johncons

Stikkord: Local Government Ombudsman

  • E-mail to Mrs. Julie Murray, LGO.







    Google Mail – Ref. 08 000 279/JEM







    Google Mail



    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>




    Ref. 08 000 279/JEM





    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>





    Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 6:22 PM





    To:

    st3 york <st3york@lgo.org.uk>



    Hi,

     

    I refer to your letter today, where you say that the Council have dealt with the problems, and that you have closed the complaint.

    Your write, that you 'appreciate your strengt of feeling on this matter'.

    That's right, I get very angry, by this corruption in government, which I think is an 'uting', like we call it in Norway.

    It's something that shouldn't be there.

    And you seem to be involved yourself.

     

    How can you argue, that the Council have dealt with this, when they haven't done anything at all.

    This is typical, on how Brits are fucking with foreign citizens living in this country, I think.

     

    So if it wasn't so, that I can't live in Norway, I would have moved back!

     

    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog







  • E-mail to the Local Government Ombudsman, 27/6/08.







    Google Mail – To Mrs. Julie Murray, Ref: 08 000 279/JEM.







    Google Mail



    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>




    To Mrs. Julie Murray, Ref: 08 000 279/JEM.





    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>





    Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 7:16 PM





    To:

    st3 york <st3york@lgo.org.uk>



    Hi,

    I'm answering your letter, from 24. June, this year.

    You write, that you think the Council, have done enough, when they have changed

    the cleaning regime, after the cleaning ladies, were washing the mens changing-room,

    within the opening hours.

    I've told you that this has happend on several occations, I saw it myself on two occations.

    And it's clear to me, that the staff at the gym, must have known about this, since there

    were so many staff present, on the last occation, that were standing in the reception,

    not doing anything.

    So, I think it's inadequate, just to change the cleaning staff.

    I think, that the gym-staff, must be uncapable, of having control, at the gym, since they

    allow things like this.

    So I think the gym-staff, should be changes as well.

    People normally understand things like this, by themselves, so I think must be something

    to do, with mob (mobsters), in the gym.

    Also, you write, that the closure of the gym, for six weeks, for refurbisment, last summer,

    was announced, in advance.

    I was at the gym a lot, and I saw no poster like this.

    And not all user use the wellness system, I think this is an excuse, that is made up later.

    I think the mob/mobsters, in the gym, knew, that I didn't use the wellness system, and

    therefore this has been used as an excuse.

    I think, that this closure for refurbisment, was some type of 'cover-up', of the mob activity,

    in the gym, after I sent an email to Linda Lennon, in the Council admin, about this, the

    Friday before the cover-up/closure of the gym.

    (If the gym was to be closed for refurbisment, then why, were they charging for the full

    month, for June of last year, when the gym closed around June 25th.

    And, the gym is in the Millenium building.

    It's a new building, why would they close the gym for six weeks, for refurbishment, in

    a new buiding.

    This I think must have a been a cover-up, to get some mob, out of the Lifestyles Gym,

    in Victioria St.).

    So I think that if the LGO, want's to act responsible in this, and not be part of the

    cover-up then they should tell in public what has been goving on.

    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog







  • E-mail to the LGO, 13/6/08.







    Google Mail – complaint against Liverpool City Council our ref 08 000 279







    Google Mail



    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>




    complaint against Liverpool City Council our ref 08 000 279





    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>





    Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 9:18 AM





    To:

    st3york@lgo.org.uk



    Hi,

     

    I can't see that I have recieved an answer to this e-mail yet, so that's why I'm sending it again.


    Hope this is alright!

     

    Yours sincerely,

     

    Erik Ribsskog

    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
    Date: May 21, 2008 8:03 AM

    Subject: Re: complaint against Liverpool City Council our ref 08 000 279
    To: st3 york <st3york@lgo.org.uk>

     

    Hi,

     

    I'm refering to our phone-call, on Monday, where I explained that I would have a closer look at the compaint, and

    call you back the next day. (Tuesday, yesterday).

     

    Unfortunaltly, I was a bit busy yesterday, but I have thought a bit more about this now, so I'm sending you this

    e-mail.

     

    Like I explained in the phone-call, my main complaint, against the gym, was that the (female) washing-staff,

    where washing the mens chaning-room, within the opening hours, on several (at least two) occations.

     

    I also explained, that I had been working-out in other council/university-run gyms, in Oslo and Sunderland,

    but that I hadn't seen this before, that the female washing-staff was washing the mens changing room,

    within the opening hours.

     

    I've been thinking a bit more about how to explain this, and I think one must probably say, that this, that

    the washing-women wash the mens changing-room within the opening hours of the gym, must be said

    to be indicent(?)

     

    And this gym is not like a private gym, but it's a council run gym, open to all members of the public, and

    run by the tax-payers money.

     

    The council, explained that they had changed the 'washing-regime', after recieving my complaint, but after

    I've been thinking more about this, I think it's a bit strange anyway.

    Since, I think that the staff at the gym should have stopped the washing-women, acting like this, I remember

    that there was plenty of staff there, the last time this happend, they were just standing in the reception-area,

    without doing any work-tasks, maybe 10 or 15 minutes before the gym closed, looking at me, more or less,

    smiling, when I left the gym, the last time this happend.

    So, I think that staff must have been aware of this.

     

    So, I think that there must have been something going on at the gym, since the staff didn't react, when the

    washing women did this.

    So I don't think it's enough by the Council, to say they've changed the washing regime, since I think there

    must be problems with the staff as well, since they didn't reflect or react at this procedure.

     

    I think both the washing-staff, and the gym-staff and management, should have understood, by themselves,

    that it's maybe a bit indecent, to let the washing-women wash the mens changing-room during the opening

    hours of the gym, while the changing-room is being used.

     

    So I think that there must be something going on there, since noone reflected on this.

     

    So, I think that maybe the situation at the gym, should be looked a more into, by the Ombudsman, since

    I think that there must have been something strange going on there.

    I haven't had the time to look at the complaint that much, and this was from last year, so I don't remember

    the details that well, but I remember that I was thinking, that there were a lot of strange things going on at

    the gym.

    So I'm forwarding you the complaint I sent the gym, so maybe you could have a look at this, and see what

    you think yourselves, of the other complaints than the main complaint mentioned in this e-mail, if you don't

    think the things going on at the gym, weren't a bit strange.

    So then I'll trust your judgement on the other complaints, since I am a bit after shedule with work etc. here.

    Hope this is alright!

     

    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog


     

     

    On 5/14/08, st3 york <st3york@lgo.org.uk> wrote:

    Dear Mr Ribskkog

     

    I refer to your complaint against Liverpool City Council. I tried calling you today and last Wednesday but have been unsuccessful.  I would like to have a chat with you about your complaint. Please would you telephone me today or on Monday, Tuesday or Wednesday next week (19-21 May) sometime between 9.15am and 4.30pm so that I can make progress on your complaint.  If I am not available when you call, please leave a message giving details of the best time to get back to you.

     

    Yours sincerely

     

    Julie Murray

    Investigator

    Commission for Local Administration in England

    Tel: 01904 380220

    Website: www.lgo.org.uk

    NOTICE – This message contains information intended only for the use of the addressee named above.  If you have received this message in error please advise us at once and do not make any use of the information.

     







  • E-mail to the LGO, 21/5/08.







    Google Mail – complaint against Liverpool City Council our ref 08 000 279







    Google Mail



    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>




    complaint against Liverpool City Council our ref 08 000 279





    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>





    Wed, May 21, 2008 at 8:03 AM





    To:

    st3 york <st3york@lgo.org.uk>



    Hi,

     

    I'm refering to our phone-call, on Monday, where I explained that I would have a closer look at the compaint, and

    call you back the next day. (Tuesday, yesterday).

     

    Unfortunaltly, I was a bit busy yesterday, but I have thought a bit more about this now, so I'm sending you this

    e-mail.

     

    Like I explained in the phone-call, my main complaint, against the gym, was that the (female) washing-staff,

    where washing the mens chaning-room, within the opening hours, on several (at least two) occations.

     

    I also explained, that I had been working-out in other council/university-run gyms, in Oslo and Sunderland,

    but that I hadn't seen this before, that the female washing-staff was washing the mens changing room,

    within the opening hours.

     

    I've been thinking a bit more about how to explain this, and I think one must probably say, that this, that

    the washing-women wash the mens changing-room within the opening hours of the gym, must be said

    to be indicent(?)

     

    And this gym is not like a private gym, but it's a council run gym, open to all members of the public, and

    run by the tax-payers money.

     

    The council, explained that they had changed the 'washing-regime', after recieving my complaint, but after

    I've been thinking more about this, I think it's a bit strange anyway.

    Since, I think that the staff at the gym should have stopped the washing-women, acting like this, I remember

    that there was plenty of staff there, the last time this happend, they were just standing in the reception-area,

    without doing any work-tasks, maybe 10 or 15 minutes before the gym closed, looking at me, more or less,

    smiling, when I left the gym, the last time this happend.

    So, I think that staff must have been aware of this.

     

    So, I think that there must have been something going on at the gym, since the staff didn't react, when the

    washing women did this.

    So I don't think it's enough by the Council, to say they've changed the washing regime, since I think there

    must be problems with the staff as well, since they didn't reflect or react at this procedure.

     

    I think both the washing-staff, and the gym-staff and management, should have understood, by themselves,

    that it's maybe a bit indecent, to let the washing-women wash the mens changing-room during the opening

    hours of the gym, while the changing-room is being used.

     

    So I think that there must be something going on there, since noone reflected on this.

     

    So, I think that maybe the situation at the gym, should be looked a more into, by the Ombudsman, since

    I think that there must have been something strange going on there.

    I haven't had the time to look at the complaint that much, and this was from last year, so I don't remember

    the details that well, but I remember that I was thinking, that there were a lot of strange things going on at

    the gym.

    So I'm forwarding you the complaint I sent the gym, so maybe you could have a look at this, and see what

    you think yourselves, of the other complaints than the main complaint mentioned in this e-mail, if you don't

    think the things going on at the gym, weren't a bit strange.

    So then I'll trust your judgement on the other complaints, since I am a bit after shedule with work etc. here.

    Hope this is alright!

     

    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog


     

     

    On 5/14/08, st3 york <st3york@lgo.org.uk> wrote:

    Dear Mr Ribskkog

     

    I refer to your complaint against Liverpool City Council. I tried calling you today and last Wednesday but have been unsuccessful.  I would like to have a chat with you about your complaint. Please would you telephone me today or on Monday, Tuesday or Wednesday next week (19-21 May) sometime between 9.15am and 4.30pm so that I can make progress on your complaint.  If I am not available when you call, please leave a message giving details of the best time to get back to you.

     

    Yours sincerely

     

    Julie Murray

    Investigator

    Commission for Local Administration in England

    Tel: 01904 380220

    Website: www.lgo.org.uk

    NOTICE – This message contains information intended only for the use of the addressee named above.  If you have received this message in error please advise us at once and do not make any use of the information.

     












    Google Mail – Complaint







    Google Mail



    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>




    Complaint





    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>





    Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 5:06 AM





    To:

    Richard.Little@liverpool.gov.uk


    Cc:

    "Lennon, Linda" <linda.lennon@liverpool.gov.uk>, "Southern, Lesley" <Lesley.Southern@liverpool.gov.uk>



    Hi,

     

    I'm refering to phone-call last week (4/7). I know I said I'd send this e-mail no

    later than Wednesday, but I didn't get to start on it untill late on Wednesday,

    so it's probably going to be Thursday untill I get to actually send the e-mail,

    so sorry about that!

     

     

    Problems with washing women/girls in the mens changing-room during opening hours:

     

    The first thing I wondered about, was regarding the problems described in

    the e-mail I sent to Linda Lennon on 8/6, about the washing girl/women in

    the mens changing-room.

     

    I'll copy the text from that e-mail into this e-mail, since I have some questions

    regarding that episode:

     

    to




    linda.lennon@liverpool.gov.uk

     

    date

    Jun 8, 2007 10:58 PM

     

    subject

    Fwd: Statement

     

    mailed-by

    gmail.com

     


    Hi,

     

    I just got back from the gym, it closed at 9 pm.

     

    I just had to eat a bit and relax a bit after the work-out, or else I would have sent the

    email at once.

     

    Because what I'm wondering about with the gym, is:

     

    Is it really right that there should be female washing-staf in the mens wardrobe

    at 8.45 pm, when the gym closes at 9pm?

     

    This happened again today, and it has also happened once before.

    I used to workout a bit when I lived in Oslo and Sunderland as well, but they never

    used to start washing the wardrobe until after the closing hours.

     

    So I think that since the gym is run by the Council, I think that they shouldn't

    have the washing-routines that includes female staff starting to wash in the

    mens wardrobe as early as 8.45 pm.

     

    I think they should wait until after closing-hours to wash the mens wardrobe,

    and that if they have to wash, then they could maybe instead wash the machines

    in the gym or something else before the gym is closed.

     

    When I went into the mens wardrobe at 8.45 pm then there was a female washing

    staff washing there, about 40 years maybe with dark hair.

     

    I think she was talking with a colleague in there, it was probably the other washing-

    woman.

    I was working out on the tread-mill by the reception untill a bit before 8.45 pm, and

    then I saw the washing-staff walking around in the reception-area at around 8.40 pm.

     

    And one of the washing-staff looked quite young, maybe 16-17 years.

    I think it must have been her that the washing-woman with dark hair spoke with in

    the mens wardrobe at 8.45.

     

    I don't think there should be that young female washing staff in the mens wardrobe

    at 8.45, when the gym closes at 9.00pm.

     

    It has happened once earlier as well that there were female washing staff in the

    mens wardrobe at around 8.45, and I just think that this isnt right.

     

    I think that both the staff in the gym and the washing staff should understand by

    themselves that the female washing staff shouldnt start to wash in the mens

    wardrobe untill after the closing hours at 9 pm, so thats why I havent complained

    about this to the staff in the gym or the washing staff.

    I think that it should be unecessary for me to tell this to them, I think they should

    have understood this by themselves.

     

    And Im not really sure whos in charge there in the evenings eighter.

     

    There has also been other incidents at the gym that I have thought to complain

    about, but I havent untill now.

    But with the washing-staff in the mens wardrobe again today at 8.45 pm, was

    a bit like the final drop, so since Im not really sure whos in charge there in the

    evening I thought that I could send you an email about this.

    And also since one of the washing women was so young, it makes me a bit

    worried about whats going on in the gym, when they put a washing woman/

    girl that looked like she was maybe 16 or 17 in the mens wardrobe at 8.45pm,

    so therefore I thought I should really just write the email now, because that this

    is a bit unacceptable for a gym thats run by the Council.

     

    I know its a bit late to send emails at this hour, but it thought that since I think

    that this way of organising the washing-routines in the gym is a bit unaceptable,

    I thought that if I sent the email about this right after I got back from the gym,

    then there would be less possibilites that eg. someone could say that I must have

    mistaken the time etc,  since now its just a quite short time since I left the gym,

    so I reckoned that its best to send it right away, while I still have the details at

    mind so to speak. 

     

    So I hope that this is alright!

     

    Sorry that I send the email this late.

     

    Regards,


     

    Erik Ribsskog


    – Show quoted text –


     

    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: Erik Ribsskog <

    eribsskog@gmail.com
    >
    Date: Jun 8, 2007 3:45 PM
    Subject: Statement
    To: linda.lennon@liverpool.gov.uk

     

    Hi,

     

    I refer to the phone-call earlier today, and send the statement from

    the bank about the duplicate payment with the direct-debit.

     

    Pleare just contact me if there is anything else I should have remembered.

     

    Hope that this is alright!

     

    Regards,


     

    Erik Ribsskog


     

    So my questions regarding this is:

     

    1. How come that there are washing women/girls in the mens changing-room at 8.45 pm,

    when the gym closes at 9 pm?

     

    2. Is the gym going to change its washing-routine, so that the washing women/girls dont

    start to wash the mens changing-room untill after the gym is closed. (Because like I explained

    in the e-mail to Linda Lennon, this with the washing women in the mens changing-room has

    also happened earlier at the Millenium gym, but I've never seen it in other gyms).

     

     

    Problems with direct-debit processing errors/duplicate payments:

     

    Also, I have been in contact with Lesley Southern, about some problems regarding processing

    errors/duplicate direct debits from the gym.

     

    I explained to him that I would also bring up some the issues regarding this with you, so I think

    its alright if I also copy the contents of that e-mail:

     

     

     

    from



    Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com> 

     

     hide details

     Jul 10 (2 days ago) 

     

    to



    "Southern, Lesley" <Lesley.Southern@liverpool.gov.uk>

     

     

    date

     

    Jul 10, 2007 6:18 PM

     

     

    subject

     

    Re: Earlier e-mails

     

     

    mailed-by

     

     


    Hi,

     

    thank you very much for your answer.

     

    I think it was very fine that you had the time to answer me, and I also think that it was very

    fine that you have taken off my arrears due to the amount of time/inconvinience I have had

    due to this.

     

    But since there were still some things I was wondering about, I thought I could try to send

    you an enquiery about this, to try to maybe found out about this.

     

    I've written an explanation below, as comments on your e-mail, since I thought it was easier

    to explain/answer this way.

     

    To summarize my questions:

     

    1. Shouldn't the gym have asked me first if they wanted to withdraw an extra payment (that they

    had no mandate for) from my account in June?

     

    2. How come that there were still two payment-requests from the gym waiting to be withdrawn

    from my account on 27/6, when firstly, the gym only have a mandate to withdraw one monthly

    payment from my account. Secondly, I had agreed with the staff at the gym, that I would pay the

    arrears when I recieved the swith-bonus from the bank. And thirdly, I had sent Linda Lennon,

    Administration Manager at the Council an e-mail about this problem on 8/6, with a copy of the

    statement from the bank, showing that there was a problem with the gym charging me duplicate

    payments from my account for the month of June?

     

    3. How come that the gym still wanted to withdraw a (duplicate) payment from my account for the

    month of July, when the gym was closed for refurbishment for six weeks from 25/6?

     

    I'm also going to contact the Duty Officer at the gym regarding why the gyms members weren't

    informed about the six weeks closure of the gym and more. So it might be that I'll also ask him

    about some of the same questions. (Like about why the gym still wanted to charge me even

    if they were going to be closed etc.)

     

    I hope you have the time to answer me about this questions, since I thought some of these things

    were a bit strange, so it would be nice to be informed about this.

    So I hope that you bear over with me if I'm asking many questions!

     

    Thank you very much in advance!

     

    Yours sincerely,

     

    Erik Ribsskog


     

     

     

     

     

    On 7/3/07, Southern, Lesley <Lesley.Southern@liverpool.gov.uk

    > wrote:

    Erik

     

    Your enquiry regarding your direct debit payments has been passed onto myself for further investigation.

     

    Unfortunately we cannot refund a payment to a member that has outstanding arrears, this is for audit purposes as we are required to provide details of all miscellaneous payments made to our members.

     

    The action we have taken to date is to take your 1 month overpayment as your cancellation fee (which is normally 2 months) and we have taken your arrears off your membership record for the inconvenience caused as a result of the error.


    – Regarding the overpayment, it wasn't actually an overpayment, because when the bank saw that it had been a

    process error/duplicate payment from the gym, then they transferred the duplicate payment back as a

    'interbranch payment' on 6/6.

     

    (Secondly, I think that I shouldn't recieve a cancellation fee, when the gym suddently closes for 6 weeks

    for refurbishment. I think that then the gym should have first sent its members a letter about this, put

    up a poster at the gym about this, and also not charged its members for the month that they are closed,

    but I have to contact the Duty Officer at the gym about something else, so I'll bring this up with him.)

     

     

    I have checked the Direct Debit report and it seems that the overpayment dates back to a missed January payment which has been allocated to your account on 30

    th May.  I will need to speak to our Direct Debit team to determine why a payment for January has been included in June's Direct Debit report.

    I've been speaking with the staff (including the Manager) at the gym several times about the arrears, and we agreed that I would

    pay the arrears later, when I recieved some money I was expecting (a switch-bonus from the bank).

     

    This was agreed with Craig at the gym, when we set up the direct-debit agreement in May.

     

    I spoke with Craig about this on 1/6 as well, since I hadn't recieved the switch-bonus yet, and then I was informed

    that the arrear was £70.50, and we agreed that I would pay this when I recieved the money from the bank.


     

    So my point is, that they should have told me first if they wanted to withdraw an extra payment from my account

    on 1/6, so that I could have planned this in advance.

     

    Also, this (RBS) bank account was set up in May, so I don't really understand how a missed direct-debit

    payment to my old (Barclays) account in Januray, could suddently appear on my RBS-account in June?

     

    It seems a bit strange to me that this could happen, when I also had agreed several times with the staff

    at the gym (in the month of March and then monthly), that I would pay the running bills, and that I'd pay the

    arrears when I recieved the switch-bonus from RBS.

     

    Also I had been told by the staff at the gym, that there was no hurry at all with the arrears, as long as I

    paid the running bills.

     

    – Also the bank told me when I called them in the beginning of June, that the gym wasn't allowed to

    withdraw more than one payment a month from my account, since they only had one mandate.

     

    – Also, when I called the gym on 26/6, to ask if they were open on 26/6, (since they were closed for

    no apparent reason on 25/6), then I was told that the gym was closed for refurbishment for six weeks.

     

    I then thought that it wasn't right that the gym should charge me for the month of July, when they were

    closed. (I also thought they should have informed the members about the six weeks closure). So due

    to this, I called my bank (the RBS customer-support line) on 27/6 to cancel the direct-debit.

    I was then told that there were still two direct-debits from the gym on my account, both with the same,

    reference-number (LIFE 800 1561).

     

    – So I was wondering, how come that there were still two payment-requests from the gym waiting to

    be withdrawn on my account on 27/6, when firstly, the gym only have a mandate to withdraw one

    monthly payment from my account. Secondly, I had agreed with the staff at the gym, that I would

    pay the arrears when I recieved the swith-bonus from the bank, and thirdly, I had sent Linda Lennon,

    Administration Manager at the Council an e-mail about this problem on 8/6, with a copy of the

    statement from the bank, showing that there was a problem with the gym charging me duplicate

    payments from my account?


     

     

     

    Your account has now been set to expired and no payment was requested in July.

     


    Well, there were actually two payments requested in July (see above

    So my questions regarding this is:

     

    3. Shouldn't the gym have asked me first if they wanted to withdraw an extra payment (that they

    had no mandate for) from my account in June?

     

    4. How come that there were still two payment-requests from the gym waiting to be withdrawn

    from my account on 27/6, when firstly, the gym only have a mandate to withdraw one monthly

    payment from my account. Secondly, I had agreed with the staff at the gym, that I would pay the

    arrears when I recieved the swith-bonus from the bank. And thirdly, I had sent Linda Lennon,

    Administration Manager at the Council an e-mail about this problem on 8/6, with a copy of the

    statement from the bank, showing that there was a problem with the gym charging me duplicate

    payments from my account for the month of June?

     

     

    Problems around the closure of the gym for six weeks from 25/6 due to refurbishment:

     

    5. How come that the gym still wanted to withdraw a (duplicate) payment from my account for the

    month of July, when the gym was closed for refurbishment for six weeks from 25/6?

     

    6. How come that there were no letters sent to the members of the gym regarding the closure

    of the gym for six weeks from 25/6 due to refurbishment?

     

    7. How come that there were no poster in the gym informing the users of the gym that the gym

    would be closed for six weeks from 25/6 due to refurbishment?

     

    8. How come that there was only a makeshift sign on the entrance-door to the millenium-

    building saying 'gym closed', and nothing more when I went there to work out on the

    evening on 25/6. (Shouldn't it have been a proper sign, with information about why the

    gym was closed, how long the gym was closed for, and not just some makeshift

    sign written with an ink-marker)?

     

    9. How come that there were no information about the fact that the gym was closed, when

    I went on the lifestyles website:

     

     

    on 26/6 (When the gym had been closed since 25/5)?

     

    (I can see that it says that the gym is closed there now, but on 26/6, there was no information

    about the gym being closed at all. I went there to see if it said anything on the website on 26/6,

    since the gym was closed for no obvious reason on 25/6, but it didn't say anything about the gym

    being closed on the website, so I noted down the phone-number to the gym, and called the gym,

    and they told me that the gym was closed for six weeks due to refurbishment.)

     

    10. How come that members of the gym were charged for the whole month of June, when the gym

    was closed for refurbishment from 25/6? (Shouldn't the six days from 25/6 to 30/6 have been

    deducted from the charge?).

     

     

    Other problems at the gym:

     

    Like I wrote in my e-mail to Linda Lennon on 8/6, there had also been other, earlier incidents at

    the gym which I had thought to complain about.

     

    But like I also wrote, it wasn't always easy to know who it was that was in charge there after the

    manager had gone home, and him I only spoke with once, since I most often worked out in the

    evening.

     

    And that the incident with the washing girls/women in the mens changing room again within the

    opening hours was the last drop, so to speak.

     

    And then it was easier for me to complain, because then I had her e-mail address from before,

    since I had sent her a copy of the statement from the bank, to document the problems with

    the duplicate direct debit/processing error from the gym.

     

    So then it was easier for me to complain.

     

    I'm going to try explain a bit more about the earlier incidents:

     

    Problems with locker:

     

    On 26/4, it says in my note-book, I was at the gym.

     

    I work with office-work, so I try to work out quite often, and I usually use different lockers at the

    gym, depending on which locker of the lockers that are free etc.

     

    And when one work out 3-5 days a week for some time, and you have a different locker each time,

    then it could be that one forgets exactly which locker one uses this particular time.

     

    And, since only about half of the key-rings with the keys for the lockers had tag-numbers on them,

    this could be a bit confusing.

     

    So when I was finished with the work-out, and I went to the area of the changing-room where my

    locker was, then the locker wouldn't open.

     

    Like I wrote, I use different lockers each time, depending on which lockers that are free, where in

    the changing-room it is less crowded etc.

     

    So it isn't that easy to be exactly sure if it is that particular locker, especially since the key-ring

    to the locker (like about half of the other key-rings, i noticed later), lacked a number-tag on it,

    to specify which locker it belonged to.

     

    I usually dont keep things like my wallet etc. in the locker, since its a big gym, always many

    people there, and I would get a lot of inconvienience if something happened to my wallet etc.,

    so I didn't keep the most 'valuble' things in the locker.

     

    I use to keep my note-book with my wallet, so I had my note-book still on me, and I thought it

    was a bit embarresing going to the reception explaining that I coultn't find my locker, so I decided

    to be 100% sure before I did that.

    So, I just wrote down the numbers of all the lockers in my note-book, and then I checked each

    and every locker, and crossed the number for that locker in my note-book.

    I made sure to check each lock thoroughly.

     

    So, when I had checked each lock in the changing-room, and the key didn't fit in any of them,

    then I went to the reception to explain.

     

    It was still quite embarresing, but at least now I had the note-book to show that I had tryed all

    of the locks.

     

    There were about 5 or 6 people sitting in the reception, and the woman in charge, told Neil to

    help me with this.

     

    I explained to Neil that maybe the smartest thing for me would be to return at closing-time,

    when all the other users of the gym had gone home, then it would only be one locker left

    to check.

     

    I was holding my note-book still, so I wrote down that Neil started acting a bit like a sergeant

    in the army, knocking his fist into the side of the enterance to the changing-room and screaming

    /comanding: 'come here'.

     

    I thought this behaviour was a bit peculiar, but I went after him into the changing-room, and then

    he starting to ask if I had been having a few beers. (Since I couldnt remember the number for

    the locker).

     

    I asked him what his name was, and wrote it down.

     

    Then I showed him that I had tryed all the lockers, and that noone worked, and that there wasnt

    any number-tag on the key-chain for the locker.

     

    He asked me which locker I thought it was, and I told him that I thought it was the number 156

    one. (It says in my note-book).

     

    So he asked me to give him the key, so that he could try the number 156 locker and the

    surrounding lockers.

     

    But he couldnt manage to open any of them, so he went to find the master-key.

     

    This took a bit of time, but he returned and then opened the locker with the new key.

     

    It was locker 156, and I showed him in my note-book that I had already tryed to open

    locker 156 with the key, because I had crossed out that number in the note-book.

     

    Neil said that 'the locks often get stuck.', I can see from my note-book.

     

    I found a new locker (since I didnt have the key any longer to the 156 one), and Neil

    reminded me to remember the key-number.

     

    I told him that I thought that there should be key-tags on the key-rings for the lockers.

     

    Also, the next time I went to the gym, the woman in charge reminded me that I should

    remember the key-number, and then I told the woman in charge that I thought that

    there should be key-tags on the key-rings. (But there still wasnt done anything

    with this problem, and about half of the key-rings were still missing a key-tag

    for the remainder of the time I was working out at the gym).

     

    So my questions regarding this is:

     

    11. How come there are so much problems with the locks getting stuck in the lockers?

    I mean, surely the gym bought new lockers when they opened? And its the Millennium

    building gym, so the building and the gym can't be that old? (Did someone buy used

    lockers for the gym when it opened)?

     

    12. How come the gym doesn't use oil in the locks for the lockers, if it, like Neil said,

    is a problem with the 'locks often get stuck'?

     

    13: And why didn't the gym put key-tags on the lockers, when about half of the key-

    tags were missing, and I had spoken about this problem with both Neil and the woman

    who was in charge there on the day this incident ocured, I think it was on 26/4?

     

     

    Problems with the washing of the machines:

     

    When I wrote the e-mail about the problem with the washing women/girls in the

    mens changing-room in the opening hours, then it came to mind that maybe

    the washing-should should rather wash the machines, and then wait untill

    the gym has closed, before they washed the changing-rooms.

     

    The reason I thought about this, is because I remembered an incident from when

    I was working out, I think it must have been in April or May.

    Then I was working out at the thread-mill, and this was I seem to remember hours

    before closing-time.

     

    There were a couple of washing-ladys there, even if it was still a few hours until

    closing-time.

     

    They were just walking around a bit, seemingly not certain on the routine.

     

    But then one of the washing ladies started to wash the stepping-machine in front

    of me. But what I thought was a bit strange, was that she only washed the tip of

    one of the handles of the stepping machine, and then nothing else. This she did

    twice with a few minuttes inbetween.

     

    Other than that, I couldn't see that eighter she or her collegue washed any of the

    other machines. (They looked a bit lost there, walking around with their buckets

    while the gym was still quite crowded, since it was hours till closing-time.)

     

    My question regarding this is:

    14: Shouldn't the washing-staff put up a sign near the machines when they wash

    them during the time of which the gym is open? Couldn't people get hurt if

    they work out on machines that are slippery from being washed? I seem to

    remember from other places I've been working etc., that yellow plastic signs

    are being put on the floor etc., saying that one have to be careful since its

    newly washed, so shouldn't the washing staff in the gym also do this when

    they clean the machines within the opening hours?

     

     

    Problems with staff:

     

    Like I've written, there have been some incedents before that I have wondered

    if I should complain about, but I'm not always sure whos in charge there, so

    this makes it a bit more tricky to complain, and I've also had the problem

    with the arrears on my membership, and the manager let me work out

    there and pay the arrears later, so there was a threshold before I would

    complain.

     

    But I wrote down in my note-book a couple of things I reacted on anyway.

     

    I was wondering a bit what was going on there, e.g. on 24/5 Craig and

    a blond girl sits in the reception.

     

    Only Craig logs in the members, even if there is a long queue. The girl

    is only watching. (I think maybe she is his girlfriend, since I noticed

    them sitting very close once when I wanted to log in).

     

    So I was wondering, if there is a long queue, surely both of them could

    log in the users of the gym, so that they wouldn't have to wait in a line,

    like if some of the customers are there to sign up for a membership,

    then still everyone have to wait in one line, even if there are more

    staff at work.

    So then I was wondering what is the girl doing there, if she cant log in

    the customers, and is only sitting watching.

     

    And I think she had been working there a while then, so I dont think

    she was on training.

     

    So this seemed a bit strange to me, so I thought I could mention it

    while Im writing this e-mail anyway.

     

    Also, I remember, that one Friday I was working out there, then they

    annonced the closing of the gym like this:

     

    'The gym will be closing in 60 minutes', 'The gym will be closing in

    45 minutes', 'The gym will be closing in 30 minutes', 'The gym will

    be closing in 15 minutes'.

    I think it was the same girl, but it seemed like it was Craig that told

    her to say it.

     

    Normally they only say 'The gym will be closing in 20 minuttes', or

    something like this, so I thought I could mention this as well, even

    if its maybe not so important what they say on the calling-system

    in the Friday evenings? Anyway, I thought I could mention it while

    I was writing the e-mail anyway.

     

    My question to this is:

     

    15. How come the staff only sits watching while the customers are

    standing in line?

     

    16. Shouldn't the staff have name-tags, where it said name and title,

    so that it would be easier for the users of the gym to know who to

    speak with regarding different problems. (So that they know who

    are in charge)?

     

    (For instance, on the day when there were washing girls/women in

    the mens changing room, and they must have been there from

    around 8.40 pm. or earlier, because I went in there on 8.45 pm,

    and then they were well into their routine it looked like, before I

    turned and went home.

     

    On that day (8/6), the staff that were working around closing-time,

    was Neil, a young girl that wears high-healed shoes and blouse,

    and a man around 40 years maybe that I think could maybe is the

    girls father, because I saw him standing very close to the girl once.

     

    I thought maybe the girl was in a kind of responsible position there,

    since she wear office-clothes, but the guy in his forthies I reckon

    also could be in charge there, since hes the oldest etc., and also

    Neil I reckoned could have been in charge, since he has access

    to the master-keys etc.

     

    So its a bit embarrasing asking about whos in charge, because

    you wouldn't want to offend anyone, with asking whos in charge,

    and then its actually that person who is in charge.

     

    I don't say that it is impossible for the customers of the gym to

    find out whose in charge, but I thought that it could maybe add

    to the general level of customer-service at the gym if the staff

    was wearing name-tags.

     

    I wrote down a note of who that was working that day, so that

    I would know later, since I wrote the e-mail that day with the

    complaint about the washing-staff in the chaning-room, so I

    thought I'd write it down, in case it became an issue.)

     

    17. Should they really anounce that the gym is closing in 60 minutes,

    and that the gym is closing in 45 minutes etc.?

     

     

     

    Problems with direct-debit agreement on 13/12/06:

     

    While I was looking for some notes before I started writing this

    e-mail now, I found a letter from the gym from 8/12/06.

     

    I'll just write what it says:

     

    'Dear Mr. Ribsskog,

     

    RE: Lifestyles Membership No: LDD121346

     

    As a valued Lifestyles member, I was surprised to find that your monthly

    Lifestyles subscription of £23.50 due earlier this month has not been paid.

     

    You may be aware of this already and have made payment at the

    Lifestyles centre, if so, please accept my apologies.

     

    If you have not paid these arrears, I would ask that you pay them at your

    earliest convienience by contacting your nearest Lifestyles Centre. Your

    membership account can be updated at any of the centres and you can

    pay either by cash, cheque, credit or debit card.

     

    Please contact Liverpool Direct on 0151 233 3007 for the number of your

    nearest Lifestye centre.

     

    I regret that until any arrears have been paid, standard admission

    charges will apply and you will lose the benefits of your membership.

     

    Yours feithfully

     

    Steve Kneale

     

    Business Development Manager'.

     

     

     

    (I write quite fast, so I thought I could just write it down, so that it would be

    easier to understand what I meant.)

     

    There were some problems regarding me switching from a Barclays Cashcard

    account to a Barclays Current-account at around the end of November/beginning

    of December 2006.

     

    The problem was that my pay from work was switched to the new current-account,

    whereas the direct-debits remained connected to the old account.

     

    I was in a busy period with work etc., so I didnt think about this problem before I

    got a letter from the bank about it.

    So I went to the bank, and transfered all my direct-debits from my old Barlays

    cashcard account, and to my new Barclays current/visa account.

    The clerk in the bank did this for me, it was a quite routine operation it seemed

    to me.

     

    Exept for the Lifestyles direct-debit for some reason.

    This direct-debit had been canceled right away, in a way so that the clerk in the

    bank couldnt transfer it to the new account.

     

    And when I went to the gym on 13/12, I had to pay the charge for Decemeber at

    the gym, and it wasn't possible for me to just switch the existing direct-debit

    agreement from my old Barlays Cashcard account to my new Barclays Current

    account, but I had to fill out a new form all over again to set up the new

    direct debit agreement on my new account.

     

    I accept that it was my fault with forgetting to transfer the direct-debit to the

    new account (It was some comunication-problem at work, with me informing

    work that I had got a new bank-account, but with work not giving me any

    feedback on that they had changed my account information in the payment

    system).

     

    But because of the later problem with the direct debits now in June, I thought

    I could ask a couple of questions regarding this as well, while I'm at it, so to

    speak.

     

    18: How come that the gym canceled my direct-debit between 1/12 and 8/12,

    and sent me a letter on 8/12, where it said that I had to go to the gym and

    pay in cash, when I had never had any payment problems with the gym before 

    this, and all the other direct-debits were possible to switch (for the clerk at

    the bank to my new account), except the gyms direct-debit? Shouldn't the

    gym have tryed to collect the payment from my account again 7-14 days

    later, like the clerk in the bank told me that the other companies did?

     

    19: Why did I have to write my signature on, and fill out a new form all over

    again on 13/12, for a new direct-debit. Didn't the gym have all my information

    from before, have one got to fill out and sign a new form just because one

    gets a new account-number, when one are still using the same bank?

     

    (The signature of the women I spoke with on the gym on 13/12/06, looks

    like it says Probert as a last name by the way, in case that makes it

    any easier to find out about this.

     

    I remember I thought it was strange that I had to fill out the form all over

    again, just because of the problem of the one payment due to the

    problems with changing the direct-debits and my pay from work to

    the new account, in a coordinated way.

     

    Because it didn't seem to be a similiar problem with the other companies

    that also had direct-debits on my account, so therefore I remember that

    I thought that this was a bit strange.

    And now, due to the other problems with the direct-debits again, now in

    June, I thought I'd just ask about the earlier problems, since they came

    to mind now.

     

    also this:

     

    How come I got a letter sent 8 days after the missed payment in December,

    where as later, in January, February and March (with the new direct-debit set

    up on 13/12), I didn't get a letter at all.

     

    It went on for two or three months, it must have been, before someone reminded

    me that there were arrears on my membership.

     

    I was quite busy in this time-periode, even if I was unemployed, so I didn't

    have so much money then, so I should maybe have spoken with the staff about

    this myself, but I much problems with paying my rent etc., and I was glad to

    have the oppertunity to work-out, since it was a bit stressing not having a

    job, and it helped to work-out to relax from the stress.

     

    And also, the staff gave different information to me regarding the arrears. The

    girl wearing office-wear, and who worked on 8/6, for instance, told me on

    one occation that it wasn't a hurry paying the arrears at all. (As long as I

    paid the running bills, which I did).

     

    And other members of staff, Craig for instance, told me that I had to pay the

    arrears before a certain date, (I spoke with the manager and got an extension,

    and later I agreed with Craig that I would pay the arrears when I got first the

    loan I was promised from the bank, and later the switch-bonus I was promised

    from the bank.)

     

    So the questions regarding this:

     

    20: How come in December I get a letter for not paying after 8 days, where as

    in the new year, it goes in the region of two or three months without recieving

    a letter or reminder from the staff, even if I worked out several times a week?

     

    21: How come one member of the staff (the girl with the office-wear who worked

    on 8/6), says that there is no hurry with the arrears, where as another member

    of staff (Craig), says that I have to pay before this and this date? How is this

    really supposed to be, according to the rules?

     

    (I appriciate very much that I was allowed to work out at the gym even if I had

    arrears, so it's not because I am ungrateful that I ask about these things. It's

    just that due to the other problems, with the washing-women/girls in the changing

    room, and the problems with the continuing processing errors and duplicate

    payments with the direct debits.

     

    And also due to the problems surrounding the unanounced closure of the gym

    for six weeks due to refurbishment.

     

    Due to these problems, I thought it would be best to mention all the other

    problems while I was at it. Even if some of these problems aren't maybe

    that serious in themselves, I anyway thought that they were worth bringing

    up, because, I think, thay add to a general picture of things at the gym

    being a bit out of hand, so due to this I'm a bit concerned about whats

    really going on at the gym, and then I thought it would be best to mentioned

    all the things that came to mind, because these things, even if it isn't clear

    to me here and now that there for certain is a problem conected with them,

    it could be a problem, so I thought it would be the most responsible thing

    to do, to also add the latter part of the problems, the ones that are mentioned

    under the title 'other problems'.

     

    So even if it was the first five or ten questions that made me go to the step

    of complaining. Even so, I hope you have the oppertunity to answer me about

    the last part of the questions as well.

     

    Sorry again that this e-mail got a bit delayed. I know I said I'd send it no latter

    than Wednesday, but I reckon that as long as I send it before the office hours

    on Thursday, then it hopefully should be ok.

     

    I'll also forward this e-mail to Linda Lennon and Lesley Southern, since I've been

    copying the e-mails I've sent to them earlier, in this e-mail now. 

     

    Hope that this is alright, and that you bear over with me if some of the last questions

    wasn't as well stated as they should have been, due to time problems etc.

     

    Hope that this is alright!

     

    Yours sincerely,

     

    Erik Ribsskog

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     







  • Svar på e-post sendt leder i Høyre, Erna Solberg, fra Marianne Fagerli, førstekonsulent, Høyres stortingsgruppe. (In Norwegian).

    Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

    Problemer med maktmisbruk/korrupsjon fra myndighetene i Norge og Storbritannia.

    Fagerli Marianne <marianne.fagerli@stortinget.no>

    Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 12:59 PM

    To: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

    Tusen takk for dine tilbakemeldinger. Jeg skal bringe denne videre til Erna Solberg.

    Med vennlig hilsen

    Marianne Fagerli
    førstekonsulent
    Høyres stortingsgruppe
    tlf: 23 31 33 46
    mobil: 416 46 094

    —–Opprinnelig melding—–
    Fra: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:
    eribsskog@gmail.com]
    Sendt: 25. april 2008 20:33
    Til:
    erna.solberg@hoyre.no
    Emne: Problemer med maktmisbruk/korrupsjon fra myndighetene i Norge og Storbritannia.

    Hei Erna Solberg,

    sorry at jeg driver å skrive til deg, sånn helt uten videre.


    Men jeg ble så imponert, over det prinsipprogrammet, som du presanterte på Høyre-møte, tidligere

    denne uke, om at dere ønsker å fordele makten i samfunnet, og at dere ikke ønsker, at det skal gå

    politikk i enkeltavgjørelse, om enkeltmenneskers skjebner osv.


    Det er i hvertfall sånn jeg skjønte det.


    Og det synes jeg virker som en veldig god ide, siden det virker litt for meg, som at det er en ny elite,

    som, mer eller mindre, styrer og ‘herjer’ som de vil i landet nå, uten noe tanke i det hele tatt, for

    medborgernes universale menneskerettigheter, og sivile rettigheter.


    Jeg blir i hvertfall tullet med, av alt som heter myndigheter i landet, det vil si Kripos, Politidirektoratet,

    Justisdepartementet, Ambassaden i London, Konsulatet i Liverpool (hvor jeg bor), UD; SMK,

    Sivilombudsmannen, Fylkesmannen i Oslo og Akershus, Spesialenheten, og også uavhengige

    organisasjoner, som Amnesty Norge, og Norsk Røde Kors og Statsministerens Kontor.


    Pluss da i tillegg, organisasjoner i Storbritannia, som det Britiske Politiet, IPCC, Liverpool City Council,

    the Local Government Ombudsman, the Financial Ombudsman, the Citizens Advice Bureau,

    the Law Society, the Legal Services Ombudsman, the Legal Services Commission, the Ministry

    of Justice, Amnesty UK.


    Listen går bare videre og videre, det virker som at det er noe lignende, av det som er beskrevet i den

    boken, som heter ‘Mafiaen i Eiker’, hvor en enkeltperson, blir systematisk motarbeidet, av offentlige

    myndigheter, til de klarer å knuse han.

    Det virker ikke, som at det, nå for tiden, er noe som helst tanke for, hva som er rett og galt, og hva

    som er folks rettigheter.

    Jeg har ikke klart å finne noen, ikke en eneste organisasjon, som bryr seg en døyt, om hva som

    er rett og galt, og hva som er folks sivile rettigheter, og folks menneskerettigheter.


    Så jeg synes det var veldig bra å høre om det programmet dere har lagt fram nå i Høyre, hvor dere

    ønsker å motarbeide nettopp slik behandling av enkeltpersoner, fra myndighetene.


    For dette synes jeg ikke, sånn som jeg ser det, at er verdig for et demokratisk samfunn.


    Og det viker som at det er like ille, her i Storbritannia, hvor jeg måtte flykte til, ettersom, at

    jeg ble jaget fra gården til onkelen min, i Kvelde i Larvik, på 35 års dagen min, i july 2005.

    Av folk som hadde våpen og hunder, så det kan virke som at det var noe politi, eller noe,

    for meg.


    Og jeg overhørte, at de sa de ønsket å skyte meg, så det var bare flaks at jeg kom meg unna.

    Så hva det er som foregår, det vet ikke jeg.


    Jeg får ikke noe hjelp, fra noen som helst myndigheter, eller private/uavhengige organisasjoner.


    Så sånn som jeg ser det, så har verden gått helt av hengslene.


    Jeg prøver å skrive, om det skjer, på en blogg jeg har, med håp, om at noen kanskje skal reflektere,

    eller reagere, over det som foregår.


    Pressen har jeg kontaktet flere ganger, de er ikke interessert i å hjelpe meg.

    Så at pressen, er involvert, i noe samrøre, med offentlig forvaltning, og også til og med frivillige/private

    organisasjoner, i både Norge og Storbritannia.


    Det er i hvertfall sånn jeg ser det, at dette er realiteten, i dag, i min situasjon, jeg klarer ikke få noe

    som helst hjelp/råd/informasjon, om hva det egentlig er som foregår.

    Jeg har kontaktet politet i Norge og Storbritannia, veldig mange ganger, men de vil ikke fortelle hva som

    foregår, så jeg tror nok at du har rett i det du la fram, i det prinsipprogrammet, at myndighetene, nå

    for tiden, ikke bryr seg noe om folks rettigheter, men at de lar politikken sin, gå foran folks rettigheter.

    Og dette er jeg enig, som i det det stod i en nettavis, at du sa, at folks universale rettigheter blir ignorert.


    Så da kan jeg gi den tilbakemeldingen, at sånn som jeg ser det, så har du og Høyre helt skjønt hva som

    foregår.


    Så da må jeg innrømme, at jeg ble imponert, når jeg leste det prinsipprogrammet til Høyre, i en nettavis

    her, tidligere denne uken.


    Så det synes jeg var veldig bra!

    Jeg var faktisk selv, på et eller to møter, i Høires Hus, skrives det vel, i Oslo, på begynnelsen av 90-tallet.


    Det var vel, i forbindelse med Unge Høyres program, til skolevalgene osv., i forkant, av kommunevalget, i 91.

    Og da, pratet jeg og en kamerat, i hvertfall tidligere kamerat, Magne Winnem, med noen av Unge Høyres,

    politiske strateger, eller i hvertfall, de som skulle utarbeide valgkampmateriale til Unge Høyre da.


    Så fikk vi si vår mening om det, vi var jo fra Røyken og Svelvik vi, så hadde vel kanskje et litt annet

    perspektiv, enn de fleste som var på møtet i Høires Hus der, tror jeg, for dem var nok mest fra Oslo

    Vest osv., så da kanksje vi la merke til ting, som vi trodde ville gi et dårlig inntrykk, i f.eks. i Buskerud,

    eller Vestfold da.


    Men jeg får håpe at vi ikke fikk dem til å moderere programmet for mye.

    Jeg husker ikke navna på de her nå.


    Den eneste jeg husker navnet på, det var at den var en jentene der, som het Huitfeldt vel, og det var ikke

    Anniken Huitfeldt, men ei som var datter av en Høyre politiker, eller noe tror jeg.


    Det var kameraten min, Winnem, som kjente til dette.


    Men samme det.

    Så jeg må innrømme det, at jeg ble veldig imponert, over det prinsipprogrammet, som Høyre la frem, her

    nå nettopp.

    Jeg hadde ikke tid, til å drive med politikk, på begynnelsen av 90-tallet, og jeg synes egentlig ikke, at det

    var rett av meg, som bare hadde sittet på skolebenken hele livet, til da, å bli aktiv i Unge Høyre osv.,

    og diskutere, og si at dette er best, osv., når jeg ikke hadde noe erfaring fra annet enn skolebenken selv.


    Jeg synes det ble litt dumt, og visste ikke om jeg da egentlig visste noe særlig, om de temaene, som

    ble diskutert, på møtet der osv.

    Det var vel mest at jeg gjentok det, som lærerne hadde sagt på skolen, at Norge burde satse på kunnskap,

    og forskning.

    Men jeg hadde jo ikke helt oversikten selv, jeg mener det jeg synes ikke det var noe hensikt, for meg,

    som ikke kjente så mye til verden, å drive for mye med politikk, ettersom, at jeg jo ikke egentlig hadde

    noe særlig livserfaring, og da ville det vel antagelig ikke vært så hensiktsmessig, at jeg skulle prøve,

    å finne løsninger på alt mulig forskjellige, når jeg ikke selv syntes, at jeg visste så særlig mye om

    hvordan verden var.

    Så derfor, så ble det ikke til, at jeg gikk noe mer på møter på Høires Hus osv.


    Men, i de siste årene, så har jeg jo skjønt det, at det er noe, som ikke er som det burde være, i det hele

    tatt, i Norge. (Og nok også andre land).


    Så nå skjønner jeg jo det, at det er faktisk er veldige viktige temaer, dette med maktfordeliing, og

    det som kan synes, å være samarbeid, mellom forskjellige offentlige etater etc., for å motarbeide

    enkeltpersoner.


    Det virker som at det en mafia i offentlig adminstrasjon.


    Og jeg har skrevet før, at det kan virke som at det er noe i forbindelse med noe New World Order agenda.


    At man skal ha en underklasse, som blir styrt og kontrollert helt, av den nye overklassen/den nye eliten.


    Og middelklassen, den forsvinner, så det blir bare eliten, og undersåttene igjen, så og si, kan det

    virke som, for meg.

    I hverfall så synes jeg det jeg har opplevd de siste årene, passer godt med det jeg har hørt om, angående

    de her New World Order-teoriene da.

    Men jeg vet ikke helt, jeg lurer litt på, om kanskje det hadde vært smart for meg, å for eksempel begynne

    med politikk?

    For eksempel, disse statelige og offentlige myndigheter, inkludert politiet, virker det som, de er jo i hælene

    mine hele tida, så det er ikke fred å få, må man vel si.

    Og det virker som at det er ‘Street Theater’ og ‘Group Stalking’ operasjoner, som iverksettes rundt meg,

    av noe overvåkningspoliti, eller hva det kan være.


    Enda jeg har aldri vært noe kriminell, og jeg har jobbet og betalt skatt hele livet.

    Det virker som at disse operasjonene, som er på nettet, hvis jeg diskuterer, f.eks. på Veggavisen,

    eller en Facebook diskusjonsgruppe, så dukker det opp en organsiert gjeng, som mobber og trakasserer

    meg systematisk og planlagt.

    Og dette har også skjedd når jeg går ut døra. At det virker som at politiet, eller noen andre, har en slags

    overvåkningaksjon, for å få brutt meg ned, virker det som.


    Dette går på ting som ‘Mind Control’, virker det som for meg.


    Og dette er ting, som går på, at de bryter ned folk, så de blir traumatiske, osv., og så, så får de kontroll

    på personene, og personene gjøre det, som dette nettverket vil.


    Det er i hvertfall sånn det virker for meg, jeg har lest om det på nettet, og jeg kjenner igjen det som står

    beskrevet der.

    Jeg skal legge ved noen linker, til blogg osv., som forklarer mer om det jeg mener.

    Nå bor jo jeg i Storbritannia da, så jeg vet ikke om Høyre har noe regler, for at man må bo i Norge,

    hvis man har lyst til drive med politikk osv., men det går vel mye på møter osv., så da er det vel

    antagelig en fordel å bo i Norge ja.

    Men jeg, er som jeg sier, nå i det siste, etter at jeg har fått tenkt gjennom dette.


    Jeg er en flyktning fra Norge jeg nå.

    Jeg ble jagd bort fra gården til onkelen min, i Kvelde i Larvik, sommeren 2005, av noen folk med våpen

    og hunder, som jeg ikke vet hvem er, eller hvorfor de skulle ha tak i meg, og skyte meg, som jeg

    overhørte de sa, når jeg var inni skogen ved gården der.

    Så jeg har tatt kontakt med FN’s høykommisær for flyktninger, avdeling Storbritannia, for å få råd om

    hva jeg burde gjøre i forbindelse med dette.


    De sa bare, at de kunne ikke involvere seg i enkeltsaker, og ga meg to telefonnumre, til et par

    advokatfirmaer, tror jeg det var, som jeg ikke har kontaket enda, for jeg lurer på om dette ikke er

    mer generelle tema, som kanskje burde vært tatt opp med f.eks. FN da


    Jeg vil jo gjerne vite, f.eks., om jeg formelt oppfyller kravene, til å være en flyktning, for da ville kanskje

    dette hjelpe, til å få politiet i Norge, til å gi meg råd, informasjon, eller hjelp i forbindelse med den

    situasjonen, som er, at jeg blir forfulgt av noe slags kriminelt nettverk da, virker det som.


    Hvis det ikke er politiet da, som en jeg pratet med på nettet, mente det kunne være.

    For dette har holdt på, siden 2003, og det er helt umulig å få et eneste råd., eller ord omtrent, ut

    av politiet, så hva det er som foregår, det er vanskelig å si, men at noe er galt, det er nok sikkert.

    Jeg vet ikke helt hvorfor, at jeg bestemte meg for å skrive den her e-posten, men mye av grunnen,

    var vel, at jeg synes det prinsipprogrammet som dere presanterte, i avisene, tidligere denne uken,

    var veldig bra, så det virker i hvertfall som at det er noen oppegående folk igjen i landet, synes jeg,

    og det er ikke så mange andre jeg kan si det om, i forbindelse med de tingene som foregår nå,

    synes jeg det virker som.


    Så det synes jeg var veldig positivt, og jeg tror Høyres politikk, med konservatisme, osv., ikke

    vil være på langt nær så ille, som AP’s New World Order politikk, vil jeg kalle det, med en ny

    elite, som får i pose og sekk, og men en underklasse, som må stå i køer, til Aker Sykehus,

    osv., og dit ville ikke jeg dratt for å operere eller noe igjen, etter at jeg opererte kneet der,

    i 1996.

    Der var det mye rart, jeg mistenker at dette nettverket, av offentlig forvaltning, som er beskrevet,

    i den boken, ‘mafiaen i Eiker’, jeg mistenker at dette eller lignende netteverk, også har sine

    representanter, på sykehusene.


    Uten at jeg skal gå mer i detalj om det nå.

    Jeg tror, at i et samfunn med Høyres politikk, så vil det være mulig, for enkeltmennesker, å komme

    seg f.eks. over fra arbeiderklassen, eller hvilket utrykk man skal bruke nå, og oppover, til middelklassen,

    eller overklassen da, hvis de jobber og står på, uten å bli motarbeidet, av diverse jantelover, som

    kanskje egentlig er et slags nettverk da, i tillegg til de netteverkene som er i offentlig admistrasjon osv.

    Men jeg tror ikke, at folk har så særlig muligheter, til å komme seg oppover, i samfunnet, i det

    samfunnet som vi har nå, med AP’s poltitikk, med en overlegen elite, et såkalt plutokrati, som

    det skrives i avisene hele tiden.


    Jeg tror i et sånt samfunn, så er det så og si umulig, å komme seg over, fra ‘undersåttene’, til

    denne eliten, som styrer, i dette plutokratiet da.


    Som jeg selv har selv mange referanser til, i aviser osv, at Norge er egentlig et plutokrati.

    Og da mistenker jeg, at dette er samfunnet, som man får av, AP’s politikk, med overformynderi,

    en ny elite, som kan kjøpe seg forbi køene, på de dårligere og dårligere offentlige sykhusene.


    Så dette AP/New World Order/den nye eliten samfunnet, det tror jeg man burde gjøre noe med,

    hvis man har noe som helst sympati, med de mange, altså flertallet som havner i denne,

    ‘undersått’ gruppen.


    Så dette håper jeg at det er mulig å gjøre noe med, dette AP-samfunnet.

    Er 2/3 samfunnet de kaller det?

    Betyr dette, at den siste tredelen ikke har noen rettigheter, men får rettighetene sine ignorert,

    av offentlig forvaltning og non-profit organisasjoner osv.

    Det er i hvertfall sånn det virker for meg, må jeg innrømme


    At noen av de her 2/3 av folka i samfunnet da, har bestemt seg for, at jeg er i den siste tredelen,

    og da ikke har noen rettigheter, og alle kan fritt tulle med meg.


    Det er i hvertfall sånn det virker for meg.


    Hvordan dette blir organisert i detalj, det kan jeg ikke si sikkert, men det er vel muligens noe

    frimurere, eller Illuminati f.eks., inne i bildet da, uten at jeg skal si dette hundre prosent sikkert.


    Men jeg ønsker i hvertfall lykke til videre med den høyre prisippolitikken, som jeg synes virket

    veldig bra.


    Jeg tror, at hvis Høyre, klarer å forklare velgerne, kanskje litt enklere, hva dette vil si, med at

    det går politikk i enkeltsaker, og at folks universale rettigheter blir ignorert av myndighetene.


    Kanskje hvis Høyre tok fram noen eksempler, på hva som faktisk foregår, av maktmisbruk

    og det som værre er, fra myndighetene.


    For jeg tror ikke det er alle som skjønner det som står i prinsipprogrammet om universale

    rettigheter, og at avgjørelser i enkeltsaker, tas med en poltisk agenda i bakhodet, og at

    man overkjører folks sivile rettigheter, og menneskerettigheter


    Men det er kanskje ting som kommer senere, i valgkampen neste år osv?

    Men jeg får i hvertfall ønske lykke til med det nye prinsipprogrammet, og si mange takk, for

    at det i hvertfall er noen oppegående personer tilbake i Norge, for det synes jeg det bli litt

    mangelvare på nå, hvis jeg skal være ærlig, så det synes jeg var et veldig bra og fornuftig

    program, å komme med nå, fra Høyre!

    Så beklager hvis jeg skriver mye her, jeg legger med noen linker, bare i tilfelle, at noen

    har tid å lese dette.


    Da håper dette er i orden, og igjen takk for at det dukker opp noen bra nyheter i mediene.

    Så beklager jeg skrev for mye i denne e-posten, jeg bare fikk en ide, om at kunne jo prøve å

    sende, en e-post i hvertfall, så da tenkte jeg at jeg kunne jo prøve å gjøre det.

    Så da får jeg håpe, at det var i orden!

    Med vennlig hilsen


    Erik Ribsskog


    PS.


    Her er de nevnte linkene:

    https://johncons-blogg.net/ (Dette er til bloggen min, som det er ca. 1700 innlegg på nå,

    og som jeg holder på å indeksere ferdig, så dette burde forhåpentligvis være gjort innen ikke

    alt for lenge).

    https://johncons-blogg.net/2008/02/lack-of-openness-from-government.html (Her er link,

    til den posten på bloggen, hvor jeg har skrevet, om det jeg vet, om hva som egentlig foregår, noe

    jeg gjerne skulle ha ønsket var mer).

    http://www.linkedin.com/pub/6/86a/455 (Her er til siden min på linkedin, som jeg nettopp har

    skaffet meg, jeg har lagt inn arbeidserfaring, så det skulle være mulig å se der, at jeg er en

    person, som har jobbet og studert hele livet, og som aldri vært kriminell, i det hele tatt, og

    som det ikke burde være noen grunn, for politiet, å tulle med).

    http://xiandos.info/Surveillance,_Psychotronics_and_(Gang-)Stalking_Operations (Her står det, om

    begreper, som ‘Street Theater’, ‘Group Stalking’, og ‘Mind Control’. Dette som står nevnt her, passer

    veldig bra, med det jeg har opplevd selv, her i Liverpool, de siste par årene. Uten at jeg vet om dette

    er styrt av noen lokale nettverk, eller om det er føderale, eller hva de kaller det i Storbritannia, som

    jeg kanskje mistenker at det også kan være, og muligens også linket til nettverk i Norge, uten at

    jeg skal påstå hvordan dette er, for sikkert).

  • E-post om problemer med maktmisbruk og korrupsjon, fra myndighetene, sendt leder i Høyre, Erna Solberg, 25. april 2008. (In Norwegian).







    Google Mail – Problemer med maktmisbruk/korrupsjon fra myndighetene i Norge og Storbritannia.







    Google Mail


    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>


    Problemer med maktmisbruk/korrupsjon fra myndighetene i Norge og Storbritannia.





    Erik Ribsskog

    <eribsskog@gmail.com>





    Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 7:32 PM





    To:

    erna.solberg@hoyre.no



    Hei Erna Solberg,

     

    sorry at jeg driver å skrive til deg, sånn helt uten videre.

    Men jeg ble så imponert, over det prinsipprogrammet, som du presanterte på Høyre-møte, tidligere

    denne uke, om at dere ønsker å fordele makten i samfunnet, og at dere ikke ønsker, at det skal gå

    politikk i enkeltavgjørelse, om enkeltmenneskers skjebner osv.

    Det er i hvertfall sånn jeg skjønte det.

    Og det synes jeg virker som en veldig god ide, siden det virker litt for meg, som at det er en ny elite,

    som, mer eller mindre, styrer og 'herjer' som de vil i landet nå, uten noe tanke i det hele tatt, for

    medborgernes universale menneskerettigheter, og sivile rettigheter.

    Jeg blir i hvertfall tullet med, av alt som heter myndigheter i landet, det vil si Kripos, Politidirektoratet,

    Justisdepartementet, Ambassaden i London, Konsulatet i Liverpool (hvor jeg bor), UD; SMK,

    Sivilombudsmannen, Fylkesmannen i Oslo og Akershus, Spesialenheten, og også uavhengige

    organisasjoner, som Amnesty Norge, og Norsk Røde Kors og Statsministerens Kontor.

    Pluss da i tillegg, organisasjoner i Storbritannia, som det Britiske Politiet, IPCC, Liverpool City Council,

    the Local Government Ombudsman, the Financial Ombudsman, the Citizens Advice Bureau,

    the Law Society, the Legal Services Ombudsman, the Legal Services Commission, the Ministry

    of Justice, Amnesty UK.

    Listen går bare videre og videre, det virker som at det er noe lignende, av det som er beskrevet i den

    boken, som heter 'Mafiaen i Eiker', hvor en enkeltperson, blir systematisk motarbeidet, av offentlige

    myndigheter, til de klarer å knuse han.

     

    Det virker ikke, som at det, nå for tiden, er noe som helst tanke for, hva som er rett og galt, og hva

    som er folks rettigheter.

     

    Jeg har ikke klart å finne noen, ikke en eneste organisasjon, som bryr seg en døyt, om hva som 

    er rett og galt, og hva som er folks sivile rettigheter, og folks menneskerettigheter.

    Så jeg synes det var veldig bra å høre om det programmet dere har lagt fram nå i Høyre, hvor dere

    ønsker å motarbeide nettopp slik behandling av enkeltpersoner, fra myndighetene.

    For dette synes jeg ikke, sånn som jeg ser det, at er verdig for et demokratisk samfunn.

    Og det viker som at det er like ille, her i Storbritannia, hvor jeg måtte flykte til, ettersom, at 

    jeg ble jaget fra gården til onkelen min, i Kvelde i Larvik, på 35 års dagen min, i july 2005.

     

    Av folk som hadde våpen og hunder, så det kan virke som at det var noe politi, eller noe, 

    for meg.

    Og jeg overhørte, at de sa de ønsket å skyte meg, så det var bare flaks at jeg kom meg unna.

     

    Så hva det er som foregår, det vet ikke jeg.

    Jeg får ikke noe hjelp, fra noen som helst myndigheter, eller private/uavhengige organisasjoner.

    Så sånn som jeg ser det, så har verden gått helt av hengslene.

    Jeg prøver å skrive, om det skjer, på en blogg jeg har, med håp, om at noen kanskje skal reflektere,

    eller reagere, over det som foregår.

    Pressen har jeg kontaktet flere ganger, de er ikke interessert i å hjelpe meg.

     

    Så at pressen, er involvert, i noe samrøre, med offentlig forvaltning, og også til og med frivillige/private

    organisasjoner, i både Norge og Storbritannia.

    Det er i hvertfall sånn jeg ser det, at dette er realiteten, i dag, i min situasjon, jeg klarer ikke få noe

    som helst hjelp/råd/informasjon, om hva det egentlig er som foregår.

     

    Jeg har kontaktet politet i Norge og Storbritannia, veldig mange ganger, men de vil ikke fortelle hva som

    foregår, så jeg tror nok at du har rett i det du la fram, i det prinsipprogrammet, at myndighetene, nå

    for tiden, ikke bryr seg noe om folks rettigheter, men at de lar politikken sin, gå foran folks rettigheter.

     

    Og dette er jeg enig, som i det det stod i en nettavis, at du sa, at folks universale rettigheter blir ignorert.

    Så da kan jeg gi den tilbakemeldingen, at sånn som jeg ser det, så har du og Høyre helt skjønt hva som

    foregår.

    Så da må jeg innrømme, at jeg ble imponert, når jeg leste det prinsipprogrammet til Høyre, i en nettavis

    her, tidligere denne uken.

    Så det synes jeg var veldig bra!

     

    Jeg var faktisk selv, på et eller to møter, i  Høires Hus, skrives det vel, i Oslo, på begynnelsen av 90-tallet.

    Det var vel, i forbindelse med Unge Høyres program, til skolevalgene osv., i forkant, av kommunevalget, i 91.

     

    Og da, pratet jeg og en kamerat, i hvertfall tidligere kamerat, Magne Winnem, med noen av Unge Høyres,

    politiske strateger, eller i hvertfall, de som skulle utarbeide valgkampmateriale til Unge Høyre da.

    Så fikk vi si vår mening om det, vi var jo fra Røyken og Svelvik vi, så hadde vel kanskje et litt annet

    perspektiv, enn de fleste som var på møtet i Høires Hus der, tror jeg, for dem var nok mest fra Oslo

    Vest osv., så da kanksje vi la merke til ting, som vi trodde ville gi et dårlig inntrykk, i f.eks. i Buskerud,

    eller Vestfold da.

    Men jeg får håpe at vi ikke fikk dem til å moderere programmet for mye.

     

    Jeg husker ikke navna på de her nå.

    Den eneste jeg husker navnet på, det var at den var en jentene der, som het Huitfeldt vel, og det var ikke

    Anniken Huitfeldt, men ei som var datter av en Høyre politiker, eller noe tror jeg.

    Det var kameraten min, Winnem, som kjente til dette.

    Men samme det.

     

    Så jeg må innrømme det, at jeg ble veldig imponert, over det prinsipprogrammet, som Høyre la frem, her

    nå nettopp.

     

    Jeg hadde ikke tid, til å drive med politikk, på begynnelsen av 90-tallet, og jeg synes egentlig ikke, at det

    var rett av meg, som bare hadde sittet på skolebenken hele livet, til da, å bli aktiv i Unge Høyre osv.,

    og diskutere, og si at dette er best, osv., når jeg ikke hadde noe erfaring fra annet enn skolebenken selv.

    Jeg synes det ble litt dumt, og visste ikke om jeg da egentlig visste noe særlig, om de temaene, som

    ble diskutert, på møtet der osv.

     

    Det var vel mest at jeg gjentok det, som lærerne hadde sagt på skolen, at Norge burde satse på kunnskap,

    og forskning.

     

    Men jeg hadde jo ikke helt oversikten selv, jeg mener det jeg synes ikke det var noe hensikt, for meg,

    som ikke kjente så mye til verden, å drive for mye med politikk, ettersom, at jeg jo ikke egentlig hadde

    noe særlig livserfaring, og da ville det vel antagelig ikke vært så hensiktsmessig, at jeg skulle prøve,

    å finne løsninger på alt mulig forskjellige, når jeg ikke selv syntes, at jeg visste så særlig mye om

    hvordan verden var.

     

    Så derfor, så ble det ikke til, at jeg gikk noe mer på møter på Høires Hus osv.

    Men, i de siste årene, så har jeg jo skjønt det, at det er noe, som ikke er som det burde være, i det hele

    tatt, i Norge. (Og nok også andre land).

    Så nå skjønner jeg jo det, at det er faktisk er veldige viktige temaer, dette med maktfordeliing, og

    det som kan synes, å være samarbeid, mellom forskjellige offentlige etater etc., for å motarbeide

    enkeltpersoner.

    Det virker som at det en mafia i offentlig adminstrasjon.

    Og jeg har skrevet før, at det kan virke som at det er noe i forbindelse med noe New World Order agenda.

    At man skal ha en underklasse, som blir styrt og kontrollert helt, av den nye overklassen/den nye eliten.

    Og middelklassen, den forsvinner, så det blir bare eliten, og undersåttene igjen, så og si, kan det

    virke som, for meg.

     

    I hverfall så synes jeg det jeg har opplevd de siste årene, passer godt med det jeg har hørt om, angående

    de her New World Order-teoriene da.

     

    Men jeg vet ikke helt, jeg lurer litt på, om kanskje det hadde vært smart for meg, å for eksempel begynne

    med politikk?

     

    For eksempel, disse statelige og offentlige myndigheter, inkludert politiet, virker det som, de er jo i hælene

    mine hele tida, så det er ikke fred å få, må man vel si.

     

    Og det virker som at det er 'Street Theater' og 'Group Stalking' operasjoner, som iverksettes rundt meg,

    av noe overvåkningspoliti, eller hva det kan være.

    Enda jeg har aldri vært noe kriminell, og jeg har jobbet og betalt skatt hele livet.

     

    Det virker som at disse operasjonene, som er på nettet, hvis jeg diskuterer, f.eks. på Veggavisen,

    eller en Facebook diskusjonsgruppe, så dukker det opp en organsiert gjeng, som mobber og trakasserer

    meg systematisk og planlagt.

     

    Og dette har også skjedd når jeg går ut døra. At det virker som at politiet, eller noen andre, har en slags

    overvåkningaksjon, for å få brutt meg ned, virker det som.

    Dette går på ting som 'Mind Control', virker det som for meg.

    Og dette er ting, som går på, at de bryter ned folk, så de blir traumatiske, osv., og så, så får de kontroll

    på personene, og personene gjøre det, som dette nettverket vil.

    Det er i hvertfall sånn det virker for meg, jeg har lest om det på nettet, og jeg kjenner igjen det som står

    beskrevet der.

    Jeg skal legge ved noen linker, til blogg osv., som forklarer mer om det jeg mener.

     

    Nå bor jo jeg i Storbritannia da, så jeg vet ikke om Høyre har noe regler, for at man må bo i Norge,

    hvis man har lyst til drive med politikk osv., men det går vel mye på møter osv., så da er det vel

    antagelig en fordel å bo i Norge ja.

     

    Men jeg, er som jeg sier, nå i det siste, etter at jeg har fått tenkt gjennom dette.

    Jeg er en flyktning fra Norge jeg nå.

     

    Jeg ble jagd bort fra gården til onkelen min, i Kvelde i Larvik, sommeren 2005, av noen folk med våpen

    og hunder, som jeg ikke vet hvem er, eller hvorfor de skulle ha tak i meg, og skyte meg, som jeg

    overhørte de sa, når jeg var inni skogen ved gården der.

     

    Så jeg har tatt kontakt med FN's høykommisær for flyktninger, avdeling Storbritannia, for å få råd om

    hva jeg burde gjøre i forbindelse med dette.

    De sa bare, at de kunne ikke involvere seg i enkeltsaker, og ga meg to telefonnumre, til et par

    advokatfirmaer, tror jeg det var, som jeg ikke har kontaket enda, for jeg lurer på om dette ikke er

    mer generelle tema, som kanskje burde vært tatt opp med f.eks. FN da.

    Jeg vil jo gjerne vite, f.eks., om jeg formelt oppfyller kravene, til å være en flyktning, for da ville kanskje

    dette hjelpe, til å få politiet i Norge, til å gi meg råd, informasjon, eller hjelp i forbindelse med den

    situasjonen, som er, at jeg blir forfulgt av noe slags kriminelt nettverk da, virker det som.

    Hvis det ikke er politiet da, som en jeg pratet med på nettet, mente det kunne være.

     

    For dette har holdt på, siden 2003, og det er helt umulig å få et eneste råd., eller ord omtrent, ut

    av politiet, så hva det er som foregår, det er vanskelig å si, men at noe er galt, det er nok sikkert.

     

    Jeg vet ikke helt hvorfor, at jeg bestemte meg for å skrive den her e-posten, men mye av grunnen,

    var vel, at jeg synes det prinsipprogrammet som dere presanterte, i avisene, tidligere denne uken,

    var veldig bra, så det virker i hvertfall som at det er noen oppegående folk igjen i landet, synes jeg,

    og det er ikke så mange andre jeg kan si det om, i forbindelse med de tingene som foregår nå,

    synes jeg det virker som.

    Så det synes jeg var veldig positivt, og jeg tror Høyres politikk, med konservatisme, osv., ikke

    vil være på langt nær så ille, som AP's New World Order politikk, vil jeg kalle det, med en ny

    elite, som får i pose og sekk, og men en underklasse, som må stå i køer, til Aker Sykehus,

    osv., og dit ville ikke jeg dratt for å operere eller noe igjen, etter at jeg opererte kneet der,

    i 1996.

     

    Der var det mye rart, jeg mistenker at dette nettverket, av offentlig forvaltning, som er beskrevet,

    i den boken, 'mafiaen i Eiker', jeg mistenker at dette eller lignende netteverk, også har sine

    representanter, på sykehusene.

    Uten at jeg skal gå mer i detalj om det nå.

     

    Jeg tror, at i et samfunn med Høyres politikk, så vil det være mulig, for enkeltmennesker, å komme

    seg f.eks. over fra arbeiderklassen, eller hvilket utrykk man skal bruke nå, og oppover, til middelklassen,

    eller overklassen da, hvis de jobber og står på, uten å bli motarbeidet, av diverse jantelover, som 

    kanskje egentlig er et slags nettverk da, i tillegg til de netteverkene som er i offentlig admistrasjon osv.

     

    Men jeg tror ikke, at folk har så særlig muligheter, til å komme seg oppover, i samfunnet, i det 

    samfunnet som vi har nå, med AP's poltitikk, med en overlegen elite, et såkalt plutokrati, som 

    det skrives i avisene hele tiden.

    Jeg tror i et sånt samfunn, så er det så og si umulig, å komme seg over, fra 'undersåttene', til

    denne eliten, som styrer, i dette plutokratiet da.

    Som jeg selv har selv mange referanser til, i aviser osv., at Norge er egentlig et plutokrati.

     

    Og da mistenker jeg, at dette er samfunnet, som man får av, AP's politikk, med overformynderi,

    en ny elite, som kan kjøpe seg forbi køene, på de dårligere og dårligere offentlige sykhusene.

    Så dette AP/New World Order/den nye eliten samfunnet, det tror jeg man burde gjøre noe med,

    hvis man har noe som helst sympati, med de mange, altså flertallet som havner i denne, 

    'undersått' gruppen.

    Så dette håper jeg at det er mulig å gjøre noe med, dette AP-samfunnet. 

     

    Er 2/3 samfunnet de kaller det?

     

    Betyr dette, at den siste tredelen ikke har noen rettigheter, men får rettighetene sine ignorert, 

    av offentlig forvaltning og non-profit organisasjoner osv.

     

    Det er i hvertfall sånn det virker for meg, må jeg innrømme.

    At noen av de her 2/3 av folka i samfunnet da, har bestemt seg for, at jeg er i den siste tredelen,

    og da ikke har noen rettigheter, og alle kan fritt tulle med meg.

    Det er i hvertfall sånn det virker for meg.

    Hvordan dette blir organisert i detalj, det kan jeg ikke si sikkert, men det er vel muligens noe 

    frimurere, eller Illuminati f.eks., inne i bildet da, uten at jeg skal si dette hundre prosent sikkert.

    Men jeg ønsker i hvertfall lykke til videre med den høyre prisippolitikken, som jeg synes virket 

    veldig bra.

    Jeg tror, at hvis Høyre, klarer å forklare velgerne, kanskje litt enklere, hva dette vil si, med at 

    det går politikk i enkeltsaker, og at folks universale rettigheter blir ignorert av myndighetene.

    Kanskje hvis Høyre tok fram noen eksempler, på hva som faktisk foregår, av maktmisbruk

    og det som værre er, fra myndighetene.

    For jeg tror ikke det er alle som skjønner det som står i prinsipprogrammet om universale 

    rettigheter, og at avgjørelser i enkeltsaker, tas med en poltisk agenda i bakhodet, og at 

    man overkjører folks sivile rettigheter, og menneskerettigheter.

    Men det er kanskje ting som kommer senere, i valgkampen neste år osv?

     

    Men jeg får i hvertfall ønske lykke til med det nye prinsipprogrammet, og si mange takk, for

    at det i hvertfall er noen oppegående personer tilbake i Norge, for det synes jeg det bli litt

    mangelvare på nå, hvis jeg skal være ærlig, så det synes jeg var et veldig bra og fornuftig

    program, å komme med nå, fra Høyre!

     

    Så beklager hvis jeg skriver mye her, jeg legger med noen linker, bare i tilfelle, at noen 

    har tid å lese dette.

    Da håper dette er i orden, og igjen takk for at det dukker opp noen bra nyheter i mediene.

     

    Så beklager jeg skrev for mye i denne e-posten, jeg bare fikk en ide, om at kunne jo prøve å

    sende, en e-post i hvertfall, så da tenkte jeg at jeg kunne jo prøve å gjøre det.

     

    Så da får jeg håpe, at det var i orden!

     

    Med vennlig hilsen

    Erik Ribsskog

    PS.

    Her er de nevnte linkene:

     

    http://johncons-mirror.blogspot.com/ (Dette er til bloggen min, som det er ca. 1700 innlegg på nå,

    og som jeg holder på å indeksere ferdig, så dette burde forhåpentligvis være gjort innen ikke 

    alt for lenge).

     

    til den posten på bloggen, hvor jeg har skrevet, om det jeg vet, om hva som egentlig foregår, noe

    jeg gjerne skulle ha ønsket var mer).

     

    http://www.linkedin.com/pub/6/86a/455 (Her er til siden min på linkedin, som jeg nettopp har

    skaffet meg, jeg har lagt inn arbeidserfaring, så det skulle være mulig å se der, at jeg er en

    person, som har jobbet og studert hele livet, og som aldri vært kriminell, i det hele tatt, og

    som det ikke burde være noen grunn, for politiet, å tulle med).

     

    begreper, som 'Street Theater', 'Group Stalking', og 'Mind Control'. Dette som står nevnt her, passer

    veldig bra, med det jeg har opplevd selv, her i Liverpool, de siste par årene. Uten at jeg vet om dette

    er styrt av noen lokale nettverk, eller om det er føderale, eller hva de kaller det i Storbritannia, som

    jeg kanskje mistenker at det også kan være, og muligens også linket til nettverk i Norge, uten at

    jeg skal påstå hvordan dette er, for sikkert).

     

     







  • LGO.

    From: eribsskog@gmail.com Erik Ribsskog
    To: r.agnew@lgo.org.uk Rosemary Agnew
    Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 11:56:25 +0000
    Subject: Fwd: Your letter of 23. January 2008. (07/C/06289/RA).

    Hi,

    I can't see that I have recieved any answer to this e-mail yet, that's why
    I'm sending it again.

    Hope this is alright!

    Yours sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
    Date: Feb 8, 2008 10:26 PM
    Subject: Your letter of 23. January 2008. (07/C/06289/RA).
    To: Rosemary Agnew <r.agnew@lgo.org.uk>

    Hi,

    I know there have been some correspondence already surrounding issues like
    this, but
    I'm just writing you now, anyway, just to try to make things clear.

    You write in your letter of 23/1, that 'you had not exhausted the Council
    complaint procedure'.

    But, it was actually the Council, who didn't stick to the complaint
    procedure.

    I sent the Council a complaint, but the Council didn't answer my e-mail.

    And it says in the complaint-procedure, that complaints should be answered
    within 2 weeks,
    which the Council didn't.

    So I'm sure exactly why it is that you are writing, that I haven't exhausted
    the Council complaint
    procedure.

    Because I wrote to you, the LGO, since the Council didn't answer me.

    And then, the Council wanted to investigate another comlaint, than my
    complaint, and meet
    me to discuss another complaint than my complaint.

    I've tried to contact both you and the Council regarding this.

    Since, it isn't possible for me, to exhaust the Council complaint procedure,
    when the Council
    aren't dealing with my complaint.

    So that's where the problems are.

    I'll try to summarise them.

    1. The Council, didn't answer my complaint within two weeks, so they didn't
    stick to the Council
    Complaint procedure.

    2. If point 1, isn't enough, then later, the Council, weren't dealing with
    my complaint at all, but
    wanted to discuss another complaint than my complaint.

    And I can't be expected to exhaust a complaint procedure that doesn't belong
    to my complaint.

    I shouldn't be blaimed for not exhausting a complaint procedure that doesn't
    belong to my complaint.

    This is the Councils fault, since they want me to exhaust a
    complaint-procedure which is belonging
    to another complaint, than my complaint.

    So, I just wanted to make this clear, before I complain to the Ombudsman
    again.

    Since I think things like these, the mentioned points, should be made clear,
    before I complain to
    the Ombudsman again.

    Hope this is alright, and thank you very much for your help in advance!

    Your sincerely,

    Erik Ribsskog

    Letter from LGO, 23/1.