johncons

Stikkord: Møte Walton Lane politistasjon 8. november 2007.

  • European Human Rights Court: E-mail sent 12/4/08.

    From: eribsskog@gmail.com Erik Ribsskog
    To: ECHRvisitors@echr.coe.int
    Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 00:14:59 +0100
    Subject: Being used as a ‘target guy’ by three different governments.

    Hi,

    I’m a Norwegian citizen living in Britain.

    I have to say I’m a refugee from Norway.

    I know I’m supposed to send a letter to the Hich Court of Human Rights in
    Europe, but I’m having some problems with my printer,
    so I hope it’s alright that I’m sending an e-mail.

    I’ve overheard that I have been followed by some ‘mafia’ in Norway, in 2003.

    In 2005, I was chased away from my uncles farm in Norway, by some people
    with guns and dogs, that I overheard saying that were going
    to shoot me.

    This year, I’ve overheard that I’ve been used as a ‘target-guy’.

    And it seems that I have been having phoney water-meter inspectors from
    probably the CIA in my flat, in 2007.

    I think this started when I went to Detroit in 2005.

    Then I had to wait at the imigration-control, for several hours, being
    questioned, inbetwen the questioning-offices was taking phone-calls.

    Then he said they couldn’t let me in, since I didn’t have a bond in Norway.

    So then I think they started to use me as a target-guy.

    And I also suspect that the Norwegian and British governments are involved.

    Then americans sent me back to Oslo, via Paris, in what seemed like a
    ‘terminal’ (like in the movie) plot, since they had written something in my
    passport,
    that I suspect would have led the French imigration-control, to send me back
    to America again, had they seen what the Americans had written in my
    passport.

    Also, in Britain, the Police have refused to give me any help, but I think
    have just let me go on, even if I suspect there was some mafia, in the
    company, Arvato
    Service Ltd., that I have been working in, in Liverpool, in 2005 and 2006.

    The Police didn’t give me any help or advice, even if I contacted them many
    times, and they still just pretend that there is nothing going on.

    And there are collegues that were working there, that I suspect something
    could have happened with, but the Police just pretend there have been
    nothing going
    on, even if I think it is my right to know what has been going on there,
    since I was working there.

    It was like slavery, working there, and I’m trying to a case ran throug the
    British court-system.

    But the Police wont even look at the case, even if there were being used
    illigal management methods there etc.

    The Police sent me to the CAB, to get the case up for the Crowns Court, but
    no lawyers want to help me, under the Duty Solicitors Programme, and the
    British Police are just harassing and lying etc, so I suspect that there
    could be some type of intellegence-activity, behind this, that no
    organisations or
    institutions want to help me in Norway or Britain, including Amnesty, the
    Red Cross and Human Rights Watch etc.

    I suspect that this could be due to some type of Goverment cover-up plan, in
    connection with what went on at Arvato, where I suspect Nordic women were
    being the subject of traficcing etc.

    I’ve been contacting the Norwegian Special Police, Kripos, but they dont
    anser my calls/emails.

    The organisation responsible for them, Politidirektoratet, dont answer my
    emails.

    The Norwegian embassy in London, and three Norwegian ministries,
    Justisdepartementet (The Justice Dep.), UD (The Foreign Ministry), and
    Fornyings og
    Adminstrasjonsdepartementet. (Translates to Renewal and Administration
    Minstry).

    Neighter of these institutions/ministries are answering my emails.

    I contacted the SMK (The Prime-ministers Office), in Norway.

    And complained on the three ministries.

    But they are ignoring my complaint, they are acting irresponsible, I would
    say, and are just refering me to the Sivilombudsmannen.

    Who is the Ombudsman, in Norway, that deals with irregularitites from the
    Goverment administration.

    But I think, that the Prime Ministers Office, should have a look at this,
    because this is regarding three ministries.

    I think, that the SMK probably are involved, since they wont even look at
    this.

    And it’s not allowed to use ones citizens as target-guys/spies, which it
    seem’s to me that has been going on.

    And I’m not sure if the Sivilombudsmannen, have any real power over the
    Government.

    And I think, using ones citizens as target-guys/spies, on some mafia etc.,
    without even asking the citizen if he want’s this.

    I think this is a serious crime towards the human rights.

    And neighter the Norwegian or British Amnesty or Human Rights Watch, wants
    to help me with this, so I think they are probably being
    told by some Government inteligence not to help me, or something like this.

    So I don’t really know who else that could look at this.

    So I hope the European Human Rights Court have the chance to have a look at
    this!

    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

  • Untitled Post

    Jeg skriver notat her mens jeg har det i hue.

    På møtet på Walton Lane police-station i forrige uke, så sa jeg i møtet at det var klart for meg at det foregikk organisert kriminell aktivitet i Arvato firmaet, skand. microsoft kampanjen.

    Jeg sa at det virket som om jentene der ble ‘used’ og ‘exploted’.

    Så spurte Sgt. Smyth om jeg det var traficcing jeg mente.

    Jeg sa ja, fordi veldig mange av jentene skulle plutselig til Spania. Og en av jentene, Sofie, hadde også møtt en engelsk kar, som hun sa var ok på byen, men ikke noe ok/fin hjemme., i Spania da.

    Så jeg har tenkt at det kunne ha vært en link mellom England/Lpool/Arvato Skandinaviske jenter og Spania da.

    Det var derfor jeg svarte ja på det.

    Så senere, på slutten av møtet, så skulle Sgt. Smythe skrive en slutterklæring/vitne-erklæring.

    Og da skrev at det skulle være full investigation angående traficcing i Arvato, mener jeg å huske på skjemaet.

    Men da sa han, like før jeg skulle skrive under, at da var forutsetningen, at jeg glemte den klagen, angående ‘unprofessional conduct’ fra konstabler/offiserer ved The Merseyside Police. (Han sa dette med ‘smørblid’ stemme).

    Jeg sa at jeg så på investigation mot Arvato, og investigation om ‘unprofessional conduct’ fra medlemer av The Merseyside Police, som to forskjellige ting, og som to forskjellige saker/undersøkelse.

    (Jeg hadde også tidligere i møtet, sagt at jeg synes at politikonstabler/offiserer, burde oppføre seg ‘appropriate’ og ‘representatively’ uavhengig av situasjonsbestemte forhold osv.)

    Og da jeg sa det, så fikk Sgt. Smyth et litt ‘sinna’ utrykk i øynene, fant fram et nytt skjema, og sa at det skulle være full etterforsking
    mot både Arvato og politiet.

    Og han leste høyt og raskt opp det han hadde skrevet ned, på det nye skjema.

    Og dette var på slutten av møtet, og det virka litt for meg, som om han ble ‘sinna’, fordi jeg ville se på det som to forskjellige saker, og ikke bare en sak mot Arvato.

    Så jeg fikk litt ‘bakoversveis’ på en måte, så jeg ville egentlig bare komme meg ut av kontoret på en måte.

    Sånn synes jeg det virka.

    Så han sa jo før han leste fort og høyt opp, at jeg kunne legge til ting osv.

    Men dette gikk veldig raskt, og han sersjanten ble plutselig ganske brå og litt hissig, virka han som.

    For nå skrev han bare investigation om ‘organised crime’ mot Arvato, jeg mener å huske, at han hadde skrevet ‘trafficing’,
    på det første skjema.

    Men da hadde jeg litt bakoversveis, og dette gikk så raskt, og var ganske hissig, eller hva man skal si.

    Og han sa det var 19 punkter mot politiet, men jeg måtte endre det til 20 i hvertfall to ganger i løpet av møtet.

    (Fordi på møtet med Sgt. Camel 16/1, var det vel, så var det også en annen konstabel/offiser der, som ikke introduserte seg,
    og mens Camel var ute for å ringe eller prate med kollegaer, eller hva det var han skulle.

    Da avtalte jeg med han andre kollegaen/offiseren, at jeg skulle dra opp dit igjen dagen etter, med alle dokumentene jeg
    hadde fra Arvato.

    Men når Camel kom tilbake, så bare ‘overridet’ han det, og han bare blåse av han kollegaen sin, og sa ‘no’.

    Men han spurte ikke meg.

    Jeg mener at den avtalen mellom meg og kollegaen hans, var en avtale mellom meg og politiet, og ikke kunne brytes
    av Camel, uten at han avtalte dette med meg.

    Han bare sa ‘no’ til kollegaen sin, og ble ikke enig med meg om dette.

    Jeg mener det var feil/’cowboy’-aktig oppførsel, og som jeg også synes preget møte, og jeg mener at Camel ikke hadde
    rett til å diktere dette, når jeg og kollegaen hans hadde blitt enig om noe annet).

    Så det var det 20. punktet.

    Når Smyth leste opp vitne-erklæringen, raskt, så la jeg vel merke til at det ikke var noe om de jentene på Arvato, som ble
    nevnt der.

    Så jeg sa han skulle skrive om det.

    Men dette gikk så raskt, og jeg hadde også bedt han bytte ut 19 med 20, og han virka litt sinna/hissig, så jeg fikk meg ikke
    til å diktere han til å bytte ut organised crime med trafficing.

    Men ja heller til på slutten at jeg var bekymret for jentene.

    For han virka litt som om han var sint og halveis truende for meg.

    At han var en affektert sinnstemning.

    Fordi ellers, så hadde jeg nok ikke godtatt det, uten videre, at han byttet ut organised crime med trafficing.

    Så dette er noe jeg har tenkt på de siste dagene.

    At kanskje han ble sint og ikke ville egentlig hjelpe meg alikevel, siden jeg ikke ville frafalle undersøkelsen
    mot politioffiserene/konstablene.

    Jeg mener det ville vært en hestehandel.

    Jeg mener at politiet burde gjørde jobben sin på en ordentlig måte.

    Og jeg er ikke sånn at jeg går med på at de kan gjøre jobben sin på en ‘cowboy’-aktig måte, mot at de gjør
    jobben sin, og etterforsker Arvato.

    Nei, det synes jeg ikke er en ordentlig/ryddig måte å gjøre ting på.

    Men jeg har jo hatt det møte litt i bakhodet de siste dagene, og nå når jeg har tenkt litt mer på det, så kan
    det virke sånn for meg.

    At nå vil ikke politiet hjelpe meg, siden jeg ikke ble med på noen hestehandel.

    Så derfor tenkte jeg at jeg skulle skrive opp dette, siden dette kanskje kan bli et aktuelt tema senere,
    så da tenkte jeg at jeg kunne skrive det et sted hvor det ble registrert da.

    Og det blir det jo på blogg.

    Jeg har jo allerede skrevet en e-post til ipcc, men jeg har ikke fått noe svar på den.

    Så jeg er litt redd at det vil virke dumt, om jeg sender dem enda en e-post før jeg har fått svar.

    Jeg burde vel kanskje skrevet opp alt i den første e-posten.

    Men dette her trengte jeg litt tid på å tenke på i baholdet, før jeg viste hvordan jeg skulle presantere det
    osv.

    Det ble litt mye på det møtet, og på et annet språk osv, og det var trakassering og tull med e-post adresse
    osv., så det tok litt av fokuset og konsentrasjonen bort fra det jeg skriver om nå.

    Men nå når jeg tenkte på dette igjen, tidligere i dag, så tenkte jeg at jeg også burde prøve å gjøre noe i
    forbindelse med det her.

    Så tenkte jeg nå at hvis jeg skrev det på bloggen, så viste jeg hvor jeg hadde det, og det ble også registrert
    med dato osv.

    Og dette er vel noe som jeg ikke burde legge vekk, og ikke glemme å gjøre noe med.

    Så da synes det kanskje var like greit å skrive det her, sånn at det blir glemt bort blant alt det andre, med
    trakasseringen og e-posten osv.

  • Untitled Post

    Er dette politiets måte å si fra om at hvis du får problemer med mafia/mob etc. så skal du bare la dem drepe deg og gjøre hva dem vil med deg, for du kommer ikke til å få noe hjelp av politiet.

  • Untitled Post

    From: Civil.Litigation.E@merseyside.police.uk
    To: eribsskog@gmail.com Erik Ribsskog
    Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2007 16:19:39 +0000
    Subject: Re: Fwd: PSD 07/0519/Sgt. Smyth/Rachel

    Dear Mr Ribsskog,

    Thank you for your email and the enclosures you have sent today.

    I can confirm that we have today received thirteen emails from you, eleven
    of which contain attachments. The other two emails are your emails making
    contact with us. The email address I gave you yesterday is the correct
    address.

    As discussed with yourself and Sgt John Smyth yesterday, your complaint
    will now be dealt with by way of a Full Investigation.

    Yours sincerely

    Rachel Coyne
    Liverpool North Standards Unit
    Walton Lane Police Station

    ============================================================
    This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
    solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.

    If you have received this email in error please notify the sender as soon
    as possible.

    This footnote confirms that all reasonable steps have been taken to
    ensure that this email message has been swept for the presence of
    computer viruses.

    The views expressed in this communication may not necessarily be the
    views of Merseyside Police.

    All communications, including telephone calls and electronic messages to
    and from Merseyside Police may be subject to monitoring and recording.
    ============================================================

  • Untitled Post

    From: eribsskog@gmail.com Erik Ribsskog
    To: civil.litigation.e@merseyside.police.uk
    Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2007 13:00:09 +0000
    Subject: Fwd: PSD 07/0519/Sgt. Smyth/Rachel

    Hi,

    now I’ve sent you the following documents:

    – Enclosures 1-25

    – Enclosures A-G

    – Enclosures new1-new8

    – Thread about the use of negative reinforcement as a management method at
    Arvato Services, Liverpool.

    – Scan 1-253

    – Enclosures I-XII

    It would be very fine, if you have the oppertunity to confirm that you have
    recieved these files, since I discovered,
    while I was sending the enclosures, that the e-mail address, that is on your
    letters, is written a bit differently,
    (civil.litigation.e.@merseyside.police.uk), than the e-mail address that I
    was given in the meeting yesterday,
    (civil.litigation.e@merseyside.police.uk).

    Hope that this is alright!

    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: Erik Ribsskog
    Date: Nov 9, 2007 11:43 AM
    Subject: PSD 07/0519/Sgt. Smyth/Rachel
    To: civil.litigation.e@merseyside.police.uk

    Hi,

    I’m refering to the meeting at Walton Lane Police Station, yesterday, where
    it
    was agreed that I should e-mail you some documents regarding the case we
    were discussing in the meeting.

    There are quite a few documents, so I’m going to be sending you several
    e-mails.

    When I’m finished sending you all of the documents, then I’ll send an e-mail
    with an overview of which documents I have been sending you.

    While I was at your Police Station yesterday, it seemed like I was harassed
    in
    the reception.

    First I rang the bell.

    Then a blond PC in her 30’s, I think, showed up, and asked me what it was
    regarding.

    Then she stopped listening to me.

    And started speaking with an African gentleman, who was sitting waiting in
    your
    waiting-area.

    Then she went to the back-office.

    Then she got back, and helped the gentleman.

    Then she asked me again what my visit was regarding.

    This seemed odd and harassing to me, because she shouldn’t have switched her

    attention away from me, after first asking me to tell her what my visit
    there was
    regarding.

    I don’t want to speculate, but I was wondering if this could some way that
    the
    Merseyside Police wanted to see if I was a racist, and wanted to check if
    I was politically correct enough to het help.

    It could seem a bit like this to me now, so I was wondering how I should go
    forward
    with reporting this.

    Also, I didn’t mention it yesterday in the meeting, I remember I felt
    ‘stupid’/looked
    down on, while I was waiting, while the PC went back to the back office.

    But I needed some time to think through the situation, before I knew how to
    present it.

    And yesterday, I was also so focused on preparing for the meeting, so I
    didn’t use
    that much time to think about this spesific situation.

    But after I got back home again, I have had the oppertunity, to think more
    about this,
    and thats why I’m writing about this to you now.

    To get advice on how I should go forward, with reporting this.

    Because like I told you in the meeting yesterday, I don’t think PC’s and
    Police Officers,
    should act inaproperatly or unrepresentatlively, (regardless of the
    circomstances), so
    that’s why I think I should report about harassment-situations like this.

    Hope that this is alright!

    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog