Er dette politiets måte å si fra om at hvis du får problemer med mafia/mob etc. så skal du bare la dem drepe deg og gjøre hva dem vil med deg, for du kommer ikke til å få noe hjelp av politiet.
Stikkord: Politiet
-
Untitled Post
Altså, noen ganger, så hender det jo at man skal beskrive en situasjon.
F.eks. her om dagen, så var jeg på Walton Lane politistasjon i Liverpool.
Og da ble jeg trakassert av en kvinnelig blond politikonstabel.
I England, eller i hvertfall Liverpool, så har de en sånn ringeklokke man skal trykke på, så dukker det etterhvert opp en politibetjent fra bakrommet.
Så det som skjedde, var at den kvinnelige blonde politibetjenten, begynte å spørre meg om hva mitt ærend ditt skyldtes osv.
Så plutselig slutter hun å høre på meg, og begynner å prate med en afrikaner eller neger da, som sitter i ventedelen av politistasjonen.
Så sier han afrikaneren, eller negeren da, at han har ventet i 20 minutter.
Så stikker hun blonde politidama, inn på bakrommet igjen, og blir der et par minutter, snakker mer med afrikaneren/negeren, og så spørr hun meg på nytt hva mitt ærend er.
Jeg mener det var trakassering fra politidama, fordi hun skulle ikke sluttet å høre på meg, (helt uten grunn var det og, det var ingen som sa noe, eller noe annen anledning, som skulle tilsi at hun plutselig skulle slutte å høre på hva jeg sa).
Men akkurat det er egentlig ikke poenget.
Poenget er, når jeg senere, sammen med annen informasjon, skrev en e-post, og beskrev denne episoden, til ‘The Standard Unit’, altså tilsvarende spesialenheten ved politidistriktet da.
Så måtte jeg jo beskrive situasjonen.
Og da er det jo greit å kunne beskrive f.eks. at politibetjenten var kvinnelig og blond.
Og at personen i venteværelse, var mannlig og neger/afrikaner da.
Fordi da er det lettere, for de som leser rapporten/e-posten, å skjønne hvilke personer det er man referer til.
Så dess mer nøyaktig man referer, dess mer nytte/informasjon, gir det man har skrevet da.
Altså, man bør vel få lov å kalle en spade for en spade.
Man kunne jo laget en ny regel, at man bør kalle en spade for graveredskap.
Men det finnes jo hakker og mye annet, som også kan være graveredskap.
Jeg husker jeg jobba på en gård for et par års tid siden, og gravde noen grøfter osv., så det er jeg helt sikker på.
Og hvis man da får beskjed f.eks: Gå å hent det graveredskapet.
Så henter du hakka da, siden det er et graveredskap.
Nei jeg mente ikke at du skulle hente graveredskapet, graveredskapet var det jeg mente du skulle hente, stikk å hent graveredskapet nå da.
Alle skjønner at dette blir bare tull.
Man må vel ha et ord for å beskrive spaden.
Hvis man ikke får lov å kalle negre for negre, så må man i det minste få et annet ord som betyr det samme da.
Som kan være akseptabelt for negre også da.
Men i mellomtiden, så kan man vel ikke forby ordet som betyr neger?
Det blir mer som i 1984, eller hvor det var ‘new-speach’ var med, eller ny-tale, at myndighetene, eller hvem det var, forbød de ordene som refererte til det man ikke ville at folk skulle tenke på, eller mene noe om da.
Det blir i hvertfall noe lignende, iom. at man forbyr å referere til et ord med en spesiell mening.
Jeg skjønner ikke at det skal være noe være å si neger enn eksimo.
Men eskimo er vel ikke greit lenger forresten, men da kan man jo si inuit, som betyr det samme vel.
Men hva kan man si som betyr det samme som neger?
Det vet ikke jeg egentlig.
Kanskje man skulle finne på et nytt ord, som betyr det samme da, før man forbyr det gamle.
Dette har jeg også tenkt på, i forbindelse med ordet ‘rasisme’.
Så har man utvidet rasisme-begrepet.
Så vel, kun de færreste, egentlig vet hva man mener når man bruker ordet ‘rasisme’ for tiden.
Det er helt uholdbart synes jeg.
For hvordan skal man referere til rasisme, sånn som det betydde før begrepet ble utvidet da?
Man skulle jo selvfølgelig, latt rasisme bety rasisme, og så laget et nytt ord, som betydde både rasisme og også de ekstra begrepene, som er med i det nye utvidede rasisme begrepet som vel brukes nå.
Nå er det jo total forvirring.
Hvem er det som bestemmer hva ordene skal bety?
Det blir jo politikk i ordene, som som myndighetene eller hvem det er som bestemmer, holder på.
Så jeg synes bør passe litt på når ord pluteslig ikke er lov å brukes lengre, og når ordene over dagen forrandrer mening pga. en slags resulusjon eller noe slikt.
Da tror jeg det kanskje er på tide å stoppe opp litt, og prøve å høre hva det er som foregår.
-
Untitled Post
From: Civil.Litigation.E@merseyside.police.uk
To: eribsskog@gmail.com Erik Ribsskog
Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2007 16:19:39 +0000
Subject: Re: Fwd: PSD 07/0519/Sgt. Smyth/RachelDear Mr Ribsskog,
Thank you for your email and the enclosures you have sent today.
I can confirm that we have today received thirteen emails from you, eleven
of which contain attachments. The other two emails are your emails making
contact with us. The email address I gave you yesterday is the correct
address.As discussed with yourself and Sgt John Smyth yesterday, your complaint
will now be dealt with by way of a Full Investigation.Yours sincerely
Rachel Coyne
Liverpool North Standards Unit
Walton Lane Police Station============================================================
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.If you have received this email in error please notify the sender as soon
as possible.This footnote confirms that all reasonable steps have been taken to
ensure that this email message has been swept for the presence of
computer viruses.The views expressed in this communication may not necessarily be the
views of Merseyside Police.All communications, including telephone calls and electronic messages to
and from Merseyside Police may be subject to monitoring and recording.
============================================================ -
Untitled Post
From: eribsskog@gmail.com Erik Ribsskog
To: civil.litigation.e@merseyside.police.uk
Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2007 13:00:09 +0000
Subject: Fwd: PSD 07/0519/Sgt. Smyth/RachelHi,
now I’ve sent you the following documents:
– Enclosures 1-25
– Enclosures A-G
– Enclosures new1-new8
– Thread about the use of negative reinforcement as a management method at
Arvato Services, Liverpool.– Scan 1-253
– Enclosures I-XII
It would be very fine, if you have the oppertunity to confirm that you have
recieved these files, since I discovered,
while I was sending the enclosures, that the e-mail address, that is on your
letters, is written a bit differently,
(civil.litigation.e.@merseyside.police.uk), than the e-mail address that I
was given in the meeting yesterday,
(civil.litigation.e@merseyside.police.uk).Hope that this is alright!
Yours sincerely,
Erik Ribsskog
———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Erik Ribsskog
Date: Nov 9, 2007 11:43 AM
Subject: PSD 07/0519/Sgt. Smyth/Rachel
To: civil.litigation.e@merseyside.police.ukHi,
I’m refering to the meeting at Walton Lane Police Station, yesterday, where
it
was agreed that I should e-mail you some documents regarding the case we
were discussing in the meeting.There are quite a few documents, so I’m going to be sending you several
e-mails.When I’m finished sending you all of the documents, then I’ll send an e-mail
with an overview of which documents I have been sending you.While I was at your Police Station yesterday, it seemed like I was harassed
in
the reception.First I rang the bell.
Then a blond PC in her 30’s, I think, showed up, and asked me what it was
regarding.Then she stopped listening to me.
And started speaking with an African gentleman, who was sitting waiting in
your
waiting-area.Then she went to the back-office.
Then she got back, and helped the gentleman.
Then she asked me again what my visit was regarding.
This seemed odd and harassing to me, because she shouldn’t have switched her
attention away from me, after first asking me to tell her what my visit
there was
regarding.I don’t want to speculate, but I was wondering if this could some way that
the
Merseyside Police wanted to see if I was a racist, and wanted to check if
I was politically correct enough to het help.It could seem a bit like this to me now, so I was wondering how I should go
forward
with reporting this.Also, I didn’t mention it yesterday in the meeting, I remember I felt
‘stupid’/looked
down on, while I was waiting, while the PC went back to the back office.But I needed some time to think through the situation, before I knew how to
present it.And yesterday, I was also so focused on preparing for the meeting, so I
didn’t use
that much time to think about this spesific situation.But after I got back home again, I have had the oppertunity, to think more
about this,
and thats why I’m writing about this to you now.To get advice on how I should go forward, with reporting this.
Because like I told you in the meeting yesterday, I don’t think PC’s and
Police Officers,
should act inaproperatly or unrepresentatlively, (regardless of the
circomstances), so
that’s why I think I should report about harassment-situations like this.Hope that this is alright!
Yours sincerely,
Erik Ribsskog
-
Untitled Post
From: eribsskog@gmail.com Erik Ribsskog
To: civil.litigation.e@merseyside.police.uk
Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2007 11:43:48 +0000
Subject: PSD 07/0519/Sgt. Smyth/RachelHi,
I’m refering to the meeting at Walton Lane Police Station, yesterday, where
it
was agreed that I should e-mail you some documents regarding the case we
were discussing in the meeting.There are quite a few documents, so I’m going to be sending you several
e-mails.When I’m finished sending you all of the documents, then I’ll send an e-mail
with an overview of which documents I have been sending you.While I was at your Police Station yesterday, it seemed like I was harassed
in
the reception.First I rang the bell.
Then a blond PC in her 30’s, I think, showed up, and asked me what it was
regarding.Then she stopped listening to me.
And started speaking with an African gentleman, who was sitting waiting in
your
waiting-area.Then she went to the back-office.
Then she got back, and helped the gentleman.
Then she asked me again what my visit was regarding.
This seemed odd and harassing to me, because she shouldn’t have switched her
attention away from me, after first asking me to tell her what my visit
there was
regarding.I don’t want to speculate, but I was wondering if this could some way that
the
Merseyside Police wanted to see if I was a racist, and wanted to check if
I was politically correct enough to het help.It could seem a bit like this to me now, so I was wondering how I should go
forward
with reporting this.Also, I didn’t mention it yesterday in the meeting, I remember I felt
‘stupid’/looked
down on, while I was waiting, while the PC went back to the back office.But I needed some time to think through the situation, before I knew how to
present it.And yesterday, I was also so focused on preparing for the meeting, so I
didn’t use
that much time to think about this spesific situation.But after I got back home again, I have had the oppertunity, to think more
about this,
and thats why I’m writing about this to you now.To get advice on how I should go forward, with reporting this.
Because like I told you in the meeting yesterday, I don’t think PC’s and
Police Officers,
should act inaproperatly or unrepresentatlively, (regardless of the
circomstances), so
that’s why I think I should report about harassment-situations like this.Hope that this is alright!
Yours sincerely,
Erik Ribsskog
-
Untitled Post
Virket som om dem hadde en eller annen form for PC-test av meg på Walton Lane Police Station i går.
Når jeg kom dit kl 15, så ringte jeg på klokka.
Så kom det ei blond PC i 30 åra vel.
Spurte hvorfor jeg var der.
Så ignorerte hun meg, og spurte en afrikaner i 20 åra, om han fikk hjelp.
Også sa han at han hadde venta i 20 min.
Så gikk PC dama inn på bakrommet et par minutter.
Snakka med afrikaner igjen.
Så spurte hu meg igjen hvorfor jeg var der.
Jeg lurer på om det kan ha vært noe at dem skulle sjekke at jeg reagerte på at dem hjalp afrikaneren
før meg, og ikke var politisk korrekt nok til å få hjelp.Siden jeg skrev en komentar om de afrikanske jentene i flat 2 på bloggen her om dagen.
-
Untitled Post
Afr. jenter i fl. 2., skal alltid inn hoveddøra i bygget når jeg skal ut. (ca. 14.10)
Enda det ikke er så ofte.
Siv. politi etc?
Fjær på gulvet utenfor dør til leil.






