johncons

Stikkord: Liverpool Central CAB

  • Svar på e-post sendt leder i Høyre, Erna Solberg, fra Marianne Fagerli, førstekonsulent, Høyres stortingsgruppe. (In Norwegian).

    Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

    Problemer med maktmisbruk/korrupsjon fra myndighetene i Norge og Storbritannia.

    Fagerli Marianne <marianne.fagerli@stortinget.no>

    Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 12:59 PM

    To: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

    Tusen takk for dine tilbakemeldinger. Jeg skal bringe denne videre til Erna Solberg.

    Med vennlig hilsen

    Marianne Fagerli
    førstekonsulent
    Høyres stortingsgruppe
    tlf: 23 31 33 46
    mobil: 416 46 094

    —–Opprinnelig melding—–
    Fra: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:
    eribsskog@gmail.com]
    Sendt: 25. april 2008 20:33
    Til:
    erna.solberg@hoyre.no
    Emne: Problemer med maktmisbruk/korrupsjon fra myndighetene i Norge og Storbritannia.

    Hei Erna Solberg,

    sorry at jeg driver å skrive til deg, sånn helt uten videre.


    Men jeg ble så imponert, over det prinsipprogrammet, som du presanterte på Høyre-møte, tidligere

    denne uke, om at dere ønsker å fordele makten i samfunnet, og at dere ikke ønsker, at det skal gå

    politikk i enkeltavgjørelse, om enkeltmenneskers skjebner osv.


    Det er i hvertfall sånn jeg skjønte det.


    Og det synes jeg virker som en veldig god ide, siden det virker litt for meg, som at det er en ny elite,

    som, mer eller mindre, styrer og ‘herjer’ som de vil i landet nå, uten noe tanke i det hele tatt, for

    medborgernes universale menneskerettigheter, og sivile rettigheter.


    Jeg blir i hvertfall tullet med, av alt som heter myndigheter i landet, det vil si Kripos, Politidirektoratet,

    Justisdepartementet, Ambassaden i London, Konsulatet i Liverpool (hvor jeg bor), UD; SMK,

    Sivilombudsmannen, Fylkesmannen i Oslo og Akershus, Spesialenheten, og også uavhengige

    organisasjoner, som Amnesty Norge, og Norsk Røde Kors og Statsministerens Kontor.


    Pluss da i tillegg, organisasjoner i Storbritannia, som det Britiske Politiet, IPCC, Liverpool City Council,

    the Local Government Ombudsman, the Financial Ombudsman, the Citizens Advice Bureau,

    the Law Society, the Legal Services Ombudsman, the Legal Services Commission, the Ministry

    of Justice, Amnesty UK.


    Listen går bare videre og videre, det virker som at det er noe lignende, av det som er beskrevet i den

    boken, som heter ‘Mafiaen i Eiker’, hvor en enkeltperson, blir systematisk motarbeidet, av offentlige

    myndigheter, til de klarer å knuse han.

    Det virker ikke, som at det, nå for tiden, er noe som helst tanke for, hva som er rett og galt, og hva

    som er folks rettigheter.

    Jeg har ikke klart å finne noen, ikke en eneste organisasjon, som bryr seg en døyt, om hva som

    er rett og galt, og hva som er folks sivile rettigheter, og folks menneskerettigheter.


    Så jeg synes det var veldig bra å høre om det programmet dere har lagt fram nå i Høyre, hvor dere

    ønsker å motarbeide nettopp slik behandling av enkeltpersoner, fra myndighetene.


    For dette synes jeg ikke, sånn som jeg ser det, at er verdig for et demokratisk samfunn.


    Og det viker som at det er like ille, her i Storbritannia, hvor jeg måtte flykte til, ettersom, at

    jeg ble jaget fra gården til onkelen min, i Kvelde i Larvik, på 35 års dagen min, i july 2005.

    Av folk som hadde våpen og hunder, så det kan virke som at det var noe politi, eller noe,

    for meg.


    Og jeg overhørte, at de sa de ønsket å skyte meg, så det var bare flaks at jeg kom meg unna.

    Så hva det er som foregår, det vet ikke jeg.


    Jeg får ikke noe hjelp, fra noen som helst myndigheter, eller private/uavhengige organisasjoner.


    Så sånn som jeg ser det, så har verden gått helt av hengslene.


    Jeg prøver å skrive, om det skjer, på en blogg jeg har, med håp, om at noen kanskje skal reflektere,

    eller reagere, over det som foregår.


    Pressen har jeg kontaktet flere ganger, de er ikke interessert i å hjelpe meg.

    Så at pressen, er involvert, i noe samrøre, med offentlig forvaltning, og også til og med frivillige/private

    organisasjoner, i både Norge og Storbritannia.


    Det er i hvertfall sånn jeg ser det, at dette er realiteten, i dag, i min situasjon, jeg klarer ikke få noe

    som helst hjelp/råd/informasjon, om hva det egentlig er som foregår.

    Jeg har kontaktet politet i Norge og Storbritannia, veldig mange ganger, men de vil ikke fortelle hva som

    foregår, så jeg tror nok at du har rett i det du la fram, i det prinsipprogrammet, at myndighetene, nå

    for tiden, ikke bryr seg noe om folks rettigheter, men at de lar politikken sin, gå foran folks rettigheter.

    Og dette er jeg enig, som i det det stod i en nettavis, at du sa, at folks universale rettigheter blir ignorert.


    Så da kan jeg gi den tilbakemeldingen, at sånn som jeg ser det, så har du og Høyre helt skjønt hva som

    foregår.


    Så da må jeg innrømme, at jeg ble imponert, når jeg leste det prinsipprogrammet til Høyre, i en nettavis

    her, tidligere denne uken.


    Så det synes jeg var veldig bra!

    Jeg var faktisk selv, på et eller to møter, i Høires Hus, skrives det vel, i Oslo, på begynnelsen av 90-tallet.


    Det var vel, i forbindelse med Unge Høyres program, til skolevalgene osv., i forkant, av kommunevalget, i 91.

    Og da, pratet jeg og en kamerat, i hvertfall tidligere kamerat, Magne Winnem, med noen av Unge Høyres,

    politiske strateger, eller i hvertfall, de som skulle utarbeide valgkampmateriale til Unge Høyre da.


    Så fikk vi si vår mening om det, vi var jo fra Røyken og Svelvik vi, så hadde vel kanskje et litt annet

    perspektiv, enn de fleste som var på møtet i Høires Hus der, tror jeg, for dem var nok mest fra Oslo

    Vest osv., så da kanksje vi la merke til ting, som vi trodde ville gi et dårlig inntrykk, i f.eks. i Buskerud,

    eller Vestfold da.


    Men jeg får håpe at vi ikke fikk dem til å moderere programmet for mye.

    Jeg husker ikke navna på de her nå.


    Den eneste jeg husker navnet på, det var at den var en jentene der, som het Huitfeldt vel, og det var ikke

    Anniken Huitfeldt, men ei som var datter av en Høyre politiker, eller noe tror jeg.


    Det var kameraten min, Winnem, som kjente til dette.


    Men samme det.

    Så jeg må innrømme det, at jeg ble veldig imponert, over det prinsipprogrammet, som Høyre la frem, her

    nå nettopp.

    Jeg hadde ikke tid, til å drive med politikk, på begynnelsen av 90-tallet, og jeg synes egentlig ikke, at det

    var rett av meg, som bare hadde sittet på skolebenken hele livet, til da, å bli aktiv i Unge Høyre osv.,

    og diskutere, og si at dette er best, osv., når jeg ikke hadde noe erfaring fra annet enn skolebenken selv.


    Jeg synes det ble litt dumt, og visste ikke om jeg da egentlig visste noe særlig, om de temaene, som

    ble diskutert, på møtet der osv.

    Det var vel mest at jeg gjentok det, som lærerne hadde sagt på skolen, at Norge burde satse på kunnskap,

    og forskning.

    Men jeg hadde jo ikke helt oversikten selv, jeg mener det jeg synes ikke det var noe hensikt, for meg,

    som ikke kjente så mye til verden, å drive for mye med politikk, ettersom, at jeg jo ikke egentlig hadde

    noe særlig livserfaring, og da ville det vel antagelig ikke vært så hensiktsmessig, at jeg skulle prøve,

    å finne løsninger på alt mulig forskjellige, når jeg ikke selv syntes, at jeg visste så særlig mye om

    hvordan verden var.

    Så derfor, så ble det ikke til, at jeg gikk noe mer på møter på Høires Hus osv.


    Men, i de siste årene, så har jeg jo skjønt det, at det er noe, som ikke er som det burde være, i det hele

    tatt, i Norge. (Og nok også andre land).


    Så nå skjønner jeg jo det, at det er faktisk er veldige viktige temaer, dette med maktfordeliing, og

    det som kan synes, å være samarbeid, mellom forskjellige offentlige etater etc., for å motarbeide

    enkeltpersoner.


    Det virker som at det en mafia i offentlig adminstrasjon.


    Og jeg har skrevet før, at det kan virke som at det er noe i forbindelse med noe New World Order agenda.


    At man skal ha en underklasse, som blir styrt og kontrollert helt, av den nye overklassen/den nye eliten.


    Og middelklassen, den forsvinner, så det blir bare eliten, og undersåttene igjen, så og si, kan det

    virke som, for meg.

    I hverfall så synes jeg det jeg har opplevd de siste årene, passer godt med det jeg har hørt om, angående

    de her New World Order-teoriene da.

    Men jeg vet ikke helt, jeg lurer litt på, om kanskje det hadde vært smart for meg, å for eksempel begynne

    med politikk?

    For eksempel, disse statelige og offentlige myndigheter, inkludert politiet, virker det som, de er jo i hælene

    mine hele tida, så det er ikke fred å få, må man vel si.

    Og det virker som at det er ‘Street Theater’ og ‘Group Stalking’ operasjoner, som iverksettes rundt meg,

    av noe overvåkningspoliti, eller hva det kan være.


    Enda jeg har aldri vært noe kriminell, og jeg har jobbet og betalt skatt hele livet.

    Det virker som at disse operasjonene, som er på nettet, hvis jeg diskuterer, f.eks. på Veggavisen,

    eller en Facebook diskusjonsgruppe, så dukker det opp en organsiert gjeng, som mobber og trakasserer

    meg systematisk og planlagt.

    Og dette har også skjedd når jeg går ut døra. At det virker som at politiet, eller noen andre, har en slags

    overvåkningaksjon, for å få brutt meg ned, virker det som.


    Dette går på ting som ‘Mind Control’, virker det som for meg.


    Og dette er ting, som går på, at de bryter ned folk, så de blir traumatiske, osv., og så, så får de kontroll

    på personene, og personene gjøre det, som dette nettverket vil.


    Det er i hvertfall sånn det virker for meg, jeg har lest om det på nettet, og jeg kjenner igjen det som står

    beskrevet der.

    Jeg skal legge ved noen linker, til blogg osv., som forklarer mer om det jeg mener.

    Nå bor jo jeg i Storbritannia da, så jeg vet ikke om Høyre har noe regler, for at man må bo i Norge,

    hvis man har lyst til drive med politikk osv., men det går vel mye på møter osv., så da er det vel

    antagelig en fordel å bo i Norge ja.

    Men jeg, er som jeg sier, nå i det siste, etter at jeg har fått tenkt gjennom dette.


    Jeg er en flyktning fra Norge jeg nå.

    Jeg ble jagd bort fra gården til onkelen min, i Kvelde i Larvik, sommeren 2005, av noen folk med våpen

    og hunder, som jeg ikke vet hvem er, eller hvorfor de skulle ha tak i meg, og skyte meg, som jeg

    overhørte de sa, når jeg var inni skogen ved gården der.

    Så jeg har tatt kontakt med FN’s høykommisær for flyktninger, avdeling Storbritannia, for å få råd om

    hva jeg burde gjøre i forbindelse med dette.


    De sa bare, at de kunne ikke involvere seg i enkeltsaker, og ga meg to telefonnumre, til et par

    advokatfirmaer, tror jeg det var, som jeg ikke har kontaket enda, for jeg lurer på om dette ikke er

    mer generelle tema, som kanskje burde vært tatt opp med f.eks. FN da


    Jeg vil jo gjerne vite, f.eks., om jeg formelt oppfyller kravene, til å være en flyktning, for da ville kanskje

    dette hjelpe, til å få politiet i Norge, til å gi meg råd, informasjon, eller hjelp i forbindelse med den

    situasjonen, som er, at jeg blir forfulgt av noe slags kriminelt nettverk da, virker det som.


    Hvis det ikke er politiet da, som en jeg pratet med på nettet, mente det kunne være.

    For dette har holdt på, siden 2003, og det er helt umulig å få et eneste råd., eller ord omtrent, ut

    av politiet, så hva det er som foregår, det er vanskelig å si, men at noe er galt, det er nok sikkert.

    Jeg vet ikke helt hvorfor, at jeg bestemte meg for å skrive den her e-posten, men mye av grunnen,

    var vel, at jeg synes det prinsipprogrammet som dere presanterte, i avisene, tidligere denne uken,

    var veldig bra, så det virker i hvertfall som at det er noen oppegående folk igjen i landet, synes jeg,

    og det er ikke så mange andre jeg kan si det om, i forbindelse med de tingene som foregår nå,

    synes jeg det virker som.


    Så det synes jeg var veldig positivt, og jeg tror Høyres politikk, med konservatisme, osv., ikke

    vil være på langt nær så ille, som AP’s New World Order politikk, vil jeg kalle det, med en ny

    elite, som får i pose og sekk, og men en underklasse, som må stå i køer, til Aker Sykehus,

    osv., og dit ville ikke jeg dratt for å operere eller noe igjen, etter at jeg opererte kneet der,

    i 1996.

    Der var det mye rart, jeg mistenker at dette nettverket, av offentlig forvaltning, som er beskrevet,

    i den boken, ‘mafiaen i Eiker’, jeg mistenker at dette eller lignende netteverk, også har sine

    representanter, på sykehusene.


    Uten at jeg skal gå mer i detalj om det nå.

    Jeg tror, at i et samfunn med Høyres politikk, så vil det være mulig, for enkeltmennesker, å komme

    seg f.eks. over fra arbeiderklassen, eller hvilket utrykk man skal bruke nå, og oppover, til middelklassen,

    eller overklassen da, hvis de jobber og står på, uten å bli motarbeidet, av diverse jantelover, som

    kanskje egentlig er et slags nettverk da, i tillegg til de netteverkene som er i offentlig admistrasjon osv.

    Men jeg tror ikke, at folk har så særlig muligheter, til å komme seg oppover, i samfunnet, i det

    samfunnet som vi har nå, med AP’s poltitikk, med en overlegen elite, et såkalt plutokrati, som

    det skrives i avisene hele tiden.


    Jeg tror i et sånt samfunn, så er det så og si umulig, å komme seg over, fra ‘undersåttene’, til

    denne eliten, som styrer, i dette plutokratiet da.


    Som jeg selv har selv mange referanser til, i aviser osv, at Norge er egentlig et plutokrati.

    Og da mistenker jeg, at dette er samfunnet, som man får av, AP’s politikk, med overformynderi,

    en ny elite, som kan kjøpe seg forbi køene, på de dårligere og dårligere offentlige sykhusene.


    Så dette AP/New World Order/den nye eliten samfunnet, det tror jeg man burde gjøre noe med,

    hvis man har noe som helst sympati, med de mange, altså flertallet som havner i denne,

    ‘undersått’ gruppen.


    Så dette håper jeg at det er mulig å gjøre noe med, dette AP-samfunnet.

    Er 2/3 samfunnet de kaller det?

    Betyr dette, at den siste tredelen ikke har noen rettigheter, men får rettighetene sine ignorert,

    av offentlig forvaltning og non-profit organisasjoner osv.

    Det er i hvertfall sånn det virker for meg, må jeg innrømme


    At noen av de her 2/3 av folka i samfunnet da, har bestemt seg for, at jeg er i den siste tredelen,

    og da ikke har noen rettigheter, og alle kan fritt tulle med meg.


    Det er i hvertfall sånn det virker for meg.


    Hvordan dette blir organisert i detalj, det kan jeg ikke si sikkert, men det er vel muligens noe

    frimurere, eller Illuminati f.eks., inne i bildet da, uten at jeg skal si dette hundre prosent sikkert.


    Men jeg ønsker i hvertfall lykke til videre med den høyre prisippolitikken, som jeg synes virket

    veldig bra.


    Jeg tror, at hvis Høyre, klarer å forklare velgerne, kanskje litt enklere, hva dette vil si, med at

    det går politikk i enkeltsaker, og at folks universale rettigheter blir ignorert av myndighetene.


    Kanskje hvis Høyre tok fram noen eksempler, på hva som faktisk foregår, av maktmisbruk

    og det som værre er, fra myndighetene.


    For jeg tror ikke det er alle som skjønner det som står i prinsipprogrammet om universale

    rettigheter, og at avgjørelser i enkeltsaker, tas med en poltisk agenda i bakhodet, og at

    man overkjører folks sivile rettigheter, og menneskerettigheter


    Men det er kanskje ting som kommer senere, i valgkampen neste år osv?

    Men jeg får i hvertfall ønske lykke til med det nye prinsipprogrammet, og si mange takk, for

    at det i hvertfall er noen oppegående personer tilbake i Norge, for det synes jeg det bli litt

    mangelvare på nå, hvis jeg skal være ærlig, så det synes jeg var et veldig bra og fornuftig

    program, å komme med nå, fra Høyre!

    Så beklager hvis jeg skriver mye her, jeg legger med noen linker, bare i tilfelle, at noen

    har tid å lese dette.


    Da håper dette er i orden, og igjen takk for at det dukker opp noen bra nyheter i mediene.

    Så beklager jeg skrev for mye i denne e-posten, jeg bare fikk en ide, om at kunne jo prøve å

    sende, en e-post i hvertfall, så da tenkte jeg at jeg kunne jo prøve å gjøre det.

    Så da får jeg håpe, at det var i orden!

    Med vennlig hilsen


    Erik Ribsskog


    PS.


    Her er de nevnte linkene:

    https://johncons-blogg.net/ (Dette er til bloggen min, som det er ca. 1700 innlegg på nå,

    og som jeg holder på å indeksere ferdig, så dette burde forhåpentligvis være gjort innen ikke

    alt for lenge).

    https://johncons-blogg.net/2008/02/lack-of-openness-from-government.html (Her er link,

    til den posten på bloggen, hvor jeg har skrevet, om det jeg vet, om hva som egentlig foregår, noe

    jeg gjerne skulle ha ønsket var mer).

    http://www.linkedin.com/pub/6/86a/455 (Her er til siden min på linkedin, som jeg nettopp har

    skaffet meg, jeg har lagt inn arbeidserfaring, så det skulle være mulig å se der, at jeg er en

    person, som har jobbet og studert hele livet, og som aldri vært kriminell, i det hele tatt, og

    som det ikke burde være noen grunn, for politiet, å tulle med).

    http://xiandos.info/Surveillance,_Psychotronics_and_(Gang-)Stalking_Operations (Her står det, om

    begreper, som ‘Street Theater’, ‘Group Stalking’, og ‘Mind Control’. Dette som står nevnt her, passer

    veldig bra, med det jeg har opplevd selv, her i Liverpool, de siste par årene. Uten at jeg vet om dette

    er styrt av noen lokale nettverk, eller om det er føderale, eller hva de kaller det i Storbritannia, som

    jeg kanskje mistenker at det også kan være, og muligens også linket til nettverk i Norge, uten at

    jeg skal påstå hvordan dette er, for sikkert).

  • E-post om problemer med maktmisbruk og korrupsjon, fra myndighetene, sendt leder i Høyre, Erna Solberg, 25. april 2008. (In Norwegian).







    Google Mail – Problemer med maktmisbruk/korrupsjon fra myndighetene i Norge og Storbritannia.







    Google Mail


    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>


    Problemer med maktmisbruk/korrupsjon fra myndighetene i Norge og Storbritannia.





    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>





    Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 7:32 PM





    To:

    erna.solberg@hoyre.no



    Hei Erna Solberg,

     

    sorry at jeg driver å skrive til deg, sånn helt uten videre.

    Men jeg ble så imponert, over det prinsipprogrammet, som du presanterte på Høyre-møte, tidligere

    denne uke, om at dere ønsker å fordele makten i samfunnet, og at dere ikke ønsker, at det skal gå

    politikk i enkeltavgjørelse, om enkeltmenneskers skjebner osv.

    Det er i hvertfall sånn jeg skjønte det.

    Og det synes jeg virker som en veldig god ide, siden det virker litt for meg, som at det er en ny elite,

    som, mer eller mindre, styrer og 'herjer' som de vil i landet nå, uten noe tanke i det hele tatt, for

    medborgernes universale menneskerettigheter, og sivile rettigheter.

    Jeg blir i hvertfall tullet med, av alt som heter myndigheter i landet, det vil si Kripos, Politidirektoratet,

    Justisdepartementet, Ambassaden i London, Konsulatet i Liverpool (hvor jeg bor), UD; SMK,

    Sivilombudsmannen, Fylkesmannen i Oslo og Akershus, Spesialenheten, og også uavhengige

    organisasjoner, som Amnesty Norge, og Norsk Røde Kors og Statsministerens Kontor.

    Pluss da i tillegg, organisasjoner i Storbritannia, som det Britiske Politiet, IPCC, Liverpool City Council,

    the Local Government Ombudsman, the Financial Ombudsman, the Citizens Advice Bureau,

    the Law Society, the Legal Services Ombudsman, the Legal Services Commission, the Ministry

    of Justice, Amnesty UK.

    Listen går bare videre og videre, det virker som at det er noe lignende, av det som er beskrevet i den

    boken, som heter 'Mafiaen i Eiker', hvor en enkeltperson, blir systematisk motarbeidet, av offentlige

    myndigheter, til de klarer å knuse han.

     

    Det virker ikke, som at det, nå for tiden, er noe som helst tanke for, hva som er rett og galt, og hva

    som er folks rettigheter.

     

    Jeg har ikke klart å finne noen, ikke en eneste organisasjon, som bryr seg en døyt, om hva som 

    er rett og galt, og hva som er folks sivile rettigheter, og folks menneskerettigheter.

    Så jeg synes det var veldig bra å høre om det programmet dere har lagt fram nå i Høyre, hvor dere

    ønsker å motarbeide nettopp slik behandling av enkeltpersoner, fra myndighetene.

    For dette synes jeg ikke, sånn som jeg ser det, at er verdig for et demokratisk samfunn.

    Og det viker som at det er like ille, her i Storbritannia, hvor jeg måtte flykte til, ettersom, at 

    jeg ble jaget fra gården til onkelen min, i Kvelde i Larvik, på 35 års dagen min, i july 2005.

     

    Av folk som hadde våpen og hunder, så det kan virke som at det var noe politi, eller noe, 

    for meg.

    Og jeg overhørte, at de sa de ønsket å skyte meg, så det var bare flaks at jeg kom meg unna.

     

    Så hva det er som foregår, det vet ikke jeg.

    Jeg får ikke noe hjelp, fra noen som helst myndigheter, eller private/uavhengige organisasjoner.

    Så sånn som jeg ser det, så har verden gått helt av hengslene.

    Jeg prøver å skrive, om det skjer, på en blogg jeg har, med håp, om at noen kanskje skal reflektere,

    eller reagere, over det som foregår.

    Pressen har jeg kontaktet flere ganger, de er ikke interessert i å hjelpe meg.

     

    Så at pressen, er involvert, i noe samrøre, med offentlig forvaltning, og også til og med frivillige/private

    organisasjoner, i både Norge og Storbritannia.

    Det er i hvertfall sånn jeg ser det, at dette er realiteten, i dag, i min situasjon, jeg klarer ikke få noe

    som helst hjelp/råd/informasjon, om hva det egentlig er som foregår.

     

    Jeg har kontaktet politet i Norge og Storbritannia, veldig mange ganger, men de vil ikke fortelle hva som

    foregår, så jeg tror nok at du har rett i det du la fram, i det prinsipprogrammet, at myndighetene, nå

    for tiden, ikke bryr seg noe om folks rettigheter, men at de lar politikken sin, gå foran folks rettigheter.

     

    Og dette er jeg enig, som i det det stod i en nettavis, at du sa, at folks universale rettigheter blir ignorert.

    Så da kan jeg gi den tilbakemeldingen, at sånn som jeg ser det, så har du og Høyre helt skjønt hva som

    foregår.

    Så da må jeg innrømme, at jeg ble imponert, når jeg leste det prinsipprogrammet til Høyre, i en nettavis

    her, tidligere denne uken.

    Så det synes jeg var veldig bra!

     

    Jeg var faktisk selv, på et eller to møter, i  Høires Hus, skrives det vel, i Oslo, på begynnelsen av 90-tallet.

    Det var vel, i forbindelse med Unge Høyres program, til skolevalgene osv., i forkant, av kommunevalget, i 91.

     

    Og da, pratet jeg og en kamerat, i hvertfall tidligere kamerat, Magne Winnem, med noen av Unge Høyres,

    politiske strateger, eller i hvertfall, de som skulle utarbeide valgkampmateriale til Unge Høyre da.

    Så fikk vi si vår mening om det, vi var jo fra Røyken og Svelvik vi, så hadde vel kanskje et litt annet

    perspektiv, enn de fleste som var på møtet i Høires Hus der, tror jeg, for dem var nok mest fra Oslo

    Vest osv., så da kanksje vi la merke til ting, som vi trodde ville gi et dårlig inntrykk, i f.eks. i Buskerud,

    eller Vestfold da.

    Men jeg får håpe at vi ikke fikk dem til å moderere programmet for mye.

     

    Jeg husker ikke navna på de her nå.

    Den eneste jeg husker navnet på, det var at den var en jentene der, som het Huitfeldt vel, og det var ikke

    Anniken Huitfeldt, men ei som var datter av en Høyre politiker, eller noe tror jeg.

    Det var kameraten min, Winnem, som kjente til dette.

    Men samme det.

     

    Så jeg må innrømme det, at jeg ble veldig imponert, over det prinsipprogrammet, som Høyre la frem, her

    nå nettopp.

     

    Jeg hadde ikke tid, til å drive med politikk, på begynnelsen av 90-tallet, og jeg synes egentlig ikke, at det

    var rett av meg, som bare hadde sittet på skolebenken hele livet, til da, å bli aktiv i Unge Høyre osv.,

    og diskutere, og si at dette er best, osv., når jeg ikke hadde noe erfaring fra annet enn skolebenken selv.

    Jeg synes det ble litt dumt, og visste ikke om jeg da egentlig visste noe særlig, om de temaene, som

    ble diskutert, på møtet der osv.

     

    Det var vel mest at jeg gjentok det, som lærerne hadde sagt på skolen, at Norge burde satse på kunnskap,

    og forskning.

     

    Men jeg hadde jo ikke helt oversikten selv, jeg mener det jeg synes ikke det var noe hensikt, for meg,

    som ikke kjente så mye til verden, å drive for mye med politikk, ettersom, at jeg jo ikke egentlig hadde

    noe særlig livserfaring, og da ville det vel antagelig ikke vært så hensiktsmessig, at jeg skulle prøve,

    å finne løsninger på alt mulig forskjellige, når jeg ikke selv syntes, at jeg visste så særlig mye om

    hvordan verden var.

     

    Så derfor, så ble det ikke til, at jeg gikk noe mer på møter på Høires Hus osv.

    Men, i de siste årene, så har jeg jo skjønt det, at det er noe, som ikke er som det burde være, i det hele

    tatt, i Norge. (Og nok også andre land).

    Så nå skjønner jeg jo det, at det er faktisk er veldige viktige temaer, dette med maktfordeliing, og

    det som kan synes, å være samarbeid, mellom forskjellige offentlige etater etc., for å motarbeide

    enkeltpersoner.

    Det virker som at det en mafia i offentlig adminstrasjon.

    Og jeg har skrevet før, at det kan virke som at det er noe i forbindelse med noe New World Order agenda.

    At man skal ha en underklasse, som blir styrt og kontrollert helt, av den nye overklassen/den nye eliten.

    Og middelklassen, den forsvinner, så det blir bare eliten, og undersåttene igjen, så og si, kan det

    virke som, for meg.

     

    I hverfall så synes jeg det jeg har opplevd de siste årene, passer godt med det jeg har hørt om, angående

    de her New World Order-teoriene da.

     

    Men jeg vet ikke helt, jeg lurer litt på, om kanskje det hadde vært smart for meg, å for eksempel begynne

    med politikk?

     

    For eksempel, disse statelige og offentlige myndigheter, inkludert politiet, virker det som, de er jo i hælene

    mine hele tida, så det er ikke fred å få, må man vel si.

     

    Og det virker som at det er 'Street Theater' og 'Group Stalking' operasjoner, som iverksettes rundt meg,

    av noe overvåkningspoliti, eller hva det kan være.

    Enda jeg har aldri vært noe kriminell, og jeg har jobbet og betalt skatt hele livet.

     

    Det virker som at disse operasjonene, som er på nettet, hvis jeg diskuterer, f.eks. på Veggavisen,

    eller en Facebook diskusjonsgruppe, så dukker det opp en organsiert gjeng, som mobber og trakasserer

    meg systematisk og planlagt.

     

    Og dette har også skjedd når jeg går ut døra. At det virker som at politiet, eller noen andre, har en slags

    overvåkningaksjon, for å få brutt meg ned, virker det som.

    Dette går på ting som 'Mind Control', virker det som for meg.

    Og dette er ting, som går på, at de bryter ned folk, så de blir traumatiske, osv., og så, så får de kontroll

    på personene, og personene gjøre det, som dette nettverket vil.

    Det er i hvertfall sånn det virker for meg, jeg har lest om det på nettet, og jeg kjenner igjen det som står

    beskrevet der.

    Jeg skal legge ved noen linker, til blogg osv., som forklarer mer om det jeg mener.

     

    Nå bor jo jeg i Storbritannia da, så jeg vet ikke om Høyre har noe regler, for at man må bo i Norge,

    hvis man har lyst til drive med politikk osv., men det går vel mye på møter osv., så da er det vel

    antagelig en fordel å bo i Norge ja.

     

    Men jeg, er som jeg sier, nå i det siste, etter at jeg har fått tenkt gjennom dette.

    Jeg er en flyktning fra Norge jeg nå.

     

    Jeg ble jagd bort fra gården til onkelen min, i Kvelde i Larvik, sommeren 2005, av noen folk med våpen

    og hunder, som jeg ikke vet hvem er, eller hvorfor de skulle ha tak i meg, og skyte meg, som jeg

    overhørte de sa, når jeg var inni skogen ved gården der.

     

    Så jeg har tatt kontakt med FN's høykommisær for flyktninger, avdeling Storbritannia, for å få råd om

    hva jeg burde gjøre i forbindelse med dette.

    De sa bare, at de kunne ikke involvere seg i enkeltsaker, og ga meg to telefonnumre, til et par

    advokatfirmaer, tror jeg det var, som jeg ikke har kontaket enda, for jeg lurer på om dette ikke er

    mer generelle tema, som kanskje burde vært tatt opp med f.eks. FN da.

    Jeg vil jo gjerne vite, f.eks., om jeg formelt oppfyller kravene, til å være en flyktning, for da ville kanskje

    dette hjelpe, til å få politiet i Norge, til å gi meg råd, informasjon, eller hjelp i forbindelse med den

    situasjonen, som er, at jeg blir forfulgt av noe slags kriminelt nettverk da, virker det som.

    Hvis det ikke er politiet da, som en jeg pratet med på nettet, mente det kunne være.

     

    For dette har holdt på, siden 2003, og det er helt umulig å få et eneste råd., eller ord omtrent, ut

    av politiet, så hva det er som foregår, det er vanskelig å si, men at noe er galt, det er nok sikkert.

     

    Jeg vet ikke helt hvorfor, at jeg bestemte meg for å skrive den her e-posten, men mye av grunnen,

    var vel, at jeg synes det prinsipprogrammet som dere presanterte, i avisene, tidligere denne uken,

    var veldig bra, så det virker i hvertfall som at det er noen oppegående folk igjen i landet, synes jeg,

    og det er ikke så mange andre jeg kan si det om, i forbindelse med de tingene som foregår nå,

    synes jeg det virker som.

    Så det synes jeg var veldig positivt, og jeg tror Høyres politikk, med konservatisme, osv., ikke

    vil være på langt nær så ille, som AP's New World Order politikk, vil jeg kalle det, med en ny

    elite, som får i pose og sekk, og men en underklasse, som må stå i køer, til Aker Sykehus,

    osv., og dit ville ikke jeg dratt for å operere eller noe igjen, etter at jeg opererte kneet der,

    i 1996.

     

    Der var det mye rart, jeg mistenker at dette nettverket, av offentlig forvaltning, som er beskrevet,

    i den boken, 'mafiaen i Eiker', jeg mistenker at dette eller lignende netteverk, også har sine

    representanter, på sykehusene.

    Uten at jeg skal gå mer i detalj om det nå.

     

    Jeg tror, at i et samfunn med Høyres politikk, så vil det være mulig, for enkeltmennesker, å komme

    seg f.eks. over fra arbeiderklassen, eller hvilket utrykk man skal bruke nå, og oppover, til middelklassen,

    eller overklassen da, hvis de jobber og står på, uten å bli motarbeidet, av diverse jantelover, som 

    kanskje egentlig er et slags nettverk da, i tillegg til de netteverkene som er i offentlig admistrasjon osv.

     

    Men jeg tror ikke, at folk har så særlig muligheter, til å komme seg oppover, i samfunnet, i det 

    samfunnet som vi har nå, med AP's poltitikk, med en overlegen elite, et såkalt plutokrati, som 

    det skrives i avisene hele tiden.

    Jeg tror i et sånt samfunn, så er det så og si umulig, å komme seg over, fra 'undersåttene', til

    denne eliten, som styrer, i dette plutokratiet da.

    Som jeg selv har selv mange referanser til, i aviser osv., at Norge er egentlig et plutokrati.

     

    Og da mistenker jeg, at dette er samfunnet, som man får av, AP's politikk, med overformynderi,

    en ny elite, som kan kjøpe seg forbi køene, på de dårligere og dårligere offentlige sykhusene.

    Så dette AP/New World Order/den nye eliten samfunnet, det tror jeg man burde gjøre noe med,

    hvis man har noe som helst sympati, med de mange, altså flertallet som havner i denne, 

    'undersått' gruppen.

    Så dette håper jeg at det er mulig å gjøre noe med, dette AP-samfunnet. 

     

    Er 2/3 samfunnet de kaller det?

     

    Betyr dette, at den siste tredelen ikke har noen rettigheter, men får rettighetene sine ignorert, 

    av offentlig forvaltning og non-profit organisasjoner osv.

     

    Det er i hvertfall sånn det virker for meg, må jeg innrømme.

    At noen av de her 2/3 av folka i samfunnet da, har bestemt seg for, at jeg er i den siste tredelen,

    og da ikke har noen rettigheter, og alle kan fritt tulle med meg.

    Det er i hvertfall sånn det virker for meg.

    Hvordan dette blir organisert i detalj, det kan jeg ikke si sikkert, men det er vel muligens noe 

    frimurere, eller Illuminati f.eks., inne i bildet da, uten at jeg skal si dette hundre prosent sikkert.

    Men jeg ønsker i hvertfall lykke til videre med den høyre prisippolitikken, som jeg synes virket 

    veldig bra.

    Jeg tror, at hvis Høyre, klarer å forklare velgerne, kanskje litt enklere, hva dette vil si, med at 

    det går politikk i enkeltsaker, og at folks universale rettigheter blir ignorert av myndighetene.

    Kanskje hvis Høyre tok fram noen eksempler, på hva som faktisk foregår, av maktmisbruk

    og det som værre er, fra myndighetene.

    For jeg tror ikke det er alle som skjønner det som står i prinsipprogrammet om universale 

    rettigheter, og at avgjørelser i enkeltsaker, tas med en poltisk agenda i bakhodet, og at 

    man overkjører folks sivile rettigheter, og menneskerettigheter.

    Men det er kanskje ting som kommer senere, i valgkampen neste år osv?

     

    Men jeg får i hvertfall ønske lykke til med det nye prinsipprogrammet, og si mange takk, for

    at det i hvertfall er noen oppegående personer tilbake i Norge, for det synes jeg det bli litt

    mangelvare på nå, hvis jeg skal være ærlig, så det synes jeg var et veldig bra og fornuftig

    program, å komme med nå, fra Høyre!

     

    Så beklager hvis jeg skriver mye her, jeg legger med noen linker, bare i tilfelle, at noen 

    har tid å lese dette.

    Da håper dette er i orden, og igjen takk for at det dukker opp noen bra nyheter i mediene.

     

    Så beklager jeg skrev for mye i denne e-posten, jeg bare fikk en ide, om at kunne jo prøve å

    sende, en e-post i hvertfall, så da tenkte jeg at jeg kunne jo prøve å gjøre det.

     

    Så da får jeg håpe, at det var i orden!

     

    Med vennlig hilsen

    Erik Ribsskog

    PS.

    Her er de nevnte linkene:

     

    http://johncons-mirror.blogspot.com/ (Dette er til bloggen min, som det er ca. 1700 innlegg på nå,

    og som jeg holder på å indeksere ferdig, så dette burde forhåpentligvis være gjort innen ikke 

    alt for lenge).

     

    til den posten på bloggen, hvor jeg har skrevet, om det jeg vet, om hva som egentlig foregår, noe

    jeg gjerne skulle ha ønsket var mer).

     

    http://www.linkedin.com/pub/6/86a/455 (Her er til siden min på linkedin, som jeg nettopp har

    skaffet meg, jeg har lagt inn arbeidserfaring, så det skulle være mulig å se der, at jeg er en

    person, som har jobbet og studert hele livet, og som aldri vært kriminell, i det hele tatt, og

    som det ikke burde være noen grunn, for politiet, å tulle med).

     

    begreper, som 'Street Theater', 'Group Stalking', og 'Mind Control'. Dette som står nevnt her, passer

    veldig bra, med det jeg har opplevd selv, her i Liverpool, de siste par årene. Uten at jeg vet om dette

    er styrt av noen lokale nettverk, eller om det er føderale, eller hva de kaller det i Storbritannia, som

    jeg kanskje mistenker at det også kan være, og muligens også linket til nettverk i Norge, uten at

    jeg skal påstå hvordan dette er, for sikkert).

     

     







  • E-mail, answer to letter, (sent as an enclosure with e-mail), from Sue Thomas, Head of Advice Policy & Standards, Citizens Advice Bureau, 12/5/08.



    Google Mail – Your complaint about Liverpool Central CAB







    Google Mail


    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>


    Your complaint about Liverpool Central CAB





    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>





    Mon, May 12, 2008 at 5:12 PM





    To:

    "Thomas, Sue" <Sue.Thomas@citizensadvice.org.uk>



    Hi,

     

    thanks very much for your e-mail.

     

    I was wondering about the street theater operation, that was going on, at the CAB, in April of last year,

    and was included in the complaint.

     

    (With the gay-looking CAB-representative helding the meeting in the dark etc.).

     

    I wonder what happened with this issus, noone seems to have commented on this, or is my knowledge of

    the English language that is failing me, English only being my second language?

     

    Thanks in advance for the reply!

     

    Yours sincerely,

     


    Erik Ribsskog

     


    On 5/12/08, Thomas, Sue <Sue.Thomas@citizensadvice.org.uk> wrote:

    When the Independent Adjudicator sent you her reivew (on 24th April), she said that Citizens Advice would consider the report and then write to you. I am sorry that my reply is a little late but I was away from the office last week and so have only been able to finish my letter to you today.

    <<Ribsskog-Liverpool Central.doc>>   

    Sue Thomas
    Head of Advice Policy & Standards
    Tel: 020 7833 7034 Mob: 07970 990425

    P please consider the environment – do you really need to print this email?

    The Citizens Advice service helps people resolve their legal, money and other problems by providing information and advice, and by influencing policymakers. Citizens Advice is an operating name of The National Association of Citizens Advice Bureaux.

    NOTICE: this e-mail originates from Citizens Advice, an operating name of The National Association of Citizens Advice Bureaux (Charity Registration Number 279057, VAT number 726 0202 76, Company limited by guarantee, Registered Number 1436945 England, Registered office Myddelton House, 115-123 Pentonville Road, London N1 9LZ). It contains proprietary information, some or all of which may be legally privileged. It is for the intended recipient only. If an addressing or transmission error has misdirected this e-mail, please notify the author by replying to this e-mail. If you are not the intended recipient you must not use, disclose, distribute, copy, print or reply to this e-mail (other than for the reason stated above).

    This footnote confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for Content Security threats, including computer viruses.








  • Letter, (sent as an enclosure with e-mail), from Sue Thomas, Head of Advice Policy & Standards, Citizens Advice Bureau, 12/5/08.

    Myddelton House

    115-123 Pentonville Road

    London N1 9LZ

    www.citizensadvice.org.uk

    Tel: 020 7833 2181

    May 12 2008

    Dear Mr Ribsskog

    Your complaint against Liverpool Central CAB

    I undertook to write to you following the Adjudicator’s report into the handling of your complaint.

    We will update the complaints guidance to make it clear that a CAB should send its own acknowledgement to complainants even where the complaint has already been acknowledged by the Complaints Officer in the central office. We will also strengthen the guidance about who should handle a complaint so that the investigation is not carried out by someone themselves involved or the subject of the complaint. These changes will be included in the next update of the guidance in June.

    While the correct e-mail address for contacting the bureau is given on the Citizens Advice website I am afraid that the address is still shown incorrectly on the Central Liverpool CAB website. We have asked the bureau to rectify this error but to date this has not happened. I will contact the bureau manager and chair again this week as I completely understand that it is unacceptable for a wrong e-mail address to be shown as this clearly causes problems for people who want to get in touch with a bureau.

    I am not able to explain why your e-mails to David Harker and others in Central Office were not replied to. E-mail is now a standard means of formal communication and we have target response times. At the end of last year major changes were made to how the administration within the Chief Executive’s office is managed which should result in others not having the same experience as you. The Complaints Officer and I fully understand the importance of dealing with e-mails promptly and make every effort to do so even if no substantive reply will be sent. I am sorry that we failed do this last year.

    Regarding the delay between your sending an e-mail and receiving an automated response, I have talked to our IT Department and we did have problems in the summer last year with e-mails not being delivered or being severely delayed and can only assume that yours to our Chief Executive was held up in this way. But as you will have seen from my immediate response to your e-mail to me earlier this year this is no longer a problem.

    David Harker apologised in his letter and I can add little to this. I recognise that you are still disatissfied; however I can assure you that we are taking on board the recommendations made by the Independent Adjudicator and have carefully read the remainder of her report and your comments to her. I do hope that we would handle a complaint such as yours rather better in the future.

    Yours sincerely

    Sue Thomas

    Head of Advice Policy and Standards

    Patron HRH The Princess Royal Citizens Advice is an operating name of

    Chair The Revd. Hilary Watkins The National Association of Citizens Advice Bureaux

    Chief Executive David Harker OBE Charity registration number 279057

    VAT number 726 0202 76

    Company limited by guarantee

    Registered number 1436945 England

    Registered office as above

  • E-mail from Sue Thomas, Head of Advice Policy & Standards, Citizens Advice Bureau, 12/5/08.







    Google Mail – Your complaint about Liverpool Central CAB







    Google Mail


    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>


    Your complaint about Liverpool Central CAB





    Thomas, Sue

    <Sue.Thomas@citizensadvice.org.uk>





    Mon, May 12, 2008 at 4:51 PM





    To:

    Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>




    When the Independent Adjudicator sent you her reivew (on 24th April), she said that Citizens Advice would consider the report and then write to you. I am sorry that my reply is a little late but I was away from the office last week and so have only been able to finish my letter to you today.

    <<Ribsskog-Liverpool Central.doc>>   

    Sue Thomas

    Head of Advice Policy & Standards

    Tel: 020 7833 7034 Mob: 07970 990425






    P


    please consider the environment – do you really need to print this email?



    The

    Citizens Advice service helps people resolve their legal, money and other problems

    by providing information and advice, and by influencing policymakers. Citizens

    Advice is an operating name of The National Association of Citizens Advice Bureaux.

    NOTICE:

    this e-mail originates from Citizens Advice, an operating name of The National Association

    of Citizens Advice Bureaux (Charity Registration Number 279057, VAT number 726 0202

    76, Company limited by guarantee, Registered Number 1436945 England, Registered

    office Myddelton House, 115-123 Pentonville Road, London N1 9LZ). It contains proprietary

    information, some or all of which may be legally privileged. It is for the intended

    recipient only. If an addressing or transmission error has misdirected this e-mail,

    please notify the author by replying to this e-mail. If you are not the intended

    recipient you must not use, disclose, distribute, copy, print or reply to this e-mail

    (other than for the reason stated above).



    This footnote confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for Content Security threats, including computer viruses.





    Ribsskog-Liverpool Central.doc
    82K





  • E-mail from the independent CAB Adjuticator, Barbara Stow, on 29/4/08.

    From: stow_adjudicator@btinternet.com Barbara Stow
    To: eribsskog@gmail.com Erik Ribsskog
    Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 11:13:33 +0100
    Subject: Re: Fw: Citizens Advice

    Dear Mr Ribsskog

    I have thought carefully about what you say.

    I do not know the explanation for the delay in sending the out of office reply but nor do I think it significant. I have made clear my strong criticism of the failure to respond to your messages and the particular point does not in any way alter my conclusion.

    I am however now going to forward this correspondence to Citizens Advice who are going to write to you about my report. They may be able to explain why the out of office message was delayed.

    I do not at all mind you making your views clear for the record but I think we must agree to differ and this should now be the end of our correspondence. I have no further involvement in your complaint.

    Thank you for your courtesy.

    Yours sincerely

    Barbara Stow

    —– Original Message —-
    From: Erik Ribsskog
    To: Barbara Stow
    Sent: Monday, 28 April, 2008 12:49:34 PM
    Subject: Re: Fw: Citizens Advice

    Hi,

    I think, that, when you wrote your report, you must have thought that the automated e-mail, was sent on the
    same day, as the e-mail it was answering to.

    (And not six days before).

    And also, you must have thought, that the CAB, had the right e-mail adresse, on their website.

    I explain to you, that this isn’t right.

    So, you have had wrong information, that you have based your report on.

    I also question your judgement, regarding, what you wrote in your report.

    This was mentioned, in points 1-8, in my previous e-mail, from 25/4.

    This is only for the record.

    I’m not telling you, what to do, regarding this. (Since I have no right to do that, since
    the CAB is a charity, and I have no formell right to complain about your report, as far
    I’ve understood).

    I just wanted to make opinion clear.

    Just for the record, so I at least can explain about the things I’m disagreeing with, even if I know,
    that I have no formell right to appeal.

    So I hope it is alright, that I bring this up for the record, anyway!

    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

    On 4/28/08, Barbara Stow wrote:
    Dear Mr Ribsskog

    The result of my review of how your complaint was handled is in my report. I was grateful to you for pointing out my error in the date of the e-mail and explaining where the wrong e-mail address for the bureau was displayed.

    There is nothing else for me to add to the report.

    Yours sincerely

    Barbara Stow

    —– Original Message —-
    From: Erik Ribsskog
    To: Barbara Stow

    Sent: Friday, 25 April, 2008 3:50:56 PM
    Subject: Re: Fw: Citizens Advice

    Hi,

    I see that you have conluded your involvement.

    But, how can you say that the CAB haven’t done anything wrong, when.

    1. The meeting at the CAB, was held in the dark.

    2. The CAB representative, was lieing, in report 1, where he said he turned the lights on there, at the beginning of the
    meeting, which he didn’t he turned them on at the end of the meeting.

    3. How could the automated message, be delayed for six days?

    4. Why doesn’t anyone (neighter you, or the CAB Chief Executie), reflect on, that the automated message, was delayed for six days?

    5. I tell you, that there was a street theater operation, going on in the CAB premisses.

    I don’t mean that the operation was on the steet outside the State House.

    Street Theater, is a term, it doesn’t have to be on the street, even if it’s calles Street Theater.

    6. How can the CAB have had the wrong e-mail address, on their website, for years, like it seems from the website design?

    7. Why is it, that I’m writing all the time, that the meeting, on 5/4, was being held in the dark, and still noone reflects on this.
    Isn’t this a bit inpolite, to act in a way like that?

    8. You say, that the delay with the automated message, was not due to something that was sinister.

    I appriciate, that you are explaining to me, what it isn’t due to.

    But the reason I’m complaing, is not to find out what it isn’t due to.

    I’m trying to find out what it is due to.

    So I’m really not very much viser, from your reply.

    I know one thing that it isn’t due to, but I think would be very fine, to know what it was due to.

    What caused this, the six days delay, to the automated message.

    So I hope you have the oppertunity to have a look at this again!

    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

    Again, I’ve seen that you have conluded your work, but like I explained, in the last e-mail, I can’t see that these issues are
    being taken seriously, by eighter you or the Chief Executive, so I’m goint

    On 4/25/08, Barbara Stow wrote:
    Dear Mr Ribbskog

    Thank you for this message and for the second one to which you attached a screenshot.

    I attach my letter in reply.

    Barbara Stow

    —– Original Message —-
    From: Erik Ribsskog
    To: Barbara Stow
    Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 5:24:44 PM
    Subject: Re: Fw: Citizens Advice

    Hi,

    thank you very much for your answer!

    I’ve been reading through your report now, and I have some comments on it.

    I hope it’s alright that I send you these comments!

    5.

    Here you write, that I left the employment with Arvato Services Ltd.

    What happened, was that the Managing Director ordered me home, with pay, since he wouldn’t let
    me stay and work there, since he feared for my security there, he said.

    Arvato, were supposed to call me, when they had checked up more about what went on in the company.

    They didn’t call me, but they pushed a ‘phoney’ letter under the door to the building I live in, which was
    written, by one the persons I had reported there, and which the Managing Director, had put in charge of
    the investigation of the problems I had reported.

    And then, I got a form, saying my employment there had ended.

    I reported about this to the Police, as continuing of the harassment, which is the way I saw it.

    Now lately, I’ve heard, that this type of dismissal, is also called ‘constructed dismissal’.

    So I didn’t leave the employment.

    I was the subject of a constructed dismissal.

    I thought I’d make a point of this, since this isn’t reflected in your report.

    9.

    You write that the area was poorly lit.

    It was in fact very poorly lit.

    One couldn’t read like a folder or a newspaper there.

    (At the Liverpool Central CAB premisses).

    And most of the meeting there, was held in the dark there.

    This isn’t reflected in your report I think, that the meeting was held in the
    dark, so that it wasn’t possible to read there.

    11.

    Morecrofts had promissed me, on 10/4, that they would take on the case, on a payment plan type
    of payment-solution.

    Miss Pool said this.

    So when they (Samantha) said on 24/4, that there could be no payment plan type of payment-solution,
    then the company, went back on what I had previously agreed with them.

    I thought I’d make a point of this as well, since I can’t see it’s reflected in your report.

    16.

    You write, that the second e-mail I sent the CAB Chief Executive David Harker, was sent him on 22/8,
    the same day as the automated reply for this e-mail was sent back.

    This isn’t right at all.

    My e-mail, was sent on 16/8.

    And the CEO’s automated, or ‘automated’ reply, was sent back, on 22/8.

    I’m a bit disapointed, since noone seem to think, that this is remarkable.

    Since I myself, think, that automated replies, shouldn’t be sent many days later.

    Since then, I suspect that they aren’t really automated at all.

    Then I would start to think, that there’s something phoney going on.

    So I’m a bit disapointed that you write that the second e-mail, that I sent the Chief Executive,
    was sent on 22/8, when it was in fact sent on 16/8.

    51.

    You write, that you have checked yourself, that the e-mail address, listed on

    www.liverpoolcab.org, now is the right e-mail address.

    But I checked it now, I went to the website, and pressed the e-mail-button.

    Then outlook opens, and the e-mail address that one get up, is:

    bureau@liverpoolcab.f9.co.uk

    and not the right e-mail address (bureau@liverpoolcab.org), like you write in your report.

    I’m enclosing a screenshot, from the Liverpool Central CAB website, from today, that shows this.

    52.

    You say that the complaint was dealt with fairly.

    But I don’t agree with this.

    Due to these reasons:

    1:

    The CAP-representative, said that the whole meeting there, on 5/4, was held with the lights on.

    But I explained, to the Chair there, that this was a lie.

    Since, he waited until the meeting was almost finished, before he switched the lights on.

    And before this, it wasn’t possible to read in the area.

    The fact, that the representative, read the fax-number, from the phone list, instead of the
    phone-number, to EAD, I think shows this, that the representative lied.

    But this fact, that the representative lied, has been ignored, by the Chair there, thats Chairman of
    the Board then, I presume. And by the CAB Chief Executive.

    I don’t think this is very fair.

    2:

    Further, you write, that e-mails were answered late.

    But some e-mails, like the ones I sent the Comlaints Manager there, Follows, weren’t answered at all.

    This isn’t reflected on, as far as I can see, in your report.

    3:

    And what about the problems with the automated reply.

    Or the ‘magic’ automated reply, would maybe be a better description of the nature of this reply.

    Since the automaded reply, waited, from 16/8, untill 22/8, before it found it right to send itself.

    Isn’t this a bit strange, that the CAB headoffice, is operating, with seemingly ‘magic’ automated replies?

    Why didn’t the Chief Executive reflect on this at all?

    Even if I made a point of it, in the compaint.

    So I don’t agree with you, that the complaint was dealt with fairly.

    And I also think also you yourself, should have maybe reflected more on, at least, point 1 and 3 here, in your report,
    since I made a point out of these issues, in my remarks, regarding the Stage 3 report, from the Chief Executive.

    These are the issues that comes to mind, from reading your report now.

    So I thought I’d send you them, so that you could be aware, of the obvious errors you’ve made, with the Liverpool
    Central CAB’s e-mail address, on their website, which you write that you have checked, and you say it’s now
    the right address, which it isn’t.

    And the error, when you write, that my second e-mail to the Chief Executive, was sent on the same date, as the
    (‘magic’) automated reply, was sent back (22/8), when the e-mail was in fact sent on 16/8. (And not on 22/8,
    like you write in your report).

    So these are obvious errors, to do with obvious facts. So I don’t think this can be disputed.

    The other issues, surrounding that the lie from the CAB representative, isn’t reflected on.

    That the fact that the meeting there, was held in the dark, isn’t acknoledgded, even if I make a point of it in the
    answers to the various reports, I think is worrying.

    Since I explain what happened around this in detail.

    That I explain that the CAB representative read the fax-number to the EAD-company, instead of the phone-number.

    So it shouldn’t really be any doubt regarding if the meeting there, was held in the dark or not.

    I also explained, that there seemed to be some kind of ‘Street Theather’, arranged there, at the Liverpool Central CAB.

    That it seemed that there was a planned Street Theather operation, set up there, in connection with my meeting there
    on 5/4, last year.

    This isn’t taken seriously.

    I think this is probably something to do with, that I have been in contact, with the Liverpool Police, regarding something
    I overheard, when I was working in Norway, that I was followed, for some reason unclear to me, by some mafia.

    (Possibly due to some honour-stuff, due to some misunderstandings, with a collegue there, in the township, that the
    shop I worked as part-time team-leader in, besides my University level studies).

    When I got to Liverpool, I overheard that the Police-officer, that I explained to, that I was followed, said on the back-office,
    on St. Ann St. Police Station there, that ‘don’t he understand, that noone wants to be involved’.

    I think, that the British Police, after this, that they sent me out of the Police-station, without leting me explain properly,
    about this, why I thought I was being followed, have been having some type of survailance operation, around me.

    And that this Street Theater operation, at the CAB, last year, was part of this Police surveilance operation.

    So that the whole meeting there, wasn’t a proper meeting at all, just some kind of phoney set-up.

    I don’t think this is right.

    Because since Norway are part of the EU-market, then Norwegian citizens have the right, to work and live in Britain.

    And I have paid tax to the UK government, and to the Council.

    So I don’t think it’s right that my rights should be ignored, in a way like this, since the Police want’s to have some
    kind of set-ups, like it seems.

    Anyway, how this is, I can’t see that this is reflected on in your report.

    But I suspect, due to the mistakes in your report, that I’ve mentioned, and due to the many things you just ignore in it,
    and fail to reflect on.

    Due to this, I also suspect that your report, could be part of this phoney Police operation, or what this all is.

    So I think this is very poor.

    That the organisation, and system, around the CAB, that is supposed to work for making sure that peoples rights are
    respected, just play games with peoples rights in a way like this.

    Since I think it has to be something phoney going on here, since the whole CAB process around the meeting and
    the complaint, is obviously corrupt.

    So the reason that I’m writing this e-mail, isn’t really because that I think something will be done regarding the
    serious issues I’ve been pointing at here.

    But I’m planning to publish my e-mail on my blog, so then at least, I’ll be able to deal with this in that way, that
    I at least get this published, so that maybe someone reads this, and maybe react or reflect on what’s going on.

    So that’s really why I’m writing this e-mail.

    Just to explain about this.

    Hope this is alright!

    Yours sincerly,

    Erik Ribsskog

    On 4/24/08, Barbara Stow wrote:
    Dear Mr Eribsskog

    I enclose the report of my review of your complaint.

    I have also sent it to Citizens Advice. They will write to you within the next two weeks when they have considered the report.

    Yours sincerely

    Barbara Stow
    Independent Adjudicator

    —– Forwarded Message —-
    From: Barbara Stow
    To: Erik Ribsskog

    Sent: Friday, 18 April, 2008 12:12:35 PM
    Subject: Fw: Citizens Advice

    Dear Mr Ribsskog

    When I wrote to you on 1 April I said that I hoped to complete my review by today, 18 April.

    I have almost done so but I am not yet quite ready to send the report.

    I am sorry for the delay. I will write to you again not later than the end of next week.

    Yours sincerely

    Barbara Stow
    Independent Adjudicator

    —– Forwarded Message —-
    From: Barbara Stow
    To: Erik Ribsskog
    Sent: Tuesday, 1 April, 2008 1:05:32 PM
    Subject: Citizens Advice

    Dear Mr Ribsskog

    I am the independent adjudicator for the Citizens Advice service and I write to confirm that Saffron Follows, on behalf of David Harker, has asked me to review how your complaint has been dealt with. I am writing by e-mail as I understand this is your preferred means of communication.

    I will consider whether your complaint has been dealt with in line with the Citizens Advice national complaints procedure and fairly. I have no authority to say whether your complaint justified. My task is to say whether it has been considered properly.

    Ms Follows has sent me the correspondence about your complaint. This includes the e-mail message of 14 March to David Harker in which you accepted the offer that someone independent could look at your complaint.

    If there is anything more you would like to say to me about why you are unhappy with the way your complaint has been considered, please let me know at the e-mail address above.

    I hope to be able to complete my review by 18 April. If I have not heard from you by 11 April I will assume that there is nothing you want to add to what you have explained already.

    Yours sincerely

    Barbara Stow
    Independent Adjudicator

  • E-mail to the independent CAB Adjudicator, Barbara Stow, on 28/4/08.

    From: eribsskog@gmail.com Erik Ribsskog
    To: stow_adjudicator@btinternet.com Barbara Stow
    Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 12:49:34 +0100
    Subject: Re: Fw: Citizens Advice

    Hi,

    I think, that, when you wrote your report, you must have thought that the
    automated e-mail, was sent on the
    same day, as the e-mail it was answering to.

    (And not six days before).

    And also, you must have thought, that the CAB, had the right e-mail adresse,
    on their website.

    I explain to you, that this isn’t right.

    So, you have had wrong information, that you have based your report on.

    I also question your judgement, regarding, what you wrote in your report.

    This was mentioned, in points 1-8, in my previous e-mail, from 25/4.

    This is only for the record.

    I’m not telling you, what to do, regarding this. (Since I have no right to
    do that, since
    the CAB is a charity, and I have no formell right to complain about your
    report, as far
    I’ve understood).

    I just wanted to make opinion clear.

    Just for the record, so I at least can explain about the things I’m
    disagreeing with, even if I know,
    that I have no formell right to appeal.

    So I hope it is alright, that I bring this up for the record, anyway!

    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

    On 4/28/08, Barbara Stow wrote:
    >
    > Dear Mr Ribsskog
    >
    > The result of my review of how your complaint was handled is in my
    > report. I was grateful to you for pointing out my error in the date of the
    > e-mail and explaining where the wrong e-mail address for the bureau was
    > displayed.
    >
    > There is nothing else for me to add to the report.
    >
    > Yours sincerely
    >
    > Barbara Stow
    >
    >
    >
    > —– Original Message —-
    > From: Erik Ribsskog
    > To: Barbara Stow
    > Sent: Friday, 25 April, 2008 3:50:56 PM
    > Subject: Re: Fw: Citizens Advice
    >
    > Hi,
    >
    > I see that you have conluded your involvement.
    >
    > But, how can you say that the CAB haven’t done anything wrong, when.
    >
    > 1. The meeting at the CAB, was held in the dark.
    >
    > 2. The CAB representative, was lieing, in report 1, where he said he
    > turned the lights on there, at the beginning of the
    > meeting, which he didn’t he turned them on at the end of the meeting.
    >
    > 3. How could the automated message, be delayed for six days?
    >
    > 4. Why doesn’t anyone (neighter you, or the CAB Chief Executie), reflect
    > on, that the automated message, was delayed for six days?
    >
    > 5. I tell you, that there was a street theater operation, going on in the
    > CAB premisses.
    >
    > I don’t mean that the operation was on the steet outside the State House.
    >
    > Street Theater, is a term, it doesn’t have to be on the street, even if
    > it’s calles Street Theater.
    >
    > 6. How can the CAB have had the wrong e-mail address, on their website,
    > for years, like it seems from the website design?
    >
    > 7. Why is it, that I’m writing all the time, that the meeting, on 5/4, was
    > being held in the dark, and still noone reflects on this.
    > Isn’t this a bit inpolite, to act in a way like that?
    >
    > 8. You say, that the delay with the automated message, was not due to
    > something that was sinister.
    >
    > I appriciate, that you are explaining to me, what it isn’t due to.
    >
    > But the reason I’m complaing, is not to find out what it isn’t due to.
    >
    > I’m trying to find out what it is due to.
    >
    > So I’m really not very much viser, from your reply.
    >
    > I know one thing that it isn’t due to, but I think would be very fine, to
    > know what it was due to.
    >
    > What caused this, the six days delay, to the automated message.
    >
    > So I hope you have the oppertunity to have a look at this again!
    >
    > Yours sincerely,
    >
    > Erik Ribsskog
    >
    > Again, I’ve seen that you have conluded your work, but like I explained,
    > in the last e-mail, I can’t see that these issues are
    > being taken seriously, by eighter you or the Chief Executive, so I’m goint
    >
    >
    >
    > On 4/25/08, Barbara Stow wrote:
    > >
    > > Dear Mr Ribbskog
    > >
    > > Thank you for this message and for the second one to which you attached
    > > a screenshot.
    > >
    > > I attach my letter in reply.
    > >
    > > Barbara Stow
    > >
    > >
    > > —– Original Message —-
    > > From: Erik Ribsskog
    > > To: Barbara Stow
    > > Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 5:24:44 PM
    > > Subject: Re: Fw: Citizens Advice
    > >
    > > Hi,
    > >
    > > thank you very much for your answer!
    > >
    > > I’ve been reading through your report now, and I have some comments on
    > > it.
    > >
    > > I hope it’s alright that I send you these comments!
    > >
    > > 5.
    > >
    > > Here you write, that I left the employment with Arvato Services Ltd.
    > >
    > > What happened, was that the Managing Director ordered me home, with pay,
    > > since he wouldn’t let
    > > me stay and work there, since he feared for my security there, he said.
    > >
    > > Arvato, were supposed to call me, when they had checked up more about
    > > what went on in the company.
    > >
    > > They didn’t call me, but they pushed a ‘phoney’ letter under the door to
    > > the building I live in, which was
    > > written, by one the persons I had reported there, and which the Managing
    > > Director, had put in charge of
    > > the investigation of the problems I had reported.
    > >
    > > And then, I got a form, saying my employment there had ended.
    > >
    > > I reported about this to the Police, as continuing of the harassment,
    > > which is the way I saw it.
    > >
    > > Now lately, I’ve heard, that this type of dismissal, is also called
    > > ‘constructed dismissal’.
    > >
    > > So I didn’t leave the employment.
    > >
    > > I was the subject of a constructed dismissal.
    > >
    > > I thought I’d make a point of this, since this isn’t reflected in your
    > > report.
    > >
    > > 9.
    > >
    > > You write that the area was poorly lit.
    > >
    > > It was in fact very poorly lit.
    > >
    > > One couldn’t read like a folder or a newspaper there.
    > >
    > > (At the Liverpool Central CAB premisses).
    > >
    > > And most of the meeting there, was held in the dark there.
    > >
    > > This isn’t reflected in your report I think, that the meeting was
    > > held in the
    > > dark, so that it wasn’t possible to read there.
    > >
    > > 11.
    > >
    > > Morecrofts had promissed me, on 10/4, that they would take on the case,
    > > on a payment plan type
    > > of payment-solution.
    > >
    > > Miss Pool said this.
    > >
    > > So when they (Samantha) said on 24/4, that there could be no payment
    > > plan type of payment-solution,
    > > then the company, went back on what I had previously agreed with them.
    > >
    > > I thought I’d make a point of this as well, since I can’t see it’s
    > > reflected in your report.
    > >
    > > 16.
    > >
    > > You write, that the second e-mail I sent the CAB Chief Executive David
    > > Harker, was sent him on 22/8,
    > > the same day as the automated reply for this e-mail was sent back.
    > >
    > > This isn’t right at all.
    > >
    > > My e-mail, was sent on 16/8.
    > >
    > > And the CEO’s automated, or ‘automated’ reply, was sent back, on 22/8.
    > >
    > > I’m a bit disapointed, since noone seem to think, that this is
    > > remarkable.
    > >
    > > Since I myself, think, that automated replies, shouldn’t be sent many
    > > days later.
    > >
    > > Since then, I suspect that they aren’t really automated at all.
    > >
    > > Then I would start to think, that there’s something phoney going on.
    > >
    > > So I’m a bit disapointed that you write that the second e-mail, that I
    > > sent the Chief Executive,
    > > was sent on 22/8, when it was in fact sent on 16/8.
    > >
    > > 51.
    > >
    > > You write, that you have checked yourself, that the e-mail address,
    > > listed on
    > >
    > > www.liverpoolcab.org, now is the right e-mail address.
    > >
    > > But I checked it now, I went to the website, and pressed the
    > > e-mail-button.
    > >
    > > Then outlook opens, and the e-mail address that one get up, is:
    > >
    > > bureau@liverpoolcab.f9.co.uk
    > >
    > > and not the right e-mail address (bureau@liverpoolcab.org), like you
    > > write in your report.
    > >
    > > I’m enclosing a screenshot, from the Liverpool Central CAB website, from
    > > today, that shows this.
    > >
    > > 52.
    > >
    > > You say that the complaint was dealt with fairly.
    > >
    > > But I don’t agree with this.
    > >
    > > Due to these reasons:
    > >
    > > 1:
    > >
    > > The CAP-representative, said that the whole meeting there, on 5/4, was
    > > held with the lights on.
    > >
    > > But I explained, to the Chair there, that this was a lie.
    > >
    > > Since, he waited until the meeting was almost finished, before he
    > > switched the lights on.
    > >
    > > And before this, it wasn’t possible to read in the area.
    > >
    > > The fact, that the representative, read the fax-number, from the phone
    > > list, instead of the
    > > phone-number, to EAD, I think shows this, that the representative lied.
    > >
    > > But this fact, that the representative lied, has been ignored, by the
    > > Chair there, thats Chairman of
    > > the Board then, I presume. And by the CAB Chief Executive.
    > >
    > > I don’t think this is very fair.
    > >
    > > 2:
    > >
    > > Further, you write, that e-mails were answered late.
    > >
    > > But some e-mails, like the ones I sent the Comlaints Manager there,
    > > Follows, weren’t answered at all.
    > >
    > > This isn’t reflected on, as far as I can see, in your report.
    > >
    > > 3:
    > >
    > > And what about the problems with the automated reply.
    > >
    > > Or the ‘magic’ automated reply, would maybe be a better description of
    > > the nature of this reply.
    > >
    > > Since the automaded reply, waited, from 16/8, untill 22/8, before it
    > > found it right to send itself.
    > >
    > > Isn’t this a bit strange, that the CAB headoffice, is operating, with
    > > seemingly ‘magic’ automated replies?
    > >
    > > Why didn’t the Chief Executive reflect on this at all?
    > >
    > > Even if I made a point of it, in the compaint.
    > >
    > > So I don’t agree with you, that the complaint was dealt with fairly.
    > >
    > > And I also think also you yourself, should have maybe reflected more on,
    > > at least, point 1 and 3 here, in your report,
    > > since I made a point out of these issues, in my remarks, regarding the
    > > Stage 3 report, from the Chief Executive.
    > >
    > > These are the issues that comes to mind, from reading your report now.
    > >
    > > So I thought I’d send you them, so that you could be aware, of the
    > > obvious errors you’ve made, with the Liverpool
    > > Central CAB’s e-mail address, on their website, which you write that you
    > > have checked, and you say it’s now
    > > the right address, which it isn’t.
    > >
    > > And the error, when you write, that my second e-mail to the Chief
    > > Executive, was sent on the same date, as the
    > > (‘magic’) automated reply, was sent back (22/8), when the e-mail was in
    > > fact sent on 16/8. (And not on 22/8,
    > > like you write in your report).
    > >
    > > So these are obvious errors, to do with obvious facts. So I don’t think
    > > this can be disputed.
    > >
    > > The other issues, surrounding that the lie from the CAB representative,
    > > isn’t reflected on.
    > >
    > > That the fact that the meeting there, was held in the dark, isn’t
    > > acknoledgded, even if I make a point of it in the
    > > answers to the various reports, I think is worrying.
    > >
    > > Since I explain what happened around this in detail.
    > >
    > > That I explain that the CAB representative read the fax-number to the
    > > EAD-company, instead of the phone-number.
    > >
    > > So it shouldn’t really be any doubt regarding if the meeting there, was
    > > held in the dark or not.
    > >
    > > I also explained, that there seemed to be some kind of ‘Street
    > > Theather’, arranged there, at the Liverpool Central CAB.
    > >
    > > That it seemed that there was a planned Street Theather operation, set
    > > up there, in connection with my meeting there
    > > on 5/4, last year.
    > >
    > > This isn’t taken seriously.
    > >
    > > I think this is probably something to do with, that I have been in
    > > contact, with the Liverpool Police, regarding something
    > > I overheard, when I was working in Norway, that I was followed, for some
    > > reason unclear to me, by some mafia.
    > >
    > > (Possibly due to some honour-stuff, due to some misunderstandings, with
    > > a collegue there, in the township, that the
    > > shop I worked as part-time team-leader in, besides my University level
    > > studies).
    > >
    > > When I got to Liverpool, I overheard that the Police-officer, that I
    > > explained to, that I was followed, said on the back-office,
    > > on St. Ann St. Police Station there, that ‘don’t he understand, that
    > > noone wants to be involved’.
    > >
    > > I think, that the British Police, after this, that they sent me out of
    > > the Police-station, without leting me explain properly,
    > > about this, why I thought I was being followed, have been having some
    > > type of survailance operation, around me.
    > >
    > > And that this Street Theater operation, at the CAB, last year, was part
    > > of this Police surveilance operation.
    > >
    > > So that the whole meeting there, wasn’t a proper meeting at all, just
    > > some kind of phoney set-up.
    > >
    > > I don’t think this is right.
    > >
    > > Because since Norway are part of the EU-market, then Norwegian citizens
    > > have the right, to work and live in Britain.
    > >
    > > And I have paid tax to the UK government, and to the Council.
    > >
    > > So I don’t think it’s right that my rights should be ignored, in a way
    > > like this, since the Police want’s to have some
    > > kind of set-ups, like it seems.
    > >
    > > Anyway, how this is, I can’t see that this is reflected on in your
    > > report.
    > >
    > > But I suspect, due to the mistakes in your report, that I’ve mentioned,
    > > and due to the many things you just ignore in it,
    > > and fail to reflect on.
    > >
    > > Due to this, I also suspect that your report, could be part of this
    > > phoney Police operation, or what this all is.
    > >
    > > So I think this is very poor.
    > >
    > > That the organisation, and system, around the CAB, that is supposed to
    > > work for making sure that peoples rights are
    > > respected, just play games with peoples rights in a way like this.
    > >
    > > Since I think it has to be something phoney going on here, since the
    > > whole CAB process around the meeting and
    > > the complaint, is obviously corrupt.
    > >
    > > So the reason that I’m writing this e-mail, isn’t really because that I
    > > think something will be done regarding the
    > > serious issues I’ve been pointing at here.
    > >
    > > But I’m planning to publish my e-mail on my blog, so then at least, I’ll
    > > be able to deal with this in that way, that
    > > I at least get this published, so that maybe someone reads this, and
    > > maybe react or reflect on what’s going on.
    > >
    > > So that’s really why I’m writing this e-mail.
    > >
    > > Just to explain about this.
    > >
    > > Hope this is alright!
    > >
    > > Yours sincerly,
    > >
    > > Erik Ribsskog
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > > On 4/24/08, Barbara Stow wrote:
    > > >
    > > > Dear Mr Eribsskog
    > > >
    > > > I enclose the report of my review of your complaint.
    > > >
    > > > I have also sent it to Citizens Advice. They will write to you within
    > > > the next two weeks when they have considered the report.
    > > >
    > > > Yours sincerely
    > > >
    > > >
    > > > Barbara Stow
    > > > Independent Adjudicator
    > > >
    > > >
    > > > —– Forwarded Message —-
    > > > From: Barbara Stow
    > > > To: Erik Ribsskog
    > > > Sent: Friday, 18 April, 2008 12:12:35 PM
    > > > Subject: Fw: Citizens Advice
    > > >
    > > > Dear Mr Ribsskog
    > > >
    > > > When I wrote to you on 1 April I said that I hoped to complete my
    > > > review by today, 18 April.
    > > >
    > > > I have almost done so but I am not yet quite ready to send the report.
    > > >
    > > > I am sorry for the delay. I will write to you again not later than
    > > > the end of next week.
    > > >
    > > > Yours sincerely
    > > >
    > > > Barbara Stow
    > > > Independent Adjudicator
    > > >
    > > >
    > > >
    > > >
    > > > —– Forwarded Message —-
    > > > From: Barbara Stow
    > > > To: Erik Ribsskog
    > > > Sent: Tuesday, 1 April, 2008 1:05:32 PM
    > > > Subject: Citizens Advice
    > > >
    > > > Dear Mr Ribsskog
    > > >
    > > > I am the independent adjudicator for the Citizens Advice service and I
    > > > write to confirm that Saffron Follows, on behalf of David Harker, has asked
    > > > me to review how your complaint has been dealt with. I am writing by e-mail
    > > > as I understand this is your preferred means of communication.
    > > >
    > > > I will consider whether your complaint has been dealt with in line
    > > > with the Citizens Advice national complaints procedure and fairly. I have
    > > > no authority to say whether your complaint justified. My task is to say
    > > > whether it has been considered properly.
    > > >
    > > > Ms Follows has sent me the correspondence about your complaint. This
    > > > includes the e-mail message of 14 March to David Harker in which you
    > > > accepted the offer that someone independent could look at your complaint.
    > > >
    > > > If there is anything more you would like to say to me about why you
    > > > are unhappy with the way your complaint has been considered, please let me
    > > > know at the e-mail address above.
    > > >
    > > > I hope to be able to complete my review by 18 April. If I have not
    > > > heard from you by 11 April I will assume that there is nothing you want to
    > > > add to what you have explained already.
    > > >
    > > > Yours sincerely
    > > >
    > > > Barbara Stow
    > > > Independent Adjudicator
    > > >
    > > >
    > > >
    > > >
    > > >
    > > >
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > >
    >
    >
    >

  • E-mail from the independent CAB Adjudicator, on 28/4/08.

    From: stow_adjudicator@btinternet.com Barbara Stow
    To: eribsskog@gmail.com Erik Ribsskog
    Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 12:09:00 +0100
    Subject: Re: Fw: Citizens Advice

    Dear Mr Ribsskog

    The result of my review of how your complaint was handled is in my report. I was grateful to you for pointing out my error in the date of the e-mail and explaining where the wrong e-mail address for the bureau was displayed.

    There is nothing else for me to add to the report.

    Yours sincerely

    Barbara Stow

    —– Original Message —-
    From: Erik Ribsskog
    To: Barbara Stow
    Sent: Friday, 25 April, 2008 3:50:56 PM
    Subject: Re: Fw: Citizens Advice

    Hi,

    I see that you have conluded your involvement.

    But, how can you say that the CAB haven’t done anything wrong, when.

    1. The meeting at the CAB, was held in the dark.

    2. The CAB representative, was lieing, in report 1, where he said he turned the lights on there, at the beginning of the
    meeting, which he didn’t he turned them on at the end of the meeting.

    3. How could the automated message, be delayed for six days?

    4. Why doesn’t anyone (neighter you, or the CAB Chief Executie), reflect on, that the automated message, was delayed for six days?

    5. I tell you, that there was a street theater operation, going on in the CAB premisses.

    I don’t mean that the operation was on the steet outside the State House.

    Street Theater, is a term, it doesn’t have to be on the street, even if it’s calles Street Theater.

    6. How can the CAB have had the wrong e-mail address, on their website, for years, like it seems from the website design?

    7. Why is it, that I’m writing all the time, that the meeting, on 5/4, was being held in the dark, and still noone reflects on this.
    Isn’t this a bit inpolite, to act in a way like that?

    8. You say, that the delay with the automated message, was not due to something that was sinister.

    I appriciate, that you are explaining to me, what it isn’t due to.

    But the reason I’m complaing, is not to find out what it isn’t due to.

    I’m trying to find out what it is due to.

    So I’m really not very much viser, from your reply.

    I know one thing that it isn’t due to, but I think would be very fine, to know what it was due to.

    What caused this, the six days delay, to the automated message.

    So I hope you have the oppertunity to have a look at this again!

    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

    Again, I’ve seen that you have conluded your work, but like I explained, in the last e-mail, I can’t see that these issues are
    being taken seriously, by eighter you or the Chief Executive, so I’m goint

    On 4/25/08, Barbara Stow wrote:
    Dear Mr Ribbskog

    Thank you for this message and for the second one to which you attached a screenshot.

    I attach my letter in reply.

    Barbara Stow

    —– Original Message —-
    From: Erik Ribsskog
    To: Barbara Stow
    Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 5:24:44 PM
    Subject: Re: Fw: Citizens Advice

    Hi,

    thank you very much for your answer!

    I’ve been reading through your report now, and I have some comments on it.

    I hope it’s alright that I send you these comments!

    5.

    Here you write, that I left the employment with Arvato Services Ltd.

    What happened, was that the Managing Director ordered me home, with pay, since he wouldn’t let
    me stay and work there, since he feared for my security there, he said.

    Arvato, were supposed to call me, when they had checked up more about what went on in the company.

    They didn’t call me, but they pushed a ‘phoney’ letter under the door to the building I live in, which was
    written, by one the persons I had reported there, and which the Managing Director, had put in charge of
    the investigation of the problems I had reported.

    And then, I got a form, saying my employment there had ended.

    I reported about this to the Police, as continuing of the harassment, which is the way I saw it.

    Now lately, I’ve heard, that this type of dismissal, is also called ‘constructed dismissal’.

    So I didn’t leave the employment.

    I was the subject of a constructed dismissal.

    I thought I’d make a point of this, since this isn’t reflected in your report.

    9.

    You write that the area was poorly lit.

    It was in fact very poorly lit.

    One couldn’t read like a folder or a newspaper there.

    (At the Liverpool Central CAB premisses).

    And most of the meeting there, was held in the dark there.

    This isn’t reflected in your report I think, that the meeting was held in the
    dark, so that it wasn’t possible to read there.

    11.

    Morecrofts had promissed me, on 10/4, that they would take on the case, on a payment plan type
    of payment-solution.

    Miss Pool said this.

    So when they (Samantha) said on 24/4, that there could be no payment plan type of payment-solution,
    then the company, went back on what I had previously agreed with them.

    I thought I’d make a point of this as well, since I can’t see it’s reflected in your report.

    16.

    You write, that the second e-mail I sent the CAB Chief Executive David Harker, was sent him on 22/8,
    the same day as the automated reply for this e-mail was sent back.

    This isn’t right at all.

    My e-mail, was sent on 16/8.

    And the CEO’s automated, or ‘automated’ reply, was sent back, on 22/8.

    I’m a bit disapointed, since noone seem to think, that this is remarkable.

    Since I myself, think, that automated replies, shouldn’t be sent many days later.

    Since then, I suspect that they aren’t really automated at all.

    Then I would start to think, that there’s something phoney going on.

    So I’m a bit disapointed that you write that the second e-mail, that I sent the Chief Executive,
    was sent on 22/8, when it was in fact sent on 16/8.

    51.

    You write, that you have checked yourself, that the e-mail address, listed on

    www.liverpoolcab.org, now is the right e-mail address.

    But I checked it now, I went to the website, and pressed the e-mail-button.

    Then outlook opens, and the e-mail address that one get up, is:

    bureau@liverpoolcab.f9.co.uk

    and not the right e-mail address (bureau@liverpoolcab.org), like you write in your report.

    I’m enclosing a screenshot, from the Liverpool Central CAB website, from today, that shows this.

    52.

    You say that the complaint was dealt with fairly.

    But I don’t agree with this.

    Due to these reasons:

    1:

    The CAP-representative, said that the whole meeting there, on 5/4, was held with the lights on.

    But I explained, to the Chair there, that this was a lie.

    Since, he waited until the meeting was almost finished, before he switched the lights on.

    And before this, it wasn’t possible to read in the area.

    The fact, that the representative, read the fax-number, from the phone list, instead of the
    phone-number, to EAD, I think shows this, that the representative lied.

    But this fact, that the representative lied, has been ignored, by the Chair there, thats Chairman of
    the Board then, I presume. And by the CAB Chief Executive.

    I don’t think this is very fair.

    2:

    Further, you write, that e-mails were answered late.

    But some e-mails, like the ones I sent the Comlaints Manager there, Follows, weren’t answered at all.

    This isn’t reflected on, as far as I can see, in your report.

    3:

    And what about the problems with the automated reply.

    Or the ‘magic’ automated reply, would maybe be a better description of the nature of this reply.

    Since the automaded reply, waited, from 16/8, untill 22/8, before it found it right to send itself.

    Isn’t this a bit strange, that the CAB headoffice, is operating, with seemingly ‘magic’ automated replies?

    Why didn’t the Chief Executive reflect on this at all?

    Even if I made a point of it, in the compaint.

    So I don’t agree with you, that the complaint was dealt with fairly.

    And I also think also you yourself, should have maybe reflected more on, at least, point 1 and 3 here, in your report,
    since I made a point out of these issues, in my remarks, regarding the Stage 3 report, from the Chief Executive.

    These are the issues that comes to mind, from reading your report now.

    So I thought I’d send you them, so that you could be aware, of the obvious errors you’ve made, with the Liverpool
    Central CAB’s e-mail address, on their website, which you write that you have checked, and you say it’s now
    the right address, which it isn’t.

    And the error, when you write, that my second e-mail to the Chief Executive, was sent on the same date, as the
    (‘magic’) automated reply, was sent back (22/8), when the e-mail was in fact sent on 16/8. (And not on 22/8,
    like you write in your report).

    So these are obvious errors, to do with obvious facts. So I don’t think this can be disputed.

    The other issues, surrounding that the lie from the CAB representative, isn’t reflected on.

    That the fact that the meeting there, was held in the dark, isn’t acknoledgded, even if I make a point of it in the
    answers to the various reports, I think is worrying.

    Since I explain what happened around this in detail.

    That I explain that the CAB representative read the fax-number to the EAD-company, instead of the phone-number.

    So it shouldn’t really be any doubt regarding if the meeting there, was held in the dark or not.

    I also explained, that there seemed to be some kind of ‘Street Theather’, arranged there, at the Liverpool Central CAB.

    That it seemed that there was a planned Street Theather operation, set up there, in connection with my meeting there
    on 5/4, last year.

    This isn’t taken seriously.

    I think this is probably something to do with, that I have been in contact, with the Liverpool Police, regarding something
    I overheard, when I was working in Norway, that I was followed, for some reason unclear to me, by some mafia.

    (Possibly due to some honour-stuff, due to some misunderstandings, with a collegue there, in the township, that the
    shop I worked as part-time team-leader in, besides my University level studies).

    When I got to Liverpool, I overheard that the Police-officer, that I explained to, that I was followed, said on the back-office,
    on St. Ann St. Police Station there, that ‘don’t he understand, that noone wants to be involved’.

    I think, that the British Police, after this, that they sent me out of the Police-station, without leting me explain properly,
    about this, why I thought I was being followed, have been having some type of survailance operation, around me.

    And that this Street Theater operation, at the CAB, last year, was part of this Police surveilance operation.

    So that the whole meeting there, wasn’t a proper meeting at all, just some kind of phoney set-up.

    I don’t think this is right.

    Because since Norway are part of the EU-market, then Norwegian citizens have the right, to work and live in Britain.

    And I have paid tax to the UK government, and to the Council.

    So I don’t think it’s right that my rights should be ignored, in a way like this, since the Police want’s to have some
    kind of set-ups, like it seems.

    Anyway, how this is, I can’t see that this is reflected on in your report.

    But I suspect, due to the mistakes in your report, that I’ve mentioned, and due to the many things you just ignore in it,
    and fail to reflect on.

    Due to this, I also suspect that your report, could be part of this phoney Police operation, or what this all is.

    So I think this is very poor.

    That the organisation, and system, around the CAB, that is supposed to work for making sure that peoples rights are
    respected, just play games with peoples rights in a way like this.

    Since I think it has to be something phoney going on here, since the whole CAB process around the meeting and
    the complaint, is obviously corrupt.

    So the reason that I’m writing this e-mail, isn’t really because that I think something will be done regarding the
    serious issues I’ve been pointing at here.

    But I’m planning to publish my e-mail on my blog, so then at least, I’ll be able to deal with this in that way, that
    I at least get this published, so that maybe someone reads this, and maybe react or reflect on what’s going on.

    So that’s really why I’m writing this e-mail.

    Just to explain about this.

    Hope this is alright!

    Yours sincerly,

    Erik Ribsskog

    On 4/24/08, Barbara Stow wrote:
    Dear Mr Eribsskog

    I enclose the report of my review of your complaint.

    I have also sent it to Citizens Advice. They will write to you within the next two weeks when they have considered the report.

    Yours sincerely

    Barbara Stow
    Independent Adjudicator

    —– Forwarded Message —-
    From: Barbara Stow
    To: Erik Ribsskog

    Sent: Friday, 18 April, 2008 12:12:35 PM
    Subject: Fw: Citizens Advice

    Dear Mr Ribsskog

    When I wrote to you on 1 April I said that I hoped to complete my review by today, 18 April.

    I have almost done so but I am not yet quite ready to send the report.

    I am sorry for the delay. I will write to you again not later than the end of next week.

    Yours sincerely

    Barbara Stow
    Independent Adjudicator

    —– Forwarded Message —-
    From: Barbara Stow
    To: Erik Ribsskog
    Sent: Tuesday, 1 April, 2008 1:05:32 PM
    Subject: Citizens Advice

    Dear Mr Ribsskog

    I am the independent adjudicator for the Citizens Advice service and I write to confirm that Saffron Follows, on behalf of David Harker, has asked me to review how your complaint has been dealt with. I am writing by e-mail as I understand this is your preferred means of communication.

    I will consider whether your complaint has been dealt with in line with the Citizens Advice national complaints procedure and fairly. I have no authority to say whether your complaint justified. My task is to say whether it has been considered properly.

    Ms Follows has sent me the correspondence about your complaint. This includes the e-mail message of 14 March to David Harker in which you accepted the offer that someone independent could look at your complaint.

    If there is anything more you would like to say to me about why you are unhappy with the way your complaint has been considered, please let me know at the e-mail address above.

    I hope to be able to complete my review by 18 April. If I have not heard from you by 11 April I will assume that there is nothing you want to add to what you have explained already.

    Yours sincerely

    Barbara Stow
    Independent Adjudicator

  • E-mail from the Ministry of Justice, 25/4/08.

    From: Ryan.Holmes@justice.gsi.gov.uk Holmes, Ryan
    To: eribsskog@gmail.com
    Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 14:30:07 +0100
    Subject: Our ref: TO08/2153

    Dear Mr Ribsskog

    Thank you for your email reply of 7 April, in which you request further advice on ways to proceed forward with your complaint against the Legal Services Ombudsman (LSO). To assist you with your concerns, I shall set out the avenues of legal assistance available to you that acknowledge your specific financial concerns.

    Firstly, while I understand you have already been in contact with the Citizen’s Advice Bureau (CAB), you may also wish to consider contacting your local Law Centre. Contact details for your local Law Centre can be found via the Law Centres Federation on 0207 428 4401, or by accessing their website www.lawcentres.org.uk. You may also find it helpful to access the Community Legal Services Direct website for information on providers of legal advice at www.clsdirect.org.uk. Alternatively, you may choose to contact Community Legal Advice for free confidential help regarding your legal queries on 0845 345 4345.

    Secondly, it may be worth investigating the possibility of a Conditional Fee Agreement (CFA). This allows a solicitor to accept a case on a ‘no won, no fee’ basis, under which they receive a fee from you only if the case is won. It is worth pointing that the solicitor’s standard fees can be increased by up to 100% to reflect the degree of risk to the solicitor in taking the case on (the ‘success fee’). However, should you lose your case, you may still be liable to pay the successful party’s costs, as well as expert witness fees and other disbursements. There are insurance schemes that, for a premium, provide cover for these items. As part of the implementation of the Access to Justice Act 1999, we have made it possible for the successful side to recover their lawyer’s success fee and insurance premium form the loser. Effectively, this has made the operation of conditional fees fairer and more attractive to clients.

    Thirdly, some solicitors may be prepared to take on your case on a pro bono agreement (i.e. provide you with a free service). You can contact the Law Society who can provide you with a list of solicitors that may provide pro bono services. The Law Society is the regulatory body for solicitors in England and Wales and you can write to them at the following address:

    The Law Society
    113 Chancery Lane
    London
    WC2A 1SX
    Tel: 0870 606 2555.

    Alternatively, you can access the Law Society’s website at www.solicitors-online.com.

    I do hope that you find this information useful.

    Yours sincerely

    Ryan Holmes
    Legal Services Regulation and Redress Division

    This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.

    This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.

    This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.

    The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2007/11/0032.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.
    Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes.

  • E-mail to the Independent CAB Adjudicator, 25/4/08.

    From: eribsskog@gmail.com Erik Ribsskog
    To: stow_adjudicator@btinternet.com Barbara Stow
    Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 15:50:56 +0100
    Subject: Re: Fw: Citizens Advice

    Hi,

    I see that you have conluded your involvement.

    But, how can you say that the CAB haven’t done anything wrong, when.

    1. The meeting at the CAB, was held in the dark.

    2. The CAB representative, was lieing, in report 1, where he said he turned
    the lights on there, at the beginning of the
    meeting, which he didn’t he turned them on at the end of the meeting.

    3. How could the automated message, be delayed for six days?

    4. Why doesn’t anyone (neighter you, or the CAB Chief Executie), reflect on,
    that the automated message, was delayed for six days?

    5. I tell you, that there was a street theater operation, going on in the
    CAB premisses.

    I don’t mean that the operation was on the steet outside the State House.

    Street Theater, is a term, it doesn’t have to be on the street, even if it’s
    calles Street Theater.

    6. How can the CAB have had the wrong e-mail address, on their website, for
    years, like it seems from the website design?

    7. Why is it, that I’m writing all the time, that the meeting, on 5/4, was
    being held in the dark, and still noone reflects on this.
    Isn’t this a bit inpolite, to act in a way like that?

    8. You say, that the delay with the automated message, was not due to
    something that was sinister.

    I appriciate, that you are explaining to me, what it isn’t due to.

    But the reason I’m complaing, is not to find out what it isn’t due to.

    I’m trying to find out what it is due to.

    So I’m really not very much viser, from your reply.

    I know one thing that it isn’t due to, but I think would be very fine, to
    know what it was due to.

    What caused this, the six days delay, to the automated message.

    So I hope you have the oppertunity to have a look at this again!

    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

    Again, I’ve seen that you have conluded your work, but like I explained, in
    the last e-mail, I can’t see that these issues are
    being taken seriously, by eighter you or the Chief Executive, so I’m goint

    On 4/25/08, Barbara Stow wrote:
    >
    > Dear Mr Ribbskog
    >
    > Thank you for this message and for the second one to which you attached a
    > screenshot.
    >
    > I attach my letter in reply.
    >
    > Barbara Stow
    >
    >
    > —– Original Message —-
    > From: Erik Ribsskog
    > To: Barbara Stow
    > Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 5:24:44 PM
    > Subject: Re: Fw: Citizens Advice
    >
    > Hi,
    >
    > thank you very much for your answer!
    >
    > I’ve been reading through your report now, and I have some comments on it.
    >
    > I hope it’s alright that I send you these comments!
    >
    > 5.
    >
    > Here you write, that I left the employment with Arvato Services Ltd.
    >
    > What happened, was that the Managing Director ordered me home, with pay,
    > since he wouldn’t let
    > me stay and work there, since he feared for my security there, he said.
    >
    > Arvato, were supposed to call me, when they had checked up more about what
    > went on in the company.
    >
    > They didn’t call me, but they pushed a ‘phoney’ letter under the door to
    > the building I live in, which was
    > written, by one the persons I had reported there, and which the Managing
    > Director, had put in charge of
    > the investigation of the problems I had reported.
    >
    > And then, I got a form, saying my employment there had ended.
    >
    > I reported about this to the Police, as continuing of the harassment,
    > which is the way I saw it.
    >
    > Now lately, I’ve heard, that this type of dismissal, is also called
    > ‘constructed dismissal’.
    >
    > So I didn’t leave the employment.
    >
    > I was the subject of a constructed dismissal.
    >
    > I thought I’d make a point of this, since this isn’t reflected in your
    > report.
    >
    > 9.
    >
    > You write that the area was poorly lit.
    >
    > It was in fact very poorly lit.
    >
    > One couldn’t read like a folder or a newspaper there.
    >
    > (At the Liverpool Central CAB premisses).
    >
    > And most of the meeting there, was held in the dark there.
    >
    > This isn’t reflected in your report I think, that the meeting was held in
    > the
    > dark, so that it wasn’t possible to read there.
    >
    > 11.
    >
    > Morecrofts had promissed me, on 10/4, that they would take on the case, on
    > a payment plan type
    > of payment-solution.
    >
    > Miss Pool said this.
    >
    > So when they (Samantha) said on 24/4, that there could be no payment plan
    > type of payment-solution,
    > then the company, went back on what I had previously agreed with them.
    >
    > I thought I’d make a point of this as well, since I can’t see it’s
    > reflected in your report.
    >
    > 16.
    >
    > You write, that the second e-mail I sent the CAB Chief Executive David
    > Harker, was sent him on 22/8,
    > the same day as the automated reply for this e-mail was sent back.
    >
    > This isn’t right at all.
    >
    > My e-mail, was sent on 16/8.
    >
    > And the CEO’s automated, or ‘automated’ reply, was sent back, on 22/8.
    >
    > I’m a bit disapointed, since noone seem to think, that this is remarkable.
    >
    > Since I myself, think, that automated replies, shouldn’t be sent many days
    > later.
    >
    > Since then, I suspect that they aren’t really automated at all.
    >
    > Then I would start to think, that there’s something phoney going on.
    >
    > So I’m a bit disapointed that you write that the second e-mail, that I
    > sent the Chief Executive,
    > was sent on 22/8, when it was in fact sent on 16/8.
    >
    > 51.
    >
    > You write, that you have checked yourself, that the e-mail address, listed
    > on
    >
    > www.liverpoolcab.org, now is the right e-mail address.
    >
    > But I checked it now, I went to the website, and pressed the
    > e-mail-button.
    >
    > Then outlook opens, and the e-mail address that one get up, is:
    >
    > bureau@liverpoolcab.f9.co.uk
    >
    > and not the right e-mail address (bureau@liverpoolcab.org), like you write
    > in your report.
    >
    > I’m enclosing a screenshot, from the Liverpool Central CAB website, from
    > today, that shows this.
    >
    > 52.
    >
    > You say that the complaint was dealt with fairly.
    >
    > But I don’t agree with this.
    >
    > Due to these reasons:
    >
    > 1:
    >
    > The CAP-representative, said that the whole meeting there, on 5/4, was
    > held with the lights on.
    >
    > But I explained, to the Chair there, that this was a lie.
    >
    > Since, he waited until the meeting was almost finished, before he switched
    > the lights on.
    >
    > And before this, it wasn’t possible to read in the area.
    >
    > The fact, that the representative, read the fax-number, from the phone
    > list, instead of the
    > phone-number, to EAD, I think shows this, that the representative lied.
    >
    > But this fact, that the representative lied, has been ignored, by the
    > Chair there, thats Chairman of
    > the Board then, I presume. And by the CAB Chief Executive.
    >
    > I don’t think this is very fair.
    >
    > 2:
    >
    > Further, you write, that e-mails were answered late.
    >
    > But some e-mails, like the ones I sent the Comlaints Manager there,
    > Follows, weren’t answered at all.
    >
    > This isn’t reflected on, as far as I can see, in your report.
    >
    > 3:
    >
    > And what about the problems with the automated reply.
    >
    > Or the ‘magic’ automated reply, would maybe be a better description of the
    > nature of this reply.
    >
    > Since the automaded reply, waited, from 16/8, untill 22/8, before it found
    > it right to send itself.
    >
    > Isn’t this a bit strange, that the CAB headoffice, is operating, with
    > seemingly ‘magic’ automated replies?
    >
    > Why didn’t the Chief Executive reflect on this at all?
    >
    > Even if I made a point of it, in the compaint.
    >
    > So I don’t agree with you, that the complaint was dealt with fairly.
    >
    > And I also think also you yourself, should have maybe reflected more on,
    > at least, point 1 and 3 here, in your report,
    > since I made a point out of these issues, in my remarks, regarding the
    > Stage 3 report, from the Chief Executive.
    >
    > These are the issues that comes to mind, from reading your report now.
    >
    > So I thought I’d send you them, so that you could be aware, of the obvious
    > errors you’ve made, with the Liverpool
    > Central CAB’s e-mail address, on their website, which you write that you
    > have checked, and you say it’s now
    > the right address, which it isn’t.
    >
    > And the error, when you write, that my second e-mail to the Chief
    > Executive, was sent on the same date, as the
    > (‘magic’) automated reply, was sent back (22/8), when the e-mail was in
    > fact sent on 16/8. (And not on 22/8,
    > like you write in your report).
    >
    > So these are obvious errors, to do with obvious facts. So I don’t think
    > this can be disputed.
    >
    > The other issues, surrounding that the lie from the CAB representative,
    > isn’t reflected on.
    >
    > That the fact that the meeting there, was held in the dark, isn’t
    > acknoledgded, even if I make a point of it in the
    > answers to the various reports, I think is worrying.
    >
    > Since I explain what happened around this in detail.
    >
    > That I explain that the CAB representative read the fax-number to the
    > EAD-company, instead of the phone-number.
    >
    > So it shouldn’t really be any doubt regarding if the meeting there, was
    > held in the dark or not.
    >
    > I also explained, that there seemed to be some kind of ‘Street Theather’,
    > arranged there, at the Liverpool Central CAB.
    >
    > That it seemed that there was a planned Street Theather operation, set up
    > there, in connection with my meeting there
    > on 5/4, last year.
    >
    > This isn’t taken seriously.
    >
    > I think this is probably something to do with, that I have been in
    > contact, with the Liverpool Police, regarding something
    > I overheard, when I was working in Norway, that I was followed, for some
    > reason unclear to me, by some mafia.
    >
    > (Possibly due to some honour-stuff, due to some misunderstandings, with a
    > collegue there, in the township, that the
    > shop I worked as part-time team-leader in, besides my University level
    > studies).
    >
    > When I got to Liverpool, I overheard that the Police-officer, that I
    > explained to, that I was followed, said on the back-office,
    > on St. Ann St. Police Station there, that ‘don’t he understand, that noone
    > wants to be involved’.
    >
    > I think, that the British Police, after this, that they sent me out of the
    > Police-station, without leting me explain properly,
    > about this, why I thought I was being followed, have been having some type
    > of survailance operation, around me.
    >
    > And that this Street Theater operation, at the CAB, last year, was part of
    > this Police surveilance operation.
    >
    > So that the whole meeting there, wasn’t a proper meeting at all, just some
    > kind of phoney set-up.
    >
    > I don’t think this is right.
    >
    > Because since Norway are part of the EU-market, then Norwegian citizens
    > have the right, to work and live in Britain.
    >
    > And I have paid tax to the UK government, and to the Council.
    >
    > So I don’t think it’s right that my rights should be ignored, in a way
    > like this, since the Police want’s to have some
    > kind of set-ups, like it seems.
    >
    > Anyway, how this is, I can’t see that this is reflected on in your report.
    >
    > But I suspect, due to the mistakes in your report, that I’ve mentioned,
    > and due to the many things you just ignore in it,
    > and fail to reflect on.
    >
    > Due to this, I also suspect that your report, could be part of this phoney
    > Police operation, or what this all is.
    >
    > So I think this is very poor.
    >
    > That the organisation, and system, around the CAB, that is supposed to
    > work for making sure that peoples rights are
    > respected, just play games with peoples rights in a way like this.
    >
    > Since I think it has to be something phoney going on here, since the whole
    > CAB process around the meeting and
    > the complaint, is obviously corrupt.
    >
    > So the reason that I’m writing this e-mail, isn’t really because that I
    > think something will be done regarding the
    > serious issues I’ve been pointing at here.
    >
    > But I’m planning to publish my e-mail on my blog, so then at least, I’ll
    > be able to deal with this in that way, that
    > I at least get this published, so that maybe someone reads this, and maybe
    > react or reflect on what’s going on.
    >
    > So that’s really why I’m writing this e-mail.
    >
    > Just to explain about this.
    >
    > Hope this is alright!
    >
    > Yours sincerly,
    >
    > Erik Ribsskog
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > On 4/24/08, Barbara Stow wrote:
    > >
    > > Dear Mr Eribsskog
    > >
    > > I enclose the report of my review of your complaint.
    > >
    > > I have also sent it to Citizens Advice. They will write to you within
    > > the next two weeks when they have considered the report.
    > >
    > > Yours sincerely
    > >
    > >
    > > Barbara Stow
    > > Independent Adjudicator
    > >
    > >
    > > —– Forwarded Message —-
    > > From: Barbara Stow
    > > To: Erik Ribsskog
    > > Sent: Friday, 18 April, 2008 12:12:35 PM
    > > Subject: Fw: Citizens Advice
    > >
    > > Dear Mr Ribsskog
    > >
    > > When I wrote to you on 1 April I said that I hoped to complete my review
    > > by today, 18 April.
    > >
    > > I have almost done so but I am not yet quite ready to send the report.
    > >
    > > I am sorry for the delay. I will write to you again not later than the
    > > end of next week.
    > >
    > > Yours sincerely
    > >
    > > Barbara Stow
    > > Independent Adjudicator
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > > —– Forwarded Message —-
    > > From: Barbara Stow
    > > To: Erik Ribsskog
    > > Sent: Tuesday, 1 April, 2008 1:05:32 PM
    > > Subject: Citizens Advice
    > >
    > > Dear Mr Ribsskog
    > >
    > > I am the independent adjudicator for the Citizens Advice service and I
    > > write to confirm that Saffron Follows, on behalf of David Harker, has asked
    > > me to review how your complaint has been dealt with. I am writing by e-mail
    > > as I understand this is your preferred means of communication.
    > >
    > > I will consider whether your complaint has been dealt with in line with
    > > the Citizens Advice national complaints procedure and fairly. I have no
    > > authority to say whether your complaint justified. My task is to say
    > > whether it has been considered properly.
    > >
    > > Ms Follows has sent me the correspondence about your complaint. This
    > > includes the e-mail message of 14 March to David Harker in which you
    > > accepted the offer that someone independent could look at your complaint.
    > >
    > > If there is anything more you would like to say to me about why you are
    > > unhappy with the way your complaint has been considered, please let me know
    > > at the e-mail address above.
    > >
    > > I hope to be able to complete my review by 18 April. If I have not
    > > heard from you by 11 April I will assume that there is nothing you want to
    > > add to what you have explained already.
    > >
    > > Yours sincerely
    > >
    > > Barbara Stow
    > > Independent Adjudicator
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > >
    >
    >
    >
    >