Forfatter: Erik Ribsskog

Jeg sendte en femte e-post til Twitter

Erik Ribsskog
Case# 37667483: Impersonation – sjefstulling
Erik Ribsskog     Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 7:04 PM
To: Twitter Support
Hi,

thank you for your e-mail!

I wonder if it could be, a misunderstanding, to do, with this decision.

(Because I think this is clearly an impersonation-case).

So I was wondering, if you could please escalate this case, to a superior/line-manager there, (for å second opinion).

Thanks in advance for any help!

Best regards,

Erik Ribsskog

On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 6:19 PM, Twitter Support wrote:

    @JohnconsWeb.

    Hello,

    We’ve investigated the reported account and have determined that it is not in violation of Twitter’s impersonation policy.

    In order for an account to be in violation of the policy, it must portray another person or business in a misleading or deceptive manner. Read the full policy here: https://support.twitter.com/articles/18366

    Thank you for your report, and please note that any documents you may have uploaded will be deleted.

    Twitter Support
    Reference #ref:00DA0000000K0A8.500G00000120TUw:ref
    Help
    Twitter, Inc. 1355 Market Street, Suite 900 San Francisco, CA 94103

15. september 2016
Jeg sendte en fjerde e-post til Twitter

Erik Ribsskog
Case# 37667529: Impersonation – JodenRibsskog
Erik Ribsskog     Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 6:25 PM
To: Twitter Support
Hi,

thank you for your e-mail!

I wonder if it could be, a misunderstanding, to do, with this decision.

(Because I think this is clearly an impersonation-case).

So I was wondering, if you could please escalate this case, to a superior/line-manager there, (for å second opinion).

Thanks in advance for any help!

Best regards,

Erik Ribsskog

On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 6:20 PM, Twitter Support wrote:

    @JohnconsWeb.
    Hello,

    We’ve investigated the reported account and have determined that it is not in violation of Twitter’s impersonation policy.

    In order for an account to be in violation of the policy, it must portray another person or business in a misleading or deceptive manner. Read the full policy here: https://support.twitter.com/articles/18366

    Thank you for your report, and please note that any documents you may have uploaded will be deleted.

    Twitter Support
    Reference #ref:00DA0000000K0A8.500G00000120TYP:ref
    Help
    Twitter, Inc. 1355 Market Street, Suite 900 San Francisco, CA 94103

15. september 2016
Jeg sendte en tredje e-post til Twitter

Erik Ribsskog
Case# 37667579: Impersonation – BaronErikR
Erik Ribsskog     Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 5:57 PM
To: Twitter Support
Hi,

thank you for your e-mail!

I wonder if it could be, a misunderstanding, to do, with this decision.

(Because I think this is clearly an impersonation-case).

So I was wondering, if you could please escalate this case, to a superior/line-manager there, (for å second opinion).

Thanks in advance for any help!

Best regards,

Erik Ribsskog

On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 6:20 PM, Twitter Support wrote:

    @JohnconsWeb.
    Hello,

    We’ve investigated the reported account and have determined that it is not in violation of Twitter’s impersonation policy.

    In order for an account to be in violation of the policy, it must portray another person or business in a misleading or deceptive manner. Read the full policy here: https://support.twitter.com/articles/18366

    Thank you for your report, and please note that any documents you may have uploaded will be deleted.

    Twitter Support
    Reference #ref:00DA0000000K0A8.500G00000120TcW:ref
    Help
    Twitter, Inc. 1355 Market Street, Suite 900 San Francisco, CA 94103

15. september 2016
Jeg sendte enda en e-post til Twitter

Erik Ribsskog
Case# 37667633: Impersonation – erikribs
Erik Ribsskog     Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 5:46 PM
To: Twitter Support
Hi,

thank you for your e-mail!

I wonder if it could be, a misunderstanding, to do, with this decision.

(Because I think this is clearly an impersonation-case).

So I was wondering, if you could please escalate this case, to a superior/line-manager there, (for å second opinion).

Thanks in advance for any help!

Best regards,

Erik Ribsskog

On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 6:20 PM, Twitter Support wrote:

    @JohnconsWeb.
    Hello,

    We’ve investigated the reported account and have determined that it is not in violation of Twitter’s impersonation policy.

    In order for an account to be in violation of the policy, it must portray another person or business in a misleading or deceptive manner. Read the full policy here: https://support.twitter.com/articles/18366

    Thank you for your report, and please note that any documents you may have uploaded will be deleted.

    Twitter Support
    Reference #ref:00DA0000000K0A8.500G00000120Tgi:ref
    Help
    Twitter, Inc. 1355 Market Street, Suite 900 San Francisco, CA 94103

15. september 2016
Jeg sendte en e-post til Twitter

Erik Ribsskog
Case# 37667382: Impersonation – minitissemann
Erik Ribsskog     Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 5:35 PM
To: Twitter Support
Hi,

thank you for your e-mail!

I wonder if it could be, a misunderstanding, to do, with this decision.

(Because I think this is clearly an impersonation-case).

So I was wondering, if you could please escalate this case, to a superior/line-manager there, (for å second opinion).

Thanks in advance for any help!

Best regards,

Erik Ribsskog

On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 6:25 PM, Twitter Support wrote:

    @JohnconsWeb.

    Hello,

    We’ve investigated the reported account and have determined that it is not in violation of Twitter’s impersonation policy.

    In order for an account to be in violation of the policy, it must portray another person or business in a misleading or deceptive manner. Read the full policy here: https://support.twitter.com/articles/18366

    Thank you for your report, and please note that any documents you may have uploaded will be deleted.

    Twitter Support
    Reference #ref:00DA0000000K0A8.500G00000120TN2:ref
    Help
    Twitter, Inc. 1355 Market Street, Suite 900 San Francisco, CA 94103

15. september 2016
Her er Konkurransetilsynet på villspor, mistenker jeg

http://e24.no/naeringsliv/konkurransetilsynet/peppes-pizza-faar-ikke-kjoepe-dolly-dimple-s/23794748

PS.

Jeg husker, fra da jeg gikk, på Gjerdes handelsskole, (i Drammen), skoleåret 1988/89.

(Hvis ikke dette var, da jeg gikk, (på handel og kontor), på Sande videregående.

Hvor jeg gikk, fra høsten 1986 til våren 1988).

Da var klassen min, på bedriftsbesøk, hos firmaet Delikat, i Drammen.

Og da fortalte Delikat-representanten, at deres største konkurrent, var folk som lagde sursild selv, hjemme.

Så her konkurrerer også Peppes mot folk som lager pizza selv hjemme.

Og det er vel ganske mange.

Så hvis Peppes leverer dårlige pizzaer.

Så kan folk lage pizza, (eller annen mat, som brødskiver), selv.

Eller kjøpe såkalt ‘papp-pizza’, i nærbutikken.

De kan også bestille kinamat.

Og det er mange andre som leverer pizza på døra.

(Som for eksempel Pizzaexpressen og Pizzabaronen, osv.).

Så der er det vel konkurranse.

Og når det gjelder å dra på restaurant.

Så finnes det jo tusenvis av restauranter, i Oslo.

Så folk kan da gå på McDonalds eller en annen restaurant, hvis det ikke bra, hos Peppes.

Så Peppes har fortsatt mye konkurranse, (vil jeg si), selv om Dolly Dimples blir kjøpt opp eller forsvinner.

Så her lurer jeg på, om ikke Konkurransetilsynet, er på villspor.

Hm.

Så sånn er nok det.

Bare noe jeg tenkte på.

Men men.

Mvh.

Erik Ribsskog

15. september 2016
Brannalarm

Nå har brannalarmen gått, 5-6 ganger, det siste døgnet, her på tidligere Thon hotel Høvik.

Jeg lurer på, hva dette skal bety.

Da jeg leide av Rimi/Hakon, (i Waldemar Thranes gate), på St. Hanshaugen.

Så bodde jeg der, i 8-9 år.

(Fra 1996 til 2004).

Men brannalarmen starta ikke, en eneste gang, (sånn som jeg husker det).

Og heller ikke hos Ungbo, (i Skansen borettslag, på Ellingsrudåsen), så starta brannalarmen, en eneste gang, iløpet av de årene, (fra 1991 til 1996), som jeg bodde der.

(Sånn som jeg husker det).

Mens her på Høvik, (og også da jeg studerte, ved University of Sunderland), så starter brannalarmen, ‘hele tida’, virker det som.

(Av en eller annen grunn).

Hm.

Så sånn er det.

Bare noe jeg tenkte på.

Men men.

Med hilsen

Erik Ribsskog

15. september 2016
Brannalarm

15. september 2016

Jeg sendte en e-post til Riksarkivet

Erik Ribsskog

Spørsmål om dødsfall i Alicante i 1985

Erik Ribsskog

Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 5:01 AM

To: Seksjon for brukertjenester

Cc: emb.madrid@mfa.no

Hei,

takk for svar!

Nå var nå dette, en e-post, som jeg sendte, til ambassaden i Madrid.

Og så sendte jeg en kopi, til deres informasjon, (som de sier i Danmark, sånn som jeg husker det).

Så vi får nå la ambassaden finne ut av det, synes jeg.

Jeg
kan også ta med om, at min stesøster Christell Humblen sin nå avdøde
far Oddbjørn Humblen, var norsk visekonsul, (ulønnet), på Madagaskar, på
slutten av 60-tallet.

Og da var han visst, på besøk, i spedalske-kolonier der, osv.

Så jeg får bare håpe, at den samme iver og ånd, også kommer over stasjonen i Spania.

Sånn at det er mulig, å finne ut mer, om det her.

På forhånd takk for eventuell hjelp!

Mvh.

Erik Ribsskog

2016-08-22 14:35 GMT+02:00 Seksjon for brukertjenester <post@arkivverket.no>:

Vedlagt følger svar på e-post av 03.08.2016, vår ref. 2015/30757.

PS.

Her er e-brevet fra Riksarkivet:

15. september 2016

Enda mer om nettmobbing

Erik Ribsskog
Har du flyttet?
Erik Ribsskog Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 4:43 AM
To: juridisk
Cc: norges@hytteforbund.no
Hei,

dette er trakassering som følge av identietstyveri, (virker det som).

(Jeg har ikke kontaktet disse).

Vennligst rydd opp!

Med hilsen

Erik Ribsskog

PS.

Jeg sender fortsatt om identitetstyveri til Datatilsynet, (siden at det ikke
virker helt klart, hvem andre jeg burde sende om dette til, synes
jeg).

———- Forwarded message ———-
From:
Date: 2016-09-09 13:59 GMT+02:00
Subject: Har du flyttet?
To: eribsskog@gmail.com

Hei Erik, vi får posten din i retur. Har du flyttet fra Stabekk?

På forhånd – takk for svar.

Med vennlig hilsen

for Norges Hytteforbund

Heidi N. Sunde

(mobil 99706225)

15. september 2016