessarily those of the authors employer or service provider.

    This email has been automatically scanned for viruses and malicious content by MessageLabs for your protection
    ______________________________________________________________________


    ______________________________________________________________________
    This email has been automatically scanned for viruses and malicious content by MessageLabs for your protection
    ______________________________________________________________________

    —— Please do not remove your unique tracking number! ——
    <<#22175-263877#>>
    ______________________________________________________________________
    DISCLAIMER:

    The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be read, copied or used only by the intended recipient(s). If you have received it in error please contact the sender immediately by returning the e-mail or by telephoning a number contained in the body of the e-mail then and please delete the e-mail without disclosing its contents elsewhere. No responsibility is accepted for loss or damage arising from viruses or changes made to this message after it was sent. The views contained in this email are those of the author and not necessarily those of the authors employer or service provider.

    This email has been automatically scanned for viruses and malicious content by MessageLabs for your protection
    ______________________________________________________________________


    ______________________________________________________________________
    This email has been automatically scanned for viruses and malicious content by MessageLabs for your protection
    ______________________________________________________________________

    —— Please do not remove your unique tracking number! ——
    <<#22175-263877#>>
    ______________________________________________________________________
    DISCLAIMER:

    The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be read, copied or used only by the intended recipient(s). If you have received it in error please contact the sender immediately by returning the e-mail or by telephoning a number contained in the body of the e-mail then and please delete the e-mail without disclosing its contents elsewhere. No responsibility is accepted for loss or damage arising from viruses or changes made to this message after it was sent. The views contained in this email are those of the author and not necessarily those of the authors employer or service provider.

    This email has been automatically scanned for viruses and malicious content by MessageLabs for your protection
    ______________________________________________________________________

  • Jeg sendte en ny e-post til Tilsynet for advokatvirksomhet


    Gmail – SV: Klage/Fwd: Skadenummer: SA59484-001-BIK (H163117989M)

    Gmail


    Erik Ribsskog
    <eribsskog@gmail.com>



    SV: Klage/Fwd: Skadenummer: SA59484-001-BIK (H163117989M)



    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>


    Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 11:48 AM

    To:
    Robin MacKenzie-Robinson <RoMa@tilsynet.no>

    Cc:
    Bjorge.Skjeldestad@tryg.no

    Bcc:
    kundeservice@if.no

    Hei,

    ok, da fikk jeg klarhet i dette.
    Da virker det for meg som om IF har forsøkt å lure meg.

    Jeg sender derfor kopi til IF og Tryg.

    Så håper jeg at IF skjerper seg.

    For det her syntes jeg at var rimelig sleipt.

    Jeg har som sagt en fetter i IF, som heter Tommy Løff Olsen.

    (Hvis han jobber der enda da).
    Og har overhørt at jeg er forfulgt av ‘mafian’.


    Så her kan det være mafia i IF, frykter jeg.
    Så dette er også en formell klage på lureri fra IF.

    Mvh.

    Erik Ribsskog

    2013/1/17 Robin MacKenzie-Robinson <RoMa@tilsynet.no>

    Det vises til dine e-poster av 12. desember 2012 og 12. januar 2013 hvor De ønsker å klage på saksbehandlingen til Tilsynsrådet for advokatvirksomhets medarbeider Jonas Haugsvold.

    Tilsynsrådet for advokatvirksomhet kan ved forespørsel informere om advokaters sikkerhetsstiller. I dette tilfellet ønsket De informasjon om sikkerhetsstiller for advokat Ida Valen Rukke. På det tidspunktet De ønsket denne informasjonen var IF sikkerhetsstiller for advokat Rukke. Det informerte Jonas Haugsvold Dem om.

    De ønsker nå å få opplyst hvem som var sikkerhetsstiller for advokat Rukke før hun tegnet sikkerhetsstillelse hos If Skadeforsikring.

    Fra 16. februar 2009 og frem til 1. august 2012 har Tryg vært sikkerhetsstiler for advokat Rukke.

    Til Deres informasjon følger det av advokatforskriften § 2-4 første ledd at:    ”Den sikkerhetsstilleren som advokaten har når skadelidte fremsetter krav om erstatning, er ansvarlig overfor skadelidte. Dette gjelder selv om tapet ble forårsaket mens advokaten hadde en annen sikkerhetsstiller”.

    Med vennlig hilsen

    Robin Mackenzie-Robinson
    Rådgiver
    Tilsynsrådet for advokatvirksomhet

    Postboks 720 Sentrum, 0106 Oslo | Rådhusgt. 23
    Tlf: 22 00 75 03 | Sentralbord: 22 00 75 00
    *  post@tilsynet.no   þ  www.tilsynet.no  

    Fra: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

    Sendt: 12. januar 2013 20:03
    Til: Tilsynsrådet for Advokatvirksomhet
    Kopi: Bjorge.Skjeldestad@tryg.no
    Emne: Klage/Fwd: Skadenummer: SA59484-001-BIK (H163117989M)

    Hei,
    jeg vil klage på deres medarbeider Haugsvold, for å ha villedet meg.


    Først så opplyste han ikke om sikringsstiller, for advokaten, enda jeg mener at det burde ha fremgått av mine e-poster, at det var det jeg ønsket at han skulle opplyse meg om.

    Den andre klagen går på at deres nevnte medarbeider så skrev at IF var riktig sikringsstiller, men IF sier at Tryg var riktig selskap.


    Jeg mener at det fremgikk av min korrespondanse, med deres medarbeider, at dette gjaldt et forhold da advokat Rukke jobbet for Advokat.no.

    Så her mener jeg at deres medarbeider Haugsvold ved to anledninger har vært ‘vrang’ og bevisst har prøvd å lure meg.

    Jeg skal kopiere den første e-posten jeg sendte dere om dette, i denne e-posten, så burde dette da være mulig å se.


    Jeg ser frem til å motta deres kommentar om dette.

    Kan dere også bekrefte det som IF sier at Tryg var riktig sikringsstiller for denne saken, som var fra da Rukke jobbet hos Advokat.no, med min sak, som var fra 16. april til 18. juni, som jeg har skrevet til Tryg.

    Mvh.
    Erik Ribsskog
    PS.
    Her er mer om dette:

    2012/9/3 Jonas Haugsvold <JoHa@tilsynet.no>

    Det vises til dine e-poster av 22.6.2012 og 1.9.2012.

    Tilsynsrådet for advokatvirksomhet fører tilsyn med landets praktiserende advokater og rettshjelpere, bl.a. ved gjennomgang av deres regnskaper og behandling av betrodde midler. Tilsynsrådet er tillagt ansvaret for å påse at den som driver advokat- og øvrig rettshjelpvirksomhet har stillet lovbestemt sikkerhet for sin virksomhet. Som et av sine hovedmål skal Tilsynsrådet gjennom aktiv tilsynsvirksomhet søke å forebygge ansvarsskader.

    Tilsynsrådet kan ikke bistå deg i denne saken. Det vises til at Tilsynsrådet, ut fra sin kompetanse, verken har anledning til å anbefale særskilte advokater eller til å ta nærmere stilling til konkrete rettstvister mellom private parter. Tilsynsrådet kan heller ikke bistå med et skifte.

    Dersom du mener at en advokat har opptrådt i strid med gjeldende regler for god advokatskikk, gjør vi oppmerksom på at klage eventuelt kan fremsettes skriftlig til Disiplinærnemnden for advokater på følgende adresse:

    Disiplinærnemnden

    Kr. Augustgt. 9

    0164 Oslo

    Vennlig hilsen

    Jonas Haugsvold

    Rådgiver

    Tilsynsrådet for advokatvirksomhet

    Postboks 720 Sentrum, 0106 Oslo | Rådhusgt. 23
    Tlf: 22 00 75 02 | Sentralbord: 22 00 75 00
    *  post@tilsynet.no   þ  www.tilsynet.no

    Fra: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

    Sendt: 1. september 2012 14:50
    Til: Tilsynsrådet for Advokatvirksomhet
    Emne: Påminnelse/Fwd: Klage på tre advokater/Fwd: Din henvendelse til Advokatforeningen

    Hei,

    jeg kan ikke se at jeg har mottatt noe svar på denne e-posten, så jeg sender en påminnelse om dette.

    Håper dette er i orden!

    Mvh.

    Erik Ribsskog

    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

    Date: 2012/6/21
    Subject: Klage på tre advokater/Fwd: Din henvendelse til Advokatforeningen
    To: post@tilsynet.no
    Cc: larvik.tingrett@domstol.no

    Hei,

    min mormor døde for tre år siden, på tirsdag neste uke.


    Jeg har bare fått tre tusen i arv, enda hun var etter dansk adel og kongelige og hadde malerier fra Højris slott på veggen, da hun døde, og også mange andre artige ting, som brev og møbler og alt mulig, fra sine adelige slektninger, (Gjedde, Nyholm, Fog, Adeler, etc).

    Jeg ville først at advokat Erik Øvergård, i Hurum, skulle selge min eiendom der, (del av sameie), sånn at jeg kunne betale 30.000 til Tingretten i Larvik, for offentlig skifte.


    Øvergård sluttet plutselig å svare meg.

    Så jeg kontaktet Tingretten i Drammen, (via Namsmannen i Hurum/Røyken), og de villedet meg om salg av sameie, (Høysæter der), så jeg fikk ikke ordnet dette, for man måtte betale gebyr, og sånn, og Høysæter bare lot som om hun skulle ordne det, så mange måneder gikk tapt da, og etter dette så har jeg fått en umøblert leilighet, så jeg har ikke hatt penger til gebyr for salg av sameie.

    Jeg fikk derimot dekke litt fri rettshjelp for en barnevernssak mot Svelvik kommune, av Fylkesmannen i Oslo og Akershus.


    Jeg sendte dette til Advokat.no og spurte om jeg kunne få en advokat i Drammen, siden dette er den nærmeste store byen, fra Svelvik.


    Jeg fikk en advokat i Oslo, og tenkte at det var greit.


    Men nå så jeg senere at hun Ida Valen Rukke, som jeg ble tildelt som advokat av Advokat.no, ikke har barnevern som hovedfelt.


    Og at syv andre advokater hos Advokat.no hadde barnevern som hovedfelt.


    Da jeg klagde på at Rukke var ineffektiv, antagelig siden hun ikke var vant til å jobbe med barnevernsaker, så slutten hun i jobben, (av en eller annen grunn), og jeg ble ikke tilbudt ny advokat, av Advokat.no.

    Og dette var etter at Rukke hadde opplyst meg om at hun hadde en timelønn på over 2000, og etter at jeg hadde bedt henne om å ordne med det offentlige skiftet, i Larvik, for meg, samt oppløsing av sameie, i Holmsbu, og andre saker.

    Jeg sendte så e-post til en advokat Bille, i Drammen, som ikke har svart meg.

    Jeg mister nå antagelig den arven, etter min mormor, morfar og mor, (siden min mor og morfar døde før min mormor).

    For fristen der er mandag eller tirsdag, neste uke, å be om offentlig skifte.


    Og jeg har vært arbeidsledig i England, under finanskrisen, så jeg har ikke klart å spare opp penger, og salget av sameiet i Holmsbu har jo ikke latt seg gjennomføre grunnet sabotasje, (må jeg kalle det), fra Øverland og Tingretten i Drammen.

    Jeg ønsker jo selvfølgelig først og fremst at jeg får innvilget offentlig skifte, etter min mormor, hos Tingretten i Larvik.

    Kanskje kan gjøre dette for meg?


    Sender kopi til Tingretten i Larvik og advokat Bille i Drammen.


    Jeg ønsker også erstatning på grunn av tullet fra de nevnte advokatene.


    Jeg har måttet gått rundt i Newcastle, en hel natt, med alt jeg har hatt av eiendom her borte, (City Self Storage vil ikke sende meg de ‘norske’ tingene mine), og nesten fryst ihjel, fordi jeg ikke har fått solgt eiendom i Norge og vært prislagt diverse lugubre britiske hosteller, osv.

    Så disse advokatene kan man få billig av meg, og jeg håper dere lar de miste bevilgningen.


    Jeg blir systematisk tullet med, synes jeg det virker som, og jeg ønsker å få mye penger i erstatning, for at det skal være enklere for meg, å beskytte meg mot slik systematisk tulling og jeg har også overhørt at jeg er forfulgt av ‘mafian’, som var grunnen til at jeg flytta fra Norge, i 2004.

    Så jeg håper på amerikansk metode her, med mye erstatning til folk som er offer for maktmisbruk, osv.


    Fikk også noen dokumenter etter de kjente slektningene mine Anders Gjedde Nyholm, en general og en dommer i Haag, Didrik Nyholm, av min mormor, på 80-tallet.


    Men så skulle Ingeborg ha tilbake dette.

    Og hu var jo gammel allerede da, så jeg sa det var greit.


    Men nå som hun er død, så er jo dette egentlig mitt, mener jeg, man kan jo ikke ta tilbake en gave.

    Og min mormor hadde også masse andre artige brev fra Maren Gjedde, mm., som jeg syntes at virker interessant både for meg selv og også historisk.

    Og jeg er den eneste som har interesse for sånt, i slekta, sa min mormor, mens hun levde.


    Også skal jeg liksom bare få 3000 i arv, enda min mormor og morfar hadde det største huset i Nevlugnhavn, på 80-tallet, og de så ut som en antikkforretning eller museum.


    Hvor har det blitt av verdiene?

    Det er ikke riktig at jeg bare skal få 3000 etter min mor, mormor og morfar, mener jeg.


    Her er det noe alvorlig tull.

    Hvorfor skal ikke jeg få offentlig skifte?

    Kan dere ordne det?

    Pluss erstatning også for det andre tøyset.


    Men offentlig skifte-fristen går visst ut på mandag eller tirsdag neste uke.


    Erik Ribsskog

    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: Mona Mjøen McKiernan <mmm@advokatforeningen.no>

    Date: 2012/6/21
    Subject: Din henvendelse til Advokatforeningen
    To: “eribsskog@gmail.com” <eribsskog@gmail.com>

    Erik Ribsskog,

    Det vises til din henvendelse av 20.juni 2012, vedrørende klage på advokat.

    Av henvendelsen fremgår det at du ønsker å klage på advokat.no.

    Vi viser til vårt tidligere svar av 18.juni 2012, der det fremgår at en klage må sendes per post og gjelde en navngitt advokat.

    All informasjon om hvordan du skriver en klage finner du her: http://www.advokatenhjelperdeg.no/artikler/kan-jeg-klage-pa-advokaten/

    Vedrørende hva en klage kan føre til finner du informasjon om dette her:http://www.advokatenhjelperdeg.no/artikler/kan-jeg-klage-pa-advokaten/#hvafrerklagenetil

    Til ditt spørsmål om hva du skal gjøre med det offentlige skiftet minner vi om at Advokatforeningen ikke kan tilby juridisk rådgivning. Vi kan heller ikke tildele en advokat til deg.
    Vi råder deg til å ta kontakt med en advokat for å få hjelp med dette. Din advokat finner du her:
    http://www.advokatenhjelperdeg.no/finn-advokat/

    Alle som praktiserer som advokat, er lovpålagt å gi sine klienter økonomisk trygghet for eventuelle feil de gjør som advokat. Du finner mer informasjon om erstatning og hvordan du kan rette et erstatningskrav mot advokaten her: http://www.advokatenhjelperdeg.no/artikler/kan-jeg-klage-pa-advokaten/#kanjegferstatning

    Med vennlig hilsen

    Mona Mjøen McKiernan

    ADVOKATFORENINGEN / THE NORWEGIAN BAR ASSOCIATION

    Kristian Augusts gate 9, N-0164 Oslo T +47 22 03 50 50 E mmm@advokatforeningen.no
    www.advokatforeningen.no www.advokatenhjelperdeg.no  

    From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
    Sent: 20. juni 2012 20:57
    To: Mona Mjøen McKiernan
    Cc: Disiplinærnemnden for advokater
    Subject: Re: Din henvendelse til Advokatforeningen

    Hei,

    ok, jeg videresender denne korrespondansen til dem, så får jeg håpe at de tar kontakt.
    Også ønsker jeg samtidig å klage på Advokat.no.


    Som tidligere nevnt, så ba jeg om en advokat i Drammen, siden dette er den nærmeste store byen, fra Bergeråsen, hvor omsorgssvikten fant sted.

    (Etter at jeg ble innvilget Fri Rettshjelp, fra Fylkesmannen i Oslo og Akershus).


    Jeg ble tilbudt en advokat i Oslo.

    Og jeg tenkte at det var greit.

    Men da jeg sjekket nettsidene til Advokat.no nærmere, så så jeg det, at Advokat.no hadde syv advokater i Oslo, som var spesialister på barnevern.

    Og selv om min sak er en barnevernssak, (min far lot meg bo alene fra jeg var ni år, og jeg fikk fri rettshjelp til en barnevernssak mot Svelvik kommune).

    Så ble jeg gitt en advokat som _ikke_ hadde barnevern som hovedfelt.


    Og så, her om dagen, slutter plutselig den advokaten.


    Advokat.no skulle jo da selvfølgelig ha tilbudt meg en ny advokat.


    Men det gjorde de ikke.


    De bare sa at de var ferdig med saken.

    Og dette etter at jeg hadde forklart for hun Rukke der, at jeg blir snytt for arv også, og trenger hjelp av en advokat, til å få Tingretten i Larvik, til å ha offentlig skifte, etter min mormor, og fristen der er 26. juni, altså på tirsdag neste uke.

    Så at Advokat.no bare sluttet å jobbe med sakene mine, det kan koste meg arven etter min mor, (som døde i 1999), og min mormor som var fra danske kongelige og adelige.

    Så jeg synes Advokat.no oppfører seg så besynderlig, at jeg ønsker å klage.


    Samtidlig så lurer jeg på hva vitsen er med å klage, for Øvergård fikk bare 2000 i bot, og jeg fikk ingenting i erstatning.


    Og dette gjaldt salg av min del av et sameie i Holmsbu, som jeg ville selge for å ha råd til det nevnte offentlige skiftet da.

    For meg så virker det som at jeg bare blir systematisk tullet med av norske advokater, (er det mafian som trekker i tråder, jeg har overhørt i 2003 at jeg er forfulgt av dem).


    Hvordan skal jeg liksom få ordnet med det offentlige skiftet da.


    Hvorfor kan liksom ingen i Norge hjelpe meg med det, nå er det bare noen dager igjen til fristen går ut.


    Men Advokatforeningen er så idiotisk organisert at dere ikke gir erstatning til ofre for deres mafia-advokater, og kun gir mindre enn en timelønn i bot til disse mafia-advokatene så det er jo helt håpløst.


    Det burde vært som i USA hvor folk får store erstatninger.


    Ellers så kommer de aldri av flekken.

    Jeg blir litt kvalm her jeg sitter i England av dette mafia-opplegget som foregår i Norge.


    Så nå må dere forte dere å gi Advokat.no 2000 i bot, de også.


    Hva skal liksom løse seg da, tenker dere?

    Dette er jo helt meningsløst egentlig.

    Kan dere ikke tilby meg advokathjelp, eller noe, i det minste?

    Hvordan skal jeg få ordnet med dette offentlige skiftet hvor fristen går ut 26. juni.


    Det kan jo være at den egentlige grunnen til at Advokat.no oppførte seg så besynderlig var for at jeg skulle miste kontrollen over det arveoppgjøret, pga. at en mafia står bak, og trekker i tråder.

    Jeg rekker jo ikke nå å få en ny advokat til å ordne med dette.


    Så om dere kan ordne med det.

    Jeg har skrevet om disse problemene på blogg i tre år nå, og ingen i Norge gjør en dritt, så jeg er rimelig oppgitt, for å si det sånn.

    Jeg vet nesten ikke hva jeg skal si.


    Erik Ribsskog

    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

    Date: 2012/12/10
    Subject: Re: Skadenummer: SA59484-001-BIK (H163117989M)
    To: ansvarskade@if.no
    Cc: arne.einar.brun@tryg.no

    Hei,

    ok, det var en ‘premie-idiot’, hos Tilsynsrådet for Advokatvirksomhet, som sa at IF var riktig selskap, skjønner du.


    Jeg sender nå e-post til en i Tryg, så håper jeg at jeg får erstatning tilsvarende det denne nå ødelagte saken, (må man vel si), ville vært verdt, etter å ha vunnet den, i retten.


    Takk for deres forklaring om dette!

    Og hils min fetter Tommy.


    Dere må ikke glemme å bytte ut Audi-en hans, med jevne mellomrom, sånn at han slipper å kjøre rundt i et gammelt vrak som snart må kondemneres.

    Mvh.


    Erik Ribsskog
    2012/12/10 <ansvarskade@if.no>

    [image]

    Vedr. erstatningskrav mot Advokat.no/Ida Valen Rukke

    Det vises til mottatt erstatningskrav under sikkerhetsstillelsen/forsikringen til advokat Ida Valen Rukke. På bakgrunn av denne henvendelsen har vi opprettet et referansenummer SA59484-BIK. Jeg ber om at det vises til dette referansenummeret ved henvendelser vedrørende saken.

    Ida Valen Rukke sluttet i Advokat.no og tegnet ny forsikring og sikkerhetsstillelse hos If Skadeforsikring 01.08.12 gjennom ny arbeidsgiver. Det fremgår av forsikringsbeviset hos oss at et krav må være reist mot sikrede eller forsikringsselskapet i forsikringstiden for å falle inn under ordningen.

    Ut fra dokumentasjonen vi har mottatt synes kravet i nærværende sak å være rettet mot Advokat.no/Rukke i perioden før If Skadeforsikring tegnet forsikringen/sikkerhetsstillelsen. Kravet må således gjøres gjeldende mot det forsikringsselskapet der Advokat.no/Rukke hadde sin forsikring tidligere. Jeg har fått opplyst at dette er Tryg.

    Ut fra ovenstående vil forholdet ikke bli behandlet videre hos If skadeforsikring.

    Vennlig hilsen

    If

    Birgitte Knudtzon
    Advokat – Ansvar Skade

    Telefon: 21495821