johncons

Stikkord: Kryssordprogram

  • Lignende problemer, kunne man ha unngått, ved å ha brukt mitt kryssord-program, (som jeg lagde, som student, ved NHI, i studieåret 1991/92). Ved å for eksempel gå gjennom synonym-ordlisten, og fjernet eventuelt ‘rare/uønskede’ synonymer

    synonymer

    http://www.vg.no/nyheter/innenriks/allers-kryssord-afrikanere-er-lik-buskmenn/a/23334181/

    PS.

    Man kunne også, hatt en kvalitets-sjekk, av kryssordene, etter at de var ferdig generert.

    Og sjekket, om alle synonymene, (i kryssordet, som datamaskinen nettopp har ‘spydd’ ut), var ok.

    Man måtte kanskje, også hatt en rutine, for å sjekke, at det kryssordet, som PC-en nettopp har ‘spydd’ ut, ikke var brukt tidligere.

    Dette kunne kanskje løses, ved å fjerne synonymene, (som ble brukt, i et kryssord), fra synonym-ordlisten, (ihvertfall for en tid).

    Eller at man fikk et nytt del-program, til å søke gjennom en database, av tidligere kryssord.

    (Noe sånt).

    Og dette nye del-programmet, kunne da forkastet kryssord, som inneholdt for mange like synonymer, som tidligere publiserte kryssord, (for eksempel).

    Eller at ukebladene kjøpte kryssordene ferdig, av et firma, (hvor jeg og en investor, var eiere, for eksempel).

    Og så sørget det firmaet, for at kryssordene ikke ble for like, (for eksempel).

    Her måtte han ha hatt rutiner rundt.

    Og det kunne vært mennesker som jobbet med disse rutinene.

    Eller det kunne vært dataprogrammer.

    Man kunne latt andre folk, lage del-programmer.

    (Som fungerte, sammen med mitt kryssord-program, (og min kryssord-algoritme)).

    Her kunne det vokst opp en ny industri.

    Dette, (kryssord), er vel underholdning.

    Så sektoren her, blir kanskje underholdningsindustrien, (for eksempel).

    (Noe sånt).

    Her er det veldig store  muligheter, (vil jeg si).

    Alle aviser/ukeblader i verden, (over en viss størrelse), kunne for eksempel ha hatt en kryssord-ansvarlig, som jobbet med mitt kryssord-program, (og gjorde sine kryssord unike, ved å jobbe med/trimme, sin egen synonym-ordliste, for eksempel).

    (Noe sånt).

    Så dette, (‘automatisk kryssord-generering ved hjelp av IT’, som jeg har oppfunnet, (virker det som), kunne nok ha utviklet seg, til å blitt, en milliard-industri, (vil jeg si).

    (Men det er kanskje tilfeldigheter, som avgjør.

    Hva vet jeg).

    Så sånn er nok det.

    Bare noe jeg tenkte på.

    Men men.

    Mvh.

    Erik Ribsskog

    PS 2.

    Tidligere landbruksminister Lars Sponheim, sa jo det, (i Stortinget), for noen år siden, at: ‘Hver mann sin høne’.

    Men man kunne kanskje også ha sagt det, at: ‘Hver mann sitt kryssord-program’.

    Og så kunne folk bare ha printet ut ferdige, (‘løse-klare’) kryssord, hjemme i stua, (fra sin hjemme-PC).

    Eller løst disse kryssordene, på skjermen.

    (For eksempel på sin smart-telefon.

    På toget, på vei til jobben, (for eksempel).

    Noe sånt).

    Så her er det nærmest uante muligheter, som kan utvikles, med basis, i min kryssord-algoritme, (vil jeg si).

    Så sånn er nok det.

    Bare noe jeg tenkte på.

    Men men.

    PS 3.

    Ved å utnytte min kryssord-algoritme, så forsvinner kryssordforfatteren, (på samme måte som at Gutenberg sin boktrykkerkunst, gjorde munkene, (som tidligere ‘tegnet’ bøkene), overflødige):

    kuttes ut

    http://www.vg.no/nyheter/innenriks/allers-kryssord-afrikanere-er-lik-buskmenn/a/23334181/

    PS 4.

    Så for å prøve å si det, som en markedsfører.

    Så får man, (ved å utnytte min oppfinnelse).

    En kryssordforfatter, som skriver et nytt kryssord, i sekundet, (eller noe i den duren).

    Og en kryssordforfatter, som ikke blir sur, hvis det er et enkelt kryssord, som ukebladet/avisen, ikke liker.

    Og, (ikke minst), en kryssordforfatter, som jobber gratis!

    (Ukebladet/avisen trenger bare å kjøpe mitt kryssord-program.

    Og muligens ha en sekretær, (eller noe i den duren), som jobber litt, med synonym-ordlisten, nå og da.

    Eller, dette kan også kanskje også unngås, ved at det blir laget, fler del-program, (noe som burde være relativt ‘plankekjøring’), rundt selve kryssord-algoritmen.

    Noe sånt).

    Så her er det veldig store muligheter, for aviser og ukeblader, (som klager over at de selger mindre), til å spare penger.

    (Og de kan  kanskje også få fler lesere.

    Siden at de da, (ved å bruke min oppfinnelse), kan ha fler morsomme/bra kryssord, i avisene/ukebladene sine.

    Det er ikke umulig, at  man ved å bruke min oppfinnelse riktig, kan få ‘høykvalitets-kryssord’, som blir mer populære, enn dagens kryssord.

    Dette har jeg testet litt, (i 1992), da jeg hadde laget den første versjonen, av min oppfinnelse.

    Og test-kryssordløserne, (de som bodde, i samme bofelleskap som meg, på Ungbo, (det vil si Wenche, Anne-Lise og Per vel)), de syntes at kryssordene ble greie.

    (Selv om det ikke var snakk om. noen kjempestore kryssord, (på den tiden), må jeg innrømme.

    Men med en større synonym-ordliste, (‘sekretær-arbeid’, eller søking på nett, etter eventuelle ‘public domain’ synonym-ordlister), og dagens hurtigere PC-er, så ville kryssordene nå kunne lages i mye større format, (ved å gjøre noe ‘delprogram-jobbing’, som burde være relativt ‘plankekjøring’), vil jeg nok tippe på).

    Men jeg har ikke noe ferdig produkt/løsning, å tilby avisene/ukebladene, for øyeblikket.

    Mitt nettverk, har ikke vært der for meg, (må jeg si).

    Så jeg har ikke kommet noen vei, med dette.

    (Ingen har hjulpet meg, å komme i kontakt, med investorer, for eksempel.

    Og ingen har liksom vært i ‘heia-gjengen’ min, (og gitt meg støtte/råd/oppmuntring), når det gjelder det, å utnytte oppfinnelsen min videre, (må jeg si)).

    Så sånn er det.

    Bare noe jeg tenkte på.

    Men men.

  • Mer fra Facebook

    virket programmet hm
    PS.

    Her er mer om dette:

    vgs tekstarkiv
  • Jeg sendte en e-post til katolsk.no


    Gmail – Forslag til ny pave

    Gmail


    Erik Ribsskog
    <eribsskog@gmail.com>



    Forslag til ny pave



    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>


    Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 9:51 AM

    To:
    webred@katolsk.no

    Hei,

    jeg er ikke religiøs, men jeg vil gjerne likevel foreslå Henry Matje, fra Østfold, som ny pave.

    Han har funnet opp kryssordprogram, (et kryssord-produksjons-program), og da må man være smart som en Gutenberg eller Einstein, (vil jeg si).


    Sender med en artikkel fra VG som forklarer mer om dette.

    Mvh.

    Erik Ribsskog


    matje kryssordprogram.jpg
    64K

    PS.

    matje kryssordprogram

  • Jeg fikk en ny e-post angående patent





    Gmail – Update/Fwd: Patent



    Gmail
    Erik Ribsskog
    <eribsskog@gmail.com>



    Update/Fwd: Patent



    Information

    <Information@ipo.gov.uk>

    Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 9:20 AM

    To:
    Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

    Dear Sir,

    Thank you for your email dated 23.04.2012

    All the information you need to start an application is here:

    http://www.ipo.gov.uk/types/patent/p-applying/p-apply.htm

    Please also see the booklets on the right-hand side.  An example of how a patent specification should be set out starts at page 15 of the application Guide.

    Yours sincerely,

    John Hurley

    Information Centre

    Intellectual Property Office.

    Do you provide IP advice for businesses? Do you manage your company’s IP? Do you want to improve and refine your knowledge and understanding of IP?

    Attend the IP Masterclass – you will develop the skills to conduct an IP health check, gain a thorough understanding of patents, trade marks, designs and copyright along with licensing, brand identity and IP valuation and refine your skills in patent, trade mark and design database searches. For more information go to www.ipo.gov.uk/business-masterclass.htm

    —–Original Message—–

    From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

    Sent: 23 April 2012 16:02

    To: Information

    Subject: Re: Update/Fwd: Patent

    Hi,

    well, I think that when it’s an invention in the industry e-commerce, which is on the internet and therefore not physical, then it should be obvious that the invention isn’t physical eighter.

    I think it sounds a bit strange if one can’t patent inventions because they are digital and not physical.

    And also, like I explained in one of my earlier e-mails I think I can explain why I don’t apply at once, because I’ve been very busy and haven’t known about patents in detail earlier.

    It isn’t right that only professors, (who has learned about patents at University can apply for patents, I think).

    I’ve gone to the University of Sunderland, Faculty of Applied Sciences, and have learned about research there, but we didn’t learn about patents, (but I had some problems with the study-loan bank in Norway etc., so that took some of my attention away from the studies).

    Further, I wasn’t joking when I wrote that I have invented a new industry.

    Automated crossword-production.

    This invention does for crosswords what book-printing does for books.

    Cross-word-writers doesn’t have to sit all day any longer like if they were monks in the dark ages.

    Now they can just use my invention and the crosswords are made automaticaly.

    (After some fine-tuning/re-development to make my invention more commercial, but the invention works at todays date, it’s with NITH, and academy in Oslo, I made it in 1991/92, on a Final Year Project, (Module-name: O39/O40), Name on Project : Kryssordkompilator.

    I’ve later not had much time for dealing with things like this.

    I had to go to my conscription-service, in the Norwegian Army, in the infantery there, just weeks after finishing the invention.

    And there they didn’t understand.

    When I told my platoon-leading-officer, Sverre Frøshaug, that I had to call my acadamy, (then called NHI), then he started talking about if this was important enough, when we were at an infantery-exersice, in a mountain-area near Kongsberg.

    So I didn’t get to call NHI, and after that nothing has happened, because then I didn’t get to go on a scheduled meeting, regarding the invention, with Ole Øren, head-master, NHI.

    Of course it was important, that I called NHI, or else I wouldn’t have asked.

    So I didn’t know what to ansver Sverre Frøshaug then, when he asked me this, on the bus, back to the army-base, in Elverum, where also British Royal Marines, (I think they are), go to practice skiing, in the winters, and compete with us conscription-soldiers from Norway.

    So I wondered about how I go forward to apply for a patent for the industry/invention, which I’ve invented.

    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

    On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 9:43 AM, Information <Information@ipo.gov.uk> wrote:

           Dear Sir,

           Thank you for your email dated 20.04.2012

           If you apply for a patent in the UK you would need to have in mind an invention that has a physical feature, or features, that you can list and describe (and therefore which we could search) that you believe are new and inventive. ‘New’ means not having been made publicly available anywhere prior to the day of filing. ‘Inventive’ means the invention should include an inventive step and not be something could be merely regarded as obvious by someone with a background in that type of industry.

           I think it may be possible to patent software in the USA, but I would advise that you go to www.uspto.org for more information.

           The email address is:

           IP.Policy@uspto.org

           If you are in the UK, the best person to speak to regarding patentability would be a Patent Agent. These are Solicitors who specialise in intellectual property. The Governing body – the Chartered Institute of Patent Agents  – hold free advice clinics around the country: please go to www.cipa.org.uk

           Yours sincerely,

           John Hurley

           Information Centre

           Intellectual Property Office.

           Do you provide IP advice for businesses? Do you manage your company’s IP? Do you want to improve and refine your knowledge and understanding of IP?

           Attend the IP Masterclass – you will develop the skills to conduct an IP health check, gain a thorough understanding of patents, trade marks, designs and copyright along with licensing, brand identity and IP valuation and refine your skills in patent, trade mark and design database searches. For more information go to www.ipo.gov.uk/business-masterclass.htm

           —–Original Message—–

           From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

           Sent: 20 April 2012 16:50

           To: Information

           Subject: Update/Fwd: Patent

           Hi,

           I read up a bit more about Software Patents now:

           http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_patents_under_United_Kingdom_patent_law

           To use the same termonology, used in the Wikipedia-article, linked to above, I think I would call the method I want to patent an invention in the field/industry of E-Commerce.

           Hope this is easier to understand now!

           Best regards,

           Erik Ribsskog

           ———- Forwarded message ———-

           From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

           Date: Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 4:40 PM

           Subject: Fwd: Patent

           To: Information@ipo.gov.uk

           Hi,

           Wikipedia mentions Software patents:

           In modern usage, the term patent usually refers to the right granted to anyone who invents any new, useful, and non-obvious process, machine, article of manufacture, or composition of matter. Some other types of intellectual property rights are also referred to as patents in some jurisdictions: industrial design rights <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Industrial_design_rights>  are called design patents <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Design_patents>  in the US, plant breeders’ rights <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plant_breeders%27_rights>  are sometimes called plant patents, andutility models <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utility_model>  and Gebrauchsmuster <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gebrauchsmuster>  are sometimes called petty patents or innovation patents. The additional qualification utility patent is sometimes used (primarily in the US) to distinguish the primary meaning from these other types of patents.

           Examples of particular species of patents for inventions include biological patents <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biological_patent> , business method patents <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Business_method_patent> , chemical patents <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chemical_patent>  and software patents <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_patent> .

           http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patent

           Is this only in the US?

           Thanks in advance for any reply!

           Best regards,

           Erik Ribsskog

           PS.

           This patent is really not web design only, it’s more a method, I think one should call it.

           ———- Forwarded message ———-

           From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

           Date: Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 4:18 PM

           Subject: Re: Patent

           To: Information <Information@ipo.gov.uk>

           Ok,

           thank you very much for the reply.

           Then I understand that this is about copyright.

           Thanks again for the help!

           Best regards,

           Erik Ribsskog

           On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Information <Information@ipo.gov.uk> wrote:

                  Dear Erik

                  Thank you for your enquiry.

                  Unfortunately websites and processes related to them are not protectable by a patent <http://www.ipo.gov.uk/types/patent/p-about/p-whatis.htm>  in the United Kingdom.

                  A patent protects new physical inventions and covers how things work, what they do, how they do it, what they are made of and how they are made. It gives the owner the right to prevent others from making, using, importing or selling the invention without permission.

                  The actual software you have used on your website may be protected under copyright <http://www.ipo.gov.uk/types/copy/c-about.htm>  if it was created by you however the idea of how to view and purchase items online is not protectable by UK intellectual property laws.

                  I hope this helps with your enquiry. If you have any more queries, please do not hesitate to contact me.

                  Yours Sincerely

                  Andrew Reith

                  Information Centre

                  IP Advisor

                  Unsure how Intellectual Property can benefit you?  Want to see how IP relates to your business and how to safeguard your assets?  Get a FREE IP Health check online using a new interactive tool at – www.ipo.gov.uk/iphealthcheck

                  —–Original Message—–

                  From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

                  Sent: 20 April 2012 13:15

                  To: Information

                  Subject: Patent

                  Hi,

                  I have developed a web-shop myself, where one have to point on the pictures, of the goods, with the mouse-arrow, and then you get to read the product-information.

                  Then you just click to put the item in the shopping-basket:

                  http://www.goodyshop.co.uk/

                  I also have a Norwegian shop: http://www.godtebutikken.net/, and I’ve sold about 100 packets to Norway now.

                  So the shop works fine.

                  I wonder if I should register a patent on the way one buy the products, since I think that’s a unique solution, which I haven’t seen anywhere else, and which works fine.

                  I’m going to go to the bank again to try to get a business-loan, and then I’m going to try to register this patent.

                  I just wanted to send this initial e-mail, to document that I’ve started working with this a bit.

                  Hope this is alright!

                  Yours sincerley,

                  Erik Ribsskog



  • Jeg sendte en ny e-post angående patent





    Gmail – Update/Fwd: Patent



    Gmail
    Erik Ribsskog
    <eribsskog@gmail.com>



    Update/Fwd: Patent



    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>

    Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 4:02 PM

    To:
    Information <Information@ipo.gov.uk>

    Hi,
    well, I think that when it's an invention in the industry e-commerce, which is on the internet and therefore not physical, then it should be obvious that the invention isn't physical eighter.

    I think it sounds a bit strange if one can't patent inventions because they are digital and not physical.
    And also, like I explained in one of my earlier e-mails I think I can explain why I don't apply at once, because I've been very busy and haven't known about patents in detail earlier.
    It isn't right that only professors, (who has learned about patents at University can apply for patents, I think).
    I've gone to the University of Sunderland, Faculty of Applied Sciences, and have learned about research there, but we didn't learn about patents, (but I had some problems with the study-loan bank in Norway etc., so that took some of my attention away from the studies).

    Further, I wasn't joking when I wrote that I have invented a new industry.
    Automated crossword-production.
    This invention does for crosswords what book-printing does for books.
    Cross-word-writers doesn't have to sit all day any longer like if they were monks in the dark ages.

    Now they can just use my invention and the crosswords are made automaticaly.
    (After some fine-tuning/re-development to make my invention more commercial, but the invention works at todays date, it's with NITH, and academy in Oslo, I made it in 1991/92, on a Final Year Project, (Module-name: O39/O40), Name on Project : Kryssordkompilator.

    I've later not had much time for dealing with things like this.
    I had to go to my conscription-service, in the Norwegian Army, in the infantery there, just weeks after finishing the invention.

    And there they didn't understand.
    When I told my platoon-leading-officer, Sverre Frøshaug, that I had to call my acadamy, (then called NHI), then he started talking about if this was important enough, when we were at an infantery-exersice, in a mountain-area near Kongsberg.

    So I didn't get to call NHI, and after that nothing has happened, because then I didn't get to go on a scheduled meeting, regarding the invention, with Ole Øren, head-master, NHI.

    Of course it was important, that I called NHI, or else I wouldn't have asked.
    So I didn't know what to ansver Sverre Frøshaug then, when he asked me this, on the bus, back to the army-base, in Elverum, where also British Royal Marines, (I think they are), go to practice skiing, in the winters, and compete with us conscription-soldiers from Norway.

    So I wondered about how I go forward to apply for a patent for the industry/invention, which I've invented.
    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

    On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 9:43 AM, Information <Information@ipo.gov.uk> wrote:

    Dear Sir,

    Thank you for your email dated 20.04.2012

    If you apply for a patent in the UK you would need to have in mind an invention that has a physical feature, or features, that you can list and describe (and therefore which we could search) that you believe are new and inventive. 'New' means not having been made publicly available anywhere prior to the day of filing. 'Inventive' means the invention should include an inventive step and not be something could be merely regarded as obvious by someone with a background in that type of industry.

    I think it may be possible to patent software in the USA, but I would advise that you go to www.uspto.org for more information.

    The email address is:

    IP.Policy@uspto.org

    If you are in the UK, the best person to speak to regarding patentability would be a Patent Agent. These are Solicitors who specialise in intellectual property. The Governing body – the Chartered Institute of Patent Agents – hold free advice clinics around the country: please go to www.cipa.org.uk

    Yours sincerely,

    John Hurley

    Information Centre

    Intellectual Property Office.

    Do you provide IP advice for businesses? Do you manage your company's IP? Do you want to improve and refine your knowledge and understanding of IP?

    Attend the IP Masterclass – you will develop the skills to conduct an IP health check, gain a thorough understanding of patents, trade marks, designs and copyright along with licensing, brand identity and IP valuation and refine your skills in patent, trade mark and design database searches. For more information go to www.ipo.gov.uk/business-masterclass.htm

    —–Original Message—–

    From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

    Sent: 20 April 2012 16:50

    To: Information

    Subject: Update/Fwd: Patent

    Hi,

    I read up a bit more about Software Patents now:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_patents_under_United_Kingdom_patent_law

    To use the same termonology, used in the Wikipedia-article, linked to above, I think I would call the method I want to patent an invention in the field/industry of E-Commerce.

    Hope this is easier to understand now!

    Best regards,

    Erik Ribsskog

    ———- Forwarded message ———-

    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

    Date: Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 4:40 PM

    Subject: Fwd: Patent

    To: Information@ipo.gov.uk

    Hi,

    Wikipedia mentions Software patents:

    In modern usage, the term patent usually refers to the right granted to anyone who invents any new, useful, and non-obvious process, machine, article of manufacture, or composition of matter. Some other types of intellectual property rights are also referred to as patents in some jurisdictions: industrial design rights <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Industrial_design_rights> are called design patents <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Design_patents> in the US, plant breeders' rights <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plant_breeders%27_rights> are sometimes called plant patents, andutility models <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utility_model> and Gebrauchsmuster <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gebrauchsmuster> are sometimes called petty patents or innovation patents. The additional qualification utility patent is sometimes used (primarily in the US) to distinguish the primary meaning from these other types of patents.

    Examples of particular species of patents for inventions include biological patents <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biological_patent> , business method patents <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Business_method_patent> , chemical patents <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chemical_patent> and software patents <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_patent> .

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patent

    Is this only in the US?

    Thanks in advance for any reply!

    Best regards,

    Erik Ribsskog

    PS.

    This patent is really not web design only, it's more a method, I think one should call it.

    ———- Forwarded message ———-

    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

    Date: Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 4:18 PM

    Subject: Re: Patent

    To: Information <Information@ipo.gov.uk>

    Ok,

    thank you very much for the reply.

    Then I understand that this is about copyright.

    Thanks again for the help!

    Best regards,

    Erik Ribsskog

    On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Information <Information@ipo.gov.uk> wrote:

    Dear Erik

    Thank you for your enquiry.

    Unfortunately websites and processes related to them are not protectable by a patent <http://www.ipo.gov.uk/types/patent/p-about/p-whatis.htm> in the United Kingdom.

    A patent protects new physical inventions and covers how things work, what they do, how they do it, what they are made of and how they are made. It gives the owner the right to prevent others from making, using, importing or selling the invention without permission.

    The actual software you have used on your website may be protected under copyright <http://www.ipo.gov.uk/types/copy/c-about.htm> if it was created by you however the idea of how to view and purchase items online is not protectable by UK intellectual property laws.

    I hope this helps with your enquiry. If you have any more queries, please do not hesitate to contact me.

    Yours Sincerely

    Andrew Reith

    Information Centre

    IP Advisor

    Unsure how Intellectual Property can benefit you? Want to see how IP relates to your business and how to safeguard your assets? Get a FREE IP Health check online using a new interactive tool at – www.ipo.gov.uk/iphealthcheck

    —–Original Message—–

    From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

    Sent: 20 April 2012 13:15

    To: Information

    Subject: Patent

    Hi,

    I have developed a web-shop myself, where one have to point on the pictures, of the goods, with the mouse-arrow, and then you get to read the product-information.

    Then you just click to put the item in the shopping-basket:

    http://www.goodyshop.co.uk/

    I also have a Norwegian shop: http://www.godtebutikken.net/, and I've sold about 100 packets to Norway now.

    So the shop works fine.

    I wonder if I should register a patent on the way one buy the products, since I think that's a unique solution, which I haven't seen anywhere else, and which works fine.

    I'm going to go to the bank again to try to get a business-loan, and then I'm going to try to register this patent.

    I just wanted to send this initial e-mail, to document that I've started working with this a bit.

    Hope this is alright!

    Yours sincerley,

    Erik Ribsskog