Stikkord: E-post

Jeg sendte en ny e-post til Slottet

Gmail – Til de tysk-jødiske kongelige

Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>

Til de tysk-jødiske kongelige

Erik Ribsskog

<eribsskog@gmail.com>

Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 4:20 AM

To:
post@slottet.no

Hei,

jeg har skjønt nå, at jeg er etter Løvenbalk og en jumfru av de gamle Lunge’r, så jeg har skjønt det, at det nok er jeg, som er den egentlige kongen av Norge, (eller noe sånt).

Og at dere er de tyske versjonene.

(Noe sånt).

Men noen søker på at Mette-Marit har kontaktet forfatterforeningen om meg.

Det må dere slutte å tulle med.

Jeg vil nå ha tilbake Svalbard, til de norske.

Svalbard skal nå hete johncons-land, og dere kan be statsministeren sende min apanasje til min paypal-konto: eribsskog@gmail.com.

For jeg blir utsultet av den britiske dronningen, her i England, som heller ikke har skjønt det her.

Erik Ribsskog (Baron Adeler og den egentlige kongen av Norge)

mette marit hm.JPG
152K

PS.

Her er vedlegget:

4. november 2012
Jeg sendte en ny e-post til IF
Gmail – Oppdatering/Fwd: Re: SV: VS: Klage paa advokatforeningen/Fwd: Tull med Advokatforeningen/Fwd: Klage paa adv okat Rukke/Fwd: Klage Advokat.no/Fwd: Oppdatering/Fwd: Klage paa surr/Fwd: Klage paa Advoka tfor eningen/Fwd: Hewan Negassi/Fwd: Din henvendelse til Advoka

Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>

Oppdatering/Fwd: Re: SV: VS: Klage paa advokatforeningen/Fwd: Tull med Advokatforeningen/Fwd: Klage paa adv okat Rukke/Fwd: Klage Advokat.no/Fwd: Oppdatering/Fwd: Klage paa surr/Fwd: Klage paa Advoka tfor eningen/Fwd: Hewan Negassi/Fwd: Din henvendelse til Advoka

Erik Ribsskog

<eribsskog@gmail.com>

Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 8:38 PM

To:
kundeservice@if.no

Cc:
Jonas Haugsvold <JoHa@tilsynet.no>, postmottak@fmoa.no, Leder av Jussformidlingen <leder@jussformidlingen.no>, Postmottak@domstoladministrasjonen.no, post@finanstilsynet.no

Hei,

for å gjøre dette mer klart.

(Selv om jeg har sendt dere flere e-poster om dette).

Så kontakter jeg IF siden dere er forsikringsstiller, for advokat Ida Valen Rukke.

Som har tullet med meg, i forbindelse med en omsorgssvikt-sak, mot Svelvik kommune, som jeg fikk Fri Rettshjelp til, av Fylkesmannen i Oslo og Akershus.

Rukke gjorde ikke ferdig saken min, før hu begynte i et nytt firma.

Og jeg blir ikke tilbudt ny advokat, av Advokat.no, som har kuttet meg ut, fordi at jeg klagde på noen forhold rundt prosessen som ledet til at Rukke ble min advokat, hos Advokat.no.

(Jeg ba blant annet om en advokat i Drammen, siden det er nabo-kommunen til Svelvik, men fikk en i Oslo.

Og Rukke stod ikke oppført med barnvern, som spesialfelt, på Advokat.no sine nettsider.

Noe mange av hennes kolleger gjorde.

Så jeg syntes det virka som at Advokat.no hadde tulla med meg da.

Og gikk saken min til en advokat som ikke hadde kunnskaper på området.

Noe jeg også først mistenkte, på kommunikasjonen, fra Rukke.

Siden hu virka litt på jordet da, når hu sendte meg e-poster, sånn som jeg husker det).

Og nå vil ingen andre advokat-firma røre saken.

Enda jeg har sendt dette til firmaer og organisasjoner i Oslo, Drammen og Bergen.

Jeg vil gjerne ha minst en million i erstatning, for det er hva jeg regner med at en tapt oppvekst-sak, vil være verdt, i en norsk rettsal.

(Noe jeg nå ikke får funnet ut).

Jeg har vært på skolebesøk, hos dere, når dere holdt til ovenfor Konserthuset der, i Oslo.

Mens jeg gikk det andre året, på handel og kontor, på Sande Videregående, i 1987/88.

Og jeg skrev også en oppgave om Storebrand sin organisasjon.

Da jeg studerte det andre året, av et kandidat-studie, i informasjonsbehandling, ved NHI, i Oslo, (studieåret 1991/92).

Etter at Hagen-gruppen, (hvor min daværende kamerat Magne Winnem jobbet som butikksjef), ikke ville sende meg organisasjonskartet sitt, siden de var et privat firma, og ikke et børsnotert firma, som de sa.

Jeg har også sett på deres nettsted nå.

Og jeg sendte nesten denne e-posten til deres administrerende direktør og konsernsjef Torbjörn Magnusson.

Men jeg fant bare navnet hans, på deres nettsted, og ikke hans e-post adresse.

Men hvis dere ikke skjønner hvor dere skal sende dette, så kan dere jo sende det til han konsernsjefen.

Så vet sikkert han hvem som jobber med sånne her saker til vanlig.

Jeg vedlegger også, (igjen), et brev fra advokatforeningen, som forklarer mer om denne saken.

(Selv om Advokat.no driver med mye samrøre der, så jeg har hatt nok av den prosessen der, egentlig).

Jeg har også en fetter, Tommy Andre Løff Olsen, som jobber for dere, i Fredrikstad.

Og han har jeg ikke hatt mye å gjøre med, siden barneskolen.

Så jeg vet ikke hvor jeg har han liksom.

Så jeg håper ikke han eller dere tuller med meg nå altså.

For jeg trenger de her pengene, for jeg er arbeidsledig i England, og britene tuller med meg, så jeg har bare 30 pence på kontoen, og nesten ikke noe mat.

Så om dere kan sende mitt erstatningsoppgjør raskt til min PayPal-konto: eribsskog@gmail.com.

Håper dette er i orden!

Mvh.

Erik Ribsskog

PS.

Det var Tilsynsrådet for advokatvirksomhet, som ga med den opplysningen, at dere er forsikringsstiller, for advokat Rukke.

PS 2.

Sender også kopi til Finanstilsynet, siden fetteren min jobber hos dere.

Og jeg ikke er sikker på at ikke han kommer til å tulle med meg, gjennom dere.

Han fikk visst en Audi firmabil, av dere vel, i 2001, ifølge hans far, (og min onkel), Håkon Mogan Olsen.

Og min fetter Tommy Andre Løff Olsen, han svarer ikke hvis jeg prøver å kontakte han nå.

Og hans far og min far, og deres bror, Runar Mogan Olsen, og hans sønn Ove Olsen, de har sagt at jeg er en person non gratia, siden de ikke liker min blogg, eller noe.

Så jeg sender også til Finanstilsynet, siden jeg ikke er sikker på at disse ikke vil forsøke på noe vendetta-greier gjennom jobben til min fetter, liksom.

Hvis han fikk en Audi av dere, i 2001, så kan han jo være høyt oppe hos dere nå, for alt hva jeg vet.

———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

Date: 2012/11/1
Subject: Re: Re: SV: VS: Klage paa advokatforeningen/Fwd: Tull med Advokatforeningen/Fwd: Klage paa adv okat Rukke/Fwd: Klage Advokat.no/Fwd: Oppdatering/Fwd: Klage paa surr/Fwd: Klage paa Advoka tfor eningen/Fwd: Hewan Negassi/Fwd: Din henvendelse til Advoka
To: kundeservice@if.no
Cc: Mona Mjøen McKiernan <mmm@advokatforeningen.no>, Postmottak@domstoladministrasjonen.no, Leder av Jussformidlingen <leder@jussformidlingen.no>

Hei,

later du som at du ikke forstår dette?

Dette er jo en klage på advokat Rukke som er forsikret hos IF.

Dere har jo fått flere e-poster hvor jeg forklarer om dette i detalj.

Dere trenger da ikke late som at dere er idioter.

Erik Ribsskog

2012/11/1 <kundeservice@if.no>

Hei

Takk for din henvendelse.

Vi kan desverre ikke bistå deg i denne saken da du ikke er forsikret ved If skadeforsikring.

Ha en fin dag videre.

Mvh If

Vennlig hilsen
for If
Nina Sørby-Pedersen

www.if.no
Telefon: +47980 02400

Vi er flere ansatte som besvarer mail. Hvis du har ytterlige spørsmål i forbindelse med denne saken – vennligst benytt “reply-/svar” tasten og ikke korriger “subject-/emne” feltet

Opprinnelig melding
Hei,

den er grei.

Jeg håper IF sender penger raskt for jeg har bare 30 pence på kontoen min nå, og jeg blir tullet med av britiske myndigheter.

Så de kan sende på paypal: eribsskog@gmail.com.

Og jeg vil gjerne ha minst en million for den tapte oppveksten min.

Og før jeg går tom for strøm, (som må forhåndsbetales her jeg bor, i England), om et par uker.

Igjen takk for hjelp!

Mvh.

Erik Ribsskog

2012/11/1 Jonas Haugsvold

Det vises til din e-post 31.10.2012.

Tilsynsrådet har ikke anledning til å vurdere en eventuell habilitetsproblematikk i denne saken. Dette får du eventuelt ta opp med forsikringsselskapet.

Vennlig hilsen

Jonas Haugsvold

Rådgiver

Tilsynsrådet for advokatvirksomhet
Postboks 720 Sentrum, 0106 Oslo | Rådhusgt. 23
Tlf: 22 00 75 02 | Sentralbord: 22 00 75 00
* post@tilsynet.no þ www.tilsynet.no

Fra: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
Sendt: 31. oktober 2012 15:32
Til: Jonas Haugsvold
Kopi: Mona Mjøen McKiernan; Leder av Jussformidlingen; Postmottak@domstoladministrasjonen.no; kundeservice@if.no
Emne: Re: VS: Klage på advokatforeningen/Fwd: Tull med Advokatforeningen/Fwd: Klage på advokat Rukke/Fwd: Klage Advokat.no/Fwd: Oppdatering/Fwd: Klage på surr/Fwd: Klage på Advokatfor eningen/Fwd: Hewan Negassi/Fwd: Din henvendelse til Advokatforeningen

Hei,

nei jeg har jo sendt om dette, til IF forsikring nå.

Jeg har jo en fetter, som jobber der.

Er det riktig av meg å sende det til IF forsikring da?

Jeg har ikke hatt mye med min fetter Tommy Andre Løff Olsen å gjøre, siden oppveksten.

Han var en nabo, på Bergeråsen, hvor jeg måtte bo alene, fra jeg var ni år.

Jeg er redd for at han vil hjelpe min far og/eller Svelvik kommune, ved å tulle med min erstatningssak, i IF.

Hva er vanlig å gjøre i sånne tilfeller, når man har en inhabil fetter som jobber i forsikringsselskapet?

Mvh.

Erik Ribsskog

2012/10/31 Jonas Haugsvold

Det vises til din e-post av 19.10.2012.

Som tidligere nevnt i vår e-post av 3.9.2012 kan vi ikke bistå deg i denne saken.

Vennlig hilsen

Jonas Haugsvold

Rådgiver

Tilsynsrådet for advokatvirksomhet
Postboks 720 Sentrum, 0106 Oslo | Rådhusgt. 23
Tlf: 22 00 75 02 | Sentralbord: 22 00 75 00
* post@tilsynet.no þ www.tilsynet.no

Fra: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
Sendt: 19. oktober 2012 13:27
Til: Tilsynsrådet for Advokatvirksomhet
Kopi: post@advokatforeningen.no
Emne: Klage på advokatforeningen/Fwd: Tull med Advokatforeningen/Fwd: Klage på advokat Rukke/Fwd: Klage Advokat.no/Fwd: Oppdatering/Fwd: Klage på surr/Fwd: Klage på Advokatforeningen/Fwd: Hewan Negassi/Fwd: Din henvendelse til Advokatforeningen

Hei,

jeg har prøvd å klage på Advokat.no, til Advokatforeningen.

Jeg fikk svar at jeg måtte klage på advokat Rukke.

Og nå, så svarer Advokat.no for advokat Rukke.

Jeg synes dette blir uklart.

Dette blir som noe samrøre, som går over hue på vanlige folk, som meg.

Jeg har ikke lyst til å være med å legitimere den prosessen hos Advokatforeningen mer.

Så jeg sender bare til dere.

Jeg ber om at jeg får erstatning som hvis omsorgssvikt-saken min hadde blitt vunnet i retten.

Jeg har tidligere sendt dere oppdateringer.

Min far lot meg bo alene som barn, uten at kommunen, (Svelvik), brøyt inn.

Jeg fikk noen tusen i Fri Rettshjelp, fra FMOA.

Jeg sendte en e-post til Advokat.no og spurte om å få en advokat i Drammen, siden det er den byen de jobber fra som er nærmest Svelvik.

Jeg fikk istedet advokat Rukke, i Oslo.

Jeg tenkte at det var greit.

Men så senere at hun ikke stod oppført som ekspert på barnevern, noe mange andre advokater hos dem gjorde, på deres nettside.

Da mistet jeg tilliten til Rukke, som jeg heller ikke syntes at fikk gjort noe konstruktivt, for den frie rettshjelpen, min.

Så min klage var at Advokat.no ga saken min til en advokat som ikke var ekspert på feltet.

Senere sier Advokat.no at hun var ekspert.

Men hvorfor opplyste de ikke meg om det før, da?

De sa dette til Advokatforeningen, og ikke til meg.

Og når Rukke sluttet i jobben, uten å gjøre ferdig min sak.

Så fikk jeg ikke tilbud om ny advokat, fra Advokat.no.

Og andre advokatfirma vil ikke røre den saken nå.

Så jeg synes dette kan virke som sabotasje.

Advokat.no virka fiendtlige i sine svar til Advokatforeningen, synes jeg.

De sier at de trodde at jeg ikke ville ha mer med de å gjøre, siden jeg klagde på Rukke.

Så derfor tilbydde de meg ikke ny advokat.

Ok, jeg har jobbet på Rimi.

Hvis en kunde klager på at melka er sur, så tilbyr jeg ikke ny melk, siden jeg regna med at kunden ville begynne å handle på Rema.

Det blir noe goddag mann økseskaft, over det her.

Når jeg vil klage på Advokat.no og ikke får lov.

Og så svarer Advokat.no på klagen, på Rukke.

Da blir det så mye surr og samrøre.

Så da må man nesten være advokat, for å holde tunga rett i munnen, tror jeg.

Dette surret vil ikke jeg være med på.

Så jeg sender dette til Tilsynsrådet for advokatvirksomhet.

Så håper jeg at jeg får erstatning her.

Mvh.

Erik Ribsskog

———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Erik Ribsskog
Date: 2012/9/28
Subject: Tull med Advokatforeningen/Fwd: Klage på advokat Rukke/Fwd: Klage Advokat.no/Fwd: Oppdatering/Fwd: Klage på surr/Fwd: Klage på Advokatforeningen/Fwd: Hewan Negassi/Fwd: Din henvendelse til Advokatforeningen
To: Ernst.Moe@domstol.no
Cc: Jeppe Normann , Mona Mjøen McKiernan , post@tilsynet.no

Hei,

nå er det tull her.

Nå har Advokatforeningen fått meg til å klage på advokaten.

(En klage jeg syntes at ble svakere enn en klage på advokatfirmaet).

Også får jeg et skriv nå, hvor advokat.no sier de ‘eier’ saken.

Hvorfor sier Advokatforeningen at dette går på advokat.

Mens advokatfirmaet sier at de eier saken.

Hvordan dette fungerer har ikke Advokatforeningen forklart for meg, mener jeg.

Jeg vil klage på at dere ikke har fortalt meg at advokatfirmaet liksom eier saken.

Dette har dere ignorert.

For dere vil at jeg skal klage på advokaten.

Mens dere godtar et svar fra advokatfirmaet.

Her er det veldig bakvendt-land fra Advokatforeningen, mener jeg.

Det er som at det bare er tull og tøys og idioti, synes jeg.

Med hilsen,

Erik Ribsskog

PS.

Sender med brev jeg fikk i dag fra Advokatforeningen.

———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Erik Ribsskog
Date: 2012/8/23
Subject: Klage på advokat Rukke/Fwd: Klage Advokat.no/Fwd: Oppdatering/Fwd: Klage på surr/Fwd: Klage på Advokatforeningen/Fwd: Hewan Negassi/Fwd: Din henvendelse til Advokatforeningen
To: Disiplinærnemnden for advokater

Hei,

jeg får klage på advokaten da, siden lederen for Disiplinærnmenden mener at det er riktig.

Jeg har tidligere fått beskjed om at det er greit at jeg sender til dere på e-post siden jeg bor i utlandet, så jeg prøver å skrive klagen i denne e-posten:

1.

Advokat Rukke påtok seg min sak enda hun ikke var ekspert på feltet, (barnevern), og det fantes flere eksperter på feltet barnevern i samme advokatfirma.

(Jeg ble ikke opplyst om at advokat Rukke ikke var ekspert på barnevern, (og at det fantes flere sånne eksperter på samme avdeling som hun jobbet), men jeg fant senere ut om dette, på nettsidene, til Advokat.no.

Jeg henvendte meg til Advokat.no på e-post, og spurte om jeg kunne få en advokat i Drammen, siden Drammens-avdelingen deres, er den avdelingen deres, som ligger nærmest Svelvik kommune, som jeg har en sak mot.

Men jeg ble tilbud Rukke i Oslo.

Jeg svarte at det var vel hipp som happ, om advokaten var i Oslo eller Drammen.

Men jeg ble senere sur da jeg så på nettsidene, til Advokat.no, at denne advokat Rukke ikke var ekspert på barnevern, samtidig som at Advokat.no hadde en drøss advokater som var nettopp ekspert på barnevern.

Da eksploderte jeg nesten, for å si det sånn.

For jeg hadde også min tvil, til hvor effektivt, som Rukke jobbet.

Og når jeg så det at de hadde eksperter på barnevern, som kunne ha gjort jobben mer effektivt, for den Fri Rettshjelp-støtten, som jeg har blitt tildelt, i denne saken, fra Fylkesmannen i Oslo og Akershus, så ble jeg irritert).

2.

Advokat Rukke sluttet i jobben sin, uten å gjøre ferdig saken min, (og uten at jeg ble tilbudt ny advokat av Advokat.no, som jo har flere eksperter på barnevern som jeg har skrevet om, under punkt 1).

Jeg sliter fortsatt med å få ny advokat, til å ta den saken her nå, enda jeg har sendt dette til flere andre advokater i Drammen og Oslo nå, siden jeg fikk e-posten fra Advokat.no om at Rukke hadde sluttet.

Jeg mener at hu burde vel ha gjort ferdig de sakene hu hadde, før hu slutta i jobben.

Og jeg synes også at det minste Advokat.no burde ha gjort, var å tilby meg en ny advokat, med barnevern som ekspert-felt, etter at det stokket seg sånn, på det første forsøket.

Bare si fra til meg hvis det er noe jeg har glemt å forklare om, i denne klagen.

Mvh.

Erik Ribsskog

———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Erik Ribsskog
Date: 2012/8/22
Subject: Re: Klage Advokat.no/Fwd: Oppdatering/Fwd: Klage på surr/Fwd: Klage på Advokatforeningen/Fwd: Hewan Negassi/Fwd: Din henvendelse til Advokatforeningen
To: “Moe, Ernst”
Cc: Merete Smith

Hei,

takk for svar!

Men jeg synes det er en uskikk, at det bare er advokater, som kan klages inn.

Jeg synes at klagen min blir mye svakere, når den rettes mot advokaten.

Dette startet jo da jeg sendte e-post til Advokat.no, og ikke da Advokat.no ga meg den og den advokaten, synes jeg.

Jeg kan forklare:

1.

Advokat.no ga meg en advokat, som ikke var ekspert på det området, som jeg trengte advokat innen.

Enda de hadde flere sånne eksperter, i samme kontorlandskap/adresse.

2.

Den ‘inkompetente’ advokaten slutter, og Advokat.no tilbyr meg ikke ny advokat.

Altså det blir en sterkere klage enn:

1. Advokaten tok på seg mitt oppdrag på tross av at det fantes andre advokater i samme firma med bedre kompetanse på området som min sak gjaldt.

2. Advokaten sluttet i jobben uten å gjøre ferdig min sak.

Her forsvinner jo advokatfirmaets ansvar.

Skal ikke folk beskyttes mot tulling fra advokatfirma da?

Det er svakt at folk ikke blir beskyttet mot tulling fra advokatfirma _også_, synes jeg.

Mvh.

Erik Ribsskog

2012/8/22 Moe, Ernst

Erik Ribskog

Du finner informasjon om klageadgang og fremgangsmåte på advokatforeningens hjemmeside. Der finner du også Regler for god advokatskikk og Advokatforskriften. Det er bare advokater (personer) som kan klages inn for disiplinærorganene.

Mvh

Ernst Moe

Fra: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
Sendt: 22. august 2012 14:05
Til: Moe, Ernst
Kopi: ms@advokatforeningen.no
Emne: Klage Advokat.no/Fwd: Oppdatering/Fwd: Klage på surr/Fwd: Klage på Advokatforeningen/Fwd: Hewan Negassi/Fwd: Din henvendelse til Advokatforeningen

Hei,

jeg fant denne e-post-adressen ved å bruke Google.

ms@advokatforeningen.no klarer visst ikke å gi meg e-post adressen din, så jeg måtte gjøre det sånn.

Jeg vil klage på Advokat.no til Displinærnemden, for jeg synes det er mer hensiktsmessig, enn å klage på en bestemt advokat, i denne saken.

Men noen advokater som ikke sier hva deres rolle er i advokatforeningen/disiplinærnemden, driver å motsier hverandre.

Når det gjelder hvem som skal avgjøre om det er greit å klage på Advokat.no.

En medarbeider skrev at dette er en Disiplinærnemd-avgjørelse.

Jeg vil derfor høre dette fra Disiplinærnemnden og ikke fra folk som bare utgir seg for å representere den.

Kan jeg klage på Advokat.no?

Hvis det er greit, så forklar meg hvordan jeg kan sende klagen.

Mvh.

Erik Ribsskog

———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Erik Ribsskog
Date: 2012/8/22
Subject: Oppdatering/Fwd: Klage på surr/Fwd: Klage på Advokatforeningen/Fwd: Hewan Negassi/Fwd: Din henvendelse til Advokatforeningen
To: ms@advokatforeningen.no

Hei,

i dag fikk jeg et brev fra ei Elisabeth Wille, som sier hun er advokat.

Men det må være ei ‘sabotøse’ som har lest på bloggen min, og tuller, tror jeg.

For jeg har jo sent dette til generalsekretær ms@advokatforeningen.no.

Jeg kan ikke se at vedkommende sabotøse er medlem av Disiplinærnemnden engang.

Nå må dere slutte å tulle!

La meg sende til disiplærnemnden nå.

Og slutt å foreta deres arbeid på maur, (byråkrat)-nivå.

Dette er MI6 og CIA og det som verre er, frykter jeg.

Skjerpings!

Vedlegger brevet det er snakkings om.

Erik Ribsskog

———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Erik Ribsskog
Date: 2012/8/8
Subject: Klage på surr/Fwd: Klage på Advokatforeningen/Fwd: Hewan Negassi/Fwd: Din henvendelse til Advokatforeningen
To: ms@advokatforeningen.no

Hei,

jeg sender denne klagen til generalsekretæren, og satser på at det er riktig.

Jeg har først blitt opplyst om at jeg kan sende på e-post, og så har dette blitt forandret til vanlig post.

Dessuten, jeg prøver å klage på Advokat.no, til Disiplinærnemden.

Men byråkratene stopper klagen.

Den kommer ikke fram dit.

For byråkratene begynner å behandle klagen.

(Noe de selv har sagt de ikke har myndighet til).

Kan du være så snill og se på dette.

Egentlig så hadde jeg tenkt å sende dette, til lederen for Advokatforeningen.

Men jeg fant ikke e-post adressen til lederen deres, på nettsidene deres.

Mvh.

Erik Ribsskog

———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Jeppe Normann
Date: 2012/8/7
Subject: SV: Klage på Advokatforeningen/Fwd: Hewan Negassi/Fwd: Din henvendelse til Advokatforeningen
To: Erik Ribsskog

Alle opplysninger og kontaktinfo til Advokatforeningen finner du på nettet.

Med vennlig hilsen

Jeppe Normann

Advokat ?leder disiplinærutvalget Oslo krets

Fra: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
Sendt: 6. august 2012 16:23
Til: Jeppe Normann
Emne: Re: Klage på Advokatforeningen/Fwd: Hewan Negassi/Fwd: Din henvendelse til Advokatforeningen

Hei,

den er grei.

Men hvem er leder for Advokatforeningen?

Kan jeg være så snill å få e-post adressen til lederen der.

For jeg synes at de ‘fotsoldatene’ hans surrer så mye.

Så det vil jeg gjerne klage på da.

Mvh.

Erik Ribsskog

2012/8/6 Jeppe Normann

Jeg har ikke fått besvart denne tidligere på grunn av ferieavvikling.

Alle klager på advokater skal sendes til advokatforeningen, som ivaretar sekreteriatfunksjonene for disiplinærmyndighetene.

Jeg ber således om at alle henvendelser rettes dit.

Med vennlig hilsen

Jeppe Normann
leder disiplinærutvalget for Oslo Krets

Fra: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
Sendt: 30. juli 2012 13:56
Til: Jeppe Normann
Emne: Klage på Advokatforeningen/Fwd: Hewan Negassi/Fwd: Din henvendelse til Advokatforeningen

Hei,

jeg synes at Advokatforeningen vimser så mye, så jeg klager til leder for Disiplinærnemden, for Oslo.

1. Advokatforeningen sier først at jeg kan sende på e-post, og så sier de at jeg må sende pr. brev.

De kan ikke forandre på det de sier, mener jeg.

2. Advokatforeningen sier at det er Disiplinærnemnden som bestemmer om klagen kan godtas.

Likevel så sier de at jeg ikke kan klage på et advokatkontor.

Jeg mener at her passer det best å klage på advokatkontoret.

Og vil ha en saklig vurdering av klagen, fra Disiplinærnemnden.

Likevel så stopper Advokatforeningen klagen min før den når fram til Disiplinærnemnden.

Så derfor denne e-posten.

Klagen på advokat.no er som følger:

1.

Jeg ba om en advokat i Drammen, og fikk en i Oslo.

Men seinere så fant jeg ut, at denne advokaten ikke var spesialist i barnevernssaker, som min sak gikk på, (jeg fikk Fri Rettshjelp fra Fylkesmannen i Oslo og Akershus).

Advokat.no hadde derimot mange advokater som var spesialister på nettopp barnevern, (så jeg på deres nettsider).

Så dette var som noe helt meningsløst for meg, det blir som at hvis man leverer en bil på verkstedet, også er det elektrikeren som lakkerer bilen.

Da er det noe galt noe sted.

Men da har sikkert sjefen til elektrikeren beordret han å gjøre dette.

Så derfor er klagen på Advokat.no og ikke advokat Rukke.

2.

Da Rukke sluttet i jobben sin, så fikk jeg ikke noe ny advokat av Advokat.no.

De bare kastet meg på dør, så og si.

Jeg synes at både punkt 1 og 2 er brudd på god advokatskikk.

Mvh.

Erik Ribsskog

———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Erik Ribsskog
Date: 2012/7/30
Subject: Re: Hewan Negassi/Fwd: Din henvendelse til Advokatforeningen
To: Disiplinærnemnden for advokater

Hei,

jeg synes dere vingler så mye.

Du skrev i den forrige korrespondansen din at det var Disiplinærnemnden som avgjorde om man godta en klage på et advokatkontor.

Og nå stopper du klagen før den når fram til Dispilinærnemnden.

Dette kalles vimsing, mener jeg.

Det samme når det gjelder e-postene.

Du sa det var greit å sende på e-post, og så sier du at det må sender per brev.

Kan jeg få ta det her med en ‘scafer’ hos dere, som ikke er så stressa?

Jeg vil gjerne ha det her fra øverste hold nå.

Mvh.

Erik Ribsskog

2012/7/30 Disiplinærnemnden for advokater

Det vises til din e-post av 27. juli og vårt brev til deg av 24. juli 2012.

Disiplinærmyndighetene behandler klage på advokat (min understrekning) som skal ha opptrådt i strid med Regler for god advokatskikk eller for øvrig i strid med domstolloven eller annen lov, samt klager over at en advokat har krevd for høyt salær, jf. Advokatforskriftens

§ 5-3 og Behandlingsregler for Advokatforeningens disiplinærutvalg.

Din klage er fortsatt rettet mot advokatfirmaet Advokat.no. Det er, som tidligere opplyst, kun advokater og ikke advokatfirmaer som kan klages inn for disiplinærordningen. Vi kan således ikke registrere din klage på Advokat.no.

Vi gjør for ordens skyld oppmerksom på at i tillegg til eventuelle e-postoversendelser, skal underskrevet klage med bilag sendes i to eksemplarer per post.

Denne tilbakemeldingen kun som e-post.

Med vennlig hilsen

Beate Sundstrøm

advokatassistent DNA ? sekretær / saksbehandler

Disiplinærnemnden for advokater

Kristian Augusts gate 9, 0164 Oslo T 22 03 50 50

Fra: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
Sendt: 27. juli 2012 21:16
Til: Disiplinærnemnden for advokater
Emne: Hewan Negassi/Fwd: Din henvendelse til Advokatforeningen

Hei,

jeg viser til deg/deres brev, som jeg mottok tidligere denne uken.

Jeg synes at i denne saken, så passer det best å rette klagen mot advokatkontoret og ikke advokaten.

Så om Disiplinærnevnden kunne ha kikket på dette.

(Og svart på om det er greit å klage sånn).

Klagen min er som følger, mot Advokat.no:

1.

Jeg ba om en advokat i Drammen, og fikk en i Oslo.

Men seinere så fant jeg ut, at denne advokaten ikke var spesialist i barnevernssaker, som min sak gikk på, (jeg fikk Fri Rettshjelp fra Fylkesmannen i Oslo og Akershus).

Advokat.no hadde derimot mange advokater som var spesialister på nettopp barnevern, (så jeg på deres nettsider).

Så dette var som noe helt meningsløst for meg, det blir som at hvis man leverer en bil på verkstedet, også er det elektrikeren som lakkerer bilen.

Da er det noe galt noe sted.

Men da har sikkert sjefen til elektrikeren beordret han å gjøre dette.

Så derfor er klagen på Advokat.no og ikke advokat Rukke.

2.

Da Rukke sluttet i jobben sin, så fikk jeg ikke noe ny advokat av Advokat.no.

De bare kastet meg på dør, så og si.

Jeg synes at både punkt 1 og 2 er brudd på god advokatskikk.

Sender også kopi til Tilsynsrådet for Advokatvirksomhet, (som en oppdatering), siden jeg har klaget til de også.

Håper dette er i orden!

Mvh.

Erik Ribsskog

PS.

Du har jo tidligere skrevet at det var greit at jeg sendte på e-post, så jeg regner med at det fortsatt gjelder og sender derfor på e-post istedet for per brev i to eksemplarer.

Jeg regner med at dette var en forglemmelse og at dere ikke mente å virke vinglete/uklare.

———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Erik Ribsskog
Date: 2012/7/10
Subject: Re: Din henvendelse til Advokatforeningen
To: Disiplinærnemnden for advokater

Hei,

det høres bra ut, jeg er vant til å ikke alltid få svar, fra Norge, hit til England, så dere er bedre enn mange andre, (inkludert Kunnskapsdepartementet, f.eks. er det jeg først tenker på da).

Min adresse skal være:

Erik Ribsskog

10 Keith Court

Keith Avenue

Liverpool

GB-L4 5XJ

Storbritannia

Igjen takk for svar!

Mvh.

Erik Ribsskog

2012/7/10 Disiplinærnemnden for advokater <
nemnden@jus.no>

Hei,

Det vises til din e-post som ble sendt oss i kopi den 20. juni 2012.

Grunnet ferieavvikling i sekretariatet har vi ikke hatt anledning til å svare på din e-post tidligere. Vi beklager dette.

Til orientering opplyses det om at all korrespondanse til Disiplinærnemnden skal skje pr. post, men grunnet avstand og sen postgang kan vi godta at dine innlegg kun kommer som e-post. Vi ønsker for ordens skyld i denne forbindelse å opplyse om at dersom denne fremgangsmåten ønskes benyttet, vil du selv stå ansvarlig for om eventuelle personlige opplysninger kommer på avveie da e-post ikke er en sikker korrespondanse mellom to parter. Du vil derfor motta svar fra oss per post.

Vi tør be deg opplyse oss om din postadresse slik at svarbrev til deg i forbindelse med nedenstående e-post kan postlegges så snart som mulig.

Med vennlig hilsen
Hewan Negassi

Disiplinærnemnden for advokater

Kristian Augusts gate 9, 0164 Oslo

Fra: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
Sendt: 20. juni 2012 20:57
Til: Mona Mjøen McKiernan
Kopi: Disiplinærnemnden for advokater
Emne: Re: Din henvendelse til Advokatforeningen

Hei,

ok, jeg videresender denne korrespondansen til dem, så får jeg håpe at de tar kontakt.

Også ønsker jeg samtidig å klage på Advokat.no.

Som tidligere nevnt, så ba jeg om en advokat i Drammen, siden dette er den nærmeste store byen, fra Bergeråsen, hvor omsorgssvikten fant sted.

(Etter at jeg ble innvilget Fri Rettshjelp, fra Fylkesmannen i Oslo og Akershus).

Jeg ble tilbudt en advokat i Oslo.

Og jeg tenkte at det var greit.

Men da jeg sjekket nettsidene til Advokat.no nærmere, så så jeg det, at Advokat.no hadde syv advokater i Oslo, som var spesialister på barnevern.

Og selv om min sak er en barnevernssak, (min far lot meg bo alene fra jeg var ni år, og jeg fikk fri rettshjelp til en barnevernssak mot Svelvik kommune).

Så ble jeg gitt en advokat som _ikke_ hadde barnevern som hovedfelt.

Og så, her om dagen, slutter plutselig den advokaten.

Advokat.no skulle jo da selvfølgelig ha tilbudt meg en ny advokat.

Men det gjorde de ikke.

De bare sa at de var ferdig med saken.

Og dette etter at jeg hadde forklart for hun Rukke der, at jeg blir snytt for arv også, og trenger hjelp av en advokat, til å få Tingretten i Larvik, til å ha offentlig skifte, etter min mormor, og fristen der er 26. juni, altså på tirsdag neste uke.

Så at Advokat.no bare sluttet å jobbe med sakene mine, det kan koste meg arven etter min mor, (som døde i 1999), og min mormor som var fra danske kongelige og adelige.

Så jeg synes Advokat.no oppfører seg så besynderlig, at jeg ønsker å klage.

Samtidlig så lurer jeg på hva vitsen er med å klage, for Øvergård fikk bare 2000 i bot, og jeg fikk ingenting i erstatning.

Og dette gjaldt salg av min del av et sameie i Holmsbu, som jeg ville selge for å ha råd til det nevnte offentlige skiftet da.

For meg så virker det som at jeg bare blir systematisk tullet med av norske advokater, (er det mafian som trekker i tråder, jeg har overhørt i 2003 at jeg er forfulgt av dem).

Hvordan skal jeg liksom få ordnet med det offentlige skiftet da.

Hvorfor kan liksom ingen i Norge hjelpe meg med det, nå er det bare noen dager igjen til fristen går ut.

Men Advokatforeningen er så idiotisk organisert at dere ikke gir erstatning til ofre for deres mafia-advokater, og kun gir mindre enn en timelønn i bot til disse mafia-advokatene så det er jo helt håpløst.

Det burde vært som i USA hvor folk får store erstatninger.

Ellers så kommer de aldri av flekken.

Jeg blir litt kvalm her jeg sitter i England av dette mafia-opplegget som foregår i Norge.

Så nå må dere forte dere å gi Advokat.no 2000 i bot, de også.

Hva skal liksom løse seg da, tenker dere?

Dette er jo helt meningsløst egentlig.

Kan dere ikke tilby meg advokathjelp, eller noe, i det minste?

Hvordan skal jeg få ordnet med dette offentlige skiftet hvor fristen går ut 26. juni.

Det kan jo være at den egentlige grunnen til at Advokat.no oppførte seg så besynderlig var for at jeg skulle miste kontrollen over det arveoppgjøret, pga. at en mafia står bak, og trekker i tråder.

Jeg rekker jo ikke nå å få en ny advokat til å ordne med dette.

Så om dere kan ordne med det.

Jeg har skrevet om disse problemene på blogg i tre år nå, og ingen i Norge gjør en dritt, så jeg er rimelig oppgitt, for å si det sånn.

Jeg vet nesten ikke hva jeg skal si.

Erik Ribsskog

2012/6/20 Mona Mjøen McKiernan

Erik Ribsskog,

Vi viser til dine henvendelser av 19.juni 2012, vedrørende klage på advokat Erik Øvergård.

Det fremgår av din henvendelse at du har anket beslutningen fra disiplinærutvalget i tide.

Vi råder vi deg til å ta kontakt med Disiplinærnemnden dersom du ønsker å få vite hvordan det har gått med anken.

Disiplinærnemnden er offentlig oppnevnt nemnd, og hører ikke til Advokatforeningen.
Vi har derfor ikke mulighet til å sjekke hvordan det har gått med anken din.

Disiplinærnemndens kontaktinformasjon er nemnden@jus.no

Vi håper dette var til hjelp.

Med vennlig hilsen
Mona Mjøen McKiernan

ADVOKATFORENINGEN / THE NORWEGIAN BAR ASSOCIATION
Kristian Augusts gate 9, N-0164 Oslo T +47 22 03 50 50 E mmm@advokatforeningen.no
www.advokatforeningen.no www.advokatenhjelperdeg.no

From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
Sent: 19. juni 2012 15:33

To: Mona Mjøen McKiernan
Subject: Re: Din henvendelse til Advokatforeningen

Hei,

jeg anket i tide.

Men problemet er at dere ikke har gjort noe.

Så det er jo skandale.

Erik Ribsskog

brev advokatforeningen november.jpg
272K

PS.

Her er vedlegget:
3. november 2012
Jeg fortsetter å søke på jobber. Denne gang som Shop Manager

Gmail – SHOP MANAGER – LIVERPOOL

Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>

SHOP MANAGER – LIVERPOOL

Erik Ribsskog

<eribsskog@gmail.com>

Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 3:55 PM

To:
hr@greenhalghs.com

Cc:
Melanie Wright <MWright@ingeus.co.uk>

Hi,

I read about this vacancy on the Jobcentre website, and I wanted to please apply for this job.

I’ve been working as a Shop Manager, in Rimi, (owned by ICA and Ahold), in Norway, in three different shops, (Rimi Nylænde, Rimi Kalbakken and Rimi Langhus), from 1998 to 2002.

I had good results, when working as a Shop Manager, I even won a prestigious Shop Management-competition, named ‘Rimi Gullårer’, when I worked as a Shop Manager, at Rimi Langhus, in 2001, and got a pen and a fine letter from Forbes-billonaire and Rimi-founder Stein Erik Hagen.

I also have a degree in IT, from Oslo Univeristy College, after studying there, from 2002 to 2004. And I’ve also studied Information Management, (IT and Business), for two years, at Norwegian College of Information Technology, (NHI), in the late eighties and early nineties.

I attach my CV, and hope to hear back from you!

Yours sincerely,

Erik Ribsskog

CV – Erik Ribsskog.doc
33K

2. november 2012
Jeg sendte en klage til Advokatforeningen

Gmail – Klage

Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>

Klage

Erik Ribsskog

<eribsskog@gmail.com>

Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 3:18 PM

To:
ljt@advokatforeningen.no

Cc:
post@advokatforeningen.no, Jonas Haugsvold <JoHa@tilsynet.no>, Mona Mjøen McKiernan <mmm@advokatforeningen.no>, Leder av Jussformidlingen <leder@jussformidlingen.no>, kundeservice@if.no, Postmottak@domstoladministrasjonen.no

Hei,

jeg viser til deres brev fra 31. oktober, som jeg mottok i dag.

Jeg synes ikke at jeg kan være med å legitimere denne prosessen lenger.

Jeg synes at Advokatforeningen har stått bak et samrøre uten sidestykke i denne saken.

Mellom Rukke og Advokat.no sin eier.

Når det blir så komplisert hvem saken er mot, så er dette en tullesak, og advokater som koser seg med konspirasjon, synes jeg.

Her er advokatforeningen på alle sider og både over og under bordet, mistenker jeg.

Jeg tar nå denne saken med IF.

Og ønsker ikke å ha mer med Advokatforeningen å gjøre.

Erik Ribsskog

brev advokatforeningen november.jpg
272K

PS.

Her er vedlegget:

2. november 2012
Mer om budsjett

Gmail – Wescot Response 49597867 RE: Correspondence Reply

Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>

Wescot Response 49597867 RE: Correspondence Reply

Erik Ribsskog

<eribsskog@gmail.com>

Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 2:26 PM

To:
Contact Us <contactus@wescot.co.uk>

Cc:
client.services@cccs.co.uk

Hi,

ok, I’ll be waiting to hear from you that my debt with you and Captial One has been deleted then.

Thanks for the help with this!

Best regards,

Erik Ribsskog

On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 8:27 AM, Contact Us <contactus@wescot.co.uk> wrote:

02 November 2012

Dear Mr

Ribsskog

Further to your recent email, I am sorry to note there appears to be some confusion over the account. To resolve this and offer a detailed explanation I have
referred the points you have raised to our client and we are currently awaiting an update from them.

I trust the above answers your query and I apologise you had to contact us again to confirm the details.

Yours sincerely

Funmi Olugbenga-Dada

Account Controller

email: contactus@wescot.co.uk

From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2012 3:29 PM
To: Contact Us
Cc: Q&A
Subject: Re: Wescot ResponseRE: Correspondence Reply

Hi,

I have explained that in the e-mail where you have highlighted a sentence in red.

That your partner Capital One told me last year my signature wasn’t mine.

And that you this year have lied about me not replying to your correspondence.

And that you have made me waste my time since your partner Capital One and yourselves haven’t been able to accept my token-payment-offer like other companies like Swalec, DML and United Utilities have accepted, almost a year ago.

This is sabotage, I think.

I suspect you and Capital One have a secret agenda here.

And you really should contact your English-teacher about this.

Because I get anoyed when I have to explain the same again and again.

And it’s a saying you have here in the UK, which says it’s no excuse for ignorance.

So eighter you’re ignorant or slow.

So I think you should perhaps find another job.

Like putting spread on sandwiches, or something like that.

Just an advice.

Best regards,

Erik Ribsskog

On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 3:18 PM, Contact Us <contactus@wescot.co.uk> wrote:

Date 30th October 2012

Dear Mr Ribsskog

Further to your recent email regarding your email below. I acknowledge your comments and would like to confirm that Wescot always attempt to respond with

an explanation or resolution as quickly as possible.

Please advise as to why this account would be deleted, we have no details in regards to a query for this account. If you believe this balance is not due

we would require the full details of dispute on this account. Which would allow us to investigate your query with our client.

Please accept my apologies for any inconvenience you may have been caused whilst contacting us.

Yours sincerely

Ms H Thundercliffe

Accounts Controller

Registered in Scotland No. SC84131, Registered Office: Kyleshill House, 1 Glencairn Street, Saltcoats, Ayrshire KA21 5JT

From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

Sent: 30 October 2012 14:54
To: Contact Us
Subject: Re: Correspondence Reply

Hi,

this about that my debt has been deleted is something I’m still looking forward to hearing from you about.

Perhaps you should ask your old English-teacher for advice as to what my writings meant.

Best regards,

Erik Ribsskog

On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Contact Us <contactus@wescot.co.uk> wrote:

Date 30th October 2012

Dear Mr Ribsskog

Further to your recent email regarding the below account. I acknowledge your comments and would like to confirm that Wescot always attempt to respond with

an explanation or resolution as quickly as possible.

In your email below you have you look forward to hearing that this debt has been deleted. Please could you advise further on this, as we haveno details

in regards to the balance being deleted.

Please accept my apologies for any inconvenience you may have been caused whilst contacting us.

Yours sincereley

Ms H Thundercliffe

Accounts Controller

Registered in Scotland No. SC84131, Registered Office: Kyleshill House, 1 Glencairn Street, Saltcoats, Ayrshire KA21 5JT

From: Erik Ribsskog

[mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

Sent: 19 October 2012 10:40

To: Correspondence Queries
Cc: offers

Subject: Re: Correspondence Reply

Hi,

ok, I don’t think I have gotten their sort-code and account-number.

Do you know this?

I also sent you an update, on Saturday, after the e-mail you replied to now.

I’ll paste that in this e-mail now.

Best regards,

Erik Ribsskog

PS.

Here’s the update e-mail from Saturday:

Hi,

I got a new income and expenditure-form in the post from you today.

From 11/10, with the reference D3/49597867.

I contacted your partned Capital One last automn, regarding my new budget.

I offered you a token-payment-agreement on £1 a month, untill I got a full-time-job.

Capital One told me my signature wasn’t mine, so this process have stalled, since last year.

Now you get back to me.

I’m still unemployed but I’m trying to set a business up, on my spare-time.

And the Jobcentre is ‘messing’ with my jobseekers allowance.

So at the moment, I have to say I don’t have any income.

I could get back to you when I get the jobseekers allowance back.

And then I would offer you the same as last time, £1 a month in token-payments.

I’ve since last year gotten a flat witch was unfurnitured.

So any money I have left after token-payments each month I now buy furniture and other things for the flat with.

And I was going to set up a new budget, when I got a full-time job.

And I’m going to do that.

But I don’t think it’s right that I have to set up a new budget now, because your partner said my signature wasn’t mine, and didn’t accept my new budget, last year.

This has taken so much of my time now, so you should really just delete the debt, I think.

I’m on Ladders, so I have a high income-potential.

All the hours I’ve spent on you and Captial One should add up to arround the debt I owe you, I think.

So I’m looking forward to hearing from you that my debt with you has been deleted!

Hope this is alright!

Best regards,

Erik Ribsskog

On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 10:24 AM, Correspondence Queries <client@cccs.co.uk> wrote:

Good morning Erik,

Thank you for contacting us about Wescot.

To make token payments to Wescot you do not need to fill in a giro slip. All you need is their sort code and account number and also

the Wescot reference number starting with DM or D3. You then need to go into your bank and ask them to send £1 payment to Wescot by bank transfer. They may reject the offer of payment but they won’t reject the £1 payment you send and this will reduce the debt
in time.

If you need any advice then please do not hesitate to call us.

Kind regards

Faye

Correspondence Advisor

From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

Sent: 12 October 2012 16:13
To: Correspondence Queries
Cc: offers
Subject: Re: Update/Fwd: *****7867/Fwd: CCCS

Hi,

thank you for your e-mail!

I’m not paying token-payments at the moment.

Wescot have sent me a budget-form again now.

But as your collegue there have previously told me I don’t have to fill out this form to get token-payments.

It should be enought that I’ve explained about my situation.

I’ve offered Wescot a token-payment-arrangement like a ‘million’ times.

But they haven’t sent me giros or anything.

And this is taking a lot of my time now.

Because I’ve been offering Wescot, (and Capital One), a token-payment-arrangement since last year now.

And all I get are standard letters which tells lies like that I haven’t replied to their letters.

When I’ve sent about a million e-mails to them, which I haven’t gotten replies to.

So I now copy this e-mail to Wescot.

And I hope they’ll send me some giros for the token-payment arrangement of £1 a month now.

Or tell me what information they need from me to set up a direct-debit-agreement.

So I hope this will be sorted now.

Thanks again for the e-mail!

Best regards,

Erik Ribsskog

On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 8:07 AM, Correspondence Queries <client@cccs.co.uk> wrote:

Hello Eric

Thank you for copying us in to the email you have sent to Wescot.

Please try not to worry about the contact you have received as this is a standard procedure for creditors to take. Nelson Guest & Partners are an

internal collections department who work on behalf of Wescot to collect the outstanding balance.

As you have contacted this creditor to advise of your current financial situation and are making token payments, you are doing all you can at this

time. If you receive any further contact regarding this matter, please advise of this.

I hope this is helpful and reassuring.

If you have any queries or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact us on 0845 272 5400. Lines are open 8am to

6pm, Monday to Friday. Email us at
client.services@cccs.co.uk
or go online to www.cccs.co.uk
and follow the links to send us a web mail.

Kind regards

Hannah

Correspondence Advisor

From: Erik Ribsskog

[mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

Sent: 08 October 2012 01:14
To: offers@wescot.co.uk
Cc: Q&A
Subject: Update/Fwd: *****7867/Fwd: CCCS

Hi,

on Saturday I got a letter from Nelson Guest & Partners Solicitiors, witch I attach a scanned copy of.

I’m don’t have the chance to pay 50% of the dept, av the moment, unfortunately.

I’m repeating my offer of a token-payment-arrangement again.

(Which I’ve done many times earlier).

I hope you can ‘stop messing around’ now, (like I think I have to call it), and just accept my token-payment-offer, like the other companies have done.

I don’t understand why you do so much ‘mumbo-jumbo’ surrounding this.

This should be a straight forward tokey-payment agreement.

I hope the CCCS can tell you to stop with your funny letters and just accept my token-payment-agreement, which I have offered you, a million times, (to exaggerate, but anyway).

Captial One even have a football-cup named after you, but you don’t seem to be a serious company.

It’s like being on the candid camera to try get a token-payment-agreement agreed with you.

Erik

———- Forwarded message ———-

From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 3:32 PM
Subject: Re: *****7867/Fwd: CCCS
To: offers <offers@wescot.co.uk>
Cc: Q&A <contactus@cccs.co.uk>

Hi,

it should be D3/49597867, (like I wrote in the subject-line in the e-mail I sent you on 20/9).

I repeat my token-payment offer on £1 a month, like I offer all my other creditors untill I find new employment.

Hope this is alright!

Best regards,

Erik Ribsskog

On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 8:30 AM, offers <offers@wescot.co.uk> wrote:

Good morning,

Please provide the wescot reference beginning with D3 or DM

Kind regards

Rebecca Stearman

Offers Administrator

email:

offers@wescot.co.uk

From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

Sent: 28 September 2012 14:34
To: Correspondence Queries
Cc: offers
Subject: Re: *****7867/Fwd: CCCS

Hi,

thank you for your e-mail!

Yes, I send a copy of this e-mail to Wescot as a reminder of my token-payment-offer, of one pound a month untill I find new employement.

I thought it was like you write here, with the budget-form etc., from when I went to business-school, in the eighties.

Even if that was in Norway, I think business-law is mostly the same in the western world.

Mostly based on old British business-law, if I’m not mistaking.

Thank you very much for the help with this!

The information I sent to Capital One was a new token payment-offer after I had to move to Sunderland for some months last year.

If I remember it right.

I now found a letter on my blog, from Capital One, from 2009, when they also complained about my signature, (so this has happened in both 2009 and 2011), which I attach.

Thanks again for the advice!

Best regards,

Erik Ribsskog

On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 12:37 PM, Correspondence Queries <client@cccs.co.uk> wrote:

Hi Erick

Thank you for your email about your Wescot and Capital One accounts.

If you have concerns over the wording of the letter from Wescot, I would advise you to raise a complaint directly with them.

The complaint procedure can take up to 8 weeks and if you are unhappy with any response they give you, you can raise this further with the financial

ombudsman service.

You don’t need to fill out the budget form that Wescot have sent you. You have advised them that you have already completed a budget with us. Both forms

cover the same areas. If you need a copy of the budget that you completed with us, please let me know as I can send this out to you. The budget can also be sent to Capital One.

I wouldn’t advise you to stop making payments towards the Wescot account. It is in your best interest and benefit that you carry on making a token payment.

It will show that you are willing to pay the account off.

If you don’t make a payment, the creditor can take further action.

I understand you would like to keep the contact in writing but it is also best that you call them to discuss your concerns. This will eliminate any responses

about them not receiving your letters.

You can ask for a Data Access Request from them which will provide you with all the notes made on your account. There may be a charge for this request.

Can you advise me what information you sent to Capital One for them to reject your signature? If your signature hasn’t changed, I would advise you to

contact Capital One and ask for a further explanation, i.e. are they comparing your signature to the signature on the original credit agreement?

Again, you can ask for a Data Access Request to see what has been noted on your account and there may be a charge for this request.

I hope this has been helpful.

If you have any further queries, please contact us on 0845 272 5400, lines are open 8am to 6pm, Monday to Friday, you can email us at

client.service@cccs.co.uk.

Kind regards

Paul Marshall

Correspondence Co-ordinator

From: Erik

[mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

Sent: 26 September 2012 00:05
To: Correspondence Queries
Subject: Re: *****7867/Fwd: CCCS

Hi,

I’ve gone to business-school and letters shouldn’t contain lies even if they are standard letters.

Here it’s obvious that the standard letter is used wrongly.

I’m not making a token-payment here, you haven’t read up.

Please escalate to your line manager.

Regards,

Erik Ribsskog

PS.

And I don’t think it’s a good idea to call these companies.

It’s better to keep the correspondence in writing, so to keep documentation about what has been agreed.

PS 2.

You haven’t commented on that Capital One told me my signature wasn’t mine.

I want to please escalate this to your line-manager.

On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 10:33 AM, Correspondence Queries <client@cccs.co.uk> wrote:

Hi Erik

Thank you for contacting us about your account with Wescot.

Creditors will often send standard collection letters out to you. Standard letters will include certain phrases that may not fit entirely, such as “we have not received a reply”.

Unfortunately even though you are making a token payment we cannot stop creditors from contacting you. You should continue to keep your creditors up to date with your financial situation and offer them the most fair and reasonable offer you can.

It may be best to call your creditors and speak to someone directly. That way all issues can be discussed there and then.

If you have any further questions or need some more advise, you can call us on 0845 272 5400. Lines are open from 8am to 6pm, Monday to Friday. You can also email us at
client.service@cccs.co.uk.

Kind regards

Gurj
Correspondence Advisor

We are altering the way in which we handle your correspondence to ensure we safeguard your personal information at all times.

In order for us to do this we will be making some changes to the way in which we validate your identity.
The next time you contact us, we will require you to provide us with at least 2 pieces of information from the list below:

· Client reference number
· Postal address
· Postcode
· Telephone number
· Email address

Please make sure you provide this information along with your full name on every communication you send to us. If not, we will prompt you for these details and this may delay your reply.

Thank you

The Correspondence Team

We are altering the way in which we handle your correspondence to ensure we safeguard your personal information at all times.

In order for us to do this we will be making some changes to the way in which we validate your identity.

The next time you contact us, we will require you to provide us with at least 2 pieces of information from the list below:

·

Client reference number

·

Postal address

·

Postcode

·

Telephone number

·

Email address

Please make sure you provide this information along with your full name on every communication you send to us. If not, we will prompt you

for these details and this may delay your reply.

Thank you

The Correspondence Team

Follow us on Twitter

http://twitter.com/moneyaware

Like us on Facebook

http://www.facebook.com/moneyaware

Read the MoneyAware blog

http://moneyaware.co.uk

P

Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.

We are altering the way in which we handle your correspondence to ensure we safeguard your personal information at all times.

In order for us to do this we will be making some changes to the way in which we validate your identity.

The next time you contact us, we will require you to provide us with at least 2 pieces of information from the list below:

·

Client reference number

·

Postal address

·

Postcode

·

Telephone number

·

Email address

Please make sure you provide this information along with your full name on every communication you send to us. If not, we will prompt you

for these details and this may delay your reply.

Thank you

The Correspondence Team

We are altering the way in which we handle your correspondence to ensure we safeguard your personal information at all times.

In order for us to do this we will be making some changes to the way in which we validate your identity.

The next time you contact us, we will require you to provide us with at least 2 pieces of information from the list below:

·

Client reference number

·

Postal address

·

Postcode

·

Telephone number

·

Email address

Please make sure you provide this information along with your full name on every communication you send to us. If not, we will prompt you

for these details and this may delay your reply.

Thank you

The Correspondence Team

—–Original Message—–

From: Erik ******* [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
Sent: 20 September 2012 14:41
To: offers
Cc: Q&A
Subject: Your ref: ******7867/Fwd: CCCS

Hi,

I’m refering to your Final Notice-letter from 17/9, which I recieved today.

You there write: ‘but we have not received a replyto our previous correspondence’.

But this isn’t right, I’ve earlier written to you e-mails a lot of times offering a token-payment.

Is this the Candid Camera?

Your partner Capital One also did a practical joke like this, when they told me my signature wasn’t mine last year.

Please stop with the monkey-business, and be serious.

I hope the CCCS can stop your funny bailiff-actions and lies.

Erik ****

———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Q&A <contactus@cccs.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 17:37:39 +0100
Subject: CCCS
To: Erik******** <eribsskog@gmail.com>

Good afternoon

Thank you for your email.

There isn’t anything in the Consumer credit Act that states you must supply these details to a creditor. You can always provide them a copy of the budget and list of creditors that you have done through us.

Regardless of whether they accept the offer or not please continue to make the token payment.

Kind regards

Jonathan

Follow us on Twitter
http://twitter.com/moneyaware

Like us on Facebook
http://www.facebook.com/moneyaware

Read the MoneyAware blog
http://moneyaware.co.uk/

P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.

________________________________

From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
Sent: 19 August 2012 20:59
To: Q&A
Cc: offers@wescot.co.uk
Subject: Problems with Wescot/Fwd: Update/Fwd: Wescot reference:
*******867 (Regarding Capital One-debt).

Hi,

I’ve told Wescot I’m unemployed and have offered them a £1 monthly token-payment untill I find new employment.

(Like I’ve offered my other creditors).

Wescot don’t accept but wants me to fill out an income and expenditure-form.

I can’t remember that you at CCCS have mentioned that I have to fill out a form like that, when I do budget-work.

It’s like they go a bit to close, and this seems unecessary, to me.

What do you think at CCCS about this?

Does the law say that I have to fill out a form like that?

I attach the letter from Wescot.

Yours sincerely,

Erik *******

———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 10:35 PM
Subject: Update/Fwd: Wescot reference: *******867 (Regarding Capital One-debt).
To: offers@wescot.co.uk

Hi,

I got an income and expenditure-form, in the post, from you, earlier this week.

I don’t understand the point in me filling out that form.

I’ve already told you that I’m on budget in co-operation, with the CCCS, and that I only can afford to pay a token-payment, (on £1), untill I find new employment.

So this is my offer.

I don’t understand why you send me this form.

I think is unnessesary paper-work then.

None of my other creditors have sent me a form like that.

They have just accepted my token-payment-offer.

So I hope you can set up a direct debit-agreement, for £1 a month, for this debt.

Hope this is alright!

Best regards,

Erik *********

———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 10:31 AM
Subject: Wescot reference: ******867 (Regarding Capital One-debt).
To: offers@wescot.co.uk

Hi,

I’m refering to your letter from 19/7, which I got in the post today.

I’m currently unemployed, and on a budget in co-operation, with CCCS.

My offer to you is the same as to my other creditors, and that is that I pay a one pound token-payment, each month, until I find new employment.

Hope this is alright!

Yours sincerely,

Erik ********

VISIT OUR WEBSITE AT http://www.cccs.co.uk/
———————————————————————
This email message is intended for the individual to whom it’s addressed
and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If you are
not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use or dissemination
of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this information
in error, please return it to us immediately and delete it from your computer.
The contents or opinions expressed within this email are not intended to
represent the views of CCCS unless specifically stated to be so.
This email is not guaranteed to be free from any computer viruses, although
it has been checked using the Trend Virus Suite. You should check this email
and any attachments for the presence of viruses before downloading any files.
Foundation for Credit Counselling, trading as Consumer Credit Counselling Service (“CCCS”).
Registered Office: Wade House, Merrion Centre, Leeds, LS2 8NG. Registered in England
Company No 2757055. Registered Charity No. 1016630″

VISIT OUR WEBSITE AT

http://www.cccs.co.uk
———————————————————————This email message is intended for the individual to whom it’s addressed
and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If you are
not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use or dissemination

of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this information

in error, please return it to us immediately and delete it from your computer.

The contents or opinions expressed within this email are not intended to

represent the views of CCCS unless specifically stated to be so.

This email is not guaranteed to be free from any computer viruses, although

it has been checked using the Trend Virus Suite. You should check this email
and any attachments for the presence of viruses before downloading any files.

Foundation for Credit Counselling, trading as Consumer Credit Counselling Service (“CCCS”).

Registered Office: Wade House, Merrion Centre, Leeds, LS2 8NG. Registered in England

Company No 2757055. Registered Charity No. 1016630″

Registered in Scotland No. SC84131, Registered Office: Kyleshill House, 1 Glencairn Street, Saltcoats, Ayrshire KA21 5JT
Please consider the environment before printing this email. Wescot, helping to make a difference

Confidentiality Notice. The information in this e-mail is confidential and for use by the addressee(s) only. If you are not the intended recipient (or responsible for delivery
of the message to the intended recipient) please notify us immediately (on 01482 590590 (UK) or
+44 1482 590590 (international)) and delete this message from your computer: you may not copy or forward it, or use or disclose its contents to any other person.

As Internet communications are capable of data corruption, Wescot Credit Services Ltd does not accept any responsibility for changes made to this message after it was sent.Please note that Wescot Credit Services Ltd does not accept any liability or responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan attachments (if any). Opinions and views expressed in this e-mail are those of the sender and may not reflect the
opinions and views of Wescot Credit Services Ltd.

VISIT OUR WEBSITE AT

http://www.cccs.co.uk
———————————————————————This email message is intended for the individual to whom it’s addressed
and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If you are
not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use or dissemination

of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this information

in error, please return it to us immediately and delete it from your computer.

The contents or opinions expressed within this email are not intended to

represent the views of CCCS unless specifically stated to be so.

This email is not guaranteed to be free from any computer viruses, although

it has been checked using the Trend Virus Suite. You should check this email
and any attachments for the presence of viruses before downloading any files.

Foundation for Credit Counselling, trading as Consumer Credit Counselling Service (“CCCS”).

Registered Office: Wade House, Merrion Centre, Leeds, LS2 8NG. Registered in England

Company No 2757055. Registered Charity No. 1016630″

VISIT OUR WEBSITE AT

http://www.cccs.co.uk
———————————————————————This email message is intended for the individual to whom it’s addressed
and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If you are
not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use or dissemination

of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this information

in error, please return it to us immediately and delete it from your computer.

The contents or opinions expressed within this email are not intended to

represent the views of CCCS unless specifically stated to be so.

This email is not guaranteed to be free from any computer viruses, although

it has been checked using the Trend Virus Suite. You should check this email
and any attachments for the presence of viruses before downloading any files.

Foundation for Credit Counselling, trading as Consumer Credit Counselling Service (“CCCS”).

Registered Office: Wade House, Merrion Centre, Leeds, LS2 8NG. Registered in England

Company No 2757055. Registered Charity No. 1016630″

Registered in Scotland No. SC84131, Registered Office: Kyleshill House, 1 Glencairn Street, Saltcoats, Ayrshire KA21 5JT
Please consider the environment before printing this email. Wescot, helping to make a difference

Confidentiality Notice. The information in this e-mail is confidential and for use by the addressee(s) only. If you are not the intended recipient (or responsible for delivery of the message to
the intended recipient) please notify us immediately (on 01482 590590 (UK) or
+44 1482 590590
(international)) and delete this message from your computer: you may not copy or forward it, or use or disclose its contents to any other person.

As Internet communications are capable of data corruption, Wescot Credit Services Ltd does not accept any responsibility for changes made to this message after it was sent. Please note thatWescot Credit Services Ltd does not accept any liability or responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan attachments (if any). Opinions and views expressed in this e-mail are those of the sender and may not reflect the opinions and views
of Wescot Credit Services Ltd.

Registered in Scotland No. SC84131, Registered Office: Kyleshill House, 1 Glencairn Street, Saltcoats, Ayrshire KA21 5JT
Please consider the environment before printing this email. Wescot, helping to make a difference

Confidentiality Notice. The information in this e-mail is confidential and for use by the addressee(s) only. If you are not the intended recipient (or responsible for delivery of the message to
the intended recipient) please notify us immediately (on 01482 590590 (UK) or
+44 1482 590590
(international)) and delete this message from your computer: you may not copy or forward it, or use or disclose its contents to any other person.

As Internet communications are capable of data corruption, Wescot Credit Services Ltd does not accept any responsibility for changes made to this message after it was sent. Please note thatWescot Credit Services Ltd does not accept any liability or responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan attachments (if any). Opinions and views expressed in this e-mail are those of the sender and may not reflect the opinions and views
of Wescot Credit Services Ltd.

Registered in Scotland No. SC84131, Registered Office: Kyleshill House, 1 Glencairn Street, Saltcoats, Ayrshire KA21 5JT

Please consider the environment before printing this email. Wescot, helping to make a difference

Confidentiality Notice. The information in this e-mail is confidential and for use by the addressee(s) only. If you are not the intended recipient (or responsible for delivery of the message to the intended recipient)
please notify us immediately (on 01482 590590 (UK) or +44 1482 590590 (international)) and delete this message from your computer: you may not copy or forward it, or use or disclose its contents to any other person.

As Internet communications are capable of data corruption, Wescot Credit Services Ltd does not accept any responsibility for changes made to this message after it was sent. Please note that Wescot Credit Services Ltd
does not accept any liability or responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan attachments (if any). Opinions and views expressed in this e-mail are those of the sender and may not reflect the opinions and views of Wescot Credit Services
Ltd.

2. november 2012
Jeg sendte en ny e-post til Twitter

Gmail – #6492227 Twitter Support: update on “Offensive content – BaronAdelerSays”

Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>

#6492227 Twitter Support: update on “Offensive content – BaronAdelerSays”

Erik Ribsskog

<eribsskog@gmail.com>

Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 9:10 PM

To:
Twitter Support <support+id6492227@twitter.zendesk.com>

Hi,

what’s clear here is that you don’t know the meaning of the word ‘escalate’.

Buy a dictionary please.

Erik Ribsskog

On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 7:47 PM, FlynnJackson <notifications-support@twitter.zendesk.com> wrote:

##- Please type your reply above this line -##

FlynnJackson, Nov 01 12:47 pm (PDT): Hello,
After reviewing the account, it is clear that this account is engaged in parody and is therefore not in violation of the Twitter Rules (https://twitter.com/rules).
Parody impersonation accounts are allowed to exist on Twitter. For more information on Twitter’s parody guidelines, please see the following support page:
https://support.twitter.com/articles/106373
Thanks,

FlynnJackson
Twitter Trust & Safety

johncons, Oct 31 06:09 pm (PDT):

Hi,
you don’t seem to have any real understanding of the problem here.
Could you please escalate?
Best regards,
Erik Ribsskog

FlynnJackson, Oct 31 01:04 pm (PDT): Hello,
We understand that everyone has different levels of sensitivity towards content, and that you may feel uncomfortable with the posted content. However, Twitter provides a communication platform, and users may use our service to discuss controversial subject matter.

Here are some quick tips to help you with your situation:
* Do not respond to the user. We have found overwhelmingly that responding to a user who is intentionally attempting to aggravate you encourages that user to continue their behavior.
* Block the user. You can block the user using the blocking feature described here: https://support.twitter.com/entries/117063
* Learn more about how to deal with abusive users: https://support.twitter.com/articles/15794
If you believe the content or behavior you are reporting is prohibited in your local jurisdiction, please contact your local authorities so they can accurately assess the content or behavior for possible violations of local law. If Twitter is contacted directly by law enforcement, we can work with them and provide assistance for their investigation as well as guidance around possible approaches. You can point local law enforcement to our Law Enforcement Guidelines here: https://support.twitter.com/articles/41949.
Please note that we need to make sure we are in contact with the person directly involved or someone legally authorized to act on their behalf. It’s a strict policy, and we have it in place to prevent false or unauthorized reports. We’ll help the individual as soon as we receive an authorized report from them or their representatives. If you are in contact with the subject of the account, you should ask them to file a ticket.
If you’re concerned for your physical safety, please contact your local authorities for further assistance. Please let us know if you believe the behavior has escalated or otherwise violates our rules.
Thanks,
@FlynnJackson
Twitter Trust & Safety

johncons, Oct 30 10:45 am (PDT): How can we help?: Offensive content
Reported user: @BaronAdelerSays
Offensive Tweet: https://twitter.com/BaronAdelerSays/status/122590128697913344
Text of Tweet: Are the Police using corporal punishment, and are they calling the manager Nel, (instead of me), to give him a chance of flirting with me?
Tweet time: Oct 08 2011 08:32:18 via web
What are you reporting?: This user is saying really offensive things, but is not sending me @replies.
Blocked user(s): Yes
How long ago did this begin?: More than a month ago
How many times has this happened?: Around a houndred times, I guess.
Further description of problem: This Twitter-profile is selecting quotes from my blog, to make me look dum.
They’ve stopped updating a year ago.
They also use an ugly picture of me, which I have the copyright to.
And they use some ‘scary’ colors to make me look miserable.
I guess this is also impersonation.
Since it says ‘Sunderland’, where I lived a year ago.
I now live in Liverpool, and think this probably is an evil atempt to damage my reputation.
I’ve also sent you a lot of harassment and impersonation-reports, in the last years.
So it’s some kind of hate-campaign going on against me, it seems.
I haven’t seen this Twitter-page before today, so that’s why I use a long time reporting it.
Your full name: Erik Ribsskog
I understand that Twitter may provide third parties, such as the affected user, with a copy of this report.
Twitter username: @johncons
Email address: eribsskog@gmail.com

Message-Id:MJFJQZVT_5092d1d949462_746513e627c64514f8_sprut

1. november 2012

Jeg sendte enda en e-post til Liverpool City Council

Gmail – Update/Fwd: To: R Williams, Benefit Officer – Ref: 10055749/Fwd: Form/Fwd: New update/Fwd: Update/Fwd: Complaint

Gmail

Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>

Update/Fwd: To: R Williams, Benefit Officer – Ref: 10055749/Fwd: Form/Fwd: New update/Fwd: Update/Fwd: Complaint

Erik Ribsskog

<eribsskog@gmail.com>

Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 7:16 PM

To:
benefits.service@liverpooldirectlimited.co.uk

Hi,

I resend this e-mail, (to R Williams), since I got an e-mail from you that it was to many attachments, the first time I sent this e-mail.

I now send it again with a bit fewer attachments, and hope this works.

Hope this is alright!

Yours sincerely,

Erik Ribsskog

———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

Date: Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 6:16 PM
Subject: To: R Williams, Benefit Officer – Ref: 10055749/Fwd: Form/Fwd: New update/Fwd: Update/Fwd: Complaint
To: benefits.service@liverpooldirectlimited.co.uk
Cc: CONTACT-US <CONTACT-US@dwp.gsi.gov.uk>, Melanie Wright <MWright@ingeus.co.uk>, hv-02.kontakt@mil.no, DWP ICE gateway team <ice@dwp.gsi.gov.uk>, mail.gva@efta.int, billing@spexhost.com, “emb.london” <emb.london@mfa.no>

Hi,

I’m refering to your letter from 30/10 which I recieved today.

You write that I have two small businesses.

These are really hobbies, like the Jobcentre have called them earlier.

The first hobby-business, is a couple of years old, and is both a small web-shop, which works, but it’s also to have an online portifolio, when I apply for Web Design-jobs, since I’m unemployed and a full-time jobseeker.

So these hobby-businesses are something I do on my spare-time.

The second hobby-business are books I’ve written about my life in Norway, before I had to go as a refugee to the UK.

But these royalites aren’t that much.

Like this month I didn’t get any income, since I didn’t sell enough books, to get over the payment-threshold, of ten dollars, which CreateSpace/Amazon have for self-publised books.

So I’m not full-time self-employed, like the Jobcentre seem to think.

They haven’t sent me my Jobseekers Allowance, for more than two months, even if I’ve showed them the book-keeping for these hobby-businesses.

They are perhaps infected by some communists or Al Quaida or something, and mess with me.

Who knows.

I hope it’s enought that I send you, (again), the book-keeping, for these two hobby-businesses.

I also forward this e-mail to a lot of organisations to warn about that there’s something wrong at the Jobcentre, it seems.

Please just contact me if there’s something I’ve forgotten to explain about.

Best regards,

Erik Ribsskog

———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

Date: Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 8:56 PM
Subject: Form/Fwd: New update/Fwd: Update/Fwd: Complaint
To: Contact-Us@jobcentreplus.gsi.gov.uk
Cc: CONTACT-US <CONTACT-US@dwp.gsi.gov.uk>, Melanie Wright <MWright@ingeus.co.uk>, hv-02.kontakt@mil.no, DWP ICE gateway team <ice@dwp.gsi.gov.uk>, mail.gva@efta.int, billing@spexhost.com, “emb.london” <emb.london@mfa.no>, benefits.service@liverpooldirectlimited.co.uk

Hi,

I attached the earlier mentioned form and also the book-keeping for my two, small businesses.

You write in your letter from 5/9 that I should advice you as soon as possible if I have not yet recieved any pay from my businesses.

That’s right, these businesses run a bit in minus yet, so I have still not recieved any payment from any of these two businesses.

Also, I think I should add that my web-shop have been attacked a lot.

It has been hacked a lot and also hi-jacked from One, (by e-mailing them a hoax-e-mail).

And it has even been ridiculed on a TV-programme called Tweet 4 Tweet, about the internet, on the ‘Norwegian BBC’, that’s NRK 3.

So that’s why it has sold less lately, I guess, due to bad publicity, towards this litle business, on state television, in Norway.

I have no idea why I’m being attacked this much, but I’m more or less a refugee, from Norway, having heard there I’m followed by the ‘mafian’, in 2003, and I was the viction of a murder-atempt, in 2005, but Police don’t investigate, for some reason.

Also, the UK have almost doubled the postage for packs like I send to Norway, this spring.

So I’ve had to raise prices, which isn’t good for the turn-over.

And I depend on a high turn-over if this business is going to be succesfull.

But good marketing could still make it sucessful, I think.

So I haven’t given up.

I also refer to the web-shop(s), (I have one for Norway, one for the UK etc., since I’ve made my own design, since osCommerce was hacked so much, so I’ve made my own, ‘hacker-proof’ design, witch is in HTML, which can’t be hacked, I think), in my cover-letters.

Since I’m an IT-graduate, I apply for Web Design jobs and other IT-jobs.

Then one almost really have to have a portifolio, because employers ask to see your work.

And that’s why I accept to lose like £10 a month on my web-shops, because they are also my web-design-portifolio.

Hope that makes sense.

Latetely I’ve also started self-publishing.

I’ve had a blog for five years, and have a lot of material on my blog.

And some of the material is well suited for being published as books, I think.

So I’ve started publishing some old blog-material as books.

But that’s something that I’ve quite recently started with.

The web-shop was my first business.

Please just ask me if there is anything I should explain more about on the form, etc.

Ingeus, (Mary Stevenson), in Sunderland, told me to do book-keeping for my web-shops.

Mark, at the Jobcentre, in Williamsson Sq., has told me the web-shop was a hobby.

And the Jobcentre have put me on the Work Programme, even if I’ve had this web-shop.

I have been in several meetings with the Jobcentre in Sunderland, and Ingeus in Sunderland and Liverpool regarding if I should have really been on a self-employment-programme ran by the Jobcentre.

Rather than being on the Work Programme.

Since Ralph at Elect, in Liverpool has told me the Work Programme has no founds for marketing.

Even if Sencia mentioned they could give me founds for marketing, when I was on the Sencia-programme.

But then my web-shop was so much attacked by hackers, so I didn’t want to advertice for an unstable business.

No, with my new design, (which I’ve contacted patent-offices about, since it’s a click-shop using Javascript, which is inituive, I think, and could be used in other web-shops as well, I think. And this invetion, is my own invention, which I made in 2011, I think it must have been, when I made my own web-shop-solution, after all the attacks on the osCommerce web-shop).

So there’s also my invention, (the click-shop), in this.

I please don’t want to lose the rights for this invention, which could hopefully be sold to other people who want’s to start web-shops, possibly at least, I hope.

So I think there are possibilities here.

Now the web-shop is stable and ready to be broader marketed, I think.

I hope to find some Jobcentre-programme, or job-cafes, like the Jobcentre adviced me about, which have founds for this broad marketing.

But at the moment I have no money, so I don’t understand why you’ve stopped a payment I’ve signed for.

Because this is just part-time-jobs, which I spend 5-10 hours a week running.

Hope this is alright!

Yours sincerely,

Erik Ribsskog

———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

Date: Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 1:28 PM
Subject: New update/Fwd: Update/Fwd: Complaint
To: Contact-Us@jobcentreplus.gsi.gov.uk
Cc: CONTACT-US <CONTACT-US@dwp.gsi.gov.uk>, Melanie Wright <MWright@ingeus.co.uk>, hv-02.kontakt@mil.no, DWP ICE gateway team <ice@dwp.gsi.gov.uk>, mail.gva@efta.int, billing@spexhost.com, “emb.london” <emb.london@mfa.no>, benefits.service@liverpooldirectlimited.co.uk

Hi,

I’m refering to your letter, from 5/9, which I received today.

The work I did, (on the mentioned forms), was only a few hours.

When I went to sign on, at the Jobcentre, four weeks ago, on Thursday.

I wasn’t allowed to sign on.

But I had to have a ‘funny un-scheduled meeting’, (I’d call it), first.

Which I didn’t get to prepare for, at home.

In this meeting I informed that on my two, small businesses, I worked _less_ than 16 hours a week.

(Since this was some kind of limit, I was told).

I also informed that my businesses ran in minus.

And that I didn’t earn any money on them yet.

You say a letter was generated on 28/8.

I got a letter on Friday, last week.

That’s 7/9.

How can the letter use this long time?

And how the sanction started on 17/8.

How can you send a letter about that, on 28/8?

That’s something to complain about I think.

Because in the meeting I was told I would sign as usual, untill I heard from you.

But this hasn’t happened.

I signed on, on Thursday, two weeks ago, on Thursday.

But I didn’t get any money on Tuesday, last week.

So I had a protest, on Thursday last week.

And got the generated, (and very slow), letter, on Friday, last week.

How can you inform about a desition almost a month after the desition is made?

It should be the other way around, I think.

Inform about the desition in advance.

This is a business, that I’ve had for two years now.

And the Jobcentre have previously called it a ‘hobby’.

Now I have no money.

I’m going to read the form, and try to understand how to get money.

Should I apply for Income Benefit, since I have no income yet, from these two, small businesses.

Maybe next year, or something, I can get some income from them.

Thanks in advance for a reply regarding this.

I’ll also try to get the form sent back later today.

Best regards,

Erik Ribsskog

———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

Date: Sat, Sep 8, 2012 at 12:37 PM
Subject: Update/Fwd: Complaint
To: Contact-Us <Contact-Us@jobcentreplus.gsi.gov.uk>
Cc: CONTACT-US <CONTACT-US@dwp.gsi.gov.uk>, Melanie Wright <MWright@ingeus.co.uk>, hv-02.kontakt@mil.no, DWP ICE gateway team <ice@dwp.gsi.gov.uk>, mail.gva@efta.int, billing@spexhost.com, “emb.london” <emb.london@mfa.no>, benefits.service@liverpooldirectlimited.co.uk

Hi,

today I got a new letter from you, (which I attach).

You tell me to post some forms for you, but no forms were enclosed.

I don’t have money for printer-ink or postage since I didn’t get the payment on Tuesday, (which I signed for last week).

Can I go to the Jobcentre in Edge Lane, (where I used to go when I lived in Fairfield, earlier this year), and fill out the forms?

You say I have to send the forms no later than five days after my sign-in-day.

But my sign-in-day was Thursday last week, and that’s already more than five days ago, today, and I got your letter today.

I also think it’s like the Jobcentre have tried to trigger a reaction from me, (like I write in my e-mail yesterday), since you just stop sending my Jobseekers Allowance from 17/8.

You should have told me this well in advance of 17/8 then.

But you tell me this on 7/8.

I would please like to you to have a look at that fact, in case you forget it in all the other information here.

Because if you inform about decitions almost a month later, then people are going to be misarable, and desperate, because they aren’t going to understand anything, and they are going to be hungry, and worry about how to pay their bills, to get money for food, etc.

And they are going to feel humiliated.

I don’t it should be necessary to explain this.

Because it’s well known that people need food, etc.

So I wanted to please complain about this again.

So if you could send me the missing payment as soon as possible please, and also the relevant forms, (which I didn’t get with your letter today), then I’ll buy stamps, and send the forms back as soon as possible.

Thanks in advance for any help with this!

Yours sincerely,

Erik Ribsskog

———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

Date: Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 1:23 PM
Subject: Complaint
To: Contact-Us <Contact-Us@jobcentreplus.gsi.gov.uk>
Cc: CONTACT-US <CONTACT-US@dwp.gsi.gov.uk>, Melanie Wright <MWright@ingeus.co.uk>, hv-02.kontakt@mil.no, DWP ICE gateway team <ice@dwp.gsi.gov.uk>, mail.gva@efta.int, billing@spexhost.com, “emb.london” <emb.london@mfa.no>, Liverpool Direct <liverpool.direct@liverpool.gov.uk>

Hi,

I’m refering to your letter of 3/9 which I got in the post today.

First I want to complain that I’ve gotten a lot of grey hairs due to your lack of communication, the last couple of days.

I signed for a payment on Thursday last week, at the Jobcentre in Aintree.

So I should have gotten that payment on Tuesday, but I didn’t get it, so now I have no money.

My agreement with the Jobcentre in Aintree was that I would hear from Birkenhead and then we would take it from there.

But you have broken that agreement.

Because I was going to sign on as usual, in the mean-time.

But you messed with a payment in the meantime.

So that means you have broken an agreement and been doing fraud, (I think I have to say), and made me not get food, and made me get a lot of new grey hair, and you also made me have a protest due to the missing payment/fraud, yesterday.

You don’t seem to take people serious.

It’s really no change in my income.

I don’t get any income from my two small businesses, since they don’t earn money yet.

So this is really just dumb.

I’ve been told at the Jobcentre in Williamsson Sq., a couple of years ago, that there is no limit on how long I can claim Jobseekers Allowance.

I asked about this since I was curious due to the Finance Crises.

But now you write about the tax-years 2006 and 2007.

I worked at Arvarto, (first for Randstand and then for Arvato), from 2005 to 2006.

And then as self-employed untill 2008.

So I have been working for many years in the UK.

So I have the right to Jobseekers Allowance like I’m from the EU, I’ve been told by EFTA.

What I am supposed to do now?

Your missing payment have left me with no money, and I have no income from my two businesses.

You punish me for showing initiative, and try to start businesses, I think.

My food and electricity is soon running out.

What am I supposed to do?

How can you make mistakes like this?

Erik Ribsskog

12 attachments

web shop december 2011.jpg
412K

january 2012 detailed.jpg
414K

january 2012 balance.jpg
358K

february 2012.jpg
498K

march 2012.jpg
502K

april 2012.jpg
451K

may 2012.jpg
456K

june 2012.jpg
362K

july 2012.jpg
338K

august 2012.jpg
311K

book keeping book publishing august (march to august) 2012.jpg
401K

brev lcc.jpg
402K

1. november 2012

Jeg sendte en e-post til the Jobcentre

Gmail – To: Laura Murphy, Income Management Officer/Fwd: To: R Williams, Benefit Officer – Ref: 10055749/Fwd: Form/Fwd: New update/Fwd: Update/Fwd: Complaint

Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>

To: Laura Murphy, Income Management Officer/Fwd: To: R Williams, Benefit Officer – Ref: 10055749/Fwd: Form/Fwd: New update/Fwd: Update/Fwd: Complaint

Erik Ribsskog

<eribsskog@gmail.com>

Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 6:54 PM

To:
Contact-Us <Contact-Us@jobcentreplus.gsi.gov.uk>, CONTACT-US <CONTACT-US@dwp.gsi.gov.uk>

———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

Date: Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 6:53 PM
Subject: To: Laura Murphy, Income Management Officer/Fwd: To: R Williams, Benefit Officer – Ref: 10055749/Fwd: Form/Fwd: New update/Fwd: Update/Fwd: Complaint
To: csc@lht.co.uk

Hi,

I’m refering to your letter from 24/10, which I recieved today.

I’m forwarding you an e-mail which I sent to the Council today, to update you about the situation with the Housing Benefit.

I also attach a letter from the Council, which I got today, regarding this.

The Jobcentre now owes me more than £700 in Jobseekers Allowances, (five missing forthnightly payments).

But I’m working a lot with trying to get this solved, and I contact them about this every day, or so.

So I hope it’s going to be solved as soon as possible.

I also copy this e-mail to the Jobcentre, so perhaps they understand that I need my Jobseekers Allowance to make my budget go around, at the moment.

Hope this is alright!

Yours sincerely,

Erik Ribsskog

———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

Date: Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 6:16 PM
Subject: To: R Williams, Benefit Officer – Ref: 10055749/Fwd: Form/Fwd: New update/Fwd: Update/Fwd: Complaint
To: benefits.service@liverpooldirectlimited.co.uk
Cc: CONTACT-US <CONTACT-US@dwp.gsi.gov.uk>, Melanie Wright <MWright@ingeus.co.uk>, hv-02.kontakt@mil.no, DWP ICE gateway team <ice@dwp.gsi.gov.uk>, mail.gva@efta.int, billing@spexhost.com, “emb.london” <emb.london@mfa.no>

Hi,

I’m refering to your letter from 30/10 which I recieved today.

You write that I have two small businesses.

These are really hobbies, like the Jobcentre have called them earlier.

The first hobby-business, is a couple of years old, and is both a small web-shop, which works, but it’s also to have an online portifolio, when I apply for Web Design-jobs, since I’m unemployed and a full-time jobseeker.

So these hobby-businesses are something I do on my spare-time.

The second hobby-business are books I’ve written about my life in Norway, before I had to go as a refugee to the UK.

But these royalites aren’t that much.

Like this month I didn’t get any income, since I didn’t sell enough books, to get over the payment-threshold, of ten dollars, which CreateSpace/Amazon have for self-publised books.

So I’m not full-time self-employed, like the Jobcentre seem to think.

They haven’t sent me my Jobseekers Allowance, for more than two months, even if I’ve showed them the book-keeping for these hobby-businesses.

They are perhaps infected by some communists or Al Quaida or something, and mess with me.

Who knows.

I hope it’s enought that I send you, (again), the book-keeping, for these two hobby-businesses.

I also forward this e-mail to a lot of organisations to warn about that there’s something wrong at the Jobcentre, it seems.

Please just contact me if there’s something I’ve forgotten to explain about.

Best regards,

Erik Ribsskog

———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

Date: Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 8:56 PM
Subject: Form/Fwd: New update/Fwd: Update/Fwd: Complaint
To: Contact-Us@jobcentreplus.gsi.gov.uk
Cc: CONTACT-US <CONTACT-US@dwp.gsi.gov.uk>, Melanie Wright <MWright@ingeus.co.uk>, hv-02.kontakt@mil.no, DWP ICE gateway team <ice@dwp.gsi.gov.uk>, mail.gva@efta.int, billing@spexhost.com, “emb.london” <emb.london@mfa.no>, benefits.service@liverpooldirectlimited.co.uk

Hi,

I attached the earlier mentioned form and also the book-keeping for my two, small businesses.

You write in your letter from 5/9 that I should advice you as soon as possible if I have not yet recieved any pay from my businesses.

That’s right, these businesses run a bit in minus yet, so I have still not recieved any payment from any of these two businesses.

Also, I think I should add that my web-shop have been attacked a lot.

It has been hacked a lot and also hi-jacked from One, (by e-mailing them a hoax-e-mail).

And it has even been ridiculed on a TV-programme called Tweet 4 Tweet, about the internet, on the ‘Norwegian BBC’, that’s NRK 3.

So that’s why it has sold less lately, I guess, due to bad publicity, towards this litle business, on state television, in Norway.

I have no idea why I’m being attacked this much, but I’m more or less a refugee, from Norway, having heard there I’m followed by the ‘mafian’, in 2003, and I was the viction of a murder-atempt, in 2005, but Police don’t investigate, for some reason.

Also, the UK have almost doubled the postage for packs like I send to Norway, this spring.

So I’ve had to raise prices, which isn’t good for the turn-over.

And I depend on a high turn-over if this business is going to be succesfull.

But good marketing could still make it sucessful, I think.

So I haven’t given up.

I also refer to the web-shop(s), (I have one for Norway, one for the UK etc., since I’ve made my own design, since osCommerce was hacked so much, so I’ve made my own, ‘hacker-proof’ design, witch is in HTML, which can’t be hacked, I think), in my cover-letters.

Since I’m an IT-graduate, I apply for Web Design jobs and other IT-jobs.

Then one almost really have to have a portifolio, because employers ask to see your work.

And that’s why I accept to lose like £10 a month on my web-shops, because they are also my web-design-portifolio.

Hope that makes sense.

Latetely I’ve also started self-publishing.

I’ve had a blog for five years, and have a lot of material on my blog.

And some of the material is well suited for being published as books, I think.

So I’ve started publishing some old blog-material as books.

But that’s something that I’ve quite recently started with.

The web-shop was my first business.

Please just ask me if there is anything I should explain more about on the form, etc.

Ingeus, (Mary Stevenson), in Sunderland, told me to do book-keeping for my web-shops.

Mark, at the Jobcentre, in Williamsson Sq., has told me the web-shop was a hobby.

And the Jobcentre have put me on the Work Programme, even if I’ve had this web-shop.

I have been in several meetings with the Jobcentre in Sunderland, and Ingeus in Sunderland and Liverpool regarding if I should have really been on a self-employment-programme ran by the Jobcentre.

Rather than being on the Work Programme.

Since Ralph at Elect, in Liverpool has told me the Work Programme has no founds for marketing.

Even if Sencia mentioned they could give me founds for marketing, when I was on the Sencia-programme.

But then my web-shop was so much attacked by hackers, so I didn’t want to advertice for an unstable business.

No, with my new design, (which I’ve contacted patent-offices about, since it’s a click-shop using Javascript, which is inituive, I think, and could be used in other web-shops as well, I think. And this invetion, is my own invention, which I made in 2011, I think it must have been, when I made my own web-shop-solution, after all the attacks on the osCommerce web-shop).

So there’s also my invention, (the click-shop), in this.

I please don’t want to lose the rights for this invention, which could hopefully be sold to other people who want’s to start web-shops, possibly at least, I hope.

So I think there are possibilities here.

Now the web-shop is stable and ready to be broader marketed, I think.

I hope to find some Jobcentre-programme, or job-cafes, like the Jobcentre adviced me about, which have founds for this broad marketing.

But at the moment I have no money, so I don’t understand why you’ve stopped a payment I’ve signed for.

Because this is just part-time-jobs, which I spend 5-10 hours a week running.

Hope this is alright!

Yours sincerely,

Erik Ribsskog

———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

Date: Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 1:28 PM
Subject: New update/Fwd: Update/Fwd: Complaint
To: Contact-Us@jobcentreplus.gsi.gov.uk
Cc: CONTACT-US <CONTACT-US@dwp.gsi.gov.uk>, Melanie Wright <MWright@ingeus.co.uk>, hv-02.kontakt@mil.no, DWP ICE gateway team <ice@dwp.gsi.gov.uk>, mail.gva@efta.int, billing@spexhost.com, “emb.london” <emb.london@mfa.no>, benefits.service@liverpooldirectlimited.co.uk

Hi,

I’m refering to your letter, from 5/9, which I received today.

The work I did, (on the mentioned forms), was only a few hours.

When I went to sign on, at the Jobcentre, four weeks ago, on Thursday.

I wasn’t allowed to sign on.

But I had to have a ‘funny un-scheduled meeting’, (I’d call it), first.

Which I didn’t get to prepare for, at home.

In this meeting I informed that on my two, small businesses, I worked _less_ than 16 hours a week.

(Since this was some kind of limit, I was told).

I also informed that my businesses ran in minus.

And that I didn’t earn any money on them yet.

You say a letter was generated on 28/8.

I got a letter on Friday, last week.

That’s 7/9.

How can the letter use this long time?

And how the sanction started on 17/8.

How can you send a letter about that, on 28/8?

That’s something to complain about I think.

Because in the meeting I was told I would sign as usual, untill I heard from you.

But this hasn’t happened.

I signed on, on Thursday, two weeks ago, on Thursday.

But I didn’t get any money on Tuesday, last week.

So I had a protest, on Thursday last week.

And got the generated, (and very slow), letter, on Friday, last week.

How can you inform about a desition almost a month after the desition is made?

It should be the other way around, I think.

Inform about the desition in advance.

This is a business, that I’ve had for two years now.

And the Jobcentre have previously called it a ‘hobby’.

Now I have no money.

I’m going to read the form, and try to understand how to get money.

Should I apply for Income Benefit, since I have no income yet, from these two, small businesses.

Maybe next year, or something, I can get some income from them.

Thanks in advance for a reply regarding this.

I’ll also try to get the form sent back later today.

Best regards,

Erik Ribsskog

———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

Date: Sat, Sep 8, 2012 at 12:37 PM
Subject: Update/Fwd: Complaint
To: Contact-Us <Contact-Us@jobcentreplus.gsi.gov.uk>
Cc: CONTACT-US <CONTACT-US@dwp.gsi.gov.uk>, Melanie Wright <MWright@ingeus.co.uk>, hv-02.kontakt@mil.no, DWP ICE gateway team <ice@dwp.gsi.gov.uk>, mail.gva@efta.int, billing@spexhost.com, “emb.london” <emb.london@mfa.no>, benefits.service@liverpooldirectlimited.co.uk

Hi,

today I got a new letter from you, (which I attach).

You tell me to post some forms for you, but no forms were enclosed.

I don’t have money for printer-ink or postage since I didn’t get the payment on Tuesday, (which I signed for last week).

Can I go to the Jobcentre in Edge Lane, (where I used to go when I lived in Fairfield, earlier this year), and fill out the forms?

You say I have to send the forms no later than five days after my sign-in-day.

But my sign-in-day was Thursday last week, and that’s already more than five days ago, today, and I got your letter today.

I also think it’s like the Jobcentre have tried to trigger a reaction from me, (like I write in my e-mail yesterday), since you just stop sending my Jobseekers Allowance from 17/8.

You should have told me this well in advance of 17/8 then.

But you tell me this on 7/8.

I would please like to you to have a look at that fact, in case you forget it in all the other information here.

Because if you inform about decitions almost a month later, then people are going to be misarable, and desperate, because they aren’t going to understand anything, and they are going to be hungry, and worry about how to pay their bills, to get money for food, etc.

And they are going to feel humiliated.

I don’t it should be necessary to explain this.

Because it’s well known that people need food, etc.

So I wanted to please complain about this again.

So if you could send me the missing payment as soon as possible please, and also the relevant forms, (which I didn’t get with your letter today), then I’ll buy stamps, and send the forms back as soon as possible.

Thanks in advance for any help with this!

Yours sincerely,

Erik Ribsskog

———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

Date: Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 1:23 PM
Subject: Complaint
To: Contact-Us <Contact-Us@jobcentreplus.gsi.gov.uk>
Cc: CONTACT-US <CONTACT-US@dwp.gsi.gov.uk>, Melanie Wright <MWright@ingeus.co.uk>, hv-02.kontakt@mil.no, DWP ICE gateway team <ice@dwp.gsi.gov.uk>, mail.gva@efta.int, billing@spexhost.com, “emb.london” <emb.london@mfa.no>, Liverpool Direct <liverpool.direct@liverpool.gov.uk>

Hi,

I’m refering to your letter of 3/9 which I got in the post today.

First I want to complain that I’ve gotten a lot of grey hairs due to your lack of communication, the last couple of days.

I signed for a payment on Thursday last week, at the Jobcentre in Aintree.

So I should have gotten that payment on Tuesday, but I didn’t get it, so now I have no money.

My agreement with the Jobcentre in Aintree was that I would hear from Birkenhead and then we would take it from there.

But you have broken that agreement.

Because I was going to sign on as usual, in the mean-time.

But you messed with a payment in the meantime.

So that means you have broken an agreement and been doing fraud, (I think I have to say), and made me not get food, and made me get a lot of new grey hair, and you also made me have a protest due to the missing payment/fraud, yesterday.

You don’t seem to take people serious.

It’s really no change in my income.

I don’t get any income from my two small businesses, since they don’t earn money yet.

So this is really just dumb.

I’ve been told at the Jobcentre in Williamsson Sq., a couple of years ago, that there is no limit on how long I can claim Jobseekers Allowance.

I asked about this since I was curious due to the Finance Crises.

But now you write about the tax-years 2006 and 2007.

I worked at Arvarto, (first for Randstand and then for Arvato), from 2005 to 2006.

And then as self-employed untill 2008.

So I have been working for many years in the UK.

So I have the right to Jobseekers Allowance like I’m from the EU, I’ve been told by EFTA.

What I am supposed to do now?

Your missing payment have left me with no money, and I have no income from my two businesses.

You punish me for showing initiative, and try to start businesses, I think.

My food and electricity is soon running out.

What am I supposed to do?

How can you make mistakes like this?

Erik Ribsskog

brev lcc.jpg
402K

PS.

Her er vedlegget:

1. november 2012
Jeg sendte en e-post til Liverpool Housing Trust

Gmail – To: Laura Murphy, Income Management Officer/Fwd: To: R Williams, Benefit Officer – Ref: 10055749/Fwd: Form/Fwd: New update/Fwd: Update/Fwd: Complaint

Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>

To: Laura Murphy, Income Management Officer/Fwd: To: R Williams, Benefit Officer – Ref: 10055749/Fwd: Form/Fwd: New update/Fwd: Update/Fwd: Complaint

Erik Ribsskog

<eribsskog@gmail.com>

Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 6:53 PM

To:
csc@lht.co.uk

Hi,

I’m refering to your letter from 24/10, which I recieved today.

I’m forwarding you an e-mail which I sent to the Council today, to update you about the situation with the Housing Benefit.

I also attach a letter from the Council, which I got today, regarding this.

The Jobcentre now owes me more than £700 in Jobseekers Allowances, (five missing forthnightly payments).

But I’m working a lot with trying to get this solved, and I contact them about this every day, or so.

So I hope it’s going to be solved as soon as possible.

I also copy this e-mail to the Jobcentre, so perhaps they understand that I need my Jobseekers Allowance to make my budget go around, at the moment.

Hope this is alright!

Yours sincerely,

Erik Ribsskog

———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

Date: Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 6:16 PM
Subject: To: R Williams, Benefit Officer – Ref: 10055749/Fwd: Form/Fwd: New update/Fwd: Update/Fwd: Complaint
To: benefits.service@liverpooldirectlimited.co.uk
Cc: CONTACT-US <CONTACT-US@dwp.gsi.gov.uk>, Melanie Wright <MWright@ingeus.co.uk>, hv-02.kontakt@mil.no, DWP ICE gateway team <ice@dwp.gsi.gov.uk>, mail.gva@efta.int, billing@spexhost.com, “emb.london” <emb.london@mfa.no>

Hi,

I’m refering to your letter from 30/10 which I recieved today.

You write that I have two small businesses.

These are really hobbies, like the Jobcentre have called them earlier.

The first hobby-business, is a couple of years old, and is both a small web-shop, which works, but it’s also to have an online portifolio, when I apply for Web Design-jobs, since I’m unemployed and a full-time jobseeker.

So these hobby-businesses are something I do on my spare-time.

The second hobby-business are books I’ve written about my life in Norway, before I had to go as a refugee to the UK.

But these royalites aren’t that much.

Like this month I didn’t get any income, since I didn’t sell enough books, to get over the payment-threshold, of ten dollars, which CreateSpace/Amazon have for self-publised books.

So I’m not full-time self-employed, like the Jobcentre seem to think.

They haven’t sent me my Jobseekers Allowance, for more than two months, even if I’ve showed them the book-keeping for these hobby-businesses.

They are perhaps infected by some communists or Al Quaida or something, and mess with me.

Who knows.

I hope it’s enought that I send you, (again), the book-keeping, for these two hobby-businesses.

I also forward this e-mail to a lot of organisations to warn about that there’s something wrong at the Jobcentre, it seems.

Please just contact me if there’s something I’ve forgotten to explain about.

Best regards,

Erik Ribsskog

———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

Date: Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 8:56 PM
Subject: Form/Fwd: New update/Fwd: Update/Fwd: Complaint
To: Contact-Us@jobcentreplus.gsi.gov.uk
Cc: CONTACT-US <CONTACT-US@dwp.gsi.gov.uk>, Melanie Wright <MWright@ingeus.co.uk>, hv-02.kontakt@mil.no, DWP ICE gateway team <ice@dwp.gsi.gov.uk>, mail.gva@efta.int, billing@spexhost.com, “emb.london” <emb.london@mfa.no>, benefits.service@liverpooldirectlimited.co.uk

Hi,

I attached the earlier mentioned form and also the book-keeping for my two, small businesses.

You write in your letter from 5/9 that I should advice you as soon as possible if I have not yet recieved any pay from my businesses.

That’s right, these businesses run a bit in minus yet, so I have still not recieved any payment from any of these two businesses.

Also, I think I should add that my web-shop have been attacked a lot.

It has been hacked a lot and also hi-jacked from One, (by e-mailing them a hoax-e-mail).

And it has even been ridiculed on a TV-programme called Tweet 4 Tweet, about the internet, on the ‘Norwegian BBC’, that’s NRK 3.

So that’s why it has sold less lately, I guess, due to bad publicity, towards this litle business, on state television, in Norway.

I have no idea why I’m being attacked this much, but I’m more or less a refugee, from Norway, having heard there I’m followed by the ‘mafian’, in 2003, and I was the viction of a murder-atempt, in 2005, but Police don’t investigate, for some reason.

Also, the UK have almost doubled the postage for packs like I send to Norway, this spring.

So I’ve had to raise prices, which isn’t good for the turn-over.

And I depend on a high turn-over if this business is going to be succesfull.

But good marketing could still make it sucessful, I think.

So I haven’t given up.

I also refer to the web-shop(s), (I have one for Norway, one for the UK etc., since I’ve made my own design, since osCommerce was hacked so much, so I’ve made my own, ‘hacker-proof’ design, witch is in HTML, which can’t be hacked, I think), in my cover-letters.

Since I’m an IT-graduate, I apply for Web Design jobs and other IT-jobs.

Then one almost really have to have a portifolio, because employers ask to see your work.

And that’s why I accept to lose like £10 a month on my web-shops, because they are also my web-design-portifolio.

Hope that makes sense.

Latetely I’ve also started self-publishing.

I’ve had a blog for five years, and have a lot of material on my blog.

And some of the material is well suited for being published as books, I think.

So I’ve started publishing some old blog-material as books.

But that’s something that I’ve quite recently started with.

The web-shop was my first business.

Please just ask me if there is anything I should explain more about on the form, etc.

Ingeus, (Mary Stevenson), in Sunderland, told me to do book-keeping for my web-shops.

Mark, at the Jobcentre, in Williamsson Sq., has told me the web-shop was a hobby.

And the Jobcentre have put me on the Work Programme, even if I’ve had this web-shop.

I have been in several meetings with the Jobcentre in Sunderland, and Ingeus in Sunderland and Liverpool regarding if I should have really been on a self-employment-programme ran by the Jobcentre.

Rather than being on the Work Programme.

Since Ralph at Elect, in Liverpool has told me the Work Programme has no founds for marketing.

Even if Sencia mentioned they could give me founds for marketing, when I was on the Sencia-programme.

But then my web-shop was so much attacked by hackers, so I didn’t want to advertice for an unstable business.

No, with my new design, (which I’ve contacted patent-offices about, since it’s a click-shop using Javascript, which is inituive, I think, and could be used in other web-shops as well, I think. And this invetion, is my own invention, which I made in 2011, I think it must have been, when I made my own web-shop-solution, after all the attacks on the osCommerce web-shop).

So there’s also my invention, (the click-shop), in this.

I please don’t want to lose the rights for this invention, which could hopefully be sold to other people who want’s to start web-shops, possibly at least, I hope.

So I think there are possibilities here.

Now the web-shop is stable and ready to be broader marketed, I think.

I hope to find some Jobcentre-programme, or job-cafes, like the Jobcentre adviced me about, which have founds for this broad marketing.

But at the moment I have no money, so I don’t understand why you’ve stopped a payment I’ve signed for.

Because this is just part-time-jobs, which I spend 5-10 hours a week running.

Hope this is alright!

Yours sincerely,

Erik Ribsskog

———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

Date: Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 1:28 PM
Subject: New update/Fwd: Update/Fwd: Complaint
To: Contact-Us@jobcentreplus.gsi.gov.uk
Cc: CONTACT-US <CONTACT-US@dwp.gsi.gov.uk>, Melanie Wright <MWright@ingeus.co.uk>, hv-02.kontakt@mil.no, DWP ICE gateway team <ice@dwp.gsi.gov.uk>, mail.gva@efta.int, billing@spexhost.com, “emb.london” <emb.london@mfa.no>, benefits.service@liverpooldirectlimited.co.uk

Hi,

I’m refering to your letter, from 5/9, which I received today.

The work I did, (on the mentioned forms), was only a few hours.

When I went to sign on, at the Jobcentre, four weeks ago, on Thursday.

I wasn’t allowed to sign on.

But I had to have a ‘funny un-scheduled meeting’, (I’d call it), first.

Which I didn’t get to prepare for, at home.

In this meeting I informed that on my two, small businesses, I worked _less_ than 16 hours a week.

(Since this was some kind of limit, I was told).

I also informed that my businesses ran in minus.

And that I didn’t earn any money on them yet.

You say a letter was generated on 28/8.

I got a letter on Friday, last week.

That’s 7/9.

How can the letter use this long time?

And how the sanction started on 17/8.

How can you send a letter about that, on 28/8?

That’s something to complain about I think.

Because in the meeting I was told I would sign as usual, untill I heard from you.

But this hasn’t happened.

I signed on, on Thursday, two weeks ago, on Thursday.

But I didn’t get any money on Tuesday, last week.

So I had a protest, on Thursday last week.

And got the generated, (and very slow), letter, on Friday, last week.

How can you inform about a desition almost a month after the desition is made?

It should be the other way around, I think.

Inform about the desition in advance.

This is a business, that I’ve had for two years now.

And the Jobcentre have previously called it a ‘hobby’.

Now I have no money.

I’m going to read the form, and try to understand how to get money.

Should I apply for Income Benefit, since I have no income yet, from these two, small businesses.

Maybe next year, or something, I can get some income from them.

Thanks in advance for a reply regarding this.

I’ll also try to get the form sent back later today.

Best regards,

Erik Ribsskog

———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

Date: Sat, Sep 8, 2012 at 12:37 PM
Subject: Update/Fwd: Complaint
To: Contact-Us <Contact-Us@jobcentreplus.gsi.gov.uk>
Cc: CONTACT-US <CONTACT-US@dwp.gsi.gov.uk>, Melanie Wright <MWright@ingeus.co.uk>, hv-02.kontakt@mil.no, DWP ICE gateway team <ice@dwp.gsi.gov.uk>, mail.gva@efta.int, billing@spexhost.com, “emb.london” <emb.london@mfa.no>, benefits.service@liverpooldirectlimited.co.uk

Hi,

today I got a new letter from you, (which I attach).

You tell me to post some forms for you, but no forms were enclosed.

I don’t have money for printer-ink or postage since I didn’t get the payment on Tuesday, (which I signed for last week).

Can I go to the Jobcentre in Edge Lane, (where I used to go when I lived in Fairfield, earlier this year), and fill out the forms?

You say I have to send the forms no later than five days after my sign-in-day.

But my sign-in-day was Thursday last week, and that’s already more than five days ago, today, and I got your letter today.

I also think it’s like the Jobcentre have tried to trigger a reaction from me, (like I write in my e-mail yesterday), since you just stop sending my Jobseekers Allowance from 17/8.

You should have told me this well in advance of 17/8 then.

But you tell me this on 7/8.

I would please like to you to have a look at that fact, in case you forget it in all the other information here.

Because if you inform about decitions almost a month later, then people are going to be misarable, and desperate, because they aren’t going to understand anything, and they are going to be hungry, and worry about how to pay their bills, to get money for food, etc.

And they are going to feel humiliated.

I don’t it should be necessary to explain this.

Because it’s well known that people need food, etc.

So I wanted to please complain about this again.

So if you could send me the missing payment as soon as possible please, and also the relevant forms, (which I didn’t get with your letter today), then I’ll buy stamps, and send the forms back as soon as possible.

Thanks in advance for any help with this!

Yours sincerely,

Erik Ribsskog

———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

Date: Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 1:23 PM
Subject: Complaint
To: Contact-Us <Contact-Us@jobcentreplus.gsi.gov.uk>
Cc: CONTACT-US <CONTACT-US@dwp.gsi.gov.uk>, Melanie Wright <MWright@ingeus.co.uk>, hv-02.kontakt@mil.no, DWP ICE gateway team <ice@dwp.gsi.gov.uk>, mail.gva@efta.int, billing@spexhost.com, “emb.london” <emb.london@mfa.no>, Liverpool Direct <liverpool.direct@liverpool.gov.uk>

Hi,

I’m refering to your letter of 3/9 which I got in the post today.

First I want to complain that I’ve gotten a lot of grey hairs due to your lack of communication, the last couple of days.

I signed for a payment on Thursday last week, at the Jobcentre in Aintree.

So I should have gotten that payment on Tuesday, but I didn’t get it, so now I have no money.

My agreement with the Jobcentre in Aintree was that I would hear from Birkenhead and then we would take it from there.

But you have broken that agreement.

Because I was going to sign on as usual, in the mean-time.

But you messed with a payment in the meantime.

So that means you have broken an agreement and been doing fraud, (I think I have to say), and made me not get food, and made me get a lot of new grey hair, and you also made me have a protest due to the missing payment/fraud, yesterday.

You don’t seem to take people serious.

It’s really no change in my income.

I don’t get any income from my two small businesses, since they don’t earn money yet.

So this is really just dumb.

I’ve been told at the Jobcentre in Williamsson Sq., a couple of years ago, that there is no limit on how long I can claim Jobseekers Allowance.

I asked about this since I was curious due to the Finance Crises.

But now you write about the tax-years 2006 and 2007.

I worked at Arvarto, (first for Randstand and then for Arvato), from 2005 to 2006.

And then as self-employed untill 2008.

So I have been working for many years in the UK.

So I have the right to Jobseekers Allowance like I’m from the EU, I’ve been told by EFTA.

What I am supposed to do now?

Your missing payment have left me with no money, and I have no income from my two businesses.

You punish me for showing initiative, and try to start businesses, I think.

My food and electricity is soon running out.

What am I supposed to do?

How can you make mistakes like this?

Erik Ribsskog

brev lcc.jpg
402K

PS.

Her er vedlegget:

1. november 2012

Jeg sendte en e-post til Liverpool City Council

Gmail – To: R Williams, Benefit Officer – Ref: 10055749/Fwd: Form/Fwd: New update/Fwd: Update/Fwd: Complaint

Gmail

Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>

To: R Williams, Benefit Officer – Ref: 10055749/Fwd: Form/Fwd: New update/Fwd: Update/Fwd: Complaint

Erik Ribsskog

<eribsskog@gmail.com>

Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 6:16 PM

To:
benefits.service@liverpooldirectlimited.co.uk

Cc:
CONTACT-US <CONTACT-US@dwp.gsi.gov.uk>, Melanie Wright <MWright@ingeus.co.uk>, hv-02.kontakt@mil.no, DWP ICE gateway team <ice@dwp.gsi.gov.uk>, mail.gva@efta.int, billing@spexhost.com, “emb.london” <emb.london@mfa.no>