Stikkord: Shell

Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Update/Fwd: Complaint/Fwd: IOPC reference – 2021/162867
Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com> 9. februar 2024 kl. 00:25
Til: Phso Enquiries <phso.enquiries@ombudsman.org.uk>
Kopi: Customer Services <Customer_Services2@lowellgroup.co.uk>, customer.complaints@ee.co.uk, “complaint.info” <complaint.info@financial-ombudsman.org.uk>, enquiry@commsombudsman.org, customerwellness@three.co.uk, complaintsresolution@lowellgroup.co.uk, Lowell Norge AS <svc.no.nova@lowell.com>, bank.no@lowell.com, bank.no@lowell.mypurecloud.ie, kundeservice@mail.efi.no, boligbistand@baerum.kommune.no, Lowell Norge AS <strom.no@lowell.com>, NorgesEnergi <kundeservice@norgesenergi.no>, Lowell Norge – kundesenter <kundesenter.no@lowell.com>, kundeservice@hafslundstrom.no, Bærum Kommune <post@baerum.kommune.no>, LOS Kundesenter <kundesenter@los.no>, Sfovpost <sfovpost@statsforvalteren.no>, “post@sivilombudsmannen.no” <post@sivilombudsmannen.no>, amnestyis <amnestyis@amnesty.org>, HRW UK <hrwuk@hrw.org>, LbF Leieboerforeningen <lbf@lbf.no>, post <post@finkn.no>, Akademikerforbundet <post@akademikerforbundet.no>, kom@nve.no, rme@nve.no, trl@nve.no, morten.schau@elvia.no, Abuse <abuse@telia.com>, “inger.lise.blyverket” <inger.lise.blyverket@forbrukerradet.no>, Phso Enquiries <phso.enquiries@ombudsman.org.uk>, Info <info@tpas.org.uk>, Postmottak ASD <postmottak@asd.dep.no>, Runcorn Office <runcornoffice@taroe.org>, Postkasse <postkasse@datatilsynet.no>, Lisa Eian <eian@eianadvokat.no>, strom.no@lowell.mypurecloud.ie, post@arbeidstilsynet.no, corporationsecretary@ofcom.org.uk, post <post@finanstilsynet.no>, Post <post@brukerklagenemnda.no>, NKOM <firmapost@nkom.no>, Post <post@forbrukerradet.no>, newsroom@ee.co.uk, enquiries@policeconduct.gov.uk, 3745@gmx.com
Hi,

I also want compensation because the mentioned arrests resulted in murder of justice-court-cases.

And a prosecutor (in Liverpool Magistrates Court or if it was Liverpool County Court) said I was a: ‘Fantasist’:

But then I replied that noone has called me something like that before.

I now wonder if they have mixed me up with my mothers fourt-cousin Erik J. C. Young, from Surrey.

He has been part of a funny state, called Ladonia, that is/was run by an artist from Sweden.

(He was their embassador in Thailand.

Something like that).

I have geneaology as a hobby, so I’ve quite recently found out about this relative.

(When I lived in the UK (from 2004 to 2014) I didn’t know about this relative.

It was last year that I found out about that my great-grandmother had a cousin named Vagn Aage Fog, that had a daugther, that married Merwin Sheffield Young, who I wonder if was a Surrey-police-man and also in the RAF like a jobcenter-staff in Huyton, around 2013).

Erik John Clive Young has written all over the internet about how his Norwegian/Danish mother inherited a property in Brunei from the Danish King (the one who died around 50 years ago) and that Shell Brunei has stolen this property from him/them, and that the property had a valuable oil-field on it.

I’ve tried to ask my relatives (on my mother side) about where she worked as an au-pair.

It could be that she lived with her mothers second-cousin Fredrikke Louise Young b. Fog, in Surrey).

So this is also a mix-up, it seems.

So I also want compensation due to that the upper-clas-prosecutor mocked me and called me a: ‘Fantasist’ etc, in court (around 2013) when it’s really my mothers third-cousin Erik J. C. Young that he meant (it could seem).

Erik Ribsskog

PS.

My nick is: ‘johncons’.

And that could be shortened to: ‘jc’.

And I also have the first name Erik.

So that could be the reason for this mix-up (I think one have to call it).

PS 2.

Here is more about this:

‘Dear Supreme Court of the United Kingdom,

My name is Erik John Clive Young and I have written to The Supreme Court Judges many times over the past ten years.
My mother, Fredrikke Louise Young, who originated from Scandinavia was left land in Asia by the King of Denmark upon his death in 1972.
In 1973 my father, Mervyn Frank Sheffield Young, was in Hong Kong staying at The Londoner Hotel. He left two Samsonite brief cases full of title deeds in his hotel room it was 2.30p.m. on a Saturday afternoon so he went for a walk and a cup of tea.
Whilst he was away from his room three men came to the room, one kept watch for him at the end of the corridor whilst the other two entered his room and stole title deeds relating to land on the island of Borneo located in Brunei.
My father discovered the robbery two members of the hotel staff witnessed the robbery. He note the Borneo title deeds had been stolen but didn’t call the police because he assumed it was worthless jungle.
Around the same time three men turned up in Brunei offering title deeds for sale to Sultan Hassanal Bolkiah of Brunei. I have chapter and verse of what happened because a daughter of the last British High Commissioner To Brunei witnessed everything from 20 feet away and came and reported everything to me years later. She told me “The Sultan’s father said”those men are criminals they are not their title deeds don’t have anything to do with them” the Sultan became angry with his father who said “It’s not our land why do you want it we have enough money already why do you want more?” the Sultan’s father obstructed the Sultan from dealing with these three men so the Sultan had his security seize his father and lock him in a room nearby. The Sultan then purchased these title deeds from these three men his father had labelled as criminals.
That is how The Sultan of Brunei got hold of the 10% commission royalty payments made by The Shell Oil Corporation to him in spite of the fact that the SOC did not believe it was his land his name wasn’t on title deeds he took five months to produce and I have chapter and verse minutes of all the meetings between the Sultan and the Directors of Shell because the P.A. to the Directors of Shell Boardroom was a personal friend of mine and she recited everything to me years later. She added that she didn’t believe it was the Sultan’s land and nor did the Directors of Shell who decided to “assume” it was his land so the could win the rights for the oil reserves. Monica the P.A. says they broke the law doing what they were doing but they thought nobody would find out so everything would be OK.
To cut a long story short the Shell Oil Corporation PLC owe my family the value of the oil reserves they have pumped out of the oil field over the last 48 years at today world market price for crude oil.
I want to sue the Shell Oil Corporation and want one Supreme Court Judge whom I will Subpoena to testify that as far as he or she is concerned the Judges of The Supreme Court are of the opinion that Erik JC Young is someone you can trust and any testimony he makes will be accurate and honest.
Can you find out if they read my 200 plus emails over ten years and if they think I am honest?

Yours faithfully,
Erik JC Young
9 Lake Close
Byfleet Surrey
Tel:07528319568’

https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/a_supreme_court_judges_opinion

———- Forwarded message ———
Fra: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Date: tor. 8. feb. 2024 kl. 23:43
Subject: Complaint/Fwd: IOPC reference – 2021/162867
To: Phso Enquiries <phso.enquiries@ombudsman.org.uk>
Cc: Customer Services <Customer_Services2@lowellgroup.co.uk>, <customer.complaints@ee.co.uk>, complaint.info <complaint.info@financial-ombudsman.org.uk>, <enquiry@commsombudsman.org>, <customerwellness@three.co.uk>, <complaintsresolution@lowellgroup.co.uk>, Lowell Norge AS <svc.no.nova@lowell.com>, <bank.no@lowell.com>, <bank.no@lowell.mypurecloud.ie>, <kundeservice@mail.efi.no>, <boligbistand@baerum.kommune.no>, Lowell Norge AS <strom.no@lowell.com>, NorgesEnergi <kundeservice@norgesenergi.no>, Lowell Norge – kundesenter <kundesenter.no@lowell.com>, <kundeservice@hafslundstrom.no>, Bærum Kommune <post@baerum.kommune.no>, LOS Kundesenter <kundesenter@los.no>, Sfovpost <sfovpost@statsforvalteren.no>, post@sivilombudsmannen.no <post@sivilombudsmannen.no>, amnestyis <amnestyis@amnesty.org>, HRW UK <hrwuk@hrw.org>, LbF Leieboerforeningen <lbf@lbf.no>, post <post@finkn.no>, Akademikerforbundet <post@akademikerforbundet.no>, <kom@nve.no>, <rme@nve.no>, <trl@nve.no>, <morten.schau@elvia.no>, Abuse <abuse@telia.com>, inger.lise.blyverket <inger.lise.blyverket@forbrukerradet.no>, Phso Enquiries <phso.enquiries@ombudsman.org.uk>, Info <info@tpas.org.uk>, Postmottak ASD <postmottak@asd.dep.no>, Runcorn Office <runcornoffice@taroe.org>, Postkasse <postkasse@datatilsynet.no>, Lisa Eian <eian@eianadvokat.no>, <strom.no@lowell.mypurecloud.ie>, <post@arbeidstilsynet.no>, <corporationsecretary@ofcom.org.uk>, post <post@finanstilsynet.no>, Post <post@brukerklagenemnda.no>, NKOM <firmapost@nkom.no>, Post <post@forbrukerradet.no>, <newsroom@ee.co.uk>, <enquiries@policeconduct.gov.uk>

Hi,

I see on Wikipedia that the old British police-complaint-organisation (IPCC) has been closed down.

And that wasn’t a bad idea, I think.

Because in 2011, the IPCC told me, that they didn’t want my emails.

And the emails where copies of police-complaints, to do with internet-troll-activitiy (possibly Russian internet-trolls or something).

And the Police refused to serve me.

(Someone tried to kill me on an uncles farm in Norway, in the summer of 2005.

I fled to the UK, for the second time (the first time was in the automn of 2004, when I went to study at the University of Sunderland, and also went to London (to get air like, since I worked in a clammy part of Oslo named Bjørndal, where it’s like in Blackburn or Staines or Rotherham perhaps, with lots of immigrants) in the summer of 2003).

I contacted the Merseyside-police many times about this (and I also called the Norwegian police a lot of times about this) in the summer/automn of 2005, but the British police (and the Norwegian police) refused to serve me/do their job/investigate.

So I want compansation due to that the IPCC refused to serve me/do their job.

And also your new police-complaint-organisation (IOPC) are even worse, it seems.

They also refuse to read me emails (these are updates to do with an earlier email where I explained about the harassment from the Merseyside-police around 2013, when they knocked on my door around a hundred times (sometimes several times a day) they arrested me between five and ten times, and they also smashed my door a number of times (so it couldn’t almost be called a door in the end) and they also stole my computers all the time.

This was due to that internet-trolls (Russian?) tricked the Merseyside-police into swatting me, all time, by sending a lot of false emails in my name, to a jobcentre-staff, that was a single mum (she told me) named Sarah Bamber, from Aintree Jobcenter.

So this is like Putins wet dream I think, when your police-complaint-organisations are like this (that they refuse to do their job).

So this I wanted to complain/warn about.

Why do they call me Liying Yang?

What the hell is this crap supposed to mean.

Have Putin told them to call me a funny/Chinese name?

This I want to complain about.

Erik Ribsskog

———- Forwarded message ———
Fra: !enquiries <enquiries@policeconduct.gov.uk>
Date: tor. 8. feb. 2024 kl. 14:52
Subject: IOPC reference – 2021/162867
To: eribsskog@gmail.com <eribsskog@gmail.com>

Dear Liying Yang

We are writing further to your recent emails which you have sent to the IOPC.

It is noted that many of the emails you copy to the IOPC are regarding matters that do not fall under our remit. We sent you an email, dated 10 November 2023, advising you of the remit of the IOPC. To clarify, the IOPC is solely responsible for overseeing the formal Police Complaints process in England and Wales. We have no remit over issues that lie outside of this process, including criminal matters or housing.

Since this email, you have continued to copy us into emails which do not fall under our remit. We consider the level of correspondence excessive; you have sent at least 11 emails of this nature since the start of December.

If you continue to copy us into emails which do not require any action from the IOPC, we will consider restricting your email contact with us. This is not something we want to do but it is now taking a significant amount of time to file your correspondence which does not require a response from the IOPC.

Please consider this email as your first formal warning regarding your excessive correspondence.

Yours sincerely

Lucas Crossley
Customer Contact Advisor
Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC)
PO Box 473
Sale
M33 0BW
Tel: 0300 020 0096
Email: enquiries@policeconduct.gov.uk
Website: www.policeconduct.gov.uk
Twitter: @policeconduct
Find out how we handle your personal data.
The IOPC is proud to have achieved Customer Service Excellence accreditation

We welcome correspondence in Welsh. If you contact us in Welsh, we will respond in Welsh and this will not delay our reply.

Rydym yn croesawu gohebiaeth yn Gymraeg. Os cysylltwch â ni yn Gymraeg, fe gewch ymateb yn Gymraeg, heb arwain at oedi.

How satisfied were you with your experience with the IOPC’s Customer Contact Centre? Let us know by taking this short survey

We welcome correspondence in Welsh. We will respond to you in Welsh and this will not lead to delay.
Rydym yn croesawu gohebiaeth yn y Gymraeg. Byddwn yn ymateb i chi yn y Gymraeg ac ni fydd hyn yn arwain at oedi.
This message and its content may contain confidential, privileged or copyright information. They are intended solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you received this message in error, you must not disclose, copy, distribute or take any action which relies on the contents. Instead, please inform the sender and then permanently delete it. Any views or opinions expressed in this communication are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the IOPC. Only specified staff are authorised to make binding agreements on behalf of the IOPC by email. The IOPC accepts no responsibility for unauthorised agreements reached with other employees or agents. The IOPC cannot guarantee the security of this email or any attachments. While emails are regularly scanned, the IOPC cannot take any liability for any virus that may be transmitted with the internet. The IOPC communication systems are monitored to the extent permitted by law. Consequently, any email and or attachments may be read by monitoring staff.
Gall y neges hon a’i chynnwys gynnwys gwybodaeth gyfrinachol, freintiedig neu hawlfraint. Fe’u bwriedir at ddefnydd y derbynnydd arfaethedig yn unig. Os derbynioch y neges hon mewn camgymeriad, mae’n rhaid i chi beidio â datgelu, copïo, dosbarthu na chymryd unrhyw gamau sy’n dibynnu ar y cynnwys. Yn hytrach, rhowch wybod i’r anfonwr ac yna dilëwch ef yn barhaol. Mae unrhyw farn neu safbwyntiau a fynegir yn y cyfathrebiad hwn yn eiddo i’r awdur yn unig ac nid ydynt o reidrwydd yn cynrychioli barn yr IOPC. Dim ond staff penodedig sydd wedi’u hawdurdodi i wneud cytundebau rhwymol ar ran yr IOPC trwy e-bost. Nid yw’r IOPC yn derbyn unrhyw gyfrifoldeb am gytundebau anawdurdodedig y daethpwyd iddynt â gweithwyr neu asiantau eraill. Ni all yr IOPC warantu diogelwch yr e-bost hwn nac unrhyw atodiadau. Tra bod negeseuon e-bost yn cael eu sganio’n rheolaidd, ni all yr IOPC gymryd unrhyw gyfrifoldeb am unrhyw firws y gellir ei drosglwyddo â’r rhyngrwyd. Mae systemau cyfathrebu’r IOPC yn cael eu monitro i’r graddau a ganiateir gan y gyfraith. O ganlyniad, gall unrhyw e-bost a/neu atodiadau gael eu darllen gan staff monitro.