johncons

Stikkord: Twitter

  • Jeg sendte en trettende e-post til Twitter

    Erik Ribsskog
    Case# 37665723: Impersonation – _Erik_Ribsskog_
    Erik Ribsskog     Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 8:00 PM
    To: Twitter Support
    Hi,

    thank you for your e-mail!

    I wonder if it could be, a misunderstanding, to do, with this decision.

    (Because I think this is clearly an impersonation-case).

    So I was wondering, if you could please escalate this case, to a superior/line-manager there, (for å second opinion).

    Thanks in advance for any help!

    Best regards,

    Erik Ribsskog

    On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 6:11 PM, Twitter Support wrote:

        @JohnconsWeb.

        Hello,

        We’ve investigated the reported account and have determined that it is not in violation of Twitter’s impersonation policy.

        In order for an account to be in violation of the policy, it must portray another person or business in a misleading or deceptive manner. Read the full policy here: https://support.twitter.com/articles/18366

        Thank you for your report, and please note that any documents you may have uploaded will be deleted.

        Twitter Support
        Reference #ref:00DA0000000K0A8.500G00000120RFL:ref
        Help
        Twitter, Inc. 1355 Market Street, Suite 900 San Francisco, CA 94103

  • Jeg sendte en tolvte e-post til Twitter

    Erik Ribsskog
    Case# 37665903: Impersonation – fislefitte
    Erik Ribsskog     Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 7:55 PM
    To: Twitter Support
    Hi,

    thank you for your e-mail!

    I wonder if it could be, a misunderstanding, to do, with this decision.

    (Because I think this is clearly an impersonation-case).

    So I was wondering, if you could please escalate this case, to a superior/line-manager there, (for å second opinion).

    Thanks in advance for any help!

    Best regards,

    Erik Ribsskog

    On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 6:12 PM, Twitter Support wrote:

        @JohnconsWeb.

        Hello,

        We’ve investigated the reported account and have determined that it is not in violation of Twitter’s impersonation policy.

        In order for an account to be in violation of the policy, it must portray another person or business in a misleading or deceptive manner. Read the full policy here: https://support.twitter.com/articles/18366

        Thank you for your report, and please note that any documents you may have uploaded will be deleted.

        Twitter Support
        Reference #ref:00DA0000000K0A8.500G00000120RUL:ref
        Help
        Twitter, Inc. 1355 Market Street, Suite 900 San Francisco, CA 94103

  • Jeg sendte en ellevte e-post til Twitter

    Erik Ribsskog
    Case# 37665783: Impersonation – erikmoganolsen
    Erik Ribsskog     Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 7:50 PM
    To: Twitter Support
    Hi,

    thank you for your e-mail!

    I wonder if it could be, a misunderstanding, to do, with this decision.

    (Because I think this is clearly an impersonation-case).

    So I was wondering, if you could please escalate this case, to a superior/line-manager there, (for å second opinion).

    Thanks in advance for any help!

    Best regards,

    Erik Ribsskog

    On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 6:13 PM, Twitter Support wrote:

        @JohnconsWeb.

        Hello,

        We’ve investigated the reported account and have determined that it is not in violation of Twitter’s impersonation policy.

        In order for an account to be in violation of the policy, it must portray another person or business in a misleading or deceptive manner. Read the full policy here: https://support.twitter.com/articles/18366

        Thank you for your report, and please note that any documents you may have uploaded will be deleted.

        Twitter Support
        Reference #ref:00DA0000000K0A8.500G00000120RK6:ref
        Help
        Twitter, Inc. 1355 Market Street, Suite 900 San Francisco, CA 94103

  • Jeg sendte en tiende e-post til Twitter

    Erik Ribsskog
    Case# 37665994: Impersonation – ErikVirusskog
    Erik Ribsskog     Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 7:42 PM
    To: Twitter Support
    Hi,

    thank you for your e-mail!

    I wonder if it could be, a misunderstanding, to do, with this decision.

    (Because I think this is clearly an impersonation-case).

    So I was wondering, if you could please escalate this case, to a superior/line-manager there, (for å second opinion).

    Thanks in advance for any help!

    Best regards,

    Erik Ribsskog

    On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 6:14 PM, Twitter Support wrote:

        @JohnconsWeb.

        Hello,

        We’ve investigated the reported account and have determined that it is not in violation of Twitter’s impersonation policy.

        In order for an account to be in violation of the policy, it must portray another person or business in a misleading or deceptive manner. Read the full policy here: https://support.twitter.com/articles/18366

        Thank you for your report, and please note that any documents you may have uploaded will be deleted.

        Twitter Support
        Reference #ref:00DA0000000K0A8.500G00000120Rbb:ref
        Help
        Twitter, Inc. 1355 Market Street, Suite 900 San Francisco, CA 94103

  • Jeg sendte en niende e-post til Twitter

    Erik Ribsskog
    Case# 37666033: Impersonation – n00b_cons
    Erik Ribsskog     Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 7:37 PM
    To: Twitter Support
    Hi,

    thank you for your e-mail!

    I wonder if it could be, a misunderstanding, to do, with this decision.

    (Because I think this is clearly an impersonation-case).

    So I was wondering, if you could please escalate this case, to a superior/line-manager there, (for å second opinion).

    Thanks in advance for any help!

    Best regards,

    Erik Ribsskog

    On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 6:14 PM, Twitter Support wrote:

        @JohnconsWeb.

        Hello,

        We’ve investigated the reported account and have determined that it is not in violation of Twitter’s impersonation policy.

        In order for an account to be in violation of the policy, it must portray another person or business in a misleading or deceptive manner. Read the full policy here: https://support.twitter.com/articles/18366

        Thank you for your report, and please note that any documents you may have uploaded will be deleted.

        Twitter Support
        Reference #ref:00DA0000000K0A8.500G00000120Rea:ref
        Help
        Twitter, Inc. 1355 Market Street, Suite 900 San Francisco, CA 94103

  • Jeg sendte en åttende e-post til Twitter

    Erik Ribsskog
    Case# 37667744: Impersonation – MissErikRibssko
    Erik Ribsskog     Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 7:33 PM
    To: Twitter Support
    Hi,

    thank you for your e-mail!

    I wonder if it could be, a misunderstanding, to do, with this decision.

    (Because I think this is clearly an impersonation-case).

    So I was wondering, if you could please escalate this case, to a superior/line-manager there, (for å second opinion).

    Thanks in advance for any help!

    Best regards,

    Erik Ribsskog

    On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 6:16 PM, Twitter Support wrote:

        @JohnconsWeb.

        Hello,

        We’ve investigated the reported account and have determined that it is not in violation of Twitter’s impersonation policy.

        In order for an account to be in violation of the policy, it must portray another person or business in a misleading or deceptive manner. Read the full policy here: https://support.twitter.com/articles/18366

        Thank you for your report, and please note that any documents you may have uploaded will be deleted.

        Twitter Support
        Reference #ref:00DA0000000K0A8.500G00000120TpL:ref
        Help
        Twitter, Inc. 1355 Market Street, Suite 900 San Francisco, CA 94103

  • Jeg sendte en sjuende e-post til Twitter

    Erik Ribsskog
    Case# 37667434: Impersonation – ErikOinkerRibss
    Erik Ribsskog     Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 7:28 PM
    To: Twitter Support
    Hi,

    thank you for your e-mail!

    I wonder if it could be, a misunderstanding, to do, with this decision.

    (Because I think this is clearly an impersonation-case).

    So I was wondering, if you could please escalate this case, to a superior/line-manager there, (for å second opinion).

    Thanks in advance for any help!

    Best regards,

    Erik Ribsskog

    On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 6:16 PM, Twitter Support wrote:

        @JohnconsWeb.

        Hello,

        We’ve investigated the reported account and have determined that it is not in violation of Twitter’s impersonation policy.

        In order for an account to be in violation of the policy, it must portray another person or business in a misleading or deceptive manner. Read the full policy here: https://support.twitter.com/articles/18366

        Thank you for your report, and please note that any documents you may have uploaded will be deleted.

        Twitter Support
        Reference #ref:00DA0000000K0A8.500G00000120TQz:ref
        Help
        Twitter, Inc. 1355 Market Street, Suite 900 San Francisco, CA 94103

  • Jeg sendte en sjette e-post til Twitter

    Erik Ribsskog
    Case# 37667693: Impersonation – GronnPaaData
    Erik Ribsskog     Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 7:17 PM
    To: Twitter Support
    Hi,

    thank you for your e-mail!

    I wonder if it could be, a misunderstanding, to do, with this decision.

    (Because I think this is clearly an impersonation-case).

    So I was wondering, if you could please escalate this case, to a superior/line-manager there, (for å second opinion).

    Thanks in advance for any help!

    Best regards,

    Erik Ribsskog

    On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 6:18 PM, Twitter Support wrote:

        @JohnconsWeb.

        Hello,

        We’ve investigated the reported account and have determined that it is not in violation of Twitter’s impersonation policy.

        In order for an account to be in violation of the policy, it must portray another person or business in a misleading or deceptive manner. Read the full policy here: https://support.twitter.com/articles/18366

        Thank you for your report, and please note that any documents you may have uploaded will be deleted.

        Twitter Support
        Reference #ref:00DA0000000K0A8.500G00000120TlJ:ref
        Help
        Twitter, Inc. 1355 Market Street, Suite 900 San Francisco, CA 94103

  • Jeg sendte en femte e-post til Twitter

    Erik Ribsskog
    Case# 37667483: Impersonation – sjefstulling
    Erik Ribsskog     Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 7:04 PM
    To: Twitter Support
    Hi,

    thank you for your e-mail!

    I wonder if it could be, a misunderstanding, to do, with this decision.

    (Because I think this is clearly an impersonation-case).

    So I was wondering, if you could please escalate this case, to a superior/line-manager there, (for å second opinion).

    Thanks in advance for any help!

    Best regards,

    Erik Ribsskog

    On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 6:19 PM, Twitter Support wrote:

        @JohnconsWeb.

        Hello,

        We’ve investigated the reported account and have determined that it is not in violation of Twitter’s impersonation policy.

        In order for an account to be in violation of the policy, it must portray another person or business in a misleading or deceptive manner. Read the full policy here: https://support.twitter.com/articles/18366

        Thank you for your report, and please note that any documents you may have uploaded will be deleted.

        Twitter Support
        Reference #ref:00DA0000000K0A8.500G00000120TUw:ref
        Help
        Twitter, Inc. 1355 Market Street, Suite 900 San Francisco, CA 94103

  • Jeg sendte en fjerde e-post til Twitter

    Erik Ribsskog
    Case# 37667529: Impersonation – JodenRibsskog
    Erik Ribsskog     Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 6:25 PM
    To: Twitter Support
    Hi,

    thank you for your e-mail!

    I wonder if it could be, a misunderstanding, to do, with this decision.

    (Because I think this is clearly an impersonation-case).

    So I was wondering, if you could please escalate this case, to a superior/line-manager there, (for å second opinion).

    Thanks in advance for any help!

    Best regards,

    Erik Ribsskog

    On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 6:20 PM, Twitter Support wrote:

        @JohnconsWeb.
        Hello,

        We’ve investigated the reported account and have determined that it is not in violation of Twitter’s impersonation policy.

        In order for an account to be in violation of the policy, it must portray another person or business in a misleading or deceptive manner. Read the full policy here: https://support.twitter.com/articles/18366

        Thank you for your report, and please note that any documents you may have uploaded will be deleted.

        Twitter Support
        Reference #ref:00DA0000000K0A8.500G00000120TYP:ref
        Help
        Twitter, Inc. 1355 Market Street, Suite 900 San Francisco, CA 94103