johncons

Stikkord: Bertelsmann Arvatos Microsoft Scandinavian Product Activation

  • Jeg sendte en e-post om tilstandene hos the Financial Ombudsman, til Acas, som jobber med rådgivning innen arbeidsrett osv. (In Norwegian)







    Google Mail – The Finacial Ombudsman, using staff as slaves/Fwd: Complaint against RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mail







    Google Mail



    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>




    The Finacial Ombudsman, using staff as slaves/Fwd: Complaint against RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mail





    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>





    Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 4:48 PM





    To:

    acas@eclogistics.co.uk



    Hi,

    I've contacted you earlier, about that I was being used as a slave, and that
    they had illigal management methods, at Bertelsmanns Scand. Microsoft-activation,
    in Liverpool.

    Now, people at the Financial Ombudsman, are also being used as slaves, it seems.
    Or this could be connected with a cover-up, of the Bertelsmann/Microsoft-case, that
    I am being bullied by Government, to cover up what went on there.

    Please send this e-mail to the right people in Acas.
    Yours sincerely,
    Erik Ribsskog

    ———- Forwarded message ———-

    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
    Date: Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 4:31 PM
    Subject: Re: Complaint against RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mail

    To: "Collins, Jackie" <jackie.collins@financial-ombudsman.org.uk>

    Hi,

    Monday to Friday, 8 am to 6 pm, is alright, I think.

    But you also let your staff work Sunday mornings, at 6 am.
    It seems to me that you overload your representatives with work, and that they have to

    work 12 to 14 hours 7 days a week.
    I thought slavery was forbidden in our time.
    Why do you let your representatives work every Sunday morning, when other people in

    England are on their way home from the pub?
    Do your staff get summer-holiday at all?
    Sincerely,
    Erik Ribsskog


    On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 9:54 AM, Collins, Jackie <jackie.collins@financial-ombudsman.org.uk> wrote:

    Dear Mr Ribsskog

    We always try to provide the best service we can to our

    customers, and sometimes that means offering our staff the option of working

    overtime during very busy periods.

    Please be assured that they have to work within strict time

    guidelines, and these are always checked by Operations Managers to ensure they

    are not working too many hours.

    The service our department offers is outside of the usual

    office hours of 9am till 5pm because we have found that a lot of our

    customers have difficulties contacting us whilst they are at work themselves

    during the 9am to 5pm times, so we have opening hours of 8am – 6pm, as do

    many firms these days.

    I hope this explains.

    Regards

    Jackie

    Collins

    Operations Manager
    Direct Dial : 020 7964

    0116

    Direct Fax: 020 7964 0117


    From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

    Sent: 29 June 2009 19:32
    To: Collins,

    Jackie

    Subject: Re: Complaint against RBS/Fwd: Earlier

    e-mail

    Ok,

    that sound very fine!

    But, why is that you let your representatives work over-time every Sunday

    then?

    Shouldn't you as a main rule conduct your business, within the business

    hours?

    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

    On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 3:50 PM, Collins, Jackie <jackie.collins@financial-ombudsman.org.uk>

    wrote:

    Dear Mr

    Ribsskog

    Rosemary

    Cox has passed your complaint to me to take over as you have requested that

    she no longer deals with your case.

    I can

    confirmed that a letter has been sent to the firm, and we have asked that they

    issue you with a final response letter within 14 days. We have also

    asked them to copy us in on that response.

    If you

    remain unhappy with the firms response, or you have not received a response

    from them within 14 days, please let me know and I will arrange for your

    complaint to be moved forward for investigation by an

    Adjudicator.

    Regards

    Jackie Collins
    Operations Manager

    Direct Dial

    : 020 7964 0116

    Direct Fax: 020 7964

    0117


    From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

    Sent: 28 June 2009 11:17
    To: Cox,

    Rosemary
    Subject: Re: Complaint against RBS/Fwd: Earlier

    e-mail

    Hi,

    I don't think it's any use with me repeating myself.

    I don't think you should handle my complaint.

    The reason is, that if you are to overworked, you get to tired.

    And in dealing with complaints like these, one obviously needs ones

    judgement, to be like

    it should be.

    If one are out of balance, like I think you could be, then I don't

    think this is good for how the

    complaint is being dealt with.

    So please do as I ask Mrs .Cox, and tell your manager what I said,

    that I want someone else

    to deal with my complaint, due to that I think that you must be

    overworked.

    Haven't you seen how fine the weather is today, you should have a day

    off in the fine weather,

    I think.

    Sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

    On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 11:10 AM, Cox, Rosemary <Rosemary.Cox@financial-ombudsman.org.uk>

    wrote:


    Dear Mr Ribsskog


    Thank you for your

    e-mails


    As previously advised I am not going to debate

    with you the working hours of this office.


    I have written to you today to advise the steps

    we are taking with your complaint. If the firm fail to resolve the situation

    for you, your complaint will be passed onto our adjudication area for

    further consideration of the concerns you have

    raised.


    I should add that we do

    not tolerate rude or insulting language at this office, and

    would expect any further communication to be sent in a more acceptable

    manner.


    Kind Regards


    Rose Cox


    team manager



    From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

    Sent: 28 June 2009

    10:43

    To: Cox, Rosemary
    Subject: Re: Complaint against

    RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mail

    Hi,

    of course you can work on Sundays if you want.

    But business e-mails should just be sent within the

    business-hours.

    Or else, what's going to happen, is obvious.

    Someone are going to come drunk home from town, and answer the

    business-e-mails when they are drunk, which is what has happened today, with

    our correspondence.

    If this is something, you didn't know from before, then I think

    this Financial Ombudsman-stuff is just a load of crap really.

    Try to use the head that God gave you when you were born!

    Sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

    On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 10:33 AM, Cox, Rosemary <Rosemary.Cox@financial-ombudsman.org.uk>

    wrote:

    Dear

    Mr Ribsskog

    Thank

    you for your e-mail

    I must admit to being surprised and

    confused with the content of the

    e-mail
    .

    We are an extremely busy department and we often work at the

    weekends, this is obviously of help to consumers as we are able

    to deal with their complaints in a more timely manner. I would

    suggest that
    It is entirely up to each individual

    business to determine which hours their staff will work and I do not

    intend debating this with you.

    By working this weekend I have been able to deal with your

    complaint, which as you can appreciate is of a benefit to

    you.

    Perhaps you can clarify the spelling mistakes you are referring

    to?

    Kind

    Regards

    Rose

    Cox

    team

    manager



    From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

    Sent: 28 June 2009 10:20

    Subject: Re: Complaint against RBS/Fwd: Earlier

    e-mail

    Hi again,

    don't you think it's strange for an institutions like yours to send

    e-mails on Sunday mornings then?

    Shouldn't e-mails be sent within normal business hours then you

    think?

    This is what it says on Wikipedia:

    In

    the United

    States
    and United

    Kingdom
    , the hours between 9 am and 5 pm are typically considered to be standard business

    hours



    I

    think this is rather akward, as I also think your spelling-mistakes

    are.


    Sincerely,


    Erik Ribsskog

    On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 8:06 AM, Cox, Rosemary

    <Rosemary.Cox@financial-ombudsman.org.uk>

    wrote:

    Dear

    Mr Ribsskog

    Thank you for your e-mail

    That's no problem, however I should point out that we

    are not a government department, we are a independent complaints

    body.

    I will be in touch with your again in the next few

    days

    Kind

    Regards

    Rose

    Cox

    team

    manager



    From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

    Sent: 28 June 2009 08:02

    To: Cox, Rosemary
    Subject: Re: Complaint

    against RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mail

    Hi,

    ok that's very fine, I'm just home from town you see.

    I thought it was a bit strange, since noone in Government in

    Norway, work on Sundays.

    Sorry about this, I forget sometimes that I'm not in Norway any

    longer.

    Sorry about this!

    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

    On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 7:54 AM, Cox, Rosemary

    <Rosemary.Cox@financial-ombudsman.org.uk>

    wrote:

    Dear Mr Ribsskog

    Thank you for your e-mail

    I can assure you this is not a

    joke, I am currently in the office working

    today.

    I presume that you

    would like us to deal with your complaint, so am responding to your

    e-mails today

    Kind Regards

    Rose Cox

    team manager



    From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

    Sent: 28 June

    2009 07:36
    To: Cox, Rosemary
    Subject: Re:

    Complaint against RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mail

    Hi,

    why do send the e-mails early on a Sunday morning, by the

    way.

    Is this some kind of joke?

    Sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

    On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 7:33 AM, Cox, Rosemary

    <Rosemary.Cox@financial-ombudsman.org.uk>

    wrote:

    Dear Mr Ribsskog

    Thank you for your

    e-mails

    I will contact you again once

    I have considered the

    information.

    Kind Regards

    Rose Cox

    team manager



    From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

    Sent: 27

    June 2009 14:59
    To: Cox, Rosemary
    Subject:

    Complaint against RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mail

    Hi,

    thank you for you e-mail, that I recieved today.

    I'll contact your collegue back, regarding the

    Barclays-complaint.

    I sent the complaint on RBS Dale St., to Yvonne Williams at

    RBS, but she

    also harassed me, like this, she writes 'Dear Ms Ribsskog',

    even if my name

    is Erik, and in Britain, you have a movie called 'Erik the

    Viking', and Eric is

    also a quite usual name, in English-speaking countries.

    So I think Yvonne Williams, the complaint-investigator,

    also bullied me.

    I think this must have been a deliberate mistake.

    This ended with the complaint being partly resolved, in the way

    that RBS,

    gave me the bonus of £100, for moving my account to them, from

    Barclays,

    (who I also had problems with, that I'll exlain about to your

    collegue, like I

    mentioned earlier).

    I'll also find the actual complaint against RBS Dale St.

    now, and forward it

    to you.

    What I meant with the complaint-form, was that it didn't

    look anything at all

    like the ones you've sent me now.

    Maybe the complaint-form I was sent, was to do with other

    financial institutions,

    than banks?

    Like share-fonds etc?

    Have you also got other complaint-forms, other than to banks,

    perhaps someone

    sent me the wrong form intentionally?

    Just a thought I had.

    But anyway, thank you very much for your e-mail, and I'll

    also find the actual

    RBS Dale St. complaint, and e-mail it to you now.

    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

    ———- Forwarded message

    ———-
    From: Williams, Yvonne

    (CRU)
    <Yvonne.Williams@rbs.co.uk>
    Date: Tue,

    Jun 26, 2007 at 4:30 PM
    Subject: RE: Earlier e-mail
    To: Erik

    Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

    Dear Ms Ribsskog

    Could you please arrange another copy of your email to be

    sent to me for my investigation

    Regards

    Yvonne Williams


    From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
    Sent: 19 June 2007

    14:04
    To: Williams, Yvonne (CRU)
    Subject:

    Earlier e-mail

    *** WARNING : This message originates

    from the Internet ***


    Hi,

    I'm refering to the e-mail I sent you on 5/6.

    I was just wondering if you have recieved this e-mail,

    because I cant see

    that I have recieved any answer to it yet.

    Please just contact me if you want me to send you the e-mail

    again.

    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

    The Royal Bank of

    Scotland plc, Registered in Scotland No. 90312. Registered Office:

    36 St Andrew Square, Edinburgh EH2 2YB

    Authorised and

    regulated by the Financial Services Authority.

    This e-mail

    message is confidential and for use by the addressee only. If the

    message is received by anyone other than the addressee, please

    return the message to the sender by replying to it and then delete

    the message from your computer. Internet e-mails are not necessarily

    secure. The Royal Bank of Scotland plc does not accept

    responsibility for changes made to this message after it was

    sent.

    Whilst all reasonable care has been taken to avoid the

    transmission of viruses, it is the responsibility of the recipient

    to ensure that the onward transmission, opening or use of this

    message and any attachments will not adversely affect its systems or

    data. No responsibility is accepted by The Royal Bank of Scotland

    plc in this regard and the recipient should carry out such virus and

    other checks as it considers

    appropriate.



    This e-mail and any attachments are

    confidential and may be subject to legal privilege. If you are not

    the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and

    delete this e-mail and any attachment from your system. If you are

    not the intended recipient you must not copy, disclose or take any

    action in reliance to it.

    This e-mail and any attachments have been

    checked by virus detection software before transmission. You should

    carry out your own virus checks on the contents of this

    communication. We accept no liability for any loss or damage which

    may be caused by software viruses or by interception or interruption

    of this mail.

    Unless otherwise indicated, this e-mail

    has no contractual effect and may only be used for the purpose(s)

    indicated in it. The statements and opinions expressed in this

    e-mail are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those

    of the Financial Ombudsman Service Ltd.

    This email has originated from the

    Financial Ombudsman Service Ltd. South Quay Plaza, 183 Marsh Wall,

    London E14 9SR, United Kingdom. Registered as a limited company in

    England and Wales No. 3725015. Registered office as above.




    This e-mail and any attachments are

    confidential and may be subject to legal privilege. If you are not the

    intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and delete

    this e-mail and any attachment from your system. If you are not the

    intended recipient you must not copy, disclose or take any action in

    reliance to it.

    This e-mail and any attachments have been

    checked by virus detection software before transmission. You should

    carry out your own virus checks on the contents of this communication.

    We accept no liability for any loss or damage which may be caused by

    software viruses or by interception or interruption of this mail.

    Unless otherwise indicated, this e-mail has

    no contractual effect and may only be used for the purpose(s)

    indicated in it. The statements and opinions expressed in this e-mail

    are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the

    Financial Ombudsman Service Ltd.

    This email has originated from the

    Financial Ombudsman Service Ltd. South Quay Plaza, 183 Marsh Wall,

    London E14 9SR, United Kingdom. Registered as a limited company in

    England and Wales No. 3725015. Registered office as above.




    This e-mail and any attachments are

    confidential and may be subject to legal privilege. If you are not the

    intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and delete this

    e-mail and any attachment from your system. If you are not the intended

    recipient you must not copy, disclose or take any action in reliance to

    it.

    This e-mail and any attachments have been

    checked by virus detection software before transmission. You should

    carry out your own virus checks on the contents of this communication.

    We accept no liability for any loss or damage which may be caused by

    software viruses or by interception or interruption of this mail.

    Unless otherwise indicated, this e-mail has

    no contractual effect and may only be used for the purpose(s) indicated

    in it. The statements and opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of

    the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Financial

    Ombudsman Service Ltd.

    This email has originated from the Financial

    Ombudsman Service Ltd. South Quay Plaza, 183 Marsh Wall, London E14 9SR,

    United Kingdom. Registered as a limited company in England and Wales No.

    3725015. Registered office as above.




    This e-mail and any attachments are

    confidential and may be subject to legal privilege. If you are not the

    intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and delete this

    e-mail and any attachment from your system. If you are not the intended

    recipient you must not copy, disclose or take any action in reliance to

    it.

    This e-mail and any attachments have been

    checked by virus detection software before transmission. You should carry

    out your own virus checks on the contents of this communication. We accept

    no liability for any loss or damage which may be caused by software

    viruses or by interception or interruption of this mail.

    Unless otherwise indicated, this e-mail has no

    contractual effect and may only be used for the purpose(s) indicated in

    it. The statements and opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the

    author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Financial Ombudsman

    Service Ltd.

    This email has originated from the Financial

    Ombudsman Service Ltd. South Quay Plaza, 183 Marsh Wall, London E14 9SR,

    United Kingdom. Registered as a limited company in England and Wales No.

    3725015. Registered office as above.




    This e-mail and any attachments are

    confidential and may be subject to legal privilege. If you are not the

    intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and delete this

    e-mail and any attachment from your system. If you are not the intended

    recipient you must not copy, disclose or take any action in reliance to

    it.

    This e-mail and any attachments have been checked

    by virus detection software before transmission. You should carry out your

    own virus checks on the contents of this communication. We accept no

    liability for any loss or damage which may be caused by software viruses or

    by interception or interruption of this mail.

    Unless otherwise indicated, this e-mail has no

    contractual effect and may only be used for the purpose(s) indicated in it.

    The statements and opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the author

    and do not necessarily reflect those of the Financial Ombudsman Service

    Ltd.

    This email has originated from the Financial

    Ombudsman Service Ltd. South Quay Plaza, 183 Marsh Wall, London E14 9SR,

    United Kingdom. Registered as a limited company in England and Wales No.

    3725015. Registered office as above.




    This e-mail and any attachments are

    confidential and may be subject to legal privilege. If you are not the

    intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and delete this

    e-mail and any attachment from your system. If you are not the intended

    recipient you must not copy, disclose or take any action in reliance to

    it.

    This e-mail and any attachments have been checked

    by virus detection software before transmission. You should carry out your own

    virus checks on the contents of this communication. We accept no liability for

    any loss or damage which may be caused by software viruses or by interception

    or interruption of this mail.

    Unless otherwise indicated, this e-mail has no

    contractual effect and may only be used for the purpose(s) indicated in it.

    The statements and opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the author

    and do not necessarily reflect those of the Financial Ombudsman Service

    Ltd.

    This email has originated from the Financial

    Ombudsman Service Ltd. South Quay Plaza, 183 Marsh Wall, London E14 9SR,

    United Kingdom. Registered as a limited company in England and Wales No.

    3725015. Registered office as above.





    This e-mail and any attachments are confidential

    and may be subject to legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient,

    please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail and any attachment

    from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you must not copy,

    disclose or take any action in reliance to it.

    This e-mail and any attachments have been checked by

    virus detection software before transmission. You should carry out your own

    virus checks on the contents of this communication. We accept no liability for

    any loss or damage which may be caused by software viruses or by interception or

    interruption of this mail.

    Unless otherwise indicated, this e-mail has no

    contractual effect and may only be used for the purpose(s) indicated in it. The

    statements and opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the author and do

    not necessarily reflect those of the Financial Ombudsman Service Ltd.

    This email has originated from the Financial

    Ombudsman Service Ltd. South Quay Plaza, 183 Marsh Wall, London E14 9SR, United

    Kingdom. Registered as a limited company in England and Wales No. 3725015.

    Registered office as above.







  • Mer enn ti tusen har lest om min arbeidssak mot Bertelsmann/Microsoft. Så de vanlige folka har våkna. Når skal media og advokatene våkne? (N)

    ti tusen

    PS.

    En kommentar til det her, (bare for å forklare hvordan myndighetene i Norge er), kunne kanskje vært at det er enklere å ta ned Microsoft, enn å få rettighetene sine i Norge.

    Så det sier litt om myndighetene i Norge, mener jeg.

    Bare for å ta en sånn litt useriøs tone, for det er egentlig ikke noe felles med disse sakene, så dette er en egen sak, som er mer enn viktig nok, i seg selv, mens det at jeg ikke får rettighetene mine i Norge, det er en annen sak da, sånn som jeg ser det.

    Også er det dette at jeg ikke får rettighetene mine i Storbritania, det blir vel da en tredje sak da.

    Men jeg mener at dette viser, hvor vanskelig det er, for vanlige folk, å få rettighetene sine, fra myndighetene.

    Når man ser at det er enklere omtrent, å ta ned Mirosoft (og Bertelsmann da).

    Så det er nok ikke noe reelt demokrati, eller noen ekte respekt for folks grunnlovsfestede rettigheter, i Norge idag, dessverre.

    Så sånn er nok det.

    Med vennlig hilsen

    Erik Ribsskog

  • Hvordan ‘mafian’ jobber på f.eks. Bertelsmann/Microsoft. (In Norwegian)

    Jeg har fått noe flashback, om noe som skjedde på Microsoft-aktiveringa til Bertelsmann.

    Og det var, at noen ganger, så dukket det opp noen jenter der, danske vel, med lapper, med installasjons-id.

    Så sa de, at dette var en som hadde Windows på flere maskiner, så ikke la vedkommende aktivere.

    Men, jeg tror ikke vi var ment å samarbeide sånn.

    Vi var ment å bruke ‘aktiv lytting’ osv., ved aktiveringene.

    Og slik lapp-skriving, det hadde ingen av lederne snakket om.

    Det var hun, hva heter hun, som skrev lapper, det var vel hun, hva het hun danske da, jeg husker ikke nå.

    Men, samme det.

    Mer da.

    Jo, jeg lurer på om det kan ha vært noe ‘mafian’-greier, det med lappene.

    At det var noe ‘mob’-ofre, eller noe?

    Jeg, jeg var jo så inne i ta de samtalene.

    Så jeg glemte jo de lappene.

    Jeg spurte bare de vanlige spørsmåla.

    Og det tror jeg kanskje at var meninga og.

    Hva om det var en person, som de tulla med?

    Som jeg merker skjer, når jeg ringer til noen firma, noen ganger selv.

    Kanskje det er noe sånn tull som foregår.

    At folk som ringer, blir tullet med av noen jenter i firmaet, og at de har kontrollen, på telefonlinjene, og at de derfor ikke kommer fram til lederne osv.

    Hvem vet.

    Noe er det nok.

    Bare noe jeg fikk flashback om her nå.

    Med vennlig hilsen

    Erik Ribsskog

    PS.

    Stinne, var det vel hun het, hun danske som pleide å dukke opp med de lappene.

    Men det var vel fler som gjorde det og.

    Jeg får se om jeg klarer å komme på mer om det.

    Vi får se.

    PS 2.

    Noe annet som jeg kom på nå.

    Det var at på den danske linja, så måtte vi også samle inn e-post adresser, fra de som ringte.

    Hvis de hadde en spesiell versjon av Windows, (ikke OEM, men vanlig fullversjon vel. Og de ville ikke ha hotmail-adresser osv., men sånne telefonselskap adresser da, var det som de ville ha, som Tele Danmark, eller hva de het igjen), da skulle vi spørre de som ringte, om vi kunne få e-post adressen.

    Også skulle vi sende de på e-post, var det vel, til team-leader, eller skrive disse adressene på en lapp, på slutten av dagen.

    Dette bryter vel litt med prinsippene om at aktiveringen skal være anonym(?)

    Men dette var det Team-Leaderne, Vivian Steinsland osv., som beordret av vi på den danske linja skulle gjøre da.

    (Jeg tok samtaler på norsk, svensk og dansk. (Siden norske folk måtte det).

    Men de hadde så få dansker ansatt der, på slutten, så jeg måtte ofte ta mest danske samtaler.

    Derfor måtte jeg samle inn en del e-post adresser da, som hun Steinsland vel, spesielt, maste om.)

    Så sånn var det.

  • E-mail to Freenations







    Google Mail – Enquiry from Free Nations website







    Google Mail



    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>




    Enquiry from Free Nations website





    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>





    Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 3:24 PM





    To:

    Freenations <freenations@freeuk.com>



    Ok,

    that sounds very fine!

    Just take the time you need, I know it’s a lot of files, so you don’t

    need to stres even if I’m a bit stressed here. 🙂

    Just take the time you need!

    Thanks very much for the help!

    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

    On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 3:06 PM, Freenations <freenations@freeuk.com> wrote:

    > Ok Give me some time to look at it all and try to edit a piece together!

    >

    >

    > —– Original Message —– From: "Erik Ribsskog" <eribsskog@gmail.com>

    > To: "Freenations" <freenations@freeuk.com>

    > Sent: Friday, February 06, 2009 2:53 PM

    > Subject: Re: Enquiry from Free Nations website

    >

    >

    >> Hi,

    >>

    >> I saw your e-mail right away now.

    >>

    >> Yes, I’m trying to get the publicity, because I’m trying to get my

    >> rights from the

    >> Government in Britain and Norway, who don’t want to inform me about what’s

    >> going on, even if I’ve overheard that I’m being followed by ‘the

    >> mafia’, in Oslo, in 2003,

    >> and someone tried to kill me in Larvik in Norway in 2005.

    >>

    >> But I’m not getting any help with this, or information about what’s

    >> going on, from the

    >> Police.

    >>

    >> So I want the publicity, if it’s possible, because then I can maybe

    >> also get my rights,

    >> from the Government, in connection with this ‘mafia’-stuff.

    >>

    >> But the Bertelsmann-case, is a stand-alone case.

    >>

    >> But I haven’t got any evidence, about the mafia-stuff, but to do with

    >> the Bertelsmann-case,

    >> I have files, so that’s why I think it’s fine if I’m being quoted,

    >> because, then maybe the

    >> Norwegian media can write about it, and then maybe I could get a

    >> lawyer, from the

    >> Norwegian legal-aid programme, and get advice on what to do, in connection

    >> with

    >> that I’ve overheard that I’m being followed by the mafia.

    >>

    >> So I’m a bit edgy, sometimes, since I’m being a bit messed with by the

    >> Government

    >> etc., I think, so sorry about this!

    >>

    >> Yours sincerely,

    >>

    >> Erik Ribsskog

    >>

    >> On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 2:46 PM, Freenations <freenations@freeuk.com>

    >> wrote:

    >>>

    >>> No I just thought you might not want the publicity!

    >>>

    >>> We have no problem if you are willing to be quoted!

    >>>

    >>> Freenations

    >>>

    >>> —– Original Message —– From: "Erik Ribsskog" <eribsskog@gmail.com>

    >>> To: <freenations@freeuk.com>

    >>> Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 8:05 PM

    >>> Subject: Fwd: Enquiry from Free Nations website

    >>>

    >>>

    >>>> Hi,

    >>>>

    >>>> I’m sending a new e-mail because I was just wondering about what you

    >>>> wrote, that you wouldn’t use my name.

    >>>>

    >>>> I was wondering, has some mob, or something, said something bad about

    >>>> me, to you? Is this why you don’t want

    >>>> to use my name?

    >>>>

    >>>> Yours sincerely,

    >>>>

    >>>> Erik Ribsskog

    >>>>

    >>>>

    >>>> ———- Forwarded message ———-

    >>>> From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

    >>>> Date: Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 3:21 PM

    >>>> Subject: Re: Enquiry from Free Nations website

    >>>> To: Freenations <freenations@freeuk.com>

    >>>>

    >>>>

    >>>> Hi,

    >>>>

    >>>> yes, that would be fine, then I could see if something from the

    >>>> Arvato-case etc., was being used

    >>>> on your website.

    >>>>

    >>>> I just stumbled upon your website, when I search a bit about

    >>>> Bertelsmann on Google, but I’ll try

    >>>> read up more about Freenations on a later occation.

    >>>>

    >>>> Yours sincerely,

    >>>>

    >>>> Erik Ribsskog

    >>>>

    >>>> On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 9:27 AM, Freenations <freenations@freeuk.com>

    >>>> wrote:

    >>>>>

    >>>>> Very many thanks.

    >>>>>

    >>>>> We will certainly use this input. – but without your name.

    >>>>>

    >>>>> Do you wish to be put on our mailing list for updates to the website?

    >>>>>

    >>>>> Freenations

    >>>>> —– Original Message —– From: "Erik Ribsskog"

    >>>>> <eribsskog@gmail.com>

    >>>>> To: <freenations@freeuk.com>

    >>>>> Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 1:57 AM

    >>>>> Subject: Enquiry from Free Nations website

    >>>>>

    >>>>>

    >>>>>> Hi,

    >>>>>>

    >>>>>> I read your article about Bertelsmann taking over Council-services,

    >>>>>> (like incoming phone-calls from the people living in the

    >>>>>> constituancy), in a Yorkshire town.

    >>>>>>

    >>>>>> http://www.freenations.freeuk.com/gc-60.html

    >>>>>>

    >>>>>> I was working for Bertelsmann Arvato Services Microsoft Scandinavian

    >>>>>> Product Activation, in 2005 and 2006, and I also

    >>>>>> recieved training, for doing this ‘Council-job’ for the Yorkshire

    >>>>>> Council, by the way.

    >>>>>>

    >>>>>> A Finnish girl working at the Microsoft-activation, Aniina, and

    >>>>>> myself, we had to take the elevator down, from the 4th floor, in the

    >>>>>> Cunard Building,

    >>>>>> to the 1st floor there.

    >>>>>>

    >>>>>> (Arvato had offices in both the 1st floor and the 4th floor, in the

    >>>>>> Cunard Building).

    >>>>>>

    >>>>>> And then we spoke with a woman from the town, and a manager in Arvato,

    >>>>>> and we were to be a back-up, for the Council job.

    >>>>>>

    >>>>>> So I had training answering call from ‘citizens’ that hadn’t had their

    >>>>>> litter-bins emptied etc.

    >>>>>>

    >>>>>> And we got a plastic-folder with a booklet, and a mascot, I think it’s

    >>>>>> called, a green textile-thing, with a sticker on it, to put on the

    >>>>>> computer-screen etc,

    >>>>>> that looked like a strange animal with two eyes.

    >>>>>>

    >>>>>> This I think must have been at the beginning of 2006.

    >>>>>>

    >>>>>> And I was working at Arvato, untill November 2006.

    >>>>>>

    >>>>>> And, we never recieved a single phone-call, from the Yorkshire town.

    >>>>>>

    >>>>>> So I think must have been something ‘phoney’ at Arvato Liverpool, also

    >>>>>> since I think it was only me and Aniina, (or Anina), who recieved this

    >>>>>> training.

    >>>>>>

    >>>>>> So this seems a bit odd, thinking back on this.

    >>>>>>

    >>>>>> I also started an employment-case against Bertelsmann.

    >>>>>>

    >>>>>> They used reinforcement, as a managment-method, that the team-leaders

    >>>>>> were trained to use.

    >>>>>>

    >>>>>> And this means, that if one sit more than eg. 15 seconds, between

    >>>>>> calls, without seting the phone on ‘available’, then the team-leaders

    >>>>>> are going to

    >>>>>> scream at you, through the office/table, ‘Erik, you’re on wrap-up’.

    >>>>>>

    >>>>>> This I’ve heard is illigal in the UK, I’ve heard it’s bullying.

    >>>>>>

    >>>>>> Also there was a lot of bullying from managers, and other problems on

    >>>>>> the campaign.

    >>>>>>

    >>>>>> I’ve written about them in a summary from a meeting there, with my

    >>>>>> line-manager, in 2006:

    >>>>>>

    >>>>>> http://www.scribd.com/doc/4661735/7

    >>>>>>

    >>>>>> And there are also a lot of other documents about the problems there:

    >>>>>>

    >>>>>>

    >>>>>>

    >>>>>>

    >>>>>> http://www.scribd.com/groups/view/14830-arvato-services-ltd-s-microsoft-scandinavian-product-activation

    >>>>>>

    >>>>>> I think that if someone went through these files, then they could find

    >>>>>> a lot of documents/e-mails etc, from Arvato,

    >>>>>> that showed illigal management methods/bullying from managers etc.

    >>>>>> there.

    >>>>>>

    >>>>>> I think one could almost say that we were being used as slaves there

    >>>>>> almost, and that the reinforcement was kind

    >>>>>> of like a whip, from the ‘slave-keeper’, if one did something wrong.

    >>>>>>

    >>>>>> On top of all the other bullying that was against eg. me there.

    >>>>>>

    >>>>>> So if you have the time, then you’d be welcome to have a look at the

    >>>>>> case, and see if there’s something there,

    >>>>>> that you could write about on your webisite etc.

    >>>>>>

    >>>>>> (I’m also trying to get a court-case up, with this employment-case.

    >>>>>> But I haven’t got it that far yet).

    >>>>>>

    >>>>>> Please contact me if you have any questions regarding this!

    >>>>>>

    >>>>>> Yours sincerely,

    >>>>>>

    >>>>>> Erik Ribsskog

    >>>>>>

    >>>>>>

    >>>>>

    >>>>>

    >>>>>

    >>>>>

    >>>>> ——————————————————————————–

    >>>>>

    >>>>>

    >>>>>

    >>>>> Internal Virus Database is out of date.

    >>>>> Checked by AVG.

    >>>>> Version: 8.0.169 / Virus Database: 270.10.16/1928 – Release Date:

    >>>>> 1/31/2009

    >>>>> 8:03 PM

    >>>>>

    >>>>>

    >>>>

    >>>>

    >>>

    >>>

    >>>

    >>> ——————————————————————————–

    >>>

    >>>

    >>>

    >>> Internal Virus Database is out of date.

    >>> Checked by AVG.

    >>> Version: 8.0.169 / Virus Database: 270.10.16/1928 – Release Date:

    >>> 1/31/2009

    >>> 8:03 PM

    >>>

    >>>

    >>

    >>

    >

    >

    > ——————————————————————————–

    >

    >

    >

    > Internal Virus Database is out of date.

    > Checked by AVG.

    > Version: 8.0.169 / Virus Database: 270.10.16/1928 – Release Date: 1/31/2009

    > 8:03 PM

    >

    >






  • Svensk dame hore i Sverige. (Mer fra Aftonbladets forum). (In Norwegian).

    Ja, jeg håpet jeg ikke behøvde å gå så her langt.

    Men hun Emelie Wallin da, da hun begynte på Microsoft-aktiveringen, drevet av Bertelsmann Arvato, våren 2006.

    Så var hun ung til å dra til utlandet for å jobbe, vil jeg si.

    Men hun fortalte meg, at ‘jag har jobbat’, som hun sa.

    Så jeg tolker det, som at hun har jobbet som noe hore, i Sverige.

    Kanskje det er derfor at politiet ikke vil si noe.

    For hun her svenske jenta var veldig vakker.

    Typisk nordisk utseende, med lyst hår og blå øyne.

    Faren var visstnok politi også.

    Så jeg lurer på hva som foregår i Sverige, når de peneste damene tydeligvis blir brukt som horer av noen ligaer?

    Hun samme dama forsvant plutselig på ikke planlagte ferier, fra jobb i England, og ble plutselig borte, i sykdom, i flere måneder.

    Og hun ble behandlet dårlig av britiske kollegaer, som om hun var en slags slavinne som skulle underholde dem.

    Jeg har sett det samme i Oslo, da jeg jobbet som butikksjef, og kjørte gjennom Oslo sentrum på vei hjem fra jobb, at utlendinger kontrollerer veldig pene, typisk nordisk utseende jenter, og selger de som horer.

    Skulle ikke de peneste damene i Norge og Sverige fått seg noen bra karer og ikke blitt brukt som horer av kriminelle nettverk, dvs. utlendinger og briter.

    Jeg har prøvd å ta opp problemene i firma med britiske, norske og også svenske myndigheter.

    Men alle dekker over problemene på Bertelsmanns Microsoft-aktivering.

    Godtar nordiske myndigheter at nordiske damer blir brukt som horer av utlendinger og briter og amerikanere?

    Det er en skam det som foregår, mener jeg.

    Bare se på dette forumet, ingen gjør noenting for å hjelpe hun jenta, det eneste jeg får av tilbakemelding er at jeg er en gris, eller noe, som ikke vil at de nordiske damene skal være horer.

    Norge sender jo en julegran hvert år til Trafalgar Square i London.

    Det kan være at britene får feil ideer, fra dette, og tror at det betyr at de dermed får lov å bruke de nordiske damene som horer.

    Og det ser sånn ut på de nordiske myndighetenes reaksjon også.

    Så jeg foreslår at man slutter å sende slike juletrær osv., så lenge nordiske damer blir brukt som horer på denne måten.

    Og jeg foreslår også at dere burde prøve å passe litt bedre på de fineste damene deres i Sverige.

    Med vennlig hilsen

    Erik Ribsskog

    http://forum.aftonbladet.se/thread.jspa?threadID=19223&tstart=0

  • Hvorfor bruker noen briter mitt navn for å skrive kommentarer i the Mirror? (In Norwegian).

    Hvorfor bruker noen briter mitt navn for å skrive kommentarer i the Mirror? (In Norwegian).

    http://blogs.mirror.co.uk/investigations/2008/07/charity-conman-peter-lyon-gets.html

    De bruker navnet mitt slik Bertelsmann Arvato skrev det, på Microsoft-aktiveringa, med to b-er, istedet for to s-er.

    (Hun som hadde opplæring av meg der, Marianne Høksaas, hun sa at de pleide å stave nesten alle navna feil.

    Og navnet ble brukt i noe sånt som tre programmer for å logge seg på, for å gjøre jobben sin.

    Og jeg trengte jobben, så jeg ville ikke lage kaos der, med at de måtte bytte passord osv.

    Så sånn var det).

    Men alikevel, hva er det som skjer her?

    Briter har vel nok med å mobbe nordmenn litt sånn halvveis skjult på debattforum osv., hvorfor bruker dem navnet mitt.

    Hva er det som foregår?

    Prøver dem å ødelegge navnet mitt, er det det som foregår.

    Vanskelig å si, men det er vel antagelig det som foregår.

    Det er mulig.

    Vi får se.

    Med vennlig hilsen

    Erik Ribsskog

  • StatCounter: Noen søker på ‘to jobber på heltid med å søke på erik ribsskog’, på Google. (In Norwegian).

    StatCounter: Noen søker på ‘to jobber på heltid med å søke på erik ribsskog’, på Google. (In Norwegian).

    Det er de som jobber på Fornebu det her, som sitter der med Mac osv., og søker på meg, sånn at man kan lese det på tracking-cookie programmet mitt.

    Men men.

    Men hvorfor i alle dager vil noen betale dem for det?

    Bertelsmann, de ville ikke betale meg 1000 kroner ekstra i måneden for å være team-leader, enda jeg søkte på en stilling de utlyste osv.

    Pga. at det var for mange penger, sa de.

    Men nå betaler de altså to personer heltidslønn, for å sitte å søke på navnet mitt på nettet.

    Forstå det den som kan.

    Her er det noe lureri, mener jeg.

    Så sånn er det.

    Med vennlig hilsen

    Erik Ribsskog

  • StatCounter: Noen søker på ‘betalt av bertelsmann for å søke på erik ribsskog sin blogg’, på Google. (In Norwegian).

    StatCounter: Noen søker på ‘betalt av bertelsmann for å søke på erik ribsskog sin blogg’, på Google. (In Norwegian).

    http://www.google.no/search?hl=no&q=betalt%20av%20bertelsmann%20for%20%C3%A5%20s%C3%B8ke%20p%C3%A5%20erik%20ribsskog%20sin%20blogg&btnG=Google-s%C3%B8k&meta=&aq=f&oq=

    PS.

    Er du det ja?

    Det høres kanskje litt rart ut, men hvis det er sant, så burde du kanskje se litt opp for de gutta der.

    I hvertfall så hadde jeg skikkelig problemer da jeg jobbet for dem i Liverpool, med at de brukte ledelsesmetoder som var ulovlige, og innebar at ansatte ble skreket til, fra ledere, som en rutine.

    Og de behandlet også norske folk som slaver, ved at norske folk måtte svare på telefoner på fire språk (norsk, svensk, dansk og engelsk), mens f.eks. dansker kun måtte svare på telefoner på dansk og engelsk, på Microsoft-aktiveringa.

    Så det kunne ofte bli veldig mye å gjøre for de som var norske.

    Mens de som var finske og danske f.eks., de kunne ha det rimelig slappt, mens en annen satt og nesten jobbet seg ihjel på plassen ved siden av, siden han var fra Norge.

    Og lederne der, drev også mye med mobbing, så det gjorde arbeidssituasjonen enda værre der.

    Men men.

    Og Bertelsmann var også den største enkeltprodusent av nazi-propaganda under krigen.

    Nå skal de liksom være så fine, med ‘Bertelsmann Essentials’ osv., med at medarbeidere skal ha medbestemmelse over sine egne arbeidsoppgaver.

    Men de var ikke implementert i Liverpool, og jeg har også lest på nettet at Bertelsmann sponser sionistiske spionorganisasjoner.

    Så jeg tror nok det er en del lysskye ting i forbindelse med det firmaet, selv om de prøver å presantere en glansbilde-versjon av seg selv utad, med Bertelsmann Essentials osv., men egentlig så tror jeg nok det går mer på å behandle medarbeiderne som slaver, hvis man skal kalle en spade for en spade.

    Så sånn er det.

    Med vennlig hilsen

    Erik Ribsskog