johncons

Stikkord: Bertelsmann

  • Another MSN-conversation about translation-work, for an online games website etc.


    Never give out your password or credit card number in an
    instant message conversation.

    Erik
    says:

    Hi,
    there. I’m sitting on an old laptop, so it sometimes re-bot. So sorry
    about this! Here is the link I was mentioning, if you have the time
    to read about this:
    http://www.scribd.com/groups/view/14830-arvato-services-ltd-s-microsoft-scandinavian-product-activation

    Erik
    says:

    www.superspill.com
    could maybe a better name

    Seb
    says:

    it’s
    already taken

    Erik
    says:

    ok,
    one sec

    Erik
    says:

    I
    spoke with the guy on MSN again, and he also pointed to that .org and
    .net could also be used in Norway

    Erik
    says:

    so
    I thought about
    www.superspill.net
    perhaps?

    Erik
    says:

    seems
    to be not taken

    Erik
    says:

    or
    www.gratisspill.net

    Erik
    says:

    also
    not taken, it seems

    Erik
    says:

    (means
    free games)

    Erik
    says:

    then
    it could be written like this ‘SuperSpill’ or maybe in one word, with
    ‘Super’ in one colour and then ‘spill’ in another colour.

    Erik
    says:

    or
    the same with Gratis-spill/Gratisspill/Gratis-Spill

    Erik
    says:

    Companies
    sometimes split up words in Norwegian, even if they are meant to be
    like this ‘Gratisspill’

  • Noe ‘mob’ hadde kontroll på Microsoft-aktiveringa i Liverpool og presset de nordiske jentene til å bli deres horer. (In Norwegian)

    Sånn ser jeg det nå, som foregikk på Bertelsmann Arvato sin Microsoft-aktivering, i Liverpool, da jeg jobbet der, i 2005 og 2006.

    At nordiske jenter, i 18-års alderen (og noen enda yngre, f.eks. hun fra Nord-Norge, Kristine Hansen, var vel bare 16-17).

    De ble presset av noe ‘mob’ e.l., som hadde kontrollen der, fordi de som jobbet for Microsoft i skandinavia, de satt midt inne blant flere hundre briter som jobbet for mobilselskapet ‘3’ osv.

    Så har de nok også brukt hun team-leaderen fra Berger, Vivian Steinsland, som hore, mistenker jeg.

    Og hun Emelie Wallin fra Sverige, hun ble nok presset til å være hore, og var nok hora til han Michael O’Shaughnessy, mistenker jeg. Ihvertfall så var hun under kontroll av han.

    Og da hun Wallin var hjemme fra jobben, de siste ukene jeg jobbet på Arvato, så virket det som for meg, at han O’Shaugnessy, ble sterkere og sterkere og mer og mer uthvilt.

    Så om det kan ha vært noe sammenheng der.

    Det er mulig.

    Og også hun team-leaderen fra Sørlandet, Marianne Hoeksås, (eller hvordan det navnet staves), hun ble nok også brukt som hore, enda hun var team-leader.

    Jeg husker jeg så at hun Emelie Wallin, ble liksom truet, av en stor og sterk brite, som stod og nistirret på henne.

    Men jeg var ikke helt meg selv, for jeg ble tullet med der jeg bodde, i et bofelleskap i Walton, hvor de hadde ‘plott’ mot meg, hele tiden, og de fjernet varmovnen på rommet mitt mm.

    Så jeg var veldig redusert, og jeg hadde blitt jaget av noe mafian eller noe, fra Norge, og hadde overhørt at jeg var forfulgt, men fikk ikke noe hjelp fra Kripos, eller politiet, så jeg visste ikke hva som foregikk.

    Og det vet jeg fortsatt ikke.

    Så jeg ville ikke utsette noen for fare der, så jeg prata ikke med noen da jeg jobbet der, jeg bare gjorde jobben min.

    Mer da.

    Jo, han Michael O’Shaughnessy, han gikk alltid å delte ut kaker og godteri, fra the Swedish Chrurch.

    Men han var egentlig stor og sterk.

    Han var i 50-årene kanskje.

    Og snakket svensk, og dro på turer til Malmö.

    Så jeg så på han som svensk.

    Han ga meg også en brosjyre for the Swedish Church, første dagen på Arvato, og hun svenske team-leaderen Jill, hun sa at hun hadde bodd der.

    Så hun var nok i nettverket dems.

    Og dem hadde nok kontroll på kirken og.

    Den samme moben.

    Og på bofelleskapet der jeg bodde, vil jeg tippe.

    Gjennom hun Janine England, for eksempel.

    Hvem vet.

    Mer da.

    Jo, jeg så at en kar stod å nistirret på hun Emelie Wallin, men jeg trodde det var typen hennes, og at hun hadde ringt han.

    Men da ble hun borte noen dager.

    Og når hun kom tilbake, så var hun nedfor.

    Da trodde jeg nesten hun var en annen ung dame.

    For da var hun mer stille, og knytt.

    Så noe må ha skjedd da.

    Det var den dagen Tyskland slo Sverige i fotball-VM 2006, som han ‘branden’ stod og nistirra på henne.

    Før hun ble borte noen dager vel, og jeg spurte om hun skulle søke team-leader.

    Og hun sa bare nei.

    Så sånn var det.

    Og da hadde hun satt seg rett overfor meg.

    Og det sa også han O’Shaugnessy, at hun skulle gjøre, overhørte jeg, sitte ovenfor meg.

    Så om en ‘mob’ brukte henne som hore, og befalte henne til sitte ovenfor meg, for å utnytte meg, til å få henne roet ned, mellom ‘hore-øktene’.

    Noe sånt kanskje.

    Hva vet jeg.

    Det var ihvertfall noe sånt som foregikk.

    Og team-leaderne de var nok ihvertfall horer.

    Men om hun Emelie Wallin var hore, eller bare under kontroll av det nettverket, det vet jeg ikke egentlig.

    Men det er det kanskje noen andre som veit, det er mulig.

    Noen som jobbet der, de overhørte jeg sa, at nå var det så mye som skjedde i Liverpool, så de måtte dra.

    Det var det hun Karinne som sa.

    Og da begynte hun og hun Margrethe Augestad, (som var fra samme gruppering, vil jeg tro), å jobbe i Manchester.

    Eller hun Karianne flytta vel tilbake til Norge.

    Og de svenske søstrene Liljeblad, eller hva de het, de flytta også.

    Margrethe Augestad var på fest der, så de kan ha vært samme ‘gruppering’, eller hva det var.

    Så sånn var det.

    Med vennlig hilsen

    Erik Ribsskog

  • E-mail to the University of Liverpool about the Bertelsmann Arvato-case







    Google Mail – Advice letter







    Google Mail



    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>




    Advice letter





    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>





    Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 11:32 PM





    To:

    Law Clinic <clinic@liverpool.ac.uk>



    Hi,

    it doesn’t calrify it, unfortunatly.

    First it was mentioned a pro-bono case, with a contract to sign, not a letter.

    The Solicitor interupted the meeting, and said they couldn’t help, since

    – The case was to old, she said.

    I explained, that I hadn’t been ignorant, and then the solicitior said

    the University coultn’t

    help, due to that:

    – The case was to complex.

    I suspect that the Solicitor just didn’t want to help, and made up excuses.

    I didn’t want to start an arguement in the meeting, that’s why I’m

    complaining about this now,

    instead of in the meeting.

    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

    On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 1:58 PM, Law Clinic <clinic@liverpool.ac.uk> wrote:

    > Dear Mr Ribskogg,

    >

    >

    >

    > Thank you for your email.  Regarding the matters that you raise, I have

    > contacted the supervising solicitor who tells me that during the course of

    > the interview, you explained that you had already spoken to the CAB and two

    > separate solicitors but had not been happy with the advice you received.  In

    > addition to your concerns regarding employment issues, you also discussed a

    > potential Crown Court proceeding.  The reference to ‘Nature of the Case’ is

    > to the fact that your concerns contained wider issues than employment which

    > fall outside of the areas of expertise of  the Law Clinic.

    >

    >

    >

    > The Law Clinic is intended to provide an advice letter that is prepared over

    > two weeks. The Client discusses a concern/issue/claim with the students who

    > then go away and research the matter and respond to that concern in writing.

    > This was explained during the interview and you agreed that the Law Clinic

    > was not the correct forum for you as it was unlikely we could provide the

    > level of advice/support you required.

    >

    > I trust this clarifies the situation.

    >

    >

    >

    >

    >

    > Yours sincerely,

    >

    >

    >

    >

    >

    > Marie Ball

    >

    > Clinic Administrator

    >

    > Liverpool Law Clinic

    >

    > lawclinic@liverpool.ac.uk

    >

    >

    >

    >

    >

    > —–Original Message—–

    > From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

    > Sent: 07 March 2009 14:47

    > To: Law Clinic

    > Subject: Re: Advice letter

    >

    >

    >

    > Hi,

    >

    >

    >

    > thank you for the advice-letter!

    >

    >

    >

    > I’ve been reading through it now, and thought that I would contact the

    >

    > LSC, for further advice.

    >

    >

    >

    > But, there was a couple of things that I didn’t understand, from the

    >

    > meeting and your letter,

    >

    > that I was just wondering about if you have the chance to explain about.

    >

    >

    >

    > The solicitor said in the meeting, that the case was to big for the

    >

    > university to give advice on,

    >

    > since I had been ‘mis-lead’ by the Police and the CAB and some

    >

    > law-firms, and therefore

    >

    > didn’t contact the Employment-tribunual within three months.

    >

    >

    >

    > But couldn’t the case be run as a stand alone employment-case even if

    >

    > it was delayed due to

    >

    > that I was mis-lead by the Police etc?

    >

    >

    >

    > My second question is that you mention ‘the Nature of the Case’, in

    >

    > your letter, and say that the

    >

    > Law Clinic can’t deal with the case, due to the Nature of the Case.

    >

    >

    >

    > But I can’t say exactly that I understand what you mean by this term,

    >

    > and I would like to explain

    >

    > this, what you mean, to the LCS etc, so I was wondering if you could

    >

    > please explain to me what

    >

    > you mean with the term ‘the Nature of the case’, that you mention in

    >

    > the advice-letter.

    >

    >

    >

    > Thanks again for you help and thanks in advance for your help with

    >

    > answering these questions!

    >

    >

    >

    > Yours sincerely,

    >

    >

    >

    > Erik Ribsskog

    >

    >

    >

    >

    >

    > On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 12:19 PM, Law Clinic <clinic@liverpool.ac.uk> wrote:

    >

    >> Dear Mr Ribskogg,

    >

    >>

    >

    >>

    >

    >>

    >

    >> Please find attached letter of advice from the Liverpool Law Clinic.

    >

    >>

    >

    >>

    >

    >>

    >

    >> Yours sincerely,

    >

    >>

    >

    >>

    >

    >>

    >

    >> Marie Ball

    >

    >>

    >

    >> Administrator

    >

    >>

    >

    >> Liverpool Law Clinic

    >

    >>

    >

    >> lawclinic@liverpool.ac.uk

    >

    >>

    >

    >>






  • E-mail to Nick Ewans

     

    08
    March 2009

    23:18

     

  • Someone wanted me to describe the document ‘Ipcc Appeal Email 5’ on Scribd

    Someone wanted me to describe the document ‘Ipcc Appeal Email 5’ on Scribd


    Someone wanted me to describe this file.

    I have an employment-case, against Bertelsmann Arvatos Microsoft Scandinavian Product Activation.

    There were so many problems there, with young women being controlled like slaves by other employees, and young women suddently being home sick, and not returning, and some Scandinavian women only working one day a year, and being sick the rest of the year.

    So I feared that some of these women were under ‘mafia-control’, or something like this.

    And there was also a lot of bullying from managers, and the company used illigal management-methods, reinforcement, that I think is meant to be used only for training dogs and other animals, and not at work.

    The Police also started bullying me, and told lies, and sent me a letter calling me ‘Miss Erik Ribsskog’, etc.

    So I reported the Merseyside Police, to the IPCC, with 18 complaints about misconduct.

    The Police claimed that the complaint didn’t have any claims of misconduct, or what the term they used was.

    So this file is my appeal, to the IPCC.

    The complaint was upheld, so the IPCC belived my version and not the Police’s.

    Please just contact me if I should explain more, I’m trying to whistleblow about this case, since now, neighter the employment-case or the Police-complaint case is going anywhere.

    Sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

    http://www.scribd.com/doc/12905379/Ipcc-Appeal-Email-5