johncons

Måned: desember 2012

  • Mer om Twitter-klage, (G_Rukke)


    Gmail – #6864302 Twitter Support: update on “Offensive content – G_Rukke”

    Gmail


    Erik Ribsskog
    <eribsskog@gmail.com>



    #6864302 Twitter Support: update on “Offensive content – G_Rukke”



    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>


    Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 3:03 PM

    To:
    Twitter Support <support+id6864302@twitter.zendesk.com>

    Hi,
    I want this escalated for a second opinion please.
    This is part of a large attack it seems, and Twitter have taken the around fifty complaints I’ve sent you earlier more seriously, I think.

    This is like you aren’t taking your job seriously, I think.

    Erik Ribsskog

    On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 1:15 PM, SamuelFisher <notifications-support@twitter.zendesk.com> wrote:

    ##- Please type your reply above this line -##

    Twitter



    SamuelFisher, Dec 13 05:15 am (PST): Hello,
    While we understand your frustration, the reported behavior is not in violation of the Twitter Rules (http://twitter.com/rules).
    We have found overwhelmingly that responding to users who are intentionally attempting to aggravate you encourages that user to continue their behavior. We recommend you don’t reply, retweet, comment on their behavior, or instigate them. If you’d prefer not to see content from that person, you can block the user using the blocking feature described here: https://support.twitter.com/entries/117063
    As a policy, we do not mediate content and we do not intervene in disputes between users. This means that users are allowed to post potentially inflammatory content, provided that they do not violate the Twitter Rules.
    If you believe the content or behavior you are reporting is prohibited in your local jurisdiction, please contact your local authorities so they can accurately assess the content or behavior for possible violations of local law. If Twitter is contacted directly by law enforcement, we can work with them and provide assistance for their investigation as well as guidance around possible approaches. You can point local law enforcement to our Law Enforcement Guidelines here: https://support.twitter.com/articles/41949.
    If you’re concerned for your physical safety, please contact your local authorities for further assistance. Please let us know if you believe the behavior has escalated or otherwise violates our rules.
    Thanks,
    SamuelFisher
    Twitter Trust & Safety

    Additional information:
    • Dealing with abusive users: https://support.twitter.com/articles/15794
    • Blocking other users: https://support.twitter.com/entries/117063
    • Making your profile protected: https://support.twitter.com/entries/14016



    johncons, Dec 12 06:29 pm (PST): How can we help?: Offensive content
    Reported user: @G_Rukke

    Offensive Tweet: https://twitter.com/G_Rukke/status/278523258725343233
    Text of Tweet: @crukke Han paranoide spinnville fyren som anmeldte bestemoren for være i mafiaen er også på Twitter: @johncons
    Tweet time: Dec 11 2012 15:34:54 via web
    What are you reporting?: This user keeps sending me @replies and I don’t want to receive them.
    Blocked user(s): Yes
    How long ago did this begin?: Few days ago
    How many times has this happened?: Only once, (but this is a new account, which seems dedicated to attacking me, I think).
    I’ve sent you around fifty similar reports lately.
    This seems organised.

    Further description of problem: The person calls me paranoid, and ‘spin-wild’.
    This is very offensive, inpolite and harassing, I think.
    I don’t even know who this person is.
    Your full name: Erik Ribsskog
    I understand that Twitter may provide third parties, such as the affected user, with a copy of this report.
    Twitter username: @johncons
    Email address: eribsskog@gmail.com

    Message-Id:2QWF2V1V_50c9d4e84eceb_2a241d4627c327973a_sprut

  • Mer om Twitter-klage, (MsErikRibsskog)


    Gmail – #6864391 Twitter Support: update on “Offensive content – MsErikRibsskog”

    Gmail


    Erik Ribsskog
    <eribsskog@gmail.com>



    #6864391 Twitter Support: update on “Offensive content – MsErikRibsskog”



    SamuelFisher

    <notifications-support@twitter.zendesk.com>


    Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 1:15 PM

    Reply-To:
    Twitter Support <support+id6864391@twitter.zendesk.com>

    To:
    johncons <eribsskog@gmail.com>

    ##- Please type your reply above this line -##

    Twitter



    SamuelFisher, Dec 13 05:15 am (PST): Hello,
    While we understand your frustration, the reported behavior is not in violation of the Twitter Rules (http://twitter.com/rules).
    We have found overwhelmingly that responding to users who are intentionally attempting to aggravate you encourages that user to continue their behavior. We recommend you don’t reply, retweet, comment on their behavior, or instigate them. If you’d prefer not to see content from that person, you can block the user using the blocking feature described here: https://support.twitter.com/entries/117063
    As a policy, we do not mediate content and we do not intervene in disputes between users. This means that users are allowed to post potentially inflammatory content, provided that they do not violate the Twitter Rules.
    If you believe the content or behavior you are reporting is prohibited in your local jurisdiction, please contact your local authorities so they can accurately assess the content or behavior for possible violations of local law. If Twitter is contacted directly by law enforcement, we can work with them and provide assistance for their investigation as well as guidance around possible approaches. You can point local law enforcement to our Law Enforcement Guidelines here: https://support.twitter.com/articles/41949.
    If you’re concerned for your physical safety, please contact your local authorities for further assistance. Please let us know if you believe the behavior has escalated or otherwise violates our rules.
    Thanks,
    SamuelFisher
    Twitter Trust & Safety

    Additional information:
    • Dealing with abusive users: https://support.twitter.com/articles/15794
    • Blocking other users: https://support.twitter.com/entries/117063
    • Making your profile protected: https://support.twitter.com/entries/14016



    johncons, Dec 12 06:45 pm (PST): How can we help?: Offensive content
    Reported user: @MsErikRibsskog
    Offensive Tweet: https://twitter.com/MsErikRibsskog/status/278667989006548992
    Text of Tweet: @johncons Penis- og testikkelamputasjon bestilt.
    Tweet time: Dec 12 2012 01:10:00 via web
    What are you reporting?: This user keeps sending me @replies and I don’t want to receive them.
    Blocked user(s): Yes
    How long ago did this begin?: Few days ago
    How many times has this happened?: Only once, (but this is a new account which seems dedicated to attacking me).
    I’ve sent you around fifty similar reports lately.
    This seems organised.
    Further description of problem: The person uses my name, (Erik Ribsskog), with ‘Miss’, in front.
    And writes that penis and testicle-amutation has been ordered.
    I’m a heterosexual man, who thinks this seems like some kind of horrible threat.
    I would have normally sent crime-reports like this to the Police, but they don’t reply to my crime-reports, for some reason.
    Your full name: Erik Ribsskog
    I understand that Twitter may provide third parties, such as the affected user, with a copy of this report.
    Twitter username: @johncons
    Email address: eribsskog@gmail.com

    Message-Id:VP1WFYQ2_50c9d4e646eda_5af1ce2a7431135e6_sprut

  • Mer om Twitter-klage, (MobbedByMafia)


    Gmail – #6864437 Twitter Support: update on “Offensive content – MobbedByMafia”

    Gmail


    Erik Ribsskog
    <eribsskog@gmail.com>



    #6864437 Twitter Support: update on “Offensive content – MobbedByMafia”



    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>


    Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 2:56 PM

    To:
    Twitter Support <support+id6864437@twitter.zendesk.com>

    Hi,
    I want this escalated for a second opinion please.
    This is part of a large attack it seems, and Twitter have taken the around fifty complaints I’ve sent you earlier more seriously, I think.

    This is like you aren’t taking your job seriously, I think.

    Erik Ribsskog

    On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 1:15 PM, SamuelFisher <notifications-support@twitter.zendesk.com> wrote:

    ##- Please type your reply above this line -##

    Twitter



    SamuelFisher, Dec 13 05:15 am (PST): Hello,
    While we understand your frustration, the reported behavior is not in violation of the Twitter Rules (http://twitter.com/rules).
    We have found overwhelmingly that responding to users who are intentionally attempting to aggravate you encourages that user to continue their behavior. We recommend you don’t reply, retweet, comment on their behavior, or instigate them. If you’d prefer not to see content from that person, you can block the user using the blocking feature described here: https://support.twitter.com/entries/117063
    As a policy, we do not mediate content and we do not intervene in disputes between users. This means that users are allowed to post potentially inflammatory content, provided that they do not violate the Twitter Rules.
    If you believe the content or behavior you are reporting is prohibited in your local jurisdiction, please contact your local authorities so they can accurately assess the content or behavior for possible violations of local law. If Twitter is contacted directly by law enforcement, we can work with them and provide assistance for their investigation as well as guidance around possible approaches. You can point local law enforcement to our Law Enforcement Guidelines here: https://support.twitter.com/articles/41949.
    If you’re concerned for your physical safety, please contact your local authorities for further assistance. Please let us know if you believe the behavior has escalated or otherwise violates our rules.
    Thanks,
    SamuelFisher
    Twitter Trust & Safety

    Additional information:
    • Dealing with abusive users: https://support.twitter.com/articles/15794
    • Blocking other users: https://support.twitter.com/entries/117063
    • Making your profile protected: https://support.twitter.com/entries/14016



    johncons, Dec 12 06:54 pm (PST): How can we help?: Offensive content
    Reported user: @MobbedByMafia
    Offensive Tweet: https://twitter.com/MobbedByMafia/status/278892176509902848
    Text of Tweet: @jeblad Du må kalle @johncons for Baronesse Adeler. Alt annet er ‘breach of honour-crime’
    Tweet time: Dec 12 2012 16:00:51 via web
    What are you reporting?: This user keeps sending me @replies and I don’t want to receive them.
    Blocked user(s): Yes
    How long ago did this begin?: 24 hours ago
    How many times has this happened?: Only once, (but this is a new account which seems dedicated to attacking me).
    I’ve sent you arround fifty similar reports lately.
    This seems organised.
    Further description of problem: The person writes to another person, that he has to call me ‘Baronesse Adeler’.
    I’m a heterosexual man, and don’t like to be called baronesse.
    This I think is very offensive, inpolite and harassing.
    The person have also used a lot of effort, to manipulate pictures, (which I own the copyrights for), from my blog, (http://johncons-mirror.blogspot.co.uk/)/Flickr-account.
    Your full name: Erik Ribsskog
    I understand that Twitter may provide third parties, such as the affected user, with a copy of this report.
    Twitter username: @johncons
    Email address: eribsskog@gmail.com

    Message-Id:PSGRY4E0_50c9d4e4dfa29_6f07194527c31867b3_sprut

  • Mer om Twitter-klage, (johncons_mage)


    Gmail – #6863797 Twitter Support: update on “Offensive content – johncons_mage”

    Gmail


    Erik Ribsskog
    <eribsskog@gmail.com>



    #6863797 Twitter Support: update on “Offensive content – johncons_mage”



    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>


    Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 2:51 PM

    To:
    Twitter Support <support+id6863797@twitter.zendesk.com>

    Hi,

    I want this escalated for a second opinion please.

    This is part of a large attack it seems, and Twitter have taken the around fifty complaints I’ve sent you earlier more seriously, I think.


    This is like you aren’t taking your job seriously, I think.


    Erik Ribsskog

    On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 1:14 PM, SamuelFisher <notifications-support@twitter.zendesk.com> wrote:

    ##- Please type your reply above this line -##

    Twitter



    SamuelFisher, Dec 13 05:14 am (PST): Hello,
    While we understand your frustration, the reported behavior is not in violation of the Twitter Rules (http://twitter.com/rules).
    We have found overwhelmingly that responding to users who are intentionally attempting to aggravate you encourages that user to continue their behavior. We recommend you don’t reply, retweet, comment on their behavior, or instigate them. If you’d prefer not to see content from that person, you can block the user using the blocking feature described here: https://support.twitter.com/entries/117063
    As a policy, we do not mediate content and we do not intervene in disputes between users. This means that users are allowed to post potentially inflammatory content, provided that they do not violate the Twitter Rules.
    If you believe the content or behavior you are reporting is prohibited in your local jurisdiction, please contact your local authorities so they can accurately assess the content or behavior for possible violations of local law. If Twitter is contacted directly by law enforcement, we can work with them and provide assistance for their investigation as well as guidance around possible approaches. You can point local law enforcement to our Law Enforcement Guidelines here: https://support.twitter.com/articles/41949.
    If you’re concerned for your physical safety, please contact your local authorities for further assistance. Please let us know if you believe the behavior has escalated or otherwise violates our rules.
    Thanks,
    SamuelFisher
    Twitter Trust & Safety

    Additional information:
    • Dealing with abusive users: https://support.twitter.com/articles/15794
    • Blocking other users: https://support.twitter.com/entries/117063
    • Making your profile protected: https://support.twitter.com/entries/14016



    johncons, Dec 12 04:54 pm (PST): How can we help?: Offensive content
    Reported user: @johncons_mage
    Offensive Tweet: https://twitter.com/johncons_mage/status/277936004097257473
    Text of Tweet: Jeg er latterlig stor. Større enn størst. For å underdrive litt. Men @johncons sine mannlige elskere digger meg visstnok. Så sånn er det.
    Tweet time: Dec 10 2012 00:41:21 via web
    What are you reporting?: This user keeps sending me @replies and I don’t want to receive them.
    Blocked user(s): Yes
    How long ago did this begin?: Few days ago
    How many times has this happened?: Only once, (but this is a new account which seems dedicated to attacking me).
    I’ve sent you around 50 similar reports in the last couple of weeks.
    This seems organised.
    Further description of problem: The person with this account, calles himselves ‘johncons-mage’, which means johncons-belly.
    johncons is my nick, on the internet, I have this blog, (johncons-blogg): http://johncons-mirror.blogspot.co.uk/
    The person says that my belly is redicously big and something with male lovers.
    And I’m very heterosexual and think this is very offending and inpolite, so I wanted to compain about this.
    Your full name: Erik Ribsskog
    I understand that Twitter may provide third parties, such as the affected user, with a copy of this report.
    Twitter username: @johncons
    Email address: eribsskog@gmail.com

    Message-Id:Y8VB40A2_50c9d4a998bd7_2bf018dba70313852e_sprut

  • Jeg fikk en ny betaling, fra Amazon/CreateSpace. Takk til de som har kjøpt bøkene mine!


    Gmail – Remittance Advice – ERIK RIBSSKOG. Payment# 4473509

    Gmail


    Erik Ribsskog
    <eribsskog@gmail.com>



    Remittance Advice – ERIK RIBSSKOG. Payment# 4473509



    Amazon Accounts Payable

    <noreply@amazon.com>


    Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 9:26 AM

    Reply-To:
    noreply@amazon.com

    To:
    ~WF_ADHOC-13096090 <eribsskog@gmail.com>


    *****************PLEASE DO NOT RESPOND TO THIS EMAIL*****************
    The following payment has been made by Amazon EU Sarl.
    This payment has been processed by Direct Deposit. Please allow 5 business days following the payment date to receive the funds.
    The amounts on this page are shown in the currency in which the royalty was earned.

    Within five business days following the payment date you can view the details of this payment in the Payment History Report section at https://www.createspace.com/reports.

    Payment made to: ERIK RIBSSKOG.
    Our Supplier No.: 13061495
    Supplier site name: MOD:DE:1139481
    Paid to bank: Hidden for security
    Paid to account: Hidden for security
    Payment number: 4473509
    Payment date: 14-DEC-12
    Payment currency: EUR
    Payment amount: 13.07


    Invoice Number

    Invoice Date

    Invoice Description Discount Taken

    Amount Paid 4914577 22-SEP-12 Member ID: 1139481, Member Name: Erik Ribsskog, Se 9.21 5470794 28-NOV-12 Member ID: 1139481, Member Name: Erik Ribsskog, No 3.86
  • Fler bilder fra Liverpool

    PIC_4100

    PIC_4101

    PIC_4102

    PIC_4103

    PIC_4104

    PIC_4105

    PIC_4106

    PIC_4107

    PIC_4108

    PIC_4109

    PIC_4110

    PIC_4111

    PIC_4112

    PIC_4113

    PIC_4114

    PIC_4115

    PIC_4116

    PIC_4117

    PIC_4118

    PIC_4119

    PIC_4121

    PIC_4122

    PIC_4123

    PIC_4124

    PIC_4125

    PIC_4126

    PIC_4127

    PIC_4128

    PIC_4129

    PIC_4130

    PIC_4131

    PIC_4132

    PIC_4134

    PIC_4136

    PIC_4137

    PIC_4138

    PIC_4139

    PIC_4140

    PIC_4141

    PIC_4143

    PIC_4144

    PIC_4145

    PIC_4146

    PIC_4147

    PIC_4148

    PIC_4149

    PIC_4150

    PIC_4152

    PIC_4153

    PIC_4154

    PIC_4155

    PIC_4156

    PIC_4157

    PIC_4158

    PIC_4159

    PIC_4160

    PIC_4161

    PIC_4162

    PIC_4163

    PIC_4164

    PIC_4165

    PIC_4166

    PIC_4167

    PIC_4168

    PIC_4169

    PIC_4170

    PIC_4172

    PIC_4173

    PIC_4174

    PIC_4175

    PIC_4176

    PIC_4177

    PIC_4178

    PIC_4179

    PIC_4180

    PIC_4181

    PIC_4182

    PS.

    Her er mer om dette:

  • Min Bok 5 – Kapittel 147: Mer fra Rimi Langhus og Rimi Bjørndal

    På Rimi Langhus, så foregikk vel mesteparten av skravlinga, nede på spiserommet.

    Så det skjedde vel ikke like mye der, (i 2003), som på Rimi Bjørndal.

    Men en episode jeg husker.

    Det var at to nyansatte ungdommer, som jobba, på Rimi Langhus, da jeg begynte der igjen, som låseansvarlig, våren 2003.

    Det var Stian Augestad og Fredrik Karlsen.

    Og jeg mener å huske at jeg overhørte det, at de her to kara, prata seg imellom, (mens de la opp frysevarer, eller noe sånt vel), om at det var dumt, at jeg, som var en så god butikkleder, (eller noe lignende), skulle jobbe med data.

    (Siden jeg hadde forklart dem, da de spurte, at jeg studerte ved ingeniørhøyskolen, da).

    For de her to kara, de mente vel at jeg så flink med mennesker da, (eller noe lignende), hvis jeg skjønte det riktig.

    (Noe sånt).

    Selv om det vel også er mulig å jobbe som leder, selv om man har utdannelse, innen data.

    Jeg hadde jo mål å få meg en jobb, som IT-leder, og tjene mellom en halv million og en million, i året, liksom.

    Men det var ikke sånn at de her to kara, prata _med_ meg, om det her.

    Det var istedet sånn at de prata _om_ meg, da.

    Bak min rygg, må man vel si.

    Så jeg fikk ikke forklart dem ordentlig, om hvordan jeg selv så for meg det her, da.

    Så sånn var det.

    Bare noe jeg tenkte på.

    Men men.

    På Rimi Bjørndal, så ville butikksjef Johan der, at jeg skulle slutte å jobbe der, på torsdagene.

    (Og bare jobbe der på lørdagene).

    Av en eller annen grunn.

    (Etter sommerferien 2003 en gang, vel).

    I begynnelsen så gikk jeg ikke med på det her, for jeg syntes det var greit å få en del i lønn, da.

    Men han Johan, han forlangte så mye, av medarbeiderne.

    Så det ble slitsomt å jobbe der, to vakter i uka, da.

    For jeg måtte jo liksom fokusere på studiene mine også.

    (Som liksom var hovedprioriteten min, på den her tida, da.

    For det var jo snakk om heltidsstudier, liksom).

    Så jeg gikk etterhvert med på å bare jobbe på Rimi Bjørndal, på lørdagene, (fra klokka 14 vel, til cirka klokka 19), da.

    Så sånn var det.

    Bare noe jeg tenkte på.

    Men men.

    Lars Boye, fra Rimi sin sikkerhetsavdeling.

    (Som jeg også har skrevet om, fra ‘Rimi Kalbakken-tida’.

    Tidligere i den her boken).

    Han begynte etterhvert istedet å jobbe som distriktsjef, i et distrikt i Oslo Vest, (var det vel).

    Og Lars Boye, han bodde vel på Bjørndal, (ettersom jeg skjønte det, ihvertfall).

    Og han kom en gang, (i år 2003, må det vel ha vært), innom Rimi Bjørndal, en lørdag ettermiddag, som jeg jobba som låseansvarlig, da.

    For å handle, (eller noe sånt), må det vel ha vært.

    Ihvertfall så huket Lars Boye tak i meg, (husker jeg).

    Og ville at jeg skulle gjøre ditt og datt, inne på flaskerommet, da.

    Men da viste jeg Lars Boye en lapp, (husker jeg), som butikksjef Johan hadde skrevet til meg, dagen før, (eller noe sånt), da.

    Om ting som skulle gjøres, i butikken, da.

    Og så forklarte jeg Lars Boye det, at jeg hadde mer enn nok å gjøre, fra før, da.

    (For Rimi Bjørndal er en veldig travel butikk, da.

    Spesielt på ettermiddagene, på lørdagene.

    Selv om jeg for ikke så lenge siden, mener å ha sett det, på Google Maps, at de nå i tillegg også har fått seg en Rema-butikk, oppe på Bjørndal der.

    Men på den her tida, så var Rimi Bjørndal den eneste kjede-matbutikken, på Bjørndal, da).

    Så jeg sa til Lars Boye det, at han måtte ta det her ordreveien, da.

    (Altså med butikksjef Johan, da.

    Hvis Lars Boye var hans distriktsjef, da.

    Det husker jeg ikke helt nøyaktig nå, for å være ærlig).

    Og det mener jeg at jeg hadde rett til å si, da.

    For jeg kunne jo ikke ha to direkte overordnede, på den samme vakta, liksom.

    For det mener jeg at bare hadde blitt tull og tøys, (for på si det sånn).

    Så sånn var det.

    Bare noe jeg tenkte på.

    Men.men.

    Det var også sånn, på Rimi Bjørndal, (husker jeg), at det var vanskelig å se hvem som var muslimer der, (må man vel si).

    Og med det, så mener jeg det, at Fredrick og Toro.

    De fikk butikksjef Johan til å bestille en type frossenpizza, som ikke var i Rimi Bjørndal sitt sortiment.

    Nemlig Mia Pizza med kylling.

    Denne var frossenpizzaen, den var vel i ICA sitt supermarked-sortiment, så Hakon sitt grossistlager på Skårer, (som Rimi Bjørndal fikk varer fra), de førte dette pizzaslaget, da.

    Men dette slaget frossenpizza, det gikk jo ikke inn i kassa, da.

    (Ihvertfall så stod det vel ikke noen ordentlig label, for denne varen, på pizzadisken, til Rimi Bjørndal).

    Men Fredrick og Toro, de spiste tydeligvis bare halal-mat, (eller noe sånt), da.

    Så de fikk lov til å ha sin egen frossenpizza, i frysedisken, til Rimi Bjørndal, da.

    (Sånn som jeg husker det, ihvertfall).

    Selv om vel denne pizzaen ikke gikk inn i kassa.

    Men nå satt vel ikke jeg noe særlig i kassa, på den tida, som jeg jobba, som låseansvarlig, på Rimi Bjørndal.

    (Nemlig fra sommeren 2002 til desember 2003).

    Så hva de gjorde i kassa, når noen ville kjøpe denne Mia Pizza med kylling.

    Det veit jeg ikke.

    Men sånn som jeg husker det, så ble ikke disse pizzaene priset, da.

    (Selv om de vel ikke gikk inn i kassa).

    Så man må vel si at Fredrick og Toro, de var så vanskelige, at de skaffet plunder for Rimi Bjørndal, da.

    Siden de var så kresne i matveien, da.

    Sånn at Rimi Bjørndal måtte føre varer, som ikke gikk inn i kassa, da.

    Så sånn var det.

    Bare noe jeg tenkte på.

    Men men.

    Det var også noe lignende, som skjedde, da jeg kom tilbake fra sykmelding, som butikksjef, på Rimi Langhus, våren 2002, (husker jeg).

    Assistent Sølvi Berget der, hu hadde da, (mens jeg hadde vært sykmeldt), begynt å selge lomper og lefser, (som stod i to sjokkselgere, av papp), fra Skoga Brød.

    (Hennes tidligere arbeidsgiver, da).

    Disse lompene og lefsene, de gikk jo ikke inn i kassene, på Rimi Langhus.

    For de var jo ikke i Rimi sitt sortiment.

    Og jeg prøvde å si fra, til distriktsjef Anne-Katrine Skodvin, om at assistent Sølvi Berget, hadde tatt inn disse varene, som ikke gikk inn i kassa, da.

    (Og som vel var fra en leverandør, som Rimi ikke hadde noe kontakt med offisielt, vel).

    Men distriktsjef Anne-Katrine Skodvin, hu bare lo det bort, da.

    (Må man vel si).

    Hun svarte ihvertfall ikke noe ordentlig, (sånn som jeg husker det), da jeg gjorde et poeng av det, at det stod noen varer, (like utafor kontoret, var det vel, at disse to pappdisplayene stod), som Rimi-butikker egentlig ikke skulle selge, da.

    Og det var litt dårlig, av distriktsjef Anne-Katrine Skodvin, (syntes jeg).

    For varer som ikke er i sortimentet.

    De skaper adskillig krøll, i kassa, da.

    Siden de ikke går inn der.

    Og siden butikker flest hadde skannere, i kassa, på den her tida.

    Så var det nesten ingen, i Rimi, som visste hvordan man skulle bruke en prismaskin, da.

    Så varer som ikke gikk inn i kassa, de ble det vel ganske ofte gjettekonkurranse om, når det gjaldt å finne den riktige prisen, når de kom fram, til kassa, da.

    Og jeg hadde jo selv jobbet som heltidskasserer, på OBS Triaden, fra høsten 1990.

    Så jeg visste hvor mye heft det ble, av sånne varer, som ikke gikk inn i kassa, da.

    Samtidig, så kan også kasserere få sparken, (hvis jeg ikke tar helt feil), for å slå inn feil pris, i kassa, da.

    Så sett fra en kasserers synspunkt.

    (Et synspunkt som jeg ganske lett klarte å se, som butikksjef, (må jeg vel si).

    Siden jeg jo hadde jobba som kasserer, (på Matland/OBS Triaden), cirka 10-12 år tidligere).

    Så var varer som ikke gikk inn i kassa, en fæl uting, da.

    (For å si det sånn).

    Men dette var visst ikke distriktsjef Anne-Katrine Skodvin enig i, da.

    Og hva assistent Sølvi Berget tenkte på, det veit jeg ikke.

    Men hennes dømmekraft, den hadde jeg vel ikke så høye tanker om, fra før heller, (tror jeg).

    Så hu gadd jeg vel ikke å prate med, om det her, engang.

    (Sånn som jeg husker det, ihvertfall).

    For hu hadde jeg vel nesten gitt opp, tror jeg.

    (For å si det sånn).

    Siden hu var så skjør, da.

    (Som jeg har skrevet om, tidligere i den her boken).

    Så sånn var det.

    Bare noe jeg tenkte på.

    Men men.

    Det var fortsatt mye mer som hendte, den tida, som jeg bodde, på St. Hanshaugen.

    Og dette tenkte jeg at jeg skulle prøve å få skrevet mer om, i de neste kapitlene, av Min Bok 5.

    Så vi får se om jeg klarer å få til det.

    Vi får se.

  • Fler bilder fra Liverpool

    PIC_3984

    PIC_3985

    PIC_3986

    PIC_3987

    PIC_3988

    PIC_3989

    PIC_3990

    PIC_3991

    PIC_3992

    PIC_3993

    PIC_3994

    PIC_3995

    PIC_3996

    PIC_3997

    PIC_3998

    PIC_3999

    PIC_4000

    PIC_4001

    PIC_4002

    PIC_4003

    PIC_4004

    PIC_4005

    PIC_4006

    PIC_4007

    PIC_4008

    PIC_4009

    PIC_4010

    PIC_4011

    PIC_4012

    PIC_4013

    PIC_4014

    PIC_4015

    PIC_4016

    PIC_4017

    PIC_4018

    PIC_4019

    PIC_4020

    PIC_4021

    PIC_4023

    PIC_4024

    PIC_4025

    PIC_4026

    PIC_4027

    PIC_4028

    PIC_4029

    PIC_4030

    PIC_4031

    PIC_4032

    PIC_4033

    PIC_4034

    PIC_4035

    PIC_4036

    PIC_4037

    PIC_4038

    PIC_4039

    PIC_4040

    PIC_4041

    PIC_4042

    PIC_4043

    PIC_4044

    PIC_4045

    PIC_4046

    PIC_4047

    PIC_4048

    PIC_4050

    PIC_4051

    PIC_4052

    PIC_4053

    PIC_4054

    PIC_4055

    PIC_4056

    PIC_4057

    PIC_4058

    PIC_4059

    PIC_4060

    PIC_4061

    PIC_4062

    PIC_4063

    PIC_4064

    PIC_4065

    PIC_4066

    PIC_4067

    PIC_4068

    PIC_4069

    PIC_4070

    PIC_4071

    PIC_4072

    PIC_4073

    PIC_4074

    PIC_4075

    PIC_4076

    PIC_4077

    PIC_4078

    PIC_4079

    PIC_4080

    PIC_4081

    PIC_4082

    PIC_4083

    PIC_4084

    PIC_4085

    PIC_4088

    PIC_4089

    PIC_4090

    PIC_4091

    PIC_4094

    PIC_4095

    PIC_4096

    PIC_4097

    PIC_4098

    PIC_4099

    PS.

    Her er mer om dette: