Stikkord: Merseyside-politiet

Kommentar til Brown som vil ha en ny økonomisk verdensordning. (In Norwegian).

Why do voters allow themselves to be treated like idiots? We don’t need a NWO or new rules for banking. None of this would have happened if people had been told the truth from the very start. What we need is a media more interested in news than advertising dollars.

Udo, Melbourne, Australia

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article4938771.ece

Hvorfor må man til Australia, for å finne noen som protesterer mot Browns New World Order-politikk?

Er det ingen i England som tørr å protestere?

I såfall, hvorfor ikke?

Er dem redd for noe mob, eller er det politiet som er som en New World Order-mob, for Brown?

Ikke vet jeg, men jeg tror noe må være galt.

Hvis man ser på Liverpool, en lørdagskveld, så er sentrum ‘flooded’ med politi, som har kontroll på byen, som om det skulle ha vært et krigsområde.

Selv om jeg har bodd i Liverpool i tre år, og aldri sett en slåsskamp.

Så her er det nok noe lureri, fra staten, i Storbritannia, vil jeg si.

I hvertfall virker det sånn.

Så sånn er det.

Med vennlig hilsen

Erik Ribsskog

PS.

Avisene hyller Gordon Brown, for å ha reddet bankene.

Men man kan se, at det er skattebetalerne, som må betale regningene i England også.

Så dette er det samme som Bush & Co., har gjort i USA, vil jeg si.

At de har laget en redningspakke.

Det som kongressen vedtok i USA, har Brown og Darling tatt på bakrommet i Storbritannia.

Noe sånt.

Men skattebetalerne, er de som betaler regningen uansett, (og hvem som stikker av med pengene, det vet ikke jeg, men det er i hvertfall vanlige folk som betaler regningen for uansvarlig bankdrift, det kan man se her):

The Government will have had to impose tax rises or spending cuts – or both.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/rachel_sylvester/article4938141.ece

Så Merkel og Sarkozky og avisene, og alle mulige, synes at Brown er så flink.

Men han bare gir regningen til skattebetalerne.

Så hipp hurra, i Storbritannia, så trenger bare statsministeren å nevne Churchill, så sier alle at han er en helt, og folk skjønner ikke at dem blir lurt.

Sånn virker det for meg i hvertfall.

14. oktober 2008
Merseyside-politiet har ikke noen politistasjon i Liverpool sentrum. Før nå. (In Norwegian).

3. september 2008
Politiet i Liverpool driver å ransaker vanlige folk, kan det virke som. (In Norwegian).

Jeg var en tur ute, og fikk noe frisk luft, i kveld også.

Fordi, at selv om jeg ikke har noen penger nå, før jeg får den neste lønningssjekken, som er litt forsinket, så er det jo kjedelig, å bare sitte hjemme hele tida, siden jeg jobber hjemmenfra osv.

Og på lørdagskveldene, så er det litt liv i byen, så da hender det at jeg blir frista til å gå ut.

I dag så skjedde det egentlig ikke så mye.

Men jeg så politiet, drev å ransaket, noen folk, som så ut som vanlige folk, for meg.

Det er kanskje ikke så lett å se på bildet, men det var to jenter og, som politiet gikk gjennom veska til.

Og etter at jeg tok bildet, så gikk jeg rundt kvartalet, og traff igjen de to jentene, som ble ransaka av politiet, ved den togstasjonen, som er like ved det kunstverket, som heter ‘Turning the place over’, i Liverpool.

Og jeg spurte de hvorfor politiet ransaka dem, for jeg synes politiet her i byen, gjør så mye rart.

Og da sa de, at de bare ‘frisked everyone’.

Så hva som foregår, hvis det var riktig som de jentene sa, det er vanskelig å si.

Men noe er det vel.

Med vennlig hilsen

Erik Ribsskog

PS.

Det her bildet ble ikke så bra da:

Men jeg er ikke helt trygg på politiet her i byen egentlig, så jeg vet ikke hvor smart det er å stappe et mobilkamera oppi trynet på dem, så prøvde å ta bilder av dem litt diskret, men det var jo litt varierende resultat på bildene må man si.

Men sånn er det.

24. august 2008
The girl who was arrested in Matthew St.
Four Merseyside Police offisers (one of them garding), arresting a girl, (I heard the girl scream, a

Mature – Post Media Reply

I took this picture, a coulpe of months ago.

The girl, was pushed, by a man, in front of him, up Matthew St., in Liverpool, before about ten police-officers, stoped them.

The girl, who I didn’t see doing anything wrong, was searched by three police officers, while one stood garding.

I watched them standing like this, four about five or ten minutes.

The girl was screaming, or rather moaning, for some reason.

In the picture, it looks like it’s only two officers, searching the girl, (who wore party-clothes), but there is a third officer, in between, the two that are easiest to spot on the picture, if one look closely.

When I think of it now, I don’t understand, why they covered the girl, for viewing, and why they were standing like that, for that long, the girl couldn’t have had much on her, since she only wore going out clothes.

And I don’t understand why she was moaning.

I can’t get myself to write, what I think they could have been doing, but I’m wondering a bit, what went on, to say the least.

Yours sincerely,

Erik Ribsskog

Meet Hot Chicks In Your Area!
Date local girls in your town

Slow PC? Click Here to Increase your PC Performance
The two guys in the foreground look like a couple of meatheads.

Posted 7 hours ago by "Ant00" (R)

Quote |

Flag Comment

(0)

Top of Form

Bottom of Form
What’s your point, you illiterate moron? Hey, Erik, maybe she was another drunk party girl who did something illegal? Did that ever occur to you? Are you implying the officers sexually groped and assaulted the woman?

Posted 6 hours ago by "Johnls" (R)

Quote |

Flag Comment

(3)

Top of Form

Bottom of Form
Authorites have understood for years the criminal tactic of giving weapons and contraband to the females and innocents. The current situation with the extremists is a perfect example. They have used it for centuries. So much the reason for the demonstration of violation on the part of the females who are loud and pleading in their attempt to evade. You want to be treated like a lady; behave like one.

Posted 6 hours ago by "VZ58" (R)

Quote |

Flag Comment

(2)

Top of Form

Bottom of Form
I’m not into police-work.

But she didn’t do anything wrong.

A guy pushed her, up Matthew St., then he grabed her tit, if that’s allowed to write.

And then, about ten police officers spread out, four police officers went to arrest the girl.

They stood like that, for about five or ten minutes, before I left the scene, the other people left, so I was about the only one watching.

The girl was a bit upset, I think one has to say.

But she was wearing tight clothing, so what they could be looking for, isn’t clear to me.

But the three other Police officers, hid the forth one, and her body was lieing, over the waste bin, and she was moaning.

That’s what I saw, I can’t say exactly what they did.

But the girl didn’t say or do anything wrong, that I could see.

She was being held and pushed by a man, he grabed one of her tits, and then let her go, right before they were captured by the police, who led the man away, I think.

I couldn’t see where they brought the man, so I took a picture of the girl.

I thought that they the police were doing something wrong, since three officers were standing that close to her, and the fourht covering the three.

And the girl was moaning.

So I thought there were something wrong, because the girl had party-clothes, so she couldn’t have hid anything, so why would this go on, for five to ten minutes?

The girl seemed clear to be harmless to me, so I don’t understand whey they would stand around her like that, for five or ten minutes, and make her afraid, it seemed to me, uncalm, and moaning, like in pain.

So that’s why I posted the picture.

Yours sincerely,

Erik Ribsskog

Posted 6 hours ago by "johncons" (R)

Quote |

Flag Comment

(1)

Top of Form

Bottom of Form
You’re not yet used to Liverpool. Or so it seems.

Posted 5 hours ago by "KPD" (R)

Quote |

Flag Comment

(1)

Top of Form

Bottom of Form
SOP dictates that suspects are to be searched either at a police station, or out of view of the public, where reasonably possible.
The others were possibly providing a ‘dignity screen’ for the girl.
I don’t know what she’s suspected of, but the other option of going back to the nick probably didn’t appeal to her or the officers involved.
Another reason for the guard is the fact that the friends or associates of the girl may be upset, and try to intervene, creating further public order problems.
In my experience, female suspects were the worst to deal with, and screaming like a possessed banshee can sometimes antagonise even passers by into getting involved.
A quick (justified) search, followed by issuing a record of search for the suspect, and it’s "on your way" to enjoy the rest of the evening.
Job done, or if there are any problems – plenty of section 5 public order nickings to up the arrest points.

Posted 4 hours ago by "pheasantplucker" (R)

Quote |

Flag Comment

(0)

Top of Form

Bottom of Form
someone getting arrested on the street so what? clearly a female cop holding the accused…mountains out of mole hills…

Posted 4 hours ago by "cerpas" (R)

Quote |

Flag Comment

(1)

Top of Form

Bottom of Form
No, it wasn’t the female cop who searched the girl.

There is a male cop, in between the to police officers whos faces can be seen on the picture.

The girl wasn’t a threath to anyone, and she just wearing thight, going out clothes.

And the man pushed her up the street, while she screamed.

So to me, she seemed like a victim of the man.

He even grabbed her breast hard.

Then four police offers went after him, and four after the girl.

And there were also a few more police officers, following behind.

I think one with a funny hat.

KDP: What to you mean by not used to Liverpool, could you please elaborate?

Yours sincerely,

Erik Ribsskog

Posted 3 hours ago by "johncons" (R)

Quote |

Flag Comment

(0)

Top of Form

Bottom of Form
Quoted comment by johncons: No, it wasn’t the female cop who searched the girl.

There is a male cop, in between the to police officers whos faces can be seen on the picture.

The girl wasn’t a threath to anyone, and she just wearing thight, going out clothes.

And the man pushed her up the street, while she screamed.

So to me, she seemed like a victim of the man.

He even grabbed her breast hard.

Then four police offers went after him, and four after the girl.

And there were also a few more police officers, following behind.

I think one with a funny hat.

KDP: What to you mean by not used to Liverpool, could you please elaborate?

Yours sincerely,

Erik Ribsskog

Are you trying to say that the police methods in this case was unacceptable in your opinion. Do you know why the girl was an issue with the police?, seeing as you were close by did you not hear what was happening and why the girl was taken aside.

It just appears that the girl was maybe drunk and she possibly kicked off and was unhappy with the guy who groped her.

Sounds like a normal night out in liverpool to me.

Posted 1 hour ago by "japapadex" (R)

Quote |

Flag Comment

(0)

Top of Form

Bottom of Form
Holy Cow! Thanks for breaking this b.s. story to us. The media in the U.S. is trying to cover this up!

Posted 1 hour ago by "Mandingo07" (R)

Quote |

Flag Comment

(0)

Top of Form

Bottom of Form
Evening or night, too many people in a too small place, testosterone, alcohol and/or drugs abuse. What do you expect?

Bush did it, for all I care.

Posted 1 hour ago by "badMother" (R)

Quote |

Flag Comment

(1)

Top of Form

Bottom of Form
The girl wasn’t kicking anyone.

She was in a state of shock, I’d say.

I’ve explained why I posted this post, earlier in this thread.

Yours sincerely,

Erik Ribsskog

Posted 1 hour ago by "johncons" (R)

Quote |

Flag Comment

(0)

Top of Form

Bottom of Form
If you thought it was worth the time why is it you waited a couple of months??? By the way…did they check her for ben-wa balls?

Posted 31 mins ago by "dsterber" (R)

Quote |

Flag Comment

(0)

Top of Form

Bottom of Form
Hi,

I posted it on my blog, the same night:

https://johncons-blogg.net/2008/06/matthew-st-liverpool-ca-kl-01-in.html

I first heard of this site today, when I saw it mentioned in an online Norwegian newspaper.

I’ve also posted the pictue, on the Norwegian Wikipedia page, for Liverpool:

http://no.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liverpool

Ben-wa balls, I had to look up that.

I didn’t search her for anything, she was surrounded, by police officers, the whole time, four of them, and when the other guys, on the picture, left, then I moved a bit away, since there were very many police officers there.

The girl was moaning, and leaning over the litter bin, as far as I remember.

I tryed to understand, why she was moaning.

I looked at her, and tried to understand what was wrong.

I only understood, that the moaning, was due to something that the third officer, the one thats hidden between the other two, was doing, when he searched her, or what he was doing.

What he really was doing has been puzeling me a bit, to be honest, like I wrote earlier, I don’t think I want to wright what I wonder about really happened then.

It seems a bit surreal to me, the whole episode, and how the police acted.

But I’m maybe a bit old fashioned.

There are maybe new times now, with the new world order etc., so maybe there are new world order cops as well, what do I know.

Yours sincerely,

Erik Ribsskog

Posted very recently by "johncons" (R)

Quote |

Flag Comment

(0)

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=51b_1217744494
3. august 2008
Rare ting i England. (In Norwegian).

I England, så er det sånn, som det også er i Norge, at klager på politiet, går til en klageinstans, som heter IPCC.

Som står for the Independent Police Complaints Commission, tror jeg.

Det er noe lignende av Spesialenheten i Norge.

Og der skal liksom klagene stoppe opp(?)

Det er bare tullball, mener jeg.

For man må se hvor pengene kommer fra, til politiet.

Og de kommer vel fra finansdepartementet, og blir gitt til justisdepartementet, som gir penger til politiet.

Så her, burde også klager på politiet gå, i hvertfall hvis det er annet en rene rutine-klager da.

Men hvis det er spesielle klager, så burde de gå tjenesteveien, synes jeg, som alle andre steder.

Hvis ikke, så betyr det, at politiet kan bare gjøre hva de vil.

Eller, det betyr at myndighetene gir penger til politiet, men de har ikke ansvar for hva politiet gjør.

Enda, at myndighetene, vel er den som ansetter politisjefer og ministere.

Altså regjeringen da, eller statsministeren.

Så dette systemet med IPCC og Spesialenheten, det virker litt som lureri, synes jeg.

Som en måte for politikerne og embedsverket, å avskrive seg ansvaret for hva politiet gjør, enda de gir de penger, og ansetter lederne.

Så dette får jeg ikke til å høres riktig ut, dessverre.

Her er det noe lureri.

Og muligheter for å utnytte politiet, til å gjøre politiske motiverte ting, f.eks., uten at politikerne/embedsverket, må ta ansvaret for dette.

For politiet må være politisk styrt, vil jeg tro, siden politisjefer osv., utnevnes av poltikere.

Så her er det helt klart noe lureri, vil jeg si.

En annen ting i England, som også er noe lureri.

Det er dette Citizens Advice Buraux.

Dette er formellt en veldedig organisasjon, men de får nesten alle pengene fra myndighetene.

Så egentlig så er nok disse politisk styrt.

Men politikerne har ikke noe ansvar.

Hvis noe går galt, så er de med en gang, kun en veldedig organisasjon, som man ikke har noen rettigheter fra.

Dette gjør det mulig, å eventuelt, for politikerne, bruke pengestøtten som pressmiddel, f.eks., å eventuelt blande seg inn i enkeltsaker f.eks.

Uten å måtte ta noe ansvar, for dette.

Så CAB (Citizens Advice Buraux), er litt underfundig, vil jeg si.

Den er ‘Government’, når det passer den.

Og den er en ‘Charity’, når det passer den.

Så den CAB, burde man helst ikke ha noe med å gjøre, den er veldig sleip.

Så sånn er det.

Og CAB, sendte politiet meg til, og sa de var ‘Government’.

Så politiet er nok minst like sleipe.

Så hvem man kan stole på, som nordmann, av myndighetene i Storbritannia, det vil ikke jeg si noe sikkert om, men hvis jeg skulle gjette, så ville jeg tippe, at det nok ikke var så veldig mange av de.

Så sånn er det.

Med vennlig hilsen

Erik Ribsskog

30. juni 2008
For to år siden, skjedde det litt mye rart vel. (In Norwegian).

For to år siden snart.

Jeg lurer på om det var 4. juli, for to år siden da.

Så skjedde det en del rart.

Jeg var lei av set-upene i Mandeville St., i Walton, jeg bodde i et ‘shared house’ der.

Et par måneder i forkant, så fortalte jeg team-leaderne på Arvato, at jeg trengte en fast kontrakt, for å få ny leilighet, som jeg hadde svart på annonse for.

Så kom det tilbud om fast kontrakt, Arvato-kontrakt, i følge team-leaderne.

Når kontrakten dukket opp, i slutten av juni vel, så viste det seg å være tre måneders kontrakter, og ikke faste kontrakter, som team-leaderne hadde sagt.

Jeg tok det opp med line-manager, Line, og hun sa at den neste kontrakten, ville være en fast kontrakt, men det var den ikke, det var også en tre-måneders.

Jeg tok med kontrakten, til the estate agent, og de ville ha attest fra landlorden i Mandeville St.

Jeg tok med den og, og fikk kontrakt på leilighet, i Leather Lane.

Samme dag, dro jeg til politiet i Walton, Walton Lane, heter det vel.

Og forklarte, at det var enda mer tull i Mandeville St.

Melissa hadde stjålet PC-en til hun finske jenta som hadde bodd der før, Taru.

Og som hadde PC-en på mitt rom.

Melissa sa til meg, at hun hadde kjøpt PC-en av Taru.

Men det viste seg senere, å være løgn.

Jeg fikk en e-post av Taru.

I tillegg, så var det noe minibankkort, eller Visa Electron kort, som hadde blitt borte i posten der, og jeg synes jeg hørte et plastkort falle på gulvet, fra post-luka, i døra, og Melissa var den eneste hjemme, og jeg rapporterte dette mm. til politiet i Walton da, et par måneder før dette da.

Politiet i Walton, lurte på hvorfor jeg ble boende der, hvis så mye rart skjedde.

Så viste jeg de, kontrakten for Leather Lane, og at jeg hadde endelig fått den, samme dagen.

Jeg sa at attesten fra landlorden, var skrevet på et så underlig engelsk, at the estate agent, reagerte.

Politiet ville ha orginalen, men den ville the estate agent ha.

Så den hadde jeg allerede gitt til the estate agent, for jeg trengte jo leilighet.

Så politiet fikk låne kopien da.

Så dro jeg på jobben igjen.

Jeg hadde ferie disse dagene, som jeg flyttet, og kjøpte inn ting til leiligheten da.

Men, jeg trengte jo mer penger, for leia her var mye dyrere.

Så jeg dro på jobben, snakket med team-leader Line, og hun sa det var greit at jeg jobbet noen dager ekstra i ferien.

Etter det her, så var damene på jobben sure, og det ble de så lenge jeg jobbet der.

Av for meg ukjent anledning.

Men Judith, Godwin vel, hun sa blant annet til meg, i disse dagene.

‘You’ve been waiting sooo long for that appartment, haven’t you’.

På en ekkel måte, må jeg nesten si.

Så da fikk jeg nesten frysninger, for så ekkelt var hun.

Og jeg skjønte ikke hvorfor hun skulle være så ekkel.

Hun Emelie, Wallin, som var omtrent den eneste der, som var høflig og hyggelig, dro plutselig på ferie, omtrent samtidig, enda jeg mener at jeg hørte at hun ikke skulle på ferie, men det er mulig jeg rota.

Men, hun kom tilbake, noen uker etterpå, og virka som hun var helt rar/bortkommen, smilte osv.

Og han iren, Michael, som virka da, som at han var omtrent i familie med henne, måtte kjøpe milkshake til henne, på McDonalds, i lunch-pausen, som var på starten av skiftet dems.

De ukene her, så var det så kjedelige folk på jobben, så jeg brukte sjangsen til å lære meg litt svensk og dansk, for jeg synes at jeg kunne jo prøve å få noe utbytte av den her Microsoft rutine-jobben, når jeg først satt der i åtte timer hver dag.

Så det gjorde jeg da, også for å yte bedre service ovenfor kundene da.

Og få bedre resultater på samtale-tid, osv., som de maste fælt om.

Line, sa jo senere, at hun trodde, at jeg ønsket å jobbe ekstra i ferien, like etter at jeg hadde flytta hit, for å få mer ferie senere.

(Og ikke for å få ekstra lønn).

Så der i gården, i topp-etasjen, så lurer jeg litt på hvordan det står til, selv om det vel må ha vært et regelrett løgn.

Men men.

Og her, i Leather Lane, så fikk jeg vite, at det skulle være, faktura på strømmen, fra the estate agent.

Men når jeg flytta inn, så så jeg at man trengte et sånt lilla kort, for å kjøpe ‘strøm-billetter’, til fem pund, i mat-butikken.

Den boksen har jeg fått hivd ut nå da, så nå er det faktura.

Men da hadde jeg ikke det lilla kortet.

Så de første 3-4 dagene jeg bodde her, så var det ikke strøm.

Men jeg ville gjerne ut av Mandeville St., på grunn av alle set-upene der osv., jeg trodde de folka der var noe mob/mafia opplegg, siden de alltid skulle ta noe set-up på meg osv.

Jeg orker ikke å gå i detalj om det, men det var veldig slitsomt å bo der, pga. de her folka da, Melissa, Steven, Janine, Sarah, osv.

Det var to polske der også, på slutten, men de virka mer normale.

Men men.

Så det er mye rart.

Det er ikke så lett for meg, som er fra Larvik og Berger i Vestfold, å skjønne så mye av de mafia/mob-greiene, som folk driver med.

Ingen har fortalt meg om det greiene her, og myndighetene og politiet, er jo stumme som østers, så hva som foregår, det er jeg litt i villrede om.

Annet enn at myndighetene, har null respekt for rettighetene mine, og at ingen forteller meg noen ting.

Det er vel det jeg vet omtrent.

Så sånn er det.

Så respekt for folks rettigheter fra myndigheter, det er omtrent fraværende, virker det som.

Så man får vel ønske myndighetene god bedring da.

Selv om det spørrs hvor høye sjangser det er for at det hjelper.

Men vi får se.

Med vennlig hilsen

Erik Ribsskog

29. juni 2008
More about one of the letters from the Merseyside Police.
Photos from Fuck The Police…..

Photo 6 of 38|Back to Group|See All Photos
- Previous
- Next
Drag the corners of the transparent box below to crop this photo into your profile picture.

Click on people in the photo to tag them.

Added by you
to the group "Fuck The Police….."

Added June 1

Share

Type any name or tag:or choose a person:

Loading friends…

Enter ‘s email address and we’ll send a link to this photo.

Email:

Tag This Photo Edit This Photo Remove This Photo
24. juni 2008

E-mail to the Ministry of Justice, 19/6/08.

Google Mail – Our ref: TO08/2153

Erik Ribsskog

<eribsskog@gmail.com>

Our ref: TO08/2153

Erik Ribsskog

<eribsskog@gmail.com>

Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 8:35 PM

To:

"Holmes, Ryan" <Ryan.Holmes@justice.gsi.gov.uk>

Hi,

thank you very much for your e-mail, and the advice!

I wanted to complain about the IPCC, since the whole case is a mess, and they don't reply to my e-mails,

and they don't call me, you mention Brown, she has been supposed to call me, regarding the problems

with the missing answers on the e-mails, but she haven't called.

I think that the IPCC must have some serious problems, with handeling the complaints I sent them,

which I view as one case really.

So I was wondering, how I could submit this complaint, on the IPCC, to the Ministry of Justice.

If you think that you could please submit this complaint for me.

Also, I've contacted the FBI, in the American Embassy, in London.

And I asked them, on how should go forward, regarding reporting a crime in the US, that someone,

has set up a hate-blog against me there.

The FBI/The American Embassy Legal Advice, tells me to contact my local police-station, about this.

But I've lost a bit of confidence, with the Merseyside Police, due to the things mentioned in the

complaints, sent to the IPCC, and more.

And then I thought, that I could contact the IPCC about this then, since I didn't think I could contact

the local Police about this.

But now there has been so much problems, with the IPCC, so that I've lost a bit of confidence, in

the IPCC, as well.

So then I have to contact the Ministry of Justice about this, since I don't think that eighter the

Merseyside Police or the IPCC, have showed themselves, to be worthy, of much confidence,

unfortunatly.

So I'm mentioning this now.

Hope this is alright!

Yours sincerely,

Erik Ribsskog

On 6/19/08, Holmes, Ryan <Ryan.Holmes@justice.gsi.gov.uk> wrote:

Dear Mr Ribsskog

Thank you for your email reply of 5 June. I am also in receipt of your email dated 13 June.

As explained in my previous reply, the Law Society is the regulatory body for solicitors in England and Wales and will keep a comprehensive list of solicitors practising in your local area. Their website promotes a searchable database to help you find a solicitor which allows you to search by firm name, area of law and/or post code. To alleviate your concerns about contacting the Law Society due to previous personal experiences, I should point out that this list is a resource to assist the public locate suitable legal representation and promote solicitors across England and Wales. You can access the facility via the following link:

http://www.lawsociety.org.uk/choosingandusing/findasolicitor.law.

Alternatively, you could also look through a local directory, such as the Yellow Pages, which might help identify a suitable firm. As suggested in my previous reply, you may wish to contact the Law Centres Federation on 0207 428 4401 who can provide contact details for your local Law Centre. Also, you may find it helpful to access the Community Legal Services Direct website for information on providers of legal advice at

www.clsdirect.org.uk. These are all alternative options available to you that do not involve the assistance of the Law Society.

With regard to the complaint you have submitted to the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC), I have contacted the IPCC to investigate the status of your complaint. Senior lawyers at the IPCC inform me that without your expressed consent, I am unable to obtain any information that relates to your complaint. I was informed however that Casework Manager Sarah Brown is one of a number of IPCC staff that has conducted an investigation into your file and she can be contacted on 0207 166 3934 should you wish to discuss the details of your complaint further.

I do hope that this information is of some use to you.

Yours sincerely,

Ryan Holmes

Legal Services Regulation and Redress Division

—–Original Message—–
From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

Sent: 05 June 2008 01:51
To: Holmes, Ryan
Subject: Re: Our ref: TO08/2153

Hi,

thank you very much for your e-mail!

I have been thinking about contacting the Law Society, regarding getting a list, like you say,

for law firms, who take on law-cases on a 'pro bono' service basis.

But, like I might have forgotten to explain, the Law Society, are already involved in this,

I have complained about them to the Legal Services Ombudsman, who I have been contacting

you about.

So I've maybe lost a bit of confidence, in the Law Society, since I think they gave a bit of wrong

information, and some errors, that I thought were a bit strange, so they are really involved in this

from before.

So then I was wondering about, if it would be right to involve the Law Society again, since they

are involved from before.

Maybe there is someone else one could contact about getting the name of companies like this?

Sorry if I'm asking a lot of questions.

I've also sent a complaint, on the Merseyside Police, to the IPCC.

But the IPCC, aren't dealing with the complaint at all, it seems, so I was wondering who I should

contact then, if I wanted to compain about the IPCC not dealing with the complaint on the Police?

Sorry again that I'm asking so many questions!

Thanks in advance for the reply!

Yours sincerely,

Erik Ribsskog

On 4/25/08, Holmes, Ryan <Ryan.Holmes@justice.gsi.gov.uk> wrote:

Dear Mr Ribsskog

Thank you for your email reply of 7 April, in which you request further advice on ways to proceed forward with your complaint against the Legal Services Ombudsman (LSO). To assist you with your concerns, I shall set out the avenues of legal assistance available to you that acknowledge your specific financial concerns.

Firstly, while I understand you have already been in contact with the Citizen's Advice Bureau (CAB), you may also wish to consider contacting your local Law Centre. Contact details for your local Law Centre can be found via the Law Centres Federation on 0207 428 4401, or by accessing their website www.lawcentres.org.uk. You may also find it helpful to access the Community Legal Services Direct website for information on providers of legal advice at www.clsdirect.org.uk. Alternatively, you may choose to contact Community Legal Advice for free confidential help regarding your legal queries on 0845 345 4345.

Secondly, it may be worth investigating the possibility of a Conditional Fee Agreement (CFA). This allows a solicitor to accept a case on a 'no won, no fee' basis, under which they receive a fee from you only if the case is won. It is worth pointing that the solicitor's standard fees can be increased by up to 100% to reflect the degree of risk to the solicitor in taking the case on (the 'success fee'). However, should you lose your case, you may still be liable to pay the successful party's costs, as well as expert witness fees and other disbursements. There are insurance schemes that, for a premium, provide cover for these items. As part of the implementation of the Access to Justice Act 1999, we have made it possible for the successful side to recover their lawyer's success fee and insurance premium form the loser. Effectively, this has made the operation of conditional fees fairer and more attractive to clients.

Thirdly, some solicitors may be prepared to take on your case on a pro bono agreement (i.e. provide you with a free service). You can contact the Law Society who can provide you with a list of solicitors that may provide pro bono services. The Law Society is the regulatory body for solicitors in England and Wales and you can write to them at the following address:

The Law Society

113 Chancery Lane

London

WC2A 1SX

Tel: 0870 606 2555.

Alternatively, you can access the Law Society's website at www.solicitors-online.com.

I do hope that you find this information useful.

Yours sincerely

Ryan Holmes

Legal Services Regulation and Redress Division

This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.

Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail.

This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.

The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2007/11/0032.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.

Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes.

This email was received from the INTERNET and scanned by the Government Secure Intranet anti-virus service supplied by Cable&Wireless in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2007/11/0032.) In case of problems, please call your organisation's IT Helpdesk.

Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes.

This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.

Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail.

This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.

The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2007/11/0032.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.

Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes.

19. juni 2008

Fler bilder fra Liverpool. (In Norwegian).

Scandinavian Church, som ikke er så lenge åpen på søndager, men flaggene henger i hvertfall på rekke her, og ikke over hverandre, som på reklamen. Men men.

Chinatown.

Angelikanske katedralen, som er bygget i en gammeldags stil, men som er en av de nyeste og jeg tror muligens den største katedralen i England.

Bombed out church, en kirke som ble bombet av tyskerne under krigen.

Superlambanana bilen. (Mangler det et bremselys på tilhengeren? Dette tror jeg er en sak for Merseyside-politiet).

Rigby’s building i Dale St., hvor jeg bor, eller i hvertfall i en av bygningene bak da.

15. juni 2008

E-mail to the Ministry of Justice, 5/6/08.

Google Mail – Our ref: TO08/2153

Erik Ribsskog

<eribsskog@gmail.com>

Our ref: TO08/2153

Erik Ribsskog

<eribsskog@gmail.com>

Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 1:50 AM

To:

"Holmes, Ryan" <Ryan.Holmes@justice.gsi.gov.uk>

Hi,

thank you very much for your e-mail!

I have been thinking about contacting the Law Society, regarding getting a list, like you say,

for law firms, who take on law-cases on a 'pro bono' service basis.

But, like I might have forgotten to explain, the Law Society, are already involved in this,

I have complained about them to the Legal Services Ombudsman, who I have been contacting

you about.

So I've maybe lost a bit of confidence, in the Law Society, since I think they gave a bit of wrong

information, and some errors, that I thought were a bit strange, so they are really involved in this

from before.

So then I was wondering about, if it would be right to involve the Law Society again, since they

are involved from before.

Maybe there is someone else one could contact about getting the name of companies like this?

Sorry if I'm asking a lot of questions.

I've also sent a complaint, on the Merseyside Police, to the IPCC.

But the IPCC, aren't dealing with the complaint at all, it seems, so I was wondering who I should

contact then, if I wanted to compain about the IPCC not dealing with the complaint on the Police?

Sorry again that I'm asking so many questions!

Thanks in advance for the reply!

Yours sincerely,

Erik Ribsskog

On 4/25/08, Holmes, Ryan <Ryan.Holmes@justice.gsi.gov.uk> wrote:

Dear Mr Ribsskog

Thank you for your email reply of 7 April, in which you request further advice on ways to proceed forward with your complaint against the Legal Services Ombudsman (LSO). To assist you with your concerns, I shall set out the avenues of legal assistance available to you that acknowledge your specific financial concerns.

Firstly, while I understand you have already been in contact with the Citizen's Advice Bureau (CAB), you may also wish to consider contacting your local Law Centre. Contact details for your local Law Centre can be found via the Law Centres Federation on 0207 428 4401, or by accessing their website www.lawcentres.org.uk. You may also find it helpful to access the Community Legal Services Direct website for information on providers of legal advice at www.clsdirect.org.uk. Alternatively, you may choose to contact Community Legal Advice for free confidential help regarding your legal queries on 0845 345 4345.

Secondly, it may be worth investigating the possibility of a Conditional Fee Agreement (CFA). This allows a solicitor to accept a case on a 'no won, no fee' basis, under which they receive a fee from you only if the case is won. It is worth pointing that the solicitor's standard fees can be increased by up to 100% to reflect the degree of risk to the solicitor in taking the case on (the 'success fee'). However, should you lose your case, you may still be liable to pay the successful party's costs, as well as expert witness fees and other disbursements. There are insurance schemes that, for a premium, provide cover for these items. As part of the implementation of the Access to Justice Act 1999, we have made it possible for the successful side to recover their lawyer's success fee and insurance premium form the loser. Effectively, this has made the operation of conditional fees fairer and more attractive to clients.

Thirdly, some solicitors may be prepared to take on your case on a pro bono agreement (i.e. provide you with a free service). You can contact the Law Society who can provide you with a list of solicitors that may provide pro bono services. The Law Society is the regulatory body for solicitors in England and Wales and you can write to them at the following address:

The Law Society

113 Chancery Lane

London

WC2A 1SX

Tel: 0870 606 2555.

Alternatively, you can access the Law Society's website at www.solicitors-online.com.

I do hope that you find this information useful.

Yours sincerely

Ryan Holmes

Legal Services Regulation and Redress Division

This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.

Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail.

This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.

The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2007/11/0032.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.

Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes.

5. juni 2008