Stikkord: MP Steve Rotheram

Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>

---

RE: Your order (ZF5Z5V) at Gemini – [Not Protectively Marked] – [Not Protectively Marked] – [Not Protectively Marked]

---

Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>


Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 9:29 PM



To:
steve.rotheram.mp@parliament.uk

———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

Date: Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 9:28 PM
Subject: Re: Your order (ZF5Z5V) at Gemini – [Not Protectively Marked] – [Not Protectively Marked] – [Not Protectively Marked]
To: COMMCEN <COMMCEN@merseyside.police.uk>
Cc: Phso Enquiries <phso.enquiries@ombudsman.org.uk>, “hv-02.kontakt” <hv-02.kontakt@mil.no>, post <post@spesialenheten.no>, “emb.london” <emb.london@mfa.no>, Politikk Høyre <politikk@hoyre.no>, anne-kathrine.skodvin@ica.no, amnestyis <amnestyis@amnesty.org>, “EUteam@amnesty.org” <EUteam@amnesty.org>, “inquiries2@un.org” <inquiries2@un.org>
And people don’t get a copy of the complaint, when they use your web-site, to file a complaint to the Professional Standards Department. But I can send a copy of this e-mail to my local MP, so then can send about this to the Parliamentary Ombudsman, so for them to ask you to fix the web-site. Also, I feel a bit like I’m writing with a school-girl here when you write your name in funny, big letters like that. (And without a last-name). I wonder if someone are pulling my leg a bit here.
Erik Ribsskog

Sent: 18 November 2013 20:10
To: COMMCEN
Cc: hv-02.kontakt; post; emb.london; Politikk Høyre; anne-kathrine.skodvin@ica.no; amnestyis; EUteam@amnesty.org; inquiries2@un.org; steve.rotheram.mp@parliament.uk
Subject: Re: Your order (ZF5Z5V) at Gemini – [Not Protectively Marked] – [Not Protectively Marked]




like I’ve explained earlier, I think my role in this is to report this to the Police. If you could please escalate this to the Professional Standards Department, to get a second opinion on how to do this. Best regards, Erik Ribsskog








to obtain the email, is that for the last week or so you have advised someone is placing false orders for you to local fast food establishments, and I have previously advised you to speak to the companies directly.
sent them to you.

and email address – which is a lot to obtain.
they do not send any further orders out to you without a password, Change your password to access your email address (Incase has been breached).  As previously advised we would need each company to contact us, as although this is a inconvenience to you, it
is a financial burden on them.

us now, unless you find out who the person via the companies.






Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com] Sent: 18 November 2013 18:11
To: COMMCEN
Cc: hv-02.kontakt; post; emb.london; Politikk Høyre;
anne-kathrine.skodvin@ica.no
; amnestyis; EUteam@amnesty.org
; inquiries2@un.org
Subject: Re: Your order (ZF5Z5V) at Gemini – [Not Protectively Marked]



I checked the inbox in my e-mail-programme. And there it was. (That’s the normal, default way of uptaining e-mails, I think. Or else I would have explained. Why this funny question? Seems like an odd thing to ask. Of course I’ve gotten that e-mail the normal way.

Or else I would have mentioned it. And I’m Mr. Ribsskog to you I think). Erik Ribsskog PS. I have had similar problems many days, the last week: Four delivery-guys where on my door on 14/11, (ref: 1376 14. Nov). Fourteen delivery-guys where on my door around 28/10, (ref: 1578 28. Oct). There where also some on 13/11, (ref: 1275 13. Nov).
















Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com] Sent: 18 November 2013 14:12
To: COMMCEN
Cc: hv-02.kontakt; post; emb.london; amnestyis;
EUteam@amnesty.org
; inquiries2@un.org; Politikk Høyre
Subject: Fwd: Your order (ZF5Z5V) at Gemini






If you wanted to get these pizza-people to stop sending me e-mails or food. I haven’t contacted them at all. Erik Ribsskog

From: Takeaway.com <no-reply@takeaway.com>
Date: Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 1:51 PM
Subject: Your order (ZF5Z5V) at Gemini
To: Erik Ribsskog <e.ribsskog@gmail.com>


Your order (ZF5Z5V) at Gemini




Your order has been processed and has been sent to Gemini
If you have any questions or remarks regarding the order you just placed, please call Gemini at 01517097406. For less urgent questions about Takeaway.com just
click here. Beware: you cannot reply to this e-mail! There is a possibility that Gemini will try to contact you. Please remain available at the telephone number you provided and keep an eye on your e-mail.
A delivery (depending on the restaurant!) usually takes 45-60 minutes. On Sundays and bank holidays the delivery time may increase. Bad weather conditions and traffic can also delay the delivery of your order. In these situations Gemini will normally contact
you to inform you about the delay.
Unfortunately Takeaway.com has no influence on the time Gemini takes to prepare and deliver your order.
On behalf of Gemini, Takeaway.com would like to thank you for your order!

Payment method: Cash
You pay the exact amount













£ 16.20






£ 1.00

Delivery costs:
FREE
Total:
£ 17.20




Keith Court 10 Keith Avenue
L4 5XJ Liverpool Telephone 07757593021
Remarks:






ASAP

Order food |
Customerservice |
Terms of use

© 2000 – 2013 Takeaway.com, All rights reserved.





============================================================
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the sender as soon
as possible. This footnote confirms that all reasonable steps have been taken to
ensure that this email message has been swept for the presence of
computer viruses. The views expressed in this communication may not necessarily be the
views of Merseyside Police. All communications, including telephone calls and electronic messages to
and from Merseyside Police may be subject to monitoring and recording.
============================================================






============================================================
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the sender as soon
as possible. This footnote confirms that all reasonable steps have been taken to
ensure that this email message has been swept for the presence of
computer viruses. The views expressed in this communication may not necessarily be the
views of Merseyside Police. All communications, including telephone calls and electronic messages to
and from Merseyside Police may be subject to monitoring and recording.
============================================================

============================================================

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the sender as soon
as possible. This footnote confirms that all reasonable steps have been taken to
ensure that this email message has been swept for the presence of
computer viruses. The views expressed in this communication may not necessarily be the
views of Merseyside Police. All communications, including telephone calls and electronic messages to
and from Merseyside Police may be subject to monitoring and recording.
============================================================

Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>

---

Problems with e-mail-address for PSD/Fwd: Undeliverable: Update/Fwd: Steve Rotheram MP : Problems with IPCC/Fwd: Problemer med politiet i England/Fwd: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)

---

Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 3:30 PM


To:
“BYRNE, Maureen” <maureen.byrne@parliament.uk> Best regards, Erik Ribsskog

Delivery has failed to these recipients or groups:
psd@merseyside.police.uk
The email address that you entered couldn’t be found. Check the address and try resending the message. If the problem continues, please contact your helpdesk.
Diagnostic information for administrators:
Generating server: merseyside.pnn.police.uk
psd@merseyside.police.uk
#550 5.1.1 RESOLVER.ADR.RecipNotFound; not found ##
Original message headers:

Received: from merseyside.police.uk (10.201.3.41) by

 MAILCAS1.merseyside.pnn.police.uk (10.38.8.101) with Microsoft SMTP Server id
 14.2.318.4; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 14:39:08 +0000
Received: from Unknown [209.85.220.43] by smtpg1 – Websense Email Security
 (7.1.0); Thu, 14 Nov 2013 14:39:06 +0000
Received: by mail-pa0-f43.google.com with SMTP id fa1so2169338pad.2        for
 <psd@merseyside.police.uk>; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 06:39:04 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=JfFiKeGKrHJl5spSEtvD52iVwdBzMPidBG7ocELgBBw=;
        b=mbqdYCfynR8oBoz2SiVHBtkFImg8WH558t1+w1NGx03jo1tUm/nZFyLi0KLMWQHHNn
         gFYU1yqsa6+uXACOQ3BjghQiuLFFCiXFGcM5fNCmRt7DdCp495pKIklk7uZcW/e0rq4s
         Hm8FbW7ktcuL6QcnwfCnReUS9GzluG+piPxzUV5rVTc8XeGlArsHJIpraFbr1fDeYLag
         sUeMjW5rBlF9cGfHUlmHB23ZbYbFNmfgplRJtLUYhm9EBfegbvuiYjDpWO5asjhbdcvo
         mCwjOMWjGNUrug57/OzHqqOof+YCRPIjsEaleTAMZ2PoKPVKPdaPQAIW40HbREZdFk3o
         AP3A==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.68.162.131 with SMTP id ya3mr1775121pbb.102.1384439943940;
 Thu, 14 Nov 2013 06:39:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.70.72.99 with HTTP; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 06:39:03 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 14:39:03 +0000
Message-ID: <CAGtfns4uCxYZp4i-mUNGbgqR-vjqtnsvApy4be+GX9Pcsygbyg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Update/Fwd: Steve Rotheram MP : Problems with IPCC/Fwd: Problemer med
 politiet i England/Fwd: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
To: “BYRNE, Maureen” <maureen.byrne@parliament.uk>
CC: <psd@merseyside.police.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=”ISO-8859-1″
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-SEF-7853D99-ADF1-478E-8894-213D316B8FFA: 1
X-SEF-Processed: 7_1_0_00116__2013_11_14_14_39_07
Return-Path: eribsskog@gmail.com

============================================================

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the sender as soon
as possible. This footnote confirms that all reasonable steps have been taken to
ensure that this email message has been swept for the presence of
computer viruses. The views expressed in this communication may not necessarily be the
views of Merseyside Police. All communications, including telephone calls and electronic messages to
and from Merseyside Police may be subject to monitoring and recording.
============================================================

2 attachments

ATT00001 1K

UpdateFwd Steve Rotheram MP  Problems with IPCCFwd Problemer med politiet i EnglandFwd Delivery Status Notification (Failure) 17K

Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>

---

Update/Fwd: Steve Rotheram MP : Problems with IPCC/Fwd: Problemer med politiet i England/Fwd: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)

---

Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>


Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 2:39 PM



To:
“BYRNE, Maureen” <maureen.byrne@parliament.uk>
Cc:
psd@merseyside.police.uk






Hi, I got this e-mail address for them, in 2007. So I try to copy them this e-mail. Yours sincerely, Erik Ribsskog PS. Here is more about this: From: psd.cab@soca.x.gsi.gov.uk < psd.cab@soca.x.gsi.gov.uk>
Date: Dec 31, 2007 9:49 AM
Subject: RE: Complaint
To: eribsskog@gmail.com
Erik I have forwarded your email to the Professional Standards department
of Merseyside Police.  Please direct any further correspondence to
them atpsd@merseyside.police.uk Regards Jeff Talbot
SOCA Counter Corruption Department (CCD1)
Classification: Not Protectively Marked
This information is supplied in confidence by SOCA, and is exempt from
disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act 2000. It may also be
subject to exemption under other UK legislation. Onward disclosure may
be unlawful, for example, under the Data Protection Act 1998. Requests for disclosure to the public must be referred to the SOCA FOI
single point of contact, by email on foiaenquiries@soca.x.gsi.gov.uk
or by telephoning 020 7238 8677
———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 2:02 PM
Subject: Re: Steve Rotheram MP : Problems with IPCC/Fwd: Problemer med
politiet i England/Fwd: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
To: “BYRNE, Maureen” <maureen.byrne@parliament.uk>
Hi, ok, I’ll see if I can find the e-mail address for the professional
standards-department then. I don’t like the web-forms, you see. I’ve gone to commerce-school, (in Norway), and learned that the
citizens can just send a normal letter, (or these days e-mail). Thank you very much for explaining to me how to sort this. Yours sincerely, Erik Ribsskog PS. Are you going to do anything with the Ofcom-case, I was wondering a bit. PS 2. If you by chance know the e-mail-address to the Merseyside Police
Professional Standards Department, then that would be very fine. PS 3. When I lived in Sunderland, a couple of years ago, one couldn’t send
normal e-mails to the Police. One had to log in to their website. I don’t like that, that’s not right with what I learned on
commerce-shool, (I think). The citizens should be allowed to send just a normal e-mail to organisations. It’s like some kind of ‘Russian’ stuff if they have the ‘funny’ stuff, I think.
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 1:52 PM, BYRNE, Maureen
<maureen.byrne@parliament.uk> wrote:
> Merseyside Police have a complaints from on their website which is then dealt with by their professional standards department.
>
> Yours sincerely
>
> Maureen Byrne
> Office of Steve Rotheram MP
>
>
>
> —–Original Message—–
> From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
> Sent: 14 November 2013 13:48
> To: BYRNE, Maureen
> Subject: Re: Steve Rotheram MP : Problems with IPCC/Fwd: Problemer med politiet i England/Fwd: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
>
> Hi,
>
> ok, so I send to the IPCC if I’m not happy with the way the Merseyside Police deal with my complaint.
>
> But is it a special department within the Merseyside Police that deals with police-complaints?
>
> (I could perhaps look at their website).
>
> Thanks in advance for any help!
>
> Yours sincerely,
>
> Erik Ribsskog
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 1:38 PM, BYRNE, Maureen <maureen.byrne@parliament.uk> wrote:
>> The IPCC form may have to be completed with the full details of the complaint – either on line or possibly by post if you can print a copy off – in order for this to be dealt with.
>>
>> Yours sincerely
>>
>> Maureen Byrne
>> Office of Steve Rotheram MP
>>
>>
>>
>> —–Original Message—–
>> From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
>> Sent: 14 November 2013 13:32
>> To: BYRNE, Maureen
>> Subject: Re: Steve Rotheram MP : Problems with IPCC/Fwd: Problemer med
>> politiet i England/Fwd: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> the problem is that when I send e-mails to the IPCC, then that e-mail address doesn’t work.
>>
>> I’d like to hear this from the IPCC.
>>
>> I don’t like the webforms, since I think the citizens has more control on the communication if they have a copy of the correspondence, in their e-mail-programme.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Erik Ribsskog
>>
>> PS.
>>
>> Then I guess it should be a special department, within the Merseyside Police, that I should send the IPCC-case to?
>>
>> PS 2.
>>
>> I’ll also try to find more about the other case I mentioned in the previous e-mail.
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 1:00 PM, BYRNE, Maureen <maureen.byrne@parliament.uk> wrote:
>>> Thank you for your address.  It is unclear from your email what you are asking Steve Rotheram MP to do on your behalf. If you have a complaint against the police you would in the first instance have to make this to the police force concerned for them to investigate.  If you remain dissatisfied with their response you can of course take this to the Independent Police Complaints Commission which can investigate, as this is not the role of the Parliamentary Ombuds.  The IPCC website gives details of how to make a complaint and has the required form for you to complete, which does not require your Member of Parliament to sign.
>>>
>>> Yours sincerely
>>>
>>> Maureen Byrne
>>> Office of Steve Rotheram MP
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> —–Original Message—–
>>> From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
>>> Sent: 14 November 2013 11:47
>>> To: BYRNE, Maureen
>>> Subject: Re: Steve Rotheram MP : Problems with IPCC/Fwd: Problemer
>>> med politiet i England/Fwd: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> thank you for your e-mail!
>>>
>>> My home address should be:
>>>
>>> 10 Keith Court
>>> Keith Avenue
>>> Liverpool
>>> L4 5XJ
>>>
>>> (I’ve earlier been in touch with you regarding some cases in July, (to do with the Jobcentre), and which were resolved, if I remember it right.
>>>
>>> And there was also a case before that, I think, regarding the ‘telephone ombudsman’, (or something like that), which I can’t remember now it was resolved.
>>>
>>> Just something I thought about now, as an update).
>>>
>>> Thanks very much for the help with this!
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>>
>>> Erik Ribsskog
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 10:51 AM, BYRNE, Maureen <maureen.byrne@parliament.uk> wrote:
>>>> Steve has received your email and passed this to the constituency office.  In order for this to be progressed we will need to have your home address in line with parliamentary protocol.
>>>>
>>>> Yours sincerely
>>>>
>>>> Maureen Byrne
>>>> Office of Steve Rotheram MP
>>>> 0151 525 5025
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> —–Original Message—–
>>>> From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
>>>> Sent: 14 November 2013 08:18
>>>> To: ROTHERAM, Steve
>>>> Cc: post
>>>> Subject: Problems with IPCC/Fwd: Problemer med politiet i England/Fwd:
>>>> Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> when I send an e-mail to the e-mail address which is on the IPCC website, then this e-mail address doesn’t work, (see forwarded e-mail).
>>>>
>>>> Could you contact the Parliamentary Ombudsman please.
>>>>
>>>> And hear if they can get the IPCC to put a working e-mail address on their website, (so that I can send some police-complaints to the IPCC).
>>>>
>>>> Thanks in advance for any help!
>>>>
>>>> Yours sincerely,
>>>>
>>>> Erik Ribsskog
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ———- Forwarded message ———-
>>>> From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
>>>> Date: Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 7:36 PM
>>>> Subject: Problemer med politiet i England/Fwd: Delivery Status
>>>> Notification (Failure)
>>>> To: post <post@spesialenheten.no>
>>>> Cc: COMMCEN <COMMCEN@merseyside.police.uk>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hei,
>>>>
>>>> jeg sender denne til dere, for e-post-adressen som står på nettstedet til den engelske spesialenheten, (IPCC), virker ikke, virker det som for meg.
>>>>
>>>> Erik Ribsskog
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ———- Forwarded message ———-
>>>> From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <mailer-daemon@googlemail.com>
>>>> Date: Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 7:25 PM
>>>> Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
>>>> To: eribsskog@gmail.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently:
>>>>
>>>>      enquiries@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk
>>>>
>>>> Technical details of permanent failure:
>>>> Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the server for the recipient domain ipcc.gsi.gov.uk by cluster.gsi.messagelabs.com. [194.106.220.3].
>>>>
>>>> The error that the other server returned was:
>>>> 553-Sorry, your email address eribsskog@gmail.com has been
>>>> 553-blacklisted. Please see the FAQs section on spam at
>>>> 553-http://www.messagelabs.com/support/ for more
>>>> 553 information. (#5.7.1)
>>>>
>>>> —– Original message —–
>>>>
>>>> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
>>>>         d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
>>>>         h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
>>>>         bh=nPZSbZji+/pJLScI4mJwRGPoGVdT5nlaF6ll58e2Kmk=;
>>>>         b=U8KfBaTGbB/63//aMD4U0koRuO+VWj86+xOZsGyUwLMixw/SWisbz/L7o3VKvC5W/m
>>>>          SB9yGPoj/K8RyPkvjAz2OtzZO+ZLScB+eadLtXcsXkfL6GRQJF5WnxYcVLCNqW6zEqIP
>>>>          UjDhLre5HwYDpImcH6PUhV5mWw19Ihx7PN3K/+NBEeTDh/nzgpZ2S6PA7iZOCfGRB+xp
>>>>          Ois16iO2oePldlAP56ufhH9RREhlJ39dwNyHHQWGENxgSNOZIjFJMS/pJD6I910FCMGx
>>>>          jPBpmam7d4+mNko1xCxaLZFmv+nllyifjZ2JmMq8oH2YP4nDgx+dk5r1VVaWDHgZcfb6
>>>>          wp5g==
>>>> MIME-Version: 1.0
>>>> X-Received: by 10.66.191.198 with SMTP id
>>>> ha6mr26217796pac.72.1384284355721;
>>>>  Tue, 12 Nov 2013 11:25:55 -0800 (PST)
>>>> Received: by 10.70.72.99 with HTTP; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 11:25:55 -0800
>>>> (PST)
>>>> Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 19:25:55 +0000
>>>> Message-ID:
>>>> <CAGtfns7DNL6T03rLp6630xHEqzwaYjgdrbsdYv_=BnWG-Fy2YA@mail.gmail.com>
>>>> Subject: Update/Fwd: LOG 1507 02/11/13…….Harassment from Hungry
>>>> House –
>>>>  17991 – [Not Protectively Marked]
>>>> From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
>>>> To: COMMCEN <COMMCEN@merseyside.police.uk>
>>>> Cc: “!enquiries” <enquiries@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk>
>>>> Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=047d7b67597a4c9a2304eaffd1fd
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I was at Walton Lane police-station right now regarding four cases.
>>>>
>>>> I spoke with constable 3174.
>>>>
>>>> He ridiculed me and said the reason I had gotten 70 dodgy phone-calls and a lot of e-mails and 14 fast food-delivery guys on my door was because I had ticked a box on the internet.
>>>>
>>>> But I have a degree in IT and don’t think there is a box like that.
>>>>
>>>> I think some criminals are terrorising me.
>>>>
>>>> Regarding the strangler today at around 3PM at Heymarket.
>>>>
>>>> I attach a photograph of him.
>>>>
>>>> But the photo wasn’t that fine, due to that I wasn’t myself after the attack.
>>>>
>>>> Regarding the neighbour, (in 9 Keith Court), I think he’s a criminal.
>>>>
>>>> Since I overheard him treateing a guy in his 20’s some months ago that he would scrape up his car, (with his house-key), after they’d had an argument, (since the young Keith Court-guy said he would have hit the old guy in number nine if he had done a thing like that on the street).
>>>>
>>>> Also the guy in number 9 walks around in his underwear.
>>>>
>>>> He has been going on my door, with two, (and sometimes three), clocks, which he has asked me if were set right, (and sometimes he did this in his under-wear).
>>>>
>>>> He started the community care system, (since these are converted flats for the elderly), this spring, and I went out to see what was wrong with him.
>>>>
>>>> He said he needed to go to hospital, but really the problem was his door that had been smashed in the day before, it seemed.
>>>>
>>>> So I called the police, and a lock-smith fixed the door, later that day.
>>>>
>>>> Just to sumarise a bit.
>>>>
>>>> I’ve told this neighbour I want him to leave me alone.
>>>>
>>>> (Since he’s a criminal and I noticed his flat smelt very bad, when I called the police for him, when he had started the alarm for the elderly).
>>>>
>>>> But yesteday he stood outside my door and said ‘Good Morning’ when I was going to Tesco.
>>>>
>>>> I don’t think thats to leave me alone.
>>>>
>>>> So I told him, (loudly, to warn the neighbours etc.), to leave me alone.
>>>>
>>>> So I hope he leaves me alone now.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> —– Message truncated —–
>>>>
>>>> ________________________________
>>>>
>>>> UK Parliament Disclaimer:
>>>> This e-mail is confidential to the intended recipient. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system. Any unauthorised use, disclosure, or copying is not permitted. This e-mail has been checked for viruses, but no liability is accepted for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this e-mail.
>>>
>>> ________________________________
>>>
>>> UK Parliament Disclaimer:
>>> This e-mail is confidential to the intended recipient. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system. Any unauthorised use, disclosure, or copying is not permitted. This e-mail has been checked for viruses, but no liability is accepted for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this e-mail.
>>
>> ________________________________
>>
>> UK Parliament Disclaimer:
>> This e-mail is confidential to the intended recipient. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system. Any unauthorised use, disclosure, or copying is not permitted. This e-mail has been checked for viruses, but no liability is accepted for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this e-mail.
>
> ________________________________
>
> UK Parliament Disclaimer:
> This e-mail is confidential to the intended recipient. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system. Any unauthorised use, disclosure, or copying is not permitted. This e-mail has been checked for viruses, but no liability is accepted for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this e-mail.

Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>

---

Steve Rotheram MP : Problems with IPCC/Fwd: Problemer med politiet i England/Fwd: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)

---

Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>


Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 2:02 PM



To:
“BYRNE, Maureen” <maureen.byrne@parliament.uk>






Hi, ok, I’ll see if I can find the e-mail address for the professional
standards-department then. I don’t like the web-forms, you see. I’ve gone to commerce-school, (in Norway), and learned that the
citizens can just send a normal letter, (or these days e-mail). Thank you very much for explaining to me how to sort this.

Yours sincerely, Erik Ribsskog PS.
Are you going to do anything with the Ofcom-case, I was wondering a bit. PS 2. If you by chance know the e-mail-address to the Merseyside Police
Professional Standards Department, then that would be very fine. PS 3. When I lived in Sunderland, a couple of years ago, one couldn’t send
normal e-mails to the Police. One had to log in to their website. I don’t like that, that’s not right with what I learned on
commerce-shool, (I think). The citizens should be allowed to send just a normal e-mail to organisations. It’s like some kind of ‘Russian’ stuff if they have the ‘funny’ stuff, I think.
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 1:52 PM, BYRNE, Maureen
<maureen.byrne@parliament.uk> wrote:
> Merseyside Police have a complaints from on their website which is then dealt with by their professional standards department.
>
> Yours sincerely
>
> Maureen Byrne
> Office of Steve Rotheram MP
>
>
>
> —–Original Message—–
> From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
> Sent: 14 November 2013 13:48
> To: BYRNE, Maureen
> Subject: Re: Steve Rotheram MP : Problems with IPCC/Fwd: Problemer med politiet i England/Fwd: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
>
> Hi,
>
> ok, so I send to the IPCC if I’m not happy with the way the Merseyside Police deal with my complaint.
>
> But is it a special department within the Merseyside Police that deals with police-complaints?
>
> (I could perhaps look at their website).
>
> Thanks in advance for any help!
>
> Yours sincerely,
>
> Erik Ribsskog
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 1:38 PM, BYRNE, Maureen <maureen.byrne@parliament.uk> wrote:
>> The IPCC form may have to be completed with the full details of the complaint – either on line or possibly by post if you can print a copy off – in order for this to be dealt with.
>>
>> Yours sincerely
>>
>> Maureen Byrne
>> Office of Steve Rotheram MP
>>
>>
>>
>> —–Original Message—–
>> From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
>> Sent: 14 November 2013 13:32
>> To: BYRNE, Maureen
>> Subject: Re: Steve Rotheram MP : Problems with IPCC/Fwd: Problemer med
>> politiet i England/Fwd: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> the problem is that when I send e-mails to the IPCC, then that e-mail address doesn’t work.
>>
>> I’d like to hear this from the IPCC.
>>
>> I don’t like the webforms, since I think the citizens has more control on the communication if they have a copy of the correspondence, in their e-mail-programme.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Erik Ribsskog
>>
>> PS.
>>
>> Then I guess it should be a special department, within the Merseyside Police, that I should send the IPCC-case to?
>>
>> PS 2.
>>
>> I’ll also try to find more about the other case I mentioned in the previous e-mail.
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 1:00 PM, BYRNE, Maureen <maureen.byrne@parliament.uk> wrote:
>>> Thank you for your address.  It is unclear from your email what you are asking Steve Rotheram MP to do on your behalf. If you have a complaint against the police you would in the first instance have to make this to the police force concerned for them to investigate.  If you remain dissatisfied with their response you can of course take this to the Independent Police Complaints Commission which can investigate, as this is not the role of the Parliamentary Ombuds.  The IPCC website gives details of how to make a complaint and has the required form for you to complete, which does not require your Member of Parliament to sign.
>>>
>>> Yours sincerely
>>>
>>> Maureen Byrne
>>> Office of Steve Rotheram MP
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> —–Original Message—–
>>> From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
>>> Sent: 14 November 2013 11:47
>>> To: BYRNE, Maureen
>>> Subject: Re: Steve Rotheram MP : Problems with IPCC/Fwd: Problemer
>>> med politiet i England/Fwd: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> thank you for your e-mail!
>>>
>>> My home address should be:
>>>
>>> 10 Keith Court
>>> Keith Avenue
>>> Liverpool
>>> L4 5XJ
>>>
>>> (I’ve earlier been in touch with you regarding some cases in July, (to do with the Jobcentre), and which were resolved, if I remember it right.
>>>
>>> And there was also a case before that, I think, regarding the ‘telephone ombudsman’, (or something like that), which I can’t remember now it was resolved.
>>>
>>> Just something I thought about now, as an update).
>>>
>>> Thanks very much for the help with this!
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>>
>>> Erik Ribsskog
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 10:51 AM, BYRNE, Maureen <maureen.byrne@parliament.uk> wrote:
>>>> Steve has received your email and passed this to the constituency office.  In order for this to be progressed we will need to have your home address in line with parliamentary protocol.
>>>>
>>>> Yours sincerely
>>>>
>>>> Maureen Byrne
>>>> Office of Steve Rotheram MP
>>>> 0151 525 5025
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> —–Original Message—–
>>>> From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
>>>> Sent: 14 November 2013 08:18
>>>> To: ROTHERAM, Steve
>>>> Cc: post
>>>> Subject: Problems with IPCC/Fwd: Problemer med politiet i England/Fwd:
>>>> Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> when I send an e-mail to the e-mail address which is on the IPCC website, then this e-mail address doesn’t work, (see forwarded e-mail).
>>>>
>>>> Could you contact the Parliamentary Ombudsman please.
>>>>
>>>> And hear if they can get the IPCC to put a working e-mail address on their website, (so that I can send some police-complaints to the IPCC).
>>>>
>>>> Thanks in advance for any help!
>>>>
>>>> Yours sincerely,
>>>>
>>>> Erik Ribsskog
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ———- Forwarded message ———-
>>>> From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
>>>> Date: Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 7:36 PM
>>>> Subject: Problemer med politiet i England/Fwd: Delivery Status
>>>> Notification (Failure)
>>>> To: post <post@spesialenheten.no>
>>>> Cc: COMMCEN <COMMCEN@merseyside.police.uk>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hei,
>>>>
>>>> jeg sender denne til dere, for e-post-adressen som står på nettstedet til den engelske spesialenheten, (IPCC), virker ikke, virker det som for meg.
>>>>
>>>> Erik Ribsskog
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ———- Forwarded message ———-
>>>> From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <mailer-daemon@googlemail.com>
>>>> Date: Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 7:25 PM
>>>> Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
>>>> To: eribsskog@gmail.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently:
>>>>
>>>>      enquiries@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk
>>>>
>>>> Technical details of permanent failure:
>>>> Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the server for the recipient domain ipcc.gsi.gov.uk by cluster.gsi.messagelabs.com. [194.106.220.3].
>>>>
>>>> The error that the other server returned was:
>>>> 553-Sorry, your email address eribsskog@gmail.com has been
>>>> 553-blacklisted. Please see the FAQs section on spam at
>>>> 553-http://www.messagelabs.com/support/ for more
>>>> 553 information. (#5.7.1)
>>>>
>>>> —– Original message —–
>>>>
>>>> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
>>>>         d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
>>>>         h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
>>>>         bh=nPZSbZji+/pJLScI4mJwRGPoGVdT5nlaF6ll58e2Kmk=;
>>>>         b=U8KfBaTGbB/63//aMD4U0koRuO+VWj86+xOZsGyUwLMixw/SWisbz/L7o3VKvC5W/m
>>>>          SB9yGPoj/K8RyPkvjAz2OtzZO+ZLScB+eadLtXcsXkfL6GRQJF5WnxYcVLCNqW6zEqIP
>>>>          UjDhLre5HwYDpImcH6PUhV5mWw19Ihx7PN3K/+NBEeTDh/nzgpZ2S6PA7iZOCfGRB+xp
>>>>          Ois16iO2oePldlAP56ufhH9RREhlJ39dwNyHHQWGENxgSNOZIjFJMS/pJD6I910FCMGx
>>>>          jPBpmam7d4+mNko1xCxaLZFmv+nllyifjZ2JmMq8oH2YP4nDgx+dk5r1VVaWDHgZcfb6
>>>>          wp5g==
>>>> MIME-Version: 1.0
>>>> X-Received: by 10.66.191.198 with SMTP id
>>>> ha6mr26217796pac.72.1384284355721;
>>>>  Tue, 12 Nov 2013 11:25:55 -0800 (PST)
>>>> Received: by 10.70.72.99 with HTTP; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 11:25:55 -0800
>>>> (PST)
>>>> Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 19:25:55 +0000
>>>> Message-ID:
>>>> <CAGtfns7DNL6T03rLp6630xHEqzwaYjgdrbsdYv_=BnWG-Fy2YA@mail.gmail.com>
>>>> Subject: Update/Fwd: LOG 1507 02/11/13…….Harassment from Hungry
>>>> House –
>>>>  17991 – [Not Protectively Marked]
>>>> From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
>>>> To: COMMCEN <COMMCEN@merseyside.police.uk>
>>>> Cc: “!enquiries” <enquiries@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk>
>>>> Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=047d7b67597a4c9a2304eaffd1fd
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I was at Walton Lane police-station right now regarding four cases.
>>>>
>>>> I spoke with constable 3174.
>>>>
>>>> He ridiculed me and said the reason I had gotten 70 dodgy phone-calls and a lot of e-mails and 14 fast food-delivery guys on my door was because I had ticked a box on the internet.
>>>>
>>>> But I have a degree in IT and don’t think there is a box like that.
>>>>
>>>> I think some criminals are terrorising me.
>>>>
>>>> Regarding the strangler today at around 3PM at Heymarket.
>>>>
>>>> I attach a photograph of him.
>>>>
>>>> But the photo wasn’t that fine, due to that I wasn’t myself after the attack.
>>>>
>>>> Regarding the neighbour, (in 9 Keith Court), I think he’s a criminal.
>>>>
>>>> Since I overheard him treateing a guy in his 20’s some months ago that he would scrape up his car, (with his house-key), after they’d had an argument, (since the young Keith Court-guy said he would have hit the old guy in number nine if he had done a thing like that on the street).
>>>>
>>>> Also the guy in number 9 walks around in his underwear.
>>>>
>>>> He has been going on my door, with two, (and sometimes three), clocks, which he has asked me if were set right, (and sometimes he did this in his under-wear).
>>>>
>>>> He started the community care system, (since these are converted flats for the elderly), this spring, and I went out to see what was wrong with him.
>>>>
>>>> He said he needed to go to hospital, but really the problem was his door that had been smashed in the day before, it seemed.
>>>>
>>>> So I called the police, and a lock-smith fixed the door, later that day.
>>>>
>>>> Just to sumarise a bit.
>>>>
>>>> I’ve told this neighbour I want him to leave me alone.
>>>>
>>>> (Since he’s a criminal and I noticed his flat smelt very bad, when I called the police for him, when he had started the alarm for the elderly).
>>>>
>>>> But yesteday he stood outside my door and said ‘Good Morning’ when I was going to Tesco.
>>>>
>>>> I don’t think thats to leave me alone.
>>>>
>>>> So I told him, (loudly, to warn the neighbours etc.), to leave me alone.
>>>>
>>>> So I hope he leaves me alone now.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> —– Message truncated —–
>>>>
>>>> ________________________________
>>>>
>>>> UK Parliament Disclaimer:
>>>> This e-mail is confidential to the intended recipient. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system. Any unauthorised use, disclosure, or copying is not permitted. This e-mail has been checked for viruses, but no liability is accepted for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this e-mail.
>>>
>>> ________________________________
>>>
>>> UK Parliament Disclaimer:
>>> This e-mail is confidential to the intended recipient. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system. Any unauthorised use, disclosure, or copying is not permitted. This e-mail has been checked for viruses, but no liability is accepted for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this e-mail.
>>
>> ________________________________
>>
>> UK Parliament Disclaimer:
>> This e-mail is confidential to the intended recipient. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system. Any unauthorised use, disclosure, or copying is not permitted. This e-mail has been checked for viruses, but no liability is accepted for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this e-mail.
>
> ________________________________
>
> UK Parliament Disclaimer:
> This e-mail is confidential to the intended recipient. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system. Any unauthorised use, disclosure, or copying is not permitted. This e-mail has been checked for viruses, but no liability is accepted for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this e-mail.

Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>

---

Steve Rotheram MP : Problems with IPCC/Fwd: Problemer med politiet i England/Fwd: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)

---

Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>


Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 1:40 PM



To:
“BYRNE, Maureen” <maureen.byrne@parliament.uk>






Hi, I found more about the Ofcom-case now, on my e-mail programme. Yours sincerely, Erik Ribsskog PS. Here is more about this: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 2:23 PM To:
“BOOTH, Gary” <gary.booth@parliament.uk>


Hi, thank you for your e-mail!
My National Insurance Number is SG 27 09 67 D. It’s also a complaint from May. And then I wondered why Ofcom doesn’t have a general enquiery e-mail
address on their website.
(Because I wanted to complain to Ofcom about Virgin Broadband, some
months ago, and ended up complaining to ICO instead, since I don’t
like ‘web-mail’, like Ofcom has, (on their website), since then the
citizens sometimes lose control of their complaints, I think, since
one sometimes doesn’t recieve an e-mail where the complaint is
written, when one use ‘web-mail’, instead of proper e-mail-addresses,
because then one can have a copy of the sent e-mail in ones
e-mail-programme, and have documentation about what one wrote). Thanks again for the reply! Best regards, Erik Ribsskog On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 1:36 PM, BYRNE, Maureen
<maureen.byrne@parliament.uk> wrote:
>
>
> —–Original Message—–
> From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
> Sent: 14 November 2013 13:32
> To: BYRNE, Maureen
> Subject: Re: Steve Rotheram MP : Problems with IPCC/Fwd: Problemer med politiet i England/Fwd: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
>
> Hi,
>
> the problem is that when I send e-mails to the IPCC, then that e-mail address doesn’t work.
>
> I’d like to hear this from the IPCC.
>
> I don’t like the webforms, since I think the citizens has more control on the communication if they have a copy of the correspondence, in their e-mail-programme.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Erik Ribsskog
>
> PS.
>
> Then I guess it should be a special department, within the Merseyside Police, that I should send the IPCC-case to?
>
> PS 2.
>
> I’ll also try to find more about the other case I mentioned in the previous e-mail.
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 1:00 PM, BYRNE, Maureen <maureen.byrne@parliament.uk> wrote:
>> Thank you for your address.  It is unclear from your email what you are asking Steve Rotheram MP to do on your behalf. If you have a complaint against the police you would in the first instance have to make this to the police force concerned for them to investigate.  If you remain dissatisfied with their response you can of course take this to the Independent Police Complaints Commission which can investigate, as this is not the role of the Parliamentary Ombuds.  The IPCC website gives details of how to make a complaint and has the required form for you to complete, which does not require your Member of Parliament to sign.
>>
>> Yours sincerely
>>
>> Maureen Byrne
>> Office of Steve Rotheram MP
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> —–Original Message—–
>> From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
>> Sent: 14 November 2013 11:47
>> To: BYRNE, Maureen
>> Subject: Re: Steve Rotheram MP : Problems with IPCC/Fwd: Problemer med
>> politiet i England/Fwd: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> thank you for your e-mail!
>>
>> My home address should be:
>>
>> 10 Keith Court
>> Keith Avenue
>> Liverpool
>> L4 5XJ
>>
>> (I’ve earlier been in touch with you regarding some cases in July, (to do with the Jobcentre), and which were resolved, if I remember it right.
>>
>> And there was also a case before that, I think, regarding the ‘telephone ombudsman’, (or something like that), which I can’t remember now it was resolved.
>>
>> Just something I thought about now, as an update).
>>
>> Thanks very much for the help with this!
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Erik Ribsskog
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 10:51 AM, BYRNE, Maureen <maureen.byrne@parliament.uk> wrote:
>>> Steve has received your email and passed this to the constituency office.  In order for this to be progressed we will need to have your home address in line with parliamentary protocol.
>>>
>>> Yours sincerely
>>>
>>> Maureen Byrne
>>> Office of Steve Rotheram MP
>>> 0151 525 5025
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> —–Original Message—–
>>> From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
>>> Sent: 14 November 2013 08:18
>>> To: ROTHERAM, Steve
>>> Cc: post
>>> Subject: Problems with IPCC/Fwd: Problemer med politiet i England/Fwd:
>>> Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> when I send an e-mail to the e-mail address which is on the IPCC website, then this e-mail address doesn’t work, (see forwarded e-mail).
>>>
>>> Could you contact the Parliamentary Ombudsman please.
>>>
>>> And hear if they can get the IPCC to put a working e-mail address on their website, (so that I can send some police-complaints to the IPCC).
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance for any help!
>>>
>>> Yours sincerely,
>>>
>>> Erik Ribsskog
>>>
>>>
>>> ———- Forwarded message ———-
>>> From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
>>> Date: Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 7:36 PM
>>> Subject: Problemer med politiet i England/Fwd: Delivery Status
>>> Notification (Failure)
>>> To: post <post@spesialenheten.no>
>>> Cc: COMMCEN <COMMCEN@merseyside.police.uk>
>>>
>>>
>>> Hei,
>>>
>>> jeg sender denne til dere, for e-post-adressen som står på nettstedet til den engelske spesialenheten, (IPCC), virker ikke, virker det som for meg.
>>>
>>> Erik Ribsskog
>>>
>>>
>>> ———- Forwarded message ———-
>>> From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <mailer-daemon@googlemail.com>
>>> Date: Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 7:25 PM
>>> Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
>>> To: eribsskog@gmail.com
>>>
>>>
>>> Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently:
>>>
>>>      enquiries@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk
>>>
>>> Technical details of permanent failure:
>>> Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the server for the recipient domain ipcc.gsi.gov.uk by cluster.gsi.messagelabs.com. [194.106.220.3].
>>>
>>> The error that the other server returned was:
>>> 553-Sorry, your email address eribsskog@gmail.com has been
>>> 553-blacklisted. Please see the FAQs section on spam at
>>> 553-http://www.messagelabs.com/support/ for more
>>> 553 information. (#5.7.1)
>>>
>>> —– Original message —–
>>>
>>> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
>>>         d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
>>>         h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
>>>         bh=nPZSbZji+/pJLScI4mJwRGPoGVdT5nlaF6ll58e2Kmk=;
>>>         b=U8KfBaTGbB/63//aMD4U0koRuO+VWj86+xOZsGyUwLMixw/SWisbz/L7o3VKvC5W/m
>>>          SB9yGPoj/K8RyPkvjAz2OtzZO+ZLScB+eadLtXcsXkfL6GRQJF5WnxYcVLCNqW6zEqIP
>>>          UjDhLre5HwYDpImcH6PUhV5mWw19Ihx7PN3K/+NBEeTDh/nzgpZ2S6PA7iZOCfGRB+xp
>>>          Ois16iO2oePldlAP56ufhH9RREhlJ39dwNyHHQWGENxgSNOZIjFJMS/pJD6I910FCMGx
>>>          jPBpmam7d4+mNko1xCxaLZFmv+nllyifjZ2JmMq8oH2YP4nDgx+dk5r1VVaWDHgZcfb6
>>>          wp5g==
>>> MIME-Version: 1.0
>>> X-Received: by 10.66.191.198 with SMTP id
>>> ha6mr26217796pac.72.1384284355721;
>>>  Tue, 12 Nov 2013 11:25:55 -0800 (PST)
>>> Received: by 10.70.72.99 with HTTP; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 11:25:55 -0800
>>> (PST)
>>> Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 19:25:55 +0000
>>> Message-ID:
>>> <CAGtfns7DNL6T03rLp6630xHEqzwaYjgdrbsdYv_=BnWG-Fy2YA@mail.gmail.com>
>>> Subject: Update/Fwd: LOG 1507 02/11/13…….Harassment from Hungry
>>> House –
>>>  17991 – [Not Protectively Marked]
>>> From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
>>> To: COMMCEN <COMMCEN@merseyside.police.uk>
>>> Cc: “!enquiries” <enquiries@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk>
>>> Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=047d7b67597a4c9a2304eaffd1fd
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I was at Walton Lane police-station right now regarding four cases.
>>>
>>> I spoke with constable 3174.
>>>
>>> He ridiculed me and said the reason I had gotten 70 dodgy phone-calls and a lot of e-mails and 14 fast food-delivery guys on my door was because I had ticked a box on the internet.
>>>
>>> But I have a degree in IT and don’t think there is a box like that.
>>>
>>> I think some criminals are terrorising me.
>>>
>>> Regarding the strangler today at around 3PM at Heymarket.
>>>
>>> I attach a photograph of him.
>>>
>>> But the photo wasn’t that fine, due to that I wasn’t myself after the attack.
>>>
>>> Regarding the neighbour, (in 9 Keith Court), I think he’s a criminal.
>>>
>>> Since I overheard him treateing a guy in his 20’s some months ago that he would scrape up his car, (with his house-key), after they’d had an argument, (since the young Keith Court-guy said he would have hit the old guy in number nine if he had done a thing like that on the street).
>>>
>>> Also the guy in number 9 walks around in his underwear.
>>>
>>> He has been going on my door, with two, (and sometimes three), clocks, which he has asked me if were set right, (and sometimes he did this in his under-wear).
>>>
>>> He started the community care system, (since these are converted flats for the elderly), this spring, and I went out to see what was wrong with him.
>>>
>>> He said he needed to go to hospital, but really the problem was his door that had been smashed in the day before, it seemed.
>>>
>>> So I called the police, and a lock-smith fixed the door, later that day.
>>>
>>> Just to sumarise a bit.
>>>
>>> I’ve told this neighbour I want him to leave me alone.
>>>
>>> (Since he’s a criminal and I noticed his flat smelt very bad, when I called the police for him, when he had started the alarm for the elderly).
>>>
>>> But yesteday he stood outside my door and said ‘Good Morning’ when I was going to Tesco.
>>>
>>> I don’t think thats to leave me alone.
>>>
>>> So I told him, (loudly, to warn the neighbours etc.), to leave me alone.
>>>
>>> So I hope he leaves me alone now.
>>>
>>>
>>> —– Message truncated —–
>>>
>>> ________________________________
>>>
>>> UK Parliament Disclaimer:
>>> This e-mail is confidential to the intended recipient. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system. Any unauthorised use, disclosure, or copying is not permitted. This e-mail has been checked for viruses, but no liability is accepted for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this e-mail.
>>
>> ________________________________
>>
>> UK Parliament Disclaimer:
>> This e-mail is confidential to the intended recipient. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system. Any unauthorised use, disclosure, or copying is not permitted. This e-mail has been checked for viruses, but no liability is accepted for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this e-mail.
>
> ________________________________
>
> UK Parliament Disclaimer:
> This e-mail is confidential to the intended recipient. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system. Any unauthorised use, disclosure, or copying is not permitted. This e-mail has been checked for viruses, but no liability is accepted for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this e-mail.

Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>

---

Steve Rotheram MP : Problems with IPCC/Fwd: Problemer med politiet i England/Fwd: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)

---

Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>


Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 1:31 PM



To:
“BYRNE, Maureen” <maureen.byrne@parliament.uk>






Hi, the problem is that when I send e-mails to the IPCC, then that e-mail
address doesn’t work. I’d like to hear this from the IPCC. I don’t like the webforms, since I think the citizens has more control
on the communication if they have a copy of the correspondence, in
their e-mail-programme. Best regards, Erik Ribsskog PS. Then I guess it should be a special department, within the Merseyside
Police, that I should send the IPCC-case to? PS 2. I’ll also try to find more about the other case I mentioned in the
previous e-mail.


On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 1:00 PM, BYRNE, Maureen
<maureen.byrne@parliament.uk> wrote:
> Thank you for your address.  It is unclear from your email what you are asking Steve Rotheram MP to do on your behalf. If you have a complaint against the police you would in the first instance have to make this to the police force concerned for them to investigate.  If you remain dissatisfied with their response you can of course take this to the Independent Police Complaints Commission which can investigate, as this is not the role of the Parliamentary Ombuds.  The IPCC website gives details of how to make a complaint and has the required form for you to complete, which does not require your Member of Parliament to sign.
>
> Yours sincerely
>
> Maureen Byrne
> Office of Steve Rotheram MP
>
>
>
>
>
> —–Original Message—–
> From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
> Sent: 14 November 2013 11:47
> To: BYRNE, Maureen
> Subject: Re: Steve Rotheram MP : Problems with IPCC/Fwd: Problemer med politiet i England/Fwd: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
>
> Hi,
>
> thank you for your e-mail!
>
> My home address should be:
>
> 10 Keith Court
> Keith Avenue
> Liverpool
> L4 5XJ
>
> (I’ve earlier been in touch with you regarding some cases in July, (to do with the Jobcentre), and which were resolved, if I remember it right.
>
> And there was also a case before that, I think, regarding the ‘telephone ombudsman’, (or something like that), which I can’t remember now it was resolved.
>
> Just something I thought about now, as an update).
>
> Thanks very much for the help with this!
>
> Best regards,
>
> Erik Ribsskog
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 10:51 AM, BYRNE, Maureen <maureen.byrne@parliament.uk> wrote:
>> Steve has received your email and passed this to the constituency office.  In order for this to be progressed we will need to have your home address in line with parliamentary protocol.
>>
>> Yours sincerely
>>
>> Maureen Byrne
>> Office of Steve Rotheram MP
>> 0151 525 5025
>>
>>
>>
>> —–Original Message—–
>> From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
>> Sent: 14 November 2013 08:18
>> To: ROTHERAM, Steve
>> Cc: post
>> Subject: Problems with IPCC/Fwd: Problemer med politiet i England/Fwd:
>> Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> when I send an e-mail to the e-mail address which is on the IPCC website, then this e-mail address doesn’t work, (see forwarded e-mail).
>>
>> Could you contact the Parliamentary Ombudsman please.
>>
>> And hear if they can get the IPCC to put a working e-mail address on their website, (so that I can send some police-complaints to the IPCC).
>>
>> Thanks in advance for any help!
>>
>> Yours sincerely,
>>
>> Erik Ribsskog
>>
>>
>> ———- Forwarded message ———-
>> From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
>> Date: Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 7:36 PM
>> Subject: Problemer med politiet i England/Fwd: Delivery Status
>> Notification (Failure)
>> To: post <post@spesialenheten.no>
>> Cc: COMMCEN <COMMCEN@merseyside.police.uk>
>>
>>
>> Hei,
>>
>> jeg sender denne til dere, for e-post-adressen som står på nettstedet til den engelske spesialenheten, (IPCC), virker ikke, virker det som for meg.
>>
>> Erik Ribsskog
>>
>>
>> ———- Forwarded message ———-
>> From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <mailer-daemon@googlemail.com>
>> Date: Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 7:25 PM
>> Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
>> To: eribsskog@gmail.com
>>
>>
>> Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently:
>>
>>      enquiries@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk
>>
>> Technical details of permanent failure:
>> Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the server for the recipient domain ipcc.gsi.gov.uk by cluster.gsi.messagelabs.com. [194.106.220.3].
>>
>> The error that the other server returned was:
>> 553-Sorry, your email address eribsskog@gmail.com has been
>> 553-blacklisted. Please see the FAQs section on spam at
>> 553-http://www.messagelabs.com/support/ for more
>> 553 information. (#5.7.1)
>>
>> —– Original message —–
>>
>> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
>>         d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
>>         h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
>>         bh=nPZSbZji+/pJLScI4mJwRGPoGVdT5nlaF6ll58e2Kmk=;
>>         b=U8KfBaTGbB/63//aMD4U0koRuO+VWj86+xOZsGyUwLMixw/SWisbz/L7o3VKvC5W/m
>>          SB9yGPoj/K8RyPkvjAz2OtzZO+ZLScB+eadLtXcsXkfL6GRQJF5WnxYcVLCNqW6zEqIP
>>          UjDhLre5HwYDpImcH6PUhV5mWw19Ihx7PN3K/+NBEeTDh/nzgpZ2S6PA7iZOCfGRB+xp
>>          Ois16iO2oePldlAP56ufhH9RREhlJ39dwNyHHQWGENxgSNOZIjFJMS/pJD6I910FCMGx
>>          jPBpmam7d4+mNko1xCxaLZFmv+nllyifjZ2JmMq8oH2YP4nDgx+dk5r1VVaWDHgZcfb6
>>          wp5g==
>> MIME-Version: 1.0
>> X-Received: by 10.66.191.198 with SMTP id
>> ha6mr26217796pac.72.1384284355721;
>>  Tue, 12 Nov 2013 11:25:55 -0800 (PST)
>> Received: by 10.70.72.99 with HTTP; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 11:25:55 -0800
>> (PST)
>> Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 19:25:55 +0000
>> Message-ID:
>> <CAGtfns7DNL6T03rLp6630xHEqzwaYjgdrbsdYv_=BnWG-Fy2YA@mail.gmail.com>
>> Subject: Update/Fwd: LOG 1507 02/11/13…….Harassment from Hungry
>> House –
>>  17991 – [Not Protectively Marked]
>> From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
>> To: COMMCEN <COMMCEN@merseyside.police.uk>
>> Cc: “!enquiries” <enquiries@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk>
>> Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=047d7b67597a4c9a2304eaffd1fd
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I was at Walton Lane police-station right now regarding four cases.
>>
>> I spoke with constable 3174.
>>
>> He ridiculed me and said the reason I had gotten 70 dodgy phone-calls and a lot of e-mails and 14 fast food-delivery guys on my door was because I had ticked a box on the internet.
>>
>> But I have a degree in IT and don’t think there is a box like that.
>>
>> I think some criminals are terrorising me.
>>
>> Regarding the strangler today at around 3PM at Heymarket.
>>
>> I attach a photograph of him.
>>
>> But the photo wasn’t that fine, due to that I wasn’t myself after the attack.
>>
>> Regarding the neighbour, (in 9 Keith Court), I think he’s a criminal.
>>
>> Since I overheard him treateing a guy in his 20’s some months ago that he would scrape up his car, (with his house-key), after they’d had an argument, (since the young Keith Court-guy said he would have hit the old guy in number nine if he had done a thing like that on the street).
>>
>> Also the guy in number 9 walks around in his underwear.
>>
>> He has been going on my door, with two, (and sometimes three), clocks, which he has asked me if were set right, (and sometimes he did this in his under-wear).
>>
>> He started the community care system, (since these are converted flats for the elderly), this spring, and I went out to see what was wrong with him.
>>
>> He said he needed to go to hospital, but really the problem was his door that had been smashed in the day before, it seemed.
>>
>> So I called the police, and a lock-smith fixed the door, later that day.
>>
>> Just to sumarise a bit.
>>
>> I’ve told this neighbour I want him to leave me alone.
>>
>> (Since he’s a criminal and I noticed his flat smelt very bad, when I called the police for him, when he had started the alarm for the elderly).
>>
>> But yesteday he stood outside my door and said ‘Good Morning’ when I was going to Tesco.
>>
>> I don’t think thats to leave me alone.
>>
>> So I told him, (loudly, to warn the neighbours etc.), to leave me alone.
>>
>> So I hope he leaves me alone now.
>>
>>
>> —– Message truncated —–
>>
>> ________________________________
>>
>> UK Parliament Disclaimer:
>> This e-mail is confidential to the intended recipient. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system. Any unauthorised use, disclosure, or copying is not permitted. This e-mail has been checked for viruses, but no liability is accepted for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this e-mail.
>
> ________________________________
>
> UK Parliament Disclaimer:
> This e-mail is confidential to the intended recipient. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system. Any unauthorised use, disclosure, or copying is not permitted. This e-mail has been checked for viruses, but no liability is accepted for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this e-mail.

Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>

---

Steve Rotheram MP : Problems with IPCC/Fwd: Problemer med politiet i England/Fwd: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)

---

Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>


Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 11:46 AM



To:
“BYRNE, Maureen” <maureen.byrne@parliament.uk>






Hi, thank you for your e-mail! My home address should be: 10 Keith Court
Keith Avenue
Liverpool
L4 5XJ (I’ve earlier been in touch with you regarding some cases in July, (to
do with the Jobcentre), and which were resolved, if I remember it
right. And there was also a case before that, I think, regarding the
‘telephone ombudsman’, (or something like that), which I can’t
remember now it was resolved. Just something I thought about now, as an update). Thanks very much for the help with this! Best regards, Erik Ribsskog


On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 10:51 AM, BYRNE, Maureen
<maureen.byrne@parliament.uk> wrote:
> Steve has received your email and passed this to the constituency office.  In order for this to be progressed we will need to have your home address in line with parliamentary protocol.
>
> Yours sincerely
>
> Maureen Byrne
> Office of Steve Rotheram MP
> 0151 525 5025
>
>
>
> —–Original Message—–
> From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
> Sent: 14 November 2013 08:18
> To: ROTHERAM, Steve
> Cc: post
> Subject: Problems with IPCC/Fwd: Problemer med politiet i England/Fwd: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
>
> Hi,
>
> when I send an e-mail to the e-mail address which is on the IPCC website, then this e-mail address doesn’t work, (see forwarded e-mail).
>
> Could you contact the Parliamentary Ombudsman please.
>
> And hear if they can get the IPCC to put a working e-mail address on their website, (so that I can send some police-complaints to the IPCC).
>
> Thanks in advance for any help!
>
> Yours sincerely,
>
> Erik Ribsskog
>
>
> ———- Forwarded message ———-
> From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 7:36 PM
> Subject: Problemer med politiet i England/Fwd: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
> To: post <post@spesialenheten.no>
> Cc: COMMCEN <COMMCEN@merseyside.police.uk>
>
>
> Hei,
>
> jeg sender denne til dere, for e-post-adressen som står på nettstedet til den engelske spesialenheten, (IPCC), virker ikke, virker det som for meg.
>
> Erik Ribsskog
>
>
> ———- Forwarded message ———-
> From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <mailer-daemon@googlemail.com>
> Date: Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 7:25 PM
> Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
> To: eribsskog@gmail.com
>
>
> Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently:
>
>      enquiries@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk
>
> Technical details of permanent failure:
> Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the server for the recipient domain ipcc.gsi.gov.uk by cluster.gsi.messagelabs.com. [194.106.220.3].
>
> The error that the other server returned was:
> 553-Sorry, your email address eribsskog@gmail.com has been 553-blacklisted. Please see the FAQs section on spam at 553-http://www.messagelabs.com/support/ for more
> 553 information. (#5.7.1)
>
> —– Original message —–
>
> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
>         d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
>         h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
>         bh=nPZSbZji+/pJLScI4mJwRGPoGVdT5nlaF6ll58e2Kmk=;
>         b=U8KfBaTGbB/63//aMD4U0koRuO+VWj86+xOZsGyUwLMixw/SWisbz/L7o3VKvC5W/m
>          SB9yGPoj/K8RyPkvjAz2OtzZO+ZLScB+eadLtXcsXkfL6GRQJF5WnxYcVLCNqW6zEqIP
>          UjDhLre5HwYDpImcH6PUhV5mWw19Ihx7PN3K/+NBEeTDh/nzgpZ2S6PA7iZOCfGRB+xp
>          Ois16iO2oePldlAP56ufhH9RREhlJ39dwNyHHQWGENxgSNOZIjFJMS/pJD6I910FCMGx
>          jPBpmam7d4+mNko1xCxaLZFmv+nllyifjZ2JmMq8oH2YP4nDgx+dk5r1VVaWDHgZcfb6
>          wp5g==
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> X-Received: by 10.66.191.198 with SMTP id ha6mr26217796pac.72.1384284355721;
>  Tue, 12 Nov 2013 11:25:55 -0800 (PST)
> Received: by 10.70.72.99 with HTTP; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 11:25:55 -0800 (PST)
> Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 19:25:55 +0000
> Message-ID: <CAGtfns7DNL6T03rLp6630xHEqzwaYjgdrbsdYv_=BnWG-Fy2YA@mail.gmail.com>
> Subject: Update/Fwd: LOG 1507 02/11/13…….Harassment from Hungry House –
>  17991 – [Not Protectively Marked]
> From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
> To: COMMCEN <COMMCEN@merseyside.police.uk>
> Cc: “!enquiries” <enquiries@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk>
> Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=047d7b67597a4c9a2304eaffd1fd
>
> Hi,
>
> I was at Walton Lane police-station right now regarding four cases.
>
> I spoke with constable 3174.
>
> He ridiculed me and said the reason I had gotten 70 dodgy phone-calls and a lot of e-mails and 14 fast food-delivery guys on my door was because I had ticked a box on the internet.
>
> But I have a degree in IT and don’t think there is a box like that.
>
> I think some criminals are terrorising me.
>
> Regarding the strangler today at around 3PM at Heymarket.
>
> I attach a photograph of him.
>
> But the photo wasn’t that fine, due to that I wasn’t myself after the attack.
>
> Regarding the neighbour, (in 9 Keith Court), I think he’s a criminal.
>
> Since I overheard him treateing a guy in his 20’s some months ago that he would scrape up his car, (with his house-key), after they’d had an argument, (since the young Keith Court-guy said he would have hit the old guy in number nine if he had done a thing like that on the street).
>
> Also the guy in number 9 walks around in his underwear.
>
> He has been going on my door, with two, (and sometimes three), clocks, which he has asked me if were set right, (and sometimes he did this in his under-wear).
>
> He started the community care system, (since these are converted flats for the elderly), this spring, and I went out to see what was wrong with him.
>
> He said he needed to go to hospital, but really the problem was his door that had been smashed in the day before, it seemed.
>
> So I called the police, and a lock-smith fixed the door, later that day.
>
> Just to sumarise a bit.
>
> I’ve told this neighbour I want him to leave me alone.
>
> (Since he’s a criminal and I noticed his flat smelt very bad, when I called the police for him, when he had started the alarm for the elderly).
>
> But yesteday he stood outside my door and said ‘Good Morning’ when I was going to Tesco.
>
> I don’t think thats to leave me alone.
>
> So I told him, (loudly, to warn the neighbours etc.), to leave me alone.
>
> So I hope he leaves me alone now.
>
>
> —– Message truncated —–
>
> ________________________________
>
> UK Parliament Disclaimer:
> This e-mail is confidential to the intended recipient. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system. Any unauthorised use, disclosure, or copying is not permitted. This e-mail has been checked for viruses, but no liability is accepted for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this e-mail.

Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>

---

FW: RESTRICTED – PERSONAL:

---

Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>


Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 3:04 PM



To:
“BOOTH, Gary” <gary.booth@parliament.uk>
Cc:
Phso Enquiries <phso.enquiries@ombudsman.org.uk>






Ok,

my Personal Advisor Sarah at Aintree jobcentre has faxed them the letter this time.

(Since I sent about this to you).

I’ve sent them, (Birkenhead Benefit Centre), e-mails earlier, which I have ignored.

Sent: 23 July 2013 14:52
To: BOOTH, Gary
Cc: Phso Enquiries
Subject: Re: FW: RESTRICTED – PERSONAL:






















Sent: 23 July 2013 14:40


To: BOOTH, Gary
Cc: Phso Enquiries
Subject: Re: FW: RESTRICTED – PERSONAL:








Regards, Erik Ribsskog










Sent: 23 July 2013 14:32
To: BOOTH, Gary
Cc: Phso Enquiries
Subject: Re: FW: RESTRICTED – PERSONAL:




I’m not happy with this.


Also, in the link, in your e-mail it doesn’t say an e-mail-address.


Like I’ve written to you earlier people want to use a normal email-address, to keep a copy of the correspondence in their e-mail programme. Could you please ask the Jobcentre which specific e-mail address I should use if I want to send an e-mail to Birkenhead Benefit Centre.
Can I use this e-mail-address: Contact-Us@jobcentreplus.gsi.gov.uk? Because Birkenhead Benefit Centre has told me on the phone that they don’t respond to e-mails.
(And if I send them a letter, they seem to not recieve it).
Thanks for trying 🙂 Erik Ribsskog








Sent: 23 July 2013 11:47
To: BOOTH, Gary
Subject: RESTRICTED – PERSONAL:


















Complaint Resolution Manager | Department for Work & Pensions | Cressington House| 249 St. Mary’s Road | Liverpool | L19 0NF |  www.dwp.gov.uk




Sent: 18 July 2013 11:09
To: DWP North West Complaints Resolution Team
Subject: Erik Ribsskog



told this by a member of staff in Jupiter Drive, would it be possible to let me have the procedure for e-mails to and from the public?

---

UK Parliament Disclaimer:
This e-mail is confidential to the intended recipient. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system. Any unauthorised use, disclosure, or copying is not permitted. This e-mail has been checked for viruses, but no
liability is accepted for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this e-mail.
**********************************************************************
This document is strictly confidential and is intended only for use by the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or other action taken in reliance of the information contained in this e-mail is strictly prohibited.
Any views expressed by the sender of this message are not necessarily those of the Department for Work and Pensions.
If you have received this transmission in error, please use the reply function to tell us and then permanently delete what you have received.
This email was scanned for viruses by the Department for Work and Pensions’ anti-virus services and on leaving the Department was found to be virus free.
Please note: Incoming and outgoing e-mail messages are routinely monitored for compliance with our policy on the use of electronic communications.
**********************************************************************

---

UK Parliament Disclaimer:
This e-mail is confidential to the intended recipient. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system. Any unauthorised use, disclosure, or copying is not permitted. This e-mail has been checked for viruses, but no
liability is accepted for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this e-mail.

---

UK Parliament Disclaimer:
This e-mail is confidential to the intended recipient. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system. Any unauthorised use, disclosure, or copying is not permitted. This e-mail has been checked for viruses, but no
liability is accepted for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this e-mail.

---

UK Parliament Disclaimer:
This e-mail is confidential to the intended recipient. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system. Any unauthorised use, disclosure, or copying is not permitted. This e-mail has been checked for viruses, but no
liability is accepted for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this e-mail.

---

UK Parliament Disclaimer:
This e-mail is confidential to the intended recipient. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system. Any unauthorised use, disclosure, or copying is not permitted. This e-mail has been checked for viruses, but no
liability is accepted for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this e-mail.