
Siden myndighetene ikke har svart meg, (her i England), så har jeg også søkt om å hete noe med Adeler og/eller Gjedde. Så jeg vet ikke om ‘Erik Løvenbalk Ribsskog’ var noe jeg het i 2011, liksom.
Og jeg har en blogg, som jeg har blogget mye på, siden 2007. Og jeg har et nettsted, (http://johncons.angelfire.com
http://johncons.angelfire.com/
Og jeg har som policy, å bare legge til folk jeg kjenner, fra ‘real life’, som Facebook-venner. Så jeg legger nok ikke til vedkommende der, (for å si det sånn). Og jeg kaller meg heller ikke baron, til daglig.
Det var min mor og mormor som arvet den siste baron Adeler, og i skiftet etter Adeler, så fikk min mormor mest, og ga dette, til min mor, (det ble satt inn i et hus, på Tagtvedt, for min mor). Og Ravn, (som også arvet), de bor i Canada og på institusjon, og sånn, (virker det som).
Så jeg tror jeg må si at jeg representerer Adeler, (altså Cort Adeler sine etterkommere sine adels-slekter), ihvertfall. Et riksarkiv i Danmark, (en Bartholdy), sendte meg to adelsbrev-kopier, for Adeler.
Og hvis jeg representerer dem, så er jeg vel egentlig baron Adeler, (selv om den tittelen har gått ut av bruk i Danmark, selv om dette var en tittel, som en kongetittel, så den kan vel kanskje ikke bare ‘forsvinne’).
Men i Norge, så ble adelen avskaffet, mens Adeler var i utlandet, (i Danmark). Så jeg har vel litt krav på å hete baron Adeler i Norge, faktisk. Noe sånt. Så jeg kaller meg ‘Baron Erik Ribsskog’, på bloggen min, for å liksom vise at jeg er etter sånne ‘raringer’, nemlig kongelige og adelige, (siden min mormor var etter Løvenbalk og Gjedde, blant annet og arvet Adeler).
Jeg venter på bekreftelse, fra norske myndigheter, på at jeg nå heter ‘Erik Løvenbalk Ribsskog’. Da vil jeg nok forandre det på bloggen, sånn at det står det navnet, istedet for ‘Baron Erik Ribsskog’.
For jeg ønsker bare å markere at jeg er en aristokrat, (for å si det sånn).
For jeg blir tulla fælt med uansett hva jeg gjør omtrent, og lurer på om det er noe forbindelse her. Men hva vedkommende Island-dame skriver om her.
Det sender jeg videre, til VG. For dette at jeg skrev om Mette-Marit på min blogg, det begynte med VGD-tråden: ‘Hva er galt i Norge’, fra 2007 eller 2008. Og den skrev jeg litt i, angående problemer i ICA, osv.
Og den ble sletta.
Og det forstod jeg ikke helt grunnen til.
Så jeg fortsatt litt, med det temaet, på bloggen min, da. Mvh. Erik Ribsskog
Date: Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 6:12 PM
Subject: Re: Bunte
To: Blatt Stefan <Stefan.Blatt@bunte.burda.com>
Det er mulig det er en bedre idé.
Hello againI went to Facebook now, and made myself an account there, to show that I’m a real person.And not some ‘Herr Tullballsen’.But I’m a bit private, so I think people would have to add me as a friend, to see my pictures etc.But I’m not very computer-literate, so to speak, so I’m not sure how this works.Because this Facebook-thing is all new to me.I mostly just use the Internet, to read blogs and read/write e-mail.But now I’m on Facebook, at least, so hopefully I’m a bit less mysterious now.So anyone who wants to make friends with me, can contact me there, at https://www.facebook.com/turid.franzen I’ve also been contacted by another German journalist, wanting to hear about Mette-Marit, so I’ve added that contact to this mail list, along with Baron Ribsskog’s CCs.Because I thought it was unneccessary to have this ‘discussion’ going on, in two places, at the same time(on Baron Ribsskog’s blog, and here).So the journalist who contacted me last, can just read what has already been written, in this thread, to get updated.Hope this is alright!– RegardsTuridPS: My name isn’t “Hilsen Turid”, like that last journalist wrote in her e-mail. “Hilsen” is just Norwegian for “Regards”.So my name is Turid Franzen, and not “Hilsen Turid”.Just to clear up that one!PS2: Here is the e-mail I got, from the last German journalist, asking me about Mette-Marit:“Dear Hilsen Turid,
I work for a German magazine called GALA, currently I am writing a story about Mette-Marit of Norway.
In a blog, I read that you have information about Mette-Marit having an affair. Can you tell me more about you and about the source of your information? That would be very helpful to me.
Thank you very much and best regards,
Stefanie Richter“I should also add that this ‘scoop’ was intended, for Baron Ribsskog.Since Baron Ribsskog has written a lot about the Norwegian royal family, and since I’ve been a huge fan, of Baron Ribsskog, since the first time I read his blog, and got acquainted with his rights battle.So I’m an admirer of Baron Ribsskog, and can also empathize quite a bit with his situation, since I’m also a sort of ‘refugee’, on Iceland, after I fled Norway, because of the bureaucracy there (even though I’ve never been followed by the mafia) .But Baron Ribsskog dismissed the information I gave, as anti-royal bullshit, I think it was.So I guess I have to accept that.And maybe then, it’s not too bad, that a German gossip magazine picks up this story.Since it would have gone ‘to waste’, otherwise.So that’s really why I replied to this German gossip reporter.Just to inform a bit about this.– Yours sincerelyTurid2013/12/3 Turid Franzen <turid.franzen@gmail.com>Hi,I don’t have any other info than what I wrote to Baron Løvenbalk Ribsskog, I’m afraid.And that is that this rumour has been going on, for some time, in Norway now.The rumour says that Mette-Marit has fallen back, to old habits, and that she has cheated on Haakon, possibly with the wealthy ‘richman’s son’, Ole Robert Reitan.So Haakon is finally fed up with Mette-Marit, and wants a divorce.I have a friend who’s mom works in the government.And he says that she says there’s a bit of a crisis there, on how to handle ‘this’, whatever it is, publicly.These rumours are being deleted on forums, all over the Internet, it seems.The Norwegian government is very protective, when it comes to the royal family, it seems, using the security service for damage control etc.I believe that Baron Ribsskog once reported Mette-Marit to the Police, along with a famous Norwegian politician, after some alleged sexual abuse.But the Police didn’t even reply to this report, like they are required to, by law, I think.They just ignored it, and didn’t even respond with “saken er henlagt etter bevisets stilling”, which means “the case is closed due to lack of evidence”, which is customary in Norway.So the government, and the Police, just give ‘the finger’, to people, who want to know the truth about the royal family, it looks like to me.I CC this to Baron Ribsskog, and also to Christian Burmeister, who is a blogger who has written about this, and claims to have more information.Hope this is alright!– RegardsTurid









